Multiphysics Simulations for the design of a Superconducting magnet for proton therapy

Transcription

1 WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Paul Scherrer Institut Multiphysics Simulations for the design of a Superconducting magnet for proton therapy Ciro Calzolaio October 19, 2017

2 OUTLINE Superconducting magnets: a Multiphysics approach CAD drawing; Cool-down analysis; Operation AC losses calculation; Mechanical analysis. Further steps: Quench analysis

3 Superconducting magnets: a Multiphysics approach

4 CAD drawings

5 Support structure 316 LN former Support structure Fe yoke CuBe ring 316 L Cryostat Cu Thermal shield Cu Thermal shield around the Warm bore 1 st and 2 nd stage connections to cryocooler Warm bore Fully parametric CAD used during the optimization phase.

6 Cool-down

7 Cool-down Current lead top at room temperature 1 st stage 2 nd stage Cryostat walls at room temperature Cryocooler capacity map Capacity map implemented as two arguments interpolating function.

8 Support structure: materials choice G10 316LN Ti-6Al-4V Mechanic thermal

9 Thermal Analysis: cool-down The Ti-6Al-4V structure has been considered

10 Operation AC-losses

11 AC losses To change the protons penetration depth it is necessary to change their energy the bending field has to change accordingly. B-field in the magnet good field region (GFR) based on a worst case treatment scenario

12 316Ln coil structure: eddy currents AC losses in the structure Cable: 4.9 mm x 1.5 mm x 1100 m AC losses in the coils Strand: f = 0.82 mm Nb 3 Sn Filaments: f ~ 4-5 mm AC losses in the coils (inter-strands + inter-filaments + hysteresis) evaluated analytically

13 AC losses

14 AC losses It is important to prove that the coils temperature stays below T cs (current sharing temperature) to avoid Joule heating. In operation the De thermal is negligible

15 Operation mechanics

16 Support structure cryostat verification 1) s Mises < 110 MPa upon rotation < s yield

17 Support structure cryostat verification 1) s Mises < 110 MPa upon rotation < s yield 2) Warm bore load < critical load no buckling total displacement < clearances in CAD drawing no thermal bridges 0.4 mm 0.3 mm 0.2 mm 0.1 mm 3) Thermal shield total displacement < clearances in CAD drawing no thermal bridges

18 Stress on the conductor Nb 3 Sn is brittle + strain sensitive it is crucial to monitor the stress/strain the cable Lorentz forces + thermal strain were considered. von Mises A moderate performance degradation is expected Max shear on cable insulation

19 Further steps: Quench analysis

20 Current supply Quench scenario Despite the efforts during the design phase, a perturbation in the coils my trigger a transition from the superconducting to the normal state, namely a quench. In this case it is necessary to extract the magnet energy and to dump it into an external resistor. Extraction switch 1 R ex2 R ex1 Extraction switch 2

21 Quench scenario Despite the efforts during the design phase, a perturbation in the coils my trigger a transition from the superconducting to the normal state, namely a quench. In this case it is necessary to extract the magnet energy and to dump it into an external resistor. Joule heating Detection voltage Hot spot temperature Perturbation that triggers the quench time (ms)

22 Quench scenario Despite the efforts during the design phase, a perturbation in the coils my trigger a transition from the superconducting to the normal state, namely a quench. In this case it is necessary to extract the magnet energy and to dump it into an external resistor.

23 Summary Modelling a superconducting coil implies dealing with Multiphysics problems. COMSOL Multiphysics has been used to Produce a parametric CAD of the magnet; Analyze the cooldown time and the achievable temperature; Estimate the AC losses in the magnet in operation; Check the stress in the structure and in the coils due to the Lorentz forces and the thermal strain; In operation it is possible to have perturbations that leads to a quench of the superconducting magnet. In this case A fast heating of the coils takes place; If the energy is not safely extracted, the fast heating may even destroy the coils.

24 APPENDIX Page 70

25 Support structure: optimization parameters

26 Thermal Analysis Heat capacity Joule heating AC losses coils Cryocoolers Eddy currents Magnetization Fe Conduction

27 AC losses AC losses in the structure AC losses in the coils Temperature profile

28 AC losses - hysteresis

29 DQS structure: 1 st stage thermal shield Cu piece brazed to the Cu shield Cu thermal shield G10 hollow pillar

30 DQS structure Cu support around the coil. 316 L former Fe yoke