arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 22 Apr 2018
|
|
- Kathryn Haynes
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Analyses of multiplicity distributions and Bose Einstein correlations at the LHC using negative binomial distribution and generalized Glauber Lachs formula Minoru Biyajima, and Takuya Mizoguchi 2 Department of Physics, Shinshu University, Matsumoto , Japan 2 National Institute of Technology, Toba College, Toba , Japan arxiv: v [hep-ph] 22 Apr 208 April 24, 208 Abstract This study aims to analyze the data on multiplicity distributions and Bose Einstein correlations collected at the LHC by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations using a double-generalized Glauber Lachs formula (D- GGL) and double-negative binomial distribution (). From this investigation, it can be inferred that the formula performs as effectively as the. Moreover, our results show that the parameters estimated in multiplicity distributions (MD) () are related to those contained in the BEC formula. Introduction Recently variouskinds ofdataonmultiplicity distributions(md ()) with pseudorapidityintervals( η < η c ) at LHC energies have been reported [, 2, 3, 4]. The double-negative binomial distribution () formula has been utilized to analyze these data [5, 6]. The formula was originally proposed in [7] to explain the violation of KNO scaling [8] at s = 900 GeV observed by the UA5 collaboration [9]. The is expressed as follows: P(n, n ) = αp NBD (n, k N, n )+( α)p NBD (n, k N2, n 2 ), () where α is the weight factor for the first NBD [0,, 2]. The notations, k and k 2, represent intrinsic parameters contained in the NBDs, and n and n 2 are the averaged multiplicities. The NBD is given by the following equation: P NBD (n, k N, n ) = Γ(n+k N) ( n /k N ) n Γ(n+)Γ(k N ) (+ n /k N ) n+kn, (2) On the other hand, in [3] we analyzed various data with η η c on MD () in terms of the NBD and generalized Glauber Lachs (GGL) formula [4, 5]. In that work, we found that the role of the GGL formula is compatible with that of the NBD. The GGL formula is given as follows, P GGL (n, k G, p, n ) = (p n /k G ) n exp n+kg (+p n /k G ) [ γp n + n /k G ] L (kg ) n ( γk G + n /k G ), (3) where p = /(+γ) with the ratio of γ = n coherent / n chaotic. It should be noted that the average coherent and chaotic multiplicities are contained in Eq. (3). Here, k G is also an intrinsic parameter of the GGL formula. The analyses in [3] suggested that a finite γ indicates that the coherent component seems to be necessary in data with η < η c. We remark that Eq. (3) has the following stochastic property. Eq. (3) k G= original GL k G=k N, p NBD of Eq. (2) k N p Poisson distribution p Furry dis. (4)
2 Thus, in this paper, we propose the following double-ggl formula () to analyze data on charged MD () at LHC energies: P(n, n ) = αp GGL (n, k G = 2, p, n )+( α)p NBD (n, k G = 2, p 2, n 2 ), (5) where p i, n i (i =, 2) are introduced to distinguish the parameters contained in formula. It should be noted that k G = 2 reflects the degree of freedom for the (+ ) charged particle ensembles. (a) (b) Figure : (a) The stochastic properties of the generalized Glauber Lachs formula are shown in the κ-p plane. At the point (2.0,.0), the perfect Bose Einstein statistics for the same charged particles ensemble holds. At the point (.0,.0), the Bose Einstein statistics for the (+ ) charged particle ensemble holds. (b) The charged particleensembleisdecomposedintothepositive(+)andnegative( )ensembles. Hereγ = n coherent / n chaotic can be assumed to reflect the contamination (K, p / π s), and the degree of superposition of the phase spaces of particles. As a next step, we would like to consider the BEC. The BEC for positive charged particles [6] is given by as follows: { } N (2+) GL /NBG = + [2p (+) ( p (+) )E /2 BE +(p(+) ) 2 E BE ], (6) k (+) GL where the left-hand side represents the normalized number of pairs of positive charged particles, and E BE is the exchange function between them, { exp( RQ), E BE = (7) exp( (RQ) 2 ), whereq = (p p 2 ) 2, andrdenotestheinteractionrangebetweentwoparticles. Hereafter, fortheconcrete analysis of the BEC we employ the exponential form, because values of χ s for the Gaussian formula are larger than those of the exponential formula. AsseeninFig., k (+) GL = k( ) GL = andp = p(+) = p ( ) areutilized. Forthe formula,wecancalculate the following formula for the BEC with weight factor α, provided that MD (P GGL (n)) and (P GGL2 (n)) are independent ensembles, N (2+:2 ) D GGL /NBG = { } +α[2p ( p )E /2 BE +p 2 E BE ]+( α)[2p 2 ( p 2 )E /2 BE 2 +p 2 2E BE2 ]. (8) In Eq. (8), because p = p 2 =.0 and using the replacements k (+) N = k ( ) N = 2/k N and k (+) N 2 = k ( ) N 2 = 2/k N2, we obtain the following BEC for the : N (2+:2 ) D NBD /NBG = {+α(2/k N )E BE +( α)(2/k N2 )E BE2 }. (9) In the appendix, Eq. (9) is derived from a stochastic approach. In Eq. (9), when E BE and E BE2 are the same functions, we obtain the conventional formula (CF) N (2+:2 ) CF /N BG = {+λ eff E BE }. (0) 2
3 provided that the coefficient of λ eff = 2[α/k N +( α)/k N2 ] is assumed to be a free parameter. By employing Eqs. () (5) for the MD (), it can be expected that we can analyze the data on MD () and the BEC concurrently. The present paper is organized as follows. In the second section, data on the MD () at the LHC collected by the ATLAS collaboration are treated. In the third section, data on the BEC collected by the ATLAS collaboration are performed. In the fourth section, data on the MD () and the BEC by the CMS collaboration are analyzed. In the final section, concluding remarks and discussions are presented. In the appendix, the derivation of the BEC in the two-component model is presented. 2 Analyses of MD at s =0.9, 7, 8, and 3 TeV by ATLAS data By employing Eqs. () and (5), we can analyze data on MD collected by the ATLAS collaboration [] at LHC energies. Our results are presented in Figs. 2 and 3 and Table. 0 ATLAS s= 0.9 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch 2 0 ATLAS s= 7.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch NBD 0 2 NBD n ATLAS s= 8.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch n ATLAS s= 3 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch NBD 0 2 NBD n n Figure 2: Analyses of ATLAS data (p t > 00 MeV, η < 2.5, n ch 2) using Eq. (). 3
4 0 ATLAS s= 0.9 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch 2 0 ATLAS s= 7.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch GGL 0 2 GGL n ATLAS s= 8.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch n ATLAS s= 3 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch GGL 0 2 GGL n n Figure 3: Analyses of ATLAS data (p t > 00 MeV, η < 2.5, n ch 2) using Eq. (5). Table : Analyses of MD () collected by the ATLAS collaboration (p t > 00 MeV, η < 2.5, n ch 2) using Eqs. () and (5). MD ( Eq. () s [TeV] α k n k 2 n 2 χ 2 /n.d.f ± ± ± ± ± / ± ± ± ±0.09.0±0. 29/ ± ± ± ±0.0.9±0.2 9/ ± ± ± ± ±0. 263/8 s [TeV] Eq. (5) α p n p 2 n 2 χ 2 /n.d.f ± ± ± ± ± / ± ± ± ± ±0. 4/ ± ± ± ±0.03.±0.2 / ± ± ± ± ±0. 280/8 4
5 3 Analysis of Bose Einstein correlation at s = 0.9 and 7.0 TeV for ATLAS data By employing Eqs. (8) and (9), we can analyze data on the Bose Einstein correlation at s = 0.9 and 7.0 TeV [7, 8]. Our results are presented in Figs. 4 and 5 and Table 2. Here, R denotes the magnitude of the interaction region in the exponential formula. Table 2: Analyses of Bose Einstein correlation (BEC) collected by the ATLAS collaboration (p t > 00 MeV, η < 2.5, n ch 2) using Eqs. (9), (8), and (0). Here, α is a new weight factor for data with the interval ( n). Physical quantities, denoted with bars (ᾱ, k, k 2, p, and p 2 ) are taken from Table. BEC Eq. (9) s [TeV] n ᾱ, α k k2 R [fm] R 2 [fm] ε ( 0 3 ) χ 2 /n.d.f. n ±0.4.7±0..5± / n ±0.2.5±0.3 2.± /75 n ±0.0 3.±0. 7.± / n ±0.0 8.±0. 38/76 n ± ±0.2 6/76 Eq. (8) s [TeV] n ᾱ, α p p 2 R [fm] R 2 [fm] ε ( 0 3 ) χ 2 /n.d.f. 0.9 n ± ±0. 3.5±.9 48/75 36 n ± ±2.0.9± /75 n ±0. 3.2±0. 6.7± / n ± ±0. 04/76 n ±0..5±0.2 32/76 BEC Eq. (0) conventional formula s [TeV] n λeff R ε ( 0 3 ) χ 2 /n.d.f. n ±0.03.8±0. 0.9± / n ± ± ± /75 n ±0.0 2.± ±0.2 99/ n ± ± ±0.6 33/75 n ± ±0. 0.2±0.9 25/75 Combining the results from Tables and 2, we can choose favorable frameworks that govern the multiplicity distribution and Bose Einstein correlations at s =0.9 and 7 TeV for the ATLAS collaboration data. For the BEC with the constraints of multiplicity, by taking into account the averaged probabilities over the interval ( n) and calculating new weight factors (denoted as α) we can analyze data on the BEC with multiplicity intervals. 4 Analyses of MD and the BEC at s = 0.9, and 7 TeV for CMS data In this section, we present our analyses of MD for data collected by the CMS collaboration [4], using Eqs. () and (5), and the BEC [9] using Eqs. (8) and (9). In our analysis of the data on MD (), as in the ATLAS case, P(0) and P() are disregarded, because the estimated parameters are used in the analysis of the data on the BEC. We have adopted a renormalization scheme in our calculations. Our results are presented in Figs. 6 and 7 and Tables 3 and 4. 5 Concluding remarks and discussion C) As seen in Fig. 8, the α values are almost constant at s TeV. On the other hand, fluctuation are observed for the α values at s 0.9 TeV. This behavior represents the beginning of the violation of KNO scaling, because z = n/ n = n/(a n ) = z/a (a = n / n ) and z 2 = n/ n 2 = z/a 2 (a 2 = n / n 2 ) in the 5
6 .8 ATLAS s= 0.9 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch 2.8 ATLAS s= 0.9 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, 36 n ch NBD.6.4 NBD Q [GeV] ATLAS s= 7.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch Q [GeV] ATLAS s= 7.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, 68 n ch NBD.6.4 NBD Q [GeV] Q [GeV].5 2 ATLAS s= 7.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch NBD Q [GeV].5 2 Figure 4: Analyses of ATLAS data on the BEC (p t > 00 MeV, η < 2.5, n ch 2) using Eq. (9) with E BE = exp( RQ). Table 3: Analyses of MD () collected by the CMS collaboration (p t > 0 GeV, η < 2.4, n ch 2) using Eqs. () and (5). MD () Eq. () s [TeV] α k n k 2 n 2 χ 2 /n.d.f ± ± ± ± ± / ± ± ± ± ±.0 3.0/20 s [TeV] Eq. (5) α p n p 2 n 2 χ 2 /n.d.f ± ± ± ± ± / ± ± ± ± ± /20 6
7 .8 ATLAS s= 0.9 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch 2.8 ATLAS s= 0.9 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, 36 n ch GGL.6.4 GGL Q [GeV] ATLAS s= 7.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch Q [GeV] ATLAS s= 7.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, 68 n ch GGL.6.4 GGL Q [GeV] Q [GeV].5 2 ATLAS s= 7.0 TeV p t >00 MeV, η <2.5, n ch GGL Q [GeV].5 2 Figure 5: Analyses of ATLAS data on the BEC (p t > 00 MeV, η < 2.5, n ch 2) using Eq. (8) with E BE = exp( RQ). 7
8 0 CMS s= 0.9 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch 2 0 CMS s= 0.9 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch NBD 0 2 GGL n CMS s= 7.0 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch n CMS s= 7.0 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch NBD 0 2 GGL n n Figure 6: Analyses of CMS data (p t > 0 GeV, η < 2.4, n ch 2) using Eqs. () and (5). Table 4: Analyses of the Bose Einstein correlation (BEC) for CMS collaboration data (p t > 0 GeV, η < 2.4) using Eqs. (9), (8), and (0). BEC Eq. (9) s [TeV] ᾱ k k2 R [fm] R 2 [fm] ε ( 0 2 ) χ 2 /n.d.f ±0..3±0.0 3.±0. 68/ ± ±0. 2.4±0.0 69/94 s [TeV] Eq. (8) ᾱ p p 2 R [fm] R 2 [fm] ε ( 0 2 ) χ 2 /n.d.f ±0. 2.5±0. 3.±0. 668/ ±0. 2.7±0. 2.4±0. 683/94 BEC Eq. (0) conventional formula s [TeV] λeff R ε ( 0 2 ) χ 2 /n.d.f ±0.0.56± ±0. 487/ ±0.0.9± ± /94 8
9 .8 CMS s= 0.9 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch 2.8 CMS s= 0.9 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch NBD.6.4 GGL Q [GeV] CMS s= 7.0 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch Q [GeV] CMS s= 7.0 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch NBD.6.4 GGL Q [GeV] Q [GeV].5 2 Figure 7: Analyses of CMS data (p t > 0 GeV, η < 2.4, n ch 2) using Eqs. (9) and (8). 9
10 KNO scaling function in Eq. (). ψ(z) = lim n {αp NBD (n, k N, n )+( α)p NBD (n, k N2, n 2 )} n, n ( ) k ( z e k z a +( α) kk2 2 z Γ(k 2 ) = α kk Γ(k ) a Because ψ(z) contains α, k, k 2, a, and a 2, the violation of KNO scaling is obvious. a 2 ) k2 e k2 z a 2 () α ATLAS ATLAS CMS CMS α=0.64[ exp(.s)] 0 s [TeV] 0 Figure 8: The energy dependence of the α parameters in Eqs. () and (5). C2) It can be inferred from the analyses of the data on MD () and the BEC that the formula performs as effectively as the. See Tables () (4). This can also be seen from a somewhat different point of view. Rewriting κ = 2/k N in the NBD as in Fig., we are able to compare it with p in the GGL formula as κ = /[+(k N 2)/2] p = /(+γ). (2) Our calculations are depicted in Table 5. The corresponding relation (2) appears to be satisfied provided that n. We can say that the NBD and the GGL formula are complementary to each other. Table 5: Comparison of κ i = 2/k Ni from with p i from the formula. MD () by ATLAS collaboration s [TeV] κ = 2/k N p κ 2 = 2/k N2 p ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±0.03 s [TeV] MD () by CMS collaboration κ p κ 2 p ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±0.08 C3) In our analyses of BEC, we have employed parameters estimated in the analyses of MD (). Our values obtained for the χ 2 s in Tables 2 and 4 show that the adopted procedure indeed seems to be valid. 0
11 C4) The ATLAS collaboration has stressed that the interaction ranges estimated in their analyses of the data on the BEC demonstrate the saturation of the interaction ranges (R s) as the multiplicity increases when the conventional formula is utilized. However, our results on the BEC for the ATLAS collaboration data have shown an opposite behavior, i.e., the interaction range increases as the multiplicity increases. 5 ATLAS s= 7.0 TeV, BEC conventional 4 R and R [fm] n ch Figure 9: The multiplicity (n ch ) dependences of R and R in Eqs. (8), (9), and (0) for the BEC. n ch D) Our two-component model is necessary to introduce two corresponding sources or two kinds of collision mechanism [20, 2]. The following correspondences may be inferred, because n > n 2 : P Non-diffractive (ND) process, single diffractive (SD) process, (3) P 2 double diffractive (DD) process. The weight factor α in Eqs. () and (5) can be interpreted by means of various cross sections, σ ND, σ 2SD, σ DD, and σ inel = σ ND +σ 2SD +σ DD, as { α σ ND /σ inel, (4) ( α) (σ 2SD +σ DD )/σ inel. In other words, α means the occurrence rate in two kinds of collisions [22, 23]. The total average multiplicity in Eqs. () and (5) is defined as n = α n P (n, n )n+( α) n P 2 (n, n 2 )n = α n +( α) n 2 (5) Various kinds of average multiplicities n, n 2, α n, ( α) n 2 are shown in Fig. 0(a) and (b). D2) In the fourth section, to investigate BEC by CMS collaboration, we have analyzed data excluding P(0) and P() as ATLAS collaboration did. We show our results of analysis of data including P(0) and P() using Eqs. () and (5) in Fig. and Table 6. As compared values of χ 2 s at 0.9 TeV in Table 6 and that in Table 3, the formers are larger than the latters. However, those at 7.0 TeV are almost the same. In Ref. [24], the value of χ 2 /n.d.f. = 0.84 (color reconnection approach in the Monte Carlo study) for the analysis of MD () at 7.0 TeV is mentioned. Ours in Table 6 are compatible with that above. Acknowledgement. MB would like to thank colleagues of Department of Physics, Shinshu University for their kindness.
12 n and n ATLAS, η <2.5 : n : n 2 : n : n 2 α n and ( α) n ATLAS, η <2.5 Emperical values: n : α n : ( α) n 2 : α n : ( α) n s [TeV] 0 (a) 0 s [TeV] 0 (b) Figure 0: (a) The energy dependences of the parameters n and n 2, (b) α n and ( α) n 2 in Eqs. () and (5). Table 6: Analyses of MD () collected by the CMS collaboration (p t > 0 GeV, η < 2.4, n ch 0) using Eqs. () and (5). MD () Eq. () s [TeV] α k n k 2 n 2 χ 2 /n.d.f ± ± ± ± ±2. 3.9/ ± ± ± ± ±.6 3.7/22 s [TeV] Eq. (5) α p n p 2 n 2 χ 2 /n.d.f ± ± ± ±0.08.5±.8 2.9/ ± ± ± ± ±.2 3.4/22 2
13 0 CMS s= 0.9 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch 0 0 CMS s= 0.9 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch NBD 0 2 GGL n CMS s= 7.0 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch n CMS s= 7.0 TeV p t >0 GeV, η <2.4, n ch NBD 0 2 GGL n n Figure : Analyses of CMS data (p t > 0 GeV, η < 2.4, n ch 0) using Eqs. () and (5). 3
14 A Derivation of the BEC in the two-component model Taking into account that P(n, n ) in Eq. () is the probability distribution for the charged particles ensembles (a = (+) and b = ( ) indicate the positive and negative charges respectively), we can decompose it into two probability distributions with the labels a and b as, P (ab) (n, n, k) = n=n a+n b P (a) (n a, n a, k (a) ) P (b) (n b, n b, k (b) ) (6) where n a = n b = n /2 and k (a) = k (b) = k/2. P (n, n, k ) and P 2 (n 2, n 2, k 2 ) in Eq. () can also be decomposed into the same charged particle probability distributions. Combining these, we obtain the following relations: P (a) (n, n a, k (a) ) = αp (a) (n, n a, k (a) /2)+( α)p(a) 2 (n, n a 2, k (a) 2 /2), (7) P (b) (n, n b, k (b) ) = αp (b) (n, nb, k (b) /2)+( α)p(b) 2 (n, nb 2, k (b) 2 /2). (8) By employing Eqs. (6) (8) and calculating the number of pairs in the same charged particle ensembles ((2a) and (2b)) and the number of pairs in opposite charged particle ensembles ((ab)), we obtain the following relations: N (2a) +N (2b) = n P (a) (n, n a, k (a) /2) n(n ) + 2 n P (b) (n, nb, k (b) /2) n(n ) 2 = 2 ( na (n a ) + n b (n b ) ), (9) ( )( ) N BG(ab) = P (a) (n, n a, k (a) /2)n P (b) (n, nb, k (b) /2)n n n = n a n b. By taking the following ratio, we obtain the BEC as N (2a:2b) /N BG(ab) = n(n ) / n 2 = +2/k E BE. (2) At the final step, we have introduced the exchange function for the BEC, E BE same manner, we obtain the second formula for the second component (20) Q 0 and Q 0. In the N (2a:2b) 2 /N BG(ab) 2 = +2/k 2 E BE2. (22) Combining Eqs. (2) and (22) with weight factors α and ( α), we obtain Eq. (9) from the introduction, N (2+:2 ) D NBD /NBG = α(+2/k N E BE )+( α)(+2/k N2 E BE2 ). Using the same method for the GGL formula with k G = 2.0 and p, Eq. (3), we can obtain Eq. (8) with α and p i (i =, 2) for the two-component model. References [] G. Aad et al. [ATLAS Collaboration], New J. Phys. 3 (20) [2] M. Aaboud et al. [ATLAS Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (206) no.9, 502. [3] K. Aamodt et al. [ALICE Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. C 68 (200) 345. [4] V. Khachatryan et al. [CMS Collaboration], JHEP 0 (20) 079. [5] P. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. D 85 (202) [6] V. Zaccolo [ALICE Collaboration], Nucl. Phys. A 956 (206)
15 [7] C. Fuglesang, La Thuile Multiparticle Dynamics 989 (989) [8] Z. Koba, H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B 40 (972) 37. [9] R. E. Ansorge et al. [UA5 Collaboration], Z. Phys. C 43, 357 (989). [0] A. Giovannini and R. Ugoccioni, Phys. Rev. D 59 (999) For three-component model, see, A. Giovannini and R. Ugoccioni, ibid. D 68 (2003) [] I. M. Dremin and V. A. Nechitailo, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) [2] I. Zborovsky, J. Phys. G 40 (203) [3] T. Mizoguchi and M. Biyajima, Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (200) 06. [4] M. Biyajima, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69 (983) 966. Addendum: [Prog. Theor. Phys. 70 (983) 468]. [5] M. Biyajima and N. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. 43B (984) 463. [6] M. Biyajima, A. Bartl, T. Mizoguchi, O. Terazawa and N. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 84 (990) 93; Addendum: [Prog. Theor. Phys. 88 (992) 57]. [7] G. Aad et al. [ATLAS Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (205) no.0, 466. [8] R. Astalo s, Dr. Thesis Bose-Einstein correlations in 7 TeV proton-proton collisions in the ATLAS experiment, (Uiversity of Nijmegen, 205). It should be noticed that his quantum optical formula has a different exponential formula, E BE = exp( 2RQ). [9] V. Khachatryan et al. [CMS Collaboration], JHEP 05 (20) 029. [20] J. F. Grosse-Oetringhaus and K. Reygers, J. Phys. G 37 (200) [2] S. Navin, Diffraction in Pythia, LUTP [arxiv: [hep-ph]]. [22] [ATLAS Collaboration], Charged particle multiplicities in pp interactions for track p T > 00 MeV at s = 0.9 and 7 TeV measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF [23] R. Ciesielski and K. Goulianos, MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8, PoS ICHEP 202 (203) 30 [arxiv: [hep-ph]]. [24] S. Gieseke, P. Kirchgaeser and F. Loshaj, Soft and diffractive scattering, KA-TP , MCnet-7-8 [arxiv: [hep-ph]]. 5
arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 23 Jun 2017
Weibull Distribution and the multiplicity moments in pp(p p) collisions Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, 1 Priyana Sett, 1 and Sadhana Dash 1 1 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India (Dated: June 26,
More informationNegative binomial distribution and multiplicities in p p( p) collisions
Negative binomial distribution and multiplicities in p p( p) collisions Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Wroc law Zakopane June 12, 2011 Summary s are performed for the hypothesis that charged-particle
More informationMBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8
The Rockefeller University, 10 York Avenue, New York, NY 06, USA E-mail: robert.ciesielski@rockefeller.edu Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University, 10 York Avenue, New York, NY 06, USA E-mail:
More informationMBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8
MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8 Robert Ciesielski, Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University, 130 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA E-mail: robert.ciesielski@rockefeller.edu, dino@rockefeller.edu
More informationMeasurements on hadron production in proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector
AL-PHYS-PROC-7-6 7 November 7 Measurements on hadron production in proton-proton collisions with the ALAS detector Comenius University (SK) E-mail: tibor.zenis@cern.ch Studies of correlated hadron production
More informationPrecision RENORM Tensor-Pomeron Cross Sections at LHC and Beyond
Precision RENORM Tensor-Pomeron Cross Sections at LHC and Beyond Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University http://physics.rockefeller.edu/dino/my.html http://www.cs.infn.it/diff2016 1 Basic and combined
More informationCorrelations, multiplicity distributions, and the ridge in pp and p-pb collisions
EPJ Web of Conferences, 6 (7) DOI:.5/ epjconf/76 ISMD 6 Correlations, multiplicity distributions, and the ridge in pp and p-pb collisions Alice Ohlson,a for the Collaboration Ruprecht-Karls-Universität
More informationPrecision RENORM / MBR Predictions for Diffraction at LHC
Precision RENORM / MBR Predictions for Diffraction at LHC Konstantin Goulianos http://physics.rockefeller.edu/dino/my.html Precision predictions? Wow! 1 Basic and combined diffractive CONTENTS processes
More informationRecent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS
Recent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS Roman Lysák Institute of Physics, Prague on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration Bormio 2016 Overview Understanding of soft-qcd interactions has direct impact
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 28 Mar 2013
A three-component description of multiplicity distributions in pp collisions at the LHC arxiv:1303.7388v1 [hep-ph] 28 Mar 2013 I Zborovský Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic,
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 6 Dec 2012
Scaling behavior of transverse momenta distributions in hadronic and nuclear collisions arxiv:22.28v [hep-ph] 6 Dec 202 M. Rybczyński, Z. W lodarczyk Institute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski University, Świetokrzyska
More informationRENORM Tensor-Pomeron Diffractive Predictions. Konstantin Goulianos
RENORM Tensor-Pomeron Diffractive Predictions Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University (Dino) http://physics.rockefeller.edu/dino/my.html thanks to Tran & Kim! photo credit: Emmanuelle Tran Moriond
More informationPrecision RENORM Tensor-Pomeron Cross Sections K. Goulianos
Precision RENORM Tensor-Pomeron Cross Sections Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University http://physics.rockefeller.edu/dino/my.html 5 th International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics ICNFP2016
More informationLHC MPI and underlying event results
LHC MPI and underlying event results Marianna Testa (ATLAS) for the ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb collaborations SM@LHC 2012, Copenhagen, 10-13 April 2012 The Underlying Event Everything in hadron collisions
More informationMeasurements of Particle Production in pp-collisions in the Forward Region at the LHC
2011 Europhysics Conference on High-Energy Physics, Grenoble Measurements of Particle Production in pp-collisions in the Forward Region at the LHC Thomas Ruf for the LHCb collaboration Introduction Particle
More informationDiffraction Results at LHC: Solving a Puzzle Using Precision RENORM Predictions
Diffraction Results at LHC: Solving a Puzzle Using Precision RENORM Predictions Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University http://physics.rockefeller.edu/dino/my.html https://www.brown.edu/conference/15th-workshop-non-perturbative-quantum-chromodynamics/
More informationRENORM Tensor-Pomeron Diffractive Predictions K. Goulianos
RENORM Tensor-Pomeron Diffractive Predictions Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University (Dino) http://physics.rockefeller.edu/dino/my.html thanks to Tran & Kim! photo credit: Emmanuelle Tran 1 Basic
More informationFederico Antinori (INFN Padova, Italy) on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration
Federico Antinori (INFN Padova, Italy) on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration ALICE run 2009-2010 Detector performance First physics results A taste of other analyses in advanced stage Outlook / Conclusion
More informationStudies on the definition of inelastic Non-Single Diffractive events
Studies on the definition of inelastic Non-Single Diffractive events Armando Bermúdez Martínez Instituto Superior de Tecnologías y Ciencias Aplicadas (InSTEC), Havana, Cuba Supervisor: Hannes Jung September,
More informationarxiv:hep-ex/ v1 19 Jun 1999
arxiv:hep-ex/9906031v1 19 Jun 1999 QCD AT LEP2 AND WW FINAL STATE INTERACTIONS a M. HAPKE Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK A short overview of the QCD program at
More informationPoS(IHEP-LHC-2011)008
in pp collisions at the LHC Sergei Lobanov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russian Federation E-mail: Sergey.Lobanov@cern.ch Artem Maevskiy M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russian
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 23 Jun 2011
Multiplicity distributions in pp/p p and e + e collisions with parton recombination I. Zborovský Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Řež, Czech Republic arxiv:6.4697v
More information(Experimental) Soft Diffraction at LHC. Jan Kašpar. ISMD2017, Tlaxcala, Mexico 15 September, 2017
(Experimental) Soft Diffraction at LHC Jan Kašpar ISMD2017, Tlaxcala, Mexico 15 September, 2017 Introduction selected processes: Elastic scattering p + p p + p Single diffraction p + p p + X Double diffraction
More informationMeasurements of the elastic, inelastic and total cross sections in pp collisions with ATLAS subdetectors
Measurements of the elastic, inelastic and total cross sections in pp collisions with ATLAS subdetectors 1 On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration University of Bologna Viale Berti Pichat 6/2,40127 Bologna,
More informationMultiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A
Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A Andreas Morsch CERN QCD Challenges at LHC Taxco, Mexico, Jan 18-22 (2016) Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 476 Q i 2 Λ QCD
More informationAnalyses of dn ch /dη and dn ch /dy distributions of BRAHMS Collaboration by means of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process
Analyses of dn /d and dn /dy distributions of BRAHMS Collaboration by means of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process M. Ide 1, M. Biyajima 1, and T. Mizogui 3 1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Shinshu
More informationElastic and inelastic cross section measurements with the ATLAS detector
Elastic and inelastic cross section measurements with the ATLAS detector Simon Holm Stark Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen MPI@LHC 2017 December 13, 2017, Shimla, India Outline: Physics motivation.
More informationOn the double-ridge effect at the LHC
On the double-ridge effect at the LHC S.M. Troshin, N.E. Tyurin arxiv:1301.2198v1 [nucl-th] 9 Jan 2013 Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Moscow Region, 142281, Russia Abstract We discuss a possible
More informationThe Weighted GMD Model for multiplicity distributions
EPJ Web of Conferences will be set by the publisher DOI: will be set by the publisher c Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 The Weighted GMD Model for multiplicity distributions Probing
More informationDiffraction and rapidity gap measurements with ATLAS
Diffraction and rapidity gap measurements with On behalf of the Collaboration Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the CR E-mail: vlastimil.kus@cern.ch ATL-PHYS-PROC-04-004 08/0/04 Two diffraction
More informationInterpretations and Implications of the Negative Binomial Distributions of Multiparticle Productions
Interpretations and Implications of the Negative Binomial Distributions of Multiparticle Productions Technical Report No. 2006-01 Tetsuo Arisawa September 17, 2006 Advanced Research Institute for Science
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 6 Sep 2017
Event-by-event mean p T fluctuations and transverse size of color flux tube generated in p-p collisions at s=0.90tev arxiv:1702.07440v2 [hep-ph] 6 Sep 2017 1. Introduction Takeshi Osada Department of Physics,
More informationJet production, charged particles in pp-interactions, HIJING, pseudorapidity, transverse momentum, transverse mass
Effect of the Jet Production on Pseudorapidity, Transverse Momentum and Transverse Mass istributions of Charged Particles Produced in pp-collisions at Tevatron Energy * Ali Zaman ;), Mais Suleymanov, Muhammad
More informationElastic and Total Cross-Section Measurements by TOTEM: Past and Future
Elastic and Total Cross-Section Measurements by TOTEM: Past and Future CERN (Also at Wigner RCP, Hungary) E-mail: fnemes@cern.ch The TOTEM experiment at the LHC has measured proton-proton elastic scattering
More informationLow mass diffraction at ATLAS-LHCf
Low mass diffraction at ATLAS-LHCf Qi-Dong hou Nagoya University (JP) France-Japan SAKURA Workshop on small-x physics at the LHC 6..9 Outline Diffractive dissociation A MC study about contribution of diffractive
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 11 Jul 2011
Bulk Properties of Pb-Pb collisions at snn = 2.76 TeV measured by ALICE arxiv:17.1973v1 [nucl-ex] 11 Jul 2011 Alberica Toia for the ALICE Collaboration CERN Div. PH, 1211 Geneva 23 E-mail: alberica.toia@cern.ch
More informationPoS(DIS2017)208. Nuclear PDF studies with proton-lead measurements with the ALICE detector
Nuclear PDF studies with proton-lead measurements with the ALICE detector a,b for the ALICE Collaboration a Institute for Subatomic Physics, Department for Physics and Astronomy and EMMEφ, Faculty of Science,
More informationMeasurement of diffractive and exclusive processes with the ATLAS detector
EPJ Web of Conferences will be set by the publisher DOI: will be set by the publisher c Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 15 Measurement of diffractive and exclusive processes with the ALAS
More informationAtlas results on diffraction
Atlas results on diffraction Alessia Bruni INFN Bologna, Italy for the ATLAS collaboration Rencontres du Viet Nam 14th Workshop on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering Qui Nhon, 16/12/2011 EDS 2011 Alessia
More informationDIFFRACTIVE DIJET PRODUCTION AT CDF. Konstantin Goulianos (for the CDF II Collaboration)
DIFFRACTIVE DIJET PRODUCTION AT CDF Konstantin Goulianos (for the CDF II Collaboration) 1 CONTENTS Introduction / motivation Diffractive dijets Summary 2 STUDIES OF DIFFRACTION IN QCD Non-diffractive color-exchange
More informationPoS(LeptonPhoton2015)020
Soft QCD Measurements at LHC Status and Outlook CERN E-mail: jgrosseo@cern.ch he first run of the LHC (009 0) has resulted in a tremendous legacy of soft physics results measured by ALICE, ALAS, CMS, LHCb,
More informationK 0 sk 0 s correlations in 7 TeV pp collisions from the ALICE experiment at the LHC
K 0 sk 0 s correlations in 7 TeV pp collisions from the ALICE experiment at the LHC Tom Humanic Ohio State University for the ALICE Collaboration 1 WPCF 2011 Tokyo, Japan Motivation for studying K 0 sk
More informationProton-lead measurements using the ATLAS detector
Proton-lead measurements using the ATLAS detector Martin Spousta for the ATLAS Collaboration Charles University in Prague DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3204/desy-proc-2014-04/275 Measurements of soft and hard
More informationSome studies for ALICE
Some studies for ALICE Motivations for a p-p programme in ALICE Special features of the ALICE detector Preliminary studies of Physics Performances of ALICE for the measurement of some global properties
More informationInclusive top pair production at Tevatron and LHC in electron/muon final states
Inclusive top pair production at Tevatron and LHC in electron/muon final states Andreas Jung for the ATLAS, CDF, CMS and D Collaboration Fermilab, DAB5 - MS 357, P.O. Box 5, Batavia, IL, 651, USA DOI:
More informationFirst Run-2 results from ALICE
First Run-2 results from ALICE Goethe University Frankfurt & GSI on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration XLV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics Wildbad Kreuth, 4-9 Oct 2015 1 Outline Introduction
More informationTwo Early Exotic searches with dijet events at ATLAS
ATL-PHYS-PROC-2011-022 01/06/2011 Two Early Exotic searches with dijet events at ATLAS University of Toronto, Department of Physics E-mail: rrezvani@physics.utoronto.ca This document summarises two exotic
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 9 Jan 2019
Quarkonium production as a function of charged-particle multiplicity in pp and p Pb collisions measured by ALICE at the LHC arxiv:1901.02627v1 [hep-ex] 9 Jan 2019 Discipline of Physics, School of Basic
More informationOctober 4, :33 ws-rv9x6 Book Title main page 1. Chapter 1. Measurement of Minimum Bias Observables with ATLAS
October 4, 2018 3:33 ws-rv9x6 Book Title main page 1 Chapter 1 Measurement of Minimum Bias Observables with ATLAS arxiv:1706.06151v2 [hep-ex] 23 Jun 2017 Jiri Kvita Joint Laboratory for Optics, Palacky
More informationQCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 16-20, 2016 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig
QCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 6-20, 206 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig Frashër Loshaj Table of Contents Introduction 2 MPI and the Underlying event 3 Soft interactions 4 Diffraction
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 21 Aug 2011
arxiv:18.155v1 [hep-ex] 1 Aug 011 Early Searches with Jets with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC University of Chicago, Enrico Fermi Institute E-mail: georgios.choudalakis@cern.ch We summarize the analysis
More informationMeasurement of W-boson production in p-pb collisions at the LHC with ALICE
Measurement of W-boson production in p-pb collisions at the LHC with ALICE for the ALICE Collaboration University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa ithemba Laboratory of Accelerator
More informationCharged Particle Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at snn=2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC
Charged Particle Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at snn=2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC Dominik Derendarz for the ATLAS Collaboration Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Kraków, Poland Introduction
More informationKristjan Gulbrandsen NBI ALICE/Discovery group
Kristjan Gulbrandsen NBI ALICE/Discovery group The Large Hadron Collider Protons (since late 2009) and lead ions accelerated Delivered to 4 experiments ALICE is interested (mainly) in lead collisions Proton
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 18 Jan 2016
Jet measurements in pp, p Pb and Pb Pb collisions with ALICE at the LHC arxiv:6.446v [hep-ex] 8 Jan 6 Centre for Astroparticle Physics and Space Science, Bose Institute, Kolkata, 79 (INDIA) E-mail: sprasad@cern.ch
More informationReview of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction
Review of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction Marcin Kucharczyk on behalf of LHCb collaboration HNI Krakow EDS Blois 2015, Borgo (Corse), 30.06.2015 Outline LHCb - general purpose forward experiment
More informationSearch for Quark Substructure in 7 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector
Search for Quark Substructure in 7 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector Frank Berghaus SUPERVISOR: Michel Lefebvre University of Victoria June 12, 2012 Introduction ATLAS and the LHC The LHC provides
More informationTotal, elastic and inelastic p-p cross sections at the LHC
Total, elastic and inelastic p-p cross sections at the LHC Tomáš Sýkora, Charles University in Prague on behalf of the ATLAS, CMS, LHCb and TOTEM collaborations ICHEP 2016, August 3-10, 2016, Chicago outline
More informationSmall-x QCD and forward physics results from CMS
Small-x QCD and forward physics results from CERN E-mail: gabor.veres@cern.ch he Collaboration has a comprehensive program of small-x QCD and forward physics measurements, which is supported by an excellent
More informationMultipoles and Coherent Gluon Radiation Plenary session
Multipoles and Coherent Gluon Radiation Plenary session Lanny Ray, Univ. of Texas at Austin Higher-order harmonics? BFKL Pomeron diagrams and v On to the LHC Summary and Conclusions STAR Collaboration
More informationColor reconnection in tt final states at the LHC
Color reconnection in tt final states at the LHC Spyros Argyropoulos work in collaboration with Torbjörn Sjöstrand arxiv:1407.6653 (to appear in JHEP) MCnet meeting - Karlruhe 9/10/2014 A puzzle about
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v3 5 Dec 2005
Acta Phys. Hung. A 19/1 (2005) 000 000 HEAVY ION PHYSICS Rapidity equilibration in d + Au and Au + Au systems arxiv:hep-ph/0509108v3 5 Dec 2005 Georg Wolschin Institut für Theoretische Physik der Universität,
More informationFIRST MEASUREMENTS OF PROTON-PROTON ELASTIC SCATTERING AND TOTAL CROSS-SECTION AT THE LHC BY TOTEM
FIRST MEASUREMENTS OF PROTON-PROTON ELASTIC SCATTERING AND TOTAL CROSS-SECTION AT THE LHC BY TOTEM M. DEILE on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration CERN, 111 Genève 3, Switzerland The TOTEM experiment at
More informationVector meson photoproduction in ultra-peripheral p-pb collisions measured using the ALICE detector
Vector meson photoproduction in ultra-peripheral p-pb collisions measured using the ALICE detector Jaroslav Adam On behalf of the ALICE Collaboration Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 18 Feb 2016
Nuclear Physics A Nuclear Physics A 00 (2016) 1 5 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia arxiv:1602.05811v1 [hep-ph] 18 Feb 2016 Abstract Confronting fluctuations of conserved charges in central nuclear collisions
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 26 Nov 2018
Interpreting BEC in e + e annihilation W.J. Metzger 1,, T. Csörgő,3, T. Novák 3, and S. Lökös 3,4 1 IMAPP, Radboud University, NL-655 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands Wigner RCP, Konkoly-Thege 9-33, H-111
More informationTotal pp cross section measurements at 2, 7, 8 and 57 TeV
Total pp cross section measurements at 2, 7, 8 and 57 TeV A) One (out of several) theoretical framework B) Topologies of events in σ tot C) Direct measurement of σ inel : 1) cosmic-ray experiments 2) collider
More informationJet Physics with ALICE
Jet Physics with ALICE Oliver Busch for the ALICE collaboration Oliver Busch Tsukuba 2014 /03/13 1 Outline introduction results from pp jets in heavy-ion collisions results from Pb-Pb collisions jets in
More informationFluctuations and Search for the QCD Critical Point
Fluctuations and Search for the QCD Critical Point Kensuke Homma Hiroshima University. Integrated multiplicity fluctuations. Differential multiplicity fluctuations 3. K to π and p to π fluctuations 4.
More informationSOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS
SAHAL YACOOB UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN ON BEHALF OF THE ATLAS AND CMS COLLABORATIONS SOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS 28th Rencontres de Blois INTRODUCTION IN 15 MINUTES 2 Inelastic cross section ATLAS and CMS
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 14 Oct 2013
Charged Jets in Minimum Bias p-pb Collisions at snn = 5.02 TeV with ALICE arxiv:1310.3612v1 [nucl-ex] 14 Oct 2013 for the ALICE collaboration Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany E-mail:
More informationdoi: / /38/12/124053
doi: 1.188/954-3899/38/12/12453 Eccentricity and elliptic flow in pp collisions at the LHC E Avsar a, Y Hatta b, C Flensburg c, J -Y Ollitrault d and T Ueda e a 14 Davey Lab, Penn State University, University
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 13 Sep 2016
Energy loss as the origin of an universal scaling law of the elliptic flow Carlota Andrés, 1, Mikhail Braun, 2, and Carlos Pajares 1, 1 Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías IGFAE, arxiv:1609.03927v1
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 15 Jan 2019
CMS-CR-8/37 January 7, 9 Top Quark Modelling and Tuning at CMS arxiv:9.559v [hep-ex] 5 Jan 9 Emyr Clement on behalf of the CMS Collaboration University of Bristol Recent measurements dedicated to improving
More informationTransverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions with minimum bias events in CMS at the LHC
Transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions with minimum bias events in CMS at the LHC Christof Roland/ MIT For the CMS Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond QCD Session 14 th March, 2010 Moriond
More informationParticle spectra in Minimum Bias events at 13TeV
Particle spectra in Minimum Bias events at TeV Juan Manuel Grados Luyando on behalf of the CMS collaboration Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg MPI@LHC 05 Trieste, Italy Motivation Probe the different
More informationPoS(DIS 2013)083. New Results on Diffractive and Exclusive Production from CDF
New Results on Diffractive and Exclusive Production from CDF The Rockefeller University E-mail: dino@rockefeller.edu We present results on central exclusive production of + in pp collisions at s = 9 and
More informationInstitute for High Energy Physics of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. A sensitive test for models of Bose-Einstein correlations
Institute for High Energy Physics of the Austrian Academy of Sciences HEPHY-PUB 662/96, STPHY 22/96 A sensitive test for models of Bose-Einstein correlations H.C. Eggers 1,2, P. Lipa 2 and B. Buschbeck
More informationOn behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations
On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Reza Goldouzian Université libre de Bruxelles 1 Ø There are several models of physics beyond the standard model require new particles that couple to quarks
More informationTESTING THE STANDARD MODEL IN THE FORWARD REGION AT THE LHC
TESTING THE STANDARD MODEL IN THE FORWARD REGION AT THE LHC Ronan McNulty (UCD Dublin) Irish Quantum Foundations, Castletown House, 3,4 th May 2013 Ronan McNulty, Irish Quantum Foundations 2 Outline Theory:
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015
Anti-neutrino oscillations with TK arxiv:508.05v [hep-ex] 5 Aug 05 Université de Genève (H E-mail: melody.ravonel@cern.ch TK is a long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment, in which a muon neutrino
More informationEnergy conservation and the prevalence of power distributions
Eur. Phys. J. A 2018) 54: 190 DOI 10.1140/epja/i2018-12631-2 Regular Article Theoretical Physics THE EROPEAN PHYSICAL JORNAL A Energy conservation and the prevalence of power distributions Maciej Rybczyński
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 11 Aug 2013
Flow in p-pb collisions at the LHC arxiv:8.7v [nucl-th] Aug Wojciech Broniowski he H. Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, - Cracow, Poland and Institute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski University,
More informationConference Report Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland
Available on the CMS information server CMS CR 212/178 The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment Conference Report Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland 212//9 Measurement of isolated photon
More informationMicroscopic collectivity: The ridge and strangeness enhancement from string string interactions in Pythia8
Microscopic collectivity: The ridge and strangeness enhancement from string string interactions in Pythia8 Christian Bierlich bierlich@thep.lu.se Lund University / University of Copenhagen May 15, 2018
More informationMeasurements of the total and inelastic pp cross section with the ATLAS detector at 8 and 13 TeV
Measurements of the total and inelastic pp cross section with the ATLAS detector at 8 and 13 TeV Motivation Measurements of the total and inelastic cross sections and their energy evolution probe the non-perturbative
More informationLong-range angular correlations by strong color fields in hadronic collisions
Long-range angular correlations by strong color fields in hadronic collisions Kevin Dusling North Carolina State University Rencontres de Moriond La Thuile, Aosta valley, Italy th March 15, 2013 First
More informationarxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 2 Mar 2018
KA-TP-32-207 UWTHPH-207-34 HERWIG-207-03 MCNET-7-25 Baryon production from cluster hadronization Stefan Gieseke, Patrick Kirchgaeßer, Simon Plätzer 2 Institute for Theoretical Physics, Karlsruhe Institute
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 14 Apr 2015
DIFFRACTIVE DISSOCIATION IN HIGH ENERGY pp COLLISIONS IN ADDITIVE QUARK MODEL Yu.M. Shabelski and A.G. Shuvaev arxiv:1504.03499v1 [hep-ph] 14 Apr 2015 Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Kurchatov National
More informationSingle Higgs production at LHC as a probe for an anomalous Higgs self coupling
Single Higgs production at LHC as a probe for an anomalous Higgs self coupling Brookhaven National Laboratory E-mail: pgiardino@bnl.gov We explore the possibility of probing the trilinear Higgs self coupling
More informationThe photon PDF from high-mass Drell Yan data at the LHC
The photon PDF from high-mass Drell Yan data at the LHC University of Oford E-mail: francesco.giuli@cern.ch In this contribution, we review the results of [1], where a determination of the photon PDF from
More informationResults on heavy ion collisions at LHCb
Results on heavy ion collisions at LHCb Marcin Kucharczyk on behalf of LHCb collaboration HNI Krakow 28th Rencontres de Blois 29.05-03.06 2016 Outline LHCb - general purpose forward experiment Physics
More informationRecent forward physics and diffraction results from CMS
Recent forward physics and diffraction results from CMS Gabor Veres (CERN) on behalf of the CMS Collaboration ISMD 2015 Conference, Wildbad Kreuth, Germany October 5th, 2015 Outline CMS: forward instrumentation
More informationJet Physics at ALICE. Oliver Busch. University of Tsukuba Heidelberg University
Jet Physics at ALICE Oliver Busch University of Tsukuba Heidelberg University 1 2 Outline Introduction Results from pp collisions Identified jet fragmentation in pp Jets in heavy-ion collisions Jet shapes
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 21 Nov 2018
arxiv:8.0889v [nucl-th] 2 Nov 208 Strongly intensive fluctuations and correlations in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions in the model with string fusion Vladimir Kovalenko, Saint Petersburg State University
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 6 Dec 2011
Higher harmonic anisotropic flow measurements of charged particles at s NN =.76 TeV with the ALICE detector You Zhou (for the ALICE Collaboration) arxiv:111.156v1 [nucl-ex] 6 Dec 011 Nikhef, Science Park
More informationTotal Inelastic Cross Section at LHC. Sara Valentinetti, INFN and Univ. of Bologna (Italy) On behalf of ATLAS and CMS
Total Inelastic Cross Section at LHC Sara Valentinetti, INFN and Univ. of Bologna (Italy) On behalf of ATLAS and CMS LC13 Workshop, ECT*, Villa Tambosi, Villazzano (TN), 16-20 Sep 2013 Outline Introduction
More informationNew results related to QGP-like effects in small systems with ALICE
New results related to QGP-like effects in small systems with ALICE for the ALICE collaboration Lund University E-mail: vytautas.vislavicius@cern. Results on the production of π ±, K ±, p( p), Λ( Λ), Ξ
More informationInclusive spectrum of charged jets in central Au+Au collisions at s NN = 200 GeV by STAR
Inclusive spectrum of charged jets in central Au+Au collisions at s NN = 200 GeV by SAR Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciencis of Czech Republic, Na ruhlarce 39/64, 180 86 Prague, Czech Republic
More informationCollective Dynamics of the p+pb Collisions
Collective Dynamics of the p+pb Collisions Wojciech Broniowski CEA Saclay & UJK Kielce & IFJ PAN Cracow th Workshop on Non-Perturbative QCD Paris, - June [Piotr Bo»ek & WB, PLB 78 () 557, 7 () 5, arxiv:.]
More information