Mechanics of Irregular Honeycomb Structures


 Noel Townsend
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Mechanics of Irregular Honeycomb Structures S. Adhikari 1, T. Mukhopadhyay 1 Chair of Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK Sixth International Congress on Computational Design Optimization and Simulation, 216, IIT Bombay, India Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 1
2 Outline 1 Introduction Regular Honeycomb 2 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Poisson s ratio ν 12 Poisson s ratio ν 21 Shear modulus (G 12 ) 3 Uncertainty modelling and simulation 4 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Main observations 5 Conclusions Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 2
3 Swansea University Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 3
4 Swansea University Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 4
5 Introduction Lattice structures Lattice structures are abundant in manmade and natural systems at various length scales Lattice structures are made of periodic identical/nearidentical geometric units Among various lattice geometries (triangle, square, rectangle, pentagon, hexagon), hexagonal lattice is most common (note that hexagon is the highest space filling pattern in 2D). This talk is about inplane elastic properties of 2D hexagonal lattice structures  commonly known as honeycombs Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 5
6 Lattice structures  nano scale Introduction Single layer graphene sheet and born nitride nano sheet Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 6
7 Introduction Lattice structures  nature Top left: cork, top right: balsa, next down left: sponge, next down right: trabecular bone, next down left: coral, next down right: cuttlefish bone, bottom left: leaf tissue, bottom right: plant stem, third column  epidermal cells (from web.mit.edu) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 7
8 Introduction Lattice structures  man made (a) Automotive: BMW i3 (c) Civil engineering: building frame Adhikari (Swansea) (b) Aerospace carbon fibre (d) Architecture Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 8
9 Introduction Some questions of general interest Shall we consider lattices as structures or materials from a mechanics point of view? At what relative lengthscale a lattice structure can be considered as a material with equivalent elastic properties? In what ways structural irregularities mess up equivalent elastic properties? Can we evaluate it in a quantitative as well as in a qualitative manner? What is the consequence of random structural irregularities on the homogenisation approach in general? Can we obtain statistical measures? Is there any underlying ergodic behaviour for large random lattices so that ensemble statistics is close to a sample statistics? How large is large? How can we efficiently compute equivalent elastic properties of random lattice structures? Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 9
10 Introduction Regular lattice structures Honeycombs have been modelled as a continuous solid with an equivalent elastic moduli throughout its domain. This approach eliminates the need of detail finite element modelling of honeycombs in complex structural systems like sandwich structures. Extensive amount of research has been carried out to predict the equivalent elastic properties of regular honeycombs consisting of perfectly periodic hexagonal cells (ElSayed et al., 1979; Gibson and Ashby, 1999; Goswami, 26; Masters and Evans, 1996; Zhang and Ashby, 1992). Analysis of two dimensional honeycombs dealing with inplane elastic properties are commonly based on unit cell approach, which is applicable only for perfectly periodic cellular structures. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 1
11 Introduction Regular Honeycomb Equivalent elastic properties of regular honeycombs Unit cell approach  Gibson and Ashby (1999) (e) Regular hexagon (θ = 3 ) (f) Unit cell We are interested in homogenised equivalent inplane elastic properties This way, we can avoid a detailed structural analysis considering all the beams and treat it as a material Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
12 Introduction Regular Honeycomb Equivalent elastic properties of regular honeycombs The cell walls are treated as beams of thickness t, depth b and Young s modulus E s. l and h are the lengths of inclined cell walls having inclination angle θ and the vertical cell walls respectively. The equivalent elastic properties are: ( ) 3 t cos θ E 1 = E s l ( h l + sin θ) sin 2 (1) θ ( ) 3 t ( h l + sin θ) E 2 = E s l cos 3 (2) θ cos 2 θ ν 12 = ( h l + sin θ) sin θ ν 21 = ( h l + sin θ) sin θ cos 2 (4) θ ( ) 3 ( t h l + sin θ ) G 12 = E s l ( h ) 2 (5) l (1 + 2 h l ) cos θ (3) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
13 Introduction Regular Honeycomb Finite element modelling and verification A finite element code has been developed to obtain the inplane elastic moduli numerically for honeycombs. Each cell wall has been modelled as an EulerBernoulli beam element having three degrees of freedom at each node. For E 1 and ν 12 : two opposite edges parallel to direction2 of the entire honeycomb structure are considered. Along one of these two edges, uniform stress parallel to direction1 is applied while the opposite edge is restrained against translation in direction1. Remaining two edges (parallel to direction1) are kept free. For E 2 and ν 21 : two opposite edges parallel to direction1 of the entire honeycomb structure are considered. Along one of these two edges, uniform stress parallel to direction2 is applied while the opposite edge is restrained against translation in direction2. Remaining two edges (parallel to direction2) are kept free. For G 12 : uniform shear stress is applied along one edge keeping the opposite edge restrained against translation in direction1 and 2, while the remaining two edges are kept free. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
14 Introduction Regular Honeycomb Finite element modelling and verification Ratio of elastic modulus E 1 E 2 ν 12 ν 21 G Number of unit cells θ = 3, h/l = 1.5. FE results converge to analytical predictions after 1681 cells. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
15 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Irregular lattice structures (g) Cedar wood (h) Manufactured honeycomb core (i) Graphene image (j) Fabricated CNT surface Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
16 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Irregular lattice structures A significant limitation of the aforementioned unit cell approach is that it cannot account for the spatial irregularity, which is practically inevitable. Spatial irregularity in honeycomb may occur due to manufacturing uncertainty, structural defects, variation in temperature, prestressing and microstructural variability in honeycombs. To include the effect of irregularity, voronoi honeycombs have been considered in several studies (Li et al., 25; Zhu et al., 21, 26). The effect of different forms of irregularity on elastic properties and structural responses of honeycombs are generally based on direct finite element (FE) simulation. In the FE approach, a small change in geometry of a single cell may require completely new geometry and meshing of the entire structure. In general this makes the entire process timeconsuming and tedious. The problem becomes even worse for uncertainty quantification of the responses associated with irregular honeycombs, where the expensive finite element model is needed to be simulated for a large number of samples while using a Monte Carlo based approach. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
17 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Irregular lattice structures Direct numerical simulation to deal with irregularity in honeycombs may not necessarily provide proper understanding of the underlying physics of the system. An analytical approach could be a simple, insightful, yet an efficient way to obtain effective elastic properties of honeycombs. This work develops a structural mechanics based analytical framework for predicting equivalent inplane elastic properties of irregular honeycomb having spatially random variations in cell angles. Closedform analytical expressions will be derived for equivalent inplane elastic properties. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
18 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs The philosophy of the analytical approach for irregular honeycombs The key idea to obtain the effective inplane elastic moduli of the entire irregular honeycomb structure is that it is considered to be consisted of several Representative Unit Cell Elements (RUCE) having different individual elastic moduli. The expressions for elastic moduli of a RUCE is derived first and subsequently the expressions for effective inplane elastic moduli of the entire irregular honeycomb are derived by assembling the individual elastic moduli of these RUCEs using basic principles of mechanics (divide and concur!). Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
19 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) To derive the expression of longitudinal Young s modulus for a RUCE (E 1U ), stress σ 1 is applied in direction1 as shown below: (k) (l) Figure: RUCE and freebody diagram used in the analysis for E 1 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
20 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) Elastic property of a representative unit cell element (RUCE) The inclined cell walls having inclination angle α and β do not have any contribution in the analysis, as the stresses applied on them in two opposite directions neutralise each other. The remaining structure except these two inclined cell walls is symmetric. The applied stresses cause the inclined cell walls having inclination angle θ to bend. From the condition of equilibrium, the vertical forces C in the freebody diagram of these cell walls need to be zero. The cell walls are treated as beams of thickness t, depth b and Young s modulus E s. l and h are the lengths of inclined cell walls having inclination angle θ and the vertical cell walls respectively. Therefore, we have where M = Pl sin θ 2 (6) P = σ 1 (h + l sin θ)b (7) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 2
21 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) Elastic property of a representative unit cell element (RUCE) From the standard beam theory, the deflection of one end compared to the other end of the cell wall can be expressed as δ = Pl3 sin θ 12E s I (8) where I is the second moment of inertia of the cell wall, that is I = bt 3 /12. The component of δ parallel to direction1 is δ sin θ. The strain parallel to direction1 becomes ɛ 1 = δ sin θ (9) l cos θ Thus the Young s modulus in direction1 for a RUCE can be expressed as E 1U = σ 1 ɛ 1 = E s ( ) 3 t cos θ ( ) l h + sin θ sin 2 θ l (1) Next we use this to obtain E 1 for the entire structure. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
22 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb (b) Idealized j th strip (a) Entire idealized irregular honeycomb structure (c) Idealized i th cell in j th strip Figure: Freebody diagrams of idealized irregular honeycomb structure in the proposed analysis of E 1 The entire irregular honeycomb structure is assumed to have m and n number of RUCEs in direction1 and direction2 respectively. A particular cell having position at i th column and j th row is represented as (i,j), where i = 1, 2,..., m and j = 1, 2,..., n. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
23 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb To obtain E 1eq, stress σ 1 is applied in direction1. If the deformation compatibility condition of j th strip (as highlighted in the figure) is considered, the total deformation due to stress σ 1 of that particular strip ( 1 ) is the summation of individual deformations of each RUCEs in direction1, while deformation of each of these RUCEs in direction2 is the same. Thus for the j th strip 1 = The equation (11) can be rewritten as m 1ij (11) i=1 ɛ 1 L = m ɛ 1ij L ij (12) i=1 where ɛ 1 and L represent strain and dimension in direction1 of respective elements. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
24 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb Equation (12) leads to σ 1 L = Eˆ 1j m i=1 σ 1 L ij E 1Uij (13) From equation (13), equivalent Young s modulus of j th strip ( E ˆ 1j ) can be expressed as m ˆ E 1j = i=1 m i=1 l ij cos θ ij l ij cos θ ij E 1Uij where θ ij is the inclination angle of the cell walls having length l ij in the RUCE positioned at (i,j). (14) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
25 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb After obtaining the Young s moduli of n number of strips, they are assembled to achieve the equivalent Young s modulus of the entire irregular honeycomb structure (E 1eq ) using force equilibrium and deformation compatibility conditions. σ 1 Bb = n σ 1j B j b (15) j=1 where B j is the dimension of j th strip in direction2 and B = n B j. b represents the depth of honeycomb. As strains in direction1 for each of the n strips are same to satisfy the deformation compatibility condition, equation (15) leads to n n E 1eq = Eˆ 1j B j (16) B j j=1 j=1 j=1 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
26 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Longitudinal Young s modulus (E 1 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb Using equation (14) and equation (16), equivalent Young s modulus in direction1 of the entire irregular honeycomb structure (E 1eq ) can be expressed as: Equivalent E 1 E 1eq = 1 n B j j=1 m n l ij cos θ ij i=1 m l ij cos θ ij B j (17) j=1 E 1Uij i=1 Here Young s modulus in direction1 of a RUCE positioned at (i,j) is E 1Uij, which can be obtained from equation (1) as ( ) 3 t cos θ E 1Uij = E s ( ) ij (18) l ij h + sin θ ij sin 2 θ ij l ij Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
27 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) To derive the expression of transverse Young s modulus for a RUCE (E 2U ), stress σ 2 is applied in direction2 as shown below: (a) (b) (c) Figure: RUCE and freebody diagram used in the proposed analysis for E 2 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
28 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Elastic property of a representative unit cell element (RUCE) Total deformation of the RUCE in direction2 consists of three components, namely deformation of the cell wall having inclination angle α, deformation of the cell walls having inclination angle θ and deformation of the cell wall having inclination angle β. If the remaining structure except the two inclined cell walls having inclination angle α and β is considered, two forces that act at joint B are W and M 1. For the cell wall having inclination angle α, effect of the bending moment M 1 generated due to application of W at point D is only to create rotation (φ) at the joint B. Vertical deformation of the cell wall having inclination angle α has two components, bending deformation in direction2 and rotational deformation due the rotation of joint B. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
29 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Elastic property of a representative unit cell element (RUCE) After some algebra and mechanics, the total deformation in direction2 of the RUCE due to the application of stresses σ 2 is δ v = σ 2l cos θ E s t ( 3 ( cos 2l 3 cos 2 θ + 8s 3 2 ) ) α sin 3 α + cos2 β sin 3 + 2s 2 l(cot 2 α + cot 2 β) β (19) The strain in direction2 can be obtained as ɛ 2 = δ v h + 2s + 2l sin θ (2) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
30 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Elastic property of a representative unit cell element (RUCE) Therefore, the Young s modulus in direction2 of a RUCE can be expressed as E 2U = σ 2 ɛ 2 = E s ( ) 3 t l ( ( s cos θ 2 cos 2 θ + 8 l ( h + 2 s l l ) 3 ( cos 2 α sin 3 α + cos2 β sin 3 β ) + 2 sin θ ) ( s ) (cot 2 α + cot β)) 2 l (21) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 3
31 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb To derive the expression of equivalent Young s modulus in direction2 for the entire irregular honeycomb structure (E 2eq ), the Young s moduli for the constituting RUCEs (E 2U ) are assembled. (b) Idealized j th strip (a) Entire idealized irregular honeycomb structure (c) Idealized i th cell in j th strip Figure: Freebody diagrams of idealized irregular honeycomb structure Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
32 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb When the force equilibrium under the application of stress σ 2 of j th strip (as highlighted in 4(b)) is considered: ( m ) ( m ) σ 2 2l ij cos θ ij b = σ 2ij 2l ij cos θ ij b (22) i=1 By deformation compatibility condition, strains of each RUCE in direction2 of the j th strip are same. Equation (22), rewritten as ( m ) ( m ) Eˆ 2j l ij cos θ ij ɛ = E 2Uij l ij cos θ ij ɛ ij i=1 where ɛ ij = ɛ, for i = 1, 2...m in the j th strip. Eˆ 2j is the equivalent elastic modulus in direction2 of the j th strip: m ˆ E 2j = i=1 i=1 i=1 E 2Uij l ij cos θ ij (23) (24) m l ij cos θ ij i=1 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
33 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb Total deformation of the entire honeycomb in direction2 ( 2 ) is the sum of deformations of each strips in that direction, n 2 = 2ij (25) Equation (25) can be rewritten as ɛ 2 B = j=1 n ɛ 2j B j (26) where ɛ 2, ɛ 2j and B j represent total strain of the entire honeycomb structure in direction2, strain of j th strip in direction2 and dimension in direction2 of j th strip respectively. From equation (26) we have n σ 2 B j j=1 E 2eq = j=1 n j=1 σ 2 B j ˆ E 2j (27) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
34 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb From equation (24) and equation (27), the Young s modulus in direction2 of the entire irregular honeycomb structure can be expressed as Equivalent E 2 E 2eq = n B j j=1 1 m l ij cos θ ij i=1 m E 2Uij l ij cos θ ij i=1 n B j (28) j=1 Here Young s modulus in direction2 of a RUCE positioned at (i,j) is E 2Uij, which can be obtained from equation (21). Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
35 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Transverse Young s modulus (E 2 ) Special case: classical deterministic results The expressions of Young s moduli for randomly irregular honeycombs (equation (17) and (28)) reduces to the formulae provided by Gibson and Ashby (Gibson and Ashby, 1999) in case of uniform honeycombs (i.e. B 1 = B 2 =... = B n ; s = h/2; α = β = 9 ; l ij = l and θ ij = θ, for all i and j). By applying the conditions B 1 = B 2 =... = B n ; l ij = l and θ ij = θ, equation (17) and (28) reduce to E 1U and E 2U respectively. For s = h/2 and α = β = 9, E 1U and E 2U produce the same expressions for Young s moduli of uniform honeycomb as presented by Gibson and Ashby (Gibson and Ashby, 1999). In the case of regular uniform honeycombs (θ = 3 ) E1 = E ( ) 3 2 t = 2.3 (29) E s E s l where E1 and E 2 denote the Young moduli of uniform regular honeycombs in longitudinal and transverse direction respectively. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
36 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Poisson s ratio ν 12 Poisson s ratio ratio ν 12 Poisson s ratios are calculated by taking the negative ratio of strains normal to, and parallel to, the loading direction. Poisson s ratio of a RUCE for the loading direction1 (ν 12U ) is obtained as ν 12U = ɛ 2 ɛ 1 (3) where ɛ 1 and ɛ 2 represent the strains of a RUCE in direction1 and direction2 respectively due to loading in direction1. ɛ 1 can be obtained from equation (9). From 1(l), ɛ 2 can be expressed as 2δ cos θ ɛ 2 = h + 2l sin θ + 2s Thus the expression for Poisson s ratio of a RUCE for the loading direction1 becomes 2 cos 2 θ ν 12U = ( 2 sin θ + 2 s + h l l ) sin θ (31) (32) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
37 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Poisson s ratio ν 12 Poisson s ratio of the entire irregular honeycomb To derive the expression of equivalent Poisson s ratio for loading direction1 of the entire irregular honeycomb structure (ν 12eq ), the Poisson s ratios for the constituting RUCEs (ν 12U ) are assembled. For obtaining ν 12eq, stress σ 1 is applied in direction1. If the application of stress σ 1 in the j th strip is considered, total deformation of the j th strip in direction1 is summation of individual deformations of the RUCEs in direction1 of that particular strip. Thus from equation (12), using the basic definition of ν 12, ɛ 2 ˆν 12j L = m i=1 ɛ 2ij L ij ν U12ij (33) where ɛ 2 and ɛ 2ij are the strains in direction2 of j th strip and individual RUCEs of j th strip respectively. ν U12ij represents the Poisson s ratio for loading direction1 of a RUCE positioned at (i,j). ˆν 12j denotes the equivalent Poisson s ratio for loading direction1 of the j th strip. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
38 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Poisson s ratio ν 12 Poisson s ratio of the entire irregular honeycomb Ensuring the deformation compatibility condition ɛ 2 = ɛ 2ij for i = 1, 2,..., m in the j th strip, equation (33) leads to ˆν 12j = m L L ij (34) i=1 ν 12Uij Total deformation of the entire honeycomb structure in direction2 under the application of stress σ 1 along the two opposite edges parallel to direction2 is summation of the individual deformations in direction2 of n number of strips. Thus n ɛ 2 B = ɛ 2j B j (35) j=1 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
39 Here ν 12Uij can be obtained from equation (32). Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Poisson s ratio ν 12 Poisson s ratio of the entire irregular honeycomb Using the basic definition of ν 12 equation (35) becomes n ν 12eq ɛ 1 B = ν 12j ɛ 1j B j (36) where ν 12eq represents the equivalent Poisson s ratio for loading direction1 of the entire irregular honeycomb structure. ɛ 1 and ɛ 1j denote the strain of entire honeycomb structure in direction1 and strain of j th strip in direction1 respectively. From the condition of deformation comparability ɛ 1 = ɛ 1j for j = 1, 2,..., n. Thus from equation (34) and equation (36): j=1 Equivalent ν 12 ν 12eq = 1 n B j j=1 m n l ij cos θ ij i=1 m l ij cos θ ij B j (37) j=1 ν 12Uij i=1
40 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Poisson s ratio ν 21 Poisson s ratio ν 21 Poisson s ratio of a RUCE for the loading direction2 (ν 21U ) is obtained as ν 21U = ɛ 1 ɛ 2 (38) where ɛ 1 and ɛ 2 represent the strains of a RUCE in direction1 and direction2 respectively due to loading in direction2. ɛ 2 can be obtained from equation (19) and equation (2) as σ 2 l cos θ ɛ 2 = E s t 3 (h + 2s + 2l sin θ) ( ( cos 2l 3 cos 2 θ + 8s 3 2 ) ) α sin 3 α + cos2 β sin 3 + 2s 2 l(cot 2 α + cot 2 β) β We have with δ 1 = ( ) W 2 cos θ l 3 12E s I ɛ 1 = δ 1 sin θ l cos θ and W = 2σ 2 lb cos θ. (39) (4) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 4
41 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Poisson s ratio ν 21 Poisson s ratio of a representative unit cell element (RUCE) Thus equation (4) reduces to ν 21U = ɛ 1 = σ 2l 3 sin θ cos θ E s t 3 (41) Thus the expression for Poisson s ratio of a RUCE for the loading direction2 becomes ( h sin θ + 2 s ) + 2 sin θ l l ( s ) 3 ( cos 2 2 cos 2 α θ + 8 l sin 3 α + cos2 β sin 3 β ) ( s ) (cot 2 α + cot 2 β) l (42) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
42 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Poisson s ratio ν 21 Poisson s ratio of the entire irregular honeycomb To derive the expression of equivalent Poisson s ratio for loading direction2 of the entire irregular honeycomb structure (ν 21eq ), the Poisson s ratios for the constituting RUCEs (ν 21U ) are assembled. For obtaining ν 21eq, stress σ 2 is applied in direction2. If the application of stress σ 2 in the j th strip is considered, total deformation of the j th strip in direction1 is summation of individual deformations of the RUCEs in direction1 of that particular strip. Thus, ɛ 1 L = Using the basic definition of ν 21 equation (43) leads to ˆν 21j ɛ 2 L = m ɛ 1ij L ij (43) i=1 m ν 21Uij ɛ 2ij L ij (44) where ˆν 21j represents the equivalent Poisson s ratio for loading direction2 of the j th strip. i=1 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
43 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Poisson s ratio ν 21 Poisson s ratio of the entire irregular honeycomb ɛ 2 and ɛ 2ij are the strains in direction2 of j th strip and individual RUCEs of j th strip respectively. ν 21Uij represents the Poisson s ratio for loading direction2 of a RUCE positioned at (i,j). To ensure the deformation compatibility condition ɛ 2 = ɛ 2ij for i = 1, 2,..., m in the j th strip. Thus equation (44) leads to ν 21j ˆ = m ν 21Uij l ij cos θ ij i=1 (45) m l ij cos θ ij i=1 Total deformation of the entire honeycomb structure in direction2 under the application of stress σ 2 along the two opposite edges parallel to direction1 is summation of the individual deformations in direction2 of n number of strips. Thus n ɛ 2 B = ɛ 2j B j (46) j=1 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
44 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Poisson s ratio ν 21 Poisson s ratio of the entire irregular honeycomb By definition of ν 21 equation (46) leads to ɛ 1 ν 21eq B = n j=1 ɛ 1j B j (47) ν 21j ˆ From the condition of deformation comparability ɛ 1 = ɛ 1j for j = 1, 2,..., n. Thus the equivalent Poisson s ratio for loading direction2 of the entire irregular honeycomb structure: Equivalent ν 12 ν 21eq = n B j j=1 1 m l ij cos θ ij i=1 m ν 21Uij l ij cos θ ij i=1 n B j (48) j=1 Here ν 21Uij can be obtained from equation (42). Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
45 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Shear modulus (G 12 ) Shear modulus (G 12 ) To derive the expression of shear modulus (G 12U ) for a RUCE, shear stress τ is applied as shown below: (a) (b) (c) Figure: RUCE and freebody diagram used in the proposed analysis for G 12 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
46 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Shear modulus (G 12 ) Elastic property of a representative unit cell element (RUCE) Total lateral movement of point D with respect to point H can be obtained as δ L = 2τl cos θ Et 3 ( (2ls 2 + h s3 sin α + 1 ) ) + (s + l sin θ)h 2 sin β (49) The shear strain γ for a RUCE can be expressed as δ L γ = 2s + h + 2l sin θ = 2τl cos θ Et 3 (2s + h + 2l sin θ) ( (2ls 2 + h s3 sin α + 1 ) ) (5) + (s + l sin θ)h 2 sin β Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
47 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Shear modulus (G 12 ) Elastic property of a representative unit cell element (RUCE) Thus the expression for shear modulus of a RUCE becomes G 12U = τ γ = Es ( t l ) 3 ( ( s ) 2 ( s 2 cos θ l l ( 2 s l ) + 2 sin θ + h l ) 3 ( 1 sinα + 1 ) + 1 sinβ 2 ( ) 3 h ( s + l l ) ( ) ) 2 h + sin θ l (51) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
48 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Shear modulus (G 12 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb To derive the expression of equivalent shear modulus of the entire irregular honeycomb structure (G 12eq ), the shear moduli for the constituting RUCEs (G 12U ) are assembled : (b) Idealized j th strip (a) Entire idealized irregular honeycomb structure (c) Idealized i th cell in j th strip Figure: Freebody diagrams of idealized irregular honeycomb structure in the proposed analysis of G 12 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
49 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Shear modulus (G 12 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb For obtaining G 12eq, shear stress τ is applied parallel to direction direction1. If the equilibrium of forces for application of stress τ in the j th strip is considered: m τl = τ ij L ij (52) By definition of shear modulus equation (52) can be rewritten as i=1 Ĝ 12j γl = m G 12Uij γ ij L ij (53) i=1 where Ĝ12j represents the equivalent shear modulus of the j th strip. γ and γ ij are the shear strains of j th strip and individual RUCEs of the j th strip respectively. G 12Uij represents the shear modulus of a RUCE positioned at (i,j). Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
50 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Shear modulus (G 12 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb To ensure the deformation compatibility condition γ = γ ij for i = 1, 2,..., m in the j th strip. Thus equation (53) leads to m G 12Uij l ij cos θ ij i=1 Ĝ 12j = (54) m l ij cos θ ij i=1 Total lateral deformation of one edge compared to the opposite edge of the entire honeycomb structure under the application of shear stress τ is the summation of the individual lateral deformations of n number of strips. Thus n γb = γ j B j (55) j=1 By definition of G 12 equation (55) leads to τ n τ j B = B G 12eq Gˆ j (56) 12j j=1 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 5
51 Equivalent elastic properties of random irregular honeycombs Shear modulus (G 12 ) Elastic property of the entire irregular honeycomb From equation (54) and (56), the equivalent shear modulus of the entire irregular honeycomb structure can be expressed as: Equivalent G 12 G 12eq = n B j j=1 1 m l ij cos θ ij i=1 m G 12Uij l ij cos θ ij i=1 n B j (57) j=1 Here G 12Uij can be obtained from equation (51). Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
52 Uncertainty modelling and simulation Computational model and validation The analytical approach is capable of obtaining equivalent inplane elastic properties for irregular honeycombs from known random spatial variation of cell angle and material properties of the honeycomb cells. The homogenised properties depend on the ratios h/l, t/l, s/l and the angles θ, α, β. In addition, the two Young s moduli and shear modulus also depend on E s. We show results for h/l = 1.5 and three values of cell angle θ, namely: 3, 45 and 6. As the two Young s moduli and shear modulus of low density honeycomb are proportional to E s ρ 3 (Zhu et al., 21), the nondimensional results for elastic moduli E 1, E 2, ν 12, ν 21 and G 12 have been obtained using Ē 1 = E 1eq E s ρ 3, Ē 2 = E 2eq E s ρ 3, ν 12 = ν 12eq, ν 21 = ν 21eq and G 12 = G 12eq E s ρ 3 respectively, where. represents the nondimensional elastic modulus and ρ is the relative density of honeycomb (ratio of the planar area of solid to the total planar area of the honeycomb). Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
53 Uncertainty modelling and simulation Computational model and validation (a) θ = 6 (b) θ = 45 Figure: Regular honeycomb with different θ values Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
54 Uncertainty modelling and simulation Computational model and validation For the purpose of finding the range of variation in elastic moduli due to spatial uncertainty, cell angles and material properties can be perturbed following a random distribution within specific bounds. We show results for spatial irregularity in the cell angles only Frequency 1 Frequency Cell angle (a) Distribution of cell angle (θ) Inclination angle α (b) Distribution of the inclination angle (α) Figure: Typical statistical distribution of cell angle (θ) and inclination angle α (number of RUCE: 1681) Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
55 Uncertainty modelling and simulation Computational model and validation The maximum, minimum and mean values of nondimensional inplane elastic moduli for different degree of spatially random variations in cell angles ( θ =, 1, 3, 5, 7 ) are calculated using both direct finite element simulation and the derived closedform expressions. For a particular cell angle θ, results have been obtained using a set of uniformly distributed 1 random samples in the range of [θ θ, θ + θ]. The set of input parameter for a particular sample consists of N number of cell angles in the specified range, where N(= n m) is the total number of RUCEs in the entire irregular honeycomb structure. We used 1681 RUCEs (as this was needed for convergence of the deterministic case). The quantities h and θ have been considered as the two random input parameters while α, β and l are dependent features. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
56 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Longitudinal elastic modulus (E 1 ) θ = 3 o θ = 45 o θ = 6 o Ē Random variation in cell angle (degree) h/l = 1.5, Ē 1 = E 1eq /E sρ Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
57 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Transverse elastic modulus (E 2 ) θ = 3 o θ = 45 o θ = 6 o Ē Random variation in cell angle (degree) h/l = 1.5, Ē 2 = E 2eq /E sρ 3 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
58 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Poisson s ratio ν θ = 3 o θ = 45 o θ = 6 o ν Random variation in cell angle (degree) h/l = 1.5 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
59 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Poisson s ratio ν θ = 3 o θ = 45 o θ = 6 o ν Random variation in cell angle (degree) h/l = 1.5 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
60 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Shear modulus (G 12 ) G θ = 3 o θ = 45 o θ = 6 o Random variation in cell angle (degree) h/l = 1.5, G 12 = G 12eq /E sρ 3 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June 216 6
61 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Probability density function of E 2 Probability density function FEM Analytical Ē 2 h/l = 1.5, Ē 2 = E 2eq /E regular, θ = 45, θ = 5 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
62 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Ergodic behaviour of E 2 : spread of values h/l = 1.5, Ē 2 = E 2eq /E regular, θ = 45, θ = 5 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
63 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Ergodic behaviour of E 2 : coefficient of variation h/l = 1.5, θ = 45, θ = 5 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
64 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Ergodic behaviour of ν 21 : coefficient of variation h/l = 1.5, θ = 45, θ = 5 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
65 Results and discussions Numerical results for the homogenised inplane properties Ergodic behaviour of G 12 : coefficient of variation h/l = 1.5, θ = 45, θ = 5 Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
66 Results and discussions Main observations Main observations The elastic moduli obtained using the analytical method and by finite element simulation are in good agreement  establishing the validity of the closedform expressions. The number of input random variables (cell angle) increase with the number of cells. The variation in E 1 and ν 12 due to spatially random variations in cell angles is very less, while there is considerable amount of reductions in the values of E 2, ν 21 and G 12 with increasing degree of irregularity. Longitudinal Young s modulus, transverse Young s modulus and shear modulus are functions of both structural geometry and material properties of the irregular honeycomb (i.e. ratios h/l, t/l, s/l and angles θ, α, β and E s ), while the Poisson s ratios depend only on structural geometry of irregular honeycombs (i.e. ratios h/l, t/l, s/l and angles θ, α, β) For large number of random cells ( 17), we observe the emergence of an effective ergodic behaviour  ensemble statistics become close to single sample statistics. Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
67 Conclusions Conclusions Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
68 Conclusions Some publications Mukhopadhyay, T. and Adhikari, S., Free vibration of sandwich panels with randomly irregular honeycomb core, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, in press. Mukhopadhyay, T. and Adhikari, S., Equivalent inplane elastic properties of irregular honeycombs: An analytical approach, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 91[8] (216), pp Mukhopadhyay, T. and Adhikari, S., Effective inplane elastic properties of auxetic honeycombs with spatial irregularity, Mechanics of Materials, 95[2] (216), pp Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
69 References ElSayed, F. K. A., Jones, R., Burgess, I. W., A theoretical approach to the deformation of honeycomb based composite materials. Composites 1 (4), Gibson, L., Ashby, M. F., Cellular Solids Structure and Properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Goswami, S., 26. On the prediction of effective material properties of cellular hexagonal honeycomb core. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 25 (4), Li, K., Gao, X. L., Subhash, G., 25. Effects of cell shape and cell wall thickness variations on the elastic properties of twodimensional cellular solids. International Journal of Solids and Structures 42 (56), Masters, I. G., Evans, K. E., Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs. Composite Structures 35 (4), Zhang, J., Ashby, M. F., The outofplane properties of honeycombs. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 34 (6), Zhu, H. X., Hobdell, J. R., Miller, W., Windle, A. H., 21. Effects of cell irregularity on the elastic properties of 2d voronoi honeycombs. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 49 (4), Zhu, H. X., Thorpe, S. M., Windle, A. H., 26. The effect of cell irregularity on the high strain compression of 2d voronoi honeycombs. International Journal of Solids and Structures 43 (5), Adhikari (Swansea) Mechanics of irregular honeycomb structures 28 June
Lecture 4 Honeycombs Notes, 3.054
HoneycombsInplane behavior Lecture 4 Honeycombs Notes, 3.054 Prismatic cells Polymer, metal, ceramic honeycombs widely available Used for sandwich structure cores, energy absorption, carriers for catalysts
More informationFinite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering Short Course on + Dynamics Boulder, Colorado January 58, 2004 Stein Sture Professor of Civil Engineering University of Colorado at Boulder Contents Steps
More informationFig. 1. Circular fiber and interphase between the fiber and the matrix.
Finite element unit cell model based on ABAQUS for fiber reinforced composites Tian Tang Composites Manufacturing & Simulation Center, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47906 1. Problem Statement In
More informationComputational Analysis for Composites
Computational Analysis for Composites Professor Johann Sienz and Dr. Tony Murmu Swansea University July, 011 The topics covered include: OUTLINE Overview of composites and their applications Micromechanics
More informationVORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NONLINEAR MATERIALS
The 4 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 7, 008, Beijing, China VORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NONLINEAR MATERIALS K.
More informationA HIGHERORDER BEAM THEORY FOR COMPOSITE BOX BEAMS
A HIGHERORDER BEAM THEORY FOR COMPOSITE BOX BEAMS A. Kroker, W. Becker TU Darmstadt, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chair of Structural Mechanics Hochschulstr. 1, D64289 Darmstadt, Germany kroker@mechanik.tudarmstadt.de,
More informationMacroscopic Elastic Constitutive Relationship of CastinPlace HollowCore Slabs
Macroscopic Elastic Constitutive Relationship of CastinPlace HollowCore Slabs JingZhong Xie 1 Abstract: The macroscopic Poisson ratio and elastic moduli of the castinplace hollowcore slab are researched
More informationLecture 7, Foams, 3.054
Lecture 7, Foams, 3.054 Opencell foams StressStrain curve: deformation and failure mechanisms Compression  3 regimes  linear elastic  bending  stress plateau  cell collapse by buckling yielding
More informationVIBRATION AND ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE OF INPLANE HONEYCOMB SANDWICH PANELS
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 801 VIBRATION AND ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE OF INPLANE HONEYCOMB SANDWICH PANELS Xiao Gong Clemson University, xiaog@clemson.edu Follow this and additional
More informationGLOBAL AND LOCAL LINEAR BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF A CHIRAL CELLULAR STRUCTURE
GLOBAL AND LOCAL LINEAR BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF A CHIRAL CELLULAR STRUCTURE Alessandro Spadoni, Massimo Ruzzene School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332 Fabrizio Scarpa
More informationPURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.
BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a crosssection of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally
More informationSmallScale Effect on the Static Deflection of a Clamped Graphene Sheet
Copyright 05 Tech Science Press CMC, vol.8, no., pp.037, 05 SmallScale Effect on the Static Deflection of a Clamped Graphene Sheet G. Q. Xie, J. P. Wang, Q. L. Zhang Abstract: Smallscale effect on the
More informationCellular solid structures with unbounded thermal expansion. Roderic Lakes. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 15, (1996).
1 Cellular solid structures with unbounded thermal expansion Roderic Lakes Journal of Materials Science Letters, 15, 475477 (1996). Abstract Material microstructures are presented which can exhibit coefficients
More informationStudy on the influence of design parameter variation on the dynamic behaviour of honeycomb sandwich panels
Study on the influence of design parameter variation on the dynamic behaviour of honeycomb sandwich panels Stijn Debruyne 2, Dirk Vandepitte 1, Eric Debrabandere 2, Marc Hongerloot 2 1 Department of Mechanical
More informationComposite Sandwich Structures with Honeycomb Core subjected to Impact
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 12212 Composite Sandwich Structures with Honeycomb Core subjected to Impact Lei He Clemson University, he6@clemson.edu Follow this and additional works
More informationLab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages
Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages Prelab assignment: Yes No Goals: 1. To evaluate tension and bending stress models and Hooke s Law. a. σ = Mc/I and σ = P/A 2. To determine material
More informationPresented By: EAS 6939 Aerospace Structural Composites
A Beam Theory for Laminated Composites and Application to Torsion Problems Dr. BhavaniV. Sankar Presented By: Sameer Luthra EAS 6939 Aerospace Structural Composites 1 Introduction Composite beams have
More informationMechanics of Inflatable Fabric Beams
Copyright c 2008 ICCES ICCES, vol.5, no.2, pp.9398 Mechanics of Inflatable Fabric Beams C. Wielgosz 1,J.C.Thomas 1,A.LeVan 1 Summary In this paper we present a summary of the behaviour of inflatable fabric
More informationPlates and Shells: Theory and Computation. Dr. Mostafa Ranjbar
Plates and Shells: Theory and Computation Dr. Mostafa Ranjbar Outline 1! This part of the module consists of seven lectures and will focus on finite elements for beams, plates and shells. More specifically,
More informationEffect of Specimen Dimensions on Flexural Modulus in a 3Point Bending Test
Effect of Specimen Dimensions on Flexural Modulus in a 3Point Bending Test M. Praveen Kumar 1 and V. Balakrishna Murthy 2* 1 Mechanical Engineering Department, P.V.P. Siddhartha Institute of Technology,
More informationInternational Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology EISSN
Research Article INTEGRATED FORCE METHOD FOR FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE PLATE BENDING PROBLEMS Doiphode G. S., Patodi S. C.* Address for Correspondence Assistant Professor, Applied Mechanics Department,
More informationFinite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module  01 Lecture  11
Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module  01 Lecture  11 Last class, what we did is, we looked at a method called superposition
More informationThe fracture toughness of planar lattices: imperfection sensitivity
1 2 The fracture toughness of planar lattices: imperfection sensitivity 3 Naomi E.R. Romijn, Norman A. Fleck 4 5 Cambridge University Engineering Department, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK 6
More informationLecture 15 Strain and stress in beams
Spring, 2019 ME 323 Mechanics of Materials Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams Reading assignment: 6.1 6.2 News: Instructor: Prof. Marcial Gonzalez Last modified: 1/6/19 9:42:38 PM Beam theory (@ ME
More informationA Suggested Analytical Solution for Vibration of Honeycombs Sandwich Combined Plate Structure
International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering IJMMEIJENS Vol:16 No:04 9 A Suggested Analytical Solution for Vibration of Honeycombs Sandwich Combined Plate Structure Muhsin J. Jweeg College
More informationVIBRATION AND ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES OF HONEYCOMB SANDWICH STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO VARIABLE INCIDENT PLANEWAVE ANGLE PRESSURE LOADS
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 52013 VIBRATION AND ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES OF HONEYCOMB SANDWICH STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO VARIABLE INCIDENT PLANEWAVE ANGLE PRESSURE LOADS Jiaxue Yan Clemson
More informationMechanics PhD Preliminary Spring 2017
Mechanics PhD Preliminary Spring 2017 1. (10 points) Consider a body Ω that is assembled by gluing together two separate bodies along a flat interface. The normal vector to the interface is given by n
More informationCorrection of locallinear elasticity for nonlocal residuals: Application to EulerBernoulli beams
Correction of locallinear elasticity for nonlocal residuals: Application to EulerBernoulli beams Mohamed Shaat* Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies Department, DACC, New Mexico State University,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME 313.3 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich A CLOSED BOOK EXAMINATION TIME: 3 HOURS For Marker s Use Only LAST NAME (printed): FIRST
More informationChapter 5 Torsion STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203. Notes are based on Mechanics of Materials: by R. C. Hibbeler, 7th Edition, Pearson
STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203 Chapter 5 Torsion Notes are based on Mechanics of Materials: by R. C. Hibbeler, 7th Edition, Pearson Dr B. Achour & Dr Eng. K. Elkashif Civil Engineering Department, University
More informationAN EFFECTIVE SOLUTION OF THE COMPOSITE (FGM S) BEAM STRUCTURES
Engineering MECHANICS, Vol. 15, 2008, No. 2, p. 115 132 115 AN EFFECTIVE SOLUTION OF THE COMPOSITE (FGM S) BEAM STRUCTURES Justín Murín, Vladimír Kutiš* The additive mixture rules have been extended for
More informationGEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE
GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Prof. J. N. Mandal Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.02225767328 email: cejnm@civil.iitb.ac.in Module13 LECTURE
More informationName (Print) ME Mechanics of Materials Exam # 1 Date: October 5, 2016 Time: 8:00 10:00 PM
Name (Print) (Last) (First) Instructions: ME 323  Mechanics of Materials Exam # 1 Date: October 5, 2016 Time: 8:00 10:00 PM Circle your lecturer s name and your class meeting time. Gonzalez Krousgrill
More informationFINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, VIBRATION AND ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE OF AUXETIC CHIRAL CORE SANDWICH STRUCTURES
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 82013 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, VIBRATION AND ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE OF AUXETIC CHIRAL CORE SANDWICH STRUCTURES Hrishikesh
More informationKINK BAND FORMATION OF FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER (FRP)
KINK BAND FORMATION OF FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER (FRP) 1 University of Science & Technology Beijing, China, niukm@ustb.edu.cn 2 Tsinghua University, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Beijing, China,
More informationBEAMS AND PLATES ANALYSIS
BEAMS AND PLATES ANALYSIS Automotive body structure can be divided into two types: i. Frameworks constructed of beams ii. Panels Classical beam versus typical modern vehicle beam sections Assumptions:
More informationLarge deflection analysis of planar solids based on the Finite Particle Method
yuying@uiuc.edu 10 th US National Congress on Computational Mechanics Large deflection analysis of planar solids based on the Finite Particle Method 1, 2 Presenter: Ying Yu Advisors: Prof. Glaucio H. Paulino
More informationDEFORMATION AND FRACTURE ANALYSIS OF ELASTIC SOLIDS BASED ON A PARTICLE METHOD
Blucher Mechanical Engineering Proceedings May 2014, vol. 1, num. 1 www.proceedings.blucher.com.br/evento/10wccm DEFORMATION AND FRACTURE ANALYSIS OF ELASTIC SOLIDS BASED ON A PARTICLE METHOD R. A. Amaro
More informationCHAPTER 5. Beam Theory
CHPTER 5. Beam Theory SangJoon Shin School of Mechanical and erospace Engineering Seoul National University ctive eroelasticity and Rotorcraft Lab. 5. The EulerBernoulli assumptions One of its dimensions
More informationChapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements
Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1 Chapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements Institute of Structural Engineering Page 2 Chapter Goals Learn how to formulate the Finite Element Equations
More informationParametric study on the transverse and longitudinal moments of trough type folded plate roofs using ANSYS
American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER) eissn : 23200847 pissn : 23200936 Volume4 pp2228 www.ajer.org Research Paper Open Access Parametric study on the transverse and longitudinal moments
More informationNUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A PILE SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS
IGC 009, Guntur, INDIA NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A PILE SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS Mohammed Younus Ahmed Graduate Student, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 3, India.
More informationModule III  Macromechanics of Lamina. Lecture 23. MacroMechanics of Lamina
Module III  Macromechanics of Lamina Lecture 23 MacroMechanics of Lamina For better understanding of the macromechanics of lamina, the knowledge of the material properties in essential. Therefore, the
More informationXI. NANOMECHANICS OF GRAPHENE
XI. NANOMECHANICS OF GRAPHENE Carbon is an element of extraordinary properties. The carboncarbon bond possesses large magnitude cohesive strength through its covalent bonds. Elemental carbon appears in
More information1 Static Plastic Behaviour of Beams
1 Static Plastic Behaviour of Beams 1.1 Introduction Many ductile materials which are used in engineering practice have a considerable reserve capacity beyond the initial yield condition. The uniaxial
More informationFLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES
UNIT  I FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES 1. What is meant by indeterminate structures? Structures that do not satisfy the conditions of equilibrium are called indeterminate structure. These
More informationEML4507 Finite Element Analysis and Design EXAM 1
21715 Name (underline last name): EML4507 Finite Element Analysis and Design EXAM 1 In this exam you may not use any materials except a pencil or a pen, an 8.5x11 formula sheet, and a calculator. Whenever
More informationINFLUENCE OF RELATIVE DENSITY AND MICROSTRUCTURAL ANISOTROPY ON THE GLOBAL ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF CELLULAR STRUCTURES JUSTIN COMPTON
INFLUENCE OF RELATIVE DENSITY AND MICROSTRUCTURAL ANISOTROPY ON THE GLOBAL ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF CELLULAR STRUCTURES by JUSTIN COMPTON Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University
More informationfive Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture five mechanics www.carttalk.com of materials Mechanics of Materials 1 Mechanics of Materials MECHANICS MATERIALS
More informationfive Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture five mechanics www.carttalk.com of materials Mechanics of Materials 1 Mechanics of Materials MECHANICS MATERIALS
More informationUNCONVENTIONAL FINITE ELEMENT MODELS FOR NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND PLATES
UNCONVENTIONAL FINITE ELEMENT MODELS FOR NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND PLATES A Thesis by WOORAM KIM Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the
More informationGeneric Strategies to Implement Material Grading in Finite Element Methods for Isotropic and Anisotropic Materials
University of Nebraska  Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska  Lincoln Engineering Mechanics Dissertations & Theses Mechanical & Materials Engineering, Department of Winter 1292011 Generic
More informationOpen Access Prediction on Deflection of Vcore Sandwich Panels in Weak Direction
Send Orders for Reprints to reprints@benthamscience.net The Open Ocean Engineering Journal, 2013, 6, Suppl1, M5) 7381 73 Open Access Prediction on Deflection of Vcore Sandwich Panels in Weak Direction
More informationCHAPTER 5 PROPOSED WARPING CONSTANT
122 CHAPTER 5 PROPOSED WARPING CONSTANT 5.1 INTRODUCTION Generally, lateral torsional buckling is a major design aspect of flexure members composed of thinwalled sections. When a thin walled section is
More informationThe numerical simulation research of an UltraLight Photovoltaic Cell multilayer composite structure
5th International Conference on Civil, Architectural and Hydraulic Engineering (ICCAHE 2016) The numerical simulation research of an UltraLight Photovoltaic Cell multilayer composite structure Kangwen
More informationStress analysis of a stepped bar
Stress analysis of a stepped bar Problem Find the stresses induced in the axially loaded stepped bar shown in Figure. The bar has crosssectional areas of A ) and A ) over the lengths l ) and l ), respectively.
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENGINEERING RESEARCH, DINDIGUL Volume 2, No 1, 2011
Interlaminar failure analysis of FRP cross ply laminate with elliptical cutout Venkateswara Rao.S 1, Sd. Abdul Kalam 1, Srilakshmi.S 1, Bala Krishna Murthy.V 2 1 Mechanical Engineering Department, P. V.
More informationHomework No. 1 MAE/CE 459/559 John A. Gilbert, Ph.D. Fall 2004
Homework No. 1 MAE/CE 459/559 John A. Gilbert, Ph.D. 1. A beam is loaded as shown. The dimensions of the cross section appear in the insert. the figure. Draw a complete free body diagram showing an equivalent
More informationThreedimensional stiff cellular structures with negative Poisson's ratio
! Threedimensional stiff cellular structures with negative Poisson's ratio Dong Li a, Jie Ma a, Liang Dong b and Roderic S. Lakes c a College of Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, PR
More informationMICROMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF FRP COMPOSITES SUBJECTED TO LONGITUDINAL LOADING
MICROMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF FRP COMPOSITES SUBJECTED TO LONGITUDINAL LOADING N. Krishna Vihari 1, P. Phani Prasanthi 1, V. Bala Krishna Murthy 2* and A. Srihari Prasad 3 1 Mech. Engg. Dept., P. V. P. Siddhartha
More informationBENCHMARK LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE USING OPENSEES & COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION
BENCHMARK LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE USING OPENSEES & COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION Ahmed Elgamal and Jinchi Lu October 07 Introduction In this study: I) The response
More informationDynamic Response Of Laminated Composite Shells Subjected To Impulsive Loads
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSRJMCE) eissn: 22781684,pISSN: 2320334X, Volume 14, Issue 3 Ver. I (May.  June. 2017), PP 108123 www.iosrjournals.org Dynamic Response Of Laminated
More informationFinite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module  01 Lecture  13
Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (Refer Slide Time: 00:25) Module  01 Lecture  13 In the last class, we have seen how
More informationA FINITE ELEMENT MODEL TO PREDICT MULTI AXIAL STRESSSTRAIN RESPONSE OF CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES WITH STRAIN INDUCED DAMAGE
A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL TO PREDICT MULTI AXIAL STRESSSTRAIN RESPONSE OF CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES WITH STRAIN INDUCED DAMAGE Daxu Zhang and D. R. Hayhurst School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering,
More informationSERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
More informationGame Physics. Game and Media Technology Master Program  Utrecht University. Dr. Nicolas Pronost
Game and Media Technology Master Program  Utrecht University Dr. Nicolas Pronost Soft body physics Soft bodies In reality, objects are not purely rigid for some it is a good approximation but if you hit
More informationBasic Equations of Elasticity
A Basic Equations of Elasticity A.1 STRESS The state of stress at any point in a loaded bo is defined completely in terms of the nine components of stress: σ xx,σ yy,σ zz,σ xy,σ yx,σ yz,σ zy,σ zx,andσ
More information1859. Forced transverse vibration analysis of a Rayleigh doublebeam system with a Pasternak middle layer subjected to compressive axial load
1859. Forced transverse vibration analysis of a Rayleigh doublebeam system with a Pasternak middle layer subjected to compressive axial load Nader Mohammadi 1, Mehrdad Nasirshoaibi 2 Department of Mechanical
More informationShock wave speed and stressstrain relation of aluminium honeycombs under dynamic compression
EPJ Web of Conferences 83, 7 (8) DYMAT 8 https://doi.org/.5/epjconf/8837 Shock wave speed and stressstrain relation of aluminium honeycombs under dynamic compression Peng Wang,*, Jun Zhang, Haiying Huang,
More informationStability of Simply Supported Square Plate with Concentric Cutout
International OPEN ACCESS Journal Of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) Stability of Simply Supported Square Plate with Concentric Cutout Jayashankarbabu B. S. 1, Dr. Karisiddappa 1 (Civil Engineering
More informationChapter 11. Displacement Method of Analysis Slope Deflection Method
Chapter 11 Displacement ethod of Analysis Slope Deflection ethod Displacement ethod of Analysis Two main methods of analyzing indeterminate structure Force method The method of consistent deformations
More informationFLANGE CURLING IN COLD FORMED PROFILES
Nordic Steel Construction Conference 22 Hotel Bristol, Oslo, Norway 57 September 22 FLANGE CURLING IN COLD FORMED PROFILES Jeppe Jönsson, Gediminas Ramonas DTU Civil Engineering, Technical University
More informationSTRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS
1 UNIT I STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS 1. Define: Stress When an external force acts on a body, it undergoes deformation. At the same time the body resists deformation. The
More informationREPORT TO DFLEX LTD APRIL 2009 REPORT. (to DFlex Ltd, NWDA Innovation Vouchers Award, 28 April 2009)
REPORT (to DFlex Ltd, NWDA Innovation Vouchers Award, 28 April 2009) Finite Element Modelling of Rigidity of Fishing Rods with Various Crosssections Report to DFlex Ltd by Z Guan Department of Engineering,
More informationAccordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation CC3.1.
C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateraltorsional buckling and distortional
More informationThe Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics
The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics Sixth edition O.C. Zienkiewicz, CBE, FRS UNESCO Professor of Numerical Methods in Engineering International Centre for Numerical Methods in
More informationk 21 k 22 k 23 k 24 k 31 k 32 k 33 k 34 k 41 k 42 k 43 k 44
CE 6 ab Beam Analysis by the Direct Stiffness Method Beam Element Stiffness Matrix in ocal Coordinates Consider an inclined bending member of moment of inertia I and modulus of elasticity E subjected shear
More informationUNIT I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:
UNIT I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability: Analysis of thin rectangular plates subject to bending, twisting, distributed transverse load, combined bending and inplane loading Thin plates having
More informationMechanically Efficient Cellular Microstructures in Plants. Lorna J. Gibson Materials Science & Engineering MIT
Mechanically Efficient Cellular Microstructures in Plants Lorna J. Gibson Materials Science & Engineering MIT 1 Introduction Plants are typically loaded in bending by wind and in compression by selfweight
More information4. SHAFTS. A shaft is an element used to transmit power and torque, and it can support
4. SHAFTS A shaft is an element used to transmit power and torque, and it can support reverse bending (fatigue). Most shafts have circular cross sections, either solid or tubular. The difference between
More informationMECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT  I
MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT  I Engineering Mechanics Branch of science which deals with the behavior of a body with the state of rest or motion, subjected to the action of forces.
More informationUsing the finite element method of structural analysis, determine displacements at nodes 1 and 2.
Question 1 A pinjointed plane frame, shown in Figure Q1, is fixed to rigid supports at nodes and 4 to prevent their nodal displacements. The frame is loaded at nodes 1 and by a horizontal and a vertical
More informationCE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design  Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design  Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationIraq Ref. & Air. Cond. Dept/ Technical College / Kirkuk
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 4, April015 1678 Study the Increasing of the Cantilever Plate Stiffness by Using s Jawdat Ali Yakoob Iesam Jondi Hasan Ass.
More informationSLOPEDEFLECTION METHOD
SLOPEDEFLECTION ETHOD The slopedeflection method uses displacements as unknowns and is referred to as a displacement method. In the slopedeflection method, the moments at the ends of the members are
More informationDue Tuesday, September 21 st, 12:00 midnight
Due Tuesday, September 21 st, 12:00 midnight The first problem discusses a plane truss with inclined supports. You will need to modify the MatLab software from homework 1. The next 4 problems consider
More informationBending of Simply Supported Isotropic and Composite Laminate Plates
Bending of Simply Supported Isotropic and Composite Laminate Plates Ernesto GutierrezMiravete 1 Isotropic Plates Consider simply a supported rectangular plate of isotropic material (length a, width b,
More information3. BEAMS: STRAIN, STRESS, DEFLECTIONS
3. BEAMS: STRAIN, STRESS, DEFLECTIONS The beam, or flexural member, is frequently encountered in structures and machines, and its elementary stress analysis constitutes one of the more interesting facets
More informationLarge Thermal Deflections of a Simple Supported Beam with TemperatureDependent Physical Properties
Large Thermal Deflections of a Simple Supported Beam with TemperatureDependent Physical Properties DR. ŞEREF DOĞUŞCAN AKBAŞ Civil Engineer, Şehit Muhtar Mah. Öğüt Sok. No:2/37, 34435 Beyoğlu Istanbul,
More informationThe inplane linear elastic constants and outofplane bending of 3coordinated ligament and cylinderligament honeycombs.
University of Bolton UBIR: University of Bolton Institutional Repository IMRI: Journal Articles (PeerReviewed) Institute for Materials Research and Innovation 200 The inplane linear elastic constants
More informationMATERIAL PROPERTIES. Material Properties Must Be Evaluated By Laboratory or Field Tests 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 ANISOTROPIC MATERIALS
. MARIAL PROPRIS Material Properties Must Be valuated By Laboratory or Field ests. INRODUCION he fundamental equations of structural mechanics can be placed in three categories[]. First, the stressstrain
More informationNomenclature. Length of the panel between the supports. Width of the panel between the supports/ width of the beam
omenclature a b c f h Length of the panel between the supports Width of the panel between the supports/ width of the beam Sandwich beam/ panel core thickness Thickness of the panel face sheet Sandwich
More informationComputational Modelling of Vibrations Transmission Loss of Auxetic Lattice Structure
Vibrations in Physical Systems Vol. 27 (2016) Abstract Computational Modelling of Vibrations Transmission Loss of Auxetic Lattice Structure Eligiusz IDCZAK Institute of Applied Mechanics, Poznan University
More informationCOURSE STE6289 Modern Materials and Computations (Moderne materialer og beregninger 7.5 stp.)
Narvik University College (Høgskolen i Narvik) EXAMINATION TASK COURSE STE6289 Modern Materials and Computations (Moderne materialer og beregninger 7.5 stp.) CLASS: Master students in Engineering Design
More informationIMPACT OF LAMINATE DIRECTIONS ON IN PLANE SHEAR STIFFNESS OF CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER
IMPACT OF LAMINATE DIRECTIONS ON IN PLANE SHEAR STIFFNESS OF CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER Turesson, J. 1 & Ekevad, M. 2 ABSTRACT Twentythree finite element models of crosslaminated timber (CLT) with different
More information7.4 The Elementary Beam Theory
7.4 The Elementary Beam Theory In this section, problems involving long and slender beams are addressed. s with pressure vessels, the geometry of the beam, and the specific type of loading which will be
More informationTHE INFLUENCE OF INPLANE DENSITY VARIATION ON ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF ORIENTED STRANDBOARD: A FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION
Proceedings of McMat5: 5 Joint ASME/ASCE/SES Conference on Mechanics and Materials June 13, 5, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA 255 THE INFLUENCE OF INPLANE DENSITY VARIATION ON ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF
More informationFINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ARKANSAS TEST SERIES PILE #2 USING OPENSEES (WITH LPILE COMPARISON)
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ARKANSAS TEST SERIES PILE #2 USING OPENSEES (WITH LPILE COMPARISON) Ahmed Elgamal and Jinchi Lu October 07 Introduction In this study, we conduct a finite element simulation
More informationUltimate shear strength of FPSO stiffened panels after supply vessel collision
Ultimate shear strength of FPSO stiffened panels after supply vessel collision Nicolau Antonio dos Santos Rizzo PETROBRAS Rio de Janeiro Brazil Marcelo Caire SINTEF do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brazil Carlos
More informationANALYSIS AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF CERAMIC PIEZOELECTRIC BEAM BEHAVIOR UNDER THE EFFECT OF EXTERNAL SOLICITATIONS
Third International Conference on Energy, Materials, Applied Energetics and Pollution. ICEMAEP016, October 3031, 016, Constantine,Algeria. ANALYSIS AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF CERAMIC PIEZOELECTRIC BEAM
More information