Lecture 10 Superconducting qubits: advanced designs, operation 1 Generic decoherence problem: Λ 0 : intended
|
|
- Calvin Barrett
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lecture 10 Superconducting qubits: advanced designs, operation 1 Generic decoherence problem: Ĥ = Ĥ(p, q : Λ), Λ: control parameter { e.g. charge qubit Λ = V g gate voltage phase qubit Λ = I bias current flux qubit Λ = Φ ext external flux Λ = Λ 0 + δλ, Λ 0 : intended δλ: effect of fluctuations of E environment Project on to qubit space: Ĥ qb = Ĥ0 + δĥ, so in energy basis Ĥ qubit = 1 2 ( ) ɛ(λ0 ) 0 + δĥ, δĥ σ H, 0 ɛ(λ 0 ) H parametrized by J i (ω), i = x, y, z, δĥ Γ 1, Γ 2 = 1 2 Γ 1 + Γ ϕ (T 1 1, T 1 2 ) Γ 1 : determined by J x,y (ω 10 ), (ω 10 ɛ(λ 0 )/ ) Γ ϕ : determined by J z (ω 0) In most cases, J(ω 0) most dangerous (e.g. 1/f noise) want no ˆσ z -coupling want ɛ/ Λ = 0. 1 General references: Devoret+Schoelkopf, Science 339, 1169 (2013) Zhang et al., Chinese Physics B 22, (2013) (decoherence + readout) Yan et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 623 (2013) 1
2 e.g. for charge qubits, ɛ/ q should be 0: for flux qubits, ɛ/ Φ = 0, etc. One obvious way to achieve this: H(p, q : Λ) = p2 2m mω 0(q Λ) 2 all energy-level differences independent of Λ, but this is just SHO, so no truncation to 2-state (qubit) system! So generic problem: How to minimize sensitivity to environmental fluctuations while maintaining enough anharmonicity to justify truncation to 2-state Hilbert space? 2
3 Quantronium 2 V g (t) island ˆθ + δ/2 Φ γ ˆθ + δ/2 I b (t) The quantities δ and γ are regarded as classical, and related by δ = γ + Φ/Φ 0, γ is controlled by the bias current I b (t). The quantity ˆθ ( average phase difference between island and rest of circuit) is regarded as QM l. For δ = 0 both the total current across the island and the total current into it are 0; the two energy eigenstates have θ = 0 and θ = π respectively. For nonzero δ the current into the island is still zero, but the current across it (i.e. around the circuit) is E J cos θ sin δ/2, i.e. E J sin(δ/2) ˆσ z /2 (if basis is even/odd combinations of n and n + 1 ). Note that for V g tuned to the degeneracy point, eigenstates in n-basis are 1 2 ( n ± n+1 ), so low-frequency fluctuations (as of gate charge ) which couple to ˆn are particularly ineffective (i.e. they involve, in this (energy) basis, only ˆσ x not ˆσ z so dephase only through the 1/2T 1 term not through 1/T ϕ ). Also for γ = Φ = 0 the energy is insensitive to fluctuations of Φ (E E J cos θ cos δ/2, E/ δ = 0). For readout, increase δ from 0 to finite value, measure current. 2 Vion et al., Science 298, 886 (2002) 3
4 Transmon 3 Simply, charge qubit shunted with large capacitance. For arbitrary values of ˆQ 2eˆn and gate voltage V g, ˆQ-dependent term in Ĥ is ˆQ 2 2C ˆQV g 2e2 C (ˆn n g) 2 + const., n g CV g /2e, so total Hamiltonian is Ĥ(ˆn, ˆϕ) = E C (ˆn n g ) 2 E J cos ˆϕ, In original charge qubit experiments, E C E J can truncate at lowest pair of states n, n + 1. In transmon, C is very large so E C E J In pendulum analogy: Ĥ = 2( ˆL L g ) 2 2I ˆϕ nearly well defined variable. transmon corresponds to 2 /2I mgl, i.e. ω mgl mgl cos ˆθ ( ˆL i ), ˆθ semiclassical limit! Problem: in this limit pendulum SHO! (no use for qubit). However, saving point is precise dependence on ratio E C /E J in limit E C E J : anharmonicity is power-law ( (E C /E J ) n ) sensitivity to n g is exponential ( exp[ const.(e J /E C )]) Why? use pendulum analogy: ( ) θ 2 V (θ) mgl cos θ = const. + mgl 2 θ4 4! +..., 3 Koch et al., Phys. Rev. A 76, (2007) θ 4
5 diference ω 21 ω 10 GSEV (ground state expectation value) of θ 4, but θ 2 0 ( /Iω) θ 4 ( /Iω) 2. In original problem ( 2 /2I E C, mgl E J, ω (E C E J ) 1/2 / ) ϕ 4 (E C /E J ). Sensitivity to n g (L g ): this must be proportional to amplitude for rotation through 2π ( quantization of ˆL). ω 21 ω 10 A(0 2π) exp( IV (θ)/ dθ) exp( const.(v 0 / ω)). But since V 0 E J, ω (E J E C ) 1/2 /, this A(0 2π) exp( const.(e J /E C ) 1/2 ). ω 10(n g ) n g exp( const.(e J /E C ) 1/2 ). More quantitative calculation (Koch et al.): ( )m EJ E m (n g = 1/2) E m (n g = 0) = const. E C exp[ (8EJ /E C ) 1/2 ]. E C Thus, for given tolerance in ratio (ω 21 ω 10 )/ω 10, can find value of ratio E C /E J s. t. anharmonicity still sufficient for qubit operation while charge noise exponentially suppressed V 0 5
6 Fluxonium 4 Digression: simple LC-circuit treated QM ly Ĥ = ˆQ 2 2C + ˆΦ 2 2L [ ˆQ, ˆΦ] = i (so e.g. ˆΦ ˆx, ˆQ ˆp). Introduce dimensionless quantities Φ Φ/Φ 0, Q ˆQ/2e C Q Φ ext L Ĥ = (2e)2 2C Q 2 + Φ2 0 2L Φ 2 E C Q2 + E L Φ2, and [ Q, Φ] = i. What is ratio of mean-square values Q, Φ in GS? E C Q = E L Φ = 1 4 ω LC (LC) 1/2, so Φ / Q = E C /E L (Z/R Q ) 2, where Z L/C impedance of circuit R Q = h/(2e) 2 = 6 kω ( quantum unit of resistance ). General theorem of electrical engineering: for any kind of simple electrical circuit, Z Z 0 (µ 0 /ɛ 0 ) 1/2 = 377 Ω vacuum impedance. (Crudely: C ɛ 0 L max, L µ 0 L max L/C µ 0 /ɛ 0 ). Thus Φ 2 / Q 2 (Z 0 /R Q ) 2 (377/6000) , in words: for any simple LC-circuit, in dimensionless units, we always have charge fluctuations flux fluctuations and since Φ 2 Q 2 1 (uncertainty principle!), Q Manucharyan et al., Science 325, 113 (2009) 6
7 Now, at least for small fluctuations of ϕ and order-of-magnitude estimates, a Josephson junction is equivalent to a nonlinear inductance: E J (ϕ) = I ( ) CΦ 0 2π cos ϕ IC Φ 0 ϕ 2 = const. +, so for ϕ 2π Φ, 2π 2 E J = (const.) + 2πI C Φ 0 ( Φ/2) L 1 eff = 2πI C/Φ 0 L J = Φ 0 /(2πI C ) small I C implies large effective inductance! (thus, charge qubit can have Z J (L J /C) 1/2 R Q fluctuations of Q( n) 1). Fluxonium: hybrid between charge and flux qubits. Standard flux-qubit geometry but with geometrical inductance L J shunted by a number L g of large (hence small-l eff ) Josephson junctions. Since junctions are in series, L tot NL eff = large. The E J /E C ratio is much smaller than for typical flux qubits, on the other hand E L is E J : E L = 0.52 GHz E J = 9.0 GHz E C = 2.5 GHz Thus structure of energy levels different from standard flux qubit, e.g. for Φ ext = 0 only 1 state per well. Φ ext = 0 Φ ext 7
8 Circuit QED 5 Consider atom in (superconducting) cavity with a single (relevant) mode created by a : E E is radially outward L = λ/2, ω c = 2πc/λ ω c cavity mode frequency. In RW approximation, Hamiltonian is Jaynes-Cummings: λ/2 r Ĥ JC = ω c a a + ω 01 2 ˆσ z + g(aσ + + a σ ) ω 01 : atomic transition frequency. Eigenstates are atomic levels Question: how large can g be? Answer: g = d E, d: atomic dipole, E: electric field of single photon. d ea 0 (Bohr radius) E = ( ω01 ɛ 0 V ) 1/2 = r 1 ω 01 (2π 2 ɛ 0 c) 1/2 }{{} since ω 01 ω c V : vol. of cavity α: fine structure constant so g r 1 ω01 e (2α/π)1/2, = a 0 2α ω 01 r π α1/2 0.1 in traditional cavity QED, cannot obtain (g/ ω 01 ) > 1 (to date, max ). However, may be able to obtain g strong coupling κ }{{} cavity loss regime. Note that in a QED cavity (especially a superconducting one) if the 5 Refs. Girvin + Schoelkopf, Nature 351, 664 (2008) Girvin et al., Physica Scripta T 137, (2009) 8
9 atomic transition is not close to resonance with any of cavity modes, spontaneous lifetime of atom much increased in relation to its free-space value. Replace atom by qubit (e.g. charge qubit/transmon) and cavity by (open) transmission line: schematically, qubit is at antinode of E. in λ/2 out r 10 µm E C. pair box Simple charge qubit: take basis as eigenstates of ĤQ, i.e. at degeneracy eigenstates of ˆσ z are 2 1/2 ( n ± n + 1 ). Then dipole interaction with EM field is Ĥ int = d E = d E ˆσ x, with d 2el q 2er, l q : qubit dimension. So in RW approximation recover ĤJC, Ĥ JC = ω c a a + 2 ˆσ z + g(aˆσ + + a σ ), but now much easier to get large values of g (in fact, easily get g κ). Two main regimes: 1. ω 01 ω c g: get vacuum Rabi splitting between 0 q 1 γ and 1 q 0 γ - level-crossing effects. 2. ω 01 ω c g, strongly dispersive regime; by doing 2nd order perturbation theory in g, get effective interaction: ( Ĥ disp = g2 a a + 1 ) ˆσ z (const.+) g2 2 ˆn photˆσ z 9
10 ˆn phot : number of photons in cavity (thus, fluctuations in photon number can lead to qubit dephasing). Alternative design 6 : flux qubit inductively coupled to magnetic field of cavity mode. Very schematically: (actually, 4 junctions) interaction is ΦH magnetic field of cavity mode Φ ext Ĥ ω c a a + ( ˆσ x + ɛˆσ z ) + g(a + a )ˆσ z, at ɛ = 0 (Φ ext = Φ 0 /2) identical to chargequbit case (σ x σ z ) so in RW approx. gives JC Hamiltonian. But g can be much larger, in fact can get g/ ω 01 > 1. Φ ext σ z = +1 σ z = 1 6 Bourassa et al., Phys. Rev. A 80, (2009) 10
11 Improved circuit QED design 7 Paik et al., and Rigetti et al., got considerably improved values of T 1 and T 2 by embedding transmon qubit in 3D superconducting box: one factor is reduction of electric field lines on surfaces which may host TLS. Also possibly better shielding from stray external radiation. Rigetti et al. speculate that being able to provide 4π of cryogenic coverage helped (easy to cool (normal) Cu walls down to 10 mk - more difficult to keep superconductor cool). Question: Is free-space electric dipole decay an issue? Quite generally, Γ ED d 2 ω d: transition dipole ME ω 10 : transition frequency For 2s 1s transition of H atom, ω 10 /2π Hz and Γ = sec 1. For charge qubit in cavity, let s say (optimistically) ω 10 /2π 20 GHz, then ω 3 factor reduces rate by However, d is 2l/a 0 (2 for C. pair, l qubit dimension) relative to H atom, so if d = 10µ (perhaps optimistic) d 2 factor increases by Hence would predict for charge qubit Γ ED Γ 2p 1s 10 3 i.e. T msec. since measured T 1 approaches 0.1 msec, conceivable this could be partial effect (certainly will soon need to be taken into account). Other recent improvements 8 from better materials engineering of junction itself (e.g. Al x O y TiN). As known sources of decoherence vanish, new ones appear, e.g. nonequilibrium quasiparticles... 7 Paik et al., PRL 107, (2011) Rigetti et al., Phys. Rev. B 86, (R) (2012) 8 Chang et al., APL 103, (2013) 11
12 Operation of single qubits Ideally, want to be able to adjust Hamiltonian so that Ĥ 0 = 1 2 ( ɛ 0 0 ɛ ) Ĥ(t) = Ĥ0 + δĥ(t), 1 2 ɛˆσ z( 1 2 ω 01ˆσ z ), δĥ(t) = H(t) ˆσ, H: pseudo-magnetic field, in arbitrary direction in Bloch sphere. How to do this? Depending on nature of qubit, may have one or more control parameters which automatically provide possibility of H in particular direction. If (as above) take basis so that Ĥ0 diagonal, then Charge qubit: most obvious control parameter is gate voltage V g V g0 + δv g (t). Then, H(t) = (cos θˆx + sin θẑ)2(2e)δv g (t), θ: angle of rotation of dc equilibrium state from degeneracy point (E C (n + 1) = E C (n)), so at degeneracy H(t) purely in x-direction. Can also in principle use E J as control parameter: in that case H(t) = (sin θˆx cos θẑ)δe J (t), so at degeneracy H purely in z-direction. 12
13 Flux qubit: most obvious control parameter is externally applied flux, which couples to total trapped flux Φ (quantum variable!) via term (Φ Φ ext ) 2 /2L. Hence in energy basis (so that Φ Φ ext ˆσ x at Φ ext = Φ 0 /2) Φ ext 2q 0 H(t) = (cos θˆx + sin θẑ)q 0 δφ(t)/l, so at symmetric point (Φ ext = Φ 0 /2) H(t) is purely in ˆx-direction. How to provide a y-component of pseudo-magnetic field H(t)? One possible answer: generalize what was already done for phase qubit: e.g. for flux qubit, δφ(t) = δφ dc (t) + δφ x (t) cos ω 01 t + δφ y (t) sin ω 01 t. Then when we go into rotating frame and use RW approximation, H x = q 0 L 1 δφ x (t), H y (t) = q 0 L 1 δφ y (t), H z (t) = q 0 L 1 δφ dc (t), works so long as time-dependence of δφ x,y (t) on scale ω 1 01 negligible. 13
14 Principal types of experiment with single qubits 1. Spectroscopy of avoided level crossing (Nakamura et al., van der Wal et al., Friedman et al.,) e.g. flux qubit: couple to DC SQUID apply given rf field to qubit (δφ ext (t) cos ω fr t) measure switching current of dc SQUID as f(φ ext ). Recall that for slow sweep of SQUID bias current, measures qubit in energy basis dip (or blip, depending on sign of δφ ext ) of I sw indicates increased occupation of upper state resonance condition E(Φ ext ) = ω rf. Thus plot out E(Φ ext ). ɛ Φ 0 /2 Φ ext If qubit in incoherent mixture of eigenvalues of Φ ( L and R ), expect crossing. If qubit in coherent quantum superposition a L + b R expect solid line (seen). 2. Rabi oscillations Start with qubit in GS, drive with pulse (length τ) at frequency ω 01 and amplitude H 0, wait time t, measure occupation probability of upper/lower state. Result should (a) oscillate as f(τ) with Rabi frequency H 0 τ (b) decay as exp( t/t 1 ). measurement of T 1. Now routine in all kinds of qubit. 14
15 3. Ramsey-fringe experiments Start with qubit in GS, apply resonant π/2 pulse around (say) x-axis of Bloch sphere (schematically, H x (t) = H 0 θ(t)θ(π/2h 0 t) cos ω rf t), ω rf close to ω 01, wait time t, apply second pulse around some axis, measure prob. of ES/GS. Expect ensemble-averaged result (a) oscillates as f(t) with difference frequency ω rf ω 01 (b) decays with t as exp( t/t 2 ). By spin-echo technique, can remove extrinsic contributions to T 2 and measure intrinsic dephasing rate T
16 Best current parameter values for single qubits 9 Rigetti et al., Phys. Rev. B 86, (R) (2012), (transmon in 3D cavity): T 1 = 70 µs, T 2 = 92 µs. Pop et al., Nature 508 (2014) (fluxonium in 3D cavity at sweet spot ) T 1 8 ms, (T 2 not measured) Comparison with desired parameter margins (from Devoret + Schoelkopf, Science 339, 1169 (2013)): Requirement for scalability Desired Estimated Demonstrated capability margins current capability successful performance QI operation Reset qubit 10 2 to Fidelity Rabi flop 10 2 to Fidelity 0.99 Swap to bus 10 2 to Fidelity 0.98 Readout qubit 10 2 to Fidelity 0.98 System Hamiltonian Stability 10 6 to 10 9? δf/f in 1 day < Accuracy 10 2 to to to 10% Yield > 10 4?? Complexity 10 4 to ? 1 to 10 qubits 9 Note in 1999, best value of T 2 a few nsec. 16
Lecture 9 Superconducting qubits Ref: Clarke and Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031 (2008).
Lecture 9 Superconducting qubits Ref: Clarke and Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031 (2008). Newcomer in the quantum computation area ( 2000, following experimental demonstration of coherence in charge + flux qubits).
More informationQuantum computation with superconducting qubits
Quantum computation with superconducting qubits Project for course: Quantum Information Ognjen Malkoc June 10, 2013 1 Introduction 2 Josephson junction 3 Superconducting qubits 4 Circuit and Cavity QED
More informationSuperconducting quantum bits. Péter Makk
Superconducting quantum bits Péter Makk Qubits Qubit = quantum mechanical two level system DiVincenzo criteria for quantum computation: 1. Register of 2-level systems (qubits), n = 2 N states: eg. 101..01>
More informationINTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD
INTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD Hanhee Paik IBM Quantum Computing Group IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY USA
More informationCircuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing
Circuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing Himadri Barman Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research Bangalore, India. QCMJC Talk, July 10, 2012 Outline Basics of quantum
More informationTheoretical design of a readout system for the Flux Qubit-Resonator Rabi Model in the ultrastrong coupling regime
Theoretical design of a readout system for the Flux Qubit-Resonator Rabi Model in the ultrastrong coupling regime Ceren Burçak Dağ Supervisors: Dr. Pol Forn-Díaz and Assoc. Prof. Christopher Wilson Institute
More informationSuperconducting Qubits. Nathan Kurz PHYS January 2007
Superconducting Qubits Nathan Kurz PHYS 576 19 January 2007 Outline How do we get macroscopic quantum behavior out of a many-electron system? The basic building block the Josephson junction, how do we
More information10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics
AS-Chap. 10-1 10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics AS-Chap. 10-2 Analogy to quantum optics Superconducting quantum circuits (SQC) Nonlinear circuits Qubits, multilevel systems Linear circuits Waveguides,
More informationDispersive Readout, Rabi- and Ramsey-Measurements for Superconducting Qubits
Dispersive Readout, Rabi- and Ramsey-Measurements for Superconducting Qubits QIP II (FS 2018) Student presentation by Can Knaut Can Knaut 12.03.2018 1 Agenda I. Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics and the Jaynes
More informationDistributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED
Distributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED M. Baur, A. Fedorov, L. Steffen (Quantum Computation) J. Fink, A. F. van Loo (Collective Interactions) T. Thiele, S. Hogan (Hybrid
More informationCircuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014
Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014 Introduction Theory details Strong coupling experiment Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical
More informationQuantum computation and quantum optics with circuit QED
Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University Quantum computation and quantum optics with circuit QED Jens Koch filling in for Steven M. Girvin Quick outline Superconducting qubits overview
More informationSuperconducting Qubits Lecture 4
Superconducting Qubits Lecture 4 Non-Resonant Coupling for Qubit Readout A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, PRA 69, 062320 (2004) Measurement Technique Dispersive Shift
More informationDissipation in Transmon
Dissipation in Transmon Muqing Xu, Exchange in, ETH, Tsinghua University Muqing Xu 8 April 2016 1 Highlight The large E J /E C ratio and the low energy dispersion contribute to Transmon s most significant
More informationIntroduction to Circuit QED
Introduction to Circuit QED Michael Goerz ARL Quantum Seminar November 10, 2015 Michael Goerz Intro to cqed 1 / 20 Jaynes-Cummings model g κ γ [from Schuster. Phd Thesis. Yale (2007)] Jaynes-Cumming Hamiltonian
More informationSuperconducting Qubits
Superconducting Qubits Fabio Chiarello Institute for Photonics and Nanotechnologies IFN CNR Rome Lego bricks The Josephson s Lego bricks box Josephson junction Phase difference Josephson equations Insulating
More informationQuantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Circuit QED
Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Circuit QED Eperiment Rob Schoelkopf Michel Devoret Andreas Wallraff David Schuster Hannes Majer Luigi Frunzio Andrew Houck Blake Johnson Emily Chan Jared Schwede
More informationCircuit Quantum Electrodynamics
Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics David Haviland Nanosturcture Physics, Dept. Applied Physics, KTH, Albanova Atom in a Cavity Consider only two levels of atom, with energy separation Atom drifts through
More informationCavity Quantum Electrodynamics with Superconducting Circuits
Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics with Superconducting Circuits Andreas Wallraff (ETH Zurich) www.qudev.ethz.ch M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, S. Filipp, J. Fink, A. Fragner, M. Göppl, P. Leek, P. Maurer, L. Steffen,
More informationDoing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED
Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED Ren-Shou Huang, Alexandre Blais, Andreas Wallraff, David Schuster, Sameer Kumar, Luigi Frunzio, Hannes Majer, Steven Girvin, Robert
More informationTopologicaly protected abelian Josephson qubits: theory and experiment.
Topologicaly protected abelian Josephson qubits: theory and experiment. B. Doucot (Jussieu) M.V. Feigelman (Landau) L. Ioffe (Rutgers) M. Gershenson (Rutgers) Plan Honest (pessimistic) review of the state
More informationNon-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout
Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout Irinel Chiorescu Delft University of Technology Quantum Transport group Prof. J.E. Mooij Kees Harmans Flux-qubit team visitors
More informationQuantum Optics and Quantum Informatics FKA173
Quantum Optics and Quantum Informatics FKA173 Date and time: Tuesday, 7 October 015, 08:30-1:30. Examiners: Jonas Bylander (070-53 44 39) and Thilo Bauch (0733-66 13 79). Visits around 09:30 and 11:30.
More informationElectrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits
1.0 10 0.8 01 switching probability 0.6 0.4 0.2 00 P. Bertet & R. Heeres SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group 11 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 swap duration (ns) Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting
More informationSuperconducting Qubits Coupling Superconducting Qubits Via a Cavity Bus
Superconducting Qubits Coupling Superconducting Qubits Via a Cavity Bus Leon Stolpmann, Micro- and Nanosystems Efe Büyüközer, Micro- and Nanosystems Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introduction Physical system
More informationSuperconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering
Superconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering Nov. 2009 Lin Tian University of California, Merced & KITP Collaborators: Kurt Jacobs (U Mass, Boston) Raymond Simmonds (Boulder)
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Mechanics of Superconducting Electrical Circuits
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics of Superconducting lectrical Circuits What is superconductivity? What is a osephson junction? What is a Cooper Pair Box Qubit? Quantum Modes of Superconducting Transmission
More informationSynthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator
Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator Max Hofheinz, Haohua Wang, Markus Ansmann, R. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. O Connell, D. Sank, M. Weides, J. Wenner, J.M. Martinis,
More informationShort Course in Quantum Information Lecture 8 Physical Implementations
Short Course in Quantum Information Lecture 8 Physical Implementations Course Info All materials downloadable @ website http://info.phys.unm.edu/~deutschgroup/deutschclasses.html Syllabus Lecture : Intro
More information10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics
AS-Chap. 10-1 10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics AS-Chap. 10-2 Analogy to quantum optics Superconducting quantum circuits (SQC) Nonlinear circuits Qubits, multilevel systems Linear circuits Waveguides,
More information2015 AMO Summer School. Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I. Io-Chun, Hoi
2015 AMO Summer School Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I Io-Chun, Hoi Outline 1. Introduction to quantum electrical circuits 2. Introduction to superconducting artificial
More informationDynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits
Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits Dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting coplanar waveguide Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 147003 (2009) Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting microwave
More informationSupplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition
Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition Shi-Biao Zheng 1, You-Peng Zhong 2, Kai Xu 2, Qi-Jue Wang 2, H. Wang 2, Li-Tuo Shen 1, Chui-Ping
More informationQuantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED
Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED Ren-Shou Huang, Alexandre Blais, Andreas Wallraff, David Schuster, Sameer Kumar, Luigi Frunzio, Hannes Majer, Steven Girvin, Robert Schoelkopf
More informationCoherent oscillations in a charge qubit
Coherent oscillations in a charge qubit The qubit The read-out Characterization of the Cooper pair box Coherent oscillations Measurements of relaxation and decoherence times Tim Duty, Kevin Bladh, David
More informationDriving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian
Qubit Control Driving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian Hamiltonian for microwave drive Unitary transform with and Results in dispersive approximation up to 2 nd order in g Drive induces Rabi oscillations
More informationQuantum computation and quantum information
Quantum computation and quantum information Chapter 7 - Physical Realizations - Part 2 First: sign up for the lab! do hand-ins and project! Ch. 7 Physical Realizations Deviate from the book 2 lectures,
More informationLecture 6. Josephson junction circuits. Simple current-biased junction Assume for the moment that the only source of current is the bulk leads, and
Lecture 6. Josephson junction circuits Simple current-biased junction Assume for the moment that the only source of current is the bulk leads, and I(t) its only destination is as supercurrent through the
More informationCavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris
Cavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris A three lecture course Goal of lectures Manipulating states of simple quantum systems has become an important
More informationRemote entanglement of transmon qubits
Remote entanglement of transmon qubits 3 Michael Hatridge Department of Applied Physics, Yale University Katrina Sliwa Anirudh Narla Shyam Shankar Zaki Leghtas Mazyar Mirrahimi Evan Zalys-Geller Chen Wang
More informationFrom SQUID to Qubit Flux 1/f Noise: The Saga Continues
From SQUID to Qubit Flux 1/f Noise: The Saga Continues Fei Yan, S. Gustavsson, A. Kamal, T. P. Orlando Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA T. Gudmundsen, David Hover, A. Sears, J.L. Yoder,
More informationSupercondcting Qubits
Supercondcting Qubits Patricia Thrasher University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Superconducting qubits are electrical circuits based on the Josephson tunnel junctions and have the ability to
More informationHybrid Quantum Circuit with a Superconducting Qubit coupled to a Spin Ensemble
Hybrid Quantum Circuit with a Superconducting Qubit coupled to a Spin Ensemble, Cécile GREZES, Andreas DEWES, Denis VION, Daniel ESTEVE, & Patrice BERTET Quantronics Group, SPEC, CEA- Saclay Collaborating
More informationSuperconducting phase qubits
Quantum Inf Process (2009) 8:81 103 DOI 10.1007/s11128-009-0105-1 Superconducting phase qubits John M. Martinis Published online: 18 February 2009 The Author(s) 2009. This article is published with open
More informationStrong tunable coupling between a charge and a phase qubit
Strong tunable coupling between a charge and a phase qubit Wiebke Guichard Olivier Buisson Frank Hekking Laurent Lévy Bernard Pannetier Aurélien Fay Ioan Pop Florent Lecocq Rapaël Léone Nicolas Didier
More informationSuperposition of two mesoscopically distinct quantum states: Coupling a Cooper-pair box to a large superconducting island
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, VOLUME 63, 054514 Superposition of two mesoscopically distinct quantum states: Coupling a Cooper-pair box to a large superconducting island Florian Marquardt* and C. Bruder Departement
More informationJosephson qubits. P. Bertet. SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group
Josephson qubits P. Bertet SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group Outline Lecture 1: Basics of superconducting qubits Lecture 2: Qubit readout and circuit quantum electrodynamics Lecture 3: 2-qubit
More information6.4 Physics of superconducting quantum circuits
AS-Chap. 6.4-1 6.4 Physics of superconducting quantum circuits 6.4 Physics of Superconducting Quantum Circuits AS-Chap. 6.4-3 General Hamiltonian H HO = E kin + E pot = p m + 1 mω r x k x e.g., 1 k x for
More informationSolid State Physics IV -Part II : Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena
Solid State Physics IV -Part II : Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena Koji Usami (Dated: January 6, 015) In this final lecture we study the Jaynes-Cummings model in which an atom (a two level system) is coupled
More informationExploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits
Exploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits Jürgen Lisenfeld, Alexander Bilmes, Georg Weiss, and A.V. Ustinov Physikalisches Institut, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe,
More informationQuantum-information processing with circuit quantum electrodynamics
PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 339 7 Quantum-information processing with circuit quantum electrodynamics Alexandre Blais, 1, Jay Gambetta, 1 A Wallraff, 1,3 D I Schuster, 1 S M Girvin, 1 M H Devoret, 1 and R J
More informationTechnische Universität
Physik-Department Superconducting flux quantum circuits: characterization, quantum coherence, and controlled symmetry breaking Dissertation von Frank Deppe Technische Universität München TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
More informationQubits: Supraleitende Quantenschaltungen. (i) Grundlagen und Messung
Braunschweiger Supraleiter-Seminar Seminar Qubits: Supraleitende Quantenschaltungen (i) Grundlagen und Messung Jens Könemann, Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig Q Φ 26. Mai 0/ 16 Braunschweiger Supraleiter-Seminar
More informationarxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 16 Oct 2009
Coherent oscillations between classically separable quantum states of a superconducting loop Vladimir E. Manucharyan, 1 Jens Koch, 1 Markus Brink, 1 Leonid I. Glazman, 1 and Michel H. Devoret 1 1 Departments
More informationProspects for Superconducting Qubits. David DiVincenzo Varenna Course CLXXXIII
Prospects for Superconducting ubits David DiVincenzo 26.06.2012 Varenna Course CLXXXIII uantum error correction and the future of solid state qubits David DiVincenzo 26.06.2012 Varenna Course CLXXXIII
More informationCavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation
PHYSICAL REVIEW A 69, 062320 (2004) Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation Alexandre Blais, 1 Ren-Shou Huang, 1,2 Andreas Wallraff,
More informationMetastable states in an RF driven Josephson oscillator
Metastable states in an RF driven Josephson oscillator R. VIJAYARAGHAVAN Daniel Prober Robert Schoelkopf Steve Girvin Department of Applied Physics Yale University 3-16-2006 APS March Meeting I. Siddiqi
More informationControlling the Interaction of Light and Matter...
Control and Measurement of Multiple Qubits in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics Andreas Wallraff (ETH Zurich) www.qudev.ethz.ch M. Baur, D. Bozyigit, R. Bianchetti, C. Eichler, S. Filipp, J. Fink, T. Frey,
More informationCavity QED. Driven Circuit QED System. Circuit QED. decay atom: γ radiation: κ. E. Il ichev et al., PRL 03
Decoherence and Relaxation in Driven Circuit QED Systems Alexander Shnirman Arkady Fedorov Julian Hauss Valentina Brosco Stefan André Michael Marthaler Gerd Schön experiments Evgeni Il ichev et al. Univ.
More informationDecoherence in Josephson-junction qubits due to critical-current fluctuations
PHYSICAL REVIEW B 70, 064517 (2004) Decoherence in Josephson-junction qubits due to critical-current fluctuations D. J. Van Harlingen, 1 T. L. Robertson, 2 B. L. T. Plourde, 2 P. A. Reichardt, 2 T. A.
More informationCavity Quantum Electrodynamics (QED): Coupling a Harmonic Oscillator to a Qubit
Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics (QED): Coupling a Harmonic Oscillator to a Qubit Cavity QED with Superconducting Circuits coherent quantum mechanics with individual photons and qubits...... basic approach:
More informationQuantum Reservoir Engineering
Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University Quantum Reservoir Engineering Towards Quantum Simulators with Superconducting Qubits SMG Claudia De Grandi (Yale University) Siddiqi Group (Berkeley)
More informationarxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 27 Feb 2007
Generating Single Microwave Photons in a Circuit arxiv:cond-mat/0702648v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 27 Feb 2007 A. A. Houck, 1 D. I. Schuster, 1 J. M. Gambetta, 1 J. A. Schreier, 1 B. R. Johnson, 1 J. M. Chow,
More informationCircuit QED with electrons on helium:
Circuit QED with electrons on helium: What s the sound of one electron clapping? David Schuster Yale (soon to be at U. of Chicago) Yale: Andreas Fragner Rob Schoelkopf Princeton: Steve Lyon Michigan State:
More informationJosephson charge qubits: a brief review
Quantum Inf Process (2009) 8:55 80 DOI 10.1007/s11128-009-0101-5 Josephson charge qubits: a brief review Yu. A. Pashkin O. Astafiev T. Yamamoto Y. Nakamura J. S. Tsai Published online: 13 February 2009
More informationREALIZING QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS WITH SUPERCONDUCTING NANOCIRCUITS
REALIZING QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS WITH SUPERCONDUCTING NANOCIRCUITS IRFAN SIDDIQI YALE UNIVERSITY R. Vijay P. Hyafil E. Boaknin M. Metcalfe F. Pierre L. Frunzio C.M. Wilson C. Rigetti V. Manucharyan J. Gambetta
More informationCIRCUIT QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS WITH ELECTRONS ON HELIUM
CIRCUIT QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS WITH ELECTRONS ON HELIUM David Schuster Assistant Professor University of Chicago Chicago Ge Yang Bing Li Michael Geracie Yale Andreas Fragner Rob Schoelkopf Useful cryogenics
More informationSuperconducting Flux Qubits: The state of the field
Superconducting Flux Qubits: The state of the field S. Gildert Condensed Matter Physics Research (Quantum Devices Group) University of Birmingham, UK Outline A brief introduction to the Superconducting
More informationEntanglement Control of Superconducting Qubit Single Photon System
: Quantum omputing Entanglement ontrol of Superconducting Qubit Single Photon System Kouichi Semba Abstract If we could achieve full control of the entangled states of a quantum bit (qubit) interacting
More informationMesoscopic field state superpositions in Cavity QED: present status and perspectives
Mesoscopic field state superpositions in Cavity QED: present status and perspectives Serge Haroche, Ein Bokek, February 21 st 2005 Entangling single atoms with larger and larger fields: an exploration
More information8 Quantized Interaction of Light and Matter
8 Quantized Interaction of Light and Matter 8.1 Dressed States Before we start with a fully quantized description of matter and light we would like to discuss the evolution of a two-level atom interacting
More informationMesoscopic Shelving Readout of Superconducting Qubits in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics
Mesoscopic Shelving Readout of Superconducting Qubits in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics Diploma Thesis by Barbara Gabriele Ursula Englert October 008 Supervised by Prof. Dr. Rudolf Gross and Prof. Dr.
More informationExperimental Quantum Computing: A technology overview
Experimental Quantum Computing: A technology overview Dr. Suzanne Gildert Condensed Matter Physics Research (Quantum Devices Group) University of Birmingham, UK 15/02/10 Models of quantum computation Implementations
More informationMaterials Origins of Decoherence in Superconducting Qubits Robert McDermott
2 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, VOL. 19, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2009 Materials Origins of Decoherence in Superconducting Qubits Robert McDermott (Invited Paper) Abstract Superconducting integrated
More informationDipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator
Dipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator 200 µm J. Basset, D.-D. Jarausch, A. Stockklauser, T. Frey, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin and A. Wallraff Quantum
More informationElectrical Quantum Engineering with Superconducting Circuits
1.0 10 0.8 01 switching probability 0.6 0.4 0.2 00 Electrical Quantum Engineering with Superconducting Circuits R. Heeres & P. Bertet SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group 11 0.0 0 100 200 300 400
More informationEngineering the quantum probing atoms with light & light with atoms in a transmon circuit QED system
Engineering the quantum probing atoms with light & light with atoms in a transmon circuit QED system Nathan K. Langford OVERVIEW Acknowledgements Ramiro Sagastizabal, Florian Luthi and the rest of the
More informationNANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
. NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY V Two-Level Quantum Systems (Qubits) Lecture notes 5 5. Qubit description Quantum bit (qubit) is an elementary unit of a quantum computer. Similar to classical computers,
More informationJohn Stewart Bell Prize. Part 1: Michel Devoret, Yale University
John Stewart Bell Prize Part 1: Michel Devoret, Yale University SUPERCONDUCTING ARTIFICIAL ATOMS: FROM TESTS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS TO QUANTUM COMPUTERS Part 2: Robert Schoelkopf, Yale University CIRCUIT
More informationExploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities. Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris
Exploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris Experiments in which single atoms and photons are manipulated in high Q cavities are modern
More informationCircuit quantum electrodynamics with transmon qubits
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN WMI WALTHER - MEISSNER - INSTITUT FÜR TIEF - TEMPERATURFORSCHUNG BAYERISCHE AKADEMIE DER WISSENSCHAFTEN Circuit quantum electrodynamics with transmon qubits Master s Thesis
More informationQubit-photon interactions in a cavity: Measurement-induced dephasing and number splitting
Qubit-photon interactions in a cavity: Measurement-induced dephasing and number splitting Jay Gambetta, 1 Alexandre Blais, 1,2 D. I. Schuster, 1 A. Wallraff, 1,3 L. Frunzio, 1 J. Majer, 1 M. H. Devoret,
More informationCharacterization of lambda systems using superconducting qubits
Characterization of lambda systems using superconducting qubits by Helen Percival A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Applied
More informationCollège de France abroad Lectures Quantum information with real or artificial atoms and photons in cavities
Collège de France abroad Lectures Quantum information with real or artificial atoms and photons in cavities Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris www.college-de-france.fr A
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
doi:10.1038/nature11505 I. DEVICE PARAMETERS The Josephson (E J and charging energy (E C of the transmon qubit were determined by qubit spectroscopy which yielded transition frequencies ω 01 /π =5.4853
More informationSuperconducting Circuits and Quantum Information
Superconducting Circuits and Quantum Information Superconducting circuits can behave like atoms making transitions between two levels. Such circuits can test quantum mechanics at macroscopic scales and
More informationJosephson qubits. P. Bertet. SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group
Josephson qubits P. Bertet SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group Outline Lecture 1: Basics of superconducting qubits Lecture 2: Qubit readout and circuit quantum electrodynamics 1) 2) 3) Readout
More informationTheory for investigating the dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits
Theory for investigating the dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits Göran Johansson Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden International Workshop on Dynamical Casimir Effect
More informationParity-Protected Josephson Qubits
Parity-Protected Josephson Qubits Matthew Bell 1,2, Wenyuan Zhang 1, Lev Ioffe 1,3, and Michael Gershenson 1 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Jersey 2 Department of Electrical
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Superconducting qubit oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime S1. FLUX BIAS DEPENDENCE OF THE COUPLER S CRITICAL CURRENT The circuit diagram of the coupler in circuit I is shown as the
More informationSuperconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172)
Superconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172) Thilo Bauch (bauch@chalmers.se) Quantum Device Physics Laboratory, MC2, Chalmers University of Technology Qubit proposals for implementing
More informationLecture 2, March 1, 2018
Lecture 2, March 1, 2018 Last week: Introduction to topics of lecture Algorithms Physical Systems The development of Quantum Information Science Quantum physics perspective Computer science perspective
More informationCircuit quantum electrodynamics : beyond the linear dispersive regime
Circuit quantum electrodynamics : beyond the linear dispersive regime 1 Jay Gambetta 2 Alexandre Blais 1 1 Département de Physique et Regroupement Québécois sur les matériaux de pointe, 2 Institute for
More informationCondensed Matter Without Matter Quantum Simulation with Photons
Condensed Matter Without Matter Quantum Simulation with Photons Andrew Houck Princeton University Work supported by Packard Foundation, NSF, DARPA, ARO, IARPA Condensed Matter Without Matter Princeton
More informationState tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity. Abstract
State tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity Matthias Steffen, M. Ansmann, R. McDermott, N. Katz, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, Erik Lucero, Matthew Neeley, E.M. Weig, A.N. Cleland,
More informationAdvances in Josephson Quantum Circuits
APS 00 March Meeting, Tutorial #3 Advances in Josephson Quantum Circuits Instructors: Michel Devoret, Yale University "Introduction to superconducting quantum circuits" Yasunobu Nakamura, NEC Japan "Superconducting
More informationRabi oscillations, Ramsey fringes and spin echoes in an electrical circuit
Fortschr. Phys. 51, No. 4 5, 462 468 (2003) / DOI 10.1002/prop.200310063 Rabi oscillations, Ramsey fringes and spin echoes in an electrical circuit D. Vion 1, A. Aassime 1, A. Cottet 1,P.Joyez 1, H. Pothier
More informationB2.III Revision notes: quantum physics
B.III Revision notes: quantum physics Dr D.M.Lucas, TT 0 These notes give a summary of most of the Quantum part of this course, to complement Prof. Ewart s notes on Atomic Structure, and Prof. Hooker s
More informationFinal Report. Superconducting Qubits for Quantum Computation Contract MDA C-A821/0000
Final Report Superconducting Qubits for Quantum Computation Contract MDA904-98-C-A821/0000 Project Director: Prof. J. Lukens Co-project Director: Prof. D. Averin Co-project Director: Prof. K. Likharev
More informationLikewise, any operator, including the most generic Hamiltonian, can be written in this basis as H11 H
Finite Dimensional systems/ilbert space Finite dimensional systems form an important sub-class of degrees of freedom in the physical world To begin with, they describe angular momenta with fixed modulus
More information