PHIL 422 Advanced Logic Inductive Proof
|
|
- Elvin Summers
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PHIL 422 Advanced Logic Inductive Proof 1. Preamble: One of the most powerful tools in your meta-logical toolkit will be proof by induction. Just about every significant meta-logical result relies upon inductive proof in some way. So you will need to become extremely familiar with how inductive proofs are constructed 2. Let s start with an example from mathematics. Note the following series of sums: 1=1 1+3= = = =25 Notice a pattern? In the first 5 cases at least, the sum of the first n odd numbers seems to be n 2. Does this pattern continue? It seems so; the sum of the first 6 odd numbers is 25+11=36. And the sum of the first 7 would be 36+13=49. Surely, this can t just be pure coincidence! But how can we assure ourselves that there isn t some weird number way out there for which this result doesn t hold, or some place out on the number line where this pattern stops. 3. Inductive proof provides us with this assurance. In inductive proofs, we show that some hypothesis holds for the earliest members of a series, and then we use that result to show that it must therefore hold for all later ones as well. The procedure: Step 1. We start by framing a hypothesis about all of the members of a class or sort. ( Every S is a Φ. ) Step 2. We then specify a way in which all the members of that class may be ordered. ( All of the S s may be ordered in terms of.. ) Here are two examples: (i) The set of all natural numbers (0, 1, 2, 3, etc.) can be ordered according to their magnitude. In this case, we can say that the ordering is complete or total, because for every pairs of numbers, either one is greater than, or less than, the other (there are no ties ). (ii) The set of all sentences in our logical language can be ordered according to
2 the number of truth-functors that they contain (you may think of this as their length ). Unlike the case above, this ordering is only partial, since distinct sentences might have an equal number of truth factors. Step 3. We then show that this hypothesis holds for the first elements of that ordering (the base cases). ( The first or earliest S s are Φ. ) For example, for an arithmetical generalization, we show that the hypothesis holds for 0 or for 1 (depending upon whether our hypothesis concerns the natural numbers or the counting numbers). For a generalization about logical formulas, we show that the hypothesis holds of atomic sentences. In many cases, this will be trivial. Step 4. We then consider an arbitrary element of a series, and show that, on the assumption that the hypothesis applies to all of the elements earlier in the series (called the inductive hypothesis), the hypothesis must apply to that arbitrary element as well. This is sometimes called the inductive step of the argument. ( If all the earliers S s are Φ, then the subsequent S s must also be Φ ) 4. Let s return to our mathematical example above, and apply the steps of inductive proof. Step 1. Our hypothesis was as follows: The sum of the first n odd numbers is equal to n 2. Step 2. We shall order all of the numbers in the obvious way by their magnitude. Step 3. Proof of the base case: We simply observe or verify that the hypothesis holds for the first case. Namely, the sum of the first 1 odd numbers (1) is equal to 1 2. Step 4. Proof of the inductive step: Take an arbitrary number x, and show that the sum of the first x odd numbers is equal to x 2, on the assumption that the hypothesis holds for any number less than x. This will takes some ordinary algebra (sorry!). But first observe that the sum of the first x odd numbers will be equal to the sum of the first x-1 odd numbers plus the x th odd number. Now that x th odd number will be equal to 2x-1 (you can easily verify this). So the sum of the first x odd numbers will be equal to the sum of the first x-1 odd numbers plus 2x-1. Now observe that x-1 is obviously less than x, and so our inductive assumption
3 must hold of it. That means that the sum of the first x-1 odd numbers is assumed to be (x-1) 2. We now plug in those two values and do the algebra. The sum of the first x odd numbers is now understood to be: The sum of the first x-1 odd numbers + the x th odd number = (x-1) 2 + (2x-1) = (x 2-2x +1) +(2x-1) = x 2 Which is exactly what we wanted to show! Our inductive proof of the hypothesis is now complete! 5. An exercise: try it for yourself! Construct a similar inductive proof establishing that (n)= n(n+1)/2. 6. So why do we care? We know how to establish the expressive or truth-functional completeness of a set of truth functors, but until now we had no formal way of establishing the expressive incompleteness of a set of functors. Now we do, once we begin to apply inductive proof to sentences of our logical language. A Second Example: The expressive limitation of {&, v} Step 1: Our hypothesis is that if we restrict our logical language to atomic sentences and compounds formed by conjunction and disjunction (&, v), then we could never construct a formula that takes on the value true when all of its atomic components are false. Step 2: This time, we ll order all of the relevant formulas by their size (as measured by the number of functors they contain). Step 3: Atomic formulas. Trivially, atomic formulas are false when they are false. The hypothesis clearly holds. Step 4: Given our restriction, we only have two sorts of compounds to consider, conjunctions and disjunctions: First, suppose a compound formula is a conjunction, and that the inductive hypothesis applies to any formula shorter than it. Now, clearly, each of its conjuncts is shorter than it, so they must take on the value false whenever all of their atomic components are false. But that means that when all of the atomic components of our conjunction are false, both of its conjuncts must be false. And that means that our original conjunction must be false as well.
4 An entirely parallel line of reasoning applies in the case that a compound formula is a disjunction (check it for yourself!). Now there is a somewhat interesting upshot of this inductive proof. It establishes that conjunctions and disjunctions alone will not be able to express any truth function that takes on the value true when all of its atomic components are false. In other words, it establishes that the set of truth-functors {&,v} cannot be truth-functionally complete, no matter how hard you try or creative you get. 7. A Third Example: The expressive limitation of the conditional Step 1: Our hypothesis is that no formulas containing only {P, Q, } has a truth table with more than two F s (considered as a 2-place truth function) Step 2: Once again, we ll order all of the relevant formulas by their size (as measured by the number of functors they contain). Step 3: Atomic Formulas: The only atomic formulas to consider here are P and Q. Considered as a 2-place truth function (whose truth table has four rows), its truth table will have exactly two F s. Step 4: Compound formulas: Since we re restricting our language, we only have to consider compound cases which are conditionals. And since the consequent of any conditional is clearly shorter than the conditional itself, the inductive hypothesis holds for it. So we can safely conclude that our conditional s consequent has at most two rows which are false. But since a conditional can be false only when its consequent is false, we may conclude that the conditional itself can be false on at most two rows. The upshot: note that conjunction is a truth function that is false on three rows of its truth table. That means that our inductive proof shows that we cannot express or define the conjunction function by means of the conditional alone. 8. Some exercises: (1) Define conjunction in terms of the conditional and the biconditional (2) Now think of a way to use that result, in combination with the inductive proof above, to establish that the conditional alone cannot define the biconditional. (3) Show that the set {, ~) is also expressively incomplete. To do this, you will need to identify some property that all negations and biconditionals have, which would prevent them from being able to express certain kinds of truth functions. Then use an inductive proof to show that every compound formula constructed from biconditionals and
5 negations must have this property. (4) Observe the following striking pattern: 1 3 = = = = =225 In other words, the sum of the cubes of the first n numbers is equal to the sum of the first n numbers squared. [ n 3 = ( n) 2 ] Now, using the result of section 5. above (a result that itself required an inductive proof), provide an inductive proof establishing that this general pattern holds.
Unary negation: T F F T
Unary negation: ϕ 1 ϕ 1 T F F T Binary (inclusive) or: ϕ 1 ϕ 2 (ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ) T T T T F T F T T F F F Binary (exclusive) or: ϕ 1 ϕ 2 (ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ) T T F T F T F T T F F F Classical (material) conditional: ϕ 1
More informationThe statement calculus and logic
Chapter 2 Contrariwise, continued Tweedledee, if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn t, it ain t. That s logic. Lewis Carroll You will have encountered several languages
More informationNatural deduction for truth-functional logic
Natural deduction for truth-functional logic Phil 160 - Boston University Why natural deduction? After all, we just found this nice method of truth-tables, which can be used to determine the validity or
More informationCSC Discrete Math I, Spring Propositional Logic
CSC 125 - Discrete Math I, Spring 2017 Propositional Logic Propositions A proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true or false Propositional Variables A propositional variable (p, q, r, s,...)
More informationLecture 2. Logic Compound Statements Conditional Statements Valid & Invalid Arguments Digital Logic Circuits. Reading (Epp s textbook)
Lecture 2 Logic Compound Statements Conditional Statements Valid & Invalid Arguments Digital Logic Circuits Reading (Epp s textbook) 2.1-2.4 1 Logic Logic is a system based on statements. A statement (or
More informationProofs. Joe Patten August 10, 2018
Proofs Joe Patten August 10, 2018 1 Statements and Open Sentences 1.1 Statements A statement is a declarative sentence or assertion that is either true or false. They are often labelled with a capital
More informationSymbolic Logic 3. For an inference to be deductively valid it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true.
Symbolic Logic 3 Testing deductive validity with truth tables For an inference to be deductively valid it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true. So, given that truth tables
More informationPHIL12A Section answers, 16 February 2011
PHIL12A Section answers, 16 February 2011 Julian Jonker 1 How much do you know? 1. Show that the following sentences are equivalent. (a) (Ex 4.16) A B A and A B A B (A B) A A B T T T T T T T T T T T F
More informationDeduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 3 Truth Trees
Deduction by Daniel Bonevac Chapter 3 Truth Trees Truth trees Truth trees provide an alternate decision procedure for assessing validity, logical equivalence, satisfiability and other logical properties
More informationHW1 graded review form? HW2 released CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Fall
CSE 20 HW1 graded review form? HW2 released DISCRETE MATH Fall 2017 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/fa17/cse20-ab/ Today's learning goals Translate sentences from English to propositional logic using appropriate
More informationMA103 STATEMENTS, PROOF, LOGIC
MA103 STATEMENTS, PROOF, LOGIC Abstract Mathematics is about making precise mathematical statements and establishing, by proof or disproof, whether these statements are true or false. We start by looking
More informationPhilosophy 220. Truth-Functional Equivalence and Consistency
Philosophy 220 Truth-Functional Equivalence and Consistency Review Logical equivalency: The members of a pair of sentences [of natural language] are logically equivalent if and only if it is not [logically]
More informationIntermediate Logic. Natural Deduction for TFL
Intermediate Logic Lecture Two Natural Deduction for TFL Rob Trueman rob.trueman@york.ac.uk University of York The Trouble with Truth Tables Natural Deduction for TFL The Trouble with Truth Tables The
More informationSection 3.1: Direct Proof and Counterexample 1
Section 3.1: Direct Proof and Counterexample 1 In this chapter, we introduce the notion of proof in mathematics. A mathematical proof is valid logical argument in mathematics which shows that a given conclusion
More informationTruth-Functional Logic
Truth-Functional Logic Syntax Every atomic sentence (A, B, C, ) is a sentence and are sentences With ϕ a sentence, the negation ϕ is a sentence With ϕ and ψ sentences, the conjunction ϕ ψ is a sentence
More informationA Little Deductive Logic
A Little Deductive Logic In propositional or sentential deductive logic, we begin by specifying that we will use capital letters (like A, B, C, D, and so on) to stand in for sentences, and we assume that
More informationKRIPKE S THEORY OF TRUTH 1. INTRODUCTION
KRIPKE S THEORY OF TRUTH RICHARD G HECK, JR 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this note is to give a simple, easily accessible proof of the existence of the minimal fixed point, and of various maximal fixed
More informationProof strategies, or, a manual of logical style
Proof strategies, or, a manual of logical style Dr Holmes September 27, 2017 This is yet another version of the manual of logical style I have been working on for many years This semester, instead of posting
More informationA Little Deductive Logic
A Little Deductive Logic In propositional or sentential deductive logic, we begin by specifying that we will use capital letters (like A, B, C, D, and so on) to stand in for sentences, and we assume that
More informationLogic. Definition [1] A logic is a formal language that comes with rules for deducing the truth of one proposition from the truth of another.
Math 0413 Appendix A.0 Logic Definition [1] A logic is a formal language that comes with rules for deducing the truth of one proposition from the truth of another. This type of logic is called propositional.
More informationProof Techniques (Review of Math 271)
Chapter 2 Proof Techniques (Review of Math 271) 2.1 Overview This chapter reviews proof techniques that were probably introduced in Math 271 and that may also have been used in a different way in Phil
More informationBefore you get started, make sure you ve read Chapter 1, which sets the tone for the work we will begin doing here.
Chapter 2 Mathematics and Logic Before you get started, make sure you ve read Chapter 1, which sets the tone for the work we will begin doing here. 2.1 A Taste of Number Theory In this section, we will
More information~ p is always false. Based on the basic truth table for disjunction, if q is true then p ~
MAT 101 Solutions Exam 2 (Logic, Part I) Multiple-Choice Questions 1. D Because this sentence contains exactly ten words, it is stating that it is false. But if it is taken to be false, then it has to
More informationNumbers that are divisible by 2 are even. The above statement could also be written in other logically equivalent ways, such as:
3.4 THE CONDITIONAL & BICONDITIONAL Definition. Any statement that can be put in the form If p, then q, where p and q are basic statements, is called a conditional statement and is written symbolically
More informationIntroducing Proof 1. hsn.uk.net. Contents
Contents 1 1 Introduction 1 What is proof? 1 Statements, Definitions and Euler Diagrams 1 Statements 1 Definitions Our first proof Euler diagrams 4 3 Logical Connectives 5 Negation 6 Conjunction 7 Disjunction
More informationCISC-102 Fall 2017 Week 3. Principle of Mathematical Induction
Week 3 1 of 17 CISC-102 Fall 2017 Week 3 Principle of Mathematical Induction A proposition is defined as a statement that is either true or false. We will at times make a declarative statement as a proposition
More informationLogic. Def. A Proposition is a statement that is either true or false.
Logic Logic 1 Def. A Proposition is a statement that is either true or false. Examples: Which of the following are propositions? Statement Proposition (yes or no) If yes, then determine if it is true or
More informationPropositional Logic and Semantics
Propositional Logic and Semantics English is naturally ambiguous. For example, consider the following employee (non)recommendations and their ambiguity in the English language: I can assure you that no
More informationLogic, Sets, and Proofs
Logic, Sets, and Proofs David A. Cox and Catherine C. McGeoch Amherst College 1 Logic Logical Operators. A logical statement is a mathematical statement that can be assigned a value either true or false.
More informationPropositional Equivalence
Propositional Equivalence Tautologies and contradictions A compound proposition that is always true, regardless of the truth values of the individual propositions involved, is called a tautology. Example:
More informationPropositional Logic, Predicates, and Equivalence
Chapter 1 Propositional Logic, Predicates, and Equivalence A statement or a proposition is a sentence that is true (T) or false (F) but not both. The symbol denotes not, denotes and, and denotes or. If
More informationA Statement; Logical Operations
A Statement; Logical Operations Mathematical logic is a branch of mathematics that deals with the formal principles, methods and criteria of validity of reasoning and knowledge. Logic is concerned with
More informationExample. Logic. Logical Statements. Outline of logic topics. Logical Connectives. Logical Connectives
Logic Logic is study of abstract reasoning, specifically, concerned with whether reasoning is correct. Logic focuses on relationship among statements as opposed to the content of any particular statement.
More informationLECTURE 1. Logic and Proofs
LECTURE 1 Logic and Proofs The primary purpose of this course is to introduce you, most of whom are mathematics majors, to the most fundamental skills of a mathematician; the ability to read, write, and
More informationAMTH140 Lecture 8. Symbolic Logic
AMTH140 Lecture 8 Slide 1 Symbolic Logic March 10, 2006 Reading: Lecture Notes 6.2, 6.3; Epp 1.1, 1.2 Logical Connectives Let p and q denote propositions, then: 1. p q is conjunction of p and q, meaning
More informationChapter 2. Mathematical Reasoning. 2.1 Mathematical Models
Contents Mathematical Reasoning 3.1 Mathematical Models........................... 3. Mathematical Proof............................ 4..1 Structure of Proofs........................ 4.. Direct Method..........................
More informationPropositional Logic Review
Propositional Logic Review UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016 John MacFarlane The task of describing a logical system comes in three parts: Grammar Describing what counts as a formula Semantics Defining
More informationDiscrete Math, Spring Solutions to Problems V
Discrete Math, Spring 202 - Solutions to Problems V Suppose we have statements P, P 2, P 3,, one for each natural number In other words, we have the collection or set of statements {P n n N} a Suppose
More informationAt the start of the term, we saw the following formula for computing the sum of the first n integers:
Chapter 11 Induction This chapter covers mathematical induction. 11.1 Introduction to induction At the start of the term, we saw the following formula for computing the sum of the first n integers: Claim
More informationProving simple set properties...
Proving simple set properties... Part 1: Some examples of proofs over sets Fall 2013 Proving simple set properties... Fall 2013 1 / 17 Introduction Overview: Learning outcomes In this session we will...
More informationCHAPTER 6 - THINKING ABOUT AND PRACTICING PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC
1 CHAPTER 6 - THINKING ABOUT AND PRACTICING PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC Here, you ll learn: what it means for a logic system to be finished some strategies for constructing proofs Congratulations! Our system of
More informationIntroduction Propositional Logic. Discrete Mathematics Andrei Bulatov
Introduction Propositional Logic Discrete Mathematics Andrei Bulatov Discrete Mathematics Propositional Logic 2-2 What is Logic? Computer science is a mere continuation of logic by other means Georg Gottlob
More informationMATHEMATICAL INDUCTION
MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION MATH 3A SECTION HANDOUT BY GERARDO CON DIAZ Imagine a bunch of dominoes on a table. They are set up in a straight line, and you are about to push the first piece to set off the chain
More information2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary Aaron Tan 21 25 August 2017 1 2. The Logic of Compound Statements 2.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Statements; Compound Statements; Statement Form (Propositional
More informationMath Real Analysis
1 / 28 Math 370 - Real Analysis G.Pugh Sep 3 2013 Real Analysis 2 / 28 3 / 28 What is Real Analysis? Wikipedia: Real analysis... has its beginnings in the rigorous formulation of calculus. It is a branch
More informationPropositional Logic. Fall () Propositional Logic Fall / 30
Propositional Logic Fall 2013 () Propositional Logic Fall 2013 1 / 30 1 Introduction Learning Outcomes for this Presentation 2 Definitions Statements Logical connectives Interpretations, contexts,... Logically
More informationSection 1.1: Logical Form and Logical Equivalence
Section 1.1: Logical Form and Logical Equivalence An argument is a sequence of statements aimed at demonstrating the truth of an assertion. The assertion at the end of an argument is called the conclusion,
More information1.1 Statements and Compound Statements
Chapter 1 Propositional Logic 1.1 Statements and Compound Statements A statement or proposition is an assertion which is either true or false, though you may not know which. That is, a statement is something
More informationLecture 02: Propositional Logic
Lecture 02: Propositional Logic CSCI 358 Discrete Mathematics, Spring 2016 Hua Wang, Ph.D. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science January 19, 2015 Propositional logic Propositional logic
More information3 The language of proof
3 The language of proof After working through this section, you should be able to: (a) understand what is asserted by various types of mathematical statements, in particular implications and equivalences;
More informationDirect Proof MAT231. Fall Transition to Higher Mathematics. MAT231 (Transition to Higher Math) Direct Proof Fall / 24
Direct Proof MAT231 Transition to Higher Mathematics Fall 2014 MAT231 (Transition to Higher Math) Direct Proof Fall 2014 1 / 24 Outline 1 Overview of Proof 2 Theorems 3 Definitions 4 Direct Proof 5 Using
More informationDiscrete Structures for Computer Science
Discrete Structures for Computer Science William Garrison bill@cs.pitt.edu 6311 Sennott Square Lecture #2: Propositional Logic Based on materials developed by Dr. Adam Lee Today s Topic: Propositional
More informationHence, the sequence of triangular numbers is given by., the. n th square number, is the sum of the first. S n
Appendix A: The Principle of Mathematical Induction We now present an important deductive method widely used in mathematics: the principle of mathematical induction. First, we provide some historical context
More informationMATH10040: Chapter 0 Mathematics, Logic and Reasoning
MATH10040: Chapter 0 Mathematics, Logic and Reasoning 1. What is Mathematics? There is no definitive answer to this question. 1 Indeed, the answer given by a 21st-century mathematician would differ greatly
More informationA statement is a sentence that is definitely either true or false but not both.
5 Logic In this part of the course we consider logic. Logic is used in many places in computer science including digital circuit design, relational databases, automata theory and computability, and artificial
More informationToday s Topic: Propositional Logic
Today s Topic: Propositional Logic What is a proposition? Logical connectives and truth tables Translating between English and propositional logic Logic is the basis of all mathematical and analytical
More informationMI 4 Mathematical Induction Name. Mathematical Induction
Mathematical Induction It turns out that the most efficient solution to the Towers of Hanoi problem with n disks takes n 1 moves. If this isn t the formula you determined, make sure to check your data
More informationSupplementary Logic Notes CSE 321 Winter 2009
1 Propositional Logic Supplementary Logic Notes CSE 321 Winter 2009 1.1 More efficient truth table methods The method of using truth tables to prove facts about propositional formulas can be a very tedious
More informationInduction 1 = 1(1+1) = 2(2+1) = 3(3+1) 2
Induction 0-8-08 Induction is used to prove a sequence of statements P(), P(), P(3),... There may be finitely many statements, but often there are infinitely many. For example, consider the statement ++3+
More informationSection 1.2: Propositional Logic
Section 1.2: Propositional Logic January 17, 2017 Abstract Now we re going to use the tools of formal logic to reach logical conclusions ( prove theorems ) based on wffs formed by some given statements.
More informationCompleteness for FOL
Completeness for FOL Overview Adding Witnessing Constants The Henkin Theory The Elimination Theorem The Henkin Construction Lemma 12 This lemma assures us that our construction of M h works for the atomic
More informationTRUTH-THEORIES FOR FRAGMENTS OF PA
TRUTH-THEORIES FOR FRAGMENTS OF PA RICHARD G. HECK, JR. The discussion here follows Petr Hájek and Pavel Pudlák, Metamathematics of First-order Arithmetic (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993). See especially
More informationNotes on arithmetic. 1. Representation in base B
Notes on arithmetic The Babylonians that is to say, the people that inhabited what is now southern Iraq for reasons not entirely clear to us, ued base 60 in scientific calculation. This offers us an excuse
More informationLogic. Quantifiers. (real numbers understood). x [x is rotten in Denmark]. x<x+x 2 +1
Logic One reason for studying logic is that we need a better notation than ordinary English for expressing relationships among various assertions or hypothetical states of affairs. A solid grounding in
More information2.2: Logical Equivalence: The Laws of Logic
Example (2.7) For primitive statement p and q, construct a truth table for each of the following compound statements. a) p q b) p q Here we see that the corresponding truth tables for two statement p q
More informationPROBLEM SET 3: PROOF TECHNIQUES
PROBLEM SET 3: PROOF TECHNIQUES CS 198-087: INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL THINKING UC BERKELEY EECS FALL 2018 This homework is due on Monday, September 24th, at 6:30PM, on Gradescope. As usual, this homework
More informationDivisibility = 16, = 9, = 2, = 5. (Negative!)
Divisibility 1-17-2018 You probably know that division can be defined in terms of multiplication. If m and n are integers, m divides n if n = mk for some integer k. In this section, I ll look at properties
More informationPEANO AXIOMS FOR THE NATURAL NUMBERS AND PROOFS BY INDUCTION. The Peano axioms
PEANO AXIOMS FOR THE NATURAL NUMBERS AND PROOFS BY INDUCTION The Peano axioms The following are the axioms for the natural numbers N. You might think of N as the set of integers {0, 1, 2,...}, but it turns
More informationManual of Logical Style
Manual of Logical Style Dr. Holmes January 9, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Conjunction 3 2.1 Proving a conjunction...................... 3 2.2 Using a conjunction........................ 3 3 Implication
More informationChapter 4: Classical Propositional Semantics
Chapter 4: Classical Propositional Semantics Language : L {,,, }. Classical Semantics assumptions: TWO VALUES: there are only two logical values: truth (T) and false (F), and EXTENSIONALITY: the logical
More informationTHE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS
CHAPTER 2 THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. SECTION 2.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logical Form
More information1.1 Language and Logic
c Oksana Shatalov, Fall 2017 1 1.1 Language and Logic Mathematical Statements DEFINITION 1. A proposition is any declarative sentence (i.e. it has both a subject and a verb) that is either true or false,
More informationIntroduction Propositional Logic
Discrete Mathematics for CSE of KU Introduction Propositional Logic Instructor: Kangil Kim (CSE) E-mail: kikim01@konkuk.ac.kr Tel. : 02-450-3493 Room : New Milenium Bldg. 1103 Lab : New Engineering Bldg.
More information1 Propositional Logic
1 Propositional Logic Required reading: Foundations of Computation. Sections 1.1 and 1.2. 1. Introduction to Logic a. Logical consequences. If you know all humans are mortal, and you know that you are
More informationNote: The area of logic that deals with propositions is called the propositional calculus or propositional logic.
Ch. 1.1 Logic Logic 1 Def. A Proposition is a statement that is either true or false. Example 1: Which of the following are propositions? Statement Proposition (yes or no) UHD is a University 1 + 3 = 0
More informationToday s Lecture 2/25/10. Truth Tables Continued Introduction to Proofs (the implicational rules of inference)
Today s Lecture 2/25/10 Truth Tables Continued Introduction to Proofs (the implicational rules of inference) Announcements Homework: -- Ex 7.3 pg. 320 Part B (2-20 Even). --Read chapter 8.1 pgs. 345-361.
More informationFINITE ABELIAN GROUPS Amin Witno
WON Series in Discrete Mathematics and Modern Algebra Volume 7 FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS Amin Witno Abstract We detail the proof of the fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups, which states that every
More informationSteinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning. Mathematical Proof and Proving (MPP)
Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning Terminology, Notations, Definitions, & Principles: Mathematical Proof and Proving (MPP) 1. A statement
More informationFoundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes
Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes These notes form a brief summary of what has been covered during the lectures. All the definitions must be memorized and understood. Statements
More informationLecture 7. Logic. Section1: Statement Logic.
Ling 726: Mathematical Linguistics, Logic, Section : Statement Logic V. Borschev and B. Partee, October 5, 26 p. Lecture 7. Logic. Section: Statement Logic.. Statement Logic..... Goals..... Syntax of Statement
More informationProofs: A General How To II. Rules of Inference. Rules of Inference Modus Ponens. Rules of Inference Addition. Rules of Inference Conjunction
Introduction I Proofs Computer Science & Engineering 235 Discrete Mathematics Christopher M. Bourke cbourke@cse.unl.edu A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It s a proof. A proof is a proof. And when
More informationSeminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010)
http://math.sun.ac.za/amsc/sam Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics 2009-2010 Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010) Contents 2009 Semester I: Elements 5 1. Cartesian product
More informationTHE LOGIC OF QUANTIFIED STATEMENTS. Predicates and Quantified Statements I. Predicates and Quantified Statements I CHAPTER 3 SECTION 3.
CHAPTER 3 THE LOGIC OF QUANTIFIED STATEMENTS SECTION 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Predicates
More informationDiscrete Mathematics
Discrete Mathematics Discrete mathematics is devoted to the study of discrete or distinct unconnected objects. Classical mathematics deals with functions on real numbers. Real numbers form a continuous
More informationTheorem. For every positive integer n, the sum of the positive integers from 1 to n is n(n+1)
Week 1: Logic Lecture 1, 8/1 (Sections 1.1 and 1.3) Examples of theorems and proofs Theorem (Pythagoras). Let ABC be a right triangle, with legs of lengths a and b, and hypotenuse of length c. Then a +
More information1.1 Language and Logic
c Oksana Shatalov, Spring 2018 1 1.1 Language and Logic Mathematical Statements DEFINITION 1. A proposition is any declarative sentence (i.e. it has both a subject and a verb) that is either true or false,
More informationThe following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text: - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof
Ch. 1.6 Introduction to Proofs The following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof - Direct proof - Indirect proof (our book calls this by contraposition)
More informationBox. Turn in your e xam to Kathy Stackhouse in Chem 303 by noon on Thursday, March 30.
Phil 201 Exam #6 Score Name Instructions: Open book, open notes. Do all your work on these pages. When doing derivations in this exam, you may use any of the simple, complex, or derived rules of truth-functional
More informationFinal Exam Theory Quiz Answer Page
Philosophy 120 Introduction to Logic Final Exam Theory Quiz Answer Page 1. (a) is a wff (and a sentence); its outer parentheses have been omitted, which is permissible. (b) is also a wff; the variable
More informationDiscrete Mathematics for CS Fall 2003 Wagner Lecture 3. Strong induction
CS 70 Discrete Mathematics for CS Fall 2003 Wagner Lecture 3 This lecture covers further variants of induction, including strong induction and the closely related wellordering axiom. We then apply these
More informationReading and Writing. Mathematical Proofs. Slides by Arthur van Goetham
Reading and Writing Mathematical Proofs Slides by Arthur van Goetham What is a proof? Why explanations are not proofs What is a proof? A method for establishing truth What establishes truth depends on
More informationLogik für Informatiker Proofs in propositional logic
Logik für Informatiker Proofs in propositional logic WiSe 009/10 al consequence Q is a logical consequence of P 1,, P n, if all worlds that make P 1,, P n true also make Q true Q is a tautological consequence
More informationProofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q
Chapter Proofs In this chapter we develop three methods for proving a statement. To start let s suppose the statement is of the form P Q or if P, then Q. Direct: This method typically starts with P. Then,
More informationLogic and Proofs 1. 1 Overview. 2 Sentential Connectives. John Nachbar Washington University December 26, 2014
John Nachbar Washington University December 26, 2014 Logic and Proofs 1 1 Overview. These notes provide an informal introduction to some basic concepts in logic. For a careful exposition, see, for example,
More informationDISCRETE STRUCTURES WEEK5 LECTURE1
DISCRETE STRUCTURES WEEK5 LECTURE1 Let s get started with... Logic! Spring 2010 CPCS 222 - Discrete Structures 2 Logic Crucial for mathematical reasoning Important for program design Used for designing
More informationFunctions. Lecture 4: Truth functions, evaluating compound statements. Arithmetic Functions. x y x+y
Lecture 4: ruth functions, evaluating compound statements 1. unctions, arithmetic functions, and truth functions 2. Definitions of truth functions unctions A function is something that takes inputs and
More informationLogical Agents. Knowledge based agents. Knowledge based agents. Knowledge based agents. The Wumpus World. Knowledge Bases 10/20/14
0/0/4 Knowledge based agents Logical Agents Agents need to be able to: Store information about their environment Update and reason about that information Russell and Norvig, chapter 7 Knowledge based agents
More informationMathematics 114L Spring 2018 D.A. Martin. Mathematical Logic
Mathematics 114L Spring 2018 D.A. Martin Mathematical Logic 1 First-Order Languages. Symbols. All first-order languages we consider will have the following symbols: (i) variables v 1, v 2, v 3,... ; (ii)
More informationFormal Logic. Critical Thinking
ormal Logic Critical hinking Recap: ormal Logic If I win the lottery, then I am poor. I win the lottery. Hence, I am poor. his argument has the following abstract structure or form: If P then Q. P. Hence,
More informationLecture 14 Rosser s Theorem, the length of proofs, Robinson s Arithmetic, and Church s theorem. Michael Beeson
Lecture 14 Rosser s Theorem, the length of proofs, Robinson s Arithmetic, and Church s theorem Michael Beeson The hypotheses needed to prove incompleteness The question immediate arises whether the incompleteness
More information