RECOMMENDED TOOLS FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ASSOCIATED TO THE EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
|
|
- Jeffrey Matthews
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing IX Edited by F. Pavese, M. Bär, J.-R. Filtz, A. B. Forbes, L. Pendrill and K. Shirono c 2012 World Scientific Publishing Company (pp. 1 12) RECOMMENDED TOOLS FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ASSOCIATED TO THE EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY A.ALLARD Laboratoire National de mtrologie et d Essais 1, rue Gaston Boissier, Paris Cedex 15, France alexandre.allard@lne.fr N.FISCHER Laboratoire National de mtrologie et d Essais 1, rue Gaston Boissier, Paris Cedex 15, France nicolas.fischer@lne.fr Sensitivity analysis is an important part of metrology, particularly for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty. Such an analysis allows to have a better knowledge on the contributions of the different input quantities to the variance of the output quantity. This article intends to give recommendations for the computation of the contributions to the variance, particularly when a Monte Carlo method is used. First in the case of an approximately linear (or monotonic measurement model), we propose to compute Spearman correlation coefficient. This sensitivity measure is easy to compute, doesn t need extra Monte Carlo trials and provides a good estimation of the sensitivity indices under the monotony of the measurement model assumption. Second, for a non linear measurement model, we propose to characterize the sensitivity through the variance of the conditional expectation. This quantity may be estimated by different methods, often known as importance measures. The principle is to decompose the variance of the output quantity into terms of increasing dimension. All these methods will be able to deal with sensitivity indices whatever the properties of the measurement model are, and also to provide an estimation for higher-order sensitivity indices if needed. The advantages and drawbacks of the different sensitivity indices are then discussed through a practical application case. Care should be taken to provide a sensitivity method that is consistent with the measurement model considered and also that minimizes the computational cost. Keywords: Sensitivity Analysis, Measurement Uncertainty, Monte Carlo Methods, Spearman coefficient, Sobol, Local polynomial Smoothers 1
2 1. Introduction Both the GUM and its Supplement 1 constitute reference documents to evaluate the measurement uncertainty. They provide guidance on such an evaluation whether a Taylor approximation or a Monte Carlo simulation is used. In both cases, the evaluation of measurement uncertainty could be represented by Figure 1. Fig. 1. The general method to evaluate measurement uncertainty. In such a context, the uncertainty budget associated to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty is very useful to the metrologist to have a better knowledge of the measurement process, through the contributions to the variance of the output quantity of each input quantity. Within the GUM Uncertainty Framework (GUF) 3 this is given by the partial derivatives of the measurement mode that are computed at the best estimate of each input quantity. It is a local sensitivity measure. It doesn t give the uncertainty budget if the input quantities depart from their best value. It would be preferable to evaluate the sensitivity all over the range of the different input quantities, which falls in the field of global sensitivity analysis. The recent use of Monte Carlo Methods, encouraged by the publication of the Supplement 1 to the GUM in 2008, doesn t need to compute those partial 2
3 derivatives. Another sensitivity measure should then be used and, if possible, a global sensitivity method that is more accurate than local ones. This paper aims at proposing some different methods to quantify the contributions to the variance of the output quantity. Also, the computation of sophisticated sensitivity indices goes often along with a high computational time. Consequently, the choice of a sensitivity method should take into consideration many aspects of the problem : linearity/monotony of the measurement model, computational time for one run of the measurement model and total number of runs needed to compute the indices. The first part of the paper deals with the basic sensitivity methods, that are to be used for simple measurement models, if the linearity (or monotony) of the model is assessed. In a second part, more complex methods are introduced, denoted as variance-based methods. Both the concept and estimation tools are given. All these methods are illustrated through the mass calibration example from the supplement 1 to the GUM (GUM-S1 4 ) and the calculations presented here have been performed using R software. 2. Basic Sensitivity Methods 2.1. The One At a Time Method (GUM-S1) The computation of a sensitivity measure associated with a Monte Carlo method is not straitforward. The GUM-S1 proposes to evaluate such contributions by holding all quantities but one fixed at their best value and performing a new Monte Carlo simulation. This method provides a quantification of the effect of the given input quantity X i on the standard deviation of the output quantity. Such a procedure is not an efficient method to evaluate the contributions to the variance of the output. First, it implies to make as many Monte Carlo simulations as the total number of input quantities n, which may be quite heavy if n is large. Second, it allows to evaluate the sensitivity while only one input quantity is varied in the same time. But in reality, all the input quantities are allowed to vary all together and if interactions are supposed to arise in a measurement process, they will only arise to the condition that all the quantities involved vary in the same time. Consequently this method is quite expensive from a computational point of view and fails to provide a complete uncertainty budget when interactions arise. However, if the measurement model is either linear or monotonic, there is no need to look for complicated methods to evaluate the contributions of interactions. In this case, a simple measure of the sensitivity may be 3
4 obtained through the computation of correlations coefficients Pearson and Spearman Correlation Coefficients If the measurement model is approximately linear, then the Pearson correlation coefficient as defined in equation 1 is suitable. M ( Xij X )( i Yj Ȳ ) j=1 ρ (X i ; Y )= M ( Xij X ) 2 M ( i Yj Ȳ ) 2 (1) j=1 j=1 where M is the total number of runs and X i and Y are the empirical means of respectively the input quantity X i and the output quantity Y. In order to be a bit less restrictive on the linear assumption, the Spearman correlation coefficient gives good results under the assumption of monotony of the measurement model. 6 Like the Pearson correlation coefficient, it can be easily compute from the original Monte Carlo data sample used to propagate the probability distributions, according to equation 2. r (X i ; Y )=1 6 M (RX ij RY j ) 2 j=1 M (M 2 1) (2) where RX ij denotes the rank of the j th observation of X i and RY j denotes the rank of the j th observation of Y. The corresponding sensitivity indices are obtained through a standardization of these correlation coefficient, and the contribution of the input quantity X i to the variance of the output quantity Y is given by the following quantity : S Spearman r 2 (X i ; Y ) i = n i=1 r2 (X i ; Y ) (3) These correlation coefficients are the suitable sensitivity methods to use in cases where there are no interactions arising in the measurement process. Their computation relies on the same samples as those used to compute the empirical distribution function of the output quantity, whereas more sophisticated sensitivity methods may require additional Monte Carlo runs and consequently a much higher computational time. 4
5 Whatever the software used to perform the Monte Carlo method according to the GUM-S1, they should be quite easy to compute, without any additional Monte Carlo trials Application Case : Mass Calibration Example The mass calibration example is provided by the GUM-S1. The measurand is the deviation δm of the conventional mass m W,c from the nominal value m nom = 100g : [ ( 1 δm =(m R,c + δm R,c ) 1+(ρ a ρ a0 ) 1 )] m nom (4) ρ W ρ R Five input quantities contribute to the variance of the measurand. They are assigned probability distribution functions as defined in table 1 : Table 1. Probability distributions of the input quantities for the mass calibration example Input quantity Probability Mean Value Stand. dev. Lower Bound Upper Bound X i (mg) distribution μ (mg) σ (mg) a (mg) b (mg) m R,c Gaussian δm R,c Gaussian ρ a Rectangular ρ W Rectangular ρ R Rectangular A Monte Carlo method is performed in order to compute the empirical pdf for the output quantity. M =10 6 runs are used and the final results are given in Table 2. Table 2. Results of the propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method for the mass calibration example Mean value Standard deviation ylow yhigh (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) The goal is to compute the uncertainty budget, that is to say the contributions to the variance of δm of the different input quantities. Table 3 summarizes the first results obtained applying the basic sensitivity tools. 5
6 Table 3. Uncertainty budget for the mass calibration example according to the GUM at first order, the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients and the One-At-a-Time (OAT) method Input quantity GUM Pearson Spearman OAT X i 1st order Correlation Correlation method m R,c δm R,c ρ a ρ W ρ R According to the results in table 3, m R,c is the most contributive input quantity. The interpretation of these results could lead to the conclusion that both ρ a, ρ W and ρ R have no contribution to the variance of the output. A simple calculation invalidates these conclusions. We performed five other Monte Carlo simulations. For each one, the standard uncertainty of one input quantity is decreased by 10% while the standard uncertainty of the other inputs remains at its original value and we observe the impact of such a change on the standard uncertainty ũ (δm) of the output. Table 4 summarizes the corresponding results. Table 4. Standard uncertainty of the output quantity while one input quantity has its standard uncertainty lowered by 10% Input quantity m R,c δm R,c ρ a ρ W ρ R Resulting ũ (δm) Compared with the original value for the standard uncertainty of the output quantity, three input quantities have, in reality, an equivalent influence : m R,c ρ a and ρ W. Actually, the basic sensitivity tools fail to identify the contribution of both ρ a and ρ W, which is provided by the interaction effect. Then, another framework has to be defined to evaluate such contributions. This framework relies on the decomposition of the variance, using the variance of the conditional expectation. 6
7 3. Variance-Based Sensitivity Indices 3.1. Concepts Let s consider the total variance decomposition theorem, which states that thevarianceofaquantityy may be decomposed as the sum of the variance of the conditional expectation of Y given X i andtheexpectationofthe conditional variance of Y given X i. V (Y )=V [E (Y X i )] + E [V (Y X i )] (5) The first term V i = V [E (Y X i )] denotes the part of the variance of Y that is due to the variations of the input quantity X i while the second term denotes the part of the variance of Y that is due to all the input quantities but X i. The first order sensitivity index is then defined as S i = V i (6) V (Y ) A second order sensitivity index can also be deduced from the variance due to the couple of quantities X i and X j : S i,j = V [E (Y X i,x j )] V i V j (7) V (Y ) Higher order sensitivity indices can be obtained in the same manner, until n th order. Of course, it would be a hard work to compute them all, and moreover, the higher the order, the more likely the sensitivity index to be null. Hence, it is possible to define a total order sensitivity index T i which encloses all the effects of all orders in which the input X i is involved. T i = S i + j =is i,j S 1,2,...,n (8) If an input quantity X i is involved is no interaction with another input in a measurement process, then T i = S i. Actually, when a measurement process is to be improved, the total sensitivity index should be considered in the general case. If a contributive standard uncertainty is reduced, the impact on the standard uncertainty of the output will result from the corresponding first order sensitivity index but also from the higher order sensitivity indices if any involving the same input quantity, as it is the case for the mass calibration example. 7
8 Different methods are available to estimate these quantities. We present here the Sobol method and the local polynomial smoothers method. As these methods may be computationally expensive, it s particularly interesting to identify the influent input quantities previously in order to reduce the set on influent input quantities of which we want to evaluate the contributions. The Morris s design can be used to this extent Sobol Estimation The Sobol indices offer the ideal framework to evaluate the sensitivity associated to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty. 1 They allow to compute first and higher order sensitivity indices as well as total order ones. 7 They rely on two M-samples (x i,j ) i=1,...,n;j=1,...,m and ( ) x i,j i=1,...,n;j=1,...,m that are mixed together in order to obtain an estimate of the sensitivity index. The first order sensitivity index is then estimated by the quantity : where : S Sobol i = ˆD i ˆD (9) ˆD i = 1 M M f (x 1,k,..., x n,k ) f k=1 ( ) x 1,k,..., x (i 1),k,x i,k,x (i+1),k,x n,k ˆf 0 2 (10) is the estimator of the variance of the conditional expectation of Y given X i and ˆD = 1 M M k=1 f 2 (x 1,k,..., x n,k ) ˆf 2 0 is the estimator of the total variance of Y.Thequantity ˆf 0 = 1 M M k=1 f (x 1,k,..., x n,k ) denotes the empirical mean of y. ˆD ij may also be defined as above with both x i,k and x j,k taken from the first sample while the other inputs are taken from the two samples and enables to estimate the second order indices : S Sobol i,j = ˆD ij ˆD i ˆD j ˆD (11) Higher order indices can be obtained in the same manner. But as they are often null, it may be more efficient to compute the total order sensitivity indices, to visualize if some significant contributions are missing. The estimation of the total sensitivity indices relies on the estimation of the variance of the output due to the variations of all other input quantities than X i. Sobol proposes then the corresponding estimate : 8
9 T Sobol i =1 ˆD i ˆD (12) where : ˆD i = 1 M M f (x 1,k,..., x n,k ) f ( x 1,k,..., x i 1,k,x ) i,k,x i+1,k,x n,k 2 ˆf 0 k=1 (13) Such an estimation is computationally very expensive. Indeed, it needs a very large number of runs to reach the convergence of the estimation. For practical purposes, bootstrap samples may be used to compute mean values for the sensitivity indices as well as a standard deviation in order to control this convergence. Then, the use of the Sobol indices may not be possible if the measurement model f is a computational code for which one evaluation of the code may last one second or more. In this case, another faster method has to be used, such as the local polynomial smoothers Local Polynomial Smoothers The second method for the estimation of the variance-based sensitivity indices as proposed here rely on a non-parametric estimation using a kernel function of the relationship between the input quantity and the output quantity. We consider an heteroskedastic model that is estimated using local polynomial smoothers : Y k = m (X ik )+σ (X ik ) ɛ k,k =1,..., M (14) where m (X ik )=E (Y X i = x i )andσ 2 (X ik )=V (Y X i = x i )foreach single set of observation (X ik ; Y k ). The principle is to approximate the regression function m by a p th order polynomial, for z in a neighborhood of x : m (z) = p β j (z x) j (15) j=0 where β j denotes the coefficients of the polynomial. This one is then fitted to the observations (Y k,x ik ) by solving the least-squares problem 9
10 min β M Y k k=1 2 p ( ) β j (X ik x) j Xik x K h j=0 (16) The quality of this estimation is then dependent on the choice of the kernel function K as well as the smoothing parameter h. More details about this estimation are given by Da Veiga et al. 5 The ( estimate ) ˆm (x) of the function m (x) isthen: ˆm (x) = ˆβ 0 (x) Let Xit be another sample of the input quantity X i.this t=1,...,m sample is used to estimate the variance of ˆm, which is an estimate of the VCE : ˆT LP i = 1 M M t=1 ( ( ) 2 ˆm Xit ˆ m) (17) where ˆ m = 1 ( M M 1 t=1 ˆm Xj ). This estimation of the sensitivity can be standardized to obtain the contribution of X i to the variance of the output Y : Ŝ LP i = ˆT LP i ˆσ 2 z (18) where ˆσ 2 z is the estimator of the total variance of Y. In order to compute the second order sensitivity indices between X i and X j, the variance of conditional expectation of Y given both X i and X j is to be considered m (X i,x j )=E (Y X i,x j ). Then, the estimation of the corresponding regression model leads to the calculation of the global contribution of the couple (X i ; X j ): ˆT LP ij = 1 M M t=1 ( ( ˆm Xit, X ) 2 jt ˆ m) (19) and the contribution of the interaction is obtained as follows : Ŝ LP ij = ˆT LP ij LP ˆT i ˆσ z 2 ˆT LP j (20) The convergence for the estimation of the sensitivity indices using local polynomial smoothers is obtained with quite low sample sizes. However, it s 10
11 important to notice that two different samples are needed : the first one to to perform the estimation of the VCE ˆm, and the second one to compute the sensitivity estimates ˆT i Application Case : Mass Calibration Example For the mass calibration example, the application of these last two methods give the results summarized in table 5. Uncertainty budget a for the mass calibration ex- Table 5. ample Input quantity Sobol Local Polynomial Smoothers X i m R,c δm R,c ρ a 0 0 ρ W 0 0 ρ R 0 0 Interaction ρ a,ρ W 0.59 b 0.49 Interaction ρ a,ρ R Note: a Performed with M= runs b Please note that for the Sobol estimation, the convergence of the indices is not achieved yet We note an important gap between the variance-based indices and the simple basic ones in Table 3, which is due to the presence of an important interaction in the measurement model. The basic sensitivity methods are not able to deal with such interactions and give a false estimation of the sensitivity. Both Sobol and LSP methods are indeed able to identify and quantify the interaction effect arising from ρ a and ρ W, which is approximately in the same proportion as the first order contribution of m R,c. Moreover, these sensitivity indices fit quite well with the observations made in table 4, about the reduction in the variance of the output quantity that can be obtained if we are able to reduce the variance in either m R,c either ρ a or ρ W. This is a strong evidence that a full decomposition of the variance is needed in such a case. 4. Conclusion As a conclusion, this paper identifies some good practice in performing a sensitivity analysis associated to the evaluation of measurement uncer- 11
12 tainty. We identify the theoretical quantity, the variance of the conditional expectation, that is to be estimated when the objective is to determine an uncertainty budget associated to an evaluation of measurement uncertainty. It is a measure of how the variations of a given quantity X i impact the variations of the output Y. Moreover, this is not only a measure in a neighborhood of the most probable value for the quantities involved (local sensitivity analysis), but all over their range (global sensitivity analysis). First, in the case of a simple measurement model (linear or linearized, monotonic), the Spearman correlation coefficient constitutes an easy and valid method to calculate the contributions to the variance of all the input quantities. Moreover, it is easy to implement in any software. Therefore, we strongly recommend to perform this index for such measurement models. Simple sensitivity measures should be used for simple models. Second, if the measurement model is more complex or implies any interaction effect, then the Spearman correlation can t deal with the second order effects. Then, both the Sobol indices and the estimation using local polynomial smoothers give a suitable estimation of the contributions to the variance. If the computational time to compute one run of the measurement model is low, then the Sobol estimation allows to estimate all orders sensitivity indices, included total order ones. Otherwise, the local polynomial estimation should be used to perform first and second order sensitivity indices. References 1. A.Allard and N.Fischer, Sensitivity analysis in metrology : study and comparison on different indices for measurement uncertainty, inadvanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing VIII, 78, 1-6 (2009). 2. A.Allard and N.Fischer and F.Didieux and E.Guillaume and B.Iooss, Evaluation of the most influent input variables on quantities of interest in a fire simulation, injournal of the French Society of Statistics, 152, 1, (2011). 3. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, (2008). 4. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, Evaluation of measurement data - supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement - Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, (2008). 5. S.Da Veiga and F.Wahl and F.Gamboa, Local Polynomial Estimation for Sensitivity Analysis on Models With Correlated Inputs, intechnometrics, 51, 4, (2009). 6. A.Saltelli and K.Chan and E.M.Scott, Sensitivity Analysis, (Wiley, 2000). 7. I.M.Sobol,Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models, inmathematical and Computational Experiments, 1, (1993). 12
MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY AND SUMMARISING MONTE CARLO SAMPLES
XX IMEKO World Congress Metrology for Green Growth September 9 14, 212, Busan, Republic of Korea MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY AND SUMMARISING MONTE CARLO SAMPLES A B Forbes National Physical Laboratory, Teddington,
More informationGuide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) and its supplemental guides
National Physical Laboratory Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) and its supplemental guides Maurice Cox National Physical Laboratory, UK maurice.cox@npl.co.uk http://www.npl.co.uk/ssfm/index.html
More informationA guide to expression of uncertainty of measurements QA4EO-QAEO-GEN-DQK-006
A guide to expression of uncertainty of measurements QA4EO-QAEO-GEN-DQK-006 A guide to expression of uncertainty of measurements Author: E-mail: Nigel Fox Nigel.Fox@npl.co.uk Editor: E-mail: Marie-Claire
More informationRevision of the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement impact on national metrology institutes and industry
Revision of the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement impact on national metrology institutes and industry Maurice Cox/Peter Harris National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK CCRI BIPM,
More informationEstimation of uncertainties using the Guide to the expression of uncertainty (GUM)
Estimation of uncertainties using the Guide to the expression of uncertainty (GUM) Alexandr Malusek Division of Radiological Sciences Department of Medical and Health Sciences Linköping University 2014-04-15
More informationAnalysis of interlaboratory comparison when the measurements are not normally distributed
Analysis of interlaboratory comparison when the measurements are not normally distributed Alexandre Allard 1,*, Soraya Amarouche 1* 1 Laboratoire National de métrologie et d Essais, 1 rue Gaston Boissier
More informationAnnex xxx General guidelines for the assessment of uncertainties in solar thermal systems performance testing
Annex xxx General guidelines for the assessment of uncertainties in solar thermal systems performance testing 1 Introduction The expected energy output presents the most important quantity, within those
More informationUnit 4. Statistics, Detection Limits and Uncertainty. Experts Teaching from Practical Experience
Unit 4 Statistics, Detection Limits and Uncertainty Experts Teaching from Practical Experience Unit 4 Topics Statistical Analysis Detection Limits Decision thresholds & detection levels Instrument Detection
More informationOIML D 28 DOCUMENT. Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION. Conventional value of the result of weighing in air
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENT OIML D 28 Edition 2004 (E) Conventional value of the result of weighing in air Valeur conventionnelle du résultat des pesées dans l'air OIML D 28 Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE
More informationScience. Approaches to measurement uncertainty evaluation. Introduction. for a safer world 28/05/2017. S L R Ellison LGC Limited, Teddington, UK
Approaches to measurement uncertainty evaluation S L R Ellison LGC Limited, Teddington, UK Science for a safer world 1 Introduction Basic principles a reminder Uncertainty from a measurement equation Gradient
More informationGuide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement Supplement 1 Numerical Methods for the Propagation of Distributions
Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement Supplement 1 Numerical Methods for the Propagation of Distributions This version is intended for circulation to the member organizations of the JCGM
More informationAPPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
APPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 2 2. REFERENCES... 2 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 2 4. BACKGROUND... 4 5. EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY POLICY... 5
More informationBootstrap. Director of Center for Astrostatistics. G. Jogesh Babu. Penn State University babu.
Bootstrap G. Jogesh Babu Penn State University http://www.stat.psu.edu/ babu Director of Center for Astrostatistics http://astrostatistics.psu.edu Outline 1 Motivation 2 Simple statistical problem 3 Resampling
More informationThe Monte Carlo method what and how?
A top down approach in measurement uncertainty estimation the Monte Carlo simulation By Yeoh Guan Huah GLP Consulting, Singapore (http://consultglp.com) Introduction The Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology
More informationModelling Under Risk and Uncertainty
Modelling Under Risk and Uncertainty An Introduction to Statistical, Phenomenological and Computational Methods Etienne de Rocquigny Ecole Centrale Paris, Universite Paris-Saclay, France WILEY A John Wiley
More informationEssentials of expressing measurement uncertainty
Essentials of expressing measurement uncertainty This is a brief summary of the method of evaluating and expressing uncertainty in measurement adopted widely by U.S. industry, companies in other countries,
More informationSobol-Hoeffding Decomposition with Application to Global Sensitivity Analysis
Sobol-Hoeffding decomposition Application to Global SA Computation of the SI Sobol-Hoeffding Decomposition with Application to Global Sensitivity Analysis Olivier Le Maître with Colleague & Friend Omar
More informationA Short Course in Basic Statistics
A Short Course in Basic Statistics Ian Schindler November 5, 2017 Creative commons license share and share alike BY: C 1 Descriptive Statistics 1.1 Presenting statistical data Definition 1 A statistical
More informationIntroduction to Smoothing spline ANOVA models (metamodelling)
Introduction to Smoothing spline ANOVA models (metamodelling) M. Ratto DYNARE Summer School, Paris, June 215. Joint Research Centre www.jrc.ec.europa.eu Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting
More informationPolynomial chaos expansions for sensitivity analysis
c DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOMATIC ENGINEERING CHAIR OF RISK, SAFETY & UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION Polynomial chaos expansions for sensitivity analysis B. Sudret Chair of Risk, Safety & Uncertainty
More informationA Unified Approach to Uncertainty for Quality Improvement
A Unified Approach to Uncertainty for Quality Improvement J E Muelaner 1, M Chappell 2, P S Keogh 1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, UK 2 MCS, Cam, Gloucester, UK Abstract To
More informationBivariate Relationships Between Variables
Bivariate Relationships Between Variables BUS 735: Business Decision Making and Research 1 Goals Specific goals: Detect relationships between variables. Be able to prescribe appropriate statistical methods
More informationIntroduction to the evaluation of uncertainty
Manual of Codes of Practice for the Determination of Uncertainties in Mechanical Tests on Metallic Materials SECTION 1 Introduction to the evaluation of uncertainty F A Kandil National Physical Laboratory
More informationy, x k estimates of Y, X k.
The uncertainty of a measurement is a parameter associated with the result of the measurement, that characterises the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the quantity being
More informationAPPENDIX G ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT
APPENDIX G ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 2 2. REFERENCES... 2 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 2 4. BACKGROUND... 4 5. ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT POLICY...
More informationAlgorithms for Uncertainty Quantification
Algorithms for Uncertainty Quantification Lecture 9: Sensitivity Analysis ST 2018 Tobias Neckel Scientific Computing in Computer Science TUM Repetition of Previous Lecture Sparse grids in Uncertainty Quantification
More informationBEST ESTIMATE PLUS UNCERTAINTY SAFETY STUDIES AT THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE OF THE ASTRID DEMONSTRATOR
BEST ESTIMATE PLUS UNCERTAINTY SAFETY STUDIES AT THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE OF THE ASTRID DEMONSTRATOR M. Marquès CEA, DEN, DER F-13108, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France Advanced simulation in support to
More informationUncertainty Analysis in High-Speed Multifunction Data Acquisition Device. M.Catelani, L.Ciani, S.Giovannetti, A.Zanobini
011 International Workshop on DC Modelling, Testing and Data Converter nalysis and Design and IEEE 011 DC Forum June 30 - July 1, 011. Orvieto, Italy. Uncertainty nalysis in High-Speed Multifunction Data
More informationLinear Regression. In this problem sheet, we consider the problem of linear regression with p predictors and one intercept,
Linear Regression In this problem sheet, we consider the problem of linear regression with p predictors and one intercept, y = Xβ + ɛ, where y t = (y 1,..., y n ) is the column vector of target values,
More informationTest for Discontinuities in Nonparametric Regression
Communications of the Korean Statistical Society Vol. 15, No. 5, 2008, pp. 709 717 Test for Discontinuities in Nonparametric Regression Dongryeon Park 1) Abstract The difference of two one-sided kernel
More informationCan there be a metrology for psychometricians?
Can there be a metrology for psychometricians? Luca Mari Università Cattaneo LIUC, Italy BEAR Seminar, University of California, Berkeley Tuesday, January 31, 2017 Abstract Metrology -- the science of
More informationMeasurement Uncertainty of Dew-Point Temperature in a Two-Pressure Humidity Generator
Int J Thermophys (2012) 33:1568 1582 DOI 10.1007/s10765-011-1005-z Measurement Uncertainty of Dew-Point Temperature in a Two-Pressure Humidity Generator L. Lages Martins A. Silva Ribeiro J. Alves e Sousa
More informationLocal Polynomial Estimation for Sensitivity Analysis on Models With Correlated Inputs
Local Polynomial Estimation for Sensitivity Analysis on Models With Correlated Inputs Sébastien Da Veiga, François Wahl, Fabrice Gamboa To cite this version: Sébastien Da Veiga, François Wahl, Fabrice
More informationMulti-fidelity sensitivity analysis
Multi-fidelity sensitivity analysis Loic Le Gratiet 1,2, Claire Cannamela 2 & Bertrand Iooss 3 1 Université Denis-Diderot, Paris, France 2 CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France 3 EDF R&D, 6 quai Watier,
More informationNovel mathematical and statistical approaches to uncertainty evaluation:
Novel mathematical and statistical approaches to uncertainty evaluation: Best practice guide to uncertainty evaluation for computationally expensive models Deliverable 2.5.1 of Work Package WP2 (Uncertainty
More informationCorrelation Effects in the Uncertainty Estimation of Two-Pressure Humidity Generators
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Correlation Effects in the Uncertainty Estimation of Two-Pressure Humidity Generators To cite this article: S A Carvajal and C A Sánchez 08 J. Phys.:
More informationFinal Overview. Introduction to ML. Marek Petrik 4/25/2017
Final Overview Introduction to ML Marek Petrik 4/25/2017 This Course: Introduction to Machine Learning Build a foundation for practice and research in ML Basic machine learning concepts: max likelihood,
More informationJAB NOTE4. ESTIMATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY (Electrical Testing / High Power Testing) Japan Accreditation Board (JAB)
JAB NOTE4 ESTIMATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY (Electrical Testing / High Power Testing) nd edition: January 5 01 1 st edition: March 5 00 Japan Accreditation Board (JAB) Initial edition: 00-0-5 1/ nd
More informationOIML G GUIDE. Edition 2009 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
GUIDE OIML G 1-104 Edition 2009 (E) Evaluation of measurement data An introduction to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement and related documents Évaluation des données de mesure Une
More informationSoftware Support for Metrology Best Practice Guide No. 6. Uncertainty Evaluation. NPL Report DEM-ES-011. M G Cox and P M Harris NOT RESTRICTED
NPL Report DEM-ES-011 Software Support for Metrology Best Practice Guide No. 6 Uncertainty Evaluation M G Cox and P M Harris NOT RESTRICTED September 2006 National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington
More informationOutline of the current status of measurement science: from the point of view of the International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM)
Outline of the current status of measurement science: from the point of view of the International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM) Luca Mari Università Cattaneo LIUC, Italy BEAR Seminar, University of California,
More informationMeasurement uncertainty and legal limits in analytical measurements
UNCERTAINTY Measurement uncertainty and legal limits in analytical measurements MIRELLA BUZOIANU, Reference Materials Laboratory, National Institute of Metrology (INM), Bucharest, Romania 1 Introduction
More informationESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN HARDNESS MEASUREMENT OF RUBBER AND OTHER ELASTOPLASTIC MATERIALS
XVIII IMEKO WORLD CONGRESS Metrology for a Sustainable Development September, 17, 006, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN HARDNESS MEASUREMENT OF RUBBER AND OTHER ELASTOPLASTIC MATERIALS
More informationStatistical Methods for SVM
Statistical Methods for SVM Support Vector Machines Here we approach the two-class classification problem in a direct way: We try and find a plane that separates the classes in feature space. If we cannot,
More informationTAYLOR SERIES METHOD (TSM) FOR UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION 1
APPEDIX B TAYLOR SERIES METHOD (TSM) FOR UCERTAITY PROPAGATIO 1 In nearly all experiments, the measured values of different variables are combined using a data reduction equation (DRE) to form some desired
More informationUncertainty quantification and visualization for functional random variables
Uncertainty quantification and visualization for functional random variables MascotNum Workshop 2014 S. Nanty 1,3 C. Helbert 2 A. Marrel 1 N. Pérot 1 C. Prieur 3 1 CEA, DEN/DER/SESI/LSMR, F-13108, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance,
More informationTrends in the Relative Distribution of Wages by Gender and Cohorts in Brazil ( )
Trends in the Relative Distribution of Wages by Gender and Cohorts in Brazil (1981-2005) Ana Maria Hermeto Camilo de Oliveira Affiliation: CEDEPLAR/UFMG Address: Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627 FACE/UFMG Belo
More informationOA03 UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CHEMICAL TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SIST EN ISO/IEC Table of contents
UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CHEMICAL TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SIST EN ISO/IEC 17025 Table of contents 1 GENERAL... 2 2 THE STANDARD SIST EN ISO/IEC 17025... 2 3 SA'S POLICY IN IMPLEMENTING
More informationUncertainty representation and propagation in chemical networks
Uncertainty representation and propagation in chemical networks P. Pernot Laboratoire de Chimie Physique, Orsay Plan 1 Introduction 2 Uncertainty propagation 3 Treatment of uncertainties for chemical rates
More informationThe PUMA method applied to the measures carried out by using a PC-based measurement instrument. Ciro Spataro
The PUMA applied to the measures carried out by using a PC-based measurement instrument Ciro Spataro 1 DIEET - University of Palermo, ITALY, ciro.spataro@unipa.it Abstract- The paper deals with the uncertainty
More information1 Overview. Coefficients of. Correlation, Alienation and Determination. Hervé Abdi Lynne J. Williams
In Neil Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2010 Coefficients of Correlation, Alienation and Determination Hervé Abdi Lynne J. Williams 1 Overview The coefficient of
More informationLecture 6: Linear Regression
Lecture 6: Linear Regression Reading: Sections 3.1-3 STATS 202: Data mining and analysis Jonathan Taylor, 10/5 Slide credits: Sergio Bacallado 1 / 30 Simple linear regression Model: y i = β 0 + β 1 x i
More informationarxiv: v1 [stat.ap] 17 Jan 2019
Application of Stochastic and Deterministic Techniques for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Energy Systems a Majdi I. Radaideh, b Mohammad I. Radaideh a Department of Nuclear, Plasma,
More informationPrimer on statistics:
Primer on statistics: MLE, Confidence Intervals, and Hypothesis Testing ryan.reece@gmail.com http://rreece.github.io/ Insight Data Science - AI Fellows Workshop Feb 16, 018 Outline 1. Maximum likelihood
More informationSome Monte Carlo Evidence for Adaptive Estimation of Unit-Time Varying Heteroscedastic Panel Data Models
Some Monte Carlo Evidence for Adaptive Estimation of Unit-Time Varying Heteroscedastic Panel Data Models G. R. Pasha Department of Statistics, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan E-mail: drpasha@bzu.edu.pk
More informationEstimating uncertainties of analytical results using information from the validation process
Analytica Chimica Acta 391 (1999) 173±185 Estimating uncertainties of analytical results using information from the validation process Alicia Maroto, Jordi Riu, Ricard BoqueÂ, F. Xavier Rius * Department
More informationMeasurement Uncertainty Knowing the Unknown
Measurement Uncertainty Knowing the Unknown Anish Shah FOUNDER and Chief Metrology Officer at Metrologized, LLC, a company founded in 2014 to further the metrology knowledge-base within the manufacturing
More informationLectures. Variance-based sensitivity analysis in the presence of correlated input variables. Thomas Most. Source:
Lectures Variance-based sensitivity analysis in the presence of correlated input variables Thomas Most Source: www.dynardo.de/en/library Variance-based sensitivity analysis in the presence of correlated
More informationNonresponse weighting adjustment using estimated response probability
Nonresponse weighting adjustment using estimated response probability Jae-kwang Kim Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea December 26, 2006 Introduction Nonresponse Unit nonresponse Item nonresponse Basic strategy
More informationBivariate Paired Numerical Data
Bivariate Paired Numerical Data Pearson s correlation, Spearman s ρ and Kendall s τ, tests of independence University of California, San Diego Instructor: Ery Arias-Castro http://math.ucsd.edu/~eariasca/teaching.html
More informationVNA error models: Comments on EURAMET/cg-12/v.01
Industrial Research Limited Report 2444 VNA error models: Comments on EURAMET/cg-12/v.01 B. D. Hall Measurement Standards Laboratory of New Zealand Lower Hutt, New Zealand 16 June 2010, (Replaces 5 May
More informationNEW APPROXIMATE INFERENTIAL METHODS FOR THE RELIABILITY PARAMETER IN A STRESS-STRENGTH MODEL: THE NORMAL CASE
Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 33 (4) 1715-1731 NEW APPROXIMATE INFERENTIAL METODS FOR TE RELIABILITY PARAMETER IN A STRESS-STRENGT MODEL: TE NORMAL CASE uizhen Guo and K. Krishnamoorthy
More informationMeasurement and Calibration of a High-Sensitivity Microwave Power Sensor with an Attenuator
RADIOENGINEERING, VOL. 3, NO. 4, DECEMBER 014 1055 Measurement and Calibration of a High-Sensitivity Microwave Power Sensor with an Attenuator Yu Song MENG, Yueyan SHAN National Metrology Centre, Agency
More informationBootstrap, Jackknife and other resampling methods
Bootstrap, Jackknife and other resampling methods Part III: Parametric Bootstrap Rozenn Dahyot Room 128, Department of Statistics Trinity College Dublin, Ireland dahyot@mee.tcd.ie 2005 R. Dahyot (TCD)
More informationSENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MULTIPHASE FLOW FOR CO 2 STORAGE IN SALINE AQUIFERS USING THE PROBABILISTIC COLLOCATION APPROACH
XIX International Conference on Water Resources CMWR 2012 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign June 17-22,2012 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MULTIPHASE FLOW FOR CO 2 STORAGE IN
More information4th International CANDU In-service Inspection Workshop and NDT in Canada 2012 Conference, 2012 June 18-21, Toronto, Ontario
4th International CANDU In-service Inspection Workshop and NDT in Canada 2012 Conference, 2012 June 18-21, Toronto, Ontario Methods for Evaluation of Accuracy with Multiple Essential Parameters for Eddy
More informationGlobal Sensitivity Analysis in Structural Optimization
Global Sensitivity Analysis in Structural Optimization Uwe Reuter Department of Civil Engineering, TU Dresden, Germany Martin Liebscher and Heiner Müllerschön DYNAmore GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany Summary:
More informationMonte Carlo error analyses of Spearman s rank test
Monte Carlo error analyses of Spearman s rank test arxiv:1411.3816v2 [astro-ph.im] 29 May 2015 Peter A. Curran International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth,
More informationDynamic System Identification using HDMR-Bayesian Technique
Dynamic System Identification using HDMR-Bayesian Technique *Shereena O A 1) and Dr. B N Rao 2) 1), 2) Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Madras, Chennai 600036, Tamil Nadu, India 1) ce14d020@smail.iitm.ac.in
More informationConfidence Intervals in Ridge Regression using Jackknife and Bootstrap Methods
Chapter 4 Confidence Intervals in Ridge Regression using Jackknife and Bootstrap Methods 4.1 Introduction It is now explicable that ridge regression estimator (here we take ordinary ridge estimator (ORE)
More informationFORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN PTB (GERMANY) AND CENAM (MEXICO).
FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN PTB (GERMANY) AND CENAM (MEXICO). Jorge C. Torres-Guzmán*, Amritlal Sawla**, Daniel Ramírez-Ahedo* * Centro Nacional de Metrología, México. **Physikalisch-Technische
More informationWorkshops. Thursday, November 21, 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM: Models of measurement: measuring systems and metrological infrastructure
Workshops Wednesday, November 20, 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM: Models of measurement: the general structure Thursday, November 21, 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM: Models of measurement: measuring systems and metrological
More informationStatistical Analysis of Engineering Data The Bare Bones Edition. Precision, Bias, Accuracy, Measures of Precision, Propagation of Error
Statistical Analysis of Engineering Data The Bare Bones Edition (I) Precision, Bias, Accuracy, Measures of Precision, Propagation of Error PRIOR TO DATA ACQUISITION ONE SHOULD CONSIDER: 1. The accuracy
More informationMethod of Estimating Uncertainty of Measurement Values in Case of Measurement Methods Involving Non-Linear Calibration
Method of Estimating Uncertainty of Measurement Values in Case of Measurement Methods Involving Non-Linear Calibration Shigemi Hosogaya *1, Masato Ota *1, Yukio Ozaki *1, Katsuhiko Kuwa *2, Naotaka Hamasaki
More informationReview of Methodology and Rationale of Monte Carlo Simulation
Review of Methodology and Rationale of Monte Carlo Simulation Application to Metrology with Open Source Software Vishal Ramnath vramnath@nmisa.org Mechanical Metrology Group National Metrology Institute
More informationEconometric Methods for Panel Data
Based on the books by Baltagi: Econometric Analysis of Panel Data and by Hsiao: Analysis of Panel Data Robert M. Kunst robert.kunst@univie.ac.at University of Vienna and Institute for Advanced Studies
More informationGATNDOR TopicCollocation Uncertainty in Vertical Pro les:statistical Functional Regression Approach
GATNDOR Topic Collocation Uncertainty in Vertical Pro les: Statistical Functional Regression Approach Joint work with: B. Demoz, R. Ignaccolo, F.Madonna. - ˆ* University of Bergamo - DIIMM - alessandro.fasso@unibg.it
More informationCALIBRATION UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION FOR INTERNAL AERODYNAMIC BALANCE
th IMEKO C & C7 Joint Symposium on Man Science & Measurement September, 3 5, 008, Annecy, France CALIBAION UNCEAINY ESIMAION FO INENAL AEODYNAMIC BALANCE eis M.L.C.C., Castro.M., Falcão J.B.P.F. 3, Barbosa
More informationDETERMINATION OF THE TYPE B STANDARD UNCERTAINTY SY oktobar 2015.
DETERMINATION OF THE TYPE B STANDARD UNCERTAINTY SY410 22. oktobar 2015. Goran Kostić Abstract. The type B standard uncertainty is determined when there is not enough measurement data to calculate the
More informationUncertainty Machine User s Manual
Uncertainty Machine User s Manual Thomas Lafarge Antonio Possolo Statistical Engineering Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland,
More informationSupplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688
Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EMS19 EURAMET Project No. 688 Bilateral Comparison of Measurements of Current Transformers (CTs) Between and Final Report Hüseyin Çaycı (, Pilot Laboratory) January 211
More informationWe are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors
We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 4,000 116,000 120M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our
More information1.1 Basis of Statistical Decision Theory
ECE598: Information-theoretic methods in high-dimensional statistics Spring 2016 Lecture 1: Introduction Lecturer: Yihong Wu Scribe: AmirEmad Ghassami, Jan 21, 2016 [Ed. Jan 31] Outline: Introduction of
More informationQuantile regression and heteroskedasticity
Quantile regression and heteroskedasticity José A. F. Machado J.M.C. Santos Silva June 18, 2013 Abstract This note introduces a wrapper for qreg which reports standard errors and t statistics that are
More informationHOW TO EXPRESS THE RELIABILITY OF MEASUREMENT RESULTS. The role of metrological traceability and measurement uncertainty-
HOW TO EXPRESS THE RELIABILITY OF MEASUREMENT RESULTS The role of metrological traceability and measurement - H. Imai 1 1 National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial
More informationGaussian process regression for Sensitivity analysis
Gaussian process regression for Sensitivity analysis GPSS Workshop on UQ, Sheffield, September 2016 Nicolas Durrande, Mines St-Étienne, durrande@emse.fr GPSS workshop on UQ GPs for sensitivity analysis
More informationReview of the role of uncertainties in room acoustics
Review of the role of uncertainties in room acoustics Ralph T. Muehleisen, Ph.D. PE, FASA, INCE Board Certified Principal Building Scientist and BEDTR Technical Lead Division of Decision and Information
More informationAGEC 661 Note Eleven Ximing Wu. Exponential regression model: m (x, θ) = exp (xθ) for y 0
AGEC 661 ote Eleven Ximing Wu M-estimator So far we ve focused on linear models, where the estimators have a closed form solution. If the population model is nonlinear, the estimators often do not have
More informationMultiple Linear Regression
Multiple Linear Regression ST 430/514 Recall: a regression model describes how a dependent variable (or response) Y is affected, on average, by one or more independent variables (or factors, or covariates).
More informationA hybrid Measurement Systems Analysis and Uncertainty of Measurement Approach for Industrial Measurement in the Light Controlled Factory
A hybrid Measurement Systems Analysis and Uncertainty of Measurement Approach for Industrial Measurement in the Light Controlled Factory J E Muelaner, A Francis, M Chappell, P G Maropoulos Laboratory for
More informationAn Introduction to The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement
An Introduction to The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement David MARTIN, France Key words: Quality, Traceability, Uncertainty, GUM SUMMARY Organisations are created to fulfil some need.
More informationTesting Error Correction in Panel data
University of Vienna, Dept. of Economics Master in Economics Vienna 2010 The Model (1) Westerlund (2007) consider the following DGP: y it = φ 1i + φ 2i t + z it (1) x it = x it 1 + υ it (2) where the stochastic
More informationSupport Vector Machines
Support Vector Machines Here we approach the two-class classification problem in a direct way: We try and find a plane that separates the classes in feature space. If we cannot, we get creative in two
More information36. Multisample U-statistics and jointly distributed U-statistics Lehmann 6.1
36. Multisample U-statistics jointly distributed U-statistics Lehmann 6.1 In this topic, we generalize the idea of U-statistics in two different directions. First, we consider single U-statistics for situations
More informationSupplemental Material for KERNEL-BASED INFERENCE IN TIME-VARYING COEFFICIENT COINTEGRATING REGRESSION. September 2017
Supplemental Material for KERNEL-BASED INFERENCE IN TIME-VARYING COEFFICIENT COINTEGRATING REGRESSION By Degui Li, Peter C. B. Phillips, and Jiti Gao September 017 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO.
More informationNonparametric Methods
Nonparametric Methods Michael R. Roberts Department of Finance The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania July 28, 2009 Michael R. Roberts Nonparametric Methods 1/42 Overview Great for data analysis
More informationPractical and Valid Guidelines for Realistic Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty in Pesticide Multi-Residue Analysis*
Practical and Valid Guidelines for Realistic Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty in Pesticide Multi-Residue Analysis* Antonio Valverde Pesticide Residue Research Group University of Almería * This presentation
More informationA combinatorial technique for weighbridge verification
VERIFICATION/WEIGHING A combinatorial technique for weighbridge verification MARK T. CLARKSON Measurement Standards Laboratory of New Zealand Industrial Research Ltd. P O Box 31-310, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
More informationData Analysis and Machine Learning Lecture 12: Multicollinearity, Bias-Variance Trade-off, Cross-validation and Shrinkage Methods.
TheThalesians Itiseasyforphilosopherstoberichiftheychoose Data Analysis and Machine Learning Lecture 12: Multicollinearity, Bias-Variance Trade-off, Cross-validation and Shrinkage Methods Ivan Zhdankin
More informationFigure 1: Triangular facet shape model for the asteroid Golevka. Table 1: Gaussian distributions for uncertain system inputs.
IAA-PDC-5-X-XX 4 th IAA Planetary Defense Conference PDC 25 3 7 April 25, Frascati, Roma, Italy KINETIC DEFLECTION UNCERTAINTIES FOR REAL ASTEROID SHAPES Juliana D. Feldhacker, B.A. Jones, A. Doostan,
More information