Output Stabilization of Time-Varying Input Delay System using Interval Observer Technique
|
|
- Cecilia Thornton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Output Stabilization of Time-Varying Input Delay System using Interval Observer Technique Andrey Polyakov a, Denis Efimov a, Wilfrid Perruquetti a,b and Jean-Pierre Richard a,b a - NON-A, INRIA Lille Nord-Europe b - LAGIS CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Lille (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 1 / 22
2 Outline 1 Introduction (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 2 / 22
3 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Problem statement (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 2 / 22
4 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Problem statement 3 Interval observer and interval predictor (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 2 / 22
5 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Problem statement 3 Interval observer and interval predictor 4 Control design (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 2 / 22
6 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Problem statement 3 Interval observer and interval predictor 4 Control design 5 Examples (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 2 / 22
7 Motivation (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 3 / 22
8 Motivation I. Output-based control is usual for practice; challenging problem in many cases. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 3 / 22
9 Motivation I. Output-based control is usual for practice; challenging problem in many cases. II. Input Delay arises in models of a control system due to a physical nature of a system (transport delays, computational delay, etc); artificially, for example, in order to model a sampling effect. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 3 / 22
10 Motivation I. Output-based control is usual for practice; challenging problem in many cases. II. Input Delay arises in models of a control system due to a physical nature of a system (transport delays, computational delay, etc); artificially, for example, in order to model a sampling effect. III. In practice, delay may be time-varying; unknown. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 3 / 22
11 Existing results (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 4 / 22
12 Existing results I. Stabilizing output-based control is designed for linear system with known and constant input delay (Olbrot 1972, Watanabe 1986); (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 4 / 22
13 Existing results I. Stabilizing output-based control is designed for linear system with known and constant input delay (Olbrot 1972, Watanabe 1986); with known and time-varying input delay (Artstein 1982; Witrant, Canudas-de-Wit, Georges & Alamir 2007); (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 4 / 22
14 Existing results I. Stabilizing output-based control is designed for linear system with known and constant input delay (Olbrot 1972, Watanabe 1986); with known and time-varying input delay (Artstein 1982; Witrant, Canudas-de-Wit, Georges & Alamir 2007); with unknown and constant input delay the possible ways are: finite-time delay identification (Belkoura, Richard & Fliess 2009); adaptive control approach (Bresch-Pierti, Krstic 2009). (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 4 / 22
15 Existing results I. Stabilizing output-based control is designed for linear system with known and constant input delay (Olbrot 1972, Watanabe 1986); with known and time-varying input delay (Artstein 1982; Witrant, Canudas-de-Wit, Georges & Alamir 2007); with unknown and constant input delay the possible ways are: finite-time delay identification (Belkoura, Richard & Fliess 2009); adaptive control approach (Bresch-Pierti, Krstic 2009). II. For linear system with an unknown time varying input delay are designed (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 4 / 22
16 Existing results I. Stabilizing output-based control is designed for linear system with known and constant input delay (Olbrot 1972, Watanabe 1986); with known and time-varying input delay (Artstein 1982; Witrant, Canudas-de-Wit, Georges & Alamir 2007); with unknown and constant input delay the possible ways are: finite-time delay identification (Belkoura, Richard & Fliess 2009); adaptive control approach (Bresch-Pierti, Krstic 2009). II. For linear system with an unknown time varying input delay are designed the full state feedback control (Fridman, Seuret & Richard 2004); (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 4 / 22
17 Existing results I. Stabilizing output-based control is designed for linear system with known and constant input delay (Olbrot 1972, Watanabe 1986); with known and time-varying input delay (Artstein 1982; Witrant, Canudas-de-Wit, Georges & Alamir 2007); with unknown and constant input delay the possible ways are: finite-time delay identification (Belkoura, Richard & Fliess 2009); adaptive control approach (Bresch-Pierti, Krstic 2009). II. For linear system with an unknown time varying input delay are designed the full state feedback control (Fridman, Seuret & Richard 2004); observer for systems with unknown time varying input and state delays (Seuret, Floquet, Richard, Spurgeon 2007). (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 4 / 22
18 Existing results I. Stabilizing output-based control is designed for linear system with known and constant input delay (Olbrot 1972, Watanabe 1986); with known and time-varying input delay (Artstein 1982; Witrant, Canudas-de-Wit, Georges & Alamir 2007); with unknown and constant input delay the possible ways are: finite-time delay identification (Belkoura, Richard & Fliess 2009); adaptive control approach (Bresch-Pierti, Krstic 2009). II. For linear system with an unknown time varying input delay are designed the full state feedback control (Fridman, Seuret & Richard 2004); observer for systems with unknown time varying input and state delays (Seuret, Floquet, Richard, Spurgeon 2007). III. H.-L. Choi and J.-T. Lim. Output feedback regulation of a chain of integrators with an unknown time-varying delay in the input. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(1): , (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 4 / 22
19 System description Consider the input delay control system of the form ẋ = Ax + Bu(t h(t)), y = Cx, (1) where x R n is the system state, u R m is the vector of control inputs, y R k is the measured output, A R n n, B R n m and C R k n are known matrices and input delay h(t) is assumed to be unknown but within the bounded interval: 0 h h(t) h, (2) where the minimum delay h and the maximum delay h are known. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 5 / 22
20 System description Consider the input delay control system of the form ẋ = Ax + Bu(t h(t)), y = Cx, (1) where x R n is the system state, u R m is the vector of control inputs, y R k is the measured output, A R n n, B R n m and C R k n are known matrices and input delay h(t) is assumed to be unknown but within the bounded interval: 0 h h(t) h, (2) where the minimum delay h and the maximum delay h are known. The system (1) is studied with the initial conditions: x(0) = x 0, u(t) = v(t) for t [ h, 0), (3) where v(t) is some bounded function. For simplicity we may assume v(t) = 0. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 5 / 22
21 Basic Assumptions Assumption (1) The set Ω R n of admissible initial conditions x 0 Ω of the system (1) is assumed to be bounded and known. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 6 / 22
22 Basic Assumptions Assumption (1) The set Ω R n of admissible initial conditions x 0 Ω of the system (1) is assumed to be bounded and known. Assumption (2) The pair (A, B) is controllable and the pair (A, C ) is observable. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 6 / 22
23 Basic Assumptions Assumption (1) The set Ω R n of admissible initial conditions x 0 Ω of the system (1) is assumed to be bounded and known. Assumption (2) The pair (A, B) is controllable and the pair (A, C ) is observable. Assumption (3) The information on the control signal u(t) on the time interval [t h, t) can be stored and used for control design. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 6 / 22
24 Problem statement Problem The main objective of this research is to design a control algorithm for exponential stabilization of the system (1), i.e. for some numbers c, r > 0 any solution of the closed-loop system (1) has to satisfy the inequality where x(0) Ω. x(t) ce rt, t > 0, (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 7 / 22
25 Interval observation (Gouze, Rapaport & Hadj-Sadok 2000) x(t) = Ã x(t) + f (t), y = C x where x R n, y R k, Ã R n n, C R k n, and f : R R n : f (t) f (t) f (t), where f (t) and f (t) are known. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 8 / 22
26 Interval observation (Gouze, Rapaport & Hadj-Sadok 2000) x(t) = à x(t) + f (t), y = C x where x R n, y R k, à R n n, C R k n, and f : R R n : where f (t) and f (t) are known. f (t) f (t) f (t), ẋ(t) = Ãx(t) + f (t) + L( Cx(t) y(t)), ẋ(t) = Ãx(t) + f (t) + L( Cx(t) y(t)), x(0) x(0) x(0) and à + L C Hurwitz and Metzler matrix. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 8 / 22
27 Interval observation (Gouze, Rapaport & Hadj-Sadok 2000) x(t) = à x(t) + f (t), y = C x where x R n, y R k, à R n n, C R k n, and f : R R n : where f (t) and f (t) are known. f (t) f (t) f (t), ẋ(t) = Ãx(t) + f (t) + L( Cx(t) y(t)), ẋ(t) = Ãx(t) + f (t) + L( Cx(t) y(t)), x(0) x(0) x(0) and à + L C Hurwitz and Metzler matrix. e = x x and e = x x ė = (à + L C )e + f (t) f (t), ė = (à + L C )e + f (t) f (t), positive system. e(t) 0 and e(t) 0 (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 8 / 22
28 Illustration of the interval observation (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 9 / 22
29 Interval observer for Time-varying Input Delay System Lemma Under Assumptions 2-3 there always exist matrices L R n k and S R n n, det(s) = 0 such that S 1 (A + LC )S Hurwitz and Metzler, (4) and the interval observer of the form ẋ(t) = Ãx(t) + min s [t h,t h] Bu(s) + L( Cx(t) y(t)), ẋ(t) = Ãx(t) + max s [t h,t h] Bu(s) + L( Cx(t) y(t)), x(0) x(0) x(0), Ã = S 1 AS, B = S 1 B, L = S 1 L, C = CS, x = S 1 x, (5) guarantees x(t) x(t) x(t) t > 0, (6) and x(t) x(t), x(t) x(t) if u(t) 0 for t +. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 10 / 22
30 Some remarks (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 11 / 22
31 Some remarks I. Let Hurwitz and Metzler matrix R be given and we need to find S, L: S 1 (A + LC )S = R. Denote X = S 1 and Y = S 1 L. Then XA + YC = RX. (7) If the matrix R has disjoint spectrum and the pair (A, C ) is observable then the equation (7) has a solution. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 11 / 22
32 Some remarks I. Let Hurwitz and Metzler matrix R be given and we need to find S, L: S 1 (A + LC )S = R. Denote X = S 1 and Y = S 1 L. Then XA + YC = RX. (7) If the matrix R has disjoint spectrum and the pair (A, C ) is observable then the equation (7) has a solution. II. The condition x(0) x(0) x(0) may be guaranteed, since the set of admissible initial conditions Ω is assumed to be known and bounded. For example, if Ω = {x R n : x T Px < 1}, P 0, then x T S T PS x < 1 and x i (0) = x i (0) = 1/λ min (S T PS), i = 1, 2,..., n. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 11 / 22
33 Interval predictor let us introduce the following predictor variables: 0 z(t) = eãh x(t) + e Aθ min Bu(s)d θ, (8) h s [t+θ h+h,t+θ] 0 z(t) = eãh x(t) + e Aθ max Bu(s)d θ, (9) h s [t+θ h+h,t+θ] which are correctly defined due to Assumption 3. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 12 / 22
34 Control design Let us define the control in the form u(t) = Kz(t), z(t) = z(t) + z(t), (10) 2 where K R m n. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 13 / 22
35 Control design Let us define the control in the form u(t) = Kz(t), z(t) = z(t) + z(t), (10) 2 where K R m n. Remark Let us mention that the control function can be selected in a more general form u(t) = K z(t) + Kz(t), where K, K R m n. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 13 / 22
36 Main Result Theorem If for some given α, β, γ R + the matrices X, Z, R i, S i R n n, i = 1, 2,..., 2n and the matrix Y R m n satisfy the following LMI system ( ) We W ez 0, X 0, Z 0, R i 0, S i 0, (11) W T ez W z then the system (1) together with the control (10) for K = YX 1 is exponentially stable with the convergence rate : r min{α, β, γ}. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 14 / 22
37 W z = W e = Π 1 B 1 Y... B 2n Y Y T B 1 T e β h S Y T B 2n T e β h S 2n, Π 2 X Ã T + Y T B T B 1 Y... B 2n Y ÃX + BY Π 3 B 1 Y... B 2n Y Y T B 1 T Y T B 1 T e α h R Y T B 2n T Y T B 2n T 0... e α h R 2n ( Z C W ez = T L T eãt h [ ] ) I n I n 0, 0 0 Π 1 = (Ã + L C )Z + Z (Ã + L C ) T + βz, Π 2 = ÃX + BY + X Ã T + Y T B T + αx, Π 3 = 1 4 2n i=1(r i + e γh S i ) 2 hx, h := h h, where B i R n m, i = 1, 2,..., n is such that i-th row of B i coincides with i-th row of B but all other rows of B i are zero; B n+i = B i, i = 1, 2..., n. For sufficiently small h the LMI is feasible. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 15 / 22
38 Double integrator A = ( ) ( 0, B = 1 ), C = ( 1 0 ) (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 16 / 22
39 Double integrator A = ( ) ( 0, B = 1 ), C = ( 1 0 ) Solving the Silvester s equation (7) for ( ) R = we derive and Ã= S = ( ( ) ( , B= ) ( , L = ) ), C= ( ). (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 16 / 22
40 Double integrator A = ( ) ( 0, B = 1 ), C = ( 1 0 ) Solving the Silvester s equation (7) for ( ) R = we derive and Ã= S = ( ( ) ( , B= ) ( , L = ) ), C= ( ). h = 2, h = 4; K = ( ), h(t) = 3 + cos(100t); x(0) = (1, 1) T, v(t) = 0, t [ h, 0) (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 16 / 22
41 Figure: Controlled double integrator: Interval Predictor-based Feedback. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 17 / 22
42 Figure: Controlled double integrator: Interval Predictor-based Feedback. Figure: Controlled double integrator: Results of Choi & Lim (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 17 / 22
43 Linear oscillator A = ( ) ( 0, B = 1 ), C = ( 1 0 ). Solving the Silvester s equation (7) for ( ) R = leads to ( S = ( Ã = ) ( , L = ), B = 10 3 ( C = ( ). Finally, using Sedumi-1.3 for MATLAB we solve LMI system (11) for α = β = γ = 0.2, h = 1, h = 2 and obtain K = ( ). (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 18 / 22 ). ),
44 Figure: Linear oscillator h(t) = (1 sign(cos(0.5t))), x(0) = (0, 1) T and v(t) = 0. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 19 / 22
45 Unstable system A = ( ) ( 0, B = 1 ), C = ( 1 0 ), h = 1, and h = 2. h(t) = sin(t), x(0) = (1, 0) T and v(t) = 0. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 20 / 22
46 Summary (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 21 / 22
47 Summary The interval observer and interval predictor for linear systems with a unknown time-varying input delay are introduced. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 21 / 22
48 Summary The interval observer and interval predictor for linear systems with a unknown time-varying input delay are introduced. The interval predictor-based output control algorithm is presented. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 21 / 22
49 Summary The interval observer and interval predictor for linear systems with a unknown time-varying input delay are introduced. The interval predictor-based output control algorithm is presented. Control problems with another delays (output or/and state) and system uncertainties can be also tackled by this technique. (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 21 / 22
50 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION (NON-A & LAGIS) Interval Predictor 22 / 22
Observer design for systems with non small and unknown time-varying delay
Observer design for systems with non small and unknown time-varying delay Alexandre Seuret, Thierry Floquet, Jean-Pierre Richard, Sarah Spurgeon To cite this version: Alexandre Seuret, Thierry Floquet,
More informationROBUST PASSIVE OBSERVER-BASED CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF SINGULAR SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATON AND SYSTEMS SCIENCES Volume 5 Number 3-4 Pages 480 487 c 2009 Institute for Scientific Computing and Information ROBUST PASSIVE OBSERVER-BASED CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF
More informationA new approach to design interval observers for linear systems
TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. XX, NO. Y, DECEMBER 20ZZ 1 A new approach to design interval observers for linear systems Filippo Cacace, Alfredo Germani, Costanzo Manes Abstract Interval observers
More informationGrammians. Matthew M. Peet. Lecture 20: Grammians. Illinois Institute of Technology
Grammians Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 2: Grammians Lyapunov Equations Proposition 1. Suppose A is Hurwitz and Q is a square matrix. Then X = e AT s Qe As ds is the unique solution
More informationStabilisation of network controlled systems with a predictive approach
Stabilisation of network controlled systems with a predictive approach Emmanuel Witrant with D. Georges, C. Canudas de Wit and O. Sename Laboratoire d Automatique de Grenoble, UMR CNRS 5528 ENSIEG-INPG,
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationThe norms can also be characterized in terms of Riccati inequalities.
9 Analysis of stability and H norms Consider the causal, linear, time-invariant system ẋ(t = Ax(t + Bu(t y(t = Cx(t Denote the transfer function G(s := C (si A 1 B. Theorem 85 The following statements
More informationState Feedback and State Estimators Linear System Theory and Design, Chapter 8.
1 Linear System Theory and Design, http://zitompul.wordpress.com 2 0 1 4 State Estimator In previous section, we have discussed the state feedback, based on the assumption that all state variables are
More informationPrediction-based control with delay estimation of LTI systems with input-output delays
Prediction-based control with delay estimation of LTI systems with input-output delays Yang Deng, Vincent Léchappé, Emmanuel Moulay, Franck Plestan To cite this version: Yang Deng, Vincent Léchappé, Emmanuel
More informationModern Optimal Control
Modern Optimal Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 19: Stabilization via LMIs Optimization Optimization can be posed in functional form: min x F objective function : inequality constraints
More informationProblem Set 5 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 5 Solutions The problem set deals with Hankel
More informationLMIs for Observability and Observer Design
LMIs for Observability and Observer Design Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 06: LMIs for Observability and Observer Design Observability Consider a system with no input: ẋ(t) = Ax(t), x(0)
More information1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole
EECS C8/ME C34 Fall Problem Set 9 Solutions (3 pts) Dominant Pole For the following transfer function: Y (s) U(s) = (s + )(s + ) a) Give state space description of the system in parallel form (ẋ = Ax +
More informationACM/CMS 107 Linear Analysis & Applications Fall 2016 Assignment 4: Linear ODEs and Control Theory Due: 5th December 2016
ACM/CMS 17 Linear Analysis & Applications Fall 216 Assignment 4: Linear ODEs and Control Theory Due: 5th December 216 Introduction Systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) can be used to describe
More informationA novel control scheme for teleoperation with guaranteed performance under time-varying delays
A novel control scheme for teleoperation with guaranteed performance under time-varying delays Bo Zhang, Alexandre Kruszewski, Jean-Pierre Richard To cite this version: Bo Zhang, Alexandre Kruszewski,
More informationChapter 3. LQ, LQG and Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 3 LQ, LQG and Control System H 2 Design Overview LQ optimization state feedback LQG optimization output feedback H 2 optimization non-stochastic version of LQG Application to feedback system design
More informationIterative methods to compute center and center-stable manifolds with application to the optimal output regulation problem
Iterative methods to compute center and center-stable manifolds with application to the optimal output regulation problem Noboru Sakamoto, Branislav Rehak N.S.: Nagoya University, Department of Aerospace
More informationMultivariable MRAC with State Feedback for Output Tracking
29 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 1-12, 29 WeA18.5 Multivariable MRAC with State Feedback for Output Tracking Jiaxing Guo, Yu Liu and Gang Tao Department
More informationLecture 15: H Control Synthesis
c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, 2010. Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 1/14 Lecture 15: H Control Synthesis Example c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, 2010. Optimal Control
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Q-Parameterization 1 This lecture introduces the so-called
More informationController Design for Robust Output Regulation of Regular Linear Systems
Controller Design for Robust Output Regulation of Regular Linear Systems L. Paunonen We present three dynamic error feedbac controllers for robust output regulation of regular linear systems. These controllers
More informationLMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control
LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 4: LMIs for State-Space Internal Stability Solving the Equations Find the output given the input State-Space:
More informationProf. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE281A Homework set 1 Linearization & phase portrait
Prof. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE28A Homework set Linearization & phase portrait. For each of the following systems, find all equilibrium points and determine the type of each isolated equilibrium. Use
More informationControl, Stabilization and Numerics for Partial Differential Equations
Paris-Sud, Orsay, December 06 Control, Stabilization and Numerics for Partial Differential Equations Enrique Zuazua Universidad Autónoma 28049 Madrid, Spain enrique.zuazua@uam.es http://www.uam.es/enrique.zuazua
More informationModern Control Systems
Modern Control Systems Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 09: Observability Observability For Static Full-State Feedback, we assume knowledge of the Full-State. In reality, we only have measurements
More informationIntroduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 4 Passivity
p. 1/6 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 4 Passivity È p. 2/6 Memoryless Functions ¹ y È Ý Ù È È È È u (b) µ power inflow = uy Resistor is passive if uy 0 p. 3/6 y y y u u u (a) (b) (c) Passive
More informationInterval observer for Linear Time Invariant (LTI) uncertain systems with state and unknown input estimations
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Interval observer for Linear Time Invariant (LTI) uncertain systems with state and unknown input estimations To cite this article: N Ellero et al
More informationEvent-triggered control subject to actuator saturation
Event-triggered control subject to actuator saturation GEORG A. KIENER Degree project in Automatic Control Master's thesis Stockholm, Sweden 212 XR-EE-RT 212:9 Diploma Thesis Event-triggered control subject
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationSampled-data implementation of derivative-dependent control using artificial delays
1 Sampled-data implementation of derivative-dependent control using artificial delays Anton Selivanov and Emilia Fridman, Senior Member, IEEE arxiv:1801.05696v1 [mat.oc] 17 Jan 2018 Abstract We study a
More informationRobust Anti-Windup Compensation for PID Controllers
Robust Anti-Windup Compensation for PID Controllers ADDISON RIOS-BOLIVAR Universidad de Los Andes Av. Tulio Febres, Mérida 511 VENEZUELA FRANCKLIN RIVAS-ECHEVERRIA Universidad de Los Andes Av. Tulio Febres,
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationRealization theory for systems biology
Realization theory for systems biology Mihály Petreczky CNRS Ecole Central Lille, France February 3, 2016 Outline Control theory and its role in biology. Realization problem: an abstract formulation. Realization
More informationarzelier
COURSE ON LMI OPTIMIZATION WITH APPLICATIONS IN CONTROL PART II.1 LMIs IN SYSTEMS CONTROL STATE-SPACE METHODS STABILITY ANALYSIS Didier HENRION www.laas.fr/ henrion henrion@laas.fr Denis ARZELIER www.laas.fr/
More informationRobust sampled-data stabilization of linear systems - An input delay approach
Robust sampled-data stabilization of linear systems - An input delay approach Emilia Fridman, Alexandre Seuret, Jean-Pierre Richard To cite this version: Emilia Fridman, Alexandre Seuret, Jean-Pierre Richard.
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationControl Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft
Control Systems Design, SC4026 SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 4 Controllability (a.k.a. Reachability) vs Observability Algebraic Tests (Kalman rank condition & Hautus test) A few
More informationL2 gains and system approximation quality 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 24: MODEL REDUCTION L2 gains and system approximation quality 1 This lecture discusses the utility
More informationME 132, Fall 2015, Quiz # 2
ME 132, Fall 2015, Quiz # 2 # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 Total NAME 14 10 8 6 14 8 60 Rules: 1. 2 sheets of notes allowed, 8.5 11 inches. Both sides can be used. 2. Calculator is allowed. Keep it in plain view
More informationStability of Linear Distributed Parameter Systems with Time-Delays
Stability of Linear Distributed Parameter Systems with Time-Delays Emilia FRIDMAN* *Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Israel joint with Yury Orlov (CICESE Research Center, Ensenada, Mexico)
More informationhal , version 1-20 May 2009
Author manuscript, published in "IFAC World Congress 2005, Prague : Czech Republic (2005" TWO CONTROL LAWS FOR A SPRAY SYSTEM WITH TIME VARYING DELAY AND DEAD BAND Jan Anthonis,1 Wouter Franssens Alexandre
More informationLecture 10: Linear Matrix Inequalities Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto
Dr-Ing Sudchai Boonto Department of Control System and Instrumentation Engineering King Mongkuts Unniversity of Technology Thonburi Thailand Linear Matrix Inequalities A linear matrix inequality (LMI)
More informationApproximation of the Linearized Boussinesq Equations
Approximation of the Linearized Boussinesq Equations Alan Lattimer Advisors Jeffrey Borggaard Serkan Gugercin Department of Mathematics Virginia Tech SIAM Talk Series, Virginia Tech, April 22, 2014 Alan
More informationPOLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19
POLE PLACEMENT Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19 Outline 1 State Feedback 2 Observer 3 Observer Feedback 4 Reduced Order
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)
More informationControl Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft
Control Systems Design, SC4026 SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 4 Controllability (a.k.a. Reachability) and Observability Algebraic Tests (Kalman rank condition & Hautus test) A few
More informationME 132, Fall 2017, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 317. G 1 (s) = 3 s + 6, G 2(s) = s + 2
ME 132, Fall 2017, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 317 Be sure to check that all of your matrix manipulations have the correct dimensions, and that the concatenations have compatible dimensions (horizontal concatenations
More informationInput/output delay approach to robust sampled-data H control
Systems & Control Letters 54 (5) 71 8 www.elsevier.com/locate/sysconle Input/output delay approach to robust sampled-data H control E. Fridman, U. Shaked, V. Suplin Department of Electrical Engineering-Systems,
More informationRiccati Equations and Inequalities in Robust Control
Riccati Equations and Inequalities in Robust Control Lianhao Yin Gabriel Ingesson Martin Karlsson Optimal Control LP4 2014 June 10, 2014 Lianhao Yin Gabriel Ingesson Martin Karlsson (LTH) H control problem
More informationMarcus Pantoja da Silva 1 and Celso Pascoli Bottura 2. Abstract: Nonlinear systems with time-varying uncertainties
A NEW PROPOSAL FOR H NORM CHARACTERIZATION AND THE OPTIMAL H CONTROL OF NONLINEAR SSTEMS WITH TIME-VARING UNCERTAINTIES WITH KNOWN NORM BOUND AND EXOGENOUS DISTURBANCES Marcus Pantoja da Silva 1 and Celso
More informationProblem Set 4 Solution 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 4 Solution Problem 4. For the SISO feedback
More informationIntro. Computer Control Systems: F8
Intro. Computer Control Systems: F8 Properties of state-space descriptions and feedback Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 22 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se F7: Quiz! 2
More informationModeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems
Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems Dr. Guillaume Ducard Fall 2017 Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control ETH Zurich, Switzerland G. Ducard c 1 / 57 Outline 1 Lecture 13: Linear System - Stability
More informationAutomatica. Sliding mode control in the presence of input delay: A singular perturbation approach. X. Han a,1, E. Fridman b, S.K.
Automatica ( ) Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Automatica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Brief paper Sliding mode control in the presence of input delay: A singular
More informationTight Robust interval observers: an LP approach
Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec 9-, 28 WeB36 Tight Robust interval observers: an LP approach M Ait Rami, C H Cheng and C de Prada Abstract This paper
More informationThe Kalman-Yakubovich-Popov Lemma for Differential-Algebraic Equations with Applications
MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE Elgersburg Workshop Elgersburg February 11-14, 2013 The Kalman-Yakubovich-Popov Lemma for Differential-Algebraic Equations with Applications Timo Reis 1 Matthias Voigt 2 1 Department
More informationConvex Optimization Approach to Dynamic Output Feedback Control for Delay Differential Systems of Neutral Type 1,2
journal of optimization theory and applications: Vol. 127 No. 2 pp. 411 423 November 2005 ( 2005) DOI: 10.1007/s10957-005-6552-7 Convex Optimization Approach to Dynamic Output Feedback Control for Delay
More informationIdentification Methods for Structural Systems
Prof. Dr. Eleni Chatzi System Stability Fundamentals Overview System Stability Assume given a dynamic system with input u(t) and output x(t). The stability property of a dynamic system can be defined from
More information21 Linear State-Space Representations
ME 132, Spring 25, UC Berkeley, A Packard 187 21 Linear State-Space Representations First, let s describe the most general type of dynamic system that we will consider/encounter in this class Systems may
More informationEE363 homework 7 solutions
EE363 Prof. S. Boyd EE363 homework 7 solutions 1. Gain margin for a linear quadratic regulator. Let K be the optimal state feedback gain for the LQR problem with system ẋ = Ax + Bu, state cost matrix Q,
More informationDelay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
International Journal of Automation and Computing 7(2), May 2010, 224-229 DOI: 10.1007/s11633-010-0224-2 Delay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
More informationOn feedback stabilizability of time-delay systems in Banach spaces
On feedback stabilizability of time-delay systems in Banach spaces S. Hadd and Q.-C. Zhong q.zhong@liv.ac.uk Dept. of Electrical Eng. & Electronics The University of Liverpool United Kingdom Outline Background
More informationA Guaranteed Cost LMI-Based Approach for Event-Triggered Average Consensus in Multi-Agent Networks
A Guaranteed Cost LMI-Based Approach for Event-Triggered Average Consensus in Multi-Agent Networks Amir Amini, Arash Mohammadi, Amir Asif Electrical and Computer Engineering,, Montreal, Canada. Concordia
More informationFinite-time Attractive Ellipsoid Method Using Implicit Lyapunov Functions
Finite-time Attractive Ellipsoid Method Using Implicit Lyapunov Functions Manuel Mera, Andrey Polyakov, Wilfrid Perruquetti, Gang Zheng To cite this version: Manuel Mera, Andrey Polyakov, Wilfrid Perruquetti,
More informationOutput Adaptive Model Reference Control of Linear Continuous State-Delay Plant
Output Adaptive Model Reference Control of Linear Continuous State-Delay Plant Boris M. Mirkin and Per-Olof Gutman Faculty of Agricultural Engineering Technion Israel Institute of Technology Haifa 3, Israel
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 6 Passivity and Input-Output Stability
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 6 Passivity and Input-Output Stability Passivity: Memoryless Functions y y y u u u (a) (b) (c) Passive Passive Not passive y = h(t,u), h [0, ] Vector case: y = h(t,u), h T =
More informationDesign of interval observers for uncertain dynamical systems
Design of interval observers for uncertain dynamical systems Denis Efimov, Tarek Raïssi To cite this version: Denis Efimov, Tarek Raïssi. Design of interval observers for uncertain dynamical systems. Automation
More informationRobust Multivariable Control
Lecture 2 Anders Helmersson anders.helmersson@liu.se ISY/Reglerteknik Linköpings universitet Today s topics Today s topics Norms Today s topics Norms Representation of dynamic systems Today s topics Norms
More information16.31 Fall 2005 Lecture Presentation Mon 31-Oct-05 ver 1.1
16.31 Fall 2005 Lecture Presentation Mon 31-Oct-05 ver 1.1 Charles P. Coleman October 31, 2005 1 / 40 : Controllability Tests Observability Tests LEARNING OUTCOMES: Perform controllability tests Perform
More informationMulti-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Multi-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures Eric Peterson Harry G.
More informationComparison of four state observer design algorithms for MIMO system
Archives of Control Sciences Volume 23(LIX), 2013 No. 2, pages 131 144 Comparison of four state observer design algorithms for MIMO system VINODH KUMAR. E, JOVITHA JEROME and S. AYYAPPAN A state observer
More informationState estimation of uncertain multiple model with unknown inputs
State estimation of uncertain multiple model with unknown inputs Abdelkader Akhenak, Mohammed Chadli, Didier Maquin and José Ragot Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, CNRS UMR 79 Institut National
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationPole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsa-lab, CNRS-INPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsa-lab.fr www.gipsa-lab.fr/ o.sename -based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More informationMinimal Input and Output Selection for Stability of Systems with Uncertainties
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. XX, NO. XX, FEBRUARY 218 1 Minimal Input and Output Selection for Stability of Systems with Uncertainties Zhipeng Liu, Student Member, IEEE, Yao Long, Student
More informationLeast Squares Based Self-Tuning Control Systems: Supplementary Notes
Least Squares Based Self-Tuning Control Systems: Supplementary Notes S. Garatti Dip. di Elettronica ed Informazione Politecnico di Milano, piazza L. da Vinci 32, 2133, Milan, Italy. Email: simone.garatti@polimi.it
More informationBalanced Truncation 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 2004: MODEL REDUCTION Balanced Truncation This lecture introduces balanced truncation for LTI
More informationDesign of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone
International Journal of Automation and Computing 8), May, -8 DOI:.7/s633--574-4 Design of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone Xue-Li
More informationTRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION
TRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 13 General objective: The output to track a reference
More informationState Feedback and State Estimators Linear System Theory and Design, Chapter 8.
1 Linear System Theory and Design, http://zitompul.wordpress.com 2 0 1 4 2 Homework 7: State Estimators (a) For the same system as discussed in previous slides, design another closed-loop state estimator,
More informationDenis ARZELIER arzelier
COURSE ON LMI OPTIMIZATION WITH APPLICATIONS IN CONTROL PART II.2 LMIs IN SYSTEMS CONTROL STATE-SPACE METHODS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS and SYNTHESIS Denis ARZELIER www.laas.fr/ arzelier arzelier@laas.fr 15
More informationSTABILIZATION OF LINEAR SYSTEMS VIA DELAYED STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLER. El-Kébir Boukas. N. K. M Sirdi. Received December 2007; accepted February 2008
ICIC Express Letters ICIC International c 28 ISSN 1881-83X Volume 2, Number 1, March 28 pp. 1 6 STABILIZATION OF LINEAR SYSTEMS VIA DELAYED STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLER El-Kébir Boukas Department of Mechanical
More informationLMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control
LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 14: LMIs for Robust Control in the LF Framework ypes of Uncertainty In this Lecture, we will cover Unstructured,
More informationNew formulation of predictors for finite-dimensional linear control systems with input delay
New formulation of predictors for finite-dimensional linear control systems with input delay Delphine Bresch-Pietri, Christophe Prieur, Emmanuel Trélat To cite this version: Delphine Bresch-Pietri, Christophe
More informationMin-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain Systems
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July -3, 27 FrC.4 Min-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain
More informationDelay estimation algorithm for nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown inputs
Delay estimation algorithm for nonlinear -delay systems with unknown inputs Jean-Pierre Barbot, Gang Zheng, Thierry Floquet, Driss Boutat, Jean-Pierre Richard To cite this version: Jean-Pierre Barbot,
More informationObservability and state estimation
EE263 Autumn 2015 S Boyd and S Lall Observability and state estimation state estimation discrete-time observability observability controllability duality observers for noiseless case continuous-time observability
More informationLecture Note 7: Switching Stabilization via Control-Lyapunov Function
ECE7850: Hybrid Systems:Theory and Applications Lecture Note 7: Switching Stabilization via Control-Lyapunov Function Wei Zhang Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ohio
More informationEects of small delays on stability of singularly perturbed systems
Automatica 38 (2002) 897 902 www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Technical Communique Eects of small delays on stability of singularly perturbed systems Emilia Fridman Department of Electrical Engineering
More informationResearch Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
Applied Mathematics Volume 202, Article ID 689820, 3 pages doi:0.55/202/689820 Research Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
More informationSimultaneous state and unknown inputs estimation with PI and PMI observers for Takagi Sugeno model with unmeasurable premise variables
Simultaneous state and unknown inputs estimation with PI and PMI observers for Takagi Sugeno model with unmeasurable premise variables Dalil Ichalal, Benoît Marx, José Ragot and Didier Maquin Centre de
More informationSYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL
SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL 1. Optimal regulator with noisy measurement Consider the following system: ẋ = Ax + Bu + w, x(0) = x 0 where w(t) is white noise with Ew(t) = 0, and x 0 is a stochastic
More informationRobust Anti-Windup Controller Synthesis: A Mixed H 2 /H Setting
Robust Anti-Windup Controller Synthesis: A Mixed H /H Setting ADDISON RIOS-BOLIVAR Departamento de Sistemas de Control Universidad de Los Andes Av. ulio Febres, Mérida 511 VENEZUELA SOLBEN GODOY Postgrado
More informationSemidefinite Programming Duality and Linear Time-invariant Systems
Semidefinite Programming Duality and Linear Time-invariant Systems Venkataramanan (Ragu) Balakrishnan School of ECE, Purdue University 2 July 2004 Workshop on Linear Matrix Inequalities in Control LAAS-CNRS,
More informationControl Systems. Time response
Control Systems Time response L. Lanari outline zero-state solution matrix exponential total response (sum of zero-state and zero-input responses) Dirac impulse impulse response change of coordinates (state)
More informationSuppose that we have a specific single stage dynamic system governed by the following equation:
Dynamic Optimisation Discrete Dynamic Systems A single stage example Suppose that we have a specific single stage dynamic system governed by the following equation: x 1 = ax 0 + bu 0, x 0 = x i (1) where
More informationNetworked control using GPS synchronization
Networked control using GPS synchronization Alexandre Seuret, Fabien Michaut, Jean-Pierre Richard, Thierry Divoux To cite this version: Alexandre Seuret, Fabien Michaut, Jean-Pierre Richard, Thierry Divoux.
More informationDynamics on a General Stage Structured n Parallel Food Chains
Memorial University of Newfoundland Dynamics on a General Stage Structured n Parallel Food Chains Isam Al-Darabsah and Yuan Yuan November 4, 2013 Outline: Propose a general model with n parallel food chains
More information