R.W. Aßmann, CERN SL-AP Snowmass 2001 July 7 th, 2001
|
|
- Marion Payne
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 R.W. Aßmann, CERN SL-AP Snowmass 2001 July 7 th, 2001
2 (almost a Higgs) November 2 nd, 2000, 7am
3 We can do this precision e+ephysics at the high-energy frontier! Push beyond 209 GeV at LEP (for the Higgs, ) Problem: This talk: Compare and recommend Sorry, folks: This is up to you
4 1. Introduction The LC design studies Simulation codes Beam dynamics beam energy 2. Single particle dynamics Optics design Example lattices Dispersion and energy spread 3. Multi-particle dynamics Transverse wakefield BNS damping SLC as the reference Emittance/wakefield optimization Predicted LC performance Required component performance 4. Transverse beam stability Predictions for LC designs LEP experience Stability studies (vibration damping) 5. Multi-bunch effects Knowledge of long-range wakefield Multi-bunch emittance growth Effects production errors/damage 6. Conclusion
5 This talk: It is not: Discuss some design choices Explain some trade-offs Illustrate some beam dynamics topics Use of simple example lattices, estimates Include some detailed, published LC studies A detailed review of all issues (would be a book) Common simulations for the three designs Any judgment on the different approaches Greg Loews International LC Study Group Talk based on my direct experience with SLC, CLIC, and NLC. But, more importantly: The work of many, many colleagues! Acknowledgements to all of them, especially: TESLA: R. Brinkmann and colleagues CLIC: D. Schulte, G. Guignard and colleagues NLC: T. Raubenheimer, P. Tenenbaum, A. Seryi and colleagues SLC: The old gang
6 The main linacs: The heart of linear colliders. Their crucial mission for the success of linear colliders: Provide beam energy of interest for physics Issues: High efficiency High accelerating gradients Reliable RF system Minimize cost per MV Transport high current and small emittance beams for high luminosity Issues: Transverse emittance dilution Energy sharpness, stability Transverse position stability Tails and beam losses Beam dynamics
7 TESLA SLC NLC/JLC CLIC (stage II) C.M. energy GeV Luminosity cm -2 s Frequency GHz Iris radius mm Gradient MV/m Bunch popul # bunches f rep Hz ge x (inj) mm-mrad ge y (inj) mm-mrad Basic scaling: Luminosity ~ Energy 2
8 Linac performance (static) characterized with: Beam current Transverse emittances Energy spread γε γε + γε + final inj disp γε wf Tolerance: γε disp + γε wf γε Wakefields ~ f 3 Beam parameters Tolerances on: Straightness of trajectory Centering in RF structures inj Required luminosity mm-mrad (SLC) mm-mrad (NLC/JLC) mm-mrad (TESLA) mm-mrad (CLIC) High gradient (high frequency) allows high beam energies, for the price of more stringent tolerances on alignment Tolerances scale with 1/f J.P. Delahaye et al For an optimized design
9 Test accelerators cannot test linac performance. Predict linac performance based on simulation codes Programs used in the context of linear collider studies: LIAR MAFIA TRANSPORT SAD MAD GUINEAPIG MERLIN TraFIC 4 MUSTAFA PLACET Q URMEL DIMAD GDFIDL LEGO WAKE TRACK FFADA PARMELA FLUKA GEANT CAIN OMEGA3P TAU3P HFSS PHI3P + many others (some nameless heroes) Computational activity for linear colliders is: manifold and redundant Especially: LIAR written for and tested against SLC linac Incorporates lot of experience from SLC Used for cross-checks of other programs (e.g. PLACET)
10 Beam energy is a crucial parameter for linear collider design. Target energy or energy range set by particle physics! Choice of technology determines the energy range: TESLA: JLC/NLC: CLIC: up to 800 GeV up to 1000 GeV up to 3000 GeV Linear collider design is not energy-independent Comparison of designs for different energies can be misleading! Compare designs for the same beam energy (G. Loew et al).
11 1. Introduction The LC design studies Simulation codes Beam dynamics beam energy 2. Single particle dynamics Optics design Example lattices Dispersion and energy spread 3. Multi-particle dynamics Transverse wakefield BNS damping SLC as the reference Emittance/wakefield optimization Predicted LC performance Required component performance 4. Transverse beam stability Predictions for LC designs LEP experience Stability studies (vibration damping) 5. Multi-bunch effects Knowledge of long-range wakefield Multi-bunch emittance growth Effects production errors/damage 6. Conclusion
12 1) Provide focusing for beam transport (no real challenge, FODO) 2) Minimize effects from kicks (wakefield) on the beam Offset y at s 2 due to kick at s 1 y( s2) = R12( s1, s2) θ ( s1) R = 12 β 1 β 2 E E 1 2 sin ( ψ ) Keep design beam size at s 2 constant (b 2 =const) For a given kick: y( s β 2 ) 1 Stronger focusing helps if kick amplitude does not depend on linac optics (wakefield kicks, injection errors) Weaker focusing helps for dispersive quadrupole kicks. (fewer quadrupole kicks)
13 TDR Dispersion-dominated optics design Wakefield-dominated optics design TESLA (.5 TeV) CLIC (3 TeV) NLC (1 TeV) Yellow report ZDR
14 y cell l b l b (250 GeV example) 72º m ~ 40 m CLIC 80º m ~ 80 m JLC/NLC 60º m ~ 360 m TESLA Note: CLIC below 45 m for 250 GeV TESLA more sensitive to ground motion waves with Long wavelength Low frequency Larger amplitude
15 Not fully realistic 90 degree FODO lattice Cell length β y (max/min) 10.0 m 17 / 2.9 m 20.0 m 34 / 5.9 m 40.0 m 68 / 11.8 m 80.0 m 136 / 23.5 m CLIC NLC TESLA Injection energy: 10 GeV Acceleration length: 96 % of cell length Assume: 250 GeV Linac length: 1890 m (135.0 MV/m) ~189 cells a 10 m 4290 m ( 59.0 MV/m) ~215 cells a 20 m m ( 23.4 MV/m) ~135 cells a 80 m
16 Trajectory in the CLIC, TESLA, JLC/NLC control rooms Assume: 100 mm QD offset at start of linac, low current (no WF s) CLIC type JLC/NLC type TESLA type (all 250 GeV)
17 Example case CLIC type no acceleration no wakefields QD misaligned by 50 mm Filamentation Emittance saturates due to filamentation for large energy spread (chromatic phase mixing)
18 Correlated, fractional energy spread (CLIC/NLC: BNS) Linac Linac exit RF curvature contribution TESLA: < 0.06 % 0.06% % NLC: < 0.80 % 0.25 % % CLIC: < 0.55 % 0.35 % % QD offset by 0.3 mm -> Y oscillation with amplitude ~ 1mm Example: σ E /E ε disp ε inj CLIC type 0.4% mm-mrad mm-mrad NLC type 0.6% mm-mrad mm-mrad TESLA type 0.05% mm-mrad mm-mrad Dispersion no problem, if trajectory controlled on 1 mm level! (pessimistic assumptions: No wakefields would mean no BNS)
19 1. Introduction The LC design studies Simulation codes Beam dynamics beam energy 2. Single particle dynamics Optics design Example lattices Dispersion and energy spread 3. Multi-particle dynamics Transverse wakefield BNS damping SLC as the reference Emittance/wakefield optimization Predicted LC performance Required component performance 4. Transverse beam stability Predictions for LC designs LEP experience Stability studies (vibration damping) 5. Multi-bunch effects Knowledge of long-range wakefield Multi-bunch emittance growth Effects production errors/damage 6. Conclusion
20 Interaction: Accelerated charge RF structures (small irises) (except TESLA) θ wf = W σ t en L 2E e struc ( z ) y1 0 Wakefield effect depends on: Intra-bunch and inter-bunch wakefields Offsets in rf structures (imperfections) Longitudinal distribution Charge Energy Optics RF phases Calculate effect with programs: Multi-particle beam dynamics Multiple interacting imperfections Chromatic, dispersive + wakefield errors Single-bunch and multi-bunch R. Assmann et al
21 Choice of technology determines radius of structure iris a: High frequency small a Low frequency large a Stronger wakefields (beam induced electro-magnetic fields) with smaller iris radius! Beam is closer to metallic walls
22
23 Bunch length: Transverse wakefield (at 1 σ z ): TESLA SLC NLC CLIC 300 mm 1100 mm 110 mm 30 mm TESLA 22 V/pC/m 2 SLC 1990 V/pC/m 2 NLC V/pC/m 2 CLIC V/pC/m 2 Injection energy: TESLA 5.0 GeV SLC 1.2 GeV NLC 8.0 GeV CLIC 9.0 GeV + Bunch intensity: TESLA SLC NLC CLIC BEAM
24 Represent bunch by two slices: separated by σ z each half charge θ wf = W σ t en L ( ) e struc z y1 2E 0 For 100 µm structure offset and 1 m structure length: TESLA: 0.7 nrad NLC: 86.1 nrad CLIC: nrad SLC: nrad Not done: Normalize to emittance Input structure length Wakefield kick for CLIC at 1.5 TeV almost down to TESLA at 5 GeV (1/3 larger)
25 Introduce correlated energy spread (RF phase) so that head and tail move together (same phase advance). No beam-breakup. NLC CLIC M. Woodley et al, PAC01 CLIC yellow report No BNS damping required for TESLA RF phase CLIC: ~ 6 degree
26 Single bunch emittance growth (SLC 1996/1997): R. Assmann, PAC97 γε 28 = κ γε initial + γε wf Problems due to poor emittance stability (drift towards larger emittances) multiplicative additive Simulation: κ = 1.06 γε wf = 2 Reasonable agreement with data from the SLC!
27 Learnt how to go from Left case (start of tuning) to Right case (end of tuning) Methods: - 1-to-1 steering (steer flat) - RF phasing (energy profile) - Dispersion-free steering - Emittance bump tuning
28
29 Low repetition rates (5-120 Hz) Small beam sizes (shown was smaller area than LEP) No equilibrium state, no damping after damping rings Every pulse is different The beam is living Asymmetric beam distributions, tails due to wakefields Intense tuning needed to control beam sizes and stability (much better for super-conducting linacs) Wakefield effects can be corrected very efficiently (took a while for SLC to learn how)
30 Vertical emittance growth in the linac (normalized): ε y SLC 2 mm-mrad TESLA 0.01 mm-mrad JLC/NLC mm-mrad CLIC mm-mrad Measured Lower wakefields (SC rf) Parameter optimization (charge, bunch length, ) Minimize wakefields and dispersion! Stringent requirements (JLC/NLC, CLIC) on: - alignment (beam-based) - steering (magnet, rf structure movements) - feedbacks - beam instrumentation Innovative methods have been developed
31 TESLA NLC CLIC 1-to-1 1-to-1 1-to-1 Shunt method Shunt method Ballistic correction Dispersion-free steering Moving procedure (local) Multi-step lining-up Dispersion-free steering Emittance bumps Emittance bumps Shunt method ( k-modulation ) (FFTB, HERA, LEP, ) Dispersion-free steering (SLC, LEP, ) Ballistic alignment Multi-step lining-up Emittance bumps (SLC) Vary quad K, measure change in trajectory, fit BPM to quad misalignment Minimize orbit, dispersion information together Minimum orbit/dispersion -> Straight trajectory Hidden bump in orbit shows up as dispersion oscillation. Switch off quadrupoles. Beam defines straight axis. Measure BPM offsets to axis. Similar to dispersion-free steering. (Modify quad strengths) Introduce wakefield kicks that compensate wakefield kicks from imperfections.
32 ORBIT DISPERSION CORR. KICKS DFS: Simultaneously optimize orbit, disp., corr. Suggested for NLC (Raubenheimer et al). Developed for SLC (Assmann et al)! It even works for storage rings (it should work for future LC!)
33 CLIC (D Amico,Guignard, Schulte) TESLA (CDR) Ballistic correction Multi-step + bumps Dispersion-free steering
34 Requirements and predicted LC performance TESLA JLC/NLC CLIC Quadrupole offset *# 300 mm 50.0 mm 50.0 mm Quadrupole roll mrad ~100 mrad BPM resolution 10 mm 0.3 mm 0.1 mm BPM-quad offset 100 mm 2.0 mm n/a BPM offset (axis) n/a n/a 10.0 mm Structure offset # 500 mm 30.0 mm 10.0 mm RF BPM offset/resol n/a 5.0 mm 5.0 mm Mover resolution n/a 50.0 nm 0.5 mm Emittance growth (a) One-to-one 1000 % ~ 1000 % 2700 % (b) All methods 3 % 40 % 15 % * Initial offset, before beam-based alignment # Achievable performance depends on instrumentation, environment, accessibility, (e.g. worse inside of cryostats)
35 BPM to QUAD offset (NLC) Mover setp size (NLC) Tenenbaum/Raubenheimer, LINAC2000 P. Tenenbaum, PAC99 If specifications are not met, then performance deterioration!
36 Tolerances for the RF system: Energy Energy spread 50 cases simulated Phase jitter Emittance growth Emittance growth Tolerances JLC/NLC: T. Higo, K. Kubo and K. Yokoya, PAC99 Energy: 0.1 % RF amplitude: 2% RF phase: 3 degree
37 1. Introduction The LC design studies Simulation codes Beam dynamics beam energy 2. Single particle dynamics Optics design Example lattices Dispersion and energy spread 3. Multi-particle dynamics Transverse wakefield BNS damping SLC as the reference Emittance/wakefield optimization Predicted LC performance Required component performance 4. Transverse beam stability Predictions for LC designs LEP experience Stability studies (vibration damping) 5. Multi-bunch effects Knowledge of long-range wakefield Multi-bunch emittance growth Effects production errors/damage 6. Conclusion
38 1) Beam position stability: Quadrupole vibration/drift drives coherent betatron oscillations. Feedback inefficient below ~ 0.04 * f rep Tolerance set by σ exit = (βε exit ) 1/2 2) Emittance stability: Betatron oscillation drives transverse emittance growth. TESLA JLC/NLC CLIC Quadrupole jitter nm 10 nm 1.3 nm Offset jitter [σ y ] A [10-7 µm 2 /s/m] Orbit drift 1 σ y in 30s - - Emittance growth - 29% in 30 min 11% in 1min Correction w/o fdbk 15 min Correction w fdbk 10 h 3 days Note: 1) Take drifts as rough estimates! Different hardware, feedback constellation, tuning methods! No consistent operational procedure simulated 2) Different A reflects different geological conditions (sandy rock; site-specific)
39 Luminosity decay due to vertical orbit drifts: L cm s per minute ε nm per minute Orbit correction ε ε 1.5% / min De/e ~ 1.5 % / min for best performance Luminosity stabilized with the vertical orbit feedback ( autopilot ) every 7-8 minutes (3% effect). Orbit stabilization: ~ 20 mm level. Both visible from experiments and beam lifetime BCT (faster)! No reason to be afraid of fast orbit stabilization
40 CLIC tolerance on vertical quadrupole vibration: 1.3 nm (vibration above 4 Hz) Measurements in the LEP tunnel Man passing by magnet 20 nm 2 µm 0.1 nm V. Shiltsev 1994 A. Seryi et al, CERN 1993 Ground stability in LEP tunnel much below required 1.3 nm (quiet) However, easily surpassed from human induced noise (running equipment)
41 CLIC Magnet Stability Study M. Aleksa, R. Assmann, W. Coosemans, G. Guignard, N. Leros, M. Mayoud, S. Redaelli, F. Ruggiero, S. Russenschuck, D. Schulte, A. Verdier, I. Wilson, F. Zimmermann - CERN: SL, PS, EST, LHC divisions involved - CERN test stand on main site (surface, close to road, accelerators, equipment). - Collaboration with SLAC/NLC. Contacts with DESY and FNAL. Since January 2001 fully approved Goal: The goal of the proposed study is to show that the present design parameters of CLIC are feasible in a real accelerator environment, using and further developing latest cutting-edge stabilization technology and time-dependent simulation programs. Active and passive stabilization technology subject of intense industrial research and development. Applications: Chip lithography, electron-transmission microscopy, NMR devices, solid-sate physics, satellites, airplanes, gravitational wave detectors, lasers, E.g. If TEM can achieve 0.05 nm resolution why can t we use this? SLAC:Strong effort for final doublet stabilization (Seryi, Frisch, ) Number of recent papers by A. Seryi (see also T working group)
42 26th Advanced ICFA Beam Dynamics Workshop on Nanometre-Size Colliding Particle Beams CERN, September 2002 Amongst other topics, address many stability issues! Where is the limit? Hope for input from colleagues in our field and from other fields. Can we give a limit? Please contact R. Assmann or F. Zimmermann if you have ideas, input, special requests!
43 1. Introduction The LC design studies Simulation codes Beam dynamics beam energy 2. Single particle dynamics Optics design Example lattices Dispersion and energy spread 3. Multi-particle dynamics Transverse wakefield BNS damping SLC as the reference Emittance/wakefield optimization Predicted LC performance Required component performance 4. Transverse beam stability Predictions for LC designs LEP experience Stability studies (vibration damping) 5. Multi-bunch effects Knowledge of long-range wakefield Multi-bunch emittance growth Effects production errors/damage 6. Conclusion
44 Input: Calculations + ASSET tests. Optimize design... CLIC structure: (scaled to 15 GHz) Measured (black) and calculated (red) transverse wakefield versus time [ns] Wakefield (V/pC/mm) I. Wilson et al EPAC2000 Time [ns] Very good agreement, except unexpected 7.6 GHz component HFSS: vacuum chamber to beam pipe transition, not the structure itself Time [ns]
45 TAU3P calculation for 10 cells compared with measurements: (RDDS accelerator structure, NLC) Dipole Mode Spectrum Dipole Mode Frequency (GHz) Amplitude Measurement Tau3P (350) (400) Frequency [Hz] Very good accuracy! Cho Ng, Brian Mc Candless, ICAP2000
46 HOM damping requirements for the TESLA superstructures Worst result (10 cases) Cavity misalignment 500 mm 21.7 MV/m gradient 27 modes: Q = 2e5 4 modes: Q = 1e5 N. Baboi et al EPAC2000 Measured HOM OK for TESLA Multi-bunch offsets at the end of the TESLA linac Calculated multi-bunch emittance growth along the TESLA linac e y = 20 E-09 m rad
47 Envelope of wakefield: (a) ideal R. Jones et al, EPAC2000 Wake Function [V/pC/mm/m] s [m] s [m] (b) 2 MHz rms error (c) 5 MHz rms error Emittance growth: BPM position [km] 4% 600% s [m] BPM position [km]
48 1. Introduction The LC design studies Simulation codes Beam dynamics beam energy 2. Single particle dynamics Optics design Example lattices Dispersion and energy spread 3. Multi-particle dynamics Transverse wakefield BNS damping SLC as the reference Emittance/wakefield optimization Predicted LC performance Required component performance 4. Transverse beam stability Predictions for LC designs LEP experience Stability studies (vibration damping) 5. Multi-bunch effects Knowledge of long-range wakefield Multi-bunch emittance growth Effects production errors/damage 6. Conclusion
49 Linac beam dynamics is a very rich field. It depends strongly on choice of RF technology and beam energy. Predictions are based on detailed simulations. Simulation codes are connected closely to SLC experience. Good reproduction of SLC data. Solutions are published for LC proposals up to 3 TeV. Relevant beam dynamics is understood. No reasonable doubts on simulation results. But: What is reasonable input? Work ongoing to establish most realistic input data (test accelerators, magnet stability study, ) (fully base design on measured performance of components)
Status of linear collider designs:
Status of linear collider designs: Main linacs Design overview, principal open issues G. Dugan March 11, 2002 Linear colliders: main linacs The main linac is the heart of the linear collider TESLA, NLC/JLC,
More informationEmittance preservation in TESLA
Emittance preservation in TESLA R.Brinkmann Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY,Hamburg, Germany V.Tsakanov Yerevan Physics Institute/CANDLE, Yerevan, Armenia The main approaches to the emittance preservation
More informationThe TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring
The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring Winfried Decking for the TESLA Collaboration April 6 th 2004 Outline The Dogbone Issues: Kicker Design Dynamic Aperture Emittance Dilution due to Stray-Fields Collective
More informationReport from the Luminosity Working Group of the International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee (ILC-TRC) Chairman: Greg Loew
Report from the Luminosity Working Group of the International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee (ILC-TRC) Chairman: Greg Loew The ILC-TRC was originally constituted in 1994 and produced a report
More informationILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET
ILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET Andrea Latina (CERN) July 11, 2007 John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science - Oxford (UK) Introduction Simulations Results Conclusions and Outlook PLACET Physical
More informationStudies of Emittance Bumps and Adaptive Alignment method for ILC Main Linac
Studies of Emittance Bumps and Adaptive Alignment method for ILC Main Linac Nikolay Solyak #, Kirti Ranjan, Valentin Ivanov, Shekhar Mishra Fermilab 22-nd Particle Accelerator Conference, Albuquerque,
More informationTwo Beamline Ground Motion Simulation for NLC
Two Beamline Ground Motion Simulation for NLC LCD group meeting May 28, 2002 Andrei Seryi for the NLC Accelerator Physics Group 1 of 25 Goal: Create a tool which will allow simulation of realistic behavior
More informationLattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source
Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source Yuri Nosochkov SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions by M-H. Wang, Y. Cai, X. Huang, K. Bane 48th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop
More informationVI/463 QUADRUPOLE ALIGNMENT AND TRAJECTORY CORREC- TION FOR FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS: SLC TESTS OF A DISPERSION-FREE STEERING ALGORITHM 1
VI/463 QUADRUPOLE ALIGNMENT AND TRAJECTORY CORREC- TION FOR FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS: SLC TESTS OF A DISPERSION-FREE STEERING ALGORITHM 1 R. Assmann, T. Chen, F.J. Decker, M. Minty, T. Raubenheimer, R.
More information3.5 / E [%] σ E s [km]
ZDR - Simulation Studies of the NLC Main Linacs R. Assmann, C. Adolphsen, K. Bane, K. Thompson, T. O. Raubenheimer Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California 9439 May 1996 Abstract This study
More informationMonochromatization Option for NLC Collisions
LCC-0134 SLAC-TN-04-003 February 19, 2004 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes Monochromatization Option for NLC Collisions Andrei Seryi, Tor Raubenheimer Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford
More information$)ODW%HDP(OHFWURQ6RXUFHIRU/LQHDU&ROOLGHUV
$)ODW%HDP(OHFWURQ6RXUFHIRU/LQHDU&ROOLGHUV R. Brinkmann, Ya. Derbenev and K. Flöttmann, DESY April 1999 $EVWUDFW We discuss the possibility of generating a low-emittance flat (ε y
More informationSteering Simulation Studies
Steering Simulation Studies Machine Advisory Committee Meeting 24 June 23 The Situation in November 2 Capability to realistically simulate both commissioning and operation of any proposed LC is critical
More informationAccelerator R&D Opportunities: Sources and Linac. Developing expertise. D. Rubin, Cornell University
Accelerator R&D Opportunities: Sources and Linac D. Rubin, Cornell University Electron and positron sources Requirements Status of R&D Linac Modeling of beam dynamics Development of diagnostic and tuning
More informationLinear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes
LCC-0073 SLAC-PUB-9004 September 2001 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes Microwave Quadrupoles for Beam Break-up Supression In the NLC Main Linac K.L.F. Bane and G. Stupakov Stanford Linear Accelerator
More informationLinear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes
LCC 0035 07/01/00 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes More Options for the NLC Bunch Compressors January 7, 2000 Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford, CA Abstract: The present bunch
More informationILC Spin Rotator. Super B Workshop III. Presenter: Jeffrey Smith, Cornell University. with
ILC Spin Rotator Super B Workshop III Presenter: Jeffrey Smith, Cornell University with Peter Schmid, DESY Peter Tenenbaum and Mark Woodley, SLAC Georg Hoffstaetter and David Sagan, Cornell Based on NLC
More information6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac
II-159 6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac 6.1 Introduction The equilibrium bunch length in the damping ring (DR) is 6 mm, too long by an order of magnitude for optimum collider performance (σ
More informationImpedance & Instabilities
Impedance & Instabilities The concept of wakefields and impedance Wakefield effects and their relation to important beam parameters Beam-pipe geometry and materials and their impact on impedance An introduction
More informationAbstract. results that address this question for the main linacs of the NLC. We will show that the effects of alignment drifts can indeed be handled.
SLAC-PUB-732 September 1996 Emittance Dilution Due to Slow Alignment Drifts in the Main Linacs of the NLC* R. Assmann, C. Adolphsen, K. Bane, T.O. Raubenheimer, K. Thompson Stanford Linear Accelerator
More informationBeam-beam Effects in Linear Colliders
Beam-beam Effects in Linear Colliders Daniel Schulte D. Schulte Beam-beam effects in Linear Colliders 1 Generic Linear Collider Single pass poses luminosity challenge Low emittances are produced in the
More informationX-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs. Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012
X-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012 Motivations & Contents Motivations Develop more compact (hopefully cheaper) FEL drivers, L S C X-band (successful
More informationOn-axis injection into small dynamic aperture
On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture L. Emery Accelerator Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory Future Light Source Workshop 2010 Tuesday March 2nd, 2010 On-Axis (Swap-Out) injection for
More informationBeam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1
Beam Dynamics D. Brandt, CERN D. Brandt 1 Some generalities D. Brandt 2 Units: the electronvolt (ev) The electronvolt (ev)) is the energy gained by an electron travelling, in vacuum, between two points
More informationCEPC Linac Injector. HEP Jan, Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi
HKUST Jockey Club Institute for Advanced Study CEPC Linac Injector HEP218 22 Jan, 218 Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi Institute of High Energy
More informationFirst propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division
First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division 1 SOLEIL : A 3 rd generation synchrotron light source 29 beamlines operational
More informationIntegrated luminosity performance studies of linear colliders with intra-train IP-FB system: ILC and CLIC
Integrated luminosity performance studies of linear colliders with intra-train IP-FB system: ILC and CLIC Javier Resta Lopez JAI, Oxford University In collaboration with P. N. Burrows, A. Latina and D.
More informatione + e - Linear Collider
e + e - Linear Collider Disclaimer This talk was lifted from an earlier version of a lecture by N.Walker Eckhard Elsen DESY DESY Summer Student Lecture 3 rd August 2006 1 Disclaimer II Talk is largely
More informationShort Introduction to CLIC and CTF3, Technologies for Future Linear Colliders
Short Introduction to CLIC and CTF3, Technologies for Future Linear Colliders Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals Visit to the CTF3 Installation Roger Ruber Collider History p p hadron collider
More informationLAYOUT AND SIMULATIONS OF THE FONT SYSTEM AT ATF2
LAYOUT AND SIMULATIONS OF THE FONT SYSTEM AT ATF J. Resta-López, P. N. Burrows, JAI, Oxford University, UK August 1, Abstract We describe the adaptation of a Feedback On Nano-second Timescales (FONT) system
More informationBernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC
Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC * Bernhard Holzer, CERN CAS Prague 2014 x Liouville: in reasonable storage rings area in phase space is constant. A = π*ε=const x ε beam emittance = woozilycity of the particle
More informationTransverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21
Transverse dynamics Selected topics Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, Erik.Adli@fys.uio.no, v2.21 Dispersion So far, we have studied particles with reference momentum p = p 0. A dipole field
More informationCOMPUTATIONAL NEEDS FOR THE ILC
Proceedings of ICAP 2006, Chamonix, France MOMPMP02 COMPUTATIONAL NEEDS FOR THE ILC D. Schulte, CERN, K. Kubo, KEK Abstract The ILC requires detailed studies of the beam transport and of individual components
More informationFACET-II Design Update
FACET-II Design Update October 17-19, 2016, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Glen White FACET-II CD-2/3A Director s Review, August 9, 2016 Planning for FACET-II as a Community Resource FACET-II Photo
More informationA Two-Stage Bunch Compressor Option for the US Cold LC
LCC-0151 SLAC-TN-0-048 June 2004 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes A Two-Stage Bunch Compressor Option for the US Cold LC Abstract This note documents a set of expressions used to explore the issue
More informationNLC Luminosity and Accelerator Physics
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center X-Band Linear Collider Path to the Future NLC Luminosity and Accelerator Physics International Technology Recommendation Panel April 26-27, 2004 Outline Talk will focus
More informationAccelerator Physics. Accelerator Development
Accelerator Physics The Taiwan Light Source (TLS) is the first large accelerator project in Taiwan. The goal was to build a high performance accelerator which provides a powerful and versatile light source
More informationPhysics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014
Physics 610 Adv Particle Physics April 7, 2014 Accelerators History Two Principles Electrostatic Cockcroft-Walton Van de Graaff and tandem Van de Graaff Transformers Cyclotron Betatron Linear Induction
More informationCERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH BEAM-BASED ALIGNMENT IN CTF3 TEST BEAM LINE
CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CLIC Note 956 BEAM-BASED ALIGNMENT IN CTF3 TEST BEAM LINE Sterbini, G (CERN) ; Dӧbert, S (CERN) ; Marín, E (CERN) ; Lillestol, RL (CERN) ; Schulte, D (CERN)
More informationThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics
ThomX Machine Advisory Committee (LAL Orsay, March 20-21 2017) Ring Beam Dynamics A. Loulergue, M. Biagini, C. Bruni, I. Chaikovska I. Debrot, N. Delerue, A. Gamelin, H. Guler, J. Zang Programme Investissements
More informationAccelerator Physics Issues of ERL Prototype
Accelerator Physics Issues of ERL Prototype Ivan Bazarov, Geoffrey Krafft Cornell University TJNAF ERL site visit (Mar 7-8, ) Part I (Bazarov). Optics. Space Charge Emittance Compensation in the Injector
More informationCLIC Detector studies status + plans
CLIC Detector studies status + plans Contents: - Introduction to CLIC accelerator - 2004 CLIC Study group report: "Physics at the CLIC Multi-TeV Linear Collider - CERN participation in Linear Collider
More informationII) Experimental Design
SLAC Experimental Advisory Committee --- September 12 th, 1997 II) Experimental Design Theory and simulations Great promise of significant scientific and technological achievements! How to realize this
More informationOverview of Acceleration
Overview of Acceleration R B Palmer, Scott Berg, Steve Kahn (presented by Steve Kahn) Nufact-04 RF Frequency Acc types and System Studies Linacs RLA s FFAG s Injection/Extraction US Study 2a acceleration
More informationD. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1
Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt, CERN D. Brandt 1 Why this Introduction? During this school, you will learn about beam dynamics in a rigorous way but some of you are completely new to the field of
More informationSLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland Michael Böge 1 SLS Team at PSI Michael Böge 2 Layout of the SLS Linac, Transferlines Booster Storage Ring (SR) Beamlines and Insertion Devices
More informationLinear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. A New Structure for the NLC Positron Predamping Ring Lattice
Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes LCC-0066 CBP Tech Note - 233 June 2001 A New Structure for the NLC Positron Predamping Ring Lattice A. Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA
More informationX-Band RF Harmonic Compensation for Linear Bunch Compression in the LCLS
SLAC-TN-5- LCLS-TN-1-1 November 1,1 X-Band RF Harmonic Compensation for Linear Bunch Compression in the LCLS Paul Emma SLAC November 1, 1 ABSTRACT An X-band th harmonic RF section is used to linearize
More informationMAX-lab. MAX IV Lattice Design: Multibend Achromats for Ultralow Emittance. Simon C. Leemann
Workshop on Low Emittance Rings 2010 CERN Jan 12 15, 2010 MAX-lab MAX IV Lattice Design: Multibend Achromats for Ultralow Emittance Simon C. Leemann simon.leemann@maxlab.lu.se Brief Overview of the MAX
More informationExcitements and Challenges for Future Light Sources Based on X-Ray FELs
Excitements and Challenges for Future Light Sources Based on X-Ray FELs 26th ADVANCED ICFA BEAM DYNAMICS WORKSHOP ON NANOMETRE-SIZE COLLIDING BEAMS Kwang-Je Kim Argonne National Laboratory and The University
More informationSimulation for choice of RF phase and RF jitters in the main linac
Simulation for choice of RF phase and RF jitters in the main linac 1998.12. Kiyoshi Kubo 1. Parameter of the linac Parameters for CMS energy 1TeV case B in the table Pre-ISG2 Parameters are used except
More informationTransverse beam stability and Landau damping in hadron colliders
Work supported by the Swiss State Secretariat for Educa6on, Research and Innova6on SERI Transverse beam stability and Landau damping in hadron colliders C. Tambasco J. Barranco, X. Buffat, T. Pieloni Acknowledgements:
More informationProton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration
Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration Matthew Wing (UCL) Motivation : particle physics; large accelerators General concept : proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration Towards a first test experiment
More informationLattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC
Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC Chin-Cheng Kuo On behalf of the TPS Lattice Design Team Ambient Ground Motion and Civil Engineering for Low Emittance Electron Storage Ring Workshop
More informationOverview on Compton Polarimetry
General Issues O spin motion & alignment tolerances O beam-beam effects & upstream vs. Downstream Compton Polarimetry Basics O beam parameters & Compton detection methods O kinematics, cross sections &
More informationCERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC
CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CLIC Note - 819 THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC A. Vivoli 1, I. Chaikovska 2, R. Chehab 3, O. Dadoun 2, P. Lepercq 2, F.
More informationCOMBINER RING LATTICE
CTFF3 TECHNICAL NOTE INFN - LNF, Accelerator Division Frascati, April 4, 21 Note: CTFF3-2 COMBINER RING LATTICE C. Biscari 1. Introduction The 3 rd CLIC test facility, CTF3, is foreseen to check the feasibility
More informationLCLS Injector Straight Ahead Spectrometer C.Limborg-Deprey Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 8 th June 2005
LCLS Injector Straight Ahead Spectrometer C.Limborg-Deprey Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 8 th June 2005 Summary The spectrometer design was modified to allow the measurement of uncorrelated energy
More informationA 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac Zhirong Huang, Faya Wang, Karl Bane and Chris Adolphsen SLAC Compact X-Ray (1.5 Å) FEL Parameter symbol LCLS CXFEL unit Bunch Charge Q 250 250
More informationIntroduction to Accelerators
Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt, CERN CAS Platja d Aro 2006 Introduction to Accelerators D. Brandt 1 Why an Introduction? The time where each accelerator sector was working alone in its corner is
More informationExcitements and Challenges for Future Light Sources Based on X-Ray FELs
Excitements and Challenges for Future Light Sources Based on X-Ray FELs 26th ADVANCED ICFA BEAM DYNAMICS WORKSHOP ON NANOMETRE-SIZE COLLIDING BEAMS Kwang-Je Kim Argonne National Laboratory and The University
More informationIII. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education
III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Introduction Outline CESR Overview CESR Layout Injector Wigglers
More informationLCLS Accelerator Parameters and Tolerances for Low Charge Operations
LCLS-TN-99-3 May 3, 1999 LCLS Accelerator Parameters and Tolerances for Low Charge Operations P. Emma SLAC 1 Introduction An option to control the X-ray FEL output power of the LCLS [1] by reducing the
More informationLHC Upgrade Plan and Ideas - scenarios & constraints from the machine side
LHC Upgrade Plan and Ideas - scenarios & constraints from the machine side Frank Zimmermann LHCb Upgrade Workshop Edinburgh, 11 January 2007 Frank Zimmermann, LHCb Upgrade Workshop time scale of LHC upgrade
More informationOverview of Linear Collider Designs
Overview of Linear Collider Designs SLAC-PUB-6244 April 1993 (4 R. H. Siemann Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309 I. INTRODUCTION Linear collider design and development
More informationBeam Physics at SLAC. Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head. July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1
Beam Physics at SLAC Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1 Members in the ABP Department * Head: Yunhai Cai * Staff: Gennady Stupakov Karl Bane Zhirong
More informationAperture Measurements and Implications
Aperture Measurements and Implications H. Burkhardt, SL Division, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract Within short time, the 2/90 optics allowed to reach similar luminosity performance as the 90/60 optics,
More information3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics
1 3. Synchrotrons Synchrotron Basics What you will learn about 2 Overview of a Synchrotron Source Losing & Replenishing Electrons Storage Ring and Magnetic Lattice Synchrotron Radiation Flux, Brilliance
More informationPractical Lattice Design
Practical Lattice Design Dario Pellegrini (CERN) dario.pellegrini@cern.ch USPAS January, 15-19, 2018 1/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design Lecture 5. Low Beta Insertions 2/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical
More informationOperational Experience with HERA
PAC 07, Albuquerque, NM, June 27, 2007 Operational Experience with HERA Joachim Keil / DESY On behalf of the HERA team Contents Introduction HERA II Luminosity Production Experiences with HERA Persistent
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014
SIX-DIMENSIONAL WEAK STRONG SIMULATIONS OF HEAD-ON BEAM BEAM COMPENSATION IN RHIC arxiv:.8v [physics.acc-ph] Oct Abstract Y. Luo, W. Fischer, N.P. Abreu, X. Gu, A. Pikin, G. Robert-Demolaize BNL, Upton,
More informationIP switch and big bend
1 IP switch and big bend Contents 1.1 Introduction..................................................... 618 1.2 TheIPSwitch.................................................... 618 1.2.1 OpticsDesign...............................................
More informationPAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL
PAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL J. S. Oh, W. Namkung, Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, POSTECH, Pohang 790-784, Korea Y. Kim, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, D-603 Hamburg, Germany Abstract With
More informationAccelerator Physics Final Exam pts.
Accelerator Physics Final Exam - 170 pts. S. M. Lund and Y. Hao Graders: C. Richard and C. Y. Wong June 14, 2018 Problem 1 P052 Emittance Evolution 40 pts. a) 5 pts: Consider a coasting beam composed of
More informationFermilab HG cavity and coupler R&D
Fermilab HG cavity and coupler R&D Motivation HOM calculations Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Outline Main Coupler and HOM dumping Multipactor Lorentz Forces Single bunch beam dynamics Summary Nikolay Solyak
More informationPresented at the 5th International Linear Collider Workshop (LCWS 2000), Oct 24-28, 2000, Batavia, IL
SLAC-PUB-10800 New NLC Final Focus Pantaleo Raimondi and Andrei Seryi Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94309 USA Abstract. A novel design of the Final Focus
More informationCERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH INTEGRATED SIMULATION OF DYNAMIC EFFECTS FOR THE 380 GEV CLIC DESIGN
CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CLIC Note 1138 INTEGRATED SIMULATION OF DYNAMIC EFFECTS FOR THE 380 GEV CLIC DESIGN Chetan Gohil 1, Daniel Schulte 2, Philip N. Burrows 1 1 JAI, University
More informationEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN - SL DIVISION. Multi-TeV CLIC Photon Collider Option. H. Burkhardt
EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN - SL DIVISION CERN-SL-2000-070 CLIC Note 463 AP Multi-TeV CLIC Photon Collider Option H. Burkhardt Considerations for an option of γγ collisions at multi-tev
More informationFACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities
FACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities 217 FACET-II Science Workshop, October 17-2, 217 Glen White Overview Machine design overview Electron systems Injector, Linac & Bunch compressors, Sector 2
More informationDiagnostics Needs for Energy Recovery Linacs
Diagnostics Needs for Energy Recovery Linacs Georg H. Hoffstaetter Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences and Education & Physics Department Cornell University, Ithaca New York 14853-2501 gh77@cornell.edu
More informationPhysics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. - Accelerator Techniques: Introduction and History -
Physics 736 Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics - Accelerator Techniques: Introduction and History - Karsten Heeger heeger@wisc.edu Homework #8 Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin
More informationSimulation of Laser-Compton cooling of electron beams for future linear colliders. Abstract
Simulation of Laser-Compton cooling of electron beams for future linear colliders T. Ohgaki Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, California 94720, USA and Venture Business Laboratory, Hiroshima
More informationSBF Accelerator Principles
SBF Accelerator Principles John Seeman SLAC Frascati Workshop November 11, 2005 Topics The Collision Point Design constraints going backwards Design constraints going forward Parameter relations Luminosity
More informationIntroduction to Collider Physics
Introduction to Collider Physics William Barletta United States Particle Accelerator School Dept. of Physics, MIT The Very Big Picture Accelerators Figure of Merit 1: Accelerator energy ==> energy frontier
More informationOn the future plan of KEK for ILC(International Linear Collider) Junji Urakawa(KEK) Contents
On the future plan of KEK for ILC(International Linear Collider) Junji Urakawa(KEK) 2004.10.24 Contents 0. Outline until now. Review of SC-LC(TESLA) and R&D items. R&D Items at ATF. R&D plans for Superconducting
More informationStart-to-end beam optics development and multi-particle tracking for the ILC undulator-based positron source*
SLAC-PUB-12239 January 27 (A) Start-to-end beam optics development and multi-particle tracking for the ILC undulator-based positron source* F. Zhou, Y. Batygin, Y. Nosochkov, J. C. Sheppard, and M. D.
More informationPart V Undulators for Free Electron Lasers
Part V Undulators for Free Electron Lasers Pascal ELLEAUME European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble V, 1/22, P. Elleaume, CAS, Brunnen July 2-9, 2003. Oscillator-type Free Electron Laser V, 2/22,
More informationIntroduction to particle accelerators
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Lecce, 17 June 2006 Introductory remarks Particle accelerators are black boxes producing either flux of particles impinging on
More informationLHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade
LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade Walter Scandale CERN Accelerator Technology department EPAC 06 27 June 2006 We acknowledge the support of the European Community-Research Infrastructure Activity under
More informationTeV Scale Muon RLA Complex Large Emittance MC Scenario
TeV Scale Muon RLA Complex Large Emittance MC Scenario Alex Bogacz and Kevin Beard Muon Collider Design Workshop, BNL, December 1-3, 29 Outline Large Emittance MC Neuffer s Collider Acceleration Scheme
More informationAnalysis of KEK-ATF Optics and Coupling Using Orbit Response Matrix Analysis 1
Analysis of KEK-ATF Optics and Coupling Using Orbit Response Matrix Analysis 1 A. Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory J. Nelson, M. Ross, M. Woodley Stanford Linear Accelerator Center S. Mishra
More informationThe Electron-Ion Collider
The Electron-Ion Collider C. Tschalaer 1. Introduction In the past year, the idea of a polarized electron-proton (e-p) or electron-ion (e-a) collider of high luminosity (10 33 cm -2 s -1 or more) and c.m.
More informationLinear Collider Studies at DESY
Linear Collider Studies at DESY R. Brinkmann for the TESLA and SBLC Collaborations DESY, Notkestr. 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany ABSTRACT This paper summarizes the present status of the studies for a superconducting
More informationPolarized electron and positron beams at CEPC
Polarized electron and positron beams at CEPC Zhe Duan Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS Presented at mini-workshop on Beam polarization in future colliders IAS-HKUST, HK, Jan 18, 2019 zhe.duan@ihep.ac.cn
More informationS2E (Start-to-End) Simulations for PAL-FEL. Eun-San Kim
S2E (Start-to-End) Simulations for PAL-FEL Aug. 25 2008 Kyungpook Nat l Univ. Eun-San Kim 1 Contents I Lattice and layout for a 10 GeV linac II Beam parameters and distributions III Pulse-to-pulse stability
More informationLCLS S-band Structure Coupler
LCLS S-band Structure Coupler Zenghai Li Advanced Computations Department Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS S-band L01/L02 Coupler Review Nov. 03, 2004 Overview Motivation Modeling tools Multipole
More informationCompressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.
Compressor Ring Valeri Lebedev Fermilab Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions Muon Collider Workshop Newport News, VA Dec. 8-1, 8 Where do we go?
More informationStatus of the LHC Beam Cleaning Study Group
Status of the LHC Beam Cleaning Study Group R. Assmann, SL BI Review 19.11.2001 BI Review 19.11.01, R. Assmann 1 LHC Beam Cleaning Study Group: Mandate: Study beam dynamics and operational issues for the
More informationCompressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam
EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN A&B DIVISION AB-Note-27-34 BI CERN-NUFACT-Note-153 Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam M. Aiba Abstract A compressor ring providing very short proton
More informationEFFECTS OF RF DEFLECTIONS ON BEAM DYNAMICS IN LINEAR COLLIDERS*
SLAC-PUB-5069 September 1989 09 EFFECTS OF RF DEFLECTIONS ON BEAM DYNAMICS IN LINEAR COLLIDERS* J. T. SEEMAN Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309. Abstract The beam
More information