On the Set of Limit Points of Normed Sums of Geometrically Weighted I.I.D. Bounded Random Variables
|
|
- Wilfrid McBride
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 On the Set of Limit Points of Normed Sums of Geometrically Weighted I.I.D. Bounded Random Variables Deli Li 1, Yongcheng Qi, and Andrew Rosalsky 3 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA 3 Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA Abstract: For a sequence of nondegenerate i.i.d. bounded random variables {Y n, n 1} defined on a probability space Ω, F, P) and a constant b > 1, it is shown for W n = b 1) bi Y i /b n+1 that S F Y1 ) {c R : P {ω Ω : c is a limit point of W n ω)}) = 1} = S F V ) [l, L] and that for almost every ω Ω, the set of limit points of W n ω) coincides with the set S F V ) where S F Y1 ) and S F V ) are the spectrums of the distribution functions of Y 1 and V b 1) b i Y i, respectively and l and L are the essential infimum of Y 1 and the essential supremum of Y 1, respectively. Examples are provided showing that, in general, the above two inclusions are proper. Keywords: Almost sure convergence; Essential infimum; Essential supremum; Infinite Bernoulli convolution; Geometric weights; Iterated logarithm type behavior; Law of the iterated logarithm; Limit points; Spectrum of a distribution function; Sums of geometrically weighted i.i.d. random variables. Mathematics Subject Classification: 60F15. Running Head: Limit Points of Normed Sums The research of Deli Li was partially supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the research of Yongcheng Qi was partially supported by NSF Grant DMS Address correspondence to Andrew Rosalsky, Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL , USA; rosalsky@stat.ufl.edu 1. INTRODUCTION At the origin of the current investigation is that of Rosalsky [16] concerning iterated logarithm type behavior for geometrically weighted independent and identically distributed i.i.d.) bounded random variables. The result of Rosalsky [16] pertaining to the current 1
2 work will now be discussed. We recall that the essential infimum and the essential supremum of a bounded random variable Y, denoted by ess inf Y and ess sup Y, respectively, are defined by ess inf Y = sup{y : PY y) = 1} and ess sup Y = inf{y : PY y) = 1}. Rosalsky [16] obtained the following result which describes the almost sure a.s.) asymptotic fluctuation behavior of the partial sums bi Y i where {Y n, n 1} is a sequence of nondegenerate i.i.d. bounded random variables defined on a probability space Ω, F, P) and b > 1 is a constant. The b i, i 1 are referred to as geometric weights and the partial sums bi Y i, n 1 are thus referred to as sums of geometrically weighted i.i.d. random variables. Theorem 1.1. Rosalsky [16]). Let {Y n, n 1} be a sequence of nondegenerate i.i.d. bounded random variables and let b > 1. Then lim sup bi Y i b n+1 /b 1) = L a.s. and lim inf where L = ess sup Y 1 and l = ess inf Y 1. bi Y i b n+1 /b 1) = l a.s. Theorem 1.1 sharpens a result of Teicher [1] Theorem 5) which asserts that the strong law of large numbers lim bi Y i = 0 a.s. b n c n holds for every numerical sequence c n no matter how slowly). Now one of the most striking and fundamental results of probability theory is the renowned law of the iterated logarithm due to Hartman and Wintner [10] for a sequence of i.i.d. square integrable random variables. This result, which has long been celebrated as being a crowning achievement in the theory of sums of independent random variables, is stated as follows. Theorem 1.. Hartman and Wintner [10]). Let {X n, n 1} be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables defined on a probability space Ω, F, P). Suppose that EX 1 = 0 and EX1 = 1. Then lim sup X i n log log n = 1 a.s. and lim inf X i n log log n = 1 a.s. Alternative proofs of the Hartman-Wintner theorem were discovered by Strassen [0], Heyde [11], Egorov [6], Teicher [1], Csörgő and Révész [4] p. 119), de Acosta [1], and Einmahl and Li [7].
3 We recall that for a given sequence {t n, n 1} in R, a point c [, ] said to be a limit point of {t n, n 1} if some subsequence of {t n, n 1} has c as its limit: lim t n k = c for some positive integer sequence {n k, k 1} with n k < n k+1, k 1. k It is convenient to simply say that c is a limit point of t n. Remark 1.1 i). It is well known see, e.g., Petrov [15] p. 48)) that the following sharpening of Theorem 1. holds: Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1., { { c [, ] : P ω Ω : c is a limit point of X }) } iω) = 1 n log log n 1.1) = [ 1, 1]. Hence for all c [ 1, 1], there exits an event Ω c with P Ω c ) = 1 such that for all ω Ω c, there exists a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers {n k, k 1} such that k X iω) = c. nk log log n k lim k The integer sequence {n k, k 1} is of course random; that is, the n k, k 1 depend on ω Ω c. ii). An even stronger version of the limit point result 1.1) indeed prevails; namely see, e.g., Stout [19] p. 94)), the set of limit points of X iω) n log log n coincides with the set [ 1, 1] for almost every ω Ω. 1.) The difference between 1.1) and 1.) is that for c [ 1, 1], 1.1) does not preclude the event of probability 1 { ω Ω : c is a limit point of X } iω) n log log n from depending on c whereas 1.) ensures that there exists an event Ω with P Ω ) = 1 such that for all c [ 1, 1] and all ω Ω, c is a limit point of X iω) ; n log log n that is, Ω does not depend on c [ 1, 1]. In the current work, for a sequence of nondegenerate i.i.d. bounded random variables {Y n, n 1} and a constant b > 1, we investigate which points c R are a.s. limit points of the sequence of normed weighted sums {W n, n 1} defined by W n = bi Y i b n+1 /b 1), n 1 1.3) 3
4 whose a.s. lim sup and a.s. lim inf were identified in Theorem 1.1. Let n V n = b 1) b i Y i, n ) Then and b 1) E ) b i Y i = b 1) EY1 ) b i = EY 1 b 1) Var ) b i Y i = b 1) Var Y 1 ) b i = b 1 b + 1 Var Y 1 and so by the Khintchine-Kolmogorov convergence theorem see, e.g., Chow and Teicher [3] p. 113)), V n converges a.s. to a random variable V 1.5) with EV = EY 1 and Var V = b 1 b + 1 Var Y ) A pertinent observation is that W n and V n are identically distributed, n ) For a random variable X with distribution function F X x) = PX x), x R, we let S F X ) denote the spectrum of F X ; that is S F X ) = {c R : F X c ε) < F X c + ε) for all ε > 0}. It is well known and easy to show that S F X ) is a closed set. In Theorem 3.1, it is shown inter alia that {c R : P {ω Ω : c is a limit point of W n ω)}) = 1} = S F V ) and in Theorem 3., it is shown that for almost every ω Ω, the set of limit points of W n ω) coincides with the set S F V ). Consequently, Theorem 3. bears the same relation to Theorem 3.1 for sums of geometrically weighted i.i.d. random variables as in Theorem 1.1 as does 1.) to 1.1) for sums of i.i.d. random variables as in Theorem 1.. The plan of the paper is as follows. In Section, we prove two preliminary lemmas. The main results of this paper, Theorems 3.1 and 3., are stated and proved in Section 3. In Section 4, two interesting examples are presented. 4
5 . PRELIMINARY LEMMAS To establish the main results, two lemmas are needed. The first lemma concerns a numerical sequence and is used to prove the second lemma which concerns an arbitrary sequence of random variables. Lemma.1. Let {t n, n 1}be a sequence in R and let c R. Then c is a limit point of {t n, n 1}.1) if and only if for all ε > 0, t n c < ε for infinitely many n..) Proof. Necessity. This implication is evident. Sufficiency. Suppose that.) holds. Choose n 1 1 such that t n1 c < 1 and n > n 1 such that t n c < 1. Suppose, inductively, that for some k, there exists integers n 1,..., n k with 1 n 1 < < n k such that Choose n k+1 > n k so that tnj c < 1 j for j = 1,..., k. t nk+1 c < 1 k + 1. Thus {n k, k 1} is a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers with t nk c < 1 k, k 1. Let ε > 0 and let K be such that K 1/ε. Then for all k K, and so lim k t nk = c; that is,.1) holds. t nk c < 1 k 1 K ε Lemma.. Let {T n, n 1} be a sequence of random variables and let c R. Then the following three statements are equivalent: i) c is a limit point of T n a.s. ii) For all ε > 0, P T n c ε, c + ε) i.o.n)) = 1. [ ) ]) iii) P j=1 T n c 1, c + 1 i.o.n) = 1. j j Proof. The equivalence between ii) and iii) is evident and the equivalence between i) and iii) follows immediately from Lemma.1. Remark.1. Stout [19] p. 33) defines a point c R to be a recurrent state of the sequence {T n, n 1} if ii) of Lemma. holds. 5
6 3. THE MAIN RESULTS With the preliminaries accounted for, the main results may be stated and proved. Throughout the rest of the paper, let {W n, n 1}, {V n, n 1}, and V be as in 1.3), 1.4), and 1.5), respectively, let F Y1 and F V denote the distribution functions of Y 1 and V, respectively, let C = {c R : P {ω Ω : c is a limit point of W n ω)}) = 1}, and let C ω) denote the set of limit points of W n ω), ω Ω. Theorem 3.1. Let {Y n, n 1} be a sequence of nondegenerate i.i.d. bounded random variables defined on a probability space Ω, F, P) and let b > 1. Then where l = ess inf Y 1 and L = ess sup Y 1. Proof. To prove S F Y1 ) C, let c S F Y1 ). Set p ε = F Y1 c + ε ) F Y1 c ε ) = P S F Y1 ) C = S F V ) [l, L] 3.1) Y 1 c ε, c + ε ]), ε > 0. Then p ε > 0 for all ε > 0 since c S F Y1 )) and p ε < 1 for all sufficiently small ε > 0 since Y 1 is nondegenerate). Let [ ] log k n k = k and j k = n k + 1, k 1 log p 1 ε where ε > 0 is small enough so that p ε < 1. Note that [ ] log k n k + 1 j k = as k. 3.) log p 1 ε Now for k 1, or, equivalently, Moreover, n k + 1 j k log k log p 1 ε = log k 1 log p ε p n k+1 j k ε k ) j k < n k < j k+1 for all large k. 3.4) 6
7 Then since the {Y n, n 1} are independent, P k=1 nk i=j k [ Y i c ε ]] ), c + ε = = k=1 k=1 F Y1 c + ε ) F Y1 c ε )) nk j k +1 p n k j k +1 ε k 1 by 3.3)) k=1 =. Moreover, the independence of the {Y n, n 1} and 3.4) ensure that for all large K, the events n k i=j k [ Y i c ε, c + ε ]], k K are independent and so by the Borel-Cantelli lemma, nk [ P Y i c ε, c + ε ]] i=j k i.o.k) ) = ) Next, note that j k 1 b i Y i j k 1 b i Y i j k 1 b i L l ) bj k L l ) b 1 and so jk 1 bi Y i b n k+1 /b 1) L l b n k+1 j k 0 a.s. as k by 3.)). 3.6) Moreover, it follows from 3.5) that with probability 1, for infinitely many k, k i=j k b i { Y nk i i=j k b ) i c ± ε b n k+1 /b 1) b n k+1 /b 1) = = b n k+1 b j k b n k b n k+1 j k c ± ε ) ) c ± ε ) 3.7) { c ± 3 ε 7
8 provided k is sufficiently large by 3.)). Then by 3.6) and 3.7), with probability 1, for infinitely many k, jk 1 nk W nk = bi Y i b n k+1 /b 1) + i=j k b i Y i c ε, c + ε); b n k+1 /b 1) that is, and, a fortiori, Then by Lemma., thereby proving that S F Y1 ) C. Next, it will be shown that P W nk c ε, c + ε) i.o. k)) = 1 P W n c ε, c + ε) i.o. n)) = 1. P {ω Ω : c is a limit point of W n ω)}) = 1 3.8) S F V ) C. 3.9) Let c S F V ) and let ε > 0 be arbitrary. Let q ε = F V c + ε ) F V c ε ) = P c ε < V c + ε ). 4 Then q ε > 0 since c S F V ). Note that V V n b 1) b i Y i i=n+1 Let Nε) be a positive integer such that Set Then for n > m 1, U m, n) = b 1 b n+1 L l b n a.s., n ) L l b Nε) < ε ) n i=m+1 U m, n) W n = b 1 b n+1 = b 1 b n+1 = b 1 b n m = W m b n m. 8 b i Y i, n > m 1. n i=m+1 b i Y i m ) b i Y i m ) bi Y i b m+1 ) n b i Y i 3.1)
9 Now for j 1, and, similarly, Thus W j j ) b 1) bi L b 1 b j+1 b j+1 W j l a.s. bj+1 b L L a.s. b 1 W j L l a.s., j ) Then by 3.1), 3.13), and 3.11), whenever m 1 and n m + Nε) we have Um, n) W n = W n L l bn m b < ε n m 4 and W m L l bn m b < ε n m 4 Now whenever m 1 and n m + Nε), 0 < q ε = P c ε 4 < V c + ε ) 4 a.s. 3.14) a.s. 3.15) = P c ε 4 < V c + ε 4, ε 4 < V n V < ε ) 4 by 3.10) and 3.11)) P c ε < V n < c + ε ) = P c ε < W n < c + ε ) by 1.7)) = P c ε < W n < c + ε, ε 4 < Um, n) W n < ε ) 4 by 3.14)) P c 34 ε < Um, n) < c + 34 ) ε. Let n k = knε), k 1. Then k=1 P c 34 ε < U n k, n k+1 ) < c + 34 ) ε = and since {U n k, n k+1 ), k 1} is a sequence of independent random variables, we have by the Borel-Cantelli lemma that P c 34 ε < U n k, n k+1 ) < c + 34 ) ε i.o.k) = ) 9
10 Now whenever m 1 and n m + Nε), we have up to an event of probability 0 that [c 34 ε < Um, n) < c + 34 ε ] = = [ c 3 4 ε < W n W m b < c + 3 ] n m 4 ε by 3.1)) [ c 3 4 ε < W n W m b < c + 3 n m 4 ε, ε 4 < W m b < ε ] n m 4 by 3.15)) [c ε < W n < c + ε]. Then recalling 3.16), 1 = P c 34 ε < U n k, n k+1 ) < c + 34 ) ε i.o.k) and, a fortiori, P c ε < W nk+1 < c + ε i.o.k) ) P c ε < W n < c + ε i.o.n)) = 1. Thus c C by Lemma. since ε > 0 is arbitrary thereby establishing 3.9). It will now be shown that C S F V ). 3.17) Suppose that c / S F V ). Then for some ε 0 > 0, Now recalling 3.10), we have for all large n that Then for all large n, P c ε 0 < W n < c + ε 0 ) F V c + ε 0 ) F V c ε 0 ) = ) = P c ε 0 < V n < c + ε 0 ) by 1.7)) V V n < ε 0 a.s. 3.19) = P c ε 0 < V n < c + ε 0, ε 0 < V V n < ε 0 ) by 3.19)) P c ε 0 < V < c + ε 0 ) F V c + ε 0 ) F V c ε 0 ) = 0 by 3.18)) 10
11 and so P c ε 0 < W n < c + ε 0 i.o.n)) = 0. Hence by Lemma., c / C. Consequently, 3.17) holds and so, recalling 3.9), C = S F V ). It remains to prove that C [l, L]. Let c C; that is, c R satisfies 3.8). Then by Theorem 1.1, l = lim inf W n c lim sup W n L a.s. n and so c [l, L] thereby proving that C [l, L]. Alternatively, it can be noted that V = b 1) b i Y i [l, L] a.s. and so C = S F V ) [l, L].) Remark 3.1 i). Recalling 1.5) and 1.6), and recalling Theorem 1.1, V n V a.s. and V is nondegenerate 3.0) lim inf W n = l a.s. and lim sup W n = L a.s. 3.1) Thus in view of 3.0) and 3.1), we see that {V n, n 1} and {W n, n 1} exhibit entirely different asymptotic behavior although their marginal distributions coincide for all n 1 as was noted in 1.7). ii). It follows from 3.0) that V n d V and hence by 1.7) W n d V. 3.) It is interesting to contrast 3.1) and 3.) with what prevails for the sequence H n X n, n 3 n log log n in the Hartman-Wintner Theorem Theorem 1. above) where {X n, n 1} is a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with EX 1 = 0 and EX 1 = 1. Recall that Theorem 1. asserts that lim inf H n = 1 a.s. and lim sup H n = 1 a.s. 3.3) Using Chebyshev s inequality, H n P 0 which is equivalent to H n d ) While 3.1) and 3.3) are analogous results in terms of their structure, 3.) and 3.4) are structurally different since V is nondegenerate whereas the random variable 0 is degenerate. iii). We also observe that there does not exist a random variable W such that W P n W. For if such a random variable W exists, then W d n W whence by 3.) necessarily W and V are identically distributed and, moreover, there exists a nonrandom) subsequence {n k, k 1} such that W nk W a.s. But by the Kolmogorov 0 1 law, W = lim sup k W nk is degenerate which contradicts V being nondegenerate. 11
12 In the next theorem, we show that for almost every ω Ω, the random) set C ω) equals the nonrandom) set S F V ) = C by Theorem 3.1). This is a strengthening of the assertion c S F V ) if and only if c R and with probability 1, c is a limit point of W n obtained from Theorem 3.1. Theorem 3.1 is used to prove Theorem 3.. Theorem 3.. Let {Y n, n 1} be a sequence of nondegenerate i.i.d. bounded random variables defined on a probability space Ω, F, P) and let b > 1. Then the set C ω) coincides with the set S F V ) for almost every ω Ω. 3.5) Proof. We first prove that S F V ) C ω) for almost every ω Ω. 3.6) For each x S F V ), by Theorem 3.1 there exists an event Ω x with P Ω x ) = 1 such that for all ω Ω x, x is a limit point of W n ω). Since S F V ) is closed and since S F V ) [l, L] by Theorem 3.1, S F V ) is compact. Thus see, e.g., Royden [17] p. 163)) S F V ) is separable; that is, S F V ) contains a countable set K which is dense in S F V ). Set Ω 0) = x K Ω x. Since K is countable, Ω 0) is an event with P Ω 0)) = 1. Now for every ω Ω 0) and every x K, x is a limit point of W n ω). 3.7) Fix ω 0 Ω 0) and x 0 S F V ). Let ε > 0. Since K is dense in S F V ), there exists x 1 K such that x 0 x 1 < ε/. Now by 3.7) and Lemma.1, W n ω 0 ) x 1 < ε for infinitely many n. Then W n ω 0 ) x 0 W n ω 0 ) x 1 + x 1 x 0 < ε + ε = ε for infinitely many n and so by Lemma.1, x 0 C ω0 ). Since ω 0 P Ω 0)) = 1, the assertion 3.6) holds. Ω 0) and x 0 S F V ) are arbitrary and Next, it will be shown that Set Ω 1) = C ω) S F V ) for almost every ω Ω. 3.8) { ω Ω : lim inf Then P Ω 1)) = 1 by Theorem 1.1 and W nω) = l and lim sup } W n ω) = L. Ω 1) { ω Ω : C ω) [l, L] }. 3.9) 1
13 Now S F V ) [l, L] by Theorem 3.1. If S F V ) = [l, L], then by 3.9) Ω 1) { ω Ω : C ω) S F V ) } and so 3.8) holds since P Ω 1)) = 1. Thus it will be assumed that S F V ) is a proper subset of [l, L]. Now by Theorem 3.1, {l, L} S F Y1 ) S F V ) [l, L] and since S F V ) is a closed set, it follows that [l, L] S F V ) = [l, L] S F V )) c = l, L) S F V )) c is an open set and hence see, e.g., Royden [17] p. 39)) can be expressed as [l, L] S F V ) = a i, b i ) 3.30) for some collection {a i, b i ), i 1} of nonempty) open intervals. Suppose we can show that there exists an event Ω ) Ω 1) with P Ω )) = 1 such that Then [l, L] S F V ) [l, L] C ω), ω Ω ). 3.31) C ω) S F V ), ω Ω ) which establishes 3.8). We now verify 3.31) for some event Ω ) Ω 1) with P Ω )) = 1. Note that for all k 1, it follows from 3.10) that there exists an integer N k 1 such that Then for all i 1, k 1, and n N k, P V n a i + 1 k, b i 1 )) k V V n 1 k a.s. for all n N k. 3.3) = P V n a i + 1 k, b i 1 ), V V n 1 ) k k by 3.3)) P a i < V < b i ) = 0 since a i, b i ) [l, L] S F V )) and hence by 1.7), for all i 1, k 1, and n N k P W n a i + 1 k, b i 1 )) k = ) 13
14 Set Ω ) = k=1 Ω 1) n=n k [ W n / a i + 1 k, b i 1 )] ). k Then Ω ) Ω 1) and it follows from 3.33) that P Ω )) = 1. Now Ω ) = = k=1 k=1 { Ω 1) ω Ω : C ω) [l, L] a i + 1 k, b i 1 )}) k { Ω 1) ω Ω : a i + 1 k, b i 1 ) }) [l, L] C ω) k Ω 1) { }) ω Ω : a i, b i ) [l, L] C ω) = Ω 1) { ω Ω : [l, L] S F V ) [l, L] C ω) } by 3.30)) thereby proving 3.31) and hence 3.8) as was noted above. Combining 3.6) and 3.8) yields the conclusion 3.5). The following corollary is an immediate consequence of Theorems 3.1 and 3.. Corollary 3.1. Let {Y n, n 1} be a sequence of nondegenerate i.i.d. bounded random variables defined on a probability space Ω, F, P) and let b > 1. If S F Y1 ) = [l, L] where l = ess inf Y 1 and L = ess sup Y 1, then C ω) = C = [l, L] for almost every ω Ω. 4. SOME INTERESTING EXAMPLES In this section we present two interesting examples pertaining to Theorem 3.1. The first example shows that, in general, the first inclusion in 3.1) of Theorem 3.1 is proper. In this example, S F Y1 ) = { 1, 1} but C = [ 1, 1]. Example 4.1. Let {Y n, n 1} be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with P Y 1 = 1) = P Y 1 = 1) = 1. Then S F Y 1 ) = { 1, 1}. In Theorem 3.1, take b =. Now V n = n i Y i converges a.s. to a random variable V. It is well known that V is uniformly distributed on [ 1, 1] see, e.g., Chow and Teicher [3] Exercise 8.3.7, p. 93)) for a routine characteristic function argument). Thus C = [ 1, 1] by Theorem 3.1. The earliest reference we can find to V having a uniform distribution is Jessen and Wintner [1]. 14
15 Remark 4.1. One of the great problems of twentieth century probability theory which has not yet been completely solved is that of identifying the type of the distribution function of V = b i Y i where {Y n, n 1} is a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with P Y 1 = 1) = P Y 1 = 1) = 1 and b > 1. The distribution function F V is known as an infinite Bernoulli convolution. There is an interesting literature of investigation on this problem going back to the groundbreaking work of Jessen and Wintner [1] and Erdös [8]. Jessen and Wintner [1] showed that F V cannot be discrete and it cannot be a mixture; it must be either continuous singular or absolutely continuous. Erdös [8] showed that F V is continuous singular if b >. A review of earlier developments concerning this problem is contained in Garsia [9]. Garsia [9] also pointed out several references of V and F V arising in connection with psychological experimentation or in data transmission problems. We refer the reader to the more recent work of Diaconis and Freedman [5] for a concise discussion of this problem of identifying the type of F V ; this work contains a brief discussion of the substantial recent discovery of Solomyak [18] whose proof was subsequently simplified by Peres and Solomyak [13]) asserting that F V is absolutely continuous for almost every [Lebesgue measure] value of b 1, ]. Solomyak s [18] result had previously been conjectured by Garsia [9].) The exceptional set is nonempty. For example, Erdös [8] showed for b = 1+ 5)/ = the golden ratio ϕ) that F V is continuous singular. The problem of characterizing the type of the distribution function F V of V = b i Y i where {Y n, n 1} is a sequence of nondegenerate i.i.d. random variables with P Y 1 = 1) = 1 P Y 1 = 1) 1 was investigated by Peres and Solomyak [14]. The second example shows that, in general, the second inclusion in 3.1) of Theorem 3.1 is also proper; we exhibit a point c l, L) such that P {ω Ω : c is a limit point of W n ω)}) = 0. Example 4.. Let {Y n, n 1} be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with P Y 1 = 0) = P Y 1 = 1) = 1. Then l = ess inf Y 1 = 0 and L = ess sup Y 1 = 1. Let b >. Note that for almost every ω [Y n = 0] where n W n ω) = 1 bi Y i ω) b n+1 /b 1) b 1) n 1 bi b n+1 and that for almost every ω [Y n = 1] where n Thus for all n, Now since b >, and so letting c W n ω) P W n < 1 b b 1)bn = b 1. b n+1 b = bn b b n+1 < 1 b or W n b 1 ) = ) b 1 b < b 1 b 1 b, b 1 ) l, L) and ε 0, c 1 ) )) b 1 c, b b b 15
16 it follows from 4.1) that for all n P W n c ε, c + ε)) = 0 and hence It follows that and so P W n c ε, c + ε) i.o.n)) = 0. lim inf W n c ε a.s. P {ω Ω : c is a limit point of W n ω)}) = 0. Remark 4.. In Example 4., if b = 3, then V n = 3 i Y i V a.s. where F V is the distribution function of the Cantor singular distribution see, e.g., Billingsley [] p. 416). Thus C = S F V ) is the Cantor ternary set. REFERENCES 1. de Acosta, A A new proof of the Hartman-Wintner law of the iterated logarithm. Annals of Probability 11: Billingsley, P Probability and Measure, 3rd ed. John Wiley, New York. 3. Chow, Y.S., and Teicher, H Probability Theory: Independence, Interchangeability, Martingales, 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York. 4. Csörgő, M., and Révész, P Strong Approximations in Probability and Statistics. Academic Press, New York. 5. Diaconis, P., and Freedman, D Iterated random functions. SIAM Review 41: Egorov, V. A A generalization of the Hartman-Wintner theorem on the law of the iterated logarithm. Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta No. 7:-8 [in Russian; English translation in Vestnik Leningrad University. Mathematics 4:117-14]. 7. Einmahl, U., and Li, D Some results on two-sided LIL behavior. Annals of Probability 33: Erdös, P On a family of symmetric Bernoulli convolutions. American Journal of Mathematics 61: Garsia, A. M Arithmetic properties of Bernoulli convolutions. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 10: Hartman, P., and Wintner, A On the law of the iterated logarithm. American Journal of Mathematics 63:
17 11. Heyde, C. C Some properties of metrics in a study on convergence to normality. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 11: Jessen, B., and Wintner, A Distribution functions and the Riemann zeta function. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 38: Peres, Y., and Solomyak, B Absolute continuity of Bernoulli convolutions, a simple proof. Mathematical Research Letters 3: Peres, Y., and Solomyak, B Self-similar measures and intersections of Cantor sets. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 350: Petrov, V. V Limit Theorems of Probability Theory: Sequences of Independent Random Variables. Clarendon Press/Oxford Univ. Press, New York. 16. Rosalsky, A Lim sup behavior of sums of geometrically weighted i.i.d. random variables. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 11: Royden, H. L Real Analysis, nd ed. Macmillan, New York. 18. Solomyak, B On the random series ±λ n an Erdös problem). Annals of Mathematics, Second Series 14: Stout, W. F Almost Sure Convergence. Academic Press, New York. 0. Strassen, V An invariance principle for the law of the iterated logarithm. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 3: Teicher, H On the law of the iterated logarithm. Annals of Probability :
AN EXTENSION OF THE HONG-PARK VERSION OF THE CHOW-ROBBINS THEOREM ON SUMS OF NONINTEGRABLE RANDOM VARIABLES
J. Korean Math. Soc. 32 (1995), No. 2, pp. 363 370 AN EXTENSION OF THE HONG-PARK VERSION OF THE CHOW-ROBBINS THEOREM ON SUMS OF NONINTEGRABLE RANDOM VARIABLES ANDRÉ ADLER AND ANDREW ROSALSKY A famous result
More informationChapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries
Chapter 1 Measure Spaces 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets 1.1.1 Notation and preliminaries We shall denote by X a nonempty set, by P(X) the set of all parts (i.e., subsets) of X, and by the empty set.
More informationNew Versions of Some Classical Stochastic Inequalities
New Versions of Some Classical Stochastic Inequalities Deli Li Lakehead University, Canada 19 July 2018 at The 14th WMPRT in Chengdu This is a joint work with Professor Andrew ROSALSKY at University of
More informationWeek 2: Sequences and Series
QF0: Quantitative Finance August 29, 207 Week 2: Sequences and Series Facilitator: Christopher Ting AY 207/208 Mathematicians have tried in vain to this day to discover some order in the sequence of prime
More informationEstimates for probabilities of independent events and infinite series
Estimates for probabilities of independent events and infinite series Jürgen Grahl and Shahar evo September 9, 06 arxiv:609.0894v [math.pr] 8 Sep 06 Abstract This paper deals with finite or infinite sequences
More information3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due ). Show that the open disk x 2 + y 2 < 1 is a countable union of planar elementary sets. Show that the closed disk x 2 + y 2 1 is a countable
More informationA note on the growth rate in the Fazekas Klesov general law of large numbers and on the weak law of large numbers for tail series
Publ. Math. Debrecen 73/1-2 2008), 1 10 A note on the growth rate in the Fazekas Klesov general law of large numbers and on the weak law of large numbers for tail series By SOO HAK SUNG Taejon), TIEN-CHUNG
More informationSome limit theorems on uncertain random sequences
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 34 (218) 57 515 DOI:1.3233/JIFS-17599 IOS Press 57 Some it theorems on uncertain random sequences Xiaosheng Wang a,, Dan Chen a, Hamed Ahmadzade b and Rong Gao c
More information1. Supremum and Infimum Remark: In this sections, all the subsets of R are assumed to be nonempty.
1. Supremum and Infimum Remark: In this sections, all the subsets of R are assumed to be nonempty. Let E be a subset of R. We say that E is bounded above if there exists a real number U such that x U for
More information5 Measure theory II. (or. lim. Prove the proposition. 5. For fixed F A and φ M define the restriction of φ on F by writing.
5 Measure theory II 1. Charges (signed measures). Let (Ω, A) be a σ -algebra. A map φ: A R is called a charge, (or signed measure or σ -additive set function) if φ = φ(a j ) (5.1) A j for any disjoint
More informationINDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS
INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS STEVEN P. LALLEY AND ANDREW NOBEL Abstract. It is shown that there are no consistent decision rules for the hypothesis testing problem
More informationRandom walks on Z with exponentially increasing step length and Bernoulli convolutions
Random walks on Z with exponentially increasing step length and Bernoulli convolutions Jörg Neunhäuserer University of Hannover, Germany joerg.neunhaeuserer@web.de Abstract We establish a correspondence
More informationProblem set 1, Real Analysis I, Spring, 2015.
Problem set 1, Real Analysis I, Spring, 015. (1) Let f n : D R be a sequence of functions with domain D R n. Recall that f n f uniformly if and only if for all ɛ > 0, there is an N = N(ɛ) so that if n
More informationSTAT 7032 Probability Spring Wlodek Bryc
STAT 7032 Probability Spring 2018 Wlodek Bryc Created: Friday, Jan 2, 2014 Revised for Spring 2018 Printed: January 9, 2018 File: Grad-Prob-2018.TEX Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati,
More informationA SKOROHOD REPRESENTATION AND AN INVARIANCE PRINCIPLE FOR SUMS OF WEIGHTED i.i.d. RANDOM VARIABLES
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNA OF MATHEMATICS Volume 22, Number 1, Winter 1992 A SKOROHOD REPRESENTATION AND AN INVARIANCE PRINCIPE FOR SUMS OF WEIGHTED i.i.d. RANDOM VARIABES EVAN FISHER ABSTRACT. A Skorohod representation
More informationProbability and Measure
Probability and Measure Robert L. Wolpert Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences Duke University, Durham, NC, USA Convergence of Random Variables 1. Convergence Concepts 1.1. Convergence of Real
More informationFundamental Inequalities, Convergence and the Optional Stopping Theorem for Continuous-Time Martingales
Fundamental Inequalities, Convergence and the Optional Stopping Theorem for Continuous-Time Martingales Prakash Balachandran Department of Mathematics Duke University April 2, 2008 1 Review of Discrete-Time
More information3 Integration and Expectation
3 Integration and Expectation 3.1 Construction of the Lebesgue Integral Let (, F, µ) be a measure space (not necessarily a probability space). Our objective will be to define the Lebesgue integral R fdµ
More informationON THE REGULARITY OF SAMPLE PATHS OF SUB-ELLIPTIC DIFFUSIONS ON MANIFOLDS
Bendikov, A. and Saloff-Coste, L. Osaka J. Math. 4 (5), 677 7 ON THE REGULARITY OF SAMPLE PATHS OF SUB-ELLIPTIC DIFFUSIONS ON MANIFOLDS ALEXANDER BENDIKOV and LAURENT SALOFF-COSTE (Received March 4, 4)
More informationSoo Hak Sung and Andrei I. Volodin
Bull Korean Math Soc 38 (200), No 4, pp 763 772 ON CONVERGENCE OF SERIES OF INDEENDENT RANDOM VARIABLES Soo Hak Sung and Andrei I Volodin Abstract The rate of convergence for an almost surely convergent
More informationPart V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory
Part V 7 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets Lebesgue Integration Theory Definition 7. (Preliminary). A measure on a set is a function :2 [ ] such that. () = 2. If { } = is a finite
More informationThe small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results)
The small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results) Ehrhard Behrends Abstract A metric space (M, d) is said to have the small ball property (sbp) if for every ε 0 > 0 there exists a sequence
More informationElementary Probability. Exam Number 38119
Elementary Probability Exam Number 38119 2 1. Introduction Consider any experiment whose result is unknown, for example throwing a coin, the daily number of customers in a supermarket or the duration of
More informationMAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9
MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: FALL 204 Contents. Sets 2 2. Functions 5 3. Countability 7 4. Axiom of choice 8 5. Equivalence relations 9 6. Real numbers 9 7. Extended
More informationChapter 2 Metric Spaces
Chapter 2 Metric Spaces The purpose of this chapter is to present a summary of some basic properties of metric and topological spaces that play an important role in the main body of the book. 2.1 Metrics
More informationMath212a1413 The Lebesgue integral.
Math212a1413 The Lebesgue integral. October 28, 2014 Simple functions. In what follows, (X, F, m) is a space with a σ-field of sets, and m a measure on F. The purpose of today s lecture is to develop the
More informationMathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering
Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering Lecture notes for PDEs Sergei V. Shabanov Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA CHAPTER 1 The integration theory
More informationEssential Background for Real Analysis I (MATH 5210)
Background Material 1 Essential Background for Real Analysis I (MATH 5210) Note. These notes contain several definitions, theorems, and examples from Analysis I (MATH 4217/5217) which you must know for
More informationCHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM
CHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM We begin our study by identifying certain special kinds of linear functionals on certain special vector spaces of functions. We describe these linear functionals
More information9 Brownian Motion: Construction
9 Brownian Motion: Construction 9.1 Definition and Heuristics The central limit theorem states that the standard Gaussian distribution arises as the weak limit of the rescaled partial sums S n / p n of
More informationIntroduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1
Christopher Heil Introduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces Last Updated: March 10, 2018 c 2018 by Christopher Heil Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces
More informationIntroduction and Preliminaries
Chapter 1 Introduction and Preliminaries This chapter serves two purposes. The first purpose is to prepare the readers for the more systematic development in later chapters of methods of real analysis
More informationEmpirical Processes: General Weak Convergence Theory
Empirical Processes: General Weak Convergence Theory Moulinath Banerjee May 18, 2010 1 Extended Weak Convergence The lack of measurability of the empirical process with respect to the sigma-field generated
More informationStanford Mathematics Department Math 205A Lecture Supplement #4 Borel Regular & Radon Measures
2 1 Borel Regular Measures We now state and prove an important regularity property of Borel regular outer measures: Stanford Mathematics Department Math 205A Lecture Supplement #4 Borel Regular & Radon
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.pr] 16 Mar 2007
CHARACTERIZATION OF LIL BEHAVIOR IN BANACH SPACE UWE EINMAHL a, and DELI LI b, a Departement Wiskunde, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, arxiv:math/0608687v2 [math.pr] 16 Mar 2007 Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel,
More information1 Sequences of events and their limits
O.H. Probability II (MATH 2647 M15 1 Sequences of events and their limits 1.1 Monotone sequences of events Sequences of events arise naturally when a probabilistic experiment is repeated many times. For
More informationProbability and Measure
Part II Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2018 84 Paper 4, Section II 26J Let (X, A) be a measurable space. Let T : X X be a measurable map, and µ a probability
More information17. Convergence of Random Variables
7. Convergence of Random Variables In elementary mathematics courses (such as Calculus) one speaks of the convergence of functions: f n : R R, then lim f n = f if lim f n (x) = f(x) for all x in R. This
More informationQED. Queen s Economics Department Working Paper No. 1244
QED Queen s Economics Department Working Paper No. 1244 A necessary moment condition for the fractional functional central limit theorem Søren Johansen University of Copenhagen and CREATES Morten Ørregaard
More informationCopyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
.1 Limits of Sequences. CHAPTER.1.0. a) True. If converges, then there is an M > 0 such that M. Choose by Archimedes an N N such that N > M/ε. Then n N implies /n M/n M/N < ε. b) False. = n does not converge,
More informationMean convergence theorems and weak laws of large numbers for weighted sums of random variables under a condition of weighted integrability
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 305 2005) 644 658 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Mean convergence theorems and weak laws of large numbers for weighted sums of random variables under a condition of weighted integrability
More informationChapter 4. Measure Theory. 1. Measure Spaces
Chapter 4. Measure Theory 1. Measure Spaces Let X be a nonempty set. A collection S of subsets of X is said to be an algebra on X if S has the following properties: 1. X S; 2. if A S, then A c S; 3. if
More informationSOME CONVERSE LIMIT THEOREMS FOR EXCHANGEABLE BOOTSTRAPS
SOME CONVERSE LIMIT THEOREMS OR EXCHANGEABLE BOOTSTRAPS Jon A. Wellner University of Washington The bootstrap Glivenko-Cantelli and bootstrap Donsker theorems of Giné and Zinn (990) contain both necessary
More informationFinal. due May 8, 2012
Final due May 8, 2012 Write your solutions clearly in complete sentences. All notation used must be properly introduced. Your arguments besides being correct should be also complete. Pay close attention
More information1.1. MEASURES AND INTEGRALS
CHAPTER 1: MEASURE THEORY In this chapter we define the notion of measure µ on a space, construct integrals on this space, and establish their basic properties under limits. The measure µ(e) will be defined
More informationRandom Bernstein-Markov factors
Random Bernstein-Markov factors Igor Pritsker and Koushik Ramachandran October 20, 208 Abstract For a polynomial P n of degree n, Bernstein s inequality states that P n n P n for all L p norms on the unit
More informationAnalysis Finite and Infinite Sets The Real Numbers The Cantor Set
Analysis Finite and Infinite Sets Definition. An initial segment is {n N n n 0 }. Definition. A finite set can be put into one-to-one correspondence with an initial segment. The empty set is also considered
More informationMATH 202B - Problem Set 5
MATH 202B - Problem Set 5 Walid Krichene (23265217) March 6, 2013 (5.1) Show that there exists a continuous function F : [0, 1] R which is monotonic on no interval of positive length. proof We know there
More informationComplete Moment Convergence for Weighted Sums of Negatively Orthant Dependent Random Variables
Filomat 31:5 217, 1195 126 DOI 1.2298/FIL175195W Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Complete Moment Convergence for
More information4 Sums of Independent Random Variables
4 Sums of Independent Random Variables Standing Assumptions: Assume throughout this section that (,F,P) is a fixed probability space and that X 1, X 2, X 3,... are independent real-valued random variables
More information2.2 Some Consequences of the Completeness Axiom
60 CHAPTER 2. IMPORTANT PROPERTIES OF R 2.2 Some Consequences of the Completeness Axiom In this section, we use the fact that R is complete to establish some important results. First, we will prove that
More informationCombinatorics in Banach space theory Lecture 12
Combinatorics in Banach space theory Lecture The next lemma considerably strengthens the assertion of Lemma.6(b). Lemma.9. For every Banach space X and any n N, either all the numbers n b n (X), c n (X)
More informationReal Analysis Math 131AH Rudin, Chapter #1. Dominique Abdi
Real Analysis Math 3AH Rudin, Chapter # Dominique Abdi.. If r is rational (r 0) and x is irrational, prove that r + x and rx are irrational. Solution. Assume the contrary, that r+x and rx are rational.
More informationEXISTENCE OF MOMENTS IN THE HSU ROBBINS ERDŐS THEOREM
Annales Univ. Sci. Budapest., Sect. Comp. 39 (2013) 271 278 EXISTENCE OF MOMENTS IN THE HSU ROBBINS ERDŐS THEOREM O.I. Klesov (Kyiv, Ukraine) U. Stadtmüller (Ulm, Germany) Dedicated to the 70th anniversary
More informationTHE CANTOR GAME: WINNING STRATEGIES AND DETERMINACY. by arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 29 Jan 2017 MAGNUS D. LADUE
THE CANTOR GAME: WINNING STRATEGIES AND DETERMINACY by arxiv:170109087v1 [mathca] 9 Jan 017 MAGNUS D LADUE 0 Abstract In [1] Grossman Turett define the Cantor game In [] Matt Baker proves several results
More informationThe Heine-Borel and Arzela-Ascoli Theorems
The Heine-Borel and Arzela-Ascoli Theorems David Jekel October 29, 2016 This paper explains two important results about compactness, the Heine- Borel theorem and the Arzela-Ascoli theorem. We prove them
More information(1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define
Homework, Real Analysis I, Fall, 2010. (1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define ρ(f, g) = 1 0 f(x) g(x) dx. Show that
More informationMetric Spaces and Topology
Chapter 2 Metric Spaces and Topology From an engineering perspective, the most important way to construct a topology on a set is to define the topology in terms of a metric on the set. This approach underlies
More informationPart III. 10 Topological Space Basics. Topological Spaces
Part III 10 Topological Space Basics Topological Spaces Using the metric space results above as motivation we will axiomatize the notion of being an open set to more general settings. Definition 10.1.
More informationIntegration on Measure Spaces
Chapter 3 Integration on Measure Spaces In this chapter we introduce the general notion of a measure on a space X, define the class of measurable functions, and define the integral, first on a class of
More informationMATH 324 Summer 2011 Elementary Number Theory. Notes on Mathematical Induction. Recall the following axiom for the set of integers.
MATH 4 Summer 011 Elementary Number Theory Notes on Mathematical Induction Principle of Mathematical Induction Recall the following axiom for the set of integers. Well-Ordering Axiom for the Integers If
More informationTheorem 2.1 (Caratheodory). A (countably additive) probability measure on a field has an extension. n=1
Chapter 2 Probability measures 1. Existence Theorem 2.1 (Caratheodory). A (countably additive) probability measure on a field has an extension to the generated σ-field Proof of Theorem 2.1. Let F 0 be
More information7 About Egorov s and Lusin s theorems
Tel Aviv University, 2013 Measure and category 62 7 About Egorov s and Lusin s theorems 7a About Severini-Egorov theorem.......... 62 7b About Lusin s theorem............... 64 7c About measurable functions............
More informationON THE STRONG LIMIT THEOREMS FOR DOUBLE ARRAYS OF BLOCKWISE M-DEPENDENT RANDOM VARIABLES
Available at: http://publications.ictp.it IC/28/89 United Nations Educational, Scientific Cultural Organization International Atomic Energy Agency THE ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS
More informationIn N we can do addition, but in order to do subtraction we need to extend N to the integers
Chapter The Real Numbers.. Some Preliminaries Discussion: The Irrationality of 2. We begin with the natural numbers N = {, 2, 3, }. In N we can do addition, but in order to do subtraction we need to extend
More informationEconomics 204 Summer/Fall 2011 Lecture 5 Friday July 29, 2011
Economics 204 Summer/Fall 2011 Lecture 5 Friday July 29, 2011 Section 2.6 (cont.) Properties of Real Functions Here we first study properties of functions from R to R, making use of the additional structure
More informationThe main results about probability measures are the following two facts:
Chapter 2 Probability measures The main results about probability measures are the following two facts: Theorem 2.1 (extension). If P is a (continuous) probability measure on a field F 0 then it has a
More informationThe Caratheodory Construction of Measures
Chapter 5 The Caratheodory Construction of Measures Recall how our construction of Lebesgue measure in Chapter 2 proceeded from an initial notion of the size of a very restricted class of subsets of R,
More informationON THE STRONG LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS FOR WEIGHTED SUMS OF RANDOM ELEMENTS IN BANACH SPACES
ON THE STRONG LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS FOR WEIGHTED SUMS OF RANDOM ELEMENTS IN BANACH SPACES By YUAN LIAO A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
More informationSelf-normalized laws of the iterated logarithm
Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, vol.3, no.3, 2014, 145-151 ISSN: 1792-6602 print), 1792-6939 online) Scienpress Ltd, 2014 Self-normalized laws of the iterated logarithm Igor Zhdanov 1 Abstract
More informationWeighted Sums of Orthogonal Polynomials Related to Birth-Death Processes with Killing
Advances in Dynamical Systems and Applications ISSN 0973-5321, Volume 8, Number 2, pp. 401 412 (2013) http://campus.mst.edu/adsa Weighted Sums of Orthogonal Polynomials Related to Birth-Death Processes
More information2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due 9/5). Prove that every countable set A is measurable and µ(a) = 0. 2 (Bonus). Let A consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is
More informationExistence of a Limit on a Dense Set, and. Construction of Continuous Functions on Special Sets
Existence of a Limit on a Dense Set, and Construction of Continuous Functions on Special Sets REU 2012 Recap: Definitions Definition Given a real-valued function f, the limit of f exists at a point c R
More informationWalker Ray Econ 204 Problem Set 3 Suggested Solutions August 6, 2015
Problem 1. Take any mapping f from a metric space X into a metric space Y. Prove that f is continuous if and only if f(a) f(a). (Hint: use the closed set characterization of continuity). I make use of
More informationThe Lebesgue Integral
The Lebesgue Integral Brent Nelson In these notes we give an introduction to the Lebesgue integral, assuming only a knowledge of metric spaces and the iemann integral. For more details see [1, Chapters
More information9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning
Tel Aviv University, 2015 Functions of real variables 93 9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning 9a Borel-Kolmogorov paradox............. 93 9b Radon-Nikodym theorem.............. 94 9c Conditioning.....................
More informationSome Background Material
Chapter 1 Some Background Material In the first chapter, we present a quick review of elementary - but important - material as a way of dipping our toes in the water. This chapter also introduces important
More informationOn Least Squares Linear Regression Without Second Moment
On Least Squares Linear Regression Without Second Moment BY RAJESHWARI MAJUMDAR University of Connecticut If \ and ] are real valued random variables such that the first moments of \, ], and \] exist and
More informationConditional independence, conditional mixing and conditional association
Ann Inst Stat Math (2009) 61:441 460 DOI 10.1007/s10463-007-0152-2 Conditional independence, conditional mixing and conditional association B. L. S. Prakasa Rao Received: 25 July 2006 / Revised: 14 May
More informationRafał Kapica, Janusz Morawiec CONTINUOUS SOLUTIONS OF ITERATIVE EQUATIONS OF INFINITE ORDER
Opuscula Mathematica Vol. 29 No. 2 2009 Rafał Kapica, Janusz Morawiec CONTINUOUS SOLUTIONS OF ITERATIVE EQUATIONS OF INFINITE ORDER Abstract. Given a probability space (, A, P ) and a complete separable
More informationStat 451: Solutions to Assignment #1
Stat 451: Solutions to Assignment #1 2.1) By definition, 2 Ω is the set of all subsets of Ω. Therefore, to show that 2 Ω is a σ-algebra we must show that the conditions of the definition σ-algebra are
More information25.1 Ergodicity and Metric Transitivity
Chapter 25 Ergodicity This lecture explains what it means for a process to be ergodic or metrically transitive, gives a few characterizes of these properties (especially for AMS processes), and deduces
More informationLogarithmic scaling of planar random walk s local times
Logarithmic scaling of planar random walk s local times Péter Nándori * and Zeyu Shen ** * Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland ** Courant Institute, New York University October 9, 2015 Abstract
More informationLecture 4 Lebesgue spaces and inequalities
Lecture 4: Lebesgue spaces and inequalities 1 of 10 Course: Theory of Probability I Term: Fall 2013 Instructor: Gordan Zitkovic Lecture 4 Lebesgue spaces and inequalities Lebesgue spaces We have seen how
More informationSUMMARY OF RESULTS ON PATH SPACES AND CONVERGENCE IN DISTRIBUTION FOR STOCHASTIC PROCESSES
SUMMARY OF RESULTS ON PATH SPACES AND CONVERGENCE IN DISTRIBUTION FOR STOCHASTIC PROCESSES RUTH J. WILLIAMS October 2, 2017 Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive,
More informationOn Generalizations Of The Borel-Cantelli Lemmas
On Generalizations Of The Borel-Cantelli Lemmas S. de Vos Bachelor Thesis in Mathematics July 9, 2010 On Generalizations Of The Borel-Cantelli Lemmas Summary This bachelor thesis is about the Borel-Cantelli
More information1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer 11(2) (1989),
Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 April 26, 2005 1 Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski 1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer
More informationBehaviour of Lipschitz functions on negligible sets. Non-differentiability in R. Outline
Behaviour of Lipschitz functions on negligible sets G. Alberti 1 M. Csörnyei 2 D. Preiss 3 1 Università di Pisa 2 University College London 3 University of Warwick Lars Ahlfors Centennial Celebration Helsinki,
More informationB8.1 Martingales Through Measure Theory. Concept of independence
B8.1 Martingales Through Measure Theory Concet of indeendence Motivated by the notion of indeendent events in relims robability, we have generalized the concet of indeendence to families of σ-algebras.
More informationJeong-Hyun Kang Department of Mathematics, University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA
#A33 INTEGERS 10 (2010), 379-392 DISTANCE GRAPHS FROM P -ADIC NORMS Jeong-Hyun Kang Department of Mathematics, University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA 30118 jkang@westga.edu Hiren Maharaj Department
More informationLebesgue Integration on R n
Lebesgue Integration on R n The treatment here is based loosely on that of Jones, Lebesgue Integration on Euclidean Space We give an overview from the perspective of a user of the theory Riemann integration
More informationON CONTINUITY OF MEASURABLE COCYCLES
Journal of Applied Analysis Vol. 6, No. 2 (2000), pp. 295 302 ON CONTINUITY OF MEASURABLE COCYCLES G. GUZIK Received January 18, 2000 and, in revised form, July 27, 2000 Abstract. It is proved that every
More informationMORE ON CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS AND SETS
Chapter 6 MORE ON CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS AND SETS This chapter can be considered enrichment material containing also several more advanced topics and may be skipped in its entirety. You can proceed directly
More informationA note on some approximation theorems in measure theory
A note on some approximation theorems in measure theory S. Kesavan and M. T. Nair Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai - 600 06 email: kesh@iitm.ac.in and mtnair@iitm.ac.in
More informationON THE EQUIVALENCE OF CONGLOMERABILITY AND DISINTEGRABILITY FOR UNBOUNDED RANDOM VARIABLES
Submitted to the Annals of Probability ON THE EQUIVALENCE OF CONGLOMERABILITY AND DISINTEGRABILITY FOR UNBOUNDED RANDOM VARIABLES By Mark J. Schervish, Teddy Seidenfeld, and Joseph B. Kadane, Carnegie
More informationContents Ordered Fields... 2 Ordered sets and fields... 2 Construction of the Reals 1: Dedekind Cuts... 2 Metric Spaces... 3
Analysis Math Notes Study Guide Real Analysis Contents Ordered Fields 2 Ordered sets and fields 2 Construction of the Reals 1: Dedekind Cuts 2 Metric Spaces 3 Metric Spaces 3 Definitions 4 Separability
More informationHAIYUN ZHOU, RAVI P. AGARWAL, YEOL JE CHO, AND YONG SOO KIM
Georgian Mathematical Journal Volume 9 (2002), Number 3, 591 600 NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS AND ITERATIVE METHODS IN UNIFORMLY CONVEX BANACH SPACES HAIYUN ZHOU, RAVI P. AGARWAL, YEOL JE CHO, AND YONG SOO KIM
More informationOn Kusuoka Representation of Law Invariant Risk Measures
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH Vol. 38, No. 1, February 213, pp. 142 152 ISSN 364-765X (print) ISSN 1526-5471 (online) http://dx.doi.org/1.1287/moor.112.563 213 INFORMS On Kusuoka Representation of
More informationA TALE OF TWO CONFORMALLY INVARIANT METRICS
A TALE OF TWO CONFORMALLY INVARIANT METRICS H. S. BEAR AND WAYNE SMITH Abstract. The Harnack metric is a conformally invariant metric defined in quite general domains that coincides with the hyperbolic
More informationMath 324 Summer 2012 Elementary Number Theory Notes on Mathematical Induction
Math 4 Summer 01 Elementary Number Theory Notes on Mathematical Induction Principle of Mathematical Induction Recall the following axiom for the set of integers. Well-Ordering Axiom for the Integers If
More information