1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps"

Transcription

1 1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps Last updated: April 14, Examples and definitions Roughly, manifolds are sets where one can introduce coordinates. An n-dimensional manifold is a set whose points can be parameterized by arrays of n independent variables. Introducing such a parametrization is called a coordinate system or a chart. It may happen that that it is not possible to have a single coordinate system for the whole manifold and we need to consider instead overlapping patches each with its own system of coordinates. Therefore we are forced to consider changes of coordinates. (For a particular patch, a coordinate system is not unique either.) Later we shall see that there is topology involved as well, because each manifold automatically carries a structure of a topological space. Before giving precise definitions, let us discuss first the fundamental idea of coordinates. What are coordinates? Coordinates on familiar spaces. Example 1.1. A point x R n is by definition an array (x 1,..., x n ). The numbers x i are called the standard coordinates on R n. (The superscript is an index, not power.) On R 2 and R 3, the standard coordinates are traditionally denoted x, y, z. Example 1.2. A linear (more precisely, affine ) change of coordinates on R n : if we consider variables y i so that y 1 x 1 b 1... = A , y n x n b n where A is an invertible square matrix (det A 0) and b i some constants, then the standard coordinates x i can be expressed in terms of y j. Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondence x (y 1,..., y n ) and the variables y j may be regarded as new affine coordinates on R n. (This is the definition of affine coordinates on R n.) 1

2 Example 1.3. Polar coordinates on R 2 ; spherical coordinates on R 3, and on R n for n > 3 (which can be defined by induction). For example, for R 2, x = (x, y) (r, θ) where x = r cos θ, y = r sin θ. Note: coordinates (r, θ) serve not for the whole R 2, but only for a part of it (an open subset). Example 1.4. In general, for an open domain U R n, differentiable functions y 1,..., y n defined on U make a system of curvilinear coordinates on U if it is possible to express back the standard coordinates x i in terms of y j, again by differentiable functions. So there a one-to-one correspondence x (y 1,..., y n ) for x U differentiable in both directions. Then automatically the Jacobi matrix x 1 x... 1 y 1 y n x n x... n y 1 y n is invertible. (Polar and spherical coordinates are particular examples of curvilinear coordinates.) Remark 1.1. In this course we shall work with differentiable functions (of several variables). The standard notation for the class of functions possessing continuous derivatives of all orders k is C k. Though many statements remain valid for C k functions, for some finite differentiability order k, it is convenient to concentrate on functions of class C (those possessing derivatives of arbitrary order). They are called smooth. We shall use differentiable and smooth as synonyms, so for us all differentiable functions are supposed to have infinitely many derivatives. Affine coordinates on R n or curvilinear coordinates on open sets U R n have the property that one coordinate system works for the whole space, R n or U respectively. Consider now examples of coordinates on familiar objects where one coordinate system is not enough and one needs to introduce coordinate patches. Example 1.5. The circle S 1 : x 2 + y 2 = 1 in R 2. A coordinate on the circle: u R, where u = x, and conversely x = 2u, y = u2 1 (check!). Good 1 y u 2 +1 u 2 +1 for all points of the circle except N = (0, 1) (the north pole ). To have a coordinate system on S 1 covering the north pole, consider a different variable, denote it u R, such that u = x. It is defined at all points of the circle 1+y except for S = (0, 1) (the south pole ). In particular, u is defined for the 2

3 north pole (where u = 0). Together the subsets where u or u are defined cover the whole S 1. On the intersection where both u and u are defined (it is S 1 \ {N, S}), the change of coordinates is u = 1 (check!). u Example 1.6. Similar stereographic coordinates can be defined for the unit 2-sphere S 2 in R 3 and, more generally, for the unit n-sphere S n R n+1. One needs to choose a point of the sphere S n as the center of projection and a plane (of dimension n) not containing this point as the plane of projection. Then the projection map send an arbitrary point P S n (except for the center) to the point P on the projection plane defined as the intersection with the straight line passing through P and the projection center. This is clearly a one-to-one correspondence P P. Say, if one takes the north pole N = (0,..., 0, 1) as the center and the coordinate plane of the first n coordinates as the projection plane, the corresponding projection will be given by formulas similar to the above. Exercise: check that they have the form u N = x 1 z and x = 2u N u N 2 +1, z = u N 2 1 u N 2 +1, where P = (x, z) Sn and P = (u N, 0), so that x and u are vectors in R n. Find the analogs for the projection from the south pole and calculate the change of coordinates. (Answer: u N = u S u S, if u 2 S R n corresponds to the projection from the south pole.) Example 1.7. Another way of introducing a coordinate on S 1 is to consider the polar angle θ. It is defined initially up to an integral multiple of 2π. To make it single-valued, we may restrict 0 < θ < 2π and thus we have to exclude the point (1, 0). To cover the whole circle, we may introduce θ so that π < θ < 3π and θ = θ for π < θ < 2π and θ = θ + 2π for 0 < θ < π. Example 1.8. Similarly, to obtain coordinates on S 2 R 3, one may use the angles θ, ϕ making part of the spherical coordinates on R 3. More generally, this can be done for S n R n+1 if one recalls the inductive construction of spherical coordinates on R n for any n. (Again, to be able to define such angular coordinates as single-valued functions, certain points have to be excluded from the sphere. To cover the whole S n, it will be necessary to consider several angular coordinate systems, each defined in a particular domain.) In each of the above examples, a familiar space (sphere) can be endowed with a collection of local coordinate systems. ( Local means that it covers only a part of the sphere.) The minimal number of coordinate patches here equals two; one can show that it is not possible to minimize it further, i.e., to cover the sphere by a single coordinate chart. 3

4 Consider more examples. Example 1.9. Recall the notion of a projective space. The real projective space RP n is defined as the set of all straight lines through the origin in R n+1. In other words, it is the set of all one-dimensional subspaces of R n+1 considered as a vector space. So a point of RP n is a line in R n+1. Fix a hyperplane (a plane of dimension n) H R n+1 not through the origin. For example, it is possible to take the hyperplane x n+1 = 1. Each line through the origin O intersects H at a unique point, except for the lines parallel to H, which do not intersect H. The hyperplane H can be identified with R n by dropping the last coordinate x n+1 = 1. Therefore the projective space RP n can be visualized as the ordinary ( affine ) n-dimensional space R n completed by adding extra points to it. 1 Notice that these extra points correspond to the straight lines through the origin in R n R n+1 considered as the coordinate hyperplane x n+1 = 0. Hence they themselves make RP n 1, and we have RP n = R n RP n 1 (so, by induction, RP n = R n R n 1... R 1 R 0 where R 0 is a single point). This construction introduces a coordinate system on the part RP n \RP n 1 of RP n. An inclusion RP n 1 RP n is equivalent to a choice of hyperplane H in R n+1. To cover by coordinates a different part of RP n, one has to choose a different H. It is not difficult to see that by taking as H the n + 1 coordinate hyperplanes x k = 1, where k = 1,..., n + 1, we obtain n + 1 coordinate systems covering together the whole RP n. Example The complex projective space CP n is defined similarly to RP n (with real numbers replaced by complex numbers). One can introduce coordinates into CP n in the same way as above Definition of a manifold. Recall that a set V R n is open is for each point x V there is an open ε-neighborhood entirely contained in V. (In a greater detail, there is ε > 0 such that V ε (x) V, where V ε (x) = {y R n x y < ε}. In other words, V ε (x) is an open ball of radius ε with center at x.) 1 Extra points that one adds to the affine space R n in order to obtain the projective space RP n are often referred to as points at infinity. Indeed, a line in R n+1 parallel to H may be visualized as the limiting position of lines intersecting H when the point of intersection goes farther and farther away from some point in H taken as an origin. 4

5 Remark 1.2. There are many reasons why open sets in R n are important. For us the main motivation is differential calculus, where one studies how the function changes if its argument is given a small increment, i.e., a given initial value of the argument is replaced by adding a small vector (which can point in an arbitrary direction). Therefore its is necessary to be able to consider a function on a whole neighborhood of any given point. So domains of definitions of functions have to be open if we wish to apply to them differential calculus. Fix a natural number n. We shall now give a series of definitions leading to the notion of an n-dimensional smooth manifold. Let X be an abstract set. A chart (or n-dimensional chart) for X is an injective map 2 ϕ: V X where V R n is an open set in R n. Denote the image of a chart ϕ by U, so U = ϕ(v ) X and the inverse map ϕ 1 : U V R n makes sense. There is a one-to-one correspondence between points in U X and arrays (x 1,..., x n ) V R n given by the maps ϕ and ϕ 1 : X U x = ϕ(x 1,..., x n ) (x 1,..., x n ) V R n. We call the n real numbers x 1,..., x n, the coordinates of a point x U X. Formally, (x 1,..., x n ) = ϕ 1 (x). For this reason we also call a chart for X, a coordinate system on X. It is also called a local coordinate system on X to emphasize that ϕ 1 makes sense only for a subset U X. An atlas for X is a collection of charts (ϕ α : V α X) such that the images cover the whole of X: X = α U α where U α = ϕ α (V α ). All charts are supposed to have the same dimension n and if we need to stress this number we speak about an n-dimensional atlas. It is convenient to think that the R n s for different charts are different copies of the space R n and to denote them R n (α), so that V α R n (α). One should keep in mind a geographical atlas, pages of which correspond to different R n (α) (geographical maps of the Earth corresponding to mathematical charts ). Consider sets U α and U β such that U α U β. To the intersection U α U β correspond subsets ϕ 1 α (U α U β ) V α and ϕ 1 (U α U β ) V β. Any 2 Recall that a map ϕ being injective means that ϕ(a) = ϕ(b) implies a = b. β 5

6 point x U α U β has two coordinate descriptions: ϕ 1 α (x) = (x 1 α,..., x n α) and ϕ 1 β (x) = (x1 β,..., xn β ). Therefore there is an invertible map ϕ 1 α ϕ β : ϕ 1 β (U α U β ) ϕ 1 α (U α U β ), (x 1 β,..., x n β) (x 1 α,..., x n α), which we call the change of coordinates between charts ϕ a and ϕ β. Definition 1.1. An atlas A = (ϕ α : V α X) is differentiable or smooth if all the sets ϕ 1 α (U α U β ) are open and the changes of coordinates ϕ 1 α ϕ β are given by differentiable (smooth) functions. Recall that by our convention smooth or differentiable means C. Note that the first part of the condition (that the sets ϕ 1 α (U α U β ) R n α are open for all α) is necessary for the second part (that the changes of coordinates are smooth) to make sense. Coordinate changes are invertible smooth maps between open subsets of (different copies of) R n. Definition 1.2. We say that the set X is an n-dimensional differentiable (or smooth) manifold if X is endowed with a smooth n-dimensional atlas. The number n is called the dimension of X, n = dim X. Besides X, Y and Z, other traditional letters for denoting manifolds are M, N, P, and Q. The dimension of a manifold M is often indicated by a superscript, e.g., we write M = M n if dim M = n. It is important to understand that a manifold is not just a set, but rather a pair (M, A) consisting of a set M and a smooth atlas A on M. With a common abuse of language, we speak of a manifold M, where a certain atlas is implicitly understood. Remark 1.3. We shall normally omit the adjective and call differentiable manifolds simply manifolds because no other kinds of manifolds will be considered 3. It is worth at least to mention some options. If no smoothness condition is imposed, but the changes of coordinates are assumed to be just continuous maps (homeomorphisms) of open subsets of R n, such a version of manifolds is called topological manifolds. They properly belong to topology, not differential geometry. On the opposite extreme, one may require that 3 One can define differentiable manifolds of a particular class of smoothness C k, for a fixed given k (i.e., k continuous derivatives), but we shall not do that. 6

7 the changes of coordinates are given by analytic rather than C functions. (A function is analytic if it can be written as the sum of a power series.) Such a version of manifolds is called real-analytic manifolds. Many of our examples are in fact real-analytic. Also, one may consider open domains of C n instead of R n, introducing complex numbers as coordinates, and require that the changes of coordinates are given by holomorphic (i.e., complexanalytic) functions. In such a way complex manifolds are defined. Any complex manifold of complex dimension n is automatically a smooth (in fact, real-analytic) manifold of dimension 2n. Some of our examples will be complex manifolds. Example Consider S 1. Introduce two charts: ϕ N : R S 1 and ϕ S : R S 1, where ( 2uN ϕ N : u N N 1 ) u 2 N + 1, u 2 N + 1 and ϕ S : u S ( 2uS u 2 + 1, 1 ) u2 S u 2 S + 1 (see Example 1.5). They correspond to the stereographic projections from the north pole N = (0, 1) and the south pole S = (0, 1) respectively. We have V N = R, U N = S 1 \{N}, V S = R, U S = S 1 \{S}, and U N U S = S 1 \{N, S}. For the change of coordinates we obtain ϕ 1 N ϕ S : R \ {0} R \ {0}, u S u N = 1 u S (check!). Therefore it is smooth, and we conclude that S 1 with this atlas is a smooth manifold of dimension 1. Example In the same way we can obtain a smooth atlas consisting of two charts on any sphere S n R n+1. (Find the explicit formulas and check the smoothness!) This makes S n a smooth manifold of dimension n. Example A point of RP n can be identified with a non-zero vector v = R n+1 considered up to a non-zero scalar factor, v kv, k 0. The coordinates of v considered up to a factor are written as (x 1 :... : x n : x n+1 ) and traditionally called the homogeneous coordinates on RP n. (They are not 7

8 coordinates in the true sense, because are defined only up to a factor.) The construction described in Example 1.9 gives a chart ϕ: R n RP n, (y 1,..., y n ) (y 1 :... : y n : 1) with the image V = V (n+1) RP n specified by the inequality x n+1 0 in homogeneous coordinates. The inverse map ϕ 1 : V R n is ( x (x 1 :... : x n : x n+1 1 ) x,..., x n ). n+1 x n+1 Similarly we can define other charts ϕ (k), k = 1,..., n, corresponding to the choice of x k as a non-zero homogeneous coordinate (i.e., to the choice {x k = 1} as the hyperplane H in Example 1.9). Together with ϕ (n+1) they make an atlas for RP n consisting of n + 1 charts. It is smooth. (Write down the explicit formulas and check!) Hence, RP n with this atlas becomes an n-dimensional smooth manifold. Coordinates in any of these charts are traditionally called the inhomogeneous coordinates on RP n. Example Acting similarly for CP n, we obtain the n + 1 charts ϕ (k) : C n CP n again giving a smooth atlas. Hence CP n has the structure of a 2n-dimensional manifold. (Each complex coordinate gives two real coordinates.) Suppose on one set M, two smooth atlases are defined, so we have two smooth manifolds, (M, A 1 ) and (M, A 2 ).For example, for the circle S 1 (or the sphere S n ) we can consider the atlas consisting of the two stereographic charts as above or an atlas constructed using angular coordinates. Are these manifold structures the same? Definition 1.3. Two smooth atlases A 1 and A 2 on the same set M are equivalent if their union A 1 A 2 is also a smooth atlas. This is equivalent to saying that all changes of coordinates between charts from A 1 and charts from A 2 are smooth. Manifolds (M, A 1 ) and (M, A 2 ) (with the same underlying set M) are regarded the same if the atlases A 1 and A 2 are equivalent. We see that, strictly speaking, a manifold should be regarded as a pair consisting of a set and an equivalence class of a smooth atlas (rather than just an atlas). This is important for theoretical considerations. Practically, we always work with some particular fixed atlas. 8

9 Example Numerous natural ways of introducing a manifold structure on the sphere S n, such as, by using angular coordinates or by using the stereographic projection, all give equivalent atlases, as one can check. Therefore we may unambiguously speak of S n as of a smooth manifold. Example Consider two atlases on R each consisting of a single chart: for A 1 = (φ: R R), φ(x) = x (the identity map), and for A 2 = (ψ : R R), ψ(x) = x 3. Check that these atlases are NOT equivalent. (This is just for an illustration. Of course, when speaking about R as a manifold, we always use the natural structure given by the identity map.) 1.2 Smooth functions and smooth maps Consider a manifold M. In the sequel we assume for each manifold a particular smooth atlas is chosen, and when we speak of charts, we mean charts from that atlas. Definition 1.4. A function f : M R is called smooth (or differentiable, note remarks made above) if for all charts ϕ α : V α M the compositions f ϕ α : V α R are smooth functions on open sets V α R n. The set of all smooth functions on M is denoted C (M). The functions f α = f ϕ α : V α R are the coordinate representations of the function f. Such representations in any two different charts are related by the equality f α = f β ϕ βα where ϕ βα = ϕ 1 β ϕ α is the change of coordinates between the charts. Simply speaking, if we describe points of M by their coordinates (w.r.t. a particular chart), then smooth functions on M are expressed as smooth function of coordinates. The requirement that all changes of coordinates ϕ 1 α ϕ β are smooth can be seen as a compatibility condition: if a function on M is smooth in one coordinate system, it will be smooth also in any other coordinate system. (The composition of smooth functions defined on open domains of Euclidean spaces is smooth, as it follows from the chain rule.) The set of all smooth functions on a manifold M is denoted by C (M). Example Elements of C (S 1 ) can be locally represented by smooth functions f = f(ϕ) of the polar angle ϕ (0, 2π) or by smooth functions of the stereographic coordinate u = u N introduced above. 9

10 Example Similarly, functions on S 2 can be represented locally as functions of the two variables u 1, u 2 defined by a stereographic projection, or as functions of the angles θ, ϕ, (or of any other local coordinates that can be introduced on the sphere). In the same way as scalar-valued functions, we can define smooth maps between manifolds. Consider manifolds M1 n and M2 m. We shall denote charts on M1 n and M2 m by adding subscripts, such as ϕ 1α : V 1α M 1, etc. Let F : M 1 M 2 be a map. Consider the subset F 1 (U 2µ ) U 1α and assume that it is not empty. Then F maps it to U 2µ ; on the other hand, consider its preimage ϕ 1 1α (F 1 (U 2µ ) U 1α ) = (F ϕ 1α ) 1 (U 2µ ) V 1α. We have a map ϕ 1 2µ F ϕ 1α : (F ϕ 1α ) 1 (U 2µ ) V 2µ. Definition 1.5. A map F : M 1 M 2 is smooth if all sets (F ϕ 1α ) 1 (U 2µ ) are open and the above map ϕ 1 2µ F ϕ 1α is a smooth map (from an open set of R n to an open set in R m ), for all indices α, µ. The same as for functions f : M R, a map F : M 1 M 2 is smooth, simply speaking, if it is smooth when expressed in coordinates (using arbitrary coordinate systems on both manifolds). The set of all smooth maps from a manifold M 1 to a manifold M 2 is denoted by C (M 1, M 2 ). In particular, for smooth functions, which are maps to R, we have C (M) = C (M, R). Theorem 1.1. The composition of smooth maps of manifolds is smooth. The identity map, for any manifold, is smooth. Hence we have a category of smooth manifolds (see Appendix). Isomorphisms in this category are called diffeomorphisms: Definition 1.6. A map of manifolds F : M 1 M 2 is a diffeomorphism if it is smooth, invertible, and the inverse map F 1 : M 2 M 1 is also smooth. Manifolds M 1 and M 2 are called diffeomorphic if there is a diffeomorphism F : M 1 M 2. Notation: M 1 = M2. Example R + = R. Use the maps exp and log. Let us consider elementary properties of smooth functions. Theorem 1.2. Consider a manifold M n. All constants are smooth functions. The sum and product of smooth functions are smooth functions. 10

11 Proof. Consider, for example, the sum of two functions f, g C (M). We need to check that f + g also belongs to C (M). By definition that means that for any chart ϕ: V M (where V R n ), the composition (f + g) ϕ belongs to C (V ). We have ((f + g) ϕ)(x) = (f + g)(ϕ(x)) = f(ϕ(x)) + g(ϕ(x)) = (f ϕ)(x)+(g ϕ)(x) = (f ϕ+g ϕ)(x) for all x V. Therefore (f + g) ϕ = f ϕ + g ϕ C (V ), since the sum of two smooth function of n variables is a smooth function. Recall that an algebra over any field is a vector space which is also a ring, such that the multiplication is a linear operation, i.e. (ka)b = k(ab) for all algebra elements a, b and field elements k. Theorem 1.2 means that C (M) is an algebra over the field of real numbers R. The algebra C (M) is associative and commutative, and there is a unit 1. Recall that a homomorphism of algebras is a linear map (of algebras regarded as vector spaces) preserving products: ψ(ab) = ψ(a)ψ(b). An isomorphism of algebras is an algebra homomorphism which is invertible. Remark 1.4. As we saw, elements of C (M n ), for any manifold of dimension n, have the local appearance as smooth functions of n real variables. Note, however, that the algebra C (M n ) for an n-dimensional manifold and the algebra C (R n ) are not, in general, isomorphic in spite of their elements having the same local form. Moreover (we do not prove that here), the algebras of functions are different (non-isomorphic) for different (non-diffeomorphic) manifolds, and the algebra C (M) completely defines a manifold M. We shall see now that smooth maps of manifolds induce homomorphisms of the corresponding algebras of smooth functions (in the opposite direction). We first analyze the case of arbitrary sets, because certain facts are not peculiar for manifolds. Let X and Y be sets, and F : X Y be an arbitrary map of sets. Denote by Fun(X) and Fun(Y ) the sets of all functions X R and Y R, respectively. Obviously, they are algebras. Consider g Fun(Y ). The operation g g F is a map Fun(Y ) Fun(X). Definition 1.7. The operation g g F is called the pullback w.r.t. F. Notation: F, so F (g) = g F. 11

12 The pullback F is a map of algebras Fun(Y ) Fun(X) in the opposite direction to the original map of sets F : X Y. Lemma 1.1. The pullback F : Fun(Y ) Fun(X) is an algebra homomorphism. Proof. We need to check that F is linear and sends products to products. For example, consider F (fg). We have ( F (fg) ) (x) = ((fg) F )(x) = (fg)(f (x) = f(f (x))g(f (x)) = ( (f F )(g F ) ) (x) = ( F f F g ) (x) for all x X. Hence F (fg) = F f F g. In the same way we check the linearity. Lemma 1.2. For arbitrary two maps F : X Y and G: Y Z, (G F ) = F G. (1) Proof. Indeed, for an arbitrary h Fun(Z), we have (G F ) (h) = h (G F ) = (h G) F = G (h) F = F (G (h)) = (F G )(h). Note the compositions of F and G in the LHS and of F and G in the RHS of formula (1) are in the opposite orders. Returning to manifolds, we obtain the following theorem. Theorem 1.3. Suppose F : M 1 M 2 is a smooth map of manifolds. Then the pull-back of functions F is an algebra homomorphism C (M 2 ) C (M 1 ), in the reverse order. For two smooth maps, F : M 1 M 2 and G: M 2 M 3, the pull-back under the composition is the composition of pull-backs in the opposite order, (G F ) = F G. Proof. We first have to check that the pull-back of a smooth function on M 2 under a smooth map F : M 1 M 2 is a smooth function on M 1. Indeed, by the definition, for f C (M 2 ), we have F f = f F, which as smooth as the composition of smooth maps. The rest follows from the two lemmas above. Example Consider a map F : R S 1 that sends t R to F (t) = (cos t, sin t) S 1 R 2. It is smooth. Because it is onto, the pullback is injective. (Check!) It follows that C (S 1 ) can be identified with its image in C (R), which is the subalgebra consisting of all 2π-periodic functions. 12

13 Appendix. The notion of a category A category is an algebraic structure (generalizing groups and semigroups) consisting of the following data: a set whose elements are called objects and a set whose elements are called arrows or morphisms, so that for each arrow there are two uniquely defined objects called its source and target (it is said that an arrow goes from its source to its target); there is a binary operation called the product or composition of arrows, defined for any two arrows a 1 and a 2 if the target of a 2 coincides with the source of a 1 ; then the source of the composition a 1 a 2 is equal to the source of a 2 and the target of a 1 a 2, to that of a 1. Two properties are satisfied: composition is associative and for each object X there is a morphism 1 X, called the identity for X, such that a 1 X = a and 1 X a = a for all arrows a going from, and to X respectively. (Categorical constructions are best understood by drawing diagrams where arrows are represented by actual arrows joining letters denoting the corresponding sources and targets.) One obtains a group if there is only one object and all arrows are assumed to be invertible, i.e., for each a there is a 1 such that a a 1 = 1 and a 1 a = 1, where 1 stands for the identity corresponding to the single object. The arrows are the group elements in this case. If no invertibility of arrows is assumed, a category with a single object is what is known as a monoid (or a semigroup with identity ). In the same way as groups appear as transformation groups, i.e., families of certain invertible transformations of a given object (a set, a vector space, etc.), semigroups or monoids appear as families of not necessarily invertible transformations of a fixed object. Categories can appear as families of transformations between different objects. For example, for a fixed vector space V, all invertible linear operators A: V V make a group (called the general linear group of V ); all linear operators A: V V, not necessarily invertible, make a monoid, where the identity is the identity operator 1 V : V V ; finally, the collection of arbitrary linear transformations A: V W between all vector spaces make a category. The objects for this category are the vector spaces and the arrows, the linear maps. The source and the target of a map have their natural meanings. The composition is the composition of maps in the natural sense. This category is called the category of vector spaces. Similarly appear such examples of categories as the category of sets (objects are sets, morphisms are arbitrary maps of sets), the category of topological spaces (objects are topological spaces, morphisms are continuous maps), the category of groups (objects are groups, morphisms are group homomorphisms), the category of associative rings (objects are associative rings, morphisms are ring homomorphisms), etc. From the viewpoint of category theory, in all these examples objects 13

14 are treated as whole entities without internal structure (which is necessary only for specifying the set of arrows); it is morphisms that play a role. One should also note that, the same as abstract groups not arising as transformation groups, there are abstract categories where arrows are not defined as maps between sets. An example is the pair category of a given set S where the objects are defined as the elements of S and the arrows are defined as the pairs (X, Y ) S S, with the composition law (X, Y ) (Y, Z) = (X, Z). Category theory plays a very important role in modern mathematics, primarily as a unifying language for many algebraic and geometric constructions. A simplest abstract notion from category theory is that of an isomorphism. A morphism a in a given category is called an isomorphism if there is a morphism b going in the opposite direction such that a b and b a are the identities for the respective objects. It follows that in this case b is defined uniquely (check from the axioms of a category!). It is called the inverse of a and denoted a 1. Two objects X and Y are called isomorphic if there is at least one isomorphism going from X to Y. One can see that this defines an equivalence relation on the set of objects (check!), also called isomorphism. Examples: in the category of groups, the isomorphisms are the isomorphisms of groups; in the category of sets, the isomorphisms are the bijections; in the category of topological spaces, the isomorphisms are the homeomorphisms. In the category of smooth manifolds, the isomorphisms are the diffeomorphisms. 14

1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps. (Solutions)

1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps. (Solutions) 1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps Solutions Last updated: February 16 2012 Problem 1 a The projection maps a point P x y S 1 to the point P u 0 R 2 the intersection of the line NP with the x-axis

More information

1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps. (Solutions)

1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps. (Solutions) 1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps Solutions Last updated: March 17 2011 Problem 1 The state of the planar pendulum is entirely defined by the position of its moving end in the plane R 2 Since

More information

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS 1. Manifolds Morally, manifolds are topological spaces which locally look like open balls of the Euclidean space R n. One can construct them by piecing together such balls ( cells

More information

EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY

EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY 1. Categories 1.1. Generalities. I ve tried to be as consistent as possible. In particular, throughout the text below, categories will be denoted by capital

More information

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Fall Last updated: November 26, (Under construction.)

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Fall Last updated: November 26, (Under construction.) 4 Vector fields Last updated: November 26, 2009. (Under construction.) 4.1 Tangent vectors as derivations After we have introduced topological notions, we can come back to analysis on manifolds. Let M

More information

Chapter 2 Linear Transformations

Chapter 2 Linear Transformations Chapter 2 Linear Transformations Linear Transformations Loosely speaking, a linear transformation is a function from one vector space to another that preserves the vector space operations. Let us be more

More information

Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that for all x M, v(x) T x M.

Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that for all x M, v(x) T x M. 5 Vector fields Last updated: March 12, 2012. 5.1 Definition and general properties We first need to define what a vector field is. Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that

More information

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 1 PROBLEM SET 1 SOLUTIONS

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 1 PROBLEM SET 1 SOLUTIONS DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY PROBLEM SET SOLUTIONS Lee: -4,--5,-6,-7 Problem -4: If k is an integer between 0 and min m, n, show that the set of m n matrices whose rank is at least k is an open submanifold of

More information

Basic Concepts of Group Theory

Basic Concepts of Group Theory Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Group Theory The theory of groups and vector spaces has many important applications in a number of branches of modern theoretical physics. These include the formal theory of

More information

Category Theory. Categories. Definition.

Category Theory. Categories. Definition. Category Theory Category theory is a general mathematical theory of structures, systems of structures and relationships between systems of structures. It provides a unifying and economic mathematical modeling

More information

Definition We say that a topological manifold X is C p if there is an atlas such that the transition functions are C p.

Definition We say that a topological manifold X is C p if there is an atlas such that the transition functions are C p. 13. Riemann surfaces Definition 13.1. Let X be a topological space. We say that X is a topological manifold, if (1) X is Hausdorff, (2) X is 2nd countable (that is, there is a base for the topology which

More information

Geometry 2: Manifolds and sheaves

Geometry 2: Manifolds and sheaves Rules:Exam problems would be similar to ones marked with! sign. It is recommended to solve all unmarked and!-problems or to find the solution online. It s better to do it in order starting from the beginning,

More information

Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds

Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds MA 755 Fall 05. Notes #1. I. Kogan. Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds Definition 1 An n-dimensional C k -differentiable manifold

More information

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality 121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY Contents 6. Poincaré Duality 1 6.1. Manifolds 2 6.2. Orientation 3 6.3. Orientation sheaf 9 6.4. Cap product 11 6.5. Proof for good coverings 15 6.6. Direct limit 18 6.7. Proof

More information

Part III. 10 Topological Space Basics. Topological Spaces

Part III. 10 Topological Space Basics. Topological Spaces Part III 10 Topological Space Basics Topological Spaces Using the metric space results above as motivation we will axiomatize the notion of being an open set to more general settings. Definition 10.1.

More information

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES BRIAN OSSERMAN In this note, we introduce the concept which plays the role of compactness for varieties completeness. We prove that completeness can be characterized

More information

An Algebraic View of the Relation between Largest Common Subtrees and Smallest Common Supertrees

An Algebraic View of the Relation between Largest Common Subtrees and Smallest Common Supertrees An Algebraic View of the Relation between Largest Common Subtrees and Smallest Common Supertrees Francesc Rosselló 1, Gabriel Valiente 2 1 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Research Institute

More information

1 Introduction: connections and fiber bundles

1 Introduction: connections and fiber bundles [under construction] 1 Introduction: connections and fiber bundles Two main concepts of differential geometry are those of a covariant derivative and of a fiber bundle (in particular, a vector bundle).

More information

Cutting and pasting. 2 in R. 3 which are not even topologically

Cutting and pasting. 2 in R. 3 which are not even topologically Cutting and pasting We begin by quoting the following description appearing on page 55 of C. T. C. Wall s 1960 1961 Differential Topology notes, which available are online at http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~aar/surgery/wall.pdf.

More information

1 Categorical Background

1 Categorical Background 1 Categorical Background 1.1 Categories and Functors Definition 1.1.1 A category C is given by a class of objects, often denoted by ob C, and for any two objects A, B of C a proper set of morphisms C(A,

More information

Introduction to Topology

Introduction to Topology Introduction to Topology Randall R. Holmes Auburn University Typeset by AMS-TEX Chapter 1. Metric Spaces 1. Definition and Examples. As the course progresses we will need to review some basic notions about

More information

LECTURE 5: SMOOTH MAPS. 1. Smooth Maps

LECTURE 5: SMOOTH MAPS. 1. Smooth Maps LECTURE 5: SMOOTH MAPS 1. Smooth Maps Recall that a smooth function on a smooth manifold M is a function f : M R so that for any chart 1 {ϕ α, U α, V α } of M, the function f ϕ 1 α is a smooth function

More information

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions 24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice

More information

Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism

Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism 1. Motivation Let f : X Y be a C p map between two C p -premanifolds with corners, with 1 p. Assuming f is bijective, we would like a criterion to tell us that f 1

More information

is holomorphic. In other words, a holomorphic function is a collection of compatible holomorphic functions on all charts.

is holomorphic. In other words, a holomorphic function is a collection of compatible holomorphic functions on all charts. RIEMANN SURFACES 2. Week 2. Basic definitions 2.1. Smooth manifolds. Complex manifolds. Let X be a topological space. A (real) chart of X is a pair (U, f : U R n ) where U is an open subset of X and f

More information

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction to finite fields 2 2. Definition and constructions of fields 3 2.1. The definition of a field 3 2.2. Constructing field extensions by adjoining

More information

Lecture 6 SPHERICAL GEOMETRY

Lecture 6 SPHERICAL GEOMETRY 1 Lecture 6 SPHERICAL GEOMETRY So far we have studied finite and discrete geometries, i.e., geometries in which the main transformation group is either finite or discrete. In this lecture, we begin our

More information

AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES

AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES BROOKE ULLERY Abstract. This paper gives a basic introduction to modern algebraic geometry. The goal of this paper is to present the basic concepts of algebraic geometry,

More information

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = a M T am, called the tangent bundle, is itself a smooth manifold, dim T M = 2n. Example 1.

More information

Metric spaces and metrizability

Metric spaces and metrizability 1 Motivation Metric spaces and metrizability By this point in the course, this section should not need much in the way of motivation. From the very beginning, we have talked about R n usual and how relatively

More information

1. Continuous Functions between Euclidean spaces

1. Continuous Functions between Euclidean spaces Math 441 Topology Fall 2012 Metric Spaces by John M. Lee This handout should be read between Chapters 1 and 2 of the text. It incorporates material from notes originally prepared by Steve Mitchell and

More information

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely

More information

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces Course 212: Academic Year 1991-2 Section 1: Metric Spaces D. R. Wilkins Contents 1 Metric Spaces 3 1.1 Distance Functions and Metric Spaces............. 3 1.2 Convergence and Continuity in Metric Spaces.........

More information

p,q H (X), H (Y ) ), where the index p has the same meaning as the

p,q H (X), H (Y ) ), where the index p has the same meaning as the There are two Eilenberg-Moore spectral sequences that we shall consider, one for homology and the other for cohomology. In contrast with the situation for the Serre spectral sequence, for the Eilenberg-Moore

More information

Chapter 19 Clifford and the Number of Holes

Chapter 19 Clifford and the Number of Holes Chapter 19 Clifford and the Number of Holes We saw that Riemann denoted the genus by p, a notation which is still frequently used today, in particular for the generalizations of this notion in higher dimensions.

More information

Let us recall in a nutshell the definition of some important algebraic structure, increasingly more refined than that of group.

Let us recall in a nutshell the definition of some important algebraic structure, increasingly more refined than that of group. Chapter 1 SOME MATHEMATICAL TOOLS 1.1 Some definitions in algebra Let us recall in a nutshell the definition of some important algebraic structure, increasingly more refined than that of group. Ring A

More information

CS 468: Computational Topology Group Theory Fall b c b a b a c b a c b c c b a

CS 468: Computational Topology Group Theory Fall b c b a b a c b a c b c c b a Q: What s purple and commutes? A: An abelian grape! Anonymous Group Theory Last lecture, we learned about a combinatorial method for characterizing spaces: using simplicial complexes as triangulations

More information

CW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997

CW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997 CW-complexes Stephen A. Mitchell November 1997 A CW-complex is first of all a Hausdorff space X equipped with a collection of characteristic maps φ n α : D n X. Here n ranges over the nonnegative integers,

More information

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................

More information

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups Lecture 4 Super Lie groups In this lecture we want to take a closer look to supermanifolds with a group structure: Lie supergroups or super Lie groups. As in the ordinary setting, a super Lie group is

More information

where Σ is a finite discrete Gal(K sep /K)-set unramified along U and F s is a finite Gal(k(s) sep /k(s))-subset

where Σ is a finite discrete Gal(K sep /K)-set unramified along U and F s is a finite Gal(k(s) sep /k(s))-subset Classification of quasi-finite étale separated schemes As we saw in lecture, Zariski s Main Theorem provides a very visual picture of quasi-finite étale separated schemes X over a henselian local ring

More information

Universal Algebra for Logics

Universal Algebra for Logics Universal Algebra for Logics Joanna GRYGIEL University of Czestochowa Poland j.grygiel@ajd.czest.pl 2005 These notes form Lecture Notes of a short course which I will give at 1st School on Universal Logic

More information

Math 215B: Solutions 1

Math 215B: Solutions 1 Math 15B: Solutions 1 Due Thursday, January 18, 018 (1) Let π : X X be a covering space. Let Φ be a smooth structure on X. Prove that there is a smooth structure Φ on X so that π : ( X, Φ) (X, Φ) is an

More information

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann 82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It

More information

Lecture 2. Smooth functions and maps

Lecture 2. Smooth functions and maps Lecture 2. Smooth functions and maps 2.1 Definition of smooth maps Given a differentiable manifold, all questions of differentiability are to be reduced to questions about functions between Euclidean spaces,

More information

12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem

12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem 12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem 95 12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem After our study of smooth cubic surfaces in the last chapter, let us now come back to the general theory of

More information

(df (ξ ))( v ) = v F : O ξ R. with F : O ξ O

(df (ξ ))( v ) = v F : O ξ R. with F : O ξ O Math 396. Derivative maps, parametric curves, and velocity vectors Let (X, O ) and (X, O) be two C p premanifolds with corners, 1 p, and let F : X X be a C p mapping. Let ξ X be a point and let ξ = F (ξ

More information

Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring Francis Bonahon. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California

Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring Francis Bonahon. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring 2016 Francis Bonahon Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California Date of this version: April 27, 2016 c Francis Bonahon 2016 CHAPTER 1 A

More information

CELLULAR HOMOLOGY AND THE CELLULAR BOUNDARY FORMULA. Contents 1. Introduction 1

CELLULAR HOMOLOGY AND THE CELLULAR BOUNDARY FORMULA. Contents 1. Introduction 1 CELLULAR HOMOLOGY AND THE CELLULAR BOUNDARY FORMULA PAOLO DEGIORGI Abstract. This paper will first go through some core concepts and results in homology, then introduce the concepts of CW complex, subcomplex

More information

SMSTC (2017/18) Geometry and Topology 2.

SMSTC (2017/18) Geometry and Topology 2. SMSTC (2017/18) Geometry and Topology 2 Lecture 1: Differentiable Functions and Manifolds in R n Lecturer: Diletta Martinelli (Notes by Bernd Schroers) a wwwsmstcacuk 11 General remarks In this lecture

More information

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY ARDA H. DEMIRHAN Abstract. We examine the conditions for uniqueness of differentials in the abstract setting of differential geometry. Then we ll come up

More information

After taking the square and expanding, we get x + y 2 = (x + y) (x + y) = x 2 + 2x y + y 2, inequality in analysis, we obtain.

After taking the square and expanding, we get x + y 2 = (x + y) (x + y) = x 2 + 2x y + y 2, inequality in analysis, we obtain. Lecture 1: August 25 Introduction. Topology grew out of certain questions in geometry and analysis about 100 years ago. As Wikipedia puts it, the motivating insight behind topology is that some geometric

More information

Subgroups of Lie groups. Definition 0.7. A Lie subgroup of a Lie group G is a subgroup which is also a submanifold.

Subgroups of Lie groups. Definition 0.7. A Lie subgroup of a Lie group G is a subgroup which is also a submanifold. Recollections from finite group theory. The notion of a group acting on a set is extremely useful. Indeed, the whole of group theory arose through this route. As an example of the abstract power of this

More information

0. Introduction 1 0. INTRODUCTION

0. Introduction 1 0. INTRODUCTION 0. Introduction 1 0. INTRODUCTION In a very rough sketch we explain what algebraic geometry is about and what it can be used for. We stress the many correlations with other fields of research, such as

More information

Algebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014

Algebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014 Algebraic Geometry Andreas Gathmann Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014 Contents 0. Introduction......................... 3 1. Affine Varieties........................ 9 2. The Zariski Topology......................

More information

Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds

Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds Theorem 1. [Exercise 1.18] Let M be a topological manifold. Then any two smooth atlases for M determine the same smooth structure if and only if their union is a smooth atlas.

More information

NOTES ON MANIFOLDS ALBERTO S. CATTANEO

NOTES ON MANIFOLDS ALBERTO S. CATTANEO NOTES ON MANIFOLDS ALBERTO S. CATTANEO Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Manifolds 2 2.1. Coordinates 6 2.2. Dimension 7 2.3. The implicit function theorem 7 3. Maps 8 3.1. The pullback 10 3.2. Submanifolds

More information

Methods in Computer Vision: Introduction to Matrix Lie Groups

Methods in Computer Vision: Introduction to Matrix Lie Groups Methods in Computer Vision: Introduction to Matrix Lie Groups Oren Freifeld Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University June 14, 2017 June 14, 2017 1 / 46 Definition and Basic Properties Definition (Matrix

More information

Math 147, Homework 1 Solutions Due: April 10, 2012

Math 147, Homework 1 Solutions Due: April 10, 2012 1. For what values of a is the set: Math 147, Homework 1 Solutions Due: April 10, 2012 M a = { (x, y, z) : x 2 + y 2 z 2 = a } a smooth manifold? Give explicit parametrizations for open sets covering M

More information

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 1: FORMS ON R n

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 1: FORMS ON R n NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 1: FORMS ON R n 1. What is a form? Since we re not following the development in Guillemin and Pollack, I d better write up an alternate approach. In this approach, we

More information

Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry

Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry Victor I. Piercey University of Arizona Integration Workshop Project August 6-10, 2010 1 Introduction In this project, we will describe the basic topology

More information

Algebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions

Algebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions Algebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions Here are a few solutions to some of the trickier problems... Recall: Let X be a topological space, A X a subspace of X. Suppose f, g : X X are maps restricting to

More information

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander During the first three days of September, 1997, I had the privilege of giving a series of five lectures at the beginning of the School on Algebraic

More information

COMBINATORIAL GROUP THEORY NOTES

COMBINATORIAL GROUP THEORY NOTES COMBINATORIAL GROUP THEORY NOTES These are being written as a companion to Chapter 1 of Hatcher. The aim is to give a description of some of the group theory required to work with the fundamental groups

More information

Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices

Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices Sergiu Rudeanu University of Bucharest Romania Closure operators are abundant in mathematics; here are a few examples. Given an algebraic structure, such

More information

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 24 Jun 2015

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 24 Jun 2015 TRIANGULATIONS OF MONOTONE FAMILIES I: TWO-DIMENSIONAL FAMILIES arxiv:1402.0460v2 [math.ag] 24 Jun 2015 SAUGATA BASU, ANDREI GABRIELOV, AND NICOLAI VOROBJOV Abstract. Let K R n be a compact definable set

More information

CHAPTER 1. Preliminaries Basic Relevant Algebra Introduction to Differential Geometry. By Christian Bär

CHAPTER 1. Preliminaries Basic Relevant Algebra Introduction to Differential Geometry. By Christian Bär CHAPTER 1 Preliminaries 1.1. Basic Relevant Algebra 1.2. Introduction to Differential Geometry By Christian Bär Inthis lecturewegiveabriefintroductiontothe theoryofmanifoldsandrelatedbasic concepts of

More information

Algebraic Varieties. Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra

Algebraic Varieties. Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra Algebraic Varieties Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra Algebraic varieties represent solutions of a system of polynomial

More information

Part IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1

Part IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1 Part IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1 (a.g.kovalev@dpmms.cam.ac.uk) 1. Suppose that H is a hyperplane in Euclidean n-space R n defined by u x = c for some unit vector u and constant c. The reflection

More information

ADVANCED CALCULUS - MTH433 LECTURE 4 - FINITE AND INFINITE SETS

ADVANCED CALCULUS - MTH433 LECTURE 4 - FINITE AND INFINITE SETS ADVANCED CALCULUS - MTH433 LECTURE 4 - FINITE AND INFINITE SETS 1. Cardinal number of a set The cardinal number (or simply cardinal) of a set is a generalization of the concept of the number of elements

More information

Math 145. Codimension

Math 145. Codimension Math 145. Codimension 1. Main result and some interesting examples In class we have seen that the dimension theory of an affine variety (irreducible!) is linked to the structure of the function field in

More information

Commutative Algebra Lecture 3: Lattices and Categories (Sept. 13, 2013)

Commutative Algebra Lecture 3: Lattices and Categories (Sept. 13, 2013) Commutative Algebra Lecture 3: Lattices and Categories (Sept. 13, 2013) Navid Alaei September 17, 2013 1 Lattice Basics There are, in general, two equivalent approaches to defining a lattice; one is rather

More information

P.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis. 1. Introduction

P.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis. 1. Introduction MATEMATIČKI VESNIK MATEMATIQKI VESNIK 70, 2 (208), 0 9 June 208 research paper originalni nauqni rad GROUPS OF GENERALIZED ISOTOPIES AND GENERALIZED G-SPACES P.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis Abstract. The

More information

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS Steven Sy December 7, 2005 I MATRIX LIE GROUPS Definition: A matrix Lie group is a closed subgroup of Thus if is any sequence of matrices in, and for some, then either

More information

0.1 Spec of a monoid

0.1 Spec of a monoid These notes were prepared to accompany the first lecture in a seminar on logarithmic geometry. As we shall see in later lectures, logarithmic geometry offers a natural approach to study semistable schemes.

More information

Let X be a topological space. We want it to look locally like C. So we make the following definition.

Let X be a topological space. We want it to look locally like C. So we make the following definition. February 17, 2010 1 Riemann surfaces 1.1 Definitions and examples Let X be a topological space. We want it to look locally like C. So we make the following definition. Definition 1. A complex chart on

More information

2. Intersection Multiplicities

2. Intersection Multiplicities 2. Intersection Multiplicities 11 2. Intersection Multiplicities Let us start our study of curves by introducing the concept of intersection multiplicity, which will be central throughout these notes.

More information

Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar

Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar Lectures by Bart Snapp About This Document These lectures are based on Chapters 1 and 2 of An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry by Karen Smith et al. 1 Affine Varieties

More information

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes!

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes! ALGEBRAIC GROUPS Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes! 1. Some algebraic geometry The subject of algebraic groups depends on the interaction between algebraic geometry and group theory.

More information

Topological properties of Z p and Q p and Euclidean models

Topological properties of Z p and Q p and Euclidean models Topological properties of Z p and Q p and Euclidean models Samuel Trautwein, Esther Röder, Giorgio Barozzi November 3, 20 Topology of Q p vs Topology of R Both R and Q p are normed fields and complete

More information

Integration and Manifolds

Integration and Manifolds Integration and Manifolds Course No. 100 311 Fall 2007 Michael Stoll Contents 1. Manifolds 2 2. Differentiable Maps and Tangent Spaces 8 3. Vector Bundles and the Tangent Bundle 13 4. Orientation and Orientability

More information

DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES

DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN We now begin a closer study of the behavior of projective nonsingular curves, and morphisms between them, as well as to projective space. To this end, we introduce

More information

Math 231b Lecture 16. G. Quick

Math 231b Lecture 16. G. Quick Math 231b Lecture 16 G. Quick 16. Lecture 16: Chern classes for complex vector bundles 16.1. Orientations. From now on we will shift our focus to complex vector bundles. Much of the theory for real vector

More information

Chern classes à la Grothendieck

Chern classes à la Grothendieck Chern classes à la Grothendieck Theo Raedschelders October 16, 2014 Abstract In this note we introduce Chern classes based on Grothendieck s 1958 paper [4]. His approach is completely formal and he deduces

More information

KUIPER S THEOREM ON CONFORMALLY FLAT MANIFOLDS

KUIPER S THEOREM ON CONFORMALLY FLAT MANIFOLDS KUIPER S THEOREM ON CONFORMALLY FLAT MANIFOLDS RALPH HOWARD DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA, S.C. 29208, USA HOWARD@MATH.SC.EDU 1. Introduction These are notes to that show

More information

(x, y) = d(x, y) = x y.

(x, y) = d(x, y) = x y. 1 Euclidean geometry 1.1 Euclidean space Our story begins with a geometry which will be familiar to all readers, namely the geometry of Euclidean space. In this first chapter we study the Euclidean distance

More information

Tropical Constructions and Lifts

Tropical Constructions and Lifts Tropical Constructions and Lifts Hunter Ash August 27, 2014 1 The Algebraic Torus and M Let K denote a field of characteristic zero and K denote the associated multiplicative group. A character on (K )

More information

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #23 11/26/2013

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #23 11/26/2013 18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #23 11/26/2013 As usual, a curve is a smooth projective (geometrically irreducible) variety of dimension one and k is a perfect field. 23.1

More information

BROUWER FIXED POINT THEOREM. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 1 3. Brouwer fixed point theorem 3 Acknowledgments 8 References 8

BROUWER FIXED POINT THEOREM. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 1 3. Brouwer fixed point theorem 3 Acknowledgments 8 References 8 BROUWER FIXED POINT THEOREM DANIELE CARATELLI Abstract. This paper aims at proving the Brouwer fixed point theorem for smooth maps. The theorem states that any continuous (smooth in our proof) function

More information

Differential Topology Solution Set #2

Differential Topology Solution Set #2 Differential Topology Solution Set #2 Select Solutions 1. Show that X compact implies that any smooth map f : X Y is proper. Recall that a space is called compact if, for every cover {U } by open sets

More information

Math 541 Fall 2008 Connectivity Transition from Math 453/503 to Math 541 Ross E. Staffeldt-August 2008

Math 541 Fall 2008 Connectivity Transition from Math 453/503 to Math 541 Ross E. Staffeldt-August 2008 Math 541 Fall 2008 Connectivity Transition from Math 453/503 to Math 541 Ross E. Staffeldt-August 2008 Closed sets We have been operating at a fundamental level at which a topological space is a set together

More information

NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN

NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN The primary goal of this note is to prove that every abstract nonsingular curve can be realized as an open subset of a (unique) nonsingular projective curve. Note that

More information

0.1 Diffeomorphisms. 0.2 The differential

0.1 Diffeomorphisms. 0.2 The differential Lectures 6 and 7, October 10 and 12 Easy fact: An open subset of a differentiable manifold is a differentiable manifold of the same dimension the ambient space differentiable structure induces a differentiable

More information

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #15 10/29/2013

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #15 10/29/2013 18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #15 10/29/2013 As usual, k is a perfect field and k is a fixed algebraic closure of k. Recall that an affine (resp. projective) variety is an

More information

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces Classifying Spaces 1. Classifying Spaces. To make our lives much easier, all topological spaces from now on will be homeomorphic to CW complexes. Fact: All smooth manifolds are homeomorphic to CW complexes.

More information

Math 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group. and by the product formula it lies in the kernel (A K )1 of the continuous idelic norm

Math 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group. and by the product formula it lies in the kernel (A K )1 of the continuous idelic norm Math 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group 1. Introduction Let K be a global field, so K is naturally a discrete subgroup of the idele group A K and by the product formula it lies in the kernel

More information

SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES

SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES In this section we will give the important constructions of loop spaces and reduced suspensions associated to pointed spaces. For this purpose there

More information

Lecture 2 Sheaves and Functors

Lecture 2 Sheaves and Functors Lecture 2 Sheaves and Functors In this lecture we will introduce the basic concept of sheaf and we also will recall some of category theory. 1 Sheaves and locally ringed spaces The definition of sheaf

More information

Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology

Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology 1. Motivation Let {Γ i } be an inverse system of finite groups with surjective transition maps, and define Γ = Γ i equipped with its inverse it topology (i.e., the

More information