ECON 312 FINAL PROJECT
|
|
- Myles Harris
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ECON 312 FINAL PROJECT JACOB MENICK 1. Introduction When doing statistics with cross-sectional data, it is common to encounter heteroskedasticity. The cross-sectional econometrician can detect heteroskedasticity with a Lagrange Multiplier test such as the Breusch-Pagan test. While there are considerations to be made about the form of the variance function for the error term, the Breusch-Pagan test is always conducted in the same general form; regress the squared residuals on some function of the regressors and compare the test statistic (NR 2 ) to a critical value of the χ 2 distribution. While heteroskedasticity can be a problem in both cross-sectional and time-series data, serial correlation is an issue unique to the time-series domain. Spatial autocorrelation, an analogous issue in the cross-section domain, is not as ubiquitous as the ever-present autocorrelation problem in time-series regression. Detecting autocorrelation, however, is less straight forward than detecting its cross-sectional relative, heteroskedasticity. This is because our null hypothesis in an analogous Lagrange-Multiplier test contains lagged values of the residuals, and, consequently, the economist must make a choice about how to deal with the observations for which lagged values of the residuals do not exist An Illustration of the Problem. Consider a time-series process with an AR(1) error term: (1) y t = α + βx t + u t where u t = ρu t 1 + ɛ t, and ɛ t is white noise To test for first order autocorrelation using LaGrange Multipliers, we would take the residuals from equation(1), û t, and regress them on û t 1 and the explanatory variables from the original regression: (2) û t = ρu t 1 ˆ + βx t + ɛ t H 0 : no autocorrelation, T 0 R 2 χ 2 p H 1 : Autocorrelation is present 1
2 2 JACOB MENICK For the Breusch-Godfrey Lagrange Multiplier test, our test statistic is T 0 R 2, where T 0 is the number of time periods, T, minus the first p observations, and R 2 is the coefficient of determination from the regression in equation (2). It makes sense that if the lagged residuals do little to explain the current residuals, then R 2 will be small, and we will fail to reject H 0 that there is no serial correlation. If they explain a lot of the variation in the current residuals, then R 2 will be large and we will reject H 0. In order to run this regression, though, we must decide what to do with the first observation on u. When testing for order p autocorrelation, we must decide what to do with the first p observations because the regression will have p lags of the residuals. According to Parker [?], there are two options at our disposal. (1) replace û 1, û 2,..., û p with zeroes (their expected value) and use T 0 = T. (2) drop û 1, û 2,..., û p and use T 0 = T p. Of the two, there is no clear favorite, and econometrics textbooks offer little guidance over how to pick between these options. Even Trevor Breusch himself neglects to advise statisticians on this choice[?]. Stata chooses option (1) by default, but altering our data in any way can feel somewhat sacrilegious, and dropping our observations is a waste of information that can be valuable, especially when the sample size is small A Course of Inquiry. This paper will attempt to determine if either of the two options for the Breusch-Godfrey test does a better job at detecting autocorrelation across various error structures and types of variables included in the regression. It will not assess the coefficient estimates in the presence of autocorrelation; only the comparative quality of options 1 and 2 mentioned in section The Data I will be conducting a Monte Carlo simulation on a dataset I created. I created three variables, denoted x1 t, x2 t, and x3 t, chosen to have normal distributions with arbitrary means and variances. Summary statistics for these three variables can be found in Table 1. The data were randomly sampled as follows: x1 t N(5, 2) x2 t N(1, 0.8) x3 t N(2.4, 0.3) There are 100 observations on each variable, thought of as a time series.
3 ECON 312 FINAL PROJECT The Data-Generating Process (DGP). There are numerous data-generating processes so that we can compare the performances of the two brands of Breusch-Godfrey tests under various circumstances. The general form of the DGP is as follows: (3) y t = α + β 1 x1 t + β 2 x2 t + β 3 x3 t + θ 1 y t 1 + u t where u t = ρ 1 u t 1 + ρ 2 u t ρ p u t p + ɛ t and ɛ t is white noise 3. The Simulation In total, I ran 72 simulations, each with 1000 Trials. There are were four qualities of the DGP structure that I varied: (1) The number of explanatory variables include 1-3 x s (2) The presence of a lagged dependent variable (3) The order of the AR(p) process of the disturbance term, u t p {1, 2} (4) The magnitude of ρ 1 and ρ 2 each ρ i [0, 1] for stationarity In each of the 72 cases, I compared the success rate of the Breusch-Godfrey test between the two practices of dealing with the first p observations. The two versions of the test were conducted in two separate simulations. Each success rate was determined by the following algorithm: simulate y according to the DGP regress y on the relevant variables run the Breusch-Godfrey test for the known order of serial correlation in the DGP Store the χ 2 test statistic in each trial divide the total number of significant χ 2 statistics by the number of trials (1000) The 72 simulations can be broken down into four categories: (1) AR(1) error process, no lagged dependent variable included (2) AR(2) error process, no lagged dependent variable included (3) AR(1) error process, lagged dependent variable is included (4) AR(2) error process, lagged dependent variable is included
4 4 JACOB MENICK In each of the four categories, there were eighteen trials conducted: a model had either one, two, or three regressors (not including the lagged dependent variable) and six different values of ρ for each number of regressors No Lagged Dependent Variable Present in Regression. The first group of simulations does not include y t 1 as a regressor u t as an AR(1) Process. For these models, u t = ρ 1 u t 1 + ɛ t DGP 1-18: y t = x1 t + ρ 1 u t 1 + ɛ t y t = x1 t +.4x2 t + ρ 1 u t 1 + ɛ t y t = x1 t +.4x2 t +.8x3 t + ρ 1 u t 1 + ɛ t where ρ 1 varies from.1 to.6 in increments of.1, for each of the three models Table: Found in Appendix B, Table 2 Stata Output: Found in Appendix C, Figure 1 For this group of simulations, the two forms of the test were virtually indistinguishable in terms of their ability to detect autocorrelation. The Breusch-Godfrey test using the nomiss0 option (referred to earlier as option 2), detected autocorrelation, on average 72.5 % of the time, and it detected it roughly 72% of the time when it replaced the first observation with a zero. This improvement of about.5% does not seem to be enough of a difference to be conclusive u t as an AR(2) Process. For these models, u t = ρ 1 u t 1 + ρ 2 u t 2 + ɛ t DGP 19-36: y t = x1 t + ρ 1 u t 1 + ρ 2 u t 2 + ɛ t y t = x1 t +.4x2 t + ρ 1 u t 1 + ρ 2 u t 2 + ɛ t y t = x1 t +.4x2 t +.8x3 t + ρ 1 u t 1 + ρ 2 u t 2 + ɛ t where ρ 1 =.2 and ρ 2 varies from.1 to.6 in increments of.1, for each of the three models Table: Found in Appendix B, Table 3 Stata Output: Found in Appendix C, Figure 2
5 ECON 312 FINAL PROJECT 5 This group of simulations sees no distinguishable difference between the two forms of the test Lagged Dependent Variable Present in Regression. The second group of simulations does include y t 1 as a regressor u t as an AR(1) Process. For these models, u t = ρ 1 u t 1 + ɛ t DGP 37-54: y t = x1 t +.4y t 1 + ρ 1 u t 1 + ɛ t y t = x1 t +.4x2 t +.4y t 1 + ρ 1 u t 1 + ɛ t y t = x1 t +.4x2 t +.8x3 t +.4y t 1 + ρ 1 u t 1 + ɛ t where ρ 1 varies from.1 to.6 in increments of.1, for each of the three models Table: Found in Appendix B, Table 4 Stata Output: Found in Appendix C, Figure 3 This group of models also sees a small difference between the two versions of the test. The test with the nomiss0 option performs on average only about 1% better u t as an AR(2) Process. For these models, u t = ρ 1 u t 1 + ρ 2 u t 2 + ɛ t DGP 55-72: y t = x1 t +.4y t 1 + ρ 1 u t 1 + ρ 2 u t 2 + ɛ t y t = x1 t +.4x2 t +.4y t 1 + ρ 1 u t 1 + ρ 2 u t 2 + ɛ t y t = x1 t +.4x2 t +.8x3 t +.4y t 1 + ρ 1 u t 1 + ρ 2 u t 2 + ɛ t where ρ 1 =.2 and ρ 2 varies from.1 to.6 in increments of.1, for each of the three models Table: Found in Appendix B, Table 5 Stata Output: Found in Appendix C, Figure 4 When a lagged dependent variable is included, and the error term is an AR(2) process, the second version of the test performs measurably better. It detects autocorrelation on average almost 6% more of the time.
6 6 JACOB MENICK 4. Results In hindsight, the small difference between the two tests in this simulation for the majority of the groups is not all that surprising; the first p observations are only one or two observations out of 100. It makes sense, then that the difference between the two tests is often on the order of one percentage point. The interesting difference though, is in the final group, in which the DGP has an AR(2) error process and a lagged dependent variable as a regressor. Why would dropping the first two observations have such an effect on the ability of a LaGrange Multiplier test to detect autocorrelation? One answer, I propose, is that when we substitute zeroes for the first p observations, not only are we eliminating evidence of autocorrelation, we are inserting evidence of no autocorrelation. Recall our test statistic, T 0 R 2, and recall that we reject the null hypothesis of no autocorrelation when our test statistic is large (larger than the critical χ 2 value with p degrees of freedom). It must be the case that the reduction in T 0 is made up by an increase in R 2 when we drop the first two observations in the case of our last group of models. Indeed, three out of the four groups of models saw the success rate of the test increase when option 2 was chosen, and the other had an indistinguishable difference between the two forms. 5. Conclusion and Validity Assessment The conclusions of this paper are not easily applied elsewhere, as the results of our test choice are largely dependent on the sample. The specifics of the data-generating processes used in this simulation were entirely arbitrary. This includes the magnitudes of the coefficients chosen, the distributions of the variables, and the sample size. I would guess that in a smaller sample, the default test option would be more robust because there would not be much to sacrifice in the way of T 0. Nonetheless, this paper suggests that there could be cases in which the Breusch-Godfrey test performs significantly better at detecting order p autocorrelation when the first p residuals are dropped rather than replaced with zeroes. Perhaps the folks over at Stata should consider making this the default option on their estat bgodfrey command. 6. Appendices 6.1. Appendix A: A Note on Stata Commands Used. This project made use of some Stata commands that were not covered in the course. The replace command was used in the forvalues loops so that I would not try to generate the same variable twice and trigger an error. I used this function particularly for lagging the error term in the AR(1)
7 ECON 312 FINAL PROJECT 7 process and the dependent variable in the models that included the dependent variable as a regressor. I also had to make some tricky use of commands to do with matrices in order to get the chi-squared statistics from the Breusch-Godfrey tests as scalars. In the Monte program, I created a matrix to hold the results from the estat bgodfrey command, and then generated a variable to pick out the [1,1] entry as a scalar. I also generated a variable to grab results from thesummarize command so that I could determine the proportion of successful tests for autocorrelation in the simulation. Table 1. Summary Statistics Variable Mean Std. Dev. Min. Max. N x x x Appendix B: Tables. These tables show the results of the Monte Carlo simulation for each group of models. The first column indicates the number of X s included in the regression. The second column indicates the value of either ρ 1 or ρ 2, whichever was varied. The third column is the proportion of significant test statistics in each round of 1000 simulations, when option 1 is used in the Breusch-Godfrey test (substitute zero for the first p residuals). The fourth column indicates the proportion of significant test statistics when option 2 is used. The bolded number in either the third or fourth column indicates at a glance which form of the test had a higher success rate for that simulation Appendix C: Stata Input/Output. These figures are screenshots of the do-file that I used in each group of simulations. As mentioned in the paper, each of these do-files was adjusted 18 times to include different values of ρ and include a different number of X s in the regression. These do-files will also be attached to this paper in case a reader is interested in replicating the results Appendix D: References.
8 8 JACOB MENICK Table 2. AR(1) Error, No Lagged Y Number of X s ρ 1 Zeros prop. success. Nomiss prop. success References [1] Jeffrey Parker Chapter 2: Regression with Stationary Time Series p [2] T.S. Breusch Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Linear Models 1978: Australian National University
9 ECON 312 FINAL PROJECT 9 Table 3. AR(2) Error, No Lagged Y,ρ 1 =.2 Number of X s ρ 2 Zeros prop. success. Nomiss prop. success
10 10 JACOB MENICK Table 4. AR(1) Error,Lagged Y Included Number of X s ρ 1 Zeros prop. success. Nomiss prop. success
11 ECON 312 FINAL PROJECT 11 Table 5. AR(2) Error,Lagged Y Included,ρ 1 =.2 Number of X s ρ 2 Zeros prop. success. Nomiss prop. success
12 12 JACOB MENICK Figure 1. An example of a do-file for the first group of simulations
13 ECON 312 FINAL PROJECT 13 Figure 2. An example of a do-file for the second group of simulations
14 14 JACOB MENICK Figure 3. An example of a do-file for the third group of simulations
15 ECON 312 FINAL PROJECT 15 Figure 4. An example of a do-file for the fourth group of simulations
Lab 11 - Heteroskedasticity
Lab 11 - Heteroskedasticity Spring 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Heteroskedasticity 2 3 Addressing heteroskedasticity in Stata 3 4 Testing for heteroskedasticity 4 5 A simple example 5 1 1 Introduction
More informationEconometrics. 9) Heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation
30C00200 Econometrics 9) Heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation Timo Kuosmanen Professor, Ph.D. http://nomepre.net/index.php/timokuosmanen Today s topics Heteroscedasticity Possible causes Testing for
More informationLECTURE 10: MORE ON RANDOM PROCESSES
LECTURE 10: MORE ON RANDOM PROCESSES AND SERIAL CORRELATION 2 Classification of random processes (cont d) stationary vs. non-stationary processes stationary = distribution does not change over time more
More informationat least 50 and preferably 100 observations should be available to build a proper model
III Box-Jenkins Methods 1. Pros and Cons of ARIMA Forecasting a) need for data at least 50 and preferably 100 observations should be available to build a proper model used most frequently for hourly or
More informationECON2228 Notes 10. Christopher F Baum. Boston College Economics. cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes / 48
ECON2228 Notes 10 Christopher F Baum Boston College Economics 2014 2015 cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes 10 2014 2015 1 / 48 Serial correlation and heteroskedasticity in time series regressions Chapter 12:
More informationEconometrics. Week 8. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague
Econometrics Week 8 Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague Fall 2012 1 / 25 Recommended Reading For the today Instrumental Variables Estimation and Two Stage
More informationECON2228 Notes 10. Christopher F Baum. Boston College Economics. cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes / 54
ECON2228 Notes 10 Christopher F Baum Boston College Economics 2014 2015 cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes 10 2014 2015 1 / 54 erial correlation and heteroskedasticity in time series regressions Chapter 12:
More informationEconomics 536 Lecture 7. Introduction to Specification Testing in Dynamic Econometric Models
University of Illinois Fall 2016 Department of Economics Roger Koenker Economics 536 Lecture 7 Introduction to Specification Testing in Dynamic Econometric Models In this lecture I want to briefly describe
More informationHeteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation
Lesson 7 Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Pilar González and Susan Orbe Dpt. Applied Economics III (Econometrics and Statistics) Pilar González and Susan Orbe OCW 2014 Lesson 7. Heteroskedasticity
More informationF9 F10: Autocorrelation
F9 F10: Autocorrelation Feng Li Department of Statistics, Stockholm University Introduction In the classic regression model we assume cov(u i, u j x i, x k ) = E(u i, u j ) = 0 What if we break the assumption?
More informationApplied Econometrics. Applied Econometrics. Applied Econometrics. Applied Econometrics. What is Autocorrelation. Applied Econometrics
Autocorrelation 1. What is 2. What causes 3. First and higher orders 4. Consequences of 5. Detecting 6. Resolving Learning Objectives 1. Understand meaning of in the CLRM 2. What causes 3. Distinguish
More informationEconometrics. Week 4. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague
Econometrics Week 4 Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague Fall 2012 1 / 23 Recommended Reading For the today Serial correlation and heteroskedasticity in
More informationSOME BASICS OF TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS
SOME BASICS OF TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS John E. Floyd University of Toronto December 8, 26 An excellent place to learn about time series analysis is from Walter Enders textbook. For a basic understanding of
More informationEconometrics 2, Class 1
Econometrics 2, Class Problem Set #2 September 9, 25 Remember! Send an email to let me know that you are following these classes: paul.sharp@econ.ku.dk That way I can contact you e.g. if I need to cancel
More informationMultiple Regression Analysis: Heteroskedasticity
Multiple Regression Analysis: Heteroskedasticity y = β 0 + β 1 x 1 + β x +... β k x k + u Read chapter 8. EE45 -Chaiyuth Punyasavatsut 1 topics 8.1 Heteroskedasticity and OLS 8. Robust estimation 8.3 Testing
More informationEconometrics Review questions for exam
Econometrics Review questions for exam Nathaniel Higgins nhiggins@jhu.edu, 1. Suppose you have a model: y = β 0 x 1 + u You propose the model above and then estimate the model using OLS to obtain: ŷ =
More informationTesting for Unit Roots with Cointegrated Data
Discussion Paper No. 2015-57 August 19, 2015 http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2015-57 Testing for Unit Roots with Cointegrated Data W. Robert Reed Abstract This paper demonstrates
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND Testing For Unit Roots With Cointegrated Data NOTE: This paper is a revision of
More informationTopic 7: Heteroskedasticity
Topic 7: Heteroskedasticity Advanced Econometrics (I Dong Chen School of Economics, Peking University Introduction If the disturbance variance is not constant across observations, the regression is heteroskedastic
More informationChapter 8 Heteroskedasticity
Chapter 8 Walter R. Paczkowski Rutgers University Page 1 Chapter Contents 8.1 The Nature of 8. Detecting 8.3 -Consistent Standard Errors 8.4 Generalized Least Squares: Known Form of Variance 8.5 Generalized
More informationAuto correlation 2. Note: In general we can have AR(p) errors which implies p lagged terms in the error structure, i.e.,
1 Motivation Auto correlation 2 Autocorrelation occurs when what happens today has an impact on what happens tomorrow, and perhaps further into the future This is a phenomena mainly found in time-series
More informationStationary and nonstationary variables
Stationary and nonstationary variables Stationary variable: 1. Finite and constant in time expected value: E (y t ) = µ < 2. Finite and constant in time variance: Var (y t ) = σ 2 < 3. Covariance dependent
More informationIris Wang.
Chapter 10: Multicollinearity Iris Wang iris.wang@kau.se Econometric problems Multicollinearity What does it mean? A high degree of correlation amongst the explanatory variables What are its consequences?
More informationAUTOCORRELATION. Phung Thanh Binh
AUTOCORRELATION Phung Thanh Binh OUTLINE Time series Gauss-Markov conditions The nature of autocorrelation Causes of autocorrelation Consequences of autocorrelation Detecting autocorrelation Remedial measures
More informationDiagnostics of Linear Regression
Diagnostics of Linear Regression Junhui Qian October 7, 14 The Objectives After estimating a model, we should always perform diagnostics on the model. In particular, we should check whether the assumptions
More informationEC312: Advanced Econometrics Problem Set 3 Solutions in Stata
EC312: Advanced Econometrics Problem Set 3 Solutions in Stata Nicola Limodio www.nicolalimodio.com N.Limodio1@lse.ac.uk The data set AIRQ contains observations for 30 standard metropolitan statistical
More informationSection 2 NABE ASTEF 65
Section 2 NABE ASTEF 65 Econometric (Structural) Models 66 67 The Multiple Regression Model 68 69 Assumptions 70 Components of Model Endogenous variables -- Dependent variables, values of which are determined
More informationLECTURE 11. Introduction to Econometrics. Autocorrelation
LECTURE 11 Introduction to Econometrics Autocorrelation November 29, 2016 1 / 24 ON PREVIOUS LECTURES We discussed the specification of a regression equation Specification consists of choosing: 1. correct
More informationECON 4551 Econometrics II Memorial University of Newfoundland. Panel Data Models. Adapted from Vera Tabakova s notes
ECON 4551 Econometrics II Memorial University of Newfoundland Panel Data Models Adapted from Vera Tabakova s notes 15.1 Grunfeld s Investment Data 15.2 Sets of Regression Equations 15.3 Seemingly Unrelated
More information1 Motivation for Instrumental Variable (IV) Regression
ECON 370: IV & 2SLS 1 Instrumental Variables Estimation and Two Stage Least Squares Econometric Methods, ECON 370 Let s get back to the thiking in terms of cross sectional (or pooled cross sectional) data
More informationModified Variance Ratio Test for Autocorrelation in the Presence of Heteroskedasticity
The Lahore Journal of Economics 23 : 1 (Summer 2018): pp. 1 19 Modified Variance Ratio Test for Autocorrelation in the Presence of Heteroskedasticity Sohail Chand * and Nuzhat Aftab ** Abstract Given that
More informationWeek 11 Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation
Week 11 Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation İnsan TUNALI Econ 511 Econometrics I Koç University 27 November 2018 Lecture outline 1. OLS and assumptions on V(ε) 2. Violations of V(ε) σ 2 I: 1. Heteroskedasticity
More informationLecture 4: Heteroskedasticity
Lecture 4: Heteroskedasticity Econometric Methods Warsaw School of Economics (4) Heteroskedasticity 1 / 24 Outline 1 What is heteroskedasticity? 2 Testing for heteroskedasticity White Goldfeld-Quandt Breusch-Pagan
More informationChristopher Dougherty London School of Economics and Political Science
Introduction to Econometrics FIFTH EDITION Christopher Dougherty London School of Economics and Political Science OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents INTRODU CTION 1 Why study econometrics? 1 Aim of this
More informationEksamen på Økonomistudiet 2006-II Econometrics 2 June 9, 2006
Eksamen på Økonomistudiet 2006-II Econometrics 2 June 9, 2006 This is a four hours closed-book exam (uden hjælpemidler). Please answer all questions. As a guiding principle the questions 1 to 4 have equal
More informationReliability of inference (1 of 2 lectures)
Reliability of inference (1 of 2 lectures) Ragnar Nymoen University of Oslo 5 March 2013 1 / 19 This lecture (#13 and 14): I The optimality of the OLS estimators and tests depend on the assumptions of
More informationCircle the single best answer for each multiple choice question. Your choice should be made clearly.
TEST #1 STA 4853 March 6, 2017 Name: Please read the following directions. DO NOT TURN THE PAGE UNTIL INSTRUCTED TO DO SO Directions This exam is closed book and closed notes. There are 32 multiple choice
More informationTesting methodology. It often the case that we try to determine the form of the model on the basis of data
Testing methodology It often the case that we try to determine the form of the model on the basis of data The simplest case: we try to determine the set of explanatory variables in the model Testing for
More informationProf. Dr. Roland Füss Lecture Series in Applied Econometrics Summer Term Introduction to Time Series Analysis
Introduction to Time Series Analysis 1 Contents: I. Basics of Time Series Analysis... 4 I.1 Stationarity... 5 I.2 Autocorrelation Function... 9 I.3 Partial Autocorrelation Function (PACF)... 14 I.4 Transformation
More informationDynamic Panels. Chapter Introduction Autoregressive Model
Chapter 11 Dynamic Panels This chapter covers the econometrics methods to estimate dynamic panel data models, and presents examples in Stata to illustrate the use of these procedures. The topics in this
More information2 Prediction and Analysis of Variance
2 Prediction and Analysis of Variance Reading: Chapters and 2 of Kennedy A Guide to Econometrics Achen, Christopher H. Interpreting and Using Regression (London: Sage, 982). Chapter 4 of Andy Field, Discovering
More informationEconomics 308: Econometrics Professor Moody
Economics 308: Econometrics Professor Moody References on reserve: Text Moody, Basic Econometrics with Stata (BES) Pindyck and Rubinfeld, Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (PR) Wooldridge, Jeffrey
More informationHeteroskedasticity. We now consider the implications of relaxing the assumption that the conditional
Heteroskedasticity We now consider the implications of relaxing the assumption that the conditional variance V (u i x i ) = σ 2 is common to all observations i = 1,..., In many applications, we may suspect
More informationReading Assignment. Serial Correlation and Heteroskedasticity. Chapters 12 and 11. Kennedy: Chapter 8. AREC-ECON 535 Lec F1 1
Reading Assignment Serial Correlation and Heteroskedasticity Chapters 1 and 11. Kennedy: Chapter 8. AREC-ECON 535 Lec F1 1 Serial Correlation or Autocorrelation y t = β 0 + β 1 x 1t + β x t +... + β k
More informationLecture 7: Dynamic panel models 2
Lecture 7: Dynamic panel models 2 Ragnar Nymoen Department of Economics, UiO 25 February 2010 Main issues and references The Arellano and Bond method for GMM estimation of dynamic panel data models A stepwise
More informationUsing EViews Vox Principles of Econometrics, Third Edition
Using EViews Vox Principles of Econometrics, Third Edition WILLIAM E. GRIFFITHS University of Melbourne R. CARTER HILL Louisiana State University GUAY С LIM University of Melbourne JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC
More informationMISCELLANEOUS REGRESSION TOPICS
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Posc/Uapp 816 MISCELLANEOUS REGRESSION TOPICS I. AGENDA: A. Example of correcting for autocorrelation. B. Regression with ordinary independent
More information1 Introduction. 2 AIC versus SBIC. Erik Swanson Cori Saviano Li Zha Final Project
Erik Swanson Cori Saviano Li Zha Final Project 1 Introduction In analyzing time series data, we are posed with the question of how past events influences the current situation. In order to determine this,
More information1 The Multiple Regression Model: Freeing Up the Classical Assumptions
1 The Multiple Regression Model: Freeing Up the Classical Assumptions Some or all of classical assumptions were crucial for many of the derivations of the previous chapters. Derivation of the OLS estimator
More informationUnit 27 One-Way Analysis of Variance
Unit 27 One-Way Analysis of Variance Objectives: To perform the hypothesis test in a one-way analysis of variance for comparing more than two population means Recall that a two sample t test is applied
More informationTesting Random Effects in Two-Way Spatial Panel Data Models
Testing Random Effects in Two-Way Spatial Panel Data Models Nicolas Debarsy May 27, 2010 Abstract This paper proposes an alternative testing procedure to the Hausman test statistic to help the applied
More informationAutocorrelation. Jamie Monogan. Intermediate Political Methodology. University of Georgia. Jamie Monogan (UGA) Autocorrelation POLS / 20
Autocorrelation Jamie Monogan University of Georgia Intermediate Political Methodology Jamie Monogan (UGA) Autocorrelation POLS 7014 1 / 20 Objectives By the end of this meeting, participants should be
More informationSection 6: Heteroskedasticity and Serial Correlation
From the SelectedWorks of Econ 240B Section February, 2007 Section 6: Heteroskedasticity and Serial Correlation Jeffrey Greenbaum, University of California, Berkeley Available at: https://works.bepress.com/econ_240b_econometrics/14/
More informationEmpirical Market Microstructure Analysis (EMMA)
Empirical Market Microstructure Analysis (EMMA) Lecture 3: Statistical Building Blocks and Econometric Basics Prof. Dr. Michael Stein michael.stein@vwl.uni-freiburg.de Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg
More informationECON Introductory Econometrics. Lecture 5: OLS with One Regressor: Hypothesis Tests
ECON4150 - Introductory Econometrics Lecture 5: OLS with One Regressor: Hypothesis Tests Monique de Haan (moniqued@econ.uio.no) Stock and Watson Chapter 5 Lecture outline 2 Testing Hypotheses about one
More informationFreeing up the Classical Assumptions. () Introductory Econometrics: Topic 5 1 / 94
Freeing up the Classical Assumptions () Introductory Econometrics: Topic 5 1 / 94 The Multiple Regression Model: Freeing Up the Classical Assumptions Some or all of classical assumptions needed for derivations
More informationTESTING FOR CO-INTEGRATION
Bo Sjö 2010-12-05 TESTING FOR CO-INTEGRATION To be used in combination with Sjö (2008) Testing for Unit Roots and Cointegration A Guide. Instructions: Use the Johansen method to test for Purchasing Power
More information1 Introduction to Generalized Least Squares
ECONOMICS 7344, Spring 2017 Bent E. Sørensen April 12, 2017 1 Introduction to Generalized Least Squares Consider the model Y = Xβ + ɛ, where the N K matrix of regressors X is fixed, independent of the
More informationLinear Regression with Time Series Data
u n i v e r s i t y o f c o p e n h a g e n d e p a r t m e n t o f e c o n o m i c s Econometrics II Linear Regression with Time Series Data Morten Nyboe Tabor u n i v e r s i t y o f c o p e n h a g
More informationProblem Set 2: Box-Jenkins methodology
Problem Set : Box-Jenkins methodology 1) For an AR1) process we have: γ0) = σ ε 1 φ σ ε γ0) = 1 φ Hence, For a MA1) process, p lim R = φ γ0) = 1 + θ )σ ε σ ε 1 = γ0) 1 + θ Therefore, p lim R = 1 1 1 +
More informationIntroductory Econometrics
Based on the textbook by Wooldridge: : A Modern Approach Robert M. Kunst robert.kunst@univie.ac.at University of Vienna and Institute for Advanced Studies Vienna December 11, 2012 Outline Heteroskedasticity
More informationIV and IV-GMM. Christopher F Baum. EC 823: Applied Econometrics. Boston College, Spring 2014
IV and IV-GMM Christopher F Baum EC 823: Applied Econometrics Boston College, Spring 2014 Christopher F Baum (BC / DIW) IV and IV-GMM Boston College, Spring 2014 1 / 1 Instrumental variables estimators
More informationChapter 1 Statistical Inference
Chapter 1 Statistical Inference causal inference To infer causality, you need a randomized experiment (or a huge observational study and lots of outside information). inference to populations Generalizations
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 6 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 6 1 / 36 Outline 1 The First-Difference (FD) estimator 2 Dynamic panel data models 3 The Anderson and Hsiao
More informationNonstationary Time Series:
Nonstationary Time Series: Unit Roots Egon Zakrajšek Division of Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board Summer School in Financial Mathematics Faculty of Mathematics & Physics University of Ljubljana September
More informationRegression #8: Loose Ends
Regression #8: Loose Ends Econ 671 Purdue University Justin L. Tobias (Purdue) Regression #8 1 / 30 In this lecture we investigate a variety of topics that you are probably familiar with, but need to touch
More informationRecall that a measure of fit is the sum of squared residuals: where. The F-test statistic may be written as:
1 Joint hypotheses The null and alternative hypotheses can usually be interpreted as a restricted model ( ) and an model ( ). In our example: Note that if the model fits significantly better than the restricted
More informationEstimation and Hypothesis Testing in LAV Regression with Autocorrelated Errors: Is Correction for Autocorrelation Helpful?
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Volume 10 Issue Article 13 11-1-011 Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in LAV Regression with Autocorrelated Errors: Is Correction for Autocorrelation Helpful?
More informationGreene, Econometric Analysis (7th ed, 2012) Chapters 9, 20: Generalized Least Squares, Heteroskedasticity, Serial Correlation
EC771: Econometrics, Spring 2012 Greene, Econometric Analysis (7th ed, 2012) Chapters 9, 20: Generalized Least Squares, Heteroskedasticity, Serial Correlation The generalized linear regression model The
More informationECONOMETRICS II, FALL Testing for Unit Roots.
ECONOMETRICS II, FALL 216 Testing for Unit Roots. In the statistical literature it has long been known that unit root processes behave differently from stable processes. For example in the scalar AR(1)
More informationLecture 8: Heteroskedasticity. Causes Consequences Detection Fixes
Lecture 8: Heteroskedasticity Causes Consequences Detection Fixes Assumption MLR5: Homoskedasticity 2 var( u x, x,..., x ) 1 2 In the multivariate case, this means that the variance of the error term does
More informationECO375 Tutorial 4 Introduction to Statistical Inference
ECO375 Tutorial 4 Introduction to Statistical Inference Matt Tudball University of Toronto Mississauga October 19, 2017 Matt Tudball (University of Toronto) ECO375H5 October 19, 2017 1 / 26 Statistical
More informationForecasting the term structure interest rate of government bond yields
Forecasting the term structure interest rate of government bond yields Bachelor Thesis Econometrics & Operational Research Joost van Esch (419617) Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam
More informationLinear Regression with Time Series Data
Econometrics 2 Linear Regression with Time Series Data Heino Bohn Nielsen 1of21 Outline (1) The linear regression model, identification and estimation. (2) Assumptions and results: (a) Consistency. (b)
More informationEconometrics - 30C00200
Econometrics - 30C00200 Lecture 11: Heteroskedasticity Antti Saastamoinen VATT Institute for Economic Research Fall 2015 30C00200 Lecture 11: Heteroskedasticity 12.10.2015 Aalto University School of Business
More informationModel Mis-specification
Model Mis-specification Carlo Favero Favero () Model Mis-specification 1 / 28 Model Mis-specification Each specification can be interpreted of the result of a reduction process, what happens if the reduction
More informationG. S. Maddala Kajal Lahiri. WILEY A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication
G. S. Maddala Kajal Lahiri WILEY A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication TEMT Foreword Preface to the Fourth Edition xvii xix Part I Introduction and the Linear Regression Model 1 CHAPTER 1 What is Econometrics?
More informationBootstrap Testing in Econometrics
Presented May 29, 1999 at the CEA Annual Meeting Bootstrap Testing in Econometrics James G MacKinnon Queen s University at Kingston Introduction: Economists routinely compute test statistics of which the
More informationECON 4160: Econometrics-Modelling and Systems Estimation Lecture 7: Single equation models
ECON 4160: Econometrics-Modelling and Systems Estimation Lecture 7: Single equation models Ragnar Nymoen Department of Economics University of Oslo 25 September 2018 The reference to this lecture is: Chapter
More informationVolatility. Gerald P. Dwyer. February Clemson University
Volatility Gerald P. Dwyer Clemson University February 2016 Outline 1 Volatility Characteristics of Time Series Heteroskedasticity Simpler Estimation Strategies Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Use
More informationEmpirical Economic Research, Part II
Based on the text book by Ramanathan: Introductory Econometrics Robert M. Kunst robert.kunst@univie.ac.at University of Vienna and Institute for Advanced Studies Vienna December 7, 2011 Outline Introduction
More informationEconometrics Multiple Regression Analysis: Heteroskedasticity
Econometrics Multiple Regression Analysis: João Valle e Azevedo Faculdade de Economia Universidade Nova de Lisboa Spring Semester João Valle e Azevedo (FEUNL) Econometrics Lisbon, April 2011 1 / 19 Properties
More informationEconometrics Summary Algebraic and Statistical Preliminaries
Econometrics Summary Algebraic and Statistical Preliminaries Elasticity: The point elasticity of Y with respect to L is given by α = ( Y/ L)/(Y/L). The arc elasticity is given by ( Y/ L)/(Y/L), when L
More informationGMM and SMM. 1. Hansen, L Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators, Econometrica, 50, p
GMM and SMM Some useful references: 1. Hansen, L. 1982. Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators, Econometrica, 50, p. 1029-54. 2. Lee, B.S. and B. Ingram. 1991 Simulation estimation
More informationLECTURE 5 HYPOTHESIS TESTING
October 25, 2016 LECTURE 5 HYPOTHESIS TESTING Basic concepts In this lecture we continue to discuss the normal classical linear regression defined by Assumptions A1-A5. Let θ Θ R d be a parameter of interest.
More informationAnswers: Problem Set 9. Dynamic Models
Answers: Problem Set 9. Dynamic Models 1. Given annual data for the period 1970-1999, you undertake an OLS regression of log Y on a time trend, defined as taking the value 1 in 1970, 2 in 1972 etc. The
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 4 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 4 1 / 30 Outline 1 Two-way Error Component Model Fixed effects model Random effects model 2 Non-spherical
More informationRockefeller College University at Albany
Rockefeller College University at Albany PAD 705 Handout: Suggested Review Problems from Pindyck & Rubinfeld Original prepared by Professor Suzanne Cooper John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard
More informationDynamic Regression Models (Lect 15)
Dynamic Regression Models (Lect 15) Ragnar Nymoen University of Oslo 21 March 2013 1 / 17 HGL: Ch 9; BN: Kap 10 The HGL Ch 9 is a long chapter, and the testing for autocorrelation part we have already
More informationCasuality and Programme Evaluation
Casuality and Programme Evaluation Lecture V: Difference-in-Differences II Dr Martin Karlsson University of Duisburg-Essen Summer Semester 2017 M Karlsson (University of Duisburg-Essen) Casuality and Programme
More informationBootstrapping Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator
Bootstrapping Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator by Emmanuel Flachaire Eurequa, University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne December 2001 Abstract Recent results of Cribari-Neto and Zarkos
More informationGraduate Econometrics Lecture 4: Heteroskedasticity
Graduate Econometrics Lecture 4: Heteroskedasticity Department of Economics University of Gothenburg November 30, 2014 1/43 and Autocorrelation Consequences for OLS Estimator Begin from the linear model
More informationMultivariate Time Series: VAR(p) Processes and Models
Multivariate Time Series: VAR(p) Processes and Models A VAR(p) model, for p > 0 is X t = φ 0 + Φ 1 X t 1 + + Φ p X t p + A t, where X t, φ 0, and X t i are k-vectors, Φ 1,..., Φ p are k k matrices, with
More informationEconometrics Honor s Exam Review Session. Spring 2012 Eunice Han
Econometrics Honor s Exam Review Session Spring 2012 Eunice Han Topics 1. OLS The Assumptions Omitted Variable Bias Conditional Mean Independence Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals Homoskedasticity
More informationHeteroskedasticity Example
ECON 761: Heteroskedasticity Example L Magee November, 2007 This example uses the fertility data set from assignment 2 The observations are based on the responses of 4361 women in Botswana s 1988 Demographic
More informationE 4160 Autumn term Lecture 9: Deterministic trends vs integrated series; Spurious regression; Dickey-Fuller distribution and test
E 4160 Autumn term 2016. Lecture 9: Deterministic trends vs integrated series; Spurious regression; Dickey-Fuller distribution and test Ragnar Nymoen Department of Economics, University of Oslo 24 October
More informationBinary Dependent Variables
Binary Dependent Variables In some cases the outcome of interest rather than one of the right hand side variables - is discrete rather than continuous Binary Dependent Variables In some cases the outcome
More informationLinear Regression with Time Series Data
u n i v e r s i t y o f c o p e n h a g e n d e p a r t m e n t o f e c o n o m i c s Econometrics II Linear Regression with Time Series Data Morten Nyboe Tabor u n i v e r s i t y o f c o p e n h a g
More informationECO375 Tutorial 7 Heteroscedasticity
ECO375 Tutorial 7 Heteroscedasticity Matt Tudball University of Toronto Mississauga November 9, 2017 Matt Tudball (University of Toronto) ECO375H5 November 9, 2017 1 / 24 Review: Heteroscedasticity Consider
More informationThe Simple Linear Regression Model
The Simple Linear Regression Model Lesson 3 Ryan Safner 1 1 Department of Economics Hood College ECON 480 - Econometrics Fall 2017 Ryan Safner (Hood College) ECON 480 - Lesson 3 Fall 2017 1 / 77 Bivariate
More information