Manifolds, sheaves, and cohomology

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Manifolds, sheaves, and cohomology"

Transcription

1 Manifolds, sheaves, and cohomology Torsten Wedhorn These are the lecture notes of my 3rd year Bachelor lecture in the winter semester 2013/14 in Paderborn. This manuscript differs from the lecture: It does not contain any pictures, and the lecture is in German. Contents 0 Categories 2 (A) The language of categories (B) Functors (C) Limits and Colimits Sheaves 7 (A) Presheaves and sheaves (B) Stalks of sheaves (C) Sheaves attached to presheaves (D) Direct and inverse images of sheaves (E) Ringed spaces Manifolds 18 (A) Premanifolds (B) Topological properties (C) Topological groups (D) Manifolds Local theory of manifolds: tangent spaces and submanifolds 28 (A) Tangent spaces (B) Morphisms of constant rank (C) Regular submanifolds Local-Global: Torsors and non abelian Čech cohomology 36 (A) Group actions (B) G-manifolds (C) Torsors (D) Non-abelian Čech cohomology (E) First term sequence of cohomology Vector bundles 49 (A) O X -modules (B) Locally free modules and vector bundles (C) Tangent bundle (D) Digression: Exterior power (E) Differential forms and de Rham complex

2 6 Soft sheaves 63 (A) Definition and examples of soft sheaves (B) Soft sheaves and partitions of sections (C) Acyclicity of soft sheaves Cohomology of Sheaves 68 (A) Homotopy category of modules (B) Diagram chases (C) Injective and K-injective modules (D) Cohomology of complexes of sheaves (E) Examples of acyclic sheaves (F) Applications Proper base change theorem 84 (A) Inverse image and cohomology (B) Direct image and cohomology (C) Proper base change Cohomology of sheaves of locally constant functions 87 (A) Contractible spaces (B) Singular cohomology (C) Cohomology and Singular Cohomology (D) Homotopy invariance of cohomology (E) Applications Categories (A) The language of categories Definition 0.1. A category (German: Kategorie) C consists of (a) a class 1 Ob(C) of objects, (b) for any two objects X and Y a set Hom C (X, Y ) = Hom(X, Y ) of morphisms from X to Y, (c) for every object X an element id X Hom(X, X), the identity of X, (d) for any three objects X, Y, Z a composition map Hom(X, Y ) Hom(Y, Z) Hom(X, Z), (f, g) g f such that (1) the composition of morphisms is associative (i.e., for all objects X, Y, Z, W and for all f Hom(X, Y ), g Hom(Y, Z), h Hom(Z, W ) one has h (g f) = (h g) f, (2) the elements id X are neutral elements with respect to composition (i.e., for all objects X and Y and morphisms f Hom(X, Y ) one has f id X = f = id Y f. A category is called small if Ob(C) is a set. 1 We refer to [Sch] 3.3 for the usage of a class. Here we ignore all set-theoretic problems. 2

3 Definition 0.2. A morphism f : X Y in a category is called an isomorphism if there exists a morphism g : Y X such that f g = id Y and g f = id X. We often write f : X Y to indicate that f is an isomorphism. We also write X = Y and say that X and Y are isomorphic if there exists an isomorphism X Y. Definition 0.3. A subcategory of a category C is a category C such that every object of C is an object of C and such that Hom C (X, Y ) Hom C (X, Y ) for any pair (X, Y ) of objects of C, compatibly with composition of morphisms and identity elements. The subcategory C is called full if Hom C (X, Y ) = Hom C (X, Y ) for all objects X and Y of C. Example 0.4. (1) Category of sets (Sets): Objects are sets, for two sets X and Y a morphism is a map X Y, composition in the category is the usual composition of maps, the identity of a set X is the usual identity map id X. An isomorphism in (Sets) is simply a bijective map. (2) (Grp) the catagory of groups: Objects are groups, morphisms are group homomorphisms, composition is the usual composition of group homomorphisms, the identity is the usual identity. An isomorphism in (Grp) is a group isomorphism. (3) (Ab) is the full subcategory of (Grp) of abelian groups: Objects are abelian groups, morphisms are group homomorphisms, composition is the usual composition of group homomorphisms, the identity is the usual identity. (4) (Ring) the category of rings: Objects are rings, morphisms are ring homomorphisms,... (5) (Top) the category of topological spaces: Objects are topological spaces, morphisms are continuous maps,... An isomorphism is a homeomorphism. (6) (Toppt) the category of pointed topological spaces: Objects are pairs (X, x), where X is a topological spaces and x X, morphisms f : (X, x) (Y, y) are continuous maps f : X Y such that f(x) = y,... (7) Let k be a field. (k-vec) the category of k-vector spaces: Objects are k-vector spaces, morphisms are k-linear maps,... An isomorphism is an isomorphism of k-vector spaces (tautology!). (8) Let A be a ring. (A-Mod) the category of left A-modules for a ring A: Objects are... (9) Let A be a commutative ring. (A-Alg) the category of commutative A-algebras: Objects are... Definition 0.5. For every category C the opposite category, denoted by C opp, is the category with the same objects as C and where for two objects X and Y of C opp we set Hom C opp(x, Y ) := Hom C (Y, X) with the obvious composition law. Definition 0.6. Let I be a set. (1) A relation on I is called partial preorder or simply preorder, if i i for all i I and i j, j k imply i k for all i, j, k I. (2) A preorder is called partial order or simply orderif i j and j i imply i = j for all i, j I. 3

4 (3) A preorder is called filtered if I and if for all i, j I there exists a k I with i k and j k. (4) A partial order is called total order if for all i, j I one has i j or j i. Example 0.7. (1) The real numbers together with the usual ordering form a totally ordered set. (2) For n, m N we write n m if there exists k N such that m = kn. Then is a filtered partial order on N. (3) Let X be a a topological space. Let Open(X) be the set of open subsets of X (i.e., the topology of X). Then is a filtered partial order on Open(X). Remark 0.8. Every preordered set I can be made into a category, again denoted by I, whose objects are the elements of I and for two elements i, j I the set of morphisms Hom I (i, j) consists of one element if i j and is empty otherwise. There is a unique way to define a composition law in this category. (B) Functors Definition 0.9. Given categories C and D, a (covariant) functor (German: (covarianter) Funktor) (resp. a contravariant functor (German: kontravarianter Funktor) F : C D is given by attaching to each object C of C an object F (C) of D, and to each morphism f : C C in C a morphism F (f): F (C) F (C ) (resp. a morphism F (f): F (C ) F (C)), compatible with composition of morphisms, i.e., F (g f) = F (g) F (f) (resp. F (g f) = F (f) F (g)) and identity elements, i.e., F (id C ) = id F (C). A contravariant functor C D is the same as a covariant functor C opp D. If F is a functor from C to D and G a functor from D E, we write G F : C E for the composition. Remark Let F : C D be a covariant or a contravariant functor. Let C and C be objects in C and let f : C C be an isomorphism in C. Then F (f) is an isomorphism. Indeed, let us assume that F is covariant... Example A simple example is the functor which forgets some structure. An example is the functor F : (Grp) (Sets) that attaches to every group the underlying set and that sends every group homomorphism to itself (but now considered as a map of sets), Example Let X be a topological space, x X. Recall that π 1 (X, x) denotes the fundamental group of (X, x): Elements in π 1 (X, x) are homotopy classes of closed paths γ : [0, 1] X with γ(0) = γ(1) = x. Multiplication of paths is by concatenation (i.e. by first running through the first path and then through the second path, each time with double velocity). Whenever f : (X, x) (Y, y) is a morphism in (Toppt), then γ f γ defines a group homomorphism π 1 (f): π 1 (X, x) π 1 (Y, y). It is easy to check that we obtain a functor π 1 : (Toppt) (Grp). 4

5 In particular, if f : (X, x) (Y, y) is a homeomorphism with f(x) = y (i.e., an isomorphism in (Toppt), then π 1 (f) is an isomorphism of groups. Definition For two functors F, G: C D we call a family of morphisms α(s): F (S) G(S) for every object S of C functorial in S if for every morphism f : T S in C the diagram F (T ) α(t ) G(T ) commutes. F (f) G(f) F (S) α(s) G(S) Example Let A be a commutative ring. (1) For every A-module M let M := Hom A (M, A) be its dual module and for every A-linear map u: M N let u : N M, λ λ u be its dual homomorphism. We obtain a contravariant functor ( ) : (A-Mod) (A-Mod). (2) For every A-module M one has the biduality homomorphism of A-modules ι M : M (M ), m (λ λ(m)), m M, λ M. Moreover, if u: M N is a homomorphism of A-modules, then the diagram M u N ι M (M ) (u ) ι N (N ) is commutative. In other words, M ι M is a morphism of functors id (A-Mod) ( ). Example Consider the functors π 1 : (Toppt) (Grp) and H 1 (, Z): (Toppt) (Grp), (X, x) H 1 (X, Z). Then there is a morphism of functors h: π 1 H 1 (, Z) such that for every object (X, x) in (Toppt) the group homomorphism h X,x : π 1 (X, x) H 1 (X, Z) is surjective. Definition Let F : C D be a functor. (1) F is called faithful (resp. fully faithful) if for all objects X and Y of C the map Hom C (X, Y ) Hom D (F (X), F (Y )), f F (f) is injective (resp. bijective). (2) F is called essentially surjective if for every object Y of D there exists an object X of C and an isomorphism F (X) = Y. (3) F is called an equivalence of categories if it is fully faithful and essentially surjective. There are analogous notions for contravariant functors. A contravariant functor which is an equivalence of categories is sometimes also called an anti-equivalence of categories. Theorem and Definition A functor F : C D is an equivalence of categories if and only if there exists a quasi-inverse functor G, i.e., a functor G: D C such that G F = id C and F G = id D. 5

6 Proof. [McL] Chap. IV, 4, Theorem 1. Definition Let C and D be categories and let F : C D and G: D C be functors. Then G is said to be right adjoint to F and F is said to be left adjoint to G if for all objects X in C and Y in D there exists a bijection which is functorial in X and in Y. Hom C (X, G(Y )) = Hom D (F (X), Y ) Example If F : C D is an equivalence of categories, then a quasi-inverse functor G: D C is right adjoint and left adjoint to F. Indeed for all objects X in C and Y in D we have bijections, functorial in X and in Y Hom C (X, G(Y )) Hom C (G(F (X)), G(Y )) Hom D (F (X), Y ). This shows that F is left adjoint to G. A similar argument shows that F is also right adjoint to G. Example Let k be a field and let F : (Vec(k)) (Sets) be the forgetful functor. Then F is right adjoint to the functor G which sends a set I to the k-vector space k (I) = { (x i ) i I ; x i k, x i = 0 for all but finitely many i} and which sends a map a: I J to the unique k-linear map G(a): k (I) k (J) such that G(a)(e i ) = e a(i) where (e i ) i I (resp. (e j ) j J is the standard basis of k (I) (resp. k (J) ). Indeed for every set I and every k-vectorspace V we have a bijection (C) Hom (Vec(k)) (k (I), V ) Hom (Sets) (I, V ), f (i f(e i )). Limits and Colimits Definition Let C be a category. (1) An inductive system in C (resp. a projective system in C) is a functor X : I C (resp. a functor X : I opp (Sets)), where I is a category 2. Then I is also called the index category. We often write X i instead of X(i) for an object in I. Hence for a morphism ϕ: i j in I we have a morphism X(ϕ): X i X j (resp. X(ϕ): X j X i ). (2) A limit of a projective system X : I opp C is an object lim X = I opp lim X i I opp i = lim in C together with morphisms p i : lim I opp X X i in C for all objects i I such that (a) for every morphism ϕ: i j in I one has p i = X(ϕ) p j, 2 To avoid set-theoretical difficulties one should in addition assume that I is equivalent to a small category. i I X i 6

7 (b) for every object Z in C and for all morphism q i : Z X i such that for all morphism ϕ: i j in I one has q i = X(ϕ) q j there exists a unique morphism q : Z lim I opp X such that q i = p i q for all i Ob(I). (3) A colimit of an inductive system X : I C is an object colim I X = colim i I X i = lim X i i I in C together with morphisms s i : X i lim I X in C for all objects i I such that (a) for every morphism ϕ: i j in I one has s i = s j X(ϕ), (b) for every object Z in C and for all morphism t i : X i Z such that for all morphism ϕ: i j in I one has t i = t j X(ϕ) there exists a unique morphism q : colim I X Z such that t i = t s i. Remark Limits and colimits are (if they exist) unique up to unique isomorphism by the uniqueness requirement in the definition. Example Let I be a filtered ordered set and let I be the attached category. Let X : I (Sets) be an inductive system. Then colim I X exists in (Sets) and we have colim X = ( X i )/, I i I where ( i I X i) is the disjoint union of the sets X i and where is the equivalence relation x i x j k I, ϕ: i k, ψ : j k : X(ϕ)(x i ) = X(ψ)(x j ) for x i X i and x j X j. Example Let I be a set with the discrete order (i.e., i j i = j). Consider I as a category and let X : I C be a diagram. (1) Then i I X i := lim I X is called the product of X (if it exists). If C = (Sets) (resp. C = (Top)), then i I X i is the usual product of sets (resp. of topological spaces). (2) Then i I X i := colim I X is called the coproduct of X or the direct sum of X (if it exists). If C = (Sets) (resp. C = (Top)), then i I X i is the disjount union of the sets X i (resp. of the topological spaces X i ). 1 Sheaves Notation: Let X be a topological space. 7

8 (A) Presheaves and sheaves Definition 1.1. A presheaf F on X consists of the following data. (a) For every open set U of X a set F (U), (b) for each pair of open sets U V a map res V U : F (V ) F (U), called restriction map, such that the following conditions hold (1) res U U = id F (U) for every open set U X, (2) for U V W open sets of X, res W U = resv U resw V. Let F 1 and F 2 be presheaves on X. A morphism of presheaves ϕ: F 1 F 2 is a family of maps ϕ U : F 1 (U) F 2 (U) (for all U X open) such that for all pairs of open sets U V in X the following diagram commutes F 1 (V ) ϕ V F 2 (V ) res V U F 1 (U) ϕ U res V U F 2 (U). Composition of morphisms of presheaves is defined in the obvious way and we obtain the category (PSh(X)) of presheaves on X. If U V are open sets of X and s F (V ) we will often write s U instead of res V U (s). The elements of F (U) are called sections of F over U. Very often we will also write Γ(U, F ) instead of F (U). Remark 1.2. We can also describe presheaves as follows. Let (Ouv X ) be the category whose objects are the open sets of X and, for two open sets U, V X, Hom(U, V ) is empty if U V, and consists of the inclusion map U V if U V (composition of morphisms being the composition of the inclusion maps). Then a presheaf is the same as a contravariant functor F from the category (Ouv X ) to the category (Sets) of sets. Remark and Definition 1.3. By replacing (Sets) in this definition by some other category C (e.g. the category of abelian groups, the category of rings, or the category of R-algebras, R a fixed ring) we obtain the notion of a presheaf F with values in C (e.g. a presheaf of abelian groups, a presheaf of rings, a presheaf of R-algebras. This signifies that F (U) is an object in C for every open subset U of X and that the restriction maps are morphisms in C. A morphism F 1 F 2 of presheaves with values in C is then simply a morphism of functors. Example 1.4. Let X be a topological space. (1) Let Y be a topological space. For U X open set C X;Y (U) := { f : U Y ; f continuous}. For U V X let res V U : C X;Y (V ) C X;Y (U) be the usual restriction f f U. Then C X;Y is a presheaf of sets. If Y = K (K = R or K = C), then C X;K (U) is a commutative K-algebra und C X;K is a presheaf of K-algebras. 8

9 (2) Let V be a finite-dimensional R-vector space and let X be an open subspace of V. Let α N 0 { }. For U X open set C α X;R (U) := C α X(U) := { f : U R ; f is a C α -map}. Again let res V U : C X α(v ) C X α(u) be the usual restriction f f U for U V X. This makes CX α into a presheaf of R-algebras. Let α 1. For X = R and U R open let d U : CR α α 1 (U) CR (U) be the derivative f f. Then (d U ) U is a morphism of presheaves of R-vector spaces. (3) Let V be a finite-dimensional C-vector space and let X be an open subspace of V. For U X open set O X (U) := O hol X (U) := { f : U C ; f holomorphic}. Then O X (with the usual restriction maps) is a presheaf of C-algebras. (4) Let E be a set. For U X open set F (U) := {f : U E constant map} with the usual restriction. Then F is a presheaf of sets. If E is an abelian group (resp. a ring), then F is a presheaf of abelian groups (resp. of rings). (5) Let B X be the Borel-σ-algebra of X (i.e., the σ-algebra generated by the open subsets of X). For U X open set M X (U) := { f : U R ; f measurable}. Then M X (with the usual restriction maps) is a presheaf of sets. Definition 1.5. Let X be a topological space. The presheaf F on X is called a sheaf, if for all open sets U in X and every open covering U = i U i the following condition holds: (Sh) Given s i F (U i ) for all i such that s i Ui U j = s j Ui U j for all i, j. Then there exists a unique s F (U) such that s Ui = s i. A morphism of sheaves is a morphism of presheaves. We obtain the category of sheaves on the topological space X, which we denote by (Sh(X)). In the same way we can define the notion of a sheaf of abelian groups, a sheaf of rings, a sheaf of R-modules, or a sheaf of R-algebras. Remark 1.6. Let X be a topological space, F a sheaf on X, let U X be open and let U = i U i be an open covering. Let s, s F (U) such that s Ui = s U i for all i I. Then s = s. Remark 1.7. Note that if F is a sheaf on X, F ( ) is a set consisting of one element (use the covering of the empty set with empty index set). In particular, if X consists of one point, a sheaf F on X is already uniquely determined by F (X) and sometimes we identify F with F (X). Example 1.8. Notations of Example 1.4. The presheaves C X;Y, C α X, and O X are sheaves. The presheaf of measurable functions on X is in general not a sheaf. The presheaf of constant functions with values in some set is in general not a sheaf. 9

10 (B) Stalks of sheaves Let X be a topological space, F be a presheaf on X, considered as a functor F : Open(X) opp (Sets), and let x X be a point. Let U(x) := { U X open ; x U } be the set of open neighborhoods of x, ordered by inclusion. We consider U(x) as a full subcategory of Open(X). Be restricting F to U(x) we obtain a functor F : U(x) opp (Sets). Note that U(x) opp is filtered. Definition and Remark 1.9. (1) The colimit F x := colim U(x) F is called the stalk of F in x. More concretely (Example 0.23), one has F x = { (U, s) ; U open neighborhood of x, s F (U)}/, where two pairs (U 1, s 1 ) and (U 2, s 2 ) are equivalent, if there exists an open neighborhood V of x with V U 1 U 2 such that s 1 V = s 2 V. (2) For each open neighborhood U of x we have a canonical map (1.9.1) F (U) F x, s s x which sends s F (U) to the class of (U, s) in F x. We call s x the germ of s in x. (3) If ϕ: F G is a morphism of presheaves on X, we have an induced map ϕ x := colim ϕ U : F x G x U x of the stalks in x. We obtain a functor F F x from the category of presheaves on X to the category of sets. For every x X and every open neighborhood one has a commutative diagram F (U) s sx F x ϕ U ϕ x G (U) t tx G x. Remark If F is a presheaf on X with values in C, where C is the category of abelian groups, of rings, or any category in which filtered inductive limits exist, then the stalk F x is an object in C and we obtain a functor F F x from the category of presheaves on X with values in C to the category C. Example Let X = C and O C be the sheaf of holomorphic functions on X. Fix z 0 C. Then two holomorphic functions f 1 and f 2 defined in open neighborhoods U 1 10

11 and U 2, respectively, of z 0 agree on some open neighborhood V U 1 U 2 if and only if they have same Taylor expansion around z 0. Therefore O C,z0 = a n (z z 0 ) n power series with positive radius of convergence, n 0 and the identity theorem says precisely that for a connected open neighborhood U of z 0, the natural map O(U) O C,z0 is injective. Example Let X be a topological space, let C X = C X;R be the sheaf of continuous R-valued functions on X, and let x X. Then C X,x = { (U, f) ; x U X open, f : U R continuous}/, where (U, f) (V, g) if there exists x W U V open such that f W = g W. In particular we see that for x V U open and f : U R continuous one has (U, f) (V, f V ). As C X is a sheaf of R-algebras, C X,x is an R-algebra. For instance, addition is defined as follows. Let s, t C X,x, represented by (U, f) and (V, g). Choose x W U V open and replace (U, f) by (W, f W ) and (V, g) by (W, g W ). Hence we may assume that U = V = W. Then define the sum s + t as the equivalence class of (W, f + g). Of course one can also define in the same way the multiplication of two elements of C X,x. If s C X,x is represented by (U, f), then s(x) := f(x) R is independent of the choice of the representative (U, f). We obtain a surjective R-algebra homomorphism ev x : C X,x R, s s(x). Let m x := ker(ev x ) = { s C X,x ; s(x) = 0 }, then m x is a maximal ideal (because C X,x /m x = R is a field). Let s CX,x \ m x be represented by (U, f). Then f(x) 0. By shrinking U we may assume that f(y) 0 for all y Y (because f is continuous). Hence 1/f exists and s is a unit in C X,x. This shows that C X,x is a local ring. A similar remark holds of course also for sheaves of differentiable or holomorphic functions. Proposition Let X be a topological space, F and G presheaves on X, and let ϕ, ψ : F G be two morphisms of presheaves. (1) Assume that F is a sheaf. Then the induced maps on stalks ϕ x : F x G x are injective for all x X if and only of ϕ U : F (U) G (U) is injective for all open subsets U X. (2) If F and G are both sheaves, the maps ϕ x are bijective for all x X if and only if ϕ U is bijective for all open subsets U X. (3) If F and G are both sheaves, the morphisms ϕ and ψ are equal if and only if ϕ x = ψ x for all x X. 11

12 Proof. For U X open consider the map F (U) x U F x, s (s x ) x U. We claim that this map is injective if F is a sheaf. Indeed let s, t F (U) such that s x = t x for all x U. Then for all x U there exists an open neighborhood V x U of x such that s Vx = t Vx. Clearly, U = x U V x and therefore s = t by Remark 1.6. Using the commutative diagram F (U) ϕ U G (U) x U F x x ϕx x U G x, we see that (3) and the necessity of the condition in (1) are implied by the above claim. Moreover, a filtered colimit of injective maps is always injective again: Let s 0, t 0 F x such that ϕ x (s 0 ) = ϕ x (t 0 ). Let s 0 be represented by (s, U) and t 0 by (t, V ). By shrinking U and V we may assume U = V. As ϕ U (s) x = ϕ x (s 0 ) = ϕ x (t 0 ) = ϕ U (t) x, there exists an open neighborhood x W U such that ϕ W (s W ) = ϕ U (s) W = ϕ U (t) W = ϕ W (t W ). As ϕ W is injective, we find s W = t W and hence s 0 = s x = t x = t 0. Therefore the condition in (1) is also sufficient. Hence we are done if we show that the bijectivity of ϕ x for all x U implies the surjectivity of ϕ U. Let t G (U). For all x U we choose an open neighborhood U x of x in U and s x F (U x ) such that (ϕ U x(s x )) x = t x. Then there exists an open neighborhood V x U x of x with ϕ V x(s x V x) = t V x. Then (V x ) x U is an open covering of U and for x, y U ϕ V x V y(sx V x V y) = t V x V y = ϕ V x V y(sy V x V y). As we already know that ϕ V x V y is injective, this shows sx V x V y = sy V x V y and the sheaf condition (Sh) ensures that we find s F (U) such that s V x = s x for all x U. Clearly, we have ϕ U (s) x = t x for all x U and hence ϕ U (s) = t. Definition We call a morphism ϕ: F G of sheaves injective (resp. surjective, resp. bijective) if ϕ x : F x G x is injective (resp. surjective, resp. bijective) for all x X. Remark Let ϕ: F G be a morphism of sheaves. (1) Then ϕ is injective (resp. bijective) if and only if ϕ U : F (U) G (U) is injective for all open U X. 12

13 (2) ϕ is surjective if and only if for all open subsets U X and every t G (U) there exist an open covering U = i U i (depending on t) and sections s i F (U i ) such that ϕ Ui (s i ) = t Ui, i.e. locally we can find a preimage of t. But the surjectivity of ϕ does not imply that ϕ U : F (U) G (U) is surjective for all open sets U of X Example Let O C be the sheaf of holomorphic functions on C. For every open subset U C and f O C (U) we let D U (f) := f be the derivative. We obtain a morphism D : O C O C of sheaves of C-vector spaces. Then D is surjective, because locally every holomorphic function has a primitive. But D U is only surjective if every connected component of U is simply connected. (C) Sheaves attached to presheaves Proposition Let F be a presheaf on a topological space X. Then there exists a pair ( F, ι F ), where F is a sheaf on X and ι F : F F is a morphism of presheaves, such that the following holds: If G is a sheaf on X and ϕ: F G is a morphism of presheaves, then there exists a unique morphism of sheaves ϕ: F G with ϕ ιf = ϕ. The pair ( F, ι F ) is unique up to unique isomorphism. Moreover, the following properties hold: (1) For all x X the map on stalks ι F,x : F x F x is bijective. (2) For every presheaf G on X and every morphism of presheaves ϕ: F G there exists a unique morphism ϕ: F G making the diagram (1.17.1) F ι F F ϕ ϕ G ι G G commutative. In particular, F F is a functor from the category of presheaves on X to the category of sheaves on X. Definition The sheaf F is called the sheaf associated to F or the sheafification of F. We can reformulate the first part of Proposition 1.17 by saying that sheafification is the left adjoint functor to the inclusion functor of the category of sheaves into the category of presheaves. Proof. For U X open, elements of F (U) are by definition families of elements in the stalks of F which locally give rise to sections of F. More precisely, we define F (U) := { (s x ) x U F x ; x U: an open neighborhood W U of x, and t F (W ): w W : s w = t w }. For U V the restriction map F (V ) F (U) is induced by the natural projection x V F x x U F x. Then it is easy to check that F is a sheaf. For U X open, 13

14 we define ι F,U : F (U) F (U) by s (s x ) x U. The definition of F shows that, for x X, Fx = F x and that ι F,x is the identity. Now let G be a presheaf on X and let ϕ: F G be a morphism. Sending (s x ) x F (U) to (ϕ x (s x )) x G (U) defines a morphism F G. By Proposition 1.13 (3) this is the unique morphism making the diagram (1.17.1) commutative. If we assume in addition that G is a sheaf, then the morphism of sheaves ι G : G G, which is bijective on stalks, is an isomorphism by Proposition 1.13 (2). Composing the morphism F G with ι 1 G, we obtain the morphism ϕ: F G. Finally, the uniqueness of ( F, ι F ) is a formal consequence. Remark If F is a presheaf of (abelian) groups, of rings, of R-modules, or of R-algebras, its associated sheaf is a sheaf of (abelian) groups, of rings, of R-modules, or of R-algebras. Remark From Proposition 1.13 (2), we get the following characterization of the sheafification: Let F be a presheaf and G be a sheaf. Then G is isomorphic to the sheafification of F if and only and if there exists a morphism ι: F G such that ι x is bijective for all x X. Example Let E be a set and denote by E X the sheaf of locally constant functions, i.e. E X (U) = {f : U E locally constant map}. This is a sheaf. Let F be the presheaf of constant functions f : U E, U X open. As every constant function is also locally constant, one has a map ι: F E X of presheaves. For every f E X (U) and every x U there exists an open neighborhood V of x such that f V is constant. This shows that ι x is bijective for all x X. Hence E X is the sheafification of F. The sheaf E X is called the constant sheaf with value E (D) Direct and inverse images of sheaves Definition Let f : X Y be a continuous map of topological spaces. Let F be a presheaf on X. We define a presheaf f F on Y by (for V Y open) (f F )(V ) = F (f 1 (V )) the restriction maps given by the restriction maps for F. Then f F is called the direct image of F under f. Whenever ϕ: F 1 F 2 is a morphism of presheaves, the family of mapsf (ϕ) V := ϕ f 1 (V ) for V Y open is a morphism f (ϕ): f F 1 f F 2. We obtain a functor f from the category of presheaves on X to the category of presheaves on Y. The following properties are immediate. Remark (1) If F is a sheaf on X, f F is a sheaf on Y. Therefore f also defines a functor f : (Sh(X)) (Sh(Y )). (2) If g : Y Z is a second continuous map, there exists an identity g (f F ) = (g f) F which is functorial in F. 14

15 Definition let f : X Y be a continuous map and let G be a presheaf on Y. Define a presheaf on X by (1.24.1) U lim G (V ), V f(u), V Y open the restriction maps being induced by the restriction maps of G. Momentarily we denote this presheaf by f + G. Let f 1 G be the sheafification of f + G. We call f 1 G the inverse image of G under f. If f is the inclusion of a subspace X of Y, we also write G X instead of f 1 G and we write G (X) := (f 1 (G ))(X). Note that even if G is a sheaf, f + G is not a sheaf in general. Remark Let f : X Y be a continuous map of topological spaces. (1) Let G be a presheaf on Y. The construction of f + G and hence of f 1 G is functorial in G. Therefore we obtain a functor f 1 : (PSh(Y )) (Sh(X)). (2) Let g : Y Z be a second continuous map and let H be a presheaf on Z. Fix an open subset U in X. An open subset W Z contains g(f(u)) if and only if it contains a subset of the form g(v ), where V Y is an open set containing f(u). This implies that f + (g + H ) = (g f) + H and we can deduce an isomorphism (1.25.1) f 1 (g 1 H ) = (g f) 1 H, which is functorial in H. (3) If x is a point of X and i: {x} X is the inclusion, the definition (1.24.1) shows that i 1 F = F x for every presheaf F on X (more precisely: i 1 (F )({x}) = F x ). (4) In particular, (1.25.1) implies for each presheaf G on Y the identity (1.25.2) (f 1 G ) x = G f(x). Remark Let X, Y be a topological spaces. (1) Let U Y be an open subspace. If V U is open, then V is open in Y and one has (F U )(V ) = G (V ). (2) Let G be a sheaf on Y, let f : X Y be a continuous map of topological spaces, and let U X be an open subset. Then the construction of the sheafification in the proof of Proposition 1.17 shows that (f 1 G )(U) is the set of s = (s x ) x U x U G f(x) such that for all x U the following condition holds: There exist x W U open, V Y open with f(w ) V, and t G (V ) such that t f(w) = s f(w) for all w W. 15

16 Direct image and inverse image are functors which are adjoint to each other. More precisely: Proposition Let f : X Y be a continuous map of topological spaces, let F be a sheaf on X and let G be a presheaf on Y. Then there is a bijection which is functorial in F and G. Hom (Sh(X)) (f 1 G, F ) Hom (PreSh(Y )) (G, f F ), ϕ ϕ, ψ ψ Proof. Let ϕ: f 1 G F be a morphism of sheaves on X, and let t G (V ), V Y open. Since f(f 1 (V )) V, we have a map G (V ) f + G (f 1 (V )), and we define ϕ V (t) as the image of t under the map G (V ) f + G (f 1 (V )) f 1 G (f 1 (V )) ϕ f 1 (V ) F (f 1 (V )) = f F (V ). Conversely, let ψ : G f F be a morphism of sheaves on Y. To define the morphism ψ it suffices to define a morphism of presheaves f + G F, which we call again ψ. Let U be open in X, and s f + G (U). If V is some open neighborhood of f(u), U is contained in f 1 (V ). Let V be such a neighborhood such that there exists s V G (V ) representing s. Then ψ V (s V ) f F (V ) = F (f 1 (V )). Let ψ U (s) F (U) be the restriction of the section ψ V (s V ) to U. Clearly, these two maps are inverse to each other. Moreover, it is straightforward albeit quite cumbersome to check that the constructed maps are functorial in F and G. Remark We will almost never use the concrete description of f 1 G in the sequel. Very often we are given f, F, and G as in the proposition, and a morphism of sheaves ψ : G f F. Then usually it is sufficient to understand for each x X the map ψ x : G f(x) (1.25.2) = (f 1 G ) x F x induced by ψ : f 1 G F on stalks. The proof of the proposition shows that we can describe this map in terms of ψ as follows: For every open neighborhood V Y of f(x), we have maps G (V ) ψ V F (f 1 (V )) F x, and taking the limit over all V we obtain the map ψ x : G f(x) F x. Remark Note that if F is a sheaf of rings (or of R-modules, or of R-algebras) on X, f F is a sheaf on Y with values in the same category. A similar statements holds for the inverse image. Finally, Proposition 1.27 holds (with the same proof) if we consider morphisms of sheaves of rings (or of R-modules, etc.). 16

17 (E) Ringed spaces We fix a commutative ring R (e.g., R = R, R = C, or R = Z). Definition (1) An R-ringed space is a pair (X, O X ), where X is a topological space and where O X is a sheaf of commutative R-algebras on X. If (X, O X ) and (Y, O Y ) are ringed spaces, we define a morphism of R-ringed spaces (X, O X ) (Y, O Y ) as a pair (f, f ), where f : X Y is a continuous map and where f : O Y f O X is a homomorphism of sheaves of R-algebras on Y. (2) A locally R-ringed space is an R-ringed space (X, O X ), such that O X,x is a local ring for all x X. We then denote by m x the maximal ideal and by κ(x) := O X,x /m x its residue field. A morphism of locally R-ringed spaces (X, O X ) (Y, O Y ) is a morphism (f, f ) of ringed spaces such that the homomorphism of local rings f x : O Y,f(x) O X,x is local (i.e., f x(m f(x) ) m x ). For R = Z we simply say ringed space instead of Z-ringed space. Remark (1) The datum of f is equivalent to the datum of a homomorphism of sheaves of R-algebras f : f 1 O Y O X on X by Proposition Often we simply write f instead of (f, f ) or (f, f ). (2) The composition of morphisms of (locally) R-ringed spaces is defined in the obvious way (using Remark 1.23 (2)), and we obtain the category of (locally) R-ringed spaces. We call O X the structure sheaf of (X, O X ). Often we simply write X instead of (X, O X ). In general, f is an additional datum for a morphism. We will usually consider the simpler case that the structure sheaf is a sheaf of certain functions on open subsetes of X and then f is given by composition with f as in the following example. Example Let X and Y be open subsets of finite-dimensional R-vector spaces. Let α N 0 { }. Then (X, CX α ) is a locally R-ringed space (cf. Example 1.12). For x X we have m x = { f CX,x α ; f(x) = 0 } and κ(x) = R. (1) Every C α -map f : X Y defines a morphism (f, f ): (X, CX α ) (Y, Cα Y ) of locally R-ringed spaces by f V : C α Y (V ) f (C α X)(V ) = C α X(f 1 (V )), t t f for V Y open. (2) Conversely, let (f, f ): (X, CX α ) (Y, Cα Y ) be any morphism of R-ringed spaces. We claim: (a) (f, f ) is automatically a morphism of locally R-ringed spaces. (b) For all V Y open the R-algebra homomorphism fv : Cα Y (V ) Cα X (f 1 (V )) is automatically given by the map t t f. Note that then f is automatically C α (consider for t projections to some coordinates). 17

18 To show (a) let x X. Set ϕ := fx, B := CX,x α, and A := Cα Y,f(x). Then ϕ: A B is a homomorphism of local R-algebras such that A/m A = R and B/m B = R. We claim that ϕ is automatically local ( ϕ 1 (m B ) is a maximal ideal of A). Indeed, ϕ induces an injective homomorphism of R-algebras A/ϕ 1 (m B ) B/m B = R. As a homomorphim of R-algebras, it is automatically surjective, hence A/ϕ 1 (m B ) = R is a field. Let us show (b). Let V Y be open and x f 1 (V ). Consider the diagram of R-algebra homomorphisms CY α(v ) fv CX α (f 1 (V )) t t f(x) CY,f(x) α f x C α X,x s s x ev f(x) : t t(f(x)) R R. ev x : s s(x) The upper rectangle is commutative and the evaluation maps are surjective. Hence there exists a homomorphism of R-algebras ι: R R making the lower rectangle commutative if and only if fx(ker(ev f(x) )) ker(ev x ), i.e., if and only if fx is local. Moreover, as a homomorphism of R-algebras, one must have ι = id R. Therefore we find fv (t)(x) = t(f(x)) which shows (b). Remark and Definition Let (X, O X ) be a (locally) R-ringed space and let U X be open. Then (U, O X U ) is a (locally) R-ringed space. Such a (locally) R-ringed space is called open subspace of (X, O X ). A morphism f : (Z, O Z ) (X, O X ) of (locally) R-ringed spaces is called open embedding if U := f(z) is open in X and f induces an isomorphism (Z, O Z ) (U, O X U ). 2 Manifolds (A) Premanifolds Definition 2.1. (1) Let α N 0 { }. A locally R-ringed space (X, O X ) is called (real) C α -premanifold if there exists an open covering X = i I U i such that for all i I there exist n N 0, an open subspace Y of R n, and an isomorphism of locally R-ringed spaces (U i, O X Ui ) (Y, CY α ) (called chart). Here Y and n depend on i. In this case the structure sheaf is denoted by CX α and is called the sheaf of C α -functions on X. A family of charts Φ i : (U i, O X Ui ) (Y i, CY α i ) is called atlas if i I U i = X. We call a real C -premanifold a smooth premanifold. 18

19 (2) A morphism of C α -premanifolds (X, O X ) (Y, O Y ) is defined as a morphism of locally R-ringed spaces. Such a morphism is also called a C α -map. C -maps are called smooth. We obtain the category of C α -premanifolds. An isomorphism in the category of C α -premanifolds is called a C α -diffeomorphism. Every such morphism is given by a continuous map f : X Y such that for all V Y open and for all t O Y (V ) one has t f O X (f 1 (V )) (by Example 1.32). Let U R n and V R m be open subspaces. Then a map f : U V is a morphism of C α -premanifolds (U, C α U ) (V, Cα V ) if and only if f is a Cα -Abbildung (Example 1.32). Remark and Definition 2.2. Let X = (X, C α X ) be a Cα -premanifold, let x X. An integer n 0 is called dimension of X in x (denoted dim x (X)) if there exists an open neighborhood U of x and a chart Φ: U Y, where Y R n is open. The dimension is uniquely determined: If Ψ: V Z R m is a second chart, then the change of charts Φ U V Ψ 1 Ψ(U V ) : Ψ(U V ) Φ(U V ) is a C α -diffeomorphism of an open subset of R m onto an open subset of R m. Hence m = n (for α 1 this is clear because the derivative of a C α -diffeomorpism in a point is an R-linear isomorphism R m R n ; for α = 0 this is more difficult but we might see it later). The function X N 0, x dim x (X) is locally constant. If it is constant = n, then we say that X has dimension n and write n = dim X. Remark 2.3. Let X be a topological space such that there exists an open covering X = i I U i and for all i I homeomorphisms Φ i : U i Yi with Y i R n i open satisfying the following condition. For all i, j I the homeomorphism (change of charts) Φ i (U i U j ) Φ 1 i Φ j U i U j Φ j (U i U j ) is a C α -diffeomorphism. For V X open define C α X(V ) := { f : V R ; i: f Ui V Φ 1 i : Φ i (U i V ) R is C α }. This defines a sheaf of R-algebras on X, and (X, CX α ) is a Cα -premanifold. (U i, Φ i ) i I is an atlas. Then Definition 2.4. A C-ringed space (X, O X ) is called complex manifold if there exists an open covering X = i I U i such that for all i I there exist n N 0, an open subspace Y of C n, and an isomorphism of locally C-ringed spaces (U i, O X Ui ) (Y, OY hol). A morphism of complex premanifolds (X, O X ) (Y, O Y ) is defined as a morphism of locally C-ringed spaces. Such a morphism is also called holomorphic. We obtain the category of complex premanifolds. An isomorphism in the category of complex premanifolds is called a biholomorphic map. 19

20 Every such morphism of complex premanifolds is given by a continuous map f : X Y such that for all V Y open and for all t O Y (V ) one has t f O X (f 1 (V )) (cf. Example 1.32). (B) Topological properties Definition 2.5. Let X be a topological space. (1) Let x X be a point. A set B x of subsets of X which all contain x is called a neighborhood basis of x if every neighborhood of x contains some element of B x. (2) X is called first countable if every point of x has a countable neighborhood basis. (3) X is called second countable if the topology has a countable basis. Example 2.6. Let X be a topological space (1) Every metrisable space X (i.e. X is a topological space whose topology is given by a metric d) is first countable: For x X the sets { B 1/n (x) := { y X ; d(x, y) < 1/n } ; n N } { B 1/n (x) := { y X ; d(x, y) 1/n } ; n N } are countable neighborhood bases of x. (2) Every premanifold is first countable (locally it is homeomorphic to a metrisable space). (3) Let X be a second countable space and let B be a countable basis. Then X is first countable (for every point { B B ; x B } is a countable neighborhood basis of x) and X contains a countable dense subset Q (for every nonempty B B choose x B B and set Q := { x B ; B B }). (4) R n is second countable. Choose a norm on R n. Then a countable basis is given by { B 1/n (x) ; x Q n, n N }. (5) Let X be second countable topological space, B X a countable basis of the topology. Then every subspace Z of X is second countable: { B Z ; B B X } is a countable basis. In particular, every subspace of R n is second countable. (6) Let X = n U n, where (U n ) n is a countable open covering of X such that the subspace U n is second countable for all n. Then X is second countable. In particular, every premanifold that has a countable atlas is second countable. (7) Let X be an uncountable set endowed with the discrete topology. Then X is a zero-dimensional premanifold which is not second countable. Definition 2.7. Let X be a topological space (1) An open covering of X is a family (U i ) i I of open subsets of X such that X = i I U i. (2) An open covering V is a subcover of an open covering (U i ) i I if there exists a subset J I such that V = (U i ) i J. (3) An open covering (V j ) j J is a refinement of an open covering (U i ) i I if there for all j J there exists i I with V j U i. 20

21 (4) A family (A i ) i I of subsets A i X is called locally finite if every x X has an open neighborhood V such that { i I ; A i V } is finite. Note: Any subcover is a refinement. Definition 2.8. A topological space is called a Lindelöf space if every open covering of X has a countable subcovering. Lemma 2.9. Every second countable topological space X is a Lindelöf space. The converse is true if X is metrisable. Proof. Reelle Analsis: Exercise 52. Converse: Let X be Lindelöf. Fix n N. Choose a countable subcover U n of { B 1/n (x) ; x X }. Then the union of all U n is a countable basis of X. Definition Let X be a Hausdorff topological space. (1) X is called locally compact if every point has a compact neighborhood. (2) X is called paracompact if every open covering has a locally finite refinement. (3) X is called σ-compact if it is the union of countably many compact subspace. Remark (1) An open nonempty subset of normed R-vector space V is locally compact if and only if dim R (V ) < (see Analysis 2). (2) A premanifold X is locally compact if and only if X is Hausdorff. (3) Every compact space is paracompact. (4) One can show that every metrisable space is paracompact ([BouTG] IX, 4, Théorème 4). Proposition Let X be a locally compact and second countable space. Then X has the following properties. (1) X is σ-compact. (2) X is paracompact. (3) X is metrisable. We will only prove (1) and (2) and refer to [Bre1] Chap. 1, Theorem for Assertion (3). Proof. Construction of a countable base B such that B compact for all B B. Let B be a countable base of X, C x compact neighborhood of x X (automatically closed in X because X is Hausdorff). Define B := { V W ; V B and W B with W C x for some x X}. Then B countable basis (because X = x C x), V W C x compact. Write B = {B 1, B 2,... }. Proof of (1). Construct K n compact and i(n) N 0 with i(n) > i(n 1) such that B 1 B i(n) K n Kn+1 for all n N 0 (then n K n i B i = X). Set C m := m j=1 B j (then C m compact). Define K n and i(n) inductively. K 0 := and i(0) := 0. If K n 1 = X, we are done. Otherwise choose l N with B l (X \ K n 1 ). 21

22 Let i(n) N with i(n) > i(n 1) and C l K n 1 1 j n(i) B j (exists because C l K n 1 is compact) and set K n := 1 j i(n) B j. Then K n compact and K n 1 C l K n 1 1 j i(n) B j K n. Proof of (2). Let U = (U i ) i be an open covering of X. Let W = (W j ) j J be the refinement of U consisting of those W B with W U i for some i. Fix n N and set W j,n := W j (Kn+2 \ K n 1). Then W j,n K n+1 \ Kn. }{{} j J compact Let J(n) J be finite such that j J(n) W j,n K n+1 \ Kn. Let V = (V l ) l be the open covering consisting of W n,j for n N and j J(n) (it is a covering because n K n = X). Moreover: V is countable and a refinement of U by construction. W n,j K n+2 and hence V l compact for all l. V is locally finite: For x X let n N with x K n. Then Kn+1 is an open neighborhood of x which intersects only the finitely many W j,m with j J(m) and m n + 1 (by the definition of W j,m ). Theorem (Urysohn s theorem/tietze extension theorem) Let X be a topological space. Then the following assertions are equivalent. (i) For any two closed subsets A, B X with A B = there exists a continuous function f : X [0, 1] such that f(a) = 0 for all a A and f(b) = 1 for all b B. (ii) For all disjoint closed sets A and B of X there exist open disjoint sets U and V such that A U and B V. (iii) For every closed subspace A of X and every continuous map f : A R there exists a continuous function f : X R such that f A = f. Proof. [BouTG] Chap. IX, 4. Note: (i) (ii) is easy: Take U = {f < 1/2} and V = {f > 1/2}. Definition A topological space X is called normal if it is Hausdorff and satisfies the equivalent conditions of Theorem Proposition Every metrisable topological space is normal. Proof. Reelle Analysis: A, B X closed, A B =. Define f : X [0, 1], f(x) = d(x,a) d(x,a)+d(x,b). Proposition Every paracompact space is normal. 22

23 Proof. Let X be a paracompact space, A, B X be closed with A B =. Claim: Let Y, Z X be closed with Y Z =. If for all y Y there exists y V y X open and Z W y X open with V y W y =, then there exists open neighborhood T of Y and open neighborhood U of Z with U T =. Claim X normal. X Hausdorff may apply claim to Y = A and Z = {x} for some x B. Hence there exist open neighborhood T of A and U of x with T U =. Then we can apply claim again to Z = A and Y = B to see that there exist open neighborhoods Ũ of A and Ṽ of B with Ũ Ṽ =. Hence X is normal. Proof of Claim. Let (T i ) i a locally finite refinement of the open cover of X formed of X \ Y and of the V y for y Y. Then: Y T i y i Y : T i V yi. Let T be the union of the T i with Y T i. Then T X open and Y T. It remains to find U: For all z Z there exists z S z X open such that S z intersects only finitely many T i (because (T i ) i is locally finite). In particular J z := { i I ; T i S z, T i Y } is finite. Set U z := S z i J z W yi. Then z U z X open, and U z T = (because W yi T i = ). Set U := z Z U z. Lemma (Shrinking lemma) Let X be a normal space. Then for every locally finite open covering (U i ) i I there exists an open covering (V i ) i I such that V i U i. Proof. [BouTG] Chap. IX, 4.3, Cor. 1 de Théorème 3. Definition and Remark Let X be a topological space and let Z X be a subset. Then Z is called locally closed if the following equivalent conditions are satisfied. (i) There exists a family (U i ) i I of open subsets U i X such that Z i I U i and such that Z U i is closed in U i. (ii) Z is an open subset of its closure Z in X. (iii) Z is the intersection of an open and a closed subset of X. Proof. (ii) (iii) (i) is clear. (i) (ii) : Let (U i ) i as in (i). As Z U i is closed in U i, we have Z U i = Z U i, which is open in Z. Hence Z = i (Z U i) is open in Z. Example Every submanifold of R n (in the sense of Analysis 2) is a locally closed subspace in R n. (C) Topological groups Definition Let X be a topological space, let Y be a set, and let π : X Y be a surjective map. Equivalently, let be an equivalence relation on X and let π : X Y := X/ be the projection. Define a topology on Y : V Y is open if π 1 (V ) is open. This topology is called the quotient topology. 23

24 Note: If Z is a topological space and there is a commutatiove diagram of maps X f Z π Y, f then f is continuous if and only if f is continuous. Definition A topological group is a set G endowed with the structure of a topological space and of a group such that the maps G G G, (g, g ) gg, G G, g g 1 are continuous (where we endow G G with the product topology). Remark G topological group, a G. Then left translation g ag and right tranlation g ga are homeomorphisms G G. Proposition G topological group, H G subgroup. We endow G/H with the quotient topology (i.e. if π : G G/H is the projection, U G/H is defined to be open if and only if π 1 (U) is open). (1) The closure H is a subgroup of G. (2) If H is locally closed in G, then H is closed in G. (3) H is open in G (resp. closed in G) if and only if G/H is discrete (resp. Hausdorff). (4) If H is a normal subgroup, G/H is a topological group. Proof. Let a: G G G be the continuous map (g, h) gh 1. Then a(h H) = a(h H) a(h H) = H. This shows (1). To prove (2) we may assume that H is open and dense in G (by replacing G by the subgroup H). Then for g G the two cosets gh and H have nonempty intersection hence they are equal, i.e. g H. (3): G/H discrete gh open in G for all g G H open in G. If G/H is Hausdorff, then eh G/H is a closed point and its inverse image H in G is closed. Conversely, if H is closed, then H = HeH is a closed point in the quotient space H\G/H. Hence its inverse image under the continuous map G/H G/H H\G/H, (g 1 H, g 2 H) Hg2 1 g 1H is closed. But this is the diagonal of G/H G/H. (4) is clear. (D) Manifolds Definition A C α -manifold (resp. a complex manifold) is a C α -premanifold (resp. a complex premanifold) whose underlying topological space is Hausdorff and second countable. 24

Sheaves. S. Encinas. January 22, 2005 U V. F(U) F(V ) s s V. = s j Ui Uj there exists a unique section s F(U) such that s Ui = s i.

Sheaves. S. Encinas. January 22, 2005 U V. F(U) F(V ) s s V. = s j Ui Uj there exists a unique section s F(U) such that s Ui = s i. Sheaves. S. Encinas January 22, 2005 Definition 1. Let X be a topological space. A presheaf over X is a functor F : Op(X) op Sets, such that F( ) = { }. Where Sets is the category of sets, { } denotes

More information

LECTURE 1: SOME GENERALITIES; 1 DIMENSIONAL EXAMPLES

LECTURE 1: SOME GENERALITIES; 1 DIMENSIONAL EXAMPLES LECTURE 1: SOME GENERALITIES; 1 DIMENSIONAL EAMPLES VIVEK SHENDE Historically, sheaves come from topology and analysis; subsequently they have played a fundamental role in algebraic geometry and certain

More information

Lecture 2 Sheaves and Functors

Lecture 2 Sheaves and Functors Lecture 2 Sheaves and Functors In this lecture we will introduce the basic concept of sheaf and we also will recall some of category theory. 1 Sheaves and locally ringed spaces The definition of sheaf

More information

Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory

Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory Matt Booth June 3, 2016 Contents 1 Sheaves on topological spaces 1 1.1 Presheaves on spaces......................... 1 1.2 Digression on pointless topology..................

More information

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY ARDA H. DEMIRHAN Abstract. We examine the conditions for uniqueness of differentials in the abstract setting of differential geometry. Then we ll come up

More information

which is a group homomorphism, such that if W V U, then

which is a group homomorphism, such that if W V U, then 4. Sheaves Definition 4.1. Let X be a topological space. A presheaf of groups F on X is a a function which assigns to every open set U X a group F(U) and to every inclusion V U a restriction map, ρ UV

More information

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 Direct Limits Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we define direct limits and prove their basic properties. This notion is important in various places in algebra. In particular, in algebraic geometry

More information

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection 3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection is called the objects of C and is denoted Obj(C). Given

More information

Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti

Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo Alex Massarenti SISSA, VIA BONOMEA 265, 34136 TRIESTE, ITALY E-mail address: alex.massarenti@sissa.it These notes collect a series of

More information

Representable presheaves

Representable presheaves Representable presheaves March 15, 2017 A presheaf on a category C is a contravariant functor F on C. In particular, for any object X Ob(C) we have the presheaf (of sets) represented by X, that is Hom

More information

Category Theory (UMV/TK/07)

Category Theory (UMV/TK/07) P. J. Šafárik University, Faculty of Science, Košice Project 2005/NP1-051 11230100466 Basic information Extent: 2 hrs lecture/1 hrs seminar per week. Assessment: Written tests during the semester, written

More information

SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES

SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES In this section we will give the important constructions of loop spaces and reduced suspensions associated to pointed spaces. For this purpose there

More information

Modules over a Ringed Space

Modules over a Ringed Space Modules over a Ringed Space Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In these notes we collect some useful facts about sheaves of modules on a ringed space that are either left as exercises in [Har77] or omitted

More information

Geometry 2: Manifolds and sheaves

Geometry 2: Manifolds and sheaves Rules:Exam problems would be similar to ones marked with! sign. It is recommended to solve all unmarked and!-problems or to find the solution online. It s better to do it in order starting from the beginning,

More information

Categories and functors

Categories and functors Lecture 1 Categories and functors Definition 1.1 A category A consists of a collection ob(a) (whose elements are called the objects of A) for each A, B ob(a), a collection A(A, B) (whose elements are called

More information

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions 24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice

More information

CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES

CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the

More information

Micro-support of sheaves

Micro-support of sheaves Micro-support of sheaves Vincent Humilière 17/01/14 The microlocal theory of sheaves and in particular the denition of the micro-support is due to Kashiwara and Schapira (the main reference is their book

More information

Université Paris Sud XI Orsay THE LOCAL FLATTENING THEOREM. Master 2 Memoire by Christopher M. Evans. Advisor: Prof. Joël Merker

Université Paris Sud XI Orsay THE LOCAL FLATTENING THEOREM. Master 2 Memoire by Christopher M. Evans. Advisor: Prof. Joël Merker Université Paris Sud XI Orsay THE LOCAL FLATTENING THEOREM Master 2 Memoire by Christopher M. Evans Advisor: Prof. Joël Merker August 2013 Table of Contents Introduction iii Chapter 1 Complex Spaces 1

More information

1 Replete topoi. X = Shv proét (X) X is locally weakly contractible (next lecture) X is replete. D(X ) is left complete. K D(X ) we have R lim

1 Replete topoi. X = Shv proét (X) X is locally weakly contractible (next lecture) X is replete. D(X ) is left complete. K D(X ) we have R lim Reference: [BS] Bhatt, Scholze, The pro-étale topology for schemes In this lecture we consider replete topoi This is a nice class of topoi that include the pro-étale topos, and whose derived categories

More information

Algebra and Topology

Algebra and Topology Algebra and Topology Course at Paris VI University, 2007/2008 1 Pierre Schapira http://www.math.jussieu.fr/ schapira/lectnotes schapira@math.jussieu.fr 1/9/2011, v2 1 To the students: the material covered

More information

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS BRIAN OSSERMAN We discuss the inverse limit construction, and consider the special case of inverse limits of finite groups, which should best be considered as topological

More information

Introduction to. Riemann Surfaces. Lecture Notes. Armin Rainer. dim H 0 (X, L D ) dim H 0 (X, L 1 D ) = 1 g deg D

Introduction to. Riemann Surfaces. Lecture Notes. Armin Rainer. dim H 0 (X, L D ) dim H 0 (X, L 1 D ) = 1 g deg D Introduction to Riemann Surfaces Lecture Notes Armin Rainer dim H 0 (X, L D ) dim H 0 (X, L 1 D ) = 1 g deg D June 17, 2018 PREFACE i Preface These are lecture notes for the course Riemann surfaces held

More information

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties 0. Brief overview Cycles and bundles are intrinsic invariants of algebraic varieties Close connections going back to Grothendieck Work with quasi-projective varieties over a field k Affine Varieties 1.

More information

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES HONGHAO GAO FEBRUARY 7, 2014 Quasi-coherent and coherent sheaves Let X Spec k be a scheme. A presheaf over X is a contravariant functor from the category of open

More information

Solutions to some of the exercises from Tennison s Sheaf Theory

Solutions to some of the exercises from Tennison s Sheaf Theory Solutions to some of the exercises from Tennison s Sheaf Theory Pieter Belmans June 19, 2011 Contents 1 Exercises at the end of Chapter 1 1 2 Exercises in Chapter 2 6 3 Exercises at the end of Chapter

More information

A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped with a Grothendieck topology T. A Grothendieck topology T consists of a collection of subfunctors

A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped with a Grothendieck topology T. A Grothendieck topology T consists of a collection of subfunctors Contents 5 Grothendieck topologies 1 6 Exactness properties 10 7 Geometric morphisms 17 8 Points and Boolean localization 22 5 Grothendieck topologies A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped

More information

7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group

7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group 7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group The group G will be called the fundamental group of the manifold V. J. Henri Poincaré, 895 The properties of a topological space that we have developed so far have

More information

1 Motivation. If X is a topological space and x X a point, then the fundamental group is defined as. the set of (pointed) morphisms from the circle

1 Motivation. If X is a topological space and x X a point, then the fundamental group is defined as. the set of (pointed) morphisms from the circle References are: [Szamuely] Galois Groups and Fundamental Groups [SGA1] Grothendieck, et al. Revêtements étales et groupe fondamental [Stacks project] The Stacks Project, https://stacks.math.columbia. edu/

More information

Lecture 9: Sheaves. February 11, 2018

Lecture 9: Sheaves. February 11, 2018 Lecture 9: Sheaves February 11, 2018 Recall that a category X is a topos if there exists an equivalence X Shv(C), where C is a small category (which can be assumed to admit finite limits) equipped with

More information

Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry

Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry 2 Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry Travis Dirle December 4, 2016 2 Contents 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 Affine Varieties.......................... 1 1.2 Projective Varieties........................

More information

SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY

SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY MARC LEVINE Contents 0. Introduction 1 1. The category of schemes 2 1.1. The spectrum of a commutative ring 2 1.2. Ringed spaces 5 1.3. Schemes 10 1.4. Schemes

More information

CHAPTER 1. Étale cohomology

CHAPTER 1. Étale cohomology CHAPTER 1 Étale cohomology This chapter summarizes the theory of the étale topology on schemes, culminating in the results on l-adic cohomology that are needed in the construction of Galois representations

More information

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS Steven Sy December 7, 2005 I MATRIX LIE GROUPS Definition: A matrix Lie group is a closed subgroup of Thus if is any sequence of matrices in, and for some, then either

More information

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths. CATEGORY THEORY PROFESSOR PETER JOHNSTONE Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths. Definition 1.1. A category C consists

More information

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4) Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4) February 5, 2014 Let k be an algebraically closed field, let X be a algebraic curve over k (always assumed to be smooth and complete), and

More information

Topological properties

Topological properties CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological

More information

UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS

UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS SEFI LADKANI Abstract. By using only combinatorial data on two posets X and Y, we construct a set of so-called formulas. A formula produces simultaneously, for

More information

SOME OPERATIONS ON SHEAVES

SOME OPERATIONS ON SHEAVES SOME OPERATIONS ON SHEAVES R. VIRK Contents 1. Pushforward 1 2. Pullback 3 3. The adjunction (f 1, f ) 4 4. Support of a sheaf 5 5. Extension by zero 5 6. The adjunction (j!, j ) 6 7. Sections with support

More information

Modules over a Scheme

Modules over a Scheme Modules over a Scheme Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In these notes we collect various facts about quasi-coherent sheaves on a scheme. Nearly all of the material is trivial or can be found in [Gro60]. These

More information

3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X).

3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X). 3. Lecture 3 3.1. Freely generate qfh-sheaves. We recall that if F is a homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers in the sense of the last lecture, then we have a well defined pairing F(X) H 0 (X/S) F(S)

More information

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES HARTSHORNE EXERCISES J. WARNER Hartshorne, Exercise I.5.6. Blowing Up Curve Singularities (a) Let Y be the cusp x 3 = y 2 + x 4 + y 4 or the node xy = x 6 + y 6. Show that the curve Ỹ obtained by blowing

More information

Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology

Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology 1. Motivation Let {Γ i } be an inverse system of finite groups with surjective transition maps, and define Γ = Γ i equipped with its inverse it topology (i.e., the

More information

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE JOHANNES EBERT 1.1. October 11th. 1. Recapitulation from differential topology Definition 1.1. Let M m, N n, be two smooth manifolds

More information

VERDIER DUALITY AKHIL MATHEW

VERDIER DUALITY AKHIL MATHEW VERDIER DUALITY AKHIL MATHEW 1. Introduction Let M be a smooth, compact oriented manifold of dimension n, and let k be a field. Recall that there is a natural pairing in singular cohomology H r (M; k)

More information

Etale cohomology of fields by Johan M. Commelin, December 5, 2013

Etale cohomology of fields by Johan M. Commelin, December 5, 2013 Etale cohomology of fields by Johan M. Commelin, December 5, 2013 Etale cohomology The canonical topology on a Grothendieck topos Let E be a Grothendieck topos. The canonical topology T on E is given in

More information

Algebraic Geometry

Algebraic Geometry MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

Introduction and preliminaries Wouter Zomervrucht, Februari 26, 2014

Introduction and preliminaries Wouter Zomervrucht, Februari 26, 2014 Introduction and preliminaries Wouter Zomervrucht, Februari 26, 204. Introduction Theorem. Serre duality). Let k be a field, X a smooth projective scheme over k of relative dimension n, and F a locally

More information

Introduction to Topology

Introduction to Topology Introduction to Topology Randall R. Holmes Auburn University Typeset by AMS-TEX Chapter 1. Metric Spaces 1. Definition and Examples. As the course progresses we will need to review some basic notions about

More information

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ANDREW SALCH 1. Affine schemes. About notation: I am in the habit of writing f (U) instead of f 1 (U) for the preimage of a subset

More information

Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring Francis Bonahon. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California

Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring Francis Bonahon. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring 2016 Francis Bonahon Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California Date of this version: April 27, 2016 c Francis Bonahon 2016 CHAPTER 1 A

More information

SMA. Grothendieck topologies and schemes

SMA. Grothendieck topologies and schemes SMA Grothendieck topologies and schemes Rafael GUGLIELMETTI Semester project Supervised by Prof. Eva BAYER FLUCKIGER Assistant: Valéry MAHÉ April 27, 2012 2 CONTENTS 3 Contents 1 Prerequisites 5 1.1 Fibred

More information

10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces.

10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces. 10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces. 10.1. The concept of a Lie subgroup of a Lie group. We have seen that if G is a Lie group and H G a subgroup which is at the same time a

More information

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2 FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Where we were 1 2. Yoneda s lemma 2 3. Limits and colimits 6 4. Adjoints 8 First, some bureaucratic details. We will move to 380-F for Monday

More information

(iv) Whitney s condition B. Suppose S β S α. If two sequences (a k ) S α and (b k ) S β both converge to the same x S β then lim.

(iv) Whitney s condition B. Suppose S β S α. If two sequences (a k ) S α and (b k ) S β both converge to the same x S β then lim. 0.1. Stratified spaces. References are [7], [6], [3]. Singular spaces are naturally associated to many important mathematical objects (for example in representation theory). We are essentially interested

More information

Notas de Aula Grupos Profinitos. Martino Garonzi. Universidade de Brasília. Primeiro semestre 2018

Notas de Aula Grupos Profinitos. Martino Garonzi. Universidade de Brasília. Primeiro semestre 2018 Notas de Aula Grupos Profinitos Martino Garonzi Universidade de Brasília Primeiro semestre 2018 1 Le risposte uccidono le domande. 2 Contents 1 Topology 4 2 Profinite spaces 6 3 Topological groups 10 4

More information

LOCAL VS GLOBAL DEFINITION OF THE FUSION TENSOR PRODUCT

LOCAL VS GLOBAL DEFINITION OF THE FUSION TENSOR PRODUCT LOCAL VS GLOBAL DEFINITION OF THE FUSION TENSOR PRODUCT DENNIS GAITSGORY 1. Statement of the problem Throughout the talk, by a chiral module we shall understand a chiral D-module, unless explicitly stated

More information

THE SMOOTH BASE CHANGE THEOREM

THE SMOOTH BASE CHANGE THEOREM THE SMOOTH BASE CHANGE THEOREM AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Statement of the smooth base change theorem 2 1.2. Topological smooth base change 4 1.3. A useful case of smooth base change

More information

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander During the first three days of September, 1997, I had the privilege of giving a series of five lectures at the beginning of the School on Algebraic

More information

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes!

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes! ALGEBRAIC GROUPS Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes! 1. Some algebraic geometry The subject of algebraic groups depends on the interaction between algebraic geometry and group theory.

More information

S n 1 i D n l S n 1 is the identity map. Associated to this sequence of maps is the sequence of group homomorphisms

S n 1 i D n l S n 1 is the identity map. Associated to this sequence of maps is the sequence of group homomorphisms ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY Contents 1. Informal introduction 1 1.1. What is algebraic topology? 1 1.2. Brower fixed point theorem 2 2. Review of background material 3 2.1. Algebra 3 2.2. Topological spaces 5 2.3.

More information

Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds

Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds MA 755 Fall 05. Notes #1. I. Kogan. Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds Definition 1 An n-dimensional C k -differentiable manifold

More information

1 Categorical Background

1 Categorical Background 1 Categorical Background 1.1 Categories and Functors Definition 1.1.1 A category C is given by a class of objects, often denoted by ob C, and for any two objects A, B of C a proper set of morphisms C(A,

More information

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, )

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, ) II.3 : Eilenberg-Steenrod properties (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, 8.3 8.5 Definition. Let U be an open subset of R n for some n. The de Rham cohomology groups (U are the cohomology groups

More information

Some remarks on Frobenius and Lefschetz in étale cohomology

Some remarks on Frobenius and Lefschetz in étale cohomology Some remarks on obenius and Lefschetz in étale cohomology Gabriel Chênevert January 5, 2004 In this lecture I will discuss some more or less related issues revolving around the main idea relating (étale)

More information

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely

More information

is holomorphic. In other words, a holomorphic function is a collection of compatible holomorphic functions on all charts.

is holomorphic. In other words, a holomorphic function is a collection of compatible holomorphic functions on all charts. RIEMANN SURFACES 2. Week 2. Basic definitions 2.1. Smooth manifolds. Complex manifolds. Let X be a topological space. A (real) chart of X is a pair (U, f : U R n ) where U is an open subset of X and f

More information

TOPICS IN ALGEBRA COURSE NOTES AUTUMN Contents. Preface Notations and Conventions

TOPICS IN ALGEBRA COURSE NOTES AUTUMN Contents. Preface Notations and Conventions TOPICS IN ALGEBRA COURSE NOTES AUTUMN 2003 ROBERT E. KOTTWITZ WRITTEN UP BY BRIAN D. SMITHLING Preface Notations and Conventions Contents ii ii 1. Grothendieck Topologies and Sheaves 1 1.1. A Motivating

More information

14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces

14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces 14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces 14.1 Introduction The aim of this lecture and the next two is to address general adic spaces and their connection to rigid geometry. 14.2 Two open questions

More information

EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY

EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY 1. Categories 1.1. Generalities. I ve tried to be as consistent as possible. In particular, throughout the text below, categories will be denoted by capital

More information

AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES

AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES BROOKE ULLERY Abstract. This paper gives a basic introduction to modern algebraic geometry. The goal of this paper is to present the basic concepts of algebraic geometry,

More information

RIEMANN SURFACES. LECTURE NOTES. WINTER SEMESTER 2015/2016.

RIEMANN SURFACES. LECTURE NOTES. WINTER SEMESTER 2015/2016. RIEMANN SURFACES. LECTURE NOTES. WINTER SEMESTER 2015/2016. A PRELIMINARY AND PROBABLY VERY RAW VERSION. OLEKSANDR IENA Contents Some prerequisites for the whole lecture course. 5 1. Lecture 1 5 1.1. Definition

More information

Lecture 2. x if x X B n f(x) = α(x) if x S n 1 D n

Lecture 2. x if x X B n f(x) = α(x) if x S n 1 D n Lecture 2 1.10 Cell attachments Let X be a topological space and α : S n 1 X be a map. Consider the space X D n with the disjoint union topology. Consider further the set X B n and a function f : X D n

More information

Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra

Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 214 (2010) 1384 1398 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jpaa Homotopy theory of

More information

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 2 Oct 2002

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 2 Oct 2002 PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 ON NORMAL STRATIFIED PSEUDOMANIFOLDS arxiv:math/0210022v1 [math.at] 2 Oct 2002 G. PADILLA Devoted

More information

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f

More information

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality 121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY Contents 6. Poincaré Duality 1 6.1. Manifolds 2 6.2. Orientation 3 6.3. Orientation sheaf 9 6.4. Cap product 11 6.5. Proof for good coverings 15 6.6. Direct limit 18 6.7. Proof

More information

arxiv: v2 [math.ra] 14 Sep 2016

arxiv: v2 [math.ra] 14 Sep 2016 ON THE NEGATIVE-ONE SHIFT FUNCTOR FOR FI-MODULES arxiv:1603.07974v2 [math.ra] 14 Sep 2016 WEE LIANG GAN Abstract. We show that the negative-one shift functor S 1 on the category of FI-modules is a left

More information

Section Higher Direct Images of Sheaves

Section Higher Direct Images of Sheaves Section 3.8 - Higher Direct Images of Sheaves Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In this note we study the higher direct image functors R i f ( ) and the higher coinverse image functors R i f! ( ) which will

More information

Topological K-theory

Topological K-theory Topological K-theory Robert Hines December 15, 2016 The idea of topological K-theory is that spaces can be distinguished by the vector bundles they support. Below we present the basic ideas and definitions

More information

Derived categories, perverse sheaves and intermediate extension functor

Derived categories, perverse sheaves and intermediate extension functor Derived categories, perverse sheaves and intermediate extension functor Riccardo Grandi July 26, 2013 Contents 1 Derived categories 1 2 The category of sheaves 5 3 t-structures 7 4 Perverse sheaves 8 1

More information

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem Hongtaek Jung December 27, 2017 Abstract This is a part of a supplementary note for a Logic and Set Theory course. The main goal is to

More information

GALOIS CATEGORIES MELISSA LYNN

GALOIS CATEGORIES MELISSA LYNN GALOIS CATEGORIES MELISSA LYNN Abstract. In abstract algebra, we considered finite Galois extensions of fields with their Galois groups. Here, we noticed a correspondence between the intermediate fields

More information

Review of category theory

Review of category theory Review of category theory Proseminar on stable homotopy theory, University of Pittsburgh Friday 17 th January 2014 Friday 24 th January 2014 Clive Newstead Abstract This talk will be a review of the fundamentals

More information

A C 0 coarse structure for families of pseudometrics and the Higson-Roe functor

A C 0 coarse structure for families of pseudometrics and the Higson-Roe functor A C 0 coarse structure for families of pseudometrics and the Higson-Roe functor Jesús P. Moreno-Damas arxiv:1410.2756v1 [math.gn] 10 Oct 2014 Abstract This paper deepens into the relations between coarse

More information

MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS.

MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS. MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS. The discussion of smooth morphisms is one place were Hartshorne doesn t do a very good job. Here s a summary of this week s material. I ll also insert some (optional)

More information

PART II.1. IND-COHERENT SHEAVES ON SCHEMES

PART II.1. IND-COHERENT SHEAVES ON SCHEMES PART II.1. IND-COHERENT SHEAVES ON SCHEMES Contents Introduction 1 1. Ind-coherent sheaves on a scheme 2 1.1. Definition of the category 2 1.2. t-structure 3 2. The direct image functor 4 2.1. Direct image

More information

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 3

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 3 FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 3 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Kernels, cokernels, and exact sequences: A brief introduction to abelian categories 1 2. Sheaves 7 3. Motivating example: The sheaf of differentiable

More information

FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.

FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0

More information

(1) The embedding theorem. It says that a Stein manifold can always be embedded into C n for sufficiently large n.

(1) The embedding theorem. It says that a Stein manifold can always be embedded into C n for sufficiently large n. Class 1. Overview Introduction. The subject of this course is complex manifolds. Recall that a smooth manifold is a space in which some neighborhood of every point is homeomorphic to an open subset of

More information

Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds

Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds Theorem 1. [Exercise 1.18] Let M be a topological manifold. Then any two smooth atlases for M determine the same smooth structure if and only if their union is a smooth atlas.

More information

Groupoids and Orbifold Cohomology, Part 2

Groupoids and Orbifold Cohomology, Part 2 Groupoids and Orbifold Cohomology, Part 2 Dorette Pronk (with Laura Scull) Dalhousie University (and Fort Lewis College) Groupoidfest 2011, University of Nevada Reno, January 22, 2012 Motivation Orbifolds:

More information

i = f iα : φ i (U i ) ψ α (V α ) which satisfy 1 ) Df iα = Df jβ D(φ j φ 1 i ). (39)

i = f iα : φ i (U i ) ψ α (V α ) which satisfy 1 ) Df iα = Df jβ D(φ j φ 1 i ). (39) 2.3 The derivative A description of the tangent bundle is not complete without defining the derivative of a general smooth map of manifolds f : M N. Such a map may be defined locally in charts (U i, φ

More information

Lie algebra cohomology

Lie algebra cohomology Lie algebra cohomology Relation to the de Rham cohomology of Lie groups Presented by: Gazmend Mavraj (Master Mathematics and Diploma Physics) Supervisor: J-Prof. Dr. Christoph Wockel (Section Algebra and

More information

Exercises from Vakil

Exercises from Vakil Exercises from Vakil Ian Coley February 6, 2015 2 Sheaves 2.1 Motivating example: The sheaf of differentiable functions Exercise 2.1.A. Show that the only maximal ideal of the germ of differentiable functions

More information

Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism

Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism 1. Motivation Let f : X Y be a C p map between two C p -premanifolds with corners, with 1 p. Assuming f is bijective, we would like a criterion to tell us that f 1

More information

C2.7: CATEGORY THEORY

C2.7: CATEGORY THEORY C2.7: CATEGORY THEORY PAVEL SAFRONOV WITH MINOR UPDATES 2019 BY FRANCES KIRWAN Contents Introduction 2 Literature 3 1. Basic definitions 3 1.1. Categories 3 1.2. Set-theoretic issues 4 1.3. Functors 5

More information

LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY

LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY In this lecture we want to cover some basic concepts from homological algebra. These prove to be very helpful in our discussion of singular homology. The following

More information