Design, Simulation and Construction of a Test Rig for Organic Vapours

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Design, Simulation and Construction of a Test Rig for Organic Vapours"

Raymond Hancock
6 years ago
Views:

1 st International Seminar on ORC Power Systems Sept

Casella * in collaboration with Fluid-dinamics of

1 1 st International Seminar on ORC Power Systems Sept 22-23, 2011 Delft, NL Design, Simulation and Construction of a Test Rig for Organic Vapours A. Spinelli, M. Pini, V. Dossena, P. Gaetani, F. Casella * in collaboration with Fluid-dinamics of Turbomachines Laboratory Energy Department * Electronics and Information Department

Motivation 2 / 18 Increase ORC turbine efficiencies via passage flow field investigation

ORC turbine blade passages Properties T T, P T, P, u, α, ψ Independent measurement of P and u

h(p T,T T ) = h(p, T) + u 2 /2 Techniques total pressure probes & pressure taps (P T, P)

2 Motivation 2 / 18 Increase ORC turbine efficiencies via passage flow field investigation Experimental investigation of ORC turbine passage flows NO experimental data for flows within ORC turbine blade passages Properties T T, P T, P, u, α, ψ Independent measurement of P and u field direct measurement of u consistency of thermodynamic models e.g. h(p T,T T ) = h(p, T) + u 2 /2 Techniques total pressure probes & pressure taps (P T, P) thermocouples (T T ), LDV (v), Schlieren (shock waves) limited investigation in industrial plants TROVA (Test Rig for Organic Vapors)

3 Summary 3 / 18 Background on ORC Design of the TROVA Dynamic simulation of the TROVA Construction of the TROVA Conclusions

4 Background on ORC Design of the TROVA Dynamic simulation of the TROVA Construction of the TROVA Conclusions

Background ORC & turbine flow 4 / 18 Rankine cycle + organic working fluid Mm, complexity Advantages on cycle, plant, operation viable technology, low/med T, W el Disadvantages on turbine

5 Background ORC & turbine flow 4 / 18 Rankine cycle + organic working fluid Mm, complexity Advantages on cycle, plant, operation viable technology, low/med T, W el Disadvantages on turbine flows real-gas effects, low speed of sound State of the art limited knowledge of expansions (h T design tools) novel real-gas models (Span-Wagner) + CFD (zflow), separate validations MDM H 2 0

6 Background ORC & turbine flow 4 / 18 Rankine cycle + organic working fluid Mm, complexity Advantages on cycle, plant, operation viable technology, low/med T, W el Disadvantages on turbine flows real-gas effects, low speed of sound State of the art limited knowledge of expansions (h T design tools) novel real-gas models (Span-Wagner) + CFD (zflow), separate validations PROVIDE EXPERIMENTAL DATA ON FLOWS TYPICAL OF ORC TURBINE PASSAGE MDM H 2 0

7 Background on ORC Design of the TROVA Dynamic simulation of the TROVA Construction of the TROVA Conclusions

8 Dedicated facility Design 5 / 18 Limits for investigation industrial ORC plants Controlled flow for calibration TEST SECTION: planar straight axis convergent divergent nozzle FLUIDS: quasi 1D, isentropic expansion (no calibrated probes) Siloxanes & Hydrofluorocarbons thermodynamics, safety Siloxane MDM (high T) & HFC R245fa (low T) OP COND: parameters A t P T,6, T T6 β max P 7 CYCLE: Gas cycle vs Phase transition cycle high costs for continuous operation meas plane

9 Dedicated facility Design 5 / 18 Limits for investigation industrial ORC plants Controlled flow for calibration TEST SECTION: planar straight axis convergent divergent nozzle FLUIDS: quasi 1D, isentropic expansion (no calibrated probes) Siloxanes & Hydrofluorocarbons thermodynamics, safety Siloxane MDM (high T) & HFC R245fa (low T) OP COND: parameters A t P T,6, T T6 β max P 7 CYCLE: Gas cycle vs Phase transition cycle high costs for continuous operation P T6 (bar) T T6 ( C) b A t (mm 2 ) c t (m/s) M t m (kg/s) MDM R245f a M t h T,6 c t, s h t, s m A c t t t 1 5.4

10 Dedicated facility Design 5 / 18 Limits for investigation industrial ORC plants Controlled flow for calibration TEST SECTION: planar straight axis convergent divergent nozzle FLUIDS: quasi 1D, isentropic expansion (no calibrated probes) Siloxanes & Hydrofluorocarbons thermodynamics, safety Siloxane MDM (high T) & HFC R245fa (low T) OP COND: parameters A t P T,6, T T6 β max P 7 CYCLE: Gas cycle vs Phase transition cycle high costs for continuous operation MDM gas cycle MDM ph. tr. cycle

11 TROVA A blow down facility 6 / 18 Closed loop phase transition batch operating facility power energy exchange time: storage P T,4 > P T,6 limited test duration Unsteady nozzle flow: constant P T,6 (MCV) change in h T,6 (HPV) sequence of steady flows with transient operating conditions P T,6, T T,6

TROVA A blow down facility 6 / 18 Closed loop phase transition batch operating facility power energy exchange time: storage P T,4 > P T,6 limited test duration

12 TROVA A blow down facility 6 / 18 Closed loop phase transition batch operating facility power energy exchange time: storage P T,4 > P T,6 limited test duration Unsteady nozzle flow: constant P T,6 (MCV) change in h T,6 (HPV) sequence of steady flows with transient operating conditions P T,6, T T,6 HPV LPV TEST SECTION MCV PUMP

13 Sizing procedure & results 7 / 18 EVALUATE HPV/LPV V, P, T t min 20 s Iterative nozzle flow calculation Lumped parameter MDM, R245fa Parameters setting V HPV, V LPV, P HPV Initial conditions nozzle flow operating conditions Calculation t Calculation stop unsteady mass & energy bal. vessels b.c. update P T,5 =P T,6 or shock at exit Parameters update if t ex t min Safety check P max for tanks connection from HPV to LPV

14 Sizing procedure & results 7 / 18 EVALUATE HPV/LPV V, P, T t min 20 s Iterative nozzle flow calculation Lumped parameter MDM, R245fa Parameters setting V HPV, V LPV, P HPV Initial conditions nozzle flow operating conditions Calculation t Calculation stop unsteady mass & energy bal. vessels b.c. update P T,5 =P T,6 or shock at exit Parameters update if t ex t min Safety check P max for tanks connection MDM Vessels design HPV LPV V (m 3 ) P max (bar) T max ( C) MDM HPV conditions, tests MDM R245fa P T,4(t=0) (bar) T T,4(t=0) ( C) t ex (s)

15 Overview 8 / 18

16 Overview 8 / 18 HEATING SECTION

17 Overview 8 / 18 THROTTLING SECTION

18 Overview 8 / 18 TEST SECTION

19 Overview 8 / 18 COOLING SECTION

20 Overview 8 / 18 COMPRESSION SECTION

21 Overview 8 / 18 VACUUM SECTION

22 Background on ORC Design of the TROVA Dynamic simulation of the TROVA Construction of the TROVA Conclusions

23 Dynamic simulation 9 / 18 Batch operation + control systems START-UP and TEST time Processes to simulate: heating test condensation Batch simulation: batch operation of the facility Model approaches: lumped parameter / 1D (plant) + 1D (nozzle) Simulation tools: Modelica (object-oriented language) + FluidProp simple models complex model Fortran + FluidProp Self-made library: lack of component models e.g. nozzle TestRig

24 Dynamic simulation 9 / 18 Batch operation + control systems START-UP and TEST time SELECTED CASES MDM 1 MDM 2 R245fa P T,4 (bar) T T,4 ( C) P T,6 (bar) T T,6 ( C) P 7 (bar) T cond ( C)

25 Models Heating system 10 / 18 3 LEVELS a. Control system model b. Vessel model c c. Heating system model a b

26 Models Test system 11 / 18 from HPV to LPV MCV TEST SECTION LPV HPV LOSSES PLENUM

27 Models Test system 11 / 18 Manual/automatic switch MCV TEST SECTION LPV HPV LOSSES PLENUM

28 Simulation results: heating & condensing systems 12 / 18 FINAL CONDITIONS MDM 1 MDM 2 R245fa P T,4 (bar) T T,4 ( C) T,4 (kg/m 3 ) t heating (s) MDM 1 MDM 2 R245fa P T9 (bar) T T9 ( C) P T6 (bar) t cond (s)

29 Simulation results: test 13 / 18 FINAL CONDITIONS MDM 1 MDM 2 R245fa P T,4 (bar) T T,4 ( C) P T,9 (bar) T T,9 ( C) P T,6 (bar) M dis (kg) t ex (s)

30 Simulation results: nozzle regimes Lumped parameter dynamic simulation Modelica Different regimes in time Quasi 1-D steady calculation at different P 8 Different regimes in space 14 / 18

31 Simulation results: nozzle regimes Lumped parameter dynamic simulation Modelica Different regimes in time Quasi 1-D steady calculation at different P 8 Different regimes in space 14 / 18 c 1 1 c s

32 Background on ORC Design of the TROVA Dynamic simulation of the TROVA Construction of the TROVA Conclusions

33 TROVA 3D layout & construction 15 / 18

34 TROVA 3D layout & construction 15 / 18

35 Background on ORC Design of the TROVA Dynamic simulation of the TROVA Construction of the TROVA Conclusions

36 Conclusions 16 / 18 Experimental investigation on typical ORC turbine expansions flow caracterization code validations Measurements in industrial ORC turbines: limits needs of calibrated probes TROVA: bolw-down phase transition facility Design & simulation performance of proposed investigation Construction Conceived for ORC fluids/applications other applications in real gases real gases calibration tunnel Developments Control + DAQ software Commissioning TEST

Ackowledgements 17 / 18 Profs Osnaghi, Dossena,

37 Ackowledgements 17 / 18 Profs Osnaghi, Dossena, Gaetani, Mr. Deponti, Matteo Pini, Emiliano Casati Prof. Mario Gaia & Turboden staff Alberto Guardone Aerospace Department Prof. Piero Colonna, Teus van der Stelt Profs Gianfranco Angelino & Costante Invernizzi Energy Department Manufacturers Mr. Malavasi, Mr. Fermi

38 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Influence of Molecular Complexity on Nozzle Design for an Organic Vapor Wind Tunnel

ORC 2011 First International Seminar on ORC Power Systems, Delft, NL, 22-23 September 2011 Influence of Molecular Complexity on Nozzle Design for an Organic Vapor Wind Tunnel A. Guardone, Aerospace Eng.