Hash-based Signatures
|
|
- Lester Stokes
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Hash-based Signatures Andreas Hülsing Summer School on Post-Quantum Cryptography June 2017, TU Eindhoven
2 Post-Quantum Signatures Lattice, MQ, Coding Signature and/or key sizes Runtimes Secure parameters PAGE y x x x x x x y x x x x x x y
3 Hash-based Signature Schemes [Mer89] Post quantum Only secure hash function Security well understood Fast PAGE 3
4 RSA DSA EC-DSA... Intractability Assumption Cryptographic hash function RSA, DH, SVP, MQ, Digital signature scheme PAGE 4
5 Hash function families
6 (Hash) function families H n h k : {0,1} m n {0,1} n m(n) n efficient {0,1} n h k m n {0,1}
7 One-wayness H n h k : {0,1} m n {0,1} n y c, k h $ k H n x $ {0,1} h k x y c m n Success if h k x = y c x
8 Collision resistance H n h k : {0,1} m n {0,1} n k h k $ H n Success if h k x 1 = h k x 2 and x 1 x 2 (x 1, x 2 )
9 Second-preimage resistance H n h k : {0,1} m n {0,1} n x c, k h $ k H n x $ m n c {0,1} Success if h k x c = h k x and x c x x
10 Undetectability H n h k : {0,1} m n {0,1} n h k $ H n b $ {0,1} If b = 1 else x $ m n {0,1} y c h k (x) y c $ {0,1} n y c, k b*
11 Pseudorandomness H n h k : {0,1} m n {0,1} n 1 n b x y = g(x) g If b = 1 g $ H n else g $ U m n,n b*
12 Generic security Black Box security (best we can do without looking at internals) For hash functions: Security of random function family (Often) expressed in #queries (query complexity) Hash functions not meeting generic security considered insecure
13 Generic Security - OWF Classically: No query: Output random guess Succ OW A = 1 2 n One query: Guess, check, output new guess Succ OW A = 2 2 n q-queries: Guess, check, repeat q-times, output new guess Succ OW A = q+1 2 n Query bound: Θ(2 n )
14 Generic Security - OWF Quantum: More complex Reduction from quantum search for random H Know lower & upper bounds for quantum search! Query bound: Θ(2 n/2 ) Upper bound uses variant of Grover (Disclaimer: Currently only proof for 2 m 2 n )
15 Generic Security OW SPR CR UD* PRF* Classical Θ(2 n ) Θ(2 n ) Θ(2 n/2 ) Θ(2 n ) Θ(2 n ) Quantum Θ(2 n/2 ) Θ(2 n/2 ) Θ(2 n/3 ) Θ(2 n/2 ) Θ(2 n/2 ) * conjectured, no proof
16 Assumption / Attacks Hash-function properties stronger / easier to break Collision-Resistance 2 nd -Preimage- Resistance weaker / harder to break One-way Pseudorandom PAGE 16
17 Attacks on Hash Functions MD5 Collisions (theo.) MD5 Collisions (practical!) SHA1 Collisions (practical!) SHA1 Collisions (theo.) MD5 & SHA-1 No (Second-) Preimage Attacks! PAGE 17
18 Basic Construction PAGE 18
19 Lamport-Diffie OTS [Lam79] Message M = b1,,bm, OWF H * = n bit SK PK sk 1,0 sk 1,1 sk m,0 sk m,1 H H H H H H pk 1,0 pk 1,1 pk m,0 pk m,1 b1 Mux b2 Mux bm Mux Sig sk 1,b1 sk m,bm PAGE 19
20 EU-CMA for OTS pk, 1 n sk M (σ, M) SIGN (σ, M ) Success if M M and Verify pk, σ, M = Accept
21 Security Theorem: If H is one-way then LD-OTS is one-time eu-cmasecure.
22 Reduction Input: y c, k Set H h k Replace random pk i,b sk 1,0 sk 1,1 sk m,0 sk m,1 H H H H H H pk 1,0 pk 1,1 y c pk m,0 pk m,1
23 Reduction Input: y c, k Set H h k Adv. Message: M = b1,,bm If bi = b return fail else return Sign(M) Replace random pk i,b? sk 1,0 sk 1,1 sk m,0 sk m,1 H H H H H pk 1,0 pk 1,1 y c pk m,0 pk m,1 b1 Mux b2 Mux bm Mux sk 1,b1 sk m,bm
24 Reduction Input: y c, k Set H h k Choose random pk i,b Forgery: M* = b1*,,bm*, σ = σ 1,, σ m If bi b return fail Else return σ i? σ i sk 1,0 sk 1,1 σ i sk m,0 sk m,1 H H H H H pk 1,0 pk 1,1 y c pk m,0 pk m,1
25 Reduction - Analysis Abort in two cases: 1. bi = b probability ½ : b is a random bit 2. bi* b probability 1-1/m: At least one bit has to flip as M* M Reduction succeeds with A s success probability times 1/2m.
26 Merkle s Hash-based Signatures PK H SIG = (i=2,,,,, ) H OTS H H H H H H H H H H H H H OTS OTS OTS OTS OTS OTS OTS OTS SK PAGE 26
27 Security Theorem: MSS is eu-cma-secure if OTS is a one-time eu-cma secure signature scheme and H is a random element from a family of collision resistant hash functions.
28 Reduction Input: k, pk OTS 1. Choose random 0 i < 2 h 2. Generate key pair using pk OTS as ith OTS public key and H h k 3. Answer all signature queries using sk or sign oracle (for index i) 4. Extract OTS-forgery or collision from forgery
29 Reduction (Step 4, Extraction) Forgery: (i, σ OTS 1. If pk OTS, pk OTS, AUTH) equals OTS pk we used for i OTS, we got an OTS forgery. Can only be used if i = i. 2. Else adversary used different OTS pk. Hence, different leaves. Still same root! Pigeon-hole principle: Collision on path to root.
30 Winternitz-OTS
31 Recap LD-OTS [Lam79] Message M = b1,,bm, OWF H * = n bit SK sk 1,0 sk 1,1 sk m,0 sk m,1 H H H H H H PK pk 1,0 pk 1,1 pk m,0 pk m,1 b1 Mux b2 Mux bn Mux Sig sk 1,b1 sk m,bm
32 LD-OTS in MSS SIG = (i=2,,,,, ) Verification: 1. Verify 2. Verify authenticity of We can do better!
33 Trivial Optimization Message M = b1,,bm, OWF H * = n bit SK sk 1,0 sk 1,1 sk m,0 sk m,1 H H H H H H PK pk 1,0 pk 1,1 pk m,0 pk m,1 b1 Mux Mux b1 bm Mux Mux bm Sig sig 1,0 sig 1,1 sig m,0 sig m,1
34 Optimized LD-OTS in MSS Verification: X SIG = (i=2,,,,, ) 1. Compute from 2. Verify authenticity of Steps together verify
35 Let s sort this Message M = b 1,,b m, OWF H SK: sk 1,,sk m,sk m+1,,sk 2m PK: H(sk 1 ),,H(sk m ),H(sk m+1 ),,H(sk 2m ) Encode M: M = M M = b 1,,b m, b 1,, b m (instead of b 1, b 1,,b m, b m ) Sig: sig i = sk i, if b i = 1 H(sk i ), otherwise Checksum with bad performance!
36 Optimized LD-OTS Message M = b 1,,b m, OWF H SK: sk 1,,sk m,sk m+1,,sk m+1+log m PK: H(sk 1 ),,H(sk m ),H(sk m+1 ),,H(sk m+1+log m ) Encode M: M = b 1,,b m, 1 m b i Sig: sig i = sk i, if b i = 1 H(sk i ), otherwise IF one b i is flipped from 1 to 0, another b j will flip from 0 to 1
37 Function chains Function family: H n h k : {0,1} n {0,1} n h k $ H n Parameter w Chain: c i ( x) i 1 h k ( c ( x)) hk hk hk ( x) i times c 0 (x) = x c 1 (x) = h k (x) c w 1 (x)
38 WOTS Winternitz parameter w, security parameter n, message length m, function family H n c 0 (sk 1 ) = sk 1 Key Generation: Compute l, sample h k pk 1 = c w-1 (sk 1 ) c 1 (sk 1 ) c 1 (sk l ) pk l = c w-1 (sk l ) c 0 (sk l ) = sk l
39 WOTS Signature generation M b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 b m b m +1 b m +2 b l c 0 (sk 1 ) = sk 1 pk 1 = c w-1 (sk 1 ) C σ 1 =c b 1(sk 1 ) Signature: σ = (σ 1,, σ l ) pk l = c w-1 (sk l ) c 0 (sk l ) = sk l σ l =c b l (sk l )
40 WOTS Signature Verification Verifier knows: M, w b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 b m b m +1 b l 1+2 b l σ 1 Signature: σ = (σ 1,, σ l ) c 1 (σ 1 ) c 2 (σ 1 ) c 3 (σ 1 ) σ l pk 1 =? c w 1 b 1 (σ 1 ) pk l =? c w 1 b l (σ l )
41 WOTS Function Chains For x 0,1 n define c 0 x = x and WOTS: c i x = h k (c i 1 x ) WOTS $ : c i x = h c i 1 x (r) WOTS + : c i x = h k (c i 1 x r i )
42 WOTS Security Theorem (informally): W-OTS is strongly unforgeable under chosen message attacks if H n is a collision resistant family of undetectable one-way functions. W-OTS $ is existentially unforgeable under chosen message attacks if H n is a pseudorandom function family. W-OTS + is strongly unforgeable under chosen message attacks if H n is a 2 nd -preimage resistant family of undetectable one-way functions.
43 XMSS
44 XMSS Tree: Uses bitmasks Leafs: Use binary tree with bitmasks OTS: WOTS + Mesage digest: Randomized hashing Collision-resilient -> signature size halved H b i H
45 Multi-Tree XMSS Uses multiple layers of trees -> Key generation (= Building first tree on each layer) Θ(2 h ) Θ(d*2 h/d ) -> Allows to reduce worst-case signing times Θ(h/2) Θ(h/2d)
46 Authentication path computation
47 TreeHash (Mer89)
48 TreeHash TreeHash(v,i): Computes node on level v with leftmost descendant L i Public Key Generation: Run TreeHash(h,0) v = h = 3 = v = 2 v = 1 h v = 0 L 0 L 1 L 2 L 3... L 7
49 TreeHash TreeHash(v,i) 1: Init Stack, N1, N2 2: For j = i to i+2 v -1 do 3: N1 = LeafCalc(j) 4: While N1.level() == Stack.top().level() do 5: N2 = Stack.pop() 6: N1 = ComputeParent( N2, N1 ) 7: Stack.push(N1) 8: Return Stack.pop()
50 TreeHash TreeHash(v,i) L i L i+1... L i+2 v-1
51 Efficiency? Key generation: Every node has to be computed once. cost = 2 h leaves + 2 h -1 nodes => optimal Signature: One node on each level 0 <= v < h. cost 2 h -1 leaves + 2 h -1-h nodes. Many nodes are computed many times! (e.g. those on level v=h-1 are computed 2 h-1 times) -> Not optimal if state allowed
52 The BDS Algorithm [BDS08]
53 Motivation (for all Tree Traversal Algorithms) No Storage: Signature: Compute one node on each level 0 <= v < h. Costs: 2 h -1 leaf + 2 h -1-h node computations. Example: XMSS with SHA2-256 and h = 20 -> approx. 15min Store whole tree: 2 h n bits. Example: h=20, n=256; storage: 2 28 bits = 32MB Idea: Look for time-memory trade-off!
54 Use a State
55 Authentication Paths
56 Observation 1 Same node in authentication path is recomputed many times! Node on level v is recomputed for 2 v successive paths. Idea: Keep authentication path in state. -> Only have to update new nodes. Result Storage: h nodes Time: ~ h leaf + h node computations (average) But: Worst case still 2 h -1 leaf + 2 h -1-h node computations! -> Keep in mind. To be solved.
57 Observation 2 When new left node in authentication path is needed, its children have been part of previous authentication paths.
58 Computing Left Nodes v = 2 v 1 A ( i 1) A( i 1 2 ) i
59 Result Storing h 2 nodes all left nodes can be computed with one node computation / node
60 Observation 3 Right child nodes on high levels are most costly. Computing node on level v requires 2 v leaf and 2 v -1 node computations. Idea: Store right nodes on top k levels during key generation. Result Storage: 2 k -2 n bit nodes Time: ~ h-k leaf + h-k node computations (average) Still: Worst case 2 h-k -1 leaf + 2 h-k -1-(h-k) node computations!
61 Distribute Computation
62 Intuition Observation: For every second signature only one leaf computation Average runtime: ~ h-k leaf + h-k node computations Idea: Distribute computation to achieve average runtime in worst case. Focus on distributing computation of leaves
63 TreeHash with Updates TreeHash.init(v,i) 1: Init Stack, N1, N2, j=i, j_max = i+2 v -1 2: Exit TreeHash.update() 1: If j <= j_max 2: N1 = LeafCalc(j) 3: While N1.level() == Stack.top().level() do 5: N2 = Stack.pop() 6: N1 = ComputeParent( N2, N1 ) 7: Stack.push(N1) 8: Set j = j+1 9: Exit One leaf per update
64 Distribute Computation Concept Run one TreeHash instance per level 0 <= v < h-k Start computation of next right node on level v when current node becomes part of authentication path. Use scheduling strategy to guarantee that nodes are finished in time. Distribute (h-k)/2 updates per signature among all running TreeHash instances
65 Distribute Computation Worst Case Runtime Before: 2 h-k -1 leaf and 2 h-k -1-(h-k) node computations. With distributed computation: (h-k)/2 + 1 leaf and 3(h-k-1)/2 + 1 node computations. Add. Storage Single stack of size h-k nodes for all TreeHash instances. + One node per TreeHash instance. = 2(h-k) nodes
66 BDS Performance Storage: h 3h 3k k n bit nodes Runtime: (h k)/2+1 leaf and 3(h k 1)/2+1 node computations.
67 XMSS in practice
68 XMSS Internet-Draft (draft-irtf-cfrg-xmss-hash-based-signatures) Protecting against multi-target attacks / tight security n-bit hash => n bit security Small public key (2n bit) At the cost of ROM for proving PK compression secure Function families based on SHA2 Equal to XMSS-T [HRS16] up-to message digest
69 XMSS / XMSS-T Implementation C Implementation, using OpenSSL [HRS16] Sign (ms) Signature (kb) Public Key (kb) Secret Key (kb) Bit Security classical/ quantum XMSS / 118 XMSS-T / 128 XMSS / 98 XMSS-T / 128 Comment h = 20, d = 1, h = 20, d = 1 h = 60, d = 3 h = 60, d = 3 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 3.50GHz XMSS-T uses message digest from Internet-Draft All using SHA2-256, w = 16 and k = 2
70 Open research topics 1. Message compression which is collision-resilient, provdies tight provable security, especially resists multi-target attacks (=> no etcr) => Has applications outside hash-based crypto! 2. Quantum query complexity for further properties E.g. PRF, UD, asec, Quantum security of existing hash function constructions. E.g. can classical attacks be improved (e.g. differential cryptanalysis) Formal proofs (see recent works on collapsing hashes)
71 SPHINCS
72 About the statefulness Works great for some settings However back-up... multi-threading... load-balancing
73 How to Eliminate the State
74 Few-Time Signature Schemes PAGE 77
75 Recap LD-OTS Message M = b1,,bn, OWF H * = n bit SK PK sk 1,0 sk 1,1 sk n,0 sk n,1 H H H H H H pk 1,0 pk 1,1 pk n,0 pk n,1 b1 Mux b2 Mux bn Mux Sig sk 1,b1 sk n,bn PAGE 78
76 HORS [RR02] Message M, OWF H, CRHF H = n bit Parameters t=2 a,k, with m = ka (typical a=16, k=32) * SK sk 1 sk 2 sk t-1 sk t H H H H H H PK pk 1 pk 1 pk t-1 pk t PAGE 79
77 HORS mapping function Message M, OWF H, CRHF H = n bit Parameters t=2 a,k, with m = ka (typical a=16, k=32) * M H b 1 b 2 b a b ar i 1 i k PAGE 80
78 HORS Message M, OWF H, CRHF H * = n bit Parameters t=2 a,k, with m = ka (typical a=16, k=32) SK sk 1 sk 2 sk t-1 sk t H H H H H H PK pk 1 pk 1 pk t-1 pk t H (M) b 1 b 2 b a b a+1 b ka-2 b ka-1 b ka i 1 Mux Mux i k sk i1 sk ik PAGE 81
79 HORS Security M mapped to k element index set M i {1,, t} k Each signature publishes k out of t secrets Either break one-wayness or r-subset-resilience: After seeing index sets M i j for r messages msg j, 1 j r, hard to find msg r+1 i msg j such that M r+1 1 j r M i j. Best generic attack: Succ r-ssr (A, q) = q rk t Security shrinks with each signature! k PAGE 82
80 HORST Using HORS with MSS requires adding PK (tn) to MSS signature. HORST: Merkle Tree on top of HORS-PK New PK = Root Publish Authentication Paths for HORS signature values PK can be computed from Sig With optimizations: tn (k(log t x + 1) + 2 x )n E.g. SPHINCS-256: 2 MB 16 KB Use randomized message hash PAGE 83
81 SPHINCS Stateless Scheme XMSS MT + HORST + (pseudo-)random index Collision-resilient Deterministic signing SPHINCS-256: 128-bit post-quantum secure Hundrest of signatures / sec 41 kb signature 1 kb keys
82 Signatures via Non- Interactive Proofs: The Case of Fish & Picnic Thanks to the Fish/Picnic team for slides
83 Interactive Proofs
84 ZKBoo
85 High-Level Approach Use LowMC v2 to build dedicated hash function with low AND-gate-depth Use ZKBoo to proof knowledge of a preimage Use Fiat-Shamir to turn ZKP into Signature in ROM (Fish), or Use Unruh s transform to turn ZKP into Signature in QROM (Picnic)
86 Performance
87 Open research topics II SPHINCS: More efficient few-time signatures Dedicated fast short, constant size input hash functions. Fish / Picnic More efficient (size!!!) QROM transform Dedicated, more efficient proof for knowledge of preimage? Hash functions with lower AND-gate depth.
88 Thank you! Questions? For references & further literature see PAGE 91
Hash-based Signatures. Andreas Hülsing
Hash-based Signatures Andreas Hülsing Post-Quantum Signatures Lattice, MQ, Coding Signature and/or key sizes Runtimes Secure parameters 23-2-2016 PAGE 2... 1 3 1 4 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 4 1 2 1 2 1 1 y x x x x
More informationMitigating Multi-Target-Attacks in Hash-based Signatures. Andreas Hülsing joint work with Joost Rijneveld, Fang Song
Mitigating Multi-Target-Attacks in Hash-based Signatures Andreas Hülsing joint work with Joost Rijneveld, Fang Song A brief motivation Trapdoor- / Identification Scheme-based (PQ-)Signatures Lattice, MQ,
More informationHash-based signatures & Hash-and-sign without collision-resistance
Hash-based signatures & Hash-and-sign without collision-resistance Andreas Hülsing 22.12.2016 Hash-based Signature Schemes [Mer89] Post quantum Only secure hash function Security well understood Fast 22-12-2016
More informationAn update on Hash-based Signatures. Andreas Hülsing
An update on Hash-based Signatures Andreas Hülsing Trapdoor- / Identification Scheme-based (PQ-)Signatures Lattice, MQ, Coding Signature and/or key sizes Runtimes Secure parameters 9-9-2015 PAGE 2... 1
More informationSPHINCS: practical stateless hash-based signatures
SPHINCS: practical stateless hash-based signatures D. J. Bernstein, D. Hopwood, A. Hülsing, T. Lange, R. Niederhagen, L. Papachristodoulou, P. Schwabe, and Z. Wilcox O'Hearn Digital Signatures are Important!
More informationXMSS A Practical Forward Secure Signature Scheme based on Minimal Security Assumptions
XMSS A Practical Forward Secure Signature Scheme based on Minimal Security Assumptions Johannes Buchmann and Andreas Hülsing {buchmann,huelsing}@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de Cryptography and Computeralgebra
More informationOptimal Parameters for XMSS MT
Optimal Parameters for XMSS MT Andreas Hülsing, Lea Rausch, and Johannes Buchmann Cryptography and Computeralgebra Department of Computer Science TU Darmstadt, Germany huelsing@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
More informationMitigating Multi-Target Attacks in Hash-based Signatures
Mitigating Multi-Target Attacks in Hash-based Signatures Andreas Hülsing 1, Joost Rijneveld 2, and Fang Song 3 1 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Technische Universiteit Eindhoven P.O. Box
More informationPost-Quantum Cryptography & Privacy. Andreas Hülsing
Post-Quantum Cryptography & Privacy Andreas Hülsing Privacy? Too abstract? How to achieve privacy? Under the hood... Public-key crypto ECC RSA DSA Secret-key crypto AES SHA2 SHA1... Combination of both
More informationOptimal Parameters for XMSSMT
Optimal Parameters for XMSSMT Andreas Hülsing, Lea Rausch, Johannes Buchmann To cite this version: Andreas Hülsing, Lea Rausch, Johannes Buchmann. Optimal Parameters for XMSSMT. Alfredo Cuzzocrea; Christian
More informationLecture 18: Message Authentication Codes & Digital Signa
Lecture 18: Message Authentication Codes & Digital Signatures MACs and Signatures Both are used to assert that a message has indeed been generated by a party MAC is the private-key version and Signatures
More informationDigital Signature Schemes and the Random Oracle Model. A. Hülsing
Digital Signature Schemes and the Random Oracle Model A. Hülsing Today s goal Review provable security of in use signature schemes. (PKCS #1 v2.x) PAGE 1 Digital Signature Source: http://hari-cio-8a.blog.ugm.ac.id/files/2013/03/dsa.jpg
More informationAuthentication. Chapter Message Authentication
Chapter 5 Authentication 5.1 Message Authentication Suppose Bob receives a message addressed from Alice. How does Bob ensure that the message received is the same as the message sent by Alice? For example,
More informationKatz, Lindell Introduction to Modern Cryptrography
Katz, Lindell Introduction to Modern Cryptrography Slides Chapter 12 Markus Bläser, Saarland University Digital signature schemes Goal: integrity of messages Signer signs a message using a private key
More informationQuantum-Safe Crypto Why & How? JP Aumasson, Kudelski Security
Quantum-Safe Crypto Why & How? JP Aumasson, Kudelski Security Flight plan What s a quantum computer? How broken are your public keys? AES vs. quantum search Hidden quantum powers Defeating quantum computing
More informationPicnic Post-Quantum Signatures from Zero Knowledge Proofs
Picnic Post-Quantum Signatures from Zero Knowledge Proofs MELISSA CHASE, MSR THE PICNIC TEAM DAVID DERLER STEVEN GOLDFEDER JONATHAN KATZ VLAD KOLESNIKOV CLAUDIO ORLANDI SEBASTIAN RAMACHER CHRISTIAN RECHBERGER
More informationCLASSICAL CRYPTOSYSTEMS IN A QUANTUM WORLD
CLASSICAL CRYPTOSYSTEMS IN A QUANTUM WORLD Mark Zhandry Stanford University * Joint work with Dan Boneh But First: My Current Work Indistinguishability Obfuscation (and variants) Multiparty NIKE without
More informationPost-Quantum Cryptography & Privacy. Andreas Hülsing
Post-Quantum Cryptography & Privacy Andreas Hülsing Privacy? Too abstract? How to achieve privacy? Under the hood... Asymmetric Crypto ECC RSA DSA Symmetric Crypto AES SHA2 SHA1... Combination of both
More informationCryptographical Security in the Quantum Random Oracle Model
Cryptographical Security in the Quantum Random Oracle Model Center for Advanced Security Research Darmstadt (CASED) - TU Darmstadt, Germany June, 21st, 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
More informationLecture 16 Chiu Yuen Koo Nikolai Yakovenko. 1 Digital Signature Schemes. CMSC 858K Advanced Topics in Cryptography March 18, 2004
CMSC 858K Advanced Topics in Cryptography March 18, 2004 Lecturer: Jonathan Katz Lecture 16 Scribe(s): Chiu Yuen Koo Nikolai Yakovenko Jeffrey Blank 1 Digital Signature Schemes In this lecture, we introduce
More informationDigital Signatures. Adam O Neill based on
Digital Signatures Adam O Neill based on http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~mihir/cse207/ Signing by hand COSMO ALICE ALICE Pay Bob $100 Cosmo Alice Alice Bank =? no Don t yes pay Bob Signing electronically SIGFILE
More informationW-OTS + Shorter Signatures for Hash-Based Signature Schemes
W-OTS + Shorter Signatures for Hash-Based Signature Schemes Andreas Hülsing huelsing@cdc.informati.tu-darmstadt.de Cryptography and Computeralgebra Department of Computer Science TU Darmstadt Abstract.
More informationBEYOND POST QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY
BEYOND POST QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY Mark Zhandry Stanford University Joint work with Dan Boneh Classical Cryptography Post-Quantum Cryptography All communication stays classical Beyond Post-Quantum Cryptography
More informationA survey on quantum-secure cryptographic systems
A survey on quantum-secure cryptographic systems Tomoka Kan May 24, 2018 1 Abstract Post-quantum cryptography refers to the search for classical cryptosystems which remain secure in the presence of a quantum
More informationTransitive Signatures Based on Non-adaptive Standard Signatures
Transitive Signatures Based on Non-adaptive Standard Signatures Zhou Sujing Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, zhousujing@pmail.ntu.edu.sg Abstract. Transitive signature, motivated by signing
More informationCOS433/Math 473: Cryptography. Mark Zhandry Princeton University Spring 2017
COS433/Math 473: Cryptography Mark Zhandry Princeton University Spring 2017 Previously Digital Signatures Algorithms: Gen() à (sk,pk) Sign(sk,m) à σ Ver(pk,m,σ) à 0/1 Correctness: Pr[Ver(pk,m,Sign(sk,m))=1:
More informationA Composition Theorem for Universal One-Way Hash Functions
A Composition Theorem for Universal One-Way Hash Functions Victor Shoup IBM Zurich Research Lab, Säumerstr. 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland sho@zurich.ibm.com Abstract. In this paper we present a new scheme
More informationNotes for Lecture 9. 1 Combining Encryption and Authentication
U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout N9 Luca Trevisan February 17, 2009 Notes for Lecture 9 Notes scribed by Joel Weinberger, posted March 1, 2009 Summary Last time, we showed that combining a CPA-secure
More informationFPGA-BASED ACCELERATOR FOR POST-QUANTUM SIGNATURE SCHEME SPHINCS-256
IMES FPGA-BASED ACCELERATOR FOR POST-QUANTUM SIGNATURE SCHEME SPHINCS-256 Dorian Amiet 1, Andreas Curiger 2 and Paul Zbinden 1 1 HSR Hochschule für Technik, Rapperswil, Switzerland 2 Securosys SA, Zürich,
More informationCOS433/Math 473: Cryptography. Mark Zhandry Princeton University Spring 2017
COS433/Math 473: Cryptography Mark Zhandry Princeton University Spring 2017 Authenticated Encryption Syntax Syntax: Enc: K M à C Dec: K C à M { } Correctness: For all k K, m M, Dec(k, Enc(k,m) ) = m Unforgeability
More informationHow to Use Short Basis : Trapdoors for Hard Lattices and new Cryptographic Constructions
Presentation Article presentation, for the ENS Lattice Based Crypto Workgroup http://www.di.ens.fr/~pnguyen/lbc.html, 30 September 2009 How to Use Short Basis : Trapdoors for http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~cpeikert/pubs/trap_lattice.pdf
More informationThe Random Oracle Paradigm. Mike Reiter. Random oracle is a formalism to model such uses of hash functions that abound in practical cryptography
1 The Random Oracle Paradigm Mike Reiter Based on Random Oracles are Practical: A Paradigm for Designing Efficient Protocols by M. Bellare and P. Rogaway Random Oracles 2 Random oracle is a formalism to
More informationENEE 459-C Computer Security. Message authentication (continue from previous lecture)
ENEE 459-C Computer Security Message authentication (continue from previous lecture) Last lecture Hash function Cryptographic hash function Message authentication with hash function (attack?) with cryptographic
More information1 Cryptographic hash functions
CSCI 5440: Cryptography Lecture 6 The Chinese University of Hong Kong 23 February 2011 1 Cryptographic hash functions Last time we saw a construction of message authentication codes (MACs) for fixed-length
More informationIntroduction to Cryptography
B504 / I538: Introduction to Cryptography Spring 2017 Lecture 12 Recall: MAC existential forgery game 1 n Challenger (C) k Gen(1 n ) Forger (A) 1 n m 1 m 1 M {m} t 1 MAC k (m 1 ) t 1 m 2 m 2 M {m} t 2
More information1 Cryptographic hash functions
CSCI 5440: Cryptography Lecture 6 The Chinese University of Hong Kong 24 October 2012 1 Cryptographic hash functions Last time we saw a construction of message authentication codes (MACs) for fixed-length
More informationLecture 14 More on Digital Signatures and Variants. COSC-260 Codes and Ciphers Adam O Neill Adapted from
Lecture 14 More on Digital Signatures and Variants COSC-260 Codes and Ciphers Adam O Neill Adapted from http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~mihir/cse107/ Setting the Stage We will cover in more depth some issues for
More informationLecture 10: NMAC, HMAC and Number Theory
CS 6903 Modern Cryptography April 10, 2008 Lecture 10: NMAC, HMAC and Number Theory Instructor: Nitesh Saxena Scribes: Jonathan Voris, Md. Borhan Uddin 1 Recap 1.1 MACs A message authentication code (MAC)
More informationShort Signatures Without Random Oracles
Short Signatures Without Random Oracles Dan Boneh and Xavier Boyen (presented by Aleksandr Yampolskiy) Outline Motivation Preliminaries Secure short signature Extensions Conclusion Why signatures without
More informationFrom 5-pass MQ-based identification to MQ-based signatures
From 5-pass MQ-based identification to MQ-based signatures Andreas Hülsing, Joost Rijneveld, Simona Samardjiska, and Peter Schwabe 30 June 2016 1 / 31 Our take on PQ-Crypto Prepare for actual use Reliable
More informationImproving Stateless Hash-Based Signatures
Improving Stateless Hash-Based Signatures Jean-Philippe Aumasson 1 and Guillaume Endignoux 2 1 Kudelski Security, Switzerland 2 Google, Switzerland Abstract. We present several optimizations to SPHINCS,
More informationHash Functions. Ali El Kaafarani. Mathematical Institute Oxford University. 1 of 34
Hash Functions Ali El Kaafarani Mathematical Institute Oxford University 1 of 34 Outline 1 Definition and Notions of Security 2 The Merkle-damgård Transform 3 MAC using Hash Functions 4 Cryptanalysis:
More informationSecure Signatures and Chosen Ciphertext Security in a Post-Quantum World
Secure Signatures and Chosen Ciphertext Security in a Post-Quantum World Dan Boneh Mark Zhandry Stanford University {dabo,zhandry}@cs.stanford.edu Abstract We initiate the study of quantum-secure digital
More informationClarifying the subset-resilience problem
Clarifying the subset-resilience problem Jean-Philippe Aumasson 1 and Guillaume Endignoux 2 1 Kudelski Security, Switzerland 2 firstname.surname@m4x.org Abstract. We investigate the subset-resilience problem,
More informationLecture 14: Cryptographic Hash Functions
CSE 599b: Cryptography (Winter 2006) Lecture 14: Cryptographic Hash Functions 17 February 2006 Lecturer: Paul Beame Scribe: Paul Beame 1 Hash Function Properties A hash function family H = {H K } K K is
More informationFrom 5-pass MQ-based identification to MQ-based signatures
From 5-pass MQ-based identification to MQ-based signatures Ming-Shing Chen 1,2, Andreas Hülsing 3, Joost Rijneveld 4, Simona Samardjiska 5, Peter Schwabe 4 National Taiwan University 1 / Academia Sinica
More informationUninstantiability of Full-Domain Hash
Uninstantiability of based on On the Generic Insecurity of, Crypto 05, joint work with Y.Dodis and R.Oliveira Krzysztof Pietrzak CWI Amsterdam June 3, 2008 Why talk about this old stuff? Why talk about
More informationIntroduction to Information Security
Introduction to Information Security Lecture 4: Hash Functions and MAC 2007. 6. Prof. Byoungcheon Lee sultan (at) joongbu. ac. kr Information and Communications University Contents 1. Introduction - Hash
More informationJohn Hancock enters the 21th century Digital signature schemes. Table of contents
John Hancock enters the 21th century Digital signature schemes Foundations of Cryptography Computer Science Department Wellesley College Fall 2016 Table of contents From last time: Good news and bad There
More informationCryptographic Hash Functions
Cryptographic Hash Functions Çetin Kaya Koç koc@ece.orst.edu Electrical & Computer Engineering Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Technical Report December 9, 2002 Version 1.5 1 1 Introduction
More informationFoundations of Cryptography
- 111 - Foundations of Cryptography Notes of lecture No. 10B & 11 (given on June 11 & 18, 1989) taken by Sergio Rajsbaum Summary In this lecture we define unforgeable digital signatures and present such
More informationECS 189A Final Cryptography Spring 2011
ECS 127: Cryptography Handout F UC Davis Phillip Rogaway June 9, 2011 ECS 189A Final Cryptography Spring 2011 Hints for success: Good luck on the exam. I don t think it s all that hard (I do believe I
More informationLecture 1. Crypto Background
Lecture 1 Crypto Background This lecture Crypto background hash functions random oracle model digital signatures and applications Cryptographic Hash Functions Hash function takes a string of arbitrary
More informationAnalysis of Random Oracle Instantiation Scenarios for OAEP and other Practical Schemes
Analysis of Random Oracle Instantiation Scenarios for OAEP and other Practical Schemes Alexandra Boldyreva 1 and Marc Fischlin 2 1 College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 801 Atlantic Drive,
More informationII. Digital signatures
II. Digital signatures Alice m Bob Eve 1. Did Bob send message m, or was it Eve? 2. Did Eve modify the message m, that was sent by Bob? 1 Digital signatures Digital signature - are equivalent of handwritten
More informationMemory-Tight Reductions
Memory-Tight Reductions Benedikt Auerbach 1 David Cash 2 Manuel Fersch 1 Eike Kiltz 1 April 12, 2018 1 Horst Görtz Institute for IT Security, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany {benedikt.auerbach,manuel.fersch,eike.kiltz}@rub.de
More informationLecture 10 - MAC s continued, hash & MAC
Lecture 10 - MAC s continued, hash & MAC Boaz Barak March 3, 2010 Reading: Boneh-Shoup chapters 7,8 The field GF(2 n ). A field F is a set with a multiplication ( ) and addition operations that satisfy
More informationFrom Fixed-Length Messages to Arbitrary-Length Messages Practical RSA Signature Padding Schemes
From Fixed-Length Messages to Arbitrary-Length Messages Practical RSA Signature Padding Schemes [Published in D. Naccache, Ed., Topics in Cryptology CT-RSA 2001, vol. 2020 of Lecture Notes in Computer
More informationSecure Signatures and Chosen Ciphertext Security in a Quantum Computing World. Dan Boneh and Mark Zhandry Stanford University
Secure Signatures and Chosen Ciphertext Security in a Quantu Coputing World Dan Boneh and Mark Zhandry Stanford University Classical Chosen Message Attack (CMA) σ = S(sk, ) signing key sk Classical CMA
More informationLecture 11: Hash Functions, Merkle-Damgaard, Random Oracle
CS 7880 Graduate Cryptography October 20, 2015 Lecture 11: Hash Functions, Merkle-Damgaard, Random Oracle Lecturer: Daniel Wichs Scribe: Tanay Mehta 1 Topics Covered Review Collision-Resistant Hash Functions
More informationThe Random Oracle Model and the Ideal Cipher Model are Equivalent
The Random Oracle Model and the Ideal Cipher Model are Equivalent Jean-ébastien Coron 1, Jacques Patarin 2, and Yannick eurin 2,3 (1) Univ. Luxembourg, (2) Univ. Versailles, (3)Orange Labs éminaire EN
More informationBuilding Quantum-One-Way Functions from Block Ciphers: Davies-Meyer and Merkle-Damgård Constructions
Building Quantum-One-Way Functions from Block Ciphers: Davies-Meyer and Merkle-Damgård Constructions Akinori Hosoyamada and Kan Yasuda NTT Secure Platform Laboratories, 3-9-, Midori-cho Musashino-shi,
More informationHashes and Message Digests Alex X. Liu & Haipeng Dai
Hashes and Message Digests Alex X. Liu & Haipeng Dai haipengdai@nju.edu.cn 313 CS Building Department of Computer Science and Technology Nanjing University Integrity vs. Secrecy Integrity: attacker cannot
More informationNew Preimage Attack on MDC-4
New Preimage Attack on MDC-4 Deukjo Hong and Daesung Kwon Abstract In this paper, we provide some cryptanalytic results for double-blocklength (DBL) hash modes of block ciphers, MDC-4. Our preimage attacks
More information1 Number Theory Basics
ECS 289M (Franklin), Winter 2010, Crypto Review 1 Number Theory Basics This section has some basic facts about number theory, mostly taken (or adapted) from Dan Boneh s number theory fact sheets for his
More informationCRYSTALS Kyber and Dilithium. Peter Schwabe February 7, 2018
CRYSTALS Kyber and Dilithium Peter Schwabe peter@cryptojedi.org https://cryptojedi.org February 7, 2018 Crypto today 5 building blocks for a secure channel Symmetric crypto Block or stream cipher (e.g.,
More informationNotes for Lecture A can repeat step 3 as many times as it wishes. We will charge A one unit of time for every time it repeats step 3.
COS 533: Advanced Cryptography Lecture 2 (September 18, 2017) Lecturer: Mark Zhandry Princeton University Scribe: Mark Zhandry Notes for Lecture 2 1 Last Time Last time, we defined formally what an encryption
More informationPost-Quantum Zero-Knowledge and Signatures from Symmetric-Key Primitives
Post-Quantum Zero-Knowledge and Signatures from Symmetric-Key Primitives Melissa Chase Microsoft Research melissac@microsoft.com Claudio Orlandi Aarhus University orlandi@cs.au.dk David Derler Graz University
More informationFoundations of Network and Computer Security
Foundations of Network and Computer Security John Black Lecture #6 Sep 8 th 2005 CSCI 6268/TLEN 5831, Fall 2005 Announcements Quiz #1 later today Still some have not signed up for class mailing list Perhaps
More information3C - A Provably Secure Pseudorandom Function and Message Authentication Code. A New mode of operation for Cryptographic Hash Function
3C - A Provably Secure Pseudorandom Function and Message Authentication Code. A New mode of operation for Cryptographic Hash Function Praveen Gauravaram 1, William Millan 1, Juanma Gonzalez Neito 1, Edward
More informationOn Post-Quantum Cryptography
On Post-Quantum Cryptography Ehsan Ebrahimi Quantum Cryptography Group University of Tartu, Estonia 15 March 2018 Information Security and Cryptography Group Seminar Post-Quantum Cryptography Users intend
More informationHigher Order Universal One-Way Hash Functions from the Subset Sum Assumption
Higher Order Universal One-Way Hash Functions from the Subset Sum Assumption Ron Steinfeld, Josef Pieprzyk, Huaxiong Wang Dept. of Computing, Macquarie University, Australia {rons, josef, hwang}@ics.mq.edu.au
More informationProvable Security in Symmetric Key Cryptography
Provable Security in Symmetric Key Cryptography Jooyoung Lee Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics, Sejong University July 5, 2012 Outline 1. Security Proof of Blockcipher-based Hash Functions K i E X
More informationProvable Chosen-Target-Forced-Midx Preimage Resistance
Provable Chosen-Target-Forced-Midx Preimage Resistance Elena Andreeva and Bart Mennink (K.U.Leuven) Selected Areas in Cryptography Toronto, Canada August 11, 2011 1 / 15 Introduction Hash Functions 2 /
More informationAn introduction to Hash functions
An introduction to Hash functions Anna Rimoldi eriscs - Universitée de la Méditerranée, Marseille Secondo Workshop di Crittografia BunnyTN 2011 A. Rimoldi (eriscs) Hash function 12 September 2011 1 / 27
More informationRandom Oracles in a Quantum World
Random Oracles in a Quantum World AsiaISG Research Seminars 2011/2012 Özgür Dagdelen, Marc Fischlin (TU Darmstadt) Dan Boneh, Mark Zhandry (Stanford University) Anja Lehmann (IBM Zurich) Christian Schaffner
More informationTHE RANK METHOD AND APPLICATIONS TO POST- QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY
THE RANK METHOD AND APPLICATIONS TO POST- QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY Mark Zhandry - Stanford University Joint work with Dan Boneh Classical Cryptography Post-Quantum Cryptography All communication stays classical
More informationIntroduction to cryptology (GBIN8U16) More on discrete-logarithm based schemes
Introduction to cryptology (GBIN8U16) More on discrete-logarithm based schemes Pierre Karpman pierre.karpman@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr https://www-ljk.imag.fr/membres/pierre.karpman/tea.html 2018 03 13 More
More informationStrongly Unforgeable Signatures Based on Computational Diffie-Hellman
Strongly Unforgeable Signatures Based on Computational Diffie-Hellman Dan Boneh 1, Emily Shen 1, and Brent Waters 2 1 Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA {dabo,emily}@cs.stanford.edu
More informationReassessing Grover s Algorithm
Reassessing Grover s Algorithm Scott Fluhrer Cisco Systems, USA sfluhrer@cisco.com Abstract. We note that Grover s algorithm (and any other quantum algorithm that does a search using an oracle) does not
More informationEncuentro de tesistas - 13 of november 2012 Valparaiso. Predicate Preserving Collision-Resistant Hashing. Philippe Camacho
Encuentro de tesistas - 13 of november 2012 Valparaiso Predicate Preserving Collision-Resistant Hashing Philippe Camacho Motivation I need to outsource my database for scaling reasons How can I be sure
More informationDigital signature schemes
Digital signature schemes Martin Stanek Department of Computer Science Comenius University stanek@dcs.fmph.uniba.sk Cryptology 1 (2017/18) Content Introduction digital signature scheme security of digital
More informationPractice Final Exam Winter 2017, CS 485/585 Crypto March 14, 2017
Practice Final Exam Name: Winter 2017, CS 485/585 Crypto March 14, 2017 Portland State University Prof. Fang Song Instructions This exam contains 7 pages (including this cover page) and 5 questions. Total
More informationDesign Paradigms for Building Multi-Property Hash Functions
Design Paradigms or Building Multi-Property Hash Functions Thomas Ristenpart UCSD Security and Cryptography Lab Lorentz Workshop June, 2008 Multi-property hash unctions One hash unction with many security
More informationApplied cryptography
Applied cryptography Identity-based Cryptography Andreas Hülsing 19 November 2015 1 / 37 The public key problem How to obtain the correct public key of a user? How to check its authenticity? General answer:
More informationTowards Tightly Secure Lattice Short Signature and Id-Based Encryption
Towards Tightly Secure Lattice Short Signature and Id-Based Encryption Xavier Boyen Qinyi Li QUT Asiacrypt 16 2016-12-06 1 / 19 Motivations 1. Short lattice signature with tight security reduction w/o
More informationCPSC 467: Cryptography and Computer Security
CPSC 467: Cryptography and Computer Security Michael J. Fischer Lecture 16 October 30, 2017 CPSC 467, Lecture 16 1/52 Properties of Hash Functions Hash functions do not always look random Relations among
More informationG Advanced Cryptography April 10th, Lecture 11
G.30-001 Advanced Cryptography April 10th, 007 Lecturer: Victor Shoup Lecture 11 Scribe: Kristiyan Haralambiev We continue the discussion of public key encryption. Last time, we studied Hash Proof Systems
More informationENEE 457: Computer Systems Security 09/19/16. Lecture 6 Message Authentication Codes and Hash Functions
ENEE 457: Computer Systems Security 09/19/16 Lecture 6 Message Authentication Codes and Hash Functions Charalampos (Babis) Papamanthou Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Maryland,
More informationCryptographic Solutions for Data Integrity in the Cloud
Cryptographic Solutions for Stanford University, USA Stanford Computer Forum 2 April 2012 Homomorphic Encryption Homomorphic encryption allows users to delegate computation while ensuring secrecy. Homomorphic
More informationLecture 5, CPA Secure Encryption from PRFs
CS 4501-6501 Topics in Cryptography 16 Feb 2018 Lecture 5, CPA Secure Encryption from PRFs Lecturer: Mohammad Mahmoody Scribe: J. Fu, D. Anderson, W. Chao, and Y. Yu 1 Review Ralling: CPA Security and
More informationFoundations of Network and Computer Security
Foundations of Network and Computer Security John Black Lecture #5 Sep 7 th 2004 CSCI 6268/TLEN 5831, Fall 2004 Announcements Please sign up for class mailing list by end of today Quiz #1 will be on Thursday,
More informationCounterexamples to Hardness Amplification Beyond Negligible
Counterexamples to Hardness Amplification Beyond Negligible Yevgeniy Dodis Abhishek Jain Tal Moran Daniel Wichs January 31, 2012 Abstract If we have a problem that is mildly hard, can we create a problem
More informationA Generic Hybrid Encryption Construction in the Quantum Random Oracle Model
A Generic Hybrid Encryption Construction in the Quantum Random Oracle Model Presented by: Angela Robinson Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Atlantic University April 4, 2018 Motivation Quantum-resistance
More informationChapter 7: Signature Schemes. COMP Lih-Yuan Deng
Chapter 7: Signature Schemes COMP 7120-8120 Lih-Yuan Deng lihdeng@memphis.edu Overview Introduction Security requirements for signature schemes ElGamal signature scheme Variants of ElGamal signature scheme
More informationPost-Quantum Cryptography
Post-Quantum Cryptography Prof. Dr. J. Buchmann Written by: P. Schmidt Last updated: February 25, 2010 1 Contents 1. Introduction 5 2. Motivation 5 3. Quantum Algorithms and Quantum Computers 6 3.1. The
More informationShort Signatures From Diffie-Hellman: Realizing Short Public Key
Short Signatures From Diffie-Hellman: Realizing Short Public Key Jae Hong Seo Department of Mathematics, Myongji University Yongin, Republic of Korea jaehongseo@mju.ac.kr Abstract. Efficient signature
More informationMessage Authentication Codes (MACs)
Message Authentication Codes (MACs) Tung Chou Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands October 8, 2015 1 / 22 About Me 2 / 22 About Me Tung Chou (Tony) 2 / 22 About Me Tung Chou (Tony) Ph.D.
More informationDigital Signatures from Strong RSA without Prime Genera7on. David Cash Rafael Dowsley Eike Kiltz
Digital Signatures from Strong RSA without Prime Genera7on David Cash Rafael Dowsley Eike Kiltz Digital Signatures Digital signatures are one of mostly deployed cryptographic primi7ves. Digital Signatures
More informationLecture 10: NMAC, HMAC and Number Theory
CS 6903 Modern Cryptography April 13, 2011 Lecture 10: NMAC, HMAC and Number Theory Instructor: Nitesh Saxena Scribes: Anand Desai,Manav Singh Dahiya,Amol Bhavekar 1 Recap 1.1 MACs A Message Authentication
More information