A Method to Teach the Parameterization of All Stabilizing Controllers
|
|
- Jemima Gregory
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Preprints of the 8th FAC World Congress Milano (taly) August 8 - September, A Method to Teach the Parameterization of All Stabilizing Controllers Vladimír Kučera* *Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Republic (Tel: ; kucera@fel.cvut.cz). Abstract: A simple insightful method to teach the oula-kučera parameterization of all controllers that stabilize a given plant is presented. The text is intended for first-year graduate students in engineering. The result is derived first using transfer functions. A state-space representation of all stabilizing controllers then evolves from the transfer function result. Thus, the transfer functions the state-space techniques are presented as connected approaches rather than isolated alternatives. Keywords: Linear systems, feedback stabilization, oula-kučera parameterization, control education.. TROUCTO The parameterization of all controllers that stabilize a given plant, often called the oula-kučera parameterization, is a fundamental result of control theory. t launched an entirely new area of research found application, among others, in optimal robust control. n its original form, the result was obtained for finitedimensional, linear time-invariant systems using transfer function methods, see Larin et al. (97), Kučera (975), oula et al. (976a, b), Kučera (979). t was then generalized to cover time-varying systems by e.g. ale Smith (993), infinite dimensional systems by e.g. esoer et al. (98), Vidyasagar (985), Quadrat (3), a class of non-linear systems by e.g. ammer (985), Paice Moore (99), Anderson (998). Quite naturally, a state-space representation of all stabilizing controllers was derived for finite dimensional, linear time-invariant systems; see ett et al. (984). Modern textbooks on the subject include Antsaklis Michel (6) Colaneri et al. (997). This paper presents a simple insightful method to teach the parameterization result. t is intended for first-year graduate students in engineering. The transfer function result is derived first. A state-space representation of all stabilizing controllers then evolves from the transfer function result. Thus, the transfer functions the state-space techniques are presented as connected approaches rather than isolated alternatives.. TRASFER FUCTO APPROAC Stability is achieved by feedback. Consider systems S S connected in the feedback configuration shown in Fig.. The systems are assumed to be continuous-time, linear timeinvariant. The case of discrete-time systems is analogous. Stability is taken to mean that the states of S S go to zero from any initial condition as time increases. Given S, the task is to determine all systems S so that the feedback system, S, is stable. Thus S is called the plant S the stabilizing controller. For any given plant, the set of stabilizing controllers is either empty or infinite. Thus it is convenient to describe the set in parametric form. Suppose that the plant is described by state-space equations of the form x Ax + Bu, y Cx + u () or by the transfer function A B ( C( s A) B + :. () C The transfer function () is a proper rational matrix such that y u holds, where y, u denotes the one-sided Laplace transforms of y, u. ere below, the arguments of time functions as well as of their Laplace transforms are dropped, for the sake of brevity, when no ambiguity occurs. The special notation for the transfer function matrix that is introduced in () will be found useful when studying the relations between the state-space the transfer-function descriptions. Fig.. Feedback system S. The feedback system S is required to be well posed, that is to say, described by state-space equations of the same form as S S are. Then, the first observation is that the feedback system S is controllable from inputs r r observable from outputs y y if only if the constituent systems S S are both controllable observable. This can be seen from the eigenvalue criterion. As a consequence, stability of the feedback system can be studied using transfer functions. Copyright by the nternational Federation of Automatic Control (FAC) 6355
2 Preprints of the 8th FAC World Congress Milano (taly) August 8 - September, The transfer function matrix,, of the feedback system S that relates inputs r, r outputs y, y is given by, (3) where are the transfer function matrices of S S, respectively. This can easily be obtained from the signal relationships in Fig.. Thus, suppose for the present that S S are jointly controllable observable. The feedback system S is seen to be well posed if only if ( is proper (that is, analytic at s ). Then the feedback system S is stable if only if ( is stable (that is, analytic in Re s ).. Fractional escriptions The set of stabilizing controllers for a given plant may contain controllers whose transfer function is not proper. n order to isolate only those with proper transfer functions, it is convenient to express the transfer function of the plant in the form of a proper stable matrix fractional description. Thus, let, (4) where, is a pair of right coprime, proper stable rational matrices, while, is a pair of left coprime, proper stable rational matrices. Similarly, for the controller, let, (5) where, is a pair of left coprime, proper stable rational matrices, while, is a pair of right coprime, proper stable rational matrices. Then the closed-loop system transfer function is proper stable if only if U (6) or, (7) U where U U are unimodular proper stable rational matrices, that is, proper stable rational matrices whose inverses exist are proper stable rational. To prove this result, consider (6) first. t follows that U Thus, in view of (3), U U. U [ ] +. Since, are right coprime, seen to be proper stable if only if stable. ow consider (7). t follows that U Thus, in view of (3), U left coprime, is U is proper U. U [ ] +. Since, are right coprime, left coprime, is seen to be proper stable if only if U is proper stable. This completes the proof of conditions (6) (7) for closed-loop stability in terms of fractional descriptions.. Bézout dentity The proper stable rational matrices, being right coprime, there exist two other proper stable rational matrices, such that +. (8) The proper stable rational matrices, being left coprime, there exist two other proper stable rational matrices, such that +. (9) t follows from (4) that. () Finally, the matrices, can be selected in such a way as to satisfy. () ndeed, if Q for some pair, that satisfies (9), then the pair + Q, Q will satisfy both (9) (). Collecting identities (8), (9), (), (), one obtains the matrix Bézout identity 6356
3 Preprints of the 8th FAC World Congress Milano (taly) August 8 - September,. () For the present, we assume that the plant S the controller S are jointly controllable observable. This proviso makes it possible to refer to the transfer function results..3 Parameterization of Stabilizing Controllers ote that () defines one stabilizing controller, namely. Any all controllers having proper transfer function, with the property that the feedback system S is well posed stable, are now provided in parametric form. Theorem. Let be coprime, proper stable matrix fractional descriptions. Let,, be proper stable rational matrices that satisfy the Bézout identity (). Then all proper that render the closed-loop feedback system well posed stable are given by ( + W) ( W ) (3) ( W )( + W ), where the parameter, W, is a proper stable rational matrix such that ( + W or ( + W exists is proper. ) ) Proof. All proper stabilizing are generated by all solutions of equation (6), written in the form ( U ) + ( U ). The solution set can be parameterized as U + W, U W, where W is an arbitrary proper stable rational matrix. This follows by direct substitution the use of (8), (). Thus, in view of (5), all proper stabilizing are given by ( U ) ( U ) ( + W) ( W ). Alternatively, all proper stabilizing are generated by all solutions of equation (7), written in the form ( U ) + ( U ). The solution set can be parameterized as U + W, U, W where W is an arbitrary proper stable rational matrix. This follows by direct substitution the use of (9), (). Thus, in view of (5), all proper stabilizing are given by. ( U )( U ) ( W )( + W ) W W (3) holds. This completes the ow () implies proof. 3. STATE SPACE APPROAC The best way of presenting the oula-kučera parameterization in state space is to follow the three steps of the transfer function approach translate each into the state-space parlance. This provides a connected result rather than two isolated alternatives. 3. Fractional escription Given the state-space description () of the plant to be stabilized, we seek appropriate stable systems, each giving rise to a pair of transfer functions that defines the desired fractional description. This can be achieved by applying a stabilizing state feedback a stabilizing output injection. To obtain a right fractional description for, consider any stabilizing state feedback u Fx + r around the plant. The resulting equations x ( A + BF) x + Br u Fx + r y ( C + F) x + r define a stable system with one input, r, two outputs, u y. enote A + BF B : F the transfer function between r u denote A + BF B : C + F the transfer function between r y. Then are proper stable rational matrices it holds y, r u r. (4) t follows that y u u so that, is a right matrix fractional description for. To obtain a left fractional description for, consider the dual situation, namely a state observer for the plant based on any stabilizing output injection Ke, where e y ( Cx + u) is the difference between the actual output the estimated output. The resulting equations x ( A KC) x + ( B K) u + Ky e y ( Cx + u) define a stable system with two inputs, u y, one output, e. enote A KC K : C the transfer function between y e denote A KC B K : C the transfer function between u e. Then are proper stable rational matrices it holds 6357
4 Preprints of the 8th FAC World Congress Milano (taly) August 8 - September, e y u ( ) r (5) because e is independent of r. t follows that so that, is a left matrix fractional description for. 3. Bézout dentity The matrix fractional descriptions for the controller can be constructed in a like fashion. To obtain a right fractional description for, consider a stabilizing state feedback u Fx around the observer with output y. The resulting equations x ( A + BF) x + Ke u Fx y ( C + F) x + e define a stable system with one input, e, two outputs, u y. enote A + BF K : (6) C + F the transfer function between e y denote A + BF K : (7) F the transfer function between e u. Then are proper stable rational matrices it holds û ê, ŷ ê. (8) t follows that û ŷ ŷ so that, is a right matrix fractional description for. To obtain a left fractional description for, consider a stabilizing state feedback u Fx + r around the observer with output r. The resulting equations x ( A KC) x + ( B K) u + Ky r Fx + u define a stable system with two inputs, u y, one output, r. enote A KC B K : (9) F the transfer function between u r denote A KC K : () F the transfer function between y r. Then are proper stable rational matrices it holds r ( ) y + u e () as r is independent of e. t follows that so that, is a left matrix fractional description for. Collecting equations (4), (5), (8), (), one obtains in matrix form r u () e y u r. (3) y e Thus, the Bézout identity () holds each of the four fractional descriptions involved is actually coprime. 3.3 Parameterization of Stabilizing Controllers Putting r in () (3), it follows that (4) is one stabilizing controller for. Thus it is plausible that involving a parameter in generating r one obtains all stabilizing controllers. Accordingly, we put r We. (5) Then () implies that [ r W ] [ W ] e ( + W ) u + ( W ) y u y while (3) implies that u W W e ( ) e. y ( + W ]) e ence the parameterization formula (3) follows ( + W) ( W ) ( W ) ( + W ). This shows that the parameter W introduced in (5) does generate any all stabilizing controllers. 3.4 State-Space Representation of Stabilizing Controllers A state-space representation of the stabilizing controller (4), which corresponds to r, is inferred from (6), (7) or (9), (). t consists of an asymptotic state observer a stabilizing state feedback from the estimated state. The entire 6358
5 Preprints of the 8th FAC World Congress Milano (taly) August 8 - September, set of stabilizing controllers is then generated by putting r We as follows, x Ax + Bu + K [ y ( Cx + u)] u Fx + W ( q)[ y ( Cx + u)], where the parameter W is an arbitrary proper stable rational matrix in the differential operator q : d / dt is such that the feedback system is well posed. A state-space representation of all stabilizing controllers is shown in Fig.. by s, ( (. s + s + The Bézout identity is completed by solving the equations + + to obtain, Thus,. s ( s ) W + W, s + s + where W is an arbitrary proper stable rational function. ote that the indicated inverse exists is proper for any W. For example, W implies. Following the state-space approach, we first construct an asymptotic state observer Fig.. A state-space representation of all stabilizing controllers. Thus, every stabilizing controller can be viewed as a combination of an asymptotic state observer a stabilizing feedback from the estimated state, plus an additional system that depends on the parameter W. The order of any stabilizing controller is the order of the plant plus the order of a statespace realization of W. Thus the set of stabilizing controllers contains controllers of arbitrarily high order. The initial assumption of controllability observability for the plant the controller can be relaxed. f the plant is uncontrollable /or unobservable, then the closed-loop system has an uncontrollable /or unobservable eigenvalue. Such an eigenvalue is invariant under state feedback /or output injection. Thus, for all such eigenvalues to be stable, the plant must be stabilizable detectable. This is a necessary sufficient condition for the stabilization of a plant given by () using the feedback configuration of Fig.. t is to be noted that a stabilizing controller can also turn uncontrollable /or unobservable provided it is jointly stabilizable detectable. x u + K( y x) (6) with an output injection gain K such that A KC K is stable, hence K >. We then apply a stabilizing state feedback u Fx + r with a gain F such that A + BF F is stable, hence F <. We complete the design of all stabilizing controllers that have a proper transfer function by adding a term that depends on the parameter, W, as follows u Fx + W ( q)( y x), (7) where W is an arbitrary proper stable rational function in the differential operator q. ote that the closed-loop system is well posed for any W. For example, W implies F K ( s ) F K. The stabilizing controllers described by (6) (7) are shown in Fig EAMPLE Simple examples are most illustrative. Consider an integrator plant described by the equations x u, y x, which correspond to () with A, B, C,. The transfer function of the plant is. s etermine all stabilizing controllers with proper transfer function using the transfer-function approach. Proper stable fractional descriptions of are provided, for example, Fig. 3. The set of all controllers that stabilize an integrator. Any stabilizing controller in the set has order at least one. The McMillan degree of its transfer function may be lower, however, in case the controller is uncontrollable /or unobservable. For example, the parameter 6359
6 Preprints of the 8th FAC World Congress Milano (taly) August 8 - September, q + K F + KF W ( q) q + yields the controller F + K K ( ) ( ) + K F + KF K F + KF F + that is uncontrollable unobservable, of McMillan degree zero. t corresponds to the controller effected byw. On the other h, if it is of interest to obtain the controller that corresponds to W in (5) by employing transfer function techniques, put s, ( s, (. s + K s + K Complete the Bézout identity while enforcing strictly proper. n this case, s + ( K F) KF, s + K s + K s + ( K F) KF, Then. s + ( K F) ( s + K KF. s + ( K F) 5. COCLUSOS KF KF s + ( K F) s + K The transfer function approach to determining all controllers with proper transfer function that stabilize a given plant consists of three steps: (i) determine coprime, proper stable fractional descriptions for, (ii) solve a Bézout equation to obtain one stabilizing controller, (iii) form the transfer functions of all stabilizing controllers using a parameter that is a proper stable rational matrix. The state space approach to determining all controllers S with proper transfer function that stabilize a given plant S consists of two steps: (i) obtain one stabilizing controller by constructing an asymptotic state observer for S applying a stabilizing state feedback from the estimated state, (ii) form all stabilizing controllers S by connecting to the initial controller a parameter that is a system with proper stable rational transfer function. Thus, in the state space approach, there is no need to construct proper stable fractional descriptions for the plant, or to solve the Bézout equation. The observer-based stabilizing controller is given directly by stabilizing gains F K. A particular selection of F K then corresponds to a choice of a particular proper stable fractional description used in the transfer-function approach. The transfer function result is the result of reference it is amenable to generalizations for time-varying, infinitedimensional, nonlinear systems. The state space result is simple useful in the design of control systems. ACKOWLEGMET Supported by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic, Project M567 Center for Applied Cybernetics. REFERECES Anderson, B..O. (998). From oula-kucera to identification, adaptive nonlinear control. Automatica, 34, Antsaklis, P.J. Michel, A.. (6). Linear Systems. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. Colaneri, P., Geromel, J.C., Locatelli, A. (997). Control Theory esign: An R R Viewpoint. Academic Press, San iego, CA. ale, W.., Smith, M.C. (993). Stabilizability existence of system representations for discrete-time time-varying systems. SAM J. Control Optimization, 3, esoer, C.A., Liu, R.W., Murray, J., Saeks, R. (98). Feedback system design: The fractional representation approach to analysis synthesis. EEE Trans. Automatic Control, 5, ammer, J. (985). onlinear system stabilization coprimeness. nt. Journal of Control, 44, Kučera, V. (975). Stability of discrete linear control systems. n: Proc. 6th FAC World Congress, paper 44.. Boston, MA. Kučera, V. (979). iscrete Linear Control: The Polynomial Equation Approach. Wiley, Chichester, UK. Larin, V.B., aumenko, K.., Suntsev, V.. (97). Spectral Methods for Synthesis of Linear Systems with Feedback (in Russian). aukova umka, Kiev, Ukraine. ett, C.., Jacobson, C.A., Balas, M.J. (984). A connection between state-space doubly coprime fractional representations. EEE Trans. Automatic Control, 9, Paice, A..B., Moore, J.B. (99). On the oula-kucera parametrization of nonlinear systems. Systems & Control Letters, 4, -9. Quadrat, A. (3). On a generalization of the oula-kučera parametrization. Part : The fractional ideal approach to SSO systems. Systems & Control Letters, 5, Vidyasagar, M. (985). Control System Synthesis: A Factorization Approach. MT Press, Cambridge, MA. oula,.c., Bongiorno, J.J., Jabr,.A. (976a). Modern Wiener-opf design of optimal controllers, Part : The single-input case. EEE Trans. Auto. Control,, 3-4. oula,.c., Jabr,.A., Bongiorno, J.J. (976b). Modern Wiener-opf design of optimal controllers, Part : The multivariable case. EEE Trans. Automatic Control,,
Parametrization of All Strictly Causal Stabilizing Controllers of Multidimensional Systems single-input single-output case
Parametrization of All Strictly Causal Stabilizing Controllers of Multidimensional Systems single-input single-output case K. Mori Abstract We give a parametrization of all strictly causal stabilizing
More informationThe parameterization of all. of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers
The parameterization stabilizing controllers 89 The parameterization of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada 2, Yuko Tatsumi 3, Non-members ABSTRACT
More informationMRAGPC Control of MIMO Processes with Input Constraints and Disturbance
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 9 Vol II WCECS 9, October -, 9, San Francisco, USA MRAGPC Control of MIMO Processes with Input Constraints and Disturbance A. S. Osunleke,
More informationInformation Structures Preserved Under Nonlinear Time-Varying Feedback
Information Structures Preserved Under Nonlinear Time-Varying Feedback Michael Rotkowitz Electrical Engineering Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Email: michael.rotkowitz@ee.kth.se
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION CONTENTS VOLUME VII
CONTENTS VOLUME VII Control of Linear Multivariable Systems 1 Katsuhisa Furuta,Tokyo Denki University, School of Science and Engineering, Ishizaka, Hatoyama, Saitama, Japan 1. Linear Multivariable Systems
More informationOptimizing simultaneously over the numerator and denominator polynomials in the Youla-Kučera parametrization
Optimizing simultaneously over the numerator and denominator polynomials in the Youla-Kučera parametrization Didier Henrion Vladimír Kučera Arturo Molina-Cristóbal Abstract Traditionally when approaching
More informationPARAMETERIZATION OF STATE FEEDBACK GAINS FOR POLE PLACEMENT
PARAMETERIZATION OF STATE FEEDBACK GAINS FOR POLE PLACEMENT Hans Norlander Systems and Control, Department of Information Technology Uppsala University P O Box 337 SE 75105 UPPSALA, Sweden HansNorlander@ituuse
More informationRational Covariance Extension for Boundary Data and Positive Real Lemma with Positive Semidefinite Matrix Solution
Preprints of the 18th FAC World Congress Milano (taly) August 28 - September 2, 2011 Rational Covariance Extension for Boundary Data and Positive Real Lemma with Positive Semidefinite Matrix Solution Y
More informationA Simple Derivation of Right Interactor for Tall Transfer Function Matrices and its Application to Inner-Outer Factorization Continuous-Time Case
A Simple Derivation of Right Interactor for Tall Transfer Function Matrices and its Application to Inner-Outer Factorization Continuous-Time Case ATARU KASE Osaka Institute of Technology Department of
More informationAn LQ R weight selection approach to the discrete generalized H 2 control problem
INT. J. CONTROL, 1998, VOL. 71, NO. 1, 93± 11 An LQ R weight selection approach to the discrete generalized H 2 control problem D. A. WILSON², M. A. NEKOUI² and G. D. HALIKIAS² It is known that a generalized
More informationA DESIGN METHOD FOR SIMPLE REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS WITH SPECIFIED INPUT-OUTPUT CHARACTERISTIC
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information Control ICIC International c 202 ISSN 349-498 Volume 8, Number 7(A), July 202 pp. 4883 4899 A DESIGN METHOD FOR SIMPLE REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS
More informationA Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants
00 ECTI TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY VOL., NO.2 NOVEMBER 2005 A Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants Kou Yamada Nobuaki Matsushima, Non-members
More informationContents. 1 State-Space Linear Systems 5. 2 Linearization Causality, Time Invariance, and Linearity 31
Contents Preamble xiii Linear Systems I Basic Concepts 1 I System Representation 3 1 State-Space Linear Systems 5 1.1 State-Space Linear Systems 5 1.2 Block Diagrams 7 1.3 Exercises 11 2 Linearization
More informationStatic Output Feedback Stabilisation with H Performance for a Class of Plants
Static Output Feedback Stabilisation with H Performance for a Class of Plants E. Prempain and I. Postlethwaite Control and Instrumentation Research, Department of Engineering, University of Leicester,
More informationStructured State Space Realizations for SLS Distributed Controllers
Structured State Space Realizations for SLS Distributed Controllers James Anderson and Nikolai Matni Abstract In recent work the system level synthesis (SLS) paradigm has been shown to provide a truly
More informationMULTIVARIABLE ZEROS OF STATE-SPACE SYSTEMS
Copyright F.L. Lewis All rights reserved Updated: Monday, September 9, 8 MULIVARIABLE ZEROS OF SAE-SPACE SYSEMS If a system has more than one input or output, it is called multi-input/multi-output (MIMO)
More informationFIR Filters for Stationary State Space Signal Models
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control FIR Filters for Stationary State Space Signal Models Jung Hun Park Wook Hyun Kwon School of Electrical Engineering
More informationMulti-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Multi-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures Eric Peterson Harry G.
More informationA Comparative Study on Automatic Flight Control for small UAV
Proceedings of the 5 th International Conference of Control, Dynamic Systems, and Robotics (CDSR'18) Niagara Falls, Canada June 7 9, 18 Paper No. 13 DOI: 1.11159/cdsr18.13 A Comparative Study on Automatic
More informationControl of linear systems subject to time-domain constraints with polynomial pole placement and LMIs
Control of linear systems subject to time-domain constraints with polynomial pole placement and LMIs Didier Henrion 1,2,3,4 Sophie Tarbouriech 1 Vladimír Kučera 3,5 February 12, 2004 Abstract: The paper
More informationPOSITIVE REALNESS OF A TRANSFER FUNCTION NEITHER IMPLIES NOR IS IMPLIED BY THE EXTERNAL POSITIVITY OF THEIR ASSOCIATE REALIZATIONS
POSITIVE REALNESS OF A TRANSFER FUNCTION NEITHER IMPLIES NOR IS IMPLIED BY THE EXTERNAL POSITIVITY OF THEIR ASSOCIATE REALIZATIONS Abstract This letter discusses the differences in-between positive realness
More informationCONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN CONFORMABLE TO PHYSICAL ACTUALITIES
3rd International Conference on Advanced Micro-Device Engineering, AMDE 2011 1 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN CONFORMABLE TO PHYSICAL ACTUALITIES 2011.12.8 TOSHIYUKI KITAMORI 2 Outline Design equation Expression
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationW 1 æw 2 G + 0 e? u K y Figure 5.1: Control of uncertain system. For MIMO systems, the normbounded uncertainty description is generalized by assuming
Chapter 5 Robust stability and the H1 norm An important application of the H1 control problem arises when studying robustness against model uncertainties. It turns out that the condition that a control
More informationPOLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19
POLE PLACEMENT Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19 Outline 1 State Feedback 2 Observer 3 Observer Feedback 4 Reduced Order
More informationFinite-Time Thermodynamics of Port-Hamiltonian Systems
Finite-Time Thermodynamics of Port-Hamiltonian Systems Henrik Sandberg Automatic Control Lab, ACCESS Linnaeus Centre, KTH (Currently on sabbatical leave at LIDS, MIT) Jean-Charles Delvenne CORE, UC Louvain
More information5. Observer-based Controller Design
EE635 - Control System Theory 5. Observer-based Controller Design Jitkomut Songsiri state feedback pole-placement design regulation and tracking state observer feedback observer design LQR and LQG 5-1
More information1 Continuous-time Systems
Observability Completely controllable systems can be restructured by means of state feedback to have many desirable properties. But what if the state is not available for feedback? What if only the output
More informationDEADBEAT CONTROL, POLE AND LQ REGULATION 1
KYBERNETIKA VOLUME 35 (1999), NUMBER 6, PAGES 681-692 DEADBEAT CONTROL, POLE AND LQ REGULATION 1 PLACEMENT, VLADIMÍR KUČERA Deadbeat control, a typical example of linear control strategies in discrete-time
More informationStability and composition of transfer functions
Problem 1.1 Stability and composition of transfer functions G. Fernández-Anaya Departamento de Ciencias Básicas Universidad Iberoaméricana Lomas de Santa Fe 01210 México D.F. México guillermo.fernandez@uia.mx
More informationRobust Control 2 Controllability, Observability & Transfer Functions
Robust Control 2 Controllability, Observability & Transfer Functions Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /26/24 Outline Reachable Controllability Distinguishable
More informationTHIS paper deals with robust control in the setup associated
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 50, NO 10, OCTOBER 2005 1501 Control-Oriented Model Validation and Errors Quantification in the `1 Setup V F Sokolov Abstract A priori information required for
More information(q 1)t. Control theory lends itself well such unification, as the structure and behavior of discrete control
My general research area is the study of differential and difference equations. Currently I am working in an emerging field in dynamical systems. I would describe my work as a cross between the theoretical
More informationMatrix Equations in Multivariable Control
Matrix Euations in Multivariable Control OMAN POKOP, JIŘÍ KOBEL Tomas Bata University in Zlín Nám. T.G.M. 5555, 76 Zlín CZECH EPUBLIC prokop@fai.utb.cz http://www.utb.cz/fai Abstract: - The contribution
More informationFinite-Time Behavior of Inner Systems
1134 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 7, JULY 2003 Finite-Time Behavior of Inner Systems Jobert H. A. Ludlage, Member, IEEE, Siep Weiland, Anton A. Stoorvogel, Senior Member, IEEE,
More informationON THE CONSTRUCTION OF GENERAL SOLUTION OF THE GENERALIZED SYLVESTER EQUATION
TWMS J App Eng Math V7, N1, 2017, pp 1-6 ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF GENERAL SOLUTION OF THE GENERALIZED SYLVESTER EQUATION FA ALIEV 1, VB LARIN 2, Abstract The problem of construction the general solution
More informationChapter 9 Observers, Model-based Controllers 9. Introduction In here we deal with the general case where only a subset of the states, or linear combin
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 9 Observers,
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationDescriptor system techniques in solving H 2 -optimal fault detection problems
Descriptor system techniques in solving H 2 -optimal fault detection problems Andras Varga German Aerospace Center (DLR) DAE 10 Workshop Banff, Canada, October 25-29, 2010 Outline approximate fault detection
More informationROBUST CONSTRAINED REGULATORS FOR UNCERTAIN LINEAR SYSTEMS
ROBUST CONSTRAINED REGULATORS FOR UNCERTAIN LINEAR SYSTEMS Jean-Claude HENNET Eugênio B. CASTELAN Abstract The purpose of this paper is to combine several control requirements in the same regulator design
More informationLinear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013
Linear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013 Abstract As in optimal control theory, linear quadratic (LQ) differential games (DG) can be solved, even in high dimension,
More informationNetwork Reconstruction from Intrinsic Noise: Non-Minimum-Phase Systems
Preprints of the 19th World Congress he International Federation of Automatic Control Network Reconstruction from Intrinsic Noise: Non-Minimum-Phase Systems David Hayden, Ye Yuan Jorge Goncalves Department
More informationYOULA KUČERA PARAMETRISATION IN SELF TUNING LQ CONTROL OF A CHEMICAL REACTOR
YOULA KUČERA PARAMETRISATION IN SELF TUNING LQ CONTROL OF A CHEMICAL REACTOR Ján Mikleš, L uboš Čirka, and Miroslav Fikar Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava,
More informationFeedback Control of Turbulent Wall Flows
Feedback Control of Turbulent Wall Flows Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano Outline Introduction Standard approach Wiener-Hopf approach Conclusions Drag reduction A model problem:
More informationComputing generalized inverse systems using matrix pencil methods
Computing generalized inverse systems using matrix pencil methods A. Varga German Aerospace Center DLR - Oberpfaffenhofen Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics D-82234 Wessling, Germany. Andras.Varga@dlr.de
More informationTo appear in IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control Revised 12/31/97. Output Feedback
o appear in IEEE rans. on Automatic Control Revised 12/31/97 he Design of Strictly Positive Real Systems Using Constant Output Feedback C.-H. Huang P.A. Ioannou y J. Maroulas z M.G. Safonov x Abstract
More informationRECURSIVE SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION IN THE LEAST SQUARES FRAMEWORK
RECURSIVE SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION IN THE LEAST SQUARES FRAMEWORK TRNKA PAVEL AND HAVLENA VLADIMÍR Dept of Control Engineering, Czech Technical University, Technická 2, 166 27 Praha, Czech Republic mail:
More informationControllers design for two interconnected systems via unbiased observers
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The nternational Federation of Automatic Control Cape Town, South Africa. August 24-29, 214 Controllers design for two interconnected systems via unbiased observers
More informationQUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS
Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2003, Vol. 13, No. 2, 179 184 QUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS PINI GURFIL Department of Mechanical and Aerospace
More information1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1
Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +
More informationarxiv: v1 [cs.sy] 2 Apr 2019
On the Existence of a Fixed Spectrum for a Multi-channel Linear System: A Matroid Theory Approach F Liu 1 and A S Morse 1 arxiv:190401499v1 [cssy] 2 Apr 2019 Abstract Conditions for the existence of a
More informationLecture 2. LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL SYSTEMS p.1/22
LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL SYSTEMS Harry Trentelman University of Groningen, The Netherlands Minicourse ECC 2003 Cambridge, UK, September 2, 2003 LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL SYSTEMS p1/22 Part 1: Generalities LINEAR
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 100 (2015 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 100 (015 ) 345 349 5th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, DAAAM 014 Control of Airflow
More informationMultivariable Control. Lecture 05. Multivariable Poles and Zeros. John T. Wen. September 14, 2006
Multivariable Control Lecture 05 Multivariable Poles and Zeros John T. Wen September 4, 2006 SISO poles/zeros SISO transfer function: G(s) = n(s) d(s) (no common factors between n(s) and d(s)). Poles:
More informationMEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems MIMO Introduction
MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems MIMO Introduction Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University 11/2/214 Outline Solving State Equations Variation
More informationA GENERALIZATION OF THE YOULA-KUČERA PARAMETRIZATION FOR MIMO STABILIZABLE SYSTEMS. Alban Quadrat
A GENERALIZATION OF THE YOULA-KUČERA ARAMETRIZATION FOR MIMO STABILIZABLE SYSTEMS Alban Quadrat INRIA Sophia Antipolis, CAFE project, 2004 Route des Lucioles, B 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis cedex, France.
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL WITH DISTURBANCE ESTIMATION
OPTIMAL CONTROL WITH DISTURBANCE ESTIMATION František Dušek, Daniel Honc, Rahul Sharma K. Department of Process control Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, University of Pardubice, Czech
More informationLMI based output-feedback controllers: γ-optimal versus linear quadratic.
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress he International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul Korea July 6-11 28 LMI based output-feedback controllers: γ-optimal versus linear quadratic. Dmitry V. Balandin
More informationLecture 2: Discrete-time Linear Quadratic Optimal Control
ME 33, U Berkeley, Spring 04 Xu hen Lecture : Discrete-time Linear Quadratic Optimal ontrol Big picture Example onvergence of finite-time LQ solutions Big picture previously: dynamic programming and finite-horizon
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More information3 Stabilization of MIMO Feedback Systems
3 Stabilization of MIMO Feedback Systems 3.1 Notation The sets R and S are as before. We will use the notation M (R) to denote the set of matrices with elements in R. The dimensions are not explicitly
More informationAdaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Disturbance
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering 2018, 8(2): 31-35 DOI: 10.5923/j.control.20180802.01 Adaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Saeed Kashefi *, Majid Hajatipor Faculty of
More informationFilter Design for Linear Time Delay Systems
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 49, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2001 2839 ANewH Filter Design for Linear Time Delay Systems E. Fridman Uri Shaked, Fellow, IEEE Abstract A new delay-dependent filtering
More informationJoão P. Hespanha. January 16, 2009
LINEAR SYSTEMS THEORY João P. Hespanha January 16, 2009 Disclaimer: This is a draft and probably contains a few typos. Comments and information about typos are welcome. Please contact the author at hespanha@ece.ucsb.edu.
More informationControllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control
Multivariable Control Lecture 4 Controllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control John T. Wen September 13, 24 Ref: 3.2-3.4 of Text Controllability ẋ = Ax + Bu; x() = x. At time
More informationEL2520 Control Theory and Practice
EL2520 Control Theory and Practice Lecture 8: Linear quadratic control Mikael Johansson School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Stockholm, Sweden Linear quadratic control Allows to compute the controller
More informationA Linear Systems Primer
Panos J. Antsaklis Anthony N. Michel A Linear Systems Primer Birkhäuser Boston Basel Berlin Panos J. Antsaklis Department of Electrical Engineering University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556 U.S.A.
More informationAn Observation on the Positive Real Lemma
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 255, 48 49 (21) doi:1.16/jmaa.2.7241, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on An Observation on the Positive Real Lemma Luciano Pandolfi Dipartimento
More informationSystems and Control Theory Lecture Notes. Laura Giarré
Systems and Control Theory Lecture Notes Laura Giarré L. Giarré 2017-2018 Lesson 17: Model-based Controller Feedback Stabilization Observers Ackerman Formula Model-based Controller L. Giarré- Systems and
More informationDigital Control Engineering Analysis and Design
Digital Control Engineering Analysis and Design M. Sami Fadali Antonio Visioli AMSTERDAM BOSTON HEIDELBERG LONDON NEW YORK OXFORD PARIS SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO Academic Press is
More informationGraphical User Interface for Design Stabilizing Controllers
Graphical User Interface for Design Stabilizing Controllers Petr Urban 1,2, Michael Šebek1 1 Department of Control Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague 2 Institute
More informationCONSIDER the linear discrete-time system
786 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 42, NO. 6, JUNE 1997 Optimal Damping of Forced Oscillations in Discrete-Time Systems Anders Lindquist, Fellow, IEEE, Vladimir A. Yakubovich Abstract In
More informationIs Monopoli s Model Reference Adaptive Controller Correct?
Is Monopoli s Model Reference Adaptive Controller Correct? A. S. Morse Center for Computational Vision and Control Department of Electrical Engineering Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 USA April 9,
More informationTHE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM
THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan 1 1 Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationObserver-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Observer-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory,
More informationAn Alternative Approach to Designing Stabilizing Compensators for Saturating Linear Time-Invariant Plants
roceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec 9-11, 28 An Alternative Approach to Designing Stabilizing Compensators for Saturating Linear Time-Invariant lants Sandip
More informationRobust SPR Synthesis for Low-Order Polynomial Segments and Interval Polynomials
Robust SPR Synthesis for Low-Order Polynomial Segments and Interval Polynomials Long Wang ) and Wensheng Yu 2) ) Dept. of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Center for Systems and Control, Peking University,
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Q-Parameterization 1 This lecture introduces the so-called
More informationParameterized Linear Matrix Inequality Techniques in Fuzzy Control System Design
324 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL. 9, NO. 2, APRIL 2001 Parameterized Linear Matrix Inequality Techniques in Fuzzy Control System Design H. D. Tuan, P. Apkarian, T. Narikiyo, and Y. Yamamoto
More informationDiscretization of Continuous Linear Anisochronic Models
Discretization of Continuous Linear Anisochronic Models Milan Hofreiter Czech echnical University in Prague Faculty of Mechanical Engineering echnicka 4, 66 7 Prague 6 CZECH REPUBLIC E-mail: hofreite@fsid.cvut.cz
More informationCramér-Rao Bounds for Estimation of Linear System Noise Covariances
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation (): 6- DOI: 593/jjmea Cramér-Rao Bounds for Estimation of Linear System oise Covariances Peter Matiso * Vladimír Havlena Czech echnical University in Prague
More informationPARETO OPTIMAL FEEDFORWARD CONSTRAINED REGULATION OF MIMO LINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright (c) 5 IFAC. All rights reserved 6th Triennial World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic PARETO OPTIMAL FEEDFORWARD CONSTRAINED REGULATION OF MIMO LINEAR SYSTEMS Aurelio Piazzi Antonio Visioli Diparnto
More informationNonlinear Observers. Jaime A. Moreno. Eléctrica y Computación Instituto de Ingeniería Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Nonlinear Observers Jaime A. Moreno JMorenoP@ii.unam.mx Eléctrica y Computación Instituto de Ingeniería Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México XVI Congreso Latinoamericano de Control Automático October
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationKybernetika. Vladimír Kučera Linear quadratic control. State space vs. polynomial equations
Kybernetika Vladimír Kučera Linear quadratic control. State space vs. polynomial equations Kybernetika, Vol. 19 (1983), No. 3, 185--195 Persistent URL: http://dml.cz/dmlcz/124912 Terms of use: Institute
More informationLinear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games
Linear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard To cite this version: Pierre Bernhard. Linear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games. Encyclopaedia of Systems and Control,
More informationVIBRATION CONTROL OF PLATE STRUCTURES
Engineering MECHANICS, Vol. 14, 2007, No. 1/2, p. 23 36 23 VIBRATION CONTROL OF PLATE STRUCTURES Jana Kovářová, Jan Dupal*, Miloš Schlegel** The paper describes two approaches to the problem of active
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM
OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600 06, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
More informationAMS subject classifications. 47N70, 47A48, 47A20, 47A56, 47A62, 93B28, 93C55, 93D15
COPRIME FACTORIZATIO AD OPTIMAL COTROL O THE DOUBLY IFIITE DISCRETE TIME AXIS MARK R. OPMEER AD OLOF J. STAFFAS Abstract. We study the problem of strongly coprime factorization over H-infinity of the unit
More informationL2 gains and system approximation quality 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 24: MODEL REDUCTION L2 gains and system approximation quality 1 This lecture discusses the utility
More informationECE557 Systems Control
ECE557 Systems Control Bruce Francis Course notes, Version.0, September 008 Preface This is the second Engineering Science course on control. It assumes ECE56 as a prerequisite. If you didn t take ECE56,
More informationAn efficient algorithm to compute the real perturbation values of a matrix
An efficient algorithm to compute the real perturbation values of a matrix Simon Lam and Edward J. Davison 1 Abstract In this paper, an efficient algorithm is presented for solving the nonlinear 1-D optimization
More informationOn Positive Real Lemma for Non-minimal Realization Systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control On Positive Real Lemma for Non-minimal Realization Systems Sadaaki Kunimatsu Kim Sang-Hoon Takao Fujii Mitsuaki
More informationChap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability
Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability 1. Controllability of Linear Systems 1.1. Kalman s Criterion Consider the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu where x R n : state vector and u R m : input vector. A :
More informationDidier HENRION henrion
POLYNOMIAL METHODS FOR ROBUST CONTROL Didier HENRION www.laas.fr/ henrion henrion@laas.fr Laboratoire d Analyse et d Architecture des Systèmes Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Université de
More informationOn the Stabilization of Neutrally Stable Linear Discrete Time Systems
TWCCC Texas Wisconsin California Control Consortium Technical report number 2017 01 On the Stabilization of Neutrally Stable Linear Discrete Time Systems Travis J. Arnold and James B. Rawlings Department
More informationIMPROVED MPC DESIGN BASED ON SATURATING CONTROL LAWS
IMPROVED MPC DESIGN BASED ON SATURATING CONTROL LAWS D. Limon, J.M. Gomes da Silva Jr., T. Alamo and E.F. Camacho Dpto. de Ingenieria de Sistemas y Automática. Universidad de Sevilla Camino de los Descubrimientos
More informationLQR, Kalman Filter, and LQG. Postgraduate Course, M.Sc. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering University of Salahaddin
LQR, Kalman Filter, and LQG Postgraduate Course, M.Sc. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering University of Salahaddin May 2015 Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Consider a linear system
More information