arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 3 Nov 2004
|
|
- Audra Stafford
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Noether s second theorem in a general setting. Reducible gauge theories D.Bashkirov 1, G.Giachetta 2, L.Mangiarotti 2, G.Sardanashvily 1 arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 3 Nov Department of Theoretical Physics, Moscow State University, Russia 2 Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Camerino, Italy Abstract: We prove Noether s direct and inverse second theorems for Lagrangian systems on fiber bundles in the case of gauge symmetries depending on derivatives of dynamic variables of an arbitrary order. The appropriate notions of reducible gauge symmetries and Noether s identities are formulated, and their equivalence is proved. 1 Introduction Different variants of Noether s second theorem state that, if a Lagrangian admits symmetries depending on parameters, its variational derivatives obey certain relations, called Noether s identities. In a rather general setting, this theorem has been formulated in [6]. We present Noether s second theorem and its inverse (Theorem 5.2) for Lagrangian systems on a fiber bundle X in the case of gauge symmetries depending on derivatives of dynamic variables of an arbitrary order. For this purpose, we consider Lagrangian formalism on the composite fiber bundle E X, where E is a vector bundle of gauge parameters. Accordingly, gauge transformations are represented by a linear differential operator υ on E taking its values into the vertical tangent bundle V of X. For instance, if transformations of parameters are independent of fields, E is the pull-back of some vector bundle E X onto. Noether s identity for a Lagrangian L is defined as a differential operator on the fiber bundle (3.9) which takes its values into the density-dual E = E n T X (1.1) of E and whose kernel contains the image of the Euler Lagrange operator δl of L, i.e., δl = 0 (Definition 5.1). Expressed in these terms, Noether s second theorem and its inverse follow at once from the first variational formula (Proposition 4.1) and the properties of differential operators on dual fiber bundles (Theorem 7.1). Namely, there exists the intertwining operator η(υ) = (7.3), η( ) = υ (7.4) such that η(η(υ)) = υ, η(η( )) =, (1.2) η(υ υ ) = η(υ ) η(υ), η( ) = η( ) η( ). (1.3) 1
2 The appropriate notions of reducible Noether s identities and gauge symmetries are formulated, and their equivalence with respect to the intertwining operator η is proved (Theorem 6.3). A particular attention is paid to global aspects of Noether s second theorem as a preliminary step of the global analysis of BV quantization [7, 9]. Here, we describe classical systems of even fields and gauge transformations. This description however fails to be algebraically self-contained. Firstly, Noether s identity does not determine transformations of gauge parameters because a classical Lagrangian is independent of gauge parameters. Secondly, the weak equality A 0 (i.e., A equals zero on-shell) is not algebraically formulated. In the framework of BV quantization, a Lagrangian depends on ghosts, its gauge symmetry is required to be nilpotent, and Euler Lagrange equations are replaced with the Koszul Tate differential δ acting on antifields [3]. In these terms, the conditions a 0, υ a 0 in Definitions 6.1 and 6.2 of reducible Noether s identities and gauge symmetries mean that the operators a and υ a are not δ-exact. 2 Preliminaries Recall that an r-order Lagrangian on a fiber bundle X is defined as a density L = Lω : J r n T X, ω = dx 1 dx n, n = dim X, (2.1) on the r-order jet manifold J r of sections of X. A k-order differential operator on a fiber bundle X with values into a fiber bundle Z X is defined as a section of the fiber bundle J k Z J k. It admits an m-order X jet prolongation (m) as a section of the fiber bundle J m+k J m Z J m+k. X By a differential operator throughout is meant its appropriate finite order jet prolongation. Given bundle coordinates (x λ, y i ) on and (x λ, z A ) on Z, a differential operator reads z A = A (x λ, y i Λ), z A Σ (m) = d Σ A, 0 Λ k, 0 Σ m, where d Σ are total derivatives (3.4). If Z is a composite fiber bundle π π Z : Z X and the relation π Z = π0 k holds, a differential operator is identified to a section of the fiber bundle J k Z J k or, equivalently, a bundle morphism J k Z. If Z is a vector bundle and 0 is its canonical zero section, Ker is defined as the inverse image of 0. Let W and Z be vector bundles over X. A k-order Z-valued differential operator on W X is called linear on W (or, simply, linear) if : J k W Z is a 2
3 morphism of the vector bundle J k W J k to the vector bundle Z over π k 0 : Jk. Given bundle coordinates (x λ, y i, w r ) on W and (x λ, y i, z A ) on Z, such an operator reads i = y i, A = 0 Ξ k 3 Lagrangian formalism on fiber bundles A,Ξ r (x λ, yλ i )wr Ξ, 0 Λ k. (2.2) In Lagrangian formalism on a fiber bundle X, we deal with the following graded differential algebra (henceforth GDA). Jet manifolds of X make up the inverse system X π π1 0 J 1 J r 1 πr r 1 J r. (3.1) In the sequel, the index r = 0 stands for. Accordingly, we have the direct system O X π O π1 0 O1 O r 1 πr r 1 Or (3.2) of GDAs O r of exterior forms on jet manifolds Jr with respect to the pull-back monomorphisms πr 1 r. Its direct limit O is a GDA consisting of all exterior forms on finite order jet manifolds modulo the pull-back identification. The projective limit (J, πr : J J r ) of the inverse system (3.1) is a Fréchet manifold [10]. A bundle atlas {(U ; x λ, y i )} of X yields the coordinate atlas {((π 0 ) 1 (U ); x λ, y i Λ)}, y i λ+λ = xµ x λd µy i Λ, 0 Λ, (3.3) of J, where Λ = (λ k...λ 1 ) is a symmetric multi-index, λ + Λ = (λλ k...λ 1 ), and d λ = λ + 0 Λ y i λ+λ Λ i, d Λ = d λr d λ1 (3.4) are the total derivatives. There is the GDA epimorphism O O U, called the restriction of O to the chart (3.3). Then O can be written in a coordinate form where the horizontal one-forms {dx λ } and the contact one-forms {θλ i = dyλ i yλ+λdx i λ } are generating elements of the O 0 U -algebra O U. Though J is not a smooth manifold, the coordinate transformations of elements of O are smooth because these elements are exterior forms on finite order jet manifolds. There is the canonical decomposition O = Ok,m of O into O0 -modules O k,m of k-contact and m-horizontal forms together with the corresponding projectors h k : O Ok, and hm : O O,m. Accordingly, the exterior differential on O is split into the sum d = d H + d V of the nilpotent total and vertical differentials d H (φ) = dx λ d λ (φ), d V (φ) = θ i Λ Λ i φ, φ O. 3
4 One also introduces the R-module projector = 0<k 1 k h k h n, (φ) = ( 1) Λ θ i [d Λ ( i Λ φ)], 0 Λ φ O >0,n, (3.5) of O such that d H = 0, and the nilpotent variational operator δ = d on O,n. Let us put E k = (O k,n ). Then the GDA O is split into the well-known variational bicomplex [2, 8, 9, 10]. Here, we are concerned with its variational complex 0 R O 0 d H O 0,1 dh O 0,n and the complex of one-contact forms 0 O 1,0 d H O 1,1 dh O 1,n They possess the following cohomology [1, 7, 8]. Theorem 3.1. δ δ E 1 E 2 (3.6) E 1 0. (3.7) (i) The cohomology of the variational complex (3.6) equals the de Rham cohomology of. (ii) The complex (3.7) is exact. Any finite order Lagrangian L (2.1) is an element of O 0,n, while δl = E i θ i ω = ( 1) Λ d Λ ( i Λ L)θi ω E 1 (3.8) 0 Λ is its Euler Lagrange operator taking the values into the vector bundle T ( n T X) = V Then item (i) of Theorem 3.1 states the following. Theorem 3.2. Every δ-closed Lagrangian L O 0,n is the sum n T X. (3.9) L = h 0 ψ + d H σ, σ O 0,n 1, (3.10) where ψ is a closed n-form on. Item (ii) of Theorem 3.1 provides the R-module decomposition O 1,n = E 1 d H (O 1,n 1 ). Given a Lagrangian L O 0,n, we have the corresponding decomposition dl = δl d H Ξ (3.11) where Ξ L = Ξ + L is a Lepagean equivalent of L. This decomposition leads to the first variational formula (4.4). 4
5 Given a Lagrangian L and its Euler-Lagrange operator δl (3.8), we further abbreviate A 0 with an equality which holds on-shell. This means that A is an element of a module over the ideal I L of the ring O 0 which is locally generated by the variational derivatives E i and their total derivations d Λ E i. In this case A vanishes on the kernel of an appropriate jet prolongation of the Euler Lagrange operator. However, the converse need not be true, unless this kernel is an imbedded submanifold. We say that I L is a differential ideal because, if a local functions f belongs to I L, then every total derivative d Λ f does as well. 4 Gauge symmetries in a general setting Let do 0 be the O 0 -module of derivations of the R-ring O 0. Any ϑ do 0 yields the graded derivation (the interior product) ϑ φ of the GDA O given by the relations ϑ df = ϑ(f), f O 0, ϑ (φ σ) = (ϑ φ) σ + ( 1) φ φ (ϑ σ), φ, σ O, and its derivation (the Lie derivative) L ϑ φ = ϑ dφ + d(ϑ φ), φ O, (4.1) L ϑ (φ φ ) = L ϑ (φ) φ + φ L ϑ (φ ). A derivation ϑ do 0 is called vertical if it vanishes on the subring C (X) O 0 of smooth functions on X. Hereafter, only vertical derivations are considered. A derivation ϑ is called contact if the Lie derivative L ϑ (4.1) preserves the contact ideal of the GDA O. Relative to an atlas (3.3), a contact derivation is given by the expression ϑ = 0 Λ d Λ υ i Λ i, (4.2) where { i Λ} is the dual to the basis {θi Λ } with respect to the interior product [9]. A contact derivation is completely determined by its summand υ = υ i (x λ, y i Λ ) i, 0 Λ k, (4.3) which is also a derivation of O 0. It is a section of the pull-back V J k J k of the vertical tangent bundle V onto J k [4] and, thus, is a k-order V -valued differential operator on. Accordingly, ϑ (4.2) is its infinite order jet prolongation. One calls υ (4.3) a generalized vector field on. Proposition 4.1. It follows from the splitting (3.11), that the Lie derivative of a Lagrangian L (2.1) along a contact derivation ϑ (4.2) admits the canonical decomposition L ϑ L = υ δl + d H (h 0 (ϑ Ξ L )), (4.4) 5
6 where Ξ L is a Lepagean equivalent of L [9]. A generalized vector field υ (4.3) is called a variational symmetry of a Lagrangian L if the Lie derivative L ϑ L (or, equivalently, υ δl) is a d H -exact form. A Lagrangian system on a fiber bundle X is said to be a gauge theory if its Lagrangian L admits a family of variational symmetries parameterized by elements of a vector bundle E as follows. Remark 4.1. In a general setting, one can consider a vector bundle E over some finite jet order manifold J m of. However, any vector bundle E J m is the pull-back onto J m of a vector bundle over because is a strong deformation retract of J m. Let E be a vector bundle coordinated by (x λ, y i, ξ r ). Given a Lagrangian L on, let us consider its pull-back, say again L, onto E. Let ϑ E be a contact derivation of the R-ring O 0 E, whose restriction ϑ = ϑ E O 0 = 0 Λ d Λ υ i Λ i (4.5) to O 0 O0 E is linear in coordinates ξr Ξ. It is determined by a generalized vector field υ E on E whose canonical projection υ : J k E υ E V E E V (see the exact sequence (4.8) below) is a linear V -valued differential operator υ = 0 Ξ m υ i,ξ r (x λ, y i Σ )ξr Ξ i (4.6) on E. Let ϑ E be a variational symmetry of a Lagrangian L on E, i.e., υ E δl = υ δl = d H σ. (4.7) Then one says that υ (4.6) is a gauge symmetry of a Lagrangian L. This is the case of Noether s second theorem. Note that any generalized vector field υ (4.6) gives rise to a generalized vector field υ E on E and, thus, defines a contact derivation ϑ E of O 0 E. Indeed, let us consider the exact sequence of vector bundles 0 V E V E E V 0, (4.8) where V E is the vertical tangent bundle of E. Its splitting Γ lifts υ to the generalized vector field υ E = Γ υ on E. However, the Lie derivative L ϑe L = υ δl + d H (h 0 (ϑ Ξ L )) 6
7 depends only on υ, but not a lift Γ. Remark 4.2. One can also consider a local-variational gauge symmetry ϑ E when the Lie derivative L ϑe L is δ-closed, but any local-variational gauge symmetry is variational as follows. By virtue of Theorem 3.2, L ϑe L takes the form (3.10) where ψ is a closed form on E. Since E is a vector bundle, is a strong deformation retract of E. Then any non-exact closed form on E is the pull-back of that on, i.e., it is independent on fiber coordinates ξ r. Since the Lie derivative L ϑ L is linear in ξλ, r it is always d H -exact, i.e., ϑ E is variational. 5 Noether s second theorem Let us start with the notion of Noether s identity. Definition 5.1. Given a Lagrangian L (2.1), we say that its Euler Lagrange operator δl (3.8) obeys Noether s identity if there exists a vector bundle E and a linear differential operator of order 0 m on the vector bundle (3.9) with the values into the density-dual E (1.1) of E such that δl = 0. (5.1) Given bundle coordinates (x λ, y i, y i ) on the fiber bundle (3.9) and (x λ, y i, ξ r ) on E, a differential operator in Definition 5.1 is represented by the density = r ξ r ω = i,λ r (x λ, yσ)y j Λi ξ r ω O 0,n [E V ], 0 Σ m. (5.2) Then Noether s identity (5.1) takes the coordinate form Remark 5.1. We will use the relations 0 Λ k 0 Λ k η(b) Λ = B Λ d Λ A = 0 Λ k ( 1) Λ d Λ (B Λ A) = 0 Σ k Λ i,λ r d Λ E i ξ r ω = 0. (5.3) ( 1) Λ d Λ (B Λ )A + d H σ, (5.4) 0 Λ k η(b) Λ d Λ A, (5.5) ( 1) Σ+Λ C Σ Σ+Λ d ΣB Σ+Λ, Cb a = b! a!(b a)!, (5.6) 7
8 for any exterior form A O Z and any local function BΛ O 0 Z on jet manifolds of a fiber bundle Z X. Since k ( 1) a Ck a = 0 for k > 0, it is easily verified that a=0 (η η)(b) Λ = B Λ. (5.7) Theorem 5.2. If a Lagrangian L (2.1) admits a gauge symmetry υ (4.6), its Euler Lagrange operator obeys Noether s identity (5.3) where i,λ r = η(υ) i,λ r = 0 Σ m Λ ( 1) Σ+Λ C Σ Σ+Λ d Συr i,σ+λ. (5.8) Conversely, if the Euler Lagrange operator of a Lagrangian L obeys Noether s identity (5.3), this Lagrangian admits a gauge symmetry υ (4.6) where υ i,λ r = η( ) i,λ r = 0 Σ m Λ ( 1) Σ+Λ C Σ Σ+Λ d Σ i,σ+λ r. (5.9) Proof. Given an operator υ (4.6), the operator = η(υ) expressed in the coordinate form (5.8) is defined in accordance with Theorem 7.1. Since the density is d H -exact, Noether s identity υ δl = υ i E i ω = 0 Ξ m υ i,ξ r ξ r Ξ E iω δ(υ δl) = η(υ) δl = 0 holds. Conversely, any operator (5.2) defines the generalized vector field υ = η( ) expressed in the coordinate form (5.9). Due to Noether s identity (5.3), we obtain 0 = 0 Ξ m ξ r i,λ r d Λ E i ω = i.e., υ is a gauge symmetry of L. υ i,ξ r ξ r Ξ E iω + d H σ = υ δl + dσ H, ( 1) Λ d Λ (ξ r i,λ r )E i ω + d H σ = By virtue of the relations (1.2), there is one-to-one correspondence between gauge symmetries of a Lagrangian L and Noether s identities for δl. Any Lagrangian L have gauge symmetries. In particular, there always exist trivial gauge symmetries υ = Λ Tr j,i,λ E j ξλ r i, Tr j,i,λ = Tr i,j,λ. 8
9 Furthermore, given a gauge symmetry υ (4.6), let h be a linear differential operator on some vector bundle E, coordinated by (x λ, y i, ξ s ), with values into the vector bundle E. Then the composition υ 0 = υ h = υ i,λ s ξ s Λ i, υ i,λ s = Ξ+Ξ =Λ 0 Σ m Ξ υr i,ξ+σ d Σ h r,ξ s, is a gauge symmetry of the pull-back of a Lagrangian L onto E. In view of this ambiguity, we agree to say that a gauge symmetry υ (4.6) of a Lagrangian L is complete if any different gauge symmetry υ 0 of L factorizes through υ as υ 0 = υ h + T, T 0. A complete gauge symmetry always exists, but the vector bundle of its parameters need not be finite-dimensional. Accordingly, given Noether s identity (5.1), let H be a linear differential operator on E with values into the density-dual E (1.1) of some vector bundle E. Then the composition = H also provides Noether s identity for δl. We agree to call Noether s identity (5.1) complete if any different differential operator possessing this property factorizes through as = H + F, F 0. Proposition 5.3. A gauge symmetry υ of a Lagrangian L is complete iff so is associated Noether s identity. Proof. The proof follows at once from Proposition 7.2. Given a gauge symmetry υ of L, let υ 0 be a different gauge symmetry. If η(υ) provides complete Noether s identity, then η(υ 0) = H η(υ) + F, F 0, and, by virtue of the relations (1.3), we have υ 0 = υ η(h) + η(f), where η(f) 0 because I L is a differential ideal. The converse is similarly proved. 6 Reducible gauge theories Recall that the notion of reducible Noether s identity has come from that of a reducible constraint [5], but it involves differential relations. 9
10 Definition 6.1. Complete Noether s identity (5.1) with 0 is said to be k-stage reducible (k = 0, 1,...) if there exist vector bundles E a and differential operators a, a = 0,..., k, such that: (i) a is a linear differential operator on the density-dual E a 1 of E a 1 with values into the density-dual E a of E a, where E 1 = E; (ii) a 0 for all a = 0,..., k; (iii) a a 1 0 for all a = 0,..., k, where 1 = ; (iv) if a is another differential operator possessing these properties, then it factorizes through a on-shell. In particular, a zero-stage reducible Noether s identity is called reducible. In this case, given bundle coordinates (x λ, y i, ξ r ) on E and (x λ, y i, ξ r 0 ) on E 0, a differential operator 0 reads 0 = 0 Ξ m 0 r,ξ r 0 ξ Ξr ξ r 0 ω. (6.1) Then the reduction condition 0 0 for Noether s identity (5.3) reads 0 Ξ m 0 r,ξ r 0 d Ξ ( i.e., the left hand-side of this expression takes the form 0 Σ m 0 +m i,λ r y Λi )ξ r 0 ω 0, (6.2) M i,σ r 0 y Σi ξ r 0 ω, where all the coefficients Mr i,σ 0 belong to the ideal I L. Given Noether s identity (5.3), one can think of the reduction condition (6.2) as being an equation for the local functions r,ξ r 0. If all its solutions vanish on-shell, Noether s identity is irreducible. Definition 6.2. A complete gauge symmetry υ 0 (4.6) is said to be k-stage reducible if there exist vector bundles E a and differential operators υ a, a = 0,..., k, such that: (i) υ a is a linear differential operator on the vector bundle E a with values into the vector bundle E a 1 ; (ii) υ a 0 for all a = 0,...,k; (iii) υ a 1 υ a 0 for all a = 0,...,k, where υ 1 = υ; (iv) if υ a is another differential operator possessing these properties, then υ a factorizes through υ a on-shell. Theorem 6.3. A gauge symmetry υ is k-stage reducible iff so is the associated Noether s identity. 10
11 Proof. The proof follows at once from Theorem 7.1 and Proposition 7.2. Let us put a = η(υ a ), a = 0,...,k. If υ a 0, then η(υ a ) 0 because I L is a differential ideal. By the same reason, if υ a 1 and υ a obey the reduction condition υ a 1 υ a 0, then η(υ a 1 υ a ) = η(υ a ) η(υ a 1 ) 0. The converse is justified in the same way. The equivalence of the conditions in items (iv) of Definitions 6.1 and 6.2 is proved similarly to that in Proposition Appendix. Differential operators on dual fiber bundles Given a fiber bundle X, let E and Q be vector bundles coordinated by (x λ, y i, ξ r ) and (x λ, y i, q a ), respectively. Let E and Q be their density-duals (1.1) coordinated by (x λ, y i, ξ r ) and (x λ, y i, q a ), respectively. Let υ be a linear Q-valued differential operator of order m on E. It is represented by the function υ = υ a q a = υr a,λ (x λ, yσ i )ξr Λ q a O 0 [E Q ], 0 Σ m. (7.1) Let be an m-order linear differential operator on the density-dual Q of Q with values into the density-dual E of E. It is represented by the density = r ξ r ω = a,λ r (x λ, y i Σ )q Λaξ r ω O 0,n [E Q ], 0 Σ m, (7.2) Theorem 7.1. E -valued differential operator Any linear Q-valued differential operator υ (7.1) on E yields the linear η(υ) = η(υ) a,λ r = η(υ) a,λ r q Λa ξ r ω, (7.3) 0 Σ m Λ ( 1) Σ+Λ C Σ Σ+Λ d Σ(υr a,σ+λ ), on Q. Conversely, any linear E -valued differential operator (7.2) on Q defines the linear Q-valued differential operator η( ) = η( ) a,λ r = on E. The relations (1.2) hold. η( ) a,λ r ξ r Λ q a, (7.4) 0 Σ m Λ ( 1) Σ+Λ C Σ Σ+Λ d Σ( a,σ+λ r ), 11
12 Proof. The function υ (7.1) defines the density Its Euler Lagrange operator υ = takes its values into the fiber bundle where V (E υ a,λ r ξ r Λ q aω O 0,n [E δ(υ) = E i dy i ω + E r dξ r ω + E a dq a ω V (E Q ) E Q n Q ]. (7.5) T X, (7.6) Q ) is the vertical cotangent bundle of the fiber bundle E Q X. Let α E : V (E Q ) V (E Q ) V E (7.7) be the canonical projection of V (E Q ) onto the vertical cotangent bundle V (E Q ) of the fiber bundle E Q and, afterwards, onto the vertical cotangent bundle V E of E. Then we obtain a differential operator (α E δ)(υ) on E Q with values into the fiber bundle V E n T X. It reads E (α E δ)(υ) = E r dξ r ω = ( 1) Λ d Λ (υr a,λ q a )dξ r ω, where {dξ r } is the fiber basis for V E E. Due to the canonical isomorphism V E = E E, this operator defines the density ( 1) Λ d Λ (υr a,λ q a )ξ r ω O 0,n [E Q ] and, by virtue of the formula (5.5), the desired differential operator (7.3). Conversely, the Euler Lagrange operator of the density (7.2) takes values into the fiber bundle (7.6) and reads δ(υ) = E i dy i ω + E r dξ r ω + E a dq a ω. (7.8) In order to repeat the above mentioned procedure, let us consider a volume form Jω on X and substitute dq a ω = Jdq a ω into the expression (7.8). Using the projection α Q : V (E Q ) V Q similar to α E (7.7) and the canonical isomorphism V Q = Q Q, we come to the density ( 1) Λ d Λ ( a,λ r ξ r )q a Jω O 0,n [E Q ] 12
13 and, hence, the function ( 1) Λ d Λ ( a,λ r ξ r )q a O 0 [E Q ], defining the desired operator (7.4). The relations (1.2) result from the relation (5.7). Relations (1.2) show that the intertwining operator η (7.3) (7.4) provides a bijection between the sets Diff(E, Q) and Diff(Q, E ) of differential operators (7.1) and (7.2). Proposition 7.2. Compositions of operators υ υ and obey the relations (1.3). Proof. It suffices to prove the first relation. Let υ υ Diff(E, Q) be a composition of differential operators υ Diff(E, Q) and υ Diff(E, E). Given fibered coordinate (ξ r ) on E, (ǫ p ) on E and (q a ) on Q, this composition defines the density (7.5) υ υ = Λ υr a,λ d Λ ( Σ υ r,σ p ǫ p Σ)q a ω. Following the relation (5.4), one can bring this density into the form Σ υ p r,σ ǫ p Σ Λ ( 1) Λ d Λ (υ a,λ r q a )ω + d H σ = Σ υ p r,σ ǫ p Σ Λ η(υ) a,λ r q Λa ω + d H σ. Its Euler Lagrange operator projected to V E E T X is Σ ( 1) Σ d Σ (υ r,σ p Λ η(υ) a,λ r q Λa )dǫ p ω = Σ η(υ ) r,σ p d Σ( Λ η(υ) a,λ r q Λa )dǫ p ω, that leads to the desired composition η(υ ) η(υ). References [1] Anderson, I. and Duchamp, T.: On the existence of global variational principles. Amer. J. Math. 102, (1980) [2] Anderson, I.: Introduction to the variational bicomplex. Contemp. Math. 132, (1992) [3] Barnich, G., Brandt, F. and Henneaux, M.: Local BRST cohomology in gauge theories. Phys. Rep. 338, (2000) [4] Fatibene, L., Ferraris, M., Francaviglia, M. and McLenaghan, R.: Generalized symmetries in mechanics and field theories. J. Math.. Phys. 43, (2002) 13
14 [5] Fish, M. and Henneaux, M.: Homological perturbation theory and algebraic structure of the antifield-antibracket formalism for gauge theories. Commun. Math. Phys (1990) [6] Fulp, R., Lada, T. and Stasheff, J.: Noether variational Theorem II and the BV formalism. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) Suppl. No. 71, (2003); E-print arxiv: math.qa/ [7] Giachetta, G., Mangiarotti, L. and Sardanashvily, G.: Iterated BRST cohomology. Lett. Math. Phys. 53, (2000) [8] Giachetta, G., Mangiarotti, L. and Sardanashvily, G.: Cohomology of the infinite-order jet space and the inverse problem. J. Math. Phys. 42, (2001) [9] Giachetta, G., Mangiarotti, L. and Sardanashvily, G.: Lagrangian supersymmetries depending on derivatives. Global analysis and cohomology. Commun. Math. Phys. (accepted); E-print arxiv: hep-th/ [10] Takens, F.: A global version of the inverse problem of the calculus of variations. J. Diff. Geom. 14, (1979) 14
Chapter 2 Noether s First Theorem
Chapter 2 Noether s First Theorem We here are concerned with Lagrangian theory on fibre bundles (Chap. 1). In this case, Noether s first theorem (Theorem 2.7) and Noether s direct second theorem (Theorem
More informationarxiv: v1 [math-ph] 2 Apr 2013
Deviation differential equations. Jacobi fields arxiv:1304.0706v1 [math-ph] 2 Apr 2013 G. SARDANASHVIL Department of Theoretical Physics, Moscow State University, 117234 Moscow, Russia Abstract Given a
More informationGroup Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations
Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations JUHA POHJANPELTO Oregon State and Aalto Universities Focused Research Workshop on Exterior Differential Systems and Lie Theory Fields Institute,
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v1 10 Nov 1995
Dirac Equation in Gauge and Affine-Metric Gravitation Theories arxiv:gr-qc/9511035v1 10 Nov 1995 1 Giovanni Giachetta Department of Mathematics and Physics University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy
More informationBędlewo. October 19, Glenn Barnich. Physique théorique et mathématique. Université Libre de Bruxelles & International Solvay Institutes
Będlewo. October 19, 2007 Glenn Barnich Physique théorique et mathématique Université Libre de Bruxelles & International Solvay Institutes Algebraic structure of gauge systems: Theory and Applications
More informationDeformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry
Deformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry Marco Zambon IAP annual meeting 2015 Symplectic manifolds Definition Let M be a manifold. A symplectic form is a two-form ω Ω 2 (M) which
More informationarxiv:math-ph/ v3 13 May 2005
Conservation laws for non global Lagrangians A. Borowiec, M. Ferraris, M. Francaviglia and M. Palese arxiv:math-ph/0301043v3 13 May 2005 Abstract In the Lagrangian framework for symmetries and conservation
More informationHigher-Spin Fermionic Gauge Fields & Their Electromagnetic Coupling
Higher-Spin Fermionic Gauge Fields & Their Electromagnetic Coupling Rakibur Rahman Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium March 28, 2012 CQUeST Workshop on Higher Spins & String Geometry Sogang University,
More informationInvariant Calculus with Vessiot
Invariant Calculus with Vessiot Irina Kogan (Yale University) August 13, 2002 Invariant Euler-Lagrange Equations and the Invariant Variational Bicomplex, I. Kogan, P.J.Olver. Maple package Vessiot for
More informationBACKGROUND IN SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY
BACKGROUND IN SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY NILAY KUMAR Today I want to introduce some of the symplectic structure underlying classical mechanics. The key idea is actually quite old and in its various formulations
More informationHigher-Spin Fermionic Gauge Fields & Their Electromagnetic Coupling
Higher-Spin Fermionic Gauge Fields & Their Electromagnetic Coupling Rakibur Rahman Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium April 18, 2012 ESI Workshop on Higher Spin Gravity Erwin Schrödinger Institute,
More informationIterated Differential Forms III: Integral Calculus
Iterated Differential Forms III: Integral Calculus arxiv:math/0610914v1 [math.dg] 30 Oct 2006 A. M. Vinogradov and L. Vitagliano DMI, Università degli Studi di Salerno and INFN, Gruppo collegato di Salerno,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math-ph] 13 Oct 2015
Noether s first theorem in Hamiltonian mechanics G. Sardanashvily Department of Theoretical Physics, Moscow State University, Russia Lepage Research Institute, Czech Republic arxiv:1510.03760v1 [math-ph]
More informationCHARACTERISTIC CLASSES
1 CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES Andrew Ranicki Index theory seminar 14th February, 2011 2 The Index Theorem identifies Introduction analytic index = topological index for a differential operator on a compact
More informationOrientation transport
Orientation transport Liviu I. Nicolaescu Dept. of Mathematics University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556-4618 nicolaescu.1@nd.edu June 2004 1 S 1 -bundles over 3-manifolds: homological properties Let
More informationON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS
ON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS RYAN E GRADY 1. L SPACES An L space is a ringed space with a structure sheaf a sheaf L algebras, where an L algebra is the homotopical
More informationGEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION
GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION 1. The basic idea The setting of the Hamiltonian version of classical (Newtonian) mechanics is the phase space (position and momentum), which is a symplectic manifold. The typical
More informationLECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES
LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES 1. Vector Bundles In general, smooth manifolds are very non-linear. However, there exist many smooth manifolds which admit very nice partial linear structures.
More informationM4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1
Problem Sheet. Let X and Y be n-dimensional topological manifolds. Prove that the disjoint union X Y is an n-dimensional topological manifold. Is S S 2 a topological manifold? 2. Recall that that the discrete
More informationThe Atiyah bundle and connections on a principal bundle
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) Vol. 120, No. 3, June 2010, pp. 299 316. Indian Academy of Sciences The Atiyah bundle and connections on a principal bundle INDRANIL BISWAS School of Mathematics, Tata
More informationChap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools
Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools 1. Manifold, Diffeomorphism 1.1. The Implicit Function Theorem ϕ : U R n R n p (0 p < n), of class C k (k 1) x 0 U such that ϕ(x 0 ) = 0 rank Dϕ(x) = n p x U
More informationNoether Symmetries and Conserved Momenta of Dirac Equation in Presymplectic Dynamics
International Mathematical Forum, 2, 2007, no. 45, 2207-2220 Noether Symmetries and Conserved Momenta of Dirac Equation in Presymplectic Dynamics Renato Grassini Department of Mathematics and Applications
More informationGEOMETRIC BRST QUANTIZATION
GEOMETRIC BRST QUANTIZATION José M. Figueroa-O Farrill and Takashi Kimura Institute for Theoretical Physics State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11794-3840, U. S. A. ABSTRACT We
More informationBRIAN OSSERMAN. , let t be a coordinate for the line, and take θ = d. A differential form ω may be written as g(t)dt,
CONNECTIONS, CURVATURE, AND p-curvature BRIAN OSSERMAN 1. Classical theory We begin by describing the classical point of view on connections, their curvature, and p-curvature, in terms of maps of sheaves
More informationPREQUANTIZATION OF SYMPLECTIC SUPERMANIFOLDS
Ninth International Conference on Geometry, Integrability and Quantization June 8 13, 2007, Varna, Bulgaria Ivaïlo M. Mladenov, Editor SOFTEX, Sofia 2008, pp 301 307 Geometry, Integrability and Quantization
More information1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle
1 1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle The main reference for this section is [8]. In the following, we consider (M, g) an n-dimensional smooth manifold endowed with a Riemannian metric g. 1.1. Notations
More informationCONSISTENT INTERACTIONS BETWEEN BF AND MASSIVE DIRAC FIELDS. A COHOMOLOGICAL APPROACH
Romanian Reports in Physics, Vol. 57, No., P. 89 03, 005 NUCLEAR PHYSICS. PARTICLE PHYSICS CONSISTENT INTERACTIONS BETWEEN BF AND MASSIVE DIRAC FIELDS. A COHOMOLOGICAL APPROACH EUGEN-MIHÃIÞÃ CIOROIANU,
More informationReminder on basic differential geometry
Reminder on basic differential geometry for the mastermath course of 2013 Charts Manifolds will be denoted by M, N etc. One should think of a manifold as made out of points (while the elements of a vector
More informationThe sh Lie structure of Poisson brackets in field theory
CGPG-96/1-7 UNC-MATH-97/3 The sh Lie structure of Poisson brackets in field theory G. Barnich 1,, R. Fulp 2, T. Lada 2 and J. Stasheff 3, arxiv:hep-th/9702176 v1 25 Feb 1997 1 Center for Gravitational
More informationNew Topological Field Theories from Dimensional Reduction of Nonlinear Gauge Theories
New Topological Field Theories from Dimensional Reduction of Nonlinear Gauge Theories Noriaki Ikeda Ritsumeikan University, Japan Collaboration with K.-I. Izawa and T. Tokunaga, N. I., Izawa, hep-th/0407243,
More informationThe BRST complex for a group action
BRST 2006 (jmf) 23 Lecture 3: The BRST complex for a group action In this lecture we will start our discussion of the homological approach to coisotropic reduction by studying the case where the coisotropic
More informationThe Cohomology of the Variational Bicomplex Invariant under the Symmetry Algebra of the Potential Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation
Nonlinear Mathematical Physics 997, V.4, N 3 4, 364 376. The Cohomology of the Variational Bicomplex Invariant under the Symmetry Algebra of the Potential Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation Juha POHJANPELTO
More informationBulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol 8(57), No Series III: Mathematics, Informatics, Physics, 43-56
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol 857, No. 1-2015 Series III: Mathematics, Informatics, Physics, 43-56 FIRST ORDER JETS OF BUNDLES OVER A MANIFOLD ENDOWED WITH A SUBFOLIATION Adelina
More informationGeometry 9: Serre-Swan theorem
Geometry 9: Serre-Swan theorem Rules: You may choose to solve only hard exercises (marked with!, * and **) or ordinary ones (marked with! or unmarked), or both, if you want to have extra problems. To have
More informationMath 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim
SOLUTIONS Dec 13, 218 Math 868 Final Exam In this exam, all manifolds, maps, vector fields, etc. are smooth. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each).
More informationLie algebra cohomology
Lie algebra cohomology Relation to the de Rham cohomology of Lie groups Presented by: Gazmend Mavraj (Master Mathematics and Diploma Physics) Supervisor: J-Prof. Dr. Christoph Wockel (Section Algebra and
More informationEuler-Poincaré reduction in principal bundles by a subgroup of the structure group
Euler-Poincaré reduction in principal bundles by a subgroup of the structure group M. Castrillón López ICMAT(CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM) Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain) Joint work with Pedro L. García,
More informationTransverse geometry. consisting of finite sums of monomials of the form
Transverse geometry The space of leaves of a foliation (V, F) can be described in terms of (M, Γ), with M = complete transversal and Γ = holonomy pseudogroup. The natural transverse coordinates form the
More informationDimensional Reduction of Invariant Fields and Differential Operators. II. Reduction of Invariant Differential Operators
Dimensional Reduction of Invariant Fields and Differential Operators. II. Reduction of Invariant Differential Operators Petko A. Nikolov and Nikola P. Petrov Abstract. In the present paper, which is a
More informationDe Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)
II. De Rham Cohomology There is an obvious similarity between the condition d o q 1 d q = 0 for the differentials in a singular chain complex and the condition d[q] o d[q 1] = 0 which is satisfied by the
More informationarxiv:alg-geom/ v1 29 Jul 1993
Hyperkähler embeddings and holomorphic symplectic geometry. Mikhail Verbitsky, verbit@math.harvard.edu arxiv:alg-geom/9307009v1 29 Jul 1993 0. ntroduction. n this paper we are studying complex analytic
More informationBRST 2006 (jmf) 7. g X (M) X ξ X. X η = [ξ X,η]. (X θ)(η) := X θ(η) θ(x η) = ξ X θ(η) θ([ξ X,η]).
BRST 2006 (jmf) 7 Lecture 2: Symplectic reduction In this lecture we discuss group actions on symplectic manifolds and symplectic reduction. We start with some generalities about group actions on manifolds.
More informationMaster of Science in Advanced Mathematics and Mathematical Engineering
Master of Science in Advanced Mathematics and Mathematical Engineering Title: Constraint algorithm for singular k-cosymplectic field theories Author: Xavier Rivas Guijarro Advisor: Francesc Xavier Gràcia
More informationON LIFTS OF SOME PROJECTABLE VECTOR FIELDS ASSOCIATED TO A PRODUCT PRESERVING GAUGE BUNDLE FUNCTOR ON VECTOR BUNDLES
ARCHIVUM MATHEMATICUM (BRNO) Tomus 50 (2014), 161 169 ON LIFTS OF SOME PROJECTABLE VECTOR FIELDS ASSOCIATED TO A PRODUCT PRESERVING GAUGE BUNDLE FUNCTOR ON VECTOR BUNDLES A. Ntyam, G. F. Wankap Nono, and
More informationNotes on the geometry of Lagrangian torus fibrations
Notes on the geometry of Lagrangian torus fibrations U. Bruzzo International School for Advanced Studies, Trieste bruzzo@sissa.it 1 Introduction These notes have developed from the text of a talk 1 where
More informationSYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction
SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS CRAIG JACKSON 1. Introduction Generally speaking, geometric quantization is a scheme for associating Hilbert spaces
More informationCohomology jump loci of local systems
Cohomology jump loci of local systems Botong Wang Joint work with Nero Budur University of Notre Dame June 28 2013 Introduction Given a topological space X, we can associate some homotopy invariants to
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 Sep 1996
Gauge Independence of the Lagrangian Path Integral in a Higher-Order Formalism arxiv:hep-th/9609037v2 Sep 996 I.A. Batalin I.E. Tamm Theory Division P.N. Lebedev Physics Institute Russian Academy of Sciences
More informationarxiv:math/ v4 [math.dg] 3 Sep 2006
DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND ODD SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY HOVHANNES M. KHUDAVERDIAN AND THEODORE TH. VORONOV arxiv:math/0606560v4 [math.dg] 3 Sep 2006 Abstract. We recall the main facts about the odd Laplacian acting
More informationHodge theory for bundles over C algebras
Hodge theory for bundles over C algebras Svatopluk Krýsl Mathematical Institute, Charles University in Prague Varna, June 2013 Symplectic linear algebra Symplectic vector space (V, ω 0 ) - real/complex
More informationMath 231b Lecture 16. G. Quick
Math 231b Lecture 16 G. Quick 16. Lecture 16: Chern classes for complex vector bundles 16.1. Orientations. From now on we will shift our focus to complex vector bundles. Much of the theory for real vector
More informationVector fields in the presence of a contact structure
Vector fields in the presence of a contact structure Valentin Ovsienko To cite this version: Valentin Ovsienko. Vector fields in the presence of a contact structure. Preprint ICJ. 10 pages. 2005.
More informationDerivations and differentials
Derivations and differentials Johan Commelin April 24, 2012 In the following text all rings are commutative with 1, unless otherwise specified. 1 Modules of derivations Let A be a ring, α : A B an A algebra,
More informationGeneralized complex geometry and topological sigma-models
Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models Anton Kapustin California Institute of Technology Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models p. 1/3 Outline Review of N = 2 sigma-models
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.dg] 19 Aug 2017
JACOBI BUNDLES AND THE BFV-COMPLEX arxiv:1601.04540v2 [math.dg] 19 Aug 2017 HÔNG VÂN LÊ, ALFONSO G. TORTORELLA, AND LUCA VITAGLIANO Abstract. We extend the construction of the BFV-complex of a coisotropic
More informationReduction of Symplectic Lie Algebroids by a Lie Subalgebroid and a Symmetry Lie Group
Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 3 (2007), 049, 28 pages Reduction of Symplectic Lie Algebroids by a Lie Subalgebroid and a Symmetry Lie Group David IGLESIAS, Juan Carlos
More informationWild ramification and the characteristic cycle of an l-adic sheaf
Wild ramification and the characteristic cycle of an l-adic sheaf Takeshi Saito March 14 (Chicago), 23 (Toronto), 2007 Abstract The graded quotients of the logarithmic higher ramification groups of a local
More informationEXTERIOR AND SYMMETRIC POWERS OF MODULES FOR CYCLIC 2-GROUPS
EXTERIOR AND SYMMETRIC POWERS OF MODULES FOR CYCLIC 2-GROUPS FRANK IMSTEDT AND PETER SYMONDS Abstract. We prove a recursive formula for the exterior and symmetric powers of modules for a cyclic 2-group.
More informationOn the Van Est homomorphism for Lie groupoids
Fields Institute, December 13, 2013 Overview Let G M be a Lie groupoid, with Lie algebroid A = Lie(G) Weinstein-Xu (1991) constructed a cochain map VE: C (G) C (A) from smooth groupoid cochains to the
More informationA Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections
A Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections Manabu AKAHO Department of Mathematics Tokyo Metropolitan University akaho@math.metro-u.ac.jp 1 Introduction There are several kinds of Floer
More informationComplex line bundles. Chapter Connections of line bundle. Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let
Chapter 1 Complex line bundles 1.1 Connections of line bundle Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let be the space of k-forms with values in L. Ω k (M, L) = C (M, L k (T M)) Definition
More informationFrom symplectic to spin geometry
From symplectic to spin geometry Jean-Philippe Michel University of Luxembourg Jean-Philippe MICHEL (UL) NCTS-CPT Workshop Hsinshu, 24-02-2011 1 / 16 Quantization for spinless system classical quantum
More informationLet V, W be two finite-dimensional vector spaces over R. We are going to define a new vector space V W with two properties:
5 Tensor products We have so far encountered vector fields and the derivatives of smooth functions as analytical objects on manifolds. These are examples of a general class of objects called tensors which
More informationQUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday September 21, 2004 (Day 1)
QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday September 21, 2004 (Day 1) Each of the six questions is worth 10 points. 1) Let H be a (real or complex) Hilbert space. We say
More informationA geometric solution of the Kervaire Invariant One problem
A geometric solution of the Kervaire Invariant One problem Petr M. Akhmet ev 19 May 2009 Let f : M n 1 R n, n = 4k + 2, n 2 be a smooth generic immersion of a closed manifold of codimension 1. Let g :
More information1 Introduction and preliminaries notions
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol 2(51) - 2009 Series III: Mathematics, Informatics, Physics, 193-198 A NOTE ON LOCALLY CONFORMAL COMPLEX LAGRANGE SPACES Cristian IDA 1 Abstract In
More informationCOMPUTING THE POISSON COHOMOLOGY OF A B-POISSON MANIFOLD
COMPUTING THE POISSON COHOMOLOGY OF A B-POISSON MANIFOLD MELINDA LANIUS 1. introduction Because Poisson cohomology is quite challenging to compute, there are only very select cases where the answer is
More informationINTEGRATION OF TWISTED POISSON STRUCTURES ALBERTO S. CATTANEO AND PING XU
INTEGRATION OF TWISTED POISSON STRUCTURES ALBERTO S. CATTANEO AND PING XU Abstract. Poisson manifolds may be regarded as the infinitesimal form of symplectic groupoids. Twisted Poisson manifolds considered
More informationMath 225B: Differential Geometry, Final
Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Final Ian Coley March 5, 204 Problem Spring 20,. Show that if X is a smooth vector field on a (smooth) manifold of dimension n and if X p is nonzero for some point of
More informationIntroduction to finite element exterior calculus
Introduction to finite element exterior calculus Ragnar Winther CMA, University of Oslo Norway Why finite element exterior calculus? Recall the de Rham complex on the form: R H 1 (Ω) grad H(curl, Ω) curl
More informationContact Transformations in Classical Mechanics
Nonlinear Mathematical Physics 1997, V.4, N 1 2, 117 123. Contact Transformations in Classical Mechanics Yurij YAREMKO Institute for Condensed Matter Physics of the Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences,
More informationHomogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky
Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds Dmitri V. Alekseevsky Hamburg,14-18 July 2008 1 The talk is based on a joint work with C.Medori and A.Tomassini (Parma) See ArXiv 0806.2272, where also a survey
More informationHiggs Bundles and Character Varieties
Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties David Baraglia The University of Adelaide Adelaide, Australia 29 May 2014 GEAR Junior Retreat, University of Michigan David Baraglia (ADL) Higgs Bundles and Character
More informationHolomorphic line bundles
Chapter 2 Holomorphic line bundles In the absence of non-constant holomorphic functions X! C on a compact complex manifold, we turn to the next best thing, holomorphic sections of line bundles (i.e., rank
More informationVector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo. 1. The notion of vector bundle
Vector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo Notes(* prepared for the First Summer School on Complex Geometry (Villarrica, Chile 7-9 December 2010 1 The notion of vector bundle In affine geometry,
More informationHomotopy Lie Algebroids
Homotopy Lie Algebroids Luca Vitagliano Università di Salerno, Italy Geometry of PDEs and Integrability 14 18 October 2013, Teplice nad Bečvou, Czech Republic Luca Vitagliano Homotopy Lie Algebroids 1
More informationAcceleration bundles on Banach and Fréchet manifolds
Acceleration bundles on Banach and JGP Editorial Board Scientific Meeting In commemoration of André Lichnerowicz 27-29 June 2006, International School for Advanced Studies, Miramare, Trieste Italy C.T.J.
More informationSheaves of Lie Algebras of Vector Fields
Sheaves of Lie Algebras of Vector Fields Bas Janssens and Ori Yudilevich March 27, 2014 1 Cartan s first fundamental theorem. Second lecture on Singer and Sternberg s 1965 paper [3], by Bas Janssens. 1.1
More informationCOHOMOLOGY OF FOLIATED FINSLER MANIFOLDS. Adelina MANEA 1
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol 4(53), No. 2-2011 Series III: Mathematics, Informatics, Physics, 23-30 COHOMOLOGY OF FOLIATED FINSLER MANIFOLDS Adelina MANEA 1 Communicated to: Finsler
More informationINSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD
INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD () Instanton (definition) (2) ADHM construction (3) Compactification. Instantons.. Notation. Throughout this talk, we will use the following notation:
More informationSpin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy
Spin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy 0. Introduction. The purpose of this addendum to the earlier notes on spinors is to outline the construction of Lorentzian metrics in
More informationHARMONIC COHOMOLOGY OF SYMPLECTIC FIBER BUNDLES
HARMONIC COHOMOLOGY OF SYMPLECTIC FIBER BUNDLES OLIVER EBNER AND STEFAN HALLER Abstract. We show that every de Rham cohomology class on the total space of a symplectic fiber bundle with closed Lefschetz
More informationCOSYMPLECTIC REDUCTION OF CONSTRAINED SYSTEMS WITH SYMMETRY
Vol. XX (XXXX) No. X COSYMPLECTIC REDUCTION OF CONSTRAINED SYSTEMS WITH SYMMETRY Frans Cantrijn Department of Mathematical Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University Krijgslaan 281 - S9, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
More informationLecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems
Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems (Courses in canonical gravity) Yaser Tavakoli December 15, 2014 1 Introduction In canonical formulation of general relativity, geometry of space-time is given
More informationThe inverse problem for Lagrangian systems with certain non-conservative forces
The inverse problem for Lagrangian systems with certain non-conservative forces Tom Mestdag Ghent University (Belgium) http://users.ugent.be/ tmestdag Joint work with Mike Crampin and Willy Sarlet Example
More informationDirac Structures on Banach Lie Algebroids
DOI: 10.2478/auom-2014-0060 An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa Vol. 22(3),2014, 219 228 Dirac Structures on Banach Lie Algebroids Vlad-Augustin VULCU Abstract In the original definition due to A. Weinstein
More informationHungry, Hungry Homology
September 27, 2017 Motiving Problem: Algebra Problem (Preliminary Version) Given two groups A, C, does there exist a group E so that A E and E /A = C? If such an group exists, we call E an extension of
More informationA MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS
A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS FRANCESCO BOTTACIN Abstract. In this paper we prove an analogue of the Marsden Weinstein reduction theorem for presymplectic actions of
More informationA Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds
arxiv:math/0312251v1 [math.dg] 12 Dec 2003 A Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds Haibao Duan Institute of Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, dhb@math.ac.cn
More informationTHE QUANTUM CONNECTION
THE QUANTUM CONNECTION MICHAEL VISCARDI Review of quantum cohomology Genus 0 Gromov-Witten invariants Let X be a smooth projective variety over C, and H 2 (X, Z) an effective curve class Let M 0,n (X,
More informationIsomorphism classes for Banach vector bundle structures of second tangents. Dodson, CTJ and Galanis, GN and Vassiliou, E. MIMS EPrint: 2005.
Isomorphism classes for Banach vector bundle structures of second tangents Dodson, CTJ and Galanis, GN and Vassiliou, E 2006 MIMS EPrint: 2005.47 Manchester Institute for Mathematical Sciences School of
More informationHamilton-Jacobi theory on Lie algebroids: Applications to nonholonomic mechanics. Manuel de León Institute of Mathematical Sciences CSIC, Spain
Hamilton-Jacobi theory on Lie algebroids: Applications to nonholonomic mechanics Manuel de León Institute of Mathematical Sciences CSIC, Spain joint work with J.C. Marrero (University of La Laguna) D.
More informationDynamical systems on Leibniz algebroids
Dynamical systems on Leibniz algebroids Gheorghe Ivan and Dumitru Opriş Abstract. In this paper we study the differential systems on Leibniz algebroids. We introduce a class of almost metriplectic manifolds
More informationSome aspects of the Geodesic flow
Some aspects of the Geodesic flow Pablo C. Abstract This is a presentation for Yael s course on Symplectic Geometry. We discuss here the context in which the geodesic flow can be understood using techniques
More informationLECTURE 2. (TEXED): IN CLASS: PROBABLY LECTURE 3. MANIFOLDS 1. FALL TANGENT VECTORS.
LECTURE 2. (TEXED): IN CLASS: PROBABLY LECTURE 3. MANIFOLDS 1. FALL 2006. TANGENT VECTORS. Overview: Tangent vectors, spaces and bundles. First: to an embedded manifold of Euclidean space. Then to one
More informationDeterminant Bundle in a Family of Curves, after A. Beilinson and V. Schechtman
Commun. Math. Phys. 211, 359 363 2000) Communications in Mathematical Physics Springer-Verlag 2000 Determinant Bundle in a Family of Curves, after A. Beilinson and V. Schechtman Hélène snault 1, I-Hsun
More informationGauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity
Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity Jon Allen The Dirac formalism for dealing with constraints in a canonical Hamiltonian formulation is reviewed. Gauge freedom is discussed and
More informationwhere m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism
8. Smoothness and the Zariski tangent space We want to give an algebraic notion of the tangent space. In differential geometry, tangent vectors are equivalence classes of maps of intervals in R into the
More informationLie Algebra Cohomology
Lie Algebra Cohomology Carsten Liese 1 Chain Complexes Definition 1.1. A chain complex (C, d) of R-modules is a family {C n } n Z of R-modules, together with R-modul maps d n : C n C n 1 such that d d
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 18 Oct 2003
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) Vol. 113, No. 2, May 2003, pp. 139 152. Printed in India The Jacobian of a nonorientable Klein surface arxiv:math/0310288v1 [math.ag] 18 Oct 2003 PABLO ARÉS-GASTESI
More information