Chapter 1. GMM: Basic Concepts
|
|
- Bennett Golden
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 1. GMM: Basic Concepts Contents 1 Motivating Examples Instrumental variable estimator Estimating parameters in monetary policy rules Estimating the parameter of risk aversion De nition 5 3 Global and local identi cation Global identi cation Local identi cation Identi ed, but only weakly Estimation and inference in well identi ed models The asymptotic distribution E cient GMM Two-step and continuous updating GMM Testing parametric restrictions in well identi ed models Wald Test Gradient test Distance test Model diagnostics Formulating model diagnostics as testing for parametric restrictions Testing overidentifying restrictions Hausman s Speci cation Test
2 1. Motivating Examples 1.1. Instrumental variable estimator Consider the following linear model with endogeneity y t = x 0 t 0 + " t, with E(x t " t ) 6= 0: (1) Suppose z t is a set of valid instruments: E(z t " t ) = 0: For now, assume dim(z t ) = dim(x t ). Multiply both sides of the regression equation by z t z t y t = z t x 0 t 0 + z t " t : Taking expectation: Assuming E(z t x 0 t) is invertible, then E(z t y t ) = E(z t x 0 t) 0 (because E(z t " t ) = 0): 0 = E(z t x 0 t) 1 E(zt y t ) Replacing the two expectations with their sample estimates ^ IV = ( TX z t x 0 t) 1 t=1 T X t=1 z t y t : In matrix notation ^ IV = (Z 0 X) 1 Z 0 y: Question: What are examples of y t ; x t and z t in macroeconomics? Can the above idea be generalized to nonlinear models allowing dim(z t ) 6= dim(x t )? We rst illustrate these two issues using examples, then present a formal framework. 1
3 1.2. Estimating parameters in monetary policy rules Clarida, Gali and Gertler (2000) estimated a forward-looking monetary policy reaction function for the postwar United States economy. We use their study to illustrate how moment conditions naturally arise in rational expectations models. Let rt denote the target rate for the nominal Federal Funds rate in period t. The target rate in each period is a function of the gaps between expected in ation and output and their respective target levels. Speci cally r t = r + (E [ t+1 j t ] ) + E [x t+1 j t ] ; (2) where t+1 denotes in ation, i.e., percentage change in the price level between time t and t + 1; is the target rate for in ation; x t+1 is the output gap, de ned as the percent deviation between actual GDP and the corresponding target; t is the information set of the agent at time t when the interest rate is set; r is the desired interest rate when in ation and output are at their target levels. De ne the ex ante real interest rate as rr t = r t E [ t+1 j t ]. Its target rate is rr = r : Then, the reaction function (2) can be represented as rr t = rr + ( 1) (E [ t+1 j t ] ) + E [x t+1 j t ] : 2
4 In the above, < 1 implies that the ex ante real rate falls with higher expected in ation; > 1 implies the opposite. The latter policy rule is often said to be stabilizing. Distinguishing between these two cases is of substantial importance. In practice, it may take more than one period for the interest rate to adjust toward its target. This is called interest rate smoothing. Clarida, Gali and Gertler (2000) modeled this as r t = r t 1 + (1 ) rt : This leads to the following policy reaction function r t = (1 ) [rr ( 1) + t+1 + x t+1 ] + r t 1 + t ; where t = (1 ) f [ t+1 E ( t+1 j t )] + [x t+1 E (x t+1 j t )]g : The term in curly brackets is a linear combination of forecast errors and thus orthogonal to any variable in t. The orthogonality is what delivers the desired moment restrictions, as seen below. Let z t denote a vector of instruments known at time t (i.e., contained in t ). The above two equations then imply the following set of orthogonality conditions E f[r t (1 ) [rr ( 1) + t+1 + x t+1 ] r t 1 ] z t g = 0: (3) In Clarida, Gali and Gertler (2000), z t includes the Funds rate, in ation, output gap, M2 growth, the spread between the long-term bond rate and three-month Treasury Bill rate. Clearly, such a choice involves some arbitrariness. This is hard to avoid in practice. Note that rr and ( 1) are not separately identi able. Clarida, Gali and Gertler (2000) assume rr is known and set it to the observed sample average. The equation (3) then has four unknown parameters, ; ; and. Clarida, Gali and Gertler (2000) nd that is greater than one for the Volcker- Greenspan period but less than 1 for the Pre-Volcker period (see Table II in their paper). They conclude that the monetary policy is better managed in the Volcker- Greenspan period. However, their study has been harshly criticized subsequently, most 3
5 notably by Cochrane (2011). The latter paper argues that the Taylor rule is in general not identi able if one allows for multiple equilibria, making conventional inferential procedure invalid Estimating the parameter of risk aversion Suppose a representative agent solves the following problem: " 1 # max E X t U(C t ) fc tg under the budget constraint t=0 (4) C t + P t Q t R t Q t M + W t ; where C t : consumption in period t; : discount factor; U(:): utility function; Q t : quantity of asset held at the end of period t; P t : price of asset at t; R t : date t payo from holding a unit of an M-period asset purchased at date t M; W t : (real) labor income at date t: Maximizing (4) leads to P t U 0 (C t ) = M E t Rt+M U 0 (C t+m ) for all t, (5) where E t [:] is the conditional expectation. Equivalently, E t M R t+m U 0 (C t+m ) P t U 0 1 = 0: (6) (C t ) 4
6 Suppose we can observe R t+m, P t, C t and is willing to accept that the utility function is given by U(C t ) = C t =: Then, (6) can be written as " E t M R t+m C 1 t+m P t C 1 t # 1 = 0: For any information variable observable to the agent at time t, say z t, " E M R t+m C! # 1 t+m 1 z t = 0: P t C 1 t 2. De nition We now de ne GMM in a general framework. Consider the following moment restriction E [m(x t ; 0 )] = 0; where X t is a random vector. In general, m(x t ; ) is a vector-valued function of X t. If the dimension of m(x t ; 0 ) is k, we say there are k moment restrictions. Suppose we have q parameters to estimate. Then the GMM estimator can be constructed as follows. First, evaluate the function m(x t ; ) at the observations: m(x t ; ); t = 1; :::; T: Next, compute the sample average Finally, solve m T () = T 1 T X t=1 m(x t ; ) m T (^) = 0: (7) The idea is very simple: the GMM estimator is obtained by matching the sample and population moments. However, if k > q, then (7) in general has no solution. The idea is then to take a weighted average of the k equations and make it as close to zero as possible, leading to the following general de nition for the GMM estimator. 5
7 De nition 1. (GMM estimator) Let W T matrix such that W T be an k by k symmetric positive de nite! p W 0 as the sample size T approaches in nity, where W 0 is non-random and positive de nite. The GMM estimator of ; denoted as ^(W T ), is given by ^(WT ) = arg min m T () 0 W T m T () (8) Clearly, the estimator is a function of W T. We return to the choice of W T later. For now, assume W T is already speci ed. 3. Global and local identi cation We consider conditions that can ensure E [m(x t ; 0 )] = 0 has a unique solution Global identi cation De nition 2. The parameter vector is globally identi ed at 0 based on the moment function m(:) if E [m(x t ; )] = 0 if and only if = 0 : A necessary condition for global identi cation is the "order condition". Order Condition: If k q, then we say the order condition for identi cation is satis ed. 1. if k = q, the model is just identi ed; 2. if k > q the model is over identi ed. The order condition is necessary but not su cient for identi cation. Necessary and su cient conditions are hard to nd for nonlinear models. In practice, a weaker concept, local identi cation, is often considered. 6
8 3.2. Local identi cation De nition 3. The parameter vector is locally identi ed at 0 by the moment function m(:) if there exists a neighborhood of 0, B( 0 ), such that inside this neighborhood E [m(x t ; )] = 0 if and only if = 0 : Rank Condition: We say the rank condition for local identi cation is satis ed if the k q matrix of [m(x t ; 0 (9) is continuous and has full column rank q at 0. Lemma 1. Suppose the rank [m(x t ; )] =@ 0 is constant in a neighborhood of 0. Then, the parameter vector is locally identi ed at 0 by the moment function m(:) if and only the rank condition is satis ed. Remark 1. If the constant rank requirement in (9) is dropped, then the condition is suf- cient but not necessary. (That is, there are situations where the rank [m(x t ; )] =@ 0 is less than q, but is still identi ed.) Remark 2. In the context of a linear model, for example, see the 2SLS in (1), we [m(x t ; 0 0 [(y t x 0 t 0 )z t 0 = Ez t x 0 t: Hence the rank condition is equivalent to the requirement that Ez t x 0 t has rank q. Proof of the Lemma. We use the arguments in Theorem 1 in Rothenberg (1971) to prove the result. Suppose 0 is not locally identi ed. Then, there exists an in nite sequence of vectors f s g 1 s=1 approaching 0 such that, for each s, E [m(x t ; 0 )] = E [m(x t ; s )]. By the mean value theorem and the di erentiability of E [m(x t ; )] in ; m j (X t ; ~ i (j) 0 = E [m j (X t ; 0 )] E [m j (X t ; s )] 0 ( s 0 ); 7
9 where the subscript j denotes the j-th element of the vector and ~ (j) lies between s and 0 and in general depends on j. Let then m j (X t ; ~ i (j) d s = s 0 k s 0 k 0 d s = 0 for every s. The sequence fd s g is an in nite sequence on the unit sphere and therefore there exists a limit point d (note that d does not depend on j). As s! 0 ; d s approaches d and by the continuity [m(x t ; )] =@ 0 we have m j (X t ; ~ i (j) lim 0 d s [m j(x t ; 0 0 d = 0: Because this holds for an arbitrary j, it holds for the full [m(x t ; 0 0 d = 0; which [m(xt ; 0 )] 0 < q: To show the converse, suppose [m(x t ; 0 )] =@ 0 has constant rank < q in a neighborhood of 0 denoted by B( 0 ). Consider the characteristic vector c() associated with one of its zero roots. We [m(x t ; 0 c() = 0 (10) for all 2 ( 0 ). Because the gradient is continuous and has constant rank in B( 0 ), the vector c() is continuous in B( 0 ). Consider the curve de ned by the function (v) which solves for 0 v v the di = c(); (0) = 0 : 8
10 [m(x t ; [m(x 0 [m(x 0 c() = 0 for all 0 v v, where the last equality uses (10). Thus, E [m(x t ; )] is constant on the curve. This implies that 0 is unidenti able. This completes the proof Identi ed, but only weakly Local and global identi cation are properties of the population. If is unidenti ed, then it is impossible to pin down its value even with an in nite sample size. In practice, the situation can be worse because we only observe a nite sample size. Even if the parameters are globally identi ed, the GMM criterion function m T () 0 W T m T () can still be at or nearly at around 0 for such a sample size. This poses substantially challenge for inference, and has led to a sizeable literature that is often referred to as "inference under weak identi cation". In the remainder of this chapter, we assume the parameters are strongly identi ed. We return to weak identi cation later. 4. Estimation and inference in well identi ed models If the parameter is strongly identi ed, then under some additional regularity conditions the GMM estimator is consistent and converges at rate p T to a Normal distribution The asymptotic distribution Proposition 1. Suppose is globally identi ed at 0, Also, assume the following conditions are satis ed 1. T 0! p G() [m(x t; 0 ; where the convergence holds uniformly in a compact neighborhood of 0. Assume G() is continuous and write G 0 G( 0 ). 9
11 2. (CLT) p T mt ( 0 )! d N(0; S 0 ) where S 0 is non-random and positive de nite. Then, p T (^(WT ) 0 )! d N(0; V (W 0 )) with V (W 0 ) = G 0 0W 0 G 0 1 (G 0 0 W 0 S 0 W 0 G 0 ) G 0 0W 0 G 0 1 Proof: Ruud (2001), pp Remark 3. The LLN and CLT T ()=@ 0 and m T () to be free of trends (time trend, or stochastic trends). This requirement is non-trivial. For example, variables such as GDP or price indices tend to grow over time. In practice, two methods are often used to eliminate such trends. The rst is to run the data through some lter. The second is to normalize the variables such that their trends will cancel out. We will provide illustrations in the next chapter. Remark 4. The limiting variance depends on the matrix W 0 : This implies that more e cient estimators can be obtained by appropriate choices of W T E cient GMM The limiting variance of GMM is minimized if W T is chosen such that (prove it!) W 0 = plim W T = S0 1 T!1 Recall that S 0 is the limiting variance of p T m T ( 0 ), hence e ciency is achieved by assigning more weights to moments that have smaller variances. In this case, the limiting distribution is given by p T (^ 0 )! d N(0; V 0 ) with V 0 = G 0 0S 1 0 G 0 1 : Remark 5. In subsequent discussions, we let ^ denote the e cient GMM estimator unless stated otherwise. 10
12 4.3. Two-step and continuous updating GMM The weighting matrix S 0 depends on the unknown parameter 0. Two ways to address this issues lead to the following two asymptotically equivalent estimators. 1. Obtain some preliminary estimate of using the identify matrix as weighting matrix. Denote the estimate as ^ 1 : Compute ^S T (^ 1 ) and solve ^GMM = arg min m T () 0 ^ST (^ 1 ) 1 m T (): This is often referred to as the "two-step GMM estimator". It is often the default choice in practice. 2. Obtain the estimate in one step, i.e., treat S T () as a function of and solve ^CUGMM = arg min m T () 0 ^ST () 1 m T () This is often referred to as the "Continuous Updating GMM estimator", or CUGMM. This is used less often compared with the two step estimator. 5. Testing parametric restrictions in well identi ed models We consider testing restrictions of the form R( 0 ) = 0; (11) where R(:) is s-vector of di erentiable function with s < q. It is useful to re-state the general model. It is speci ed by the following moment conditions E [m(x t ; 0 )] = 0 Given a sample of size T; the sample moments are given by. Let m T () = T 1 T X t=1 m(x t ; ): Q T () = m T () 0 ^S 1 T m T (); (12) 11
13 where ^S T is a consistent estimate of the limiting variance of p T m T ( 0 ). The e cient GMM estimator then solves Let ^ : unrestricted GMM estimate ~ : restricted GMM estimate ^ = arg min Q T (): We present the GMM counterparts to the Wald, score and the likelihood ration test Wald Test The Wald statistic evaluates the restriction at the unrestricted estimate: W = p " # 1 T 0 ^VT 0 pt R(^) Recall that the GMM estimator satis es p T (^ 0 )! d N(0; V 0 ): Applying the Delta method, p T (R(^) R(0 ))! d N 0 ) 0 V 0 This implies p T (R(^) R(0 )) 0 ) V 0 T (R(^) R(0 ))! d s: Because R( 0 ) = 0 under the null hypothesis, we have p T R(^) 0 ) V 0 T R(^)! d s: Finally, ^ converges in probability to 0, 0 ^VT 0 ) 0 V 0 Therefore, the Wald statistic converges to 2 s under the null hypothesis. 12
14 Example 1. Consider the following model with endogeneity, y = X + " We want to test the linear restrictions R r = 0: Suppose there are k instruments, summarized by matrix Z. Assume the errors are iid. Then, ^ = X 0 P Z X 1 X 0 P Z y Its limiting distribution is given by p T (^ 0 )! d N(0; V 0 ) with The Wald test is V 0 = 2 plim T!1 T 1 X 0 P Z X 1 : W = (R^ r) 0 h R X 0 P Z X 1 R 0 i 1 (R^ r)=^ 2 : 5.2. Gradient test The Gradient test is the GMM counterpart to the score test. It only requires estimating model under the null hypothesis. The test computes the derivative of the GMM criterion function (12) at the restricted estimate (multiplied by p T ): p T = 2 p T () 0 ^S 1 m T () (14) = 2 p T G T () 0 ^ST () 1 m T () The idea is that if the restrictions are true, then the above quantity should be close to zero. As in the score test, we form a quadratic form with an metric to judge the signi cance of the deviations from 0. The metric used here is the limiting variance of (14) under the null hypothesis, which is given by G 0 0S0 1 G 0 = V0 1 13
15 The Gradient test is therefore G = ( p T 0 ) ^V T ()( p T () ) where ^V () is a consistent estimate of V 0 under the null hypothesis. The null limiting distribution is 2 s where s is the number of restrictions Distance test Recall that the LR test examines the di erence in the likelihood functions with and without imposing the restrictions. The same idea can be used in the GMM framework, leading to the following test: D = T h Q T ( ~ ) i Q T (^) : The null limiting distribution is 2 s where s is the number of restrictions. 6. Model diagnostics We are interested in testing the speci cation of the model thorough testing the validity of the moment restrictions Formulating model diagnostics as testing for parametric restrictions Example 2. Consider the following model with endogeneity, y = X + ": Suppose we have k potential instruments, summarized by matrix Z. We conjecture that some of the instruments may be correlated with the errors, hence not valid. Suppose we have partitioned Z into Z 1 and Z 2 with Z 2 containing the questionable instruments. Then the problem reduces to testing the restriction E (y t x 0 t 0 )z 2;t = 0: 14
16 Consider a more general set up than the above example. Suppose we have partitioned the moments into two subsets, i.e., " # m 1 (X t ; 0 ) k1 1 m(x t ; 0 ) k1 = ; m 2 (X t ; 0 ) (k k1 )1 where we believe E(m 1 (X t ; 0 )) = 0 but think the second set of conditions E(m 2 (X t ; 0 )) = 0 are questionable. In other words, we want to test H 0 : E(m 2 (X t ; 0 )) = 0 (16) against the hypothesis H 1 : E(m 2 (X t ; 0 )) 6= 0 The problem (16) can reformulated as testing for parametric restrictions to which the trinity of test procedures applies. Re-write the hypothesis of interest as E(m 2 (X t ; 0 ) 0 ) = 0 where 0 = 0 under the null hypothesis and nonzero under the alternative hypothesis. This leads to the following augmented moment functions " # m a m 1 (X t ; ) (X t ; ; ) = m 2 (X t ; ) and the augmented moment restrictions: Em a (X t ; 0 ; 0 ) = 0 (17) By this simple transformation, the problem reduces to testing the parametric restrictions speci ed by = 0 based on moment conditions (17). 15
17 The augmented sample moments are given by m a T (; ) = T 1 The unrestricted estimates (^; ^) are given by The restricted estimates are ( ~ ; 0) T X t=1 m a (X t ; ; ) (^; ^) = arg min ; ma T (; ) 0 ^S 1 T ma T (; ) ~ = arg min m a T (; 0) 0 ^S 1 T ma T (; 0) Note that the same weighting matrix is used for the restricted and unrestricted estimates. Wald test. The Wald test can be constructed using the formula (13) but with ^ replaced by (^; ^). The restrictions are linear and given by h i " # R(; ) = 0 (k k1 )q I k k1 = 0: The details are omitted. The Gradient test. The LM test can be constructed using the formula (15) but with replaced by ( ~ ; 0). The Distance test is D = T h m a T ( ~ ; 0) 0 1 ^S T ma T ( ~ ; 0) m a T (^; ^) 0 1 ^S T ma T (^; ^) i ; or equivalently, D =T h m a T ( ~ ; 0) 0 1 ^S T ma T ( ~ i ; 0) m a 1;T (^) 0 1 ^S 11;T ma 1;T (^) ; where ^S 11;T consists of entries in ^S T corresponding to m 2 (X t ; ): 16
18 6.2. Testing overidentifying restrictions The speci cation tests discussed above require separating the moment conditions into two subsets. This may have undesirable consequences. In particular, if the FIRST subset in fact contains false moment restrictions, we may end up rejecting moment conditions in the SECOND subset even if they are valid. moment restrictions without having to dividing them up. This suggests testing for The idea is then to look at the magnitude of the GMM criterion function when all moments are used, and a large value indicates some moment conditions may be invalid. The resulting procedure is usually referred to as testing for "overidentifying restrictions" because testing is possible only if k > q. Because if k = q, then the objective function equals zero when evaluated at ^, hence gives no information about the validity of the moment conditions. The test statistic, J; and its limiting distribution are given by The limiting distribution has k J = T m T (^) 0 ^S 1 T m T (^)! d 2 k q q degrees of freedom intuitively because q moment conditions are used to estimated the q parameters (hence they are not "free"). course, such a test leaves open which moments are invalid should the test statistic appear statistically signi cant. Of 6.3. Hausman s Speci cation Test Hausman (1978) proposed a general testing methodology, which in particular can be employed to test for the validity of moment restrictions. The methodology di ers from the afore mentioned ones, because it is based on the sampling behavior of di erent estimators of parameters rather than population moments or parameters. In general, Hausman test works as follows. To test the null hypothesis, we need two estimators: ~ : E cient under the null hypothesis but inconsistent under the alternative hypothesis; 17
19 ^ : Consistent under both the null and the alternative hypothesis, but less e cient under the null hypothesis. Then, H = ( ~ ^) 0 h ^V (^ ~ ) i ( ~ ^): It has a chi-square limiting distribution with q degrees of freedom, where q is the dimension of : We illustrate the test with the following example. Example 3. (Testing for endogeneity) Consider the model where the errors are iid. y = X + " We suspect some variables are correlated with the errors. Suppose a set of valid instruments is available. We have: If there is no endogeneity, then the OLS estimator is consistent and BLUE; and 2SLS is also consistent, but less e cient. If there is endogeneity, then the OLS estimator is not consistent; and the 2SLS is consistent. Let ^ OLS be the OLS estimator and ^ 2SLS the 2SLS estimator. Then the Hausman test is de ned as where ^V pt ^OLS H = T (^ OLS ^2SLS ) 0 ^V ( p T ^OLS ^2SLS ) (^ OLS ^2SLS ); under the null hypothesis, and (:) ^2SLS is an estimate for the limiting variance of p T ^OLS denotes generalized inverse because the variance matrix may be singular. Because ^ OLS is BLUE under the null hypothesis, we have V ( p T ^OLS ^2SLS ) = V ( p T ^2SLS 0 ) V ( p T ^OLS 0 ): where V ( p T ^2SLS 0 ) and p T (^ OLS 0 ). 0 ) and V ( p T ^OLS 18 ^2SLS 0 ) are the limiting variance of p T (^ 2SLS
20 Suppose the null hypothesis is true, i.e., there is no endogeneity, then the test has a chi-square limiting distribution by construction. If the null hypothesis is false, then ^ OLS is biased and inconsistent while ^ 2SLS is still consistent, then the di erence ^ OLS ^2SLS will tend to be large. This forces the test to take on a large value. 19
21 References [1] Clarida, R., Galí, J. and Gertler, M. (2000): "Monetary Policy Rules And Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence And Some Theory," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, [2] Cochrane, J.H. (2011): "Determinacy and Identi cation with Taylor Rules", Journal of Political Economy, 119, [3] Rothenberg, T. J. (1971): "Identi cation in Parametric Models," Econometrica, 39, [4] Ruud, P.A. (2000): An Introduction to Classical Econometric Theory. Oxford University Press. 20
Chapter 2. GMM: Estimating Rational Expectations Models
Chapter 2. GMM: Estimating Rational Expectations Models Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Step 1: Solve the model and obtain Euler equations 2 3 Step 2: Formulate moment restrictions 3 4 Step 3: Estimation and
More informationMarkov-Switching Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables. Chang-Jin Kim 1
Markov-Switching Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables by Chang-Jin Kim 1 Dept. of Economics, Korea University and Dept. of Economics, University of Washington First draft: August, 2002 This version:
More informationGMM-based inference in the AR(1) panel data model for parameter values where local identi cation fails
GMM-based inference in the AR() panel data model for parameter values where local identi cation fails Edith Madsen entre for Applied Microeconometrics (AM) Department of Economics, University of openhagen,
More informationIntroduction: structural econometrics. Jean-Marc Robin
Introduction: structural econometrics Jean-Marc Robin Abstract 1. Descriptive vs structural models 2. Correlation is not causality a. Simultaneity b. Heterogeneity c. Selectivity Descriptive models Consider
More informationLikelihood Ratio Based Test for the Exogeneity and the Relevance of Instrumental Variables
Likelihood Ratio Based est for the Exogeneity and the Relevance of Instrumental Variables Dukpa Kim y Yoonseok Lee z September [under revision] Abstract his paper develops a test for the exogeneity and
More informationSimple Estimators for Semiparametric Multinomial Choice Models
Simple Estimators for Semiparametric Multinomial Choice Models James L. Powell and Paul A. Ruud University of California, Berkeley March 2008 Preliminary and Incomplete Comments Welcome Abstract This paper
More informationParametric Inference on Strong Dependence
Parametric Inference on Strong Dependence Peter M. Robinson London School of Economics Based on joint work with Javier Hualde: Javier Hualde and Peter M. Robinson: Gaussian Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimation
More informationNotes on Generalized Method of Moments Estimation
Notes on Generalized Method of Moments Estimation c Bronwyn H. Hall March 1996 (revised February 1999) 1. Introduction These notes are a non-technical introduction to the method of estimation popularized
More informationChapter 6. Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Models
Chapter 6. Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Models Fall 22 Contents Introduction 2. An illustrative example........................... 2.2 Discussion...................................
More informationSubsets Tests in GMM without assuming identi cation
Subsets Tests in GMM without assuming identi cation Frank Kleibergen Brown University and University of Amsterdam Sophocles Mavroeidis y Brown University sophocles_mavroeidis@brown.edu Preliminary: please
More informationECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401S) University of Toronto. Department of Economics. Spring 2013 Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria
ECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401S) University of Toronto. Department of Economics. Spring 2013 Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria SOLUTION TO FINAL EXAM Friday, April 12, 2013. From 9:00-12:00 (3 hours) INSTRUCTIONS:
More informationEconomics 241B Estimation with Instruments
Economics 241B Estimation with Instruments Measurement Error Measurement error is de ned as the error resulting from the measurement of a variable. At some level, every variable is measured with error.
More informationOn Econometric Analysis of Structural Systems with Permanent and Transitory Shocks and Exogenous Variables
On Econometric Analysis of Structural Systems with Permanent and Transitory Shocks and Exogenous Variables Adrian Pagan School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology M. Hashem Pesaran
More informationA Course on Advanced Econometrics
A Course on Advanced Econometrics Yongmiao Hong The Ernest S. Liu Professor of Economics & International Studies Cornell University Course Introduction: Modern economies are full of uncertainties and risk.
More informationLecture Notes Part 7: Systems of Equations
17.874 Lecture Notes Part 7: Systems of Equations 7. Systems of Equations Many important social science problems are more structured than a single relationship or function. Markets, game theoretic models,
More informationChapter 6: Endogeneity and Instrumental Variables (IV) estimator
Chapter 6: Endogeneity and Instrumental Variables (IV) estimator Advanced Econometrics - HEC Lausanne Christophe Hurlin University of Orléans December 15, 2013 Christophe Hurlin (University of Orléans)
More informationChapter 2. Dynamic panel data models
Chapter 2. Dynamic panel data models School of Economics and Management - University of Geneva Christophe Hurlin, Université of Orléans University of Orléans April 2018 C. Hurlin (University of Orléans)
More informationCombining Macroeconomic Models for Prediction
Combining Macroeconomic Models for Prediction John Geweke University of Technology Sydney 15th Australasian Macro Workshop April 8, 2010 Outline 1 Optimal prediction pools 2 Models and data 3 Optimal pools
More informationLecture Notes on Measurement Error
Steve Pischke Spring 2000 Lecture Notes on Measurement Error These notes summarize a variety of simple results on measurement error which I nd useful. They also provide some references where more complete
More informationx i = 1 yi 2 = 55 with N = 30. Use the above sample information to answer all the following questions. Show explicitly all formulas and calculations.
Exercises for the course of Econometrics Introduction 1. () A researcher is using data for a sample of 30 observations to investigate the relationship between some dependent variable y i and independent
More informationEconomics 620, Lecture 18: Nonlinear Models
Economics 620, Lecture 18: Nonlinear Models Nicholas M. Kiefer Cornell University Professor N. M. Kiefer (Cornell University) Lecture 18: Nonlinear Models 1 / 18 The basic point is that smooth nonlinear
More informationECONOMETRICS FIELD EXAM Michigan State University May 9, 2008
ECONOMETRICS FIELD EXAM Michigan State University May 9, 2008 Instructions: Answer all four (4) questions. Point totals for each question are given in parenthesis; there are 00 points possible. Within
More informationECON0702: Mathematical Methods in Economics
ECON0702: Mathematical Methods in Economics Yulei Luo SEF of HKU January 12, 2009 Luo, Y. (SEF of HKU) MME January 12, 2009 1 / 35 Course Outline Economics: The study of the choices people (consumers,
More informationEconomics 241B Review of Limit Theorems for Sequences of Random Variables
Economics 241B Review of Limit Theorems for Sequences of Random Variables Convergence in Distribution The previous de nitions of convergence focus on the outcome sequences of a random variable. Convergence
More informationTesting Linear Restrictions: cont.
Testing Linear Restrictions: cont. The F-statistic is closely connected with the R of the regression. In fact, if we are testing q linear restriction, can write the F-stastic as F = (R u R r)=q ( R u)=(n
More informationComment on HAC Corrections for Strongly Autocorrelated Time Series by Ulrich K. Müller
Comment on HAC Corrections for Strongly Autocorrelated ime Series by Ulrich K. Müller Yixiao Sun Department of Economics, UC San Diego May 2, 24 On the Nearly-optimal est Müller applies the theory of optimal
More informationSIMILAR-ON-THE-BOUNDARY TESTS FOR MOMENT INEQUALITIES EXIST, BUT HAVE POOR POWER. Donald W. K. Andrews. August 2011
SIMILAR-ON-THE-BOUNDARY TESTS FOR MOMENT INEQUALITIES EXIST, BUT HAVE POOR POWER By Donald W. K. Andrews August 2011 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1815 COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS
More informationWe begin by thinking about population relationships.
Conditional Expectation Function (CEF) We begin by thinking about population relationships. CEF Decomposition Theorem: Given some outcome Y i and some covariates X i there is always a decomposition where
More informationNonlinear GMM. Eric Zivot. Winter, 2013
Nonlinear GMM Eric Zivot Winter, 2013 Nonlinear GMM estimation occurs when the GMM moment conditions g(w θ) arenonlinearfunctionsofthe model parameters θ The moment conditions g(w θ) may be nonlinear functions
More informationGMM estimation of spatial panels
MRA Munich ersonal ReEc Archive GMM estimation of spatial panels Francesco Moscone and Elisa Tosetti Brunel University 7. April 009 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/637/ MRA aper No. 637, posted
More informationGMM and SMM. 1. Hansen, L Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators, Econometrica, 50, p
GMM and SMM Some useful references: 1. Hansen, L. 1982. Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators, Econometrica, 50, p. 1029-54. 2. Lee, B.S. and B. Ingram. 1991 Simulation estimation
More informationGeneralized Method of Moments (GMM) Estimation
Econometrics 2 Fall 2004 Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) Estimation Heino Bohn Nielsen of29 Outline of the Lecture () Introduction. (2) Moment conditions and methods of moments (MM) estimation. Ordinary
More informationSimple Estimators for Monotone Index Models
Simple Estimators for Monotone Index Models Hyungtaik Ahn Dongguk University, Hidehiko Ichimura University College London, James L. Powell University of California, Berkeley (powell@econ.berkeley.edu)
More informationECONOMET RICS P RELIM EXAM August 24, 2010 Department of Economics, Michigan State University
ECONOMET RICS P RELIM EXAM August 24, 2010 Department of Economics, Michigan State University Instructions: Answer all four (4) questions. Be sure to show your work or provide su cient justi cation for
More informationSophisticated Monetary Policies
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Sta Report 419 January 2008 Sophisticated Monetary Policies Andrew Atkeson University of California, Los Angeles, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,
More informationTime Series Models and Inference. James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley
Time Series Models and Inference James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley Overview In contrast to the classical linear regression model, in which the components of the
More informationMotivation Non-linear Rational Expectations The Permanent Income Hypothesis The Log of Gravity Non-linear IV Estimation Summary.
Econometrics I Department of Economics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Master in Industrial Economics and Markets Outline Motivation 1 Motivation 2 3 4 5 Motivation Hansen's contributions GMM was developed
More informationLECTURE 13: TIME SERIES I
1 LECTURE 13: TIME SERIES I AUTOCORRELATION: Consider y = X + u where y is T 1, X is T K, is K 1 and u is T 1. We are using T and not N for sample size to emphasize that this is a time series. The natural
More informationNonlinear Programming (NLP)
Natalia Lazzati Mathematics for Economics (Part I) Note 6: Nonlinear Programming - Unconstrained Optimization Note 6 is based on de la Fuente (2000, Ch. 7), Madden (1986, Ch. 3 and 5) and Simon and Blume
More informationEconometrics Midterm Examination Answers
Econometrics Midterm Examination Answers March 4, 204. Question (35 points) Answer the following short questions. (i) De ne what is an unbiased estimator. Show that X is an unbiased estimator for E(X i
More informationEconomics 620, Lecture 20: Generalized Method of Moment (GMM)
Economics 620, Lecture 20: Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) Nicholas M. Kiefer Cornell University Professor N. M. Kiefer (Cornell University) Lecture 20: GMM 1 / 16 Key: Set sample moments equal to theoretical
More information1. The Multivariate Classical Linear Regression Model
Business School, Brunel University MSc. EC550/5509 Modelling Financial Decisions and Markets/Introduction to Quantitative Methods Prof. Menelaos Karanasos (Room SS69, Tel. 08956584) Lecture Notes 5. The
More informationEquivalence of several methods for decomposing time series into permananent and transitory components
Equivalence of several methods for decomposing time series into permananent and transitory components Don Harding Department of Economics and Finance LaTrobe University, Bundoora Victoria 3086 and Centre
More informationAdvanced Economic Growth: Lecture 21: Stochastic Dynamic Programming and Applications
Advanced Economic Growth: Lecture 21: Stochastic Dynamic Programming and Applications Daron Acemoglu MIT November 19, 2007 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Advanced Growth Lecture 21 November 19, 2007 1 / 79 Stochastic
More informationMaximum Likelihood (ML) Estimation
Econometrics 2 Fall 2004 Maximum Likelihood (ML) Estimation Heino Bohn Nielsen 1of32 Outline of the Lecture (1) Introduction. (2) ML estimation defined. (3) ExampleI:Binomialtrials. (4) Example II: Linear
More informationGMM Based Tests for Locally Misspeci ed Models
GMM Based Tests for Locally Misspeci ed Models Anil K. Bera Department of Economics University of Illinois, USA Walter Sosa Escudero University of San Andr es and National University of La Plata, Argentina
More informationEconomics 620, Lecture 9: Asymptotics III: Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Economics 620, Lecture 9: Asymptotics III: Maximum Likelihood Estimation Nicholas M. Kiefer Cornell University Professor N. M. Kiefer (Cornell University) Lecture 9: Asymptotics III(MLE) 1 / 20 Jensen
More informationThe Hausman Test and Weak Instruments y
The Hausman Test and Weak Instruments y Jinyong Hahn z John C. Ham x Hyungsik Roger Moon { September 7, Abstract We consider the following problem. There is a structural equation of interest that contains
More informationR = µ + Bf Arbitrage Pricing Model, APM
4.2 Arbitrage Pricing Model, APM Empirical evidence indicates that the CAPM beta does not completely explain the cross section of expected asset returns. This suggests that additional factors may be required.
More informationEstimation and Inference with Weak Identi cation
Estimation and Inference with Weak Identi cation Donald W. K. Andrews Cowles Foundation Yale University Xu Cheng Department of Economics University of Pennsylvania First Draft: August, 2007 Revised: March
More informationConsistent estimation of asset pricing models using generalized spectral estimator
Consistent estimation of asset pricing models using generalized spectral estimator Jinho Choi Indiana University April 0, 009 Work in progress Abstract This paper essentially extends the generalized spectral
More informationNotes on Asymptotic Theory: Convergence in Probability and Distribution Introduction to Econometric Theory Econ. 770
Notes on Asymptotic Theory: Convergence in Probability and Distribution Introduction to Econometric Theory Econ. 770 Jonathan B. Hill Dept. of Economics University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill November
More informationGMM Estimation with Noncausal Instruments
ömmföäflsäafaäsflassflassflas ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff Discussion Papers GMM Estimation with Noncausal Instruments Markku Lanne University of Helsinki, RUESG and HECER and Pentti Saikkonen
More informationSupplemental Material 1 for On Optimal Inference in the Linear IV Model
Supplemental Material 1 for On Optimal Inference in the Linear IV Model Donald W. K. Andrews Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics Yale University Vadim Marmer Vancouver School of Economics University
More informationIdenti cation and Frequency Domain QML Estimation of Linearized DSGE Models
Identi cation and Frequency Domain QML Estimation of Linearized DSGE Models hongjun Qu y Boston University Denis Tkachenko z Boston University August, Abstract This paper considers issues related to identi
More informationEconomics 620, Lecture 13: Time Series I
Economics 620, Lecture 13: Time Series I Nicholas M. Kiefer Cornell University Professor N. M. Kiefer (Cornell University) Lecture 13: Time Series I 1 / 19 AUTOCORRELATION Consider y = X + u where y is
More informationECON0702: Mathematical Methods in Economics
ECON0702: Mathematical Methods in Economics Yulei Luo SEF of HKU January 14, 2009 Luo, Y. (SEF of HKU) MME January 14, 2009 1 / 44 Comparative Statics and The Concept of Derivative Comparative Statics
More informationIn the Ramsey model we maximized the utility U = u[c(t)]e nt e t dt. Now
PERMANENT INCOME AND OPTIMAL CONSUMPTION On the previous notes we saw how permanent income hypothesis can solve the Consumption Puzzle. Now we use this hypothesis, together with assumption of rational
More informationThe marginal propensity to consume and multidimensional risk
The marginal propensity to consume and multidimensional risk Elyès Jouini, Clotilde Napp, Diego Nocetti To cite this version: Elyès Jouini, Clotilde Napp, Diego Nocetti. The marginal propensity to consume
More information13 Endogeneity and Nonparametric IV
13 Endogeneity and Nonparametric IV 13.1 Nonparametric Endogeneity A nonparametric IV equation is Y i = g (X i ) + e i (1) E (e i j i ) = 0 In this model, some elements of X i are potentially endogenous,
More informationThe Forward Premium is Still a Puzzle Appendix
The Forward Premium is Still a Puzzle Appendix Craig Burnside June 211 Duke University and NBER. 1 Results Alluded to in the Main Text 1.1 First-Pass Estimates o Betas Table 1 provides rst-pass estimates
More informationUsing OLS to Estimate and Test for Structural Changes in Models with Endogenous Regressors
Using OLS to Estimate and Test for Structural Changes in Models with Endogenous Regressors Pierre Perron y Boston University Yohei Yamamoto z Hitotsubashi University August 22, 2011; Revised November 16,
More informationEmpirical Asset Pricing and Statistical Power in the Presence of Weak Risk Factors
Empirical Asset Pricing and Statistical Power in the Presence of Weak Risk Factors Craig Burnside y Duke University August 27 Abstract The risk factors in many consumption-based asset pricing models display
More informationThe Basic New Keynesian Model. Jordi Galí. June 2008
The Basic New Keynesian Model by Jordi Galí June 28 Motivation and Outline Evidence on Money, Output, and Prices: Short Run E ects of Monetary Policy Shocks (i) persistent e ects on real variables (ii)
More informationAn estimate of the long-run covariance matrix, Ω, is necessary to calculate asymptotic
Chapter 6 ESTIMATION OF THE LONG-RUN COVARIANCE MATRIX An estimate of the long-run covariance matrix, Ω, is necessary to calculate asymptotic standard errors for the OLS and linear IV estimators presented
More informationExercises Chapter 4 Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Exercises Chapter 4 Statistical Hypothesis Testing Advanced Econometrics - HEC Lausanne Christophe Hurlin University of Orléans December 5, 013 Christophe Hurlin (University of Orléans) Advanced Econometrics
More informationProblem set 1 - Solutions
EMPIRICAL FINANCE AND FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS - MODULE (8448) Problem set 1 - Solutions Exercise 1 -Solutions 1. The correct answer is (a). In fact, the process generating daily prices is usually assumed
More informationEstimation and Inference with Weak, Semi-strong, and Strong Identi cation
Estimation and Inference with Weak, Semi-strong, and Strong Identi cation Donald W. K. Andrews Cowles Foundation Yale University Xu Cheng Department of Economics University of Pennsylvania This Version:
More informationRoss (1976) introduced the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) as an alternative to the CAPM.
4.2 Arbitrage Pricing Model, APM Empirical evidence indicates that the CAPM beta does not completely explain the cross section of expected asset returns. This suggests that additional factors may be required.
More informationSolving Extensive Form Games
Chapter 8 Solving Extensive Form Games 8.1 The Extensive Form of a Game The extensive form of a game contains the following information: (1) the set of players (2) the order of moves (that is, who moves
More informationLecture 9: The monetary theory of the exchange rate
Lecture 9: The monetary theory of the exchange rate Open Economy Macroeconomics, Fall 2006 Ida Wolden Bache October 24, 2006 Macroeconomic models of exchange rate determination Useful reference: Chapter
More informationECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401) Victor Aguirregabiria. Spring 2018 TOPIC 4: INTRODUCTION TO THE EVALUATION OF TREATMENT EFFECTS
ECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401) Victor Aguirregabiria Spring 2018 TOPIC 4: INTRODUCTION TO THE EVALUATION OF TREATMENT EFFECTS 1. Introduction and Notation 2. Randomized treatment 3. Conditional independence
More informationLecture 3, November 30: The Basic New Keynesian Model (Galí, Chapter 3)
MakØk3, Fall 2 (blok 2) Business cycles and monetary stabilization policies Henrik Jensen Department of Economics University of Copenhagen Lecture 3, November 3: The Basic New Keynesian Model (Galí, Chapter
More informationECONOMET RICS P RELIM EXAM August 19, 2014 Department of Economics, Michigan State University
ECONOMET RICS P RELIM EXAM August 19, 2014 Department of Economics, Michigan State University Instructions: Answer all ve (5) questions. Be sure to show your work or provide su cient justi cation for your
More informationDiscriminating between (in)valid external instruments and (in)valid exclusion restrictions
Discussion Paper: 05/04 Discriminating between (in)valid external instruments and (in)valid exclusion restrictions Jan F. Kiviet www.ase.uva.nl/uva-econometrics Amsterdam School of Economics Roetersstraat
More informationFöreläsning /31
1/31 Föreläsning 10 090420 Chapter 13 Econometric Modeling: Model Speci cation and Diagnostic testing 2/31 Types of speci cation errors Consider the following models: Y i = β 1 + β 2 X i + β 3 X 2 i +
More informationOn Standard Inference for GMM with Seeming Local Identi cation Failure
On Standard Inference for GMM with Seeming Local Identi cation Failure Ji Hyung Lee y Zhipeng Liao z First Version: April 4; This Version: December, 4 Abstract This paper studies the GMM estimation and
More information4.8 Instrumental Variables
4.8. INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES 35 4.8 Instrumental Variables A major complication that is emphasized in microeconometrics is the possibility of inconsistent parameter estimation due to endogenous regressors.
More informationAppendix for "O shoring in a Ricardian World"
Appendix for "O shoring in a Ricardian World" This Appendix presents the proofs of Propositions - 6 and the derivations of the results in Section IV. Proof of Proposition We want to show that Tm L m T
More informationSIMILAR-ON-THE-BOUNDARY TESTS FOR MOMENT INEQUALITIES EXIST, BUT HAVE POOR POWER. Donald W. K. Andrews. August 2011 Revised March 2012
SIMILAR-ON-THE-BOUNDARY TESTS FOR MOMENT INEQUALITIES EXIST, BUT HAVE POOR POWER By Donald W. K. Andrews August 2011 Revised March 2012 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 1815R COWLES FOUNDATION FOR
More informationRobust Con dence Intervals in Nonlinear Regression under Weak Identi cation
Robust Con dence Intervals in Nonlinear Regression under Weak Identi cation Xu Cheng y Department of Economics Yale University First Draft: August, 27 This Version: December 28 Abstract In this paper,
More informationInflation Dynamics in the Euro Area Jensen, Henrik
university of copenhagen Inflation Dynamics in the Euro Area Jensen, Henrik Publication date: 2010 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA):
More informationModels, Testing, and Correction of Heteroskedasticity. James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley
Models, Testing, and Correction of Heteroskedasticity James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley Aitken s GLS and Weighted LS The Generalized Classical Regression Model
More informationAppendix II Testing for consistency
Appendix II Testing for consistency I. Afriat s (1967) Theorem Let (p i ; x i ) 25 i=1 be the data generated by some individual s choices, where pi denotes the i-th observation of the price vector and
More informationThe Hansen Singleton analysis
The Hansen Singleton analysis November 15, 2018 1 Estimation of macroeconomic rational expectations model. The Hansen Singleton (1982) paper. We start by looking at the application of GMM that first showed
More informationLearning in Real Time: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the Term Structure of Survey Forecasts
Learning in Real Time: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the Term Structure of Survey Forecasts Andrew Patton and Allan Timmermann Oxford and UC-San Diego November 2007 Motivation Uncertainty about macroeconomic
More informationEconomics Discussion Paper Series EDP Measuring monetary policy deviations from the Taylor rule
Economics Discussion Paper Series EDP-1803 Measuring monetary policy deviations from the Taylor rule João Madeira Nuno Palma February 2018 Economics School of Social Sciences The University of Manchester
More informationOn the Power of Tests for Regime Switching
On the Power of Tests for Regime Switching joint work with Drew Carter and Ben Hansen Douglas G. Steigerwald UC Santa Barbara May 2015 D. Steigerwald (UCSB) Regime Switching May 2015 1 / 42 Motivating
More informationAn Extended Macro-Finance Model with Financial Factors: Technical Appendix
An Extended Macro-Finance Model with Financial Factors: Technical Appendix June 1, 010 Abstract This technical appendix provides some more technical comments concerning the EMF model, used in the paper
More informationA New Approach to Robust Inference in Cointegration
A New Approach to Robust Inference in Cointegration Sainan Jin Guanghua School of Management, Peking University Peter C. B. Phillips Cowles Foundation, Yale University, University of Auckland & University
More information1 The Multiple Regression Model: Freeing Up the Classical Assumptions
1 The Multiple Regression Model: Freeing Up the Classical Assumptions Some or all of classical assumptions were crucial for many of the derivations of the previous chapters. Derivation of the OLS estimator
More informationInference about Clustering and Parametric. Assumptions in Covariance Matrix Estimation
Inference about Clustering and Parametric Assumptions in Covariance Matrix Estimation Mikko Packalen y Tony Wirjanto z 26 November 2010 Abstract Selecting an estimator for the variance covariance matrix
More informationLecture 6, January 7 and 15: Sticky Wages and Prices (Galí, Chapter 6)
MakØk3, Fall 2012/2013 (Blok 2) Business cycles and monetary stabilization policies Henrik Jensen Department of Economics University of Copenhagen Lecture 6, January 7 and 15: Sticky Wages and Prices (Galí,
More informationBirkbeck Economics MSc Economics, PGCert Econometrics MSc Financial Economics Autumn 2009 ECONOMETRICS Ron Smith :
Birkbeck Economics MSc Economics, PGCert Econometrics MSc Financial Economics Autumn 2009 ECONOMETRICS Ron Smith : R.Smith@bbk.ac.uk Contents 1. Background 2. Exercises 3. Advice on Econometric projects
More informationRecent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using Micro-Level Data
Recent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using Micro-Level Data July 2012 Bangkok, Thailand Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 Content a) Endogeneity b) Instrumental
More informationVolume 30, Issue 1. Measuring the Intertemporal Elasticity of Substitution for Consumption: Some Evidence from Japan
Volume 30, Issue 1 Measuring the Intertemporal Elasticity of Substitution for Consumption: Some Evidence from Japan Akihiko Noda Graduate School of Business and Commerce, Keio University Shunsuke Sugiyama
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics Fall Lecture Note 1 Choice-Based Approach: Price e ects, Wealth e ects and the WARP
Prof. Olivier Bochet Room A.34 Phone 3 63 476 E-mail olivier.bochet@vwi.unibe.ch Webpage http//sta.vwi.unibe.ch/bochet Advanced Microeconomics Fall 2 Lecture Note Choice-Based Approach Price e ects, Wealth
More informationGMM based inference for panel data models
GMM based inference for panel data models Maurice J.G. Bun and Frank Kleibergen y this version: 24 February 2010 JEL-code: C13; C23 Keywords: dynamic panel data model, Generalized Method of Moments, weak
More informationLECTURE 10: NEYMAN-PEARSON LEMMA AND ASYMPTOTIC TESTING. The last equality is provided so this can look like a more familiar parametric test.
Economics 52 Econometrics Professor N.M. Kiefer LECTURE 1: NEYMAN-PEARSON LEMMA AND ASYMPTOTIC TESTING NEYMAN-PEARSON LEMMA: Lesson: Good tests are based on the likelihood ratio. The proof is easy in the
More informationCapital Structure and Investment Dynamics with Fire Sales
Capital Structure and Investment Dynamics with Fire Sales Douglas Gale Piero Gottardi NYU April 23, 2013 Douglas Gale, Piero Gottardi (NYU) Capital Structure April 23, 2013 1 / 55 Introduction Corporate
More information