General Equilibrium. General Equilibrium, Berardino. Cesi, MSc Tor Vergata
|
|
- Heather Carson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 General Equilibrium
2 Equilibrium in Consumption
3 GE begins (1/3) 2-Individual/ 2-good Exchange economy (No production, no transaction costs, full information..) Endowment (Nature): e Private property/ NO Social Planner Redistribution: Voluntary exchange (blocking some trades) SMS SMS
4 GE begins (2/3) Contract curve and Pareto efficiency (exchange equilibrium of the process of voluntary exchange) MRS i, j Not all Pareto efficient allocations are equilibria (i.e. allocation d)
5 GE begins (3/3) What does exchange mean? (no Blocking) Each individual face the following maximization problem:
6 General equilibrium (1/3) : Exchange economy Consumers: i T; wwww T = 1,, I with preferences i over allocations of n goods with endowment e i = e i i 1,, e n and e e 1,, e I Allocations x x i x i i 1,, x n x 1,, x I with consumer i s bundle given by Conditions for allocations to be a barter equilibrium: a) Feasibility: x F e with F e x i T x i = i T e i : assignment of goods not exceed the available amount
7 General equilibrium (2/3) : b) Pareto efficiency: An allocation is Pareto efficient if it is not possible to make someone strictly better off without making someone else worse off A feasible allocation x F e is Pareto efficient if there are no other feasible allocations, y F e, such that y i i x i for all consumers, i, with at least one preference strict The equilibrium must be Pareto efficient, but not all Pareto efficient allocation are equilibria Some Pareto efficient allocations will be blocked
8 General equilibrium (3/3) : c) Unblocked Allocation must be unblocked by any coalition (S) of consumers With I>2, consumers may form coalitions to block proposed allocations S blocks x F e if there is an allocation y such that: i S y i = i S e i y i i x i for all i S, with at least one preference strict The set of all equilibrium allocations (satisfying a)-c)) is defined as the Core of an Exchange Economy (C e ) with endowment e.
9 Perfectly Competitive Market Consumers: Don t know each other (preferences), only prices matter Sufficiently insignificant on every market: price takers (no market power) Price is known Decentralized markets: each agent (seller/buyer) acts in his own selfinterest while ignoring the actions of others Self-interest oriented Individual utility maximizer at that price No production No uncertainty Equilibrium: There exists a price (vector) at which markets for goods k (simultaneously) clear (demand-supply matching) WE show the Existence of this price vector
10 Existence (1/17) Basic assumptions (consumers) i T; wwww T = 1,, I with preferences i on the n consumption set given by the utility function u i n (on ) u i is: 1. Continuous 2. Strongly increasing 3. Strictly quasiconcave At the (given) price vector p p 1,, p n 0 Consumer solves: max u x i n R + i ( x i ) R + s.t. p x i p e i R + with solution x i p, p e i, by 1-3, unique for each p 0 and n continuous in p on n-good/ n-market R ++
11 Existence (2/17) Excess demand functions Aggregate Excess demand function for good k (real) z k i ( ) ( i p x ) k p, p e i I i I z k p > 0: Aggregate demand for good k exceeds the aggregate endowment for good k z k p < 0: excess supply of good k Aggregate excess demand function (vector) e i k z ( p) ( z ( p),..., z ( p) ) 1 n
12 Existence (3/17) Given u i satisfying (1-3), then for all p 0, z p satisfies: Continuity at p Homogeneity of degree zero in prices: z λp = z p λ > 0 Walras law: p z p = 0 Walras law says that at any set of positive prices, the aggregate excess demand is zero (follows from u i strongly increasing and binding budget constraint) Excess demand in the system of markets must be matched by excess supply of equal value, at given prices, somewhere else in the system 2-good case: p 1 z 1 p = p 2 z 2 p z 1 p > 0 z 2 p < 0 z 1 p = 0 z 2 p = 0 By the Walras law if, at same prices, n-1 markets are in equilibrium then the nth market must also be in equilibrium
13 Existence (4/17) We have a general equilibrium when z k p = 0, partial equilibrium in the single market k (demand equal to supply in the market k); Or z p = 0 (demand equal to supply in every market) Walrasian prices p : prices equalizing demand and supply in every market * n p R + + A vector is called Walrasian equilibrium if z p = 0
14 Existence (5/17) THEOREM 1 (Existence) Suppose z satisfying the following conditions: 1) z(.) is continuous on n R ++ 2) p z p = 0 for all p 0 3) if p m n is a sequence of price vectors in R ++ converging to p 0, and p k = 0 for some good k, then for some good k, the associate sequence of excess demands in the market k, z kk p m, is unbounded above Then there is a price vector p 0 such that z p = 0 Condition 3 says that if the prices of some but not all goods are arbitrarily close to zero the excess demand for at least one of those goods is arbitrarily high (to be shown) Proof: We need the fixed-point theorem (Brouwer). Brouwer s fixed-point Theorem Let SϲR n be a non-empty compact and convex set. Let f: S S be a continuous function. Then there exists at least one fixed point of f in S. That is, there exists at least one x S such that x = f(x ).
15 Existence (6/17) f is a continuous mapping from a, b into a, b (itself). Thus, f crosses the 45 line at least once within the square a, b x a, b nothing about uniqueness
16 Existence (7/17) Proof First part: We start by showing the existence of p in a relatively small set of prices, then we will extend this result by extending this set. (hint: keep in mind the fixed point theorem, f: S S) Define: z k p = mmm z k p, 1 for all p 0 (bounded above by 1) and z p = z 1 p,.., z n p n S ε = p p k = 1 aaa p k ε k=1 k with εε 0,1 1+2n Compact (closed and bounded) Convex Non-empty: i.e. p= 2+1 n, n 1 n, 1+2n because ε < 1 εs ε
17 Existence (8/17) For each p S ε and for each k, let s define f k p as: f k p = ε+p k+mmm 0,z k p nε+1+ n m=1 mmm 0,z m p and f p = f 1 p,, f n p n Then k=1 f k p = 1 and f k p f k p ε 1+2n given ε < 1( ε nn+1+n 1 < f is continuous function mapping the set S ε into itself Is f k p continuous on S ε? Check: z k p is continuous on S ε (the same holds for z k p ) ε nn+1+n 1 because z m p 1 m ε 1+2n ). This implies f: S ε S ε denomiator and numerator of f k p are continuous on S ε denominator bounded away from zero (at least equal to 1)
18 Existence (9/17) Assume n=2, then f k p ε 1+2n becomes 1 > f k p ε 5 f maps S ε into S ε (it recalls the fixed point theorem f: S ε S ε ) f p 1 S ε f p ε 5 ε 5 p 1 p S ε
19 Existence (10/17) We apply FPT: p ε S ε f p ε = p ε or f k p ε =p k ε Then by applying the above result to the definition of f p (and rearranging), we have: i) p ε k nε n + m= 1 max ( ( ε 0, z p ) = ε + max( 0, z ( p ε ) m But the proof is not over yet.what do we know so far? Simply: a price vector p ε satisfying (i) for every εε 0,1 k
20 Existence (11/17) Second part: let ε approach to zero, then it gives a sequence of price vector p ε satisfying (i). Check out: sequence p ε is bounded because p ε S ε (every price is between 0 and 1). Thus p ε must converge. Assume to pick up the sequence p ε converging to a vector defined (by chance) as p What we do know about this vector: since all p k sum up to 1, then we must have p 0 with p 0. We need to show that p 0 For this proof we use condition (3).
21 Existence (12/17) We show that p 0 by contradiction: assume p 0 does not hold Then for some k we must have p * k = 0 But by condition (3) there must exist some k * with p such that z kk p ε k ' = 0 is unbounded above (remind: we have ε 0) Since p ε p * ε, p 0 implies 0, therefore for some k=k i) p ε k nε n + m= 1 k ' = max p k ' ( ( ε 0, z p ) = ε + max( 0, z ( p ε ) m zero bounded above 0 k By unboundedness of z kk p ε (from condition (3)). CONTRADICTION: 0 (positive value)=ε + 1 Cannot exist a NON strictly positive price vector p for market k (then neither for k)
22 Existence (13/17) We have shown that p ε p 0 as ε 0. Last step: showing the second part of the statement, z p We use the continuity of z. on n R ++ obtained from z(.) = 0 lim ε 0 multiplying by z k (p ) and summing over k p * ε ε ( 0, z ( p ) = ε + max( 0 z ( p ) n ε p k nε + max m, m= 1 * k n m= 1 ( ( * ) ( ( * 0, z p max 0, z p ) p max = m k k for all k. ( *) ( ( * ) ( *) ( ( * p max 0, z p = z p max 0, z p ) z n m= 1 m n k = 1 k k By the Walras law the LHS is zero, then together with p 0 implies z k p = 0.
23 Existence (14/17) Let s check when aggregate excess demand z p satisfies (3) Theorem When u i is Continuous, Strongly increasing and Strictly quasiconcave and I i=1 e i 0 then z p satisfies (1)-(3). Proof 1) Let s focus on (3). Consider the sequence of strictly positive price vectors p m p 0 such that p k =0 for some good k. From I i=1 e i 0 we have p I i=1 e i > 0, then p I i=1 e i = I i=1 p e i > 0. Thus there must be at least one consumer i with p e i >0. 2) Part. By contradiction we assume the demand of consumer i along the sequence p m, x i p m, p m e i, is bounded : Then it must converge and assume x i p m, p m e i x m x Since individual is utility (strongly increasing) maximizer (under constraint) we have: p m x m = p m e i for every m, with: Budget constraint: lll m (p m x m = p m e i ) p x = p e i >0
24 Existence (15/17) Let s introduce x = x + 0,, 0, 1 k, 0,, 0, since u i is n strongly increasing on we have: 1) u i x > u i x Recalling that = 0, that implies: 2) p x = p e i >0 p k R + By continuity of u i we have that (1) e (2) imply, t 0,1 u i tx > u i x p tx < p e i Because p m p, x m x and continuity of u i, for large m u i tx > u i x m p m tx < p m e i.contradicting that x m solve the maximization problem at p m Thus sequence of demand x m p m, p m e i is unbounded There exist some good k such that m { } x k ' is unbounded above.
25 Existence (16/17) Because i s income converge to p e i then the sequence of i s income p m e i is bounded. The condition for the demand of k to be unbounded above and m affordable is Then: Thus: p k ' 0 m p k = lim p ' m k ' = Aggregate supply for k is fixed (endowment) 0 All consumers demand a non-negative amount of k then because consumer i s demand for k is unbounded above...aggregate excess demand for k is unbounded above along the sequence p m.
26 Existence (17/17) Theorem for the Existence of GE (revised conclusion) When u i is i) continuous, ii) strong increasing and iii) strictly n quasiconcave on and I R i=1 e i + 0 then there exists at least one price vector, p 0, such that z p = 0 Intuition: We know that i)-iii) make z(.) continuous, homogeneous of degree zero and respecting Walras s law I i=1 e i 0 makes z(.) satisfy (3) in theorem 1.
27 WE and Pareto efficiency (1/6) WEA: Pareto efficient allocation
28 WE and Pareto efficiency (2/6) Is a WEA Pareto efficient? Is the feasible bundle received in the WEA the most preferred in the consumer s budget set at the Walrasian prices? + Is the set of WEA on the Contract Curve? = Pareto Efficiency
29 WE and Pareto efficiency (3/6) Definition of WEA Let p be a Walrasian equilibrium for some economy with initial endowment e, and let: x p x 1 p, p e 1,, x I p, p e I, Then x p is called a Walrasian equilibrium allocation (WEA). a) A WEA must be (clearly) feasible Formally: Let p be a Walrasian equilibrium with initial endowment e. Let x p be the associate WEA. Then x p F e b) A WEA must be the most preferred (any other WEA feasible and preferred must be too expensive) Formally-Lemma 1: Assume u i n is strictly increasing on R, that consumer s demand at p 0 is x i, and that x i n + R + i. If u i x i > u i x i, then p x i > p x i ii. If u i x i u i x i, then p x i p x i
30 WE and Pareto efficiency (4/6) Proof: Part i, assume (ii) holds. Proof by contradiction on (i). Assume (i) does not hold: Assume u i x i > u i x i, then p x i < p x i It is possible a small increase on x i toward x i still lower than x i But this would imply u i x i > u i x i > u i x i and p x i < p x i Replacing x i with x i contradicts (2) Part 2, see the book.
31 WE and Pareto efficiency (5/6) W e : Set of WEA No uniqueness
32 WE and Pareto efficiency (6/6) and about the Pareto efficiency (remind the CC and the Core)? Consider an exchange economy u i, e i increasing on, then W e C e i T. If ui is strictly Proof. By contradiction. Assume W e C e. Since x p is WEA then x p F e (is feasible). However: x p n R + C e a (blocking) coalition S and allocation y such that: 1) y i i S = e i i S and 2) u i y i u i x i p, p e i for all i S, with at least one inequality strict. Also we have: (i) p i S y i = p i S e i By 2) and Lemma 1, for each i S, we must have p y i p x i p, p e i =p e i (with at least one strict) Summing over all i in S: p i S y i > p i S e i (that contradicts (i)) (at least one must get more than the endowment to be a member of the coalition)
33 Welfare (1/4) From the previous results: Core is a non-empty set; all Core allocations are Pareto efficient. Thus 1 Welfare Theorem: every WEA is Pareto Efficient Trade off: efficiency (Pareto) vs. Equity
34 Welfare (2/4) 2 Welfare Theorem: Consider an economy u i, e i with i T aggregate endowment I i=1 e i 0, and u i continuous, strong increasing and strict quasiconcave in n R. Suppose that x is Pareto efficient for u i, e i + and the endowment is i T redistributed so that the new endowment is x. Then x is a WEA of the resulting exchange economy u i, x i i T Graphical proof (intuition): assume by contradiction that x was not a WE, but it would contradict Pareto efficiency
35 Welfare (3/4) Formal Proof What we have: if x is Pareto efficient, then it must be feasible in the economy u i, x i, that is I i T i=1 x i = i=1 e i 0, then this economy has a WEA, let s say x. What is remained to show: x = x Since x is WEA, then: x i is the consumer i demand function with endowment x i, then this implies: a) u i x i u i x i for all i T x must be feasible for the economy u i, x i i T I i=1 x i = I i=1 e i = i=1 I x i Then x is feasible for the original economy u i, e i i T But then every inequality in (a) (for every i) must be binding, otherwise x cannot be Pareto efficient. u i x i = u i x i must implies x i = x i because otherwise by strict quasiconcavity of u i, consumer would choose x α = αx i + 1 α x i with u i x α > u i x i = u i x i, contradicting that x i is utility-maximizing in the WE.
36 Welfare (4/4) Corollary of 2 WT: if x is Pareto efficient then x is a WEA for some Walrasian equilibrium p after redistribution of initial endowment to any allocation e F e, such that, p e i = p x i for every i I Redistribution + free market=pareto efficiency Less equity concerns
37 Equilibrium in Production
38 Producers (1/3) Fixed number of firm, I 1,.., J Production plan of each firm: y j j Input y k < 0 output > 0 j y k n R + Production possibility set Y j, j I 0 Y j R n Y j is closed and bounded Y j is strongly convex No constant and increasing return to scale (profitmaximizing production plant is unique)
39 Producers (2/3) Firm j s maximization problem: Since objective function is continuous and the constraint set is bounded and closed, a maximum for the profit function will exist, given by: The profit maximizing production plan, y j Unique by strong convexity, whenever p 0 n Continuous on Π j ( p) Π is continuous on j R ++ maxp y y j Y j j ( p) = maxp y y n R + j Y j j p, is: Firm s supply function (Remind Production Theory)
40 Producers (3/3) Aggregate production possibilities Y y y = y j j I, wwwww y j Y j Y respects all the assumptions on Y j. Aggregate profit p y has a unique maximum over Y when p 0 Define y p : aggregate profit-maximizing plan (continuous in p) Theorem: Aggregate profit maximization (y mmmmmmmmm AA ) For any price p 0, we have: p y p y for all y Y If and only if for some y j Y j, j I, we may write i) y = j I y j, and ii) p y j p y j for all y j Y j, j I Intuition: y maximizes aggregate profit iff it can be decomposed into individual firm profit-maximizing production plans
41 Consumers Consumers may supply goods and services by labour-commodity Consumer i s share in firm j (profit) 0 θ ii 1, with i T = 1 for all j I Consumer i s maximization problem: θ ii max u x i n R + ( i x ) s. t.: p x i p e i ( p) = m ( p) Solution x i p, m i p (unique) exists whenever p 0: Continuous in p (because m i p is continuous in p) on i + j J ij θ Π j n R ++
42 Equilibrium Let s define the refined economy u i, e i, θ ii, Y j i T,j I Aggregate excess demand for commodity k: z k i i ( p ) x p, m ( p) i I k ( ) j y ( ) k p j J i I e i k And the aggregate excess demand z ( p) ( z ( p),..., z ( p) ) 1 Theorem. If u i is continuous, strongly increasing and quasiconcave, 0 Y j R n, Y j is closed, bounded and strong convex, y + i T e i 0 for some y j I Y j, then there exist at least a price p 0 such that z p = 0. n
43 Example (1/5) 1-consumer, 1-firm economy Y = h, y 0 h b, aaa 0 y h α Where b>0 and αα 0,1 Y is closed, bounded, strongly convex and includes 0 Consumption, 2-good case 2 R + u h, y = h 1 β y β ; βε 0,1 Endowment (hours): e T, 0, with b>t (h<b)
44 Example (2/5)
45 Example (3/5) Solution (find p 0 or (w, p )) Firm s supply function Consumer s demand function Market clearing condition Firm: Where y = h α and h > 0. Foc: αph α 1 w = 0 h f = αp w max y py 1 1 α ; y f = αα w max h ph α 1 α ; π w, p α wh = 1 α α w αα w 1 1 α
46 Example (4/5) Consumer max u h, y ( h, y) s.t. pp + ww = ww + π w, p (net of profit) In fact from the endowment: w, p T, 0 Solutions: h c = 1 β ww+π w,p w ; y c = β ww+π w,p p = ww Since WE prices are positive and Excess demand is homogeneous of degree zero we assume p = 1 By Walras law we only need to find w ssss tttt h c + h f = T: w = α 1 β 1 α ααt 1 α > 0
47 Example (5/5) w p B: Technologically possible but infeasible (more than T) C: Feasible but not utility maximizer for the consumer C Pareto Efficient WEA
48 Welfare with production (1/7) WEA Pareto efficient in the economy u i, e i, θ ii, Y j i T,j I WEA is feasible: x, y = x 1,, x I, = y 1,, y j is feasible if x i for all i, y j Y j for all j, and i T x i = e i + y i 1 Welfare Theorem with Production: If u i is strictly increasing n on then every WEA is Pareto Efficient. R + i T j I n R +
49 Welfare with production (2/7) Proof. By contradiction. Assume x, y is a WEA at p but not Pareto efficient. The WEA is also feasible: i T x i = i T e i + j I y j Pareto inefficiency implies (x, y ), feasible, such that: u i x i u i x i with at least one with strict inequality, and p x i p x i Summing over i: p i T x i > p i T x i (at least one gets more) By feasibility: p i T e i + j I y j > p i T e i + j I y j After rearranging, p j I y j > p j I y j, for some j this would imply: p y j > p y j, but this contradicts that in the WE y j maximizes firm j s profit at p
50 Welfare with production (3/7) Is a Pareto efficient allocation also WEA? 2 Welfare Theorem with production: Suppose an economy with: a) u i continuous, strong increasing and strict quasiconcave b) 0 Y j R n, Y j closed, bounded and strongly convex c) y + i T e i 0 for some aggregate production vector y d) A Pareto efficient allocation (x, y ) Then there exist income transfers T 1,, T I T i = 0 i T and p such that: 1. x i maximizes u i x i s.t. p x i m i p + T i, i T 2. y i maximizes p y i s.t. y j Y j, j I
51 Welfare with production (4/7) Proof Let s construct: 1. a new production set for each firm j still satisfying (b): Y j Y j y i 2. A new economy E = u i, x i, θ ii, Y j i T,j I Lemma: since the original economy E = u i, e i, θ ii, Y j, has a WE, then also E satisfies all the necessary conditions for the existence of the WE with production (see revised theorem for the existence). Thus economy E has a WEA x, y at p 0. Next step: check whether x, y can also be a WE of the original economy,e = u i, e i, θ ii, Y j, first we need to show x i =x i. Let s use feasibility. Remind: x, y is feasible for the original economy by definition Is x,? also feasible for the original economy? Let s check. Each consumer can afford his endowment because 0 Y j implies that equilibrium profits of every firm j are non-negative. Thus: Consumption side: u i x i u i x i
52 Welfare with production (5/7) Production side We now show that a x, y is feasible also in the original economy Note that for now we have: a) y j Y j is such that y j =y j -y i for some y j Y j (see the definition of Y j ) b) x, y is feasible in E because it is a WEA in E a) + feasibility (a+b) imply: i T x i = i T x i + j I y j = i T x i + j I y j y j = i T x i j I y j + j I y j = i T e i + j I y j y is feasible in the original economy E. (still not enough ). Then x, Since x, y is Pareto efficient, then we must have: u i x i = u i x i By quasiconcavity it implies: x i =x i
53 Welfare with production (6/7) Thus we have: x i maximizes u i x i s.t. p x i p x i + j I θ ii p y j u i x i is strongly increasing then budget constraint equalizes at x i =x i. This implies: j I θ ii p y j =0 (zero profit condition for each firm j). y j =0 maximizes firm j s profits at p under Y j in E Since Y j Y j y j then y j maximizes p y j s.t. y j Y j, j I production side OK: the pareto efficient vector y j characterize a WE also in the original economy. Transfer side (T): Back to the consumer side. We have shown that: (*) x i maximizes u i x i s.t. p x i p x i Note that the transfer at the original economy to get (*) is such that T i +m i p p x i or T i p x i -m i p, with consumer s income at the original economy: m i p = p e i + θ ii j I p y j
54 Welfare with production (7/7) Last part to show: transfers must sum up to zero. i T T i = i T p x i i T p e i i T j I θ ij p y j From i T = 1 i T T i = i T p x i i T p e i j I p y j θ ii See that feasibility of x, y implies: i T p x i = i T p e i + j I p y j i T T i =0
Notes on General Equilibrium
Notes on General Equilibrium Alejandro Saporiti Alejandro Saporiti (Copyright) General Equilibrium 1 / 42 General equilibrium Reference: Jehle and Reny, Advanced Microeconomic Theory, 3rd ed., Pearson
More informationIntroduction to General Equilibrium
Introduction to General Equilibrium Juan Manuel Puerta November 6, 2009 Introduction So far we discussed markets in isolation. We studied the quantities and welfare that results under different assumptions
More informationCompetitive Equilibrium
Competitive Equilibrium Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 16, October 26 Outline 1 Pareto Effi ciency 2 The Core 3 Planner s Problem(s) 4 Competitive (Walrasian) Equilibrium Decentralized vs. Centralized Economic
More information1 General Equilibrium
1 General Equilibrium 1.1 Pure Exchange Economy goods, consumers agent : preferences < or utility : R + R initial endowments, R + consumption bundle, =( 1 ) R + Definition 1 An allocation, =( 1 ) is feasible
More informationFirst Welfare Theorem
First Welfare Theorem Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 17, October 31 Outline 1 First Welfare Theorem 2 Preliminaries to Second Welfare Theorem Past Definitions A feasible allocation (ˆx, ŷ) is Pareto optimal
More informationEC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 5
EC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 5 Leonardo Felli 32L.LG.04 27 October, 207 Pareto Efficient Allocation Recall the following result: Result An allocation x is Pareto-efficient if and only
More informationAdvanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 6: Partial and General Equilibrium
Advanced Microeconomic Theory Chapter 6: Partial and General Equilibrium Outline Partial Equilibrium Analysis General Equilibrium Analysis Comparative Statics Welfare Analysis Advanced Microeconomic Theory
More informationMarket Equilibrium and the Core
Market Equilibrium and the Core Ram Singh Lecture 3-4 September 22/25, 2017 Ram Singh (DSE) Market Equilibrium September 22/25, 2017 1 / 19 Market Exchange: Basics Let us introduce price in our pure exchange
More informationThe Ohio State University Department of Economics. Homework Set Questions and Answers
The Ohio State University Department of Economics Econ. 805 Winter 00 Prof. James Peck Homework Set Questions and Answers. Consider the following pure exchange economy with two consumers and two goods.
More informationGeneral Equilibrium and Welfare
and Welfare Lectures 2 and 3, ECON 4240 Spring 2017 University of Oslo 24.01.2017 and 31.01.2017 1/37 Outline General equilibrium: look at many markets at the same time. Here all prices determined in the
More informationDifferentiable Welfare Theorems Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium: Preliminaries
Differentiable Welfare Theorems Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium: Preliminaries Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 19, November 7 Outline 1 Welfare Theorems in the differentiable case. 2 Aggregate excess
More informationECONOMICS 001 Microeconomic Theory Summer Mid-semester Exam 2. There are two questions. Answer both. Marks are given in parentheses.
Microeconomic Theory Summer 206-7 Mid-semester Exam 2 There are two questions. Answer both. Marks are given in parentheses.. Consider the following 2 2 economy. The utility functions are: u (.) = x x 2
More informationIntroduction to General Equilibrium: Framework.
Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework. Economy: I consumers, i = 1,...I. J firms, j = 1,...J. L goods, l = 1,...L Initial Endowment of good l in the economy: ω l 0, l = 1,...L. Consumer i : preferences
More informationIn the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Microeconomics 1. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Dr. S.
In the Name of God Sharif University of Technology Graduate School of Management and Economics Microeconomics 1 44715 (1396-97 1 st term) - Group 1 Dr. S. Farshad Fatemi Chapter 10: Competitive Markets
More informationSecond Welfare Theorem
Second Welfare Theorem Econ 2100 Fall 2015 Lecture 18, November 2 Outline 1 Second Welfare Theorem From Last Class We want to state a prove a theorem that says that any Pareto optimal allocation is (part
More informationThe Consumer, the Firm, and an Economy
Andrew McLennan October 28, 2014 Economics 7250 Advanced Mathematical Techniques for Economics Second Semester 2014 Lecture 15 The Consumer, the Firm, and an Economy I. Introduction A. The material discussed
More informationDepartment of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712
Prof. Peck Fall 20 Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 872. (0 points) The following economy has two consumers, two firms, and three goods. Good is leisure/labor.
More informationLecture 1. History of general equilibrium theory
Lecture 1 History of general equilibrium theory Adam Smith: The Wealth of Nations, 1776 many heterogeneous individuals with diverging interests many voluntary but uncoordinated actions (trades) results
More informationMathematical models in economy. Short descriptions
Chapter 1 Mathematical models in economy. Short descriptions 1.1 Arrow-Debreu model of an economy via Walras equilibrium problem. Let us consider first the so-called Arrow-Debreu model. The presentation
More informationMicroeconomics II. MOSEC, LUISS Guido Carli Problem Set n 3
Microeconomics II MOSEC, LUISS Guido Carli Problem Set n 3 Problem 1 Consider an economy 1 1, with one firm (or technology and one consumer (firm owner, as in the textbook (MWG section 15.C. The set of
More informationLecture #3. General equilibrium
Lecture #3 General equilibrium Partial equilibrium equality of demand and supply in a single market (assumption: actions in one market do not influence, or have negligible influence on other markets) General
More informationCore. Ichiro Obara. December 3, 2008 UCLA. Obara (UCLA) Core December 3, / 22
Ichiro Obara UCLA December 3, 2008 Obara (UCLA) Core December 3, 2008 1 / 22 in Edgeworth Box Core in Edgeworth Box Obara (UCLA) Core December 3, 2008 2 / 22 in Edgeworth Box Motivation How should we interpret
More informationThe Fundamental Welfare Theorems
The Fundamental Welfare Theorems The so-called Fundamental Welfare Theorems of Economics tell us about the relation between market equilibrium and Pareto efficiency. The First Welfare Theorem: Every Walrasian
More information1 Second Welfare Theorem
Econ 701B Fall 018 University of Pennsylvania Recitation : Second Welfare Theorem Xincheng Qiu (qiux@sas.upenn.edu) 1 Second Welfare Theorem Theorem 1. (Second Welfare Theorem) An economy E satisfies (A1)-(A4).
More informationEconS Microeconomic Theory II Homework #9 - Answer key
EconS 503 - Microeconomic Theory II Homework #9 - Answer key 1. WEAs with market power. Consider an exchange economy with two consumers, A and B, whose utility functions are u A (x A 1 ; x A 2 ) = x A
More informationGeneral Equilibrium with Production
General Equilibrium with Production Ram Singh Microeconomic Theory Lecture 11 Ram Singh: (DSE) General Equilibrium: Production Lecture 11 1 / 24 Producer Firms I There are N individuals; i = 1,..., N There
More informationAdding Production to the Theory
Adding Production to the Theory We begin by considering the simplest situation that includes production: two goods, both of which have consumption value, but one of which can be transformed into the other.
More informationMicroeconomic Theory -1- Introduction
Microeconomic Theory -- Introduction. Introduction. Profit maximizing firm with monopoly power 6 3. General results on maximizing with two variables 8 4. Model of a private ownership economy 5. Consumer
More informationPositive Theory of Equilibrium: Existence, Uniqueness, and Stability
Chapter 7 Nathan Smooha Positive Theory of Equilibrium: Existence, Uniqueness, and Stability 7.1 Introduction Brouwer s Fixed Point Theorem. Let X be a non-empty, compact, and convex subset of R m. If
More informationCore equivalence and welfare properties without divisible goods
Core equivalence and welfare properties without divisible goods Michael Florig Jorge Rivera Cayupi First version November 2001, this version May 2005 Abstract We study an economy where all goods entering
More informationStructural Properties of Utility Functions Walrasian Demand
Structural Properties of Utility Functions Walrasian Demand Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 4, September 7 Outline 1 Structural Properties of Utility Functions 1 Local Non Satiation 2 Convexity 3 Quasi-linearity
More informationLecture 7: General Equilibrium - Existence, Uniqueness, Stability
Lecture 7: General Equilibrium - Existence, Uniqueness, Stability In this lecture: Preferences are assumed to be rational, continuous, strictly convex, and strongly monotone. 1. Excess demand function
More informationFundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics
Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics Ram Singh Lecture 6 September 29, 2015 Ram Singh: (DSE) General Equilibrium Analysis September 29, 2015 1 / 14 First Fundamental Theorem The First Fundamental
More informationThe Debreu-Scarf Theorem: The Core Converges to the Walrasian Allocations
The Debreu-Scarf Theorem: The Core Converges to the Walrasian Allocations We ve shown that any Walrasian equilibrium allocation (any WEA) is in the core, but it s obvious that the converse is far from
More informationNotes IV General Equilibrium and Welfare Properties
Notes IV General Equilibrium and Welfare Properties In this lecture we consider a general model of a private ownership economy, i.e., a market economy in which a consumer s wealth is derived from endowments
More informationMicroeconomics, Block I Part 2
Microeconomics, Block I Part 2 Piero Gottardi EUI Sept. 20, 2015 Piero Gottardi (EUI) Microeconomics, Block I Part 2 Sept. 20, 2015 1 / 48 Pure Exchange Economy H consumers with: preferences described
More informationThe Fundamental Welfare Theorems
The Fundamental Welfare Theorems The so-called Fundamental Welfare Theorems of Economics tell us about the relation between market equilibrium and Pareto efficiency. The First Welfare Theorem: Every Walrasian
More informationHandout: Competitive Equilibrium
1 Competitive equilibrium Handout: Competitive Equilibrium Definition 1. A competitive equilibrium is a set of endogenous variables (Ĉ, N s, N d, T, π, ŵ), such that given the exogenous variables (G, z,
More informationPublic Economics Ben Heijdra Chapter 9: Introduction to Normative Public Economics
Public Economics: Chapter 9 1 Public Economics Ben Heijdra Chapter 9: Introduction to Normative Public Economics Objectives of this chapter Public Economics: Chapter 9 2 Read Atkinson & Stiglitz (1980,
More informationEconomics 101. Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice
Economics 101 Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice 1 Uncle Léon The canonical model of exchange in economics is sometimes referred to as the Walrasian Model, after the early economist Léon
More information4 Lecture Applications
4 Lecture 4 4.1 Applications We now will look at some of the applications of the convex analysis we have learned. First, we shall us a separation theorem to prove the second fundamental theorem of welfare
More informationQuestion 1. (p p) (x(p, w ) x(p, w)) 0. with strict inequality if x(p, w) x(p, w ).
University of California, Davis Date: August 24, 2017 Department of Economics Time: 5 hours Microeconomics Reading Time: 20 minutes PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR THE Ph.D. DEGREE Please answer any three
More informationANSWER KEY. University of California, Davis Date: June 22, 2015
ANSWER KEY University of California, Davis Date: June, 05 Department of Economics Time: 5 hours Microeconomic Theory Reading Time: 0 minutes PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR THE Ph.D. DEGREE Please answer four
More informationEconomics 200A part 2 UCSD Fall quarter 2011 Prof. R. Starr Mr. Troy Kravitz1 FINAL EXAMINATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Economics 200A part 2 UCSD Fall quarter 2011 Prof. R. Starr Mr. Troy Kravitz1 FINAL EXAMINATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS This exam is take-home, open-book, open-notes. You may consult any published source (cite
More information3. THE EXCHANGE ECONOMY
Essential Microeconomics -1-3. THE EXCHNGE ECONOMY Pareto efficient allocations 2 Edgewort box analysis 5 Market clearing prices 13 Walrasian Equilibrium 16 Equilibrium and Efficiency 22 First welfare
More informationAlp Simsek (MIT) Recitation Notes: 1. Gorman s Aggregation Th eorem2. Normative Representative November 9, Household Theorem / 16
14.452 Recitation Notes: 1. Gorman s Aggregation Theorem 2. Normative Representative Household Theorem 3. Representative Firm Theorem (Recitation 2 on November 6, 2009) (Reference: "Introduction to Modern
More informationShort correct answers are sufficient and get full credit. Including irrelevant (though correct) information in an answer will not increase the score.
Economics 200A Part 2 UCSD Fall 2012 Prof. R. Starr, Mr. Troy Kravitz Final Exam 1 Your Name: Please answer all questions. Each of the six questions marked with a big number counts equally. Designate your
More informationProblem Set Suggested Answers
Problem Set 3 --- Suggested Answers 1. In chapters 15 18 the treatment is generalized to unbounded production technologies, resulting in the observation that when general equilibrium prices are announced,
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012
Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012 The time limit for this exam is 4 hours. It has four sections. Each section includes two questions. You are
More informationEconomics 604: Microeconomics Deborah Minehart & Rachel Kranton
Economics 604: Microeconomics Deborah Minehart & Rachel Kranton Matthew Chesnes Updated: May 12, 2005 1 Lecture 1: January 27, 2005 1.1 General Equilibrium Model (GE) Primitives: agents (consumers and
More informationGeneral equilibrium with externalities and tradable licenses
General equilibrium with externalities and tradable licenses Carlos Hervés-Beloso RGEA. Universidad de Vigo. e-mail: cherves@uvigo.es Emma Moreno-García Universidad de Salamanca. e-mail: emmam@usal.es
More informationDuality. for The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Lawrence E. Blume
Duality for The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Lawrence E. Blume Headwords: CONVEXITY, DUALITY, LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS, PARETO EFFICIENCY, QUASI-CONCAVITY 1 Introduction The word duality is
More informationProblem Set 1 Welfare Economics
Problem Set 1 Welfare Economics Solutions 1. Consider a pure exchange economy with two goods, h = 1,, and two consumers, i =1,, with utility functions u 1 and u respectively, and total endowment, e = (e
More information1 Two elementary results on aggregation of technologies and preferences
1 Two elementary results on aggregation of technologies and preferences In what follows we ll discuss aggregation. What do we mean with this term? We say that an economy admits aggregation if the behavior
More informationThe Definition of Market Equilibrium The concept of market equilibrium, like the notion of equilibrium in just about every other context, is supposed to capture the idea of a state of the system in which
More informationi) This is simply an application of Berge s Maximum Theorem, but it is actually not too difficult to prove the result directly.
Bocconi University PhD in Economics - Microeconomics I Prof. M. Messner Problem Set 3 - Solution Problem 1: i) This is simply an application of Berge s Maximum Theorem, but it is actually not too difficult
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics
Advanced Microeconomics Partial and General Equilibrium Giorgio Fagiolo giorgio.fagiolo@sssup.it http://www.lem.sssup.it/fagiolo/welcome.html LEM, Sant Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa (Italy) Part
More informationEconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018
EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 018 Show all your work clearly and make sure you justify all your answers. NAME 1. Consider the market for smart pencil in which only one firm (Superapiz) enjoys a
More informationEcon 201: Problem Set 3 Answers
Econ 20: Problem Set 3 Ansers Instructor: Alexandre Sollaci T.A.: Ryan Hughes Winter 208 Question a) The firm s fixed cost is F C = a and variable costs are T V Cq) = 2 bq2. b) As seen in class, the optimal
More informationFoundations of Neoclassical Growth
Foundations of Neoclassical Growth Ömer Özak SMU Macroeconomics II Ömer Özak (SMU) Economic Growth Macroeconomics II 1 / 78 Preliminaries Introduction Foundations of Neoclassical Growth Solow model: constant
More informationEconomic Growth: Lecture 8, Overlapping Generations
14.452 Economic Growth: Lecture 8, Overlapping Generations Daron Acemoglu MIT November 20, 2018 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lecture 8 November 20, 2018 1 / 46 Growth with Overlapping Generations
More informationMacroeconomic Theory and Analysis V Suggested Solutions for the First Midterm. max
Macroeconomic Theory and Analysis V31.0013 Suggested Solutions for the First Midterm Question 1. Welfare Theorems (a) There are two households that maximize max i,g 1 + g 2 ) {c i,l i} (1) st : c i w(1
More informationGraduate Macroeconomics 2 Problem set Solutions
Graduate Macroeconomics 2 Problem set 10. - Solutions Question 1 1. AUTARKY Autarky implies that the agents do not have access to credit or insurance markets. This implies that you cannot trade across
More informationLecture Notes for January 23, 2012: Existence of general equilibrium in an economy with an excess demand function
Lecture Notes for January 23, 2012: Existence of general equilibrium in an economy with an excess demand function The plan of the course for the next month is to create a model of a competitive economy
More informationBROUWER S FIXED POINT THEOREM: THE WALRASIAN AUCTIONEER
BROUWER S FIXED POINT THEOREM: THE WALRASIAN AUCTIONEER SCARLETT LI Abstract. The focus of this paper is proving Brouwer s fixed point theorem, which primarily relies on the fixed point property of the
More informationGENERAL EQUILIBRIUM: EXCESS DEMAND AND THE RÔLE OF PRICES
Prerequisites Almost essential General equilibrium: Basics Useful, but optional General Equilibrium: Price Taking GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM: EXCESS DEMAND AND THE RÔLE OF PRICES MICROECONOMICS Principles and
More information3.2 THE FUNDAMENTAL WELFARE THEOREMS
Essential Microeconomics -1-3.2 THE FUNDMENTL WELFRE THEOREMS Walrasian Equilibrium 2 First welfare teorem 3 Second welfare teorem (conve, differentiable economy) 12 Te omotetic preference 2 2 economy
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2016
Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2016 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.
More informationFirms and returns to scale -1- John Riley
Firms and returns to scale -1- John Riley Firms and returns to scale. Increasing returns to scale and monopoly pricing 2. Natural monopoly 1 C. Constant returns to scale 21 D. The CRS economy 26 E. pplication
More informationEconomics 201B Second Half. Lecture 12-4/22/10. Core is the most commonly used. The core is the set of all allocations such that no coalition (set of
Economics 201B Second Half Lecture 12-4/22/10 Justifying (or Undermining) the Price-Taking Assumption Many formulations: Core, Ostroy s No Surplus Condition, Bargaining Set, Shapley-Shubik Market Games
More informationKIER DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
KIER DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES KYOTO INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH Discussion Paper No.992 Intertemporal efficiency does not imply a common price forecast: a leading example Shurojit Chatterji, Atsushi
More informationWelfare Economics: Lecture 12
Welfare Economics: Lecture 12 Ram Singh Course 001 October 20, 2014 Ram Singh: (DSE) Welfare Economics October 20, 2014 1 / 16 Fair Vs Efficient Question 1 What is a fair allocation? 2 Is a fair allocation
More informationEconomics 501B Final Exam Fall 2017 Solutions
Economics 501B Final Exam Fall 2017 Solutions 1. For each of the following propositions, state whether the proposition is true or false. If true, provide a proof (or at least indicate how a proof could
More informationAdvanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6
Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO April 10, 017 Administrative Stuff Homework # is due at the end of class. I will post the solutions on the website later today. The midterm
More informationCompetitive Equilibrium and the Welfare Theorems
Competitive Equilibrium and the Welfare Theorems Craig Burnside Duke University September 2010 Craig Burnside (Duke University) Competitive Equilibrium September 2010 1 / 32 Competitive Equilibrium and
More informationRegularity of competitive equilibria in a production economy with externalities
Regularity of competitive equilibria in a production economy with externalities Elena del Mercato Vincenzo Platino Paris School of Economics - Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne QED-Jamboree Copenhagen,
More informationUnlinked Allocations in an Exchange Economy with One Good and One Bad
Unlinked llocations in an Exchange Economy with One Good and One ad Chiaki Hara Faculty of Economics and Politics, University of Cambridge Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University pril 16,
More information1. Pareto E cient Allocation and Social Welfare Maximization
Spring 2013 1. Pareto E cient Allocation and Social Welfare Maximization! "R $ Consider a private ownership economy E priv = L + ; " i ;e i #i=1;:::;i ; fy jg j=1;:::;j ; f$ i;j g i;j where " i can be
More informationBoundary Behavior of Excess Demand Functions without the Strong Monotonicity Assumption
Boundary Behavior of Excess Demand Functions without the Strong Monotonicity Assumption Chiaki Hara April 5, 2004 Abstract We give a theorem on the existence of an equilibrium price vector for an excess
More informationUniqueness, Stability, and Gross Substitutes
Uniqueness, Stability, and Gross Substitutes Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 21, November 14 Outline 1 Uniquenness (in pictures) 2 Stability 3 Gross Substitute Property Uniqueness and Stability We have dealt
More informationGARP and Afriat s Theorem Production
GARP and Afriat s Theorem Production Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 8, September 21 Outline 1 Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preferences 2 Afriat s Theorem 3 Production Sets and Production Functions 4 Profits
More informationNotes I Classical Demand Theory: Review of Important Concepts
Notes I Classical Demand Theory: Review of Important Concepts The notes for our course are based on: Mas-Colell, A., M.D. Whinston and J.R. Green (1995), Microeconomic Theory, New York and Oxford: Oxford
More informationDepartment of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009
Department of Agricultural Economics PhD Qualifier Examination May 009 Instructions: The exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question,
More information5. Externalities and Public Goods. Externalities. Public Goods types. Public Goods
5. Externalities and Public Goods 5. Externalities and Public Goods Externalities Welfare properties of Walrasian Equilibria rely on the hidden assumption of private goods: the consumption of the good
More informationUncertainty Per Krusell & D. Krueger Lecture Notes Chapter 6
1 Uncertainty Per Krusell & D. Krueger Lecture Notes Chapter 6 1 A Two-Period Example Suppose the economy lasts only two periods, t =0, 1. The uncertainty arises in the income (wage) of period 1. Not that
More informationLecture 2 The Centralized Economy
Lecture 2 The Centralized Economy Economics 5118 Macroeconomic Theory Kam Yu Winter 2013 Outline 1 Introduction 2 The Basic DGE Closed Economy 3 Golden Rule Solution 4 Optimal Solution The Euler Equation
More informationMacroeconomic Theory and Analysis Suggested Solution for Midterm 1
Macroeconomic Theory and Analysis Suggested Solution for Midterm February 25, 2007 Problem : Pareto Optimality The planner solves the following problem: u(c ) + u(c 2 ) + v(l ) + v(l 2 ) () {c,c 2,l,l
More informationDiscussion Papers in Economics
Discussion Papers in Economics No. 10/11 A General Equilibrium Corporate Finance Theorem for Incomplete Markets: A Special Case By Pascal Stiefenhofer, University of York Department of Economics and Related
More informationLecture Notes October 18, Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I.
Lecture Notes October 18, 2012 Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I. Economic General Equilibrium Partial and General Economic Equilibrium PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM S k (p o ) = D k k (po
More information5. Externalities and Public Goods
5. Externalities and Public Goods Welfare properties of Walrasian Equilibria rely on the hidden assumption of private goods: the consumption of the good by one person has no effect on other people s utility,
More informationNoncooperative Games, Couplings Constraints, and Partial Effi ciency
Noncooperative Games, Couplings Constraints, and Partial Effi ciency Sjur Didrik Flåm University of Bergen, Norway Background Customary Nash equilibrium has no coupling constraints. Here: coupling constraints
More informationExistence, Computation, and Applications of Equilibrium
Existence, Computation, and Applications of Equilibrium 2.1 Art and Bart each sell ice cream cones from carts on the boardwalk in Atlantic City. Each day they independently decide where to position their
More informationDepartment of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Answers Econ 805
Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Answers Econ 805 Prof. James Peck Winter 0. (0 points) Consider the following pure-exchange economy with two consumers and two goods. Consumer
More informationWalrasian Equilibrium in an exchange economy
Microeconomic Teory -1- Walrasian equilibrium Walrasian Equilibrium in an ecange economy 1. Homotetic preferences 2 2. Walrasian equilibrium in an ecange economy 11 3. Te market value of attributes 18
More informationNotes on Consumer Theory
Notes on Consumer Theory Alejandro Saporiti Alejandro Saporiti (Copyright) Consumer Theory 1 / 65 Consumer theory Reference: Jehle and Reny, Advanced Microeconomic Theory, 3rd ed., Pearson 2011: Ch. 1.
More informationEconomic Core, Fair Allocations, and Social Choice Theory
Chapter 9 Nathan Smooha Economic Core, Fair Allocations, and Social Choice Theory 9.1 Introduction In this chapter, we briefly discuss some topics in the framework of general equilibrium theory, namely
More informationElements of Economic Analysis II Lecture VII: Equilibrium in a Competitive Market
Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture VII: Equilibrium in a Competitive Market Kai Hao Yang 10/31/2017 1 Partial Equilibrium in a Competitive Market In the previous lecture, e derived the aggregate
More informationLectures on General Equilibrium Theory. Revealed preference tests of utility maximization and general equilibrium
Lectures ongeneral Equilibrium Theory Revealed preference tests of utility maximizationand general equilibrium p. 1/14 Lectures on General Equilibrium Theory Revealed preference tests of utility maximization
More informationMarket Outcomes: Efficient or Fair?
Market Outcomes: Efficient or Fair? Ram Singh Microeconomic Theory Lecture 14 Ram Singh: (DSE) Market Equilibrium Lecture 14 1 / 16 Fair Versus Efficient Question 1 What is a fair allocation? 2 Is a fair
More informationECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Slides to accompany 13. Markets and Efficient Risk-Bearing: Examples and Extensions
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Slides to accompany 13. Markets and Efficient Risk-Bearing: Examples and Extensions 1. Allocation of Risk in Mean-Variance Framework S states of the world,
More information