A Simulation Comparison Study for Estimating the Process Capability Index C pm with Asymmetric Tolerances
|
|
- Ann Tate
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Available online at ijims.ms.tku.edu.tw/list.asp International Journal of Information and Management Sciences 20 (2009), A Simulation Comparison Study for Estimating the Process Capability Index C pm with Asymmetric Tolerances Shu-Fei Wu Department of Statistics Tamkang University R.O.C. Abstract Process capability indices had been widely used to evaluate the process performance. The process capability index C pm proposed by Chan et al. [2] does take into account of the proximity of the process mean to the target value T for asymmetric tolerance. For point estimation of this index, a Jackknife method is presented to reduce bias. Five interval estimation methods for obtaining approximate confidence intervals are presented and compared. One is based on the chi-squared approximation to the distribution of the natural estimator of C pm given in Boyles [1], three are based on the bootstrap including standard bootstrap (SB), percentile bootstrap (PB) and bisaed-corrected percentile bootstrap (BCPB) and the last one is based on the Jackknife technique. A simulation comparison study of the performance of five methods is done under normal process environment and the results show that the Jackknife interval outperforms the other four methods. Boyles s [1] confidence interval and the SB confidence interval are more reliable than the PB and BCPB methods. At last, one real life example is used to demonstrate the use of the confidence interval to decide if the process is capable. Keywords: Process Capability Index, Bootstrap Method, Jackknife Method. 1. Introduction Process capability indices had been widely used to evaluate the capability of the manufacturing process to reach the preset quality requirements (See, for examples, Montgomery [9], Kane [7] and Ryan [11]. Three basic process capability indices are defined as follows (See Kane [7] and Pearn et al. [10]): C p = USL LSL, 6σ Received October 2007; Revised March 2008; Accepted June 2008.
2 244 International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 2, June, 2009 C pk = min(c pl,c pu ), USL LSL C pm = 6 σ 2 + (µ T) = d 2 3 σ 2 + (µ T) = d 2 3τ, where C pl = USL µ 3σ, C pu = µ LSL 3σ, USL and LSL are the upper and lower specification limits preset by the process engineers, µ is the process mean, σ is the process standard deviation, m = (USL + LSL)/2 is the midpoint of specification limits, d = (USL LSL)/2 is the half length of the specification interval and τ 2 = σ 2 + (µ T) 2. The index C p only measures the process variation without considering the process centering. The index C pk takes the process variation and process centering into account, but not the proximity of the process mean to the target value. The index C pm does take into account of the proximity of the process mean to the preset target value. For asymmetric tolerance (T m ), Chan et al. [2] developed the process capability index Cpm which is a genelization index of C pm and is defined as: C pm = min(d L,D U ) 3 σ 2 + (µ T) 2 = D σ 2 + (µ T) 2 = D τ = 3D d C pm, where D L = T LSL, D U = USL T and D = min(d L,D U )/3. Note that Cpm is reduced to C pm for symmetric tolerance. Clearly Cpm will not only continue to take the proximity of the target value into consideration as C pm does, but also taking into account the asymmetric specification limits. Please see the following figure (Kane [7]) for the reaction of Cpm to the departures from the non-central target value, where USL = 18, LSL = 10, T = 16 and the normal mean is µ = 13(1)17. The expected yield associated with a given value of Cpm USL µ is 1 yield = 1 φ( ) λ 2 (µ T) 2 LSL µ D +φ( ), where λ = λ 2 (µ T) 2 C. It revealed that the larger value of pm C pm results in a smaller expected proportion of nonconforming. 2. Point Estimation and Interval Estimation of C pm 2.1. Point Estimation of C pm Let X 1,...,X n denote a random sample from a normal distributed process with mean µ and standard deviation σ, denoted by N(µ,σ 2 ). The sample mean and the maximum likelihood estimate of the variance are n i=1 X = X n i and S 2 i=1 = (X i X) 2. n n Replacing the parameters µ and σ 2 in the index Cpm by X and S 2, then we have the natural estimator of Cpm given by: where ˆτ 2 = S 2 + ( X T) 2 = P n i=1 (X i T) 2 n. Ĉ pm = D ˆτ, (1)
3 A Simulation Comparison Study for Estimating the Process Capability Index C pm 245 Figure 1. Boyles [1] showed that ˆτ 2 is an unbiased estimator of τ 2 and has smaller variance than the biased estimator τ 2 = n n n 1 S2 + ( X T) 2 i=1 = (X i T) 2. n 1
4 246 International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 2, June, 2009 Ignoring the fact that the esimator is a random variable with distribution, many process engineers is simply comparing the calculated value of Cpm with a preassigned minimum value to determine whether if the process is capable by a given sample. For point estimation, unbiasedness is a good feature of an estimator should have. Therefore, we proposed a Jackknife estimator of the index. Jackknife method was originally introduced by Quenouille [13] in order to reduce the bias of an estimator of a serial correlation coefficient. We employ his method as follows: Let ˆθ = Ĉ pm denote the natural estimator of θ = Cpm based on the complete sample. Eliminating the first observation, we make use of the remaining n 1 observations to calculate the first natural estimator of Cpm and denoted by ˆθ (1). Similarly, eliminating the second observation, we can have the second natural estimator of Cpm and denoted by ˆθ (2) based on the remaining n 1 observations. Repeat the same procedure, we can have n natural estimators denoted by ˆθ (1), ˆθ (2),..., ˆθ (n) based on the subsample of size n 1. The ith pseudovalue is defined as ˆθ i = nˆθ (n 1)ˆθ (i), i = 1,2,...,n. The Quenoulli s estimator is the mean of the ˆθ i s, and benoted by ˆ θ. The Jackknife estimator of standard error is Sˆ θ = estimator is defined as Pn i=1 (ˆθ i ˆ θ) 2 n(n 1). For point estimation, the MSE of an MSE(ˆθ) = Var (ˆθ) + [Bias(ˆθ)] 2, where Bias(ˆθ) = E(ˆθ θ). A 1000 iteration runs of Monte-Carlo simulation were done to obtain the coverage probabilities of five methods by setting USL = 60, LSL = 40 and m=50. Following the same structure of Franklin and Wasserman [6], the random samples of size n = 10(10)40(20)60 are generated from a normal distribution with mean and variance given by (µ,σ 2 )=(50,4), (50,9), (52,4), (52,9). Two target values T =51 and T =55 are considered for asymmetric tolerance and the corresponding true index values are Cpm =(1.342,.949,1.342,.949) and Cpm =(.309,.286,.462,.393) for four different combinations of means and variances given by (50,4), (50,9), (52,4), (52,9). The average bias and MSE by using estimator defined in equation (1) and Jackknife estimator are listed in Table 1. From Table 1, we can see that the bias and MSE for both methods are smaller for more asymmetric tolerance (T = 55). The Jackknife estimator has almost the same MSE as the natural estimator given in equation (1) and the Jackknife estimator can reduce the bias a lot for small, moderate or large sample size. More over, the bias and MSE of both methods are decreasing and the discrepancy of bias between two methods is decreasing when the sample size is increasing. Overall speaking, Jackknife estimator has better performance than the other method especially for cases Interval Estimation of C pm Considering the sampling error, it is better to use the interval estimation or hypothesis testing to reflect the uncertainty about the true index value. For that reason, Chou et al. [3] provided confidence limits for the index C pk for normal process environment.
5 A Simulation Comparison Study for Estimating the Process Capability Index C pm 247 Table 1. The Bias (upper entry) and the MSE (lower entry) of the estimator given in equation (1) and Jackknife method for Cpm under normal process. T = Eqn. (1) Jackknife Eqn. (1) Jackknife Eqn. (1) Jackknife Eqn. (1) Jackknife Eqn. (1) Jackknife (50,4) C pm= (50,9) Cpm = (52,4) Cpm = (52,9) Cpm = T = 55 (50,4) C pm= (50,9) Cpm = (52,4) Cpm = (52,9) C pm= Franklin and Wasserman [6] make used of the three Bootstrap confidence interval techniques introduced by Efron and Tibshirani [5] to construct the confidence intervals for C pk. Franklin and Wasserman [6] also offered three bootstrap lower confidence limits for C p,c pk and C pm. They compare the three bootstrap methods and a parametric method given in Boyles [1] and claimed that the bootstrap lower confidence limits performed as well as the parametric method. The advantage of bootstrap methods is nonparametric and free from assumptions of the distribution of X. In addition to the previous four method, we also proposed another nonparametric method called Jackknife method. In this paper, these five methods for the interval estimation of Cpm are presented and introduced in more detail as follows: (1) Boyles s method For normal process, Chan et al. [2] had shown that the pdf of C pm is f(x) = exp[ (n 1)C2 pm/x 2 + λ ] 2 (n 1)Cpm/x 2 2 ] (n/2)+j (λ j ) Γ( n 2 + (2 n/2 x) 1, where j)22j j! j=1 0 < x <. Since ˆτ 2 has a noncentral chi-squared distribution, Boyles [1] used the central chi-squared distribution to approximate the noncentral chi-squared distribution and showed that (C pm/ĉ pm) 2 is approximated χ 2 ν/ν, where χ 2 ν is a chi-squared distribution with ν degrees of freedom, where ν = n(1 + ξ2 ) ξ 2 and ξ = µ T σ.
6 248 International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 2, June, 2009 The natural estimator of ξ is ˆξ = X T S. Thus the (1 α)100% approximate confidence interval for Cpm is χ 2 ν (1 α/2) χ 2 ν (α/2) (Ĉ pm ν,ĉ pm ), ν where χ 2 ν (α/2) is the right tail α/2 percentile of a chi-squared distribution with ν degrees of freedom. (2) The Standard Bootstrap Confidence Interval of C pm (SB) The Bootstrap method was introduced by Efren [4]. Let X 1,...,X n be the original random sample from a process with distribution F. A Bootstrap sample is one of size n drawn ( with replacement )from the original sample and is denoted by X 1,...,X n. There are a total of n n such possible samples. Let B be the number of Bootstrap samples and B is taken to be 1000 throughout this paper. Let X (i) and S 2 (i) be the sample mean and sample variance based on the ith Bootstrap sample. First, calculate the natural estimator of C pm given by Ĉ pm (i) = D S 2 (i)+( X (i) T) 2 based on the ith Bootstrap sample, i = 1,...,B. Then calculate the sample average of the Bootstrap estimates Ĉ pm( ) = 1 B B i=1 Ĉ pm(i) and the sample standard deviation of 1 Bootstrap estimates SĈ = B pm B i=1 [Ĉ pm(i) Ĉ pm( )] 2. Then the (1 α)100% confidence interval for Cpm is (Ĉ pm ± Z α/2sĉ pm ), where Z α/2 is the right tail α/2 percentile of a standard normal random variable Z. If a 95% confidence interval is desired, then Z α/2 =1.96. If a 97.5% lower confidence interval of the index is desired, the lower confidence limit can be easily obtained by simply selecting the lower value of the two-sided confidence interval. (3) Percentile bootstrap confidence interval of C pm ( PB) Let Ĉ pm (1) Ĉ pm (2) Ĉ pm (B) be the sorted Bootstrap estimates. Then Ĉpm ([B α/2] + 1) and Ĉ pm ([B (1 α/2)] + 1) are the α/2 and (1 α/2) percentile points of the distribution of Ĉ pm(i), where [x] denotes the largest integer being less than or equal to x. The (1 α)100% approximate confidence interval for Cpm is given by (Ĉ pm([b α/2] + 1), Ĉ pm([b (1 α/2)] + 1). (4) Biased corrected percentile bootstrap confidence interval of Cpm (BCPB) Since the Bootstrap distribution may be a biased distribution, the third method was developed to correct for this potential bias. For example, if Ĉ pm is 1.63 and in the order values of Ĉ pm (i) we have Ĉ pm (412)=1.61 and Ĉ pm (423)=1.66, then p 0 = P(Ĉ pm 1.63) = 412/1000 =.412. Calculate Z 0 = φ 1 (p 0 ) = φ 1 (.412) =.222, where φ 1 is the inverse of the distribution function standard normal random variable Z. Then calculate P L = φ(2z 0 Z α/2 ) and P U = φ(2z 0 + Z α/2 ), where φ is the cdf of a standard
7 A Simulation Comparison Study for Estimating the Process Capability Index C pm 249 normal random variable Z. Then the (1 α)100% approximate confidence interval for C pm is given by [Ĉ pm ([P L B] + 1), Ĉ pm ([P U B] + 1)]. (5) Jackknife confidence interval of C pm : Tukey [12] suggested that the statistic ˆt = ˆ θ θ should be distributed approximately Sˆ θ as Student s t with n 1 degrees of freedom. Then the (1 α)100% approximate confidence interval for Cpm is given by [ˆ θ ± tα/2 (n 1)Sˆ θ], where t α/2 (n 1) is the right tail α/2 percentile of a Student s t distribution. For symmetric tolerance (T = m), the index C pm reduced to the index C pm. Therefore, all results for the index C pm are applicable for the index C pm. Under the same simulation set up for point estimation, we compare the performance of five methods based on their coverage probabilities and their simulation results are listed in Table 2-3. The frequency of coverage is a Binomial event with p =.95 and n = Thus a 95% confidence interval surrounding the expected coverage frequency.95 would have a bound of ±1.96 (.95)(.05)/1000 = ± Hence, one would be 95% confident that the true coverage percentage would have a proportion of coverage between (.9365,.9635). The frequencies of coverage falling into this interval are marked by an asterisk (*) in Tables 2-3. From Tables 2-3, the coverage probabilities are increasing and the average lengths are decreasing when the sample size n is increasing for most cases. Five methods have higher coverage percentages for the case of (µ,σ 2 )=(50,4) than the other three cases for any given T and for larger T value (more asymmetric tolerance) for any given combination of (µ,σ 2 ). The simulation results also showed that the Jackknife method always has the highest coverage probability and the highest rates of reaching the nominal confidence coefficient.95 among five methods. Therefore, the Jackknife method is recommended for used. The parametric Boyles s method is also better than the other three bootstrap methods. The performance of three Bootstrap methods based on the closest coverage rates to the nominal confidence coefficient are ranked as SB>BCPB>PB. For not normal process environment, the nonparametric method should be more suitable since the nonparametric methods do not need any distributional assumptions on the process. When C pm > 1, the process is capable, and conversely. Therefore, only the normal process with mean and variance given by (50,4) when T = 51 is capable since C pm exceeding 1.
8 250 International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 2, June, 2009 Table 2. The coverage probability of five confidence intervals for Cpm with T=51 under normal process. (µ, σ 2 )=(50,4) n = 10 n = 20 n = 30 n = 40 n = 60 Coverage Coverage Coverage Coverage Coverage Boyles * 0.939* 0.947* 0.949* SB * 0.93 PB BCPB Jackknife 0.941* * 0.954* (µ, σ 2 )=(50,9) Boyles * 0.941* * SB * * PB BCPB Jackknife 0.951* 0.947* 0.941* 0.946* 0.937* (µ, σ 2 )=(52,4) Boyles * 0.938* 0.945* 0.939* SB * PB BCPB Jackknife * * (µ, σ 2 )=(52,9) Boyles * 0.938* SB * 0.940* PB BCPB Jackknife 0.950* 0.951* 0.949* 0.940* 0.944* 3. Numerical Example The Example 5-1 in Montgomery [9] is used to demonstrate the construction of 90% and 95% confidence interval estimates and the 95% and 97.5% lower confidence limit of C pm and C pm. In that example, the inside diameter measurement data of the 125 Piston rings for an automotive engine produced by a forging process is recorded in Table 5-1 of Montgomery [9]. The sample mean and the sample variance are obtained as and The upper limit, lower limit of the specification interval are assumed to be and respectively and thus the midpoint is m= The target is given by for symmetric tolerance and is given by for asymmetric tolerance. The natural point estimates of the corresponding index are Ĉpm=1.333 for symmetric tolerance and Ĉ pm=0.771 for asymmetric tolerance. Their confidence interval estimates or the lower confidence limits are presented in Table 4. Usually, if a process has C pm > 1 or C pm > 1, then it can be considered to be a capable process. From Table 4, we can conclude that this Piston rings manufacturing process is capable with symmetric tolerance (T= = m) since the lower confidence limit is greater than 1 and is
9 A Simulation Comparison Study for Estimating the Process Capability Index C pm 251 Table 3. The coverage probability of five confidence intervals for C pm with T=55 under normal process. (µ, σ 2 )=(50,4) n = 10 n = 20 n = 30 n = 40 n = 60 Coverage Coverage Coverage Coverage Coverage Boyles * 0.940* 0.941* SB * 0.950* 0.956* PB * BCPB * 0.942* 0.947* Jackknife 0.958* 0.947* 0.956* 0.956* 0.960* (µ, σ 2 )=(50,9) Boyles * * 0.938* SB 0.942* * 0.938* PB * BCPB * Jackknife 0.955* 0.943* * 0.943* (µ, σ 2 )=(52,4) Boyles * 0.938* 0.946* SB * PB * BCPB Jackknife * * 0.941* (µ, σ 2 )=(52,9) Boyles * * 0.951* SB 0.941* * 0.947* 0.955* PB BCPB Jackknife 0.957* 0.943* 0.946* 0.954* 0.960* incapable with asymmetric tolerance (T= m) since the lower confidence limit is less than 1 for confidence coefficient of.95 or Conclusion In estimating any process capability index that confidence interval estimates should be used instead of the simple point estimates. For point estimation, the Jackknife estimator has almost the same MSE as the natural estimator given in equation (1) and the Jackknife estimator can reduced the bias a lot for small, moderate or large sample size. For interval estimation, the Jackknife method and Boyles method are recommended for use for normal process. The nonparametric confidence interval estimates can protect the user from the error of calculating confidence intervals based on an assumed normal process if the process is a distinctly non normal process. In this case, the Jackknife method is recommended. A software program to obtain the point estimation and interval estimates for the index C pm with asymmetric tolerance is written by the use of the IMSL Library of Micrisoft Fortran [8] software package and is available upon request.
10 252 International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 2, June, 2009 Table 4. The 90% and 95% confidence intervals (length) or the 95% and 97.5% lower confidence bound for C pm with T = (symmetric tolerance) and for Cpm with T = (asymmetric tolerance). T= % confidence intervals (length) T = % confidence intervals (length) Ĉ pm = % lower confidence bound Ĉpm= % lower confidence bound SB (1.188, 1.478) (0.290) SB (0.694, 0.849) (0.154) (1.188, ) (0.694, ) PB (1.202, 1.496) (0.293) PB (0.702, 0.852) (0.150) (1.202, ) (0.702, ) BCPB (1.192, 1.481) (0.289) BCPB (0.703, 0.852) (0.149) (1.192, ) (0.703, ) Jackknife (1.172, 1.485) (0.313) Jackknife (0.689, 0.848) (0.159) (1.172, ) (0.689, ) T = % confidence intervals (length) T= % confidence intervals (length) Ĉ pm = % lower confidence bound Ĉpm= % lower confidence bound SB (1.155, 1.512) (0.364) SB (0.683, 0.860) (0.178) (1.155, ) (0.683, ) PB (1.176, 1.544) (0.370) PB (0.691, 0.869) (0.178) (1.176, ) (0.691, ) BCPB (1.165, 1.525) (0.377) BCPB (0.684, 0.858) (0.174) (1.165, ) (0.684, ) Jackknife (1.142, 1.516) (0.374) Jackknife (0.674, 0.864) (0.190) (1.142, ) (0.674, ) References [1] Boyles, R. A., The Taguchi capability index, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 17-26, [2] Chan, L. K., Cheng, S. W. and Spiring, F. A., A new measure of process capability:c pm, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 20, pp , [3] Chou, Y., Owen, D. B. and Borrego, A., S. A., Lower confidence limits on process capability indices, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp , [4] Efron, B., Bootstrap methods: Another look at the Jackknife, The annals of statistics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.1-26, [5] Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J., Bootstrap Method for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy, Statistical Science, Vol. 1, pp.54-77, [6] Franklin, L. A. and Wasserman, G., Bootstrap confidence interval estimates of C pk : An introduction, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computations, Vol. 20, pp , [7] Kane, V. E. (1986). Process capabillity indices, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 18, pp.41-52, [8] Microsoft Developer Studio Fortran Powerstage 4.0 and IMSL, 1995, Microsoft Corporation. [9] Montgomery, D. C., Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, [10] Pearn, W. L., Lin, G. H. and Chen, K. S. Distributional and Inferential Properties of the process accuracy and process precision indices, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, Vol. 27, pp , [11] Ryan, T. P., Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1989.
11 A Simulation Comparison Study for Estimating the Process Capability Index C pm 253 [12] Tukey, J. W., Bias and Confidence in not quite large samples., ANnals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 29, p.614, [13] Quenouille, M. H., Approximate tests for the correlation in time series, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, Vol. 11, pp.68-84, Author s Information Shu-Fei Wu is a Professor of Department of Statistics at Tamkang University. Her research interests are in the areas of screening, multiple comparisons with the average, subset selection and statistical inferences. Her work has appeared in IIE Transaction, CSDA, Communication in Statistics, JSPI, etc. Department of Statistics, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taipei, Taiwan 251, R.O.C @mail.tku.edu.tw TEL: ext.2876
Two-Sided Generalized Confidence Intervals for C pk
CHAPTER 4 Two-Sided Generalized Confidence Intervals for C pk 4.1 Introduction 9 4. Existing Methods 93 4.3 Two-Sided Generalized Confidence Intervals for C pk 96 4.4 Simulation Results 98 4.5 An Illustration
More informationEvaluating Production Yields of TFT-LCD Manufacturing Processes
Evaluating Production Yields of TFT-LCD Manufacturing Processes A presentation to the Institute of Industrial Engineering, National Taiwan University Oct. 7 th, 2009 Chen-ju Lin Department of Industrial
More informationTESTING PROCESS CAPABILITY USING THE INDEX C pmk WITH AN APPLICATION
International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering Vol. 8, No. 1 (2001) 15 34 c World Scientific Publishing Company TESTING PROCESS CAPABILITY USING THE INDEX C pmk WITH AN APPLICATION
More informationPublished online: 17 May 2012.
This article was downloaded by: [Central University of Rajasthan] On: 03 December 014, At: 3: Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 107954 Registered
More informationConfidence Intervals for Process Capability Indices Using Bootstrap Calibration and Satterthwaite s Approximation Method
CHAPTER 4 Confidence Intervals for Process Capability Indices Using Bootstrap Calibration and Satterthwaite s Approximation Method 4.1 Introduction In chapters and 3, we addressed the problem of comparing
More informationInternational Journal of Education & Applied Sciences Research, Vol.3, Issue 06, Aug-Oct- 2016, pp EISSN: , ISSN: (Print)
GENERALIZED PROCESS CAPABILITY INDEX APPLIED TO POISSON PROCESS DISTRIBUTION www.arseam.com Abstract Mahendra Saha Assistant Professor Department of statistics Central University of Rajasthan Bandarsindri,
More informationCriteria of Determining the P/T Upper Limits of GR&R in MSA
Quality & Quantity 8) 4:3 33 Springer 7 DOI.7/s3-6-933-7 Criteria of Determining the P/T Upper Limits of GR&R in MSA K. S. CHEN,C.H.WU and S. C. CHEN Institute of Production System Engineering & Management,
More informationNonparametric Test on Process Capability
Nonparametric Test on Process Capability Stefano Bonnini Abstract The study of process capability is very important in designing a new product or service and in the definition of purchase agreements. In
More informationChapter 4. One-sided Process Capability Assessment in the Presence of Gauge Measurement Errors
hapter One-sided Process apability Assessment in the Presence of Gauge Measurement Errors n the manufacturing industry, many product characteristics are of one-sided specifications The process capability
More informationEstimating and Testing Quantile-based Process Capability Indices for Processes with Skewed Distributions
Journal of Data Science 8(2010), 253-268 Estimating and Testing Quantile-based Process Capability Indices for Processes with Skewed Distributions Cheng Peng University of Southern Maine Abstract: This
More informationThe Nonparametric Bootstrap
The Nonparametric Bootstrap The nonparametric bootstrap may involve inferences about a parameter, but we use a nonparametric procedure in approximating the parametric distribution using the ECDF. We use
More informationOn Line Computation of Process Capability Indices
International Journal of Statistics and Applications 01, (5): 80-93 DOI: 10.593/j.statistics.01005.06 On Line Computation of Process Capability Indices J. Subramani 1,*, S. Balamurali 1 Department of Statistics,
More informationConfidence Intervals in Ridge Regression using Jackknife and Bootstrap Methods
Chapter 4 Confidence Intervals in Ridge Regression using Jackknife and Bootstrap Methods 4.1 Introduction It is now explicable that ridge regression estimator (here we take ordinary ridge estimator (ORE)
More informationConfidence Interval for Cpm Based on Dp,q Distance
Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 8 (: 4-, ISSN 549-3644 Science Publications Confidence Interval for C Based on Dp,q Distance Bahram Sadeghpour Gildeh and Samaneh Asghari Department of Statistics,
More informationASSESSING PROCESS PERFORMANCE WITH INCAPABILITY INDEX BASED ON FUZZY CRITICAL VALUE
Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems Vol. 3, No. 5, (26). 2-34 2 ASSESSING PROCESS PERFORMANCE WITH INCAPABILITY INDEX BASED ON FUZZY CRITICAL VALUE Z. ABBASI GANJI AND B. SADEGHPOUR GILDEH Abstract. Process
More informationEXAMINERS REPORT & SOLUTIONS STATISTICS 1 (MATH 11400) May-June 2009
EAMINERS REPORT & SOLUTIONS STATISTICS (MATH 400) May-June 2009 Examiners Report A. Most plots were well done. Some candidates muddled hinges and quartiles and gave the wrong one. Generally candidates
More informationON CONSTRUCTING T CONTROL CHARTS FOR RETROSPECTIVE EXAMINATION. Gunabushanam Nedumaran Oracle Corporation 1133 Esters Road #602 Irving, TX 75061
ON CONSTRUCTING T CONTROL CHARTS FOR RETROSPECTIVE EXAMINATION Gunabushanam Nedumaran Oracle Corporation 33 Esters Road #60 Irving, TX 7506 Joseph J. Pignatiello, Jr. FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida
More informationNEW APPROXIMATE INFERENTIAL METHODS FOR THE RELIABILITY PARAMETER IN A STRESS-STRENGTH MODEL: THE NORMAL CASE
Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 33 (4) 1715-1731 NEW APPROXIMATE INFERENTIAL METODS FOR TE RELIABILITY PARAMETER IN A STRESS-STRENGT MODEL: TE NORMAL CASE uizhen Guo and K. Krishnamoorthy
More informationA process capability index for discrete processes
Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation Vol. 75, No. 3, March 2005, 175 187 A process capability index for discrete processes MICHAEL PERAKIS and EVDOKIA XEKALAKI* Department of Statistics, Athens
More informationThe comparative studies on reliability for Rayleigh models
Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society 018, 9, 533 545 http://dx.doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.018.9..533 한국데이터정보과학회지 The comparative studies on reliability for Rayleigh models Ji Eun Oh 1 Joong
More informationStatistics II Lesson 1. Inference on one population. Year 2009/10
Statistics II Lesson 1. Inference on one population Year 2009/10 Lesson 1. Inference on one population Contents Introduction to inference Point estimators The estimation of the mean and variance Estimating
More informationWeek 1 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Distributions A
Week 1 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Distributions A Christopher Ting http://www.mysmu.edu/faculty/christophert/ Christopher Ting : christopherting@smu.edu.sg : 6828 0364 : LKCSB 5036 October
More informationBias Variance Trade-off
Bias Variance Trade-off The mean squared error of an estimator MSE(ˆθ) = E([ˆθ θ] 2 ) Can be re-expressed MSE(ˆθ) = Var(ˆθ) + (B(ˆθ) 2 ) MSE = VAR + BIAS 2 Proof MSE(ˆθ) = E((ˆθ θ) 2 ) = E(([ˆθ E(ˆθ)]
More informationSimulating Uniform- and Triangular- Based Double Power Method Distributions
Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, vol.6, no.1, 2017, 1-44 ISSN: 1792-6602 (print), 1792-6939 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2017 Simulating Uniform- and Triangular- Based Double Power Method Distributions
More informationConfidence Intervals for the Process Capability Index C p Based on Confidence Intervals for Variance under Non-Normality
Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences 101): 101 115 2016) MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES Journal homepage: http://einspem.upm.edu.my/journal Confidence Intervals for the Process Capability
More informationMathematical statistics
October 18 th, 2018 Lecture 16: Midterm review Countdown to mid-term exam: 7 days Week 1 Chapter 1: Probability review Week 2 Week 4 Week 7 Chapter 6: Statistics Chapter 7: Point Estimation Chapter 8:
More informationMultivariate Capability Analysis Using Statgraphics. Presented by Dr. Neil W. Polhemus
Multivariate Capability Analysis Using Statgraphics Presented by Dr. Neil W. Polhemus Multivariate Capability Analysis Used to demonstrate conformance of a process to requirements or specifications that
More informationPoint and Interval Estimation for Gaussian Distribution, Based on Progressively Type-II Censored Samples
90 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, VOL. 52, NO. 1, MARCH 2003 Point and Interval Estimation for Gaussian Distribution, Based on Progressively Type-II Censored Samples N. Balakrishnan, N. Kannan, C. T.
More informationReview. December 4 th, Review
December 4 th, 2017 Att. Final exam: Course evaluation Friday, 12/14/2018, 10:30am 12:30pm Gore Hall 115 Overview Week 2 Week 4 Week 7 Week 10 Week 12 Chapter 6: Statistics and Sampling Distributions Chapter
More informationA New Bootstrap Based Algorithm for Hotelling s T2 Multivariate Control Chart
Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran 7(3): 69-78 (16) University of Tehran, ISSN 16-14 http://jsciences.ut.ac.ir A New Bootstrap Based Algorithm for Hotelling s T Multivariate Control Chart A.
More informationTolerance limits for a ratio of normal random variables
Tolerance limits for a ratio of normal random variables Lanju Zhang 1, Thomas Mathew 2, Harry Yang 1, K. Krishnamoorthy 3 and Iksung Cho 1 1 Department of Biostatistics MedImmune, Inc. One MedImmune Way,
More informationMathematical statistics
October 4 th, 2018 Lecture 12: Information Where are we? Week 1 Week 2 Week 4 Week 7 Week 10 Week 14 Probability reviews Chapter 6: Statistics and Sampling Distributions Chapter 7: Point Estimation Chapter
More informationJournal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering 9 (2011) 15-20
Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering 9 (2011) 15-20 Process Capability Analysis in the Presence of Autocorrelation Mohsen Mohamadi a, Mehdi Foumani b,*, Babak Abbasi c a Faculty of Industrial
More informationBayesian Confidence Intervals for the Ratio of Means of Lognormal Data with Zeros
Bayesian Confidence Intervals for the Ratio of Means of Lognormal Data with Zeros J. Harvey a,b & A.J. van der Merwe b a Centre for Statistical Consultation Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science
More informationPractice Problems Section Problems
Practice Problems Section 4-4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7 4-8 4-10 Supplemental Problems 4-1 to 4-9 4-13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 0 4-3, 34, 36, 38 4-47, 49, 5, 54, 55 4-59, 60, 63 4-66, 68, 69, 70, 74 4-79, 81, 84 4-85,
More informationZero-Inflated Models in Statistical Process Control
Chapter 6 Zero-Inflated Models in Statistical Process Control 6.0 Introduction In statistical process control Poisson distribution and binomial distribution play important role. There are situations wherein
More informationA nonparametric two-sample wald test of equality of variances
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Informatics - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 211 A nonparametric two-sample wald test of equality of variances David
More informationAN EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST FOR NORMALITY
Econometrics Working Paper EWP0401 ISSN 1485-6441 Department of Economics AN EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST FOR NORMALITY Lauren Bin Dong & David E. A. Giles Department of Economics, University of Victoria
More informationSTEP STRESS TESTS AND SOME EXACT INFERENTIAL RESULTS N. BALAKRISHNAN. McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. p.
p. 1/6 STEP STRESS TESTS AND SOME EXACT INFERENTIAL RESULTS N. BALAKRISHNAN bala@mcmaster.ca McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada p. 2/6 In collaboration with Debasis Kundu, IIT, Kapur, India
More informationSampling Distributions of Statistics Corresponds to Chapter 5 of Tamhane and Dunlop
Sampling Distributions of Statistics Corresponds to Chapter 5 of Tamhane and Dunlop Slides prepared by Elizabeth Newton (MIT), with some slides by Jacqueline Telford (Johns Hopkins University) 1 Sampling
More informationSTAT 512 sp 2018 Summary Sheet
STAT 5 sp 08 Summary Sheet Karl B. Gregory Spring 08. Transformations of a random variable Let X be a rv with support X and let g be a function mapping X to Y with inverse mapping g (A = {x X : g(x A}
More informationThe bootstrap. Patrick Breheny. December 6. The empirical distribution function The bootstrap
Patrick Breheny December 6 Patrick Breheny BST 764: Applied Statistical Modeling 1/21 The empirical distribution function Suppose X F, where F (x) = Pr(X x) is a distribution function, and we wish to estimate
More informationTerminology Suppose we have N observations {x(n)} N 1. Estimators as Random Variables. {x(n)} N 1
Estimation Theory Overview Properties Bias, Variance, and Mean Square Error Cramér-Rao lower bound Maximum likelihood Consistency Confidence intervals Properties of the mean estimator Properties of the
More informationExact Inference for the Two-Parameter Exponential Distribution Under Type-II Hybrid Censoring
Exact Inference for the Two-Parameter Exponential Distribution Under Type-II Hybrid Censoring A. Ganguly, S. Mitra, D. Samanta, D. Kundu,2 Abstract Epstein [9] introduced the Type-I hybrid censoring scheme
More informationFinite Population Correction Methods
Finite Population Correction Methods Moses Obiri May 5, 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Normal-based Confidence Interval 2 3 Bootstrap Confidence Interval 3 4 Finite Population Bootstrap Sampling 5 4.1
More informationFrequency Estimation of Rare Events by Adaptive Thresholding
Frequency Estimation of Rare Events by Adaptive Thresholding J. R. M. Hosking IBM Research Division 2009 IBM Corporation Motivation IBM Research When managing IT systems, there is a need to identify transactions
More informationOne-Sample Numerical Data
One-Sample Numerical Data quantiles, boxplot, histogram, bootstrap confidence intervals, goodness-of-fit tests University of California, San Diego Instructor: Ery Arias-Castro http://math.ucsd.edu/~eariasca/teaching.html
More informationApplication of Variance Homogeneity Tests Under Violation of Normality Assumption
Application of Variance Homogeneity Tests Under Violation of Normality Assumption Alisa A. Gorbunova, Boris Yu. Lemeshko Novosibirsk State Technical University Novosibirsk, Russia e-mail: gorbunova.alisa@gmail.com
More informationTESTING FOR NORMALITY IN THE LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL: AN EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST
Econometrics Working Paper EWP0402 ISSN 1485-6441 Department of Economics TESTING FOR NORMALITY IN THE LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL: AN EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST Lauren Bin Dong & David E. A. Giles Department
More informationAn interval estimator of a parameter θ is of the form θl < θ < θu at a
Chapter 7 of Devore CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ESTIMATORS An interval estimator of a parameter θ is of the form θl < θ < θu at a confidence pr (or a confidence coefficient) of 1 α. When θl =, < θ < θu is called
More information4 Resampling Methods: The Bootstrap
4 Resampling Methods: The Bootstrap Situation: Let x 1, x 2,..., x n be a SRS of size n taken from a distribution that is unknown. Let θ be a parameter of interest associated with this distribution and
More informationinferences on stress-strength reliability from lindley distributions
inferences on stress-strength reliability from lindley distributions D.K. Al-Mutairi, M.E. Ghitany & Debasis Kundu Abstract This paper deals with the estimation of the stress-strength parameter R = P (Y
More informationResearch Article A Nonparametric Two-Sample Wald Test of Equality of Variances
Advances in Decision Sciences Volume 211, Article ID 74858, 8 pages doi:1.1155/211/74858 Research Article A Nonparametric Two-Sample Wald Test of Equality of Variances David Allingham 1 andj.c.w.rayner
More informationStatistics and Econometrics I
Statistics and Econometrics I Point Estimation Shiu-Sheng Chen Department of Economics National Taiwan University September 13, 2016 Shiu-Sheng Chen (NTU Econ) Statistics and Econometrics I September 13,
More informationBias of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of the Generalized Rayleigh Distribution
Bias of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of the Generalized Rayleigh Distribution by Xiao Ling B.Sc., Beijing Normal University, 2007 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the
More informationRegression #3: Properties of OLS Estimator
Regression #3: Properties of OLS Estimator Econ 671 Purdue University Justin L. Tobias (Purdue) Regression #3 1 / 20 Introduction In this lecture, we establish some desirable properties associated with
More informationProblem 1 (20) Log-normal. f(x) Cauchy
ORF 245. Rigollet Date: 11/21/2008 Problem 1 (20) f(x) f(x) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 4 2 0 2 4 Normal (with mean -1) 4 2 0 2 4 Negative-exponential x x f(x) f(x) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
More informationRegression Estimation - Least Squares and Maximum Likelihood. Dr. Frank Wood
Regression Estimation - Least Squares and Maximum Likelihood Dr. Frank Wood Least Squares Max(min)imization Function to minimize w.r.t. β 0, β 1 Q = n (Y i (β 0 + β 1 X i )) 2 i=1 Minimize this by maximizing
More informationNonparametric Methods II
Nonparametric Methods II Henry Horng-Shing Lu Institute of Statistics National Chiao Tung University hslu@stat.nctu.edu.tw http://tigpbp.iis.sinica.edu.tw/courses.htm 1 PART 3: Statistical Inference by
More informationUnit 14: Nonparametric Statistical Methods
Unit 14: Nonparametric Statistical Methods Statistics 571: Statistical Methods Ramón V. León 8/8/2003 Unit 14 - Stat 571 - Ramón V. León 1 Introductory Remarks Most methods studied so far have been based
More informationMA 575 Linear Models: Cedric E. Ginestet, Boston University Non-parametric Inference, Polynomial Regression Week 9, Lecture 2
MA 575 Linear Models: Cedric E. Ginestet, Boston University Non-parametric Inference, Polynomial Regression Week 9, Lecture 2 1 Bootstrapped Bias and CIs Given a multiple regression model with mean and
More informationAnalysis of Type-II Progressively Hybrid Censored Data
Analysis of Type-II Progressively Hybrid Censored Data Debasis Kundu & Avijit Joarder Abstract The mixture of Type-I and Type-II censoring schemes, called the hybrid censoring scheme is quite common in
More informationDoes k-th Moment Exist?
Does k-th Moment Exist? Hitomi, K. 1 and Y. Nishiyama 2 1 Kyoto Institute of Technology, Japan 2 Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University, Japan Email: hitomi@kit.ac.jp Keywords: Existence of moments,
More informationCentral Limit Theorem ( 5.3)
Central Limit Theorem ( 5.3) Let X 1, X 2,... be a sequence of independent random variables, each having n mean µ and variance σ 2. Then the distribution of the partial sum S n = X i i=1 becomes approximately
More information2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu.830j / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.
More information6 Single Sample Methods for a Location Parameter
6 Single Sample Methods for a Location Parameter If there are serious departures from parametric test assumptions (e.g., normality or symmetry), nonparametric tests on a measure of central tendency (usually
More informationBetter Bootstrap Confidence Intervals
by Bradley Efron University of Washington, Department of Statistics April 12, 2012 An example Suppose we wish to make inference on some parameter θ T (F ) (e.g. θ = E F X ), based on data We might suppose
More informationSmooth nonparametric estimation of a quantile function under right censoring using beta kernels
Smooth nonparametric estimation of a quantile function under right censoring using beta kernels Chanseok Park 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 Short Title: Smooth
More informationEmpirical Power of Four Statistical Tests in One Way Layout
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 9, 2014, no. 28, 1347-1356 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/imf.2014.47128 Empirical Power of Four Statistical Tests in One Way Layout Lorenzo
More informationStatistics - Lecture One. Outline. Charlotte Wickham 1. Basic ideas about estimation
Statistics - Lecture One Charlotte Wickham wickham@stat.berkeley.edu http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~wickham/ Outline 1. Basic ideas about estimation 2. Method of Moments 3. Maximum Likelihood 4. Confidence
More informationKent Academic Repository
Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Coolen-Maturi, Tahani and Elsayigh, A. (2010) A Comparison of Correlation Coefficients via a Three-Step Bootstrap Approach.
More informationStatistical Inference Using Progressively Type-II Censored Data with Random Scheme
International Mathematical Forum, 3, 28, no. 35, 1713-1725 Statistical Inference Using Progressively Type-II Censored Data with Random Scheme Ammar M. Sarhan 1 and A. Abuammoh Department of Statistics
More informationBootstrap Confidence Intervals
Bootstrap Confidence Intervals Patrick Breheny September 18 Patrick Breheny STA 621: Nonparametric Statistics 1/22 Introduction Bootstrap confidence intervals So far, we have discussed the idea behind
More informationAPPENDICES APPENDIX A. STATISTICAL TABLES AND CHARTS 651 APPENDIX B. BIBLIOGRAPHY 677 APPENDIX C. ANSWERS TO SELECTED EXERCISES 679
APPENDICES APPENDIX A. STATISTICAL TABLES AND CHARTS 1 Table I Summary of Common Probability Distributions 2 Table II Cumulative Standard Normal Distribution Table III Percentage Points, 2 of the Chi-Squared
More informationIntroduction and Descriptive Statistics p. 1 Introduction to Statistics p. 3 Statistics, Science, and Observations p. 5 Populations and Samples p.
Preface p. xi Introduction and Descriptive Statistics p. 1 Introduction to Statistics p. 3 Statistics, Science, and Observations p. 5 Populations and Samples p. 6 The Scientific Method and the Design of
More informationBasic Concepts of Inference
Basic Concepts of Inference Corresponds to Chapter 6 of Tamhane and Dunlop Slides prepared by Elizabeth Newton (MIT) with some slides by Jacqueline Telford (Johns Hopkins University) and Roy Welsch (MIT).
More informationBootstrap (Part 3) Christof Seiler. Stanford University, Spring 2016, Stats 205
Bootstrap (Part 3) Christof Seiler Stanford University, Spring 2016, Stats 205 Overview So far we used three different bootstraps: Nonparametric bootstrap on the rows (e.g. regression, PCA with random
More informationSupporting Information for Estimating restricted mean. treatment effects with stacked survival models
Supporting Information for Estimating restricted mean treatment effects with stacked survival models Andrew Wey, David Vock, John Connett, and Kyle Rudser Section 1 presents several extensions to the simulation
More informationACCOUNTING FOR INPUT-MODEL AND INPUT-PARAMETER UNCERTAINTIES IN SIMULATION. <www.ie.ncsu.edu/jwilson> May 22, 2006
ACCOUNTING FOR INPUT-MODEL AND INPUT-PARAMETER UNCERTAINTIES IN SIMULATION Slide 1 Faker Zouaoui Sabre Holdings James R. Wilson NC State University May, 006 Slide From American
More informationREFERENCES AND FURTHER STUDIES
REFERENCES AND FURTHER STUDIES by..0. on /0/. For personal use only.. Afifi, A. A., and Azen, S. P. (), Statistical Analysis A Computer Oriented Approach, Academic Press, New York.. Alvarez, A. R., Welter,
More informationBayesian nonparametric estimation of finite population quantities in absence of design information on nonsampled units
Bayesian nonparametric estimation of finite population quantities in absence of design information on nonsampled units Sahar Z Zangeneh Robert W. Keener Roderick J.A. Little Abstract In Probability proportional
More informationSTAT 830 Non-parametric Inference Basics
STAT 830 Non-parametric Inference Basics Richard Lockhart Simon Fraser University STAT 801=830 Fall 2012 Richard Lockhart (Simon Fraser University)STAT 830 Non-parametric Inference Basics STAT 801=830
More informationBootstrap, Jackknife and other resampling methods
Bootstrap, Jackknife and other resampling methods Part III: Parametric Bootstrap Rozenn Dahyot Room 128, Department of Statistics Trinity College Dublin, Ireland dahyot@mee.tcd.ie 2005 R. Dahyot (TCD)
More informationEstimation and Hypothesis Testing in LAV Regression with Autocorrelated Errors: Is Correction for Autocorrelation Helpful?
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Volume 10 Issue Article 13 11-1-011 Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in LAV Regression with Autocorrelated Errors: Is Correction for Autocorrelation Helpful?
More informationEstimation of Stress-Strength Reliability Using Record Ranked Set Sampling Scheme from the Exponential Distribution
Filomat 9:5 015, 1149 116 DOI 10.98/FIL1505149S Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Estimation of Stress-Strength eliability
More informationA Non-parametric bootstrap for multilevel models
A Non-parametric bootstrap for multilevel models By James Carpenter London School of Hygiene and ropical Medicine Harvey Goldstein and Jon asbash Institute of Education 1. Introduction Bootstrapping is
More informationElements of statistics (MATH0487-1)
Elements of statistics (MATH0487-1) Prof. Dr. Dr. K. Van Steen University of Liège, Belgium November 12, 2012 Introduction to Statistics Basic Probability Revisited Sampling Exploratory Data Analysis -
More informationSTATS 200: Introduction to Statistical Inference. Lecture 29: Course review
STATS 200: Introduction to Statistical Inference Lecture 29: Course review Course review We started in Lecture 1 with a fundamental assumption: Data is a realization of a random process. The goal throughout
More informationResampling and the Bootstrap
Resampling and the Bootstrap Axel Benner Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center INF 280, D-69120 Heidelberg benner@dkfz.de Resampling and the Bootstrap 2 Topics Estimation and Statistical Testing
More informationThe dimension accuracy analysis of a micro-punching mold for IC packing bag
The dimension accuracy analysis of a micro-punching mold for IC packing bag Wei-Shin Lin and Jui-Chang Lin * Associate professor, Department of Mechanical and Computer - Aided Engineering, National Formosa
More informationF & B Approaches to a simple model
A6523 Signal Modeling, Statistical Inference and Data Mining in Astrophysics Spring 215 http://www.astro.cornell.edu/~cordes/a6523 Lecture 11 Applications: Model comparison Challenges in large-scale surveys
More informationTESTING VARIANCE COMPONENTS BY TWO JACKKNIFE METHODS
Libraries Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture 2008-20th Annual Conference Proceedings TESTING ARIANCE COMPONENTS BY TWO JACKKNIFE METHODS Jixiang Wu Johnie N. Jenkins Jack C. McCarty Follow
More informationTEST OF HOMOGENEITY OF PARALLEL SAMPLES FROM LOGNORMAL POPULATIONS WITH UNEQUAL VARIANCES
TEST OF HOMOGENEITY OF PARALLEL SAMPLES FROM LOGNORMAL POPULATIONS WITH UNEQUAL VARIANCES S. E. Ahed, R. J. Tokins and A. I. Volodin Departent of Matheatics and Statistics University of Regina Regina,
More informationData Mining Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Uncertainty Fall 2011 Ming Li Department of Computer Science and Technology Nanjing University
Data Mining Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Uncertainty Fall 2011 Ming Li Department of Computer Science and Technology Nanjing University Why uncertainty? Why should data mining care about uncertainty? We
More informationSTAT 461/561- Assignments, Year 2015
STAT 461/561- Assignments, Year 2015 This is the second set of assignment problems. When you hand in any problem, include the problem itself and its number. pdf are welcome. If so, use large fonts and
More informationThe exact bootstrap method shown on the example of the mean and variance estimation
Comput Stat (2013) 28:1061 1077 DOI 10.1007/s00180-012-0350-0 ORIGINAL PAPER The exact bootstrap method shown on the example of the mean and variance estimation Joanna Kisielinska Received: 21 May 2011
More informationSection 8.1: Interval Estimation
Section 8.1: Interval Estimation Discrete-Event Simulation: A First Course c 2006 Pearson Ed., Inc. 0-13-142917-5 Discrete-Event Simulation: A First Course Section 8.1: Interval Estimation 1/ 35 Section
More informationPerformance Evaluation and Comparison
Outline Hong Chang Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Machine Learning Methods (Fall 2012) Outline Outline I 1 Introduction 2 Cross Validation and Resampling 3 Interval Estimation
More informationApplication of Parametric Homogeneity of Variances Tests under Violation of Classical Assumption
Application of Parametric Homogeneity of Variances Tests under Violation of Classical Assumption Alisa A. Gorbunova and Boris Yu. Lemeshko Novosibirsk State Technical University Department of Applied Mathematics,
More informationCOMPARISON OF THE ESTIMATORS OF THE LOCATION AND SCALE PARAMETERS UNDER THE MIXTURE AND OUTLIER MODELS VIA SIMULATION
(REFEREED RESEARCH) COMPARISON OF THE ESTIMATORS OF THE LOCATION AND SCALE PARAMETERS UNDER THE MIXTURE AND OUTLIER MODELS VIA SIMULATION Hakan S. Sazak 1, *, Hülya Yılmaz 2 1 Ege University, Department
More information