Cycle Time Analysis for Wafer Revisiting Process in Scheduling of Single-arm Cluster Tools
|
|
- Valerie Hamilton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 International Journal of Automation and Computing 8(4), November 2011, DOI: /s Cycle Time Analysis for Wafer Revisiting Process in Scheduling of Single-arm Cluster Tools Yu-Xi Sun Nai-Qi Wu School of Mechatronics Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou , PRC Abstract: Some wafer fabrication processes performed by cluster tools require revisiting. With wafer revisiting, a cluster tool is very difficult to be scheduled due to a large number of possible schedules for the revisiting process. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a typical process with wafer revisiting that should be performed by cluster tools. This paper discusses the scheduling problem of single-arm cluster tools for the ALD process. In scheduling such a system, the most difficult part is to schedule the revisiting process such that the cycle time is minimized. Thus, this paper studies the revisiting process of ALD with revisiting times k = 3, 4, and 5, and analytical expressions are obtained to calculate the cycle time for the k possible schedules. Then, the schedule with the minimal cycle time is the optimal one. In this way, the scheduling problem of such a revisiting process becomes very simple and this is a significant improvement in scheduling cluster tools with wafer revisiting. Illustrative example is presented to show the application of the proposed method. Keywords: Scheduling, semiconductor manufacturing, cluster tools, Petri net, automated manufacturing systems. 1 Introduction Cluster tools have been increasingly used in the wafer fabrication process [1]. A cluster tool comprises one or two load-locks where wafers enter and exit the cluster tool, a number of processing modules (PMs), an aligner module, and a wafer handling robot, which transports the wafers such that several processing steps can be done simultaneously. The robot can be a single-arm or dual-arm type. Due to lower cost, improved robot speed, and scheduling simplicity, single-arm type is still widely used. With two load-locks, a cluster tool can be operated in an uninterrupted way for a batch of identical wafers. Thus, a steady-state cyclic schedule is desired, and often, it is a onewafer cyclic schedule. To discover the operational properties of cluster tools, attempts have been made in their modeling and performance evaluation [2 6]. With these models, a periodic steady-state schedule can be found. The operations of a cluster tool are divided into two different regions: transport-bound and process-bound regions. In the former, the robot is always busy and the period of the system is a function of robot task times. In the latter, the robot has idle time and the period is determined by the processing times in the PMs. As pointed out in [7], in cluster tools, PM activities follow the robot tasks. Hence, it is important to schedule the robot tasks. For cluster tools, the robot moving time from one PM to another can be treated as a constant and is much shorter than the wafer processing times [8]. Thus, for such cluster tools with one-wafer cyclic schedule, backward scheduling is optimal [9, 10]. For backward scheduling, the cycle is determined by the so-called fundamental period (FP) [3, 4]. Let ζ i denote time taken for completing a wafer at Step i in the steady-state process. Then, FP = max(ζ 1, ζ 2,, ζ n) for a system with n steps. Manuscript received February 5, 2010; revised October 8, 2010 This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No ) and Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No ). Thus, it is very important to calculate FP and methods are to do so given in [3, 4]. The wafer fabrication process is characterized by revisiting. Some processes that are performed by a cluster tool require a revisiting. The atomic layer deposition (ALD) process is such a typical revisiting process [11]. With revisiting, a cluster tool is difficult to schedule because deadlock exists. A Petri net is developed for cluster tools to analyze the wafer fabrication process with revisiting in [12]. However, it presents no method for scheduling the system. Based on a Petri net model, a mixed integer programming model is proposed to schedule a single-arm cluster tool with wafer revisiting in [11]. However, it involves prohibitive computation for its computational complexity is exponential to the number of discrete variables. The ALD process contains three processing steps. A wafer visits the first step only once. After being processed by the first step, it visits the second and third steps consecutively. This process is then repeated for a number of times called revisiting times; occasionally, it is more than five times [11]. Let k be the number of revisiting times, such that a fabrication process can be denoted as (m 1, (m 2, m 3) k ), where m 1, m 2, and m 3 are the number of PMs for Steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For example, (1, (1, 2) 2 ) denotes that the number of PMs for Steps 1, 2, and 3 is 1, 1, and 2, respectively, and it needs to revisit Steps 2 and 3 twice. For this fabrication process, (m 2, m 3) k is called the revisiting process. Because of the wafer revisiting, Steps 2 and 3 are coupled together as a macro step. Thus, as FP is in a wafer fabrication process without revisiting, it is very important to obtain the cycle time for the revisiting process. To obtain the cycle time for the revisiting process, it needs to schedule the process such that the cycle time is minimized. However, scheduling the revisiting process is not trivial due to the fact that potential deadlock exists and there is a large number of possible schedules. Let τ 1, τ 2, and τ 3 denote the time needed for performing an operation at Steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively. When the
2 438 International Journal of Automation and Computing 8(4), November 2011 difference between τ 2 and τ 3 is not large, it is reasonable to configure the system such that m 2 = m 3 = 1. However, when the difference is large, it may need to configure the system such that m 2 = 1 and m 3 = 2, or m 2 = 2 and m 3 = 1. In [13], a method is proposed to schedule such a system to obtain a one-wafer cycle schedule. The system is modeled by a Petri net such that deadlock can be easily avoided. Then, based on the Petri net, a method is given to schedule the revisiting process so that the cycle time is minimized for the revisiting process. With the cycle time for the revisiting process, an optimal one-wafer cycle schedule can be obtained for the entire system. The key is to schedule the revisiting process and obtain the minimal cycle time. It is shown that, for the revisiting process (1, 1) k, the optimal one-wafer cycle schedule is determined and an analytical expression for calculating the cycle time is given. For revisiting processes (1, 2) k and (2, 1) k, it is shown that the optimal one-wafer scheduling can be selected among k schedules. Further, for (1, 2) 2, the two candidates are presented and analytical expressions are obtained to calculate their cycle times. By doing so, to select the optimal schedule from the two candidates, it needs to simply calculate their cycle times. Notice that, the number of revisiting times may be more than five, and the larger the number of revisiting times is, the more complex the scheduling problem is for the revisiting process. In [13], it does not present what are the k candidates and how to obtain the optimal one. Considering that the scheduling problem of the revisiting process is the most difficult part of scheduling singlearm cluster tools with revisiting, and following the work in [13], this paper discusses the scheduling problem of wafer revisiting process (1, 2) k with k = 3, 4, and 5. Given k, we present the k candidates and develop the analytical expression for each candidate to calculate its cycle time. Thus, it needs to simply calculate the cycle time for each candidate and obtain the optimal schedule. This is a significant improvement in scheduling cluster tools with wafer revisiting. With the scheduling problem for wafer revisiting process (1, 2) k, it is easy to obtain similar results for wafer revisiting process (2, 1) k. Thus, this paper focuses only on the wafer revisiting process (1, 2) k. In the next section, we briefly introduce the Petri net model and relative concepts presented in [13]. Then, the schedules and analytical expressions for cycle time calculation are derived in Section 3. Illustrative examples are presented to show the applications of the proposed method in Section 4. Conclusions are given in Section 5. Notations. C(p i, W d ): The color of token W d in p i. FP: Fundamental period. LEV: Leaving token from a circuit. M(RVC, LEV): The number of leaving tokens at marking M. PM: Processing module. PN: Petri net. RVC: Revisiting circuit. ST i: The set of tokens in p i at marking M. W d : The token representing the d-th wafer released into the system. W d (q): The q-th visit of token W d to a processing step. 2 System modeling and deadlock avoidance The Petri net (PN) model proposed in [13] is used to describe the revisiting process. In this section, a brief introduction is presented, for further detail, readers can see [13]. The PN model used is a finite capacity P N = (P, T, I, O, M, K), where P = {p 1, p 2,, p m} is a finite set of places, T = {t 1, t 2,, t n} is a finite set of transitions, P T, P T =, I : P T N is an input function with N = {0, 1, 2, }, O : P T N is an output function, M : P N is a marking representing the number of tokens in places with M 0 denoting the initial marking, and K : P {1, 2, 3, } is a capacity function with K(p) representing the number of tokens that place p can hold at a time. The preset of transition t is the set of all input places to t, i.e., t = {p : p P and I(p, t) > 0}. The postset of t is the set of all output places from t, i.e., t = {p : p P and O(p, t) > 0}. Similarly, p s preset p = {t T : O(p, t) > 0} and postset p = {t T : I(p, t) > 0}. In the PN model, the robot activities are modeled by a macro transition t ij as shown in Fig. 1, where transition x ij is for the robot unloading a wafer from a PM at Step i, place y ij for moving from Step i to Step j, and transition z ij for the robot s loading the wafer into a PM at Step j. Transition t 0 models the robot moving from a PM to another without carrying a wafer. Fig. 1 PN model for robot activities To model the ALD process (1, (1, 2) k ), place p i is used to model processing step i with Step 0 being the load-locks. The number of PMs at Steps 1, 2, and 3 is 1, 1, and 2, so K(p 1) = K(p 2) = 1 and K(p 3) = 2. Because the loadlocks can hold all the wafers in the system, it is reasonable to assume that K(p 0) =. Then, the process can be modeled as follows: put macro transition t ij between p i and p j to connect p i and p j, if the wafers go to p j after being processed by p i. For revisiting process (m i, m i+1) k, there is a macro-transition t (i+1)i that connects p i+1 and p i. All the activities modeled by any macro transition t ij should be performed by the robot. Thus, for every transition t ij, add an arc from r 2 to t ij and another arc from t ij to r 1. In this way, a PN model for ALD process (1, (1, 2) k ) is obtained as shown in Fig. 2. In this model, circuit (p 2, t 23, p 3, t 32, p 2) describes the revisiting process and is called revisiting circuit (RVC).
3 Y. X. Sun and N. Q. Wu / Cycle Time Analysis for Wafer Revisiting Process in 439 RVC and M(RVC, PAV) = K(RVC) M(RVC) + M(RVC, LEV) be the number of potentially available spaces in the RVC at marking M. Then, we have the following result. Lemma 1 [13]. The PN model developed for a single-arm cluster tool with revisiting is deadlock-free if and only if for the RVC and at any marking M. M(RVC, PAV) 1. (1) Fig. 2 The PN model for flow pattern (1, (1, 2) k ) To avoid confusion, colors are introduced into the model. The color of a macro-transition is defined as C(t ij) = c ij. The color of a token W d in p i is defined as C(p i, W d ) = c ij if the token goes to p j after being processed in a PM modeled by p i. The transition enabling and firing rules are defined in [13]. For the purpose of scheduling, the temporal aspect of activities should be considered. In cluster tools, the time taken by a robot picking a wafer up, loading a wafer into a PM, and moving can be thought of as a constant. Thus, the times associated with x ij, y ij, z ij, and t 0 are denoted as α, µ, β, and γ, respectively. Notice that t 0 also represents that the robot moves from p i to p i, it is called a virtual t 0. In this case, the time taken is zero. Further, let τ i be the time associated with place p i, i.e., the time needed for a wafer to be processed at Step i. Let W d (q) in p i denote a token representing that the d-th wafer visits p i at the q-th time, and ST i denote the set of tokens in p i at marking M representing the wafers processed at Step i. For example, ST 2 = {W d (2)} represents that the d-th wafer for its second visiting is being processed at Step 2. Then, a marking for the system can be equivalently represented by (ST 1, ST 2, ST 3). For example, M = ({W 4(1)}, {W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(1)}) is a marking at which the system is deadlocked. A macro transition t ij is said to be an input (output) transition of an RVC if t ij is not on it, but t ij( t ij) is on it. Notice that an RVC in the PN model developed in the last section has one and only one input (output) transition. For example, in the PN shown in Fig. 2, t 12 is the only input transition of the unique RVC in it, and t 30 is the only output one. If p i is on an RVC, p i t 30, and token W d (q) in p i at marking M enables t 30, this token is said to be a leaving one. Let M(RVC, LEV) denote the number of leaving tokens of RVC at marking M. When a leaving token leaves p i by firing t out, a space in p i is freed. Thus, a space occupied by a leaving token in p i is potentially available. Let P (RVC) denote the set of places that are on the RVC and K(RVC) = p i P (RVC) K(pi). Further, let M(RVC) = p i P (RVC) M(pi) be the number of tokens in Let Π = max Mi R(M 0 )(M i(rvc)) and at the same time the condition given by (1) is satisfied. In other words, Π is the largest number of tokens in RVC without being deadlocked. Then, a marking M R(M 0) is said to be a feasible and maximally concurrent marking for revisiting process (1, 2) k, if M(RVC) = Π. When the RVC contains the largest number of tokens, it implies that the number of wafers being processed in the RVC is maximized. In this case, the productivity must be maximized. Thus, for an optimal steady-state periodical schedule, the revisiting process must undergo a feasible and maximally concurrent marking M. Therefore, we can select the maximally concurrent markings as the start markings for analyzing the cycle time of the revisiting process. With this observation, we schedule the revisiting processes as follows. 3 Cycle time for the revisiting process 3.1 Case 1: k = 3 When k = 3, the wafer revisiting process is (1, 2) 3. Then, there are three feasible and maximally concurrent markings: ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(3)}), ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), W 1(3)}), and ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(3)}). Thus, to obtain the optimal schedule, it needs to schedule the system by starting from the three feasible and maximally concurrent markings. By starting from ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(3)}), we obtain the unique schedule σ 31 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(3)}) t 0(to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), null}) t 0(to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(1), W 3(1)}) t 0(in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(2)}, {null, W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(2), W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 32 ({W 2(3)}, {null, W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(1)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(3), W 3(1)})}. The diagram for this schedule is shown in Fig. 3, where σ = {t 0 (in p 3)} represents that the robot moves between the PMs in p 3. For this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 2(1), W 2(1) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)} and {processing of W 1(3) in p 3} are being concurrently done, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are also being concurrently done. We use θ( ) to denote the time needed for completing a sequence of transition firings. Thus, ψ 31 = max{θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)}), θ({processing of W 1(3) in p 3}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2})} + θ({t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32}) + θ({processing of W 2(2) in p 2}) + θ({t 23}) + θ({processing of W 2(2) in p 3}) + θ({t 32}) + θ({processing of W 2(3) in p 2}) + θ({t 23}), or ψ 31 = max{(2γ + α + µ + β), τ 2, τ 3} + 6(α + µ + β)+ 2γ + 2τ 2 + τ 3 (2)
4 440 International Journal of Automation and Computing 8(4), November 2011 W 3(1) in p 2}), or 2γ + α + µ + β > τ 2 and θ({processing of W 2(2) in p 3}) θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), or τ 3 4γ + 3(α+µ+β). In this case, we have ψ 32 = θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3}) + θ({t 32}) + θ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) + θ({t 23}). Hence ψ 32 = (3(α + µ + β) + 3γ) + τ 3 + (2(α + µ + β) + τ 2). (4) 3) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}) > θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}), or 2γ + α + µ + β > τ 2 and θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) > θ({processing of W 2(2) in p 3}), or 4γ + 3(α+µ+β) > τ 3. In this case, we have ψ 32 = θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + max{θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(3) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3})} + θ({t 32}) + θ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) + θ({t 23}). Therefore, ψ 32 = (3(α + µ + β) + 3γ) + max((2γ + 2(α + µ + β)+ τ 2), τ 3) + (2(α + µ + β) + τ 2). (5) Fig. 3 The diagram for the schedule For ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), W 1(3)}), we obtain the unique schedule σ 32 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), W 1(3)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(2), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(3)}, {null, W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 3(2)}, {W 2(3), null}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(2)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(3), W 3(2)})}. In this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 1(3), W 1(3) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 2(2) in p 3} are concurrently being done, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are also concurrently being done. Moreover, {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(3) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 3} are concurrently being done. For this schedule, to obtain the analytical expression of the cycle time, there are three cases as below. 1) θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}) θ({ t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}), or τ 2 2γ + α + µ + β. For this case, we have ψ 32 = max{θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 2(2) in p 3})} + θ({t 32 ({processing of W 2(3) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) + θ({t 32}) + θ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) + θ({t 23}), or ψ 32 = max{(2γ + 2(α + µ + β) + τ 2), τ 3} + (2(α + µ+ β) + γ + τ 2) + (2(α + µ + β) + τ 2). (3) 2) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}) > θ({processing of With ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(3)}), we obtain the unique schedule σ 33 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(3)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) {t 32 and then t 23}(2 times) ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(3)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(3), W 3(3)})}. Notice that, for this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 1(3), W 1(3) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are being concurrently done. Thus, we have ψ 33 = max{θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}), θ({processing W 3(1) in p 2})} + θ({t 23}) + θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3}) + 2θ({ t 32 and then t 23}) + θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12}), or ψ 33 = max{(2γ + α + µ + β), τ 2} + 2(α + µ + β) + γ + τ 3+ (4(α + µ + β) + 2τ 2 + τ 3). (6) Given values of α, µ, β, γ, τ 2, and τ 3, we can easily obtain ψ 31, ψ 32, and ψ 33. Then, we can obtain ψ = min{ψ 31, ψ 32, ψ 33} and the corresponding optimal schedule. 3.2 Case 2: k = 4 With k = 4, the wafer revisiting process is (1, 2) 4. For this process, it has four feasible and maximally concurrent markings: ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(4)}), ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), W 1(4)}), ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(4)}), and ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(4), W 1(4)}). Then, the process can be scheduled as follows. Starting from marking ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(4)}), we can obtain the unique schedule σ 41 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(4)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(1), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) {t 32 and then t 23}(3 times) ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(1)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(4), W 3(1)})}. For this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 2(1), W 2(1) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)} and {processing of W 1(4) in p 3} are being concurrently done, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are also being concurrently done. With this
5 Y. X. Sun and N. Q. Wu / Cycle Time Analysis for Wafer Revisiting Process in 441 schedule, we have ψ 41 = max {θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)}), θ({processing of W 1(4) in p 3}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2})} + θ({t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + θ({t 0 (in p 3)}) + 3θ({t 32 and then t 23}). With 3θ({t 32 and then t 23}) = 6(α + µ + β) + 3τ 2+ 2τ 3, therefore, ψ 41 = max{(2γ + α + µ + β), τ 2, τ 3} + 2(α + µ + β) + 2γ+ (6(α + µ + β) + 3τ 2 + 2τ 3). (7) With ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), W 1(4)}), we obtain the schedule σ 42 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), W 1(4)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(2), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(3)}, {null, W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 3(2)}, {W 2(3), null}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(2)}) t 0(in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(4)}, {null, W 3(2)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(2)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(4), W 3(2)})}. For this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 2(2), W 2(2) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)} and {processing of W 1(4) in p 3} are being concurrently done, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are also being concurrently done. Moreover, {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(3) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 3} are concurrently being done, {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) t 23 t 0(in p 3)} and {processing of W 2(3) in p 3} are also being concurrently done. Thus, ψ 42 = max{θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)}), θ({processing of W 1(4) in p 3}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2})} + θ({t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + max{θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(3) in p 2}) t 23 t 0(in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3})} + θ({t 32 ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) + θ({t 32}) + θ({processing of W 2(4) in p 2}) + θ({t 23}), or ψ 42 = max{(2γ + α + µ + β), τ 2, τ 3} + (2(α + µ + β) + γ)+ max{(2γ + 2(α + µ + β) + τ 2), τ 3}+ (4(α + µ + β) + 2τ 2 + γ). (8) By starting from marking ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(4)}), we obtain the schedule σ 43 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(4)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(4)}, {null, W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) {t 32 and then t 23}(2 times) ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(3)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(4), W 3(3)})}. For this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 1(4), W 1(4) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 2(3) in p 3} are concurrently being done, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are also concurrently being done. Moreover, {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(4) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 3} are concurrently being done. For this schedule, there are three cases as follows. 1) θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}), or τ 2 2γ + α + µ + β. In this case, we have ψ 43 = max{θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 2(3) in p 3})} + θ({t 32 ({processing of W 2(4) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) + 2θ({ t 32 and then t 23}). With 2θ({t 32 and then t 23}) = 4(α + µ + β) + 2τ 2 + τ 3, we obtain ψ 43 = max{(2γ + 2(α + µ + β) + τ 2), τ 3} + (2(α + µ+ β) + γ + τ 2) + (4(α + µ + β) + 2τ 2 + τ 3). (9) 2) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}) > θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}), or 2γ + α + µ + β > τ 2 and θ({processing of W 2(3) in p 3}) θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0(in p 3)}), or τ 3 4γ + 3(α + µ + β). In this case, we have ψ 43 = θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3}) + 2θ({ t 32 and then t 23}). Hence, ψ 43 = (3(α+µ+β)+3γ)+τ 3+(4(α+µ+β)+2τ 2+τ 3). (10) 3) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}) > θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}), or 2γ + α + µ + β > τ 2 and θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) > θ({processing of W 2(3) in p 3}), or 4γ + 3(α+µ+β) > τ 3. In this case, we have ψ 43 = θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + max{θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(4) in p 2}) t 23 t 0(in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3})} + 2θ({ t 32 and then t 23}). Therefore, ψ 43 = (3(α + µ + β) + 3γ) + max{(2γ + 2(α + µ + β)+ τ 2)}, τ 3) + (4(α + µ + β) + 2τ 2 + τ 3). (11) By starting from marking ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(4), W 1(4)}), we obtain the schedule σ 44 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(4), W 1(4)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(4), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) {t 32 and then t 23}(3 times) ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(4)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(4), W 3(4)})}. Notice that, in this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 1(4), W 1(4) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are being concurrently done. Thus, we have ψ 44 = max{θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}), θ({processing W 3(1) in p 2})} + θ({t 23}) + θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3}) + 3θ({t 32 and then t 23}) + θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12}), or ψ 44 = max{(2γ + α + µ + β), τ 2} + 2(α + µ + β) + γ + τ 3+ (6(α + µ + β) + 3τ 2 + 2τ 3). (12) With (7) (12) obtained, one can easily find the optimal schedule for the wafer revisiting process (1, 2) Case 3: k = 5 With k = 5, the wafer revisiting process is (1, 2) 5 and there are five feasible and maximally concurrent markings: ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(5)}), ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), W 1(5)}), ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(5)}), ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(4), W 1(5)}), and ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(5), W 1(5)}). Then, the system can be scheduled as follows. By starting from marking ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(5)}), we obtain the unique schedule σ 51 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), W 1(5)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(1), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(1), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) {t 32 and then t 23}(4 times) ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(1)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(5), W 3(1)})}. For this
6 442 International Journal of Automation and Computing 8(4), November 2011 schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 2(1), W 2(1) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)} and {processing of W 1(5) in p 3} are being concurrently done, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are also being concurrently done. Thus, we have ψ 51 = max{θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)}), θ({processing of W 1(5) in p 3}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2})} + θ({t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + θ({t 0 (in p 3)}) + 4θ({t 32 and then t 23}). With 4θ({t 32 and then t 23}) = 8(α + µ + β) + 4τ 2+ 3τ 3, we have ψ 51 = max{(2γ + α + µ + β), τ 2, τ 3} + 2(α + µ + β) + 2γ+ (8(α + µ + β) + 4τ 2 + 3τ 3). (13) By starting from marking ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), W 1(5)}), we obtain the unique schedule σ 52 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), W 1(5)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(2), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(2), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(3)}, {null, W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 3(2)}, {W 2(3), null}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(2)}) t 0 (in p 3) {t 32 and then t 23}(2 times) ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(2)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(5), W 3(2)})}. For this schedule, {t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)} and {processing of W 1(5) in p 3} are being concurrently done, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are also being concurrently done. Furthermore, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 2(2), W 2(2) is already completed. Moreover, {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(3) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 3} are being concurrently done, {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 2(3) in p 3} are also being concurrently done. Thus, ψ 52 = max{θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3)}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}), θ({processing of W 1(5) in p 3})} + θ({t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + max{θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(3) in p 2}) t 23 t 0(in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3})} + θ({t 32}) + θ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) + θ({t 23 t 0(in p 3)}) + 2θ({t 32 and then t 23}). With 2θ({t 32 and then t 23}) = 4(α+µ+β) + 2τ 2+τ 3, we have the following expression: ψ 52 = max{(2γ + α + µ + β), τ 2, τ 3} + (2(α + µ + β) + γ)+ max{(2γ + 2(α + µ + β) + τ 2), τ 3} + (γ + 2(α + µ+ β) + τ 2) + (4(α + µ + β) + 2τ 2 + τ 3). (14) By starting from marking ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(5)}), we obtain the unique schedule σ 53 ={({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(5)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(4)}, {null, W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 3(2)}, {W 2(4), null}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(2)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(5)}, {null, W 3(2)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(2)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 3(3)}, {W 2(5), null}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(3)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(5), W 3(3)})}. For this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 1(5), W 1(5) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 2(3) in p 3} are concurrently being done, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are also concurrently being done. Moreover, {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(4) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 3} are being concurrently done, {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 2(4) in p 3} are also being concurrently done, and {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(5) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 3(2) in p 3} are also being concurrently done. For this schedule, cycle time can be calculated as given in the three cases below. 1) θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}), or τ 2 2γ + α + µ + β. In this case, we have ψ 53= max{θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 2(3) in p 3})} + θ({t 32 ({processing of W 2(4) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) + max{θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) t 23 t 0(in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 2(4) in p 3})} + θ({t 32 ({processing of W 2(5) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) + θ({t 32}) + θ({processing of W 3(3) in p 2}) + θ({t 23}), or ψ 53 = 2 max{(2γ + 2(α + µ + β) + τ 2), τ 3} + 2(2(α + µ+ β) + γ + τ 2) + (2(α + µ + β) + τ 2). (15) 2) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}) > θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}), or 2γ + α + µ + β > τ 2 and θ({processing of W 2(3) in p 3}) θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), namely τ 3 4γ + 3(α+µ+β). In this case, we have ψ 53 = θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3}) + max{θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 2(4) in p 3})} + θ({t 32 ({processing of W 2(5) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) + θ({t 32}) + θ({processing of W 3(3) in p 2}) + θ({t 23}). Thus, ψ 53 = (3(α + µ + β) + 3γ) + τ 3 + max{(2γ + 2(α + µ+ β) + τ 2), τ 3} + (2(α + µ + β) + γ + τ 2) + (2(α+ µ + β) + τ 2). (16) 3) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}) > θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}), or 2γ + α + µ + β > τ 2 and θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) > θ({processing of W 2(3) in p 3}), namely 4γ + 3(α + µ + β) > τ 3. In this case, we have ψ 53 = θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + max{θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(4) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3})} + max{θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 3(2) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 2(4) in p 3})} + θ({t 32 ({processing of W 2(5) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) + θ({t 32}) + θ({processing of W 3(3) in p 2}) + θ({t 23}). Hence, ψ 53 = (3(α + µ + β) + 3γ) + 2 max{(2γ + 2(α + µ+ β) + τ 2), τ 3} + (2(α + µ + β) + γ + τ 2)+ (2(α + µ + β) + τ 2). (17) By starting from marking ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(4), W 1(5)}), we obtain the unique schedule σ 54 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(4), W 1(5)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(4), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3)
7 Y. X. Sun and N. Q. Wu / Cycle Time Analysis for Wafer Revisiting Process in 443 t 32 ({W 2(5)}, {null, W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) {t 32 and then t 23}(3 times) ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(4)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(5), W 3(4)})}. For this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 1(5), W 1(5) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 2(4) in p 3} are concurrently being done, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are also concurrently being done. Moreover, {t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(5) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 3} are concurrently being done. There are also three cases for calculating the cycle time. 1) θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}) θ({ t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}), or τ 2 2γ + α + µ + β. In this case, we have ψ 54= max {θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 2(4) in p 3})} + θ({t 32 ({processing of W 2(5) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) + 3θ({ t 32 and then t 23}). With 3θ({t 32 and then t 23}) = 6(α + µ + β) + 3τ 2+ 2τ 3, the cycle time can be calculated as ψ 54 = max{(2γ + 2(α + µ + β) + τ 2), τ 3} + (2(α + µ + β)+ γ + τ 2) + (6(α + µ + β) + 3τ 2 + 2τ 3). (18) 2) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}) > θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}), or 2γ + α + µ + β > τ 2 and θ({processing of W 2(4) in p 3}) θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), namely τ 3 4γ + 3(α + µ + β). In this case, we have ψ 54 = θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3}) + 3θ({ t 32 and then t 23}). Thus, ψ 54 = (3(α+µ+β)+3γ)+τ 3+(6(α+µ+β)+3τ 2+2τ 3). (19) 3) θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}) > θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 2}), or 2γ + α + µ + β > τ 2 and θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}) > θ({processing of W 2(4) in p 3}), namely 4γ + 3(α + µ + β) > τ 3. In this case, we have ψ 54 = θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12 t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2) t 23}) + max{θ({t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({processing of W 2(5) in p 2}) t 23 t 0 (in p 3)}), θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3})} + 3θ({ t 32 and then t 23}). Thus, ψ 54 = (3(α + µ + β) + 3γ) + max{(2γ + 2(α + µ + β)+ τ 2), τ 3} + (6(α + µ + β) + 3τ 2 + 2τ 3) (20) By starting from marking ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(5), W 1(5)}), we obtain the unique schedule σ 55 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(5), W 1(5)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(5), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) {t 32 and then t 23}(4 times) ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(5)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(5), W 3(5)})}. In this schedule, when the robot reaches p 3 to unload W 1(5), W 1(5) is already completed. Furthermore, {t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)} and {processing of W 3(1) in p 2} are being concurrently done. Thus, we have ψ 55 = max{θ({t 0 (to p 3) t 30 t 0 (to p 2)}), θ({processing W 3(1) in p 2})} + θ({t 23}) + θ({processing of W 3(1) in p 3}) + 4θ({t 32 and then t 23}) + θ({t 0 (to p 1) t 12}), or ψ 55 = max{(2γ + α + µ + β), τ 2} + 2(α + µ + β) + γ + τ 3+ (8(α + µ + β) + 4τ 2 + 3τ 3). (21) By using (13) (21), it is easy to find the optimal schedule for the revisiting process and the corresponding minimal cycle time. All the expressions have been coded in a software-based system. When the parameters are known, we can simply enter the parameters to return an optimal schedule and cycle time. This cycle time can be treated just as the FP in the process without wafer revisiting. Notice that if the problem is to be solved by the mixed integer programming method presented by [11], it must be very difficult for there is a large number of binary variables when k > 2. As our method solves the problem of computational complexity, thus, the method proposed in this paper is applicable to real-world problems. 4 Illustrative example In this section, an illustrative example is presented to show the power and applications of the proposed method. Example. The wafer revisiting process is (1, 2) 5, and the parameters are τ 2 = 200 s, τ 3 = 250 s, and α = µ = β = γ = 3 s. It follows from (3.12) to (3.20) that ψ 51 = 1896 s, ψ 52 = 1428 s, ψ 53 = 1160 s, ψ 54 = 1625 s, and ψ 55 = 2093 s. Thus, σ 53 = {({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), W 1(5)}) t 0 (to p 3) t 30 ({W 3(1)}, {W 2(3), null}) t 0 (to p 2) t 23 ({}, {W 2(3), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(4)}, {null, W 3(1)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(1)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 3(2)}, {W 2(4), null}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(4), W 3(2)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 2(5)}, {null, W 3(2)}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(2)}) t 0 (in p 3) t 32 ({W 3(3)}, {W 2(5), null}) (virtual t 0) t 23 ({}, {W 2(5), W 3(3)}) t 0 (to p 1) t 12 ({W 4(1)}, {W 2(5), W 3(3)})} is the optimal schedule. Change τ 2 and τ 3 into τ 2 = 200 s and τ 3 = 200 s, respectively, we have ψ 51 = 1696 s, ψ 52 = 1302 s, ψ 53 = 1108 s, ψ 54 = 1499 s, and ψ 55 = 1893 s. Again, σ 53 is the optimal one. Change τ 2 and τ 3 into τ 2 = 250 s and τ 3 = 200 s, respectively, we have ψ 51 = 1946 s, ψ 52 = 1552 s, ψ 53 = 1358 s, ψ 54 = 1749 s, and ψ 55 = 2143 s, so we obtain the same result. Numerical experiments and simulation are done for a number of examples; it shows that the results obtained are correct. 5 Conclusions Wafer fabrication is characterized by revisiting. Some wafer fabrication processes performed by cluster tools contain a revisiting process. With wafer revisiting, there is a large number of possible schedules for the revisiting process, such that a cluster tool is very difficult to be scheduled. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a typical process with wafer revisiting that should be performed by cluster tools. This paper discusses the scheduling problem of single-arm cluster tools for the ALD process with wafer flow (1, (1, 2) k ). In scheduling such a system, the most difficult part is
8 444 International Journal of Automation and Computing 8(4), November 2011 to schedule the revisiting process and obtain its optimal cycle time. Based on the results obtained in [13], the scheduling problem of revisiting process (1, 2) k is studied. It is known that the optimal schedule should be selected from k possible schedules for a given k. Analytical expressions are obtained to calculate the cycle time for the k possible schedules with k = 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Then, the obtained schedule with the minimal cycle time is the optimal one. In this way, the scheduling problem of (1, 2) k becomes very simple and this is a significant improvement in scheduling cluster tools with wafer revisiting. With the results obtained, it is easy to get similar results for wafer revisiting process (2, 1) k. Another characteristic in wafer fabrication is wafer residency time constraint, which requires that a wafer should be taken away in a limited time after its completion of processing at a PM. In this study, we do not consider this constraint. It is our future work to schedule cluster tools with wafer revisiting by taking such a constraint into consideration. References [1] P. Burggraaf. Coping with the high cost of wafer fabs. Semiconductor International, vol. 38, no. 3, pp , [2] S. Ding, J. Yi, M. T. Zhang. Multicluster tools scheduling : An integrated event graph and network model approach. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 19, no. 3, pp , [3] T. L. Perkinson, P. K. MacLarty, R. S. Gyurcsik, R. K. Cavin III. Single-wafer cluster tool performance: An analysis of throughput. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp , [4] T. L. Perkinson, R. S. Gyurcsik, P. K. MacLarty. Singlewafer cluster tool performance: An analysis of the effects of redundant chambers and revisitation sequences on throughput. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 9, no. 3, pp , [5] S. Venkatesh, R. Davenport, P. Foxhoven, J. Nulman. A steady-state throughput analysis of cluster tools: Dualblade versus single-blade robots. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp , [6] W. M. Zuberek. Timed Petri nets in modeling and analysis of cluster tools. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 17, no. 5, pp , [7] Y. H. Shin, T. E. Lee, J. H. Kim, H. Y. Lee. Modeling and implementing a real-time scheduler for dual-armed cluster tools. Computers in Industry, vol. 45, no. 1, pp , [8] J. H. Kim, T. E. Lee, H. Y. Lee, D. B. Park. Scheduling analysis of timed-constrained dual-armed cluster tools. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp , [9] T. E. Lee, H. Y. Lee, Y. H. Shin. Workload balancing and scheduling of a single-armed cluster tool. In Proceedings of the 5th APIEMS Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, pp. 1 15, [10] M. J. Lopez, S. C. Wood. Systems of multiple cluster tools: Configuration, reliability, and performance. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 16, no. 2, pp , [11] H. Y. Lee, T. E. Lee. Scheduling single-armed cluster tools with reentrant wafer flows. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 19, no. 2, pp , [12] W. M. Zuberek. Cluster tools with chamber revisiting Modeling and analysis using timed Petri nets. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 17, no. 3, pp , [13] N. Q. Wu, F. Chu, C. B. Chu, M. C. Zhou. Petri net-based scheduling of single-arm cluster tools with reentrant atomic layer deposition processes. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp , Yu-Xi Sun received his B. Sc. degree in mechanical engineering from Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, PRC in He is currently a master student in the Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechatronics Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, PRC. His research interests include manufacturing systems, scheduling, and control. sunimperial@163.com Nai-Qi Wu received the M. Sc. and Ph. D. degrees in systems engineering both from Xi an Jiaotong University, Xi an, PRC in 1985 and 1988, respectively. From 1988 to 1995, he was with Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, PRC, and from 1995 to 1998, with Shantou University, Shantou, PRC. In 1998, he moved to Guangdong University of Technology. From 1991 to 1992, he was a visiting scholar in the School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA. In 1999, 2004, and , he was a visiting professor with the Department of Industrial Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA, the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, USA, and Industrial Systems Engineering Department, Industrial Systems Optimization Laboratory, University of Technology of Troyes, Troyes, France, respectively. He is currently a professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering in the Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechatronics Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, PRC. He is an associate editor of the IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics, Part C and IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering and editor in chief of Industrial Engineering Journal. He was a program committee member of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics, a program committee member of the IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, a program committee member of the 2006, IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, a program committee member of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, a program committee member of the 2007 International Conference on Engineering and Systems Management, and reviewer for many international journals. His research interests include production planning and scheduling, manufacturing system modeling and control, discrete event systems, Petri net theory and applications, transportation, and information assurance. nqwu@gdut.edu.cn (Corresponding author)
Resource-Oriented Petri Nets in Deadlock Avoidance of AGV Systems
Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation Seoul, Korea May 21-26, 2001 Resource-Oriented Petri Nets in Deadlock Avoidance of AGV Systems Naiqi Wu Department of Mechatronics
More informationA NOVEL SIMULATION METHODOLOGY FOR MODELING CLUSTER TOOLS. Emrah Cimren Robert Havey DongJin Kim
Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference R. Pasupathy, S.-H. Kim, A. Tolk, R. Hill, and M. E. Kuhl, eds A NOVEL SIMULATION METHODOLOGY FOR MODELING CLUSTER TOOLS Emrah Cimren Robert Havey DongJin
More informationTHROUGHPUT ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING CELLS USING TIMED PETRI NETS
c 1994 IEEE. Published in the Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, San Antonio, TX, October 2 5, 1994. Personal use of this material is permitted. However,
More informationModelling of Railway Network Using Petri Nets
Modelling of Railway Network Using Petri Nets MANDIRA BANIK 1, RANJAN DASGUPTA 2 1 Dept. of Computer Sc. & Engg., National Institute of Technical Teachers' Training & Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
More informationElementary Siphons of Petri Nets and Deadlock Control in FMS
Journal of Computer and Communications, 2015, 3, 1-12 Published Online July 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jcc http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2015.37001 Elementary Siphons of Petri Nets and
More informationComputers and Mathematics with Applications. Module-based architecture for a periodic job-shop scheduling problem
Computers and Mathematics with Applications 64 (2012) 1 10 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Computers and Mathematics with Applications journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/camwa
More informationA Deadlock Prevention Policy for Flexible Manufacturing Systems Using Siphons
Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation Seoul, Korea May 21-26, 2001 A Deadlock Prevention Policy for Flexible Manufacturing Systems Using Siphons YiSheng Huang 1
More informationSub-Optimal Scheduling of a Flexible Batch Manufacturing System using an Integer Programming Solution
Sub-Optimal Scheduling of a Flexible Batch Manufacturing System using an Integer Programming Solution W. Weyerman, D. West, S. Warnick Information Dynamics and Intelligent Systems Group Department of Computer
More informationNECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR DEADLOCKS IN FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS BASED ON A DIGRAPH MODEL
Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 217-228, June 2004 217 NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR DEADLOCKS IN FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS BASED ON A DIGRAPH MODEL Wenle Zhang, Robert P. Judd,
More informationThroughput Optimization in Single and Dual-Gripper Robotic Cells
Throughput Optimization in Single and Dual-Gripper Robotic Cells U.V. Manoj; manojuv@tamu.edu College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Chelliah Sriskandarajah Mays Business School,
More informationStructural Analysis of Resource Allocation Systems with Synchronization Constraints
Structural Analysis of Resource Allocation Systems with Synchronization Constraints Spyros Reveliotis School of Industrial & Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332 USA Abstract
More informationTime Petri Nets. Miriam Zia School of Computer Science McGill University
Time Petri Nets Miriam Zia School of Computer Science McGill University Timing Specifications Why is time introduced in Petri nets? To model interaction between activities taking into account their start
More informationOPTIMAL TOKEN ALLOCATION IN TIMED CYCLIC EVENT GRAPHS
OPTIMAL TOKEN ALLOCATION IN TIMED CYCLIC EVENT GRAPHS Alessandro Giua, Aldo Piccaluga, Carla Seatzu Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, Italy giua@diee.unica.it
More informationEvaluating the Impact of Process Changes on Cluster Tool Performance
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, VOL. 13, NO. 2, MAY 2000 181 Evaluating the Impact of Process Changes on Cluster Tool Performance Jeffrey W. Herrmann, Niranjan Chandrasekaran, Brian F.
More informationA Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Checking Consistency of Free-Choice Signal Transition Graphs
Fundamenta Informaticae XX (2004) 1 23 1 IOS Press A Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Checking Consistency of Free-Choice Signal Transition Graphs Javier Esparza Institute for Formal Methods in Computer Science
More informationA REACHABLE THROUGHPUT UPPER BOUND FOR LIVE AND SAFE FREE CHOICE NETS VIA T-INVARIANTS
A REACHABLE THROUGHPUT UPPER BOUND FOR LIVE AND SAFE FREE CHOICE NETS VIA T-INVARIANTS Francesco Basile, Ciro Carbone, Pasquale Chiacchio Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e dell Informazione, Università
More informationCurriculum Vitae Name: Education degree: Postal address: Phone: Cellular phone: Fax: Research and Teaching Interests Current Position
Name: Jo-Ming Tseng Education degree: Curriculum Vitae Ph.D., Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (NYUST), Taiwan Postal address: 666,
More informationStochastic Petri Net. Ben, Yue (Cindy) 2013/05/08
Stochastic Petri Net 2013/05/08 2 To study a formal model (personal view) Definition (and maybe history) Brief family tree: the branches and extensions Advantages and disadvantages for each Applications
More informationScheduling jobs with agreeable processing times and due dates on a single batch processing machine
Theoretical Computer Science 374 007 159 169 www.elsevier.com/locate/tcs Scheduling jobs with agreeable processing times and due dates on a single batch processing machine L.L. Liu, C.T. Ng, T.C.E. Cheng
More informationTime and Timed Petri Nets
Time and Timed Petri Nets Serge Haddad LSV ENS Cachan & CNRS & INRIA haddad@lsv.ens-cachan.fr DISC 11, June 9th 2011 1 Time and Petri Nets 2 Timed Models 3 Expressiveness 4 Analysis 1/36 Outline 1 Time
More informationA deadlock prevention method for railway networks using monitors for colored Petri nets
A deadlock prevention method for railway networks using monitors for colored Petri nets Maria Pia Fanti Dip di Elettrotecnica ed Elettronica Politecnico di Bari, Italy fanti@deemailpolibait Abstract The
More information2.13 Maximum flow with a strictly positive initial feasible flow
ex-.-. Foundations of Operations Research Prof. E. Amaldi. Maximum flow and minimum cut iven the following network with capacities on the arcs find a maximum (feasible) flow from node to node, and determine
More informationLinear programming techniques for analysis and control of batches Petri nets
Linear programming techniques for analysis and control of batches Petri nets Isabel Demongodin, LSIS, Univ. of Aix-Marseille, France (isabel.demongodin@lsis.org) Alessandro Giua DIEE, Univ. of Cagliari,
More informationTime(d) Petri Net. Serge Haddad. Petri Nets 2016, June 20th LSV ENS Cachan, Université Paris-Saclay & CNRS & INRIA
Time(d) Petri Net Serge Haddad LSV ENS Cachan, Université Paris-Saclay & CNRS & INRIA haddad@lsv.ens-cachan.fr Petri Nets 2016, June 20th 2016 1 Time and Petri Nets 2 Time Petri Net: Syntax and Semantic
More informationExact Mixed Integer Programming for Integrated Scheduling and Process Planning in Flexible Environment
Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering 15 (2014) 47-53 Exact ixed Integer Programming for Integrated Scheduling and Process Planning in Flexible Environment ohammad Saidi mehrabad a, Saeed Zarghami
More informationA Siphon-based Deadlock Prevention Policy for a Class of Petri Nets - S 3 PMR
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control A Siphon-based eadlock Prevention Policy for a Class of Petri Nets - S 3 PMR Mingming Yan, Rongming Zhu, Zhiwu Li
More informationThe network maintenance problem
22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 3 to 8 December 2017 mssanz.org.au/modsim2017 The network maintenance problem Parisa Charkhgard a, Thomas Kalinowski
More informationSTABILITY ANALYSIS OF DAMPED SDOF SYSTEMS WITH TWO TIME DELAYS IN STATE FEEDBACK
Journal of Sound and Vibration (1998) 214(2), 213 225 Article No. sv971499 STABILITY ANALYSIS OF DAMPED SDOF SYSTEMS WITH TWO TIME DELAYS IN STATE FEEDBACK H. Y. HU ANDZ. H. WANG Institute of Vibration
More informationONE NOVEL COMPUTATIONALLY IMPROVED OPTIMAL CONTROL POLICY FOR DEADLOCK PROBLEMS OF FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS USING PETRI NETS
Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference Modelling, Identification and Control (AsiaMIC 2013) April 10-12, 2013 Phuket, Thailand ONE NOVEL COMPUTATIONALLY IMPROVED OPTIMAL CONTROL POLICY FOR
More informationCycle time optimization of deterministic timed weighted marked graphs by transformation
Cycle time optimization of deterministic timed weighted marked graphs by transformation Zhou He, Zhiwu Li, Alessandro Giua, Abstract Timed marked graphs, a special class of Petri nets, are extensively
More informationc 2011 Nisha Somnath
c 2011 Nisha Somnath HIERARCHICAL SUPERVISORY CONTROL OF COMPLEX PETRI NETS BY NISHA SOMNATH THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace
More informationLecture 8: Column Generation
Lecture 8: Column Generation (3 units) Outline Cutting stock problem Classical IP formulation Set covering formulation Column generation A dual perspective Vehicle routing problem 1 / 33 Cutting stock
More informationUsing Shared-Resource Capacity for Robust Control of Failure-Prone Manufacturing Systems
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART A: SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, VOL. 38, NO. 3, MAY 2008 605 Using Shared-Resource Capacity for Robust Control of Failure-Prone Manufacturing Systems Shengyong
More informationObserver-based sampled-data controller of linear system for the wave energy converter
International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, December 211, pp. 275-279 http://dx.doi.org/1.5391/ijfis.211.11.4.275 Observer-based sampled-data controller of linear system
More informationAnalysis and Optimization of Discrete Event Systems using Petri Nets
Volume 113 No. 11 2017, 1 10 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu ijpam.eu Analysis and Optimization of Discrete Event Systems using Petri Nets
More informationDEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH OPERATIONS RESEARCH DETERMINISTIC QUALIFYING EXAMINATION. Part I: Short Questions
DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH OPERATIONS RESEARCH DETERMINISTIC QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Part I: Short Questions August 12, 2008 9:00 am - 12 pm General Instructions This examination is
More informationA Generalized Stochastic Petri net Model for Performance Analysis and Control of Capacitated Re-entrant Lines
IEEE RANSACIONS ON R&A, VOL. XX, NO. Y, MONH 2003 1 A Generalized Stochastic etri net Model for erformance Analysis and Control of Capacitated Re-entrant Lines Jin Young Choi and Spyros A. Reveliotis*
More information[4] T. I. Seidman, \\First Come First Serve" is Unstable!," tech. rep., University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1993.
[2] C. J. Chase and P. J. Ramadge, \On real-time scheduling policies for exible manufacturing systems," IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. AC-37, pp. 491{496, April 1992. [3] S. H. Lu and P. R. Kumar,
More informationResearch Article Mathematical Model and Cluster Synchronization for a Complex Dynamical Network with Two Types of Chaotic Oscillators
Applied Mathematics Volume 212, Article ID 936, 12 pages doi:1.11/212/936 Research Article Mathematical Model and Cluster Synchronization for a Complex Dynamical Network with Two Types of Chaotic Oscillators
More informationA Semiconductor Wafer
M O T I V A T I O N Semi Conductor Wafer Fabs A Semiconductor Wafer Clean Oxidation PhotoLithography Photoresist Strip Ion Implantation or metal deosition Fabrication of a single oxide layer Etching MS&E324,
More informationOn Qualitative Analysis of Fault Trees Using Structurally Persistent Nets
On Qualitative Analysis of Fault Trees Using Structurally Persistent Nets Ricardo J. Rodríguez rj.rodriguez@unileon.es Research Institute of Applied Sciences in Cybersecurity University of León, Spain
More informationA Method for Sweet Point Operation of Re-entrant Lines
A Method for Sweet Point Operation of Re-entrant Lines Semyon M. Meerkov, Chao-Bo Yan, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 4819-2122, USA (e-mail:
More informationIntuitionistic Fuzzy Estimation of the Ant Methodology
BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES Volume 9, No 2 Sofia 2009 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Estimation of the Ant Methodology S Fidanova, P Marinov Institute of Parallel Processing,
More informationHYPENS Manual. Fausto Sessego, Alessandro Giua, Carla Seatzu. February 7, 2008
HYPENS Manual Fausto Sessego, Alessandro Giua, Carla Seatzu February 7, 28 HYPENS is an open source tool to simulate timed discrete, continuous and hybrid Petri nets. It has been developed in Matlab to
More informationIN AN industrial automated manufacturing system (AMS),
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS: SYSTEMS, VOL. 45, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2015 1459 Lexicographic Multiobjective Integer Programming for Optimal and Structurally Minimal Petri Net Supervisors
More informationDESIGN OF LIVENESS-ENFORCING SUPERVISORS VIA TRANSFORMING PLANT PETRI NET MODELS OF FMS
Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 1, No., pp. 0, May 010 Published online February 010 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.100/asjc.18 DESIGN OF LIVENESS-ENFORCING SUPERVISORS VIA TRANSFORMING
More informationOptical time-domain differentiation based on intensive differential group delay
Optical time-domain differentiation based on intensive differential group delay Li Zheng-Yong( ), Yu Xiang-Zhi( ), and Wu Chong-Qing( ) Key Laboratory of Luminescence and Optical Information of the Ministry
More informationExercises Stochastic Performance Modelling. Hamilton Institute, Summer 2010
Exercises Stochastic Performance Modelling Hamilton Institute, Summer Instruction Exercise Let X be a non-negative random variable with E[X ]
More informationStochastic Petri Nets. Jonatan Lindén. Modelling SPN GSPN. Performance measures. Almost none of the theory. December 8, 2010
Stochastic Almost none of the theory December 8, 2010 Outline 1 2 Introduction A Petri net (PN) is something like a generalized automata. A Stochastic Petri Net () a stochastic extension to Petri nets,
More informationOn the Optimality of Randomized Deadlock Avoidance Policies
On the Optimality of Randomized Deadlock Avoidance Policies Spyros A. Reveliotis and Jin Young Choi School of Industrial & Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332 Abstract
More informationA Self-adaption Quantum Genetic Algorithm Used in the Design of Command and Control Structure
2017 3rd International Conference on Computational Systems and Communications (ICCSC 2017) A Self-adaption Quantum Genetic Algorithm Used in the esign of Command and Control Structure SUN Peng1, 3, a,
More informationProduct Quality Prediction by a Neural Soft-Sensor Based on MSA and PCA
International Journal of Automation and Computing 1 (2006) 17-22 Product Quality Prediction by a Neural Soft-Sensor Based on MSA and PCA Jian Shi, Xing-Gao Liu National Laboratory of Industrial Control
More informationResearch Article Comparison and Evaluation of Deadlock Prevention Methods for Different Size Automated Manufacturing Systems
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 2015, Article ID 537893, 19 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/537893 Research Article Comparison and Evaluation of Deadlock Prevention Methods for Different
More informationOn the Cross-Correlation of a p-ary m-sequence of Period p 2m 1 and Its Decimated
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL 58, NO 3, MARCH 01 1873 On the Cross-Correlation of a p-ary m-sequence of Period p m 1 Its Decimated Sequences by (p m +1) =(p +1) Sung-Tai Choi, Taehyung Lim,
More informationTransfer Line Balancing Problem
Transfer Line Balancing Problem Transfer Line Balancing Problem (TLBP) was introduced in [3] In comparison with the well-known assembly line balancing problems, TLBP has many new assumptions reflecting
More informationMQNA - Markovian Queueing Networks Analyser
MQNA - Markovian Queueing Networks Analyser Leonardo Brenner Paulo Fernandes Afonso Sales PUCRS, Brazil PUCRS, Brazil PUCRS, Brazil lbrenner@inf.pucrs.br paulof@inf.pucrs.br asales@inf.pucrs.br Abstract
More informationc 2014 Vijayalakshmi Deverakonda
c 214 Vijayalakshmi Deverakonda DISJUNCTIVE NORMAL FORMULA BASED SUPERVISORY CONTROL POLICY FOR GENERAL PETRI NETS BY VIJAYALAKSHMI DEVERAKONDA THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationThe Passport Control Problem or How to Keep an Unstable Service System Load Balanced?
The Passport Control Problem or How to Keep an Unstable Service System Load Balanced? A. ITAI Computer Science Department, Technion M. RODEH Computer Science Department, Technion H. SHACHNAI Computer Science
More informationAnalysis of real-time system conflict based on fuzzy time Petri nets
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 26 (2014) 983 991 DOI:10.3233/IFS-130789 IOS Press 983 Analysis of real-time system conflict based on fuzzy time Petri nets Zhao Tian a,, Zun-Dong Zhang a,b, Yang-Dong
More informationCurriculum Vitae. Ran Wei
Curriculum Vitae Ran Wei Contact Information Mailing Address: Department of Geography University of Utah 260 S. Central Campus Dr., Rm. 270 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9155, USA Phone: 1-801-581-8730 Email:
More information7. Queueing Systems. 8. Petri nets vs. State Automata
Petri Nets 1. Finite State Automata 2. Petri net notation and definition (no dynamics) 3. Introducing State: Petri net marking 4. Petri net dynamics 5. Capacity Constrained Petri nets 6. Petri net models
More informationMulti-criteria approximation schemes for the resource constrained shortest path problem
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Multi-criteria approximation schemes for the resource constrained shortest path problem Markó Horváth Tamás Kis Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract
More informationSystem Reliability Allocation Based on Bayesian Network
Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 6, No. 3, 681-687 (2012) 681 Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences An International Journal System Reliability Allocation Based on Bayesian Network Wenxue Qian 1,, Xiaowei Yin
More informationLow complexity state metric compression technique in turbo decoder
LETTER IEICE Electronics Express, Vol.10, No.15, 1 7 Low complexity state metric compression technique in turbo decoder Qingqing Yang 1, Xiaofang Zhou 1a), Gerald E. Sobelman 2, and Xinxin Li 1, 3 1 State
More informationClasses of Petri Nets That a Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Reachability is Obtainable
Trans. of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers Vol.E1, No.1, 92/97 (2001) Classes of Petri Nets That a Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Reachability is Obtainable Kunihiko Hiraishi and
More informationORI 390Q Models and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems First Exam, fall 1994
ORI 90Q Models and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems First Exam, fall 1994 (time, defect rate) (12,0.05) 5 6 V A (16,0.07) (15,0.07) (5,0) M 1 1 2 M1 M2 O A (10,0.1) 7 8 V B (8,0.2) M4 2 4 M5 The figure
More informationNONBLOCKING CONTROL OF PETRI NETS USING UNFOLDING. Alessandro Giua Xiaolan Xie
NONBLOCKING CONTROL OF PETRI NETS USING UNFOLDING Alessandro Giua Xiaolan Xie Dip. Ing. Elettrica ed Elettronica, U. di Cagliari, Italy. Email: giua@diee.unica.it INRIA/MACSI Team, ISGMP, U. de Metz, France.
More informationSimultaneous Integrated Model with Multiobjective for Continuous Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Scheduling Problem
Simultaneous Integrated Model with Multiobjective for Continuous Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Scheduling Problem Nurhidayu Idris 1 and Zaitul Marlizawati Zainuddin 2 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences,
More informationSTOCHASTIC MODELLING OF A COMPUTER SYSTEM WITH HARDWARE REDUNDANCY SUBJECT TO MAXIMUM REPAIR TIME
STOCHASTIC MODELLING OF A COMPUTER SYSTEM WITH HARDWARE REDUNDANCY SUBJECT TO MAXIMUM REPAIR TIME V.J. Munday* Department of Statistics, M.D. University, Rohtak-124001 (India) Email: vjmunday@rediffmail.com
More informationOptimal Checkpoint Placement on Real-Time Tasks with Harmonic Periods
Kwak SW, Yang JM. Optimal checkpoint placement on real-time tasks with harmonic periods. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 27(1): 105 112 Jan. 2012. DOI 10.1007/s11390-012-1209-0 Optimal Checkpoint
More informationIndustrial Automation (Automação de Processos Industriais)
Industrial Automation (Automação de Processos Industriais) Discrete Event Systems http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/~jag/courses/api1516/api1516.html Slides 2010/2011 Prof. Paulo Jorge Oliveira Rev. 2011-2015
More informationResearch Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
Applied Mathematics Volume 202, Article ID 689820, 3 pages doi:0.55/202/689820 Research Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
More informationPetri Nets (for Planners)
Petri (for Planners) B. Bonet, P. Haslum... from various places... ICAPS 2011 & Motivation Petri (PNs) is formalism for modelling discrete event systems Developed by (and named after) C.A. Petri in 1960s
More informationYu (Marco) Nie. Appointment Northwestern University Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Fall present.
Yu (Marco) Nie A328 Technological Institute Civil and Environmental Engineering 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60202-3129 Phone: (847) 467-0502 Fax: (847) 491-4011 Email: y-nie@northwestern.edu Appointment
More informationNEW COLOURED REDUCTIONS FOR SOFTWARE VALIDATION. Sami Evangelista Serge Haddad Jean-François Pradat-Peyre
NEW COLOURED REDUCTIONS FOR SOFTWARE VALIDATION Sami Evangelista Serge Haddad Jean-François Pradat-Peyre CEDRIC-CNAM Paris 292, rue St Martin, 75003 Paris LAMSADE-CNRS UMR 7024 Université Paris 9 Place
More informationChapter 3: Discrete Optimization Integer Programming
Chapter 3: Discrete Optimization Integer Programming Edoardo Amaldi DEIB Politecnico di Milano edoardo.amaldi@polimi.it Website: http://home.deib.polimi.it/amaldi/opt-16-17.shtml Academic year 2016-17
More informationSome results on cross-correlation distribution between a p-ary m-sequence and its decimated sequences
Some results on cross-correlation distribution between a p-ary m-sequence and its decimated sequences A joint work with Chunlei Li, Xiangyong Zeng, and Tor Helleseth Selmer Center, University of Bergen
More informationRO: Exercices Mixed Integer Programming
RO: Exercices Mixed Integer Programming N. Brauner Université Grenoble Alpes Exercice 1 : Knapsack A hiker wants to fill up his knapsack of capacity W = 6 maximizing the utility of the objects he takes.
More informationMinimizing Mean Flowtime and Makespan on Master-Slave Systems
Minimizing Mean Flowtime and Makespan on Master-Slave Systems Joseph Y-T. Leung,1 and Hairong Zhao 2 Department of Computer Science New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ 07102, USA Abstract The
More informationAlgorithms. NP -Complete Problems. Dong Kyue Kim Hanyang University
Algorithms NP -Complete Problems Dong Kyue Kim Hanyang University dqkim@hanyang.ac.kr The Class P Definition 13.2 Polynomially bounded An algorithm is said to be polynomially bounded if its worst-case
More informationOperations Research Letters. Instability of FIFO in a simple queueing system with arbitrarily low loads
Operations Research Letters 37 (2009) 312 316 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Operations Research Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/orl Instability of FIFO in a simple queueing
More informationTime-optimal scheduling for high throughput screening processes using cyclic discrete event models
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 66 2004 181 191 ime-optimal scheduling for high throughput screening processes using cyclic discrete event models E. Mayer a,, J. Raisch a,b a Fachgruppe System
More informationOptimal Consecutive-$ $i$ $k$ $/i$ $-out-of-$ $i$ $(2k+1)$ $/i$ $: $ $i$ $G$ $/i$ $ Cycle. Technical Report
Optimal Consecutive-$ $i$ $k$ $/i$ $-out-of-$ $i$ $2k1)$ $/i$ $: $ $i$ $G$ $/i$ $ Cycle Technical Report Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Minnesota 4-192 EECS Building 2 Union
More informationDetermination of accelerated condition for brush wear of small brush-type DC motor in using Design of Experiment (DOE) based on the Taguchi method
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 25 (2) (2011) 317~322 www.springerlink.com/content/1738-494x DOI 10.1007/s12206-010-1230-6 Determination of accelerated condition for brush wear of small brush-type
More informationCMSC 722, AI Planning. Planning and Scheduling
CMSC 722, AI Planning Planning and Scheduling Dana S. Nau University of Maryland 1:26 PM April 24, 2012 1 Scheduling Given: actions to perform set of resources to use time constraints» e.g., the ones computed
More informationADVANCED ROBOTICS. PLAN REPRESENTATION Generalized Stochastic Petri nets and Markov Decision Processes
ADVANCED ROBOTICS PLAN REPRESENTATION Generalized Stochastic Petri nets and Markov Decision Processes Pedro U. Lima Instituto Superior Técnico/Instituto de Sistemas e Robótica September 2009 Reviewed April
More informationEstimating analytically the capacity of batch plants with shared equipment: a yoghurt plant case study
Procedia Food Science (0) 79 798 th International Congress on Engineering and Food (ICEF) Estimating analytically the capacity of batch plants with shared equipment: a yoghurt plant case study Alexandros
More informationAn Effective Chromosome Representation for Evolving Flexible Job Shop Schedules
An Effective Chromosome Representation for Evolving Flexible Job Shop Schedules Joc Cing Tay and Djoko Wibowo Intelligent Systems Lab Nanyang Technological University asjctay@ntuedusg Abstract As the Flexible
More informationA Hybrid Time-delay Prediction Method for Networked Control System
International Journal of Automation and Computing 11(1), February 2014, 19-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11633-014-0761-1 A Hybrid Time-delay Prediction Method for Networked Control System Zhong-Da Tian Xian-Wen Gao
More informationProperty-preserving subnet reductions for designing manufacturing systems with shared resources
Theoretical Computer Science 332 (2005) 461 485 www.elsevier.com/locate/tcs Property-preserving subnet reductions for designing manufacturing systems with shared resources H.J. Huang a,, L. Jiao b, T.Y.
More informationOn correlation between two real interval sets
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS On correlation between two real interval sets To cite this article: P Pandian and K Kavitha 2018 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1000 012055 View the article
More informationDelay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
International Journal of Automation and Computing 7(2), May 2010, 224-229 DOI: 10.1007/s11633-010-0224-2 Delay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
More informationSurveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing (LIESMARS), Wuhan University, China
Name: Peng Yue Title: Professor and Director, Institute of Geospatial Information and Location Based Services (IGILBS) Associate Chair, Department of Geographic Information Engineering School of Remote
More informationThe Expected Opportunity Cost and Selecting the Optimal Subset
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 9, 2015, no. 131, 6507-6519 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2015.58561 The Expected Opportunity Cost and Selecting the Optimal Subset Mohammad
More informationTHIS paper is aimed at designing efficient decoding algorithms
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. 45, NO. 7, NOVEMBER 1999 2333 Sort-and-Match Algorithm for Soft-Decision Decoding Ilya Dumer, Member, IEEE Abstract Let a q-ary linear (n; k)-code C be used
More informationA Method Based on Depth-first Search to Compute All Minimal Siphons
2148 JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE, VOL. 9, NO. 8, AUGUST 2014 A Method Based on Depth-first Search to Compute All Minimal Siphons Fan Ning Hangzhou Vocational & Technical College, Hangzhou 310018, China ningfanse@126.com
More informationEDF Feasibility and Hardware Accelerators
EDF Feasibility and Hardware Accelerators Andrew Morton University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, arrmorton@uwaterloo.ca Wayne M. Loucks University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, wmloucks@pads.uwaterloo.ca
More informationTHE power transfer capability is one of the most fundamental
4172 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 27, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2012 Letters Power Characterization of Isolated Bidirectional Dual-Active-Bridge DC DC Converter With Dual-Phase-Shift Control Biao
More informationSCHEDULING POLICIES IN MULTI-PRODUCT MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS WITH SEQUENCE-DEPENDENT SETUP TIMES
Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference S. Jain, R. R. Creasey, J. Himmelspach, K. P. White, and M. Fu, eds. SCHEDULING POLICIES IN MULTI-PRODUCT MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS WITH SEQUENCE-DEPENDENT
More informationA Halal and Quality Attributes Driven Animal Products Formal Producing System Based on HQESPNM
A Halal and Quality Attributes Driven Animal Products Formal Producing System Based on HQESPN Qiang Han and Wenxing Bao School of Computer Science and Engineering, BeiFang University of Nationalities,
More information