arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 22 Dec 2014
|
|
- Melissa Campbell
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 22 Dec 2014 Bethe states of the XXZ spin- 1 chain with arbitrary 2 boundary fields Xin Zhang a, Yuan-Yuan Li a, Junpeng Cao a,b, Wen-Li Yang c,d1, Kangjie Shi c and Yupeng Wang a,b2 a Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing , China b Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing, China c Institute of Modern Physics, Northwest University, Xian , China d Beijing Center for Mathematics and Information Interdisciplinary Sciences, Beijing, , China Abstract Based on the inhomogeneous T Q relation constructed via the off-diagonal Bethe Ansatz (ODBA, the Bethe-type eigenstates of the XXZ spin- 1 2 chain with arbitrary boundary fields are constructed. It is found that by employing two sets of gauge transformations, proper generators and reference state for constructing Bethe vectors can be obtained respectively. Given an inhomogeneous T Q relation for the eigenvalue, it is proven that the resulting Bethe state is an eigenstate of the transfer matrix, provided that the parameters of the generators satisfy the associated Bethe Ansatz equations (BAEs. PACS: Pq, Vf, Pm Keywords: Spin chain; Bethe Ansatz; T Q relation; Scalar product 1 Corresponding author: wlyang@nwu.edu.cn 2 Corresponding author: yupeng@iphy.ac.cn
2 1 Introduction In this paper we focus on constructing the Bethe-type eigenstates (Bethe states of the quantum XXZ spin- 1 chain with arbitrary boundary fields, defined by the Hamiltonian 2 H = = N 1 N 1 { σ x j σj+1 x +σ y } j σy j+1 +coshησz jσj+1 z + h1 σ 1 + h N σ N { } σ x j σj+1 x +σy j σy j+1 +coshησz j σz j (coshα sinhβ σ1 z sinhα coshβ +coshθ σ1 x +isinhθ σ y 1 (coshα + sinhβ + σn z coshθ + σn x isinhθ + σ y N, (1.1 sinhα + coshβ + where σj α (α = x,y,z is the Pauli matrix on the site j along the α direction and α ±, β ±, θ ± are the boundary parameters associated with the boundary fields. The model has played a fundamental role in the study of quantum integrable system[1, 2] with boundaries. Moreover, it has many applications in the non-perturbative analysis of quantum systems appearing in string and super-symmetric Yang-Mills (SYM theories [3] (and references therein, lowdimensional condensed matter physics [4] and statistical physics [5, 6]. However, the Bethe Ansatz solution of the model for generic values of boundary fields has challenged for many years since Sklyanin s elegant work [7], and many efforts had been made [8, 9, 10, 11, 5, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17] to approach this nontrivial problem. The off-diagonal Bethe Ansatz (ODBA provides an efficient method [18] for solving the eigenvalue problem of integrable models with generic integrable boundary conditions. Several long-standing models [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24] including the XXZ spin- 1 chain 2 have since been solved via this method. The central point is to construct a proper T Q relation [1], which immediately leads to the Bethe Ansatz solution for the eigenvalues, with an extra off-diagonal (or inhomogeneous term for the eigenvalues of the transfer matrix based on their functional relations. An interesting issue in this framework is how to retrieve the Bethe states from the obtained spectrum. Indeed, significant progress has been achieved in this aspect recently. For example, based on the inhomogeneous T Q relation obtained in [19], the Bethe states of the open XXX spin chain was conjectured in [25] and then proven in [26]. Alternatively, a set of eigenstates of the inhomogeneous XXZ transfer matrix was 2
3 derived in [16, 27] via the separation of variables (SoV method [28]. However, how to get the homogeneous limit (if there is any of those SoV states is still an open problem. For the open XXZ chain, when the boundary fields are all along the z-direction (or the diagonal boundaries, the corresponding Bethe states were constructed by the algebraic Bethe Ansatz method [7, 29]. The unparallel boundary fields break the U(1-symmetry (i.e, the total spin is not conserved any more. This makes the problem of constructing Bethe vectors rather unusual because of the absence of an obvious reference state. So far, the Bethe states could only be obtained for some constrained boundary parameters. When the boundary parameters obey a constraint [8, 9], which is already in U(1-symmetry-broken case, the associated Bethe states were constructed[9] within the framework of the generalized algebraic Bethe Ansatz [1, 30]. Very recently, based on small sites analysis of the model with triangular boundaries, the corresponding Bethe states are conjectured [31] and proven in [32]. In this paper we study the Bethe states of the transfer matrix for the quantum XXZ spin- 1 chain with arbitrary boundary fields based on the inhomogeneous T Q relation of 2 the eigenvalues obtained by ODBA. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 serves as an introduction of our notations and the ODBA solutions of the model. In section 3, after introducing the gauge transformations, we compute the associated commutation relations among the matrix elements of the two gauged double-row monodromy matrices, and their actions on the associated vacuum states. In section 4, two particular gauge transformations are chosen according to the boundary parameters of K-matrices respectively. Based on the chosen parameters of the resulting transformations, the Bethe-type eigenstates of the transfer matrix are constructed. In section 5, we summarize our results and give the concluding remarks. Some useful formulae and technical proofs are given in Appendices A-C respectively. 2 ODBA solution For the XXZ spin chain with generic boundaries, the associated R-matrix and the reflection matrix K (u [33, 34] read R(u = 1 sinh(u + η sinhu 0 0 sinhu sinh(u + η, (2.1 3
4 K (u = ( K 11 (u K 12 (u K 21(u K 22(u, K 11 (u = 2(sinh(α cosh(β cosh(u+cosh(α sinh(β sinh(u, K 22 (u = 2(sinh(α cosh(β cosh(u cosh(α sinh(β sinh(u, K 12 (u = eθ sinh(2u, K 21 (u = e θ sinh(2u, (2.2 and K + (u = K ( u η, (2.3 (α,β,θ ( α +, β +,θ + where η is the crossing parameter, and α, β, θ are the boundary parameters associated with boundary fields (see (1.1. The R-matrix is a solution of the quantum Yang-Baxter equation (QYBE R 12 (u 1 u 2 R 13 (u 1 u 3 R 23 (u 2 u 3 = R 23 (u 2 u 3 R 13 (u 1 u 3 R 12 (u 1 u 2, (2.4 and K (u satisfy the following reflection equations (RE R 12 (u 1 u 2 K1 (u 1R 21 (u 1 +u 2 K2 (u 2 = K2 (u 2 R 12 (u 1 +u 2 K1 (u 1 R 21 (u 1 u 2, (2.5 and R 12 (u 2 u 1 K 1 + (u 1 R 21 ( u 1 u 2 2ηK 2 + (u 2 = K 2 + (u 2 R 12 ( u 1 u 2 2ηK 1 + (u 1 R 21 (u 2 u 1. (2.6 Weintroducethe row-to-row (orone-rowmonodromymatricest 0 (uand ˆT 0 (u,which are 2 2 matrices with elements being operators acting on the tensor space V N, T 0 (u = R 0N (u θ N R 0N 1 (u θ N 1 R 01 (u θ 1, (2.7 ˆT 0 (u = R 10 (u+θ 1 R 20 (u+θ 2 R N0 (u+θ N. (2.8 Here {θ j j = 1,,N} are the inhomogeneous parameters. For open spin chains, one needs to consider the double-row monodromy matrix U 0 (u U 0 (u = T 0 (uk0 (uˆt 0 (u. (2.9 The double-row transfer matrix t(u is thus given by t(u = tr 0 (K 0 + (uu 0(u. (2.10 4
5 The QYBE (2.4 and REs (2.5 and (2.6 lead to the fact that the transfer matrices with different spectral parameters commute with each other [7]: [t(u, t(v] = 0. Then t(u serves as the generating functional of the conserved quantities of the corresponding system, which ensures the integrability of the open spin chain. The Hamiltonian (1.1 is expressed in terms of the transfer matrix (2.10 with the K- matrices (2.2 and (2.3 by H = lnt(u u=0,θj =0 N coshη tanhη. (2.11 u It was proven in [20] that for generic {θ j } the transfer matrix given by (2.10 for arbitrary boundary parameters satisfies the following operator identities t(θ j t(θ j η = a(θ j d(θ j η id, (2.12 t( u η = t(u, t(u+iπ = t(u, (2.13 t(0 = 2 3 sinhα coshβ sinhα + coshβ + coshη N sinh(η θ l sinh(η +θ l sinh 2 id, (2.14 η l=1 t( iπ 2 = 23 coshα sinhβ coshα + sinhβ + coshη N sinh( iπ +θ 2 l +ηsinh( iπ +θ 2 l η sinh 2 id, (2.15 η l=1 lim t(u = cosh(θ θ + e ±[(2N+4u+(N+2η] u ± 2 2N+1 sinh 2N η where the functions a(u and d(u are given by id+..., (2.16 a(u = 2 2sinh(2u+2η sinh(2u+η sinh(u α cosh(u β sinh(u α + cosh(u β + Ā(u,(2.17 N sinh(u θ l +ηsinh(u+θ l +η d(u = a( u η, Ā(u = sinh 2. (2.18 η l=1 The above operator relations lead to that the corresponding eigenvalue of the transfer matrix, denoted by Λ(u, enjoys the following properties Λ(θ j Λ(θ j η = a(θ j d(θ j η, j = 1,...,N, (2.19 Λ( u η = Λ(u, Λ(u+iπ = Λ(u, (2.20 N Λ(0 = 2 3 sinh(η θ l sinh(η +θ l sinhα coshβ sinhα + coshβ + coshη sinh 2, η ( l=1
6 Λ( iπ 2 = 23 coshα sinhβ coshα + sinhβ + coshη N sinh( iπ +θ 2 l +η sinh( iπ +θ 2 l η sinh 2, (2.22 η l=1 lim Λ(u = cosh(θ θ + e ±[(2N+4u+(N+2η] u ± 2 2N+1 sinh 2N η +... (2.23 Λ(u, as an entire function of u, is a trigonometric polynomial of degree 2N +4. (2.24 Each solution of (2.19-(2.24 can be given in terms of the following inhomogeneous T Q relation [19, 35, 36] 3 Λ(u = a(u Q(u η +d(u Q(u+η Q(u Q(u 2c sinh(2usinh(2u+2η + Ā(uĀ( u η, (2.25 Q(u where c is a constant depending on the boundary parameters c = cosh(α +β +α + +β + +(1+Nη cosh(θ θ +, (2.26 and the Q-function is given by Q(u = N with the parameters {λ j } satisfying the associated BAEs sinh(u λ j sinh(u+λ j +η, (2.27 a(λ j Q(λ j η+d(λ j Q(λ j +η + 2c sinh2λ j sinh(2λ j +2ηĀ(λ jā( λ j η = 0, j = 1,...,N. (2.28 We shall show in Section 4 that for each solution of (2.19-(2.24, one can construct the corresponding Bethe-type eigenstate (see (4.10 below of the transfer matrix (2.10 with the eigenvalue given by (2.25. Therefore the relations (2.19-(2.24 (or the inhomogeneous T Q relation (2.25 indeed completely characterize the spectrum of the transfer matrix. Some remarks are in order. There exist various possible ways [19] to parameterize the solution of(2.19-(2.24, but they are all equivalent to each other because of the finite number of solutions. For generic boundary parameters, the minimal degree of the Q-polynomial is 3 The T Q relation (2.25 corresponds to the case of M = 0 in [19]. A generalization to other cases is straightforward. 6
7 N, while the degree of the Q-polynomial may be reduced to a small value in case of the inhomogeneous term (or the third term in (2.25 vanishing. In this case the T Q relation becomes a homogeneous one (the well-known Baxter s T Q relation. This happens in case of U(1 symmetry or in degenerate cases [9], for which the transfer matrix can be diagonalized in smaller blocks. 3 Gauge transformations and the associated operators A particular set of gauge transformation (the six-vertex version of the vertex-face correspondence, which have played a key role to construct the associated Bethe states, was proposed in [9]. Recently, such gauge transformation was adopted in constructing the SoV eigenstates for the open chains [27]. In this paper, we use two sets of such gauge transformation and the inhomogeneous T Q relation (2.25 to construct the Bethe states for the quantum XXZ spin- 1 chain with arbitrary boundary fields. 2 Following [9], let us introduce two column vectors as follows ( ( e [u+(α+mη] e [u+(α mη] X m (u α =, Y 1 m (u α = 1, (3.1 where α and m are two arbitrary complex parameters. For generic α and m, the two vectors are linearly independent. Thus one can introduce the following gauge matrices M m (u α = ( X m (u α, Y m (u α (, M 1 Y m (u = m (u α, (3.2 X m (u α M m (u α = ( X m+1 (u α, Y m 1 (u α ( Ỹm 1 (u α, M 1 m (u α =, (3.3 X m+1 (u α where M m (u α = ( Xm 1 (u α, Ŷ m+1 (u α X m (u α = eu+αη ( 1, e [u+(α+mη] 2sinhmη Y m (u α = eu+αη ( 1, e [u+(α mη] 2sinhmη ( Y, M 1 m (u α = m+1 (u α X m 1 (u α, (3.4, (3.5, (3.6 X m (u α = eη sinhmη sinh(m 1η X m(u α, Ỹ m (u α = eη sinhmη sinh(m+1η Y m(u α, (3.7 X m (u α = e η sinh(m+2η sinh(m+1η X m(u α, Ŷ m (u α = e η sinh(m 2η sinh(m 1η Y m(u α. (3.8 7
8 We remark that the vectors X m (u α and X m (u α only depend on α+m, while the vectors Y m (u α and Y m (u α only depend on α m, up to a scaling factor. These column and row vectors satisfy some intertwining relations [9], which are listed in Appendix A (see (A.1-(A.28 below. These relations allow us to introduce the following gauged operators and the associated K + -matrix ( A m (u α B m (u α U (m,α u = C m (u α D m (u α ( Y m (u αu(u = X m 2 ( u α Y m (u αu(uŷm( u α, (3.9 X m (u αu(u X m ( u α X m (u αu(uŷm+2( u α ( K + K + 11 (m,α u = (m,α u K+ 12 (m,α u K + 21 (m,α u K+ 22 (m,α u ( Y = m ( u αk + (ux m (u α Y m+2 ( u αk + (uy m (u α X m 2 ( u αk + (ux m (u α X m ( u αk +. (3.10 (uy m (u α With the help of the relations (A.29-(A.31, we can rewrite the transfer matrix (2.10 in terms of the above gauged operators and K-matrix, namely, t(u = tr { K + (uu (u } = K + 11(m,α ua m (u α+k + 21(m,α ub m (u α +K + 12(m,α uc m (u α+k + 22(m,α ud m (u α { } = tr U (m,α uk + (m,α u. (3.11 The QYBE (2.4, the RE (2.5 and the intertwining relations given in Appendix A allow us to derive the commutation relations among the matrix elements of U (m, α u. Here we present some relevant relations for our purpose: C m (u 1 αc m+2 (u 2 α = C m (u 2 αc m+2 (u 1 α, (3.12 [ Dm 2 (u 2 α, D m 2 (u 1 α ] = sinh(mη +u 1 +u 2 sinhmηsinh(u 1 +u 2 +η C m 2(u 1 αb m (u 2 α sinh(mη +u 1 +u 2 sinhmηsinh(u 1 +u 2 +η C m 2(u 2 αb m (u 1 α, (3.13 D m 2 (u 2 αc m 2 (u 1 α = sinh(u 1 u 2 +ηsinh(u 1 +u 2 sinh(u 1 +u 2 +ηsinh(u 1 u 2 C m 2(u 1 αd m (u 2 α sinh(mη u 1 +u 2 sinh(u 1 +u 2 sinhmηsinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(u 1 +u 2 +η C m 2(u 2 αd m (u 1 α 8
9 sinh(mη +u 1 +u 2 sinhmηsinh(u 1 +u 2 +η C m 2(u 2 αa m (u 1 α, (3.14 [ Dm (u 2 α, A m (u 1 α ] = sinh(m+1ηsinh(mη u 1 +u 2 sinh(u 1 +u 2 +2η sinh(m+2ηsinh(m 1ηsinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(u 1 +u 2 +η [C m (u 1 αb m+2 (u 2 α C m (u 2 αb m+2 (u 1 α]. (3.15 The proof of the above relations is relegated to Appendix B. Let us introduce the left local vacuum state of the n-th site in the lattice as follows: ω;m,α n = X m+n N 1 (θ n α, n = 1,,N, (3.16 where the row vector X m (u is given by (3.5. Further, we introduce the following global vacuum state α+m = 2 N e N l=1 θ l αnη N sinh(m lη l=1 N ω;m n. (3.17 Theexplicitexpression(3.5oftherowvectorX m (uimpliesthattheaboveleftvacuumstate depends only on α+m. Following the method in [9, 37, 38], after some tedious calculation, we obtain the actions of the gauged operators C m (u α, A m (u α and D m (u α on the state as follows: α+m C m (u α =K 21 (m N,α u sinh(m+2η sinh(m+2 Nη N sinh(u θ j +ηsinh(u+θ j sinh 2 α+m+2, (3.18 η α+m D m (u α =K 22(m N,α u N +K 21 (m N,α u N n=1 sinh(u θ j +ηsinh(u+θ j +η sinh 2 α+m η sinh(u θ j +η α+m+1 B m+1 (u α, (3.19 α+m A m (u α = sinh(2u (m 1η sinh(2u+ηsinh(1 mη { N K sinh(u θ j +ηsinh(u+θ j +η 22(m N,α u sinh 2 α+m η N } + K 21 (m N,α u sinh(u θ j +η α+m+1 B m+1 (u α +F(u. (3.20 9
10 Here we have introduced the gauged K -matrix ( K (l K 11,α u = (l,α u K 12 (l,α u K 21 (l,α u K 22 (l,α u ( Y = l (u αk (u X l 2( u α Y l (u αk (uŷl ( u α X l (u αk (u X,(3.21 l ( u α X l (u αk (uŷl +2( u α with l = m N, and the gauged operator B m (u α is given by B m (u α = Y m N+1 ( u αˆt(uŷm+1( u α. (3.22 The extra term F(u in (3.20 actually vanishes at the points { θ j j = 1,,N}, namely, This fact gives rise to the following important relations F( θ j = 0, j = 1,...,N. (3.23 α+m A m ( θ j α = sinh((m 1η +2θ j sinh(m 1ηsinh(2θ j η α+m D m( θ j α. (3.24 The associated right vacuum state, which only depends on α+m, is given by [9] α+m = N X m+n n+1 (θ n α, (3.25 n=1 and the associated gauged operators are ( Am (u α B U (m,α u = m (u α, C m (u α D m (u α ( Ỹm 2 (u αu (ux m ( u α Ỹ m (u αu(uy m ( u α = X m (u αu (ux m ( u α Xm+2 (u αu (uy m ( u α. (3.26 The matrix elements of the above gauged monodromy matrix acting on the right vacuum state (3.25 were given in [9]. Here we present some relevant ones C m (u α α+m = K21 1η (l,α usinh(m+n sinh(m 1η N A m (u α α+m = K 11(l,α u sinh(u θ j sinh(u+θ j +η sinh 2 α+m 2, (3.27 η +K 21(l,α u N sinh(u θ j +ηsinh(u+θ j +η sinh 2 α+m η N sinh(u+θ j +η B m 1 (u α α+m 1, (
11 with l = m+n. Here another gauged K -matrix is (c.f., (3.21 ( K K (l,α u = 11 (l,α u K12 (l,α u K21 (l,α u K 22 (l,α u, ( Ỹl 2 (u αk (ux l ( u α Ỹ l (u αk (uy l ( u α = X l (u αk (ux l ( u α Xl+2 (u αk (uy l ( u α, (3.29 and the gauged operator B m (u α is given by 4 Bethe states B m (u α = Ỹm 1(uT(uY m+n 1 (u. (3.30 Up to now, the parameters α and m in the definitions of the gauged operator U (m,α u in (3.9 and the associated K-matrix K + (m,α u in (3.10 (resp. U (m,α u in (3.26 and the associated K-matrix K (m,α u in (3.29 are arbitrary. The works in [25, 26] shed light on the two important facts to construct the Bethe-type eigenstates of the U(1-symmetrybroken integrable models: (1 The inhomogeneous T Q relation has played a central role in constructing the Bethe states because it enables one in this case to tell the wanted term from the unwanted ones within the framework of the algebraic Bethe Ansatz method; (2 It also suggests that in order to construct the right Bethe states 4 of the transfer matrix (2.10, one may choose the two parameters α and m according to the boundary parameters α +, β + and θ + to construct the creation operator (resp. according to the boundary parameters α, β and θ to seek the associated reference state. For this purpose, let us choose the gauge parameters in (3.10 as follows { def αη = α (l η = η θ + +i π mod(2iπ, 2 (4.1 mη def = m (l η = α + +β + i π mod(2iπ. 2 In this particular choice of the gauged parameters, the corresponding gauged K-matrix K + (m,α u given by (3.10 becomes diagonal K + (m (l,α (l u = Diag(K + 11 (m(l,α (l u,k + 22 (m(l,α (l u, (4.2 where the non-vanishing matrix elements read K + 11(m (l,α (l 2e u u= cosh(α + +β + sinh(u+α ++ηcosh(u+β + +ηcosh(α + +β + η, (4.3 4 The generalization to construct the left Bethe states is straightforward. 11
12 2e u K + 22(m (l,α (l u= cosh(α + +β + sinh(u α ++ηcosh(u β + +ηcosh(α + +β + +η. (4.4 In this case the the transfer matrix (2.10 becomes t(u = K + 11 (m(l,α (l ua m (l(u α (l +K + 22 (m(l,α (l ud m (l(u α (l. (4.5 Direct calculation shows that the following identity holds K + 22(m (l,α (l u+ sinh((m(l 1η 2u sinh(2u+ηsinh(m (l 1η K+ 11(m (l,α (l u = 2e usinh(2u+2η sinh(2u+η sinh(u α +cosh(u β +. (4.6 Then let us choose the gauge parameters in (3.29 such that the following relation is satisfied (m (r +α (r η = θ +α +β Nη +iπ mod(2iπ. (4.7 InthiscasethecorrespondinggaugedK-matrixK (m (r +N,α (r ugivenby(3.29becomes up-triangular with the matrix element K 11 (m(r +N,α (r u fixed, namely, K 21 (m(r +N,α (r u = 0, K 11 (m(r +N,α (r u = 2e u sinh(u α cosh(u β. (4.8 Although neither the parameter α (r nor m (r is fixed by the up-triangularity condition of K (m (r,α (r u, the sum of the two parameters is unique as shown in (4.7. This allows us to define an unique reference state Ω, where the vacuum state α (r +m (r is defined by (3.25. Ω = α (r +m (r, (4.9 Following the method developed in [26], we propose that the Bethe-type eigenstate of the transfer matrix (2.10 for the present model is given by λ 1,,λ N = C m (l(λ 1 α (l C m (l +2(λ 2 α (l C m (l +2(N 1(λ N α (l Ω, (4.10 where the two parameters α (l and m (l are given by (4.1. The Bethe state λ 1,,λ N becomes an eigenstate of the transfer matrix t(u with an eigenvalue Λ(u given by (2.25 provided that the N parameters {λ j j = 1,,N} satisfy the BAEs (2.28. The proof is relegated to Appendix C. 12
13 From the definitions (3.1-(3.8 of the gauge matrices, it is clear that both the reference state Ω and the creation operator C m (l(u α (l have well-defined homogeneous limits: {θ j 0}. This implies that the homogeneous limit of the Bethe state (4.10 exactly gives rise to the corresponding Bethe state of the homogeneous XXZ spin- 1 chain with arbitrary 2 boundary fields, where the associated T Q relation and BAEs are given by (2.25 and (2.28 with {θ j = 0}. It would be interesting to study the relation between our Bethe states and the eigenstates proposed in [27] for which the homogeneous limit is still unclear. 5 Conclusions Inthispaper, wederived thebethestatesofthetransfer matrixofthexxzspin- 1 2 chainwith arbitrary boundary fields specified by the most generic non-diagonal K-matrices given by (2.2 and(2.3. It should be emphasized that constructing the Bethe state of U(1-symmetrybroken models had challenged for many years because of the lacking of the inhomogeneous T Q relations such as (2.25. The idea of this paper to construct the Bethe state is to search for two gauge transformations such that one makes the resulting K + -matrix to be diagonal and the other makes the resulting K -matrix up-triangular. Then we find that the two parameters m (l and α (l of the first gauge transformation must obey the following equations { sinh(α+ +β + = sinh(θ + +(α (l 1η +m (l η, sinh(α + +β + = sinh(θ + +(α (l 1η m (l η, while the parameters of the second gauge transformation have to satisfy the relation (5.1 sinh(α +β +sinh(θ +(m (r +α (r η+nη = 0. (5.2 The equation (5.1 is to determine the creation operator C m (l(u α (l, while the equation (5.2 is to choose the associated reference state (such as (4.9. It is found that besides the solution given by (4.1 and (4.7 there exist the other three solutions of (5.1 and (5.2. Each of the three solutions gives rise to a set of Bethe states with eigenvalues parameterized by a T Q relation of the form(2.25 by replacing α ±, β ± with ±α ±, ±β ±. Nevertheless, different types of inhomogeneous T Q relations [19, 14] only give different parameterizations of the eigenvalues of the transfer matrix but not new solutions. We note that for the degenerate caseconsidered in[9], thepresent methodmaynot workbutthebethestatescanbeobtained via algebraic Bethe Ansatz. 13
14 Acknowledgments The financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos , , , , the National Program for Basic Research of MOST (973 project under grant No.2011CB921700, BCMIIS and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences are gratefully acknowledged. Two of the authors (W.-L. Yang and K. Shi would like to thank IoP/CAS for the hospitality. Appendix A: Intertwining relations We list some intertwining relations (or face-vertex correspondence relations in [9] which are useful to construct the reference state and the commutation relations among the gauged operators: 5 R 12 (u 1 u 2 Xm+2 1 (u 1Xm+1 2 (u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η Xm+2 2 (u 2Xm+1 1 (u 1, R 12 (u 1 u 2 Xm 1 (u 1Ym 1 2 (u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m 1η Ym 2 sinhmη (u 2Xm+1 1 (u 1 + sinh(mη +u 1 u 2 Xm 2 sinh mη (u 2Ym 1 1 (u 1, R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ym(u 1 1 Xm+1(u 2 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m+1η X 2 sinhmη m(u 2 Ym 1(u sinh(mη u 1 +u 2 Y 2 sinh mη m(u 2 Xm+1(u 1 1, R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ym 2 1 (u 1Ym 1 2 (u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η Ym 2 2 (u 2Ym 1 1 (u 1, R 12 (u 1 u 2 X m 1 2 (u 2 X m 1 (u 1 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η X m 2 (u 2 X m 1 1 (u 1, R 12 (u 1 u 2 X 2 m 1 (u 2Ŷ 1 m+2 (u 1 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m+1η sinhmη X 2 m 2 (u 2Ŷ 1 m+1 (u 1 (A.1 (A.2 (A.3 (A.4 (A.5 + sinh(mη u 1 +u 2 Ŷm+2 2 sinh mη (u 2 X m 1 1 (u 1, (A.6 R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ŷ m+1(u 2 2 X m 2(u 1 1 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m 1η Ŷ 2 sinhmη m+2(u 2 X m 1(u sinh(mη +u 1 u 2 X 2 sinh mη m 2(u 2 Ŷ m+1(u 1 1, (A.7 5 In fact these vectors depend also on α but as this parameter will not vary in the following relations, in this appendix we omit this argument for simplicity temporarily. 14
15 R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ŷ m+1 2 (u 2Ŷ m 1 (u 1 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η Ŷm 2 (u 2Ŷ m+1 1 (u 1, (A.8 X 1 m 1 (u 1X 2 m 2 (u 2R 12 (u 1 u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η X 2 m 1 (u 2X 1 m 2 (u 1, (A.9 X 1 m 1(u 1 Y 2 m(u 2 R 12 (u 1 u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m+1η Y 2 sinhmη m+1(u 2 X 1 m(u 1 + sinh(mη +u 1 u 2 X 2 sinh mη m 1(u 2 Y 1 m(u 1, (A.10 Y 1 m+1 (u 1X 2 m (u 2R 12 (u 1 u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m 1η X 2 m 1 sinhmη (u 2Y 1 m (u 1 + sinh(mη u 1 +u 2 Y 2 m+1 sinh mη (u 2X 1 m (u 1, (A.11 Y 1 m+1 (u 1Y 1 m+2 (u 2R 12 (u 1 u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η Y 2 m+1 (u 2Y 1 m+2 (u 1, X 1 m+1(u 1 X 2 m(u 2 R 12 (u 1 u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η X 2 m+1(u 2 X 1 m(u 1, (A.12 (A.13 X m+1 1 (u 1Ỹ m 2 2 (u 2R 12 (u 1 u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m+1η Ỹm 1 2 sinhmη (u 2 X m+2 1 (u 1 + sinh(mη +u 1 u 2 X m+1 2 sinh mη (u 2Ỹ m 2 1 (u 1, (A.14 Ỹ 1 m 1 (u 1 X 2 m+2 (u 2R 12 (u 1 u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m 1η sinhmη X 2 m+1 (u 2Ỹ 1 m 2 (u 1 + sinh(mη u 1 +u 2 Ỹm 1 2 sinh mη (u 2 X m+2 1 (u 1, (A.15 Ỹm 1(u 1 1 Ỹ m(u 2 2 R 12 (u 1 u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η Ỹ 2 m 1(u 2 Ỹ m(u 1 1, X 2 m (u 2R 12 (u 1 u 2 Xm 1 (u 1 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m 1η X 2 m 1 sinhmη (u 2Xm+1 1 (u 1, X 2 m (u 2R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ym 1 (u 1 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η X 2 m+1 (u 2Ym+1 1 (u 1 (A.16 (A.17 + sinh(mη u 1 +u 2 Y 2 m+1 sinh mη (u 2Xm+1 1 (u 1, (A.18 Y 2 m(u 2 R 12 (u 1 u 2 Xm(u 1 1 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η Y 2 m 1(u 2 Xm 1(u sinh(mη +u 1 u 2 X 2 sinh mη m 1(u 2 Ym 1(u 1 1, (A.19 Y 2 m (u 2R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ym 1 (u 1 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m+1η Y 2 m+1 sinhmη (u 2Ym 1 1 (u 1, 15 (A.20
16 X m+1 1 (u 1R 12 (u 1 u 2 Xm+1 2 (u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m+1η Xm 2 sinhmη (u 2 X m+2 1 (u 1, X m+1 1 (u 1R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ym 1 2 (u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η Ym 2 2 (u 2 X m 1 (u 1 + sinh(mη +u 1 u 2 Xm 2 sinh mη (u 2Ỹ m 2 1 (u 1, Ỹm 1(u 1 1 R 12 (u 1 u 2 Xm+1(u 2 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η X 2 m+2(u 2 Ỹ m(u sinh(mη u 1 +u 2 Y 2 sinh mη m(u 2 X m+2(u 1 1, Ỹm 1 1 (u 1R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ym 1 2 (u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m 1η Ym 2 sinhmη (u 2Ỹ m 2 1 (u 1, X 1 m 1 (u 1R 12 (u 1 u 2 X 2 m 1 (u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m+1η sinhmη X 2 m 2 (u 2X 1 m (u 1, (A.21 (A.22 (A.23 (A.24 (A.25 X 1 m 1(u 1 R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ŷ m+1(u 2 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η Ŷ 2 m(u 2 X 1 m 2(u 1 + sinh(mη +u 1 u 2 X 2 sinh mη m 2(u 2 Y 1 m(u 1, (A.26 Y 1 m+1 (u 1R 12 (u 1 u 2 X 2 m 1 (u 2 = sinh(u 1 u 2 +η X 2 m (u 2Y 1 m+2 (u 1 + sinh(mη u 1 +u 2 Ŷm+2 2 sinh mη (u 2X 1 m (u 1, (A.27 Y 1 m+1 (u 1R 12 (u 1 u 2 Ŷ m+1 2 (u 2= sinh(u 1 u 2 sinh(m 1η Ŷm+2 2 sinhmη (u 2Y 1 m (u 1, (A.28 where Xm 1(u, X2 m (u are embedding vector in the 1-st and 2-nd tensor space, respectively. Moreover, the vectors also enjoy the following orthonormal relations: Y m (ux m (u = 1, Y m (uy m (u = 0, X m (ux m (u = 0, X m (uy m (u = 1, ( 1 0 X m (uy m (u+y m (ux m (u =, (A Ỹ m 1 (ux m+1 (u = 1, Ỹ m 1 (uy m 1 (u = 0, X m+1 (ux m+1 (u = 0, Xm+1 (uy m 1 (u = 1, ( 1 0 X m+1 (uỹm 1(u+Y m 1 (u X m+1 (u =, (A Y m+1 (u X m 1 (u = 1, Y m+1 (uŷm+1(u = 0, X m 1 (u X m 1 (u = 0, X m 1 (uŷm+1(u = 1, 16
17 X m 1 (uy m+1 (u+ŷm+1(ux m 1 (u = ( Appendix B: Commutation relations Using QYBE (2.4 and the RE (2.5, one may derive that. (A.31 R 12 (u 1 u 2 U 1 (u 1 R 21 (u 1 +u 2 U 2 (u 2 = U 2 (u 2 R 21 (u 1 +u 2 U 1 (u 1 R 12 (u 1 u 2. (B.1 MultiplyingtheaboveequationwithX 1 m+1 (u 1X 2 m (u 2fromtheleftand X 1 m+1 ( u 1 X 2 m+2 ( u 2 from the right, and using the relations (A.5 and (A.9, we arrive at (3.12. Similarly, multiplying(b.1withx 1 m 1 (u 1X 2 m 2 (u 2(X 1 m 1 (u 1X 2 m 2 (u 2fromtheleftandŶ1 m+1 ( u 1Ŷ 2 m ( u 2 ( X 1 m 1 ( u 1Ŷ 2 m+2 ( u 2fromtherightandusing theintertwining relations(a.1-(a.28, one can obtain the relation (3.13 (or (3.14. Using the similar method and the relation (3.13, one can further check (3.15. Appendix C: Proof the Bethe state There are several ways [25, 26, 31, 32] to show that the state λ 1,,λ N constructed by (4.10 is the eigenstate of the transfer matrix (2.10. Here we adopt the method developed in [26] to demonstrate it. For arbitrary parameters α, m let us introduce the following left states 6 parameterized by the N inhomogeneous parameters {θ j }: α,m;θ p1 θ pn = α+m D m ( θ p1 α D m ( θ pn α, 1 q 1 < q 2 <... < q n N, n = 0,1,,N. (C.1 The commutation relations (3.13, (3.14 and (3.18 imply that α,m;θ p1,,θ pn C m (u α=g(u,{θ p1,,θ pn } α,m+2;θ p1,,θ pn, (C.2 where g(u,{θ p1,,θ pn }= g 0 (u m,α n sinh(u+θ pj +ηsinh(u θ pj sinh(u θ pj +ηsinh(u+θ pj, (C.3 6 Such states were used as a basis to construct the SoV eigenstates of the XXZ open chain [27]. Here we use two different gauge transformations respectively for the left and right pseudo vacuum states to reach the Bethe states. 17
18 and The above equations lead to that g 0 (u m,α = K 21 (m N;α u sinh(m+2η sinh(m+2 Nη N sinh(u θ j +ηsinh(u+θ j sinh 2. (C.4 η α,m;θ p1,,θ pn C m ( θ pj α = 0, j 1,,n. (C.5 Let Ψ be an eigenstate of the transfer matrix t(u with an eigenvalue Λ(u, namely, t(u Ψ = Λ(u Ψ. (C.6 Following the method used in [18, 26], we introduce the following scalar products F n (θ p1,,θ pn = α (l,m (l ;θ p1,,θ pn Ψ, n = 0,,N, (C.7 which altogether uniquely determine the eigenstate Ψ. With the particular choice of the parameters (4.1, one can derive the following recursive relations (see (C.8 below by considering the quantity of α (l,m (l ;θ p1,,θ pn t( θ pn+1 Ψ, Λ( θ pn+1 F n (θ p1,,θ pn = K + 11(m (l,α (l θ pn+1 α (l,m (l ;θ p1,,θ pn A m (l( θ pn+1 α (l Ψ +K + 22(m (l,α (l θ pn+1 F n+1 (θ p1,,θ pn,θ pn+1. The relations (3.14, (3.15, (3.24 and (C.5 enable us to further simplify the above equation { Λ( θ pn+1 F n (θ p1,,θ pn = F n+1 (θ p1,,θ pn,θ pn+1 K + 22 (m(l,α (l θ pn+1 } sinh((m(l 1η+2θ pn+1 sinh(m (l 1ηsinh(2θ pn+1 η K+ 11 (m(l,α (l θ pn+1 (4.6 sinh( 2θ = 2e θp pn+1 +2η n+1 sinh( 2θ pn+1 +η sinh( θ p n+1 α + cosh( θ pn+1 β + F n+1 (θ p1,,θ pn,θ pn+1. Then the inhomogeneous T Q relation (2.25 implies that {F n (θ p1,,θ pn } satisfy the following recursive relations F n+1 (θ p1,,θ pn,θ pn+1 = 2e θp n+1 sinh(θpn+1 +α cosh(θ pn+1 +β Q( θ p n+1 η Q( θ pn+1 Ā( θ p n+1 F n (θ p1,,θ pn. 18 (C.8
19 Iterating the above recursive relation, we readily obtain n { F n (θ p1,,θ pn = 2e θp j sinh(θpj +α cosh(θ pj +β Q( θ } p j η Ā( θ pj F 0, Q( θ pj n = 0,1,,N, (C.9 where F 0 = α (l,m (l Ψ is an overall scalar factor and the function Ā(u is given by (2.18. The relation (C.2 implies that n { } α (l,m (l Q( θpj η ;θ p1,,θ pn λ 1,,λ N = G 0 α (l,m ;θ p1,,θ pn Ω Q( θ pj n = 0,,N, (C.10 where m = m (l +2N and G 0 is an overall factor which does not depend on n, N G 0 = g 0 (λ j m (l +2(j 1,α (l. (C.11 Hence it is sufficient to compute the quantity { α (l,m ;θ p1,,θ pn Ω }. Due to the fact that the particular choice (4.7 of the parameters m (r, α (r makes the matrix element K 21 (m(r + N,α (r u vanishes (see (4.8, we can derive the following relations from (3.27 and (3.28 C m (r(u α (r Ω =0, A m (r(u α (r Ω = K11 (m(r (r +N,α uā(u Ω. (C.13 (C.12 The definitions (3.9 and (3.26 of the two gauged double-row monodromy matrices and the relations(a.29-(a.31allowustoexpress theoperators C m (u α (l and D m (u α (l interms of some linear combinations of A m (r(u α (r, B m (r(u α (r, C m (r(u α (r and D m (r(u α (r respectively, namely, C m ( u α (l =X m ( u α (l X m (r( u α (r A m (r( u α (r Y m (r(u α (r X m (u α (l +X m ( u α (l Y m 2( u α (r C (r m (r( u α (r Y m (r(u α (r X m (u α (l +X m ( u α (l X m +2( u α (r B (r m (r( u α (r X m (r(u α (r X m (u α (l +X m ( u α (l Y m (r( u α (r D m (r( u α (r X m (r(u α (r X m (u α (l, (C.14 D m ( u α (l =X m ( u α (l X m (r( u α (r A m (r( u α (r Y m (r(u α (r Ŷm +2(u α (l +X m ( u α (l Y m 2( u α (r C (r m (r( u α (r Y m (r(u α (r Ŷm +2(u α (l +X m ( u α (l X m +2( u α (r B (r m (r( u α (r X m (r(u α (r Ŷm +2(u α (l +X m ( u α (l Y m (r( u α (r D m (r( u α (r X m (r(u α (r Ŷm +2(u α (l. (C.15 19
20 The vanishing condition (C.5 implies that α (l,m ;θ p1,,θ pn C m ( θ pn+1 α (l Ω = 0, n = 0,1,,N 1. (C.16 Keeping the relations (C.12 and (C.13 in mind and using the above equations and the explicit expressions (3.1, (3.5-(3.8, after a tedious calculation, we can derive the following recursive relations α (l,m ;θ p1,,θ pn+1 Ω = K 11 (m(r +N,α (r θ pn+1 Ā( θ p n+1 α (l,m ;θ p1,,θ pn Ω (4.8 = 2e θp n+1 sinh(θpn+1 +α cosh(θ pn+1 +β Ā( θ p n+1 α (l,m ;θ p1,,θ pn Ω, n = 0,1,,N 1. (C.17 Iterating the above recursive relations, we have n { α (l,m ;θ p1,,θ pn Ω = 2e θ pj sinh(θpj +α cosh(θ pj +β Ā( θ p j } α (l +m Ω, n = 0,1,,N. Submitting the above relations into (C.10, finally we obtain the expressions of the scalar products of the Bethe state (4.10 with each state (C.1 α (l,m (l ;θ p1,,θ pn λ 1,,λ N n { = 2e θp j sinh(θpj +α cosh(θ pj +β Q( θ } p j η Ā( θ pj Q( θ pj G 0 α (l +m Ω, n = 0,1,,N, (C.18 where the scalar factor G 0, which does not depend on n, is given by (C.11. Comparing the above expression with (C.9, we conclude that the Bethe state λ 1,...,λ N given by (4.10 is an eigenstate of the transfer matrix t(u with an eigenvalue Λ(u given by (2.25, provided that the parameters {λ j } satisfy the BAEs (2.28. References [1] R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics, Academic Press,
21 [2] V. E. Korepin, N. M. Bogoliubov and A. G. Izergin, Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Function, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, [3] N. Beisert et al., Lett. Math. Phys. 99 (2012, 3. [4] T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension, Oxford University Press, Oxford, [5] J. de Gier and F.H.L. Essler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005, [6] J. Sirker, R.G. Pereira and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009, [7] E.K. Sklyanin, J. Phys. A 21 (1988, [8] R. I. Nepomechie, J. Phys. A 34 (2001, 9993; R. I. Nepomechie, Nucl. Phys. B 622 (2002, 615; R. I. Nepomechie, J. Stat. Phys. 111 (2003, 1363; R. I. Nepomechie, J. Phys. A 37 (2004, 433. [9] J. Cao, H.-Q. Lin, K.-J. Shi and Y. Wang, Nucl. Phys. B 663 (2003, 487. [10] W.-L. Yang, Y.-Z. Zhang and M. Gould, Nucl. Phys. B 698 (2004, 503. [11] J. de Gier and P. Pyatov, J. Stat. Mech. (2004, P03002; A. Nichols, V. Rittenberg and J. de Gier, J. Stat. Mech. (2005, P03003; J. de Gier, A. Nichols, P. Pyatov and V. Rittenberg, Nucl. Phys. B 729 (2005, 387. [12] A. Doikou and P. P. Martins, J. Stat. Mech. (2006, P06004; A. Doikou, J. Stat. Mech. (2006, P [13] Z. Bajnok, J. Stat. Mech. (2006, P [14] W.-L. Yang, R.I. Nepomechie and Y.-Z. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006, 664. [15] W. Galleas, Nucl. Phys. B 790 (2008, 524. [16] G. Niccoli, J. Stat. Mech. (2012, P [17] S. Belliard, N. Crampé and E. Ragoucy, Lett. Math. Phys. 103 (2013, 493. [18] J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K.-J. Shi and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013,
22 [19] J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K.-J. Shi and Y. Wang, Nucl. Phys. B 875 (2013, 152. [20] J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K.-J. Shi and Y. Wang, Nucl. Phys. B 877 (2013, 152. [21] J. Cao, S. Cui, W.-L. Yang, K.-J. Shi and Y. Wang, Nucl. Phys. B 886 (2014, 185. [22] Y. -Y. Li, J. Cao, W. -L. Yang, K. Shi and Y. Wang, Nucl. Phys. B 884 (2014, 17. [23] J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K.-J. Shi and Y. Wang, JHEP 04 (2014, 143. [24] K. Hao, J. Cao, G. -L. Li, W. -L. Yang, K. Shi and Y. Wang, JHEP 06 (2014, 128. [25] S. Belliard and N. Crampé, SIGMA 9 (2013, 072. [26] X. Zhang, Y.-Y. Li, J. Cao, W. -L. Yang, K. Shi and Y. Wang, arxiv: v2. [27] S. Faldella, N. Kitanine and G. Niccoli, J. Stat. Mech. (2014, P [28] E. K. Sklyanin, Lect. Notes Phys. 226 (1985, 196; J. Sov. Math. 31 (1985, 3417; Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 118 (1995, 35. [29] E. K. Sklyanin and L. D. Faddeev, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 23 (1978, 902. [30] L. A. Takhtadzhan and L. D. Faddeev, Rush. Math. Surveys 34 (1979, 11. [31] S. Belliard, arxiv: [32] N. Crampé, arxiv: [33] H.J. de Vega and A. González-Ruiz, J. Phys. A 26 (1993, L519. [34] S. Ghoshal and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9 (1994, [35] R. I. Nepomechie, J. Phys. A 46 (2013, [36] J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K. Shi and Y. Wang, arxiv: [37] H. Fan, B.-Y. Hou, K.-J. Shi and Z.-X. Yang, Nucl. Phys. B 478 (1996, 723. [38] W.-L. Yang and R. Sasaki, J. Math. Phys. 45 ( ; Nucl. Phys. B 679 (
Trigonometric SOS model with DWBC and spin chains with non-diagonal boundaries
Trigonometric SOS model with DWBC and spin chains with non-diagonal boundaries N. Kitanine IMB, Université de Bourgogne. In collaboration with: G. Filali RAQIS 21, Annecy June 15 - June 19, 21 Typeset
More informationBethe Ansatz solution of the open XX spin chain with nondiagonal boundary terms
UMTG 231 Bethe Ansatz solution of the open XX spin chain with nondiagonal boundary terms arxiv:hep-th/0110081v1 9 Oct 2001 Rafael I. Nepomechie Physics Department, P.O. Box 248046, University of Miami
More informationThe XYZ spin chain/8-vertex model with quasi-periodic boundary conditions Exact solution by Separation of Variables
The XYZ spin chain/8-vertex model with quasi-periodic boundary conditions Exact solution by Separation of Variables Véronique TERRAS CNRS & Université Paris Sud, France Workshop: Beyond integrability.
More informationarxiv: v1 [math-ph] 24 Dec 2013
ITP-UU-13/32 SPIN-13/24 Twisted Heisenberg chain and the six-vertex model with DWBC arxiv:1312.6817v1 [math-ph] 24 Dec 2013 W. Galleas Institute for Theoretical Physics and Spinoza Institute, Utrecht University,
More informationA tale of two Bethe ansätze
UMTG 93 A tale of two Bethe ansätze arxiv:171.06475v [math-ph] 6 Apr 018 Antonio Lima-Santos 1, Rafael I. Nepomechie Rodrigo A. Pimenta 3 Abstract We revisit the construction of the eigenvectors of the
More informationarxiv: v3 [math-ph] 17 Aug 2016
arxiv:1602.02042v3 [math-ph] 17 Aug 2016 Exact soution of the trigonometric SU(3) spin chain with generic off-diagona boundary refections Guang-Liang Li a, Junpeng Cao b,c,d, Kun Hao e,f, Fakai Wen e,f,
More informationDifference Equations and Highest Weight Modules of U q [sl(n)]
arxiv:math/9805089v1 [math.qa] 20 May 1998 Difference Equations and Highest Weight Modules of U q [sl(n)] A. Zapletal 1,2 Institut für Theoretische Physik Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 14, 14195
More informationOn the algebraic Bethe ansatz approach to correlation functions: the Heisenberg spin chain
On the algebraic Bethe ansatz approach to correlation functions: the Heisenberg spin chain V. Terras CNRS & ENS Lyon, France People involved: N. Kitanine, J.M. Maillet, N. Slavnov and more recently: J.
More informationProperties of the Bethe Ansatz equations for Richardson-Gaudin models
Properties of the Bethe Ansatz equations for Richardson-Gaudin models Inna Luyaneno, Phillip Isaac, Jon Lins Centre for Mathematical Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland
More informationA warm-up for solving noncompact sigma models: The Sinh-Gordon model
A warm-up for solving noncompact sigma models: The Sinh-Gordon model Jörg Teschner Based on A. Bytsko, J.T., hep-th/0602093, J.T., hep-th/0702122 Goal: Understand string theory on AdS-spaces Building blocks:
More informationTakeo INAMI and Hitoshi KONNO. Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto , Japan. ABSTRACT
SLAC{PUB{YITP/K-1084 August 1994 Integrable XYZ Spin Chain with Boundaries Takeo INAMI and Hitoshi KONNO Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-01, Japan. ABSTRACT HEP-TH-9409138
More informationThe sl(2) loop algebra symmetry of the XXZ spin chain at roots of unity and applications to the superintegrable chiral Potts model 1
The sl(2) loop algebra symmetry of the XXZ spin chain at roots of unity and applications to the superintegrable chiral Potts model 1 Tetsuo Deguchi Department of Physics, Ochanomizu Univ. In collaboration
More informationarxiv: v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 13 Jul 2015
Where are the roots of the Bethe Ansatz equations? R. S. Vieira and A. Lima-Santos Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Física, CEP 13560-905, São Carlos, Brazil (Dated: July 14, 2015) arxiv:1502.05316v2
More informationarxiv: v2 [math-ph] 14 Jul 2014
ITP-UU-14/14 SPIN-14/12 Reflection algebra and functional equations arxiv:1405.4281v2 [math-ph] 14 Jul 2014 W. Galleas and J. Lamers Institute for Theoretical Physics and Spinoza Institute, Utrecht University,
More informationBethe ansatz solution of a closed spin 1 XXZ Heisenberg chain with quantum algebra symmetry
Bethe ansatz solution of a closed spin 1 XXZ Heisenberg chain with quantum algebra symmetry Jon Links, Angela Foerster and Michael Karowski arxiv:solv-int/9809001v1 8 Aug 1998 Department of Mathematics,
More informationCanonicity of Bäcklund transformation: r-matrix approach. I. arxiv:solv-int/ v1 25 Mar 1999
LPENSL-Th 05/99 solv-int/990306 Canonicity of Bäcklund transformation: r-matrix approach. I. arxiv:solv-int/990306v 25 Mar 999 E K Sklyanin Laboratoire de Physique 2, Groupe de Physique Théorique, ENS
More informationSystematic construction of (boundary) Lax pairs
Thessaloniki, October 2010 Motivation Integrable b.c. interesting for integrable systems per ce, new info on boundary phenomena + learn more on bulk behavior. Examples of integrable b.c. that modify the
More informationSince the discovery of high T c superconductivity there has been a great interest in the area of integrable highly correlated electron systems. Notabl
CERN-TH/97-72 Anisotropic Correlated Electron Model Associated With the Temperley-Lieb Algebra Angela Foerster (;y;a), Jon Links (2;b) and Itzhak Roditi (3;z;c) () Institut fur Theoretische Physik, Freie
More informationBaxter Q-operators and tau-function for quantum integrable spin chains
Baxter Q-operators and tau-function for quantum integrable spin chains Zengo Tsuboi Institut für Mathematik und Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin This is based on the following papers.
More informationGeneralization of the matrix product ansatz for integrable chains
arxiv:cond-mat/0608177v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 7 Aug 006 Generalization of the matrix product ansatz for integrable chains F. C. Alcaraz, M. J. Lazo Instituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math-ph] 30 Jul 2018
LPENSL-TH-08-18 On quantum separation of variables arxiv:1807.11572v1 [math-ph] 30 Jul 2018 J. M. Maillet 1 and G. Niccoli 2 Dedicated to the memory of L. D. Faddeev Abstract. We present a new approach
More informationGaudin Hypothesis for the XYZ Spin Chain
Gaudin Hypothesis for the XYZ Spin Chain arxiv:cond-mat/9908326v3 2 Nov 1999 Yasuhiro Fujii and Miki Wadati Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7 3 1, Bunkyo-ku,
More informationBethe states and separation of variables for SU(N) Heisenberg spin chain
Bethe states and separation of variables for SU(N) Heisenberg spin chain Nikolay Gromov King s College London & PNPI based on 1610.08032 [NG, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, G. Sizov] Below: FLM = F. Levkovich-Maslyuk
More informationDeformed Richardson-Gaudin model
Deformed Richardson-Gaudin model P Kulish 1, A Stolin and L H Johannesson 1 St. Petersburg Department of Stelov Mathematical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences Fontana 7, 19103 St. Petersburg, Russia
More informationOn elliptic quantum integrability
On elliptic quantum integrability vertex models, solid-on-solid models and spin chains 1405.4281 with Galleas 1505.06870 with Galleas thesis Ch I and II 1510.00342 thesis Ch I and III in progress with
More informationFree Fermionic Elliptic Reflection Matrices and Quantum Group Invariance
IMAFF 93/11 LPTHE PAR 93/1 April 1993 Free Fermionic Elliptic Reflection Matrices and Quantum Group Invariance arxiv:hep-th/930411v1 3 Apr 1993 R. Cuerno Instituto de Matemáticas y Física Fundamental,
More informationarxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 24 May 2007
arxiv:0705.3569v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech 4 May 007 A note on the spin- 1 XXZ chain concerning its relation to the Bose gas Alexander Seel 1, Tanaya Bhattacharyya, Frank Göhmann 3 and Andreas Klümper 4 1 Institut
More informationarxiv:nlin/ v1 [nlin.si] 18 Mar 2003
UFSCAR-TH-02 Yang-Baxter equation for the asymmetric eight-vertex model. arxiv:nlin/0303036v1 [nlin.si] 18 Mar 2003 W. Galleas and M.J. Martins Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de São Carlos
More informationTHE SPECTRUM OF BOUNDARY SINE- GORDON THEORY
THE SPECTRUM OF BOUNDARY SINE- GORDON THEORY Z. Bajnok, L. Palla and G. Takács Institute for Theoretical Physics, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary Abstract We review our recent results on the on-shell
More informationMatrix Product Operators: Algebras and Applications
Matrix Product Operators: Algebras and Applications Frank Verstraete Ghent University and University of Vienna Nick Bultinck, Jutho Haegeman, Michael Marien Burak Sahinoglu, Dominic Williamson Ignacio
More informationAn Improved F-Expansion Method and Its Application to Coupled Drinfel d Sokolov Wilson Equation
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 50 (008) pp. 309 314 c Chinese Physical Society Vol. 50, No., August 15, 008 An Improved F-Expansion Method and Its Application to Coupled Drinfel d Sokolov Wilson
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 18 Apr 2007
USTC-ICTS-07-02 Probing α-vacua of Black Holes in LHC arxiv:0704.2298v1 [hep-th] 18 Apr 2007 Tower Wang Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P. O. Box 2735 Beijing 100080, China
More informationBethe vectors for XXX-spin chain
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Bethe vectors for XXX-spin chain To cite this article: estmír Burdík et al 204 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 563 020 View the article online for updates and enhancements.
More informationSpace from Superstring Bits 1. Charles Thorn
Space from Superstring Bits 1 Charles Thorn University of Florida Miami 2014 1 Much of this work in collaboration with Songge Sun A single superstring bit: quantum system with finite # of states Superstring
More informationAn ingenious mapping between integrable supersymmetric chains
An ingenious mapping between integrable supersymmetric chains Jan de Gier University of Melbourne Bernard Nienhuis 65th birthday, Amsterdam 2017 György Fehér Sasha Garbaly Kareljan Schoutens Jan de Gier
More informationSix-point gluon scattering amplitudes from -symmetric integrable model
YITP Workshop 2010 Six-point gluon scattering amplitudes from -symmetric integrable model Yasuyuki Hatsuda (YITP) Based on arxiv:1005.4487 [hep-th] in collaboration with K. Ito (TITECH), K. Sakai (Keio
More informationKitaev honeycomb lattice model: from A to B and beyond
Kitaev honeycomb lattice model: from A to B and beyond Jiri Vala Department of Mathematical Physics National University of Ireland at Maynooth Postdoc: PhD students: Collaborators: Graham Kells Ahmet Bolukbasi
More informationDuality and quantum-algebra symmetry of the A (1) open spin chain with diagonal boundary fields
UMTG 207 Duality and quantum-algebra symmetry of the A 1) 1 open spin chain with diagonal boundary fields Anastasia Doikou and Rafael I. epomechie Physics Department, P.O. Box 248046, University of Miami
More informationSine square deformation(ssd) and Mobius quantization of 2D CFTs
riken_ssd_2017 arxiv:1603.09543/ptep(2016) 063A02 Sine square deformation(ssd) and Mobius quantization of 2D CFTs Niigata University, Kouichi Okunishi Related works: Kastura, Ishibashi Tada, Wen Ryu Ludwig
More informationExact Solutions of Supersymmetric KdV-a System via Bosonization Approach
Commun. Theor. Phys. 58 1 617 6 Vol. 58, No. 5, November 15, 1 Exact Solutions of Supersymmetric KdV-a System via Bosonization Approach GAO Xiao-Nan Ô é, 1 YANG Xu-Dong Êü, and LOU Sen-Yue 1,, 1 Department
More informationA Realization of Yangian and Its Applications to the Bi-spin System in an External Magnetic Field
Commun. Theor. Phys. Beijing, China) 39 003) pp. 1 5 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 39, No. 1, January 15, 003 A Realization of Yangian and Its Applications to the Bi-spin System in an External
More informationOrientifold planar equivalence.
Orientifold planar equivalence. An overview and some hints from the lattice**. Agostino Patella* Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa INFN, Pisa 21/3/2007 * PhD advisor: Adriano Di Giacomo ** Based on: - A.
More informationFinite temperature form factors in the free Majorana theory
Finite temperature form factors in the free Majorana theory Benjamin Doyon Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, Oxford University, UK supported by EPSRC postdoctoral fellowship hep-th/0506105
More informationIzergin-Korepin determinant reloaded
Izergin-Korepin determinant reloaded arxiv:math-ph/0409072v1 27 Sep 2004 Yu. G. Stroganov Institute for High Energy Physics 142284 Protvino, Moscow region, Russia Abstract We consider the Izergin-Korepin
More informationThermal quantum discord in Heisenberg models with Dzyaloshinski Moriya interaction
Thermal quantum discord in Heisenberg models with Dzyaloshinski Moriya interaction Wang Lin-Cheng(), Yan Jun-Yan(), and Yi Xue-Xi() School of Physics and Optoelectronic Technology, Dalian University of
More information7 Algebraic Bethe Ansatz
7 Algebraic Bethe Ansatz It is possible to continue the formal developments of the previous chapter and obtain a completely algebraic derivation of the Bethe Ansatz equations (5.31) and the corresponding
More informationarxiv:math-ph/ v1 29 Dec 1999
On the classical R-matrix of the degenerate Calogero-Moser models L. Fehér and B.G. Pusztai arxiv:math-ph/9912021v1 29 Dec 1999 Department of Theoretical Physics, József Attila University Tisza Lajos krt
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 22 Aug 2013
arxiv:1304.5901v [hep-th] Aug 013 Transmission matrices in gl N & U q (gl N ) quantum spin chains Anastasia Doikou Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Patras, GR-6500 Patras, Greece E-mail:
More informationFractional-Spin Integrals of Motion for the Boundary Sine-Gordon Model at the Free Fermion Point
UMTG 200 Fractional-Spin Integrals of Motion for the Boundary Sine-Gordon Model at the Free Fermion Point Luca Mezincescu and Rafael I. Nepomechie Physics Department, P.O. Box 248046, University of Miami
More informationApplication of the trial equation method for solving some nonlinear evolution equations arising in mathematical physics
PRMN c Indian cademy of Sciences Vol. 77, No. 6 journal of December 011 physics pp. 103 109 pplication of the trial equation method for solving some nonlinear evolution equations arising in mathematical
More informationYangians In Deformed Super Yang-Mills Theories
Yangians In Deformed Super Yang-Mills Theories arxiv:0802.3644 [hep-th] JHEP 04:051, 2008 Jay N. Ihry UNC-CH April 17, 2008 Jay N. Ihry UNC-CH Yangians In Deformed Super Yang-Mills Theories arxiv:0802.3644
More informationStructures of (ΩΩ) 0 + and (ΞΩ) 1 + in Extended Chiral SU(3) Quark Model
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 40 (003) pp. 33 336 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 40, No. 3, September 15, 003 Structures of (ΩΩ) 0 + and (ΞΩ) 1 + in Extended Chiral SU(3) Quark Model
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Oct 1993
ISAS/EP/93/167 Two-point Correlation Function in Integrable QFT with Anti-Crossing Symmetry arxiv:hep-th/9310130v1 0 Oct 1993 G. Delfino and G. Mussardo International School for Advanced Studies, and Istituto
More informationCoordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates
Coordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates Amir H. Fatollahi Department of Physics, Alzahra University, P. O. Box 19938, Tehran 91167, Iran fath@alzahra.ac.ir Abstract
More informationarxiv: v1 [nlin.si] 24 May 2017
Boundary Algebraic Bethe Ansatz for a nineteen vertex model with U q osp ) ) ] symmetry arxiv:1705.08953v1 nlin.si] 4 May 017 R. S. Vieira E-mail: rsvieira@df.ufscar.br Universidade Federal de São Carlos,
More informationTHE PROPERTY OF MAXIMAL TRANSCENDENTALITY IN THE N =4SYM A. V. Kotikov
ˆ ˆŠ Œ ˆ ˆ Œ ƒ Ÿ 200.. 4.. 6 THE PROPERTY OF MAXIMAL TRANSCENDENTALITY IN THE N =4SYM A. V. Kotikov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna We show results for the versal anomalous dimension γ j of
More informationS Leurent, V. Kazakov. 6 July 2010
NLIE for SU(N) SU(N) Principal Chiral Field via Hirota dynamics S Leurent, V. Kazakov 6 July 2010 1 Thermodynaamic Bethe Ansatz (TBA) and Y -system Ground state energy Excited states 2 3 Principal Chiral
More informationDeformed Richardson-Gaudin model
Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience Deformed Richardson-Gaudin model This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. View the table
More informationEffects of Different Spin-Spin Couplings and Magnetic Fields on Thermal Entanglement in Heisenberg XY Z Chain
Commun. heor. Phys. (Beijing China 53 (00 pp. 659 664 c Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing Ltd Vol. 53 No. 4 April 5 00 Effects of Different Spin-Spin Couplings and Magnetic Fields on hermal Entanglement
More information(Received 22 October 2009; revised manuscript received 30 December 2010)
Chin. Phys. B Vol. 19 No. 9 010) 090313 Teleportation and thermal entanglement in two-qubit Heisenberg XY Z spin chain with the Dyaloshinski Moriya interaction and the inhomogeneous magnetic field Gao
More informationAddition of Angular Momenta
Addition of Angular Momenta What we have so far considered to be an exact solution for the many electron problem, should really be called exact non-relativistic solution. A relativistic treatment is needed
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 21 Feb 2006
Spinor field realizations of the non-critical W 2,4 string based on the linear W 1,2,4 algebra Zhang Li-Jie 1 and Liu Yu-Xiao 2 1 Department of Mathematics and Physics, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 24 Sep 1998
ICTP/IR/98/19 SISSA/EP/98/101 Quantum Integrability of Certain Boundary Conditions 1 arxiv:hep-th/9809178v1 24 Sep 1998 M. Moriconi 2 The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics Strada
More informationarxiv:nlin/ v1 [nlin.si] 24 Jul 2003
C (1) n, D (1) n and A (2) 2n 1 reflection K-matrices A. Lima-Santos 1 and R. Malara 2 arxiv:nlin/0307046v1 [nlin.si] 24 Jul 2003 Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Física Caixa Postal
More informationOn sl3 KZ equations and W3 null-vector equations
On sl3 KZ equations and W3 null-vector equations Sylvain Ribault To cite this version: Sylvain Ribault. On sl3 KZ equations and W3 null-vector equations. Conformal Field Theory, Integrable Models, and
More informationClifford algebras, Fermions and Spin chains
Clifford algebras, Fermions and Spin chains 1 Birgit Wehefritz-Kaufmann Physics Department, University of Connecticut, U-3046, 15 Hillside Road, Storrs, CT 0669-3046 Abstract. We show how using Clifford
More informationThe six vertex model is an example of a lattice model in statistical mechanics. The data are
The six vertex model, R-matrices, and quantum groups Jethro van Ekeren. 1 The six vertex model The six vertex model is an example of a lattice model in statistical mechanics. The data are A finite rectangular
More informationSOME RESULTS ON THE YANG-BAXTER EQUATIONS AND APPLICATIONS
SOME RESULTS ON THE YANG-BAXTER EQUATIONS AND APPLICATIONS F. F. NICHITA 1, B. P. POPOVICI 2 1 Institute of Mathematics Simion Stoilow of the Romanian Academy P.O. Box 1-764, RO-014700 Bucharest, Romania
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Nov 1998
SOGANG-HEP 249/98 Consistent Dirac Quantization of SU(2) Skyrmion equivalent to BFT Scheme arxiv:hep-th/9811066v1 7 Nov 1998 Soon-Tae Hong 1, Yong-Wan Kim 1,2 and Young-Jai Park 1 1 Department of Physics
More informationThe continuum limit of the integrable open XYZ spin-1/2 chain
arxiv:hep-th/9809028v2 8 Sep 1998 The continuum limit of the integrable open XYZ spin-1/2 chain Hiroshi Tsukahara and Takeo Inami Department of Physics, Chuo University, Kasuga, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8551
More informationDiagonalization of the Coupled-Mode System.
Diagonalization of the Coupled-Mode System. Marina Chugunova joint work with Dmitry Pelinovsky Department of Mathematics, McMaster University, Canada Collaborators: Mason A. Porter, California Institute
More informationMagnets, 1D quantum system, and quantum Phase transitions
134 Phys620.nb 10 Magnets, 1D quantum system, and quantum Phase transitions In 1D, fermions can be mapped into bosons, and vice versa. 10.1. magnetization and frustrated magnets (in any dimensions) Consider
More informationCondensation properties of Bethe roots in the XXZ chain
Condensation properties of Bethe roots in the XXZ chain K K Kozlowski CNRS, aboratoire de Physique, ENS de yon 25 th of August 206 K K Kozlowski "On condensation properties of Bethe roots associated with
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 10 May 1999
Minimal Length Uncertainty Relation and Hydrogen Atom F. Brau Université de Mons-Hainaut, B-7 Mons, BELGIQUE (February 1, 8) arxiv:quant-ph/99533v1 1 May 1999 Abstract We propose a new approach to calculate
More informationThe boundary supersymmetric sine-gordon model revisited
UMTG 7 The boundary supersymmetric sine-gordon model revisited arxiv:hep-th/010309v 7 Mar 001 Rafael I. Nepomechie Physics Department, P.O. Box 48046, University of Miami Coral Gables, FL 3314 USA Abstract
More informationQuantum Chromo Dynamics (QCD), as the fundamental theory of the strong interaction predicts the existence of exotic mesons made of gluons. Observation
Scalar Glueball Decay Into Pions In Eective Theory Hongying Jin and Xinmin Zhang Institute of High Energy Physics, Academia Sinica, P.O.Box 98(4), Beijing 39, China Abstract We examine the mixing between
More informationSupersymmetric Gauge Theories, Matrix Models and Geometric Transitions
Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, Matrix Models and Geometric Transitions Frank FERRARI Université Libre de Bruxelles and International Solvay Institutes XVth Oporto meeting on Geometry, Topology and Physics:
More informationarxiv:solv-int/ v1 5 Jan 1999
UFSCARF-TH-98-33 Unified algebraic Bethe ansatz for two-dimensional lattice models arxiv:solv-int/9901002v1 5 Jan 1999 M.J. Martins Universidade Federal de São Carlos Departamento de Física C.P. 676, 13565-905,
More informationThe form factor program a review and new results
The form factor program a review and new results the nested SU(N)-off-shell Bethe ansatz H. Babujian, A. Foerster, and M. Karowski FU-Berlin Budapest, June 2006 Babujian, Foerster, Karowski (FU-Berlin)
More informationarxiv: v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 7 Aug 2011
Topological Geometric Entanglement of Blocks Román Orús 1, 2 and Tzu-Chieh Wei 3, 4 1 School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia 2 Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik,
More informationNew Non-Diagonal Singularity-Free Cosmological Perfect-Fluid Solution
New Non-Diagonal Singularity-Free Cosmological Perfect-Fluid Solution arxiv:gr-qc/0201078v1 23 Jan 2002 Marc Mars Departament de Física Fonamental, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 647, 08028 Barcelona,
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 7 Mar 2005
hep-th/0503003 March 2005 arxiv:hep-th/0503003v2 7 Mar 2005 Drinfeld twists and algebraic Bethe ansatz of the supersymmetric model associated with U q (gl(m n)) Wen-Li Yang, a,b Yao-Zhong Zhang b and Shao-You
More informationProlongation structure for nonlinear integrable couplings of a KdV soliton hierarchy
Prolongation structure for nonlinear integrable couplings of a KdV soliton hierarchy Yu Fa-Jun School of Mathematics and Systematic Sciences, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China Received
More informationComma Vertex and String Field Algebra
KEK-TH-777 hep-th/0107101 Comma Vertex and String Field Algebra Kazuyuki Furuuchi and Kazumi Okuyama Theory Group, KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan furuuchi@post.kek.jp, kazumi@post.kek.jp Abstract
More information2. Examples of Integrable Equations
Integrable equations A.V.Mikhailov and V.V.Sokolov 1. Introduction 2. Examples of Integrable Equations 3. Examples of Lax pairs 4. Structure of Lax pairs 5. Local Symmetries, conservation laws and the
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 3 Mar 2017
Semiclassical expansion of the Bethe scalar products in the XXZ spin chain Constantin Babenko arxiv:703.023v [hep-th] 3 Mar 207 Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Énergies, Université Pierre et
More informationScaling dimensions at small spin
Princeton Center for Theoretical Science Princeton University March 2, 2012 Great Lakes String Conference, Purdue University arxiv:1109.3154 Spectral problem and AdS/CFT correspondence Spectral problem
More informationAn Inverse Mass Expansion for Entanglement Entropy. Free Massive Scalar Field Theory
in Free Massive Scalar Field Theory NCSR Demokritos National Technical University of Athens based on arxiv:1711.02618 [hep-th] in collaboration with Dimitris Katsinis March 28 2018 Entanglement and Entanglement
More informationImplications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics
Physics 215 Winter 2018 Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics 1. The time reversal operator is antiunitary In quantum mechanics, the time reversal operator Θ acting on a state produces
More informationUNIQUENESS OF POSITIVE SOLUTION TO SOME COUPLED COOPERATIVE VARIATIONAL ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9947(XX)0000-0 UNIQUENESS OF POSITIVE SOLUTION TO SOME COUPLED COOPERATIVE VARIATIONAL ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS YULIAN
More informationMichael CREUTZ Physics Department 510A, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
with η condensation Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 66-85, Japan E-mail: saoki@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp Michael CREUTZ Physics Department
More informationIntroduction to the Mathematics of the XY -Spin Chain
Introduction to the Mathematics of the XY -Spin Chain Günter Stolz June 9, 2014 Abstract In the following we present an introduction to the mathematical theory of the XY spin chain. The importance of this
More informationarxiv: v2 [math-ph] 24 Feb 2016
ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF MULTIDIMENSIONALLY CONSISTENT 3D MAPS MATTEO PETRERA AND YURI B. SURIS Institut für Mathemat MA 7-2 Technische Universität Berlin Str. des 17. Juni 136 10623 Berlin Germany arxiv:1509.03129v2
More informationQuantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.
Quantum Mechanics Solutions 1. (a) If H has an orthonormal basis consisting of the eigenvectors { v i } of A with eigenvalues λ i C, then A can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition as A =
More informationMagnon kinematics in planar N = 4 Yang-Mills
Magnon kinematics in planar N = 4 Yang-Mills Rafael Hernández, IFT-Madrid Collaboration with N. Beisert, C. Gómez and E. López Outline Introduction Integrability in the AdS/CFT correspondence The quantum
More informationBethe ansatz for the deformed Gaudin model
Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, 00, 59, 4, 36 33 doi: 0.376/proc.00.4. Available online at www.eap.ee/proceedings Bethe ansatz for the deformed Gaudin model Petr Kulish a,b, enad anojlović
More informationarxiv: v1 [math-ph] 7 Aug 2016
Analytic Optimization of a MERA network and its Relevance to Quantum Integrability and Wavelet Hiroaki Matsueda Sendai National College of Technology, Sendai 989-3128, Japan arxiv:168.225v1 [math-ph] 7
More informationIntegrability and Finite Size Effects of (AdS 5 /CFT 4 ) β
Integrability and Finite Size Effects of (AdS 5 /CFT 4 ) β Based on arxiv:1201.2635v1 and on-going work With C. Ahn, D. Bombardelli and B-H. Lee February 21, 2012 Table of contents 1 One parameter generalization
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 24 Dec 2003
Quantum Entanglement in Heisenberg Antiferromagnets V. Subrahmanyam Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India. arxiv:quant-ph/0309004 v2 24 Dec 2003 Entanglement sharing among
More informationLecture notes: Quantum gates in matrix and ladder operator forms
Phys 7 Topics in Particles & Fields Spring 3 Lecture v.. Lecture notes: Quantum gates in matrix and ladder operator forms Jeffrey Yepez Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Hawai i at Manoa
More information