MSR by Examples. Iliano Cervesato. ITT Industries, NRL Washington DC.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MSR by Examples. Iliano Cervesato. ITT Industries, NRL Washington DC."

Transcription

1 MSR by Examples Iliano Cervesato ITT Industries, NRL Washington DC PPL 01 March 21 st, 2001

2 Outline I. Security Protocols II. MSR by Examples Multiset rewriting The Neuman-Stubblebine Protocol MSR III. Intruder Models Dolev-Yao intruder MSR by Examples 2

3 Part I Security Protocols MSR by Examples 3

4 What are they? Exchange of (encrypted) messages for Communicating secrets Authentication Contract signing E-commerce MSR by Examples 4

5 Neuman-Stubblebine Phase I A B: A, n A B S: B, {A, n A, T B } kbs, n B S A: {B, n A, k AB, T B } kas, {A, k AB, T B } kbs,n B A B: {A, k AB, T B } kbs, {n B } kab MSR by Examples 5

6 Neuman-Stubblebine Phase II A B: n A, {A, k AB, T B } kbs B A: n B, {n A } kab A B: {n B } kab MSR by Examples 6

7 Dolev-Yao Abstraction Symbolic data No bit-strings Perfect cryptography No guessing of keys Public knowledge soup Magic access to data MSR by Examples 7

8 Why is Protocol Analysis Difficult? Subtle cryptographic primitives Dolev-Yao abstraction Distributed hostile environment Prudent engineering practice Inadequate specification languages the devil is in details MSR by Examples 8

9 Languages to Specify What? Message flow Message constituents Operating environment Protocol goals MSR by Examples 9

10 Desirable Properties Unambiguous Simple Flexible Adapts to protocol Applies to a wide class of protocols Insightful MSR by Examples 10

11 Part II MSR by Examples MSR by Examples 11

12 What s in MSR? Multiset rewriting with existentials Dependent types w/ subsorting Memory predicates New New Constraints New MSR by Examples 12

13 Multiset Rewriting Multiset: set with repetitions allowed Rewrite rule: r: N 1 N 2 Application r M 1 M 2 r M, N 1 M, N 2 Multi-step transition, reachability MSR by Examples 13

14 Neuman-Stubblebine Phase I A B: A, n A B S: B, {A, n A, T B } kbs, n B S A: {B, n A, k AB, T B } kas, {A, k AB, T B } kbs,n B A B: {A, k AB, T B } kbs, {n B } kab MSR by Examples 14

15 NS-I: B s point of view A B: A, n A B S: B, {A, n A, T B } kbs, n B S A: {B, n A, k AB, T B } kas, {A, k AB, T B } kbs,n B A B: {A, k AB, T B } kbs, {n B } kab MSR by Examples 15

16 NS-I: S s point of view A B: A, n A B S: B, {A, n A, T B } kbs, n B S A: {B, n A, k AB, T B } kas, {A, k AB, T B } kbs,n B A B: {A, k AB, T B } kbs, {n B } kab MSR by Examples 16

17 NS-I: A s point of view A B: A, n A B S: B, {A, n A, T B } kbs, n B S A: {B, n A, k AB, T B } kas, {A, k AB, T B } kbs,n B A B: {A, k AB, T B } kbs, {n B } kab X X Ticket MSR by Examples 17

18 Sending / Receiving Messages N(A, n A ) Network predicate N(t): t is a message in transit N({B,n A,k AB,T B } kas,x,n B ) N({n B } kab ) MSR by Examples 18

19 Terms Atomic terms Principal names A Keys k Nonces n Term constructors ( ) {_} D e f i n a b l e MSR by Examples 19

20 Nonces n A. N(A, n A ) Existential variables n A instantiated to a new constant N({B,n A,k AB,T B } kas, X, n B ) N({n B } kab ) MSR by Examples 20

21 MSet Rewriting with Existentials msets of 1 st -order atomic formulas Rules: Application r: F(x) n. G(x,n) r M 1 M 2 c not in M 1 r M, F(t) M, G(t,c) MSR by Examples 21

22 Sequencing actions L. Fresh! n A. N(A, n A ) L(A,n A ) Role state predicate L(A,n A ) N({B,n A,k AB,T B } kas, X, n B ) N({n B } kab ) MSR by Examples 22

23 Role state predicates Hold data local to a role instance Lifespan = role L l (A,t,, t) Invoke next rule L l = control (A,t,, t) = data MSR by Examples 23

24 Remembering Things L. n A. L(A,n A ) N(A, n A ) L(A,n A ) N({B,n A,k AB,T B } kas, X, n B ) N({n B } kab ) Tkt A (B,k AB,X) Memory predicate MSR by Examples 24

25 Memory Predicates New M A (t,, t) Hold private info. across role exec. Support for subprotocols Communicate data Pass control Interface to outside system Implements intruder MSR by Examples 25

26 Role owner New Role owner The principal executing the role L. n A. L(A,n A ) N(A, n A ) A L(A,n A ) N({B,n A,k AB,T B } kas, X, n B ) N({n B } kab ) Tkt A (B,k AB,X) MSR by Examples 26

27 What is what? Types A L: princ x nonce. na :nonce. n A :nonce. L(A,n A ) N(A, n A ) B:princ. n A,n B : nonce k AB : shk A B k AS : shk A S X: msg L(A,n A ) N({B,n A,k AB,T B } kas, X, n B ) N({n B } kab ) Tkt A (B,k AB,X) MSR by Examples 27

28 Types of Terms A: princ n: nonce k: shk A B k: pubk A k : privk k (definable) Types can depend on term Captures relations between objects Static Local Mandatory MSR by Examples 28

29 Subtyping τ :: msg Allows atomic terms in messages Definable Non-transmittable terms Sub-hierarchies MSR by Examples 29

30 Type of predicates Dependent sums Σx: τ. τ τ (x) x τ Forces associations among arguments x E.g.: princ (A) x pubk A (k A) x privk k A MSR by Examples 30

31 Type Checking New Σ P t has type τ in Γ Γ t : τ P is welltyped in Σ Catches: Encryption with a nonce Transmission of a long term key MSR by Examples 31

32 Access Control New r is AC-valid for A in Γ Catches Γ A r P is ACvalid in Σ Σ P A signing/encrypting with B s key A accessing B s private data, Gives meaning to Dolev-Yao intruder MSR by Examples 32

33 NS-I: B s point of view A B: A, n A B S: B, {A, n A, T B } kbs, n B S A: {B, n A, k AB, T B } kas, {A, k AB, T B } kbs,n B A B: {A, k AB, T B } kbs, {n B } kab MSR by Examples 33

34 NS-I: B s role L: princ (B) x princ x nonce x shk B S x nonce x time. B A:princ. n A : nonce k BS :shkb S T B : time n B :nonce. N(A, n A ) Clk B (T B ) N(B, {A,n A,T B } kbs, n B ) Clk B (T B ) L(B,A,n A,k BS,n B,T B ). k AB :shka B n B : nonce T now : time T V,T e : time L(B,A,n A,k BS,n B,T B ) N({A,k AB,T B } kbs, {n B } kab ) Val B (A,T B, T V ) (T e = T B + T V ) Auth B (A, k AB,T B,T e ) Val B (A,T B, T V ) Constraint MSR by Examples 34

35 Constraints New χ Guards over interpreted domain Abstract Modular Invoke constraint handler E.g.: timestamps (T E = T N + T d ) (T N < T E ) MSR by Examples 35

36 NS-I: S s point of view A B: A, n A B S: B, {A, n A, T B } kbs, n B S A: {B, n A, k AB, T B } kas, {A, k AB, T B } kbs,n B A B: {A, k AB, T B } kbs, {n B } kab MSR by Examples 36

37 NS-I: S s role Anchored role A,B:princ. k AS :shka S k BS :shkb S n A,n B : nonce T B : time N(B, {A,n A,T B } kbs,n B ) k AB :shka B. N({B,n A,k AB,T B } kas, {A,k AB,T B } kbs, n B ) S MSR by Examples 37

38 Neuman-Stubblebine Phase II A B: n A, {A, k AB, T B } kbs B A: n B, {n A } kab A B: {n B } kab MSR by Examples 38

39 NS-II: A s role A L: princ (A) x princ (B) x shk A B x nonce. n A :nonce. B:princ. k AB :shka B X: msg Tkt A (B,k AB,X) N( n A, X) Tkt A (B,k AB,X) L(A, B,k AB,n A ). n A,n B : nonce L(A, B,k AB,n A ) N(n B,{n A } kab ) N({n B } kab ) MSR by Examples 39

40 NS-II: B s role L: princ (B) x princ (A) x shk A B x nonce. B n A : nonce k BS :shkb S A:princ. k AB :shka B T B,T e : time T now : time N(n A, {A,k AB,T B } kbs ) Auth B (A, k AB,T B,T e ) Clk B (T now ) (T now < T e ) n B :nonce. N(n B, {n A } kab ) Auth B (A, k AB,T B,T e ) Clk B (T now ) L(B,A,k AB,n B ). n B : nonce L(B,A,k AB,n B ) N({n B } kab ) MSR by Examples 40

41 Summary: Rules x 1 : τ 1. x n : τ n. y 1 : τ 1. lhs rhs y n : τ n. N(t) Network L(t,, t) Local state M A (t,, t) Memory χ Constraints N(t) Network L(t,, t) Local state M A (t,, t) Memory MSR by Examples 41

42 Summary: Roles Role state pred. var. declarations Generic roles L: τ (x 1 ) 1 x x τ n (xn) x:τ. lhs y:τ. rhs x:τ. lhs y:τ. rhs A Role owner Anchored roles L: τ (x1) 1 x x τ n (xn) x:τ. lhs y:τ. rhs x:τ. lhs y:τ. rhs A MSR by Examples 42

43 Summary: Snapshots Active role set C = [S] R Σ State N(t) L l (t,, t) M A (t,, t) Signature a : τ L l : τ M _ : τ MSR by Examples 43

44 Summary: Execution Model Activate roles Generates new role state pred. names Instantiate variables Apply rules Skips rules P C C 1-step firing MSR by Examples 44

45 Summary: Rule application r = F, χ n:τ. G(n) Constraint check Σ = χ (constraint handler) Firing [S 1 ] R(r,ρ) Σ [S 2 ] Rρ Σ, c:τ c not in S 1 S, F S, G(c) MSR by Examples 45

46 Properties Type preservation Access control preservation Completeness of Dolev-Yao intruder New MSR by Examples 46

47 Completed Case-Studies Full Needham-Schroeder public-key Otway-Rees Neuman-Stubblebine repeated auth. OFT group key management MSR by Examples 47

48 Part III The Intruder MSR by Examples 48

49 Execution with an Attacker P, P I C C Selected principal(s): Generic capabilities: Well-typed AC-valid I P I Modeled completely within MSR MSR by Examples 49

50 The Dolev-Yao Intruder Specific protocol suite P DY Underlies every protocol analysis tool Completeness still unproved MSR by Examples 50

51 Capabilities of the D-Y Intruder Intercept / emit messages Decrypt / encrypt with known key Split / form pairs Look up public information Generate fresh data MSR by Examples 51

52 DY Intruder Net Interference M I (t) : Intruder knowledge t: msg. N(t) M I (t) I t: msg. M I (t) N(t) I MSR by Examples 52

53 DY Intruder Decryption A,B: princ k: shk A B t: msg M I ({t} k ) M I (k) M I (t) I A: princ k: pubk A k : privk A t: msg M I ({t} k ) M I (k) M I (t) I MSR by Examples 53

54 DY Intruder Encryption A,B: princ k: shk A B t: msg M I (t) M I (k) M I ({t} k ) I A: princ k: pubk A t: msg M I (t) M I (k) M I ({t} k ) I MSR by Examples 54

55 DY Intruder Pairs t 1,t 2 : msg M I (t 1,t 2 ) M I (t 1 ) M I (t 2 ) I t 1,t 2 : msg M I (t 1 ) M I (t 2 ) M I (t 1,t 2 ) I MSR by Examples 55

56 DY Intruder Structural rules t: msg M I ( t) M I (t) M I (t) I t: msg M I ( t) I MSR by Examples 56

57 DY Intruder Data access A: princ. M I (A) I A: princ k: shk I A M I (k) I + dual A: princ k: pubk A M I (k) I k: pubk I k : privk k M I (k ) I No nonces, no other keys, MSR by Examples 57

58 DY Intruder Data Generation Safe data n:nonce. M I (n) I m:msg. M I (m) I Anything else? A,B:princ. k:shk A B. M I (k) I??? It depends on the protocol!!! Automated generation? MSR by Examples 58

59 DY Intruder Stretches AC to Limit AC-valid Well-typed Dolev-Yao intruder MSR by Examples 59

60 Completeness of D-Y Intruder If P [S] R Σ [S ] R Σ with all well-typed and AC-valid Then P, P DY [S] R Σ [S ] R Σ MSR by Examples 60

61 Consequences Justifies design of current tools Support optimizations D-Y intr. often too general/inefficient Generic optimizations Per protocol optimizations Restrictive environments Caps multi-intruder situations MSR by Examples 61

62 Future work Experimentation Clark-Jacob library Fair-exchange protocols More multicast Pragmatics Type-reconstruction Operational execution model(s) Implementation Automated specification techniques MSR by Examples 62

Typed MSR: Syntax and Examples

Typed MSR: Syntax and Examples Typed MSR: Syntax and Examples Iliano Cervesato iliano@itd.nrl.navy.mil ITT Industries, Inc @ NRL Washington DC http://www.cs.stanford.edu/~iliano/ MMM 01 St. Petersburg, Russia May 22 nd, 2001 Outline

More information

MSR by Examples. Iliano Cervesato. ITT Industries, NRL Washington DC.

MSR by Examples. Iliano Cervesato. ITT Industries, NRL Washington DC. MSR by Examples Iliano Cervesato iliano@itd.nrl.navy.mil ITT Industries, Inc @ NRL Washington DC http://www.cs.stanford.edu/~iliano/ IITD, CSE Dept. Delhi, India April 24 th,2002 Outline Security Protocols

More information

Abstract Specification of Crypto- Protocols and their Attack Models in MSR

Abstract Specification of Crypto- Protocols and their Attack Models in MSR Abstract Specification of Crypto- Protocols and their Attack Models in MSR Iliano Cervesato iliano@itd.nrl.navy.mil ITT Industries, Inc @ NRL Washington DC http://www.cs.stanford.edu/~iliano/ Software

More information

Lecture 7: Specification Languages

Lecture 7: Specification Languages Graduate Course on Computer Security Lecture 7: Specification Languages Iliano Cervesato iliano@itd.nrl.navy.mil ITT Industries, Inc @ NRL Washington DC http://www.cs.stanford.edu/~iliano/ DIMI, Universita

More information

One Year Later. Iliano Cervesato. ITT Industries, NRL Washington, DC. MSR 3.0:

One Year Later. Iliano Cervesato. ITT Industries, NRL Washington, DC.  MSR 3.0: MSR 3.0: The Logical Meeting Point of Multiset Rewriting and Process Algebra MSR 3: Iliano Cervesato iliano@itd.nrl.navy.mil One Year Later ITT Industries, inc @ NRL Washington, DC http://www.cs.stanford.edu/~iliano

More information

MSR 3.0: The Logical Meeting Point of Multiset Rewriting and Process Algebra. Iliano Cervesato. ITT Industries, NRL Washington, DC

MSR 3.0: The Logical Meeting Point of Multiset Rewriting and Process Algebra. Iliano Cervesato. ITT Industries, NRL Washington, DC MSR 3.0: The Logical Meeting Point of Multiset Rewriting and Process Algebra Iliano Cervesato iliano@itd.nrl.navy.mil ITT Industries, inc @ NRL Washington, DC http://theory.stanford.edu/~iliano ISSS 2003,

More information

Notes on BAN Logic CSG 399. March 7, 2006

Notes on BAN Logic CSG 399. March 7, 2006 Notes on BAN Logic CSG 399 March 7, 2006 The wide-mouthed frog protocol, in a slightly different form, with only the first two messages, and time stamps: A S : A, {T a, B, K ab } Kas S B : {T s, A, K ab

More information

The Logical Meeting Point of Multiset Rewriting and Process Algebra

The Logical Meeting Point of Multiset Rewriting and Process Algebra MFPS 20 @ MU May 25, 2004 The Logical Meeting Point of Multiset Rewriting and Process Algebra Iliano ervesato iliano@itd.nrl.navy.mil ITT Industries, inc @ NRL Washington, D http://theory.stanford.edu/~iliano

More information

Encoding security protocols in the cryptographic λ-calculus. Eijiro Sumii Joint work with Benjamin Pierce University of Pennsylvania

Encoding security protocols in the cryptographic λ-calculus. Eijiro Sumii Joint work with Benjamin Pierce University of Pennsylvania Encoding security protocols in the cryptographic λ-calculus Eijiro Sumii Joint work with Benjamin Pierce University of Pennsylvania An obvious fact Security is important Cryptography is a major way to

More information

Control Flow Analysis of Security Protocols (I)

Control Flow Analysis of Security Protocols (I) Control Flow Analysis of Security Protocols (I) Mikael Buchholtz 02913 F2005 Mikael Buchholtz p. 1 History of Protocol Analysis Needham-Schroeder 78 Dolev-Yao 81 Algebraic view of cryptography 02913 F2005

More information

Verification of Security Protocols in presence of Equational Theories with Homomorphism

Verification of Security Protocols in presence of Equational Theories with Homomorphism Verification of Security Protocols in presence of Equational Theories with Homomorphism Stéphanie Delaune France Télécom, division R&D, LSV CNRS & ENS Cachan February, 13, 2006 Stéphanie Delaune (FT R&D,

More information

Models and analysis of security protocols 1st Semester Security Protocols Lecture 6

Models and analysis of security protocols 1st Semester Security Protocols Lecture 6 Models and analysis of security protocols 1st Semester 2010-2011 Security Protocols Lecture 6 Pascal Lafourcade Université Joseph Fourier, Verimag Master: October 18th 2010 1 / 46 Last Time (I) Symmetric

More information

Time-Bounding Needham-Schroeder Public Key Exchange Protocol

Time-Bounding Needham-Schroeder Public Key Exchange Protocol Time-Bounding Needham-Schroeder Public Key Exchange Protocol Max Kanovich, Queen Mary, University of London, UK University College London, UCL-CS, UK Tajana Ban Kirigin, University of Rijeka, HR Vivek

More information

Protocol Insecurity with a Finite Number of Sessions and Composed Keys is NP-complete

Protocol Insecurity with a Finite Number of Sessions and Composed Keys is NP-complete Protocol Insecurity with a Finite Number of Sessions and Composed Keys is NP-complete Michaël Rusinowitch and Mathieu Turuani LORIA-INRIA- Université Henri Poincaré, 54506 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy cedex, France

More information

A Logic of Authentication

A Logic of Authentication A Logic of Authentication by Burrows, Abadi, and Needham Presented by Adam Schuchart, Kathryn Watkins, Michael Brotzman, Steve Bono, and Sam Small Agenda The problem Some formalism The goals of authentication,

More information

A Calculus for Control Flow Analysis of Security Protocols

A Calculus for Control Flow Analysis of Security Protocols International Journal of Information Security manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) A Calculus for Control Flow Analysis of Security Protocols Mikael Buchholtz, Hanne Riis Nielson, Flemming Nielson

More information

Discrete vs. Dense Times in the Analysis of Cyber-Physical Security Protocols

Discrete vs. Dense Times in the Analysis of Cyber-Physical Security Protocols Discrete vs. Dense Times in the Analysis of Cyber-Physical Security Protocols Max Kanovich 1,5 Tajana Ban Kirigin 2 Vivek Nigam 3 Andre Scedrov 4,5 and Carolyn Talcott 6 1 Queen Mary, University of London

More information

CPSA and Formal Security Goals

CPSA and Formal Security Goals CPSA and Formal Security Goals John D. Ramsdell The MITRE Corporation CPSA Version 2.5.1 July 8, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Syntax 6 3 Semantics 8 4 Examples 10 4.1 Needham-Schroeder Responder.................

More information

Relating State-Based and Process-Based Concurrency through Linear Logic

Relating State-Based and Process-Based Concurrency through Linear Logic École Polytechnique 17 September 2009 Relating State-Based and Process-Based oncurrency through Linear Logic Iliano ervesato arnegie Mellon University - Qatar iliano@cmu.edu Specifying oncurrent Systems

More information

Term Rewriting applied to Cryptographic Protocol Analysis: the Maude-NPA tool

Term Rewriting applied to Cryptographic Protocol Analysis: the Maude-NPA tool Term Rewriting applied to Cryptographic Protocol Analysis: the Maude-NPA tool Santiago Escobar Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación Universitat Politècnica de València sescobar@dsic.upv.es

More information

Probabilistic Polynomial-Time Process Calculus for Security Protocol Analysis. Standard analysis methods. Compositionality

Probabilistic Polynomial-Time Process Calculus for Security Protocol Analysis. Standard analysis methods. Compositionality Probabilistic Polynomial-Time Process Calculus for Security Protocol Analysis J. Mitchell, A. Ramanathan, A. Scedrov, V. Teague P. Lincoln, P. Mateus, M. Mitchell Standard analysis methods Finite-state

More information

A Formal Analysis for Capturing Replay Attacks in Cryptographic Protocols

A Formal Analysis for Capturing Replay Attacks in Cryptographic Protocols ASIAN 07 A Formal Analysis for Capturing Replay Attacks in Cryptographic s Han Gao 1, Chiara Bodei 2, Pierpaolo Degano 2, Hanne Riis Nielson 1 Informatics and Mathematics Modelling, Technical University

More information

Models for an Adversary-Centric Protocol Logic

Models for an Adversary-Centric Protocol Logic Workshop on Logical Aspects of Cryptographics 2001 Preliminary Version Models for an Adversary-Centric Protocol Logic Peter Selinger Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Ottawa Ottawa,

More information

A Logic of Authentication. Borrows, Abadi and Needham TOCS 1990, DEC-SRC 1989

A Logic of Authentication. Borrows, Abadi and Needham TOCS 1990, DEC-SRC 1989 A Logic of Authentication Borrows, Abadi and Needham TOCS 1990, DEC-SRC 1989 Logic Constructs P believes X : P may act as though X is true. P sees X : a message containing X was sent to P; P can read and

More information

Quantum Wireless Sensor Networks

Quantum Wireless Sensor Networks Quantum Wireless Sensor Networks School of Computing Queen s University Canada ntional Computation Vienna, August 2008 Main Result Quantum cryptography can solve the problem of security in sensor networks.

More information

Strand Spaces Proving Protocols Corr. Jonathan Herzog 6 April 2001

Strand Spaces Proving Protocols Corr. Jonathan Herzog 6 April 2001 Strand Spaces Proving Protocols Corr Jonathan Herzog 6 April 2001 Introduction 3Second part of talk given early last month Introduced class of cryptographic protocols Modeled at high level of abstraction

More information

Extending Dolev-Yao with Assertions

Extending Dolev-Yao with Assertions Extending Dolev-Yao with Assertions Vaishnavi Sundararajan Chennai Mathematical Institute FOSAD 2015 August 31, 2015 (Joint work with R Ramanujam and S P Suresh) Vaishnavi S Extending Dolev-Yao with Assertions

More information

A progress report on using Maude to verify protocol properties using the strand space model

A progress report on using Maude to verify protocol properties using the strand space model A progress report on using Maude to verify protocol properties using the strand space model Presented by Robert P. Graham, MAJ, USAF/AFIT Stephen W. Mancini, 1Lt, USAF/AFIT Presentation date: 01 Oct 03

More information

Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction

Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction Proving Security Protocols 1 L. C. Paulson Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction Lawrence C. Paulson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge Proving Security Protocols 2 L. C. Paulson

More information

Proving Security Protocols Correct. Lawrence C. Paulson Computer Laboratory

Proving Security Protocols Correct. Lawrence C. Paulson Computer Laboratory Proving Security Protocols Correct Lawrence C. Paulson Computer Laboratory How Detailed Should a Model Be? too detailed too simple concrete abstract not usable not credible ``proves'' everything ``attacks''

More information

On the Verification of Cryptographic Protocols

On the Verification of Cryptographic Protocols On the Verification of Cryptographic Protocols Federico Cerutti Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell Informazione, Università di Brescia Via Branze 38, I-25123 Brescia, Italy January 11, 2011 Talk at Prof.

More information

Equational Tree Automata: Towards Automated Verification of Network Protocols

Equational Tree Automata: Towards Automated Verification of Network Protocols Equational Tree Automata: Towards Automated Verification of Network Protocols Hitoshi Ohsaki and Toshinori Takai National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Nakoji 3 11 46,

More information

Automated Validation of Internet Security Protocols. Luca Viganò

Automated Validation of Internet Security Protocols. Luca Viganò Automated Validation of Internet Security Protocols Luca Viganò The AVISPA Project Luca Viganò 1 Motivation The number and scale of new security protocols under development is out-pacing the human ability

More information

MASTER S THESIS FROM FORMAL TO COMPUTATIONAL AUTHENTICITY DISTRIBUTED AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AALBORG UNIVERSITY

MASTER S THESIS FROM FORMAL TO COMPUTATIONAL AUTHENTICITY DISTRIBUTED AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AALBORG UNIVERSITY DISTRIBUTED AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AALBORG UNIVERSITY MASTER S THESIS MICHAEL GARDE FROM FORMAL TO COMPUTATIONAL AUTHENTICITY AN APPROACH FOR RECONCILING FORMAL AND COMPUTATIONAL

More information

L7. Diffie-Hellman (Key Exchange) Protocol. Rocky K. C. Chang, 5 March 2015

L7. Diffie-Hellman (Key Exchange) Protocol. Rocky K. C. Chang, 5 March 2015 L7. Diffie-Hellman (Key Exchange) Protocol Rocky K. C. Chang, 5 March 2015 1 Outline The basic foundation: multiplicative group modulo prime The basic Diffie-Hellman (DH) protocol The discrete logarithm

More information

Automatic Verification of Complex Security Protocols With an Unbounded Number of Sessions

Automatic Verification of Complex Security Protocols With an Unbounded Number of Sessions Automatic Verification of Complex Security Protocols With an Unbounded Number of Sessions Kaile Su, Weiya Yue and Qingliang Chen Department of Computer Science, Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, P.R. China

More information

BAN Logic A Logic of Authentication

BAN Logic A Logic of Authentication BAN Logic A Logic of Authentication Sape J. Mullender Huygens Systems Research Laboratory Universiteit Twente Enschede 1 BAN Logic The BAN logic was named after its inventors, Mike Burrows, Martín Abadí,

More information

1 Secure two-party computation

1 Secure two-party computation CSCI 5440: Cryptography Lecture 7 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Spring 2018 26 and 27 February 2018 In the first half of the course we covered the basic cryptographic primitives that enable secure

More information

A decidable subclass of unbounded security protocols

A decidable subclass of unbounded security protocols A decidable subclass of unbounded security protocols R. Ramanujam and S. P. Suresh The Institute of Mathematical Sciences C.I.T. Campus, Chennai 600 113, India. E-mail: {jam,spsuresh}@imsc.res.in 1 Summary

More information

CPSC 467b: Cryptography and Computer Security

CPSC 467b: Cryptography and Computer Security Outline Authentication CPSC 467b: Cryptography and Computer Security Lecture 18 Michael J. Fischer Department of Computer Science Yale University March 29, 2010 Michael J. Fischer CPSC 467b, Lecture 18

More information

Lecture 1: Introduction to Public key cryptography

Lecture 1: Introduction to Public key cryptography Lecture 1: Introduction to Public key cryptography Thomas Johansson T. Johansson (Lund University) 1 / 44 Key distribution Symmetric key cryptography: Alice and Bob share a common secret key. Some means

More information

CS 395T. Probabilistic Polynomial-Time Calculus

CS 395T. Probabilistic Polynomial-Time Calculus CS 395T Probabilistic Polynomial-Time Calculus Security as Equivalence Intuition: encryption scheme is secure if ciphertext is indistinguishable from random noise Intuition: protocol is secure if it is

More information

Gurgen Khachatrian Martun Karapetyan

Gurgen Khachatrian Martun Karapetyan 34 International Journal Information Theories and Applications, Vol. 23, Number 1, (c) 2016 On a public key encryption algorithm based on Permutation Polynomials and performance analyses Gurgen Khachatrian

More information

NSL Verification and Attacks Agents Playing Both Roles

NSL Verification and Attacks Agents Playing Both Roles NSL Verification and Attacks Agents Playing Both Roles Pedro Adão Gergei Bana Abstract Background: [2] and eprint version: [1] 1 The Axioms Equality is a Congruence. The first axiom says that the equality

More information

CIS 6930/4930 Computer and Network Security. Topic 5.2 Public Key Cryptography

CIS 6930/4930 Computer and Network Security. Topic 5.2 Public Key Cryptography CIS 6930/4930 Computer and Network Security Topic 5.2 Public Key Cryptography 1 Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange 2 Diffie-Hellman Protocol For negotiating a shared secret key using only public communication

More information

Asymmetric Encryption

Asymmetric Encryption -3 s s Encryption Comp Sci 3600 Outline -3 s s 1-3 2 3 4 5 s s Outline -3 s s 1-3 2 3 4 5 s s Function Using Bitwise XOR -3 s s Key Properties for -3 s s The most important property of a hash function

More information

CHRISTIAN-ALBRECHTS-UNIVERSITÄT KIEL

CHRISTIAN-ALBRECHTS-UNIVERSITÄT KIEL INSTITUT FÜR INFORMATIK UND PRAKTISCHE MATHEMATIK A Constraint-Based Algorithm for Contract-Signing Protocols Detlef Kähler, Ralf Küsters Bericht Nr. 0503 April 2005 CHRISTIAN-ALBRECHTS-UNIVERSITÄT KIEL

More information

Negative applications of the ASM thesis

Negative applications of the ASM thesis Negative applications of the ASM thesis Dean Rosenzweig and Davor Runje University of Zagreb Berlin, February 26-27, 2007 Outline 1 Negative applications of the ASM thesis Motivation Non-interactive algorithms

More information

Cryptography IV: Asymmetric Ciphers

Cryptography IV: Asymmetric Ciphers Cryptography IV: Asymmetric Ciphers Computer Security Lecture 7 David Aspinall School of Informatics University of Edinburgh 31st January 2011 Outline Background RSA Diffie-Hellman ElGamal Summary Outline

More information

A new security notion for asymmetric encryption Draft #8

A new security notion for asymmetric encryption Draft #8 A new security notion for asymmetric encryption Draft #8 Muhammad Rezal Kamel Ariffin 1,2 1 Al-Kindi Cryptography Research Laboratory, Institute for Mathematical Research, 2 Department of Mathematics,

More information

Report Documentation Page

Report Documentation Page Multiset Rewriting and the Complexity of Bounded Security Protocols Λ N.A. Durgin P.D. Lincoln J.C. Mitchell A. Scedrov Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA nadurgi@sandia.gov Computer Science Dept.

More information

The Maude-NRL Protocol Analyzer Lecture 3: Asymmetric Unification and Indistinguishability

The Maude-NRL Protocol Analyzer Lecture 3: Asymmetric Unification and Indistinguishability The Maude-NRL Protocol Analyzer Lecture 3: Asymmetric Unification and Catherine Meadows Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375 catherine.meadows@nrl.navy.mil Formal Methods for the Science of

More information

Analysis of authentication protocols Intership report

Analysis of authentication protocols Intership report Analysis of authentication protocols Intership report Stéphane Glondu ENS de Cachan September 3, 2006 1 Introduction Many computers are interconnected through networks, the biggest of them being Internet.

More information

Practice Assignment 2 Discussion 24/02/ /02/2018

Practice Assignment 2 Discussion 24/02/ /02/2018 German University in Cairo Faculty of MET (CSEN 1001 Computer and Network Security Course) Dr. Amr El Mougy 1 RSA 1.1 RSA Encryption Practice Assignment 2 Discussion 24/02/2018-29/02/2018 Perform encryption

More information

A compositional logic for proving security properties of protocols

A compositional logic for proving security properties of protocols Journal of Computer Security 11 (2003) 677 721 677 IOS Press A compositional logic for proving security properties of protocols Nancy Durgin a, John Mitchell b and Dusko Pavlovic c a Sandia National Labs,

More information

Deciding the Security of Protocols with Commuting Public Key Encryption

Deciding the Security of Protocols with Commuting Public Key Encryption Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 125 (2005) 55 66 www.elsevier.com/locate/entcs Deciding the Security of Protocols with Commuting Public Key Encryption Yannick Chevalier a,1 Ralf Küsters

More information

A simple procedure for finding guessing attacks (Extended Abstract)

A simple procedure for finding guessing attacks (Extended Abstract) A simple procedure for finding guessing attacks (Extended Abstract) Ricardo Corin 1 and Sandro Etalle 1,2 1 Dept. of Computer Science, University of Twente, The Netherlands 2 CWI, Center for Mathematics

More information

Proof Scores in the OTS/CafeOBJ Method

Proof Scores in the OTS/CafeOBJ Method Proof Scores in the OTS/CafeOBJ Method Kazuhiro Ogata 1,2 and Kokichi Futatsugi 2 1 NEC Software Hokuriku, Ltd. ogatak@acm.org 2 Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST) kokichi@jaist.ac.jp

More information

A Formal Analysis for Capturing Replay Attacks in Cryptographic Protocols

A Formal Analysis for Capturing Replay Attacks in Cryptographic Protocols A Formal Analysis for Capturing Replay Attacks in Cryptographic Protocols Han Gao 1,ChiaraBodei 2, Pierpaolo Degano 2, and Hanne Riis Nielson 1 1 Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University

More information

Public-Key Cryptosystems CHAPTER 4

Public-Key Cryptosystems CHAPTER 4 Public-Key Cryptosystems CHAPTER 4 Introduction How to distribute the cryptographic keys? Naïve Solution Naïve Solution Give every user P i a separate random key K ij to communicate with every P j. Disadvantage:

More information

An Efficient Cryptographic Protocol Verifier Based on Prolog Rules

An Efficient Cryptographic Protocol Verifier Based on Prolog Rules An Efficient Cryptographic Protocol Verifier Based on Prolog Rules Bruno Blanchet INRIA Rocquencourt Domaine de Voluceau B.P. 105 78153 Le Chesnay Cedex, France Bruno.Blanchet@inria.fr Abstract We present

More information

Computing on Encrypted Data

Computing on Encrypted Data Computing on Encrypted Data COSIC, KU Leuven, ESAT, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, bus 2452, B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee, Belgium. August 31, 2018 Computing on Encrypted Data Slide 1 Outline Introduction Multi-Party

More information

Picnic Post-Quantum Signatures from Zero Knowledge Proofs

Picnic Post-Quantum Signatures from Zero Knowledge Proofs Picnic Post-Quantum Signatures from Zero Knowledge Proofs MELISSA CHASE, MSR THE PICNIC TEAM DAVID DERLER STEVEN GOLDFEDER JONATHAN KATZ VLAD KOLESNIKOV CLAUDIO ORLANDI SEBASTIAN RAMACHER CHRISTIAN RECHBERGER

More information

Public Key 9/17/2018. Symmetric Cryptography Review. Symmetric Cryptography: Shortcomings (1) Symmetric Cryptography: Analogy

Public Key 9/17/2018. Symmetric Cryptography Review. Symmetric Cryptography: Shortcomings (1) Symmetric Cryptography: Analogy Symmetric Cryptography Review Alice Bob Public Key x e K (x) y d K (y) x K K Instructor: Dr. Wei (Lisa) Li Department of Computer Science, GSU Two properties of symmetric (secret-key) crypto-systems: The

More information

Automatic, computational proof of EKE using CryptoVerif

Automatic, computational proof of EKE using CryptoVerif Automatic, computational proof of EKE using CryptoVerif (Work in progress) Bruno Blanchet blanchet@di.ens.fr Joint work with David Pointcheval CNRS, École Normale Supérieure, INRIA, Paris April 2010 Bruno

More information

On the Automatic Analysis of Recursive Security Protocols with XOR

On the Automatic Analysis of Recursive Security Protocols with XOR On the Automatic Analysis of Recursive Security Protocols with XOR Ralf Küsters 1 and Tomasz Truderung 2 1 ETH Zurich ralf.kuesters@inf.ethz.ch 2 University of Kiel, Wrocław University tomasz.truderung@ii.uni.wroc.pl

More information

Public Key Cryptography

Public Key Cryptography Public Key Cryptography Ali El Kaafarani 1 Mathematical Institute 2 PQShield Ltd. 1 of 44 Outline 1 Public Key Encryption: security notions 2 RSA Encryption Scheme 2 of 44 Course main reference 3 of 44

More information

1 Number Theory Basics

1 Number Theory Basics ECS 289M (Franklin), Winter 2010, Crypto Review 1 Number Theory Basics This section has some basic facts about number theory, mostly taken (or adapted) from Dan Boneh s number theory fact sheets for his

More information

Exam Security January 19, :30 11:30

Exam Security January 19, :30 11:30 Exam Security January 19, 2016. 8:30 11:30 You can score a maximum of 100. Each question indicates how many it is worth. You are NOT allowed to use books or notes, or a (smart) phone. You may answer in

More information

CPSC 467: Cryptography and Computer Security

CPSC 467: Cryptography and Computer Security CPSC 467: Cryptography and Computer Security Michael J. Fischer Lecture 11 October 7, 2015 CPSC 467, Lecture 11 1/37 Digital Signature Algorithms Signatures from commutative cryptosystems Signatures from

More information

EXAM IN. TDA352 (Chalmers) - DIT250 (GU) 12 January 2018, 08:

EXAM IN. TDA352 (Chalmers) - DIT250 (GU) 12 January 2018, 08: CHALMERS GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET EXAM IN CRYPTOGRAPHY TDA352 (Chalmers) - DIT250 (GU) 12 January 2018, 08:30 12.30 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Typgodkänd räknare. Annan minnestömd räknare får användas efter godkännande

More information

Cryptography and Network Security Prof. D. Mukhopadhyay Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Cryptography and Network Security Prof. D. Mukhopadhyay Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Cryptography and Network Security Prof. D. Mukhopadhyay Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Module No. # 01 Lecture No. # 33 The Diffie-Hellman Problem

More information

A Cryptographic Decentralized Label Model

A Cryptographic Decentralized Label Model A Cryptographic Decentralized Label Model Jeffrey A. Vaughan and Steve Zdancewic Department of Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania IEEE Security and Privacy May 22, 2007 Information

More information

A one message protocol using cryptography, where K AB is a symmetric key shared between A and B for private communication. A B : {M} KAB on c AB

A one message protocol using cryptography, where K AB is a symmetric key shared between A and B for private communication. A B : {M} KAB on c AB A one message protocol using cryptography, where K AB is a symmetric key shared between A and B for private communication. A B : {M} KAB on c AB This can be represented as A send cab {M} KAB ;halt B recv

More information

Notes for Lecture 9. 1 Combining Encryption and Authentication

Notes for Lecture 9. 1 Combining Encryption and Authentication U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout N9 Luca Trevisan February 17, 2009 Notes for Lecture 9 Notes scribed by Joel Weinberger, posted March 1, 2009 Summary Last time, we showed that combining a CPA-secure

More information

Discrete Logarithm Problem

Discrete Logarithm Problem Discrete Logarithm Problem Finite Fields The finite field GF(q) exists iff q = p e for some prime p. Example: GF(9) GF(9) = {a + bi a, b Z 3, i 2 = i + 1} = {0, 1, 2, i, 1+i, 2+i, 2i, 1+2i, 2+2i} Addition:

More information

Notes for Lecture A can repeat step 3 as many times as it wishes. We will charge A one unit of time for every time it repeats step 3.

Notes for Lecture A can repeat step 3 as many times as it wishes. We will charge A one unit of time for every time it repeats step 3. COS 533: Advanced Cryptography Lecture 2 (September 18, 2017) Lecturer: Mark Zhandry Princeton University Scribe: Mark Zhandry Notes for Lecture 2 1 Last Time Last time, we defined formally what an encryption

More information

Cryptography CS 555. Topic 25: Quantum Crpytography. CS555 Topic 25 1

Cryptography CS 555. Topic 25: Quantum Crpytography. CS555 Topic 25 1 Cryptography CS 555 Topic 25: Quantum Crpytography CS555 Topic 25 1 Outline and Readings Outline: What is Identity Based Encryption Quantum cryptography Readings: CS555 Topic 25 2 Identity Based Encryption

More information

Probabilistic Model Checking of Security Protocols without Perfect Cryptography Assumption

Probabilistic Model Checking of Security Protocols without Perfect Cryptography Assumption Our Model Checking of Security Protocols without Perfect Cryptography Assumption Czestochowa University of Technology Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University CN2016 Our 1 2 3 Our 4 5 6 7 Importance of Security

More information

Automata-based analysis of recursive cryptographic protocols

Automata-based analysis of recursive cryptographic protocols 1 Automata-based analysis of recursive cryptographic protocols Thomas Wilke Joint work with Ralf Küsters Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel June 13, 2004 Un-/Decidability of security in the DY model

More information

arxiv: v1 [cs.cr] 27 May 2016

arxiv: v1 [cs.cr] 27 May 2016 Towards the Automated Verification of Cyber-Physical Security Protocols: Bounding the Number of Timed Intruders Vivek Nigam 1, Carolyn Talcott 2 and Abraão Aires Urquiza 1 arxiv:1605.08563v1 [cs.cr] 27

More information

The Faithfulness of Abstract Protocol Analysis: Message Authentication

The Faithfulness of Abstract Protocol Analysis: Message Authentication The Faithfulness of Abstract Protocol Analysis: Message Authentication Joshua D. Guttman F. Javier Thayer Lenore D. Zuck December 18, 2002 Abstract Dolev and Yao initiated an approach to studying cryptographic

More information

Verification of the TLS Handshake protocol

Verification of the TLS Handshake protocol Verification of the TLS Handshake protocol Carst Tankink (0569954), Pim Vullers (0575766) 20th May 2008 1 Introduction In this text, we will analyse the Transport Layer Security (TLS) handshake protocol.

More information

CryptoVerif: A Computationally Sound Mechanized Prover for Cryptographic Protocols

CryptoVerif: A Computationally Sound Mechanized Prover for Cryptographic Protocols CryptoVerif: A Computationally Sound Mechanized Prover for Cryptographic Protocols Bruno Blanchet CNRS, École Normale Supérieure, INRIA, Paris March 2009 Bruno Blanchet (CNRS, ENS, INRIA) CryptoVerif March

More information

APPLICATIONS OF BAN-LOGIC JAN WESSELS CMG FINANCE B.V.

APPLICATIONS OF BAN-LOGIC JAN WESSELS CMG FINANCE B.V. APPLITIONS OF AN-LOGIC JAN WESSELS CMG FINANCE.V. APRIL 19, 2001 Chapter 1 Introduction This document is meant to give an overview of the AN-logic. The AN-logic is one of the methods for the analysis of

More information

CS-E4320 Cryptography and Data Security Lecture 11: Key Management, Secret Sharing

CS-E4320 Cryptography and Data Security Lecture 11: Key Management, Secret Sharing Lecture 11: Key Management, Secret Sharing Céline Blondeau Email: celine.blondeau@aalto.fi Department of Computer Science Aalto University, School of Science Key Management Secret Sharing Shamir s Threshold

More information

A Resolution Strategy for Verifying Cryptographic Protocols with CBC Encryption and Blind Signatures

A Resolution Strategy for Verifying Cryptographic Protocols with CBC Encryption and Blind Signatures A Resolution Strategy for Verifying Cryptographic Protocols with CBC Encryption and Blind Signatures Véronique Cortier LORIA, Nancy, France CNRS & INRIA Project Cassis cortier@loria.fr Michael Rusinowitch

More information

Group Diffie Hellman Protocols and ProVerif

Group Diffie Hellman Protocols and ProVerif Group Diffie Hellman Protocols and ProVerif CS 395T - Design and Analysis of Security Protocols Ankur Gupta Secure Multicast Communication Examples: Live broadcast of a match, stock quotes, video conferencing.

More information

Computational security & Private key encryption

Computational security & Private key encryption Computational security & Private key encryption Emma Arfelt Stud. BSc. Software Development Frederik Madsen Stud. MSc. Software Development March 2017 Recap Perfect Secrecy Perfect indistinguishability

More information

Fundamentals of Modern Cryptography

Fundamentals of Modern Cryptography Fundamentals of Modern Cryptography BRUCE MOMJIAN This presentation explains the fundamentals of modern cryptographic methods. Creative Commons Attribution License http://momjian.us/presentations Last

More information

Cryptography CS 555. Topic 23: Zero-Knowledge Proof and Cryptographic Commitment. CS555 Topic 23 1

Cryptography CS 555. Topic 23: Zero-Knowledge Proof and Cryptographic Commitment. CS555 Topic 23 1 Cryptography CS 555 Topic 23: Zero-Knowledge Proof and Cryptographic Commitment CS555 Topic 23 1 Outline and Readings Outline Zero-knowledge proof Fiat-Shamir protocol Schnorr protocol Commitment schemes

More information

Lecture Notes 20: Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Lecture Notes 20: Zero-Knowledge Proofs CS 127/CSCI E-127: Introduction to Cryptography Prof. Salil Vadhan Fall 2013 Lecture Notes 20: Zero-Knowledge Proofs Reading. Katz-Lindell Ÿ14.6.0-14.6.4,14.7 1 Interactive Proofs Motivation: how can parties

More information

On-the-fly Model Checking of Security Protocols

On-the-fly Model Checking of Security Protocols Guoqiang LI Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Supervisor: Prof. Mizuhito Ogawa February 7, 2008 1 / 103 A Challenging Problem and A Legend... A security protocol, although only containing

More information

Branch Prediction based attacks using Hardware performance Counters IIT Kharagpur

Branch Prediction based attacks using Hardware performance Counters IIT Kharagpur Branch Prediction based attacks using Hardware performance Counters IIT Kharagpur March 19, 2018 Modular Exponentiation Public key Cryptography March 19, 2018 Branch Prediction Attacks 2 / 54 Modular Exponentiation

More information

2 Message authentication codes (MACs)

2 Message authentication codes (MACs) CS276: Cryptography October 1, 2015 Message Authentication Codes and CCA2 Instructor: Alessandro Chiesa Scribe: David Field 1 Previous lecture Last time we: Constructed a CPA-secure encryption scheme from

More information

1 Indistinguishability for multiple encryptions

1 Indistinguishability for multiple encryptions CSCI 5440: Cryptography Lecture 3 The Chinese University of Hong Kong 26 September 2012 1 Indistinguishability for multiple encryptions We now have a reasonable encryption scheme, which we proved is message

More information

Practical Verifiable Encryption and Decryption of Discrete Logarithms

Practical Verifiable Encryption and Decryption of Discrete Logarithms Practical Verifiable Encryption and Decryption of Discrete Logarithms Jan Camenisch IBM Zurich Research Lab Victor Shoup New York University p.1/27 Verifiable encryption of discrete logs Three players:

More information

A Short Tutorial on Proverif

A Short Tutorial on Proverif A Short Tutorial on Proverif Alfredo Pironti and Riccardo Sisto Politecnico di Torino, Italy Cryptoforma Meeting, Apr 8, 2010 1 Outline PART 1: how the tool works (Riccardo Sisto) Context: Abstract modelling

More information

Definition: For a positive integer n, if 0<a<n and gcd(a,n)=1, a is relatively prime to n. Ahmet Burak Can Hacettepe University

Definition: For a positive integer n, if 0<a<n and gcd(a,n)=1, a is relatively prime to n. Ahmet Burak Can Hacettepe University Number Theory, Public Key Cryptography, RSA Ahmet Burak Can Hacettepe University abc@hacettepe.edu.tr The Euler Phi Function For a positive integer n, if 0

More information

Introduction to Modern Cryptography. Lecture RSA Public Key CryptoSystem 2. One way Trapdoor Functions

Introduction to Modern Cryptography. Lecture RSA Public Key CryptoSystem 2. One way Trapdoor Functions Introduction to Modern Cryptography Lecture 7 1. RSA Public Key CryptoSystem 2. One way Trapdoor Functions Diffie and Hellman (76) New Directions in Cryptography Split the Bob s secret key K to two parts:

More information