Geomagnetic Field Modeling Lessons learned from Ørsted and CHAMP and prospects for Swarm
|
|
- June Byrd
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Geomagnetic Field Modeling Lessons learned from Ørsted and CHAMP and prospects for Swarm Nils Olsen RAS Discussion Meeting on Swarm October 9 th 2009 Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 1 / 43
2 Outline of Talk 1 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space 2 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat 3 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C 4 Near Future: Swarm 5 Recent Core Field Changes Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 2 / 43
3 Outline of Talk Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space 1 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space 2 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat 3 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C 4 Near Future: Swarm 5 Recent Core Field Changes Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 3 / 43
4 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space Why should we measure magnetic field from space? Global coverage with ground observatories... and with 3 days of satellite data Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 4 / 43
5 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space Magnetic Field Model From Satellite Data B = grad V V = N n a + V ext n=1 m=0 r, θ, φ are spherical coordinates ( a ) n+1 [gn m cos mφ + hn m sin mφ] P m r n (cos θ) a is Earth s radius g m n and h m n are the spherical harmonic expansion coefficients of the internal magnetic field Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 5 / 43
6 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space Expansion Coefficients g m n, h m n of the Internal Field Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 6 / 43
7 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space Expansion Coefficients g m n, h m n of the Internal Field Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 6 / 43
8 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space Expansion Coefficients g m n, h m n of the Internal Field Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 6 / 43
9 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space Expansion Coefficients g m n, h m n of the Internal Field Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 6 / 43
10 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space Model Resolution Vector data 10,000 observations No external field Static internal field Perfectly polar orbit (inclination = 90 ) Vector data at all latitudes Ideal case: Perfect satellite, perfect environment,... Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 7 / 43
11 Outline of Talk Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat 1 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space 2 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat 3 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C 4 Near Future: Swarm 5 Recent Core Field Changes Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 8 / 43
12 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat Satellite Missions: POGO Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 9 / 43
13 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat Model Resolution Scalar data 10,000 observations No external field Static internal field Perfectly polar orbit (inclination = 90 ) Only intensity data strong Backus effect! Sectorial coefficients g n n, h n n are poorly determined Example: data from POGO satellite series ( ) Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 10 / 43
14 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat Model Resolution Scalar data 10,000 observations No external field Static internal field Perfectly polar orbit (inclination = 90 ) Only intensity data strong Backus effect! Sectorial coefficients g n n, h n n are poorly determined Example: data from POGO satellite series ( ) Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 10 / 43
15 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat Model Resolution Vector and scalar data 10,000 observations No external field Static internal field Perfectly polar orbit (inclination = 90 ) Vector data at non-polar latitudes (below ±60 ), else intensity data Vector data only needed at low latitudes to avoid Backus effect Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 11 / 43
16 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat Satellite Missions: Magsat Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 12 / 43
17 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat Model Resolution Vector and scalar data 10,000 observations No external field Static internal field Near polar orbit (inclination = 97 ) Vector data at non-polar latitudes (below ±60 ), else intensity data Zonal coefficients poorly determined due to polar gap Example: data from Magsat satellite ( ) Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 13 / 43
18 Outline of Talk Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C 1 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space 2 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat 3 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C 4 Near Future: Swarm 5 Recent Core Field Changes Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 14 / 43
19 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C Satellite Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 15 / 43
20 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C Present Satellites Satellites of the International Decade of Geopotential Research Ørsted Launched on 23th February 1999 Polar orbit, km altitude all local times within 790 days (2.2 years) CHAMP Launched on 15th July 2000 low altitude ( km) all local times within 130 days SAC-C Copy of Ørsted experiment Launched on 21th November km altitude, fixed local time 1030/2230 (no high-precision vector data due to payload failure) Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 16 / 43
21 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C Single satellites: Space-Time Ambiguity A low-earth-orbiting satellite moves with 8 km/s. It is difficult to distinguish whether an observed field change is due to a temporal field change or due to the movement of the satellite. Multi-point observations in space can resolve this ambiguity Satellite Constellation Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 17 / 43
22 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C N Single Satellites vs. Constellation of N Satellites Data treated as multiple single-satellite observations Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 18 / 43
23 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C N Single Satellites vs. Constellation of N Satellites Data treated as multiple single-satellite observations N satellites increase of number of data by N reduction of model error by N (if data are independent) Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 18 / 43
24 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C N Single Satellites vs. Constellation of N Satellites Data treated as multiple single-satellite observations N satellites increase of number of data by N reduction of model error by N (if data are independent) improvement less than N if data are not independent Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 18 / 43
25 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C N Single Satellites vs. Constellation of N Satellites Data treated as multiple single-satellite observations N satellites increase of number of data by N reduction of model error by N (if data are independent) improvement less than N if data are not independent Take advantage of constellation: potential of improvement better than N Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 18 / 43
26 Outline of Talk Near Future: Swarm 1 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space 2 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat 3 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C 4 Near Future: Swarm 5 Recent Core Field Changes Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 19 / 43
27 Near Future: Swarm After Ørsted and CHAMP: Swarm Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 20 / 43
28 Near Future: Swarm The Swarm Concept ESA mission, to be launched in satellites: 2 side-by-side in low orbit 1 in higher orbit Three orbital planes with two different near-polar inclinations Science objectives Monitoring of core field changes after Ørsted and CHAMP Improved determination of the small-scale crustal field 3D mantle conductivity Magnetospheric and ionospheric current systems Magnetic forcing of the upper atmosphere Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 21 / 43
29 Near Future: Swarm The Swarm Concept ESA mission, to be launched in satellites: 2 side-by-side in low orbit 1 in higher orbit Three orbital planes with two different near-polar inclinations Science objectives Monitoring of core field changes after Ørsted and CHAMP Improved determination of the small-scale crustal field 3D mantle conductivity Magnetospheric and ionospheric current systems Magnetic forcing of the upper atmosphere Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 21 / 43
30 Near Future: Swarm Lower Pair of Swarm Satellites Measures Magnetic Field Gradient Pair of Swarm Satellites Measures Magnetic Field Gradient B r B θ B φ Swarm allows to measure the East-West Gradient, which is more sensitive to the small-scale lithospheric field Magnetic field East-West Gradient of Magnetic field Geophysical Colloquium, ETH Zurich page 32 Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 22 / 43
31 Near Future: Swarm Advantage of two satellites flying side-by-side Quasi-complex representation of crustal field: B = Re{grad V } V = a ( a ) n+1 γ m r n Pn m e imφ n,m γ m n = g m n ih m n Difference of B at two satellites separated by φ in longitude: B = B(r, θ, φ) B(r, θ, φ + φ) order m = Re{grad V } γn m = γn m ( 1 e im φ ) 1 e im φ m φ Sensitive to higher order m Filter gain 1 exp(i m φ) φ = 1 o φ = 1.4 o φ = 2 o Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 23 / 43
32 Near Future: Swarm Model Resolution East-West gradient data 10,000 observations No external field Static internal field Near polar orbit (inclination = 97 ) East-West gradient data Zonal coefficients undetermined Enhanced resolution of sectorial coefficients Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 24 / 43
33 Near Future: Swarm End-To-End Mission Simulation Generation of synthetic orbits simulation starts on July 1, 1998 (one solar cycle before anticipated launch) simulation length of 4.5 years Swarm A Swarm C Swarm C Swarm A Local Time [hrs] 12 altitude [km] Swarm C Swarm A year year 24 Swarm A Swarm C Swarm C Swarm A 18 Local Time [hrs] year Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 25 / 43
34 Near Future: Swarm End-To-End Mission Simulation Magnetic Field Generation Core field time changes up to n = 19 Crustal field (static) up to n = 250 Ionospheric field, daily + seasonal periodicity Amplitude modulated by daily values of F10.7 Induced field by means of 1D conductivity model Magnetospheric field Time dependence of external coefficients up to n = 3, m = 0, 1 given by observatory data (hourly mean values) Induced field (up to n = 45) calculated using 3D mantle conductivity, including oceans Toroidal (non-potential) field daily + seasonal periodicity Instrument noise Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 26 / 43
35 Near Future: Swarm Crustal Field Recovery from B alone Single satellite approach degree error at ground 1 degree correlation [nt] 10 0 degree correlation ρ n signal Field only degree n degree n Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 27 / 43
36 Near Future: Swarm Crustal Field Recovery from B and [ B] EW Constellation approach degree error at ground 1 degree correlation [nt] 10 0 degree correlation ρ n signal Field only Field + Gradient degree n degree n Same observations in both cases, but different arrangement of data subsets Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 27 / 43
37 Crustal Field Recovery Near Future: Swarm Sensitivity matrix: relative error in %, normalized by mean power at that degree n Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 28 / 43
38 Near Future: Swarm Map of Crustal Field Difference using B only B r at surface, in nt Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 29 / 43
39 Near Future: Swarm Map of Crustal Field Difference using B and [ B] EW B r at surface, in nt Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 30 / 43
40 Near Future: Swarm Improvement of Lithospheric Field Model POGO and Magsat... n 30, resolution: 1330 km Magnetic field of Earths crust radial component at 10 km altitude Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 31 / 43
41 Near Future: Swarm Improvement of Lithospheric Field Model POGO and Magsat... n 30, resolution: 1330 km... with present satellites Ørsted and CHAMP... n 60, resolution: 670 km Magnetic field of Earths crust radial component at 10 km altitude Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 31 / 43
42 Near Future: Swarm Improvement of Lithospheric Field Model POGO and Magsat... n 30, resolution: 1330 km... with present satellites Ørsted and CHAMP... n 60, resolution: 670 km... and with Swarm n 130, resolution: 300 km Magnetic field of Earths crust radial component at 10 km altitude Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 31 / 43
43 Outline of Talk Recent Core Field Changes 1 Exploring Earth s Magnetic Field from Space 2 Previous Missions: POGO and Magsat 3 Present Missions: Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C 4 Near Future: Swarm 5 Recent Core Field Changes Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 32 / 43
44 Core field changes Recent Core Field Changes Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 33 / 43
45 Recent Core Field Changes Core field changes Ground observatory data monitor field change in time at a fixed location in space The role of observatory data: help in separating spatial and temporal variations when analyzing satellite data help in bridging the gap between satellite missions Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 33 / 43
46 Recent Core Field Changes Observatory monthly means monitor field change at fixed locations but: contain internal and external field contribution challenge: extraction of core field signal Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 34 / 43
47 Recent Core Field Changes Observatory monthly means monitor field change at fixed locations but: contain internal and external field contribution challenge: extraction of core field signal dy/dt [nt/yr] dy /dt at Niemegk/Germany observed annual differences of monthly means Scatter (partly) due to magnetospheric ring-current contributions Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 34 / 43
48 Revised monthly means Recent Core Field Changes 50 years ( ) of hourly mean values from Niemegk Traditional way: arithmetic mean (all days, all local times) σ = 13.3 nt/yr σ = 4.7 nt/yr NGK σ = 11.6 nt/yr dx/dt [nt/yr] dy/dt [nt/yr] dz/dt [nt/yr] year year year Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 35 / 43
49 Revised monthly means Recent Core Field Changes 50 years ( ) of hourly mean values from Niemegk Traditional way: arithmetic mean (all days, all local times) σ = 13.3 nt/yr σ = 4.7 nt/yr NGK σ = 11.6 nt/yr dx/dt [nt/yr] dy/dt [nt/yr] dz/dt [nt/yr] year year New: robust (Huber) average of data after correction for ionospheric and magnetospheric contributions σ = 4.9 nt/yr NGK σ = 1.9 nt/yr year σ = 3.3 nt/yr dx/dt [nt/yr] dy/dt [nt/yr] dz/dt [nt/yr] year year year Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 35 / 43
50 Revised monthly means Recent Core Field Changes 50 years ( ) of hourly mean values from Niemegk Traditional way: arithmetic mean (all days, all local times) σ = 13.3 nt/yr σ = 4.7 nt/yr NGK σ = 11.6 nt/yr dx/dt [nt/yr] dy/dt [nt/yr] dz/dt [nt/yr] year year New: robust (Huber) average of data after correction for ionospheric and magnetospheric contributions σ = 4.9 nt/yr NGK σ = 1.9 nt/yr year σ = 3.3 nt/yr dx/dt [nt/yr] dy/dt [nt/yr] dz/dt [nt/yr] year year year Standard deviation σ (wrt a GCV spline fit) is reduced by a factor of 3 Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 35 / 43
51 Recent Core Field Changes The CHAOS Field Model Series CHAOS 6.5 years of satellite data (March 1999 and December 2005) Order 4 splines up to spherical harmonic degree n = 14, static up to n = 50 Regularization of < B 2 > at Earth s surface CHAOS-2 10 years of satellite data (March 1999 and March 2009) Observatory monthly means ( ) Order 6 splines up to n = 20, static for n = Regularization of < B 2 > at Core-Mantle Boundary (CMB) CHAOS years of satellite data (March 1999 and August 2009) Revised observatory monthly means ( ) Order 6 splines up to n = 20, static for n = Regularization of < d 3 B/dt 3 2 > at CMB Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 36 / 43
52 Recent Core Field Changes CHAOS-3 Data Selection Distribution of non-polar data CHAMP scalar CHAMP vector Oersted scalar Oersted vector SAC C scalar total number of data points per month year stacked histogram Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 37 / 43
53 Recent Core Field Changes Spectrum of first and second time derivative at t = CHAOS 2 CHAOS 3 [(nt/yr) 2 or (nt/yr 2 ) first time derivative 10 1 second time derivative degree n CHAOS-3 shows less secular acceleration power at n = 1, more power at n > 6 Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 38 / 43
54 Fit to observatory data Recent Core Field Changes CHAOS-2 CHAOS-3 component mean rms mean rms Ẋ [nt/yr] Ẏ [nt/yr] Ż [nt/yr] CHAOS-3 rms misfit reduced by factor 2 for X and Y, and by 30% for Z The non-zero mean values of CHAOS-2 are not present in CHAOS-3 Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 39 / 43
55 Fit to observatory data Recent Core Field Changes CHAOS-2 CHAOS-3 component mean rms mean rms Ẋ [nt/yr] Ẏ [nt/yr] Ż [nt/yr] CHAOS-3 rms misfit reduced by factor 2 for X and Y, and by 30% for Z The non-zero mean values of CHAOS-2 are not present in CHAOS-3 Also satellite rms misfit data is slightly lower for CHAOS-3 compared to CHAOS-2 Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 39 / 43
56 Recent Core Field Changes Fit to observatory data dx/dt [nt/yr] KAK X dy/dt [nt/yr] KAK Y CHAOS 2 CHAOS dz/dt [nt/yr] 35 KAK Z dx/dt [nt/yr] HER X dy/dt [nt/yr] HER Y dz/dt [nt/yr] HER Z Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 40 / 43
57 Conclusions Conclusions Bright future for space magnetometry (until 2015?) Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 41 / 43
58 Conclusions Conclusions Bright future for space magnetometry (until 2015?) Constellation aspect: is sometimes more than 3 Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 41 / 43
59 Conclusions Conclusions Bright future for space magnetometry (until 2015?) Constellation aspect: is sometimes more than 3 changed role of ground observatory data Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 41 / 43
60 Conclusions Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm 42 / 43
A New Lithospheric Field Model based on CHAMP and Swarm Magnetic Satellite Data
A New Lithospheric Field Model based on CHAMP and Swarm Magnetic Satellite Data Nils Olsen 1, Dhananjay Ravat 2, Christopher C Finlay 1, Livia K. Kother 1 1 DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark 2
More informationChapter 4 Multipole model of the Earth's magnetic field
Chapter 4 Multipole model of the Earth's magnetic field 1 Previously A measurement of the geomagnetic field at any given point and time consists of a superposition of fields from different sources: Internal
More informationFirst scalar magnetic anomaly map from CHAMP satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 29, NO. 14, 10.1029/2001GL013685, 2002 First scalar magnetic anomaly map from CHAMP satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field S. Maus, M. Rother, R. Holme, H.
More informationGlobal Geomagnetic Field Models from DMSP Satellite Magnetic Measurements
Global Geomagnetic Field Models from DMSP Satellite Magnetic Measurements Patrick Alken Stefan Maus Arnaud Chulliat Manoj Nair Adam Woods National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA, Boulder, CO, USA 9 May
More informationOriginally published as:
Originally published as: Maus, S., Lühr, H., Purucker, M. (06): Simulation of the high-degree lithospheric field recovery for the Swarm constellation of satellites. - Earth Planets and Space, 58, 4, 397-7.
More informationESA training. Gravity, magnetics and gradients for mapping and modelling. Jörg Ebbing. Department of Geosciences Kiel University
ESA training Gravity, magnetics and gradients for mapping and modelling Jörg Ebbing Department of Geosciences Kiel University Contributions from: Eldar Baykiev (Trondheim), Des Fitzgerald (Melbourne),
More informationAn Equivalent Source Method for Modelling the Lithospheric Magnetic Field Using Satellite and Airborne Magnetic Data
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 03, 2018 An Equivalent Source Method for Modelling the Lithospheric Magnetic Field Using Satellite and Airborne Magnetic Data Kother, Livia Kathleen; D. Hammer, Magnus;
More informationDetermination of the IGRF 2000 model
Earth Planets Space, 52, 1175 1182, 2000 Determination of the IGRF 2000 model Nils Olsen 1, Terence J. Sabaka 2, and Lars Tøffner-Clausen 3 1 Danish Space Research Institute, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK
More informationIGRF-12 GFZ candidates
IGRF-12 GFZ candidates V. Lesur 1, M. Rother 1, I. Wardinski 1, R. Schachtschneider 1, M. Hamoudi 2, A. Chambodut 3 October 1, 2014 1 Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research centre for Geosciences,
More informationThe second generation of the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model: GRIMM-2
Originally published as: Lesur, V.., Wardinski, I., Hamoudi, M., Rother, M. (2010): The second generation of the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model: GRIMM 2. Earth Planets and Space, 62, 10, 765 773
More informationEdinburgh Research Explorer
Edinburgh Research Explorer CHAOS-2 - A geomagnetic field model derived from one decade of continuous satellite data Citation for published version: Olsen, N, Mandea, M, Sabaka, TJ & Tøffner-Clausen, L
More informationThe second generation of the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model: GRIMM-2
Earth Planets Space, 62, 765 773, 2010 The second generation of the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model: GRIMM-2 V. Lesur, I. Wardinski, M. Hamoudi, and M. Rother Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German
More informationCore field acceleration pulse as a common cause of the 2003 and 2007 geomagnetic jerks
Click Here for Full Article GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 37,, doi:10.1029/2009gl042019, 2010 Core field acceleration pulse as a common cause of the 2003 and 2007 geomagnetic jerks A. Chulliat, 1
More informationSpace Weather Awareness in the Arctic. Torsten Neubert Head of Section for Solar System Physics
Space Weather Awareness in the Arctic Torsten Neubert Head of Section for Solar System Physics Technology in the Arctic There is significant potential Resources Tourism helped by receding ocean ice There
More information(ii) Observational Geomagnetism. Lecture 5: Spherical harmonic field models
(ii) Observational Geomagnetism Lecture 5: Spherical harmonic field models Lecture 5: Spherical harmonic field models 5.1 Introduction 5.2 How to represent functions on a spherical surface 5.3 Spherical
More informationELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF THE DEEP MANTLE
ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF THE DEEP MANTLE Jakub Velímský Department of Geophysics Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University in Prague Mariánské lázně November 15. 17. 2010 J. Velímský (CUP)
More informationGE SPACE. Geomagnetic Earth Observation from SPAce
GE SPACE Geomagnetic Earth Observation from SPAce Fit to NERC s Science Priorities Understanding the complex interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system over a range of space and time scales Fit
More informationINDUCTION STUDIES WITH SATELLITE DATA
INDUCTION STUDIES WITH SATELLITE DATA NILS OLSEN Danish Space Research Institute, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Abstract. The natural variations of the Earth s magnetic field of periods
More informationConductivity Distribution of the Earth Derived from Long Period Magnetic Data
Conductivity Distribution of the Earth Derived from Long Period Magnetic Data Nils Olsen Neustadt/Weinstrasse, 27 th June 2009 Nils Olsen (DTU Space) Long Period Transfer Functions 1 / 25 Long Period Transfer
More informationSwarm Satellite Constellation Application and Research Facility: Status and Plans
Swarm Satellite Constellation Application and Research Facility: Status and Plans Alan W P Thomson 3 NERC All rights reserved Manchester NAM-MIST 27 th March 2012 and Patrick Alken 2,8, Ciaran Beggan 3,
More informationDetermination of the 1-D distribution of electrical conductivity in Earth s mantle from Swarm satellite data
Earth Planets Space, 65, 233 237, 203 Determination of the -D distribution of electrical conductivity in Earth s mantle from Swarm satellite data Christoph Püthe and Alexey Kuvshinov ETH Zürich, Institute
More informationWhat ancient scalar satellite data can tell us about the 1969 geomagnetic jerk?
Earth Planets Space, 61, 885 894, 2009 What ancient scalar satellite data can tell us about the 1969 geomagnetic jerk? Y. Yahiat 1,M.Hamoudi 1, and M. Mandea 2 1 University of Sciences and Technology Houari
More informationG 3. AN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE EARTH SCIENCES Published by AGU and the Geochemical Society
Geosystems G 3 AN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE EARTH SCIENCES Published by AGU and the Geochemical Society Technical Brief Volume 9, Number 7 25 July 2008 Q07021, doi: ISSN: 1525-2027 Click Here for Full
More informationInternational Geomagnetic Reference Field the eighth generation
Earth Planets Space, 52, 1119 1124, 2000 International Geomagnetic Reference Field the eighth generation Mioara Mandea 1 and Susan Macmillan 2 1 Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, B.P. 89, 4 Place
More informationSLR and the Gravity Field
SLR and the Gravity Field Daniela Thaller With contributions by: Krzysztof Sośnica (University of Wroclaw, Poland) Mathis Bloßfeld (DGFI-TUM, Germany) Gravity Field Determination Dedicated gravity field
More informationGeomagnetic jerks characterization via spectral analysis
Solid Earth, 3, 131 148, 212 www.solid-earth.net/3/131/212/ doi:1.5194/se-3-131-212 Author(s) 212. CC Attribution 3. License. Solid Earth Geomagnetic jerks characterization via spectral analysis B. Duka
More informationOrbits for Polar Applications Malcolm Macdonald
Orbits for Polar Applications Malcolm Macdonald www.strath.ac.uk/mae 25 June 2013 malcolm.macdonald.102@strath.ac.uk Slide 1 Image Credit: ESA Overview Where do we currently put spacecraft? Where else
More informationMapping of Swarm Magnetic Field Intensity from Alpha to Charlie
Data, Innovation, and Science Cluster Mapping of Swarm Magnetic Field Intensity from Alpha to Charlie Doc. no: SW-TN-DTU-GS-017, Rev: 1, 4 July 2016 Prepared: Checked: Lars Tøffner-Clausen Date 4 July
More informationNeutral Winds in the Upper Atmosphere. Qian Wu National Center for Atmospheric Research
Neutral Winds in the Upper Atmosphere Qian Wu National Center for Atmospheric Research Outline Overview of the upper atmosphere. Ozone heating. Neutral wind tides (the strongest dynamic feature). Why do
More informationHigh resolution geoid from altimetry & bathymetry: requirements for a future mission
High resolution geoid from altimetry & bathymetry: requirements for a future mission The GRAL team: J-Y Royer 1,2, M-F Lalancette 3, G Louis 1,2, M Maia 1,2, D Rouxel 3 & L Géli 4 Project funded by 1 2
More informationCorrelation Between IGRF2000 Model and Measured Geomagnetic Data on the Territory of the Republic of Macedonia from 2003 and 2004 Measurements
PUBLS. INST. GEOPHYS. POL. ACAD. SC., C-99 (398), 2007 Correlation Between IGRF2000 Model and Measured Geomagnetic Data on the Territory of the Republic of Macedonia from 2003 and 2004 Measurements Sanja
More informationStudyofEquatorialElectrojetusingChainofStationsalongtheDipEquator
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: A Physics and Space Science Volume 17 Issue 3 Version 1.0 Year 2017 Type : Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals
More informationESA s supporting Activities Related to Mass Transport in the Earth System
ESA s supporting Activities Related to Mass Transport in the Earth System Roger Haagmans Mission Science Division European Space Agency Swarm mission: 3D-Mantle Conductivity (A. Jackson ETH Zürich, DNSC,
More informationGeophysik mittels Satellitenbeobachtungen - Von der Struktur zur dynamischen Betrachtung der Erde
Geophysik mittels Satellitenbeobachtungen - Von der Struktur zur dynamischen Betrachtung der Erde Jörg Ebbing Institut für Geowissenschaften Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel 102. Sitzung des FKPE
More informationOut-of-Cycle Update. of the US/UK World Magnetic Model for
Out-of-Cycle Update of the US/UK World Magnetic Model for 2015-2020 Arnaud Chulliat Patrick Alken Manoj Nair Adam Woods Brian Meyer Robert Redmon NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information 325
More informationObserving Geomagnetic Induction in Magnetic Satellite Measurements and Associated Implications for Mantle Conductivity
Observing Geomagnetic Induction in Magnetic Satellite Measurements and Associated Implications for Mantle Conductivity Steven Constable and Catherine Constable Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics
More informationModeling the geomagnetic field over Croatia
GEOFIZIKA VOL. 28 2011 Original scientific paper UDC 550.380.2 Modeling the geomagnetic field over Croatia Giuliana Verbanac University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Department of Geophysics, Zagreb,
More informationNOAA/NGDC candidate models for the 12th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field
Alken et al. Earth, Planets and Space (2015) 67:68 DOI 10.1186/s40623-015-0215-1 FULL PAPER Open Access NOAA/NGDC candidate models for the 12th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field Patrick
More informationChapter 6 Local and regional magnetic field measurements and models
Chapter 6 Local and regional magnetic field measurements and models 1 Previously For the global spherical harmonic expansion model of the Earth's magnetic field (e.g., IGRF), the maximum degree is typically
More informationDynamical. regions during sudden stratospheric warming event (Case study of 2009 and 2013 event)
Dynamical Coupling between high and low latitude regions during sudden stratospheric warming event (Case study of 2009 and 2013 event) Vinay Kumar 1,S. K. Dhaka 1,R. K. Choudhary 2,Shu-Peng Ho 3,M. Takahashi
More informationLCS-1: A high-resolution global model of the lithospheric magnetic field derived from CHAMP and Swarm satellite observations
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 19, 2018 LCS-1: A high-resolution global model of the lithospheric magnetic field derived from CHAMP and Swarm satellite observations Olsen, Nils; Ravat, Dhananjay
More informationNew advances in geomagnetic field modeling
New advances in geomagnetic field modeling Patrick Alken, Arnaud Chulliat, Manoj Nair, Brian Meyer, Rick Saltus, Adam Woods, Nir Boneh University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO National Centers for
More information1 The satellite altimeter measurement
1 The satellite altimeter measurement In the ideal case, a satellite altimeter measurement is equal to the instantaneous distance between the satellite s geocenter and the ocean surface. However, an altimeter
More informationIn flight scalar calibration and characterisation of the Swarm magnetometry package
DOI 10.1186/s40623-016-0501-6 FRONTIER LETTER Open Access In flight scalar calibration and characterisation of the Swarm magnetometry package Lars Tøffner Clausen 1*, Vincent Lesur 2, Nils Olsen 1 and
More informationThe International Geomagnetic Reference Field. Introduction. Scope of the IGRF. Applications and Availability. Inception and development
The International Geomagnetic Reference Field Susan Macmillan 1 and Christopher Finlay 2 1 British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3LA, UK 2 Institut für Geophysik,
More informationEvaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF-11
Earth Planets Space, 62, 787 804, 200 Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF- C. C. Finlay,S.Maus 2,C.D.Beggan 3, M. Hamoudi 4,F.J.Lowes 5, N. Olsen 6, and E. Thébault 7 Earth and Planetary
More informationThe Behaviour of the XMM-Newton Background: From the beginning of the mission until May XMM-SOC-GEN-TN-0014 issue 3.10
The Behaviour of the XMM-Newton Background: From the beginning of the mission until May 2017 XMM-SOC-GEN-TN-0014 issue 3.10 R. González-Riestra and P.M. Rodríguez-Pascual XMM-SOC User Support Group June
More informationSIO 229 Part II Geomagnetism. Lecture 1 Introduction to the geomagnetic field
SIO 229 Part II Geomagnetism Lecture 1 Introduction to the geomagnetic field Why study Earth's magnetic field Schematic picture of Earth's magnetic field interacting with the solar wind (credit: NASA)
More informationConstraints on Shallow Low-Viscosity Earth Layers from Future GOCE Data
Constraints on Shallow Low-Viscosity Earth Layers from Future GOCE Data Hugo Schotman 1,2, Bert Vermeersen 2, Pieter Visser 2 1 2 3 rd International GOCE User Workshop, ESA Esrin, 7 November 2006 glacial-isostatic
More informationAPPENDIX B SUMMARY OF ORBITAL MECHANICS RELEVANT TO REMOTE SENSING
APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF ORBITAL MECHANICS RELEVANT TO REMOTE SENSING Orbit selection and sensor characteristics are closely related to the strategy required to achieve the desired results. Different types
More informationFUNKTIONALANALYSIS UND GEOMATHEMATIK
SCHRIFTEN ZUR FUNKTIONALANALYSIS UND GEOMATHEMATIK Thorsten Maier Wavelet-Mie-Representations for Solenoidal Vector Fields with Applications to Ionospheric Geomagnetic Data Bericht 7 anuar 2004 FACHBEREICH
More informationThermospheric Winds. Astrid Maute. High Altitude Observatory (HAO) National Center for Atmospheric Science (NCAR) Boulder CO, USA
Thermospheric Winds Astrid Maute High Altitude Observatory (HAO) National Center for Atmospheric Science (NCAR) Boulder CO, USA High Altitude Observatory (HAO) National Center for Atmospheric Research
More informationMagnetic field nomenclature
Magnetic field nomenclature Declination trend angle between horizontal projection of F and true North Inclination plunge angle between horizontal and F Magnetic equator location on surface where field
More informationMonthly Geomagnetic Bulletin
HARTLAND OBSERVATORY Monthly Geomagnetic Bulletin BRISTOL CHANNEL December 2002 02/12/HA Hartland NERC 2002 1. HARTLAND OBSERVATORY MAGNETIC DATA 1.1 Introduction This bulletin is published to meet the
More informationOrbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010
Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez Orbit Design Requirements The following Science Requirements provided drivers for Orbit Design: Global Coverage: the entire extent (100%) of the ice-free ocean surface to at
More informationOriginally published as:
Originally published as: Lesur, V., Wardinski, I., Asari, S., Minchev, B., Mandea, M. (2010): Modelling the Earth s core magnetic field under flow constraints. - Earth Planets and Space, 62, 6, 503-516
More informationINVESTIGATIONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE DIURNAL VARIATIONS OF GEOMAGNETIC FIELD
Geologica Macedonica, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 37 51 (2012) GEOME 2 ISSN 0352 1206 Manuscript received: May 6, 2012 UDC: 556.385 Accepted: October 10, 2012 Original scientific paper INVESTIGATIONS OF THE STRUCTURE
More informationGravity Recovery Using COSMIC GPS Data: Application of Orbital Perturbation Theory
Gravity Recovery Using COSMIC GPS Data: Application of Orbital Perturbation Theory by Cheinway Hwang Report No. 463 Geodetic and GeoInformation Science Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More informationEvaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF-11
Earth Planets Space, xx, 9, 2 Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF 2 C. C. Finlay, S. Maus 2, C. D. Beggan 3, M. Hamoudi 4, F. J. Lowes, N. Olsen 6, and E. Thébault 7. 3 Earth and
More informationØrsted and Magsat scalar anomaly fields
Earth Planets Space, 52, 1213 1225, 2000 Ørsted and Magsat scalar anomaly fields D. J. Ivers 1, R. J. Stening 2, J. Turner 1, and D. E. Winch 1 1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney,
More informationA time-dependent model of the Earth s magnetic field and its secular variation for the period
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111,, doi:10.1029/2006jb004401, 2006 A time-dependent model of the Earth s magnetic field and its secular variation for the period 1980 2000 I. Wardinski 1 and R.
More informationCHALLENGES TO THE SWARM MISSION: ON DIFFERENT INTERNAL SHA MAGNETIC FIELD MODELS OF THE EARTH IN DEPENDENCE ON SATELLITE ALTITUDES
CHALLENGES TO THE SWARM MISSION: ON DIFFERENT INTERNAL SHA MAGNETIC FIELD MODELS OF THE EARTH IN DEPENDENCE ON SATELLITE ALTITUDES Wigor A. Webers Helmholtz- Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum,
More informationCHAPTER 2 DATA. 2.1 Data Used
CHAPTER DATA For the analysis, it is required to use geomagnetic indices, which are representatives of geomagnetic activity, and Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) data in addition to f F,which is used
More informationB. Loomis, D. Wiese, R. S. Nerem (1) P. L. Bender (2) P. N. A. M. Visser (3)
Possible mission architectures for a GRACE follow-on mission including a study on upgraded instrumentation suites, and multiple satellite pairs in moderately-inclined orbits B. Loomis, D. Wiese, R. S.
More informationr 2. (5) This agrees of course with the traditional multipole way of writing it: for an axial point dipole at the coordinate origin
1. A Digression on Dipoles From the perspective of potential theory, the dipole represents the point source obtained by allowing two point charges of opposite sign to approach each other, in such a way
More informationLAB 2: Earth Sun Relations
LAB 2: Earth Sun Relations Name School The amount of solar energy striking the Earth s atmosphere is not uniform; distances, angles and seasons play a dominant role on this distribution of radiation. Needless
More informationEXTREMELY QUIET 2009 STATE OF GEOMAGNETIC FIELD AS A REFERENCE LEVEL FOR AMPLITUDE OF THE LOCAL GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCES
EXTREMELY QUIET 2009 STATE OF GEOMAGNETIC FIELD AS A REFERENCE LEVEL FOR AMPLITUDE OF THE LOCAL GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCES A.E. Levitin, L.I. Gromova, S.V. Gromov, L.A. Dremukhina Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial
More informationHydrological Mass Variations due to Extreme Weather Conditions in Central Europe from Regional GRACE 4D Expansions
Hydrological Mass Variations due to Extreme Weather Conditions in Central Europe from Regional GRACE 4D Expansions Florian Seitz 1, Michael Schmidt 2, C.K. Shum 3, Yiqun Chen 3 1 Earth Oriented Space Science
More informationTime Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 27, 2010 Substorms Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite shows changes that occur during an auroral substorm.
More informationTHE RELIABILITY OF EARTH S MAGNETIC POLES IN THE MODERN, HISTORICAL AND ANCIENT MODELS. T.I. Zvereva, S.V. Starchenko
THE RELIABILITY OF EARTH S MAGNETIC POLES IN THE MODERN, HISTORICAL AND ANCIENT MODELS T.I. Zvereva, S.V. Starchenko Pushkov institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, ionosphere and Radio wave Propagation (IZMIRAN),
More informationGlobal Models of the Magnetic Field in Historical Times: Augmenting Declination Observations with Archeo- and Paleo- Magnetic Data D.
J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 38, 715-720, 1986 Global Models of the Magnetic Field in Historical Times: Augmenting Declination Observations with Archeo- and Paleo- Magnetic Data D. GUBBINS Bullard Laboratories,
More informationOriginally published as:
Originally published as: Mandea, M., Olsen, N. (2009): Geomagnetic and Archeomagnetic Jerks: Where Do We Stand?. - Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 90, 24, 208-208 From geomagnetic jerks
More informationHYPER Industrial Feasibility Study Final Presentation Orbit Selection
Industrial Feasibility Study Final Presentation Orbit Selection Steve Kemble Astrium Ltd. 6 March 2003 Mission Analysis Lense Thiring effect and orbit requirements Orbital environment Gravity Atmospheric
More informationSolar Insolation and Earth Radiation Budget Measurements
Week 13: November 19-23 Solar Insolation and Earth Radiation Budget Measurements Topics: 1. Daily solar insolation calculations 2. Orbital variations effect on insolation 3. Total solar irradiance measurements
More informationSatellite Geodesy and Navigation Present and Future
Satellite Geodesy and Navigation Present and Future Drazen Svehla Institute of Astronomical and Physical Geodesy Technical University of Munich, Germany Content Clocks for navigation Relativistic geodesy
More informationObservation of magnetic diffusion in the Earth s outer core from Magsat, Ørsted, and CHAMP data
Click Here for Full Article JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115,, doi:10.1029/2009jb006994, 2010 Observation of magnetic diffusion in the Earth s outer core from Magsat, Ørsted, and CHAMP data A.
More informationSIO229 PART II: GEOMAGNETISM
SIO229 PART II: GEOMAGNETISM 1. INTRODUCTION Geomagnetism, the study of Earth s magnetic field, has a long history and has revealed much about the way the Earth works. As we shall see, the existence and
More informationUnusual behaviour of the IGRF during the period
Earth Planets Space, 52, 1227 1233, 2000 Unusual behaviour of the IGRF during the 1945 1955 period Wen-yao Xu Institute of Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China (Received February
More informationGeophysics Departmental Exam: 2004 Part 1
2004 Geophysics Departmental Exam: 2004 Part 1 This section is 90 minutes, closed book, and consists of questions designed to test your knowledge of facts and figures in the geosciences. The focus will
More informationOrbit Evolution of the Swarm Mission Detlef Sieg
Orbit Evolution of the Swarm Mission Detlef Sieg Content Orbit history absolute Aerodynamic scale factors from orbit determination Altitude history and prediction RAAN/LTAN (orbit plane rotation) Orbital
More informationG. Balasis (1), I. A. Daglis (1,2), M. Georgiou (1,2), C. Papadimitriou (1,2), E. Zesta (3), I. Mann (4) and R. Haagmans (5)
G. Balasis (1), I. A. Daglis (1,2), M. Georgiou (1,2), C. Papadimitriou (1,2), E. Zesta (3), I. Mann (4) and R. Haagmans (5) (1) IAASARS-National Observatory of Athens; (2) University of Athens; (3) NASA;
More information2-1-4 Preceding Monitoring of Solar Wind Toward the Earth Using STEREO
2-1-4 Preceding Monitoring of Solar Wind Toward the Earth Using STEREO NAGATSUMA Tsutomu, AKIOKA Maki, MIYAKE Wataru, and OHTAKA Kazuhiro Acquisition of solar wind information before it reaches the earth
More informationNASA Future Magnetospheric Missions. J. Slavin & T. Moore Laboratory for Solar & Space Physics NASA GSFC
NASA Future Magnetospheric Missions J. Slavin & T. Moore Laboratory for Solar & Space Physics NASA GSFC Future Magnetospheric Missions Strategic Missions Radiation Belt Storm Probes (LWS/2011) Magnetospheric
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
doi:.38/nature149 1 Observation information This study examines 2 hours of data obtained between :33:42 and 12:46:28 Universal Time (UT) on April 17 11 using the -metre Keck telescope. This dataset was
More informationMonthly Magnetic Bulletin
BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ascension Island Observatory Monthly Magnetic Bulletin December 2008 08/12/AS Crown copyright; Ordnance Survey ASCENSION ISLAND OBSERVATORY MAGNETIC DATA 1. Introduction Ascension
More informationTilts and Obliquities!
Fran Bagenal! University of Colorado! Tilts and Obliquities! Offset Tilted Dipole Approximation Earth Stanley & Bloxham 2006 Jupiter Saturn B radial @ surface Uranus Neptune Magnetic Potential 3-D harmonics
More informationThermosperic wind response to geomagnetic activity in the low latitudes during the 2004 Equinox seasons
Available online at www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Advances in Applied Science Research, 211, 2 (6):563-569 ISSN: 976-861 CODEN (USA): AASRFC Thermosperic wind response to geomagnetic activity in the low
More informationMagnetospheric Physics - Homework, 02/21/ Local expansion of B: Consider the matrix B = (1)
Magnetospheric Physics - Homework, //4 4. Local expansion of B: Consider the matrix B α x γ δ x γ α y δ y β x β y α z () with constant parameters α i, β i, δ i, γ, and γ for the expansion of the magnetic
More informationESA s Juice: Mission Summary and Fact Sheet
ESA s Juice: Mission Summary and Fact Sheet JUICE - JUpiter ICy moons Explorer - is the first large-class mission in ESA's Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme. Planned for launch in 2022 and arrival at Jupiter
More informationTowards jointly-determined magnetospheric periods
Towards jointly-determined magnetospheric periods Dave Andrews ISSI, October 2015 david.andrews@irfu.se Outline Lots of independent work done on determining rotation periods of various magnetospheric phenomena
More informationHEIGHT-LATITUDE STRUCTURE OF PLANETARY WAVES IN THE STRATOSPHERE AND TROPOSPHERE. V. Guryanov, A. Fahrutdinova, S. Yurtaeva
HEIGHT-LATITUDE STRUCTURE OF PLANETARY WAVES IN THE STRATOSPHERE AND TROPOSPHERE INTRODUCTION V. Guryanov, A. Fahrutdinova, S. Yurtaeva Kazan State University, Kazan, Russia When constructing empirical
More informationGOCE. Gravity and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer
GOCE Gravity and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer Reiner Rummel Astronomical and Physical Geodesy Technische Universität München rummel@bv.tum.de ESA Earth Observation Summerschool ESRIN/Frascati
More informationOSTST, October 2014
OSTST, 19-23 October 2014 Update of the South-Atlantic Anomaly corrective model for JASON-1 DORIS data using the maps of energetic particles from the CARMEN dosimeter onboard JASON-2 H. Capdeville (1),
More informationA coherent model of the crustal magnetic field of Mars
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 109,, doi:10.1029/2004je002265, 2004 A coherent model of the crustal magnetic field of Mars Jafar Arkani-Hamed Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal,
More informationThe Earth s time-variable gravity field observed by GOCE
The Earth s time-variable gravity field observed by GOCE GOCE+ Time-Variations, part of STSE (Theme 4, Innovative Feasibility Studies) J. Bouman, M. Fuchs, C. Haberkorn, V. Lieb, M. Schmidt T. Broerse,
More informationP2.12 Sampling Errors of Climate Monitoring Constellations
P2.12 Sampling Errors of Climate Monitoring Constellations Renu Joseph 1*, Daniel B. Kirk-Davidoff 1 and James G. Anderson 2 1 University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 2 Harvard University, Cambridge,
More informationINTERNAL THALES ALENIA SPACE
Workshop Galileo Galilei (GG) and GGG lab prototype: state of the art and new possibilities Template reference : 100181670S-EN GG error budget from the end-to-end simulator developed at TAS-I Giuseppe
More information2 Preliminary Results Achieved by the Meridian Project
Space Science Activities in China cycle peak year ( ), magnetic storm activities increased significantly, the Meridian Project has repeatedly observed the responses of the space environment to solar storms
More informationTowards quantitative assessment of the hazard from space weather. Global 3-D modellings of the electric field induced by a realistic geomagnetic storm
Earth Planets Space, 65, 1017 1025, 2013 Towards quantitative assessment of the hazard from space weather. Global 3-D modellings of the electric field induced by a realistic geomagnetic storm Christoph
More information3. The diagram below shows the Moon at four positions in its orbit around Earth as viewed from above the North Pole.
1. Which object orbits Earth in both the Earth-centered (geocentric) and Sun-centered (heliocentric) models of our solar system? (1) Polaris (3) the Sun (2) Venus (4) the Moon 2. A cycle of Moon phases
More information