Nonlinear MHD Modelling of Rotating Plasma Response to Resonant Magnetic Perturbations.


 Gerald Atkins
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Nonlinear MHD Modelling of Rotating Plasma Response to Resonant Magnetic Perturbations. M. Becoulet 1, F. Orain 1, G.T.A. Huijsmans 2, P. Maget 1, N. Mellet 1, G. DifPradalier 1, G. Latu 1, C. Passeron 1, E. Nardon 1, V. Grandgirard 1, A. Ratnani 1 1 Association EuratomCEA, CEA/DSM/IRFM, Centre de Cadarache, 13108, SaintPaullezDurance, France. 2 ITER Organization, Route de Vinon,13115 SaintPaullez Durance, France TH/21 (poster session P4, today,14h) This work has benefitted from financial support from the National French Research Program (ANR): ANEMOS(2011) and E2T2(2010). Supercomputers used: HPCFF(Julich, Germany), JADE(CINES, France), Mésocentre (Marseille, France).
2 Type I ELM control by RMPs in ITER. Many open questions in physics of ELMs+RMPs still remain. Aim: progress in understanding of RMPs, give reliable predictions for ITER. Idea: RMP coils=> magnetic perturbation =>edge ergodic region=> control of edge transport, MHD. However, at the same edge ergodisation in vacuum => different reaction of ELMs to RMPs in experiment: suppression, mitigation, triggering? RMPs are different from vacuum RMPs in plasma! Rotating plasma response : current perturbations on q=m/n => screening of RMPs. [Fitzpatrick PoP 1998], [Waelbroeck NF2012], [Izzo NF 2008], [Becoulet NF 2009, 2012], [Strauss NF 2009], [Orain EPS2012], [Ferraro APS 2011] etc RMPs /ELMs at high ν*? (Type II ELMs like events, density, magnetic field fluctuations, no changes in profiles) Density pumpout (at low ν*)? Rotation braking/acceleration? Fenstermacher, IAEA2010 AUG:Suttrop,PRL 2011 KSTAR, Jeon, IAEA 2012 this session M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 2/14
3 Outline: RMPs and flows in nonlinear resistive MHD code JOREK : RMPs at the computational boundary (SOL, Xpoint, divertor geometry) 2 fluid diamagnetic effects (large in pedestal!), neoclassical poloidal viscosity ( V ~ V neo θ, i θ, i in pedestal), V : toroidal rotation source, SOL flows. equilibrium radial electric field (large ExB in pedestal!). [Huysmans PPCF2009] RMPs in JETlike case. (EFCC,40kAt,n=2). Three regimes depending on resistivity and rotation. Oscillating /rotating islands at high resistivity, low rotation δb r (t), δn e (t),δt e (t)fluctuations (~khz). Link with Type II ELMs with RMPs at high ν*? Static islands at strong rotation, low resistivity, more screening of RMPs. Intermediate: oscillating, quasistatic islands. RMPs in ITER.(IVC,54kAt,n=3). Screening of RMPs (stronger for central islands, penetration at the edge). Boundary deformation, lobes near Xpoint,splitting of strike points. No significant density/temperature transport, modulations near Xpoint. M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 3/14
4 Nonlinear reduced resistive MHD in torus (Xpoint, divertor, SOL) with diamagnetic and neoclassical effects (important in large pedestal gradients region!). JOREK. [Huysmans PPCF2009] 2 V R2 τ = u ϕ i 2 IC R B = F ϕ + ψ ϕ ρ p ϕ + V B τ = m /(2 e F µ ρ ) 0 IC i E B diamagnetic parameter F τ F, , IC F ψ = η ψ u ψ u p p R t R R R ϕ B2 R2 R2 ϕ ψ + + p = ρt Ohm s law: ρ R If this term is ~zero at q=m/n => V dia 0 e, Parallel θ = VE, θ + Ve, θ => no RMP screening V momentum: B ρ = ρ V V ( ρt ) J B S VS ν ( ) V neo Π t V ρ i Poloidal ϕ ρ V = ρ V V ( ρt ) J B S VS ν ( ) V neo Π V i momentum: t ρ ( ρt) = V ( ρt) γρt V + T T (1 γ ) S 1 Κ +Κ + + V 2 Temperature: S t T 2 ρ Mass density: ρ = ρv + ( D ρ ) S t + e = ( R/ ψ ) ψ ϕ ρ θ Πneo µ ρ( B2 / B2 Neoclassical poloidal viscosity [Gianakon PoP2002] )( V V ) e i i, neo θ θ, i θ, neo θ Ion poloidal velocity =>neoclassical V V = k τ ( ψ T )/ B B = ψ / R, i, neo i, neo IC θ Temperature dependent viscosity, resistivity, K : θ θ θ ~ ( T / T ) ; η = ; K / K ~10 ( T / T ) η η 3 / / M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 4/14
5 Plasma flows (w/o RMPs): parallel => central source, on targets ion sound speed. Ion poloidal velocity in pedestal => neoclassical. Large ExB rotation in pedestal => RMPs screening? JETlike:R=3m, τ ~ 2.10 q 95 =3,T 3; µ ~10 0 =5keV,n e = m 3,f 0 =9kHz. 5; k = 1; η = IC neo neo Er ( u, ψ )/ ψ SOL Pedestal center=> <=center Pedestal SOL V V θ,i V = ±C, div s M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 5/14
6 Static RMPs + rotating plasma => response currents on the resonant surfaces=> RMP screening. Vacuum RMP (EFCC, n=2, I coil =40kAt ) are increased in time at JOREK boundary. ψ ( t ) = ψ vacuum f ( t ) n = 2 bnd n = 2, 40kAt ERGOS[Becoulet NF 2008] JETlike Poloidal magnetic flux perturbation (max) with RMPs in plasma with flows. ψ n=2 ERGOS [NF Becoulet 2008] JOREK Toroidal current perturbations on the rational surfaces (q=m/2; m=3,4,5,6) with RMPs. j φ,n=2 M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 6/14 JOREK
7 Stronger RMP screening for lower resistivity and larger poloidal rotation. Ergodic region at the edge. Central islands are screened: (m/n)=3/2; 4/2. Edge ergodic region: (5/2,6/2) penetrate (η~t 3/2 ) JETlike Similar results in cylinder [Becoulet NF 2012] M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 7/14
8 Three regimes depending on rotation & resistivity. high η, low τ IC : rotating oscillating islands f * mv / (2 π r ) ~ 6kHz θ res high τ IC : static islands, more screening of RMPs. low η, low τ IC : intermediateocsillating, quasistatic islands =>fluctuations of magnetic field, density and temperature, no significant transport. Possibly related to RMPs suppression at high ν*? Rutherford regime? [Fitzpatrick PoP 1998], [IzzoNF2008] JETlike M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 8/14
9 RMPs in ITER. W/o RMPs n=3 is stable. With RMPs =>n=3 static perturbations at the edge. Courtesy to E.Day,M.Schaffer IVC, max: I coil =90kAt, n=2,3,4. Used here n=3, 54kAt. Radial electric field τ ~ 5.10 ; µ ~10 5; k = 1; η = IC i, neo i, neo ITER: Hmode,15MA/5.3T, R=6.2m, a=2m,q 95 =3,T 0 =27.8keV,n e = m 3,f 0 =1kHz ψ n=3 j φ, n=3 T e, n=3 ITER M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 9/14
10 Boundary deformation. Lobes near Xpoint (smaller with rotation). Splitting of strike points (> on outer target) ~6cm w/o flows with all flows  screening ITER wall ITER ~22cm Inner target Outer target M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 10/14
11 Small changes in edge T e, n e profiles, no density pumpout. Maximum T e,n e modulations ~near Xpoint. T e n e RMP off RMP on RMP off T e n e RMP off RMP on ITER RMP on M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 11/14
12 Comparison JOREK&ERGOS(vacuum)&RMHD(cylinder). JOREK (torus, rotating plasma) : RMPs screening on q=m/n (stronger for central islands). Amplification r<r res in JOREK. Compared to vacuum (ERGOS). RMPs screening by rotating plasma (JOREK), smaller screening for edge RMP harmonics (η~t 3/2 ). Compared to cylinder (RMHD,q=q tor ): Stronger RMPs screening in JOREK. Amplification for r<r res. [RMHD: Becoulet NF 2012] ITER ITER M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 12/14
13 DIIID like [RMHD: Becoulet NF 2012] Island is not screened if at q~(m/n) electron poloidal velocity => zero. For ITER parameters: V θ Ohm s law=>if electron poloidal velocity=>zero: current perturbation no RMP screening => vacuumlike island. vacuum in plasma V e, θ = 0 ~ / V + E, V e dia q m n θ, θ Jϕ, mn => q ~ m / n V θ, e 0 0 For ITER parameters used here electron poloidal velocity is not zero: =>screening ITER RMP off RMP on e, 0 V dia 0 e, θ = V V E, θ + e V θ,e M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 13/14
14 Discussion and conclusions. Nonlinear resistive MHD code JOREK development for RMPs with flows: RMPs  at the boundary, 2 fluid diamagnetic effects, neoclassical poloidal viscosity, toroidal rotation source, SOL flows. JETlike(n=2).Three regimes: high η, small (poloidal) rotation (high ν*?) => oscillating and rotating islands, fluctuations δn e, δt e, δψ (t) (~khz). low η, higher rotation => static islands, more screening of RMPs. Intermediate => oscillating, quasistatic islands. RMPs (n=3) in ITER. Screening of central islands, static edge islands, ergodic edge, splitting of strike points (>outer), modulations of n e,t e near Xpoint. Future: RMPs interaction with ELMs. Modelling of MAST, JET, AUG experiments. W mag,n=2 (t) n e with RMPs in ITER M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 14/14
15 Additional slides M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 15/14
16 Pressure gradient is 3D, locally is even steeper with RMP. RMP on RMP off M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 16/14
17 Peak heat fluxes on divertor targets are reduced with RMPs on. Heat flux on inner and outer divertor targets. M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 17/14
18 Equilibrium flows (w/o RMPs) : parallel velocity (central source, SOLsheath conditions on divertor targets). Ion poloidal velocity => neoclassical in the pedestal. Parallel flow. V Central plasma: source V Poloidal flow. = ( ψ, u) τ ( ψ, p) / ρ V B 2 / B θ, i + IC θ θ maintains initial V profile: S = ν V V = ( ψ, u ) + τ ( ψ, p ) / ρ / B V, t = θ, e IC θ 0 SOL: sheath conditions on Pedestal: V V T θ, i θ, i, neo i targets: V = ±C SOL: V V B, div s θ, i θ V V θ V θ,neo JETlike:R=3m, a=1m,q 95 =3,T 0 =5keV,n e = m 3,f 0 =9kHz. τ ~ 2.10 ; µ ~10 5; k = 1.; η = IC i, neo i, neo M. Bécoulet, , TH/21, 24 th IAEA, San Diego, California, USA 18/14
Nonlinear MHD Modelling of Rotating Plasma Response to Resonant Magnetic Perturbations.
Nonlinear MHD Modelling of Rotating Plasma Response to Resonant Magnetic Perturbations. M. Becoulet 1, F. Orain 1, G.T.A. Huijsmans 2, G. Dif Pradalier 1, G. Latu 1, C. Passeron 1, E. Nardon 1, V. Grandgirard
More informationR B. Here the first term represents
TH/61Rb Nonlinear MHD modelling of Edge Localized Modes and their interaction with Resonant Magnetic Perturbations in rotating plasmas. M.Bécoulet 1, F.Orain 1, J. Morales 1, X. Garbet 1, G. DifPradalier
More informationNonlinear MHD Simulations of Edge Localized Modes in ASDEX Upgrade. Matthias Hölzl, Isabel Krebs, Karl Lackner, Sibylle Günter
Nonlinear MHD Simulations of Edge Localized Modes in ASDEX Upgrade Matthias Hölzl, Isabel Krebs, Karl Lackner, Sibylle Günter Matthias Hölzl Nonlinear ELM Simulations DPG Spring Meeting, Jena, 02/2013
More informationResonant magnetic perturbation experiments on MAST using external and internal coils for ELM control
11/5/09 Resonant magnetic perturbation experiments on MAST using external and internal coils for ELM control A. Kirk, E. Nardon, R. Akers, M. Bécoulet a, G. De Temmerman, B. Dudson b, B. Hnat c, Y.Q. Liu,
More informationNonlinear modeling of the Edge Localized Mode control by Resonant Magnetic Perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade
1 TH/P126 Nonlinear modeling of the Edge Localized Mode control by Resonant Magnetic Perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade F.Orain 1, M.Hölzl 1, E.Viezzer 1, M.Dunne 1, M.Bécoulet 2, P.Cahyna 3, G.T.A.Huijsmans
More informationGA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIIID
GA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIIID by A. WINGEN, N.M. FERRARO, M.W. SHAFER, E.A. UNTERBERG, T.E. EVANS, D.L. HILLIS, and P.B. SNYDER JULY 2014 DISCLAIMER This report was
More informationPhysics of Penetration of Resonant Magnetic Perturbations Used. for Type I Edge Localized Modes Suppression in Tokamaks.
Physics of Penetration of Resonant Magnetic Perturbations Used for Type I Edge Localized Modes Suppression in Tokamaks. M. Bécoulet (1), G. uysmans (1), X. Garbet (1), E. Nardon (), D. owell (), A.Garofalo
More informationMHD Analysis of the Tokamak Edge Pedestal in the Low Collisionality Regime Thoughts on the Physics of ELMfree QH and RMP Discharges
MHD Analysis of the Tokamak Edge Pedestal in the Low Collisionality Regime Thoughts on the Physics of ELMfree QH and RMP Discharges P.B. Snyder 1 Contributions from: H.R. Wilson 2, D.P. Brennan 1, K.H.
More informationModeling of ELM Dynamics for ITER
Modeling of ELM Dynamics for ITER A.Y. PANKIN 1, G. BATEMAN 1, D.P. BRENNAN 2, A.H. KRITZ 1, S. KRUGER 3, P.B. SNYDER 4 and the NIMROD team 1 Lehigh University, 16 Memorial Drive East, Bethlehem, PA 18015
More informationELM control with RMP: plasma response models and the role of edge peeling response
ELM control with RMP: plasma response models and the role of edge peeling response Yueqiang Liu 1,2,3,*, C.J. Ham 1, A. Kirk 1, Li Li 4,5,6, A. Loarte 7, D.A. Ryan 8,1, Youwen Sun 9, W. Suttrop 10, Xu
More information Effect of Stochastic Field and Resonant Magnetic Perturbation on Global MHD Fluctuation 
15TH WORKSHOP ON MHD STABILITY CONTROL: "USJapan Workshop on 3D Magnetic Field Effects in MHD Control" U. Wisconsin, Madison, Nov 1517, 17, 2010 LHD experiments relevant to Tokamak MHD control  Effect
More informationControl of Neoclassical tearing mode (NTM) in advanced scenarios
FIRST CHENGDU THEORY FESTIVAL Control of Neoclassical tearing mode (NTM) in advanced scenarios ZhengXiong Wang Dalian University of Technology (DLUT) Dalian, China Chengdu, China, 28 Aug, 2018 Outline
More informationCurrent density modelling in JET and JT60U identity plasma experiments. Paula Sirén
Current density modelling in JET and JT60U identity plasma experiments Paula Sirén 1/12 1/16 EuratomTEKES EuratomTekes Annual Seminar 2013 28 24 May 2013 Paula Sirén Current density modelling in JET
More informationEffect of RMPs on the edge turbulence in ohmic and Lmode plasmas
MaxPlanckInstitut für Plasmaphysik Effect of RMPs on the edge turbulence in ohmic and Lmode plasmas 1, Ph. Ghendrih2, A. Kirk3, O. Schmitz4, W. Suttrop1, P. Tamain3, Y. Xu5, and the ASDEX Upgrade Team1
More informationProgress on the application of ELM control schemes to ITER scenarios from the nonactive phase to DT operation
Progress on the application of ELM control schemes to ITER scenarios from the nonactive phase to DT operation A. Loarte 1, G. Huijsmans 1, S. Futatani 1, D.J. Campbell 1, T. Casper 1, E. Daly 1, Y. Gribov
More informationFormation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas )
Formation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas ) Yasutomo ISHII and Andrei SMOLYAKOV 1) Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki 3110102, Japan 1) University
More informationComparison of Divertor Heat Flux Splitting by 3D Fields with Field Line Tracing Simulation in KSTAR
1 Comparison of Divertor Heat Flux Splitting by 3D Fields with Field Line Tracing Simulation in KSTAR W. Choe 1,2*, K. Kim 1,2, J.W. Ahn 3, H.H. Lee 4, C.S. Kang 4, J.K. Park 5, Y. In 4, J.G. Kwak 4,
More informationFlow and dynamo measurements in the HIST double pulsing CHI experiment
Innovative Confinement Concepts (ICC) & USJapan Compact Torus (CT) Plasma Workshop August 1619, 211, Seattle, Washington HIST Flow and dynamo measurements in the HIST double pulsing CHI experiment M.
More informationEX/42: Active Control of TypeI Edge Localized Modes with n = 1 and n = 2 fields on JET
EX/42: Active Control of TypeI Edge Localized Modes with n = 1 and n = 2 fields on JET Y Liang (FZ Jülich), JETEFDA contributors IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Geneva, Switzerland 1318/10/2008 Page
More informationResponse of a Resistive and Rotating Tokamak to External Magnetic Perturbations Below the Alfven Frequency
Response of a Resistive and Rotating Tokamak to External Magnetic Perturbations Below the Alfven Freuency by M.S. Chu In collaboration with L.L. Lao, M.J. Schaffer, T.E. Evans E.J. Strait (General Atomics)
More informationModelling Toroidal Rotation Damping in ITER Due to External 3D Fields
CCFEPR(15)1 Yueqiang Liu, R. Akers, I.T. Chapman, Y. Gribov, G.Z. Hao, G.T.A. Huijsmans, A. Kirk, A. Loarte, S.D. Pinches, M. Reinke, D. Ryan, Y. Sun, and Z.R. Wang Modelling Toroidal Rotation Damping
More informationRecent Progress in Understanding the Processes Underlying the Triggering of and Energy Loss Associated with Type I ELMs
CCFEPR(14)32 A. Kirk, D. Dunai, M. Dunne, G. Huijsmans, S. Pamela, M. Becoulet, J.R. Harrison, J. Hillesheim, C. Roach, S. Saarelma and the MAST Team Recent Progress in Understanding the Processes Underlying
More informationLecture9: Plasma Physics 1. APPH E6101x Columbia University
Lecture9: Plasma Physics 1 APPH E6101x Columbia University Last Lecture Force balance (equilibrium) in a magnetized plasma Zpinch θpinch screwpinch (straight tokamak) GradShafranov Equation  Conservation
More informationCurrentdriven instabilities
Currentdriven instabilities Ben Dudson Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK 21 st February 2014 Ben Dudson Magnetic Confinement Fusion (1 of 23) Previously In the last
More informationBursty Transport in Tokamaks with Internal Transport Barriers
Bursty Transport in Tokamaks with Internal Transport Barriers S. Benkadda 1), O. Agullo 1), P. Beyer 1), N. Bian 1), P. H. Diamond 3), C. Figarella 1), X. Garbet 2), P. Ghendrih 2), V. Grandgirard 1),
More informationOverview Impact of 3D fields (RMP) on edge turbulence and turbulent transport
Trilateral Euregio Cluster Overview Impact of 3D fields (RMP) on edge turbulence and turbulent transport TEC Yuhong Xu Laboratory for Plasma Physics, Ecole Royale Militaire  Koninklijke Militaire School,
More informationDesign of next step tokamak: Consistent analysis of plasma flux consumption and poloidal field system
Design of next step tokamak: Consistent analysis of plasma flux consumption and poloidal field system J.M. Ané 1, V. Grandgirard, F. Albajar 1, J.Johner 1 1EuratomCEA Association, Cadarache, France EuratomEPFL
More informationCharacteristics of the Hmode H and Extrapolation to ITER
Characteristics of the Hmode H Pedestal and Extrapolation to ITER The Hmode Pedestal Study Group of the International Tokamak Physics Activity presented by T.Osborne 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference
More informationNONLINEAR MHD SIMULATIONS OF ELMs IN JET
NONLINEAR MHD SIMULATIONS OF ELMs IN JET S.J.P. Pamela 1, G.T.A. Huysmans 1, M.N.A. Beurskens 2, S. Devaux 3, T. Eich 3, S. Benkadda 4 and JET EFDA contributors. 1 Association EURATOMCEA, F1318 SaintPaullezDurance,
More informationDirect drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks
Direct drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks J. W. Van Dam and L.J. Zheng Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas at Austin 12th USEU Transport Task Force Annual
More informationActive Control of TypeI Edge Localized Modes with n=1 and n=2 fields on JET
Active Control of TypeI Edge Localized Modes with n=1 and n=2 fields on JET Y. Liang 1, H. R. Koslowski 1, P. R. Thomas 2, E. Nardon 3, S. Jachmich 4, A. Alfier 5, G. Arnoux 2, Y. Baranov 3, M. Bécoulet
More informationResistive Wall Mode Observation and Control in ITERRelevant Plasmas
Resistive Wall Mode Observation and Control in ITERRelevant Plasmas J. P. Levesque April 12, 2011 1 Outline Basic Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) model RWM stability, neglecting kinetic effects Sufficient for
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.plasmph] 11 Mar 2016
1 Effect of magnetic perturbations on the 3D MHD selforganization of shaped tokamak plasmas arxiv:1603.03572v1 [physics.plasmph] 11 Mar 2016 D. Bonfiglio 1, S. Cappello 1, M. Veranda 1, L. Chacón 2 and
More informationGA A26123 PARTICLE, HEAT, AND SHEATH POWER TRANSMISSION FACTOR PROFILES DURING ELM SUPPRESSION EXPERIMENTS ON DIIID
GA A26123 PARTICLE, HEAT, AND SHEATH POWER TRANSMISSION FACTOR PROFILES DURING ELM SUPPRESSION EXPERIMENTS ON DIIID by J.G. WATKINS, T.E. EVANS, I. JOSEPH, C.J. LASNIER, R.A. MOYER, D.L. RUDAKOV, O. SCHMITZ,
More informationKSTAR Equilibrium Operating Space and Projected Stabilization at High Normalized Beta
1 THS/P205 KSTAR Equilibrium Operating Space and Projected Stabilization at High Normalized Beta Y.S. Park 1), S.A. Sabbagh 1), J.W. Berkery 1), J.M. Bialek 1), Y.M. Jeon 2), S.H. Hahn 2), N. Eidietis
More informationEdge Rotational Shear Requirements for the Edge Harmonic Oscillation in DIII D Quiescent H mode Plasmas
Edge Rotational Shear Requirements for the Edge Harmonic Oscillation in DIII D Quiescent H mode Plasmas by T.M. Wilks 1 with A. Garofalo 2, K.H. Burrell 2, Xi. Chen 2, P.H. Diamond 3, Z.B. Guo 3, X. Xu
More informationFirst Observation of ELM Suppression by Magnetic Perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade and Comparison to DIIID MatchedShape Plasmas
1 PD/11 First Observation of ELM Suppression by Magnetic Perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade and Comparison to DIIID MatchedShape Plasmas R. Nazikian 1, W. Suttrop 2, A. Kirk 3, M. Cavedon 2, T.E. Evans
More informationINTERACTION OF AN EXTERNAL ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELD WITH THE PLASMA TEARING MODE SURROUNDED BY A RESISTIVE WALL
INTERACTION OF AN EXTERNAL ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELD WITH THE PLASMA TEARING MODE SURROUNDED BY A RESISTIVE WALL S.C. GUO* and M.S. CHU GENERAL ATOMICS *Permanent Address: Consorzio RFX, Padova, Italy **The
More informationResistive Wall Mode Control in DIIID
Resistive Wall Mode Control in DIIID by Andrea M. Garofalo 1 for G.L. Jackson 2, R.J. La Haye 2, M. Okabayashi 3, H. Reimerdes 1, E.J. Strait 2, R.J. Groebner 2, Y. In 4, M.J. Lanctot 1, G.A. Navratil
More informationIssues of Perpendicular Conductivity and Electric Fields in Fusion Devices
Issues of Perpendicular Conductivity and Electric Fields in Fusion Devices Michael Tendler, Alfven Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Plasma Turbulence Turbulence can be regarded
More informationHighlights from (3D) Modeling of Tokamak Disruptions
Highlights from (3D) Modeling of Tokamak Disruptions Presented by V.A. Izzo With major contributions from S.E. Kruger, H.R. Strauss, R. Paccagnella, MHD Control Workshop 2010 Madison, WI ..onset of rapidly
More informationLinjin Zheng, Infernal Modes at Tokamak H mode Pedestal A Physics Interpreta;on for Edge Harmonic Oscilla;on (EHO)
International Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference, Austin, May 24, 2011 Infernal Modes at Tokamak H mode Pedestal A Physics Interpreta;on for Edge Harmonic Oscilla;on (EHO) Linjin Zheng, M. T. Kotschenreuther,
More informationNIMROD FROM THE CUSTOMER S PERSPECTIVE MING CHU. General Atomics. Nimrod Project Review Meeting July 21 22, 1997
NIMROD FROM THE CUSTOMER S PERSPECTIVE MING CHU General Atomics Nimrod Project Review Meeting July 21 22, 1997 Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant DEFG0395ER54309 and Contract
More informationFusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) Divertor Plans and Research Options
Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) Divertor Plans and Research Options A.M. Garofalo, T. Petrie, J. Smith, V. Chan, R. Stambaugh (General Atomics) J. Canik, A. Sontag, M. Cole (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)
More informationELMs and Constraints on the HMode Pedestal:
ELMs and Constraints on the HMode Pedestal: A Model Based on PeelingBallooning Modes P.B. Snyder, 1 H.R. Wilson, 2 J.R. Ferron, 1 L.L. Lao, 1 A.W. Leonard, 1 D. Mossessian, 3 M. Murakami, 4 T.H. Osborne,
More informationInternal Transport Barrier Triggering by Rational Magnetic Flux Surfaces in Tokamaks
EFDA JET CP(0)07/09 E. Joffrin, C.D. Challis, G.D. Conway, X. Garbet, A. Gude, S. Guenther, N. C. Hawkes, T.C. Hender, D. Howell, G.T.A. Huysmans, E. Lazarro, P. Maget, M. Marachek, A.G. Peeters, S.D.
More informationExtension of HighBeta Plasma Operation to Low Collisional Regime
EX/44 Extension of HighBeta Plasma Operation to Low Collisional Regime Satoru Sakakibara On behalf of LHD Experiment Group National Institute for Fusion Science SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for
More informationGyrokinetic Theory and Dynamics of the Tokamak Edge
ASDEX Upgrade Gyrokinetic Theory and Dynamics of the Tokamak Edge B. Scott Max Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik D85748 Garching, Germany PET15, Sep 2015 these slides: basic processes in the dynamics
More informationNeoclassical Tearing Modes
Neoclassical Tearing Modes O. Sauter 1, H. Zohm 2 1 CRPPEPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 2 MaxPlanckInstitut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany Physics of ITER DPG Advanced Physics School 2226 Sept, 2014,
More informationarxiv: v3 [physics.plasmph] 23 Sep 2014
arxiv:1408.6379v3 [physics.plasmph] 23 Sep 2014 Nonlinear Simulations of MHD Instabilities in Tokamaks Including Eddy Current Effects and Perspectives for the Extension to Halo Currents M. Hoelzl 1,
More informationModelling of the penetration process of externally applied helical magnetic perturbation of the DED on the TEXTOR tokamak
INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 8 (6) 69 8 PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION doi:.88/7/8// Modelling of the penetration process of externally applied helical magnetic perturbation
More informationA New Resistive Response to 3D Fields in Low Rotation Hmodes
in Low Rotation Hmodes by Richard Buttery 1 with Rob La Haye 1, Yueqiang Liu 2, Bob Pinsker 1, Jongkyu Park 3, Holger Reimerdes 4, Ted Strait 1, and the DIIID research team. 1 General Atomics, USA 2
More informationOverview of edge modeling efforts for advanced divertor configurations in NSTXU with magnetic perturbation fields
Overview of edge modeling efforts for advanced divertor configurations in NSTXU with magnetic perturbation fields H. Frerichs, O. Schmitz, I. Waters, G. P. Canal, T. E. Evans, Y. Feng and V. Soukhanovskii
More informationOn the physics of shear flows in 3D geometry
On the physics of shear flows in 3D geometry C. Hidalgo and M.A. Pedrosa Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión, EURATOMCIEMAT, Madrid, Spain Recent experiments have shown the importance of multiscale (longrange)
More informationIssues in Neoclassical Tearing Mode Theory
Issues in Neoclassical Tearing Mode Theory Richard Fitzpatrick Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX Tearing Mode Stability in Tokamaks According to standard (singlefluid)
More informationImpact of diverted geometry on turbulence and transport barrier formation in 3D global simulations of tokamak edge plasma
1 Impact of diverted geometry on turbulence and transport barrier formation in 3D global simulations of tokamak edge plasma D. Galassi, P. Tamain, H. Bufferand, C. Baudoin, G. Ciraolo, N. Fedorczak, Ph.
More informationEvaluation of First Wall Heat Fluxes Due to Magnetic Perturbations for a Range of ITER Scenarios
EUROFUSION WP14ER PR(14)04 P. Cahyna et al. Evaluation of First Wall Heat Fluxes Due to Magnetic Perturbations for a Range of ITER Scenarios Preprint of Paper to be submitted for publication in Journal
More informationSTOCHASTIC BOUNDARY PLASMA IN TOKAMAKS WITH RESONANT MAGNETIC PERTURBATIONS. August 10, 2015
STOCHASTIC BOUNDARY PLASMA IN TOKAMAKS WITH RESONANT MAGNETIC PERTURBATIONS Y. Liang Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie und Klimaforschung  Plasmaphysik, 52425 Jülich, Germany August
More informationExponential Growth and Filamentary Structure of Nonlinear Ballooning Instability 1
Exponential Growth and Filamentary Structure of Nonlinear Ballooning Instability 1 Ping Zhu in collaboration with C. C. Hegna and C. R. Sovinec University of WisconsinMadison Sherwood Conference Denver,
More informationInteraction between EGAMs and turbulence in fullf gyrokinetic simulations
Interaction between EGAMs and turbulence in fullf gyrokinetic simulations David Zarzoso 1 X Garbet 1, Y Sarazin 1, V Grandgirard 1, J Abiteboul 1, A Strugarek 1,2, G DifPradalier 1, R Dumont 1, G Latu
More informationFundamentals of Magnetic Island Theory in Tokamaks
Fundamentals of Magnetic Island Theory in Tokamaks Richard Fitzpatrick Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA Talk available at http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/talks/talks.html
More informationEffect of Ion Orbit Loss on Rotation and the Radial Electric Field in the DIIID Tokamak
Effect of Ion Orbit Loss on Rotation and the Radial Electric Field in the DIIID Tokamak by T.M. Wilks 1 with W.M. Stacey 1 and T.E. Evans 2 1 Georgia Institute of Technology 2 General Atomics Presented
More informationThe EPED Pedestal Model: Extensions, Application to ELMSuppressed Regimes, and ITER Predictions
The EPED Pedestal Model: Extensions, Application to ELMSuppressed Regimes, and ITER Predictions P.B. Snyder 1, T.H. Osborne 1, M.N.A. Beurskens 2, K.H. Burrell 1, R.J. Groebner 1, J.W. Hughes 3, R. Maingi
More informationAdvances in the Physics Basis of the Hybrid Scenario on DIIID
Advances in the Physics Basis of the Hybrid Scenario on DIIID C.C. Petty 1), W.P. West 1), J.C. DeBoo 1), E.J. Doyle 2), T.E. Evans 1), M.E. Fenstermacher 3), M. Groth 3), J.R. Ferron 1), G.R. McKee 4),
More informationImpact of High Field & High Confinement on LmodeEdge Negative Triangularity Tokamak (NTT) Reactor
Impact of High Field & High Confinement on LmodeEdge Negative Triangularity Tokamak (NTT) Reactor M. Kikuchi, T. Takizuka, S. Medvedev, T. Ando, D. Chen, J.X. Li, M. Austin, O. Sauter, L. Villard, A.
More informationMinimal Model Study for ELM Control by Supersonic Molecular Beam Injection and Pellet Injection
25 th Fusion Energy Conference, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2014 TH/P29 Minimal Model Study for ELM Control by Supersonic Molecular Beam Injection and Pellet Injection Tongnyeol Rhee 1,2, J.M. Kwon 1, P.H.
More informationParticle transport results from collisionality scans and perturbative experiments on DIIID
1 EX/P326 Particle transport results from collisionality scans and perturbative experiments on DIIID E.J. Doyle 1), L. Zeng 1), G.M. Staebler 2), T.E. Evans 2), T.C. Luce 2), G.R. McKee 3), S. Mordijck
More informationEFFECT OF EDGE NEUTRAL SOUCE PROFILE ON HMODE PEDESTAL HEIGHT AND ELM SIZE
EFFECT OF EDGE NEUTRAL SOUCE PROFILE ON HMODE PEDESTAL HEIGHT AND ELM SIZE T.H. Osborne 1, P.B. Snyder 1, R.J. Groebner 1, A.W. Leonard 1, M.E. Fenstermacher 2, and the DIIID Group 47 th Annual Meeting
More informationDensity Fluctuation Induced Kinetic Dynamo and Nonlinear Tearing Mode Saturation in the MST Reversed Field Pinch
Density Fluctuation Induced Kinetic Dynamo and Nonlinear Tearing Mode Saturation in the MST Reversed Field Pinch W.X.Ding, L. Lin, D.L. Brower, A. Almagri, B. Chapman, G. Fiksel, D.J. Den Hartog, J. Reusch,
More informationSMR/ Summer College on Plasma Physics. 30 July  24 August, Introduction to Magnetic Island Theory.
SMR/18561 2007 Summer College on Plasma Physics 30 July  24 August, 2007 Introduction to Magnetic Island Theory. R. Fitzpatrick Inst. for Fusion Studies University of Texas at Austin USA Introduction
More informationDocument Version Publisher s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)
Progress in understanding disruptions triggered by massive gas injection via 3D nonlinear MHD modelling with JOREK Nardon, E.; Fil, A.; Huijsmans, G.T.A. Published in: Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
More informationSnakes and similar coherent structures in tokamaks
Snakes and similar coherent structures in tokamaks A. Y. Aydemir 1, K. C. Shaing 2, and F. W. Waelbroeck 1 1 Institute for Fusion Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 2 Plasma and
More informationPlasma turbulence measured by fast sweep reflectometry on TORE SUPRA
Plasma turbulence measured by fast sweep reflectometry on TORE SUPRA F. Clairet &, L. Vermare &, S. Heuraux, G. Leclert # & Association EuratomCEA sur la fusion, DSM/DRFC/SCCP C.E. Cadarache, 8 SaintPaullèsDurance,
More informationUnderstanding Edge Harmonic Oscillation Physics Using NIMROD
Understanding Edge Harmonic Oscillation Physics Using NIMROD J. King With contributions from S. Kruger & A. Pankin (TechX); K. Burrell, A. Garofalo, R. Groebner & P. Snyder (General Atomics) Work supported
More informationPerformance limits. Ben Dudson. 24 th February Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Performance limits Ben Dudson Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK 24 th February 2014 Ben Dudson Magnetic Confinement Fusion (1 of 24) Previously... In the last few
More informationTARGET PLATE CONDITIONS DURING STOCHASTIC BOUNDARY OPERATION ON DIII D
GA A25445 TARGET PLATE CONDITIONS DURING STOCHASTIC BOUNDARY OPERATION ON DIII D by J.G. WATKINS, T.E. EVANS, C.J. LASNIER, R.A. MOYER, and D.L. RUDAKOV JUNE 2006 QTYUIOP DISCLAIMER This report was prepared
More informationBlob motion and control. simple magnetized plasmas
Blob motion and control in simple magnetized plasmas Christian Theiler A. Fasoli, I. Furno, D. Iraji, B. Labit, P. Ricci, M. Spolaore 1, N. Vianello 1 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas (CRPP)
More informationDriftDriven and TransportDriven Plasma Flow Components in the Alcator CMod Boundary Layer
DriftDriven and TransportDriven Plasma Flow Components in the Alcator CMod Boundary Layer N. Smick, B. LaBombard MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center PSI19 San Diego, CA May 25, 2010 Boundary flows
More informationITER operation. Ben Dudson. 14 th March Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
ITER operation Ben Dudson Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK 14 th March 2014 Ben Dudson Magnetic Confinement Fusion (1 of 18) ITER Some key statistics for ITER are:
More informationOverview of Physics Results from MAST
23 rd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Daejeon, South Korea, October 2010 Overview of Physics Results from MAST Brian Lloyd for the MAST Team & Collaborators EURATOM / CCFE Fusion Association CCFE is the
More informationDivertor Requirements and Performance in ITER
Divertor Requirements and Performance in ITER M. Sugihara ITER International Team 1 th International Toki Conference Dec. 1114, 001 Contents Overview of requirement and prediction for divertor performance
More informationEffect of nonaxisymmetric magnetic perturbations on divertor heat and particle flux profiles
1 EXD/P301 Effect of nonaxisymmetric magnetic perturbations on divertor heat and particle flux profiles JW. Ahn 1, J.M. Canik 1, R. Maingi 1, T.K. Gray 1, J.D. Lore 1, A.G. McLean 1, J.K. Park 2, A.L.
More informationRunaway electron losses enhanced by resonant magnetic perturbations
Runaway electron losses enhanced by resonant magnetic perturbations G. Papp 1,2, M. Drevlak 3, T. Fülöp 1, P. Helander 3, G. I. Pokol 2 1) Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden 2) Budapest
More informationGyrokinetic simulations with GYSELA: Main current issues in physics & numerics
Gyrokinetic simulations with GYSELA: Main current issues in physics & numerics Y. Sarazin, Y. Asahi 2, N. Bouzat, G. DifPradalier, P. Donnel, C. Ehrlacher, C. Emeriau 3, X. Garbet, Ph. Ghendrih, V. Grandgirard,
More informationErosion and Confinement of Tungsten in ASDEX Upgrade
ASDEX Upgrade MaxPlanckInstitut für Plasmaphysik Erosion and Confinement of Tungsten in ASDEX Upgrade R. Dux, T.Pütterich, A. Janzer, and ASDEX Upgrade Team 3rd IAEAFECConference, 4.., Daejeon, Rep.
More informationThe Effects of Noise and Time Delay on RWM Feedback System Performance
The Effects of Noise and Time Delay on RWM Feedback System Performance O. KatsuroHopkins, J. Bialek, G. Navratil (Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York,
More informationStationary, High Bootstrap Fraction Plasmas in DIIID Without Inductive Current Control
Stationary, High Bootstrap Fraction Plasmas in DIIID Without Inductive Current Control P. A. Politzer, 1 A. W. Hyatt, 1 T. C. Luce, 1 F. W. Perkins, 4 R. Prater, 1 A. D. Turnbull, 1 D. P. Brennan, 5 J.
More informationResults From Initial Snowflake Divertor Physics Studies on DIIID
Results From Initial Snowflake Divertor Physics Studies on DIIID S. L. Allen, V. A. Soukhanovskii, T.H. Osborne, E. Kolemen, J. Boedo, N. Brooks, M. Fenstermacher, R. Groebner, D. N. Hill, A. Hyatt, C.
More informationHighm Multiple Tearing Modes in Tokamaks: MHD Turbulence Generation, Interaction with the Internal Kink and Sheared Flows
TH/P33 Highm Multiple Tearing Modes in Tokamaks: MHD Turbulence Generation, Interaction with the Internal Kink and Sheared Flows A. Bierwage 1), S. Benkadda 2), M. Wakatani 1), S. Hamaguchi 3), Q. Yu
More informationNonlinear 3D MHD physics of the helical reversedfield pinch
Nonlinear 3D MHD physics of the helical reversedfield pinch Daniele Bonfiglio* Consorzio RFX, EuratomENEA Association, Padova, Italy *In collaboration with: S. Cappello, L. Chacón (Oak Ridge National
More informationDriving Mechanism of SOL Plasma Flow and Effects on the Divertor Performance in JT60U
EX/D3 Driving Mechanism of SOL Plasma Flow and Effects on the Divertor Performance in JT6U N. Asakura ), H. Takenaga ), S. Sakurai ), G.D. Porter ), T.D. Rognlien ), M.E. Rensink ), O. Naito ), K. Shimizu
More informationMechanisms of intrinsic toroidal rotation tested against ASDEX Upgrade observations
Mechanisms of intrinsic toroidal rotation tested against ASDEX Upgrade observations William A. Hornsby C. Angioni, E. Fable, P. Manas, R. McDermott, Z.X. Lu, S. Grosshauser 2, A. G. Peeters 2 and the ASDEX
More informationA mechanism for magnetic field stochastization and energy release during an edge pedestal collapse
A mechanism for magnetic field stochastization and energy release during an edge pedestal collapse S. S. Kim, Hogun Jhang, T. Rhee, G. Y. Park, R. Singh National Fusion Research Institute, Korea Acknowledgements:
More informationINTERACTION OF DRIFT WAVE TURBULENCE AND MAGNETIC ISLANDS
INTERACTION OF DRIFT WAVE TURBULENCE AND MAGNETIC ISLANDS A. Ishizawa and N. Nakajima National Institute for Fusion Science F. L. Waelbroeck, R. Fitzpatrick, W. Horton Institute for Fusion Studies, University
More informationDevelopment and Validation of a Predictive Model for the Pedestal Height (EPED1)
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for the Pedestal Height (EPED1) P.B. Snyder 1 with R.J. Groebner 1, A.W. Leonard 1, T.H. Osborne 1, M. Beurskens 3, L.D. Horton 4, A.E. Hubbard 5, J.W.
More informationDimensionless pedestal identity plasmas on Alcator CMod C
Dimensionless pedestal identity plasmas on Alcator CMod C and JET G P Maddison 1, A E Hubbard 2, J W Hughes 2, I M Nunes 3, M N A Beurskens 1, S K Erents 1, Pasqualotto 4, E Giovannozzi 5, A Alfier 4,
More informationAgenda. 9:05 10:35 A. Loarte, main speaker P. Lang T. Luce. 10:35 11:00 Coffee break 11:00 12:30 Poster session
Agenda Monday, 19.10.2015 morning session 9:00 9:05 E. Wolfrum, Welcome Topic 1: Development of reactor relevant scenarios: key physics and operational aspects Chair: S. Lebedev 9:05 10:35 A. Loarte, main
More informationTransition From Single Fluid To Pure Electron MHD Regime Of Tearing Instability
Transition From Single Fluid To Pure Electron MHD Regime Of Tearing Instability V.V.Mirnov, C.C.Hegna, S.C.Prager APS DPP Meeting, October 2731, 2003, Albuquerque NM Abstract In the most general case,
More informationSimulation Research on disruptions and runaway electrons
第 20 回 NEXT 研究会 Simulation Research on disruptions and runaway electrons A. Matsuyama, M. Yagi, H. Nuga, N. Aiba, and Y. Ishii JAEA, Rokkasho, Japan Acknowledgement: Y. Shibata, A. Ito, M. Furukawa, S.
More informationEnergeticIonDriven MHD Instab. & Transport: Simulation Methods, V&V and Predictions
EnergeticIonDriven MHD Instab. & Transport: Simulation Methods, V&V and Predictions 7th APTWG Intl. Conference 58 June 2017 Nagoya Univ., Nagoya, Japan Andreas Bierwage, Yasushi Todo 14.1MeV 10 kev
More information