UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM
|
|
- Dorothy Sara Taylor
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM MSc Physics Theoretical Physics MASTER THESIS Investigating the ER=EPR proposal A field theory study of long wormholes by Bernardo Zan May ECTS Supervisor: Prof. dr. Jan de Boer Examiner: dr. Ben Freivogel Institute for Theoretical Physics
2
3 Abstract The ER=EPR correspondence states that two entangled systems are always connected by an Einstein Rosen bridge. This proposal might solve the question of black hole evaporation without requiring the presence of firewalls. However, it has been argued that the conditions necessary to have a smooth geometrical description cannot be satisfied by the randomness of a typical state. It was shown that correlators between two entangled theories are weak for typical states and depend on the spectrum of the field theory; this is taken as evidence for the absence of a semiclassical wormhole. We study a non typical state which presents a long semiclassical wormhole description from the field theory point of view. We find that, under certain conditions, a random matrix approach is able to model this state: the correlator between the two theories is small and it does not depend on the spectrum of the theories.
4
5 Contents Introduction 1 1 Quantum field theory at finite temperature KMS condition and periodicity of fields Path integral for the partition function Thermofield dynamics Real time formalism Schwinger Keldysh propagators Free bosonic field Bosonic propagators in position space Operators on the same theory Operators on different theories Massless limit The ER=EPR proposal AdS space and the AdS/CFT correspondence The BTZ black hole Propagators for the BTZ black hole Holography for the BTZ black hole Hawking radiation The information paradox and the firewall proposal The ER=EPR proposal Reactions to the ER=EPR proposal Long semiclassical wormholes Motivation Quenching the system Response theory to second order A first toy model A second toy model On a circle III
6 4 Random matrices Why random matrices? Ensembles and states Non energy changing operators Energy changing operators Random matrices and wormholes Random matrices and time dependence Unitary matrices Numerical results Triangular matrices Matrices with no diagonal elements Comparison with the bulk description Conclusion 59 Appendices 61 A Second order quench 61 A.1 On the line A.2 On the circle B Weingarten function 65 B.1 Weingarten function B.2 Unitary matrices on the microcanonical state B.3 Unitary matrices on the TFD state Bibliography 69 IV
7 Introduction Many aspects of the physics of black hole are still not understood or subject to debate. Since the discovery of Hawking radiation [1] in 1975, combining gravitation and quantum effects has proven to be a challenging task. The fate of the information that enters a black hole after this evaporates through Hawking radiation was initially not well understood. This radiation appears thermal to a distant static observer. Unitarity, one of the well established foundations of quantum mechanics, appeared to be violated by the evolution of a black hole from a pure state to such a mixed state. Most of the scientific community agrees now that the evaporation of a black hole is a unitary process. The information leaks out through entanglement between the quanta being emitted through Hawking radiation at different times. The AdS/CFT correspondence [2] has proven important in answering this question. This correspondence relates a gravitational theory on a manifold which is asymptotically AdS, a spacetime with a negative cosmological constant, in d + 1 dimensions to a conformal field theory, a quantum field theory that is conformally invariant, living on the d dimensional boundary of the manifold. When one of the two theories is strongly coupled, the other one is weakly coupled. This correspondence has many applications. One of these, for example, is to carry out computations in strongly coupled theories that would not be possible otherwise. It turns out to be useful also when considering the process of evaporation of a black hole. Non unitary of this process would not be consistent with the AdS/CFT correspondence. Since some types of black holes are dual to conformal field theories which evolve unitarily, their evaporation must be unitary as well. However, the solution of the information paradox has generated other apparent inconsistencies. The quanta emitted through Hawking radiation are entangled with quanta inside the black hole. Information starts leaking out after half of the black hole has evaporated. If effective field theory is a valid description of the physics outside the horizon, this information must be carried by the entanglement between early and late Hawking radiation. These modes are approximately maximally entangled: monogamy of entanglement, the principle for which one system cannot be maximally entangled with two independent systems, is violated. In 2012 it was proposed [3] that the modes of Hawking radiation are not entangled with modes inside the black hole, and monogamy of entanglement is not violated. However, there is not a clear mechanism which would allow this breaking of entanglement. Besides, it would mean that just behind the horizon there are many energetic particles, reason for which this proposal is called 1
8 Introduction 2 the firewall proposal. The horizon of the black hole would then be a special place for a freely falling observer, hence violating Einstein equivalence principle. In 2013 a different solution of the paradox was proposed [4]. It conjectures a correspondence between entanglement and Einsten Rosen bridges, and goes under the name of ER=EPR. According to the proposal, two entangled systems are always connected by a wormhole. There are cases for which this is known to be true. The BTZ black hole [5] is dual to an entangled state, the thermofield double state (TFD) [6]. However, according to the ER=EPR proposal, the duality holds for all entangled systems. For example, even simpler systems, such as two entangled qubits, should be connected by a wormhole; however, this wormhole will have a highly quantum nature, and cannot be studied given our current understanding of quantum gravity. If correct, the ER=EPR proposal could imply the absence of firewalls at the black hole horizon, consistently with Einstein equivalence principle. An observer trying to measure the violation of the monogamy of entanglement would first measure a mode of the early and one of the late Hawking radiation. Since information is not lost when a black hole evaporates, the observer would see that these two modes are entangled. Then he would enter the black hole to check the entanglement between the late radiation mode and its Hawking partner mode inside the black hole. He would however meet an energetic particle on the horizon, making the measurement impossible. This energetic particle would be created by the action of the observer when he first made a measurement on the early Hawking radiation. This action at a distance would be possible only because, according to the ER=EPR proposal, two entangled systems are connected by a wormhole. This small violation of locality might explain the process of evaporation of black holes without requiring the presence of firewalls. Investigating the ER=EPR proposal turns out to be a difficult task. Different works [7, 8] have argued that, while the TFD is dual to a semiclassical wormhole, typical states are not. Correlations between the two entangled systems suppressed by factors of e S, dependent on the spectrum of the field theory, are taken as evidence of the absence of a wormhole, since the geometry should arise from the coarse graining of the field theory. However, it was shown in [9] and [10] by Shenker and Stanford that it is possible to construct long semiclassical wormholes, for which correlators can be made of order e S. In [8] random matrices were used to study states more general than the TFD. Under the assumption that a correlator that depends on the number of states of a theory is evidence for the absence of a wormhole, the authors claimed that typical states are not connected by wormholes. The SS construction is, instead, highly non typical. The main questions we will try to answer in this work concerns the validity of a free field or a random matrix approach for this latter SS state and whether this state presents correlations that depend on the number of sates of the field theory. If e S correlations follow only from an ad hoc construction, it would look like the claim of [7, 8] is correct and typical states are not dual to smooth geometries. The structure of this work is as follows. In chapter 1 we review some properties of quantum field theory at finite temperature, and focus on the bosonic dimensional case. This will play a role in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence. In chapter 2, the BTZ black hole, which provides an example of a wormhole with an entangled dual, is reviewed. We also
9 3 Introduction explain the process of black hole evaporation and the firewall as well as the ER=EPR proposal. In chapter 3 we try to model the SS construction, which consists in introducing matter on the boundary of the black hole, using a quench in a free field theory. Eventually, in chapter 4, we try to model the same process using random matrices drawn from different ensembles.
10
11 1 Quantum field theory at finite temperature Quantum field theory was initially developed at zero temperature; much work has been devoted to generalizing its results to finite temperature. Different approaches, allowing to keep some tools of T = 0 QFT, exist; in the following section we will review the thermofield formalism and the real time formalism. The first makes it possible to express the statistical value of an operator as the expectation value of the operator in a quantum field theory, and has a direct application when talking about black holes in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence; the second achieves the generalization of Feynman diagrams to finite temperature. We will show that the latter approach is equivalent to the first one, and proves useful in computations in the same context. Later, we will specialize in the case of a free boson in dimensions, which will be useful in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence, as will be explained in chapter 2. We begin by reviewing some general features of finite temperature field theory. At finite temperature T, the expectation value of an operator O is given by O = Tr(ρ eq O) (1.1) where ρ eq is the thermal density matrix, ρ eq = e βh /Z and β = 1 T (in this work we set Boltzmann s constant k B to 1). This density matrix represents the case of a canonical ensemble. In the presence of a Noether conserved charge Q and a chemical potential µ, we need to consider the grand canonical density matrix, ρ = 1 Z e β(h+µq). However, for our purposes it will be enough to consider the canonical ensemble. 1.1 KMS condition and periodicity of fields Lorentz invariance is broken at finite temperature. It is possible to see this from the Kubo- Martin-Schwinger (KMS) condition. If we consider the expectation value of two operators A(t)B(t ) at finite temperature, we 5
12 KMS condition and periodicity of fields 6 can use the cyclicity of the trace to see Tr(ρ eq A(t)B(t )) = 1 Z Tr(e βh A(t)B(t )) = 1 Z Tr(e βh B(t )e βh A(t)e βh ) (1.2) = 1 Z Tr(e βh B(t )A(t + iβ)). We are working in the Heisenberg picture, A(t) = e ith A(0)e ith. We have therefore what is known as the KMS condition: A(t)B(t ) = B(t )A(t + iβ) (1.3) If we define (expressing only the time dependence for simplicity) C > (t t ) = C < (t t) = φ(t)φ(t ), then we have C > (t iβ) = φ(t iβ)φ(0) = φ(0)φ(t) = C < (t). (1.4) Fourier transforming the two sides of (1.4) we obtain φ k φ k = e βk 0 φ k φ k, (1.5) and we see that, because of the term e βk 0, this is not Lorentz invariant. An equivalent way of stating that finite temperature breaks Lorentz invariance is that, when inserting a system in a heat bath, we have a preferred frame, the rest frame of the heat bath Path integral for the partition function The partition function Z is defined as the trace of the density matrix Z = Tr ρ eq. (1.6) This quantity plays a crucial role in statistical mechanics, since most of the interesting thermodynamic quantities can be obtained from it. It has been long known that statistical quantum mechanics is connected to quantum field theory in Euclidean space. In fact, it is possible to express the partition function Z as a path integral in Euclidean space, with some periodic boundary conditions. The lagrangian for a real scalar field φ is L = 1 2 µφ µ φ V(φ) (1.7) where V(φ) is a potential. The transition amplitude can be expressed as (see for example [11]) φ b (x) e iht φ a (x) = [ t Dφ exp i dt 0 ] d d 1 xl (x) (1.8)
13 7 Quantum field theory at finite temperature with the condition φ(x 0 = 0, x) = φ a (x) and φ(x 0 = t, x) = φ b (x). We can use this to compute the partition function so that Z = Tr e βh = Z = N [ iβ Dφ exp i dt 0 Dφ φ e βh φ (1.9) ] d d 1 xl [φ]. (1.10) where the fields φ satisfy the periodic condition φ(0) = φ( iβ). It is convenient now to go to Euclidean time, performing the change of variable τ = it. This gives [ β Z = N Dφ exp dτ periodic 0 ] d d 1 xl E [φ] (1.11) where L E = 1 2 ( τφ) ( iφ) 2 + V(φ) is the Euclidean lagrangian density. The identification of imaginary time τ = τ + β shows as well how Lorentz invariance is broken at finite temperature. 1.2 Thermofield dynamics Thermofield dynamics was developed in [12]. Its aim is to express statistical averages at a finite temperature as the expectations value in a quantum field theory. The idea is to find a temperature dependent state Ψ β for which Ψ β A Ψ β = Tr(e βh A) Tr(e βh ) = 1 Z n e βe n n A n (1.12) It is not possible to create such a state using only one Hilbert space. However, if we consider another (fictitious) Hilbert space, we can build the following state, which will hold the desired property. Ψ β = 1 Z e βen/2 n ñ (1.13) n where Z = n e βe n. This is usually called thermofield double state (TFD), and we will write it as Ψ, dropping the β dependence. The state n belongs to the first Hilbert space, while ñ to the doubled Hilbert space. The usual relations ñ m = δ nm hold for the latter states as well. If we compute the expectation value of an operator living in the first Hilbert space, then we find the required relation (1.13). This is because, if we start from the density matrix ρ = Ψ Ψ, the reduced density matrix obtained by tracing out the second Hilbert space is the thermal density matrix ρ eq = e βh /Z. It is also possible to consider operators Õ living in the second Hilbert space. Inside the context of thermofield dynamics it might not be immediately clear what these fictitious operators represent physically. However, it will be explained in chapter 2 that in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence these operators have a straightforward interpretation. We are interested in finding propagators between these two Hilbert spaces. In order to
14 Real time formalism 8 t i Im t O 1 (t) t f Re t t i iσ O 2 (t ) t f iσ t i iβ Figure 1.1: Schwinger Keldysh time contour. have a Lagrangian formulation we turn to the real time formalism, which we will show to be equivalent to the thermofield dynamics approach. 1.3 Real time formalism Another formalism allowing the computation of expectation values of physical observables at finite temperature is the real time, or time path, formalism. This method was developed by Schwinger and Keldysh [13, 14] and it allows the generalization of Feynman rules to finite temperature. Similarly to the previous approach, this formalism doubles the degrees of freedom: besides the ordinary physical fields, living at real times, there are also ghost fields which live at imaginary times. The time path is shown in figure 1.1. It extends into the complex plane: it runs on the real axis from a time t i to a time t f, then runs in the imaginary time direction to t f iσ, runs back parallel to the real axis to t i iσ 1, and eventually runs downward to t i iβ. This latter point is identified with t i, since the fields are periodic in imaginary time with period β. The limits t i and t f are taken. Boundary conditions are imposed so that fields vanish at t = ±, and the contributions of the vertical segments of the contour vanish. Operators living on the real time contour are denoted as O 1, while the ghost operators on the imaginary time segment are denoted as O 2. They are defined as O 1 (t) = O(t) = e iht Oe iht (1.14) O 2 (t) = O(t iσ) = e ih(t iσ) Oe ih(t iσ) While σ can take any value, provided 0 < σ < β, the most convenient choice in our case is to take σ = β/2. The reason for this is that such a symmetric choice makes this formalism closely related to the TFD state, and it will be important for our future applications. This approach is equivalent to the thermofield formalism. In order to see this, we set σ = 1 Actually, the horizontal segments are slightly tilted in order to have the correct pole prescription. The upper line runs around the poles in the usual Feynman prescription, while the lower in the opposite way.
15 9 Quantum field theory at finite temperature β/2 and we look for an operator B acting on the second Hilbert space such that Tr(ρ eq A(t)B(t + iβ/2)) = Ψ A(t) B(t ) Ψ. (1.15) Remembering that B(t + iβ/2) = e βh/2 B(t )e βh/2, the previous equation becomes 1 Z e βen/2 e βem/2 n A(t) m m B(t ) n = n,m = 1 Z n,m e βe n/2 e βe m/2 n A(t) m n B(t ) m. (1.16) From this equation we can see that we require B = B T. Therefore an operator living on the second Hilbert space in the thermofield formalism is related to an operator living on the imaginary part of the Schwinger-Keldysh contour. The previous formula can be generalized to the insertion of many operators B in the same manner. 1.4 Schwinger Keldysh propagators The TFD state appears in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondance. We will be interested in computing the propagator between the two different Hilbert space; having shown that the TFD formalism is the same as the real time formalism, we turn to this last one to compute the propagators. We define the Schwinger Keldysh propagators as id 11 (x, t) = TO 1 (x, t)o 1 (0) id 12 (x, t) = O 2 (0)O 1 (x, t) id 21 (x, t) = O 2 (x, t)o 1 (0) id 22 (x, t) = TO 2 (x, t)o 2 (0). (1.17) T denotes time ordering, while T denotes anti time ordering (the second branch of the Schwinger Keldysh time contour has a different pole prescription from that of the first branch). We define also the retarded propagator id R (x, t) = θ(t) [O 1 (x, t), O 1 (0)]. (1.18) This turns out to be a useful quantity, since it allows us to express the propagators (1.17) in momentum space. Besides, we will later focus on a free boson. For this theory, the retarded propagator is state independent, therefore it is possible to compute it at T = 0, where Lorentz invariance is still present. Omitting for the moment any spatial coordinate, which remains trivial, we can express D 11 as id 11 (t) = 1 Z a a e βh[ θ(t)o 1 (t)o 1 (0) + θ( t)o 1 (0)O 1 (t) ] a. (1.19)
16 Schwinger Keldysh propagators 10 Inserting a complete set of states and expressing O 1 (t) = e iht O(0)e iht we find id 11 (t) = 1 Z e i(e a E b )t ( O ab O ba θ(t)e βe a + θ( t)e βe ) b. (1.20) a,b We now Fourier transform to momentum space id 11 (ω) = id 11 (t)e iωt ε t. (1.21) The ε factor makes the integral convergent. After solving the integral we find D 11 (ω) = 1 ( Z e βe ) a O ab O ba ω + (E a,b a E b ) + iε e βeb. (1.22) ω + (E a E b ) iε The same procedure can be applied to D R. We find and, in momentum space, Using the Dirac identity id R (t) = θ(t) Z a,b e i(e a E b )t O ab O ba (e βe a e βe b ) (1.23) D R (ω) = 1 ( Z e βe ) a O ab O ba ω + (E a,b a E b ) + iε e βeb. (1.24) ω + (E a E b ) + iε we can find the following relations 1 lim ε 0 + x iε = P 1 ± iπδ(x), (1.25) x Re D 11 (ω) = Re D R (ω) (1.26) Im D 11 (ω) = eβω + 1 e βω 1 Im DR (ω) = coth βω 2 Im DR (ω). (1.27) Repeating the same for D 21, we find D 12 (ω) = 1 ( ) Z e βea/2 e βeb/2 1 O ab O ba w + (E a,b b E a ) iε 1 w + (E b E a ) + iε (1.28) and therefore D 12 (ω) = 2ie βω/2 1 e βω Im DR (ω). (1.29) The same analysis can be repeated for D 21 and D 22. D 21 is the same as D 12 because of the symmetric choice σ = β/2, and D 22 has the same imaginary part as D 11 but opposite real part, due to the reverse time ordering T D 21 (ω) = D 12 (ω) (1.30)
17 11 Quantum field theory at finite temperature D 22 (ω) = D 11 (ω) = Re D R (ω) + i coth βω 2 Im DR (ω) (1.31) The Schwinger Keldysh formalism makes it possible to generalize Feynman rules to finite temperature. The propagator for the field φ is now represented by the 2 2 matrix D ij. Since the field living on imaginary times φ 2 plays the role of an unphysical or ghost field, the external legs of all Feynman diagrams will be the physical field φ 1. The interaction between the two types of fields is possible thanks to the off diagonal elements of the matrix D, and in the internal lines of the Feynman diagram both φ 1 and φ 2 will appear. There are two types of interaction vertex, one for each kind of field. In this work we will treat free theory at finite temperature, therefore we will not use Fenyman diagrams. We are only interested in the D ij matrix in the bosonic case. A more detailed overview of Fenyman diagrams in the Schwinger Keldysh formalism, as well as a treatment of the fermionic case, can be found in [15]. 1.5 Free bosonic field Given the lagrangian for a free bosonic field in d dimensions the mode expansion for the field is L = 1 2 µφ µ φ 1 2 m2 φ 2 (1.32) φ(x, t) = d d 1 k 1 (2π) d 1 [a 2ω k e ik x + a k e ik x ] (1.33) k where ω k = k 2 + m 2. In thermal equilibrium we have [16] a k a k = (2π)d 1 2ω k [N(ω k ) + 1]δ(k k ) a k a k = (2π)d 1 2ω k N(ω k )δ(k k ) (1.34) with N(ω k ) = (e βω k 1) 1. We define C > (x, y) = C < (y, x) = φ(x)φ(y), and the spectral density as ρ(k) = C > (k) C < (k). (1.35) The spectral density turns out to be an useful quantity, since it allows us to find the retarded and advanced propagator using the relations D R (k 0, k) = D A (k 0, k) = dk 0 2π dk 0 2π ρ(k 0, k) k 0 k 0 iε ρ(k 0, k) k 0 k 0 + iε. (1.36)
18 Bosonic propagators in position space 12 In the case of a free bosonic field we find ρ(k) = 2π 2ω k ( δ(k0 ω k ) δ(k 0 + ω k ) ) = 2π sgn(k 0 )δ(k 2 + m 2 ) (1.37) where sgn(k 0 ) = θ(k 0 ) θ( k 0 ). We have D R (k) = 1 (k 0 + iε) 2 + ω 2 k (1.38) This quantity is independent of the temperature. The temperature dependence appears only when we turn to the time ordered correlator. Now, let s consider the propagators D ab for O = φ. Using Re D R 1 (k) = P k ω2 k Im D R (k) = π sgn(k 0 )δ(k 2 + m 2 ) (1.39) we determine D 11 (k) = 1 k 2 + m 2 iε + 2πi e β k0 1 δ(k2 + m 2 ) D 12 (k) = D 21 (k) = 2πie β k 0 /2 δ(k 2 + m 2 ) 1 e β k 0 1 D 22 (k) = k 2 + m 2 iε + 2πi e β k0 1 δ(k2 + m 2 ). (1.40) We see clearly that these quantities are not Lorentz invariant. If we take the limit T 0, however, we find the usual correlator for a free boson. The off diagonal elements D 12 and D 21 vanish at zero temperature, because the two theories in the TFD state are not entangled anymore, or because the two horizontal parts of the Schwinger Keldysh contour are infinitely far apart. We find the usual rules for Feynman diagrams. Since the first and second field cannot interact anymore, and in the outer legs of the Feynman diagrams only the physical field φ 1 appears, the whole Feynman diagram will only consist φ 1 and the ghost field φ 2 will not play a role. 1.6 Bosonic propagators in position space Throughout this work we will be interested in the dimensional case. We compute now the Fourier transform of the Schwinger Keldysh propagators. D ab (x) = d 2 k (2π) 2 eik x D ab (k) (1.41)
19 13 Quantum field theory at finite temperature Operators on the same theory The first term of D 11 in (1.40) gives 1 (2π) 2 e ik x dkdk 0 k ω2 k iɛ = 1 (2π) 2 dke ikx e ik 0t dk 0 k 2 0 ω2 k + iɛ = i 2π = i 4π θ(t) = i 4π θ(t) dk eikx 2ω k ( θ(t)e iω k t + θ( t)e iω kt ) dk e ikx iωkt + ( t t ) ω k dye im(t cosh y x sinh y) + ( t t ). (1.42) We first carried on the usual contour integration around the two poles and then made the change of variables k = m sinh y. = i 4π θ(t) dye m x 2 t 2 cosh(y+a) + ( t t ) = i 2π θ(t)k 0(m x 2 t 2 ) + ( t t ) = i 2π K 0(m x 2 t 2 ). (1.43) We used d cosh(y + a) = d cosh a cosh y + d sinh a sinh y = it cosh y ix sinh y, to find that d = x 2 t 2 and a = tanh 1 ( x/t). Eventually we made the shift y y a. This is the usual Feynman correlator for T = 0. The second term is 1 (2π) 2 = i 2π = i 2π dkdk 0 e ik x 2πi e β k0 1 δ(k2 + m 2 ) dkdk0 e ik x e β k0 ( δ(k0 + ω 2ω k 1 e β k k ) + δ(k 0 ω k ) ) 0 dk e βωk 2ω k 1 e βω e ikx( e iωkt + e iω kt ). k Now, using the expansion 1 1 x = xn, we can express the integral as i 2π n=0 = i 4π n=0 (1.44) dk e (n+1)βω k e ikx( e iωkt + e iω kt ) 2ω k dye m[(n+1)β+it] cosh y+ix sinh y + ( t t ) (1.45) where we made the substitution k = m sinh y. Now we repeat the same trick as before. Using d n cosh(y + a n ) = d n cosh y cosh a n + d n sinh y sinh a n, we can rewrite the previous integral as i 4π dye md n cosh(y+a n ) n=0 (1.46)
20 Bosonic propagators in position space 14 where d n and a n are given by d n cosh a n = (n + 1)β + it d n sinh a n = ix (1.47) We find therefore the explicit values d 2 n = ((n + 1)β + it) 2 + x 2 ( ) a n = tanh 1 ix (n + 1)β + it (1.48) Since the imaginary part of a n is given by ( ) Im a n = Re tan 1 x, (1.49) (n + 1)β + it then Im a n [ π 2, π 2 ]. Since the integral does not present singularities, and Re cosh(x + ib) > 0 if x R and b [ π 2, π 2 ], we can make the shift y y a n = i 4π = i 2π = i 2π n=0 n=0 ( 2 n= dye m (β(n+1)+it) 2 +x 2 cosh y + ( t t ) (K 0 ( m (β(n + 1) + it) 2 + x 2) + K 0 ( m (β(n + 1) it) 2 + x 2)) + n=0 )K 0 ( m (β(n + 1) + it) 2 + x 2). (1.50) Summing the two terms together we obtain D 11 (x, t) = i 2π n= = i 2π K 0 (m n= ) K 0 (m (β(n + 1) + it) 2 + x 2 ) (βn + it) 2 + x 2. (1.51) Using the relation in momentum space D 22 (k) = D 11 (k), we can find D 22 (x) in positions space: dk D 22 (x) = (2π) 2 ( D 11(k)) e ik x [ dk = (2π) 2 D 11(k)e ik x = D 11 ( x) = D 11 (x) ] (1.52)
21 15 Quantum field theory at finite temperature Operators on different theories To find D 12 in position space we follow the same method. D 12 (x, t) = i 2π = i 2π = i 2π dkdk 0 e β k 0 /2 1 e β k 0 e ik 0t+ikx δ(k 2 + m 2 ) dkdk0 2 k 0 e β k 0 /2 1 e β k 0 e ik 0t+ikx [δ(k 0 + ω k ) + δ(k 0 ω k )] dk e βωk/2 ( ) 2ω k 1 e βω e +ikx e iωkt + e +iω kt k (1.53) Let us consider the first term only for the moment. Using the series expansion (1 x) 1 = n=0 x n i 2π dk 2ω k 1 e βω e +ikx e iωkt = k e βωk/2 i 2π = i 4π n=0 n=0 dk 2ω k e (n+ 1 2 )βω k e +ikx e iω kt dye ((n+ 1 2 )β+it)m cosh y e imx sinh y (1.54) where in the last line we have made the usual change of variables k = m sinh y, for which ω k = m cosh y and dk = ω k dy. Using again d cosh(y + a) = d cosh y cosh a + d sinh y sinh a, we can rewrite the previous integral as where d n and a n are given this time by i 4π dye md n cosh(y+a n ) n=0 (1.55) d 2 n = [ (n )β + it] 2 + x 2 ( ) a n = tanh 1 ix (n )β + it (1.56) Once again, we have no problem with the shift y y a n i 4π dye md n cosh(y) = n=0 i 2π Considering also the second part of the integral, we obtain D 12 (x, t) = i 2π = i 2π [ K 0 (m (n + 1 n=0 [ (n + 1 K 0 (m n= )β + it 2 )β + it 2 [ K 0 (m (n + 1 ] 2 ) )β + it + x n= (1.57) ] 2 ) + x 2 + i [ 2π K 0 (m (n + 1 ] 2 ) )β it + x n=0 2 2 ] 2 ) + x 2. (1.58)
22 Bosonic propagators in position space 16 We note that both D 11 and D 12 are periodic in t t + iβ, as required by the periodic identification of the complex time coordinate. We also note that D 11 (x, t + i β 2 ) = D 12(x, t) Massless limit Since we will turn our attention to the AdS/CFT correspondence, we are interested in conformal field theories. A free CFT is given by the lagrangian (1.7) with m = 0, since a mass term would introduce a length scale that would make the theory not scale invariant. For m 0, both D 11 and D 12 diverge. The behavior of the K 0 function, for small argument, is K 0 (x) log( x 2 ) γ E + O(x 2 ) as x 0. (1.59) Therefore D11 0 (x, t) = i 2π = i 2π n= n= [ [ ( 2 ) γ E + log 2 log(m nβ + it) ] + x 2 γ E + log(2) log(m) 1 2 log ((nβ + it) 2 + x 2 )]. (1.60) We get rid of the γ E + log(2) log(m) term, to obtain, as a massless propagator, D11 0 i (( 2 (x, t) = 4π log nβ + it) ) + x 2. (1.61) n= This sum clearly diverges, so we need to renormalize it. In order to do so we first derive twice with respect to the x coordinate; this will make the sum convergent. After the sum is taken care of, we integrate back. This gives [ D11 0 i (x, t) = 4π = i 4π log log [ sinh ( π(t x) )] [ ( π(t + x) )] ] + log sinh β β [ 1 2πt cosh 2 β 1 ] 2πx cosh. 2 β (1.62) The same procedure can be carried out for D 12, and we obtain as a final result [ D12 0 i (x, t) = 4π = i 4π log log [ cosh ( π(t x) )] [ ( π(t + x) )] ] + log cosh β β [ 1 2πt cosh 2 β + 1 ] 2πx cosh. 2 β (1.63) In a two dimensional conformal field theory, the field φ does not have a definite scaling dimension. Instead, the operator φ has weight (1, 0), and φ has weight (0, 1). and are the shorthand notation for = 1 2 ( x t ) = 1 2 ( x + t ). (1.64)
23 17 Quantum field theory at finite temperature Therefore for these fields we have the following propagators 2 φ 1 (x, t) φ 1 (0) = φ 1 (x, t) φ 1 (0) = φ 1 (x, t) φ 2 (0) = φ 1 (x, t) φ 2 (0) = π 1 4β 2 [sinh π β (x t)]2 π 1 4β 2 [sinh π β (x + t)]2 π 1 4β 2 [cosh π β (x t)]2 π 1 4β 2 [cosh π β (x + t)]2 (1.65) φ i (x, t) φ j (0) = 0. Now let s consider the operator O i = : φ i φi :, which has weight (1, 1). We have O 1 (x, t)o 1 (0) = π2 16β 4 1 [ 1 2 cosh 2πx O 1 (x, t)o 2 (0) = π2 16β 4 1 [ 1 2 β cosh 2πx β ] 2 2πt cosh β ] 2. 2πt cosh β (1.66) We can also consider the operator V j α = :e iαφ j :, which has weight ( α2 8π, α2 8π ). Since :eiαφ i(x,t) : :e iαφ j(0) : = e α2 φ i (x,t)φ j (0) we have V 1 α (x, t)v 1 α (0) = V 1 α (x, t)v 2 α (0) = [ 1 2 [ 1 2 cosh 2πx β cosh 2πx β ] α 2 2πt 4π cosh β. ] α 2 2πt 4π cosh β (1.67) It is worth noting that these quantities can also be obtained by conformal mapping the plane onto the cylinder. 2 There is a small sublety here: the (massive) field on the second boundary is quantized as φ 2 (x, t) = dk 2π2ω k ã k e ik x + ã k eik x. Therefore, the φ has an overall minus sign when compared to its counterpart φ. This explains why in third and fourth formula of (1.65) there is no minus sign.
24
25 2 The ER=EPR proposal Black holes are solutions of General Relativity. Their peculiarity is the presence of an event horizon, which prevents anything, including light, that is inside the black hole to escape, therefore making it black. They are characterized only by mass, angular momentum and electric charge. The attempt to obtain a theory of quantum gravity is focused mostly on the study of black holes, since quantum effects become important in this situation, while in the vast majority of gravitational situations they can be neglected. However, black holes still represent an open issue for theoretical physics, since the presence of these quantum effects leads to apparent inconsistencies in the theory. Studying and understanding the origin of these paradoxes can help us moving closer to a theory of quantum gravity. In the following chapter we will explain the ER=EPR proposal. First, we want to have a simple situation we can study. In order to do so, we will briefly review the AdS/CFT correspondence [2]. We will then talk about the BTZ black hole [5], a black hole solution in AdS 2+1, and some of its properties, for which the AdS/CFT correspondance has proven useful [6]. Since gravity in dimensions does not present any propagating degree of freedom, i.e. gravitons, and its field theory dual is a two dimensional CFT, which has the advantage of having an infinite dimensional symmetry goup, it provides an accessible example to investigate the physics of black holes and has been intensively studied in the last twenty years. The BTZ black hole will serve as the simplest example of a black hole we can study. We will finally introduce the information paradox and some of the solutions that have been proposed, such as the firewall [3] and the ER=EPR proposal [4]. 2.1 AdS space and the AdS/CFT correspondence Anti de Sitter space is one of the maximally symmetric spaces. This means that AdS d has d(d + 1)/2 killing vectors, the largest number possible for a d dimensional spacetime. Contrary to the other maximally symmetric spaces, it has a negative cosmological constant. AdS n can be defined as an embedded hyperboloid of radius l in a n + 1 dimensional flat space. X 2 1 X2 0 + X X2 n 1 = l2 (2.1) 19
26 The BTZ black hole 20 The metric can be expressed in global coordinates ds 2 = l 2 ( cosh 2 ρdt 2 + dρ 2 + sinh 2 ρdω d 2 ) (2.2) with t [0, 2π], and ρ R +. This choice of coordinates covers the whole AdS space. is The Poincaré patch instead covers only half of AdS. The metric in this choice of coordinates ds 2 = l2 z 2 (dz2 dt 2 d 2 + i=1 dxi 2 ). (2.3) Using the substitution z = 1 u we find the metric ds 2 = l 2 ( du 2 u 2 u2 (dt 2 d 2 + i=1 dx 2 i ) ). (2.4) The space has a conformal boundary at u = (or z = 0). This boundary is of vital interest for the AdS/CFT correspondence [2], which relates a theory of gravity living on AdS d+1 to a conformal theory living on this boundary. More specifically, the AdS/CFT correspondence states that d e d xφ 0 (x)o(x) CFT = Z bulk [φ(x, z)] (2.5) φ(x,0)=φ0 (x). φ 0 (x) represents the boundary value of the field in the bulk φ(x, z). Both the right and left hand sides of the last formula might present divergences, and in general it is necessary to carry out a renormalization procedure. See for example [17]. For our purposes, it will be enough to use the following formula. When taking a n-point function in the bulk and sending it to the boundary, one has the relation [18] O(x 1 )... O(x n ) CFT = lim z 0 z n φ(x 1, z)... φ(x n, z) bulk. (2.6) The mass m of the field φ is related to the scaling dimension of the CFT operator O by = d 2 + d m2 l 2. (2.7) 2.2 The BTZ black hole The BTZ black hole can be obtained as a quotient of AdS 2+1 [19]. This turns out to be useful, since some quantities, e.g. the geodesic length between two points, will be the same in the AdS and BTZ case. We will focus only on the non-rotating chargeless solution. In this case the metric can be written as ds 2 = r2 r 2 l 2 dt 2 + l2 r 2 r 2 dr 2 + r 2 dφ 2. (2.8) The radius at which the event horizon is situated is r, while l is the radius of AdS. For sim-
27 21 The ER=EPR proposal u v Figure 2.1: Kruskal diagram for the BTZ black hole. The thick lines represent the boundaries and the zigzag lines represent the future and past singularity. B C A D Figure 2.2: Penrose diagram for the BTZ black hole. A and C are the right and left exterior. plicity, from here on we will set l to 1. The φ coordinate is periodically identified, φ = φ + 2π. The mass of the black hole M is related to the black hole radius as M = r2 8, and the temperature of the black hole is β 1 = r 2π. It is possible to find the maximally extended solution of the BTZ space time by switching to Kruskal coordinates. The metric becomes [6] ds 2 = 4dudv (1 + uv) 2 + (1 uv) 2 r2 (1 + uv) 2 dφ2. (2.9) The future and past singularities are located at uv = 1. We have two boundaries of AdS, located at uv = 1. In the form (2.8) the boundaries are located at r =. In this limit the metric reduces (ignoring a conformal factor) to Therefore the CFTs on the boundaries are defined on R S 1. ds 2 dt 2 + dφ 2. (2.10) The Penrose diagram of the BTZ black hole is shown in figure 2.2. Region B is the inside of
28 The BTZ black hole 22 the black hole. A and C can be interpreted as two disconnected spaces, or as distant regions of the same space. It is possible to have a path that goes from region A to region C; this is called Einstein Rosen bridge, or wormhole. It would appear at first sight that this is a shortcut through space time, and could therefore violate causality. It is easy to see from figure 2.2 that no signal can travel from A to C; it is normally said that the length of the bridge increases so that no signal can possibly go through Propagators for the BTZ black hole This discussion follows the one from [19]. In order to obtain the bulk to boundary propagator for the BTZ black hole, we can exploit the fact that it is a quotient of AdS 3. Therefore we just need to add a sum over images to the bulk to boundary propagator of the latter, to take into account the periodic identification of φ. Let us consider the bulk to boundary propagator for a scalar field of mass m in region A. The point x = (t, φ, r) = (x, r) is located in the right bulk, while the point z = (t, φ ) is on the boundary of region A. Then the propagator will be K AA (x, r; z) [ r 2 r 2 n= r 2 cosh r t + r ] 2 cosh r ( φ + 2πn) (2.11) r where = m 2, t = t t and φ = φ φ. If we now want to move one point to region C, it is sufficient to shift t t + iβ/2. If the point x is in region C, we have K CA (x, r; z) [ r 2 r 2 n= r 2 cosh r t + r ] 2 cosh r ( φ + 2πn). (2.12) r We can see that, while K AA might diverge for some values of r, φ and t, K CA is always non singular. This is consistent with the fact that, in general, propagators diverge on light like geodesics. There is no such geodesic that connects region 1 with region 3. We can obtain the boundary to boundary propagator by sending the bulk point x to the boundary. According to the AdS/CFT correspondence, this will be obtained by the limit P(x, z) = C lim r r 2 K(x, r; z) (2.13) with C being a r independent factor. Applying this limit we obtain P AA (x, z) P CA (x, z) n= n= [ ] 2 cosh r t + cosh r ( φ + 2πn) [ ] 2 (2.14) cosh r t + cosh r ( φ + 2πn) There is a subtlety when it comes to P CA : generally the time in the second boundary is seen as
29 23 The ER=EPR proposal u v Figure 2.3: Constant t slice in Kruskal coordinates decreasing towards the future. In this case, t is to be intended as t = t + t. The reason for this is that the ratio between the Kruskal coordinates u and v is only dependent on time (see [20] for the explicit form of u and v) u v = f (t) (2.15) therefore a slice with t constant is represented by a straight line passing through the point u = v = 0, as shown in figure Holography for the BTZ black hole It was shown in [6] that performing the path integral on the boundary CFT gives a state Ψ = 1 Z e βei/2 i L i R. (2.16) i As seen in chapter 1, this is the thermofield state. The propagators obtained from the bulk, (2.14), are the same as the one obtained with the Schwinger Keldysh formalism in the boundary CFTs in section for a field with scaling dimension (, ), if we include also a sum over images due to the periodic identification of the spatial coordinate. This is consistent with the claim (2.6). The BTZ black hole is dual to the TFD state. The fact that the insertion of two operators on two independent and non interacting theories has a non vanishing correlator can be understood as the effect of the entangled state of the theories, or, equivalently, of the presence of the wormhole connecting the two theories. We considered only the case with a non rotating and chargeless black hole. In the case of a conserved charge Q, the state (2.16) will also have a chemical potential µ Ψ = 1 Z e βe i/2 βµq i /2 E i, Q i L E i, Q i R. (2.17) i
30 Hawking radiation 24 r = 0 H + I + H + I + I r = 0 I Figure 2.4: Penrose diagram for a black hole originated by collapse. H represents the event horizon and I + and I future and past null infinity. 2.3 Hawking radiation So far, we have ignored quantum effects. When taking them into consideration on a black hole background, the situation becomes more complicated. Quantum effects on a curved spacetime are responsible for a black hole radiation, known as Hawking radiation [1]. This eventually leads to the information paradox. We will consider a black hole formed by collapse in flat space, as originally studied by Hawking. This case can be generalized to that of the BTZ black hole. In the case of a black hole formed by collapse, the Penrose diagram reduces to the one shown in figure 2.4, since the usual Schwarzschild metric is valid only in the region outside the collapsing matter. The Schwarzschild metric in d dimensions is ds 2 = ( 1 2M r ) dt 2 + dr2 1 2M r + r 2 dω 2 d 2, (2.18) where dω d is the metric on a d dimensional sphere. The regions I and I + are the past and future null infinity. When we consider the limit r, the metric reduces to the flat space one, so these regions are asymptotically flat. Let us now consider a real scalar field φ, which we take to be massless for simplicity. The field satisfies the Klein Gordon equation, which reduces to the usual flat space Klein Gordon equation φ = 0 at infinity. The mode expansion for the scalar field on region I is φ = ω f ω a ω + f ωa ω (2.19) where the coefficients f ω solve the Klein Gordon equation. We consider the f coefficients to contain only positive frequencies so that a ω and a ω are annihilation and creation operators on the region considered. A massless field in the region outside the event horizon will be fully described by the choice of the coefficients f ω. It is possible to do the same considering future infinity instead of the past one. In this case,
31 25 The ER=EPR proposal we need to consider not only the region I +, but also the event horizon. We can determine the field as φ = ω p ω b ω + p ωb ω + q ω c ω + q ωc ω. (2.20) The p modes represent the outgoing modes on I + and the q modes the ingoing on the event horizon. Again we restrict to positive frequencies only on I +, so that b ω and b ω are annihilation and creation operator. The same cannot be done on the event horizon, since the splitting between positive and negative frequencies is possible when a timelike killing vector exists. On the horizon, the killing vector becomes null. This, however, is not relevant for our computation. Since φ can be determined by information on I or on I + and the event horizon, the coefficients f, p and q or the operators a, b and c are not independent of each other. They are related by some Bogoliubov transformation p ω = ω α ωω f ω + β ωω f ω b ω = ω α ωω a ω β ωω a ω (2.21) and so on. The Bogoliubov coefficients satisfy the condition ω α ωω 2 β ωω 2 = 1 (2.22) which gives consistent commutation relations for the a and b operators. Let us now consider the vacuum for the a operator. This is given by 0 in with the condition a ω 0 in = 0 ω. (2.23) The outgoing vacuum 0 out will be given by the same condition, this time for the operator b. However, in general, 0 out will not be the same as 0 in, which will not be annihilated by a b operator. Let us consider the b number operator N b = ω b ωb ω, and compute its expectation value on the state 0 in. This will be given, using (2.21), by and will not vanish in general. N b in = ωω β ωω 2 (2.24) The value of the β ωω coefficients can be computed (as in [1]) by considering the radial part of the mode decomposition at past and future infinity. The modes on I + can be of two kind. It could be a mode of energy ω on I which is reflected by the Schwarzschild static potential and ends up on I + with the same frequency ω. It could otherwise be a mode that scattered inside the collapsing matter, and ends up on I + with a different frequency ω. The interesting effects are given by the second type of modes, for which the result is β ωω = e πω/κ α ωω (2.25)
32 The information paradox and the firewall proposal 26 where κ represents the surface gravity of the black hole, in this case 1/4M. Combining this with the condition (2.22), we obtain that ω β ωω 2 = 1 e 2πω/κ 1. (2.26) This is the expectation value of b ωb ω, the expected number of particles in every ω mode. It is a Bose-Einstein distribution for a temperature of T = κ 2π = 1 8πM. (2.27) Hawking radiation can also be pictured in a simple manner. It consists of two virtual particles being created just outside the black hole horizon. There is the possibility that, before they annihilate each other, one of the two falls inside the black hole. The other particle will move away from the black hole. The sum of many similar processes gives rise to Hawking radiation. Since the time translation Killing vector becomes spacelike inside the horizon, the energy of the infalling quanta is considered to be negative. The black hole loses mass and eventually evaporates. In the case of the BTZ black hole, the situation is slightly different. This black hole did not originate by collapse, and its Penrose diagram is the one shown in figure 2.2. Because of the Unruh effect [21], a distant static observer sees a non zero temperature for the black hole. Since the space is asymptotically AdS, the black hole is thermodynamically stable [22], and is eternal. AdS acts as a confining box, so all the particles emitted by Hawking radiation will eventually come back to the black hole. It is still possible to study the evaporation of a BTZ black hole by coupling it to sources. 2.4 The information paradox and the firewall proposal The presence of the Hawking radiation has important consequences on the physics of black holes. Consider for example a black hole that originated from the collapse of a star, which is in an initial pure state. Particles emitted through Hawking radiation are entangled with particles inside of the black hole. After the black hole evaporates, we are left with a thermal density matrix, and it looks like we evolved from a pure to a mixed state 1. This is not allowed by quantum mechanics, since it would violate unitarity. The loss of information is also not consistent with the AdS/CFT correspondence, according to which the black hole is dual to a thermal theory which follows the rules of quantum mechanics. Unitarity in this latter theory implies that the black hole evolves unitarily as well. Let us now introduce the concept of typical state, which will play an important role later on in the discussion. A typical state is a state for which the expectation value of simple observable 1 It was argued by [23] that even though there could be small corrections to Hawking radiation, these will not be enough to make this process unitary. However, in [24, 25], the authors argue that the presence of small corrections becomes important once Page time is reached and eventually unitarizes Hawking radiation. This last construction presents a small violation of locality, which however cannot be detected within the limits of effective field theory.
33 27 The ER=EPR proposal quantities is close to the thermal expectation value. For example, one expects that almost all of the one point functions will be close to their thermal expectation value. If we consider an evaporating system in a typical state, information will significantly start leaking out after half of the degrees of freedom of the system have already evaporated [26]. In the case of black holes, this time is called Page time. This happens because subsystems smaller than half of the system contain a negligible amount of information. The leaking out of information is possible thanks to the entanglement between the late and early radiation. This, however, presents a different problem. Let us call C a quantum of the early Hawking radiation, and B a quantum emitted in the late Hawking radiation, i.e. after the Page time. B has also a partner just inside the horizon, A. Hawking radiation is a process which creates pairs of particles in a highly entangled pure state. Therefore, we can approximate the quantum B to be maximally entangled with A; due to the leaking out of information, B must be maximally entangled with C. We are facing a serious paradox, since monogamy of entanglement, the principle for which one quantum system cannot be maximally entangled with two independent systems, is violated. This explanation of the paradox is intuitively clear, but it is not very rigorous, since it does not take into account energy conservation; for example, the quanta A and B are in a state which is not maximally entangled, but rather thermally entangled. A more rigorous version of the paradox can be presented using the strong subadditivity of entropy [3]. Let us consider three quantum systems A, B and C and the total Hilbert space, H = H A H B H C. The density matrix on H is ρ ABC, while ρ AB is the reduced density matrix obtained by tracing out H C, and so on. S i is the entropy associated with a density matrix, i.e. S i = Tr(ρ i log ρ i ). Then the strong subadditivity of entropy states that S AB + S BC S ABC + S B. (2.28) Now let us consider again the evaporating black hole. If we assume that nothing unusual happens when crossing the horizon (this assumption is often referred to as the no drama hypothesis), then B and A, which were created in a pure state, are still in a pure state. This implies S AB = 0 and S ABC = S C. Besides, if the black hole is old, its entropy is decreasing, because once the black hole is evaporated we will obtain a pure state. Therefore, S BC < S C. Finally, the strong subadditivity of entropy reduces to S C > S B + S C, which is of course wrong, since B has a thermal density matrix. In the AMPS paper [3], it was argued that the following hypothesis cannot be valid at the same time: 1. the process of evaporation of a black hole obeys unitarity; 2. outside of the horizon, physics is approximately semiclassical; 3. the crossing of the horizon does not present any special feature for a freely falling observer (no drama hypothesis).
10 Interlude: Preview of the AdS/CFT correspondence
10 Interlude: Preview of the AdS/CFT correspondence The rest of this course is, roughly speaking, on the AdS/CFT correspondence, also known as holography or gauge/gravity duality or various permutations
More informationT H E K M S - C O N D I T I O N
T H E K M S - C O N D I T I O N martin pauly January 3, 207 Abstract This report develops the relation between periodicity in imaginary time and finite temperature for quantum field theories, given by
More information17 Eternal Black Holes and Entanglement
17 Eternal Black Holes and Entanglement References: This section is based mostly on Maldacena hep-th/0106112; see also the relevant section of Harlow s review lectures, 1409.1231. An eternal black hole
More informationQuantum Mechanics and the Black Hole Horizon
1 Quantum Mechanics and the Black Hole Horizon Kyriakos Papadodimas CERN and University of Groningen 9th Aegean summer school: Einstein s theory of gravity and its modifications Space-time, gravity and
More informationFinite Temperature Field Theory
Finite Temperature Field Theory Dietrich Bödeker, Universität Bielefeld 1. Thermodynamics (better: thermo-statics) (a) Imaginary time formalism (b) free energy: scalar particles, resummation i. pedestrian
More informationExact Solutions of the Einstein Equations
Notes from phz 6607, Special and General Relativity University of Florida, Fall 2004, Detweiler Exact Solutions of the Einstein Equations These notes are not a substitute in any manner for class lectures.
More informationBlack Holes, Holography, and Quantum Information
Black Holes, Holography, and Quantum Information Daniel Harlow Massachusetts Institute of Technology August 31, 2017 1 Black Holes Black holes are the most extreme objects we see in nature! Classically
More information10 Thermal field theory
0 Thermal field theory 0. Overview Introduction The Green functions we have considered so far were all defined as expectation value of products of fields in a pure state, the vacuum in the absence of real
More informationSPACETIME FROM ENTANGLEMENT - journal club notes -
SPACETIME FROM ENTANGLEMENT - journal club notes - Chris Heinrich 1 Outline 1. Introduction Big picture: Want a quantum theory of gravity Best understanding of quantum gravity so far arises through AdS/CFT
More informationThe Information Paradox
The Information Paradox Quantum Mechanics and Black Holes FokionFest 22 December 2017, Athens Kyriakos Papadodimas CERN 1 Space-Time and Quantum Gravity Space-time at short scales/scattering at E & 1019
More informationExcluding Black Hole Firewalls with Extreme Cosmic Censorship
Excluding Black Hole Firewalls with Extreme Cosmic Censorship arxiv:1306.0562 Don N. Page University of Alberta February 14, 2014 Introduction A goal of theoretical cosmology is to find a quantum state
More informationNonlocal Effects in Quantum Gravity
Nonlocal Effects in Quantum Gravity Suvrat Raju International Centre for Theoretical Sciences 29th Meeting of the IAGRG IIT Guwahati 20 May 2017 Collaborators Based on work with 1 Kyriakos Papadodimas
More informationHolographic construction of CFT excited states. Kostas Skenderis
Holographic construction of CFT excited states STAG CH RESEARCH ER C TE CENTER Aspects of Conformal Field Theories Thessaloniki, Greece 24 September 2015 Introduction According to holography, gravity in
More informationBLACK HOLES (ADVANCED GENERAL RELATIV- ITY)
Imperial College London MSc EXAMINATION May 2015 BLACK HOLES (ADVANCED GENERAL RELATIV- ITY) For MSc students, including QFFF students Wednesday, 13th May 2015: 14:00 17:00 Answer Question 1 (40%) and
More informationds/cft Contents Lecturer: Prof. Juan Maldacena Transcriber: Alexander Chen August 7, Lecture Lecture 2 5
ds/cft Lecturer: Prof. Juan Maldacena Transcriber: Alexander Chen August 7, 2011 Contents 1 Lecture 1 2 2 Lecture 2 5 1 ds/cft Lecture 1 1 Lecture 1 We will first review calculation of quantum field theory
More informationQuantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions I
Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions I Alex Maloney, McGill University Nordic Network Meeting, 12-09 A. M. & { S. Giombi, W. Song, A. Strominger, E. Witten, A. Wissanji, X. Yin} Empirical Evidence that Canada
More informationA Holographic Description of Black Hole Singularities. Gary Horowitz UC Santa Barbara
A Holographic Description of Black Hole Singularities Gary Horowitz UC Santa Barbara Global event horizons do not exist in quantum gravity: String theory predicts that quantum gravity is holographic:
More informationTASI lectures: Holography for strongly coupled media
TASI lectures: Holography for strongly coupled media Dam T. Son Below is only the skeleton of the lectures, containing the most important formulas. I. INTRODUCTION One of the main themes of this school
More informationIntroduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics. Satoshi Iso (KEK)
Introduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics Satoshi Iso (KEK) Plan of the talk [1] Overview of BH thermodynamics causal structure of horizon Hawking radiation stringy picture of BH entropy [2] Hawking radiation
More informationHolographic entanglement entropy
Holographic entanglement entropy Mohsen Alishahiha School of physics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM) 21th Spring Physics Conference, 1393 1 Plan of the talk Entanglement entropy Holography
More informationHolographic Entanglement and Interaction
Holographic Entanglement and Interaction Shigenori Seki RINS, Hanyang University and Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques Intrication holographique et interaction à l IHES le 30 janvier 2014 1 Contents
More informationThe Role of Black Holes in the AdS/CFT Correspondence
The Role of Black Holes in the AdS/CFT Correspondence Mario Flory 23.07.2013 Mario Flory BHs in AdS/CFT 1 / 30 GR and BHs Part I: General Relativity and Black Holes Einstein Field Equations Lightcones
More informationClassical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator
Classical field theory 212 (NS-364B Feynman propagator 1. Introduction States in quantum mechanics in Schrödinger picture evolve as ( Ψt = Û(t,t Ψt, Û(t,t = T exp ı t dt Ĥ(t, (1 t where Û(t,t denotes the
More informationTOPIC V BLACK HOLES IN STRING THEORY
TOPIC V BLACK HOLES IN STRING THEORY Lecture notes Making black holes How should we make a black hole in string theory? A black hole forms when a large amount of mass is collected together. In classical
More informationLECTURE 3: Quantization and QFT
LECTURE 3: Quantization and QFT Robert Oeckl IQG-FAU & CCM-UNAM IQG FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg 14 November 2013 Outline 1 Classical field theory 2 Schrödinger-Feynman quantization 3 Klein-Gordon Theory Classical
More informationHolographic renormalization and reconstruction of space-time. Kostas Skenderis Southampton Theory Astrophysics and Gravity research centre
Holographic renormalization and reconstruction of space-time Southampton Theory Astrophysics and Gravity research centre STAG CH RESEARCH ER C TE CENTER Holographic Renormalization and Entanglement Paris,
More informationQuantization of Scalar Field
Quantization of Scalar Field Wei Wang 2017.10.12 Wei Wang(SJTU) Lectures on QFT 2017.10.12 1 / 41 Contents 1 From classical theory to quantum theory 2 Quantization of real scalar field 3 Quantization of
More information1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions
1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions Predictions for observables in quantum field theories are made by computing expectation values of products of field operators, which are called Green functions
More information3 Rindler Space and Hawking Radiation
3 Rindler Space and Hawking Radiation The next couple of lectures are on Hawking radiation. There are many good references to learn this subject, for example: Carroll s GR book Chapter 9; Townsend gr-qc/970702;
More informationThe Black Hole Information Paradox
University of Groningen Faculty of science and engineering Bachelor thesis The Black Hole Information Paradox Author: Alex Pel Supervisor: Kyriakos Papadodimas Second assessor: Eric Bergshoeff July 6,
More informationThe Klein-Gordon Equation Meets the Cauchy Horizon
Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics University of Chicago University of Mississippi May 10, 2005 Relativistic Wave Equations At the present time, our best theory for describing nature is Quantum
More informationThermalization after holographic bilocal quench
Prepared for submission to JHEP Thermalization after holographic bilocal quench arxiv:1706.07390v3 [hep-th] 10 Oct 017 Irina Ya. Aref eva, Mikhail A. Khramtsov, Maria D. Tikhanovskaya Steklov Mathematical
More informationIf I only had a Brane
If I only had a Brane A Story about Gravity and QCD. on 20 slides and in 40 minutes. AdS/CFT correspondence = Anti de Sitter / Conformal field theory correspondence. Chapter 1: String Theory in a nutshell.
More informationLecture notes 1. Standard physics vs. new physics. 1.1 The final state boundary condition
Lecture notes 1 Standard physics vs. new physics The black hole information paradox has challenged our fundamental beliefs about spacetime and quantum theory. Which belief will have to change to resolve
More informationκ = f (r 0 ) k µ µ k ν = κk ν (5)
1. Horizon regularity and surface gravity Consider a static, spherically symmetric metric of the form where f(r) vanishes at r = r 0 linearly, and g(r 0 ) 0. Show that near r = r 0 the metric is approximately
More informationSymmetries, Horizons, and Black Hole Entropy. Steve Carlip U.C. Davis
Symmetries, Horizons, and Black Hole Entropy Steve Carlip U.C. Davis UC Davis June 2007 Black holes behave as thermodynamic objects T = κ 2πc S BH = A 4 G Quantum ( ) and gravitational (G) Does this thermodynamic
More informationWhy we need quantum gravity and why we don t have it
Why we need quantum gravity and why we don t have it Steve Carlip UC Davis Quantum Gravity: Physics and Philosophy IHES, Bures-sur-Yvette October 2017 The first appearance of quantum gravity Einstein 1916:
More informationQuantum Black Holes and Global Symmetries
Quantum Black Holes and Global Symmetries Daniel Klaewer Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Young Scientist Workshop 217, Schloss Ringberg Outline 1) Quantum fields in curved spacetime 2) The Unruh
More information8.821 String Theory Fall 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 8.81 String Theory Fall 008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8.81 F008 Lecture 1: Boundary of AdS;
More informationQuantum Entanglement of locally perturbed thermal states
Quantum Entanglement of locally perturbed thermal states Joan Simón University of Edinburgh and Maxwell Institute of Mathematical Sciences Holography, strings and higher spins Swansea, March 20, 2015 Based
More informationHolography and (Lorentzian) black holes
Holography and (Lorentzian) black holes Simon Ross Centre for Particle Theory The State of the Universe, Cambridge, January 2012 Simon Ross (Durham) Holography and black holes Cambridge 7 January 2012
More informationSection 4: The Quantum Scalar Field
Physics 8.323 Section 4: The Quantum Scalar Field February 2012 c 2012 W. Taylor 8.323 Section 4: Quantum scalar field 1 / 19 4.1 Canonical Quantization Free scalar field equation (Klein-Gordon) ( µ µ
More informationApplications of AdS/CFT correspondence to cold atom physics
Applications of AdS/CFT correspondence to cold atom physics Sergej Moroz in collaboration with Carlos Fuertes ITP, Heidelberg Outline Basics of AdS/CFT correspondence Schrödinger group and correlation
More informationBlack holes, Holography and Thermodynamics of Gauge Theories
Black holes, Holography and Thermodynamics of Gauge Theories N. Tetradis University of Athens Duality between a five-dimensional AdS-Schwarzschild geometry and a four-dimensional thermalized, strongly
More informationTOPIC X ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS TO RESOLVE THE INFORMATION PARADOX
TOPIC X ALTENATIVE POPOSALS TO ESOLVE THE INFOMATION PAADOX 1 Lecture notes 1 Wormholes 1.1 The fabric of spacetime What is spacetime made of? One might answer: spacetime is made of points. But points
More information2 Quantization of the scalar field
22 Quantum field theory 2 Quantization of the scalar field Commutator relations. The strategy to quantize a classical field theory is to interpret the fields Φ(x) and Π(x) = Φ(x) as operators which satisfy
More informationPAPER 311 BLACK HOLES
MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III Friday, 8 June, 018 9:00 am to 1:00 pm PAPER 311 BLACK HOLES Attempt no more than THREE questions. There are FOUR questions in total. The questions carry equal weight. STATIONERY
More informationBLACK HOLE ENTROPY ENTANGLEMENT AND HOLOGRAPHIC SPACETIME. Ted Jacobson University of Maryland
BLACK HOLE ENTROPY ENTANGLEMENT AND HOLOGRAPHIC SPACETIME Ted Jacobson University of Maryland Goddard Scientific Colloquium, Feb. 7, 2018 Holographic principle Information paradox geometry from entanglement
More informationGeometric Entropy: Black Hole Background
Geometric Entropy: Black Hole Background Frank Wilczek Center for Theoretical Physics, MIT, Cambridge MA 02139 USA March 13, 2014 Abstract I review the derivation of Hawking temperature and entropy through
More information8.821 F2008 Lecture 12: Boundary of AdS; Poincaré patch; wave equation in AdS
8.821 F2008 Lecture 12: Boundary of AdS; Poincaré patch; wave equation in AdS Lecturer: McGreevy Scribe: Francesco D Eramo October 16, 2008 Today: 1. the boundary of AdS 2. Poincaré patch 3. motivate boundary
More informationQuantum Entanglement and the Geometry of Spacetime
Quantum Entanglement and the Geometry of Spacetime Matthew Headrick Brandeis University UMass-Boston Physics Colloquium October 26, 2017 It from Qubit Simons Foundation Entropy and area Bekenstein-Hawking
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 22 Apr 2018
Why do Things Fall? arxiv:1802.01198v2 [hep-th] 22 Apr 2018 Leonard Susskind Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4060, USA Abstract
More informationYasunori Nomura. UC Berkeley; LBNL; Kavli IPMU
Yasunori Nomura UC Berkeley; LBNL; Kavli IPMU Why black holes? Testing grounds for theories of quantum gravity Even most basic questions remain debatable Do black holes evolve unitarily? Does an infalling
More informationBlack hole thermodynamics
Black hole thermodynamics Daniel Grumiller Institute for Theoretical Physics Vienna University of Technology Spring workshop/kosmologietag, Bielefeld, May 2014 with R. McNees and J. Salzer: 1402.5127 Main
More informationPRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in
LONDON BEIJING HONG TSINGHUA Report and Review in Physics Vol2 PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS From Quantum Field Theory to Classical Mechanics Ni Jun Tsinghua University, China NEW JERSEY \Hp SINGAPORE World Scientific
More informationBlack holes as open quantum systems
Black holes as open quantum systems Claus Kiefer Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität zu Köln Hawking radiation 1 1 singularity II γ H γ γ H collapsing 111 star 1 1 I - future event horizon + i
More informationAttempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 19 May 2004
CU-TP-1114 arxiv:hep-th/0405160v1 19 May 2004 A Secret Tunnel Through The Horizon Maulik Parikh 1 Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 Abstract Hawking radiation is often intuitively
More informationHolographic Entanglement Entropy
Motivation Time-dependent Multi-region Summary Holographic entanglement entropy for time dependent states and disconnected regions Durham University INT08: From Strings to Things, April 3, 2008 VH, M.
More informationThe fuzzball paradigm
The fuzzball paradigm Samir D. Mathur The Ohio State University (1) The fuzzball construction (shows how the horizon can be removed in string theory states) (2) The small corrections theorem (proves one
More informationBulk local states on the black holes in AdS/CFT
Bulk local states on the black holes in AdS/CFT Kanato Goto The University of Tokyo,Komaba Holography,Quantum Entanglement and Higher Spin Gravity, Feb.6 th -7 th @YITP,Kyoto Based on the work in progress
More informationFinite-temperature Field Theory
Finite-temperature Field Theory Aleksi Vuorinen CERN Initial Conditions in Heavy Ion Collisions Goa, India, September 2008 Outline Further tools for equilibrium thermodynamics Gauge symmetry Faddeev-Popov
More informationAdS/CFT duality. Agnese Bissi. March 26, Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics Erice. Mathematical Institute University of Oxford
AdS/CFT duality Agnese Bissi Mathematical Institute University of Oxford March 26, 2015 Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics Erice What is it about? AdS=Anti de Sitter Maximally symmetric solution of
More informationTOPIC VII ADS/CFT DUALITY
TOPIC VII ADS/CFT DUALITY The conjecture of AdS/CFT duality marked an important step in the development of string theory. Quantum gravity is expected to be a very complicated theory. String theory provides
More information2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics
Chapter 2 Green Functions and Observables 2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics We will be interested in studying the properties of the ground state of a quantum mechanical many particle system. We
More informationBlack-Holes in AdS: Hawking-Page Phase Transition
Black-Holes in AdS: Hawking-Page Phase Transition Guilherme Franzmann December 4, 2014 1 / 14 References Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Anti-de Sitter space, S.W. Hawking and Don. N Page (1983); Black
More informationReconstructing Bulk from Boundary: clues and challenges
Reconstructing Bulk from Boundary: clues and challenges Ben Freivogel GRAPPA and ITFA Universiteit van Amsterdam Ben Freivogel () Reconstructing Bulk from Boundary May 24, 2013 1 / 28 Need quantum gravity
More informationQuantum Fields in Curved Spacetime
Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime Lecture 3 Finn Larsen Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics Yerevan, August 22, 2016. Recap AdS 3 is an instructive application of quantum fields in curved space. The
More informationHolography Duality (8.821/8.871) Fall 2014 Assignment 2
Holography Duality (8.821/8.871) Fall 2014 Assignment 2 Sept. 27, 2014 Due Thursday, Oct. 9, 2014 Please remember to put your name at the top of your paper. Note: The four laws of black hole mechanics
More informationThe Apparent Universe
The Apparent Universe Alexis HELOU APC - AstroParticule et Cosmologie, Paris, France alexis.helou@apc.univ-paris7.fr 11 th June 2014 Reference This presentation is based on a work by P. Binétruy & A. Helou:
More informationEmergent Causality in Holography
Emergent Causality in Holography Netta Engelhardt Princeton University 20.6.18 Based mostly on: NE, Horowitz 16; NE 16; NE, Fischetti 17 Spacetime Emergence Holography: the equivalence of a higher-dim
More informationAcceleration and Entanglement: a Deteriorating Relationship
Acceleration and Entanglement: a Deteriorating Relationship R.B. Mann Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 120404 (2005) Phys. Rev. A74 032326 (2006) Phys. Rev. A79 042333 (2009) Phys. Rev. A80 02230 (2009) D. Ahn P. Alsing
More informationHolography for Black Hole Microstates
1 / 24 Holography for Black Hole Microstates Stefano Giusto University of Padua Theoretical Frontiers in Black Holes and Cosmology, IIP, Natal, June 2015 2 / 24 Based on: 1110.2781, 1306.1745, 1311.5536,
More informationOn the partner particles for black-hole evaporation
On the partner particles for black-hole evaporation Ralf Schützhold Fakultät für Physik Universität Duisburg-Essen On the partner particles for black-hole evaporation p.1/12 Quantum Radiation Relativistic
More informationHIGHER SPIN DUALITY from THERMOFIELD DOUBLE QFT. AJ+Kenta Suzuki+Jung-Gi Yoon Workshop on Double Field Theory ITS, ETH Zurich, Jan 20-23,2016
HIGHER SPIN DUALITY from THERMOFIELD DOUBLE QFT AJ+Kenta Suzuki+Jung-Gi Yoon Workshop on Double Field Theory ITS, ETH Zurich, Jan 20-23,2016 Overview } Construction of AdS HS Gravity from CFT } Simplest
More informationAdS/CFT Correspondence and Entanglement Entropy
AdS/CFT Correspondence and Entanglement Entropy Tadashi Takayanagi (Kyoto U.) Based on hep-th/0603001 [Phys.Rev.Lett.96(2006)181602] hep-th/0605073 [JHEP 0608(2006)045] with Shinsei Ryu (KITP) hep-th/0608213
More information8.821 String Theory Fall 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 8.81 String Theory Fall 008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8.81 F008 Lecture 11: CFT continued;
More informationQuantum gravity and entanglement
Quantum gravity and entanglement Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India HRI, February 2011 PLAN 1. Entanglement in quantum gravity 2. Entanglement from quantum gravity I shall use
More informationQuestions for Black Hole evaporation from Quantum Statistical Mechanics
Questions for Black Hole evaporation from Quantum Statistical Mechanics David Wallace Philosophy Department, University of Southern California Black Hole Initiative, May 9 th 2017 Thermally Typical Black
More informationThe Feynman Propagator and Cauchy s Theorem
The Feynman Propagator and Cauchy s Theorem Tim Evans 1 (1st November 2018) The aim of these notes is to show how to derive the momentum space form of the Feynman propagator which is (p) = i/(p 2 m 2 +
More informationThe arrow of time, black holes, and quantum mixing of large N Yang-Mills theories
The arrow of time, black holes, and quantum mixing of large N Yang-Mills theories Hong Liu Massachusetts Institute of Technology based on Guido Festuccia, HL, to appear The arrow of time and space-like
More informationQuantum mechanics and the geometry of spacetime
Quantum mechanics and the geometry of spacetime Juan Maldacena PPCM Conference May 2014 Outline Brief review of the gauge/gravity duality Role of strong coupling in the emergence of the interior Role of
More informationHolographic thermalization of 2D CFT
Holographic thermalization of 2D CFT Shu Lin ( 林树 ) Sun Yat-Sen University ICTS, USTC, 9/8/2016 SL, Shuryak, PRD 2008 SL, PRD 2016 Outline Phenomenon of thermalization in physics Holographic description
More information21 Holographic Entanglement Entropy
21 Holographic Entanglement Entropy 21.1 The formula We now turn to entanglement entropy in CFTs with a semiclassical holographic dual. That is, we assume the CFT has a large number of degrees of freedom
More information8.821 String Theory Fall 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 8.8 String Theory Fall 008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8.8 F008 Lecture 0: CFTs in D > Lecturer:
More informationLecture 8: 1-loop closed string vacuum amplitude
Lecture 8: 1-loop closed string vacuum amplitude José D. Edelstein University of Santiago de Compostela STRING THEORY Santiago de Compostela, March 5, 2013 José D. Edelstein (USC) Lecture 8: 1-loop vacuum
More informationChapter 2 General Relativity and Black Holes
Chapter 2 General Relativity and Black Holes In this book, black holes frequently appear, so we will describe the simplest black hole, the Schwarzschild black hole and its physics. Roughly speaking, a
More informationBlack Holes: Complementarity vs. Firewalls
Black Holes: Complementarity vs. Firewalls Raphael Bousso Center for Theoretical Physics University of California, Berkeley Strings 2012, Munich July 27, 2012 The Question Complementarity The AMPS Gedankenexperiment
More informationDuality and Holography
Duality and Holography? Joseph Polchinski UC Davis, 5/16/11 Which of these interactions doesn t belong? a) Electromagnetism b) Weak nuclear c) Strong nuclear d) a) Electromagnetism b) Weak nuclear c) Strong
More informationÜbungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.
Übungen zu RT2 SS 2010 (1) Show that the tensor field g µν (x) = η µν is invariant under Poincaré transformations, i.e. x µ x µ = L µ νx ν + c µ, where L µ ν is a constant matrix subject to L µ ρl ν ση
More informationWeek 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field
Notes for Phys. 610, 2011. These summaries are meant to be informal, and are subject to revision, elaboration and correction. They will be based on material covered in class, but may differ from it by
More informationHolographic Cosmology Beyond Inflation? Mark Trodden! University of Pennsylvania
Holographic Cosmology Beyond Inflation? Mark Trodden! University of Pennsylvania Workshop: Status and Future of Inflationary Theory! University of Chicago, August 22-24, 2014 Questions Haven t been thinking
More informationShape Dynamic Black Holes and Horizons
Shape Dynamic. 1/1 Shape Dynamic and Horizons Gabriel Herczeg Physics, University of California, Davis May 9, 2014 Shape Dynamic. 2/1 Asymptotically Flat Boundary Conditions Asymptotically Flat Boundary
More informationGauge/Gravity Duality and the Black Hole Interior
Gauge/Gravity Duality and the Black Hole Interior Joseph Polchinski Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics University of California at Santa Barbara KIAS-YITP joint workshop String Theory, Black Holes
More informationBlack Holes and Thermodynamics I: Classical Black Holes
Black Holes and Thermodynamics I: Classical Black Holes Robert M. Wald General references: R.M. Wald General Relativity University of Chicago Press (Chicago, 1984); R.M. Wald Living Rev. Rel. 4, 6 (2001).
More informationRadiation from the non-extremal fuzzball
adiation from the non-extremal fuzzball Borun D. Chowdhury The Ohio State University The Great Lakes Strings Conference 2008 work in collaboration with Samir D. Mathur (arxiv:0711.4817) Plan Describe non-extremal
More informationReview of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10
Review of scalar field theory Srednicki 5, 9, 10 2 The LSZ reduction formula based on S-5 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate
More informationThe Absence of Horizon in Black-Hole Formation
The Absence of Horizon in Black-Hole Formation Pei-Ming Ho 1, Department of Physics and Center for Theoretical Sciences, Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei
More information19 Entanglement Entropy in Quantum Field Theory
19 Entanglement Entropy in Quantum Field Theory So far we have discussed entanglement in ordinary quantum mechanics, where the Hilbert space of a finite region is finite dimensional. Now we will discuss
More informationIntroduction to AdS/CFT
Introduction to AdS/CFT D-branes Type IIA string theory: Dp-branes p even (0,2,4,6,8) Type IIB string theory: Dp-branes p odd (1,3,5,7,9) 10D Type IIB two parallel D3-branes low-energy effective description:
More information