Finite element-based elasto-plastic optimum reinforcement dimensioning of spatial concrete panel structures
|
|
- Shanon Thomas
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Research Collection Report Finite element-based elasto-plastic optimum reinforcement dimensioning of spatial concrete panel structures Author(s): Tabatabai, Seyed Mohammad Reza Publication Date: 1996 Permanent Link: Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library
2
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
4 Contents i
5 Contents ii
6 Contents iii
7 Abstract 1
8 Zusammenfassung 2
9 1.3 Assumptions and limitations 3
10 1. Problem Definition and Scope Formulation 4
11 1.1 Reinforcement dimensioning today 5
12 1. Problem Definition and Scope Formulation É ÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉ (a) staircase with structural wall (b) foundation caissons of Storebaelt bridge (Denmark) Figure 1.1 Examples of spatial panel structures 6
13 1.2 Scope of this work dx dy 7
14 1. Problem Definition and Scope Formulation 8
15 1.3 Assumptions and limitations 9
16 1. Problem Definition and Scope Formulation 10
17 2.1 The finite element method 11
18 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming dy dy v y dy u v dx y u y dx u x dx x v x Figure 2.1 Linear strain-displacement relationship in a membrane panel 12
19 2.1 The finite element method y n x dy (n y n y dy) dx y x n yx dy f B y dxdy (n xy n xy dy) dx y h n xy dx f B x dxdy (n yx n yx dx) dy x dx n y dx (n x n x dx) dy x dy Figure 2.2 Stress resultants in an infinitesimal membrane element 1 n y n xy 1 y t n n yx n x 1 n x cos n yx cos n xy sin n tn n n 1 n t n nt n xy cos n x sin n yx sin x n y sin n y cos Figure 2.3 Normal stress transformation in a membrane element 13
20 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming z z y y y x w x z y Figure 2.4 Displacement components in plate bending x x x y 14
21 2.1 The finite element method z y q x dy m x dy (m xy m xy dy) dx y x m yx dy f B z dxdy (m y m y dy) dx y h dx m y dx m xy dx q y dx (m x m x dx) dy x (q y q y dy) dx y (m yx m yx dx) dy x (q x q x dx) dy x dy Figure 2.5 Stress resultants on an infinitesimal plate bending element 15
22 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming 16
23 2.1 The finite element method t y n x 1 1 q y q x t q x cos 1 q y sin q n n q y cos q t 1 t q x sin Figure 2.6 Shear stress transformation in a bending element n 17
24 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming f SZ f BZ f BY f SY f BX f SX Z y F iz z x X Y F ix F iy ÈÈ ÍÍ Figure 2.7 General three-dimensional body in equilibrium 18
25 2.1 The finite element method 19
26 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming 20
27 2.1 The finite element method 21
28 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming 22
29 2.2 Plasticity theory y y E tan E e p p (a) elastic-perfectly plastic (b) rigid-perfectly plastic Figure 2.8 Perfectly plastic materials in a uniaxial stress state 23
30 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming 24
31 2.2 Plasticity theory h A t N t M A b b Figure 2.9 Generalized strains and stresses for a beam section 25
32 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming S k S * S ds dq p S k N j S S ds j dq pj N j O S 1 1 O S 1 S n S n m (a) (b) Figure2.10 Yield surface in the generalized stress space 26
33 2.2 Plasticity theory 27
34 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming 28
35 2.3 Linear programming 29
36 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming 1 x 1 x j x n Z s 1. s i. s m c 0 b 1. b i. b m c 1 c j c n a 11 a 1j a 1n... a i1 a ij a in... a m1 a mj a mn O (m1)x(n1) Figure 2.11 Formulation of tableau of a general linear program x 1 x j x n x 1 s i x n c 0 c j c n c 0 b ic j a ij c j a ij c n a inc j a ij s 1 s i b i a i1 a 1j a ij pivot a in s 1 x j b i a ij a i1 a ij a 1j a ij 1 a ij a in a ij s m a mj b m a mn s m b m b ia mj a ij a mj a ij a mn a ina mj a ij (a) (b) Figure2.12 Tableau modification for one pivoting exchange step 30
37 2.3 Linear programming b i 0 exists? no optimum found yes pq exchange step for pivot a find min( b i 0) pivot row p i a pj 0 exists? no yes max b p find a pj pivot column q j no feasible solution Figure2.13 Exchange step from an unfeasible minimum towards a feasible optimum solution 31
38 2. Basics of the Finite Element Method, Plasticity Theory and Linear Programming c j 0 exists? no optimum found yes pq exchange step for pivot a find min(c j 0) pivot column q j a iq 0 exists? no optimum found yes min b i find a iq pivot row p i Figure2.14 Exchange step from a feasible non-optimum towards a feasible optimum solution 32
39 3.1 Yield conditions for a membrane infinitesimal element 33
40 3. Yield Conditions for an Infinitesimal Element h dy reinforced concrete = concrete + steel dx Figure 3.1 Reinforced concrete infinitesimal element in membrane state f c c tan E c c (a) c c c sliding failure c c c f c ÏÏ ÏÏ c ÏÏ Ï Ï Ï ÏÏ c c separation failure c f t 0 (b) c Figure 3.2 Concrete material model 34
41 3.1 Yield conditions for a membrane infinitesimal element y n c y n c 2 n c xy n c 1 x n c x (n c xy) 2 n c x n c y n c xy n c y n c 2 (a) O n c x r c m n c 1 r c m (n c xy) 2 (r c m n c x)(r c m n c y) (b) Figure 3.3 Yield conditions for an infinitesimal concrete element in a membrane state 35
42 3. Yield Conditions for an Infinitesimal Element n s xy n s y r s my y x Figure 3.4 Yield conditions for an orthogonal reinforcement net r s mx n s x n y 1 : n 2 xy (r s mx n x )(r s my n y ) 0 1 n xy r s my n x 2 : n 2 xy (r s mx n x )(r s my n y ) 0 3 : n 2 xy ( 1 2 rc m) : n 2 xy (n x r s mx 1 2 rc m) 2 ( 1 2 rc m) : n 2 xy (n y r s my 1 2 rc m) 2 ( 1 2 rc m) r c m 6 : n 2 xy (n x 1 2 rc m) 2 ( 1 2 rc m) : n 2 xy (n y 1 2 rc m) 2 ( 1 2 rc m) : n x r s mx 0 9 : n y r s my 0 r c m rmx s 10 : n x r s mx 0 11 : n y r s my 0 Figure 3.5 Nonlinear yield conditions for an infinitesimal reinforced concrete membrane element 36
43 3.1 Yield conditions for a membrane infinitesimal element n xy n y r c m 1 r s mx r s my 1,2 : n x n xy r s mx 0 7 r c m 2 n x 3,4 : n y n xy r s my r c m 5,6 : n x n xy r c m ,8 : n y n xy r c m 0 9,10 : n xy rc m 2 0 Figure 3.6 Linearized yield conditions of an infinitesimal reinforced concrete membrane element 37
44 3. Yield Conditions for an Infinitesimal Element dx s 2 dy = s s i + y i x Figure 3.7 Superposition of reinforcement layers for an infinitesimal element 38
45 3.2 Yield conditions for a membrane-bending infinitesimal element Z Z f c h Y M p A s x A s h 2 h 2 d a X A s f y 1 Figure 3.8 Reinforced element subjected to pure bending 39
46 3. Yield Conditions for an Infinitesimal Element m x M b px m x m xy M b px m x m xy M b px m y M b py m y m xy M b py m x m xy M b px (M b px m x )(M b py m y ) m 2 xy m x m xy M t px m y m xy M b py m x M t px m y m xy M t py m y m xy M b py m y M t py m x m xy M t px (M t px m x )(M t py m y ) m 2 xy m x m xy M t px m y m xy M t py m y m xy M t py (a) (b) (c) Figure 3.9 Yield conditions for an orthogonally reinforced plate bending element (a) Nonlinear (b),(c) Linearized 40
47 3.2 Yield conditions for a membrane-bending infinitesimal element m xy m y y O m x x Figure3.10 Yield conditions for an infinitesimal concrete element in the bending state with M b px M b py M t px M t py 41
48 3. Yield Conditions for an Infinitesimal Element m x M b px m x m xy M b px M b pxy m y M b py m x m xy M b px M b pxy (M b px m x )(M b py m y ) (m xy M b pxy) 2 m y m xy M b py M b pxy m x M t px m y m xy M b py M b pxy m y M t py m x m xy M t px M t pxy (M t px m x )(M t py m y ) (m xy M t pxy) 2 m x m xy M t px M t pxy m y m xy M t py M t pxy m y m xy M t py M t pxy (a) (b) Figure 3.11 Yield conditions for an arbitrarily reinforced plate bending element (a) Nonlinear (b) Linearized Figure3.12 Stress components in a combined membrane-bending element 42
49 3.2 Yield conditions for a membrane-bending infinitesimal element top cover layer core bottom cover layer Figure3.13 Sandwich model for a membrane-bending element 43
50 3. Yield Conditions for an Infinitesimal Element z y (a) pure shear in uncracked core z x x y (c) membrane forces equilibrating q 0 cot y x y (b) diagonal compression field in cracked core x Figure3.14 Design for transverse shear 44
51 3.2 Yield conditions for a membrane-bending infinitesimal element Figure3.15 Sandwich model for a membrane-bending element including shear reinforcement 45
52 3. Yield Conditions for an Infinitesimal Element 46
53 4.1 Deficiencies of the usual approach 47
54 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element (a) (b) Figure 4.1 Evaluation of nodal average stresses in the finite element approach 48
55 4.2 Finite elements as dimensioning units 49
56 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element 50
57 4.2 Finite elements as dimensioning units 51
58 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element y y xy x x Figure 4.2 Transition from infinitesimal to finite element-based dimensioning 52
59 4.2 Finite elements as dimensioning units 53
60 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element e 1 e rigid body modes constant strain modes linear strain modes Figure 4.3 Linearly independent nodal forces for an isoparametric membrane finite element 54
61 4.3 Generalized strains and stresses for a finite element 55
62 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element 56
63 4.3 Generalized strains and stresses for a finite element Figure 4.4 Strain modes for a rectangular membrane free formulation finite element 57
64 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element 58
65 4.3 Generalized strains and stresses for a finite element Figure 4.5 Strain modes for a rectangular bending finite element 59
66 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element 60
67 4.4 Yield conditions for a quadrilateral finite element b b s r D C a a (a) A B (b) Figure 4.6 Rectangular membrane finite element a m5 a m4 b 2 a 2 a m5 a m4 Figure 4.7 Admissible stress state for linear modes of membrane quadrilateral finite elements 61
68 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element 62
69 4.4 Yield conditions for a quadrilateral finite element s r j y x Figure 4.8 Reinforcement dimensioning direction for membrane finite element y s n y n xy n s n rs n r r n x x Figure 4.9 Stress transformation to a rotated coordinate system 63
70 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element 64
71 4.4 Yield conditions for a quadrilateral finite element r s r s A B C D D C r c r c A B r c 2 Figure4.10 Selected constraints in the four zones of a membrane finite element 65
72 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element s b D C r b a a (a) A B (b) Figure 4.11 Rectangular bending finite element a b5 a b4 a b4 Figure4.12 Admissible stress state for linear modes of bending quadrilateral finite elements a b5 66
73 4.4 Yield conditions for a quadrilateral finite element r s y t j s r t x b j y b x Figure4.13 Reinforcement dimensioning direction for bending finite element 67
74 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element A B C D r st D C r st A B r sb D C r sb A B Figure4.14 Selected constraints in the four zones of a bending finite element 68
75 4.4 Yield conditions for a quadrilateral finite element 69
76 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element 70
77 4.6 Transverse shear in bending finite elements Figure4.15 Strain modes for transverse shear (with no rotations) in bending 71
78 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element 72
79 4.7 Mesh parameter for error estimation 73
80 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element 74
81 4.7 Mesh parameter for error estimation 75
82 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element Figure4.16 Membrane nodal force combinations in the unchecked subspace of a finite element Figure4.17 Bending nodal load combinations in the unchecked subspace of a finite element 76
83 4.7 Mesh parameter for error estimation bounded full nonlinear yield conditions linearized yield conditions unbounded in some directions p or p or nonlinear yield conditions in subspace controlled linearized yield conditions in subspace Figure4.18 Projection of yield conditions in a subspace 77
84 4. First Concept: Element-based Dimensioning and Yield Conditions for a Finite Element Finite element model number of nodes number of degrees of freedom number of independent strain modes number of constant strain modes number of suggested higher order modes number of unchecked dimensions mesh parameter required triangular isoparametric membrane no quadrilateral isoparametric membrane no triangular free formulation membrane yes quadrilateral free formulation membrane yes triangular bending yes quadrilateral bending yes Figure4.19 Comparison between different element models in finite element-based dimensioning 78
85 5.1 Basic idea in a simple example l A E F p f c f y F 79
86 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States 1 0 l 1 Ï 1 F 2 ÏÏ p e : F 2 F 2 p e : F 2 F 2 p dist : p 0 : AE 2 AE 2 AE p I : AE 2 AE 2 p : F 2 AE 2 F AE 2 2 Figure 5.1 Force redistribution in a two element bar system 80
87 5.1 Basic idea in a simple example 81
88 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States (1 s ) A s 2 F f c A (2 c ) (1 s ) (2 c ) F f c A vector of the objective function F f c A F 2f y A s 1 Figure 5.2 Graphical presentation of the optimization problem for the two element beam 82
89 5.2 Reinforcement evaluation for the linear elastic solution 83
90 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States y p 1 As j ka s i 1 1 x p (a) A s i (b) Figure 5.3 Uniaxial (bar) and biaxial (net) reinforcement fields 84
91 5.2 Reinforcement evaluation for the linear elastic solution Ï Ï Ì Ì Ì Ì Ì membrane panel central layer (a) reinforcement fields (b) reinforcement zones bending panel Ì Ì top layer bottom layer Figure 5.4 Definition of a) user-defined reinforcement fields b) program-generated reinforcement zones in membrane and bending panels 85
92 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States 86
93 5.2 Reinforcement evaluation for the linear elastic solution 87
94 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States Figure 5.5 Flow diagram of reinforcement design for the linear elastic stress distribution Figure 5.6 Evaluation of the extreme state forces for the linear elastic solution 88
95 5.2 Reinforcement evaluation for the linear elastic solution Figure 5.7 Building the linear program for the linear elastic stress distribution X s 1 X s j X s NF Z 0. A z1 A zj A zn * * * * all zones of all panels all zones of a panel 1 zone s i s i (f i r s min i ) (f i r s min i ) or or (a s ij as ij ) (a s ij as ij ) X s min j element with biggest (f i r s min i ) in r direction element with biggest (f i r s min i ) in s direction prescribed minimum reinforcement Figure 5.8 Setup of the tableau for reinforcement of the linear elastic solution 89
96 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States no feasible solution slack fy ( e ) slack fy ( e dist 0 ) Figure 5.9 Checking all constraints 90
97 5.3 Force redistribution by introducing fictitious plastic strains 91
98 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States fields / panel e.g. elements e.g. constraints / element full tableau linear elastic full tableau elasto-plastic 1 membrane panel 1 bending panel Figure5.10 Example of a full tableau size without progressive optimization Ç ÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ linear ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ elastic ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇ ÇÇ new violated constraints new redistributions ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ linear ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ elastic ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ Figure 5.11 Progressive optimization and expansion of the tableau 92
99 5.3 Force redistribution by introducing fictitious plastic strains stopping optimization due to: numerical instability or unacceptable mesh parameter or no new redistribution stress states possible or direct user interruption Figure5.12 Flow diagram of the optimization stage 93
100 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States X s 1 X s j X s NF 1 m Z * A z1 A zj A zn * * * * * * s i (f i r s min i ) 0. or (a s ij as ij ) f I ij s ( min i 1 ) s ( max i 1 ) Figure5.13 Expansion of the tableau for new initial strains 94
101 5.3 Force redistribution by introducing fictitious plastic strains 95
102 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States X s 1 X s j X s NF 1 m Z 0. A z1 A zj A zn * * * * * * * * s i (f i r s min i ) 0. or (a s ij as ij ) f I ij s i (f i r s min i ) 0. or (a s ij as ) ij f I ij s i (f i r c i) f I ij Figure5.14 Expansion of the tableau for new violated constraints 96
103 5.3 Force redistribution by introducing fictitious plastic strains I 1m I 2m I 3m I 4m Figure5.15 Initial strain combinations shown on a square membrane finite element I 1b I 2b I 3b I 4b Figure5.16 Initial curvature combinations shown on a square bending finite element 97
104 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States (a) (b) Figure5.17 Plastic curvature modes (a) with and (b) without concrete crushing 98
105 5.3 Force redistribution by introducing fictitious plastic strains Z 1 x T nk O 0 O k x 1 xnk T sk T k T Z s mk O 11 O 12 1+m k s mk O 11 O 12 O 1 22 O 21 O 12 O 1 22 s k O 21 O 22 k x k O 1 22 O 21 O n k k 1+n k k Figure5.18 Regrouped tableau in the beginning O 0 and after k exchange steps O k 99
106 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States Z 1 x T nk O k s T k x T n a x T n a s mk O 11 O 12 O 1 22 O 21 O 12 O 1 22 O 1a O 12 O 1 22 O 2a 1+m k O 1a x k O 1 22 O 21 O 1 22 O 1 22 O 2a O 2a k 1+n k k n a n a Figure5.19 Introduction of new columns (redistribution load cases) in the tableau at step k (O k ) Z 1 x T nk O k s T k 1+m k s mk O 11 O 12 O 1 22 O 21 O 12 O 1 22 k x k O 1 22 O 21 O 1 22 m a s ma O a1 O a2 O 1 22 O 21 O a2 O n k k m a s ma O a1 O a2 Figure5.20 Introduction of new rows (constraints) in the tableau at step k (O k ) 100
107 5.4 Ultimate load analysis (a) reinforcement minimization (b) ultimate load maximization Figure5.21 Comparison between reinforcement minimization and ultimate load maximization 101
108 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States (a) (b) Figure5.22 Alternatives for ultimate load maximization transformed into a minimization problem Z 0. j 1. A zj X s j all zones of all panels all zones of a panel 1 zone s i s i * (f i r s min i (f i r s min i ) ) j j * (a s ij as ij ) Xs j (a s ij as ij ) Xs j Figure5.23 Adopted tableau for the ultimate load analysis 102
109 5.4 Ultimate load analysis 103
110 5. Second Concept: Optimization by Superposition of Self-Equilibrating Stress States 104
111 6.1 The structure of ORCHID FE FE LP FE LP PT Figure 6.1 Basic stages towards optimum reinforcement dimensioning 105
112 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning Figure 6.2 Flow diagram for Creating and solving the linear elastic finite element model 106
113 6.1 The structure of ORCHID reading geometrical input reading / writing FE model reading / writing load cases reading / writing reinforcement field input writing reinforcement output eventual data transfer to CAD programs for drafting drawing of whole structure and single panels drawing of displacements and stresses drawing of reinforcement and redistribution fields user-machine interaction interactive inputting, modifying and checking, zooming, scaling, rotating, animating, picking, selecting A: linear elastic FE B: linear optimization program FE meshing construction and expansion of tableau calculation of element stiffness types simplex algorithm and optimization assemblage of stiffness matrix and load vectors ultimate load analysis solution of equation system calculation of generalized stresses Figure 6.3 Modularity of ORCHID 107
114 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning 108
115 6.2 The graphical user interface of ORCHID commands of the active mode pull-down control menu optimization chart 2D view of active panel 3D view of spatial structure Figure 6.4 Graphical User Interface (GUI) of ORCHID 109
116 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning 110
117 6.3 Free Formulation element model 111
118 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning y v r z y xy x v x y u y x r z xy u x xy yx 1 2 ( x y ) 1 2 (v u x y ) r z 1 2 ( x y ) 1 2 (v u x y ) Figure 6.5 Definition of rotational degree of freedom in membrane free formulation elements 112
119 6.3 Free Formulation element model 113
120 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning w 1 3 w 1 ( 1 6, 2 3 ) ( 1 6, 1 6 ) ( 2 3, 1 6 ) Figure 6.6 Adopted integration points coordinates 114
121 6.3 Free Formulation element model y 3 3 (0,0,1) 1 x 1 C 1 2 (a) 1 (b) 2 0 A 2 A 3 2 (1,0,0) 3 0 (0,1,0) P A Figure 6.7 Dimensionless coordinate systems for triangular elements for (a) membrane (b) bending 115
122 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning y x Figure 6.8 Local coordinates for a quadrilateral element 116
123 6.4 Specific features of the finite element model 117
124 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning y p panel node x p common node Z X Y Figure 6.9 Distinction between panel and common nodes 118
125 6.4 Specific features of the finite element model (a) (b) Figure6.10 Introduction of fictitious beams for adjoining membrane panels 119
126 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning m sl m y m1 x sl m2 y m1 sl x m2 (a) (b) (c) Figure 6.11 Master Slave specification 120
127 6.4 Specific features of the finite element model mi RX RY DZ DX DY RZ P sl P m1 P m2 Q sl Q m1 Q m2 b m bb mb b mm m RX RY DZ DX DY RZ sl (a) (b) Figure6.12 Eccentric panel connections 121
128 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning 122
129 6.4 Specific features of the finite element model Q sl Q mi (i 1, 2) k bb T PmiT bb k bb T Qmi bb T PmiT mb k mmt Qmi mb T PmiT mb k mmt Qmi mm k mm P sl T PmiT mm k mm T Qmi mb T PmiT mm k mm T Qmi mm P mi (i 1, 2) (a) (b) Figure6.13 Modification of the stiffness matrix for slave nodes 123
130 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning y z x Z Y X Figure6.14 Types of loads and boundary conditions implemented in ORCHID 124
131 6.6 Equation solver 125
132 6. ORCHID: A Program for Optimum Reinforced Concrete Highly Interactive Dimensioning 126
133 7.1 T-beam modelled by two panels 127
134 7. Examples Í Í Í Figure 7.1 T-beam modelled with continuum elements and two panels 128
135 7.1 T-beam modelled by two panels flange panel top view web panel side view Figure 7.2 Distribution of principal membrane stresses of the T-beam tension compression 129
136 7. Examples flange panel top view required reinforcement web panel side view Figure 7.3 Required reinforcement for the linear elastic stress distribution flange panel top view same layout for both layers web panel side view Figure 7.4 User-defined reinforcement fields for the T-beam 130
137 7.1 T-beam modelled by two panels flange panel top view required provided web panel side view Figure 7.5 Required and provided reinforcement for the linear elastic stress distribution flange panel top view required provided web panel side view Figure 7.6 Reinforcement for the optimized elasto-plastic stress distribution 131
138 7. Examples reinf. weight elastic before optimization elasto plastic after optimization field nr. elastic before optimization elasto plastic after optimization flange panel web panel total total Figure 7.7 Reinforcement comparisons for the T-beam 132
139 7.2 Three-panel plate with stiffening walls ÍÍ roller support ÍÄÄ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÍÍ É ÉÉÍ ÉÉÉ ÉÉ Í Í Í Figure 7.8 Structural geometry and deformed mesh ÍÍ simple support 133
140 7. Examples É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É a) plate s principal moments b) plate s principal shear stresses positive moment negative moment intensity and direction c) load transfer mechanism tension compression d) plate s principal normal forces e) wall s principal normal forces Figure 7.9 Stress distribution for the linear elastic solution top layer required provided bottom layer É É É É É É É É É É user-defined reinforcement fields for both layers É É É É É É É É É É Figure7.10 Required reinforcement 134
141 7.2 Three-panel plate with stiffening walls ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ a) plate s principal shear stresses intensity and direction b) bottom layer reinforcement c) load transfer mechanism after optimization required provided Figure 7.11 Elasto-plastic load transfer no
142 7. Examples required provided intensity and direction É É É É É É É É É a) plate s principal shear stresses É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É b) bottom layer reinforcement É É É É É É É É É c) newly defined reinforcement field d) load transfer mechanism after optimization Figure7.12 Elasto-plastic load transfer no
143 7.3 Effects of model assumptions in optimization required provided intensity and direction a) plate s principal shear stresses ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ b) bottom layer reinforcement ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ c) newly defined reinforcement d) load transfer mechanism after optimization Figure7.13 Elasto-plastic load transfer no
144 7. Examples 3.0 ÉÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ 4 ÉÉ ÉÉ ÉÉ ÍÍ ÈÈ É ÉÉ ÉÉ ÈÈ ÈÈ 6 m ÉÉ ÉÉÉ 1.0 É ÉÍ ÈÈ ÈÈ ÈÈ Figure7.14 Simple one way slab with two vertical panels fully fixed support 138
145 7.3 Effects of model assumptions in optimization required reinforcement for linear elastic stress distribution reinforcement fields cases 1,2 required reinforcement for elasto-plastic stress distribution (a) top bottom top bottom top bottom (b) additional top reinforcement fields (c) bottom top Figure7.15 Required reinforcements for linear elastic and redistributed cases of a one way slab 139
146 7. Examples 140
147 8.1 On the proposed method 141
148 8. Closure 142
149 8.2 Suggestions for future work 143
150 8. Closure 144
151 Symbols 145
152 Symbols 146
153 Symbols 147
154 List of Figures 148
155 List of Figures 149
156 List of Figures 150
157 List of Figures 151
158 Literature 152
159 Literature 153
160 Literature 154
161 Literature 155
Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 13
Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (Refer Slide Time: 00:25) Module - 01 Lecture - 13 In the last class, we have seen how
More informationFLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES
UNIT - I FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES 1. What is meant by indeterminate structures? Structures that do not satisfy the conditions of equilibrium are called indeterminate structure. These
More informationFINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TAPERED COMPOSITE PLATE GIRDER WITH A NON-LINEAR VARYING WEB DEPTH
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 12, No. 11 (2017) 2839-2854 School of Engineering, Taylor s University FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TAPERED COMPOSITE PLATE GIRDER WITH A NON-LINEAR VARYING
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...
More informationEDEM DISCRETIZATION (Phase II) Normal Direction Structure Idealization Tangential Direction Pore spring Contact spring SPRING TYPES Inner edge Inner d
Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo Bulletin of ERS, No. 48 (5) A TWO-PHASE SIMPLIFIED COLLAPSE ANALYSIS OF RC BUILDINGS PHASE : SPRING NETWORK PHASE Shanthanu RAJASEKHARAN, Muneyoshi
More informationCHAPTER 14 BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF 1D AND 2D STRUCTURES
CHAPTER 14 BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF 1D AND 2D STRUCTURES 14.1 GENERAL REMARKS In structures where dominant loading is usually static, the most common cause of the collapse is a buckling failure. Buckling may
More informationResearch Collection. Numerical analysis on the fire behaviour of steel plate girders. Conference Paper. ETH Library
Research Collection Conference Paper Numerical analysis on the fire behaviour of steel plate girders Author(s): Scandella, Claudio; Knobloch, Markus; Fontana, Mario Publication Date: 14 Permanent Link:
More informationInternational Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN
Research Article INTEGRATED FORCE METHOD FOR FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE PLATE BENDING PROBLEMS Doiphode G. S., Patodi S. C.* Address for Correspondence Assistant Professor, Applied Mechanics Department,
More informationME FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FORMULAS
ME 2353 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FORMULAS UNIT I FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION OF BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS 01. Global Equation for Force Vector, {F} = [K] {u} {F} = Global Force Vector [K] = Global Stiffness
More informationTheoretical Manual Theoretical background to the Strand7 finite element analysis system
Theoretical Manual Theoretical background to the Strand7 finite element analysis system Edition 1 January 2005 Strand7 Release 2.3 2004-2005 Strand7 Pty Limited All rights reserved Contents Preface Chapter
More informationFinite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges
01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only
More informationFinite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 11
Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 01 Lecture - 11 Last class, what we did is, we looked at a method called superposition
More informationNomenclature. Length of the panel between the supports. Width of the panel between the supports/ width of the beam
omenclature a b c f h Length of the panel between the supports Width of the panel between the supports/ width of the beam Sandwich beam/ panel core thickness Thickness of the panel face sheet Sandwich
More informationA METHOD OF LOAD INCREMENTS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SECOND-ORDER LIMIT LOAD AND COLLAPSE SAFETY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMED STRUCTURES
A METHOD OF LOAD INCREMENTS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SECOND-ORDER LIMIT LOAD AND COLLAPSE SAFETY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMED STRUCTURES Konuralp Girgin (Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Science and Technology,
More informationCHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS
(74) CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS This chapter will be devoted to the analysis of prismatic members subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M' acting in the same longitudinal plane. Such members are
More informationSEMM Mechanics PhD Preliminary Exam Spring Consider a two-dimensional rigid motion, whose displacement field is given by
SEMM Mechanics PhD Preliminary Exam Spring 2014 1. Consider a two-dimensional rigid motion, whose displacement field is given by u(x) = [cos(β)x 1 + sin(β)x 2 X 1 ]e 1 + [ sin(β)x 1 + cos(β)x 2 X 2 ]e
More informationSERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS
CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil
More informationUnit 18 Other Issues In Buckling/Structural Instability
Unit 18 Other Issues In Buckling/Structural Instability Readings: Rivello Timoshenko Jones 14.3, 14.5, 14.6, 14.7 (read these at least, others at your leisure ) Ch. 15, Ch. 16 Theory of Elastic Stability
More informationFlexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections
4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
More informationBasic Energy Principles in Stiffness Analysis
Basic Energy Principles in Stiffness Analysis Stress-Strain Relations The application of any theory requires knowledge of the physical properties of the material(s) comprising the structure. We are limiting
More informationStatic & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering
Static & Dynamic Analysis of Structures A Physical Approach With Emphasis on Earthquake Engineering Edward LWilson Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering University of California, Berkeley Fourth Edition
More informationDesign of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN
Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511
More informationMechanics of Materials Primer
Mechanics of Materials rimer Notation: A = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) b = total width of material at a horizontal section d = diameter of a hole D = symbol for diameter E = modulus
More informationInstitute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I
Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1 Chapter 2 The Direct Stiffness Method Institute of Structural Engineering Page 2 Direct Stiffness Method (DSM) Computational method for structural analysis Matrix
More informationVORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS
The 4 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October -7, 008, Beijing, China VORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS K.
More informationA study of the critical condition of a battened column and a frame by classical methods
University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 003 A study of the critical condition of a battened column and a frame by classical methods Jamal A.H Bekdache
More informationUNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:
UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability: Analysis of thin rectangular plates subject to bending, twisting, distributed transverse load, combined bending and in-plane loading Thin plates having
More informationME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.
ME 323 - Final Exam Name December 15, 2015 Instructor (circle) PROEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) Krousgrill 11:30AM-12:20PM Ghosh 2:30-3:20PM Gonzalez 12:30-1:20PM Zhao 4:30-5:20PM M (x) y 20 kip ft 0.2
More informationCE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
More information7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces
7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3.1 General In the previous chapters of Draft IS: 800 LSM version, we have stipulated the codal provisions for determining the stress distribution in
More informationDynamic Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Structure Using Plasticity and Interface Damage Models
Dynamic Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Structure Using Plasticity and Interface Damage Models I. Rhee, K.J. Willam, B.P. Shing, University of Colorado at Boulder ABSTRACT: This paper examines the global
More informationParametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams
Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 55, No. 1 (2015) 1-27 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.1.001 1 Parametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams Luís F.A.
More informationInstitute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I
Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1 Chapter 2 The Direct Stiffness Method Institute of Structural Engineering Page 2 Direct Stiffness Method (DSM) Computational method for structural analysis Matrix
More informationEngineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS
Unit 2: Unit code: QCF Level: Credit value: 15 Engineering Science L/601/10 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL COLUMNS 1. Be able to determine the behavioural characteristics of elements of static engineering systems
More informationLevel 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method
9210-203 Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method You should have the following for this examination one answer book No additional data is attached
More informationChapter 12 Plate Bending Elements. Chapter 12 Plate Bending Elements
CIVL 7/8117 Chapter 12 - Plate Bending Elements 1/34 Chapter 12 Plate Bending Elements Learning Objectives To introduce basic concepts of plate bending. To derive a common plate bending element stiffness
More informationINFLUENCE OF WEB THICKNESS REDUCTION IN THE SHEAR RESISTANCE OF NON-PRISMATIC TAPERED PLATE GIRDERS
INFLUENCE OF WEB THICKNESS REDUCTION IN THE SHEAR RESISTANCE OF NON-PRISMATIC TAPERED PLATE GIRDERS Paulo J. S. Cruz 1, Lúcio Lourenço 1, Hélder Quintela 2 and Manuel F. Santos 2 1 Department of Civil
More information1 Static Plastic Behaviour of Beams
1 Static Plastic Behaviour of Beams 1.1 Introduction Many ductile materials which are used in engineering practice have a considerable reserve capacity beyond the initial yield condition. The uniaxial
More informationAircraft Structures Kirchhoff-Love Plates
University of Liège erospace & Mechanical Engineering ircraft Structures Kirchhoff-Love Plates Ludovic Noels Computational & Multiscale Mechanics of Materials CM3 http://www.ltas-cm3.ulg.ac.be/ Chemin
More informationPractice Final Examination. Please initial the statement below to show that you have read it
EN175: Advanced Mechanics of Solids Practice Final Examination School of Engineering Brown University NAME: General Instructions No collaboration of any kind is permitted on this examination. You may use
More informationSeismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department
More informationMoment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel
Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel * Hyun Sung Joo, 1) Jiho Moon, 2) Ik-Hyun sung, 3) Hak-Eun Lee 4) 1), 2), 4) School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural
More informationComposite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis
EUROCODES Bridges: Background and applications Dissemination of information for training Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 1 Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis Laurence
More informationMATERIAL PROPERTIES. Material Properties Must Be Evaluated By Laboratory or Field Tests 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 ANISOTROPIC MATERIALS
. MARIAL PROPRIS Material Properties Must Be valuated By Laboratory or Field ests. INRODUCION he fundamental equations of structural mechanics can be placed in three categories[]. First, the stress-strain
More informationPRACTICE 2 PROYECTO Y CONSTRUCCIÓN DE PUENTES. 1º Máster Ingeniería de Caminos. E.T.S.I. Caminos, canales y puertos (Ciudad Real) 01/06/2016
PRACTICE 2 PROYECTO Y CONSTRUCCIÓN DE PUENTES 1º Máster Ingeniería de Caminos E.T.S.I. Caminos, canales y puertos (Ciudad Real) 01/06/2016 AUTHOR: CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 2. BRIDGE GEOMETRY AND MATERIAL...
More informationUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME 313.3 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich A CLOSED BOOK EXAMINATION TIME: 3 HOURS For Marker s Use Only LAST NAME (printed): FIRST
More informationFailure interaction curves for combined loading involving torsion, bending, and axial loading
Failure interaction curves for combined loading involving torsion, bending, and axial loading W M Onsongo Many modern concrete structures such as elevated guideways are subjected to combined bending, torsion,
More informationChapter 12. Static Equilibrium and Elasticity
Chapter 12 Static Equilibrium and Elasticity Static Equilibrium Equilibrium implies that the object moves with both constant velocity and constant angular velocity relative to an observer in an inertial
More informationLecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension
Lecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension Module. General Field Equations General Field Equations [] Equilibrium Equations in Elastic bodies xx x y z yx zx f x 0, etc [2] Kinematics xx u x x,etc. [3]
More information7.6 Stress in symmetrical elastic beam transmitting both shear force and bending moment
7.6 Stress in symmetrical elastic beam transmitting both shear force and bending moment à It is more difficult to obtain an exact solution to this problem since the presence of the shear force means that
More informationLecture Slides. Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. The McGraw-Hill Companies 2012
Lecture Slides Chapter 4 Deflection and Stiffness The McGraw-Hill Companies 2012 Chapter Outline Force vs Deflection Elasticity property of a material that enables it to regain its original configuration
More informationTable of Contents. Preface...xvii. Part 1. Level
Preface...xvii Part 1. Level 1... 1 Chapter 1. The Basics of Linear Elastic Behavior... 3 1.1. Cohesion forces... 4 1.2. The notion of stress... 6 1.2.1. Definition... 6 1.2.2. Graphical representation...
More informationCHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS
4.1. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS A column is a vertical structural member transmitting axial compression loads with or without moments. The cross sectional dimensions of a column
More informationWorkshop 8. Lateral Buckling
Workshop 8 Lateral Buckling cross section A transversely loaded member that is bent about its major axis may buckle sideways if its compression flange is not laterally supported. The reason buckling occurs
More informationApplications of the Plate Membrane Theory
Chapter 2 Applications of the Plate Membrane Theory In this chapter we will give solutions for plates, which are loaded only on their edges. This implies that no distributed forces p x and p y occur, and
More informationINFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE GIRDER
International Journal of Civil Structural 6 Environmental And Infrastructure Engineering Research Vol.1, Issue.1 (2011) 1-15 TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.,. INFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE
More informationTHE BEHAVIOUR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE AS DEPICTED IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS.
THE BEHAVIOUR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE AS DEPICTED IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. THE CASE OF A TERRACE UNIT. John N Karadelis 1. INTRODUCTION. Aim to replicate the behaviour of reinforced concrete in a multi-scale
More informationUltimate shear strength of FPSO stiffened panels after supply vessel collision
Ultimate shear strength of FPSO stiffened panels after supply vessel collision Nicolau Antonio dos Santos Rizzo PETROBRAS Rio de Janeiro Brazil Marcelo Caire SINTEF do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brazil Carlos
More informationFailure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas
Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!
More informationChapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements
Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1 Chapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements Institute of Structural Engineering Page 2 Chapter Goals Learn how to formulate the Finite Element Equations
More informationAn Increase in Elastic Buckling Strength of Plate Girder by the Influence of Transverse Stiffeners
GRD Journals- Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering Volume 2 Issue 6 May 2017 ISSN: 2455-5703 An Increase in Elastic Buckling Strength of Plate Girder by the Influence of Transverse Stiffeners
More informationLecture 7: The Beam Element Equations.
4.1 Beam Stiffness. A Beam: A long slender structural component generally subjected to transverse loading that produces significant bending effects as opposed to twisting or axial effects. MECH 40: Finite
More information3 2 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) 3. a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1
Math Problem a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1 3 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) = Au( t) with u (0) =. 3 1 u 1 =, u 1 3 = b- True or false and why 1. if A is
More informationAn Evaluation and Comparison of Models for Maximum Deflection of Stiffened Plates Using Finite Element Analysis
Marine Technology, Vol. 44, No. 4, October 2007, pp. 212 225 An Evaluation and Comparison of Models for Maximum Deflection of Stiffened Plates Using Finite Element Analysis Lior Banai 1 and Omri Pedatzur
More informationRedistribution of force concentrations in reinforced concrete cantilever slab using 3D non-linear FE analyses
y x m y m y Linear elastic isotropic Linear elastic orthotropic Plastic Redistribution of force concentrations in reinforced concrete cantilever slab using 3D non-linear FE analyses x Master of Science
More informationOptimum Height of Plate Stiffener under Pressure Effect
The st Regional Conference of Eng. Sci. NUCEJ Spatial ISSUE vol., No.3, 8 pp 459-468 Optimum Height of Plate Stiffener under Pressure Effect Mazin Victor Yousif M.Sc Production Engineering University of
More informationLeaf Spring (Material, Contact, geometric nonlinearity)
00 Summary Summary Nonlinear Static Analysis - Unit: N, mm - Geometric model: Leaf Spring.x_t Leaf Spring (Material, Contact, geometric nonlinearity) Nonlinear Material configuration - Stress - Strain
More informationBridge deck modelling and design process for bridges
EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine
More informationCHAPTER 5. Beam Theory
CHPTER 5. Beam Theory SangJoon Shin School of Mechanical and erospace Engineering Seoul National University ctive eroelasticity and Rotorcraft Lab. 5. The Euler-Bernoulli assumptions One of its dimensions
More informationFinal Exam Ship Structures Page 1 MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. Engineering Ship Structures
Final Exam - 53 - Ship Structures - 16 Page 1 MEMORIA UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDAND Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science Engineering 53 - Ship Structures FINA EXAMINATION SONS Date: Wednesday April 13,
More informationSoftware Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAFE 014 EXAMPLE 16 racked Slab Analysis RAKED ANALYSIS METHOD The moment curvature diagram shown in Figure 16-1 depicts a plot of the uncracked and cracked conditions, 1 State 1, and, State,
More informationAnalysis of a portal steel frame subject to fire by use of a truss model
Analysis of a portal steel frame subject to fire by use of a truss model P. G. Papadopoulos & A. Mathiopoulou Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Abstract A plane
More informationAccordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.
C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional
More informationSemiloof Curved Thin Shell Elements
Semiloof Curved Thin Shell Elements General Element Name Y,v,θy X,u,θx Z,w,θz Element Group Element Subgroup Element Description Number Of Nodes Freedoms Node Coordinates TSL 1 2 Semiloof 3 QSL8 7 8 1
More informationChapter 12 Elastic Stability of Columns
Chapter 12 Elastic Stability of Columns Axial compressive loads can cause a sudden lateral deflection (Buckling) For columns made of elastic-perfectly plastic materials, P cr Depends primarily on E and
More informationCRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF FEM MODELS.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF FEM MODELS. Prof. P. C.Vasani,Applied Mechanics Department, L. D. College of Engineering,Ahmedabad- 380015 Ph.(079) 7486320 [R] E-mail:pcv-im@eth.net 1. Criteria for Convergence.
More information6. Bending CHAPTER OBJECTIVES
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Determine stress in members caused by bending Discuss how to establish shear and moment diagrams for a beam or shaft Determine largest shear and moment in a member, and specify where
More informationUse Hooke s Law (as it applies in the uniaxial direction),
0.6 STRSS-STRAIN RLATIONSHIP Use the principle of superposition Use Poisson s ratio, v lateral longitudinal Use Hooke s Law (as it applies in the uniaxial direction), x x v y z, y y vx z, z z vx y Copyright
More informationUniversity of Sheffield The development of finite elements for 3D structural analysis in fire
The development of finite elements for 3D structural analysis in fire Chaoming Yu, I. W. Burgess, Z. Huang, R. J. Plank Department of Civil and Structural Engineering StiFF 05/09/2006 3D composite structures
More informationSTATICALLY INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
STATICALLY INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES INTRODUCTION Generally the trusses are supported on (i) a hinged support and (ii) a roller support. The reaction components of a hinged support are two (in horizontal
More informationReview Lecture. AE1108-II: Aerospace Mechanics of Materials. Dr. Calvin Rans Dr. Sofia Teixeira De Freitas
Review Lecture AE1108-II: Aerospace Mechanics of Materials Dr. Calvin Rans Dr. Sofia Teixeira De Freitas Aerospace Structures & Materials Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Analysis of an Engineering System
More informationMechanics of Materials II. Chapter III. A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection
Mechanics of Materials II Chapter III A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection Outline Introduction Assumtions and limitations Axial loading Torsion of circular shafts
More informationMarch 24, Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE
Chapter 4 Deflection and Stiffness 1 2 Chapter Outline Spring Rates Tension, Compression, and Torsion Deflection Due to Bending Beam Deflection Methods Beam Deflections by Superposition Strain Energy Castigliano
More informationM5 Simple Beam Theory (continued)
M5 Simple Beam Theory (continued) Reading: Crandall, Dahl and Lardner 7.-7.6 In the previous lecture we had reached the point of obtaining 5 equations, 5 unknowns by application of equations of elasticity
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Elastic Methods... 3 1.1 Introduction... 3 1. Grillage Analysis... 4 1.3 Finite Element
More informationCHAPTER -6- BENDING Part -1-
Ishik University / Sulaimani Civil Engineering Department Mechanics of Materials CE 211 CHAPTER -6- BENDING Part -1-1 CHAPTER -6- Bending Outlines of this chapter: 6.1. Chapter Objectives 6.2. Shear and
More informationStress analysis of a stepped bar
Stress analysis of a stepped bar Problem Find the stresses induced in the axially loaded stepped bar shown in Figure. The bar has cross-sectional areas of A ) and A ) over the lengths l ) and l ), respectively.
More informationDecember 10, PROBLEM NO points max.
PROBLEM NO. 1 25 points max. PROBLEM NO. 2 25 points max. B 3A A C D A H k P L 2L Given: Consider the structure above that is made up of rod segments BC and DH, a spring of stiffness k and rigid connectors
More informationPrinciples of Finite Element for Design Engineers and Analysts. Ayman Shama, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE
Principles of Finite Element for Design Engineers and Analysts Ayman Shama, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE Outline Principles of Engineering Analysis The development of the finite element method Types of elements
More informationDue Monday, September 14 th, 12:00 midnight
Due Monday, September 14 th, 1: midnight This homework is considering the analysis of plane and space (3D) trusses as discussed in class. A list of MatLab programs that were discussed in class is provided
More informationBHAR AT HID AS AN ENGIN E ERI N G C O L L E G E NATTR A MPA LL I
BHAR AT HID AS AN ENGIN E ERI N G C O L L E G E NATTR A MPA LL I 635 8 54. Third Year M E C H A NICAL VI S E M ES TER QUE S T I ON B ANK Subject: ME 6 603 FIN I T E E LE ME N T A N A L YSIS UNI T - I INTRODUCTION
More informationA HIGHER-ORDER BEAM THEORY FOR COMPOSITE BOX BEAMS
A HIGHER-ORDER BEAM THEORY FOR COMPOSITE BOX BEAMS A. Kroker, W. Becker TU Darmstadt, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chair of Structural Mechanics Hochschulstr. 1, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany kroker@mechanik.tu-darmstadt.de,
More informationComputational Analysis for Composites
Computational Analysis for Composites Professor Johann Sienz and Dr. Tony Murmu Swansea University July, 011 The topics covered include: OUTLINE Overview of composites and their applications Micromechanics
More informationINTRODUCTION TO STRAIN
SIMPLE STRAIN INTRODUCTION TO STRAIN In general terms, Strain is a geometric quantity that measures the deformation of a body. There are two types of strain: normal strain: characterizes dimensional changes,
More informationPLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder
16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders
More informationBending of Simply Supported Isotropic and Composite Laminate Plates
Bending of Simply Supported Isotropic and Composite Laminate Plates Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete 1 Isotropic Plates Consider simply a supported rectangular plate of isotropic material (length a, width b,
More informationMachine Direction Strength Theory of Corrugated Fiberboard
Thomas J. Urbanik 1 Machine Direction Strength Theory of Corrugated Fiberboard REFERENCE: Urbanik.T.J., Machine Direction Strength Theory of Corrugated Fiberboard, Journal of Composites Technology & Research,
More informationChapter 5 Elastic Strain, Deflection, and Stability 1. Elastic Stress-Strain Relationship
Chapter 5 Elastic Strain, Deflection, and Stability Elastic Stress-Strain Relationship A stress in the x-direction causes a strain in the x-direction by σ x also causes a strain in the y-direction & z-direction
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P
ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL COLUMNS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P This material is duplicated in the Mechanical Principles module H2 and those studying
More information