0.6 Factoring 73. As always, the reader is encouraged to multiply out (3
|
|
- Anthony Ryan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 0.6 Factoring 7 5. The G.C.F. of the terms in 81 16t is just 1 so there is nothing of substance to factor out from both terms. With just a difference of two terms, we are limited to fitting this olynomial into either the Difference of Two Squares or Difference of Two Cubes formula. Since the variable here is t, and is a multile of, we can think of t (t ). This means that we can write 16t (t ) which is a erfect square. (Since is not a multile of, we cannot write t as a erfect cube of a olynomial.) Identifying 81 9 and 16t (t ), we aly the Difference of Squares Formula to get: 81 16t 9 (t ) (9 t )(9 + t ) Difference of Squares, a 9, b t At this oint, we have an oortunity to roceed further. Identifying 9 and t (t), we see that we have another difference of squares in the first quantity, which we can reduce. (The sum of two squares in the second quantity cannot be factored over the rationals.) 81 16t (9 t )(9 + t ) ( (t) )(9 + t ) ( t)( + t)(9 + t ) Difference of Squares, a, b t As always, the reader is encouraged to multily out ( t)(+t)(9+t ) to check the result. 6. With a G.C.F. of 1 and just two terms, x 6 6 is a candidate for both the Difference of Squares and the Difference of Cubes formulas. Notice that we can identify x 6 (x ) and 6 8 (both erfect squares), but also x 6 (x ) and 6 (both erfect cubes). If we follow the Difference of Squares aroach, we get: x 6 6 (x ) 8 (x 8)(x + 8) Difference of Squares, a x and b 8 At this oint, we have an oortunity to use both the Difference and Sum of Cubes formulas: x 6 6 (x )(x + ) (x )(x +x + )(x + )(x x + ) Sum / Difference of Cubes, a x, b (x )(x + )(x x + )(x +x + ) Rearrange factors From this aroach, our final answer is (x )(x + )(x x + )(x +x + ). Following the Difference of Cubes Formula aroach, we get x 6 6 (x ) (x )((x ) +x + ) Difference of Cubes, a x, b (x )(x +x + 16) At this oint, we recognize x as a difference of two squares: x 6 6 (x )(x +x + 16) (x )(x + )(x +x + 16) Difference of Squares, a x, b
2 7 Prerequisites Unfortunately, the remaining factor x +x + 16 is not a erfect square trinomial - the middle term would have to be 8x for this to work - so our final answer using this aroach is (x )(x + )(x +x + 16). This isn t as factored as our result from the Difference of Squares aroach which was (x )(x + )(x x + )(x +x + ). While it is true that x +x +16 (x x +)(x +x +), there is no intuitive way to motivate this factorization at this oint. 5 The moral of the story? When given the otion between using the Difference of Squares and Difference of Cubes, start with the Difference of Squares. Our final answer to this roblem is (x )(x + )(x x + )(x +x + ). The reader is strongly encouraged to show that this reduces down to x 6 6 after erforming all of the multilication. The formulas on age 71, while useful, can only take us so far, so we need to review some more advanced factoring strategies. Advanced Factoring Formulas un-f.o.i.l.ing : Given a trinomial Ax + Bx + C, try to reverse the F.O.I.L. rocess. That is, find a, b, c and d such that Ax + Bx + C (ax + b)(cx + d). NOTE: This means ac A, bd C and B ad + bc. Factor by Grouing: If the exression contains four terms with no common factors among the four terms, try factor by grouing : ac + bc + ad + bd (a + b)c +(a + b)d (a + b)(c + d) The techniques of un-f.o.i.l.ing and factoring by grouing are difficult to describe in general but should make sense to you with enough ractice. Be forewarned - like all Rules of Thumb, these strategies work just often enough to be useful, but you can be sure there are excetions which will defy any advice given here and will require some insiration to solve. 6 Even though Chater will give us more owerful factoring methods, we ll find that, in the end, there is no single algorithm for factoring which works for every olynomial. In other words, there will be times when you just have to try something and see what haens. Examle Factor the following olynomials comletely over the integers x x 6. t 11t y 1y. 18xy 5xy 180x 5. t 10t +t x +x Of course, this begs the question, How do we know x x + and x +x + are irreducible? (We were told so on age 71, but no reason was given.) Stay tuned! We ll get back to this in due course. 6 Jeff will be sure to eer the Exercises with these. 7 This means that all of the coefficients in the factors will be integers. In a rare dearture from form, Carl decided to avoid fractions in this set of examles. Don t get comlacent, though, because fractions will return with a vengeance soon enough.
3 0.6 Factoring 75 Solution. 1. The G.C.F. of the terms x x 6 is 1 and x x 6 isn t a erfect square trinomial (Think about why not.) so we try to reverse the F.O.I.L. rocess and look for integers a, b, c and d such that (ax + b)(cx + d) x x 6. To get started, we note that ac 1. Since a and c are meant to be integers, that leaves us with either a and c both being 1, or a and c both being 1. We ll go with a c 1, since we can factor 8 the negatives into our choices for b and d. This yields (x + b)(x + d) x x 6. Next, we use the fact that bd 6. The roduct is negative so we know that one of b or d is ositive and the other is negative. Since b and d are integers, one of b or d is ±1 and the other is 6 OR one of b or d is ± and the other is. After some guessing and checking, 9 we find that x x 6(x + )(x ).. As with the revious examle, we check the G.C.F. of the terms in t 11t + 5, determine it to be 1 and see that the olynomial doesn t fit the attern for a erfect square trinomial. We now try to find integers a, b, c and d such that (at + b)(ct + d) t 11t + 5. Since ac, we have that one of a or c is, and the other is 1. (Once again, we ignore the negative otions.) At this stage, there is nothing really distinguishing a from c so we choose a and c 1. Now we look for b and d so that (t + b)(t + d) t 11t + 5. We know bd 5 so one of b or d is ±1 and the other ±5. Given that bd is ositive, b and d must have the same sign. The negative middle term 11t guides us to guess b 1 and d 5 so that we get (t 1)(t 5) t 11t + 5. We verify our answer by multilying. 10. Once again, we check for a nontrivial G.C.F. and see if 6 11y 1y fits the attern of a erfect square. Twice disaointed, we rewrite 6 11y 1y 1y 11y + 6 for notational convenience. We now look for integers a, b, c and d such that 1y 11y +6 (ay + b)(cy + d). Since ac 1, we know that one of a or c is ±1 and the other ±1 OR one of them is ± and the other is ±6 OR one of them is ± while the other is ±. Since their roduct is 1, however, we know one of them is ositive, while the other is negative. To make matters worse, the constant term 6 has its fair share of factors, too. Our answers for b and d lie among the airs ±1 and ±6, ± and ±18, ± and ±9, or ±6. Since we know one of a or c will be negative, we can simlify our choices for b and d and just look at the ositive ossibilities. After some guessing and checking, 11 we find ( y + )(y + 9) 1y 11y Since the G.C.F. of the terms in 18xy 5xy 180x is 18x, we begin the roblem by factoring it out first: 18xy 5xy 180x 18x(y y 10). We now focus our attention on y y 10. We can take a and c to both be 1 which yields (y + b)(y + d) y y 10. Our choices for b and d are among the factor airs of 10: ±1 and ±10 or ± and ±5, where 8 Pun intended! 9 The authors have seen some strange gimmicks that allegedly hel students with this ste. We don t like them so we re sticking with good old-fashioned guessing and checking. 10 That s the checking art of guessing and checking. 11 Some of these guesses can be more educated than others. Since the middle term is relatively small, we don t exect the extreme factors of 6 and 1 to aear, for instance.
4 76 Prerequisites one of b or d is ositive and the other is negative. We find (y 5)(y + ) y y 10. Our final answer is 18xy 5xy 180x 18x(y 5)(y + ). 5. Since t 10t t + 15 has four terms, we are retty much resigned to factoring by grouing. The strategy here is to factor out the G.C.F. from two airs of terms, and see if this reveals a common factor. If we grou the first two terms, we can factor out a t to get t 10t t (t 5). We now try to factor something out of the last two terms that will leave us with a factor of (t 5). Sure enough, we can factor out a from both: t+15 (t 5). Hence, we get t 10t t + 15 t (t 5) (t 5) (t )(t 5) Now the question becomes can we factor t over the integers? This would require integers a, b, c and d such that (at +b)(ct +d) t. Since ab and cd, we aren t left with many otions - in fact, we really have only four choices: (t 1)(t + ), (t + 1)(t ), (t )(t +1) and (t +)(t 1). None of these roduces t - which means it s irreducible over the integers - thus our final answer is (t )(t 5). 6. Our last examle, x +x +16, is our old friend from Examle As noted there, it is not a erfect square trinomial, so we could try to reverse the F.O.I.L. rocess. This is comlicated by the fact that our highest degree term is x, so we would have to look at factorizations of the form (x + b)(x + d) as well as (x + b)(x + d). We leave it to the reader to show that neither of those work. This is an examle of where trying something ays off. Even though we ve stated that it is not a erfect square trinomial, it s retty close. Identifying x (x ) and 16, we d have (x + ) x +8x + 16, but instead of 8x as our middle term, we only have x. We could add in the extra x we need, but to kee the balance, we d have to subtract it off. Doing so roduces and unexected oortunity: x +x + 16 x +x (x x ) Adding and subtracting the same term x +8x + 16 x Rearranging terms (x + ) (x) Factoring erfect square trinomial [(x + ) x][(x + ) + x] Difference of Squares: a (x + ), b x (x x + )(x +x + ) Rearraging terms We leave it to the reader to check that neither x integers, so we are done. x + nor x +x + factor over the Solving Equations by Factoring Many students wonder why they are forced to learn how to factor. Simly ut, factoring is our main tool for solving the non-linear equations which arise in many of the alications of Mathematics. 1 We use factoring in conjunction with the Zero Product Proerty of Real Numbers which was first stated on age 19 and is given here again for reference. 1 Also known as story roblems or real-world examles.
5 0.6 Factoring 77 The Zero Product Proerty of Real Numbers: If a and b are real numbers with ab 0 then either a 0 or b 0 or both. For examle, consider the equation 6x + 11x 10. To see how the Zero Product Proerty is used to hel us solve this equation, we first set the equation equal to zero and then aly the techniques from Examle 0.6.: 6x + 11x 10 6x + 11x 10 0 Subtract 10 from both sides (x + 5)(x ) 0 Factor x or x 0 Zero Product Proerty x 5 or x a x + 5, b x The reader should check that both of these solutions satisfy the original equation. It is critical that you see the imortance of setting the exression equal to 0 before factoring. Otherwise, we d get: 6x + 11x 10 x(6x + 11) 10 Factor What we cannot deduce from this equation is that x 10 or 6x or that x and 6x , etc.. (It s wrong and you should feel bad if you do it.) It is recisely because 0 lays such a secial role in the arithmetic of real numbers (as the Additive Identity) that we can assume a factor is 0 when the roduct is 0. No other real number has that ability. We summarize the correct equation solving strategy below. Strategy for Solving Non-linear Equations 1. Put all of the nonzero terms on one side of the equation so that the other side is 0.. Factor.. Use the Zero Product Proerty of Real Numbers and set each factor equal to 0.. Solve each of the resulting equations. Let s finish the section with a collection of examles in which we use this strategy. Examle Solve the following equations. 1. x 5 16x. t 1+t. (y 1) (y 1). w 8w 1 1 w 5. z(z(18z + 9) 50) 5 6. x 8x 90
6 78 Prerequisites Solution. 1. We begin by gathering all of the nonzero terms to one side getting 0 on the other and then we roceed to factor and aly the Zero Product Proerty. x 5 16x x + 16x 5 0 Add 16x, subtract 5 (x 5)(x + 7) 0 Factor x 5 0 or x Zero Product Proerty x 5 or x 7 We check our answers by substituting each of them into the original equation. Plugging in x 5 5 yields on both sides while x 7 gives 17 on both sides.. To solve t 1+t, we first clear fractions then move all of the nonzero terms to one side of the equation, factor and aly the Zero Product Proerty. t 1+t t 1+t Clear fractions (multily by ) 0 1+t t Subtract 0 t t + 1 Rearrange terms 0 (t 1) Factor (Perfect Square Trinomial) At this oint, we get (t 1) (t 1)(t 1) 0, so, the Zero Product Proerty gives us t 1 0 in both cases. 1 Our final answer is t 1, which we invite the reader to check.. Following the strategy outlined above, the first ste to solving (y 1) (y 1) is to gather the nonzero terms on one side of the equation with 0 on the other side and factor. (y 1) (y 1) (y 1) (y 1) 0 Subtract (y 1) (y 1)[(y 1) ] 0 Factor out G.C.F. (y 1)(y ) 0 Simlify y 1 0 or y 0 y 1 or y Both of these answers are easily checked by substituting them into the original equation. An alternative method to solving this equation is to begin by dividing both sides by (y 1) to simlify things outright. As we saw in Examle 0..1, however, whenever we divide by 1 More generally, given a ositive ower, the only solution to X 0 is X 0.
7 0.6 Factoring 79 a variable quantity, we make the exlicit assumtion that this quantity is nonzero. Thus we must stiulate that y (y 1) (y 1) (y 1) (y 1) y 1 y Divide by (y 1) - this assumes (y 1) 6 0 Note that in this aroach, we obtain the y solution, but we lose the y 1 solution. How did that haen? Assuming y is equivalent to assuming y 6 1. This is an issue because y 1 is a solution to the original equation and it was divided out too early. The moral of the story? If you decide to divide by a variable exression, double check that you aren t excluding any solutions. 1. Proceeding as before, we clear fractions, gather the nonzero terms on one side of the equation, have 0 on the other and factor. 8w 1 w 1 w 8w 1 w 1 1 Multily by 1 1 w (8w 1) (w ) Distribute w 8w 1 w + 1 Distribute 0 8w 1 w + 1 w Subtract w 0 8w w w Gather like terms 0 w (8w w ) Factor out G.C.F. w At this oint, we aly the Zero Product Proerty to deduce that w 0 or 8w w 0. From w 0, we get w 0. To solve 8w w 0, we rearrange terms and factor: w +8w (w 1)( w + ) 0. Alying the Zero Product Proerty again, we get w 1 0 (which gives w 1 ), or w + 0 (which gives w ). Our final answers are w 0, w 1 and w. The reader is encouraged to check each of these answers in the original equation. (You need the ractice with fractions!) 5. For our next examle, we begin by subtracting the 5 from both sides then work out the indicated oerations before factoring by grouing. z(z(18z + 9) 50) 5 z(z(18z + 9) 50) 5 0 Subtract 5 z(18z +9z 50) 5 0 Distribute 18z +9z 50z 5 0 Distribute 9z (z + 1) 5(z + 1) 0 Factor (9z 5)(z + 1) 0 Factor 1 You will see other examles throughout this text where dividing by a variable quantity does more harm than good. Kee this basic one in mind as you move on in your studies - it s a good cautionary tale.
8 80 Prerequisites At this oint, we use the Zero Product Proerty and get 9z 5 0 or z The latter 1 gives z whereas the former factors as (z 5)(z + 5) 0. Alying the Zero Product Proerty again gives z 5 0 (so z 5 ) or z (so z 5.) Our final answers are z 1, z 5 and z 5, each of which good fun to check. 6. The nonzero terms of the equation x 8x 9 0 are already on one side of the equation so we roceed to factor. This trinomial doesn t fit the attern of a erfect square so we attemt to reverse the F.O.I.L.ing rocess. With an x term, we have two ossible forms to try: (ax + b)(cx + d) and (ax + b)(cx + d). We leave it to you to show that (ax + b)(cx + d) does not work and we show that (ax + b)(cx + d) does. Since the coefficient of x is 1, we take a c 1. The constant term is 9 so we know b and d have oosite signs and our choices are limited to two otions: either b and d come from ±1 and ±9 OR one is while the other is. After some trial and error, we get x 8x 9(x 9)(x + 1). Hence x 8x 9 0 reduces to (x 9)(x + 1) 0. The Zero Product Proerty tells us that either x 9 0 or x To solve the former, we factor: (x )(x + ) 0, so x 0 (hence, x ) or x + 0 (hence, x ). The equation x has no (real) solution, since for any real number x, x is always 0 or greater. Thus x + 1 is always ositive. Our final answers are x and x. As always, the reader is invited to check both answers in the original equation.
9 0.6 Factoring Exercises In Exercises 1-0, factor comletely over the integers. Check your answer by multilication. 1. x 10x. 1t 5 8t. 16xy 1x y. 5(m + ) (m + ) 5. (x 1)(x + ) (x 1) 6. t (t 5) + t 5 7. w t 9. 81t z 6y 11. (y + ) y 1. (x + h) (x + h) 1. y y t + 10t x 6x + 7x 16. m + 10m x 18. t 6 + t 19. x 5x 1 0. y 1y t + 16t +5. 6x x m m. 7w w 5. m +9m 1m 6. x + x 0 7. (t 1) + (t 1) x 5x 9x t + t t y +5y +9 In Exercises 1-5, find all rational number solutions. Check your answers. 1. (7x + )(x 5) 0. (t 1) (t + ) 0. (y + )(y + y 10) 0. t t 5. y +y 6. 6x 8x x 9x 8. w(6w + 11) w +5w + (w +1) 0. x (x ) 16(x ) 1. (t + 1) (t + 1). a +6 a. 8t t +. x + x x y y (y + ) 6. With hel from your classmates, factor x +8x With hel from your classmates, find an equation which has,, and 117 as solutions. 15 y +5y +9(y +6y + 9) y
10 8 Prerequisites 0.6. Answers 1. x(1 5x). t (t ). xy(y x). (m + ) (m + 7) 5. (x 1)(x 1) 6. (t 5)(t + 1) 7. (w 11)(w + 11) 8. (7 t)(7 + t) 9. (t )(t + )(9t + ) 10. (z 8y )(z +8y ) 11. (y )(y + 1) 1. (x + h)(x + h 1)(x + h + 1) 1. (y 1) 1. (5t + 1) 15. x(x ) 16. (m + 5) 17. ( x)(9 + 6x +x ) 18. t (t + 1)(t t + 1) 19. (x 7)(x + ) 0. (y 9)(y ) 1. (t + 1)(t + 5). (x 5)(x ). (7 m)(5 + m). ( w + 1)(w ) 5. m(m 1)(m + ) 6. (x )(x + )(x + 5) 7. (t )(t + )(t + 1) 8. (x )(x + )(x 5) 9. (t )(1 t)(1 + t) 0. (y y + )(y + y + ) 1. x 7 or x 5. t 1 or t. y 5 or y. t 0 or t 5. y 1 or y 6. x or x 7 7. x 0 or x ± 8. w 5 or w 9. w 5 or w 1 0. x or x ± 1. t 1, t 1, or t 0. a ±1. t or t. x 5. y ±
11 0.7 Quadratic Equations Quadratic Equations In Section 0.6.1, we reviewed how to solve basic non-linear equations by factoring. The astute reader should have noticed that all of the equations in that section were carefully constructed so that the olynomials could be factored using the integers. To demonstrate just how contrived the equations had to be, we can solve x +5x 0 by factoring, (x 1)(x + ) 0, from which we obtain x 1 and x. If we change the 5 to a 6 and try to solve x +6x 0, however, we find that this olynomial doesn t factor over the integers and we are stuck. It turns out that there are two real number solutions to this equation, but they are irrational numbers, and our aim in this section is to review the techniques which allow us to find these solutions. 1 In this section, we focus our attention on quadratic equations. Definition An equation is said to be quadratic in a variable X if it can be written in the form AX + BX + C 0 where A, B and C are exressions which do not involve X and A 6 0. Think of quadratic equations as equations that are one degree u from linear equations - instead of the highest ower of X being just X X 1, it s X. The simlest class of quadratic equations to solve are the ones in which B 0. In that case, we have the following. Solving Quadratic Equations by Extracting Square Roots If c is a real number with c 0, the solutions to X c are X ± c. Note: If c < 0, X c has no real number solutions. There are a coule different ways to see why Extracting Square Roots works, both of which are demonstrated by solving the equation x. If we follow the rocedure outlined in the revious section, we subtract from both sides to get x 0 and we now try to factor x. As mentioned in the remarks following Definition 0.1, we could think of x x ( ) and aly the Difference of Squares formula to factor x (x )(x + ). We solve (x )(x + ) 0 by using the Zero Product Proerty as before by setting each factor equal to zero: x 0 and x + 0. We get the answers x ±. In general, if c 0, then c is a real number, so x c x ( c) (x c)(x + c). Relacing the with c in the above discussion gives the general result. Another way to view this result is to visualize taking the square root of both sides: since x c, x c. How do we simlify x? We have to exercise a bit of caution here. Note that (5) and ( 5) both simlify to 5 5. In both cases, x returned a ositive number, since the negative in 5 was squared away before we took the square root. In other words, x is x if x is ositive, or, if x is negative, we make x ositive - that is, x x, the absolute value of x. So from x, we take the square root of both sides of the equation to get x. This simlifies to x, which by Theorem 0. is equivalent to x or x. Relacing the in the revious argument with c, gives the general result. 1 While our discussion in this section dearts from factoring, we ll see in Chater that the same corresondence between factoring and solving equations holds whether or not the olynomial factors over the integers.
12 8 Prerequisites As you might exect, Extracting Square Roots can be alied to more comlicated equations. Consider the equation below. We can solve it by Extracting Square Roots rovided we first isolate the erfect square quantity: x x + x + 15 x + ± r 15 Add 15 Divide by Extract Square Roots x + 15 ± 15 x ± ± 15 x Proerty of Radicals Subtract Add fractions Let s return to the equation x +6x 0 from the beginning of the section. We leave it to the reader to show that x + 15 x +6x. (Hint: Exand the left side.) In other words, we can solve x +6x 0bytransforming into an equivalent equation. This rocess, you may recall, is called Comleting the Square. We ll revisit Comleting the Square in Section. in more generality and for a different urose but for now we revisit the stes needed to comlete the square to solve a quadratic equation. Solving Quadratic Equations: Comleting the Square To solve a quadratic equation AX + BX + C 0 by Comleting the Square: 1. Subtract the constant C from both sides.. Divide both sides by A, the coefficient of X. (Remember: A 6 0.). Add B A to both sides of the equation. (That s half the coefficient of X, squared.).. Factor the left hand side of the equation as X + A B 5. Extract Square Roots. B 6. Subtract A from both sides.
13 0.7 Quadratic Equations 85 To refresh our memories, we aly this method to solve x x + 5 0: x x +5 0 x x 5 Subtract C 5 x 5 8x Divide by A x 5 8x Add B A ( ) 16 (x ) r x ± r x ± Factor: Perfect Square Trinomial Extract Square Roots Add At this oint, we use roerties of fractions and radicals to rationalize the denominator: r r We can now get a common (integer) denominator which yields: r 19 x ± ± 1 ± 19 The key to Comleting the Square is that the rocedure always roduces a erfect square trinomial. To see why this works every single time, we start with AX + BX + C 0 and follow the rocedure: AX + BX + C 0 AX + BX C Subtract C X + BX A X + BX A + B A C A C A + B A Divide by A 6 0 B Add A (Hold onto the line above for a moment.) Here s the heart of the method - we need to show that X + BX B A A + X + B A To show this, we start with the right side of the equation and aly the Perfect Square Formula from Theorem 0.7 X + A B B B X + X + X + BX B A A A + X A Recall that this means we want to get a denominator with rational (more secifically, integer) numbers.
14 86 Prerequisites With just a few more stes we can solve the general equation AX + BX + C 0 so let s ick u the story where we left off. (The line on the revious age we told you to hold on to.) X + BX B A A + C B A + A X + A B C A + B A X + A B AC A + B A X + B B AC A A X + B r B A ± AC A X + B B A ± AC A B B X A ± AC A B ± B X AC A Lo and behold, we have derived the legendary Quadratic Formula! Factor: Perfect Square Trinomial Get a common denominator Add fractions Extract Square Roots Proerties of Radicals Subtract B A Add fractions. Theorem 0.9. Quadratic Formula: The solution to AX + BX + C 0 with A 6 0 is: X B ± B AC A We can check our earlier solutions to x +6x 0 and x x using the Quadratic Formula. For x +6x 0, we identify A, B 6 and C. The quadratic formula gives: x 6 ± 6 ()( ) () 6 ± ± 60 Using roerties of radicals ( 60 15), this reduces to ( ± 15) ± 15. We leave it to the reader to show these two answers are the same as ± 15, as required. For x x + 5 0, we identify A, B and C 5. Here, we get: x ( ) ± ( ) ()(5) () ± Since , this reduces to x 1± 19. Think about what ( ± 15) is really telling you.
15 0.7 Quadratic Equations 87 It is worth noting that the Quadratic Formula alies to all quadratic equations - even ones we could solve using other techniques. For examle, to solve x +5x 0 we identify A, B 5 and C. This yields: x 5 ± 5 ()( ) () 5 ± 9 5 ± 7 At this oint, we have x and x the same two answers we obtained factoring. We can also use it to solve x, if we wanted to. From x 0, we have A 1, B 0 and C. The Quadratic Formula roduces x 0 ± 0 (1)() (1) ± 1 ± ± As this last examle illustrates, while the Quadratic Formula can be used to solve every quadratic equation, that doesn t mean it should be used. Many times other methods are more efficient. We now rovide a more comrehensive aroach to solving Quadratic Equations. Strategies for Solving Quadratic Equations If the variable aears in the squared term only, isolate it and Extract Square Roots. Otherwise, ut the nonzero terms on one side of the equation so that the other side is 0. Try factoring. If the exression doesn t factor easily, use the Quadratic Formula. The reader is encouraged to ause for a moment to think about why Comleting the Square doesn t aear in our list of strategies desite the fact that we ve sent the majority of the section so far talking about it. Let s get some ractice solving quadratic equations, shall we? Examle Find all real number solutions to the following equations. 1. (w 1) 0. 5x x(x ) 7. (y 1) y +. 5(5 1x) 59 5x 5..9t + 10t x x 6 Solution. 1. Since (w 1) 0 contains a erfect square, we isolate it first then extract square roots: (w 1) 0 (w 1) Add (w 1) ± w 1 Extract Square Roots 1 ± w Add 1 1 ± w Divide by Unaccetable answers include Jeff and Carl are mean and It was one of Carl s Pedantic Rants.
16 88 Prerequisites We find our two answers w 1±. The reader is encouraged to check both answers by substituting each into the original equation. 5. To solve 5x x(x ) 7, we begin erforming the indicated oerations and getting one side equal to 0. 5x x(x ) 7 5x x +x 7 Distribute x +8x 7 Gather like terms x +8x 7 0 Subtract 7 At this oint, we attemt to factor and find x +8x 7(x 1)( x + 7). Using the Zero Product Proerty, we get x 1 0 or x Our answers are x 1 or x 7, both of which are easy to check.. Even though we have a erfect square in (y 1), Extracting Square Roots won t hel matters since we have a y on the other side of the equation. Our strategy here is to erform the indicated oerations (and clear the fraction for good measure) and get 0 on one side of the equation. (y 1) y + y y + y +1 Perfect Square Trinomial (y y + y + 1) Multily by y + y 6y + 6 Distribute y 6y + 6 (y + ) y 6y + 6+(y + ) 0 Subtract 6, Add (y + ) y 5y 1 0 A cursory attemt at factoring bears no fruit, so we run this through the Quadratic Formula with A, B 5 and C 1. y+ ( 5) ± ( 5) y ()( 1) () y 5 ± y 5 ± 7 6 Since 7 is rime, we have no way to reduce 7. Thus, our final answers are y 5± 7 6. The reader is encouraged to suly the details of the challenging verification of the answers. 5 It s excellent ractice working with radicals fractions so we really, really want you to take the time to do it.
17 0.7 Quadratic Equations 89. We roceed as before; our aim is to gather the nonzero terms on one side of the equation. 5(5 1x) 59 5x x 59 5x 59 (15 105x) 5x Distribute Multily by 500 0x x Distribute 500 0x x 0 Subtract 59, Add 100x 100x 0x Gather like terms With highly comosite numbers like 100 and 1, factoring seems inefficient at best, 6 so we aly the Quadratic Formula with A 100, B 0 and C 1: x ( 0) ± ( 0) (100)(1) (100) 0 ± ± ± To our surrise and delight we obtain just one answer, x Our next equation.9t + 10t + 0, already has 0 on one side of the equation, but with coefficients like.9 and 10, factoring with integers is not an otion. We could make things a bit easier on the eyes by clearing the decimal (by multilying through by 10) to get 9t + 100t but we simly cannot rid ourselves of the irrational number. The Quadratic Formula is our only recourse. With A 9, B 100 and C 0 we get: 6 This is actually the Perfect Square Trinomial (10x 1).
18 90 Prerequisites t 100 q ± (100 ) ( 9)(0) ( 9) 100 ± ± ± ( 50 ± 50) ( 9) 50 ± 50 9 ( 50 ± 50) Reduce Proerties of Negatives Distribute You ll note that when we distributed the negative in the last ste, we changed the ± to a. While this is technically correct, at the end of the day both symbols mean lus or minus, 7 so we can write our answers as t 50 ± Checking these answers are a true test of arithmetic mettle. 6. At first glance, the equation x x 6 seems mislaced. The highest ower of the variable x here is, not, so this equation isn t a quadratic equation - at least not in terms of the variable x. It is, however, an examle of an equation that is quadratic in disguise. 8 We introduce a new variable u to hel us see the attern - secifically we let u x. Thus u (x ) x. So in terms of the variable u, the equation x x 6 is u u 6. The latter is a quadratic equation, which we can solve using the usual techniques: u u 6 0 u u 6 Subtract u After a few attemts at factoring, we resort to the Quadratic Formula with A, B, 7 There are instances where we need both symbols, however. For examle, the Sum and Difference of Cubes Formulas (age 71) can be written as a single formula: a ± b (a ± b)(a ab + b ). In this case, all of the to symbols are read to give the sum formula; the bottom symbols give the difference formula. 8 More formally, quadratic in form. Carl likes Quadratics in Disguise since it reminds him of the tagline of one of his beloved childhood cartoons and toy lines.
19 0.7 Quadratic Equations 91 C 6 and get: u ( ) ± ( ) ()( 6) () ± ± 76 6 ± 19 6 ± 19 6 (1 ± 19) () 1 ± 19 Proerties of Radicals Factor Reduce We ve solved the equation for u, but what we still need to solve the original equation 9 - which means we need to find the corresonding values of x. Since u x, we have two equations: x or x 1 19 q We can solve the first equation by extracting square roots to get x ±. The second equation, however, has no real number solutions because 1 19 is a negative number. For our final answers we can rationalize the denominator 10 to get: x ± s ± s ± + 19 As with the revious exercise, the very challenging check is left to the reader. Our last examle above, the Quadratic in Disguise, hints that the Quadratic Formula is alicable to a wider class of equations than those which are strictly quadratic. We give some general guidelines to recognizing these beasts in the wild on the next age. 9 Or, you ve solved the equation for you (u), now you have to solve it for your instructor (x). 10 We ll say more about this technique in Section 0.9.
20 9 Prerequisites Identifying Quadratics in Disguise An equation is a Quadratic in Disguise if it can be written in the form: AX m + BX m + C 0. In other words: There are exactly three terms, two with variables and one constant term. The exonent on the variable in one term is exactly twice the variable on the other term. To transform a Quadratic in Disguise to a quadratic equation, let u X m so u (X m ) X m. This transforms the equation into Au + Bu + C 0. For examle, x 6 x is a Quadratic in Disguise, since 6. If we let u x, we get u (x ) x 6, so the equation becomes u u However, x 6 x is not a Quadratic in Disguise, since 6 6. The substitution u x yields u (x ) x, not x 6 as required. We ll see more instances of Quadratics in Disguise in later sections. We close this section with a review of the discriminant of a quadratic equation as defined below. Definition The Discriminant: Given a quadratic equation AX + BX + C 0, the quantity B AC is called the discriminant of the equation. The discriminant is the radicand of the square root in the quadratic formula: X B ± B AC A It discriminates between the nature and number of solutions we get from a quadratic equation. The results are summarized below. Theorem Discriminant Theorem: Given a Quadratic Equation AX + BX + C 0, let D B AC be the discriminant. If D > 0, there are two distinct real number solutions to the equation. If D 0, there is one reeated real number solution. Note: Reeated here comes from the fact that both solutions B±0 A reduce to B A. If D < 0, there are no real solutions. For examle, x + x 1 0 has two real number solutions since the discriminant works out to be (1) (1)( 1) 5 > 0. This results in a ± 5 in the Quadratic Formula, generating two different answers. On the other hand, x + x has no real solutions since here, the discriminant is (1) (1)(1) < 0 which generates a ± in the Quadratic Formula. The equation x +x has discriminant () (1)(1) 0 so in the Quadratic Formula we get a ± 00 thereby generating just one solution. More can be said as well. For examle, the discriminant of 6x x 0 0 is 961. This is a erfect square, 961 1, which means our solutions are
21 0.7 Quadratic Equations 9 rational numbers. When our solutions are rational numbers, the quadratic actually factors nicely. In our examle 6x x 0 (x + 5)(x 8). Admittedly, if you ve already comuted the discriminant, you re most of the way done with the roblem and robably wouldn t take the time to exeriment with factoring the quadratic at this oint but we ll see another use for this analysis of the discriminant in the next section Secifically in Examle
22 9 Prerequisites Exercises In Exercises 1-1, find all real solutions. Check your answers, as directed by your instructor. 1. x (5t + ). (y ) 10. x + x w w 6. y(y + ) 1 7. z z v + 0.v x x t (t + 1) 11. (x ) x (y 1)(y + 1) 5y 1. w +w x + x 15. ( y) ( y) x +6x 15x v 7v v y 8y 18y 1 0. x x v +1 In Exercises - 7, find all real solutions and use a calculator to aroximate your answers, rounded to two decimal laces b 6. r r + r 5..9t + 100t x 1.65( x) 7. (0.5+A) 0.7(0.1 A) v In Exercises 8-0, use Theorem 0. along with the techniques in this section to find all real solutions to the following. 8. x x 9. x x x 1 0. x x + x 1. Prove that for every nonzero number, x + x + 0 has no real solutions.. Solve for t: 1 gt + vt + h 0. Assume g > 0, v 0 and h 0.
23 0.7 Quadratic Equations Answers 1. x ± 5 6. x 1 ± 5 7. z 1 ± t 5 ± r 1 1. w ±. t 5, 5 5. w 1,. y ±1, ± 5 6. y ± 5 8. v, 1 9. No real solution. 11. x 0 1. y ± x ±1 15. y ± x 0, 5 ± , ± 18. v 0, ±, ± y 5 ± 6 ± x 1. v, r b ± ±.0. r ± 50 ±.. r ± x 99 ± x 1,, ± 17, r 6.,.7 5. t 500 ± 10 91, t 5.68, 1.7 9, x 1.69, A 107 ± 7 70, A 0.50, x ±1, ± 0. x 1, 1, 7 1. The discriminant is: D < 0. Since D < 0, there are no real solutions.. t v ± v +gh g
24 16 Prerequisites 0.10 Comlex Numbers We conclude our Prerequisites chater with a review the set of Comlex Numbers. As you may recall, the comlex numbers fill an algebraic ga left by the real numbers. There is no real number x with x 1, since for any real number x 0. However, we could formally extract square roots and write x ± 1. We build the comlex numbers by relabeling the quantity 1 as i, the unfortunately misnamed imaginary unit. 1 The number i, while not a real number, is defined so that it lays along well with real numbers and acts very much like any other radical exression. For instance, (i) 6i, 7i i i, ( 7i) + ( + i) 5 i, and so forth. The key roerties which distinguish i from the real numbers are listed below. Definition The imaginary unit i satisfies the two following roerties: 1. i 1. If c is a real number with c 0 then c i c Proerty 1 in Definition 0.18 establishes that i does act as a square root of 1, and roerty establishes what we mean by the rincial square root of a negative real number. In roerty, it is imortant to remember the restriction on c. For examle, it is erfectly accetable to say i i() i. However, ( ) 6 i, otherwise, we d get ( ) i i(i) i ( 1), which is unaccetable. The moral of this story is that the general roerties of radicals do not aly for even roots of negative quantities. With Definition 0.18 in lace, we are now in osition to define the comlex numbers. Definition A comlex number is a number of the form a + bi, where a and b are real numbers and i is the imaginary unit. The set of comlex numbers is denoted C. Comlex numbers include things you d normally exect, like + i and 5 i. However, don t forget that a or b could be zero, which means numbers like i and 6 are also comlex numbers. In other words, don t forget that the comlex numbers include the real numbers, so 0 and 1 are both considered comlex numbers. The arithmetic of comlex numbers is as you would exect. The only things you need to remember are the two roerties in Definition The next examle should hel recall how these animals behave. 1 Some Technical Mathematics textbooks label it j. While it carries the adjective imaginary, these numbers have essential real-world imlications. For examle, every electronic device owes its existence to the study of imaginary numbers. Note the use of the indefinite article a. Whatever beast is chosen to be i, i is the other square root of 1. To use the language of Section 0.1., R C.
25 0.10 Comlex Numbers 17 Examle Perform the indicated oerations. 1. (1 i) ( + i). (1 i)( + i). 1 i i ( )( 1) 6. (x [1 + i])(x [1 i]) Solution. 1. As mentioned earlier, we treat exressions involving i as we would any other radical. We distribute and combine like terms: (1 i) ( + i) 1 i i Distribute 6i Gather like terms Technically, we d have to rewrite our answer 6i as ( ) + ( 6)i to be (in the strictest sense) in the form a + bi. That being said, even edants have their limits, and we ll consider 6i good enough.. Using the Distributive Proerty (a.k.a. F.O.I.L.), we get (1 i)( + i) (1)() + (1)(i) (i)() (i)(i) F.O.I.L. +i 6i 8i i 8( 1) i 1 i i. How in the world are we suosed to simlify 1 i i? Well, we deal with the denominator i as we would any other denominator containing two terms, one of which is a square root: we and multily both numerator and denominator by + i, the (comlex) conjugate of i. Doing so roduces 1 i i (1 i)( + i) ( i)( + i) Equivalent Fractions +i 6i 8i 9 16i F.O.I.L. i 8( 1) 9 16( 1) i 1 11 i i. We use roerty of Definition 0.18 first, then aly the rules of radicals alicable to real numbers to get 1 i i 1 i
26 18 Prerequisites 5. We adhere to the order of oerations here and erform the multilication before the radical to get ( )( 1) We can brute force multily using the distributive roerty and see that (x [1 + i])(x [1 i]) x x[1 i] x[1 + i] + [1 i][1 + i] F.O.I.L. x x +ix x ix +1 i +i i Distribute x x +1 ( 1) Gather like terms x x +5 i 1 This tye of factoring will be revisited in Section.. In the revious examle, we used the conjugate idea from Section 0.9 to divide two comlex numbers. More generally, the comlex conjugate of a comlex number a + bi is the number a bi. The notation commonly used for comlex conjugation is a bar : a + bi a bi. For examle, +i i and i +i. To find 6, we note that 66+0i 6 0i 6, so 6 6. Similarly, i i, since i 0+i 0 i i. Note that , not 5, since i + 5 0i + 5. Here, the conjugation secified by the bar notation involves reversing the sign before i 1, not before 5. The roerties of the conjugate are summarized in the following theorem. Theorem 0.1. Proerties of the Comlex Conjugate: Let z and w be comlex numbers. z z z + w z + w zw z w z n (z) n, for any natural number n z is a real number if and only if z z. Essentially, Theorem 0.1 says that comlex conjugation works well with addition, multilication and owers. The roofs of these roerties can best be achieved by writing out z a + bi and w c + di for real numbers a, b, c and d. Next, we comute the left and right sides of each equation and verify that they are the same. The roof of the first roerty is a very quick exercise. To rove the second roerty, we comare z + w with z + w. We have z + w a + bi + c + di a bi + c di. To find z + w, we first comute so z + w (a + bi)+(c + di) (a + c)+(b + d)i z + w (a + c)+(b + d)i (a + c) (b + d)i a + c bi di a bi + c di z + w Trust us on this.
27 0.10 Comlex Numbers 19 As such, we have established z + w z + w. The roof for multilication works similarly. The roof that the conjugate works well with owers can be viewed as a reeated alication of the roduct rule, and is best roved using a technique called Mathematical Induction. 5 The last roerty is a characterization of real numbers. If z is real, then z a +0i, so z a 0i a z. On the other hand, if z z, then a + bi a bi which means b b so b 0. Hence, z a +0i a and is real. We now return to the business of solving quadratic equations. Consider x x The discriminant b ac 16 is negative, so we know by Theorem 0.10 there are no real solutions, since the Quadratic Formula would involve the term 16. Comlex numbers, however, are built just for such situations, so we can go ahead and aly the Quadratic Formula to get: x ( ) ± ( ) (1)(5) (1) ± 16 ± i 1± i. Examle Find the comlex solutions to the following equations Solution. x x +1 x +. t 9t +5. z Clearing fractions yields a quadratic equation so we then roceed as in Section 0.7. x x +1 x + x (x + )(x + 1) Multily by (x + 1) to clear denominators x x + x +x + F.O.I.L. x x +x + Gather like terms 0 x +x + Subtract x From here, we aly the Quadratic Formula ± x (1)() (1) ± 8 ± i 8 ± i ( 1 ± i ) 1 ± i Quadratic Formula Simlify Definition of i Product Rule for Radicals Factor and reduce 5 See Section Remember, all real numbers are comlex numbers, so comlex solutions means both real and non-real answers.
28 10 Prerequisites We get two answers: x 1+i and its conjugate x 1 i. Checking both of these answers reviews all of the salient oints about comlex number arithmetic and is therefore strongly encouraged.. Since we have three terms, and the exonent on one term ( on t ) is exactly twice the exonent on the other ( on t ), we have a Quadratic in Disguise. We roceed accordingly. t 9t +5 t 9t 5 0 Subtract 9t and 5 (t + 1)(t 5) 0 Factor t or t 5 Zero Product Proerty From t we get t 1, or t 1. We extract square roots as follows: r r t ± ±i ±i 1 ±i ± i, where we have rationalized the denominator er convention. From t 5, we get t ± 5. In total, we have four comlex solutions - two real: t ± 5 and two non-real: t ± i.. To find the real solutions to z + 1 0, we can subtract the 1 from both sides and extract cube roots: z 1, so z 1 1. It turns out there are two more non-real comlex number solutions to this equation. To get at these, we factor: z +1 0 (z + 1)(z z + 1) 0 Factor (Sum of Two Cubes) z or z z +10 From z + 1 0, we get our real solution z 1. From z z + 1 0, we aly the Quadratic Formula to get: z ( 1) ± ( 1) (1)(1) (1) 1 ± 1 ± i Thus we get three solutions to z one real: z 1 and two non-real: z 1±i. As always, the reader is encouraged to test their algebraic mettle and check these solutions. It is no coincidence that the non-real solutions to the equations in Examle aear in comlex conjugate airs. Any time we use the Quadratic Formula to solve an equation with real coefficients, the answers will form a comlex conjugate air owing to the ± in the Quadratic Formula. This leads us to a generalization of Theorem 0.10 which we state on the next age.
29 0.10 Comlex Numbers 11 Theorem 0.1. Discriminant Theorem: Given a Quadratic Equation AX + BX + C 0, where A, B and C are real numbers, let D B AC be the discriminant. If D > 0, there are two distinct real number solutions to the equation. If D 0, there is one (reeated) real number solution. Note: Reeated here comes from the fact that both solutions B±0 A reduce to B A. If D < 0, there are two non-real solutions which form a comlex conjugate air. We will have much more to say about comlex solutions to equations in Section. and we will revisit Theorem 0.1 then.
30 1 Prerequisites Exercises In Exercises 1-10, use the given comlex numbers z and w to find and simlify the following. z + w zw z 1 z z w z zz (z) 1. z +i, w i. z 1+i, w i. z i, w 1+i. z i, w i 5. z 5i, w +7i 6. z 5+i, w +i 7. z i, w +i 8. z 1 i, w 1 i w z 9. z 1 + i, w 1 + i 10. z + i, w i In Exercises 11-18, simlify the quantity ( 5)( ) ( 9)( 16) 17. ( 9) 18. ( 9) We know that i 1 which means i i i ( 1) i i and i i i ( 1)( 1) 1. In Exercises 19-6, use this information to simlify the given ower of i. 19. i 5 0. i 6 1. i 7. i 8. i 15. i 6 5. i i 0 In Exercises 7-5, find all comlex solutions. 7. x +6x 8. 15t +t +5t(t + 1) 9. y +y 0. 1 w w 1. y y y. x x 1 x. x 5 x. 6. Multily and simlify: x [ i ] 5y +1 y 1 y 5. z 16 x [ + i ]
31 0.10 Comlex Numbers Answers 1. For z +i and w i z + w +7i zw 1 + 8i z 5 + 1i 1 z 1 1 i z w 1 i w z i z i zz 1 (z) 5 1i. For z 1+i and w i z + w 1 zw 1 i z i 1 z 1 1 i z w 1+i w z 1 1 i z 1 i zz (z) i. For z i and w 1+i z + w 1+i zw i z 1 1 z i z w i w z +i z i zz 1 (z) 1. For z i and w i z + w +i zw 8+8i z 16 1 z 1 i z w 1+i w z 1 1 i z i zz 16 (z) For z 5i and w +7i z + w 5+i zw i z 16 0i 1 z + 5 i z w i w z i z +5i zz (z) i
32 1 Prerequisites 6. For z 5+i and w +i z + w 1+i zw 6i z 10i 1 z i z w i w z i z 5 i zz 6 (z) + 10i 7. For z i and w +i z + w zw z i 1 z + i z w i w z i z +i zz (z) i 8. For z 1 i and w 1 i z + w i zw z i 1 z 1 + i z w 1 + i w z 1 i z 1+i zz (z) +i 9. For z 1 + i and w 1 + i z + w i zw 1 z 1 + i 1 z 1 i z w 1 i w z 1 + i z 1 i zz 1 (z) 1 i 10. For z + i and w i z + w zw 1 z i 1 z i z w i w z i z i zz 1 (z) i 11. 7i 1. i
33 0.10 Comlex Numbers i 19. i 5 i i 1 i i 0. i 6 i i 1 ( 1) 1 1. i 7 i i 1 ( i) i. i 8 i i i (1) 1. i 15 i i 1 ( i) i. i 6 i 6 i 1 ( 1) 1 5. i 117 i 9 i 1 i i 6. i 0 i x ± i 1 0. w 1 ± i 7 5 ± i. x 6. x 6x + 8. t 5, ± i 1. y ± i. y ±i, ± i 9. y ±, ±i. x 0, 1 ± i 5. z ±, ±i
Section 0.10: Complex Numbers from Precalculus Prerequisites a.k.a. Chapter 0 by Carl Stitz, PhD, and Jeff Zeager, PhD, is available under a Creative
Section 0.0: Comlex Numbers from Precalculus Prerequisites a.k.a. Chater 0 by Carl Stitz, PhD, and Jeff Zeager, PhD, is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike.0 license.
More informationSection 0.6: Factoring from Precalculus Prerequisites a.k.a. Chapter 0 by Carl Stitz, PhD, and Jeff Zeager, PhD, is available under a Creative
Section 0.6: Factoring from Precalculus Prerequisites a.k.a. Chapter 0 by Carl Stitz, PhD, and Jeff Zeager, PhD, is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike.0 license. 201,
More informationMATH 2710: NOTES FOR ANALYSIS
MATH 270: NOTES FOR ANALYSIS The main ideas we will learn from analysis center around the idea of a limit. Limits occurs in several settings. We will start with finite limits of sequences, then cover infinite
More informationSets of Real Numbers
Chater 4 Sets of Real Numbers 4. The Integers Z and their Proerties In our revious discussions about sets and functions the set of integers Z served as a key examle. Its ubiquitousness comes from the fact
More informationHENSEL S LEMMA KEITH CONRAD
HENSEL S LEMMA KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction In the -adic integers, congruences are aroximations: for a and b in Z, a b mod n is the same as a b 1/ n. Turning information modulo one ower of into similar
More informationMA3H1 TOPICS IN NUMBER THEORY PART III
MA3H1 TOPICS IN NUMBER THEORY PART III SAMIR SIKSEK 1. Congruences Modulo m In quadratic recirocity we studied congruences of the form x 2 a (mod ). We now turn our attention to situations where is relaced
More informationWorksheet on Derivatives. Dave L. Renfro Drake University November 1, 1999
Worksheet on Derivatives Dave L. Renfro Drake University November, 999 A. Fun With d d (n ) = n n : Find y In case you re interested, the rimary urose of these roblems (Section A) is to review roerties
More informationChapter 7 Rational and Irrational Numbers
Chater 7 Rational and Irrational Numbers In this chater we first review the real line model for numbers, as discussed in Chater 2 of seventh grade, by recalling how the integers and then the rational numbers
More informationElliptic Curves Spring 2015 Problem Set #1 Due: 02/13/2015
18.783 Ellitic Curves Sring 2015 Problem Set #1 Due: 02/13/2015 Descrition These roblems are related to the material covered in Lectures 1-2. Some of them require the use of Sage, and you will need to
More information3.4 Complex Zeros and the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
86 Polynomial Functions 3.4 Complex Zeros and the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra In Section 3.3, we were focused on finding the real zeros of a polynomial function. In this section, we expand our horizons
More informationExcerpt from "Intermediate Algebra" 2014 AoPS Inc.
Ecert from "Intermediate Algebra" 04 AoPS Inc. www.artofroblemsolving.com for which our grah is below the -ais with the oints where the grah intersects the -ais (because the ineuality is nonstrict), we
More informationf(r) = a d n) d + + a0 = 0
Math 400-00/Foundations of Algebra/Fall 07 Polynomials at the Foundations: Roots Next, we turn to the notion of a root of a olynomial in Q[x]. Definition 8.. r Q is a rational root of fx) Q[x] if fr) 0.
More informationPackage Summary. Square Root Equations Absolute Value Equations. Making Math Possible 1 of 9 c Sa diyya Hendrickson
Solving Equations Preared by: Sa diyya Hendrickson Name: Date: Package Summary Square Root Equations Absolute Value Equations Making Math Possible 1 of 9 c Sa diyya Hendrickson A square root equation is
More informationA CONCRETE EXAMPLE OF PRIME BEHAVIOR IN QUADRATIC FIELDS. 1. Abstract
A CONCRETE EXAMPLE OF PRIME BEHAVIOR IN QUADRATIC FIELDS CASEY BRUCK 1. Abstract The goal of this aer is to rovide a concise way for undergraduate mathematics students to learn about how rime numbers behave
More informationMATH 361: NUMBER THEORY EIGHTH LECTURE
MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY EIGHTH LECTURE 1. Quadratic Recirocity: Introduction Quadratic recirocity is the first result of modern number theory. Lagrange conjectured it in the late 1700 s, but it was first
More informationTopic 7: Using identity types
Toic 7: Using identity tyes June 10, 2014 Now we would like to learn how to use identity tyes and how to do some actual mathematics with them. By now we have essentially introduced all inference rules
More informationLesson 21 Not So Dramatic Quadratics
STUDENT MANUAL ALGEBRA II / LESSON 21 Lesson 21 Not So Dramatic Quadratics Quadratic equations are probably one of the most popular types of equations that you ll see in algebra. A quadratic equation has
More informationAlgebra & Trig Review
Algebra & Trig Review 1 Algebra & Trig Review This review was originally written for my Calculus I class, but it should be accessible to anyone needing a review in some basic algebra and trig topics. The
More informationNotes on Instrumental Variables Methods
Notes on Instrumental Variables Methods Michele Pellizzari IGIER-Bocconi, IZA and frdb 1 The Instrumental Variable Estimator Instrumental variable estimation is the classical solution to the roblem of
More informationCryptanalysis of Pseudorandom Generators
CSE 206A: Lattice Algorithms and Alications Fall 2017 Crytanalysis of Pseudorandom Generators Instructor: Daniele Micciancio UCSD CSE As a motivating alication for the study of lattice in crytograhy we
More informationElementary Analysis in Q p
Elementary Analysis in Q Hannah Hutter, May Szedlák, Phili Wirth November 17, 2011 This reort follows very closely the book of Svetlana Katok 1. 1 Sequences and Series In this section we will see some
More informationPretest (Optional) Use as an additional pacing tool to guide instruction. August 21
Trimester 1 Pretest (Otional) Use as an additional acing tool to guide instruction. August 21 Beyond the Basic Facts In Trimester 1, Grade 8 focus on multilication. Daily Unit 1: Rational vs. Irrational
More information16.2. Infinite Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
Infinite Series 6. Introduction We extend the concet of a finite series, met in section, to the situation in which the number of terms increase without bound. We define what is meant by an infinite series
More information16.2. Infinite Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
Infinite Series 6.2 Introduction We extend the concet of a finite series, met in Section 6., to the situation in which the number of terms increase without bound. We define what is meant by an infinite
More informationWhy Proofs? Proof Techniques. Theorems. Other True Things. Proper Proof Technique. How To Construct A Proof. By Chuck Cusack
Proof Techniques By Chuck Cusack Why Proofs? Writing roofs is not most student s favorite activity. To make matters worse, most students do not understand why it is imortant to rove things. Here are just
More informationAlgebra. Here are a couple of warnings to my students who may be here to get a copy of what happened on a day that you missed.
This document was written and copyrighted by Paul Dawkins. Use of this document and its online version is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use located at. The online version of this document is
More informationUnit 2-1: Factoring and Solving Quadratics. 0. I can add, subtract and multiply polynomial expressions
CP Algebra Unit -1: Factoring and Solving Quadratics NOTE PACKET Name: Period Learning Targets: 0. I can add, subtract and multiply polynomial expressions 1. I can factor using GCF.. I can factor by grouping.
More informationQuadratic Equations Part I
Quadratic Equations Part I Before proceeding with this section we should note that the topic of solving quadratic equations will be covered in two sections. This is done for the benefit of those viewing
More informationFactorability in the ring Z[ 5]
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research Paers in Mathematics Mathematics, Deartment of 4-2004 Factorability in the ring
More information19th Bay Area Mathematical Olympiad. Problems and Solutions. February 28, 2017
th Bay Area Mathematical Olymiad February, 07 Problems and Solutions BAMO- and BAMO- are each 5-question essay-roof exams, for middle- and high-school students, resectively. The roblems in each exam are
More information1. INTRODUCTION. Fn 2 = F j F j+1 (1.1)
CERTAIN CLASSES OF FINITE SUMS THAT INVOLVE GENERALIZED FIBONACCI AND LUCAS NUMBERS The beautiful identity R.S. Melham Deartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney PO Box 23, Broadway,
More informationThe Hasse Minkowski Theorem Lee Dicker University of Minnesota, REU Summer 2001
The Hasse Minkowski Theorem Lee Dicker University of Minnesota, REU Summer 2001 The Hasse-Minkowski Theorem rovides a characterization of the rational quadratic forms. What follows is a roof of the Hasse-Minkowski
More information16. . Proceeding similarly, we get a 2 = 52 1 = , a 3 = 53 1 = and a 4 = 54 1 = 125
. Sequences When we first introduced a function as a special type of relation in Section.3, we did not put any restrictions on the domain of the function. All we said was that the set of x-coordinates
More informationFeedback-error control
Chater 4 Feedback-error control 4.1 Introduction This chater exlains the feedback-error (FBE) control scheme originally described by Kawato [, 87, 8]. FBE is a widely used neural network based controller
More informationNumerical Linear Algebra
Numerical Linear Algebra Numerous alications in statistics, articularly in the fitting of linear models. Notation and conventions: Elements of a matrix A are denoted by a ij, where i indexes the rows and
More informationMultiplicative group law on the folium of Descartes
Multilicative grou law on the folium of Descartes Steluţa Pricoie and Constantin Udrişte Abstract. The folium of Descartes is still studied and understood today. Not only did it rovide for the roof of
More informationReal Analysis 1 Fall Homework 3. a n.
eal Analysis Fall 06 Homework 3. Let and consider the measure sace N, P, µ, where µ is counting measure. That is, if N, then µ equals the number of elements in if is finite; µ = otherwise. One usually
More informationSeries Handout A. 1. Determine which of the following sums are geometric. If the sum is geometric, express the sum in closed form.
Series Handout A. Determine which of the following sums are geometric. If the sum is geometric, exress the sum in closed form. 70 a) k= ( k ) b) 50 k= ( k )2 c) 60 k= ( k )k d) 60 k= (.0)k/3 2. Find the
More informationSolution sheet ξi ξ < ξ i+1 0 otherwise ξ ξ i N i,p 1 (ξ) + where 0 0
Advanced Finite Elements MA5337 - WS7/8 Solution sheet This exercise sheets deals with B-slines and NURBS, which are the basis of isogeometric analysis as they will later relace the olynomial ansatz-functions
More informationMath 104B: Number Theory II (Winter 2012)
Math 104B: Number Theory II (Winter 01) Alina Bucur Contents 1 Review 11 Prime numbers 1 Euclidean algorithm 13 Multilicative functions 14 Linear diohantine equations 3 15 Congruences 3 Primes as sums
More information8.6 Partial Fraction Decomposition
628 Systems of Equations and Matrices 8.6 Partial Fraction Decomposition This section uses systems of linear equations to rewrite rational functions in a form more palatable to Calculus students. In College
More informationMath 99 Review for Exam 3
age 1 1. Simlify each of the following eressions. (a) ab a b + 1 b 1 a 1 b + 1 Solution: We will factor both numerator and denominator and then cancel. The numerator can be factored by grouing ab {z a
More informationRECIPROCITY LAWS JEREMY BOOHER
RECIPROCITY LAWS JEREMY BOOHER 1 Introduction The law of uadratic recirocity gives a beautiful descrition of which rimes are suares modulo Secial cases of this law going back to Fermat, and Euler and Legendre
More information5.3 Other Algebraic Functions
5.3 Other Algebraic Functions 397 5.3 Other Algebraic Functions This section serves as a watershed for functions which are combinations of polynomial, and more generally, rational functions, with the operations
More informationAdding and Subtracting Polynomials
Adding and Subtracting Polynomials When you add polynomials, simply combine all like terms. When subtracting polynomials, do not forget to use parentheses when needed! Recall the distributive property:
More informationON THE LEAST SIGNIFICANT p ADIC DIGITS OF CERTAIN LUCAS NUMBERS
#A13 INTEGERS 14 (014) ON THE LEAST SIGNIFICANT ADIC DIGITS OF CERTAIN LUCAS NUMBERS Tamás Lengyel Deartment of Mathematics, Occidental College, Los Angeles, California lengyel@oxy.edu Received: 6/13/13,
More informationThe Euler Phi Function
The Euler Phi Function 7-3-2006 An arithmetic function takes ositive integers as inuts and roduces real or comlex numbers as oututs. If f is an arithmetic function, the divisor sum Dfn) is the sum of the
More informationAlmost 4000 years ago, Babylonians had discovered the following approximation to. x 2 dy 2 =1, (5.0.2)
Chater 5 Pell s Equation One of the earliest issues graled with in number theory is the fact that geometric quantities are often not rational. For instance, if we take a right triangle with two side lengths
More informationQUIZ ON CHAPTER 4 - SOLUTIONS APPLICATIONS OF DERIVATIVES; MATH 150 FALL 2016 KUNIYUKI 105 POINTS TOTAL, BUT 100 POINTS = 100%
QUIZ ON CHAPTER - SOLUTIONS APPLICATIONS OF DERIVATIVES; MATH 150 FALL 016 KUNIYUKI 105 POINTS TOTAL, BUT 100 POINTS = 100% = x + 5 1) Consider f x and the grah of y = f x in the usual xy-lane in 16 x
More informationChapter 1A -- Real Numbers. iff. Math Symbols: Sets of Numbers
Fry Texas A&M University! Fall 2016! Math 150 Notes! Section 1A! Page 1 Chapter 1A -- Real Numbers Math Symbols: iff or Example: Let A = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16,...} and let B = {3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18,
More informationSolving Quadratic & Higher Degree Equations
Chapter 9 Solving Quadratic & Higher Degree Equations Sec 1. Zero Product Property Back in the third grade students were taught when they multiplied a number by zero, the product would be zero. In algebra,
More informationMobius Functions, Legendre Symbols, and Discriminants
Mobius Functions, Legendre Symbols, and Discriminants 1 Introduction Zev Chonoles, Erick Knight, Tim Kunisky Over the integers, there are two key number-theoretic functions that take on values of 1, 1,
More informationCharacteristics of Fibonacci-type Sequences
Characteristics of Fibonacci-tye Sequences Yarden Blausa May 018 Abstract This aer resents an exloration of the Fibonacci sequence, as well as multi-nacci sequences and the Lucas sequence. We comare and
More informationCSE 599d - Quantum Computing When Quantum Computers Fall Apart
CSE 599d - Quantum Comuting When Quantum Comuters Fall Aart Dave Bacon Deartment of Comuter Science & Engineering, University of Washington In this lecture we are going to begin discussing what haens to
More information15-451/651: Design & Analysis of Algorithms October 23, 2018 Lecture #17: Prediction from Expert Advice last changed: October 25, 2018
5-45/65: Design & Analysis of Algorithms October 23, 208 Lecture #7: Prediction from Exert Advice last changed: October 25, 208 Prediction with Exert Advice Today we ll study the roblem of making redictions
More informationJohn Weatherwax. Analysis of Parallel Depth First Search Algorithms
Sulementary Discussions and Solutions to Selected Problems in: Introduction to Parallel Comuting by Viin Kumar, Ananth Grama, Anshul Guta, & George Karyis John Weatherwax Chater 8 Analysis of Parallel
More informationSequences and the Binomial Theorem
Chapter 9 Sequences and the Binomial Theorem 9. Sequences When we first introduced a function as a special type of relation in Section.3, we did not put any restrictions on the domain of the function.
More informationOn the Rank of the Elliptic Curve y 2 = x(x p)(x 2)
On the Rank of the Ellitic Curve y = x(x )(x ) Jeffrey Hatley Aril 9, 009 Abstract An ellitic curve E defined over Q is an algebraic variety which forms a finitely generated abelian grou, and the structure
More information7.2 Inference for comparing means of two populations where the samples are independent
Objectives 7.2 Inference for comaring means of two oulations where the samles are indeendent Two-samle t significance test (we give three examles) Two-samle t confidence interval htt://onlinestatbook.com/2/tests_of_means/difference_means.ht
More informationOutline. EECS150 - Digital Design Lecture 26 Error Correction Codes, Linear Feedback Shift Registers (LFSRs) Simple Error Detection Coding
Outline EECS150 - Digital Design Lecture 26 Error Correction Codes, Linear Feedback Shift Registers (LFSRs) Error detection using arity Hamming code for error detection/correction Linear Feedback Shift
More informationCSC165H, Mathematical expression and reasoning for computer science week 12
CSC165H, Mathematical exression and reasoning for comuter science week 1 nd December 005 Gary Baumgartner and Danny Hea hea@cs.toronto.edu SF4306A 416-978-5899 htt//www.cs.toronto.edu/~hea/165/s005/index.shtml
More informationPractice Final Solutions
Practice Final Solutions 1. True or false: (a) If a is a sum of three squares, and b is a sum of three squares, then so is ab. False: Consider a 14, b 2. (b) No number of the form 4 m (8n + 7) can be written
More informationIntroduction. So, why did I even bother to write this?
Introduction This review was originally written for my Calculus I class, but it should be accessible to anyone needing a review in some basic algebra and trig topics. The review contains the occasional
More informationRESOLUTIONS OF THREE-ROWED SKEW- AND ALMOST SKEW-SHAPES IN CHARACTERISTIC ZERO
RESOLUTIONS OF THREE-ROWED SKEW- AND ALMOST SKEW-SHAPES IN CHARACTERISTIC ZERO MARIA ARTALE AND DAVID A. BUCHSBAUM Abstract. We find an exlicit descrition of the terms and boundary mas for the three-rowed
More information= 9 = x + 8 = = -5x 19. For today: 2.5 (Review) and. 4.4a (also review) Objectives:
Math 65 / Notes & Practice #1 / 20 points / Due. / Name: Home Work Practice: Simplify the following expressions by reducing the fractions: 16 = 4 = 8xy =? = 9 40 32 38x 64 16 Solve the following equations
More informationLecture 21: Quantum Communication
CS 880: Quantum Information Processing 0/6/00 Lecture : Quantum Communication Instructor: Dieter van Melkebeek Scribe: Mark Wellons Last lecture, we introduced the EPR airs which we will use in this lecture
More informationERRATA AND SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR A FRIENDLY INTRODUCTION TO NUMBER THEORY FOURTH EDITION
ERRATA AND SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR A FRIENDLY INTRODUCTION TO NUMBER THEORY FOURTH EDITION JOSEPH H. SILVERMAN Acknowledgements Page vii Thanks to the following eole who have sent me comments and corrections
More informationMATH 3240Q Introduction to Number Theory Homework 7
As long as algebra and geometry have been searated, their rogress have been slow and their uses limited; but when these two sciences have been united, they have lent each mutual forces, and have marched
More informationRound-off Errors and Computer Arithmetic - (1.2)
Round-off Errors and Comuter Arithmetic - (.). Round-off Errors: Round-off errors is roduced when a calculator or comuter is used to erform real number calculations. That is because the arithmetic erformed
More informationFrobenius Elements, the Chebotarev Density Theorem, and Reciprocity
Frobenius Elements, the Chebotarev Density Theorem, and Recirocity Dylan Yott July 30, 204 Motivation Recall Dirichlet s theorem from elementary number theory. Theorem.. For a, m) =, there are infinitely
More informationBy Evan Chen OTIS, Internal Use
Solutions Notes for DNY-NTCONSTRUCT Evan Chen January 17, 018 1 Solution Notes to TSTST 015/5 Let ϕ(n) denote the number of ositive integers less than n that are relatively rime to n. Prove that there
More informationComplex Analysis Homework 1
Comlex Analysis Homework 1 Steve Clanton Sarah Crimi January 27, 2009 Problem Claim. If two integers can be exressed as the sum of two squares, then so can their roduct. Proof. Call the two squares that
More informationLesson 5b Solving Quadratic Equations
Lesson 5b Solving Quadratic Equations In this lesson, we will continue our work with Quadratics in this lesson and will learn several methods for solving quadratic equations. The first section will introduce
More informationCOLLEGE ALGEBRA. Paul Dawkins
COLLEGE ALGEBRA Paul Dawkins Table of Contents Preface... iii Outline... iv Preliminaries... 7 Introduction... 7 Integer Exponents... 8 Rational Exponents...5 Radicals... Polynomials...30 Factoring Polynomials...36
More informationIntroduction to Group Theory Note 1
Introduction to Grou Theory Note July 7, 009 Contents INTRODUCTION. Examles OF Symmetry Grous in Physics................................. ELEMENT OF GROUP THEORY. De nition of Grou................................................
More information4. Score normalization technical details We now discuss the technical details of the score normalization method.
SMT SCORING SYSTEM This document describes the scoring system for the Stanford Math Tournament We begin by giving an overview of the changes to scoring and a non-technical descrition of the scoring rules
More informationMath 5330 Spring Notes Prime Numbers
Math 5330 Sring 208 Notes Prime Numbers The study of rime numbers is as old as mathematics itself. This set of notes has a bunch of facts about rimes, or related to rimes. Much of this stuff is old dating
More information2 Asymptotic density and Dirichlet density
8.785: Analytic Number Theory, MIT, sring 2007 (K.S. Kedlaya) Primes in arithmetic rogressions In this unit, we first rove Dirichlet s theorem on rimes in arithmetic rogressions. We then rove the rime
More information2 Asymptotic density and Dirichlet density
8.785: Analytic Number Theory, MIT, sring 2007 (K.S. Kedlaya) Primes in arithmetic rogressions In this unit, we first rove Dirichlet s theorem on rimes in arithmetic rogressions. We then rove the rime
More informationMath 4400/6400 Homework #8 solutions. 1. Let P be an odd integer (not necessarily prime). Show that modulo 2,
MATH 4400 roblems. Math 4400/6400 Homework # solutions 1. Let P be an odd integer not necessarily rime. Show that modulo, { P 1 0 if P 1, 7 mod, 1 if P 3, mod. Proof. Suose that P 1 mod. Then we can write
More informationChapter 9: Roots and Irrational Numbers
Chapter 9: Roots and Irrational Numbers Index: A: Square Roots B: Irrational Numbers C: Square Root Functions & Shifting D: Finding Zeros by Completing the Square E: The Quadratic Formula F: Quadratic
More information#A37 INTEGERS 15 (2015) NOTE ON A RESULT OF CHUNG ON WEIL TYPE SUMS
#A37 INTEGERS 15 (2015) NOTE ON A RESULT OF CHUNG ON WEIL TYPE SUMS Norbert Hegyvári ELTE TTK, Eötvös University, Institute of Mathematics, Budaest, Hungary hegyvari@elte.hu François Hennecart Université
More informationPractical Algebra. A Step-by-step Approach. Brought to you by Softmath, producers of Algebrator Software
Practical Algebra A Step-by-step Approach Brought to you by Softmath, producers of Algebrator Software 2 Algebra e-book Table of Contents Chapter 1 Algebraic expressions 5 1 Collecting... like terms 5
More informationGOOD MODELS FOR CUBIC SURFACES. 1. Introduction
GOOD MODELS FOR CUBIC SURFACES ANDREAS-STEPHAN ELSENHANS Abstract. This article describes an algorithm for finding a model of a hyersurface with small coefficients. It is shown that the aroach works in
More information3 Properties of Dedekind domains
18.785 Number theory I Fall 2016 Lecture #3 09/15/2016 3 Proerties of Dedekind domains In the revious lecture we defined a Dedekind domain as a noetherian domain A that satisfies either of the following
More informationx 2 a mod m. has a solution. Theorem 13.2 (Euler s Criterion). Let p be an odd prime. The congruence x 2 1 mod p,
13. Quadratic Residues We now turn to the question of when a quadratic equation has a solution modulo m. The general quadratic equation looks like ax + bx + c 0 mod m. Assuming that m is odd or that b
More informationRANDOM WALKS AND PERCOLATION: AN ANALYSIS OF CURRENT RESEARCH ON MODELING NATURAL PROCESSES
RANDOM WALKS AND PERCOLATION: AN ANALYSIS OF CURRENT RESEARCH ON MODELING NATURAL PROCESSES AARON ZWIEBACH Abstract. In this aer we will analyze research that has been recently done in the field of discrete
More informationUnit 1 - Computer Arithmetic
FIXD-POINT (FX) ARITHMTIC Unit 1 - Comuter Arithmetic INTGR NUMBRS n bit number: b n 1 b n 2 b 0 Decimal Value Range of values UNSIGND n 1 SIGND D = b i 2 i D = 2 n 1 b n 1 + b i 2 i n 2 i=0 i=0 [0, 2
More informationCH 73 THE QUADRATIC FORMULA, PART II
1 CH THE QUADRATIC FORMULA, PART II INTRODUCTION W ay back in Chapter 55 we used the Quadratic Formula to solve quadratic equations like 6x + 1x + 0 0, whose solutions are 5 and 8. In fact, all of the
More informationINTRODUCTION. Please write to us at if you have any comments or ideas. We love to hear from you.
Casio FX-570ES One-Page Wonder INTRODUCTION Welcome to the world of Casio s Natural Dislay scientific calculators. Our exeriences of working with eole have us understand more about obstacles eole face
More informationMATH342 Practice Exam
MATH342 Practice Exam This exam is intended to be in a similar style to the examination in May/June 2012. It is not imlied that all questions on the real examination will follow the content of the ractice
More informationSolving Quadratic & Higher Degree Equations
Chapter 7 Solving Quadratic & Higher Degree Equations Sec 1. Zero Product Property Back in the third grade students were taught when they multiplied a number by zero, the product would be zero. In algebra,
More information10.7 Trigonometric Equations and Inequalities
0.7 Trigonometric Equations and Inequalities 857 0.7 Trigonometric Equations and Inequalities In Sections 0. 0. and most recently 0. we solved some basic equations involving the trigonometric functions.
More informationDISCRIMINANTS IN TOWERS
DISCRIMINANTS IN TOWERS JOSEPH RABINOFF Let A be a Dedekind domain with fraction field F, let K/F be a finite searable extension field, and let B be the integral closure of A in K. In this note, we will
More informationACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER /2018
ACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER 1 2017/2018 DR. ANTHONY BROWN 1. Arithmetic and Algebra 1.1. Arithmetic of Numbers. While we have calculators and computers
More informationCHAPTER EIGHT: SOLVING QUADRATIC EQUATIONS Review April 9 Test April 17 The most important equations at this level of mathematics are quadratic
CHAPTER EIGHT: SOLVING QUADRATIC EQUATIONS Review April 9 Test April 17 The most important equations at this level of mathematics are quadratic equations. They can be solved using a graph, a perfect square,
More informationSolving Quadratic & Higher Degree Equations
Chapter 9 Solving Quadratic & Higher Degree Equations Sec 1. Zero Product Property Back in the third grade students were taught when they multiplied a number by zero, the product would be zero. In algebra,
More informationChemical Kinetics and Equilibrium - An Overview - Key
Chemical Kinetics and Equilibrium - An Overview - Key The following questions are designed to give you an overview of the toics of chemical kinetics and chemical equilibrium. Although not comrehensive,
More informationδ(xy) = φ(x)δ(y) + y p δ(x). (1)
LECTURE II: δ-rings Fix a rime. In this lecture, we discuss some asects of the theory of δ-rings. This theory rovides a good language to talk about rings with a lift of Frobenius modulo. Some of the material
More informationMATH 361: NUMBER THEORY ELEVENTH LECTURE
MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY ELEVENTH LECTURE The subjects of this lecture are characters, Gauss sums, Jacobi sums, and counting formulas for olynomial equations over finite fields. 1. Definitions, Basic Proerties
More information