1 ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #1 Monday, January 6, 2003
2 Instructor: Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room CRL-229, Ext Office Hours: TBA Teaching Assistants: Kamran Mustafa Jennifer Ko Room CRL-205, Ext Office Hours: TBA Web Site:
3 Proposed Course Content: Introduction to the Principles of Feedback (1 hour) Continuous-Time Signals and Systems (1 hour) Review of the Laplace Transform, and the evaluation of time and frequency responses from poles and zeros Analysis of Single-Input Single-Output (SISO) Control Loops (2 hrs) Sensitivity Functions Root Locus, Frequency Response Techniques Relative Stability Robustness Classical Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Control (5 hours) Ziegler-Nichols Methods Lead-Lag compensators Industrial application: Control of a distillation column
4 Course Content (cont.): Performance Limitations (4 hours) Sensors and actuators Bode's integral constraints Examples of design trade-offs Models for Sampled-Data Control Systems (2 hours) Advanced SISO Control Open loop inversion and affine parameterization of stabilizing controllers (2 hours) Optimization based designs (2 hours) Linear state space models (4 hours) Controller synthesis via state space methods (3 hours) Introduction to non-linear control (4 hours)
5 Course Content (cont.): Multi-Input Multi-Output (MIMO) Control (8 hours) Models for multivariable systems Stability, Frequency response, robustness Decentralized control Optimal multivariable control systems State-estimate feedback Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Achieving integral action in LQR synthesis Industrial Applications (Total Course = 39 hours)
6 Textbook: G. C. Goodwin, S. F. Graebe, and M. E. Salgado, "Control System Design," Prentice Hall, (New and used copies available at Titles Bookstore.) Chapters 2 and 3 will only be covered briefly in lectures, but you should read these chapters thoroughly.
7 Prerequisites: Courses: ELEC ENG 3TP4 Competencies: Linear signals and systems analysis, esp. Laplace transform, differential equations, state-space models Matrix algebra Matlab/Simulink
8 Proposed Assessment: Weekly Homework (10%) Labs (15%) Project (15%) Midterm (20%) Final (40%) You will be notified in advance if any changes are to be made to this assessment scheme.
9 Lectures: There will be 39 one-hour lectures (3 per week) in BSB-B103 on: Mondays 11:30am-12:30pm, Wednesdays 11:30am-12:30pm, and Fridays 1:30-2:30pm. Lecture notes in PDF format will be posted on the course web site before each lecture.
10 Tutorials: There will be 1 one-hour tutorial per week. The class is split into two sections for tutorials: Section T1 is in LS-B130A on Wednesdays 10:30-11:30am Section T2 is in ABB-270 on Fridays 10:30-11:30am
11 Labs: There will be 5 three-hour labs in T every second week on Mondays 2:30-5:30pm. The two tutorial sections (T1 and T2) will alternate weeks for labs. Lab descriptions will be made available on this web site the week before the lab, and lab reports are to be submitted at the tutorial the week after the lab. The majority of the labs will be Matlab/Simulink based simulations that can also be performed outside of lab hours, but the TAs will only provide assistance during lab hours.
12 Weekly Homework: There will be 10 weekly homework assignments. Homework assignments will be given out at the end of the tutorial each week, and homework reports are to be submitted at the start of the tutorial the following week. TBA Project:
13 Policy Reminders: The Faculty of Engineering is concerned with ensuring an environment that is free of all adverse discrimination. If there is a problem, that cannot be resolved by discussion among the persons concerned, individuals are reminded they should contact the Departmental Chair, the Sexual Harassment Officer or the Human Rights Consultant, as soon as possible. Students are reminded that they should read and comply with the Statement on Academic Ethics and the Senate Resolutions on Academic Dishonesty as found in the Senate Policy Statements distributed at registration and available at the senate office.
14 Chapter 2 Introduction to the Principles of Feedback Topics to be covered include: An industrial motivational example; A statement of the fundamental nature of the control problem; The idea of inversion as the central ingredient in solving control problems; Evolution from open loop inversion to closed loop feedback solutions.
15 We will see that feedback is a key tool that can be used to modify the behaviour of a system. This behaviour altering effect of feedback is a key mechanism that control engineers exploit deliberately to achieve the objective of acting on a system to ensure that the desired performance specifications are achieved.
16 A motivating industrial example We first present a simplified, yet essentially authentic, example of an industrial control problem. The example, taken from the steel industry, is of a particular nature, however the principal elements of specifying a desired behaviour, modeling and the necessity for trade-off decisions are generic.
17 Photograph of Bloom Caster
18 Process schematic of an Industrial Bloom Caster
19 Continuous caster. Typical bloom (left) and simplified diagram (right) tundish with molten steel t l control valve mould primary cooling w continuously withdrawn, semi-solid strand
20 Operators viewing the mould
21 The cast strip in the secondary cooling chamber
22 Performance specifications The key performance goals for this problem are: Safety: Clearly, the mould level must never be in danger of overflowing or emptying as either case would result in molten metal spilling with disastrous consequences. Profitability: Aspects which contribute to this requirement include: Product quality Maintenance Throughput
23 Modeling To make progress on the control system design problem, it is first necessary to gain an understanding of how the process operates. This understanding is typically expressed in the form of a mathematical model. q h* h( t) v( t) σ ( t) q in out ( t) ( t) : : : : : : commanded level of steel in mould actual level of steel in mould valve position casting speed inflow of matter into the mould outflow of matter from the mould
24 Model as simple tank Molten Steel Tundish Valve Mould Level Cooling Water
25 Block diagram of the simplified mould level dynamics, sensors and actuators These variables are related as shown below: Casting speed measurement Inflow from control valve + Outflow due to casting speed Measured mould level + Mould level + Meas. noise
26 Feedback and Feedforward We will find later that the core idea in control is that of inversion. Moreover, inversion can be conveniently achieved by the use of two key mechanisms (namely, feedback and feedforward).
27 Figure 2.4: Model of the simplified mould level control with feedforward compensation for casting speed Suggested Control Strategy: Commanded mould level + K 1 Casting speed measurement K Inflow from control valve Outflow due to casting speed + Mould level Meas. noise Measured mould level + Note that this controller features joint feedback and a preemptive action (feedforward).
28 A first indication of trade-offs On simulating the performance of the above control loop for K=1 and K=5, see Figure 2.5, we find that the smaller controller gain (K=1) results in a slower response to a change in the mould level set-point. On the other hand, the larger controller gain (K=5), results in a faster response but also increases the effects of measurement noise as seen by the less steady level control and by the significantly more aggressive valve movements.
29 Figure 2.5: A first indication of trade-offs: Increased responsiveness to set-point changes also increases sensitivity to measurement noise and actuator wear. 1.4 Mould level K=5 K= Valve command K=1 0 K= Time [s]
30 Question We may ask if these trade-offs are unavoidable or whether we could improve on the situation by such measures as: better modelling more sophisticated control system design This will be the subject of the rest of our deliberations. (Aside: Actually the trade-off is fundamental as we shall see presently).
31 Definition of the control problem Abstracting from the above particular problem, we can introduce: Definition 2.1: The central problem in control is to find a technically feasible way to act on a given process so that the process behaves, as closely as possible, to some desired behaviour. Furthermore, this approximate behaviour should be achieved in the face of uncertainty of the process and in the presence of uncontrollable external disturbances acting on the process.
32 Prototype solution to the control problem via inversion One particularly simple, yet insightful way of thinking about control problems is via inversion. To describe this idea we argue as follows: say that we know what effect an action at the input of a system produces at the output, and say that we have a desired behaviour for the system output, then one simply needs to invert the relationship between input and output to determine what input action is necessary to achieve the desired output behaviour.
33 Figure 2.6: Conceptual controller The above idea is captured in the following diagram: d r + f 1 u f + + y Conceptual controller Plant
34 We will actually find that the inverse solution given on the last slide holds very generally. Thus, all controllers implicitly generate an inverse of the process, in so far that this is feasible. However, the details of controllers will differ with respect to the mechanism used to generate the required approximate inverse.
35 High gain feedback and inversion We next observe that there is a rather intriguing property of feedback, namely that it implicitly generates an approximate inverse of dynamic transformations, without the inversion having to be carried out explicitly. r u y h Plant + z f Figure 2.7: Realisation of conceptual controller The loop implements an approximate inverse of f ο, i.e. u = f r, if r - h -1 u r
36 Chapter 2 Specifically, u f r h z r h u = = or u f r u h = 1 Hence r f u h r f u = Provided is small, i.e. is high gain. u h 1 h
37 The above equation is satisfied if h -1 u is large. We conclude that an approximate inverse is generated provided we place the model of the system in a high gain feedback loop.
38 Example 2.3 Assume that a plant can be described by the model dy( t) + 2 dt y( t) = u( t) and that a control law is required to ensure that y(t) follows a slowly varying reference. One way to solve this problem is to construct an inverse for the model which is valid in the low frequency region. Using the architecture in Figure 2.7, we obtain an approximate inverse, provided that h ο has large gain in the low frequency region.
39 Figure 2.8: Tank level control using approximate inversion Simulating the resultant controller gives the results below: 2 Ref. and plant output r(t) y(t) Time [s]
40 From open to closed loop architectures Unfortunately, the above methodology will not lead to a satisfactory solution to the control problem unless: the model on which the design of the controller has been based is a very good representation of the plant, the model and its inverse are stable, and disturbances and initial conditions are negligible. We are thus motivated to find an alternative solution to the problem which retains the key features but which does not suffer from the above drawbacks.
41 Figure 2.9: Open loop control with built-in inverse r(t) + Feedback gain A u(t) Plant y(t) Model Open loop controller Figure 2.10: Closed loop control r(t) + e(t) u(t) A y(t) Feedback gain Plant
42 The first thing to note is that, provided the model represents the plant exactly, and that all signals are bounded (i.e. the loop is stable), then both schemes are equivalent, regarding the relation between r(t) and y(t). The key differences are due to disturbances and different initial conditions. In the open loop control scheme the controller incorporates feedback internally, i.e. a signal at point A is fed back.
43 In the closed loop scheme, the feedback signal depends on what is actually happening in the plant since the true plant output is used. We will see later that this modified architecture has many advantages including: insensitivity to modelling errors; insensitivity to disturbances in the plant (that are not reflected in the model).
44 For example, if a plant disturbance leads to a non-zero error e(t), in Figure 2.10, then high gain feedback will result in a very large control action u(t). This may lie outside the available input range and thus invalidate the solution. Chapter 2 Trade-offs involved in choosing the feedback gain The preliminary insights of the previous two sections would seem to imply that all that is needed to generate a controller is to put high gain feedback around the plant. This is true in so far that it goes. However, nothing in life is cost free and this also applies to the use of high gain feedback.
45 Another potential problem with high gain feedback is that it is often accompanied by the very substantial risk of instability. Instability is characterised by self sustaining (or growing) oscillations. As an illustration, the reader will probably have witnessed the high pitch whistling sound that is heard when a loudspeaker is placed too close to a microphone. This is a manifestation of instability resulting from excessive feedback gain. Tragic manifestations of instability include aircraft crashes and the Chernobyl disaster in which a runaway condition occurred.
46 Yet another potential disadvantage of high loop gain was hinted at in the mould level example. There we saw that increasing the controller gain lead to increased sensitivity to measurement noise. (Actually, this turns out to be generically true).
47 In summary, high loop gain is desirable from many perspectives but it is also undesirable when viewed from other perspectives. Thus, when choosing the feedback gain one needs to make a conscious tradeoff between competing issues.
48 The previous discussion can be summarised in the following statement: High loop gain gives approximate inversion which is the essence of control. However, in practice, the choice of feedback gain is part of a complex web of design trade-offs. Understanding and balancing these trade-offs is the essence of control system design.
49 Measurements Finally, we discuss the issue of measurements (i.e. what it is we use to generate the feedback signal). A more accurate description of the feedback control loop including sensors is shown in Figure 2.11.
50 Figure 2.11: Closed loop control with sensors r(t) + Controller u(t) Plant A y(t) y m (t) Measurement and signal transmission system
51 Desirable attributes of sensors Reliability. It should operate within the necessary range. Accuracy. For a variable with a constant value, the measurement should settle to the correct value. Responsiveness. If the variable changes, the measurement should be able to follow the changes. Slow responding measurements can, not only affect the quality of control but can actually make the feedback loop unstable. Loop instability may arise even though the loop has been designed to be stable assuming an exact measurement of the process variable.
52 Noise immunity. The measurement system, including the transmission path, should not be significantly affected by exogenous signals such as measurement noise. Linearity. If the measurement system is not linear, then at least the nonlinearity should be known so that it can be compensated. Non intrusive. The measuring device should not significantly affect the behaviour of the plant.
53 Figure 2.12: Typical feedback loop In summary, a typical feedback loop (including sensor issues) is shown below. Referenceof Desired value output Controller Control signal Actuators Disturbances System Actual output Measurements Sensors Measurement noise
Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic: Guidance and Control Introduction and PID Loops Dr. Kostas Alexis (CSE) Autonomous Robot Challenges How do I control where to go? Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic:
CHEE 319 Process Dynamics and Control Winter 2012 Instructor: M.Guay TAs: S. Dougherty, D. Park and E. Moshksar 1 Organization Instructor: Dr. Martin Guay Office: Dupuis 406 Phone: 533-2788 Email: email@example.com
RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 Open-Loop Process The study of dynamics was limited to open-loop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
Control Systems I Lecture 1: Introduction Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 1, Guzzella Ch. 1 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 22, 2017 E. Frazzoli
Design of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process D.Angeline Vijula #, Dr.N.Devarajan * # Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering Sri Ramakrishna
Control of MIMO processes Control of Multiple-Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes Statistical Process Control Feedforward and ratio control Cascade control Split range and selective control Control
Process Dynamics The Fundamental Principle of Process Control APC Techniques Dynamics 2-1 Page 2-1 Process Dynamics (1) All Processes are dynamic i.e. they change with time. If a plant were totally static
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
Amme 35 : System Dynamics Control State Space Design Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 1 Mar Introduction 2 8 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 15 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane
CDS 110b: Lecture 2-1 Linear Quadratic Regulators Richard M. Murray 11 January 2006 Goals: Derive the linear quadratic regulator and demonstrate its use Reading: Friedland, Chapter 9 (different derivation,
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8- am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total
Modeling and Control Overview D R. T A R E K A. T U T U N J I A D V A N C E D C O N T R O L S Y S T E M S M E C H A T R O N I C S E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T P H I L A D E L P H I A U N I
Feedback Basics David M. Auslander Mechanical Engineering University of California at Berkeley copyright 1998, D.M. Auslander 1 I. Feedback Control Context 2 What is Feedback Control? Measure desired behavior
ME 132, Dynamic Systems and Feedback Class Notes by Andrew Packard, Kameshwar Poolla & Roberto Horowitz Spring 2005 Instructor: Prof. A Packard Department of Mechanical Engineering University of California
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
Chemistry 14C: Structure of Organic Molecules - Winter 2017 Version 56 Instructor: Dr. Steven A. Hardinger Office: Young Hall 3077C email@example.com Office hours: Monday and Tuesday 2:00-2:50 PM Teaching
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch. 2-3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli
Control Systems II ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017 Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded Control
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
Course Goal: CHEN 205 - Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics I, Credit 3 (3-0) Spring 2009, TuTh 9:35 10:50, Brown 102 (a) To introduce students to the fundamental concepts and laws of thermodynamics; and
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II firstname.lastname@example.org Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
Systems Engineering/Process Control L1 What is Systems Engineering/Process Control? Graphical system representations Fundamental control principles Reading: Systems Engineering and Process Control: 1.1
Physics 1303.010 Fundamentals of Astronomy Course Information Meeting Place & Time ASU Planetarium (VIN P-02) TR 09:30-10:45 AM Spring 2018 Instructor Dr. Kenneth Carrell Office: VIN 119 Phone: (325) 942-2136
FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and Closed-Loop Control Systems 3. Why Closed-Loop Control? 4. Case Study --- Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. Steady-State Errors in Unity Feedback Control
Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (5-59-L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages
Introduction to Systems Theory and Control Systems Paula Raica Department of Automation Dorobantilor Str., room C21, tel: 0264-401267 Baritiu Str., room C14, tel: 0264-202368 email: Paula.Raica@aut.utcluj.ro
Spring 2015 MECH 2311 INTRODUCTION TO THERMAL FLUID SCIENCES Course Description Instructor An introduction to basic concepts of thermodynamics and fluid mechanics to include properties, property relationships,
Switching Theory and Logical Design - Class Schedule Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday May 7 8 9 - Class 2 - Class 2 2 24 - Class 3 25 26 - Class 4 27 28 Quiz Commencement 3 June 2 - Class 5 3 -
Dynamics and PID control Sigurd Skogestad Process dynamics Things take time Step response (response of output y to step in input u): k = Δy( )/ Δu process gain - process time constant (63%) - process time
Pitch Rate CAS Design Project Washington University in St. Louis MAE 433 Control Systems Bob Rowe 4.4.7 Design Project Part 2 This is the second part of an ongoing project to design a control and stability
EL2520 Control Theory and Practice Lecture 8: Linear quadratic control Mikael Johansson School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Stockholm, Sweden Linear quadratic control Allows to compute the controller
SYLLABUS AS 102 - The Astronomical Universe Prof. Merav Opher - Fall 2013 Course Catalog Summary: The birth and death of stars; red giants, white dwarfs, black holes; our galaxy, the Milky Way, and other
Syllabus, General Chemistry I, CHM 1142 Section TCAA, Fall, 2008 McCall Hall, Room 318 MWF 9:00-9:50 AM Instructor: Dr. Christopher King, email@example.com Office: McCall 315, (334)670 3576. My office hours
Welcome to Physics 211! General Physics I Physics 211 Fall 2015 Lecture 01-1 1 Physics 215 Honors & Majors Are you interested in becoming a physics major? Do you have a strong background in physics and
Department of Chemistry CHEM 3640 Fall 2015 Chemistry of the Elements I Lecturer: Marcel Schlaf Lab-coordinator: Robert Reed MACN 339, x 53002, firstname.lastname@example.org SCI 3108, x 53805, email@example.com
Simulation Study on Pressure Control using Nonlinear Input/Output Linearization Method and Classical PID Approach Ufuk Bakirdogen*, Matthias Liermann** *Institute for Fluid Power Drives and Controls (IFAS),
WEST LOS ANGELES COLLEGE Introduction to General Chemistry CHEMISTRY 60 SYLLABUS; 5 units SPRING 2014; Section 3492 Instructor Information Instructor E-mail Lecture Room MSA 005 Laboratory Session Room
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
PID Control Objectives The objective of this lab is to study basic design issues for proportional-integral-derivative control laws. Emphasis is placed on transient responses and steady-state errors. The
EE C128 / ME C134 Feedback Control Systems Lecture Additional Material Introduction to Model Predictive Control Maximilian Balandat Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science University of
Introduction to Engineering Analysis - ENGR1100 Course Description and Syllabus Monday / Thursday Sections Fall 2010 All course materials are available on the RPI Learning Management System (LMS) website.
ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 Design and Decoupling of Control System for a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) Georgeous, N.B *1 and Gasmalseed, G.A, Abdalla, B.K (1-2) University
Morpheus: Neo, sooner or later you re going to realize, just as I did, that there s a difference between knowing the path, and walking the path. Why CS 53? Making linear algebra more concrete. Making it
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
5.0 context and direction In esson 4, we encountered instability. We think of stability as a mathematical property of our linear system models. Now we will embed this mathematical notion within the practical
Teaching State Variable Feedback to Technology Students Using MATLAB and SIMULINK Kathleen A.K. Ossman, Ph.D. University of Cincinnati Session 448 I. Introduction This paper describes a course and laboratory
ME264 Thermodynamics Spring 2016 Syllabus Instructor: Dr. Özgür Uğraş Baran 1 Course Information Basic Information Required or elective Course Credit (Hours/ECTS credits) Required (3-0-0/6) Class Hours
KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Introduction to Model Order Reduction Lecture 1: Introduction and overview Henrik Sandberg, Bart Besselink, Madhu N. Belur Overview of Today s Lecture What is model (order)
Solutions for Tutorial 3 Modelling of Dynamic Systems 3.1 Mixer: Dynamic model of a CSTR is derived in textbook Example 3.1. From the model, we know that the outlet concentration of, C, can be affected
On an internal multimodel control for nonlinear multivariable systems A comparative study Nahla Touati Karmani Dhaou Soudani Mongi Naceur Mohamed Benrejeb Abstract An internal multimodel control designed
ECE 516: System Control Engineering This course focuses on the analysis and design of systems control. This course will introduce time-domain systems dynamic control fundamentals and their design issues
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES 3700 Introduction to Spatial Information for Environment and Natural Resources COURSE INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Kris Jaeger Assistant Professor 359 Kottman Hall (Mondays and Tuesdays)
LAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK NATURAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT SCC105: Introduction to Chemistry Fall I 2014 Your Instructor's name Your Instructor's contact information Course Description:
ME 132, Spring 2005, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 18 4 Arithmetic of Feedback Loops Many important guiding principles of feedback control systems can be derived from the arithmetic relations, along with their
Faculty of Mechanical and Power Engineering Dr inŝ. JANUSZ LICHOTA CONTROL SYSTEMS PID controllers, part I Wrocław 2007 CONTENTS Controller s classification PID controller what is it? Typical controller
Learn2Control Laboratory Version 3.2 Summer Term 2014 1 This Script is for use in the scope of the Process Control lab. It is in no way claimed to be in any scientific way complete or unique. Errors should
Feedback: Still the simplest and best solution Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian Univ. of Science and Tech. (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract Most engineers are
Observer design for rotating shafts excited by unbalances R. S. Schittenhelm, Z. Wang, S. Rinderknecht Institute for Mechatronic Systems in Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Southwestern College CHEM 170-60/62 Preparation for General Chemistry Spring Semester 2012 Professor David R. Brown, Ph.D. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Class Meetings Lecture MW 5:00 p.m.
Today s Outline Biostatistics 602 - Statistical Inference Lecture 01 Introduction to Principles of Hyun Min Kang Course Overview of January 10th, 2013 Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 01 January
Computation of Stabilizing PI and PID parameters for multivariable system with time delays Nour El Houda Mansour, Sami Hafsi, Kaouther Laabidi Laboratoire d Analyse, Conception et Commande des Systèmes
AUTOMATYKA/AUTOMATICS 214 Vol. 18 No. 2 http://dx.doi.org/1.7494/automat.184.108.40.206 Bartosz Kania, Tomasz Dziwiński, Waldemar Bauer, Marta Zagórowska, Jerzy Baranowski A Comparison between Integer Order
APPLICAION OF ADAPIVE CONROLLER O WAER HYDRAULIC SERVO CYLINDER Hidekazu AKAHASHI*, Kazuhisa IO** and Shigeru IKEO** * Division of Science and echnology, Graduate school of SOPHIA University 7- Kioicho,
World Applied Sciences Journal 14 (9): 1306-1312, 2011 ISSN 1818-4952 IDOSI Publications, 2011 Design Artificial Nonlinear Controller Based on Computed Torque like Controller with Tunable Gain Samira Soltani
MIMO robustness MIMO analysis: loop-at-a-time y 1 y 2 P (s) + + K 2 (s) r 1 r 2 K 1 (s) Plant: P (s) = 1 s 2 + α 2 s α 2 α(s + 1) α(s + 1) s α 2. (take α = 10 in the following numerical analysis) Controller:
Module - CE 2042 Soil Mechanics and Geology-1 Assignment Tests for Particle Size Distribution Analysis Marks 10% Learning Ability to conduct particle size distribution analysis of soils Outcome Ability
Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Introduction Introduce a linear algebra tool: singular values of a matrix Motivation Why do we need singular values in MIMO control
328 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL 7, NO 3, MAY 1999 A Control Engineer s Guide to Sliding Mode Control K David Young, Senior Member, IEEE, Vadim I Utkin, Senior Member, IEEE, and
Tuning of Internal Model Control Proportional Integral Derivative Controller for Optimized Control Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of Degree of MASTER OF ENGINEERING
Competences The smart choice of Fluid Control Systems Contents 1. Open-loop and closed-loop control Page 4 1.1. Function and sequence of an open-loop control system Page 4 1.2. Function and sequence of
Recitation : Time delays Emilio Frazzoli Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology November, 00. Introduction and motivation. Delays are incurred when the controller
CE1 ENGINEERING MECHANICS - DYNAMICS Instructor JORGE A. RAMÍREZ, PH.D. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR Water Resources, Hydrologic and Environmental Sciences Division Civil Engineering Department A Engineering Bldg.