arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 4 Oct 2016

Transcription

1 ON SOME MULTIPLE CHARACTER SUMS arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 4 Oct 2016 ILYA D. SHKREDOV AND IGOR E. SHPARLINSKI Abstract. We improve a recent result of B. Hanson (2015) on multiplicative character sums with expressions of the type a+b+cd and variables a,b,c,d from four distinct sets of a finite field. We also consider similar sums with a+b(c+d). These bounds rely on some recent advances in additive combinatorics. 1. Introduction 1.1. Motivation and previous results. Let p be a prime and let F p be the finite field of p elements. Given four sets A,B,C,D F p, and two sequences of weights α = (α a ), β = (β b,c,d ) (b,c,d) B C D supported on A and B C D, respectively, we consider the multilinear character sums (1.1) S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) = α a β b,c,d χ(a+b+cd), c C b B where χ is a fixed nontrivial multiplicative character of F p, see [13, Chapter 3] for a background on characters. We also consider related sums (1.2) T χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) = α a β b,c,d χ(a+b(c+d)). b B c C d D In is easy to see that if the weight β b,c,d is multilinear, that is of the form d D (1.3) β b,c,d = β b γ c δ d thesums (1.2) caneasily be reduced tothe sums ofthe form(1.1) (with slightly modified weights). First we recall that for the bilinear analogues of these sums, that is, for the sums S χ (U,V;ϕ,ψ) = ϕ u ψ v χ(u+v) u U v V 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 11B30, 11L07, 11T23. Key words and phrases. Multiple character sums, additive combinatorics. 1

2 2 I. D. SHKREDOV AND I. E. SHPARLINSKI with sets U,V F p and weights ϕ = (ϕ u ) u U, ψ = (ψ v ) v V, we have the classical bound (1.4) S χ (U,V;ϕ,ψ) pφψ, with Ψ = ϕ u 2 and Ψ = ψ v 2. u U v V Indeed, using the trivial inequalities S χ (U,V;ϕ,ψ) 2 2 ϕ u 2 ψ v χ(u+v) u U u U v V ϕ u 2 2 ψ v χ(u+v), u U u F p v V expanding the square, changing the order of summation and recalling the orthogonality of characters, we immediately obtain (1.4). Although our results apply to more general weights, we always assume that the weighst satisfy the inequalities (1.5) max α a 1 and max β b,c,d 1. (b,c,d) B C D We also recall that 0 is excluded from the sets A,B,C,D (it is trivial to adjust our bounds to include this case as well). Thus, using A, B, C and D to denote the cardinalities of A,B,C and D respectively, under the condition (1.5) we easily derive p (1.6) S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) ABCD AM where M = max{b,c,d} and a similar bound for T χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) (oneonlyhastoconsider thecontribution fromthetermswithc+d = 0 separately). In the case of constant weights α a = β b,c,d = 1, these sums, which we denote as S χ (A,B,C,D), have been nontrivially estimated by Hanson [12] under the various restrictions on A, B, C and D. For example, it is shown in [12] that for any fixed ε > 0 there exists some η > 0 such that if A,B,C,D p ε and then either C < p 1/2 and A 56 B 28 C 33 D 4 p 60+ε ; or C p 1/2 and A 112 B 56 D 8 p 87+ε ; (1.7) S χ (A,B,C,D) = O ( ABCDp η).

3 MULTIPLE CHARACTER SUMS 3 Balog and Wooley[2, Section 6] have sugegsted an alternative approach to bounding the sums S χ (A,B,C,D) which may lead to more explicit statements with a small, but explicit values of η. However our results seems to supersede these bounds as well. Several more bounds of multiplicative character sums, which go beyond an immediate application of (1.4), have been given by Bourgain, Garaev, Konyagin and Shparlinski [6], Chang [8], Friedlander and Iwaniec [10], Karatsuba [14] and Shkredov and Volostnov [19]. However, despite the active interest to such sums of multiplicative characters, there is a large discrepancy between the strength and generality of the above results and the results available for similar exponential sums for which strong explicit bounds are known in very general scenarios, see [3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 15, 16]. Here we make a further step towards eliminating this disparity General notation. Throughout the paper, the expressions A B, B A and A = O(B) are each equivalent to the statement that A cb for some positive constant c. Throughout the paper, the implied constants in these symbols may occasionally, where obvious, depend on the integer positive parameter ν, and are absolute otherwise Main results. It is convenient to assume that BCD p 2. Clearly this restriction is not important as if it fails we can use M p 2/3 in the bound (1.6), getting a bound of the type (1.7) already for A p 1/3+ε with any fixed ε > 0. We are now ready to present our main results. Theorem 1.1. For any sets A,B,C,D F p, of cardinalities A,B,C,D, respectively, and two sequences of weights α = (α a ) and β = (β b,c,d ) (b,c,d) B C D, satisfying (1.5), for any fixed integer ν 1, we have S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β), T χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) where M = max{b,c,d}. ( (BCD) 1 1/(4ν) +(BCD) 1 1/(2ν) M 1/(2ν)) { A ( 1/2 p 1/2, if ν = 1, Ap 1/(4ν) +A 1/2 p 1/(2ν)), if ν 2, To understand the strength of Theorem 1.1, we assume that A p ε for some ε > 0. Taking ν large enough (for example ν = 2/ε +1) and assuming that M (BCD) 1/2 (which certainly holds in the most

4 4 I. D. SHKREDOV AND I. E. SHPARLINSKI interesting case when the sets B, C and D are of comparable sizes), we see that the bound of Theorem 1.1 takes shape ( p ) 1/(4ν), S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β),T χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) ABCD BCD which is nontrivial as along as BCD > p 1+ε for some ε > 0. In another interesting case of all sets of asymptotically the same size, that is, when A B C D, taking ν = 1 we obtain S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β), T χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) A 11/4 p 1/2 which is nontrivial for A p 2/5+ε. 2. Preliminaries 2.1. Background from arithmetic combinatorics. For sets B, C, D F p. we denote by I(B,C,D) the number of solutions to the equation b 1 +c 1 d 1 = b 2 +c 2 d 2 b 1,b 2 B, c 1,c 2 C, d 1,d 2 D. Roche-Newton, Rudnev and Shkredov [17, Equation (4)] have shown that the points planes incidence bound of Rudnev [18] yields the following estimate: Lemma 2.1. Let B,C,D F p be of cardinalities B,C,D, respectively, with BCD p 2. Then we have where M = max{b,c,d}. I(B,C,D) B 3/2 C 3/2 D 3/2 +BCDM, Furthermore, for sets B,C,D F p. we denote by J(B,C,D) the number of solutions to the equation b 1 (c 1 +d 1 ) = b 2 (c 2 +d 2 ) b 1,b 2 B, c 1,c 2 C, d 1,d 2 D. It is shown in [16, Lemma 2.3] that using some recent results of Aksoy Yazici, Murphy, Rudnev and Shkredov [1, Theorem 19] (which are also based on the work of Rudnev [18]), one can derive the following analogue of Lemma 2.1 Lemma 2.2. Let B,C,D F p be of cardinalities B,C,D, respectively, with BCD p 2. Then we have where M = max{b,c,d}. J(B,C,D) B 3/2 C 3/2 D 3/2 +BCDM,

5 MULTIPLE CHARACTER SUMS Bounds of some character sums on average. The following result is very well-know, and in the case when A is aninterval it dates back to Davenport & Erdős [9]. The proof transfers to the case of general sets without any changes. Indeed, for ν = 1 it is based on the elementary identity χ(u+λ)χ(v +λ) = { 1, if u v, p 1, if u = v, u,v F p, where χ is the complex conjugate character, see [13, Equation (3.20)]. For ν 2, the proof is completely analogous but appeal to the Weil bound of multiplicative character sums, see [13, Theorem 11.23], to estimate off-diagonal terms. Lemma 2.3. For any set A F p, of cardinalities A and ta sequences of weights α = (α a ) satisfying (1.5), for any fixed integer ν 1, we have 2ν { Ap, if ν = 1, α a χ(λ+a) A 2ν p 1/2 +A ν p, if ν Proof of Theorem Bound on S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β). Using (1.5), we obtain S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) α a χ(a+b+cd). b B c C d D Now, for every λ F p we collect together the terms with the same value of b+cd = λ, and write (3.1) S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) K(B,C,D;λ) α a χ(a+λ), where K(B,C,D;λ) is the number of solutions to the equation Clearly we have (3.2) b+cd = λ, (b,c,d) B C D. K(B,C,D;λ) = BCD, K(B,C,D;λ) 2 = I(B,C,D).

6 6 I. D. SHKREDOV AND I. E. SHPARLINSKI Therefore, by the Hölder inequality, for any integer ν 1, we have S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) 2ν λ FpK(B,C,D;λ) 2ν 2 K(B,C,D;λ) 2 α a χ(a+λ) = (BCD) 2ν 2 I(B,C,D) 2ν α a χ(a+λ). Recalling Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3, we obtain S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) 2ν ( (BCD) 2ν 1/2 +(BCD) 2ν 1 M ) { Ap, if ν = 1, A 2ν p 1/2 +A ν p, if ν 2, and the result follows. 2ν 3.2. Bound on T χ (A,B,C,D;α,β). We proceed as in the case of the sums S χ (A,B,C,D;α,β). We define L(B,C,D;λ) is the number of solutions to the equation b(c+d) = λ, (b,c,d) B C D, and then instead of (3.1) write T χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) L(B,C,D;λ) α a χ(a+λ). As before, by the Hölder inequality, for any integer ν 1, we have T χ (A,B,C,D;α,β) 2ν (BCD) 2ν 2 J(B,C,D) α a χ(a+λ) UsingLemma2.2insteadofLemma2.1intheargumentofSection(3.1) we obtain the desired estimate. 2ν.

7 MULTIPLE CHARACTER SUMS 7 4. Comments We note that in the case of the multilinear weights of the form (1.3) (an in particular in the case of constant weights) the roles of the sets A and B can be interchanged. Furthermore, in this case, writing χ(a+b+cd) = χ(c)χ(d+(a+b)c 1 ) = χ(d)χ(c+(a+b)d 1 ) one can obtain the bound of Theorem 1.1 with any permutation of the roles of A,B,C,D. It is also easy to see that we can abandon the assumption (1.5) and obtain a more precise version of of Theorem 1.1 with L 1 and L 2 norms of the weight sequences α and β. Finally, using results from [1] one can obtain similar bounds for several other character sums exactly in the same way, for example, for the sums ( α a β b,c,d χ a+ b+c ), d+c and b B c C d D b B c C d D as well some other related sums. ( α a β b,c,d χ a+ b ), c+d We also note that the same approach (with ν = 1) applies to the sums U(A,B,C,D;α,β) = α a β b,c,d e p (a(b+cd)), b B c C d D V(A,B,C,D;α,β) = α a β b,c,d e p (ab(c+d)), c C b B where e p (u) = exp(2πiu/p), which are very similar to those appearing in the proofs of [16, Theorems 1.1 and 1.3]. Indeed, by the Cauchy inequality, in the notation of Section 3.1, we obtain U(A,B,C,D;α,β) 2 K(B,C,D;λ) 2 2 α a e p (aλ) = I(B,C,D) 2 α a e p (aλ). d D Using the orthogonality of exponential functions, we derive U(A,B,C,D;α,β) 2 pi(b,c,d)a,

8 8 I. D. SHKREDOV AND I. E. SHPARLINSKI and revoking Lemma 2.1, we derive U(A,B,C,D;α,β) p 1/2( (BCD) 3/4 +(BCDM) 1/2) A 1/2, where, as before, M = max{b,c,d}. The same argument also gives V(A,B,C,D;α,β) p 1/2( (BCD) 3/4 +(BCDM) 1/2) A 1/2. Assuming that M (BCD) 1/2, we see that these bounds nontrivial as along as A(BCD) 1/2 > p 1+ε for some ε > 0. In particular, under the condition A B C D this holds for A p 2/5+ε, which is consistent with the range of nontriviality of [16, Theorems 1.1 and 1.3]. Acknowledgement During the preparation of this work, the second author was supported by the Australian Research Council Grant DP References [1] E. Aksoy Yazici, B. Murphy, M. Rudnev and I. D. Shkredov, Growth estimates in positive characteristic via collisions, preprint, arxiv.org/abs/ [2] A. Balog and T. D. Wooley, A low-energy decomposition theorem, Quart. J. Math., (to appear). [3] J. Bourgain, Multilinear exponential sums in prime fields under optimal entropy condition on the sources, Geom. and Funct. Anal., 18 (2009), [4] J. Bourgain, On exponential sums in finite fields, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud., 21, János Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest, 2010, [5] J. Bourgain and M. Z. Garaev, On a variant of sum-product estimates and explicit exponential sum bounds in prime fields, Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 146 (2009), [6] J. Bourgain, M. Z. Garaev, S. V. Konyagin and I. E. Shparlinski, On congruences with products of variables from short intervals and applications, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 280 (2013), (Transl. from Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov). [7] J. Bourgain and A. Glibichuk, Exponential sum estimates over a subgroup in an arbitrary finite field, J. D Analyse Math., 115 (2011), [8] M.-C. Chang, On a question of Davenport and Lewis and new character sum bounds in finite fields, Duke Math. J., 145 (2008), [9] H. Davenport and P. Erdős, The distribution of quadratic and higher residues, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 2 (1952), [10] J. B. Friedlander and H. Iwaniec, Estimates for character sums, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 119 (1993), [11] M. Z. Garaev, Sums and products of sets and estimates of rational trigonometric sums in fields of prime order, Russian Math. Surveys, 65 (2010), (Transl. from Uspekhi Mat. Nauk).

9 MULTIPLE CHARACTER SUMS 9 [12] B. Hanson, Estimates for characters sums with various convolutions, preprint, arxiv.org/abs/ [13] H. Iwaniec and E. Kowalski, Analytic number theory, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, [14] A. A. Karatsuba, The distribution of values of Dirichlet characters on additive sequences, Doklady Acad. Sci. USSR, 319(1991), (in Russian). [15] A. Ostafe, Polynomial values in affine subspaces over finite fields, J. D Analyse Math., (to appear). [16] G. Petridis and I. E. Shparlinski, Bounds on trilinear and quadrilinear exponential sums, J. d Analyse Math., (to appear). [17] O. Roche-Newton, M. Rudnev and I. D. Shkredov, New sum-product type estimates over finite fields, Adv. Math., 293 (2016), [18] M. Rudnev, On the number of incidences between planes and points in three dimensions, Combinatorica, (to appear). [19] I. D. Shkredov and A. S. Volostnov, Sums of multiplicative characters with additive convolutions, Proc. Steklov Math. Inst., (to appear). Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Gubkina 8, Moscow, Russia, , and Institute for Information Transmission Problems of Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoy Karetny Per. 19, Moscow, Russia, address: ilya.shkredov@gmail.com Department of Pure Mathematics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia address: igor.shparlinski@unsw.edu.au