The Numerical Delta Method and Bootstrap
|
|
- Hillary Hodges
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Numerical Delta Method and Bootstrap Han Hong and Jessie Li Stanford University and UCSC 1 / 41
2 Motivation Recent developments in econometrics have given empirical researchers access to estimators that exhibit nonsmoothness in the population objective function. Hypothesis tests and counterfactual analyses are being performed on nondifferentiable functions of structural parameters. This paper combines numerical differentiation with resampling to offer an asymptotically valid and computationally attractive approach for conducting inference in a class of possibly nonsmooth problems. Initially motivated by Fang and Santos (2014 and Dumbgen ( / 41
3 Motivating Example Tennessee STAR experiment examined effects of class size reduction on test scores through a randomized experiment. Interested in testing whether treatment weakly benefits students at all percentiles of the test score distribution. Linear conditional quantile model: Q Y (τ W, X = α(τ + θ(τw + X β(τ θ(τ is Quantile Treatment Effect (QTE at τth quantile. Y is test scores. W is indicator for assignment to small class. X are student and teacher covariates. H 0 : θ(τ 0 for all τ T versus H 1 : θ(τ < 0 for some τ T T {0.05, 0.10,..., 0.95}. 3 / 41
4 Motivating Example A test statistic is the negative of the minimum of the normalized QTEs: S n nφ (ˆθ n = n min τ T ˆθ n (τ ÂsyVar (ˆθ n (τ Need to estimate the test statistic s limiting distribution under H 0 and use the percentiles of that distribution to form critical values. The minimum function makes the test statistic a nondifferentiable function of the QTEs, which invalidates standard delta method and bootstrap. Subsampling is a viable alternative but more information from the sample can be used. 4 / 41
5 Directionally Differentiable Function We are still able to obtain the test statistic s limiting distribution because the function is directionally differentiable. A function that is directionally differentiable has a different derivative depending on how you orient the tangent plane. For ease of visualization, look at min (β 1, β 2. 5 / 42
6 Outline 1 The Directional Delta Method 2 The Numerical Delta Method Pointwise Valid Confidence Intervals Uniformly Valid Inference 3 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models 4 The Numerical Bootstrap General Principle Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Comparison with Subsampling 5 Empirical Application to Tennessee STAR Experiment 6 / 41
7 The Directional Delta Method The Directional Delta Method Santos and Fang (2014, Shapiro (1991, Dumbgen (1993 Consider a function(al φ ( which is Hadamard directionally differentiable. Goal: statistical inference for φ (θ 0 using limiting distribution of r n (φ (ˆθn φ (θ 0 where r n (ˆθn θ 0 converges in distribution to G 0. Consider rewriting the statistic as a finite difference: ( φ r n (φ (ˆθ n φ (θ 0 = φ θ 0 (G 0 (θ rn r n (ˆθ n θ 0 φ (θ 0 1/r n As n, the stepsize 1/r n 0, and the finite difference converges to the Hadamard directional derivative evaluated at θ 0 with direction given by G 0. Consistent estimate of φ θ 0 (G 0 can be used to conduct inference. 7 / 41
8 The Directional Delta Method Examples of Directionally Differentiable Functions Regression function in threshold regression (e.g. Hansen 2015 Reinhart and Rogoff (2010 argue that economic growth declines when government debt relative to GDP exceeds a threshold. y t = β 1 (x t γ + β 2 (x t γ + + β 3 z t + e t = φ t (θ + e t. y t is GDP growth, x t is debt to GDP percentage. Would like to form confidence bands around the regression function. φ t (θ is directionally but not fully differentiable at x t = γ. Upper and Lower Bounds on Value Distribution in Incomplete Auction Model (e.g. Haile and Tamer (2003 Test statistics for subvector inference in moment inequality models (e.g. Bugni, Canay and Shi (2014 Endpoints of identified set for partially identified parameters (e.g. Lee and Bhattacharya ( / 41
9 The Directional Delta Method Literature Review Fang and Santos (2014 show that consistent estimates of the directional derivative can be used for inference. They derive the analytic expressions for the directional derivative and estimate its components on a case by case basis. We generalize Dumbgen s method to avoid analytic derivations and achieves pointwise valid inference for all directionally differentiable functions and uniformly valid inference under convexity and Lipschitz continuity of the function(al. We allow for estimators that are not n consistent or asymptotically normal. Hirano and Porter (2012 and Song (2014 focus on estimation rather than inference. Woutersen and Ham (2016 propose a method for conducting inference on nonsmooth functions of parameters based on projections. 9 / 41
10 The Directional Delta Method Examples of Directional Derivatives For φ (θ = aθ + + bθ, where θ + = max{θ, 0} and θ = min{θ, 0}, φ θ (h = ah1(θ > 0 bh1(θ < 0 + ( ah + + bh 1(θ = 0 For φ (θ = max{θ 1, θ 2,..., θ K }, φ θ (h = max {h k} where I = {k : θ k = max{θ 1, θ 2,..., θ K }} k I For φ (θ = inf τ T θ (τ, φ θ (h = inf h (τ where T 0 = argmin τ T θ (τ τ T 0 10 / 41
11 The Numerical Delta Method The Numerical Directional Delta Method Estimates the distribution of φ θ 0 (G 0 using the distribution of φ (ˆθn + ɛ n Z ˆφ n (Z n φ (ˆθ n n (1 ɛ n Z n Theorem P W G 0 (convergence in distribution conditional on the data e.g. Asymptotic Normal Approximation: N(0, ˆσ 2 n e.g. Bootstrap: r n (ˆθ n ˆθ n where ˆθ n are the bootstrapped estimates. e.g. MCMC: r n (ˆθ n ˆθ n where ˆθ n are draws from the posterior. For φ( Hadamard directionally differentiable at θ 0, ɛ n 0, r n ɛ n, and Z P n G 0, W ˆφ n (Z n P W φ θ 0 (G / 41
12 The Numerical Delta Method Numerical Delta Method Algorithm Pointwise Valid Confidence Intervals Suppose we take the bootstrap approach: For B iterations, draw with replacement a resample of size n, reestimate the parameters ˆθ n. Form the B dim (θ matrix Z n = r n (ˆθ n ˆθ n. Form the B 1 vector ˆφ n (Z n = φ(ˆθ n+ɛ nz n φ(ˆθ n ɛ n. A 1 α two-sided equal-tailed confidence interval for φ (θ 0 can be formed by ] [φ(ˆθ n 1rn c 1 α/2, φ(ˆθ n 1rn c α/2 where c 1 α/2 and c α/2 are the (1 α/2th and (α/2th percentiles of the empirical distribution of ˆφ n (Z n. A 1 α symmetric confidence interval can be formed by [φ(ˆθ n 1rn d 1 α, φ(ˆθ n + 1rn d 1 α ] where d 1 α is the (1 αth percentile of the empirical distribution of ˆφ n(z n. 12 / 41
13 The Numerical Delta Method Pointwise Valid Confidence Intervals Choice of ɛ n for First Order Numerical Delta Method Optimal ɛ n should minimize error between ˆφ n (Z n and φ θ 0 (G 0. Suppose φ θ 0 ( is Lipschitz. When the second order directional ( derivative is nonzero, 1/rn If φ θ 0 ( is not linear, ɛ n = O leads to an error of O P ( 1/r n. If φ θ 0 ( is linear, ɛ n = O (1/r n leads to error of O P (1/r n. When the second order directional derivative is zero, e.g. φ(θ = aθ + + bθ, φ(θ = min{θ 1,..., θ k }, ɛ n should converge to zero very slowly to get error of O P (1/r n. 13 / 41
14 Uniform Size Control The Numerical Delta Method Uniformly Valid Inference Consider hypothesis testing of the following form: H 0 : φ (θ 0 0 against H 1 : φ (θ 0 > 0. using the test statistic r n φ (ˆθ n. Examples of such tests include Dominance Test: H 0 : θ(τ 0 for all τ T versus H 1 : θ(τ < 0 for some τ T. r n φ (ˆθn = ( ˆθ n min n(τ τ T ÂsyVar(ˆθ n(τ Moment Inequalities Test: H 0 : θ 0k = E[X k ] 0 for all k = 1...K versus H 1 : θ 0k < 0 for some k = 1...K r n φ (ˆθ n = ( K ( ( 2 1/2 n X k k=1 14 / 41
15 The Numerical Delta Method Uniformly Valid Inference Uniform Size Control & Uniformly Valid Confidence Intervals Reject H 0 whenever r n φ (ˆθ n ĉ 1 α, where ĉ 1 α is the 1 α quantile of ˆφ n (Z n. Whenever φ (θ is convex and Lipschitz in θ, the size of this test will be less than or equal to α uniformly over a class of data generating distributions. If φ ( is( convex and Lipschitz, the upper one-sided confidence interval φ (ˆθ n ĉ1 α r n, has coverage greater than or equal to 1 α uniformly over a class of data generating distributions. If φ ( is( concave and Lipschitz, then the lower one-sided confidence interval, φ (ˆθ n ĉα r n will have uniformly valid coverage asymptotically. 15 / 41
16 Outline The Numerical Bootstrap General Principle 1 The Directional Delta Method 2 The Numerical Delta Method Pointwise Valid Confidence Intervals Uniformly Valid Inference 3 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models 4 The Numerical Bootstrap General Principle Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Comparison with Subsampling 5 Empirical Application to Tennessee STAR Experiment 24 / 41
17 The Numerical Bootstrap General Principle A generalized numerical bootstrap method Inference on parameters which can be written as functions of the data generating distribution. Write θ 0 = θ (P and ˆθ n = θ (P n, where P is the data generating distribution and P n is the empirical distribution. Goal is to consistently estimate limiting distribution of a (n (θ (P n θ (P = n γ (ˆθ n θ 0 : a (n ( θ ( P + 1 n n (Pn P θ (P J. For ɛ n 0 and nɛ n, the numerical bootstrap replaces P with P n, 1/ n with ɛ n and n (P n P with n (Pn P n where Pn is the bootstrapped empirical distribution. ( 1 a θ ɛ 2 n P n + ɛ n n (P n P n θ (P }{{} n = ɛ 2γ n (ˆθ n ˆθ n Zn 25 / 41
18 The Numerical Bootstrap Comparison with Subsampling Comparison of Numerical Bootstrap with Subsampling Subsampling approximates the limiting distribution of ( ( a (n θ P + 1 n (Pn P θ (P n using the distribution of ( ( a (b θ P n + 1 b (Pb P n b θ (P n Numerical bootstrap estimates n (P n P using the entire sample of size n, which is more precise than using a subsample of size b << n. ( 1 (θ ( a Pn ɛ 2 + ɛ n n (P n P n θ (P n n 36 / 41
19 The Numerical Bootstrap Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Maximum Score Estimator of Manski (1975 Model:y i = 1 (x i θ + ν i 0 where P (ν i < 0 x i = x = 0.5 for all x. Maximize the number of correct predictions 1 ˆθ n = argmax θ Θ n n [2 1 (y i = 1 1] 1 ( x i θ 0 i=1 Kim and Pollard (1990 show that the maximum score estimator converges to a nonstandard limiting distribution at the cube root rate. Abrevaya and Huang (2005 show that one cannot use the bootstrap to estimate that limiting distribution consistently. Subsampling is a viable alternative. Alternative bootstrap methods: Seijo and Sen (2011: based on smoothing Most recently Cattaneo, Jansson and Nagasawa (2017: combine with numerical Hessian estimation. Horowitz (1992, Hong, Mahajan and Nekipelov (2016: smooth objective function. 26 / 41
20 The Numerical Bootstrap M-estimator consistency Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems ˆθ n arg maxp n π(, θ = 1 θ Θ n n π (z i, θ. We approximate the limiting distribution of n γ (ˆθ n θ 0 using the finite sample distribution of ɛ 2γ n (ˆθ n ˆθ n, where ˆθ n arg maxznπ(, θ, and Zn = P n + ɛ n Ĝn is a linear combination θ Θ between the empirical distribution and the bootstrapped empirical process. For example, when Ĝn is the multinomial bootstrap, for each bootstrap sample zi, i = 1,..., n, ˆθ n 1 = arg max θ Θ n n i=1 π (z i, θ + ɛ n n 1 n i=1 n (π (zi, θ π (z i, θ. i=1 27 / 41
21 The Numerical Bootstrap M-estimator consistency Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems On the other hand, when Ĝ n is the Wild bootstrap, ˆθ n 1 = arg max θ Θ n n i=1 π (z i, θ + ɛ n n 1 n n ( ξi ξ π (z i, θ. for Z 0 (h a mean zero Gaussian process with covariance kernel Σ ρ and nondegenerate increments, and i=1 n γ (ˆθ n θ 0 J arg maxz 0 (h 1 h 2 h Hh Z n ɛ 2γ n (ˆθ n ˆθ n P W J and Z n J. 28 / 41
22 The Numerical Bootstrap Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Maximum Score Estimator of Manski (1975 For each bootstrap draw {yi, x i }n i=1, compute Numerical Bootstrap estimate: ˆθ n 1 = argmax θ Θ n + ɛ n n 1 n n i=1 n [2 1 (y i = 1 1] 1 ( x i θ 0 i=1 { [2 1 (y i = 1 1] 1 ( x i θ 0 [2 1 (y i = 1 1] 1 ( x i θ 0 } Use the simulated distribution (conditional on data of (ˆθ n ˆθ n to approximate the limit distribution of ɛ 2/3 n n 1/3 (ˆθ n θ / 41
23 The Numerical Bootstrap Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Maximum Score Estimator of Manski (1975 A 1 α two-sided equal-tailed confidence interval for φ (θ 0 can be formed by [ ˆθ n 1 n 1/3 c 1 α/2, ˆθ n 1 ] n 1/3 c α/2 where c 1 α/2 and c α/2 are the (1 α/2th and (α/2th percentiles of the distribution of ɛ 2/3 n (ˆθ n ˆθ n. A 1 α symmetric confidence interval can be formed by [ ˆθ n 1 n 1/3 d 1 α, ˆθ n + 1 ] n 1/3 d 1 α where d 1 α is the (1 αth percentile of the distribution of (ˆθ n. ˆθ n ɛ 2/3 n 30 / 41
24 The Numerical Bootstrap Constrained M-estimation Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Replace Θ with a constrain set C, such that for ˆθ n C, P n π (, ˆθ n inf P ( nπ (, θ + o P n 2γ, (4 θ C and for ˆθ n C, Z nπ (, ˆθ n inf θ C Z nπ (, θ + op ( ɛ 4γ n. Let T C (θ 0 be a cone such that when α, α (C θ 0 T C (θ 0. J arg min h TC (θ 0 Z 0 (h h Hh. Jˆ n n (ˆθn γ θ 0 J, Jˆ n ɛ 2γ n (ˆθ n ˆθ P W n J, and Jˆ n ɛ 2γ n (ˆθ n ˆθ n J. Can also estimate T C (θ 0 directly by h C ˆθ n ɛ n in some situations. 31 / 41
25 The Numerical Bootstrap Sample size dependent statistics For Ĝ n = n (P n P, ˆθ n = θ (P n, n, n = θ Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems ( P + 1 Ĝ n, n 2, n n Suppose Define Jˆ n = a (n (θ (P n, n, n θ 0 Jˆ ( ˆθ n = θ Zn, 1 ( ɛ 2, n = θ P n + ɛ n Ĝn, 1 n ɛ 2, n. n ( Jˆ 1 n = a (ˆθ P W ɛ 2 n ˆθ n n Examples include Laplace estimators (e.g. Jun, Pinkse, Wan and LASSO. ˆ J 32 / 41
26 The Numerical Bootstrap Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Application to LASSO, Finite Dimensional Case LASSO s asymptotic distribution cannot be consistently estimated by the conventional bootstrap when some of the coefficients are zero. 1 ˆβ n = arg min β n n i=1 ( yi x i β 2 + λ n n p β k. (5 k=1 Numerical Bootstrap consistently estimates the asymptotic distribution of ( ( n ˆβ n β 0 using the distribution of ɛ 1 n ˆβ n ˆβ n where Z n ( y x β 2 = 1 n ˆβ n = arg min Zn β ( y x β p 2 + λn ɛ n β k (6 k=1 ( n ( n yi x i β 2 ( + ɛn 2 n yi ( xi β yi x i β 2 i=1 n i=1 i=1 (7 33 / 41
27 The Numerical Bootstrap Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Application to 1-Norm SVM, Finite Dimensional Case For κ > 0, λ n > 0, the 1-norm SVM estimator is 1 n ( ( ˆβ n = arg min ρτ yi x i β κ + λ + n β n n i=1 k β j. where ρ τ (u is the Koenker and Bassett (1978 check function. If τ = 1 2 and κ = 0, then ˆβ is the LASSO quantile regression estimator of Belloni et al (2011. Numerical Bootstrap consistently estimates the asymptotic distribution of ( ( n ˆβ n β 0 using the distribution of ɛ 1 n ˆβ n ˆβ n ˆβ n 1 = arg min β n + ɛn n ( n i=1 n i=1 k + λ nɛ n β j j=1 ( ρτ ( yi x i β + κ + (ρ τ ( y i xi β + κ + n i=1 j=1 ( ρτ ( yi x i β + κ + (8 34 / 41
28 The Numerical Bootstrap Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Recentering Test H 0 : θ (P = θ vs H 1 : θ (P > θ. Estimate the distribution of a (n (ˆθn θ by either (1 the noncentered numerical bootstrap distribution ( 1 a (ˆθ n θ, or (2 the centered numerical bootstrap distribution ( 1 a (ˆθ n ˆθ n. Similar to subsampling (Chernozhukov et al. ɛ 2 n ɛ 2 n Can also estimate unknown polynomial rates of convergence. 35 / 41
29 Outline Second Order Directional Delta Method 1 The Directional Delta Method 2 The Numerical Delta Method Pointwise Valid Confidence Intervals Uniformly Valid Inference 3 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models 4 The Numerical Bootstrap General Principle Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Comparison with Subsampling 5 Empirical Application to Tennessee STAR Experiment 16 / 41
30 Second Order Directional Delta Method Second Order Directional Delta Method First order directional delta method may produce degenerate limiting distribution. e.g. Test statistics commonly used for moment inequality models have zero first order directional derivative under the null. Theorem Let φ ( be a twice Hadamard directionally differentiable function at θ 0 and r n (ˆθ n θ 0 G 0. If φ θ 0 (h = 0 for all h, then r 2 n ( φ(ˆθ n φ(θ 0 J 1 2 φ θ 0 (G 0 (2 17 / 41
31 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models Application to Partially Identified Models Simplified 2x2 Entry Game in Bresnahan and Reiss (1991: firm j {1, 2} decides whether to enter a market i {1,..., n}. Action: z j,i = 1 if firm j enters market i. Benefit of Entry: η j,i U(0, 1. Profit function: π j,i = (η j,i β j z j,i 1{z j,i = 1} where β (0, 1 2. Firms play pure strategy Nash Equilibria: 1 (z 1i, z 2i = (1, 1 if η j,i > β j j. 2 (z 1i, z 2i = (1, 0 if η 1,i > β 1 and η 2,i < β 2. 3 (z 1i, z 2i = (0, 1 if η 1,i < β 1 and η 2,i > β 2. 4 (z 1i, z 2i {(1, 0, (0, 1} if η j,i < β j j. Model implies P (z 1i = 1, z 2i = 1 = (1 β 1 (1 β 2 β 2 (1 β 1 P (z 1i = 1, z 2i = 0 β 2 18 / 41
32 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models Application to Partially Identified Models Model leads to Q = 4 moment inequalities Pg ( ; β Eg (z i ; β 0. z 1i z 2i (1 β 1 (1 β 2 Pg ( ; β = (z 1i z 2i (1 β 1 (1 β 2 z 1i (1 z 2i β 2 (1 β 1 β 2 z 1i (1 z 2i Suppose we would like to perform the following test in Bugni, Canay, and Shi (BCS (2014 for k = 1, 2: H 0 : β k = γ 0 H 1 : β k γ 0 For P n g( ; β 1 n n i=1 g(z i; β, test statistic is n inf S (P ng( ; β = n β B k (γ 0 inf β B k (γ 0 q=1 Q ( (Pn g q ( ; β 2 B k (γ 0 {β B : β k = γ 0 } is the set of all β = (β 1, β 2 such that β k = γ / 41
33 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models Application to Partially Identified Models A level α test rejects when n inf S (P ng(z i ; β is greater than the β B k (γ 0 (1 α percentile of a consistent estimate of the limiting distribution of ( ( n inf (ˆθ S n (β inf S (θ 0(β = n φ (ˆθ n φ(θ 0 β B k (γ 0 β B k (γ 0 Define θ 0 (β = Pg(, β and ˆθ n (β = P n g(, β. Define φ(θ inf S(θ(β = (f S (θ, S (θ = Q ( q=1 θ 2, q β B k (γ 0 f (S = inf S (β. β B k (γ 0 Using the chain rule, we can show that φ is twice Hadamard directionally differentiable. 20 / 41
34 Second Order Directional Delta Method Second Order Numerical Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models Theorem Let φ ( be a twice Hadamard directionally differentiable function at θ 0 and r n (ˆθ n θ 0 G 0. Let ɛ n 0, r n ɛ n, and Z P n G 0. Then if W φ θ 0 (h = 0 for all h, 1 φ (ˆθ n + ɛ n Z ˆφ n (Z n 2 n ɛ 2 n φ (ˆθ n P W J 1 2 φ θ 0 (G 0. (3 For P ng( ; β 1 n n i=1 g(z i ; β and Z n n (P n P n g( ; β, inf S (( P n + ɛ n n (P n P n g( ; β 1 ˆφ n (Z β B k (γ 0 n = 2 ɛ 2 n inf β B k (γ 0 S (P ng( ; β 21 / 41
35 Second Order Directional Delta Method Second Order Numerical Delta Method Alternatively, we can use Application to Partially Identified Models ˆφ n(h φ(ˆθ n + 2ɛ n h 2φ(ˆθ n + ɛ n h + φ(ˆθ n ɛ 2 n For our moment inequalities example, ˆφ n (Z n = 1 ( inf ɛ S (( P 2 n + 2ɛ n n (P n P n g( ; β n β B k (γ 0 2 inf S (( P n + ɛ n n (P n P n g( ; β + β B k (γ 0 inf S (P ng( ; β β B k (γ 0 Theorem Under the same conditions as in the previous theorem, except without φ θ 0 (h 0, ˆφ n (Z n P φ θ W 0 (G / 41
36 Second Order Directional Delta Method Moment Inequalities Simulation Application to Partially Identified Models A level 5% test rejects when n inf S (P ng( ; β > ĉ 95, where ĉ 95 β B k (γ 0 is the 95th percentile of one of the following distributions. 1 Numerical Second Order Derivative 1: Two-term finite difference 2 Numerical Second Order Derivative 2: Three-term finite difference 3 Bugni, Canay, and Shi (2014 Minimum Resampling Test 4 Romano and Shaikh (2008 Subsampling Test using b = n 2/3 β 1 = 0.3 and β 2 = 0.5 are the true values. Plot rejection frequencies when testing H 0 : β 1 = γ 0 against H 1 : β 1 γ 0 for γ 0 [0.1, 0.5]. Plot rejection frequencies when testing H 0 : β 2 = γ 0 against H 1 : β 2 γ 0 for γ 0 [0.3, 0.7]. 23 / 41
37 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models Figure : Rejection frequency as a function of β 1 1 Rejection Frequencies as a function of beta1 N=1000 B= Rejection Frequency Numerical Derivative 1 Numerical Derivative BCS Subsampling beta1 25 / 42
38 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models Figure : Rejection frequency as a function of β Rejection Frequencies as a function of beta1 N=1000 B= Rejection Frequency Numerical Derivative 1 Numerical Derivative 2 BCS Subsampling beta1 26 / 42
39 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models Figure : Rejection frequency as a function of β 2 1 Rejection Frequencies as a function of beta2 N=1000 B= Rejection Frequency Numerical Derivative Numerical Derivative 2 BCS Subsampling beta2 27 / 42
40 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models Figure : Rejection frequency as a function of β Rejection Frequencies as a function of beta2 N=1000 B= Rejection Frequency Numerical Derivative 1 Numerical Derivative 2 BCS Subsampling beta2 28 / 42
41 Empirical Application to Tennessee STAR Experiment Outline 1 The Directional Delta Method 2 The Numerical Delta Method Pointwise Valid Confidence Intervals Uniformly Valid Inference 3 Second Order Directional Delta Method Application to Partially Identified Models 4 The Numerical Bootstrap General Principle Applications to Nonsmooth Optimization Problems Comparison with Subsampling 5 Empirical Application to Tennessee STAR Experiment 37 / 41
42 Empirical Application to Tennessee STAR Experiment Tennessee STAR Experiment For 79 schools between 1985 and 1988, Tennessee government randomly assigned some students to classes with only students while others to classes with students. Substantial attrition after the first year. Many students either moved away from participating schools or had to repeat a grade, which meant that they no longer received treatment. Run regressions on student-level variables for the year in which they entered the program Chetty et al (2011. Y i is the average of each student s math and reading percentile ranks obtained using the transformation in Krueger (1999. X i are student s gender, race, age, whether she has free lunch, teacher s experience, her position on the career ladder, whether she has a higher degree, and whether school is urban or rural. Fail to reject the null that QTEs at quantiles {0.05, 0.10,..., 0.95} are all nonnegative. 38 / 41
43 Empirical Application to Tennessee STAR Experiment Empirical Application Suppose we would like to form confidence intervals around the maximum and minimum QTEs. φ 1 (θ max τ T θ(τ and φ 2 (θ min τ T θ(τ. T {0.05, 0.10,..., 0.95}. Numerical Delta Method: For B iterations, draw with replacement a resample of size n, reestimate the QTE ˆθ n. Form the B 19 matrix Z n = n (ˆθ n ˆθ n. Compute percentiles of φ(ˆθ n+ɛ nz n φ(ˆθ n ɛ n. Subsampling: For B iterations, draw with replacement a resample of size b << n, reestimate the QTE ˆθ b. Compute percentiles of ( b φ (ˆθ b φ (ˆθ n. 39 / 41
44 Empirical Application to Tennessee STAR Experiment Table: 95% Numerical Delta Method Confidence Intervals for the Maximum and Minimum Quantile Treatment Effect φ(ˆθ n SE Equal-Tailed Lower Upper Max 6.77% 0.73% (4.07%,6.97% (,6.77% (4.37%, Min 1.52% 0.75% (1.35%,4.26% (,3.99% (1.54%, Table: 95% Subsampling Confidence Intervals for the Maximum and Minimum Quantile Treatment Effect SE Equal-Tailed Lower Upper Max 0.83% (4.12%,7.42% (,7.15% (4.42%, Min 0.81% (0.87%,4.05% (,3.76% (1.10%, 40 / 41
45 Empirical Application to Tennessee STAR Experiment Conclusion Demonstrated how to conduct inference on directionally differentiable functions of parameters using the numerical delta method. Pointwise valid inference for all directionally differentiable functions. Uniformly valid inference for convex and Lipschitz functions. Consistent estimation of the limiting distribution of test statistics in partially identified models. Proposed a numerical bootstrap principle that can be used to conduct inference when regular bootstrap fails. Pointwise valid inference for Maximum Score, LASSO, and 1-norm Support Vector Machine Regression. 41 / 41
Statistical Properties of Numerical Derivatives
Statistical Properties of Numerical Derivatives Han Hong, Aprajit Mahajan, and Denis Nekipelov Stanford University and UC Berkeley November 2010 1 / 63 Motivation Introduction Many models have objective
More informationQuantile methods. Class Notes Manuel Arellano December 1, Let F (r) =Pr(Y r). Forτ (0, 1), theτth population quantile of Y is defined to be
Quantile methods Class Notes Manuel Arellano December 1, 2009 1 Unconditional quantiles Let F (r) =Pr(Y r). Forτ (0, 1), theτth population quantile of Y is defined to be Q τ (Y ) q τ F 1 (τ) =inf{r : F
More informationInference for Identifiable Parameters in Partially Identified Econometric Models
Inference for Identifiable Parameters in Partially Identified Econometric Models Joseph P. Romano Department of Statistics Stanford University romano@stat.stanford.edu Azeem M. Shaikh Department of Economics
More informationProgram Evaluation with High-Dimensional Data
Program Evaluation with High-Dimensional Data Alexandre Belloni Duke Victor Chernozhukov MIT Iván Fernández-Val BU Christian Hansen Booth ESWC 215 August 17, 215 Introduction Goal is to perform inference
More informationQuantile Processes for Semi and Nonparametric Regression
Quantile Processes for Semi and Nonparametric Regression Shih-Kang Chao Department of Statistics Purdue University IMS-APRM 2016 A joint work with Stanislav Volgushev and Guang Cheng Quantile Response
More informationA Resampling Method on Pivotal Estimating Functions
A Resampling Method on Pivotal Estimating Functions Kun Nie Biostat 277,Winter 2004 March 17, 2004 Outline Introduction A General Resampling Method Examples - Quantile Regression -Rank Regression -Simulation
More informationSupplement to Quantile-Based Nonparametric Inference for First-Price Auctions
Supplement to Quantile-Based Nonparametric Inference for First-Price Auctions Vadim Marmer University of British Columbia Artyom Shneyerov CIRANO, CIREQ, and Concordia University August 30, 2010 Abstract
More informationIV Quantile Regression for Group-level Treatments, with an Application to the Distributional Effects of Trade
IV Quantile Regression for Group-level Treatments, with an Application to the Distributional Effects of Trade Denis Chetverikov Brad Larsen Christopher Palmer UCLA, Stanford and NBER, UC Berkeley September
More informationFlexible Estimation of Treatment Effect Parameters
Flexible Estimation of Treatment Effect Parameters Thomas MaCurdy a and Xiaohong Chen b and Han Hong c Introduction Many empirical studies of program evaluations are complicated by the presence of both
More informationA Course in Applied Econometrics. Lecture 10. Partial Identification. Outline. 1. Introduction. 2. Example I: Missing Data
Outline A Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 10 1. Introduction 2. Example I: Missing Data Partial Identification 3. Example II: Returns to Schooling 4. Example III: Initial Conditions Problems in
More informationConfidence Intervals for Low-dimensional Parameters with High-dimensional Data
Confidence Intervals for Low-dimensional Parameters with High-dimensional Data Cun-Hui Zhang and Stephanie S. Zhang Rutgers University and Columbia University September 14, 2012 Outline Introduction Methodology
More informationPartial Identification and Inference in Binary Choice and Duration Panel Data Models
Partial Identification and Inference in Binary Choice and Duration Panel Data Models JASON R. BLEVINS The Ohio State University July 20, 2010 Abstract. Many semiparametric fixed effects panel data models,
More informationSIMILAR-ON-THE-BOUNDARY TESTS FOR MOMENT INEQUALITIES EXIST, BUT HAVE POOR POWER. Donald W. K. Andrews. August 2011
SIMILAR-ON-THE-BOUNDARY TESTS FOR MOMENT INEQUALITIES EXIST, BUT HAVE POOR POWER By Donald W. K. Andrews August 2011 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1815 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS
More informationLecture 13: Subsampling vs Bootstrap. Dimitris N. Politis, Joseph P. Romano, Michael Wolf
Lecture 13: 2011 Bootstrap ) R n x n, θ P)) = τ n ˆθn θ P) Example: ˆθn = X n, τ n = n, θ = EX = µ P) ˆθ = min X n, τ n = n, θ P) = sup{x : F x) 0} ) Define: J n P), the distribution of τ n ˆθ n θ P) under
More informationBayesian Indirect Inference and the ABC of GMM
Bayesian Indirect Inference and the ABC of GMM Michael Creel, Jiti Gao, Han Hong, Dennis Kristensen Universitat Autónoma, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics, and MOVE Monash University Stanford University
More informationInference for identifiable parameters in partially identified econometric models
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138 (2008) 2786 2807 www.elsevier.com/locate/jspi Inference for identifiable parameters in partially identified econometric models Joseph P. Romano a,b,, Azeem
More informationInference for Subsets of Parameters in Partially Identified Models
Inference for Subsets of Parameters in Partially Identified Models Kyoo il Kim University of Minnesota June 2009, updated November 2010 Preliminary and Incomplete Abstract We propose a confidence set for
More informationComparison of inferential methods in partially identified models in terms of error in coverage probability
Comparison of inferential methods in partially identified models in terms of error in coverage probability Federico A. Bugni Department of Economics Duke University federico.bugni@duke.edu. September 22,
More informationInference in Nonparametric Series Estimation with Data-Dependent Number of Series Terms
Inference in Nonparametric Series Estimation with Data-Dependent Number of Series Terms Byunghoon ang Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison First version December 9, 204; Revised November
More informationSTAT 461/561- Assignments, Year 2015
STAT 461/561- Assignments, Year 2015 This is the second set of assignment problems. When you hand in any problem, include the problem itself and its number. pdf are welcome. If so, use large fonts and
More informationINFERENCE APPROACHES FOR INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE QUANTILE REGRESSION. 1. Introduction
INFERENCE APPROACHES FOR INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE QUANTILE REGRESSION VICTOR CHERNOZHUKOV CHRISTIAN HANSEN MICHAEL JANSSON Abstract. We consider asymptotic and finite-sample confidence bounds in instrumental
More informationPartial Identification and Confidence Intervals
Partial Identification and Confidence Intervals Jinyong Hahn Department of Economics, UCLA Geert Ridder Department of Economics, USC September 17, 009 Abstract We consider statistical inference on a single
More informationSIMILAR-ON-THE-BOUNDARY TESTS FOR MOMENT INEQUALITIES EXIST, BUT HAVE POOR POWER. Donald W. K. Andrews. August 2011 Revised March 2012
SIMILAR-ON-THE-BOUNDARY TESTS FOR MOMENT INEQUALITIES EXIST, BUT HAVE POOR POWER By Donald W. K. Andrews August 2011 Revised March 2012 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1815R COWLES FOUNDATION FOR
More informationAdaptive test of conditional moment inequalities
Adaptive test of conditional moment inequalities Denis Chetverikov The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP36/12 Adaptive Test of Conditional Moment Inequalities
More informationConstructing a Confidence Interval for the Fraction Who Benefit from Treatment, Using Randomized Trial Data
Johns Hopkins University, Dept. of Biostatistics Working Papers 10-25-2017 Constructing a Confidence Interval for the Fraction Who Benefit from Treatment, Using Randomized Trial Data Emily J. Huang Johns
More informationLecture 9: Quantile Methods 2
Lecture 9: Quantile Methods 2 1. Equivariance. 2. GMM for Quantiles. 3. Endogenous Models 4. Empirical Examples 1 1. Equivariance to Monotone Transformations. Theorem (Equivariance of Quantiles under Monotone
More informationInstrumental Variables Estimation and Weak-Identification-Robust. Inference Based on a Conditional Quantile Restriction
Instrumental Variables Estimation and Weak-Identification-Robust Inference Based on a Conditional Quantile Restriction Vadim Marmer Department of Economics University of British Columbia vadim.marmer@gmail.com
More informationSOLUTIONS Problem Set 2: Static Entry Games
SOLUTIONS Problem Set 2: Static Entry Games Matt Grennan January 29, 2008 These are my attempt at the second problem set for the second year Ph.D. IO course at NYU with Heski Bar-Isaac and Allan Collard-Wexler
More informationUniversity of California San Diego and Stanford University and
First International Workshop on Functional and Operatorial Statistics. Toulouse, June 19-21, 2008 K-sample Subsampling Dimitris N. olitis andjoseph.romano University of California San Diego and Stanford
More informationINVALIDITY OF THE BOOTSTRAP AND THE M OUT OF N BOOTSTRAP FOR INTERVAL ENDPOINTS DEFINED BY MOMENT INEQUALITIES. Donald W. K. Andrews and Sukjin Han
INVALIDITY OF THE BOOTSTRAP AND THE M OUT OF N BOOTSTRAP FOR INTERVAL ENDPOINTS DEFINED BY MOMENT INEQUALITIES By Donald W. K. Andrews and Sukjin Han July 2008 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1671
More informationMCMC CONFIDENCE SETS FOR IDENTIFIED SETS. Xiaohong Chen, Timothy M. Christensen, and Elie Tamer. May 2016 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO.
MCMC CONFIDENCE SETS FOR IDENTIFIED SETS By Xiaohong Chen, Timothy M. Christensen, and Elie Tamer May 2016 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 2037 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS YALE UNIVERSITY
More informationOptimal Plug-in Estimators of Directionally Differentiable Functionals
Optimal Plug-in Estimators of Directionally Differentiable Functionals (Job Market Paper) Zheng Fang Department of Economics, UC San Diego zfang@ucsd.edu November, 2014 Abstract This paper studies optimal
More informationInference on distributions and quantiles using a finite-sample Dirichlet process
Dirichlet IDEAL Theory/methods Simulations Inference on distributions and quantiles using a finite-sample Dirichlet process David M. Kaplan University of Missouri Matt Goldman UC San Diego Midwest Econometrics
More informationarxiv: v1 [econ.em] 26 Sep 2017
arxiv:1709.09115v1 [econ.em] 26 Sep 2017 Inference on Estimators defined by Mathematical Yu-Wei Hsieh USC Programming Xiaoxia Shi UW-Madison September 27, 2017 Abstract Matthew Shum Caltech We propose
More informationFall 2017 STAT 532 Homework Peter Hoff. 1. Let P be a probability measure on a collection of sets A.
1. Let P be a probability measure on a collection of sets A. (a) For each n N, let H n be a set in A such that H n H n+1. Show that P (H n ) monotonically converges to P ( k=1 H k) as n. (b) For each n
More informationAsymmetric least squares estimation and testing
Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing Whitney Newey and James Powell Princeton University and University of Wisconsin-Madison January 27, 2012 Outline ALS estimators Large sample properties Asymptotic
More informationOn the Uniform Asymptotic Validity of Subsampling and the Bootstrap
On the Uniform Asymptotic Validity of Subsampling and the Bootstrap Joseph P. Romano Departments of Economics and Statistics Stanford University romano@stanford.edu Azeem M. Shaikh Department of Economics
More informationApproximate Bayesian computation for spatial extremes via open-faced sandwich adjustment
Approximate Bayesian computation for spatial extremes via open-faced sandwich adjustment Ben Shaby SAMSI August 3, 2010 Ben Shaby (SAMSI) OFS adjustment August 3, 2010 1 / 29 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Spatial
More informationProblem Selected Scores
Statistics Ph.D. Qualifying Exam: Part II November 20, 2010 Student Name: 1. Answer 8 out of 12 problems. Mark the problems you selected in the following table. Problem 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Selected
More informationMonte Carlo Confidence Sets for Identified Sets
Monte Carlo Confidence Sets for Identified Sets Xiaohong Chen Timothy M. Christensen Elie Tamer First Draft: August 25; st Revision: September 27; 3rd Revision: June 28 Abstract It is generally difficult
More informationUltra High Dimensional Variable Selection with Endogenous Variables
1 / 39 Ultra High Dimensional Variable Selection with Endogenous Variables Yuan Liao Princeton University Joint work with Jianqing Fan Job Market Talk January, 2012 2 / 39 Outline 1 Examples of Ultra High
More informationON THE UNIFORM ASYMPTOTIC VALIDITY OF SUBSAMPLING AND THE BOOTSTRAP. Joseph P. Romano Azeem M. Shaikh
ON THE UNIFORM ASYMPTOTIC VALIDITY OF SUBSAMPLING AND THE BOOTSTRAP By Joseph P. Romano Azeem M. Shaikh Technical Report No. 2010-03 April 2010 Department of Statistics STANFORD UNIVERSITY Stanford, California
More informationQuantile Regression for Extraordinarily Large Data
Quantile Regression for Extraordinarily Large Data Shih-Kang Chao Department of Statistics Purdue University November, 2016 A joint work with Stanislav Volgushev and Guang Cheng Quantile regression Two-step
More informationand Level Sets First version: August 16, This version: February 15, Abstract
Consistency of Plug-In Estimators of Upper Contour and Level Sets Neşe Yıldız First version: August 16, 2004. This version: February 15, 2008. Abstract This note studies the problem of estimating the set
More informationAsymptotically Efficient Estimation of Models Defined by Convex Moment Inequalities
Asymptotically Efficient Estimation of Models Defined by Convex Moment Inequalities Hiroaki Kaido Department of Economics Boston University hkaido@bu.edu Andres Santos Department of Economics UC San Diego
More informationVALIDITY OF SUBSAMPLING AND PLUG-IN ASYMPTOTIC INFERENCE FOR PARAMETERS DEFINED BY MOMENT INEQUALITIES
Econometric Theory, 2009, Page 1 of 41. Printed in the United States of America. doi:10.1017/s0266466608090257 VALIDITY OF SUBSAMPLING AND PLUG-IN ASYMPTOTIC INFERENCE FOR PARAMETERS DEFINED BY MOMENT
More informationQuantile Regression for Dynamic Panel Data
Quantile Regression for Dynamic Panel Data Antonio Galvao 1 1 Department of Economics University of Illinois NASM Econometric Society 2008 June 22nd 2008 Panel Data Panel data allows the possibility of
More informationBootstrapping high dimensional vector: interplay between dependence and dimensionality
Bootstrapping high dimensional vector: interplay between dependence and dimensionality Xianyang Zhang Joint work with Guang Cheng University of Missouri-Columbia LDHD: Transition Workshop, 2014 Xianyang
More informationLecture 2: Consistency of M-estimators
Lecture 2: Instructor: Deartment of Economics Stanford University Preared by Wenbo Zhou, Renmin University References Takeshi Amemiya, 1985, Advanced Econometrics, Harvard University Press Newey and McFadden,
More informationInference on Optimal Treatment Assignments
Inference on Optimal Treatment Assignments Timothy B. Armstrong Yale University Shu Shen University of California, Davis April 8, 2015 Abstract We consider inference on optimal treatment assignments. Our
More informationTesting against a linear regression model using ideas from shape-restricted estimation
Testing against a linear regression model using ideas from shape-restricted estimation arxiv:1311.6849v2 [stat.me] 27 Jun 2014 Bodhisattva Sen and Mary Meyer Columbia University, New York and Colorado
More informationEconometric Analysis of Games 1
Econometric Analysis of Games 1 HT 2017 Recap Aim: provide an introduction to incomplete models and partial identification in the context of discrete games 1. Coherence & Completeness 2. Basic Framework
More informationarxiv: v3 [stat.me] 26 Sep 2017
Monte Carlo Confidence Sets for Identified Sets Xiaohong Chen Timothy M. Christensen Elie Tamer arxiv:165.499v3 [stat.me] 26 Sep 217 First draft: August 215; Revised September 217 Abstract In complicated/nonlinear
More informationHigh Dimensional Empirical Likelihood for Generalized Estimating Equations with Dependent Data
High Dimensional Empirical Likelihood for Generalized Estimating Equations with Dependent Data Song Xi CHEN Guanghua School of Management and Center for Statistical Science, Peking University Department
More informationMultiscale Adaptive Inference on Conditional Moment Inequalities
Multiscale Adaptive Inference on Conditional Moment Inequalities Timothy B. Armstrong 1 Hock Peng Chan 2 1 Yale University 2 National University of Singapore June 2013 Conditional moment inequality models
More informationThe properties of L p -GMM estimators
The properties of L p -GMM estimators Robert de Jong and Chirok Han Michigan State University February 2000 Abstract This paper considers Generalized Method of Moment-type estimators for which a criterion
More informationTESTING REGRESSION MONOTONICITY IN ECONOMETRIC MODELS
TESTING REGRESSION MONOTONICITY IN ECONOMETRIC MODELS DENIS CHETVERIKOV Abstract. Monotonicity is a key qualitative prediction of a wide array of economic models derived via robust comparative statics.
More informationWhat s New in Econometrics. Lecture 13
What s New in Econometrics Lecture 13 Weak Instruments and Many Instruments Guido Imbens NBER Summer Institute, 2007 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Motivation 3. Weak Instruments 4. Many Weak) Instruments
More informationStatistical Inference
Statistical Inference Liu Yang Florida State University October 27, 2016 Liu Yang, Libo Wang (Florida State University) Statistical Inference October 27, 2016 1 / 27 Outline The Bayesian Lasso Trevor Park
More informationSparsity Models. Tong Zhang. Rutgers University. T. Zhang (Rutgers) Sparsity Models 1 / 28
Sparsity Models Tong Zhang Rutgers University T. Zhang (Rutgers) Sparsity Models 1 / 28 Topics Standard sparse regression model algorithms: convex relaxation and greedy algorithm sparse recovery analysis:
More informationTESTING REGRESSION MONOTONICITY IN ECONOMETRIC MODELS
TESTING REGRESSION MONOTONICITY IN ECONOMETRIC MODELS DENIS CHETVERIKOV Abstract. Monotonicity is a key qualitative prediction of a wide array of economic models derived via robust comparative statics.
More informationMCMC Confidence Sets for Identified Sets
MCMC Confidence Sets for Identified Sets Xiaohong Chen Timothy M. Christensen Keith O'Hara Elie Tamer The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP28/16 MCMC Confidence
More informationBootstrap Confidence Intervals
Bootstrap Confidence Intervals Patrick Breheny September 18 Patrick Breheny STA 621: Nonparametric Statistics 1/22 Introduction Bootstrap confidence intervals So far, we have discussed the idea behind
More informationlarge number of i.i.d. observations from P. For concreteness, suppose
1 Subsampling Suppose X i, i = 1,..., n is an i.i.d. sequence of random variables with distribution P. Let θ(p ) be some real-valued parameter of interest, and let ˆθ n = ˆθ n (X 1,..., X n ) be some estimate
More informationStatistics 300B Winter 2018 Final Exam Due 24 Hours after receiving it
Statistics 300B Winter 08 Final Exam Due 4 Hours after receiving it Directions: This test is open book and open internet, but must be done without consulting other students. Any consultation of other students
More informationAsymptotic Distortions in Locally Misspecified Moment Inequality Models
Asymptotic Distortions in Locally Misspecified Moment Inequality Models Federico A. Bugni Department of Economics Duke University Ivan A. Canay Department of Economics Northwestern University Patrik Guggenberger
More informationExpecting the Unexpected: Uniform Quantile Regression Bands with an application to Investor Sentiments
Expecting the Unexpected: Uniform Bands with an application to Investor Sentiments Boston University November 16, 2016 Econometric Analysis of Heterogeneity in Financial Markets Using s Chapter 1: Expecting
More informationNONPARAMETRIC AND PARTIALLY IDENTIFIED CUBE ROOT ASYMPTOTICS FOR MAXIMUM SCORE AND RELATED METHODS
NONARAMETRIC AND ARTIALLY IDENTIFIED CUBE ROOT ASYMTOTICS FOR MAXIMUM SCORE AND RELATED METHODS MYUNG HWAN SEO AND TAISUKE OTSU Abstract. Since Manski s (1975) seminal work, the maximum score method for
More informationON THE CHOICE OF TEST STATISTIC FOR CONDITIONAL MOMENT INEQUALITES. Timothy B. Armstrong. October 2014 Revised July 2017
ON THE CHOICE OF TEST STATISTIC FOR CONDITIONAL MOMENT INEQUALITES By Timothy B. Armstrong October 2014 Revised July 2017 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1960R2 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN
More informationInference on Breakdown Frontiers
Inference on Breakdown Frontiers Matthew A. Masten Alexandre Poirier May 12, 2017 Abstract A breakdown frontier is the boundary between the set of assumptions which lead to a specific conclusion and those
More informationA Simple Way to Calculate Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified Parameters. By Tiemen Woutersen. Draft, September
A Simple Way to Calculate Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified Parameters By Tiemen Woutersen Draft, September 006 Abstract. This note proposes a new way to calculate confidence intervals of partially
More informationBayesian Regression Linear and Logistic Regression
When we want more than point estimates Bayesian Regression Linear and Logistic Regression Nicole Beckage Ordinary Least Squares Regression and Lasso Regression return only point estimates But what if we
More informationCommon Threshold in Quantile Regressions with an Application to Pricing for Reputation
Common Threshold in Quantile Regressions with an Application to Pricing for Reputation Liangjun Su a, Pai Xu b a Singapore Management University, Singapore b University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong December
More informationCan we do statistical inference in a non-asymptotic way? 1
Can we do statistical inference in a non-asymptotic way? 1 Guang Cheng 2 Statistics@Purdue www.science.purdue.edu/bigdata/ ONR Review Meeting@Duke Oct 11, 2017 1 Acknowledge NSF, ONR and Simons Foundation.
More informationLeast Absolute Value vs. Least Squares Estimation and Inference Procedures in Regression Models with Asymmetric Error Distributions
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 13 5-1-2009 Least Absolute Value vs. Least Squares Estimation and Inference Procedures in Regression Models with Asymmetric Error
More informationTesting Many Moment Inequalities
Testing Many Moment Inequalities Victor Chernozhukov Denis Chetverikov Kengo Kato The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP52/14 TESTING MANY MOMENT INEQUALITIES
More informationUniform Inference for Conditional Factor Models with Instrumental and Idiosyncratic Betas
Uniform Inference for Conditional Factor Models with Instrumental and Idiosyncratic Betas Yuan Xiye Yang Rutgers University Dec 27 Greater NY Econometrics Overview main results Introduction Consider a
More informationQuantile Regression: Inference
Quantile Regression: Inference Roger Koenker University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Aarhus: 21 June 2010 Roger Koenker (UIUC) Introduction Aarhus: 21.6.2010 1 / 28 Inference for Quantile Regression Asymptotics
More informationPROGRAM EVALUATION WITH HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA
PROGRAM EVALUATION WITH HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA A. BELLONI, V. CHERNOZHUKOV, I. FERNÁNDEZ-VAL, AND C. HANSEN Abstract. In this paper, we consider estimation of general modern moment-condition problems in
More informationIntroduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference Lecture 02: Overview Continued
Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference Lecture 02: Overview Continued Michael R. Kosorok, Ph.D. Professor and Chair of Biostatistics Professor of Statistics and Operations Research
More informationThe Econometrics of Shape Restrictions
The Econometrics of Shape Restrictions Denis Chetverikov Department of Economics U.C. Los Angeles chetverikov@econ.ucla.edu Andres Santos Department of Economics U.C. Los Angeles andres@econ.ucla.edu Azeem
More informationInference For High Dimensional M-estimates. Fixed Design Results
: Fixed Design Results Lihua Lei Advisors: Peter J. Bickel, Michael I. Jordan joint work with Peter J. Bickel and Noureddine El Karoui Dec. 8, 2016 1/57 Table of Contents 1 Background 2 Main Results and
More informationLIKELIHOOD INFERENCE IN SOME FINITE MIXTURE MODELS. Xiaohong Chen, Maria Ponomareva and Elie Tamer MAY 2013
LIKELIHOOD INFERENCE IN SOME FINITE MIXTURE MODELS By Xiaohong Chen, Maria Ponomareva and Elie Tamer MAY 2013 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1895 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS YALE
More informationInference for High Dimensional Robust Regression
Department of Statistics UC Berkeley Stanford-Berkeley Joint Colloquium, 2015 Table of Contents 1 Background 2 Main Results 3 OLS: A Motivating Example Table of Contents 1 Background 2 Main Results 3 OLS:
More informationMoment and IV Selection Approaches: A Comparative Simulation Study
Moment and IV Selection Approaches: A Comparative Simulation Study Mehmet Caner Esfandiar Maasoumi Juan Andrés Riquelme August 7, 2014 Abstract We compare three moment selection approaches, followed by
More informationWhat s New in Econometrics? Lecture 14 Quantile Methods
What s New in Econometrics? Lecture 14 Quantile Methods Jeff Wooldridge NBER Summer Institute, 2007 1. Reminders About Means, Medians, and Quantiles 2. Some Useful Asymptotic Results 3. Quantile Regression
More informationInference on Estimators defined by Mathematical Programming
Inference on Estimators defined by Mathematical Programming Yu-Wei Hsieh USC Xiaoxia Shi UW-Madison Matthew Shum Caltech December 11, 2017 Abstract We propose an inference procedure for estimators defined
More informationReliable Inference in Conditions of Extreme Events. Adriana Cornea
Reliable Inference in Conditions of Extreme Events by Adriana Cornea University of Exeter Business School Department of Economics ExISta Early Career Event October 17, 2012 Outline of the talk Extreme
More informationSEMIPARAMETRIC QUANTILE REGRESSION WITH HIGH-DIMENSIONAL COVARIATES. Liping Zhu, Mian Huang, & Runze Li. The Pennsylvania State University
SEMIPARAMETRIC QUANTILE REGRESSION WITH HIGH-DIMENSIONAL COVARIATES Liping Zhu, Mian Huang, & Runze Li The Pennsylvania State University Technical Report Series #10-104 College of Health and Human Development
More informationSources of Inequality: Additive Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient.
Sources of Inequality: Additive Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient. Carlos Hurtado Econometrics Seminar Department of Economics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign hrtdmrt2@illinois.edu Feb 24th,
More informationBayesian Sparse Linear Regression with Unknown Symmetric Error
Bayesian Sparse Linear Regression with Unknown Symmetric Error Minwoo Chae 1 Joint work with Lizhen Lin 2 David B. Dunson 3 1 Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Austin 2 Department of
More informationCLUSTER-ROBUST BOOTSTRAP INFERENCE IN QUANTILE REGRESSION MODELS. Andreas Hagemann. July 3, 2015
CLUSTER-ROBUST BOOTSTRAP INFERENCE IN QUANTILE REGRESSION MODELS Andreas Hagemann July 3, 2015 In this paper I develop a wild bootstrap procedure for cluster-robust inference in linear quantile regression
More informationLecture 8 Inequality Testing and Moment Inequality Models
Lecture 8 Inequality Testing and Moment Inequality Models Inequality Testing In the previous lecture, we discussed how to test the nonlinear hypothesis H 0 : h(θ 0 ) 0 when the sample information comes
More informationTHE LIMIT OF FINITE-SAMPLE SIZE AND A PROBLEM WITH SUBSAMPLING. Donald W. K. Andrews and Patrik Guggenberger. March 2007
THE LIMIT OF FINITE-SAMPLE SIZE AND A PROBLEM WITH SUBSAMPLING By Donald W. K. Andrews and Patrik Guggenberger March 2007 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1605 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS
More informationBAYESIAN INFERENCE IN A CLASS OF PARTIALLY IDENTIFIED MODELS
BAYESIAN INFERENCE IN A CLASS OF PARTIALLY IDENTIFIED MODELS BRENDAN KLINE AND ELIE TAMER UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN AND HARVARD UNIVERSITY Abstract. This paper develops a Bayesian approach to inference
More informationStatistics 135 Fall 2008 Final Exam
Name: SID: Statistics 135 Fall 2008 Final Exam Show your work. The number of points each question is worth is shown at the beginning of the question. There are 10 problems. 1. [2] The normal equations
More informationBayesian and Frequentist Inference in Partially Identified Models
Bayesian and Frequentist Inference in Partially Identified Models Hyungsik Roger Moon University of Southern California Frank Schorfheide University of Pennsylvania CEPR and NBER September 7, 2011 Correspondence:
More informationA NOTE ON MINIMAX TESTING AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS IN MOMENT INEQUALITY MODELS. Timothy B. Armstrong. December 2014
A NOTE ON MINIMAX TESTING AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS IN MOMENT INEQUALITY MODELS By Timothy B. Armstrong December 2014 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1975 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS
More informationMultiple Testing of One-Sided Hypotheses: Combining Bonferroni and the Bootstrap
University of Zurich Department of Economics Working Paper Series ISSN 1664-7041 (print) ISSN 1664-705X (online) Working Paper No. 254 Multiple Testing of One-Sided Hypotheses: Combining Bonferroni and
More informationLearning discrete graphical models via generalized inverse covariance matrices
Learning discrete graphical models via generalized inverse covariance matrices Duzhe Wang, Yiming Lv, Yongjoon Kim, Young Lee Department of Statistics University of Wisconsin-Madison {dwang282, lv23, ykim676,
More information