Chapter 1. Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Chapter 1. Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena"

Bruno Sparks
6 years ago
Views:

1 Chapter 1 Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena

2 Chap. 1-2 I. Foundations of the Josephson Effect 1. Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena 1.1 The Macroscopic Quantum Model of Superconductivity Macroscopic systems Quantum mechanics Physical quantities (p, E, ) are quantized Usually thermal motion masks quantum properties No quantization effects on a macroscopic scale Superconductivity: Macroscopic quantum effects are observable Example: quantization of flux through a loop Why? Electrons form highly correlated system

3 1.1.1 Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Milestones 1911 Discovery of superconductivity 1933 Meißner-Ochsenfeld effect 1935 London-Laue-theory phenomenological model describing observations 1948 London: superelectron fluid as quantum mechanical entity Superconductivity is an inherently quantum phenomenon manifested on a macroscopic scale Macroscopic wave function Ψ r, t = Ψ 0 e iθ(r,t) London equations 1952 Ginzburg-Landau theory Description by complex order parameter Ψ(r) Treatment of spatially inhomogeneous situations near T c 1957 Microscopic BCS theory (J. Bardeen, L.N. Cooper, J.R. Schrieffer) BCS ground state Ψ BCS (coherent many body state) 1962 Prediction of the Josephson effect Chap. 1-3

4 Chap Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Macroscopic quantum model of superconductivity Macroscopic wave function Ψ(r, t) Describes the behavior of the whole ensemble of superconducting electrons Justified by microscopic BCS theory Small portion of electrons close to Fermi level are bound to Cooper pairs Center of mass motion of pairs is strongly correlated Example: Wave function Ψ r, t = Ψ 0 e iθ(r,t) = Ψ 0 e i(k s r ωt) Each pair has momentum ħk s or velocity v s = ħk s m s

Quantization of electromagnetic radiation (Planck, Einstein): photons

054 571 596 82 10 34 Js Luis de Broglie describes classical particles as

5 Chap Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Basic quantum mechanics Quantization of electromagnetic radiation (Planck, Einstein): photons represent smallest amount of energy: E = ħω with ħ = Js Luis de Broglie describes classical particles as waves wave particle duality Particle wave interrelations: E = ħω, p = ħk = h λ k Erwin Schrödinger developed a wave mechanics for particles Complex wave function describes quantum particle

6 Chap Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Basic quantum mechanics with multiply by use since

7 Chap Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Basic quantum mechanics Similar considerations Schrödinger postulated a General time dependent equation for massive quantum objects: Schrödinger equation (differential equation) Hamilton operator We restrict ourselves to systems with constant total energy (conservative systems) Due to E = ħω also the frequency is constant Prefactor of 2 nd term on lhs of is constant Solutions can be split in a two parts depending only on space and time

8 Chap Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Basic quantum mechanics and Stationary Schrödinger equation for Hamiltonians without explicit time dependence Yields eigenenergies E n and eigenstates Ψ n (r)

function Note: EM fields represented as the real or imaginary part of a complex expression Schrödinger

probability of a quantum object Conservation of probability density requires Continuity equation describes

9 Chap Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Probability currents Interpretation of complex wave function Note: EM fields represented as the real or imaginary part of a complex expression Schrödinger equation suggests that phase has physical significance Max Born: Interpretation of square magnitude as probability of a quantum object Conservation of probability density requires Continuity equation describes evolution of probability in space and time J ρ describes probabilistic flow of a quantum object, not the motion of a charged particle in an electromagnetic field (forces depending on the motion of the particle itself)

10 Chap Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Probability currents Time evolution of defines probability current: Example: J ρ for a charged particle in an EM field Start with classical equation of motion: Canonical (kinetic and field) momemtum p = mv + qa Vector potential

11 Chap Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Example: J ρ for a charged particle in an EM field Lorentz law with E and B expressed in terms of potentials φ and A Lorentz s law: with: generalized potential: p = mv + qa da = A + v A dt t Schrödinger equation: insert expression for V(r, t)

expression in the quantum description of

12 Chap Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Example: J ρ for a charged particle in an EM field Schrödinger equation Probability current Central expression in the quantum description of superconductivity Wave function of a single charged particle will be replaced by the macroscopic wave function describing all superelectrons

13 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors Normal metals Electrons as weakly/non-interacting particles Ordinary Schrödinger equation: where is the complex wave function of a particle Stationary case: Quantum behavior reduced to that of wave function phase Fermi statistics different time evolution of phase for different energies Phases are uniformly distributed, phase drops out for macroscopic quantities

14 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors Central hypothesis of macroscopic quantum model: There exists a macroscopic wave function describing the behavior of all superelectrons in a superconductor (motivation: superconductivity is a coherent phenomenon of all sc electrons) Normalization condition: N s and n s (r,t) are the total and local density of superconducting electrons Charged superfluid (analogy to fluid mechanics) Similarities in the description of superconductivity and superfluids No explanation of microscopic origin of superconductivity Relevant issue: describe superelectron fluid as quantum mechanical entity

density A = Vector potential φ = Scalar potential

15 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors Some basic relations: General relations in electrodynamics: Electric field Flux density A = Vector potential φ = Scalar potential Electrical current is driven by gradient of electrochemical potential: Canonical momentum: Kinematic momentum:

1.1.2 Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors Schrödinger equation for charged particle: electro-chemical potential Insert macroscopic wave-function Y y, q q s, m m s Split up into

16 1.1.2 Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors Schrödinger equation for charged particle: electro-chemical potential Insert macroscopic wave-function Y y, q q s, m m s Split up into real and imaginary part and assume Real part: Energy-phase relation Kinetic energy Potential energy Imaginary part: Current-phase relation Superelectron velocity v s J s = n s q s v s Chap. 1-17

17 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors We start from the Schrödinger equation: electro-chemical potential We use the definition S ħθ and obtain with

18 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors

19 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors equation for real part: J s = q sn s m s ħ θ q s A energy-phase relation (term of order 2 n s is usually neglected)

20 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors Interpretation of energy-phase relation corresponds to action In the quasi-classical limit ħ 0, the energy-phase-relation becomes the Hamilton-Jacobi equation

21 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors equation for imaginary part: Conservation law for probability density continuity equation for probability density and probability current density J ρ

22 1.1.2 Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors energy-phase relation 1 supercurrent density-phase relation (London parameter) 2 equations (1) and (2) have general validity for charged and uncharged superfluids (i) superconductor with Cooper pairs of charge q s = -2e (ii) (iii) neutral Bose superfluid, e.g. 4 He neutral Fermi superfluid, e.g. 3 He we use equations (1) and (2) to derive London equations note: independent of k! Chap. 1-23

23 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors Additional topic: Gauge invariance expression for the supercurrent density must be gauge invariant with the gauge invariant phase gradient: the supercurrent is London coefficient London penetration depth

24 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors Summary: The macroscopic wave function describes the whole ensemble of superelectrons with The current-phase relation (supercurrent equation) is The gauge invariant phase gradient is The energy-phase relation is

25 Chap Macroscopic Quantum Currents in Superconductors Importance of current-phase and energy-phase relation We can derive 1. and 2. London equation Flux(oid) quantization Josephson equations

26 1.1.3 The London Equations Fritz London ( ) Chap. 1-27

27 1.1.3 The London Equations Chap London equations are purely phenomenological Describe the behavior of superconductors Starting point: (super)current-phase relation (CPR) (London parameter) 2 nd London equation Meißner-Ochsenfeld effect: Take the curl of CPR second London equation Maxwell: describes Meißner-Ochsenfeld effect applied field decays exponentially inside superconductor, decay length (London penetration depth)

28 Chap The London Equations Example Meißner-Ochsenfeld effect Plane surface extending in yz-plane, magnetic field B z parallel to z-axis: exponential decay

Use energy-phase relation and First London equation Linearized form

29 1.1.3 The London Equations Chap st London equation perfect conductivity Time derivative od CPR Use energy-phase relation and First London equation Linearized form Time-independent supercurrent electric field inside the superconductor vanishes dissipationless supercurrent

Fermi circle are occupied Current in x-direction shift of Fermi circle along k x normal state: by ±dk x Relaxation into states with

30 1.1.3 The London Equations Chap Processes that could cause a decay of J s Example: Fermi sphere in two dimensions in the k x k y plane T = 0: all states inside the Fermi circle are occupied Current in x-direction shift of Fermi circle along k x normal state: by ±dk x Relaxation into states with lower energy (obeying Pauli principle) centered Fermi sphere current relaxes supercond. state: All Cooper pairs must have the same center of mass moment only scattering around the sphere no decay of supercurrent normal state superconducting state

1.1.3 The London Equations Chap. 1-32 Additional topic: Linearized 1. London Equation Usually, 1.

31 1.1.3 The London Equations Chap Additional topic: Linearized 1. London Equation Usually, 1. London equation is linearized: Allowed if E >> v s B kinetic energy of superelectrons Condition is satisfied in most cases Equivalent to neglecting magnetic contribution in Lorentz law The nonlinear first London equation results from the Lorentz's law and the second London equation Exact form describes the zero dc resistance in superconductors The first London equation is derived using the second London equation Meißner-Ochsenfeld effect is more fundamental than vanishing dc resistance Additional topic: The London Gauge (see lecture notes) rigid phase: no conversion of J s in J n :

Superconducting cylinder Bohr s model for atoms Stationary supercurrent: Angular momentum quantization No destructive interference of

32 1.2. Fluxoid Quantization Chap Gedanken-experiment Generate supercurrent in a ring Zero dc-resistance Stationary state Determined by quantum conditions Superconducting cylinder Bohr s model for atoms Stationary supercurrent: Angular momentum quantization No destructive interference of electron wave Stationary state Macroscopic wave function is not allowed to interfere destructively quantization condition Derivation of the quantization condition (based on macroscopic quantum model of superconductivity) Start with supercurrent density:

33 1.2. Fluxoid Quantization Chap Integration of expression for supercurrent density around a closed contour Stoke s theorem (path C in simply or multiply connected region): applied to supercurrent: Integral of phase gradient: If r 1 r 2 (closed path), then integral 0 But Phase only specified within modulo 2p of principal value π, π : q n = q 0 + 2πn

holds for all contour lines including contour that has shrunk to single point r 1 = r 2 in limit r 1 r

34 1.2. Fluxoid Quantization Chap then: Fluxoid is quantized Flux quantum: Simply connected superconductor Quantization condition holds for all contour lines including contour that has shrunk to single point r 1 = r 2 in limit r 1 r 2 n = 0 Multiply connected superconductor Contour line can no longer shrink to single point Inclusion of non-superconducting region in contour r 1 r 2 in limit r 1 r 2 n 0 possible

35 1.2.1 Fluxoid and Flux Quantization Chap Fluxoid quantization Total flux = externally applied flux + flux generated by induced supercurrent Must have discrete values Flux Quantization (without oid ) Superconducting cylinder, wall much thicker than λ L Application of small magnetic field at T < T c Screening currents, no flux inside Application of H ext during cool down Screening current on outer and inner wall Amount of flux trapped in cylinder satisfies fluxoid quantization condition Wall thickness λ L closed contour deep inside with J s = 0 Flux quantization Remove field after cooling down Trapped flux is integer multiple of Φ 0

36 1.2.1 Fluxoid and Flux Quantization Chap H ext magnetic flux J s J s inner surface current r r outer surface current

37 1.2.1 Fluxoid and Flux Quantization Chap B ext > 0 B ext > 0 B ext = 0 T > T c T < T c T < T c

38 1.2.1 Fluxoid and Flux Quantization Chap Flux Trapping: why is flux not expelled after switching of external field - J s / t = 0 according to 1 st London equation: E = 0 deep inside (supercurrent only on surface within l J ) with and we get: F: magnetic flux enclosed in loop contour deep inside the superconductor: E = 0 and therefore Flux enclosed in cylinder stays constant

1.2.2 Experimental Proof of Flux Quantization 1961 by Doll/Näbauer at Munich, Deaver/Fairbanks at Stanford

thickness λ L Different amounts of flux are frozen in during cooling down in B cool Measure amount of trapped

Required: Large relative changes of magnetic flux Small fields Small diameter d For d = 10 μm we need: 2 10 5

39 1.2.2 Experimental Proof of Flux Quantization 1961 by Doll/Näbauer at Munich, Deaver/Fairbanks at Stanford quantization of magnetic flux in superconducting cylinder Cooper pairs with q s = 2e Cylinder with wall thickness λ L Different amounts of flux are frozen in during cooling down in B cool Measure amount of trapped flux Demanding! Required: Large relative changes of magnetic flux Small fields Small diameter d For d = 10 μm we need: T for one flux quantum B Measurement of (very small) torque p D = μ B p due to probe field B p Resonance method: Amplitude of rotary oscillation exciting torque quartz thread Pb quartz cylinder d 10 µm Chap. 1-40

40 Chap Experimental Proof of Flux Quantization resonance amplitude (mm/gauss) R. Doll, M. Näbauer Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 51 (1961) F B cool (Gauss) trapped magnetic flux (h/2e) B.S. Deaver, W.M. Fairbank Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 43 (1961) B cool (Gauss) Φ 0 = h 2e Prediction by Fritz London: h/e First experimental evidence for the existence of Cooper pairs Paarweise im Fluss, D. Einzel and R. Gross, Physik Journal 10, No. 6, (2011)

1.3 Josephson Effect (together with Leo Esaki and

1-42 Brian David Josephson (born 04. 01.

theoretical predictions of the properties of a

41 1.3 Josephson Effect (together with Leo Esaki and Ivar Giaever) Chap Brian David Josephson (born ) Nobel Prize in Physics 1973 "for his theoretical predictions of the properties of a supercurrent through a tunnel barrier, in particular those phenomena which are generally known as the Josephson effects"

Chap. 1-43 1.3.1 Josephson Equations What happens if we weakly couple two superconductors? Mechanisms Tunneling barriers, point contacts, normal conductors, etc.

42 Chap Josephson Equations What happens if we weakly couple two superconductors? Mechanisms Tunneling barriers, point contacts, normal conductors, etc. Do they form a bound state such as a molecule? If so, what is the binding energy? Cooper pairs can tunnel through thin insulating barrier! Expectation Extremely small Tunneling probability for pairs T B. D. Josephson (1962): Tunneling probability for pairs T 2 Coherent tunneling of pairs Tunneling of macroscopic wave function Finite supercurrent at zero applied voltage Oscillating supercurrent at constant applied voltage Josephson effects Finite binding energy (Josephson coupling energy)

Supercurrent density depends on gauge invariant phase gradient: Simplifying assumptions:

junction area γ varies in superconducting electrodes much smaller than in the tunnel barrier

43 Chap Josephson Equations Coupling is weak Supercurrent density is small Ψ 2 = n s is not changed Supercurrent density depends on gauge invariant phase gradient: Simplifying assumptions: Current density is homogeneous γ varies negligibly in electrodes J s same in electrodes and junction area γ varies in superconducting electrodes much smaller than in the tunnel barrier Replace gauge invariant phase gradient γ by gauge invariant phase difference n s /n n s (x) S 1 I S 2 g(x) dx x (arb. units) g(x) g(x) dx,g(x) (arb. units)

44 1.3.1 Josephson Equations First Josephson equation: Expectation: J s = 0 Phase difference must be zero: J c : critical current density (maximum Josephson current density) (General formulation of 1 st Josephson equation) Weak coupling Keep only 1 st term 1. Josephson equation: Spatially inhomogeneous supercurrent density: Current phase relation derived by Josephson for SIS junctions supercurrent density varies sinusoidally with φ = θ 2 θ 1 w/o external potentials Chap. 1-45

J s The time evolution of the macroscopic wave functions is eiθ t = If

45 Chap Josephson Equations Other argument why there are only sin contributions to Josephson current Time reversal symmetry If we reverse time, the Josephson current should flow in opposite direction t t, J s J s The time evolution of the macroscopic wave functions is eiθ t = If we reverse time, we have t t e iωt If the Josephson effect stays unchanged under time reversal, we have to demand Satisfied only by sin-terms

1.3.1 Josephson Equations Second Josephson equation:

difference: Substitution of the energy-phase relation

continuous (J s (1) = J s (2)): E = φ A t 2.

46 1.3.1 Josephson Equations Second Josephson equation: Time derivative of the gauge invariant phase difference: Substitution of the energy-phase relation Supercurrent density across the junction is continuous (J s (1) = J s (2)): E = φ A t 2. Josephson equation: Voltage phase relation Voltage drop across barrier Chap. 1-47

47 Chap Josephson Equations Second Josephson equation: For a constant voltage across the junction: I s oscillates at the Josephson frequency ν = V Φ 0 Voltage controlled oscillator Applications: Josephson voltage standard Microwave sources

wave matching method Energy-phase relation: E 0 = kinetic energy Time-dependent macroscopic wave function Within

48 Chap Josephson Tunneling Maximum Josephson current density Insulating tunneling barrier of thickness d Calculation by wave matching method Energy-phase relation: E 0 = kinetic energy Time-dependent macroscopic wave function Within barrier (height V 0 > E 0 ) Only elastic processes Time evolution is the same outside and inside barrier Consider only time-independent part Time-independent Schrödinger(-like) equation for region of constant potential

49 1.3.2 Josephson Tunneling Chap Maximum Josephson current density Homogeneous barrier and supercurrent flow 1D problem Solutions: Superconductor: Insulator: Decaying + growing exponential Characteristic decay constant: barrier properties Coefficients A and B are determined by the boundary conditions at x = ± d/2: n 1,2, θ 1,2 : Cooper pair density and wave function phase at the boundaries x = ± d 2

50 Chap Josephson Tunneling Maximum Josephson current density Solving vor A and B: Supercurrent density Substituting the coefficients A and B Current-phase relation Real junctions: V 0 few mev 1/κ < 1 nm, d few nm κd 1 Maximum Josephson current decays exponentially with increasing thickness

51 Summary Chap The supercurrent equation is 2 nd London equation: which leads to: 1 st London equation: Fluxiod quantization

52 Summary Chap Macroscopic wave function Ψ describes ensemble of macroscopic number of superconducting pairs Ψ 2 describes density of superconducting pairs Current density in a superconductor: Gauge invariant phase gradient: Phenomenological London equations: Flux(oid) quantization:

53 Summary Chap Josephson equations: Maximum Josephson current density

Chapter 1. Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena

Chapter 1. Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena Chapter 1 Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena Chap. 1-2 I. Foundations of the Josephson Effect 1. Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena 1.1 The Macroscopic Quantum Model of Superconductivity quantum mechanics: - physical