Default Reasoning - Motivation

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Default Reasoning - Motivation"

Transcription

1 Default Reasoning - Motivation The most what we know about the world is only almost always true. We never have total knowledge about the world. / Typically a bird can fly. Unless it is a penguin ostrich kiwi etc. Possible formalization in PL1 (first order predicate logic) cx Bird(x) o lpenguin(x) o lostrich(x)... 0 Flies(x) / Problems 1) Can we ever specify... completely? 2) We cannot conclude for any bird that it can fly if we do not know that it is not a penguin not a ostrich not a kiwi and not a.

2 pproach / We would like to have something like typically birds can fly. Possibility dditional (non-logical) inference rules Bird(x) Flies(x) Flies(x) Intended meaning If x is a bird and there is no evidence that Flies(x) might be false then assume Flies(x). Exceptions are represented by simple implications cx Penguin(x) 0 lflies(x) cx Ostrich(x) 0 lflies(x) cx Kiwi(x) 0 lflies(x) Monotonicity of PL1 if X is a consequence of S then it is also a consequence of any set containing S. One cannot preempt conclusions by adding new premises.

3 Formal Framework for Non-Monotonic Reasoning PL1 with w traditional provability and Cn consequence operation. We consider only sets of closed formulas. Default rules α( x) β 1 (x)... β (x) m γ(x) in which α( x) β ( x)... β ( x) ( x) 1 m γ are formulas with free variables x = o α(x) Prerequisite / must be provable o β 1 ( x)... β (x) Justification / consistent assumptions m o γ(x) Consequent default rule is called closed if it does not have any free variables. x1... x n Default theory tuple (D W) in which D is a countable set of default rules and W is a countable set of PL1 formulas. Closed default theory ll default rules are closed. / From now on we consider closed default theories.

4 Properties of Default Reasoning Non-Monotonic Reasoning ssume there is exactly one default and nothing more is known. B Then we can conclude B. If the fact l is added B cannot be concluded! Non-Determinism Spouse(xy) hometown(y) = z hometown(x) = z hometown(x) = z Employer(xy) location(y) = z hometown(x) = z hometown(x) = z Furthermore Spouse(mary tom) hometown(tom) = toronto Employer(mary univ) location(univ) = vancouver / Default rules are used to complement incomplete theories. Thereby several complements can be possible multiple extensions (credulous strategy). / lternatively the intersection over all possbile extensions can be used. (skeptical strategy).

5 dditional Examples Default assumptions in frames and semantic networks. Example By default the hometown of a person is Palo lto. [Person UNIT Basic... <hometown {(a city) Palo lto; DEFULT}>... ] Person(x) hometown(x) hometown(x) = y = y Closed World ssumption. For each base relation R in a DB R( x R( x x... x n n ) ) Frame Default (as an alternative to frame axioms). For each relation R with a situation argument s and transition function f R(xs) R(xf(xs)) R(xf(xs))

6 Problems in Default Logic Case nalysis in Default Logic Example Emu( x) Fly( x) Fly( x) Ostrich(x) Fly(x) Fly(x) We cannot infer from (Emu(Tweety) n Ostrich(Tweety)) lfly(tweety). Two solutions 1) Combine the default rules to a single default Big Bird(x) Fly(x) Fly(x) and add Emu(x) n Ostrich(x) 0 Big-Bird(x) to the facts. 2) Reformulate the defaults (no prerequiste) Emu(x) Fly(x) Ostrich(x) Fly(x) Emu(x) Fly(x) Ostrich(x) Fly(x)

7 Extensions of Default Theories The default rules D extend the PL1 theory that is given by W Extensions of (D W). Desirable properties of an extension E of (D W) includes the facts W 4 E is deductively closed E = Cn(E) all applicable defaults fired If α β1... β γ 1) m 2 D α 2) 2 E 3) β 1... β m ; E γ then 2 E. E only consists of those facts that must be in E according to these prerequisites.

8 Formal Definition of Extensions of Default Theories Let = (D W) be a closed default theory. For each set of closed formulas S (S) is the smallest set that meets the following requirements D1 W 4 (S) D2 Cn( (S)) = (S) (Fixpoint) D3 If α β1... β γ 1) 2 D α m 2) 2 (S) and 3) β 1... β m ; S then γ2 (S). set of closed formulas E is an extension of if E = (E).

9 1) W = {B 0 l o lc} E 1 = Cn(W { C}) E 2 = Cn(W {B}) Examples = C C B B D 2) W = { } E 1 = Cn({lC}) E 2 = Cn({lD}) = C D D C D 3) W = { } E 1 = Cn({l}) E 2 = Cn({ dx P(x)}) = x P x x P x D ) ( ) (

10 Semi-Normal Defaults Besides normal defaults the semi-normal defaults are useful in I systems αβ γ γ Important for interacting normal defaults dult(x)employed(x) Dropout(x) dult(x) Employed(x) dult(x) Dropout(x) Employed(x) Employed(x) better semi-normal default dult (x)employed(x) Dropout(x) Employed(x) For so called ordered default theories a proof theory exists [Etherington 88]. But this kind of conflict resolution is not simple. Especially for more complex theories.

A Brief Introduction to Nonmonotonic Reasoning

A Brief Introduction to Nonmonotonic Reasoning A Brief Introduction to Nonmonotonic Reasoning Gerhard Brewka, Stefan Woltran Computer Science Institute University of Leipzig [brewka,woltran]@informatik.uni-leipzig.de G. Brewka, S. Woltran (Leipzig)

More information

CogSysI Lecture 9: Non-Monotonic and Human Reasoning

CogSysI Lecture 9: Non-Monotonic and Human Reasoning CogSysI Lecture 9: Non-Monotonic and Human Reasoning Intelligent Agents WS 2004/2005 Part II: Inference and Learning Non-Monotonic and Human Reasoning CogSysI Lecture 9: Non-Monotonic and Human Reasoning

More information

Non-Monotonic Formalisms

Non-Monotonic Formalisms Chapter 4 Non-Monotonic Formalisms Não há regra sem excepção. (There is no rule without an exception) Portuguese saying A characteristic of human reasoning is the ability to deal with incomplete information.

More information

Default Logic Autoepistemic Logic

Default Logic Autoepistemic Logic Default Logic Autoepistemic Logic Non-classical logics and application seminar, winter 2008 Mintz Yuval Introduction and Motivation Birds Fly As before, we are troubled with formalization of Non-absolute

More information

logic is everywhere Logik ist überall Hikmat har Jaga Hai Mantık her yerde la logica è dappertutto lógica está em toda parte Non-Monotonic Reasoning

logic is everywhere Logik ist überall Hikmat har Jaga Hai Mantık her yerde la logica è dappertutto lógica está em toda parte Non-Monotonic Reasoning Non-Monotonic Reasoning 1 Introduction logika je všude 2 Closed World Assumption 3 Completion logic is everywhere 4 Circumscription la lógica está por todas partes 5 Default Logic 6 Answer Set Programming

More information

Representation Results for Defeasible Logic

Representation Results for Defeasible Logic Representation Results for Defeasible Logic G. Antoniou, D. Billington, G. Governatori and M.J. Maher School of Computing and Information Technology, Griffith University Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia {ga,db,guido,mjm}@cit.gu.edu.au

More information

Artificial Intelligence II

Artificial Intelligence II Artificial Intelligence II 2013/2014 - Prof: Daniele Nardi, Joachim Hertzberg Exercitation 2 - Roberto Capobianco Non-Monotonic Reasoning 1 Closed World Assumption (Recap) If something is not in the KB,

More information

Tutorial: Nonmonotonic Logic (Day 1)

Tutorial: Nonmonotonic Logic (Day 1) Tutorial: Nonmonotonic Logic (Day 1) Christian Straßer Institute for Philosophy II, Ruhr-University Bochum Center for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/defeasible-reasoning/index.html

More information

Argumentation with Abduction

Argumentation with Abduction Argumentation with Abduction Neophytos Demetriou Dept. of Computer Science University of Cyprus Nicosia CY-1678, Cyprus nkd@cs.ucy.ac.cy Tel.: (+357) 22892673 Antonis Kakas Dept. of Computer Science University

More information

4 Quantifiers and Quantified Arguments 4.1 Quantifiers

4 Quantifiers and Quantified Arguments 4.1 Quantifiers 4 Quantifiers and Quantified Arguments 4.1 Quantifiers Recall from Chapter 3 the definition of a predicate as an assertion containing one or more variables such that, if the variables are replaced by objects

More information

Negation as failure (Normal logic programs)

Negation as failure (Normal logic programs) 491 Knowledge Representation Contents Negation as failure (NBF): Summary Negation as failure (Normal logic programs) Marek Sergot Department of Computing Imperial College, London January 2001; January

More information

Section 5 Circumscription. Subsection 5.1 Introducing Circumscription. TU Dresden, WS 2017/18 Introduction to Nonmonotonic Reasoning Slide 128

Section 5 Circumscription. Subsection 5.1 Introducing Circumscription. TU Dresden, WS 2017/18 Introduction to Nonmonotonic Reasoning Slide 128 Section 5 Circumscription Subsection 5.1 Introducing Circumscription TU Dresden, WS 2017/18 Introduction to Nonmonotonic Reasoning Slide 128 Circumscription developed by John McCarthy, refined by Vladimir

More information

INTRODUCTION TO NONMONOTONIC REASONING

INTRODUCTION TO NONMONOTONIC REASONING Faculty of Computer Science Chair of Automata Theory INTRODUCTION TO NONMONOTONIC REASONING Anni-Yasmin Turhan Dresden, WS 2017/18 About the Course Course Material Book "Nonmonotonic Reasoning" by Grigoris

More information

Chapter 13 Uncertainty

Chapter 13 Uncertainty Chapter 13 Uncertainty CS4811 Artificial Intelligence Nilufer Onder Department of Computer Science Michigan Technological University 1 Outline Types of uncertainty Sources of uncertainty Nonmonotonic logics

More information

Reasoning in Uncertain Situations

Reasoning in Uncertain Situations 9 Reasoning in Uncertain Situations 9.0 Introduction 9.1 Logic-Based Abductive Inference 9.2 Abduction: Alternatives to Logic 9.3 The Stochastic Approach to Uncertainty 9.4 Epilogue and References 9.5

More information

Knowledge Representation (Overview)

Knowledge Representation (Overview) Knowledge Representation (Overview) Marek Sergot October 2017 Knowledge Representation includes reasoning a huge sub-field of AI a variety of representation/modelling formalisms, mostly (these days, always)

More information

Commonsense Reasoning and Argumentation

Commonsense Reasoning and Argumentation DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCES UTRECHT UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 2018 Commonsense Reasoning and Argumentation Author: HENRY PRAKKEN Contents 1 Circumscription 9 1.1 The basic idea: model preference.....................

More information

SEMANTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON NONMONOTONIC LOGIC. Robert C. Moore Artificial Intelligence Center SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94025

SEMANTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON NONMONOTONIC LOGIC. Robert C. Moore Artificial Intelligence Center SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94025 SEMANTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON NONMONOTONIC LOGIC Robert C. Moore Artificial Intelligence Center SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94025 ABSTRACT Commonsense reasoning is "nonmonotonic" in the sense that

More information

Nonmonotonic Logic. Daniel Bonevac. April 16, Accident victims who are cool to the touch may be in shock.

Nonmonotonic Logic. Daniel Bonevac. April 16, Accident victims who are cool to the touch may be in shock. Nonmonotonic Logic Daniel Bonevac April 16, 2012 We organize our thought with general principles: 1. 2. Acids are corrosive. 3. Handguns are dangerous. 4. Promises ought to be kept. 5. What goes up must

More information

Overview. I Review of natural deduction. I Soundness and completeness. I Semantics of propositional formulas. I Soundness proof. I Completeness proof.

Overview. I Review of natural deduction. I Soundness and completeness. I Semantics of propositional formulas. I Soundness proof. I Completeness proof. Overview I Review of natural deduction. I Soundness and completeness. I Semantics of propositional formulas. I Soundness proof. I Completeness proof. Propositional formulas Grammar: ::= p j (:) j ( ^ )

More information

Introduction to Structured Argumentation

Introduction to Structured Argumentation Introduction to Structured Argumentation Anthony Hunter Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK April 15, 2016 1 / 42 Computational models of argument Abstract argumentation Structured

More information

(A 3 ) (A 1 ) (1) COMPUTING CIRCUMSCRIPTION. Vladimir Lifschitz. Department of Computer Science Stanford University Stanford, CA

(A 3 ) (A 1 ) (1) COMPUTING CIRCUMSCRIPTION. Vladimir Lifschitz. Department of Computer Science Stanford University Stanford, CA COMPUTING CIRCUMSCRIPTION Vladimir Lifschitz Department of Computer Science Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 Abstract Circumscription is a transformation of predicate formulas proposed by John McCarthy

More information

A Theorem Prover for Prioritized Circumscription

A Theorem Prover for Prioritized Circumscription A Theorem Prover for Prioritized Circumscription Andrew B. Baker and Matthew L. Ginsberg Department of Computer Science Stanford University Stanford, California 94305 Abstract In a recent paper, Ginsberg

More information

3. Only sequences that were formed by using finitely many applications of rules 1 and 2, are propositional formulas.

3. Only sequences that were formed by using finitely many applications of rules 1 and 2, are propositional formulas. 1 Chapter 1 Propositional Logic Mathematical logic studies correct thinking, correct deductions of statements from other statements. Let us make it more precise. A fundamental property of a statement is

More information

Přednáška 12. Důkazové kalkuly Kalkul Hilbertova typu. 11/29/2006 Hilbertův kalkul 1

Přednáška 12. Důkazové kalkuly Kalkul Hilbertova typu. 11/29/2006 Hilbertův kalkul 1 Přednáška 12 Důkazové kalkuly Kalkul Hilbertova typu 11/29/2006 Hilbertův kalkul 1 Formal systems, Proof calculi A proof calculus (of a theory) is given by: A. a language B. a set of axioms C. a set of

More information

Inferences Critical. Lecture 30: Inference. Application: Question Answering. Types of Inferences

Inferences Critical. Lecture 30: Inference. Application: Question Answering. Types of Inferences Inferences Critical Lecture 30: Inference CS 181O Spring 2016 Kim Bruce Inferences, often using world knowledge, play a big role in understanding utterances John ate the pudding with a fork John ate the

More information

MULTI-AGENT ONLY-KNOWING

MULTI-AGENT ONLY-KNOWING MULTI-AGENT ONLY-KNOWING Gerhard Lakemeyer Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University Germany AI, Logic, and Epistemic Planning, Copenhagen October 3, 2013 Joint work with Vaishak Belle Contents of this

More information

A. Propositional Logic

A. Propositional Logic CmSc 175 Discrete Mathematics A. Propositional Logic 1. Statements (Propositions ): Statements are sentences that claim certain things. Can be either true or false, but not both. Propositional logic deals

More information

ESSENCE 2014: Argumentation-Based Models of Agent Reasoning and Communication

ESSENCE 2014: Argumentation-Based Models of Agent Reasoning and Communication ESSENCE 2014: Argumentation-Based Models of Agent Reasoning and Communication Sanjay Modgil Department of Informatics, King s College London Outline Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning - Dung s Theory of

More information

Tractable Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning to Generate Belief Set

Tractable Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning to Generate Belief Set Tractable Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning to Generate Belief Set Dipanjan kumar Dey Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Assistant professor of Prajnanananda Institute of technology and management

More information

Introduction to Structural Argumentation

Introduction to Structural Argumentation Introduction to Structural Argumentation Anthony Hunter Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK July 8, 2014 1 / 28 Approaches to structured argumentation Some frameworks for structured

More information

Reasoning with Inconsistent and Uncertain Ontologies

Reasoning with Inconsistent and Uncertain Ontologies Reasoning with Inconsistent and Uncertain Ontologies Guilin Qi Southeast University China gqi@seu.edu.cn Reasoning Web 2012 September 05, 2012 Outline Probabilistic logic vs possibilistic logic Probabilistic

More information

Phil Introductory Formal Logic

Phil Introductory Formal Logic Phil 134 - Introductory Formal Logic Lecture 7: Deduction At last, it is time to learn about proof formal proof as a model of reasoning demonstrating validity metatheory natural deduction systems what

More information

Class 29 - November 3 Semantics for Predicate Logic

Class 29 - November 3 Semantics for Predicate Logic Philosophy 240: Symbolic Logic Fall 2010 Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays: 9am - 9:50am Hamilton College Russell Marcus rmarcus1@hamilton.edu Class 29 - November 3 Semantics for Predicate Logic I. Proof Theory

More information

KRR. Example. Example (formalization) Example (cont.) Knowledge representation & reasoning

KRR. Example. Example (formalization) Example (cont.) Knowledge representation & reasoning Klassische hemen der Computerwissenschaften Artificial Intelligence Knowledge representation & reasoning Prof. Dr. ranz Wotawa wotawa@ist.tugraz.at KRR Example Use logic to represent knowledge (e.g., the

More information

Argumentation-Based Models of Agent Reasoning and Communication

Argumentation-Based Models of Agent Reasoning and Communication Argumentation-Based Models of Agent Reasoning and Communication Sanjay Modgil Department of Informatics, King s College London Outline Logic and Argumentation - Dung s Theory of Argumentation - The Added

More information

22c:145 Artificial Intelligence. First-Order Logic. Readings: Chapter 8 of Russell & Norvig.

22c:145 Artificial Intelligence. First-Order Logic. Readings: Chapter 8 of Russell & Norvig. 22c:145 Artificial Intelligence First-Order Logic Readings: Chapter 8 of Russell & Norvig. Einstein s Puzzle in Logic We used propositinal variables to specify everything: x 1 = house #1 is red ; x 2 =

More information

Handout Lecture 8: Non-monotonic logics

Handout Lecture 8: Non-monotonic logics Handout Lecture 8: Non-monotonic logics Xavier Parent and Leon van der Torre University of Luxembourg April 27, 2016 Abstract This handout is devoted to non-monotonic logics a family of logics devised

More information

EECS 1028 M: Discrete Mathematics for Engineers

EECS 1028 M: Discrete Mathematics for Engineers EECS 1028 M: Discrete Mathematics for Engineers Suprakash Datta Office: LAS 3043 Course page: http://www.eecs.yorku.ca/course/1028 Also on Moodle S. Datta (York Univ.) EECS 1028 W 18 1 / 21 Predicate Logic

More information

CS411 Notes 3 Induction and Recursion

CS411 Notes 3 Induction and Recursion CS411 Notes 3 Induction and Recursion A. Demers 5 Feb 2001 These notes present inductive techniques for defining sets and subsets, for defining functions over sets, and for proving that a property holds

More information

CSCE 222 Discrete Structures for Computing. Review for Exam 1. Dr. Hyunyoung Lee !!!

CSCE 222 Discrete Structures for Computing. Review for Exam 1. Dr. Hyunyoung Lee !!! CSCE 222 Discrete Structures for Computing Review for Exam 1 Dr. Hyunyoung Lee 1 Topics Propositional Logic (Sections 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3) Predicate Logic (Sections 1.4 and 1.5) Rules of Inferences and Proofs

More information

Notation for Logical Operators:

Notation for Logical Operators: Notation for Logical Operators: always true always false... and...... or... if... then...... if-and-only-if... x:x p(x) x:x p(x) for all x of type X, p(x) there exists an x of type X, s.t. p(x) = is equal

More information

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review OBJECTIVES (Review problems: on next page) 1.1 Distinguish between propositions and non-propositions. Know the truth tables (i.e., the definitions) of the logical operators,,,, and Write truth tables for

More information

A Positive Formalization for the Notion of Pragmatic Truth 1

A Positive Formalization for the Notion of Pragmatic Truth 1 A Positive Formalization for the Notion of Pragmatic Truth 1 Tarcisio Pequeno Laboratório de Inteligência Artificial Universidade Federal do Ceará Fortaleza CE Brazil Arthur Buchsbaum Departamento de Informática

More information

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary Aaron Tan 28 31 August 2017 1 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I Predicate; domain; truth set Universal quantifier,

More information

-1- THE PROBABILITY THAT TWEETY IS ABLE TO FLY Giangiacomo Gerla Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università di Camerino ITALY.

-1- THE PROBABILITY THAT TWEETY IS ABLE TO FLY Giangiacomo Gerla Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università di Camerino ITALY. -1- THE PROBABILITY THAT TWEETY IS ABLE TO FLY Giangiacomo Gerla Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università di Camerino ITALY. Abstract. Consider the question of assigning a probabilistic valuation

More information

Knowledge-based systems

Knowledge-based systems CS 750 Foundations of I Lecture 6 Knowledge-based systems Milos Hauskrecht milos@cs.pitt.edu 539 Sennott Square dministration announcements Midterm: Thursda October 6, 07 In-class Closed book What does

More information

Designing of Nonmonotonic Inductive Logic Programming Systems. Chongbing Liu

Designing of Nonmonotonic Inductive Logic Programming Systems. Chongbing Liu Designing of Nonmonotonic Inductive Logic Programming Systems Chongbing Liu October 24, 2005 Outlines Basic Algorithms and Properties Sequential Learning Algorithm Parallelization 1 Basic Algorithms and

More information

An Intuitively Complete Analysis of Gödel s Incompleteness

An Intuitively Complete Analysis of Gödel s Incompleteness An Intuitively Complete Analysis of Gödel s Incompleteness JASON W. STEINMETZ (Self-funded) A detailed and rigorous analysis of Gödel s proof of his first incompleteness theorem is presented. The purpose

More information

Propositional Logic: Part II - Syntax & Proofs 0-0

Propositional Logic: Part II - Syntax & Proofs 0-0 Propositional Logic: Part II - Syntax & Proofs 0-0 Outline Syntax of Propositional Formulas Motivating Proofs Syntactic Entailment and Proofs Proof Rules for Natural Deduction Axioms, theories and theorems

More information

COMP 409: Logic Homework 5

COMP 409: Logic Homework 5 COMP 409: Logic Homework 5 Note: The pages below refer to the text from the book by Enderton. 1. Exercises 1-6 on p. 78. 1. Translate into this language the English sentences listed below. If the English

More information

Examples: P: it is not the case that P. P Q: P or Q P Q: P implies Q (if P then Q) Typical formula:

Examples: P: it is not the case that P. P Q: P or Q P Q: P implies Q (if P then Q) Typical formula: Logic: The Big Picture Logic is a tool for formalizing reasoning. There are lots of different logics: probabilistic logic: for reasoning about probability temporal logic: for reasoning about time (and

More information

Logic: The Big Picture

Logic: The Big Picture Logic: The Big Picture A typical logic is described in terms of syntax: what are the legitimate formulas semantics: under what circumstances is a formula true proof theory/ axiomatization: rules for proving

More information

A Sequent Calculus for Skeptical Reasoning in Autoepistemic Logic

A Sequent Calculus for Skeptical Reasoning in Autoepistemic Logic A Sequent Calculus for Skeptical Reasoning in Autoepistemic Logic Robert Saxon Milnikel Kenyon College, Gambier OH 43022 USA milnikelr@kenyon.edu Abstract A sequent calculus for skeptical consequence in

More information

MACM 101 Discrete Mathematics I. Exercises on Predicates and Quantifiers. Due: Tuesday, October 13th (at the beginning of the class)

MACM 101 Discrete Mathematics I. Exercises on Predicates and Quantifiers. Due: Tuesday, October 13th (at the beginning of the class) MACM 101 Discrete Mathematics I Exercises on Predicates and Quantifiers. Due: Tuesday, October 13th (at the beginning of the class) Reminder: the work you submit must be your own. Any collaboration and

More information

7. Propositional Logic. Wolfram Burgard and Bernhard Nebel

7. Propositional Logic. Wolfram Burgard and Bernhard Nebel Foundations of AI 7. Propositional Logic Rational Thinking, Logic, Resolution Wolfram Burgard and Bernhard Nebel Contents Agents that think rationally The wumpus world Propositional logic: syntax and semantics

More information

How to determine if a statement is true or false. Fuzzy logic deal with statements that are somewhat vague, such as: this paint is grey.

How to determine if a statement is true or false. Fuzzy logic deal with statements that are somewhat vague, such as: this paint is grey. Major results: (wrt propositional logic) How to reason correctly. How to reason efficiently. How to determine if a statement is true or false. Fuzzy logic deal with statements that are somewhat vague,

More information

On Terminological Default Reasoning about Spatial Information: Extended Abstract

On Terminological Default Reasoning about Spatial Information: Extended Abstract On Terminological Default Reasoning about Spatial Information: Extended Abstract V. Haarslev, R. Möller, A.-Y. Turhan, and M. Wessel University of Hamburg, Computer Science Department Vogt-Kölln-Str. 30,

More information

Introduction to Structured Argumentation

Introduction to Structured Argumentation Introduction to Structured Argumentation Anthony Hunter Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK September 6, 2016 1 / 134 Computational models of argument 1 Introduction 2 Framework

More information

Theorem. For every positive integer n, the sum of the positive integers from 1 to n is n(n+1)

Theorem. For every positive integer n, the sum of the positive integers from 1 to n is n(n+1) Week 1: Logic Lecture 1, 8/1 (Sections 1.1 and 1.3) Examples of theorems and proofs Theorem (Pythagoras). Let ABC be a right triangle, with legs of lengths a and b, and hypotenuse of length c. Then a +

More information

Lecture 11: Gödel s Second Incompleteness Theorem, and Tarski s Theorem

Lecture 11: Gödel s Second Incompleteness Theorem, and Tarski s Theorem Lecture 11: Gödel s Second Incompleteness Theorem, and Tarski s Theorem Valentine Kabanets October 27, 2016 1 Gödel s Second Incompleteness Theorem 1.1 Consistency We say that a proof system P is consistent

More information

Combining logic with probability Motivation

Combining logic with probability Motivation Combining logic with probability Motivation is a powerful language to represent complex relational information Probability is the standard way to represent uncertainty in knowledge Combining the two would

More information

Logic III. Introduction to Artificial Intelligence CSE 150

Logic III. Introduction to Artificial Intelligence CSE 150 Logic III Introduction to Artificial Intelligence CSE 150 Outline Last Lecture Propositional Logic and Sound inference rules Introduction First order logic Symbols, Variables, Functions, Predicates This

More information

Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Gerhard Brewka Computer Science Institute University of Leipzig brewka@informatik.uni-leipzig.de joint work with Stefan Woltran G. Brewka (Leipzig) KR 2010 1 / 18 Outline

More information

Cogito ergo sum non machina!

Cogito ergo sum non machina! Cogito ergo sum non machina! About Gödel s First Incompleteness Theorem and Turing machines. Ricardo Pereira Tassinari 1 Philosophy Department of State University of São Paulo - UNESP - Campus Marília

More information

Review 1. Andreas Klappenecker

Review 1. Andreas Klappenecker Review 1 Andreas Klappenecker Summary Propositional Logic, Chapter 1 Predicate Logic, Chapter 1 Proofs, Chapter 1 Sets, Chapter 2 Functions, Chapter 2 Sequences and Sums, Chapter 2 Asymptotic Notations,

More information

The Importance of Being Formal. Martin Henz. February 5, Propositional Logic

The Importance of Being Formal. Martin Henz. February 5, Propositional Logic The Importance of Being Formal Martin Henz February 5, 2014 Propositional Logic 1 Motivation In traditional logic, terms represent sets, and therefore, propositions are limited to stating facts on sets

More information

Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1. Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1)

Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1. Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1) Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1 Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1) Introduction Lecture Notes (1) and (2) provide an OVERVIEW of a standard intuitive formalization and introduction to

More information

Learning Goals of CS245 Logic and Computation

Learning Goals of CS245 Logic and Computation Learning Goals of CS245 Logic and Computation Alice Gao April 27, 2018 Contents 1 Propositional Logic 2 2 Predicate Logic 4 3 Program Verification 6 4 Undecidability 7 1 1 Propositional Logic Introduction

More information

Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus

Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus Lila Kari University of Waterloo Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 22 Predicate calculus - Logical consequence

More information

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 A Reminder of Our Plot I wish to provide some historical and intellectual context to the formal tools that logicians developed to study the

More information

Program Analysis Part I : Sequential Programs

Program Analysis Part I : Sequential Programs Program Analysis Part I : Sequential Programs IN5170/IN9170 Models of concurrency Program Analysis, lecture 5 Fall 2018 26. 9. 2018 2 / 44 Program correctness Is my program correct? Central question for

More information

Default Reasoning by Deductive Planning

Default Reasoning by Deductive Planning Default Reasoning by Deductive Planning Michael Thielscher FG Intellektik, TH Darmstadt Alexanderstraße 10 D 64283 Darmstadt Germany mit@intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de Torsten Schaub IRISA Campus

More information

Truth, Subderivations and the Liar. Why Should I Care about the Liar Sentence? Uses of the Truth Concept - (i) Disquotation.

Truth, Subderivations and the Liar. Why Should I Care about the Liar Sentence? Uses of the Truth Concept - (i) Disquotation. Outline 1 2 3 4 5 1 / 41 2 / 41 The Liar Sentence Let L be the sentence: This sentence is false This sentence causes trouble If it is true, then it is false So it can t be true Thus, it is false If it

More information

Logic and Modelling. Introduction to Predicate Logic. Jörg Endrullis. VU University Amsterdam

Logic and Modelling. Introduction to Predicate Logic. Jörg Endrullis. VU University Amsterdam Logic and Modelling Introduction to Predicate Logic Jörg Endrullis VU University Amsterdam Predicate Logic In propositional logic there are: propositional variables p, q, r,... that can be T or F In predicate

More information

REMARKS ON INHERITANCE SYSTEMS

REMARKS ON INHERITANCE SYSTEMS REMARKS ON INHERITANCE SYSTEMS arxiv:math/0611937v1 [math.lo] 30 Nov 2006 Karl Schlechta Laboratoire d Informatique Fondamentale de Marseille November 30, 2006 Abstract We try a conceptual analysis of

More information

Pei Wang( 王培 ) Temple University, Philadelphia, USA

Pei Wang( 王培 ) Temple University, Philadelphia, USA Pei Wang( 王培 ) Temple University, Philadelphia, USA Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): a small research community in AI that believes Intelligence is a general-purpose capability Intelligence should

More information

02 Traditional Logic I

02 Traditional Logic I Martin Henz January 22, 2014 Generated on Wednesday 22 nd January, 2014, 09:51 1 Review: Agenda and Hallmarks 2 3 1 Review: Agenda and Hallmarks 2 3 First Agenda Find out in detail how formal systems work

More information

Outline. Overview. Syntax Semantics. Introduction Hilbert Calculus Natural Deduction. 1 Introduction. 2 Language: Syntax and Semantics

Outline. Overview. Syntax Semantics. Introduction Hilbert Calculus Natural Deduction. 1 Introduction. 2 Language: Syntax and Semantics Introduction Arnd Poetzsch-Heffter Software Technology Group Fachbereich Informatik Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Sommersemester 2010 Arnd Poetzsch-Heffter ( Software Technology Group Fachbereich

More information

6.825 Techniques in Artificial Intelligence. Logic Miscellanea. Completeness and Incompleteness Equality Paramodulation

6.825 Techniques in Artificial Intelligence. Logic Miscellanea. Completeness and Incompleteness Equality Paramodulation 6.825 Techniques in Artificial Intelligence Logic Miscellanea Completeness and Incompleteness Equality Paramodulation Lecture 9 1 Logic is a huge subject. It includes esoteric mathematical and philosophical

More information

Answer Set Programming

Answer Set Programming Quick Summary Department of Applied Informatics Comenius University in Bratislava 2015/2016 Language Definition (Language of LP) constants a, b, c,... variables X, Y, Z,... function symbols f, g, h,...

More information

Capturing Lewis s Elusive Knowledge

Capturing Lewis s Elusive Knowledge Zhaoqing Xu Department of Philosophy, Peking University zhaoqingxu@gmail.com September 22, 2011 1 Introduction 2 Philosophical Background Dretske s Relevant Alternatives Theory Lewis s Elusive Knowledge

More information

Classical Propositional Logic

Classical Propositional Logic The Language of A Henkin-style Proof for Natural Deduction January 16, 2013 The Language of A Henkin-style Proof for Natural Deduction Logic Logic is the science of inference. Given a body of information,

More information

Resolution or modus ponens are exact there is no possibility of mistake if the rules are followed exactly.

Resolution or modus ponens are exact there is no possibility of mistake if the rules are followed exactly. THE WEAKEST LINK Resolution or modus ponens are exact there is no possibility of mistake if the rules are followed exactly. These methods of inference (also known as deductive methods) require that information

More information

Answer Set Programming

Answer Set Programming s Department of Applied Informatics Comenius University in Bratislava 2009/2010 Outline 1 Least Model Immediate Consequence Operator 2 Default Negation 3 Minimal Models 4 Least Model Immediate Consequence

More information

15414/614 Optional Lecture 3: Predicate Logic

15414/614 Optional Lecture 3: Predicate Logic 15414/614 Optional Lecture 3: Predicate Logic Anvesh Komuravelli 1 Why Predicate Logic? Consider the following statements. 1. Every student is younger than some instructor. 2. Not all birds can fly. Propositional

More information

Computational Logic Fundamentals (of Definite Programs): Syntax and Semantics

Computational Logic Fundamentals (of Definite Programs): Syntax and Semantics Computational Logic Fundamentals (of Definite Programs): Syntax and Semantics 1 Towards Logic Programming Conclusion: resolution is a complete and effective deduction mechanism using: Horn clauses (related

More information

Propositional Logic Not Enough

Propositional Logic Not Enough Section 1.4 Propositional Logic Not Enough If we have: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Does it follow that Socrates is mortal? Can t be represented in propositional logic. Need a language that talks

More information

Propositional Resolution Introduction

Propositional Resolution Introduction Propositional Resolution Introduction (Nilsson Book Handout) Professor Anita Wasilewska CSE 352 Artificial Intelligence Propositional Resolution Part 1 SYNTAX dictionary Literal any propositional VARIABLE

More information

Review 3. Andreas Klappenecker

Review 3. Andreas Klappenecker Review 3 Andreas Klappenecker Final Exam Friday, May 4, 2012, starting at 12:30pm, usual classroom Topics Topic Reading Algorithms and their Complexity Chapter 3 Logic and Proofs Chapter 1 Logic and Proofs

More information

3.4 Set Operations Given a set A, the complement (in the Universal set U) A c is the set of all elements of U that are not in A. So A c = {x x / A}.

3.4 Set Operations Given a set A, the complement (in the Universal set U) A c is the set of all elements of U that are not in A. So A c = {x x / A}. 3.4 Set Operations Given a set, the complement (in the niversal set ) c is the set of all elements of that are not in. So c = {x x /. (This type of picture is called a Venn diagram.) Example 39 Let = {1,

More information

CHAPTER 1. MATHEMATICAL LOGIC 1.1 Fundamentals of Mathematical Logic

CHAPTER 1. MATHEMATICAL LOGIC 1.1 Fundamentals of Mathematical Logic CHAPER 1 MAHEMAICAL LOGIC 1.1 undamentals of Mathematical Logic Logic is commonly known as the science of reasoning. Some of the reasons to study logic are the following: At the hardware level the design

More information

First Order Logic Implication (4A) Young W. Lim 4/6/17

First Order Logic Implication (4A) Young W. Lim 4/6/17 First Order Logic (4A) Young W. Lim Copyright (c) 2016-2017 Young W. Lim. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version

More information

Chapter 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements

Chapter 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Chapter 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements 3.1. Predicates and Quantified Statements I Predicate in grammar Predicate refers to the part of a sentence that gives information about the subject. Example:

More information

Propositional logic. First order logic. Alexander Clark. Autumn 2014

Propositional logic. First order logic. Alexander Clark. Autumn 2014 Propositional logic First order logic Alexander Clark Autumn 2014 Formal Logic Logical arguments are valid because of their form. Formal languages are devised to express exactly that relevant form and

More information

Tutorial: Nonmonotonic Logic

Tutorial: Nonmonotonic Logic Tutorial: Nonmonotonic Logic PhDs in Logic (2017) Christian Straßer May 2, 2017 Outline Defeasible Reasoning Scratching the Surface of Nonmonotonic Logic 1/52 Defeasible Reasoning What is defeasible reasoning?

More information

An Argumentation-Theoretic Characterization of Defeasible Logic

An Argumentation-Theoretic Characterization of Defeasible Logic An Argumentation-Theoretic Characterization of Defeasible Logic G. Governatori and M.J. Maher 1 Abstract. Defeasible logic is an efficient non-monotonic logic that is defined only proof-theoretically.

More information

arxiv:cs/ v1 [cs.ai] 24 May 2004

arxiv:cs/ v1 [cs.ai] 24 May 2004 Under consideration for publication in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 1 arxiv:cs/0405090v1 [cs.ai] 24 May 2004 Propositional Defeasible Logic has Linear Complexity M.J. Maher Department of Mathematical

More information

TR : Possible World Semantics for First Order LP

TR : Possible World Semantics for First Order LP City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Computer Science Technical Reports Graduate Center 2011 TR-2011010: Possible World Semantics for First Order LP Melvin Fitting Follow this and additional

More information