Comparing Change Scores with Lagged Dependent Variables in Models of the Effects of Parents Actions to Modify Children's Problem Behavior
|
|
- Brice Gilbert
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Comparing Change Scores with Lagged Dependent Variables in Models of the Effects of Parents Actions to Modify Children's Problem Behavior David R. Johnson Department of Sociology and Haskell Sie Department of Educational Psychology & Department of Statistics The Pennsylvania State University May 22, 2013
2 The Problem Use of non-experimental two-wave panel (prospective) data to estimate the effects of parental behavior control strategies on the trajectory of child problem behavior. Two approaches have been used The Lagged Dependent Variable (LDV) method, also referred to as the residualized gain score method. The Change Score (SC) or the simple gain score method. In empirical studies, these often give different and often contradictory findings (Larzelere et. al, 2010). The purpose of this study is to examine some of the assumptions of these models and test them in simulated data where the true effect is know.
3 This is an extension of a comparison of twowave LDV and CS approaches in family research (Johnson, 2005) The focus here is on the two-wave case, although extension to multiple waves of both approaches is straightforward and will be briefly discussed.
4 The Substantive Model How do parent s practices of controlling rule violation and problem behavior by their child affect change in the child s observed problem behavior over time? Assume an observational or non-randomized experimental study rather than a randomized experiment. For example, assessing a measure of child problem behavior at two points of time and also assessing parental reports on their child control practices either at time 1, between 1 and 2, or at time 2.
5 Two-wave panel data: Assumptions Measurements are obtained at two time points. Y 1 : the child's problem behavior score at time 1 Y 2 : the child's problem behavior score at time 2 Both Y 1 and Y 2 are influenced by the same stable (non-time varying) variable Y (the child's disposition for problem behaviors). X is a parental intervention or control method: zero at time 1 and one at time 2 if intervention occurs somewhere between the two time points. X can also be specified a stable measure of parental control behavior consistent across time periods measured as a continuous variable or a binary variable. X can also be specified as a time-varying measure of parental control behavior that is measured at time 1 and time 2. S is a time-invariant variable measuring stable traits and background influences of both the parent and the child.
6 LDV and CS models Lagged Dependent Variable (LDV) method, also known as the residualized gain score or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method. Without any time-varying independent variables, the model is given by Y 2 = α + βx + γs + δy 1 + ε Change Score (CS) method, also commonly referred to as the simple gain score method. From Y 2 = α 2 + βx + γs + ε 2, and Y 1 = α 1 + γs + ε 1, we have Y 2 -Y 1 = α + βx + ε, where α = α 2 - α 1 and ε = ε 2 - ε 1.
7 Alternative Specifications of the CS model. The CS model can also be parameterized as a fixed effect pooled time-series model (Allison, 2009). Each wave is a separate record in the dataset linked by an ID (long vs. wide format). Y t = βx t + λt + α + ε, where t is the wave, X is a time-varying treatment, T is 0 for wave 1 and 1 for wave2, α is fixed effect for each individual in the dataset, and ε is a within-individual error term. Only time-varying variables can be included in the model. All variables are expressed as a deviation from their mean across waves.
8 Alternative Specifications of the CS model. When X is an intervention between w1 and w2 then X is time varying. If X is a measure of parenting practice assessed at both time periods then is also time varying. If X is a stable measure of parental practice measured only at time 1 (or earlier) then it is not time-varying. However, it can still be included in the fixed-effects model when interacted with time T. Estimates are the same as the CS in two-wave models.
9 LDV versus CS Both control Y 1 while examining the relationship between X and Y 2 in an attempt to estimate the causal effect of X on Y (Allison, 1990) important if X is not randomly assigned. The LDV method treats Y 2 as the dependent variable, regressed on X, S and Y 1 as independent variables. The CS method treats Y 2 -Y 1 as the dependent variable, regressed only on X. The LDV method has traditionally been considered superior to the CS method because: Y 2 -Y 1 tends to have a lower reliability than Y 1 or Y 2 itself, and a correlation between X and Y 1 will lead to a spurious negative relationship between X and Y 2 -Y 1 due to regression to the mean (Allison, 1990). The CS method is more advantageous in terms of: controlling for all time-invariant variables whether measured or unmeasured, as long as their effects are invariant over time, and allowing Y 1 to have measurement error
10 LDV versus CS Analyses of the same data using the two methods often lead to different conclusions. The two methods test different null hypotheses The LDV model is preferable over the CS model if Y 1 has a causal effect on Y 2 or if X is influenced by period-specific components of Y 1 (Allison, 1990). The LDV method is inappropriate to use when X (e.g., parental control) is not randomized and large differences on Y 1 scores exist between groups with different values of X. Also will be biased when measurement error is present in Y 1.
11 Simulation Study: Method Measurement errors: no measurement error, measurement errors on all four variables Y 1, Y 2, X, S. Time effect on the child's problem behavior at time 2: no effect and a moderate effect of 0.3. Parental intervention effect on the child's problem behavior: a positive effect of 0.5, a negative effect of -0.5, and no effect. A causal effect of the child's behavior at time 1 on his/her behavior at time 2: no effect and a positive effect of 0.4. Factors affecting the parental intervention: no factor affecting X, only S, only Y, only Y 1, both S and Y, both S and Y 1. Models compared: LDV model without control of S, LDV model with control of S, CS model.
12 Simulation Study: Method To generate the variable X that represents parental intervention, a continuous variable X c was first generated. Then define X=1 if X c > 0.67 and 0 otherwise. In models with measurement errors, the variables Y 1, Y 2, X c, S are substituted by y 1 =Y r 1, y 2 =Y r 2, x c =X c +0.5r 3, and s=s+0.7r 4, respectively, where r 1, r 2, r 3, and r 4 are standard normal random variates. 100 replications were generated with 2,000 subjects within each replication.
13 Model 1: X is random S = Stable Personality background factors: Y = Stable propensity for problem behavior; X = Parental Control; T = Developmental (time) effect; Y 1, Y 2 = problem behavior in waves 1 and 2 S Y T s Y 1 Y 2 X y 1 y 2 x
14 Model 2: Causal Effect from S to X S = Stable Personality background factors: Y = Stable propensity for problem behavior; X = Parental Control; T = Developmental (time) effect; Y 1, Y 2 = problem behavior in waves 1 and 2 S Y T s Y 1 Y 2 X y 1 y 2 x
15 Model 3: Causal Effect from Y to X S = Stable Personality background factors: Y = Stable propensity for problem behavior; X = Parental Control; T = Developmental (time) effect; Y 1, Y 2 = problem behavior in waves 1 and 2 S Y T s Y 1 Y 2 X y 1 y 2 x
16 Model 4: Causal Effect from Y 1 to X S = Stable Personality background factors: Y = Stable propensity for problem behavior; X = Parental Control; T = Developmental (time) effect; Y 1, Y 2 = problem behavior in waves 1 and 2 S Y T s Y 1 Y 2 X y 1 y 2 x
17 Model 5: Causal Effects from both S and Y to X S = Stable Personality background factors: Y = Stable propensity for problem behavior; X = Parental Control; T = Developmental (time) effect; Y 1, Y 2 = problem behavior in waves 1 and 2 S Y T s Y 1 Y 2 X y 1 y 2 x
18 Model 6: Causal Effects from S and Y 1 to X S = Stable Personality background factors: Y = Stable propensity for problem behavior; X = Parental Control; T = Developmental (time) effect; Y 1, Y 2 = problem behavior in waves 1 and 2 S Y T s Y 1 Y 2 X y 1 y 2 x
19 Models 7-12: Causal Effect from Y 1 to Y 2 added to Models 1-6 S = Stable Personality background factors: Y = Stable propensity for problem behavior; X = Parental Control; T = Developmental (time) effect; Y 1, Y 2 = problem behavior in waves 1 and 2 S Y T s Y 1 Y 2 X y 1 y 2 x
20 Simulation Study: Assessment Criteria In each model, the regression coefficient estimate representing the effect of parental intervention X was evaluated against its true effect on Y 2 using and Bias β = r=1 β r β MSE β = 1 β 100 r β 2 r=1 Also compared was the proportion of models where the regression coefficient estimate was significant in the direction of the true effect. Will focus here only on the Bias. MSE and proportion significant available on handout for all models. 100
21 Descriptive Information The only pieces of information available in the estimation models without measurement error are Y 1, Y 2, X and S. When measurement error was assumed, then y 1, y 2, x and s were available. The means of the Y variables at each wave when X = 0 and X = 1 serve as an indicator of the pattern generated by the simulation. Will only present situations where the effect of T is 0. (estimate of effect of X does not vary by different values of T)
22 0.1 Means of Y at Wave 1 and 2 for Model 1 (X is Random) Model 1 X=0 Model 1 X= W1 W2
23 1 Comparison of Means of Y at Waves 1 and 2 for Model 3 (Y -> X) and Model 4 (Y1 -> X) Model 3 X=0 Model 3 X=1 Model 4 X=0 Model 4 X= W1 W2
24 0.8 Models 3 (Y -> X) & 4 (y1 -> X) with Measurement Error Model 3 X=0 Model 3 X=1 Model 4 X=0 Model 4 X= W1 W2
25 Summary of the Simulation Results Full simulation results available on handout. Present results for an effect of X of -.5. Assumes that parental control reduces problem behavior. Present models with no measurement error and with measurement error in all variables. Also exam some models where X is assumed to have no effect (X = 0) to assess whether either model is likely to yield an effect when none is present.
26 Bias in Estimated of X (-.5) when no Measurement Error is Present M1: X random M2: S -> X M3: Y -> X M4: Y1 -> X M5: Y, S -> X M6: Y1, S -> X M7: X random; Y1 -> Y2 M8: S -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M9: Y -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M10: Y1 -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M11: Y, S -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M12: Y1, S -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 CS LDV
27 Bias in Effect of X with Measurement Error when the True Effect of X is negative (-.5) M1: X random M2: S -> X M3: Y -> X M4: Y1 -> X M5: Y, S -> X M6: Y1, S -> X M7: X random; Y1 -> Y2 M8: S -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M9: Y -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M10: Y1 -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M11: Y, S -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M12: Y1, S -> X ; Y1 -> Y CS LDV
28 M1: X random M2: S -> X M3: Y -> X M4: Y1 -> X M5: Y, S -> X M6: Y1, S -> X M7: X random; Y1 -> Y2 M8: S -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M9: Y -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M10: Y1 -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M11: Y, S -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 M12: Y1, S -> X ; Y1 -> Y2 Bias in Effect of X when the True Effect of X is 0. Measurement Error in Y1, Y2, S, & X CS LDV
29 Major findings Whether Y or Y 1 has a causal effect on X makes a substantial difference in the estimates of the CS and LDV models. When Y 1 has a causal effect on X, CS overestimates the negative effect and LDV is unbiased. When Y has a causal effect on X, LDV underestimates the effect and CS is unbiased. When measurement error is present, the CS method outperforms the LDV method overall. When Y 1 has a causal effect on Y 2, The LDV method is less biased except when measurement error is present.
30 Implications for choice of an analysis model. How and when the parental control method is measured is critical for choice of methods. If measured shortly after an episode of child problem behavior then there is likely to be a causal effect of that episode on the parental report, favoring the LDV method. If parental control methods tend to be stable, reflecting in generally the propensity of the child to problem behavior, then the CS method is likely to be preferred. If measurement error is expected to be present then CS would be preferred, or a method such as multiple indicators in SEM need to be used to adjust for measurement error. Computing both models is not of much help in deciding on which is more appropriate. Even if there is no effect, both models would under certain conditions show significant effects of the parental control.
31 Alternative Approaches? The economists Heckman and Robb (1985) examined models for a similar situation: the effect of training programs on earnings. They concluded that panel models involved many assumptions that were likely to be violated yielding biased estimates. However, methods based upon repeated cross-sections also involved assumptions but these were more reasonable and had less serious impact on the estimates. Two waves is likely not enough to deal with the complexities. LDV models can readily extent to multiple waves. CS within the fixed effects framework also permits multiple waves. With additional waves and multiple indicators of main variables allows more degrees of freedom to identify more of the model assumptions. Recent work has integrated the fixed effects approach with SEM models, including Latent Growth Curve models (Bollen & Brand, 2010 ; Teachman, 2012).
32 Thank You Contact Information: David R. Johnson Haskell Sie
33 References Allison, P. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Los Angeles: Sage. Bollen, K. A., & Brand, J. E. (2010). A general panel model with random and fixed effects: A structural equations approach. Social Forces. 89: Cribbie, R. A., & Jamieson, J. (2004). Decreases in posttest variance and the measurement of change. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 9, Heckman, J. J., & Robb, R. (1985). Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions: An overview. Journal of Econometrics. 30: Johnson, D R. (1995). "Alternative methods for the quantitative analysis of panel data in family research: Pooled time-series models," Journal of Marriage and the Family. 57: Johnson, D. R. (2005). Two-wave panel analysis: Comparing statistical methods for studying the effects of transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, Larzelere, R. E., Ferrer, E., Kuhn, B. R., & Danelia, K. (2010). Differences in causal estimates from longitudinal analyses of residualized versus simple gain scores: Contrasting controls for selection and regression artifacts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34, Teachman, J. (2012). Latent growth curve models with random and fixed effects. Paper presented at the 20 th Annual Symposium on Family Issues, Pennsylvania State Univeristy.
Plausible Values for Latent Variables Using Mplus
Plausible Values for Latent Variables Using Mplus Tihomir Asparouhov and Bengt Muthén August 21, 2010 1 1 Introduction Plausible values are imputed values for latent variables. All latent variables can
More informationCausal Inference Lecture Notes: Causal Inference with Repeated Measures in Observational Studies
Causal Inference Lecture Notes: Causal Inference with Repeated Measures in Observational Studies Kosuke Imai Department of Politics Princeton University November 13, 2013 So far, we have essentially assumed
More informationGeoffrey T. Wodtke. University of Toronto. Daniel Almirall. University of Michigan. Population Studies Center Research Report July 2015
Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effects with Time-Varying Treatments and Time-Varying Effect Moderators: Structural Nested Mean Models and Regression-with-Residuals Geoffrey T. Wodtke University of Toronto
More informationChapter 5. Introduction to Path Analysis. Overview. Correlation and causation. Specification of path models. Types of path models
Chapter 5 Introduction to Path Analysis Put simply, the basic dilemma in all sciences is that of how much to oversimplify reality. Overview H. M. Blalock Correlation and causation Specification of path
More informationAnalysis of Panel Data: Introduction and Causal Inference with Panel Data
Analysis of Panel Data: Introduction and Causal Inference with Panel Data Session 1: 15 June 2015 Steven Finkel, PhD Daniel Wallace Professor of Political Science University of Pittsburgh USA Course presents
More informationPanel Data. March 2, () Applied Economoetrics: Topic 6 March 2, / 43
Panel Data March 2, 212 () Applied Economoetrics: Topic March 2, 212 1 / 43 Overview Many economic applications involve panel data. Panel data has both cross-sectional and time series aspects. Regression
More informationSTOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY Department of Economics Course name: Empirical Methods Course code: EC40 Examiner: Lena Nekby Number of credits: 7,5 credits Date of exam: Saturday, May 9, 008 Examination time: 3
More informationThree-Level Modeling for Factorial Experiments With Experimentally Induced Clustering
Three-Level Modeling for Factorial Experiments With Experimentally Induced Clustering John J. Dziak The Pennsylvania State University Inbal Nahum-Shani The University of Michigan Copyright 016, Penn State.
More informationBasic Linear Model. Chapters 4 and 4: Part II. Basic Linear Model
Basic Linear Model Chapters 4 and 4: Part II Statistical Properties of Least Square Estimates Y i = α+βx i + ε I Want to chooses estimates for α and β that best fit the data Objective minimize the sum
More informationIntroduction to Regression Analysis. Dr. Devlina Chatterjee 11 th August, 2017
Introduction to Regression Analysis Dr. Devlina Chatterjee 11 th August, 2017 What is regression analysis? Regression analysis is a statistical technique for studying linear relationships. One dependent
More informationPsychological Methods
Psychological Methods A Cautionary Note on Modeling Growth Trends in Longitudinal Data Goran Kuljanin, Michael T. Braun, and Richard P. DeShon Online First Publication, April 5, 011. doi: 10.1037/a003348
More informationAN INVESTIGATION OF THE ALIGNMENT METHOD FOR DETECTING MEASUREMENT NON- INVARIANCE ACROSS MANY GROUPS WITH DICHOTOMOUS INDICATORS
1 AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ALIGNMENT METHOD FOR DETECTING MEASUREMENT NON- INVARIANCE ACROSS MANY GROUPS WITH DICHOTOMOUS INDICATORS Jessica Flake, Erin Strauts, Betsy McCoach, Jane Rogers, Megan Welsh
More informationUNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID ECONOMETRICS Academic year 2009/10 FINAL EXAM (2nd Call) June, 25, 2010
UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID ECONOMETRICS Academic year 2009/10 FINAL EXAM (2nd Call) June, 25, 2010 Very important: Take into account that: 1. Each question, unless otherwise stated, requires a complete
More informationChapter 8 Handout: Interval Estimates and Hypothesis Testing
Chapter 8 Handout: Interval Estimates and Hypothesis esting Preview Clint s Assignment: aking Stock General Properties of the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) Estimation Procedure Estimate Reliability: Interval
More informationA Non-parametric bootstrap for multilevel models
A Non-parametric bootstrap for multilevel models By James Carpenter London School of Hygiene and ropical Medicine Harvey Goldstein and Jon asbash Institute of Education 1. Introduction Bootstrapping is
More informationCategorical Predictor Variables
Categorical Predictor Variables We often wish to use categorical (or qualitative) variables as covariates in a regression model. For binary variables (taking on only 2 values, e.g. sex), it is relatively
More informationApplied Econometrics Lecture 1
Lecture 1 1 1 Università di Urbino Università di Urbino PhD Programme in Global Studies Spring 2018 Outline of this module Beyond OLS (very brief sketch) Regression and causality: sources of endogeneity
More informationLongitudinal Data Analysis Using SAS Paul D. Allison, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: October 13-14, 2017, Boston, Massachusetts
Longitudinal Data Analysis Using SAS Paul D. Allison, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: October 13-14, 217, Boston, Massachusetts Outline 1. Opportunities and challenges of panel data. a. Data requirements b. Control
More informationSpecifying Latent Curve and Other Growth Models Using Mplus. (Revised )
Ronald H. Heck 1 University of Hawai i at Mānoa Handout #20 Specifying Latent Curve and Other Growth Models Using Mplus (Revised 12-1-2014) The SEM approach offers a contrasting framework for use in analyzing
More informationStructural equation modeling
Structural equation modeling Rex B Kline Concordia University Montréal ISTQL Set B B1 Data, path models Data o N o Form o Screening B2 B3 Sample size o N needed: Complexity Estimation method Distributions
More informationRelated Concepts: Lecture 9 SEM, Statistical Modeling, AI, and Data Mining. I. Terminology of SEM
Lecture 9 SEM, Statistical Modeling, AI, and Data Mining I. Terminology of SEM Related Concepts: Causal Modeling Path Analysis Structural Equation Modeling Latent variables (Factors measurable, but thru
More informationDifference scores or statistical control? What should I use to predict change over two time points? Jason T. Newsom
Difference scores or statistical control? What should I use to predict change over two time points? Jason T. Newsom Overview Purpose is to introduce a few basic concepts that may help guide researchers
More informationMS&E 226: Small Data
MS&E 226: Small Data Lecture 6: Model complexity scores (v3) Ramesh Johari ramesh.johari@stanford.edu Fall 2015 1 / 34 Estimating prediction error 2 / 34 Estimating prediction error We saw how we can estimate
More informationTHE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY. Second Semester Final Examination November, Econometrics II: Econometric Modelling (EMET 2008/6008)
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Second Semester Final Examination November, 2014 Econometrics II: Econometric Modelling (EMET 2008/6008) Reading Time: 5 Minutes Writing Time: 90 Minutes Permitted Materials:
More informationChapter 1 Introduction. What are longitudinal and panel data? Benefits and drawbacks of longitudinal data Longitudinal data models Historical notes
Chapter 1 Introduction What are longitudinal and panel data? Benefits and drawbacks of longitudinal data Longitudinal data models Historical notes 1.1 What are longitudinal and panel data? With regression
More informationWorkshop on Statistical Applications in Meta-Analysis
Workshop on Statistical Applications in Meta-Analysis Robert M. Bernard & Phil C. Abrami Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance and CanKnow Concordia University May 16, 2007 Two Main Purposes
More informationLeast Squares Estimation of a Panel Data Model with Multifactor Error Structure and Endogenous Covariates
Least Squares Estimation of a Panel Data Model with Multifactor Error Structure and Endogenous Covariates Matthew Harding and Carlos Lamarche January 12, 2011 Abstract We propose a method for estimating
More informationNew Developments in Econometrics Lecture 11: Difference-in-Differences Estimation
New Developments in Econometrics Lecture 11: Difference-in-Differences Estimation Jeff Wooldridge Cemmap Lectures, UCL, June 2009 1. The Basic Methodology 2. How Should We View Uncertainty in DD Settings?
More informationAn Empirical Comparison of Multiple Imputation Approaches for Treating Missing Data in Observational Studies
Paper 177-2015 An Empirical Comparison of Multiple Imputation Approaches for Treating Missing Data in Observational Studies Yan Wang, Seang-Hwane Joo, Patricia Rodríguez de Gil, Jeffrey D. Kromrey, Rheta
More informationLongitudinal Data Analysis. RatSWD Nachwuchsworkshop Vorlesung von Josef Brüderl 25. August, 2009
Longitudinal Data Analysis RatSWD Nachwuchsworkshop Vorlesung von Josef Brüderl 25. August, 2009 Longitudinal Data Analysis Traditional definition Statistical methods for analyzing data with a time dimension
More informationWU Weiterbildung. Linear Mixed Models
Linear Mixed Effects Models WU Weiterbildung SLIDE 1 Outline 1 Estimation: ML vs. REML 2 Special Models On Two Levels Mixed ANOVA Or Random ANOVA Random Intercept Model Random Coefficients Model Intercept-and-Slopes-as-Outcomes
More informationFour Parameters of Interest in the Evaluation. of Social Programs. James J. Heckman Justin L. Tobias Edward Vytlacil
Four Parameters of Interest in the Evaluation of Social Programs James J. Heckman Justin L. Tobias Edward Vytlacil Nueld College, Oxford, August, 2005 1 1 Introduction This paper uses a latent variable
More informationEMERGING MARKETS - Lecture 2: Methodology refresher
EMERGING MARKETS - Lecture 2: Methodology refresher Maria Perrotta April 4, 2013 SITE http://www.hhs.se/site/pages/default.aspx My contact: maria.perrotta@hhs.se Aim of this class There are many different
More informationTechnical and Practical Considerations in applying Value Added Models to estimate teacher effects
Technical and Practical Considerations in applying Value Added Models to estimate teacher effects Pete Goldschmidt, Ph.D. Educational Psychology and Counseling, Development Learning and Instruction Purpose
More informationControlling for latent confounding by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) Blinded Blinded
Controlling for latent confounding by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) Blinded Blinded 1 Background Latent confounder is common in social and behavioral science in which most of cases the selection mechanism
More informationExam D0M61A Advanced econometrics
Exam D0M61A Advanced econometrics 19 January 2009, 9 12am Question 1 (5 pts.) Consider the wage function w i = β 0 + β 1 S i + β 2 E i + β 0 3h i + ε i, where w i is the log-wage of individual i, S i is
More informationØkonomisk Kandidateksamen 2004 (I) Econometrics 2. Rettevejledning
Økonomisk Kandidateksamen 2004 (I) Econometrics 2 Rettevejledning This is a closed-book exam (uden hjælpemidler). Answer all questions! The group of questions 1 to 4 have equal weight. Within each group,
More informationAdvising on Research Methods: A consultant's companion. Herman J. Ader Gideon J. Mellenbergh with contributions by David J. Hand
Advising on Research Methods: A consultant's companion Herman J. Ader Gideon J. Mellenbergh with contributions by David J. Hand Contents Preface 13 I Preliminaries 19 1 Giving advice on research methods
More informationComments on The Role of Large Scale Assessments in Research on Educational Effectiveness and School Development by Eckhard Klieme, Ph.D.
Comments on The Role of Large Scale Assessments in Research on Educational Effectiveness and School Development by Eckhard Klieme, Ph.D. David Kaplan Department of Educational Psychology The General Theme
More informationAN EVALUATION OF PARAMETRIC AND NONPARAMETRIC VARIANCE ESTIMATORS IN COMPLETELY RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS. Stanley A. Lubanski. and. Peter M.
AN EVALUATION OF PARAMETRIC AND NONPARAMETRIC VARIANCE ESTIMATORS IN COMPLETELY RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS by Stanley A. Lubanski and Peter M. Steiner UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 018 Background To make
More informationRunning Head: Effect Heterogeneity with Time-varying Treatments and Moderators ESTIMATING HETEROGENEOUS CAUSAL EFFECTS WITH TIME-VARYING
Running Head: Effect Heterogeneity with Time-varying Treatments and Moderators ESTIMATING HETEROGENEOUS CAUSAL EFFECTS WITH TIME-VARYING TREATMENTS AND TIME-VARYING EFFECT MODERATORS: STRUCTURAL NESTED
More informationAuxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Using the BCH Method in Mplus to Estimate a Distal Outcome Model and an Arbitrary Secondary Model
Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Using the BCH Method in Mplus to Estimate a Distal Outcome Model and an Arbitrary Secondary Model Tihomir Asparouhov and Bengt Muthén Mplus Web Notes: No. 21 Version
More informationAn Introduction to Causal Mediation Analysis. Xu Qin University of Chicago Presented at the Central Iowa R User Group Meetup Aug 10, 2016
An Introduction to Causal Mediation Analysis Xu Qin University of Chicago Presented at the Central Iowa R User Group Meetup Aug 10, 2016 1 Causality In the applications of statistics, many central questions
More informationLongitudinal Data Analysis Using Stata Paul D. Allison, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: May 18-19, 2017, Chicago, Illinois
Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Stata Paul D. Allison, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: May 18-19, 217, Chicago, Illinois Outline 1. Opportunities and challenges of panel data. a. Data requirements b. Control
More informationEconomics 308: Econometrics Professor Moody
Economics 308: Econometrics Professor Moody References on reserve: Text Moody, Basic Econometrics with Stata (BES) Pindyck and Rubinfeld, Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (PR) Wooldridge, Jeffrey
More informationA Course in Applied Econometrics. Lecture 2 Outline. Estimation of Average Treatment Effects. Under Unconfoundedness, Part II
A Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture Outline Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Unconfoundedness, Part II. Assessing Unconfoundedness (not testable). Overlap. Illustration based on Lalonde
More informationOn The Comparison of Two Methods of Analyzing Panel Data Using Simulated Data
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Volume 11 Issue 7 Version 1.0 October 2011 Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA) Online ISSN
More informationComposite Causal Effects for. Time-Varying Treatments and Time-Varying Outcomes
Composite Causal Effects for Time-Varying Treatments and Time-Varying Outcomes Jennie E. Brand University of Michigan Yu Xie University of Michigan May 2006 Population Studies Center Research Report 06-601
More informationLINKING IN DEVELOPMENTAL SCALES. Michelle M. Langer. Chapel Hill 2006
LINKING IN DEVELOPMENTAL SCALES Michelle M. Langer A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master
More informationHow well do Fit Indices Distinguish Between the Two?
MODELS OF VARIABILITY VS. MODELS OF TRAIT CHANGE How well do Fit Indices Distinguish Between the Two? M Conference University of Connecticut, May 2-22, 2 bkeller2@asu.edu INTRODUCTION More and more researchers
More informationPrinciples Underlying Evaluation Estimators
The Principles Underlying Evaluation Estimators James J. University of Chicago Econ 350, Winter 2019 The Basic Principles Underlying the Identification of the Main Econometric Evaluation Estimators Two
More informationFormula for the t-test
Formula for the t-test: How the t-test Relates to the Distribution of the Data for the Groups Formula for the t-test: Formula for the Standard Error of the Difference Between the Means Formula for the
More informationFinal Exam - Solutions
Ecn 102 - Analysis of Economic Data University of California - Davis March 19, 2010 Instructor: John Parman Final Exam - Solutions You have until 5:30pm to complete this exam. Please remember to put your
More informationDynamics in Social Networks and Causality
Web Science & Technologies University of Koblenz Landau, Germany Dynamics in Social Networks and Causality JProf. Dr. University Koblenz Landau GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Last Time:
More informationII. MATCHMAKER, MATCHMAKER
II. MATCHMAKER, MATCHMAKER Josh Angrist MIT 14.387 Fall 2014 Agenda Matching. What could be simpler? We look for causal effects by comparing treatment and control within subgroups where everything... or
More informationAdvanced Structural Equations Models I
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this
More informationWrite your identification number on each paper and cover sheet (the number stated in the upper right hand corner on your exam cover).
Formatmall skapad: 2011-12-01 Uppdaterad: 2015-03-06 / LP Department of Economics Course name: Empirical Methods in Economics 2 Course code: EC2404 Semester: Spring 2015 Type of exam: MAIN Examiner: Peter
More informationExploring Cultural Differences with Structural Equation Modelling
Exploring Cultural Differences with Structural Equation Modelling Wynne W. Chin University of Calgary and City University of Hong Kong 1996 IS Cross Cultural Workshop slide 1 The objectives for this presentation
More informationMyths about the Analysis of Change
James H. Steiger Department of Psychology and Human Development Vanderbilt University, 2010 1 Introduction 2 Limitations of the Two-Observation Study 3 Myth 2: The Difference Score is Intrinsically Unreliable
More informationFinQuiz Notes
Reading 10 Multiple Regression and Issues in Regression Analysis 2. MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION Multiple linear regression is a method used to model the linear relationship between a dependent variable
More informationBOOTSTRAPPING DIFFERENCES-IN-DIFFERENCES ESTIMATES
BOOTSTRAPPING DIFFERENCES-IN-DIFFERENCES ESTIMATES Bertrand Hounkannounon Université de Montréal, CIREQ December 2011 Abstract This paper re-examines the analysis of differences-in-differences estimators
More informationSample Problems. Note: If you find the following statements true, you should briefly prove them. If you find them false, you should correct them.
Sample Problems 1. True or False Note: If you find the following statements true, you should briefly prove them. If you find them false, you should correct them. (a) The sample average of estimated residuals
More informationIntroduction to Econometrics. Review of Probability & Statistics
1 Introduction to Econometrics Review of Probability & Statistics Peerapat Wongchaiwat, Ph.D. wongchaiwat@hotmail.com Introduction 2 What is Econometrics? Econometrics consists of the application of mathematical
More informationECO220Y Simple Regression: Testing the Slope
ECO220Y Simple Regression: Testing the Slope Readings: Chapter 18 (Sections 18.3-18.5) Winter 2012 Lecture 19 (Winter 2012) Simple Regression Lecture 19 1 / 32 Simple Regression Model y i = β 0 + β 1 x
More informationROBUSTNESS OF MULTILEVEL PARAMETER ESTIMATES AGAINST SMALL SAMPLE SIZES
ROBUSTNESS OF MULTILEVEL PARAMETER ESTIMATES AGAINST SMALL SAMPLE SIZES Cora J.M. Maas 1 Utrecht University, The Netherlands Joop J. Hox Utrecht University, The Netherlands In social sciences, research
More informationChapter 6 Stochastic Regressors
Chapter 6 Stochastic Regressors 6. Stochastic regressors in non-longitudinal settings 6.2 Stochastic regressors in longitudinal settings 6.3 Longitudinal data models with heterogeneity terms and sequentially
More informationmultilevel modeling: concepts, applications and interpretations
multilevel modeling: concepts, applications and interpretations lynne c. messer 27 october 2010 warning social and reproductive / perinatal epidemiologist concepts why context matters multilevel models
More informationCOSC 341 Human Computer Interaction. Dr. Bowen Hui University of British Columbia Okanagan
COSC 341 Human Computer Interaction Dr. Bowen Hui University of British Columbia Okanagan 1 Last Topic Distribution of means When it is needed How to build one (from scratch) Determining the characteristics
More informationSTOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY Department of Economics Course name: Empirical Methods Course code: EC40 Examiner: Per Pettersson-Lidbom Number of creds: 7,5 creds Date of exam: Thursday, January 15, 009 Examination
More informationEconometric Methods. Prediction / Violation of A-Assumptions. Burcu Erdogan. Universität Trier WS 2011/2012
Econometric Methods Prediction / Violation of A-Assumptions Burcu Erdogan Universität Trier WS 2011/2012 (Universität Trier) Econometric Methods 30.11.2011 1 / 42 Moving on to... 1 Prediction 2 Violation
More informationPropensity Score Matching
Methods James H. Steiger Department of Psychology and Human Development Vanderbilt University Regression Modeling, 2009 Methods 1 Introduction 2 3 4 Introduction Why Match? 5 Definition Methods and In
More informationFixed Effects Models for Panel Data. December 1, 2014
Fixed Effects Models for Panel Data December 1, 2014 Notation Use the same setup as before, with the linear model Y it = X it β + c i + ɛ it (1) where X it is a 1 K + 1 vector of independent variables.
More informationSelection on Observables: Propensity Score Matching.
Selection on Observables: Propensity Score Matching. Department of Economics and Management Irene Brunetti ireneb@ec.unipi.it 24/10/2017 I. Brunetti Labour Economics in an European Perspective 24/10/2017
More informationWhat s New in Econometrics. Lecture 1
What s New in Econometrics Lecture 1 Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Unconfoundedness Guido Imbens NBER Summer Institute, 2007 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Potential Outcomes 3. Estimands and
More informationBootstrapping Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator
Bootstrapping Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator by Emmanuel Flachaire Eurequa, University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne December 2001 Abstract Recent results of Cribari-Neto and Zarkos
More informationAnalysis of Covariance. The following example illustrates a case where the covariate is affected by the treatments.
Analysis of Covariance In some experiments, the experimental units (subjects) are nonhomogeneous or there is variation in the experimental conditions that are not due to the treatments. For example, a
More informationEconometrics with Observational Data. Introduction and Identification Todd Wagner February 1, 2017
Econometrics with Observational Data Introduction and Identification Todd Wagner February 1, 2017 Goals for Course To enable researchers to conduct careful quantitative analyses with existing VA (and non-va)
More informationINTRODUCTION TO BASIC LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL
INTRODUCTION TO BASIC LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL 13 September 2011 Yogyakarta, Indonesia Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL In general, regression models estimate the effect
More informationOutline
2559 Outline cvonck@111zeelandnet.nl 1. Review of analysis of variance (ANOVA), simple regression analysis (SRA), and path analysis (PA) 1.1 Similarities and differences between MRA with dummy variables
More informationAddressing Analysis Issues REGRESSION-DISCONTINUITY (RD) DESIGN
Addressing Analysis Issues REGRESSION-DISCONTINUITY (RD) DESIGN Overview Assumptions of RD Causal estimand of interest Discuss common analysis issues In the afternoon, you will have the opportunity to
More informationEcn Analysis of Economic Data University of California - Davis February 23, 2010 Instructor: John Parman. Midterm 2. Name: ID Number: Section:
Ecn 102 - Analysis of Economic Data University of California - Davis February 23, 2010 Instructor: John Parman Midterm 2 You have until 10:20am to complete this exam. Please remember to put your name,
More informationEfficiency of repeated-cross-section estimators in fixed-effects models
Efficiency of repeated-cross-section estimators in fixed-effects models Montezuma Dumangane and Nicoletta Rosati CEMAPRE and ISEG-UTL January 2009 Abstract PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE Exploiting across
More informationBasic econometrics. Tutorial 3. Dipl.Kfm. Johannes Metzler
Basic econometrics Tutorial 3 Dipl.Kfm. Introduction Some of you were asking about material to revise/prepare econometrics fundamentals. First of all, be aware that I will not be too technical, only as
More informationEstimating and Using Propensity Score in Presence of Missing Background Data. An Application to Assess the Impact of Childbearing on Wellbeing
Estimating and Using Propensity Score in Presence of Missing Background Data. An Application to Assess the Impact of Childbearing on Wellbeing Alessandra Mattei Dipartimento di Statistica G. Parenti Università
More informationTime Metric in Latent Difference Score Models. Holly P. O Rourke
Time Metric in Latent Difference Score Models by Holly P. O Rourke A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved June 2016 by the Graduate
More informationComparing Group Means When Nonresponse Rates Differ
UNF Digital Commons UNF Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2015 Comparing Group Means When Nonresponse Rates Differ Gabriela M. Stegmann University of North Florida Suggested Citation Stegmann,
More information9. Linear Regression and Correlation
9. Linear Regression and Correlation Data: y a quantitative response variable x a quantitative explanatory variable (Chap. 8: Recall that both variables were categorical) For example, y = annual income,
More informationThursday Morning. Growth Modelling in Mplus. Using a set of repeated continuous measures of bodyweight
Thursday Morning Growth Modelling in Mplus Using a set of repeated continuous measures of bodyweight 1 Growth modelling Continuous Data Mplus model syntax refresher ALSPAC Confirmatory Factor Analysis
More informationPsychology 282 Lecture #3 Outline
Psychology 8 Lecture #3 Outline Simple Linear Regression (SLR) Given variables,. Sample of n observations. In study and use of correlation coefficients, and are interchangeable. In regression analysis,
More informationAnswer all questions from part I. Answer two question from part II.a, and one question from part II.b.
B203: Quantitative Methods Answer all questions from part I. Answer two question from part II.a, and one question from part II.b. Part I: Compulsory Questions. Answer all questions. Each question carries
More informationREVIEW 8/2/2017 陈芳华东师大英语系
REVIEW Hypothesis testing starts with a null hypothesis and a null distribution. We compare what we have to the null distribution, if the result is too extreme to belong to the null distribution (p
More informationWISE International Masters
WISE International Masters ECONOMETRICS Instructor: Brett Graham INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS 1 The time allowed for this examination paper is 2 hours. 2 This examination paper contains 32 questions. You are
More informationEconometrics I KS. Module 2: Multivariate Linear Regression. Alexander Ahammer. This version: April 16, 2018
Econometrics I KS Module 2: Multivariate Linear Regression Alexander Ahammer Department of Economics Johannes Kepler University of Linz This version: April 16, 2018 Alexander Ahammer (JKU) Module 2: Multivariate
More informationCourse title SD206. Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling
10 th ECPR Summer School in Methods and Techniques, 23 July - 8 August University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Course Description Form 1-2 week course (30 hrs) Course title SD206. Introduction to Structural
More informationSupplemental material to accompany Preacher and Hayes (2008)
Supplemental material to accompany Preacher and Hayes (2008) Kristopher J. Preacher University of Kansas Andrew F. Hayes The Ohio State University The multivariate delta method for deriving the asymptotic
More informationMidterm 2 - Solutions
Ecn 102 - Analysis of Economic Data University of California - Davis February 23, 2010 Instructor: John Parman Midterm 2 - Solutions You have until 10:20am to complete this exam. Please remember to put
More informationUsing Mplus individual residual plots for. diagnostics and model evaluation in SEM
Using Mplus individual residual plots for diagnostics and model evaluation in SEM Tihomir Asparouhov and Bengt Muthén Mplus Web Notes: No. 20 October 31, 2017 1 Introduction A variety of plots are available
More informationQuantitative Economics for the Evaluation of the European Policy
Quantitative Economics for the Evaluation of the European Policy Dipartimento di Economia e Management Irene Brunetti Davide Fiaschi Angela Parenti 1 25th of September, 2017 1 ireneb@ec.unipi.it, davide.fiaschi@unipi.it,
More informationApplied Statistics and Econometrics
Applied Statistics and Econometrics Lecture 6 Saul Lach September 2017 Saul Lach () Applied Statistics and Econometrics September 2017 1 / 53 Outline of Lecture 6 1 Omitted variable bias (SW 6.1) 2 Multiple
More informationClass Notes: Week 8. Probit versus Logit Link Functions and Count Data
Ronald Heck Class Notes: Week 8 1 Class Notes: Week 8 Probit versus Logit Link Functions and Count Data This week we ll take up a couple of issues. The first is working with a probit link function. While
More information