Homework 4. Goldstein 9.7. Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics October 01, 2010 (1) P i = F 1. Q i. p i = F 1 (3) q i (5) P i (6)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Homework 4. Goldstein 9.7. Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics October 01, 2010 (1) P i = F 1. Q i. p i = F 1 (3) q i (5) P i (6)"

Transcription

1 Theoretical Dynamics October 01, 2010 Instructor: Dr. Thomas Cohen Homework 4 Submitted by: Vivek Saxena Goldstein 9.7 Part (a) F 1 (q, Q, t) F 2 (q, P, t) P i F 1 Q i (1) F 2 (q, P, t) F 1 (q, Q, t) + P i Q i (2) F 1 (q, Q, t) F 3 (p, Q, t) p i F 1 q i (3) F 3 (p, Q, t) F 1 (q, Q, t) p i q i (4) F 1 (q, Q, t) F 4 (p, P, t) p i F 1 q i (5) P i F 1 Q i (6) F 4 (p, P, t) F 1 (q, Q, t) p i q i + P i Q i (7) F 2 (q, P, t) F 3 (p, Q, t) p i F 2 q i (8) Q i F 2 P i (9) F 3 (p, Q, t) F 2 (q, P, t) p i q i P i Q i (10) F 2 (q, P, t) F 4 (p, P, t) p i F 2 q i (11) F 4 (p, P, t) F 2 (q, P, t) p i q i (12) 4-1

2 F 3 (p, Q, t) F 4 (p, P, t) P i F 3 Q i (13) F 4 (p, P, t) F 3 (p, Q, t) + P i Q i (14) Part (b) For an identity transformation, F 2 function is q i P i and by equation (7), the type 4 generating F 4 (p, P, t) F 2 (q, P, t) p i q i (15) q i P i p i q i 0 as p i F 2 q i For an exchange transformation, F 1 q i Q i and by equation (4), the type 3 generating function is Part (c) P i F 3 (p, Q, t) F 1 (q, Q, t) p i q i (16) q i Q i p i q i 0 as p i F 1 q i Q i (17) Consider a type 2 generating function F 2 (q, P, t) of the old coordinates and the new momenta, of the form F 2 (q, P, t) f i (q 1,..., q n ; t)p i g(q 1,..., q n ; t) (18) where f i s are a set of independent functions, and g i s are differentiable functions of the old coordinates and time. The new coordinates Q i are given by In particular, the function Q i F 2 P i f i (q 1,..., q n ; t) (19) f i (q 1,..., q n ; t) R ij q j (20) where R ij is the (i, j)-th element of a N N orthogonal matrix, generates an orthogonal transformation of the coordinates. Now, p j F 2 q j This equation can be written in matrix form, as f i q j P i g q j R ij P i g q j (21) p f q P g q (22) 4-2

3 where p denotes the N 1 column vector (p 1,..., p N ) T, g/ q denotes the N 1 column vector ( g/ q 1,..., g/ q n ) T, and f q denotes the N N matrix with entries ( ) f f i R ij (23) q q j From (22), the new momenta are given by ij ( ) f 1 ( P p + g ) q q ( R 1 p + g ) q (24) (25) R 1 (p + q g) (26) As R is an orthogonal matrix, RR T R T R I, so R 1 R T is also an orthogonal transformation. This gives the required result: the new momenta are given by the orthogonal transformation (R 1 ) of an n-dimensional vector (p + q g), whose components are the old momenta (p) plus a gradient in configuration space ( q g). Goldstein 9.25 Part (a) The given Hamiltonian is The equation of motion for q is H 1 2 ( ) 1 q 2 + p2 q 4 (27) q H p pq4 (28) Part (b) Suppose we let Q 2 1/q 2 and P 2 p 2 q 4. Then, Q ±1/q and P ±pq 2. Now, {Q, P } {±1/q, ±pq 2 } {q 1, pq 2 } {q 1, p}q 2 + p{q 1, q 2 } ( ) q 1 p q p q 1 p q 2 + p 0 p q ( 1q ) 2 q

4 the signs on both Q and P cannot be identical. We take Q 1 q (29) P pq 2 (30) which is a valid canonical transformation. This gives the Hamiltonian, The equations of motion are H(Q, P ) 1 2 (P 2 + Q 2 ) (31) Q H P P (32) P H Q (33) Q Q + Q 0, the solution to which is of the form Q A cos t + B sin t. P Q B cos t A sin t. Now, This gives q 1 Q (A cos t + B sin t) 1 (34) p P Q 2 (B cos t A sin t)(a cos t + B sin t) 2 (35) so, and hence q (A cos t + B sin t) 2 ( A sin t + B cos t) (36) pq 4 (B cos t A sin t)(a cos t+b sin t) 2 (A cos t+b sin t) 4 (B cos t A sin t)(a cos t+b sin t) 2 q (37) the solution to the transformed equation for Q satisfies the original equation of motion for q. Problem 1 Part (a) {X, P x } {x + ɛ, p x } {x, p x } 1 (38) {Y, P y } {y, p x } 1 (39) 4-4

5 {Z, P z } {z, p z } 1 (40) {X, P y } {X, P z } {Y, P x } {Y, P z } {Z, P x } {Z, P y } 0 (41) {X, X} {Y, Y } {Z, Z} {P x, P x } {P y, P z } {P z, P z } {P x, P y } {P y, P z } {P z, P x } 0 (42) this is a canonical transformation. It corresponds to a translated canonical coordinate system (translation along the x-direction in phase space). So P x is the generator of the canonical transformation. Part (b) dx dɛ [X, P x] 1 (43) {X, P x } {x cos ɛ + y sin ɛ, p x cos ɛ + p y sin ɛ} cos 2 ɛ{x, p x } + sin 2 {y, p y } 1 (44) {Y, P y } { x sin ɛ + y cos ɛ, p x sin ɛ + p y cos ɛ} sin 2 ɛ{x, p x } + cos 2 ɛ{y, p y } 1 (45) {Z, P z } {z, p z } Using properties of the Poisson Bracket, we also have 1 (46) {X, P y } {X, P z } {Y, P x } {Y, P z } {Z, P x } {Z, P y } 0 (47) {X, X} {Y, Y } {Z, Z} {P x, P x } {P y, P z } {P z, P z } {P x, P y } {P y, P z } {P z, P x } 0 (48) this is a canonical transformation. It corresponds to a rotation about the z-axis in phase space. dx x sin ɛ + y cos ɛ (49) dɛ whereas {X, L z } {x cos ɛ + y sin ɛ, xp y yp x } x sin ɛ y cos ɛ (50) dx dɛ {X, L z} (51) Therefore, L z is the generator of the canonical transformation. 4-5

6 Part (c) {X, P x } {x, p x + ɛ} 1 (52) {Y, P y } {y, p y } 1 (53) {Z, P z } {z, p z } Using properties of the Poisson Bracket, we also have 1 (54) {X, P y } {X, P z } {Y, P x } {Y, P z } {Z, P x } {Z, P y } 0 (55) {X, X} {Y, Y } {Z, Z} {P x, P x } {P y, P z } {P z, P z } {P x, P y } {P y, P z } {P z, P x } 0 (56) this is a canonical transformation. It corresponds to a translation along the p x direction in phase space. Now, ( Px X {P x, X} P ) x X 1 dp x (57) q i p i p i q i dɛ Therefore, X is the generator of the canonical transformation. Part (d) {X, P x } {(1 + ɛ)x, (1 + ɛ) 1 p x } 1 (58) {Y, P y } {(1 + ɛ)y, (1 + ɛ) 1 p y } 1 (59) {Z, P z } {(1 + ɛ)z, (1 + ɛ) 1 p z } Using properties of the Poisson Bracket, we also have 1 (60) {X, P y } {X, P z } {Y, P x } {Y, P z } {Z, P x } {Z, P y } 0 (61) {X, X} {Y, Y } {Z, Z} {P x, P x } {P y, P z } {P z, P z } {P x, P y } {P y, P z } {P z, P x } 0 (62) 4-6

7 this is a canonical transformation. It is a scaling transformation, which preserves the volume element in phase space. Suppose g is the generator of the scaling transformation. Then, X x [X, g] [(1 + ɛ)x, g] (63) ɛ which implies that is, the solution to which is x 1 + ɛ x g [x, g] x g x p x p x x (64) x 1 + ɛ g (65) p x g xp x 1 + ɛ + f(y, z, p y, p z ) (66) As dy/dɛ y [(1 + ɛ)y, g] and dz/dɛ z [(1 + ɛ)z, g], following a similar argument for Y and Z (or by symmetry) we get as the generator of the scaling transformation. Problem 2 As η is a canonical transformation, we have g xp x 1 + ɛ + yp y 1 + ɛ + zp z + constant (67) 1 + ɛ H ɛ H ɛ H {η i, g} H ξ j J jk g ξ k H η j J jk g η k H δ ij J jk g η k H J ij g η j {H, g} ġ ɛ {η i, g} (68) (as ξ is a canonical transformation) (as Poisson Brackets are invariant under canonical transformations) (69) But since H is conserved, H ɛ 0 and hence ġ 0. Therefore, g is conserved. 4-7

8 Problem 3 The quantity, which was found to be an invariant of the system, can be expressed in terms of the canonical coordinates x, y, p x, p y as (x, y, p x, p y ) 1 (p2 x p 2 y) mω2 (x 2 αy 2 ) (70) As is the conserved generator of a family of canonical transformations parametrized by an infinitesimal parameter ɛ, we must have We consider each condition separately below. δx ɛ{x, } (71) δy ɛ{y, } (72) δp x ɛ{p x, } (73) δp y ɛ{p x, } (74) δx ɛ{x, } 1 ɛ{x, (p2 x p 2 y) mω2 (x 2 αy 2 )} ɛ{x, p2 x } ɛp x m (75) (76) δy ɛ{y, } 1 ɛ{y, (p2 x p 2 y) mω2 (x 2 αy 2 )} ɛ{y, p2 y } ɛp y m (77) δp x ɛ{p x, } 1 ɛ{p x, (p2 x p 2 y) mω2 (x 2 αy 2 )} ɛ{p x, 1 2 mω2 x 2 } ɛmω 2 x (78) δp y ɛ{p y, } 1 ɛ{p y, (p2 x p 2 y) mω2 (x 2 αy 2 )} ɛ{p y, 1 2 mω2 αy 2 } ɛmω 2 αy (79) 4-8

9 Now, let ɛ δθ where θ is a parameter. Then, the above equations become dx p x dθ m (80) dy p y dθ m (81) dp x dθ mω 2 x (82) dp y dθ mω 2 αy (83) The solutions to which are and correspondingly d 2 x dθ 2 + ω2 x 0 (84) d 2 y dθ 2 + ω2 αy 0 (85) x A cos(ωθ) + B sin(ωθ) (86) y C cos(ω αθ) + D sin(ω αθ) (87) p x mωa sin(ωθ) + mωb cos(ωθ) (88) p y mω αc sin(ω αθ) mω αd cos(ω αθ) (89) Using the subscript 0 to denote the initial coordinates and momenta, we have x 0 A (90) y 0 C (91) p x0 mωb (92) p y0 mω αd (93) x x 0 cos(ωθ) + p x0 mω sin(ωθ) y y 0 cos(ω θ) p y 0 mω α sin(ω αθ) p x mωx 0 sin(ωθ) + p x0 cos(ωθ) p y mω αy 0 sin(ω αθ) + p y0 cos(ω αθ) Reverting to the notation in which x 0, p x0, y 0, p y0 denote the original coordinates and X, Y, P x, P y denote the canonically transformed coordinates, we get the form of the canonical transformation as X x cos(ωθ) + p x sin(ωθ) mω (94) P x p x cos(ωθ) mωx sin(ωθ) (95) Y y cos(ω αθ) p y mω α sin(ω αθ) (96) P y p y cos(ω αθ) + mω αy sin(ω αθ) (97) 4-9

10 where θ is an arbitrary parameter, such that θ 0 corresponds to the untransformed coordinates. This canonical transformation is composed of two rotations in the 4-dimensional phase space (one involving X and P x and the other involving Y and P y ), and its generator is the conserved quantity. Problem 4 Part (a) Now, F 2 (q, P, t) (q + 12 gt2 ) (P mgt) P 2 t (98) p F 2 q the canonical transformation is Part (b) P mgt (99) Q F 2 P q gt2 P t m q gt2 pt m gt2 (100) P p + mgt (101) Q q pt m 1 2 gt2 (102) {Q, Q} {q pt m 1 2 gt2, q pt m 1 2 gt2 } 0 (103) {P, P } {p + mgt, p + mgt} 0 (104) {Q, P } {q pt m 1 2 gt2, p + mgt} Q P q p Q P p q ( (1)(1) t ) (0) m 1 (105) the transformation satisfies the canonical Poisson Bracket relations. Part (c) The Lagrangian is L(q, q) 1 2 m q2 mgq (106) 4-10

11 The canonical momentum is p L q m q (107) So the Hamiltonian is Now, Q q pt m 1 2 gt2, so {Q, H} H p q L p2 + mgq (108) { q pt {q, p2 m 1 2 gt2, p2 } } + mgq } { pt m, mgq 1 {q, p2 } gt{p, q} p + gt (109) m Also Also, P p + mgt, so Q p gt (110) m dq dt Q + {Q, H} 0 (111) {P, H} {p + mgt, p2 + mgq} mg{p, q} mg (112) and P dp dt P mg (113) + {P, H} 0 (114) 4-11

12 Part (d) F 2 the Hamiltonian associated with Q, P is gt(p mgt) + (q + 12 ) gt2 ( mg) P 2 P gt 3 2 mg2 t 2 mgq P 2 (p + mgt)gt 3 2 mg2 t 2 (p + mgt)2 mgq p2 mgq mg2 t 2 (115) K H + F 2 p2 p2 + mgq mgq mg2 t 2 mg 2 t 2 (116) the Hamiltonian K is zero up to time-dependent constant term mg 2 t 2, but it is not a function of P and Q (which are constant with time, since {Q, H} {P, H} 0 as shown above). Part (e) Q and P are conserved quantities, that equal the initial position and the initial momentum respectively. They are constant with time, as q and p vary: Part (f) q(t 0) Q p(t 0) P F 2 q F 2 P mgt p (117) P gt mg2 t 2 mgq P 2 2 (118) H p2 + mgq 1 ( ) 2 F2 + mgq (119) q K H + F 2 mg 2 t 2 (as shown in part d) 4-12

13 implies H ( q, F ) 2 + F 2 q mg 2 t 2 (120) the Hamilton-Jacobi equation is satisfied, except for a time-dependent constant term appearing on the right hand side. Part (g) f(q, P, t) F 2 (q(q, P, t), P, t) (q + 12 ) gt2 (P mgt) P 2 t ( Q + pt ) m + gt2 (P mgt) P 2 t ( ) (P mgt)t Q + + gt 2 (P mgt) P 2 t m Also, p m q P mgt. ( Q + P t m L(q, q) p2 mgq ) (P mgt) P 2 t QP + P 2 t Qmgt gp t2 (121) f P 2 mgq 2P gt (122) 1 (P mgt)2 mg ( Q + P t m 1 ) 2 gt2 1 (P 2 + m 2 g 2 t 2 2P mgt) mgq P gt mg2 t 2 P 2 2P gt mgq + mg2 t 2 f(q, P, t) + mg 2 t 2 (123) L(q(Q, P, t), q(q, P, t)) f(q,p,t) up to a time-dependent term mg 2 t 2. Problem 5 The Hamilton-Jacobi equation, as expressed in the form H(q, S(q, P )) + S(q, P ) 0 (124) 4-13

14 was obtained by constructing a generating function of the form F F 2 (q, P, t) Q i P i where F 2 denotes a generic type-2 generating function. For such a choice of F, the Hamiltonian K H + F is zero. Now, consider a type-3 generating function F 3 of the old momenta and the new coordinates, such that the Hamiltonian K is zero. Therefore, Now, so, Q i K P i 0 (125) P i K 0 (126) Q i q i F 3 p i ( p F 3 ) i (127) H(q(Q, p), p, t) + F 3 (Q, p, t) 0 (128) where the old coordinates q have been expressed in terms of the old momenta and the new coordinates using equation (127). This is a PDE in (n + 1) variables p 1,..., p n, t. Let S denote the solution of this PDE. Then, a solution of the form, F 3 S S(p 1,..., p n ; α 1,..., α n+1 ; t) (129) where Q i α i are the constants of motion (for i 1,..., n), is consistent with equation (125). Here the constant α n+1 must be a constant of integration, so the physically meaningful solution is of the form in terms of S, equation (128) can be written as which is of the desired form. S S(p 1,..., p n ; α 1,... α n ; t) (130) H( p S, S p, t) + (Q, p, t) 0 (131) 4-14

Homework 3. 1 Goldstein Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics September 24, The Hamiltonian is given by

Homework 3. 1 Goldstein Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics September 24, The Hamiltonian is given by Theoretical Dynamics September 4, 010 Instructor: Dr. Thomas Cohen Homework 3 Submitted by: Vivek Saxena 1 Goldstein 8.1 1.1 Part (a) The Hamiltonian is given by H(q i, p i, t) = p i q i L(q i, q i, t)

More information

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformations-1

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformations-1 1 Introduction Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics Canonical Transformations The choice of generalized coordinates used to describe a physical system is completely arbitrary, but the Lagrangian is invariant

More information

Canonical transformations (Lecture 4)

Canonical transformations (Lecture 4) Canonical transformations (Lecture 4) January 26, 2016 61/441 Lecture outline We will introduce and discuss canonical transformations that conserve the Hamiltonian structure of equations of motion. Poisson

More information

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations, Physics 6010, Fall 2010 Hamiltonian Formalism: Hamilton s equations. Conservation laws. Reduction. Poisson Brackets. Relevant Sections in Text: 8.1 8.3, 9.5 The Hamiltonian Formalism We now return to formal

More information

HAMILTON S PRINCIPLE

HAMILTON S PRINCIPLE HAMILTON S PRINCIPLE In our previous derivation of Lagrange s equations we started from the Newtonian vector equations of motion and via D Alembert s Principle changed coordinates to generalised coordinates

More information

Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition. Chapter 9

Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition. Chapter 9 Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition Homer Reid October 29, 2002 Chater 9 Problem 9. One of the attemts at combining the two sets of Hamilton s equations into one tries

More information

NIU PHYS 500, Fall 2006 Classical Mechanics Solutions for HW6. Solutions

NIU PHYS 500, Fall 2006 Classical Mechanics Solutions for HW6. Solutions NIU PHYS 500, Fall 006 Classical Mechanics Solutions for HW6 Assignment: HW6 [40 points] Assigned: 006/11/10 Due: 006/11/17 Solutions P6.1 [4 + 3 + 3 = 10 points] Consider a particle of mass m moving in

More information

Lecture 5. Alexey Boyarsky. October 21, Legendre transformation and the Hamilton equations of motion

Lecture 5. Alexey Boyarsky. October 21, Legendre transformation and the Hamilton equations of motion Lecture 5 Alexey Boyarsky October 1, 015 1 The Hamilton equations of motion 1.1 Legendre transformation and the Hamilton equations of motion First-order equations of motion. In the Lagrangian formulation,

More information

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 2

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 2 PHY411 Lecture notes Part 2 Alice Quillen April 6, 2017 Contents 1 Canonical Transformations 2 1.1 Poisson Brackets................................. 2 1.2 Canonical transformations............................

More information

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction The Geometry of Euler s equation Introduction Part 1 Mechanical systems with constraints, symmetries flexible joint fixed length In principle can be dealt with by applying F=ma, but this can become complicated

More information

Hamiltonian flow in phase space and Liouville s theorem (Lecture 5)

Hamiltonian flow in phase space and Liouville s theorem (Lecture 5) Hamiltonian flow in phase space and Liouville s theorem (Lecture 5) January 26, 2016 90/441 Lecture outline We will discuss the Hamiltonian flow in the phase space. This flow represents a time dependent

More information

for changing independent variables. Most simply for a function f(x) the Legendre transformation f(x) B(s) takes the form B(s) = xs f(x) with s = df

for changing independent variables. Most simply for a function f(x) the Legendre transformation f(x) B(s) takes the form B(s) = xs f(x) with s = df Physics 106a, Caltech 1 November, 2018 Lecture 10: Hamiltonian Mechanics I The Hamiltonian In the Hamiltonian formulation of dynamics each second order ODE given by the Euler- Lagrange equation in terms

More information

Assignment 8. [η j, η k ] = J jk

Assignment 8. [η j, η k ] = J jk Assignment 8 Goldstein 9.8 Prove directly that the transformation is canonical and find a generating function. Q 1 = q 1, P 1 = p 1 p Q = p, P = q 1 q We can establish that the transformation is canonical

More information

Part II. Classical Dynamics. Year

Part II. Classical Dynamics. Year Part II Year 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 28 Paper 1, Section I 8B Derive Hamilton s equations from an action principle. 22 Consider a two-dimensional phase space with the Hamiltonian

More information

Hamilton s principle and Symmetries

Hamilton s principle and Symmetries Hamilton s principle and Symmetries Sourendu Gupta TIFR, Mumbai, India Classical Mechanics 2011 August 18, 2011 The Hamiltonian The change in the Lagrangian due to a virtual change of coordinates is dl

More information

Chapter 1. Principles of Motion in Invariantive Mechanics

Chapter 1. Principles of Motion in Invariantive Mechanics Chapter 1 Principles of Motion in Invariantive Mechanics 1.1. The Euler-Lagrange and Hamilton s equations obtained by means of exterior forms Let L = L(q 1,q 2,...,q n, q 1, q 2,..., q n,t) L(q, q,t) (1.1)

More information

HANDOUT #12: THE HAMILTONIAN APPROACH TO MECHANICS

HANDOUT #12: THE HAMILTONIAN APPROACH TO MECHANICS MATHEMATICS 7302 (Analytical Dynamics) YEAR 2016 2017, TERM 2 HANDOUT #12: THE HAMILTONIAN APPROACH TO MECHANICS These notes are intended to be read as a supplement to the handout from Gregory, Classical

More information

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators Part 2: Basic tools and concepts Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators This course consists of eight lectures: 1.

More information

Lecture 11 : Overview

Lecture 11 : Overview Lecture 11 : Overview Error in Assignment 3 : In Eq. 1, Hamiltonian should be H = p2 r 2m + p2 ϕ 2mr + (p z ea z ) 2 2 2m + eφ (1) Error in lecture 10, slide 7, Eq. (21). Should be S(q, α, t) m Q = β =

More information

M2A2 Problem Sheet 3 - Hamiltonian Mechanics

M2A2 Problem Sheet 3 - Hamiltonian Mechanics MA Problem Sheet 3 - Hamiltonian Mechanics. The particle in a cone. A particle slides under gravity, inside a smooth circular cone with a vertical axis, z = k x + y. Write down its Lagrangian in a) Cartesian,

More information

Physics 106a, Caltech 13 November, Lecture 13: Action, Hamilton-Jacobi Theory. Action-Angle Variables

Physics 106a, Caltech 13 November, Lecture 13: Action, Hamilton-Jacobi Theory. Action-Angle Variables Physics 06a, Caltech 3 November, 08 Lecture 3: Action, Hamilton-Jacobi Theory Starred sections are advanced topics for interest and future reference. The unstarred material will not be tested on the final

More information

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto April 3, 2014 1 Symplectic manifolds Let (M, ω) and (N, η) be symplectic

More information

Course 241: Advanced Mechanics. Scholarship Questions

Course 241: Advanced Mechanics. Scholarship Questions Course 41: Advanced echanics Scholarship Questions This covers the first sixteen questions from part I up to the end of rigid bodies, and a selection of the questions from part II. I wouldn t be too bothered

More information

Statistical Mechanics Solution Set #1 Instructor: Rigoberto Hernandez MoSE 2100L, , (Dated: September 4, 2014)

Statistical Mechanics Solution Set #1 Instructor: Rigoberto Hernandez MoSE 2100L, , (Dated: September 4, 2014) CHEM 6481 TT 9:3-1:55 AM Fall 214 Statistical Mechanics Solution Set #1 Instructor: Rigoberto Hernandez MoSE 21L, 894-594, hernandez@gatech.edu (Dated: September 4, 214 1. Answered according to individual

More information

15. Hamiltonian Mechanics

15. Hamiltonian Mechanics University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Classical Dynamics Physics Course Materials 2015 15. Hamiltonian Mechanics Gerhard Müller University of Rhode Island, gmuller@uri.edu Creative Commons License

More information

1 Graded problems. PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 23 rd, 2015 Assignment # 12, Solutions. Problem 1

1 Graded problems. PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 23 rd, 2015 Assignment # 12, Solutions. Problem 1 PHY 546: Theoretical Dynaics, Fall 05 Noveber 3 rd, 05 Assignent #, Solutions Graded probles Proble.a) Given the -diensional syste we want to show that is a constant of the otion. Indeed,.b) dd dt Now

More information

Legendre s Equation. PHYS Southern Illinois University. October 13, 2016

Legendre s Equation. PHYS Southern Illinois University. October 13, 2016 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University October 13, 2016 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Legendre s Equation October 13, 2016 1 / 10 The Laplacian in Spherical Coordinates The Laplacian is given

More information

An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem

An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem The most famous n-body problem is one where particles interact by an inverse square-law force. However, there is a class of exactly solvable n-body problems in which

More information

EULER-LAGRANGE TO HAMILTON. The goal of these notes is to give one way of getting from the Euler-Lagrange equations to Hamilton s equations.

EULER-LAGRANGE TO HAMILTON. The goal of these notes is to give one way of getting from the Euler-Lagrange equations to Hamilton s equations. EULER-LAGRANGE TO HAMILTON LANCE D. DRAGER The goal of these notes is to give one way of getting from the Euler-Lagrange equations to Hamilton s equations. 1. Euler-Lagrange to Hamilton We will often write

More information

Variational principles and Hamiltonian Mechanics

Variational principles and Hamiltonian Mechanics A Primer on Geometric Mechanics Variational principles and Hamiltonian Mechanics Alex L. Castro, PUC Rio de Janeiro Henry O. Jacobs, CMS, Caltech Christian Lessig, CMS, Caltech Alex L. Castro (PUC-Rio)

More information

June 21, Peking University. Dual Connections. Zhengchao Wan. Overview. Duality of connections. Divergence: general contrast functions

June 21, Peking University. Dual Connections. Zhengchao Wan. Overview. Duality of connections. Divergence: general contrast functions Dual Peking University June 21, 2016 Divergences: Riemannian connection Let M be a manifold on which there is given a Riemannian metric g =,. A connection satisfying Z X, Y = Z X, Y + X, Z Y (1) for all

More information

Legendre Transforms, Calculus of Varations, and Mechanics Principles

Legendre Transforms, Calculus of Varations, and Mechanics Principles page 437 Appendix C Legendre Transforms, Calculus of Varations, and Mechanics Principles C.1 Legendre Transforms Legendre transforms map functions in a vector space to functions in the dual space. From

More information

Dirac Structures and the Legendre Transformation for Implicit Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Systems

Dirac Structures and the Legendre Transformation for Implicit Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Systems Dirac Structures and the Legendre Transformation for Implicit Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Systems Hiroaki Yoshimura Mechanical Engineering, Waseda University Tokyo, Japan Joint Work with Jerrold E. Marsden

More information

Hamiltonian Field Theory

Hamiltonian Field Theory Hamiltonian Field Theory August 31, 016 1 Introduction So far we have treated classical field theory using Lagrangian and an action principle for Lagrangian. This approach is called Lagrangian field theory

More information

Balanced models in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Hamiltonian formulation, constraints and formal stability

Balanced models in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Hamiltonian formulation, constraints and formal stability Balanced models in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Hamiltonian formulation, constraints and formal stability Onno Bokhove 1 Introduction Most fluid systems, such as the three-dimensional compressible Euler

More information

Physics 235 Chapter 7. Chapter 7 Hamilton's Principle - Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics

Physics 235 Chapter 7. Chapter 7 Hamilton's Principle - Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics Chapter 7 Hamilton's Principle - Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics Many interesting physics systems describe systems of particles on which many forces are acting. Some of these forces are immediately

More information

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Hamiltonian Formulation & Canonical Transformation

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Hamiltonian Formulation & Canonical Transformation 1 PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics Hamiltonian Formulation & Canonical Transformation Legendre Transform Let consider the simple case with ust a real value function: F x F x expresses a relationship between

More information

Hamilton-Jacobi theory

Hamilton-Jacobi theory Hamilton-Jacobi theory November 9, 04 We conclude with the crowning theorem of Hamiltonian dynamics: a proof that for any Hamiltonian dynamical system there exists a canonical transformation to a set of

More information

Hamiltonian Solution I

Hamiltonian Solution I Physics 4 Lecture 5 Hamiltonian Solution I Lecture 5 Physics 4 Classical Mechanics II September 7th 2007 Here we continue with the Hamiltonian formulation of the central body problem we will uncover the

More information

Housekeeping. No announcement HW #7: 3.19

Housekeeping. No announcement HW #7: 3.19 1 Housekeeping No announcement HW #7: 3.19 2 Configuration Space vs. Phase Space 1 A given point in configuration space q q prescribes fully the 1,, n configuration of the system at a given time t. The

More information

Chapter 11. Hamiltonian formulation Legendre transformations

Chapter 11. Hamiltonian formulation Legendre transformations Chapter 11 Hamiltonian formulation In reformulating mechanics in the language of a variational principle and Lagrangians in Chapter 4, we learned about a powerful new technology that helps us unravel dynamics

More information

p 1 ( Y p dp) 1/p ( X p dp) 1 1 p

p 1 ( Y p dp) 1/p ( X p dp) 1 1 p Doob s inequality Let X(t) be a right continuous submartingale with respect to F(t), t 1 P(sup s t X(s) λ) 1 λ {sup s t X(s) λ} X + (t)dp 2 For 1 < p

More information

Chaos in Hamiltonian systems

Chaos in Hamiltonian systems Chaos in Hamiltonian systems Teemu Laakso April 26, 2013 Course material: Chapter 7 from Ott 1993/2002, Chaos in Dynamical Systems, Cambridge http://matriisi.ee.tut.fi/courses/mat-35006 Useful reading:

More information

Dynamics and Stability application to submerged bodies, vortex streets and vortex-body systems

Dynamics and Stability application to submerged bodies, vortex streets and vortex-body systems Dynamics and Stability application to submerged bodies, vortex streets and vortex-body systems Eva Kanso University of Southern California CDS 140B Introduction to Dynamics February 5 and 7, 2008 Fish

More information

PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 16 th, 2015 Assignment # 11, Solutions. p θ = L θ = mr2 θ, p φ = L θ = mr2 sin 2 θ φ.

PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 16 th, 2015 Assignment # 11, Solutions. p θ = L θ = mr2 θ, p φ = L θ = mr2 sin 2 θ φ. PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall 215 November 16 th, 215 Assignment # 11, Solutions 1 Graded problems Problem 1 1.a) The Lagrangian is L = 1 2 m(ṙ2 +r 2 θ2 +r 2 sin 2 θ φ 2 ) V(r), (1) and the conjugate

More information

Page 712. Lecture 42: Rotations and Orbital Angular Momentum in Two Dimensions Date Revised: 2009/02/04 Date Given: 2009/02/04

Page 712. Lecture 42: Rotations and Orbital Angular Momentum in Two Dimensions Date Revised: 2009/02/04 Date Given: 2009/02/04 Page 71 Lecture 4: Rotations and Orbital Angular Momentum in Two Dimensions Date Revised: 009/0/04 Date Given: 009/0/04 Plan of Attack Section 14.1 Rotations and Orbital Angular Momentum: Plan of Attack

More information

Liouville integrability of Hamiltonian systems and spacetime symmetry

Liouville integrability of Hamiltonian systems and spacetime symmetry Seminar, Kobe U., April 22, 2015 Liouville integrability of Hamiltonian systems and spacetime symmetry Tsuyoshi Houri with D. Kubiznak (Perimeter Inst.), C. Warnick (Warwick U.) Y. Yasui (OCU Setsunan

More information

Canonical transformations and exact invariants for time-dependent Hamiltonian systems

Canonical transformations and exact invariants for time-dependent Hamiltonian systems Ann. Phys. Leipzig 11 00 1, 15 38 Canonical transformations and exact invariants for time-dependent Hamiltonian systems Jürgen Struckmeier a and Claus Riedel Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung GSI,

More information

Review of Lagrangian Mechanics and Reduction

Review of Lagrangian Mechanics and Reduction Review of Lagrangian Mechanics and Reduction Joel W. Burdick and Patricio Vela California Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering, BioEngineering Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Verona Short Course, August

More information

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from? 110 Phys460.nb 7 Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from? 7.1. Lagrangian mechanics and canonical quantization Q: How do we quantize a general system? 7.1.1.Lagrangian Lagrangian

More information

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS Third Year SEMESTER 1 015 016 Classical Mechanics MP350 Prof. S. J. Hands, Prof. D. M. Heffernan, Dr. J.-I. Skullerud and Dr. M. Fremling Time allowed: 1 1 hours Answer two questions

More information

(Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7) p j . (5.1) !q j. " d dt = 0 (5.2) !p j . (5.

(Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7) p j . (5.1) !q j.  d dt = 0 (5.2) !p j . (5. Chapter 5. Hamiltonian Dynamics (Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7) 5.1 The Canonical Equations of Motion As we saw in section 4.7.4, the generalized

More information

Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Method

Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Method Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Method Mingwei Tang Department of Statistics University of Washington mingwt@uw.edu November 14, 2017 1 Hamiltonian System Notation: q R d : position vector, p R

More information

Chapter 1 Symplectic Integrator and Beam Dynamics Simulations

Chapter 1 Symplectic Integrator and Beam Dynamics Simulations Chapter 1 and Beam Accelerator Physics Group, Journal Club November 9, 2010 and Beam NSLS-II Brookhaven National Laboratory 1.1 (70) Big Picture for Numerical Accelerator Physics and Beam For single particle

More information

= 0. = q i., q i = E

= 0. = q i., q i = E Summary of the Above Newton s second law: d 2 r dt 2 = Φ( r) Complicated vector arithmetic & coordinate system dependence Lagrangian Formalism: L q i d dt ( L q i ) = 0 n second-order differential equations

More information

Problem 1: Lagrangians and Conserved Quantities. Consider the following action for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension

Problem 1: Lagrangians and Conserved Quantities. Consider the following action for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension 105A Practice Final Solutions March 13, 01 William Kelly Problem 1: Lagrangians and Conserved Quantities Consider the following action for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension S = dtl = mc dt 1

More information

Lecture notes on Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism in Accelerator Physics

Lecture notes on Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism in Accelerator Physics G. Stupakov Revision 20 Lecture notes on Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism in Accelerator Physics The US Particle Accelerator School June 13-24, 2011 Melville, New York 2011 Contents 1 Preliminaries

More information

763620SS STATISTICAL PHYSICS Solutions 5 Autumn 2012

763620SS STATISTICAL PHYSICS Solutions 5 Autumn 2012 7660SS STATISTICAL PHYSICS Solutions 5 Autumn 01 1 Classical Flow in Phase Space Determine the trajectories of classical Hamiltonian flow in -dim corresponding to a particle in a constant gravitational

More information

Differential Kinematics

Differential Kinematics Differential Kinematics Relations between motion (velocity) in joint space and motion (linear/angular velocity) in task space (e.g., Cartesian space) Instantaneous velocity mappings can be obtained through

More information

2

2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK First Examination for PhD Candidates in Physics Analytical Dynamics Summer 2010 Do two of the

More information

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY Utrecht Lecture Notes Masters Program Theoretical Physics September 2006 INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY by B. de Wit Institute for Theoretical Physics Utrecht University Contents 1 Introduction 4

More information

On explicit integration of two non-holonomic problems

On explicit integration of two non-holonomic problems On explicit integration of two non-holonomic problems Alexey V. Borisov 1 1 Institute of Computer Sciences, Izhevsk, Russia Generalized Chaplygin systems Equations of motion of the generalized Chaplygin

More information

More On Carbon Monoxide

More On Carbon Monoxide More On Carbon Monoxide E = 0.25 ± 0.05 ev Electron beam results Jerry Gilfoyle The Configurations of CO 1 / 26 More On Carbon Monoxide E = 0.25 ± 0.05 ev Electron beam results Jerry Gilfoyle The Configurations

More information

Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians: Energy, Momentum, and the Quantum Free Particle

Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians: Energy, Momentum, and the Quantum Free Particle Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians: Energy, Momentum, and the Quantum Free Particle Peter Woit Department of Mathematics, Columbia University woit@math.columbia.edu November 28, 2012 We ll now turn to

More information

The Principle of Least Action

The Principle of Least Action The Principle of Least Action Anders Svensson Abstract In this paper, the principle of least action in classical mechanics is studied. The term is used in several different contexts, mainly for Hamilton

More information

REVIEW. Hamilton s principle. based on FW-18. Variational statement of mechanics: (for conservative forces) action Equivalent to Newton s laws!

REVIEW. Hamilton s principle. based on FW-18. Variational statement of mechanics: (for conservative forces) action Equivalent to Newton s laws! Hamilton s principle Variational statement of mechanics: (for conservative forces) action Equivalent to Newton s laws! based on FW-18 REVIEW the particle takes the path that minimizes the integrated difference

More information

Generators for Continuous Coordinate Transformations

Generators for Continuous Coordinate Transformations Page 636 Lecture 37: Coordinate Transformations: Continuous Passive Coordinate Transformations Active Coordinate Transformations Date Revised: 2009/01/28 Date Given: 2009/01/26 Generators for Continuous

More information

M3/4A16. GEOMETRICAL MECHANICS, Part 1

M3/4A16. GEOMETRICAL MECHANICS, Part 1 M3/4A16 GEOMETRICAL MECHANICS, Part 1 (2009) Page 1 of 5 UNIVERSITY OF LONDON Course: M3/4A16 Setter: Holm Checker: Gibbons Editor: Chen External: Date: January 27, 2008 BSc and MSci EXAMINATIONS (MATHEMATICS)

More information

Entropy Gradient Maximization for Systems with Discoupled Time

Entropy Gradient Maximization for Systems with Discoupled Time Entropy Gradient Maximization for Systems with Discoupled Time I. V. Drozdov Abstract The conventional definition of time based on the period of oscillations or fluctuations around equilibrium states is

More information

Averaging II: Adiabatic Invariance for Integrable Systems (argued via the Averaging Principle)

Averaging II: Adiabatic Invariance for Integrable Systems (argued via the Averaging Principle) Averaging II: Adiabatic Invariance for Integrable Systems (argued via the Averaging Principle In classical mechanics an adiabatic invariant is defined as follows[1]. Consider the Hamiltonian system with

More information

Chaotic motion. Phys 420/580 Lecture 10

Chaotic motion. Phys 420/580 Lecture 10 Chaotic motion Phys 420/580 Lecture 10 Finite-difference equations Finite difference equation approximates a differential equation as an iterative map (x n+1,v n+1 )=M[(x n,v n )] Evolution from time t

More information

[#1] R 3 bracket for the spherical pendulum

[#1] R 3 bracket for the spherical pendulum .. Holm Tuesday 11 January 2011 Solutions to MSc Enhanced Coursework for MA16 1 M3/4A16 MSc Enhanced Coursework arryl Holm Solutions Tuesday 11 January 2011 [#1] R 3 bracket for the spherical pendulum

More information

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions Physics 342 Lecture 21 Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions Lecture 21 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monday, March 22nd, 21 We are used to the temporal separation that gives, for example, the timeindependent

More information

The kinetic equation (Lecture 11)

The kinetic equation (Lecture 11) The kinetic equation (Lecture 11) January 29, 2016 190/441 Lecture outline In the preceding lectures we focused our attention on a single particle motion. In this lecture, we will introduce formalism for

More information

Introduction to Integrability

Introduction to Integrability Introduction to Integrability Problem Sets ETH Zurich, HS16 Prof. N. Beisert, A. Garus c 2016 Niklas Beisert, ETH Zurich This document as well as its parts is protected by copyright. This work is licensed

More information

On Symmetry and Conserved Quantities in Classical Mechanics

On Symmetry and Conserved Quantities in Classical Mechanics On Symmetry and Conserved Quantities in Classical Mechanics J. Butterfield 1 All Souls College Oxford OX1 4AL Tuesday 12 July 2005; for a Festschrift for Jeffrey Bub, ed. W. Demopoulos and I. Pitowsky,

More information

BFT embedding of noncommutative D-brane system. Abstract

BFT embedding of noncommutative D-brane system. Abstract SOGANG-HEP 271/00 BFT embedding of noncommutative D-brane system Soon-Tae Hong,WonTaeKim, Young-Jai Park, and Myung Seok Yoon Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University,

More information

Path Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor

Path Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor EJTP 6, No. 22 (2009) 189 196 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Path Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor Walaa. I. Eshraim and Nasser. I. Farahat Department of

More information

From Particles to Fields

From Particles to Fields From Particles to Fields Tien-Tsan Shieh Institute of Mathematics Academic Sinica July 25, 2011 Tien-Tsan Shieh (Institute of MathematicsAcademic Sinica) From Particles to Fields July 25, 2011 1 / 24 Hamiltonian

More information

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION 1. The basic idea The setting of the Hamiltonian version of classical (Newtonian) mechanics is the phase space (position and momentum), which is a symplectic manifold. The typical

More information

2.3 Calculus of variations

2.3 Calculus of variations 2.3 Calculus of variations 2.3.1 Euler-Lagrange equation The action functional S[x(t)] = L(x, ẋ, t) dt (2.3.1) which maps a curve x(t) to a number, can be expanded in a Taylor series { S[x(t) + δx(t)]

More information

Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation

Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation 1 Orbital angular momentum operator According to the classic expression of orbital angular momentum L = r p, we define the quantum operator L x =

More information

Physics 70007, Fall 2009 Answers to Final Exam

Physics 70007, Fall 2009 Answers to Final Exam Physics 70007, Fall 009 Answers to Final Exam December 17, 009 1. Quantum mechanical pictures a Demonstrate that if the commutation relation [A, B] ic is valid in any of the three Schrodinger, Heisenberg,

More information

Synchro-Betatron Motion in Circular Accelerators

Synchro-Betatron Motion in Circular Accelerators Outlines Synchro-Betatron Motion in Circular Accelerators Kevin Li March 30, 2011 Kevin Li Synchro-Betatron Motion 1/ 70 Outline of Part I Outlines Part I: and Model Introduction Part II: The Transverse

More information

L(q, q) = m 2 q2 V (q) 2 m + V (q)

L(q, q) = m 2 q2 V (q) 2 m + V (q) Lecture 7 Phase Space, Part 1 MATH-GA 71.1 Mechanics 1 Phase portraits 1.1 One dimensional system Consider the generic one dimensional case of a point mass m described by a generalized coordinate q and

More information

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 31 Jan 2006

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 31 Jan 2006 Hamilton-Jacobi theory for Hamiltonian systems with non-canonical symplectic structures Aldo A. Martínez-Merino and Merced Montesinos Departamento de Física, Cinvestav, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional

More information

A Characterization of Conserved Quantities in Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics

A Characterization of Conserved Quantities in Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics Entropy 2013, 15, 5580-5596; doi:10.3390/e15125580 OPEN ACCESS entropy ISSN 1099-4300 www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy Article A Characterization of Conserved Quantities in Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics Ignacio

More information

CE 530 Molecular Simulation

CE 530 Molecular Simulation CE 530 Molecular Simulation Lecture Molecular Dynamics Simulation David A. Kofke Department of Chemical Engineering SUNY Buffalo kofke@eng.buffalo.edu MD of hard disks intuitive Review and Preview collision

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 18 Nov 2008

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 18 Nov 2008 arxiv:0811.2889v1 [math.ds] 18 Nov 2008 Abstract Quaternions And Dynamics Basile Graf basile.graf@epfl.ch February, 2007 We give a simple and self contained introduction to quaternions and their practical

More information

Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations

Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations JUHA POHJANPELTO Oregon State and Aalto Universities Focused Research Workshop on Exterior Differential Systems and Lie Theory Fields Institute,

More information

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems (Courses in canonical gravity) Yaser Tavakoli December 15, 2014 1 Introduction In canonical formulation of general relativity, geometry of space-time is given

More information

Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity

Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity Jon Allen The Dirac formalism for dealing with constraints in a canonical Hamiltonian formulation is reviewed. Gauge freedom is discussed and

More information

Liouville Equation. q s = H p s

Liouville Equation. q s = H p s Liouville Equation In this section we will build a bridge from Classical Mechanics to Statistical Physics. The bridge is Liouville equation. We start with the Hamiltonian formalism of the Classical Mechanics,

More information

From quantum to classical statistical mechanics. Polyatomic ideal gas.

From quantum to classical statistical mechanics. Polyatomic ideal gas. From quantum to classical statistical mechanics. Polyatomic ideal gas. Peter Košovan peter.kosovan@natur.cuni.cz Dept. of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry Lecture 5, Statistical Thermodynamics, MC260P105,

More information

Math512 PDE Homework 2

Math512 PDE Homework 2 Math51 PDE Homework October 11, 009 Exercise 1.3. Solve u = xu x +yu y +(u x+y y/ = 0 with initial conditon u(x, 0 = 1 x. Proof. In this case, we have F = xp + yq + (p + q / z = 0 and Γ parameterized as

More information

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 1

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 1 PHY411 Lecture notes Part 1 Alice Quillen April 6, 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Hamiltonian Mechanics............................. 2 1.2 Lagrangian mechanics.............................. 4 1.3 Dynamical

More information

FYS 3120: Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics

FYS 3120: Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics FYS 3120: Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics Formula Collection Spring semester 2014 1 Analytical Mechanics The Lagrangian L = L(q, q, t), (1) is a function of the generalized coordinates q = {q i

More information

Canonical Transformations and the Hamilton-Jacobi Theory in Quantum Mechanics

Canonical Transformations and the Hamilton-Jacobi Theory in Quantum Mechanics Canonical Transformations and the Hamilton-Jacobi Theory in Quantum Mechanics Jung-Hoon Kim and Hai-Woong Lee Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Taejon, 305-70,

More information

The Microcanonical Approach. (a) The volume of accessible phase space for a given total energy is proportional to. dq 1 dq 2 dq N dp 1 dp 2 dp N,

The Microcanonical Approach. (a) The volume of accessible phase space for a given total energy is proportional to. dq 1 dq 2 dq N dp 1 dp 2 dp N, 8333: Statistical Mechanics I Problem Set # 6 Solutions Fall 003 Classical Harmonic Oscillators: The Microcanonical Approach a The volume of accessible phase space for a given total energy is proportional

More information

Part of the advantage : Constraint forces do no virtual. work under a set of virtual displacements compatible

Part of the advantage : Constraint forces do no virtual. work under a set of virtual displacements compatible FORCES OF CONSTRAINT Lagrangian formalism : Generalized coordinate Minimum set of Eqns Part of the advantage : Constraint forces do no virtual work under a set of virtual displacements compatible with

More information