Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Jets with Internal Forced Mixers
|
|
- Joshua Reynolds
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Jets with Internal Forced Mixers L. A. Garrison A. S. Lyrintzis G. A. Blaisdell Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA W. N. Dalton Rolls-Royce Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, 41234, USA In the current study Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis using the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations with the two-equation Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model is performed for internally mixed jets with the goal of accurately predicting the development of the turbulence in the resulting jet plumes. The CFD results from an axisymmetric and three forced mixer test cases are compared to experimental Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) data. The CFD results of the mean velocities in the jet plume compare well with experimental PIV data with the exception of a slightly slower centerline velocity decay rate. In addition, the CFD results of the turbulence levels in the jet shear layer take longer to spread to the centerline. The CFD results also show an overprediction in the turbulence levels in the initial portion of the jet shear layer. However, the peak turbulence levels in the CFD results further downstream in the jet plumes for the forced mixer test cases are in agreement with PIV data. In addition, the CFD results from this study support the hypothesis that the additional noise source seen at high Mach numbers (high Mach number lift - HML) in the high frequency range of the acoustic data for these mixers at near critical pressure ratios is due to the interaction of the turbulent streamwise vorticies shed by the mixers and a normal shock at the final nozzle exit. Nomeclature Roman Symbols Subscripts U Jet velocity c Core flow property D Jet diameter b Bypass flow property H Lobe penetration height m Fully mixed jet property M Mach number f Flight stream property k Turbulence kinetic energy 1 Flow property upstream of a shock p Static pressure 2 Flow property downstream of a shock L 11 Longitudinal turbulence length scale ã Constant (Ribner) Abbreviations K 1 Non-dimensional wave number NP R Nozzle Pressure Ratio f Frequency HM L High Mach number Lift A Area CF D Computational Fluid Dynamics RAN S Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Greek Symbols P IV Particle Image Velocimetry λ Velocity ratio ω Specific turbulence dissipation rate Graduate Research Assistant, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Student Member AIAA. Professor, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Associate Fellow AIAA. Associate Professor, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Senior Member AIAA. Manager Mechnaical Methods and Acoustics, Member AIAA. 1 of 20
2 I. Introduction The prediction of the jet noise from complex configurations continues to be a problem for industry despite over a half century of research in flow generated noise. The lack of accurate noise prediction methods for the complex geometries applicable to modern jet engines prevents engine companies from factoring noise into the design of new mixer geometries. As a result, engine companies are forced to design, build, and perform relatively expensive experimental tests of new nozzle and mixer designs to determine whether they will meet FAA noise requirements. One recent approach to modeling the noise for the complex configuration of a jet with an internal forced mixer has been developed which uses modified single jet noise spectra to build a noise prediction. 1, 2 This two-source noise prediction method, which is a modification of the four-source method for predicting coaxial jets, 3, 4 uses a combination of two single jet predictions which are filtered and shifted by empirically derived source strength terms. This type of noise model, with two empirically determined parameters, has been previously shown to be capable of accurately matching experimental noise data for a family of 12-lobe forced mixers. The goal of the current research effort is to replace the empirically derived two-source noise model parameters with model parameters that are determined from CFD analysis, ultimately resulting in a standalone noise prediction tool. In this paper, the CFD analyses of the various mixer geometries are validated against experimental PIV data. In this study, CFD analyses of a confluent (axisymmetric) and three forced mixer geometries are performed to determine the turbulence quantities in the jet plumes. The mean flow and turbulence data from the CFD solutions are compared to experimental Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) data of the jet plume flow fields. In addition, the CFD results from this study are shown to support the hypothesis for the origin of the high Mach number lift (HML) phenomenon, which is seen in the high frequency region of the acoustic data for these mixers at set points with near critical pressure ratios. 5 It is shown that only the cases that exhibit the HML phenomenon have a normal shock at the nozzle exit, supporting the theory that the HML noise source is due to the interaction of the turbulent streamwise vorticies shed by the forced mixers and a normal shock at the final nozzle exit. II. Experimental Data The experimental Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) data for the mixers evaluated in this study was taken in Aeroacoustic Propulsion Laboratory at NASA Glenn. 6 PIV measurements were taken at twelve planes perpendicular to the jet axis at locations ranging from 0.1 to 10 diameters downstream of the final nozzle exit. The stereo PIV arrangement used in the experimental test program measured all three velocity components. Both mean and rms velocities are available. The PIV data was corrected to align the jet centerline axis with the origin of PIV reference frame. The PIV data was then interpolated onto a uniform polar grid to aide in further post-processing. The results for one confluent mixer and three forced mixer geometries are presented in this paper. The confluent mixer geometry, shown in Figure 1, is an axisymmetric splitter plate which separates the bypass and core flows. All three forced mixers, which are essentially convoluted splitter plates, have 12 lobes and are of similar designs. An example of a forced mixer geometry is shown in Figure 2. The primary difference between the three forced mixers is the amount of lobe penetration, H, defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum radii at the end of the splitter plate as shown in Figure 3. The values of the lobe penetration heights non-dimensionalized by the final nozzle exit diameter, D, are given in Table 1 for the three forced mixers. In addition to the four mixer geometries, three nozzle geometries are also evaluated. These nozzle geometries are the baseline L0 nozzle, the L1 nozzle (75% of the baseline length), and the L2 nozzle (50% of the baseline length). The profiles for the three nozzle geometries are shown in Figure 4. In this study, flow field results are presented for a total of three operating set points. The primary and secondary nozzle pressure ratios, the velocity ratios, and the flight Mach numbers for these set points are shown in Table 2. The confluent mixer CFD results are compared to the PIV data at set points 312 and The nozzle pressure ratios of the core and bypass flows are equal in set point 5000 which simulates a single jet. Forced mixer CFD results are compared to PIV data for set points 112 and of 20
3 Table 1. Forced mixer properties. Mixer ID H/D Description 12CL Lobe, Low Penetration 12UM Lobe, Medium Penetration 12UH Lobe, High Penetration Table 2. Experimental data test conditions. Set Point NP R c NP R b λ M f III. CFD Analysis An initial study of the axisymmetric confluent mixer case was performed using both FLUENT 7 and the WIND code, 8 which solves the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. In this initial study the performance of a number of two-equation turbulence models was assessed. It was ultimately determined that the two-equation Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model 9 yielded the best agreement with the PIV data. All of the CFD analyses of the steady-state jet plume flow fields presented in this paper were calculated using the WIND code with the two-equation SST turbulence model. The boundary conditions are calculated based on the total pressure, total temperature, mass flow rate, and ambient conditions recorded during the PIV tests. In addition, the inflow boundary conditions for the turbulence kinetic energy, k, are determined based on the turbulence levels in the first plane of the PIV data. The inflow boundary conditions for the specific turbulence dissipation rate, ω, are determined based on the turbulence kinetic energy and the assumption that the turbulent viscosity is 100 times the molecular viscosity. It was seen that varying the inflow turbulence viscosity ratio over several orders of magnitude had a relatively small impact on the turbulence levels in the jet plume. A. Confluent Mixer The axisymmetric grid used for the confluent mixer calculations contains approximately 80,000 grid points. A refined grid with twice as many points in the axial and radial directions was also tested. The turbulence levels in the jet plume of the fine grid were almost identical to those with the 80,000 point grid. The computational domain of the jet plume extends out 5.5 diameters in the radial direction and 10 diameters downstream of the nozzle exit. The axisymmetric calculations, run on 6 processors of a Linux cluster, take 1.5 seconds per cycle. Typically 8,000 cycles are run to obtain a converged solution, resulting in a turn around time of approximately 3.5 hours. The CFD results for the confluent mixer with the baseline L0 nozzle at set point 5000 (simulated single jet) are compared to the experimental PIV data in Figure 5. Contours of the non-dimensional mean streamwise velocity (U/U m ) and relative turbulence intensity (k 1/2 /U m ) are shown for the CFD solution (positive radii) and PIV data (negative radii) in Figure 5. From the comparison of the mean velocity it is seen that the CFD results slightly under-predict the decay of the centerline velocity. The comparison of the turbulence kinetic energy shows a slight over-prediction in the CFD turbulence kinetic energy in the jet shear layer region up to 6 diameters downstream of the nozzle exit. In addition the turbulence in the PIV data spreads to the centerline much faster than in the CFD results. The CFD results for the confluent mixer with the baseline L0 nozzle at set point 312 are compared to the experimental PIV data in Figure 6. From the comparison of the mean streamwise velocity it is seen that once again the CFD slightly under-predicts the decay of the centerline velocity. The comparison of the turbulence kinetic energy shows a consistent over-prediction of the turbulence in the CFD results. In addition, it is once again seen that the turbulence in the PIV data spreads to the centerline much faster 3 of 20
4 than what is predicted by CFD. B. Forced Mixers Due to the periodic nature of the forced mixer geometries, the CFD computational domain consists of only one half of a lobe (15 degrees). The grids used for the forced mixer calculations contain approximately 1.9 million grid points. The computational domain of the jet plume for these grids extends out 5.5 diameters in the radial direction and 10 diameters downstream of the nozzle exit. The forced mixer calculations are run on a Linux cluster using 8 processors. The forced mixer cases are run in three stages using grid sequencing. The grid sequencing level, number of cycles, and calculation speed for each stage are given in Table 3. For one sequencing level every other gird point is used, for two sequencing levels every forth grid point is used. As a result the first stage is run on a coarse grid consisting of every grid point of the full grid in the axial direction and every forth grid point of the full grid in the radial and azimuthal directions. Solution convergence is determined based on the L2 norm of the residuals, which typically drops by three orders of magnitude before leveling off. Converged solutions for the forced mixer cases are obtained after approximately 46 hours of run time. Table 3. Forced mixer run stage information. Stage Grid Sequencing (X,R,θ) Cycles Calculation Speed (sec/cycle) 1 0,2, ,1, ,0, A comparison of the CFD results and PIV data is shown in Figure 7 for the low penetration mixer (12CL) with the baseline L0 nozzle at set point 112. In addition to these contour plots, a comparison of radial profiles of mean velocity and turbulence intensity for this test case are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. Overall there this good qualitative agreement between the CFD results and the PIV data for the mean streamwise velocity. However, the CFD results show an over-prediction in the turbulence kinetic energy in the jet shear layer just downstream of the nozzle exit. The CFD predictions of the turbulence levels farther downstream in the jet plume do, however, appear to be in agreement with the PIV data. It is also noted that the CFD results appear sharper than the PIV data. Some of the smoothing and asymmetry that is seen in the PIV data may be due to possible vibrations in the nozzle hardware. Cross-plane contours of the turbulence intensity (k 1/2 /V mix ) at X/D locations of 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 are shown in Figure 10 for the CFD analysis of the three 12-lobed mixers (12CL, 12UM, and 12UH) with the baseline L0 nozzle at set point 312. In addition, the corresponding PIV measurements for these cases are shown in Figure 11. It is seen in Figures 10 and 11 that the trend of the increase in the peak turbulence intensities in the shear layer with varying lobe penetration height is accurately predicted by the CFD analysis. In addition, for the upstream planes of the 12UM and 12UH mixers the CFD values of the magnitude of the turbulence intensity in the jet shear layer are in agreement with the PIV data. It is observed, however, that for the upstream planes of the 12CL mixer the CFD values of the magnitude of the turbulence intensity in the jet shear layer are slightly less than those seen in the PIV data. These differences could arise from a deficiency in the SST turbulence model and/or deficiencies in the PIV data resulting from inadequate resolution of the thin initial shear layer, low seed density in the initial shear, or possible reflections from the nozzle hardware. C. High Mach Number Lift Analysis of the acoustic data from the NASA Glenn experiments has shown the occurrence of an additional noise source in the jet noise spectra at the high power set points (310 and 312). 5 This additional phenomenon, referred to as the high Mach number lift (HML), is seen in the high frequency region of the noise spectra, as shown in Figure 12. Preliminary acoustic data appraisal has shown that this source does not exhibit a flight reduction that would be consistent with a shear layer based noise source. 10 As a result, it is currently believed that this noise source is nozzle-based. A more intriguing result observed in the acoustic data is that the HML noise source is only present in the L0 and L2 nozzles, but not the L1 nozzle, and it is not 4 of 20
5 present for the confluent mixer geometry. It has been shown by previous CFD work that for the Baseline L0 nozzle geometry a small region of supersonic flow occurs near the nozzle exit (close to the nozzle wall), terminating in a normal shock. 11 It has therefore been hypothesized that the HML noise source could be caused by turbulence from the streamwise vorticies generated by the forced mixer passing through a normal shock at the nozzle exit. Supersonic flow could occur in a convergent nozzle at sub-critical pressure ratios as a result of flow turning effects. The axial variation of the angle between the interior nozzle wall and the jet axis, which illustrates the flow turning effects of the various nozzles, is shown in Figure 13 for the L0, L1, and L2 nozzles. It is seen in Figure 13 that the L0 and L2 nozzles have a relatively rapid transition from the convergent section of the nozzle to the parallel section at the nozzle exit. In contrast, the L1 nozzle has a more gradual transition. The CFD results in the lobe peak azimuthal plane of the 12UM mixer at set point 312 with the L0, L1, and L2 nozzles are shown in Figure 14. From these results it is seen that both the L0 and L2 nozzle geometries produce a normal shock at the final nozzle exit. However, a shock is not present at the nozzle exit for the L1 nozzle geometry. These findings are consistent with the flow turning effects shown in Figure 13. In addition, the Mach number profiles along lines offset from the nozzle wall are shown in Figures 15 and 16 for the L0 and L1 nozzles, respectively. The turbulence kinetic energy just upstream of the normal shock for the 12-lobed mixers with the L0 nozzle is shown in Figure 17 for set point 312. In this figure the bold contour lines correspond to the supersonic region and the thin contour lines correspond to the subsonic flow region. An initial attempt to quantify the strength of HML noise source resulting from the turbulence-shock interaction is made by applying the CFD data to the theoretical work of Ribner. 12, 13, 14 The non-dimensional HML source strength is estimated as ( ) k p2 p 1 HML e 3.5 p 2 p 1 p 2 da A U 2 m p 2 where p 2 p 1 is the difference in static pressure across the shock and the area of integration is the shock surface. The HML source strength is proportional to the turbulence kinetic energy, as suggested by Ribner. The functional dependence of the HML source strength with the shock strength (static pressure rise) was determined based on a curve fit to the Ribner theory. The calculated HML source strength values are plotted on the shock surface for the three 12-lobed mixers in Figure 18. The total integrated HML source strength for the 12UM mixer is 1.99 times stronger than the total HML source strength for the 12CL mixer, which is consistent with the acoustic experimental data. 10 In addition to the source strength, the HML noise source peak frequencies are estimated using the Ribner theory. 14 The peak frequency is estimated as f = K 1U A 2πãL 11 where U A is the velocity upstream of the shock, ã is a constant (1.339), L 11 is the longitudinal turbulence length scale, and K 1 is the peak wave number of the far-field noise one-dimensional power spectra, which is estimated as 0.75 from the Ribner results. The upstream velocity and longitudinal turbulence length scales are calculated using the CFD data. The HML noise source peak frequencies for the 12CL mixer at set point 310 are shown in Figure 19. It is seen that these estimated peak frequencies are consistent with the frequency range of the HML noise source as seen in Figure 12. The far-field directivity of the HML noise source has also been estimated by combining the Ribner theory for the refracted noise emission angle along with a geometric acoustics shear layer refraction correction. The results of this analysis are compared to the difference between Sound Pressure Level spectra of the L0 nozzle and L1 nozzle cases at 20 khz for the 12CL mixer at set point 310 in Figure 20, where the far-field angle is referenced from the jet axis. It is seen in Figure 20 that these estimates of the far-field directivity of the HML noise source are in agreement with the experimental acoustic data. IV. Conclusion In this study CFD analyses of internally mixed jets are performed. The jet plume flow fields resulting from one axisymmetric and three forced mixer geometries are considered. For the axisymmetric confluent mixer cases the mean streamwise velocity values are in qualitative agreement with the PIV results. The 5 of 20
6 largest differences in the CFD predictions for these cases are the over-prediction of the turbulence kinetic energy in the shear layer and the slight under-prediction of the centerline velocity decay rate. For the three dimensional forced mixer cases the CFD predicted mean streamwise velocity and a turbulence kinetic energy values are in agreement with the PIV results, with the exception of an over-prediction of turbulence kinetic energy in the jet shear layer just downstream of the nozzle exit. The turbulence levels farther downstream for the various forced mixers were in agreement with the experimental PIV data. The final step in creating a stand-alone noise prediction methodology is the formalization of the process in which the two-source noise model parameters are determined from the CFD results. Finally, the results from the CFD analysis of the 12UM mixer with the various nozzle geometries supports the present theory that the origin of the high Mach number lift noise source, which is seen in the high frequency range of the acoustic data at near critical pressure ratios, is due to the interaction of turbulence with a normal shock at the nozzle exit. Acknowledgments This work has been funded by the Aeroacoustics Research Consortium (AARC) as part of a collaborative project with Dr. Brian Tester and Dr. Mike Fisher at the Institute of Sound and Vibration Research (ISVR), University of Southampton, UK. The first author is also supported by a Purdue Research Fellowship. All WIND calculations were performed on the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics 104-processor LINUX cluster acquired by a Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) grant sponsored by ARO. The experimental PIV data used in this study has been provided by Dr. James Bridges at the NASA Glenn Research Center. References 1 Garrison, L. A., Dalton, W. N., Lyrintzis, A. S., and Blaisdell, G. A., Semi-Empirical Noise Models for Predicting the Noise from Jets with Forced Mixers, AIAA Paper No , May Tester, B. J., Fisher, M. J., and Dalton, W. N., A Contribution to the Understanding and Prediction of Jet Noise Deneration in Forced Mixers, AIAA Paper No , May Fisher, M. J., Preston, G. A., and Bryce, W. D., A Modelling of the Noise from Simple Coaxial Jets Part I: With Unheated Primary Flow, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 209, No. 3, 1998, pp Fisher, M. J., Preston, G. A., and Mead, C. J., A Modelling of the Noise from Simple Coaxial Jets Part II: With Heated Primary Flow, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 209, No. 3, 1998, pp Tester, B. J. and Fisher, M. J., 21st Century Jet Noise Test Data Appraisal, ISVR Consultancy Ref:6920-Final Report, November Bridges, J. and Wernet, M. P., Cross-Stream PIV Measurements of Jets with Internal Lobed Mixers, AIAA Paper No , May FLUENT 6.0 User s Guide, Fluent Inc., WIND v5.0 User s Guide, NPARC Alliance, NASA Glenn Research Center and USAF Arnold Engineering Development Center, Menter, F., Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications, AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1994, pp Tester, B. J. and Fisher, M. J., Jet Noise Generation by Forced Mixers: Part II Flight Effects, AIAA Paper No , May Wright, C. W., Investigating Correlations Between Reynolds Averaged Flow Fields and Noise for Forced Mixed Jets, Master s thesis, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, May Ribner, H. S., Convection of a Pattern of Vorticity Through a Shock Wave, NACA TR-1164, Ribner, H. S., Shock-Turbulence Interaction and the Generation of Noise, NACA TR-1233, Ribner, H. S., Spectra of Noise and Amplified Turbulence Emanating from Shock-Turbulence Interaction, AIAA Journal, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1986, pp of 20
7 Figure 1. Sample configuration of the confluent mixer and nozzle. 7 of 20
8 Figure 2. Sample configuration of an internal forced mixer and nozzle. (a) (b) Figure 3. Forced mixer penetration height: (a) lobed mixer trailing edge profile and (b) lobed mixer side view. 8 of 20
9 Figure 4. Nozzle geometry profiles: (a) L0, L1, and L2 nozzles (b) L2 nozzle (c) L1 nozzle and (d) L0 (baseline) nozzle. 9 of 20
10 (a) (b) Figure 5. CFD and PIV comparison for the confluent mixer at set point 5000: (a) normalized velocity (U/U m) and (b) relative turbulence intensity (k 1/2 /U m(%)); positive radii, CFD; negative radii, PIV. 10 of 20
11 (a) (b) Figure 6. CFD and PIV comparison for the confluent mixer at set point 312: (a) normalized velocity (U/U m) and (b) relative turbulence intensity (k 1/2 /U m(%)); positive radii, CFD; negative radii, PIV. 11 of 20
12 Figure 7. CFD and PIV comparison of the 12CL mixer at set point 112 (Left two columns: mean velocity (U/U m); Right two columns: relative turbulence intensity (k 1/2 /U m(%))). 12 of 20
13 (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 8. Comparison of radial profiles of mean velocity (U/U m) in the lobe peak azimuthal plane between CFD and PIV for the 12CL mixer at set point 112: (a) X/D=0.1, (b) X/D=1, (c) X/D=5, and (d) X/D=10; solid line, PIV; dash line, CFD. 13 of 20
14 (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 9. Comparison of radial profiles of relative turbulence intensity (k 1/2 /U m(%)) in the lobe peak azimuthal plane between CFD and PIV for the 12CL mixer at set point 112: (a) X/D=0.1, (b) X/D=1, (c) X/D=5, and (d) X/D=10; solid line, PIV; dash line, CFD. 14 of 20
15 Figure 10. point 312. CFD relative turbulence intensities (k 1/2 /U m(%)) of the 12CL, 12UM, and 12UH mixers at set Figure 11. PIV relative turbulence intensities (k 1/2 /U m(%)) of the 12CL, 12UM, and 12UH mixers at set point of 20
16 Figure 12. Far-field Sound Pressure Level spectra at 70 for the 12UM mixer with the L0 nozzle and the 12CL mixer with the L0, L1, and L2 nozzles at set point 310. Figure 13. L2 nozzles. Axial variation of the angle between the interior nozzle wall and the jet axis for the L0, L1, and 16 of 20
17 (a) (b) (c) Figure 14. CFD Mach number contours for the 12UM mixer in the lobe peak azimuthal plane at set point 312 with the (a) L0 nozzle, (b) L1 nozzle, and (c) L2 nozzle. 17 of 20
18 (a) (b) Figure 15. Axial Mach number variation in lobe peak azimuthal plane of the 12UM mixer with the L0 nozzle at set point 312 (a) Mach number contours and profile locations (b) Mach number profiles (along lines offset from the nozzle wall). (a) (b) Figure 16. Axial Mach number variation in lobe peak azimuthal plane of the 12UM mixer with the L1 nozzle at set point 312 (a) Mach number contours and profile locations (b) Mach number profiles (along lines offset from the nozzle wall. 18 of 20
19 (a) (b) (c) Figure 17. CFD turbulence kinetic energy upstream of the normal shock for the (a) 12CL mixer, (b) 12UM mixer, and (c) 12UH mixer; bold contours, supersonic region; thin contours, subsonic region. (a) (b) (c) Figure 18. Estimated HML noise source strength on the shock surface for the (a) 12CL mixer, (b) 12UM mixer, and (c) 12UH mixer. 19 of 20
20 Figure 19. Estimated HML noise source peak frequencies for the 12CL mixer at set point 310. Figure 20. Estimated HML noise source directivity at for the 12CL mixer at set point of 20
RANS-Based Noise Predictions of Jets with Internal Forced Mixers *
12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (27th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 8-10 May 2006, Cambridge, Massachusetts AIAA 2006-2599 RANS-Based Noise Predictions of Jets with Internal Forced Mixers * L.A.
More informationComputational Investigations of High-Speed Dual-Stream Jets
9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit -4 May 3, Hilton Head, South Carolina AIAA 3-33 Computational Investigations of High-Speed Dual-Stream Jets Nicholas J. Georgiadis * National Aeronautics
More informationJET NOISE MODELS FOR FORCED MIXER NOISE PREDICTIONS. A Thesis. Submitted to the Faculty. Purdue University. Loren A. Garrison
JET NOISE MODELS FOR FORCED MIXER NOISE PREDICTIONS A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Loren A. Garrison In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science
More informationLarge Eddy Simulation of Three-Stream Jets
Large Eddy Simulation of Three-Stream Jets J. Xiong 1, F. Liu 2, and D. Papamoschou 3 University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697 We present a computational study of three-stream jets simulating
More informationNumerical Study of Jet Plume Instability from an Overexpanded Nozzle
45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 8 - January 27, Reno, Nevada AIAA 27-39 Numerical Study of Jet Plume Instability from an Overexpanded Nozzle Q. Xiao * and H.M. Tsai Temasek Laboratories,
More informationEvaluation of Turbulence Model Corrections for Supersonic Jets using the OVERFLOW Code
Evaluation of Turbulence Model Corrections for Supersonic Jets using the OVERFLOW Code Nico Gross, Gregory A. Blaisdell, and Anastasios S. Lyrintzis Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 The OVERFLOW
More informationFEDSM COMPUTATIONAL AEROACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF OVEREXPANDED SUPERSONIC JET IMPINGEMENT ON A FLAT PLATE WITH/WITHOUT HOLE
Proceedings of FEDSM2007: 5 th Joint ASME/JSME Fluids Engineering Conference July 30-August 2, 2007, San Diego, CA, USA FEDSM2007-37563 COMPUTATIONAL AEROACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF OVEREXPANDED SUPERSONIC JET
More informationNumerical Studies of Supersonic Jet Impingement on a Flat Plate
Numerical Studies of Supersonic Jet Impingement on a Flat Plate Overset Grid Symposium Dayton, OH Michael R. Brown Principal Engineer, Kratos/Digital Fusion Solutions Inc., Huntsville, AL. October 18,
More informationAIAA Computational Analysis of a Pylon-Chevron Core Nozzle Interaction
Computational Analysis of a Pylon-Chevron Core Nozzle Interaction R.H.Thomas, K.W.Kinzie, and S. Paul Pao NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA USA 7 th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 28-30 May
More informationAnalysis of Modified Compressibility Corrections for Turbulence Models
49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 4-7 January 2011, Orlando, Florida AIAA 2011-279 Analysis of Modified Compressibility Corrections for Turbulence
More informationNAPC Numerical investigation of axisymmetric underexpanded supersonic jets. Pratikkumar Raje. Bijaylakshmi Saikia. Krishnendu Sinha 1
Proceedings of the 1 st National Aerospace Propulsion Conference NAPC-2017 March 15-17, 2017, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur NAPC-2017-139 Numerical investigation of axisymmetric underexpanded supersonic jets Pratikkumar
More informationNumerical Simulation of the Vortical Structures in a Lobed Jet Mixing Flow
Numerical Simulation of the Vortical Structures in a Lobed Jet Mixing Flow Nathan J. Cooper * and Parviz Merati Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo,
More informationMulti-source Aeroacoustic Noise Prediction Method
Multi-source Aeroacoustic Noise Prediction Method Jonathan SCOTT CFD Engineer 03/12/2013 1 Introduction Trend to reduce engine displacement while increasing break power by turbo charging engines Traditionally
More informationNumerical Investigation of the Transonic Base Flow of A Generic Rocket Configuration
1 Numerical Investigation of the Transonic Base Flow of A Generic Rocket Configuration A. Henze, C. Glatzer, M. Meinke, W. Schröder Institute of Aerodynamics, RWTH Aachen University, Germany March 21,
More informationCHARACTERISTICS OF ELLIPTIC CO-AXIAL JETS
ELECTRIC POWER 2003 March 4-6, 2003 George R Brown Convention Center, Houston, TX EP 03 Session 07C: Fuels, Combustion and Advanced Cycles - Part II ASME - FACT Division CHARACTERISTICS OF ELLIPTIC CO-AXIAL
More informationDIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HIGH SPEED FLOW OVER CAVITY. Abstract
3 rd AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES (TAICDL), August 5-9 th, 2001, Arlington, Texas. DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HIGH SPEED FLOW OVER CAVITY A. HAMED, D. BASU, A. MOHAMED AND K. DAS Department
More informationParabolized Stability Analysis of Jets Issuing from Serrated Nozzles
Parabolized Stability Analysis of Jets Issuing from Serrated Nozzles Aniruddha Sinha, Hao Xia and Tim Colonius Abstract Jets issuing from serrated nozzles have a correspondingly serrated timeaveraged flow
More informationNumerical Study of Pressure Waves Generated by H-IIA Launch Vehicle at Lift-off
Numerical Study of Pressure Waves Generated by H-IIA Launch Vehicle at Lift-off Seiji Tsutsumi, Taro Shimizu, Ryoji Takaki, Eiji Shima, and Kozo Fujii Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 3-1-1 Yoshinodai,
More informationThe Very Near Pressure Field of Three-Stream Jets
The Very Near Pressure Field of Three-Stream Jets A. Adam, D. Papamoschou, J. Xiong, and F. Liu University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA Using large eddy simulation (LES) of a hot coaxial
More informationThe Computations of Jet Interaction on a Generic Supersonic Missile
The Computations of Jet Interaction on a Generic Supersonic Missile *Jinbum Huh 1) and Seungsoo Lee 2) 1), 2) Department of Aerospace Engineering, Inha Univ., Incheon, Korea 2) slee@inha.ac.kr ABSTRACT
More informationA Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Method For Uncertainty Propagation in CFD Simulations
An Extended Abstract submitted for the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada January 26 Preferred Session Topic: Uncertainty quantification and stochastic methods for CFD A Non-Intrusive
More informationStudies on the Transition of the Flow Oscillations over an Axisymmetric Open Cavity Model
Advances in Aerospace Science and Applications. ISSN 2277-3223 Volume 3, Number 2 (2013), pp. 83-90 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/aasa.htm Studies on the Transition of the Flow
More informationHeating effects on the structure of noise sources of high-speed jets
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 5-8 January 2009, Orlando, Florida AIAA 2009-291 47th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 5 8 January 2009,
More informationOver-expansion Effects on Mach 3.0 Supersonic Jet Acoustics
14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 5-7 May 28, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada AIAA 28-286 Over-expansion Effects on Mach. Supersonic Jet Acoustics Taku Nonomura
More informationPrediction of noise from a wing-in-junction flow using computational fluid dynamics
Proceedings of Acoustics - Fremantle -3 November, Fremantle, Australia Prediction of noise from a wing-in-junction flow using computational fluid dynamics Con J. Doolan, Jesse L. Coombs, Danielle J. Moreau,
More informationNUMERICAL INVESTIGATION ON THE FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF A SUPERSONIC JET IMPINGING ON AN AXI-SYMMETRIC DEFLECTOR
ICAS 2002 CONGRESS NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION ON THE FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF A SUPERSONIC JET IMPINGING ON AN AXI-SYMMETRIC DEFLECTOR S.Sankaran, M.Rajeswara Rao, T.N.V.Satyanarayana, N.Satyanarayana K.Visvanathan
More informationTurbulence and Aeroacoustics Research Team of the Centre Acoustique Laboratoire des Fluides et d Acoustique UMR CNRS 5509, Ecole Centrale de Lyon MUSAF II Colloquium Toulouse, September 2013 Ö Ø ÓÑÔÙØ
More informationExperimental investigation of flow control devices for the reduction of transonic buffeting on rocket afterbodies
Experimental investigation of flow control devices for the reduction of transonic buffeting on rocket afterbodies F.F.J. Schrijer 1, A. Sciacchitano 1, F. Scarano 1 1: Faculty of Aerospace Engineering,
More informationRECONSTRUCTION OF TURBULENT FLUCTUATIONS FOR HYBRID RANS/LES SIMULATIONS USING A SYNTHETIC-EDDY METHOD
RECONSTRUCTION OF TURBULENT FLUCTUATIONS FOR HYBRID RANS/LES SIMULATIONS USING A SYNTHETIC-EDDY METHOD N. Jarrin 1, A. Revell 1, R. Prosser 1 and D. Laurence 1,2 1 School of MACE, the University of Manchester,
More informationinter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE
Copyright SFA - InterNoise 2000 1 inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering 27-30 August 2000, Nice, FRANCE I-INCE Classification: 1.0 ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT
More informationAIRFRAME NOISE MODELING APPROPRIATE FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION
AIRFRAME NOISE MODELING APPROPRIATE FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION AIAA-2004-0689 Serhat Hosder, Joseph A. Schetz, Bernard Grossman and William H. Mason Virginia Tech Work sponsored by NASA
More informationSimulation of Aeroelastic System with Aerodynamic Nonlinearity
Simulation of Aeroelastic System with Aerodynamic Nonlinearity Muhamad Khairil Hafizi Mohd Zorkipli School of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA Norizham Abdul Razak School
More informationWALL ROUGHNESS EFFECTS ON SHOCK BOUNDARY LAYER INTERACTION FLOWS
ISSN (Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization, Volume 2, Special Issue
More informationNumerical investigation of swirl flow inside a supersonic nozzle
Advances in Fluid Mechanics IX 131 Numerical investigation of swirl flow inside a supersonic nozzle E. Eslamian, H. Shirvani & A. Shirvani Faculty of Science and Technology, Anglia Ruskin University, UK
More informationComputation of the Flow of a Dual-Stream Jet with Fan-Flow Deflectors for Noise Reduction
39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 22-25 June 29, San Antonio, Texas AIAA 29-422 Computation of the Flow of a Dual-Stream Jet with Fan-Flow Deflectors for Noise Reduction Juntao Xiong, Feng Liu and Dimitri
More informationEFFECT OF REYNOLDS NUMBER ON THE UNSTEADY FLOW AND ACOUSTIC FIELDS OF SUPERSONIC CAVITY
Proceedings of FEDSM 03 4TH ASME_JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, July 6 11, 2003 FEDSM2003-45473 EFFECT OF REYNOLDS NUMBER ON THE UNSTEADY FLOW AND ACOUSTIC FIELDS OF SUPERSONIC
More informationNumerical Methods in Aerodynamics. Turbulence Modeling. Lecture 5: Turbulence modeling
Turbulence Modeling Niels N. Sørensen Professor MSO, Ph.D. Department of Civil Engineering, Alborg University & Wind Energy Department, Risø National Laboratory Technical University of Denmark 1 Outline
More informationLEE-SIDE FLOW SIMULATIONS OF CRUCIFORM WING- BODY CONFIGURATIONS AT INCOMPRESSIBLE MACH NUMBERS
LEE-SIDE FLOW SIMULATIONS OF CRUCIFORM WING- BODY CONFIGURATIONS AT INCOMPRESSIBLE MACH NUMBERS Janine Versteegh* ** *University of the Witwatersrand **Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 11 Oct 2012
Low-Order Modelling of Blade-Induced Turbulence for RANS Actuator Disk Computations of Wind and Tidal Turbines Takafumi Nishino and Richard H. J. Willden ariv:20.373v [physics.flu-dyn] Oct 202 Abstract
More informationNumerical Investigation of Shock wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction over a 2D Compression Ramp
Advances in Aerospace Science and Applications. ISSN 2277-3223 Volume 4, Number 1 (2014), pp. 25-32 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/aasa.htm Numerical Investigation of Shock wave
More informationThe Effect of Endplates on Rectangular Jets of Different Aspect Ratios
The Effect of Endplates on Rectangular Jets of Different Aspect Ratios M. Alnahhal *, Th. Panidis Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics, Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics Department, University of
More informationEntitled Assessment of Turbulence Models and Corrections with Application to the Orion Launch Abort System
Graduate School ETD Form 9 (Revised 12/07) PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL Thesis/Dissertation Acceptance This is to certify that the thesis/dissertation prepared By Nico Gross Entitled Assessment of
More informationComputational and Experimental Investigation of Fan Flow Deflection for Supersonic Turbofan Engines
15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 11-13 May 2009, Miami, Florida AIAA 2009-3254 Computational and Experimental Investigation of Fan Flow Deflection for Supersonic
More informationNumerical Simulation of Supersonic Expansion in Conical and Contour Nozzle
Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Expansion in Conical and Contour Nozzle Madhu B P (1), Vijaya Raghu B (2) 1 M.Tech Scholars, Mechanical Engineering, Maharaja Institute of Technology, Mysore 2 Professor,
More informationGPPS NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF UNSTEADY ENDWALL FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER WITH ONCOMING WAKE
Proceedings of Shanghai 17 Global Power and Propulsion Forum 3 th October 1 st November, 17 http://www.gpps.global GPPS-17-133 NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF UNSTEADY ENDWALL FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER WITH ONCOMING
More informationChapter 5 Phenomena of laminar-turbulent boundary layer transition (including free shear layers)
Chapter 5 Phenomena of laminar-turbulent boundary layer transition (including free shear layers) T-S Leu May. 3, 2018 Chapter 5: Phenomena of laminar-turbulent boundary layer transition (including free
More informationNPC Abstract
NPC-2013-15002 Development of Mach 3.6 water cooled Facility Nozzle By Jayaprakash C*, Sathiyamoorthy K*, Ashfaque A. Khan*, Venu G*, Venkat S Iyengar*, Srinivas J**, Pratheesh Kumar P** and Manjunath
More informationFlow field in the compressor blade cascade NACA
Flow field in the compressor blade cascade NACA 65-100 Tomáš Turek Thesis Supervisor: Ing. Tomáš Hyhlík, Ph.D. Abstract An investigation is made into the effects of a flow field in the compressor blade
More informationInvestigation of Noise Sources in Turbulent Hot Jets using Large Eddy Simulation Data
45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 8-11 January 2007, Reno, Nevada AIAA 2007-16 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 8-11, 2007, Reno, NV., USA. Investigation of Noise
More informationLarge Eddy Simulation of Piloted Turbulent Premixed Flame
Large Eddy Simulation of Piloted Turbulent Premixed Flame Veeraraghava Raju Hasti, Robert P Lucht and Jay P Gore Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette,
More informationUniversity of Huddersfield Repository
University of Huddersfield Repository Malviya, Vihar, Gundala, Naresh and Mishra, Rakesh Effect of cross wind on aerodynamic coefficients of ground vehicles. Original Citation Malviya, Vihar, Gundala,
More informationNUMERICAL SIMULATION AND MODELING OF UNSTEADY FLOW AROUND AN AIRFOIL. (AERODYNAMIC FORM)
Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences ISSN 1112-9867 Available online at http://www.jfas.info NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND MODELING OF UNSTEADY FLOW AROUND AN AIRFOIL. (AERODYNAMIC FORM) M. Y. Habib
More informationMixing Enhancement of High-Bypass Turbofan Exhausts via Contouring of Fan Nozzle
37th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 25-28 June 27, Miami, FL AIAA 27-4497 Mixing Enhancement of High-Bypass Turbofan Exhausts via Contouring of Fan Nozzle Marco Debiasi, Shyam Sundar Dhanabalan
More informationFLOW STRUCTURE of SUPERSONIC JETS from CONICAL C-D NOZZLES
FLOW STRUCTURE of SUPERSONIC JETS from CONICAL C-D NOZZLES David Munday * and Ephraim Gutmark, University of Cincinnati Junhui Liu and K. Kailasanath, Naval Research Laboratory This paper examines the
More informationON USING ARTIFICIAL COMPRESSIBILITY METHOD FOR SOLVING TURBULENT FLOWS
Conference Applications of Mathematics 212 in honor of the 6th birthday of Michal Křížek. Institute of Mathematics AS CR, Prague 212 ON USING ARTIFICIAL COMPRESSIBILITY METHOD FOR SOLVING TURBULENT FLOWS
More informationOn Theoretical Broadband Shock-Associated Noise Near-Field Cross-Spectra
On Theoretical Broadband Shock-Associated Noise Near-Field Cross-Spectra Steven A. E. Miller The National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Langley Research Center Aeroacoustics Branch AIAA Aeroacoustics
More informationDESIGN & COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSES OF AN AXISYMMETRIC NOZZLE AT TRANSONIC FREE STREAM CONDITIONS
DESIGN & COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSES OF AN AXISYMMETRIC NOZZLE AT TRANSONIC FREE STREAM CONDITIONS S Wasim Akram 1, S. Rajesh 2 1 M.Tech Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Krishna
More informationSTAR-CCM+: NACA0012 Flow and Aero-Acoustics Analysis James Ruiz Application Engineer January 26, 2011
www.cd-adapco.com STAR-CCM+: NACA0012 Flow and Aero-Acoustics Analysis James Ruiz Application Engineer January 26, 2011 Introduction The objective of this work is to prove the capability of STAR-CCM+ as
More informationFluid Mechanics. Chapter 9 Surface Resistance. Dr. Amer Khalil Ababneh
Fluid Mechanics Chapter 9 Surface Resistance Dr. Amer Khalil Ababneh Wind tunnel used for testing flow over models. Introduction Resistances exerted by surfaces are a result of viscous stresses which create
More informationLift-Off Acoustics Predictions for the Ares I Launch Pad
15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 11-13 May 2009, Miami, Florida AIAA 2009-3163 Lift-Off Acoustics Predictions for the Ares I Launch Pad Kenneth J. Plotkin *
More informationAerodynamics of Wedge-Shaped Deflectors for Jet Noise Reduction
4th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 5-8 June 006, San Francisco, California AIAA 006-3655 Aerodynamics of Wedge-Shaped Deflectors for Jet Noise Reduction Dimitri Papamoschou *, An Vu, and Andrew Johnson.
More informationAeroacoustics, Launcher Acoustics, Large-Eddy Simulation.
Seventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7), Big Island, Hawaii, July 9-13, 2012 ICCFD7-2012-3104 ICCFD7-3104 Analysis of Acoustic Wave from Supersonic Jets Impinging to an
More informationTHE exhaust of jet engines continues to be a significant
JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER Vol. 28, No. 4, July August 22 Aerodynamic Performance of Fan-Flow Deflectors for Jet-Noise Reduction Downloaded by Dimitri Papamoschou on January 3, 24 http://arc.aiaa.org
More informationNumerical and Experimental Investigation of the Flow-Induced Noise of a Wall Mounted Airfoil
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Flow-Induced Noise of a Wall Mounted Airfoil Paul Croaker, Danielle Moreau, Manuj Awasthi, Mahmoud Karimi, Con Doolan, Nicole Kessissoglou School of Mechanical
More informationNumerical study of the effects of trailing-edge bluntness on highly turbulent hydro-foil flows
Numerical study of the effects of trailing-edge bluntness on highly turbulent hydro-foil flows T. Do L. Chen J. Tu B. Anderson 7 November 2005 Abstract Flow-induced noise from fully submerged lifting bodies
More informationApplication of Compact Schemes to Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Jets
Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 21, No. 3, December 2004 ( 2004) Application of Compact Schemes to Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Jets Ali Uzun, 1 Gregory A. Blaisdell, 2 and Anastasios S. Lyrintzis
More informationInternational Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 5, May ISSN
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 5, May-2015 28 CFD BASED HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS OF SOLAR AIR HEATER DUCT PROVIDED WITH ARTIFICIAL ROUGHNESS Vivek Rao, Dr. Ajay
More informationINVESTIGATION OF FLOW PARAMETERS AND NOISE OF SUBSONIC AND SUPERSONIC JETS USING RANS/ILES HIGH RESOLUTION METHOD
INVESTIGATION OF FLOW PARAMETERS AND NOISE OF SUBSONIC AND SUPERSONIC JETS USING RANS/ILES HIGH RESOLUTION METHOD L.A. Benderskiy, D.A. Lyubimov Central Institute of Aviation Motors, Russia Leosun.Ben@gmail.com
More informationFar-Field Noise Control in Supersonic Jets From Conical and Contoured Nozzles
Jin-Hwa Kim Martin Kearney-Fischer Mo Samimy 1 e-mail: samimy.1@osu.edu Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43235 Sivaram Gogineni Spectral Energies, LLC, Dayton, OH 45431 Far-Field Noise Control in Supersonic
More information41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 6-9 January 2003, Reno, Nevada Modeling shock unsteadiness in shock/turbulence interaction
4st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 6-9 January 003, Reno, Nevada Modeling shock unsteadiness in shock/turbulence interaction AIAA 003-65 Krishnendu Sinha*, Krishnan Mahesh and Graham V. Candler
More informationThe Effects of Scalloping Width and Position on Jet Mixing of Lobed Nozzles
doi: 10.5028/jatm.v7i4.519 The Effects of Scalloping Width and Position on Jet Mixing of Lobed Nozzles Liu Dawei 1, Huang Jun 1, Sheng Zhiqiang 1, Ji Jinzu 1 Abstract: A series of geometric models of lobed
More informationDesign and simulation of Open Circuit Blowdown type Wind Tunnel
Design and simulation of Open Circuit Blowdown type Wind Tunnel Sanjeev Kumar Gupta a, V.K.Dwivedi b, Jitendra Kumar Chauhan c, and Rahul Goswami c a Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
More informationSimulation of Flow around a Surface-mounted Square-section Cylinder of Aspect Ratio Four
Simulation of Flow around a Surface-mounted Square-section Cylinder of Aspect Ratio Four You Qin Wang 1, Peter L. Jackson 2 and Jueyi Sui 2 1 High Performance Computing Laboratory, College of Science and
More informationComparison of two equations closure turbulence models for the prediction of heat and mass transfer in a mechanically ventilated enclosure
Proceedings of 4 th ICCHMT May 17-0, 005, Paris-Cachan, FRANCE 381 Comparison of two equations closure turbulence models for the prediction of heat and mass transfer in a mechanically ventilated enclosure
More informationTHE EFFECT OF NOZZLE GEOMETRY NOISE OF HIGH-SPEED JETS ABSTRACT
FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND DECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND VIBRATION THE EFFECT OF NOZZLE GEOMETRY NOISE OF HIGH-SPEED JETS ON THE Christopher K.W. Tam Department of Mathematics,
More informationLarge-eddy simulations for wind turbine blade: rotational augmentation and dynamic stall
Large-eddy simulations for wind turbine blade: rotational augmentation and dynamic stall Y. Kim, I.P. Castro, and Z.T. Xie Introduction Wind turbines operate in the atmospheric boundary layer and their
More informationJet Noise Analysis of a Mixed Turbofan Engine
Jet Noise Analysis of a Mixed Turbofan Engine Jens TRÜMNER 1 ; Christian MUNDT 2 1,2 Institute for Thermodynamics, UniBw München, Germany ABSTRACT Due to constantly increasing flight traffic the aircraft
More informationAerodynamics and Aeroacoustics Investigation of a Low Speed Subsonic Jet
Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics Investigation of a Low Speed Subsonic Jet Pedro R. C. Souza Federal University of Uberlândia, Block 5P, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, 38408-100, Brazil Anderson R. Proença Institute
More informationDetached Eddy Simulation on Hypersonic Base Flow Structure of Reentry-F Vehicle
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 00 (2014) 000 000 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia APISAT2014, 2014 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology,
More informationCFD Analysis for Thermal Behavior of Turbulent Channel Flow of Different Geometry of Bottom Plate
International Journal Of Engineering Research And Development e-issn: 2278-067X, p-issn: 2278-800X, www.ijerd.com Volume 13, Issue 9 (September 2017), PP.12-19 CFD Analysis for Thermal Behavior of Turbulent
More informationLaminar and Turbulent Flow Calculations for the HIFiRE-5b Flight Test
Laminar and Turbulent Flow Calculations for the HIFiRE-5b Flight Test Kevin M. Porter, Jonathan Poggie Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-045, USA and Roger L. Kimmel, Air Force Research Laboratory,
More informationNumerical Modeling of Active Flow Control in a Boundary Layer Ingesting Offset Inlet
2nd AIAA Flow Control Conference, 28 June - 1 July, 2004, Portland, Oregon Numerical Modeling of Active Flow Control in a Boundary Layer Ingesting Offset Inlet Brian G. Allan, Lewis R. Owens, and Bobby
More informationOn the transient modelling of impinging jets heat transfer. A practical approach
Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer 7 2012 Begell House, Inc. On the transient modelling of impinging jets heat transfer. A practical approach M. Bovo 1,2 and L. Davidson 1 1 Dept. of Applied Mechanics,
More informationOpenFOAM Simulations for MAV Applications
16 th Annual CFD Symposium 11th-12th August 2014, Bangalore 1 OpenFOAM Simulations for MAV Applications Syed Zahid*, A. Rajesh, M.B. Subrahmanya, B.N. Rajani *Student, Dept. of Mech. Engg, SDM, Dharwad,
More informationNumerical Design of Plug Nozzles for Micropropulsion Applications
Numerical Design of Plug Nozzles for Micropropulsion Applications Jason M. Pearl 1 William F. Louisos 2 Darren L. Hitt 3 Mechanical Engineering Program, School of Engineering College of Engineering & Mathematical
More informationEVALUATION OF FOUR TURBULENCE MODELS IN THE INTERACTION OF MULTI BURNERS SWIRLING FLOWS
EVALUATION OF FOUR TURBULENCE MODELS IN THE INTERACTION OF MULTI BURNERS SWIRLING FLOWS A Aroussi, S Kucukgokoglan, S.J.Pickering, M.Menacer School of Mechanical, Materials, Manufacturing Engineering and
More informationVerification of K-ω SST Turbulence Model for Supersonic Internal Flows
Verification of K-ω SST Turbulence Model for Supersonic Internal Flows J. Kolář, V. Dvořák Abstract In this work, we try to find the best setting of Computational Fluid Dynamic solver available for the
More informationPerformance improvement of propulsion systems by optimization of the mixing efficiency and pressure loss of forced mixers
Paper presented at the 8. European Propulsion Forum Affordability and the Environment Key Challenges for Propulsion in the 2 st Century 26.-28. March 200 in Nottingham Abstract Performance improvement
More informationThe Simulation of Wraparound Fins Aerodynamic Characteristics
The Simulation of Wraparound Fins Aerodynamic Characteristics Institute of Launch Dynamics Nanjing University of Science and Technology Nanjing Xiaolingwei 00 P. R. China laithabbass@yahoo.com Abstract:
More informationActive Noise Control in Jets from Conical and Contoured Supersonic Nozzles with Plasma Actuators
15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 11-13 May 2009, Miami, Florida AIAA 2009-3187 Active Noise Control in Jets from Conical and Contoured Supersonic Nozzles with
More informationPlanar Laser-Induced Iodine Fluorescence Technique for Flow Visualization and Quantitative Measurements in Rarefied Flows
Planar Laser-Induced Iodine Fluorescence Technique for Flow Visualization and Quantitative Measurements in Rarefied Flows Professor James McDaniel*, Eric Cecil*, Erin Reed* and Josh Codoni* Professor Iain
More informationcompression corner flows with high deflection angle, for example, the method cannot predict the location
4nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 5-8 January 4, Reno, Nevada Modeling the effect of shock unsteadiness in shock-wave/ turbulent boundary layer interactions AIAA 4-9 Krishnendu Sinha*, Krishnan
More informationVERTICAL TURBULENT BUOYANT HELIUM JET CFD MODELING AND VALIDATION
VERTICAL TURBULENT BUOYANT HELIUM JET CFD MODELING AND VALIDATION Cheng Z, Agranat V.M. and Tchouvelev A.V. A.V.Tchouvelev & Associates, Inc., 659 Spinnaker Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5W R Hydrogenics
More informationNUMERICAL PREDICTIONS AND EXPERIMENTS ON SUPERSONIC JET MIXING FROM CASTELLATED NOZZLES
ICAS CONGRESS NUMERICAL PREDICTIONS AND EXPERIMENTS ON SUPERSONIC JET MIXING FROM CASTELLATED NOZZLES A. J. Saddington, N. J. Lawson, K. Knowles Aeromechanical Systems Group Department of Aerospace, Power
More informationFluctuating Pressure Inside/Outside the Flow Separation Region in High Speed Flowfield
Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology 1 (2015) 18-26 doi: 10.17265/2332-8258/2015.01.003 D DAVID PUBLISHING Fluctuating Pressure Inside/Outside the Flow Separation Region in High Speed Flowfield
More informationFlow-Induced Noise Technical Group
Flow-Induced Noise Technical Group Center for Acoustics and Vibration Spring Workshop May 4, 2010 Presented by: Dean E. Capone, Group Leader 1 Overview The mission of the Flow-Induced Noise Group of the
More informationConjugate Heat Transfer Simulation of Internally Cooled Gas Turbine Vane
Conjugate Heat Transfer Simulation of Internally Cooled Gas Turbine Vane V. Esfahanian 1, A. Shahbazi 1 and G. Ahmadi 2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran 2 Department
More informationEXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON THE NONCIRCULAR INCOMPRESSIBLE JET CHARACTERISTICS
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON THE NONCIRCULAR INCOMPRESSIBLE JET CHARACTERISTICS S. Venkata Sai Sudheer 1, Chandra Sekhar K 2, Peram Laxmi Reddy 3 1,2 Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering, CVR College
More informationComputational Analysis of Bell Nozzles
Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference of Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer (FFHMT'17) Toronto, Canada August 21 23, 2017 Paper No. 110 DOI: 10.11159/ffhmt17.110 Computational Analysis of Bell
More informationAerodynamic Optimization of the Expansion Section in a Hypersonic Quiet Nozzle Based on Favorable Pressure Effect
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2014, 2, 443-448 Published Online May 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jamp http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2014.26054 Aerodynamic Optimization of
More information