Control engineering sample exam paper - Model answers

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Control engineering sample exam paper - Model answers"

Transcription

1 Question Control engineering sample exam paper - Model answers a) By a direct computation we obtain x() =, x(2) =, x(3) =, x(4) = = x(). This trajectory is sketched in Figure (left). Note that A 2 = I and A 4 = I. b) By a direct computation we obtain x() =,x(2) =, x(3) = This trajectory is sketched in Figure (right)., x(4) = = x(). x 2 x 2 x(3) x()=x(4) x(2) x x(3) x() x x()=x(4) x() x(2) Figure : Sketch of the trajectories of the considered system. c) Using the results in a) and b) yields β α x() =, x(2) = α β This trajectory is sketched in Figure 2., x(3) = β α, x(4) = α β = x(). d) We have to show that for any ɛ>thereexistsaδ(ɛ) such that x() <δ(ɛ) implies x(k) <ɛfor all k. Note that for any initial condition the distance of x(k) from the origin is constant, i.e. x(k) is constant for all k. Therefore, the selection δ(ɛ) = ɛ makes the above implication true. The state does not converge to the origin, hence the equilibrium is not attractive. Finally, the system is time-invariant, hence stability is uniform. e) Given a continuous-time system ẋ = A c x, its Euler approximate model, with sampling time T,is x(k +)=(I + TA c )x(k) =Ax(k).

2 x 2 x(3) β x()=x(4) x(2) α x x() Figure 2: Sketch of a generic trajectory of the considered system. Hence, A c = A I T = T. The characteristic polynomial of the matrix A c is s 2 +2s+2, hence the continuous-time system is asymptotically stable. (Note that, in this case, this is true regardless of the value of T.) 2

3 Question 2 a) The equilibrium points are the solutions of the equations = L x 2u + E L From the first equation we have = RC x 2 + C x u. x 2 = E u and from the second equation x = Ru x 2 = E Ru 2. b) The linearized model is given by δ x = Aδ x + Bδ u = ẋ x ẋ x 2 ẋ 2 x ẋ 2 x 2 δ x + ẋ u ẋ 2 u δ u = u L u C RC δ x + E Lu E CRu 2 δ u. c) The characteristic polynomial of the matrix A is p(s) =s 2 + RC s + u2 LC, hence, by Routh test, its roots have negative real part. This implies that the linearized system is asymptotically stable for any positive R, L, C and u. d) By the principle of stability in the first approximation, the equilibrium of the nonlinear system is locally asymptotically stable. e) If u =wehave ẋ = E L, ẋ 2 = RC x 2. The system does not have any equilibrium because the equation = E does not have any solution. Moreover, x (t) =x () + Et and x 2 (t) =e t RC x 2 () which shows that x (t) and x 2 (t). 3

4 Question 3 a) The reachability matrix is R = B AB A 2 B = The matrix R has rank 2. In fact, its determinant is zero, and the first two columns are linearly independent. This implies that the system is not reachable. A basis for the reachable space is given by the image of R, namely ImR =Im. 2 2 b) The set of reachable states in one step is given by x() = Bu() = u(), 2 with u() IR. The set of reachable states in two steps is given by u() x(2) = ABu() + Bu() =, u() 2 2 with u() IR and u() IR. c) The condition for controllability in two steps is ImA 2 ImB,AB, which is equivalent to rank B AB A 2 =rank B AB =2. Note that B AB A 2 = and this has rank two. Hence the system is controllable in two steps. d) To write the system is the canonical form for unreachable systems we define a matrix L from the first two columns of R and adding a third colum which makes it invertible, namely L = The transformed system is described by ˆx(k +)=L ALˆx(k)+L Bu(k) = 2 2. /2 /2. ˆx(k)+ u(k), from which we see that the unreachable system is described by the equation ˆx 2 (k +) =. This is consistent with the fact that the unreachable system has dimension one, because rankr = 2, and the system is controllable, i.e. the unreachable modes are at zero. 4

5 Question 4 a) Note that, if w(t) = sin t, cos t, then ẇ(t) =cost, sin t, and cos t sin t sin t = 2 cos t. This implies that w(t) belongs to the class of signals for which asymptotic tracking is achievable. b) Let e = x w and note that Let now ė =ẋ ẇ = Ax + Bu ẇ = Ax + Bu Aw = Ae + Bu. u = Ke = K(x w) and select K =k,k 2,k 3 such that the eigenvalues of A + BK are all equal to. Note that k +k 2 +k 3 A + BK = 2. The characteristic polynomial of A + BK is p(s) =(s +)(s 2 k s ++k 2 ) and this should be equal to (s +) 3. This is achieved by selecting k = 2 andk 2 =, while k 3 can be arbitrarily assigned. This is due to the fact that the pair (A, B) isnot reachable, however it is stabilizable and the unreachable mode is s =. This can be seen considering the reachability pencil si A B = s s 2 s + and noting that it has rank 2 for s = and rank 3 for any other s. 5

6 Question 5 a) The reachability matrix is R = 2 α + and the system is reachable if α. Ifα = the reachability pencil is s si A B = s and this has rank for s = and rank 2 for any other s. Therefore, the system is controllable and stabilizable. b) The observability matrix is O = α and the system is observable if α. Ifα = the observability pencil is s si A = s C and this has rank for s = 2 and rank 2 for any other s. Therefore the system is not detectable. c) Let K =k k 2 and note that A + BK = k + +k 2 α + k k 2 + and that the characteristic polynomial of this matrix is s 2 +( 2 k k 2 )s +(k 2 α + k 2 α). Hence the selection k = k 2 = is such that the eigenvalues of A + BK are equal to. Let L =l l 2 T and note that l + l A + LC =, α + l 2 l 2 and that the characteristic polynomial of this matrix is Hence the selection s 2 +( 2 l + l 2 )s +( 2l 2 + l ++l α α) l = 3+α α l 2 = +3α α is such that the eigenvalues of A + LC are equal to. Finally, the controller is ξ = (A + BK + LC)ξ Ly, u = Kξ. d) The limit for α of K = k 2 + k2 2 is 2, whereas the limit for α of L is equal to +. This is in agreement with the fact that, for α =, the system is not reachable but stabilizable, with a non-reachable mode equal to, but not detectable., 6

7 Question 6 a) Let i and i 2 be the currents through L and C, respectively. Then y = i = i + i 2. Moreover, Hence, A = RC i = x 2 = u Lẋ 2 R R L b) The reachability matrix is B = RC L C = RC R 2 C 2 R L L 2 i 2 = Cẋ = u x R. C = R D = R. and it is full rank if R 2 C L. If R 2 C = L the system is not reachable. However, as both the eigenvalues of A have negative real part, the system is stabilizable. c) The observability matrix is O = R R 2 C and it is full rank if R 2 C L. If R 2 C = L the system is not observable. However, as both the eigenvalues of A have negative real part, the system is detectable. d) Consider new coordinates ˆx such that x = Lˆx and L is constructed from the first column of the reachability matrix, multiplied by R 2 C, and a second column which renders L invertible: R L =. Then R L ˆx = RC RC y = ˆx +. u These equations show that the unreachable subsystem, namely ˆx 2 = RC ˆx 2 is observable, and that the unobservable subsystem, namely ˆx = RC ˆx + u is reachable. Hence, there is no subsystem which is both reachable and observable. 7

8 e) The input-output behaviour of the first electrical network is described by Ce At B + D = e R L t L e RC t R 2 C +/R. This, for L = R 2 C,isequalto/R, which describes the input-output behaviour of the second circuit. 8

Controllability. Chapter Reachable States. This chapter develops the fundamental results about controllability and pole assignment.

Controllability. Chapter Reachable States. This chapter develops the fundamental results about controllability and pole assignment. Chapter Controllability This chapter develops the fundamental results about controllability and pole assignment Reachable States We study the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu, t, where x(t) R n and u(t) R m Thus

More information

SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER

SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER Exercise 54 Consider the system: ẍ aẋ bx u where u is the input and x the output signal (a): Determine a state space realization (b): Is the

More information

POLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19

POLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19 POLE PLACEMENT Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19 Outline 1 State Feedback 2 Observer 3 Observer Feedback 4 Reduced Order

More information

Module 03 Linear Systems Theory: Necessary Background

Module 03 Linear Systems Theory: Necessary Background Module 03 Linear Systems Theory: Necessary Background Ahmad F. Taha EE 5243: Introduction to Cyber-Physical Systems Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ taha/index.html September

More information

4F3 - Predictive Control

4F3 - Predictive Control 4F3 Predictive Control - Discrete-time systems p. 1/30 4F3 - Predictive Control Discrete-time State Space Control Theory For reference only Jan Maciejowski jmm@eng.cam.ac.uk 4F3 Predictive Control - Discrete-time

More information

1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1

1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1 Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +

More information

CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING

CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded

More information

Topics in control Tracking and regulation A. Astolfi

Topics in control Tracking and regulation A. Astolfi Topics in control Tracking and regulation A. Astolfi Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The full information regulator problem 3 3 The FBI equations 5 4 The error feedback regulator problem 5 5 The internal model

More information

Reachability and Controllability

Reachability and Controllability Capitolo. INTRODUCTION 4. Reachability and Controllability Reachability. The reachability problem is to find the set of all the final states x(t ) reachable starting from a given initial state x(t ) :

More information

Linear System Theory

Linear System Theory Linear System Theory Wonhee Kim Chapter 6: Controllability & Observability Chapter 7: Minimal Realizations May 2, 217 1 / 31 Recap State space equation Linear Algebra Solutions of LTI and LTV system Stability

More information

Controllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control

Controllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control Multivariable Control Lecture 4 Controllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control John T. Wen September 13, 24 Ref: 3.2-3.4 of Text Controllability ẋ = Ax + Bu; x() = x. At time

More information

Nonlinear Control Systems

Nonlinear Control Systems Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 7. Feedback Linearization IST-DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs1/ 1 1 Feedback Linearization Given a nonlinear

More information

Stability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization

Stability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization Stability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization 1 1, The Netherlands DISC Course Mathematical Models of Systems Outline 1 Stability of autonomous systems 2 The pole placement problem 3 Stabilization

More information

Module 07 Controllability and Controller Design of Dynamical LTI Systems

Module 07 Controllability and Controller Design of Dynamical LTI Systems Module 07 Controllability and Controller Design of Dynamical LTI Systems Ahmad F. Taha EE 5143: Linear Systems and Control Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ataha October

More information

Intro. Computer Control Systems: F8

Intro. Computer Control Systems: F8 Intro. Computer Control Systems: F8 Properties of state-space descriptions and feedback Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 22 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se F7: Quiz! 2

More information

Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability

Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability 1. Controllability of Linear Systems 1.1. Kalman s Criterion Consider the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu where x R n : state vector and u R m : input vector. A :

More information

Zeros and zero dynamics

Zeros and zero dynamics CHAPTER 4 Zeros and zero dynamics 41 Zero dynamics for SISO systems Consider a linear system defined by a strictly proper scalar transfer function that does not have any common zero and pole: g(s) =α p(s)

More information

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Control and Dynamical Systems

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Control and Dynamical Systems CDS 101 1. For each of the following linear systems, determine whether the origin is asymptotically stable and, if so, plot the step response and frequency response for the system. If there are multiple

More information

Systems and Control Theory Lecture Notes. Laura Giarré

Systems and Control Theory Lecture Notes. Laura Giarré Systems and Control Theory Lecture Notes Laura Giarré L. Giarré 2017-2018 Lesson 17: Model-based Controller Feedback Stabilization Observers Ackerman Formula Model-based Controller L. Giarré- Systems and

More information

Lecture 2 and 3: Controllability of DT-LTI systems

Lecture 2 and 3: Controllability of DT-LTI systems 1 Lecture 2 and 3: Controllability of DT-LTI systems Spring 2013 - EE 194, Advanced Control (Prof Khan) January 23 (Wed) and 28 (Mon), 2013 I LTI SYSTEMS Recall that continuous-time LTI systems can be

More information

EEE582 Homework Problems

EEE582 Homework Problems EEE582 Homework Problems HW. Write a state-space realization of the linearized model for the cruise control system around speeds v = 4 (Section.3, http://tsakalis.faculty.asu.edu/notes/models.pdf). Use

More information

Topic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis

Topic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Topic # 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Fall 010 16.30/31 Lyapunov Stability Analysis Very general method to prove (or disprove) stability of

More information

Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback

Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of

More information

5. Observer-based Controller Design

5. Observer-based Controller Design EE635 - Control System Theory 5. Observer-based Controller Design Jitkomut Songsiri state feedback pole-placement design regulation and tracking state observer feedback observer design LQR and LQG 5-1

More information

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : Dynamic Systems Spring 2011

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : Dynamic Systems Spring 2011 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.4: Dynamic Systems Spring Homework Solutions Exercise 3. a) We are given the single input LTI system: [

More information

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Control Systems Design, SC426 SC426 Fall 2, dr A Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 5 Controllable Canonical and Observable Canonical Forms Stabilization by State Feedback State Estimation, Observer Design

More information

EE221A Linear System Theory Final Exam

EE221A Linear System Theory Final Exam EE221A Linear System Theory Final Exam Professor C. Tomlin Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley Fall 2016 12/16/16, 8-11am Your answers must be supported by analysis,

More information

Lyapunov Stability Analysis: Open Loop

Lyapunov Stability Analysis: Open Loop Copyright F.L. Lewis 008 All rights reserved Updated: hursday, August 8, 008 Lyapunov Stability Analysis: Open Loop We know that the stability of linear time-invariant (LI) dynamical systems can be determined

More information

Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems

Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems Ahmad F. Taha EE 5143: Linear Systems and Control Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ataha November

More information

16.31 Fall 2005 Lecture Presentation Mon 31-Oct-05 ver 1.1

16.31 Fall 2005 Lecture Presentation Mon 31-Oct-05 ver 1.1 16.31 Fall 2005 Lecture Presentation Mon 31-Oct-05 ver 1.1 Charles P. Coleman October 31, 2005 1 / 40 : Controllability Tests Observability Tests LEARNING OUTCOMES: Perform controllability tests Perform

More information

University of Toronto Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE410F Control Systems Problem Set #3 Solutions = Q o = CA.

University of Toronto Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE410F Control Systems Problem Set #3 Solutions = Q o = CA. University of Toronto Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE41F Control Systems Problem Set #3 Solutions 1. The observability matrix is Q o C CA 5 6 3 34. Since det(q o ), the matrix is

More information

Linear Systems. Manfred Morari Melanie Zeilinger. Institut für Automatik, ETH Zürich Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zürich

Linear Systems. Manfred Morari Melanie Zeilinger. Institut für Automatik, ETH Zürich Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zürich Linear Systems Manfred Morari Melanie Zeilinger Institut für Automatik, ETH Zürich Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zürich Spring Semester 2016 Linear Systems M. Morari, M. Zeilinger - Spring

More information

CDS Solutions to the Midterm Exam

CDS Solutions to the Midterm Exam CDS 22 - Solutions to the Midterm Exam Instructor: Danielle C. Tarraf November 6, 27 Problem (a) Recall that the H norm of a transfer function is time-delay invariant. Hence: ( ) Ĝ(s) = s + a = sup /2

More information

EL 625 Lecture 10. Pole Placement and Observer Design. ẋ = Ax (1)

EL 625 Lecture 10. Pole Placement and Observer Design. ẋ = Ax (1) EL 625 Lecture 0 EL 625 Lecture 0 Pole Placement and Observer Design Pole Placement Consider the system ẋ Ax () The solution to this system is x(t) e At x(0) (2) If the eigenvalues of A all lie in the

More information

MATH 3321 Sample Questions for Exam 3. 3y y, C = Perform the indicated operations, if possible: (a) AC (b) AB (c) B + AC (d) CBA

MATH 3321 Sample Questions for Exam 3. 3y y, C = Perform the indicated operations, if possible: (a) AC (b) AB (c) B + AC (d) CBA MATH 33 Sample Questions for Exam 3. Find x and y so that x 4 3 5x 3y + y = 5 5. x = 3/7, y = 49/7. Let A = 3 4, B = 3 5, C = 3 Perform the indicated operations, if possible: a AC b AB c B + AC d CBA AB

More information

Systems and Control Theory Lecture Notes. Laura Giarré

Systems and Control Theory Lecture Notes. Laura Giarré Systems and Control Theory Lecture Notes Laura Giarré L. Giarré 2018-2019 Lesson 14: Rechability Reachability (DT) Reachability theorem (DT) Reachability properties (DT) Reachability gramian (DT) Reachability

More information

Exam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time

Exam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.

More information

Intro. Computer Control Systems: F9

Intro. Computer Control Systems: F9 Intro. Computer Control Systems: F9 State-feedback control and observers Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se F8: Quiz! 2 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se

More information

Entrance Exam, Differential Equations April, (Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems) y + 2y + y cos(x 2 y) = 0, y(0) = 2, y (0) = 4.

Entrance Exam, Differential Equations April, (Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems) y + 2y + y cos(x 2 y) = 0, y(0) = 2, y (0) = 4. Entrance Exam, Differential Equations April, 7 (Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems). Consider the following initial value problem: { y + y + y cos(x y) =, y() = y. Find all the values y such that the

More information

Feedback Linearization

Feedback Linearization Feedback Linearization Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey May 14, 2015 1 Introduction Consider a class o single-input-single-output (SISO) nonlinear systems o the orm ẋ = (x) + g(x)u (1) y = h(x) (2)

More information

+ i. cos(t) + 2 sin(t) + c 2.

+ i. cos(t) + 2 sin(t) + c 2. MATH HOMEWORK #7 PART A SOLUTIONS Problem 7.6.. Consider the system x = 5 x. a Express the general solution of the given system of equations in terms of realvalued functions. b Draw a direction field,

More information

SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL

SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL 1. Optimal regulator with noisy measurement Consider the following system: ẋ = Ax + Bu + w, x(0) = x 0 where w(t) is white noise with Ew(t) = 0, and x 0 is a stochastic

More information

Lecture 4 and 5 Controllability and Observability: Kalman decompositions

Lecture 4 and 5 Controllability and Observability: Kalman decompositions 1 Lecture 4 and 5 Controllability and Observability: Kalman decompositions Spring 2013 - EE 194, Advanced Control (Prof. Khan) January 30 (Wed.) and Feb. 04 (Mon.), 2013 I. OBSERVABILITY OF DT LTI SYSTEMS

More information

Solutions of Spring 2008 Final Exam

Solutions of Spring 2008 Final Exam Solutions of Spring 008 Final Exam 1. (a) The isocline for slope 0 is the pair of straight lines y = ±x. The direction field along these lines is flat. The isocline for slope is the hyperbola on the left

More information

2 Lyapunov Stability. x(0) x 0 < δ x(t) x 0 < ɛ

2 Lyapunov Stability. x(0) x 0 < δ x(t) x 0 < ɛ 1 2 Lyapunov Stability Whereas I/O stability is concerned with the effect of inputs on outputs, Lyapunov stability deals with unforced systems: ẋ = f(x, t) (1) where x R n, t R +, and f : R n R + R n.

More information

Optimal control and estimation

Optimal control and estimation Automatic Control 2 Optimal control and estimation Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011

More information

1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole

1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole EECS C8/ME C34 Fall Problem Set 9 Solutions (3 pts) Dominant Pole For the following transfer function: Y (s) U(s) = (s + )(s + ) a) Give state space description of the system in parallel form (ẋ = Ax +

More information

Chapter III. Stability of Linear Systems

Chapter III. Stability of Linear Systems 1 Chapter III Stability of Linear Systems 1. Stability and state transition matrix 2. Time-varying (non-autonomous) systems 3. Time-invariant systems 1 STABILITY AND STATE TRANSITION MATRIX 2 In this chapter,

More information

Chapter 8 Stabilization: State Feedback 8. Introduction: Stabilization One reason feedback control systems are designed is to stabilize systems that m

Chapter 8 Stabilization: State Feedback 8. Introduction: Stabilization One reason feedback control systems are designed is to stabilize systems that m Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of echnology c Chapter 8 Stabilization:

More information

Review: control, feedback, etc. Today s topic: state-space models of systems; linearization

Review: control, feedback, etc. Today s topic: state-space models of systems; linearization Plan of the Lecture Review: control, feedback, etc Today s topic: state-space models of systems; linearization Goal: a general framework that encompasses all examples of interest Once we have mastered

More information

There are none. Abstract for Gauranteed Margins for LQG Regulators, John Doyle, 1978 [Doy78].

There are none. Abstract for Gauranteed Margins for LQG Regulators, John Doyle, 1978 [Doy78]. Chapter 7 Output Feedback There are none. Abstract for Gauranteed Margins for LQG Regulators, John Doyle, 1978 [Doy78]. In the last chapter we considered the use of state feedback to modify the dynamics

More information

Module 06 Stability of Dynamical Systems

Module 06 Stability of Dynamical Systems Module 06 Stability of Dynamical Systems Ahmad F. Taha EE 5143: Linear Systems and Control Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ataha October 10, 2017 Ahmad F. Taha Module 06

More information

Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems. Stability of Linear Systems. Sven Laur University of Tartu

Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems. Stability of Linear Systems. Sven Laur University of Tartu Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems Stability of Linear Systems Sven Laur University of Tartu Motivating Example Naive open-loop control r[k] Controller Ĉ[z] u[k] ε 1 [k] System Ĝ[z] y[k] ε 2 [k]

More information

4F3 - Predictive Control

4F3 - Predictive Control 4F3 Predictive Control - Lecture 2 p 1/23 4F3 - Predictive Control Lecture 2 - Unconstrained Predictive Control Jan Maciejowski jmm@engcamacuk 4F3 Predictive Control - Lecture 2 p 2/23 References Predictive

More information

TRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION

TRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION TRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 13 General objective: The output to track a reference

More information

Control Systems. Internal Stability - LTI systems. L. Lanari

Control Systems. Internal Stability - LTI systems. L. Lanari Control Systems Internal Stability - LTI systems L. Lanari outline LTI systems: definitions conditions South stability criterion equilibrium points Nonlinear systems: equilibrium points examples stable

More information

You may use a calculator, but you must show all your work in order to receive credit.

You may use a calculator, but you must show all your work in order to receive credit. Math 2410-010/015 Exam II April 7 th, 2017 Name: Instructions: Key Answer each question to the best of your ability. All answers must be written clearly. Be sure to erase or cross out any work that you

More information

Lecture 2: Discrete-time Linear Quadratic Optimal Control

Lecture 2: Discrete-time Linear Quadratic Optimal Control ME 33, U Berkeley, Spring 04 Xu hen Lecture : Discrete-time Linear Quadratic Optimal ontrol Big picture Example onvergence of finite-time LQ solutions Big picture previously: dynamic programming and finite-horizon

More information

RECURSIVE ESTIMATION AND KALMAN FILTERING

RECURSIVE ESTIMATION AND KALMAN FILTERING Chapter 3 RECURSIVE ESTIMATION AND KALMAN FILTERING 3. The Discrete Time Kalman Filter Consider the following estimation problem. Given the stochastic system with x k+ = Ax k + Gw k (3.) y k = Cx k + Hv

More information

CDS Solutions to Final Exam

CDS Solutions to Final Exam CDS 22 - Solutions to Final Exam Instructor: Danielle C Tarraf Fall 27 Problem (a) We will compute the H 2 norm of G using state-space methods (see Section 26 in DFT) We begin by finding a minimal state-space

More information

Stabilisation of Linear Time-Invariant Systems subject to Output Saturation

Stabilisation of Linear Time-Invariant Systems subject to Output Saturation Stabilisation of Linear Time-Invariant Systems subject to Output Saturation by Gijs Hilhorst, BSc A Thesis in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Science at the Department

More information

Lyapunov Stability Theory

Lyapunov Stability Theory Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous

More information

Full State Feedback for State Space Approach

Full State Feedback for State Space Approach Full State Feedback for State Space Approach State Space Equations Using Cramer s rule it can be shown that the characteristic equation of the system is : det[ si A] 0 Roots (for s) of the resulting polynomial

More information

EE451/551: Digital Control. Chapter 8: Properties of State Space Models

EE451/551: Digital Control. Chapter 8: Properties of State Space Models EE451/551: Digital Control Chapter 8: Properties of State Space Models Equilibrium State Definition 8.1: An equilibrium point or state is an initial state from which the system nevers departs unless perturbed

More information

Observers for Linear Systems with Unknown Inputs

Observers for Linear Systems with Unknown Inputs Chapter 3 Observers for Linear Systems with Unknown Inputs As discussed in the previous chapters, it is often the case that a dynamic system can be modeled as having unknown inputs (e.g., representing

More information

State will have dimension 5. One possible choice is given by y and its derivatives up to y (4)

State will have dimension 5. One possible choice is given by y and its derivatives up to y (4) A Exercise State will have dimension 5. One possible choice is given by y and its derivatives up to y (4 x T (t [ y(t y ( (t y (2 (t y (3 (t y (4 (t ] T With this choice we obtain A B C [ ] D 2 3 4 To

More information

Robust Stability. Robust stability against time-invariant and time-varying uncertainties. Parameter dependent Lyapunov functions

Robust Stability. Robust stability against time-invariant and time-varying uncertainties. Parameter dependent Lyapunov functions Robust Stability Robust stability against time-invariant and time-varying uncertainties Parameter dependent Lyapunov functions Semi-infinite LMI problems From nominal to robust performance 1/24 Time-Invariant

More information

Lec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action

Lec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action Lec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action November 22, 2017 Lund University, Department of Automatic Control Controllability and Observability Example of Kalman decomposition 1 s 1 x 10 x

More information

Solutions to Dynamical Systems 2010 exam. Each question is worth 25 marks.

Solutions to Dynamical Systems 2010 exam. Each question is worth 25 marks. Solutions to Dynamical Systems exam Each question is worth marks [Unseen] Consider the following st order differential equation: dy dt Xy yy 4 a Find and classify all the fixed points of Hence draw the

More information

Observability. Dynamic Systems. Lecture 2 Observability. Observability, continuous time: Observability, discrete time: = h (2) (x, u, u)

Observability. Dynamic Systems. Lecture 2 Observability. Observability, continuous time: Observability, discrete time: = h (2) (x, u, u) Observability Dynamic Systems Lecture 2 Observability Continuous time model: Discrete time model: ẋ(t) = f (x(t), u(t)), y(t) = h(x(t), u(t)) x(t + 1) = f (x(t), u(t)), y(t) = h(x(t)) Reglerteknik, ISY,

More information

Perspective. ECE 3640 Lecture 11 State-Space Analysis. To learn about state-space analysis for continuous and discrete-time. Objective: systems

Perspective. ECE 3640 Lecture 11 State-Space Analysis. To learn about state-space analysis for continuous and discrete-time. Objective: systems ECE 3640 Lecture State-Space Analysis Objective: systems To learn about state-space analysis for continuous and discrete-time Perspective Transfer functions provide only an input/output perspective of

More information

Chapter 3. State Feedback - Pole Placement. Motivation

Chapter 3. State Feedback - Pole Placement. Motivation Chapter 3 State Feedback - Pole Placement Motivation Whereas classical control theory is based on output feedback, this course mainly deals with control system design by state feedback. This model-based

More information

Decentralized control with input saturation

Decentralized control with input saturation Decentralized control with input saturation Ciprian Deliu Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Technical University Eindhoven Eindhoven, The Netherlands November 2006 Decentralized control with

More information

Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Tools (NMPC Tools)

Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Tools (NMPC Tools) Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Tools (NMPC Tools) Rishi Amrit, James B. Rawlings April 5, 2008 1 Formulation We consider a control system composed of three parts([2]). Estimator Target calculator Regulator

More information

Observability and Constructability

Observability and Constructability Capitolo. INTRODUCTION 5. Observability and Constructability Observability problem: compute the initial state x(t ) using the information associated to the input and output functions u(t) and y(t) of the

More information

ECE557 Systems Control

ECE557 Systems Control ECE557 Systems Control Bruce Francis Course notes, Version.0, September 008 Preface This is the second Engineering Science course on control. It assumes ECE56 as a prerequisite. If you didn t take ECE56,

More information

ECEEN 5448 Fall 2011 Homework #4 Solutions

ECEEN 5448 Fall 2011 Homework #4 Solutions ECEEN 5448 Fall 2 Homework #4 Solutions Professor David G. Meyer Novemeber 29, 2. The state-space realization is A = [ [ ; b = ; c = [ which describes, of course, a free mass (in normalized units) with

More information

PH.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MATHEMATICS

PH.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY SPRING SEMESTER 207 Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials NAME PH.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MATHEMATICS Problem

More information

Variable Structure Control ~ Disturbance Rejection. Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University

Variable Structure Control ~ Disturbance Rejection. Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Variable Structure Control ~ Disturbance Rejection Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Linear Tracking & Disturbance Rejection Variable Structure

More information

Automatic Control 2. Model reduction. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Automatic Control 2. Model reduction. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year Lecture: Automatic Control 2 Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011 1 / 17 Lecture:

More information

Some solutions of the written exam of January 27th, 2014

Some solutions of the written exam of January 27th, 2014 TEORIA DEI SISTEMI Systems Theory) Prof. C. Manes, Prof. A. Germani Some solutions of the written exam of January 7th, 0 Problem. Consider a feedback control system with unit feedback gain, with the following

More information

Steady State Kalman Filter

Steady State Kalman Filter Steady State Kalman Filter Infinite Horizon LQ Control: ẋ = Ax + Bu R positive definite, Q = Q T 2Q 1 2. (A, B) stabilizable, (A, Q 1 2) detectable. Solve for the positive (semi-) definite P in the ARE:

More information

Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form

Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio

More information

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Control Systems Design, SC4026 SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 4 Controllability (a.k.a. Reachability) vs Observability Algebraic Tests (Kalman rank condition & Hautus test) A few

More information

APPM 2360: Final Exam 10:30am 1:00pm, May 6, 2015.

APPM 2360: Final Exam 10:30am 1:00pm, May 6, 2015. APPM 23: Final Exam :3am :pm, May, 25. ON THE FRONT OF YOUR BLUEBOOK write: ) your name, 2) your student ID number, 3) lecture section, 4) your instructor s name, and 5) a grading table for eight questions.

More information

Theorem 1. ẋ = Ax is globally exponentially stable (GES) iff A is Hurwitz (i.e., max(re(σ(a))) < 0).

Theorem 1. ẋ = Ax is globally exponentially stable (GES) iff A is Hurwitz (i.e., max(re(σ(a))) < 0). Linear Systems Notes Lecture Proposition. A M n (R) is positive definite iff all nested minors are greater than or equal to zero. n Proof. ( ): Positive definite iff λ i >. Let det(a) = λj and H = {x D

More information

Discrete and continuous dynamic systems

Discrete and continuous dynamic systems Discrete and continuous dynamic systems Bounded input bounded output (BIBO) and asymptotic stability Continuous and discrete time linear time-invariant systems Katalin Hangos University of Pannonia Faculty

More information

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8- am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total

More information

Module 9: State Feedback Control Design Lecture Note 1

Module 9: State Feedback Control Design Lecture Note 1 Module 9: State Feedback Control Design Lecture Note 1 The design techniques described in the preceding lectures are based on the transfer function of a system. In this lecture we would discuss the state

More information

Lecture 18 : State Space Design

Lecture 18 : State Space Design UCSI University Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Faculty of Engineering Department of Mechatronics Lecture 18 State Space Design Mohd Sulhi bin Azman Lecturer Department of Mechatronics UCSI University sulhi@ucsi.edu.my

More information

Null Controllability of Discrete-time Linear Systems with Input and State Constraints

Null Controllability of Discrete-time Linear Systems with Input and State Constraints Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec. 9-11, 2008 Null Controllability of Discrete-time Linear Systems with Input and State Constraints W.P.M.H. Heemels and

More information

EE226a - Summary of Lecture 13 and 14 Kalman Filter: Convergence

EE226a - Summary of Lecture 13 and 14 Kalman Filter: Convergence 1 EE226a - Summary of Lecture 13 and 14 Kalman Filter: Convergence Jean Walrand I. SUMMARY Here are the key ideas and results of this important topic. Section II reviews Kalman Filter. A system is observable

More information

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Control Systems Design, SC4026 SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 4 Controllability (a.k.a. Reachability) and Observability Algebraic Tests (Kalman rank condition & Hautus test) A few

More information

Zero controllability in discrete-time structured systems

Zero controllability in discrete-time structured systems 1 Zero controllability in discrete-time structured systems Jacob van der Woude arxiv:173.8394v1 [math.oc] 24 Mar 217 Abstract In this paper we consider complex dynamical networks modeled by means of state

More information

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function

More information

20D - Homework Assignment 5

20D - Homework Assignment 5 Brian Bowers TA for Hui Sun MATH D Homework Assignment 5 November 8, 3 D - Homework Assignment 5 First, I present the list of all matrix row operations. We use combinations of these steps to row reduce

More information

Linear dynamical systems with inputs & outputs

Linear dynamical systems with inputs & outputs EE263 Autumn 215 S. Boyd and S. Lall Linear dynamical systems with inputs & outputs inputs & outputs: interpretations transfer function impulse and step responses examples 1 Inputs & outputs recall continuous-time

More information

Power Systems Control Prof. Wonhee Kim. Ch.3. Controller Design in Time Domain

Power Systems Control Prof. Wonhee Kim. Ch.3. Controller Design in Time Domain Power Systems Control Prof. Wonhee Kim Ch.3. Controller Design in Time Domain Stability in State Space Equation: State Feeback t A t B t t C t D t x x u y x u u t Kx t t A t BK t A BK x t x x x K shoul

More information

Control Systems. Time response

Control Systems. Time response Control Systems Time response L. Lanari outline zero-state solution matrix exponential total response (sum of zero-state and zero-input responses) Dirac impulse impulse response change of coordinates (state)

More information

1 Continuous-time Systems

1 Continuous-time Systems Observability Completely controllable systems can be restructured by means of state feedback to have many desirable properties. But what if the state is not available for feedback? What if only the output

More information