1. Introduction The nonlinear complementarity problem (NCP) is to nd a point x 2 IR n such that hx; F (x)i = ; x 2 IR n + ; F (x) 2 IRn + ; where F is


 Derek Boone
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 New NCPFunctions and Their Properties 3 by Christian Kanzow y, Nobuo Yamashita z and Masao Fukushima z y University of Hamburg, Institute of Applied Mathematics, Bundesstrasse 55, D2146 Hamburg, Germany, z Department of Applied Mathematics and Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 661, Japan. February 7, 1996 (Revised June 25, 1996) Abstract. Recently, Luo and Tseng proposed a class of merit functions for the nonlinear complementarity problem (NCP) and showed that it enjoys several interesting properties under some assumptions. In this paper, adopting a similar idea to Luo and Tseng's, we present new merit functions for the NCP, which can be decomposed into component functions. We show that these merit functions not only share many properties with the one proposed by Luo and Tseng but also enjoy additional favorable properties owing to their decomposable structure. In particular, we present fairly mild conditions under which these merit functions have bounded level sets. Key words: Nonlinear complementarity problem, NCPfunction, merit function, unconstrained optimization reformulation, error bound, bounded level sets. 3 The work of the second and third authors was supported in part by the Scientic Research GrantinAid from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan. The work of the second author was also supported by the Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.
2 1. Introduction The nonlinear complementarity problem (NCP) is to nd a point x 2 IR n such that hx; F (x)i = ; x 2 IR n + ; F (x) 2 IRn + ; where F is a function from IR n into itself, h1; 1i denotes the inner product in IR n, and IR n + := fx 2 IR n j x i ; i = 1;... ; ng [1, 2]. Recently, reformulations of the NCP as a minimization problem or a system of equations have drawn much attention [3]. A function which can constitute an equivalent minimization problem for the NCP is called a merit function. More precisely, a merit function is a function whose global minima on a set X IR n are coincident with the solutions of the original NCP. To construct such a function, it is eective to take advantage of the Cartesian structure of the NCP. In particular, the class of functions dened below serves as a convenient tool for constructing a merit function [4, 5, 6, 7]. Denition 1.1 A function : IR 2! IR is called an NCPfunction if (a; b) = () ab = ; a ; b : By using an NCPfunction, we can construct a merit function g : IR n! IR for the NCP as follows: If is nonnegative on IR 2, then dene the function g by g(x) = otherwise, by g(x) = nx i=1 nx i=1 (x i ; F i (x)); (x i ; F i (x)) 2 : It is easy to see that the NCP can be cast as the unconstrained optimization problem with the objective function g. There are many functions that belong to the class of NCPfunctions. Among others, the following three NCPfunctions have been well studied in the literature. Example 1.1 (i) N R (a; b) = minfa; bg. 1
3 (ii) MS (a; b) = ab (maxf; a bg2 a 2 + maxf; b ag 2 b 2 ); > 1. (iii) F B (a; b) = p a 2 + b 2 a b. The merit function based on the function NR is called the natural residual. The function MS is nonnegative on IR 2 [6] and the merit function based on MS is the implicit Lagrangian proposed by Mangasarian and Solodov [8]. The function F B was rst considered by Fischer [9] (and attributed to Burmeister). Recently, the merit function based on F B has extensively been studied and has shown to have a number of favorable properties. Among the above three NCPfunctions, the following useful relations hold. Proposition 1.1 [1, 11] There exist positive constants c1; c2; c3; c4 such that c1 NR (a; b) 2 F B (a; b) 2 c2 NR (a; b) 2 and c3 NR (a; b) 2 MS (a; b) c4 NR (a; b) 2 for all a; b 2 IR. This proposition indicates that if a merit function based on one of the three NCPfunctions provides an error bound or has bounded level sets, then the same is true for the merit functions based on the other NCPfunctions. To the authors' knowledge, for the merit functions based on these NCPfunctions to provide global error bounds, not only the strong monotonicity (or the uniform P property) but also the Lipschitz continuity of the function F involved in the NCP are required [12, 13]. The question whether or not the merit functions based on these NCPfunctions provide global error bounds without the Lipschitz continuity of F remains unanswered. Recently, Luo and Tseng [14] proposed a class of new merit functions f : IR n! IR dened by nx f(x) = (hx; F (x)i) + i=1 2 i(x i ; F i (x)); (1)
4 where : IR! [; 1) and i : IR 2! [; 1); i = 1;... ; n, are continuous functions that vanish on the negative orthant only. The function f is not based on an NCPfunction in the sense of Denition 1.1. Nevertheless, the function f enjoys several interesting properties under some assumptions as shown in [14]. Among others, f turns out to provide a global error bound under the strong monotonicity of F only, and it is convex on IR n under the assumption that hx; F (x)i and Fi(x); i = 1;... ; n, are all convex functions of x. We may naturally come up with the idea of constructing a new NCPfunction by using a similar approach to Luo and Tseng's. In view of the structure of the function f, we notice that the second term is decomposable into n component functions but the rst term is not. So, for constructing a new P merit function based on an NCPfunction, we may substitute the n decomposable function i=1 (xifi(x)) for the function (hx; F (x)i). In other words, we consider the following class of functions g : IR n! IR: where i : IR 2! IR is dened by nx g(x) = i(xi; Fi(x)); (2) i=1 i(a; b) = (ab) + i(a; b) (3) for each i = 1;... ; n. It can be shown that i is an NCPfunction, and hence g is a merit function for the NCP (see Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 2.1). Of course, the function g is not the same as the merit function f. Nevertheless, we can expect that g not only shares many properties with f but also enjoys additional favorable properties owing to its decomposable structure. A possible cost to pay is that g is in general nonconvex, while f becomes convex when F satises some conditions (see [14, Theorem 2.2]). The following concepts [15, 16] will be useful throughout the paper. (a) F : IR n! IR n is a Pfunction if max 1in x i 6=y i (xi yi)(fi(x) Fi(y)) for all x; y 2 IR n ; x 6= y: 3
5 (b) F : IR n! IR n is a P function if max 1in (x i y i )(F i (x) F i (y)) > for all x; y 2 IR n ; x 6= y: (c) F : IR n! IR n is a uniform P function (with modulus ) if there is a > such that max 1in (x i y i )(F i (x) F i (y)) kx yk 2 for all x; y 2 IR n : (d) (e) An n 2 n matrix M is a P matrix if every principal minor of M is nonnegative. An n 2 n matrix M is a P matrix if every principal minor of M is positive. It is known [16, Theorem 5.8] that if a P function is dierentiable, then its Jacobian matrices are P matrices. The paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we introduce a class of new merit functions. In Section 3 we show that the merit functions provide global error bounds for the NCP under the uniform P property of the function F. In particular, this result does not rely on the Lipschitz continuity of F. In Section 4 we show that the merit functions have bounded level sets under fairly mild assumptions. In Section 5 we consider conditions under which any stationary point of the merit functions turns out to be a solution of the NCP. In Section 6 we present a simple descent method for solving the NCP. We conclude the paper with some nal remarks in Section 7. We shall use the following notation. For a vector x 2 IR n and an index set f1; 2;... ; ng, x represents the vector with elements x i ; i 2. By k 1 k and k 1 k 1, we denote the Euclidean norm and l 1 norm, respectively. We denote the (transposed) Jacobian of F at x by rf (x), i.e., rf (x) is the matrix whose (i; j)th element j i. For a vector t 2 IR m, [t] + denotes the vector whose ith element is maxf; t i g. 2. Unconstrained optimization reformulations In this section, we show that the function i dened by (3) is an NCPfunction, so that the unconstrained optimization problem constituted from this function is equivalent to the NCP. 4
6 To begin with, following [14], we dene a class of functions, to which the functions i that constitute i are supposed to belong. Denition 2.1 The class of continuous functions : IR m! [; 1) such that (t) = () t is denoted by 9 m. (3). The following lemma shows the most fundamental property of the function i dened by Lemma 2.1 For any and i 2 9 2, the function i dened by (3) is a nonnegative NCPfunction. Proof. Since and i are nonnegative by denition, i is nonnegative. Now, we prove that i is an NCPfunction. First, suppose that (a; b) is a vector such that a ; b and ab =. Then, by the denition of 9 m, we have (ab) = and i(a; b) =, which yields i (a; b) =. Next, suppose that i (a; b) =. Then, by the nonnegativity of and i, we must have (ab) = and i(a; b) =. Moreover, by the denition of 9 m, we obtain ab, a and b, from which it follows that ab =. Hence, i is an NCPfunction. 2 The following theorem establishes the equivalence between the NCP and the unconstrained minimization problem min x2ir n g(x); where g is dened by (2). Theorem 2.1 Let i : IR 2! IR be dened by (3) with arbitrary and i for i = 1;... ; n, and let g : IR n! IR be dened by (2). Then g is nonnegative on IR n. Moreover, g(x) = if and only if x is a solution of the NCP. 5
7 Proof. By Lemma 2.1, i are nonnegative NCPfunctions for all i = 1;... ; n. Moreover, g(x) = if and only if i (x i ; F i (x)) = for all i = 1;... ; n. Hence the theorem follows. 2 We provide examples of functions that belong to 9 m ; m = 1; 2. Denition 2.2 For p >, let p : IR! [; 1) be dened by p (t) = maxf; tg p ; and let p I ; p II ; p F B ; p M : IR 2! [; 1) be dened, respectively, by p I(t) = k[t] + k p 1 = (maxf; t 1 g + maxf; t 2 g) p ; p II(t) = k[t] + k p = maxf; t 1 g 2 + maxf; t 2 g 2 p=2 ; p p F B(t) = [ F B (t)] + = max ; p M(t) = maxf; t 1 ; t 2 g p : q t t t 1 + t 2 p ; It is easy to observe that p and p I ; p II ; p F B ; p M Moreover, for p > 1, the functions, p p II and p F B are continuously dierentiable up to (p 1)th order. Using the functions given in Denition 2.2, we present some examples of the NCPfunction i dened by (3). Denition 2.3 For p >, let p I ; p II ; p F B ; p M : IR 2! [; 1) be dened, respectively, by p I(a; b) = (ab) p + I(a; p b); p II(a; b) = (ab) p + II(a; p b); p F B(a; b) = (ab) p + p F B(a; b); p M(a; b) = (ab) p + M(a; p b): 6
8 For p > 1, the functions p II and p F B are continuously dierentiable up to (p 1)th order. Now we display four special cases of g, which correspond to the functions given in Denition 2.3. Denition 2.4 For p >, let g p I ; gp II ; gp F B ; gp M : IRn! [; 1) be dened, respectively, by g p I (x) = nx g p II (x) = nx g p F B (x) = nx g p M (x) = nx p I (x i; F i (x)); i=1 p II (x i; F i (x)); i=1 p F B (x i; F i (x)); i=1 p M (x i; F i (x)): i=1 Note that for p > 1, the functions g p II and gp F B are continously dierentiable up to (p 1)th order, provided that F is continuously dierentiable up to (p 1)th order. 3. Global error bounds In this section, we show that if F is a uniform P function and if and 1;... ; n satisfy suitable assumptions, then the merit function g dened by (2) provides a global error bound for the NCP. To the authors' knowledge, this is the rst time that a global error bound result is established for a merit function under the uniform P function property only. For example, for the squared FischerBurmeister function and the implicit Lagrangian, a similar result is currently known only when F is not only a uniform P function but also a globally Lipschitzcontinuous function [4, 12, 17]. The error bound results established below rely on the following growth assumption on and i ; i = 1;... ; n. Assumption 3.1 The functions and i ; i = 1;... ; n, have growth of order p > in the sense that there exists a positive constant such that, for each i = ; 1;... ; n, 7
9 i satises i(t) k[t] + k p for all t: The next proposition shows that all the functions given in Denition 2.2 have growth of order p. Proposition 3.1 The functions p, p I, p II, p F B and p M have growth of order p. Proof. It is easy to show that the functions Here we only prove that p, p I, p II and p M have growth of order p. 1 F B has growth of order 1. Then it will be easy to verify that p F B has growth of order p for any p >. If t 1 and t 2 are both nonnegative, then we have 1 F B qt (t) = t2 2 + t 1 + t 2 q t t2 2 = k[t] + k: If t 1 and t 2 are both nonpositive, then we have 1 F B (t) = = k[t] +k. Finally, without loss of generality, we suppose t 1 > and t 2 <. Then we have 1 F B (t) = qt t2 2 + t 1 + t 2 t 1 = k[t] + k: The proof is complete. 2 The next result relates the function g to the function gi 1. Recall that the function g1 I : IR n! IR is dened by g 1 I (x) = nx = i=1 nx i=1 1 I (x i; F i (x)) ([x i F i (x)] + + [F i (x)] + + [x i ] + ) : 8
10 Lemma 3.1 Let Assumption 3.1 be satised and the function g be dened by (2). Then, there exists a positive constant such that gi(x) 1 g(x) 1=p for all x 2 IR n : (4) Proof. The inequality can be shown to hold in a way similar to [14, Lemma 3.1]. 2 The inequality (4) shows that if gi 1 provides a global error bound, then g also provides a global error bound. We are now in a position to prove the main theorem of this section. Theorem 3.1 Suppose that F is a uniform P function. Let Assumptions 3.1 be satised and the function g be dened by (2). Then there exists a positive constant such that kx x 3 k 2 g(x) 1=p for all x 2 IR n ; (5) where x 3 is the unique solution of the NCP. Proof. Since F is a uniform P function, there exists a constant > such that kx x 3 k 2 max 1in (x i x 3 i )(F i (x) F i (x 3 )) (6) for all x 2 IR n. Also, since x 3 solves the NCP, we have x 3 i ; F i(x 3 ) and x 3 i F i(x 3 ) = for all i. Therefore we have, for each i and all x 2 IR n, (x i x 3 i )(F i (x) F i (x 3 )) = x i F i (x) x 3 i F i(x) F i (x 3 )x i [x i F i (x)] + + x 3 i [F i (x)] + + F i (x 3 )[x i ] + i ([x i F i (x)] + + [F i (x)] + + [x i ] + ) (7) = i 1 I(x i ; F i (x)); where i := maxf1; x 3 i ; F i(x 3 )g >. Let ^ := max 1in i : Then, combining (6) and (7), we obtain kx x 3 k 2 max 1in i 1 I(x i ; F i (x)) ^ nx i=1 1 I(x i ; F i (x)) = ^ g 1 I(x): The desired inequality (5) then follows from Lemma Proposition 3.1 and Theorem 3.1 indicate that the functions g p I ; gp II ; gp F B and g p M all satisfy the inequality (5) and hence provide global error bounds if F is a uniform P function. 9
11 4. Bounded level sets In this section we consider conditions which guarantee that the level sets L(c) := fx 2 IR n j g(x) cg are bounded for all c : To establish the bounded level set results, we need the following assumption on the functions and i ; i = 1;... ; n; which constitute the merit function g. Assumption 4.1 The functions and i ; i = 1;... ; n, have the property that, for each i = ; 1;... ; n, k[t] + k! 1 implies i(t)! 1. Note that every merit function g given in Denition 2.4 is constituted from functions i satisfying Assumption 4.1, cf. Proposition 3.1. We rst deal with monotone problems. Before stating the result, we note that the particular level set L() is equal to the solution set of the NCP. Hence, if the NCP has an unbounded solution set, the level sets L(c) cannot be bounded for any c since L() L(c) for all c : Since it can happen that the monotone complementarity problem has an unbounded solution set (e.g., take F (x) ), we need an additional assumption, namely that the NCP is strictly feasible, i.e., that there exists a vector ^x > with F (^x) > : Theorem 4.1 Assume that F is monotone and the NCP is strictly feasible. Let g be dened by (2) and Assumption 4.1 be satised. Then the level sets L(c) are bounded for all c : Proof. Assume there exists an unbounded sequence fx k g L(c) for some c. We rst note that there is no index j such that x k j! 1 or F j (x k )! 1 on a subsequence, because otherwise we would have j(x k j ; F j(x k ))! 1 by Assumption 4.1, which in turn would imply g(x k )! 1 on a subsequence. Hence all components of the two sequences fx k g and ff (x k )g are bounded from below. On the other hand, the sequence fx k g is unbounded 1
12 by assumption. Hence there exists an index j such that x k j! 1 on a subsequence. Now let ^x satisfy the strict feasibility condition for the NCP. Since F is monotone, we have hx k ; F (^x)i + h^x; F (x k )i hx k ; F (x k )i + h^x; F (^x)i: (8) Since ^x > and F (^x) > ; it follows immediately from the previous remarks that the lefthand side of (8) tends to innity. Hence hx k ; F (x k )i! 1 on a subsequence. Thus, there is an index l such that x k l F l(x k )! 1 on a subsequence. By Assumption 4.1, this implies that (x k l F l(x k )) and therefore g(x k ) itself tend to innity on a subsequence. This is the desired contradiction to fx k g L(c): 2 Note that this bounded level set result for the monotone NCP is also true for the merit function proposed by Luo and Tseng [14]. This follows immediately from the denition of the function f in (1) and the proof given for Theorem 4.1. However, for the merit functions constituted by the NCPfunctions of Example 1.1, this result does not hold. In fact, consider the simple example with n = 1, where F (x) 1. Then F is monotone and the NCP is strictly feasible. However, for the merit function constituted by the NCPfunction NR, we have L NR (1) := fx 2 IR j minfx; F (x)g 2 1g = [1; 1); which is unbounded. By Proposition 1.1, this also implies that the implicit Lagrangian and the squared FischerBurmeister function, which are constituted from MS and F B respectively, have unbounded level sets for this example. We next present another condition which guarantees the boundedness of the level sets. This result is a straightforward modication of the corresponding result by Luo and Tseng [14, Theorem 4.1]. Theorem 4.2 Let g be dened by (2) and Assumption 4.1 be satised. Suppose that, for any sequence fx k g such that kx k k! 1, [x k ] + =kx k k! and [F (x k )] + =kx k k!, we have lim inf k!1 max i fx k i F i(x k )g kx k k > : 11
13 Then the level sets L(c) are bounded for all c : Proof. The theorem can be proved in a way similar to [14, Theorem 4.1]. 2 We can easily verify that lim inf k!1 hx k ; F (x k )i kx k k > =) lim inf k!1 max i fx k i F i(x k )g kx k k > : So, the assumptions on F in Theorem 4.2 are weaker than those in [14, Theorem 4.1], which hold whenever F is a uniform P function or an R function in the sense of Chen and Harker [18]. In particular, the level sets are bounded if F is an ane mapping such that F (x) = Mx + q with an R matrix M. 5. Stationary points Luo and Tseng [14] gave conditions under which the merit function f dened by (1) is convex. However, the merit function g given by (2) is not necessarily convex under such conditions. Nevertheless, since commonly used minimization methods can only nd a stationary point or a local minimum, it is important to investigate conditions under which any stationary point of g is a solution of the NCP. In this section, we focus our attention to such conditions. In what follows, we suppose the functions i consist of continuously dierentiable functions and i Then i are also continuously dierentiable i (a; i (a; b) = b i(a; b) ; (9) = a i(a; b) : (1) Moreover, if F is continuously dierentiable, then the function g dened by (2) is also continuously dierentiable. We dene the following classes of continuously dierentiable functions, which are given by Luo and Tseng [14]. 12
14 Denition m + denotes the class of continuously dierentiable functions 2 9m such that C.1 ht; r (t)i for all t 2 IR m ; C.2 r (t) for all t 2 IR m ; C.3 r (t) = () t. Moreover, 9 m ++ denotes the class of functions 2 9m + such that C.4 r (t) > for all t 6. The functions the function p, p II and p F B with p > 1 belong to 91 +, 92 + and 92 +, respectively. However, p II with p > 1 does not belong to 92 ++, whereas the function p F B with p > 1 belongs to Note that p I and p M are not dierentiable and hence belong to neither 92 + nor The next lemma shows some important properties of the NCPfunction i constituted by i belonging to the classes of functions dened above. Lemma 5.1 Let the NCPfunction i be dened by (3) with and i Then, i has the following properties. (P.1) i (a; b) = () r i (a; b) = ; i(a; i (a; b) for all (a; b) T 2 IR 2. Moreover, if i , then we have i(a; b) = i(a; b) =. Proof. (P.1) First, suppose that i (a; b) =. Then, since i are nonnegative functions, we have ab ; a b 1 C A : 13
15 Hence, C.3 yields (ab) = and r i(a;b) =. It then follows from (9) and (1) that r i (a; b) =. Next, suppose that r i (a; b) =. Then, by (9) and (1), we obtain and b a (ab) i(a;b) (ab) i(a;b) Let the both sides of (11) and (12) be nonzero. Then, since (11) : (12) (ab) and r i(a;b) by C.2, we must have a > and b > from (11) and (12). It then follows from C.3 that r i(a;b) =, which is a contradiction. Therefore, the both sides of at least one of (11) and (12) are zero. Without loss of generality, we assume the both sides of (11) are zero. Then, by C.3, we obtain ab or b =. It can easily be veried by considering the two cases ab and b = separately that the both sides of (12) are zero. Hence, we have r i(a;b) = and (ab) =. It then follows from C.3 that a, b and ab, which yield a, b and ab =. Since i is an NCPfunction, we obtain i (a; b) =. (P.2) By C.1 and C.2, we have ab (ab) 2 = (ab (ab)) (ab) : (13) We also have from C.2 Furthermore, C.1 and C.2 yield (ab) = From (9) and (1), we i(a; i(a; b) i(a;b) : (14)! i(a;b) (ab) D (a;b) ;r T i(a;b) E : i (a; i (a; b) = ab + (ab) 2 i(a;b) (ab) i(a; b)! i(a;b) ; (16) 14
16 which shows (P.2) by (13)(15). (P.3) Suppose i(a;b) = ab + =. Then, by (16), we have (ab) 2 i(a; i(a; b) (ab) i(a; b) i(a; b) Hence, by (13)(15), every term of the righthand side must be zero. Moreover, C.3 and the rst term being zero yield ab. If either a or b is negative, then the second term is positive by C.4. This is a contradiction. So, we must have a and b. Hence, we obtain ab =, a and b, which yield i (a; b) =. Then, by (P.1) proved earlier, we i(a;b) =. We can prove the converse in a similar way. 2 Note that the functions p II and p F B with p > 1 enjoy properties (P.1) and (P.2). Moreover, the function p F B with p > 1 has property (P.3), whereas the function p II with p > 1 does not. Now, we give a necessary and sucient condition for a stationary point of g to be a solution of the NCP. To this end, we dene the index sets ( P(x) := i i (x i ; F i (x)) > ( ) C(x) i i (x i ; F i (x)) = ( ) N (x) i i (x i ; F i (x)) < R(x) := P(x) [ N (x): For simplicity, we shall denote these sets by P, C, N and R. The point x under consideration will always be clear from the context. Using these index sets, we dene regularity conditions. Similar concepts of regularity have been considered by De Luca et al. [19], Facchinei and Kanzow [2] and Luo and Tseng [14] for dierent merit functions. ; ; ;! : Denition 5.2 A point x 2 IR n is said to be regular if for every nonzero vector z 2 IR n such that z C = ; z P > ; z N < ; 15
17 there exists a vector y 2 IR n such that y P ; y N ; y R 6= and hy; rf (x)zi : Moreover, a point x 2 IR n is said to be strictly regular if for every nonzero vector z 2 IR n such that z C = ; z P > ; z N < ; there exists a vector y 2 IR n such that y C = ; y P ; y N and hy; rf (x)zi > : The rst regularity in Denition 5.2 is similar to that of [19], whereas the second strict regularity is similar to that of [2], where it is simply called regular. We next present a sucient condition for a vector x 2 IR n to be (strictly) regular. Lemma 5.2 Let x 2 IR n : If rf (x) is a Pmatrix (P matrix), then x is a (strictly) regular vector. Proof. We only consider the case where rf (x) is a Pmatrix. The proof is similar for the case where rf (x) is a P matrix, see also [2]. So let z 2 IR n be a nonzero vector with z C = ; z P > and z N < : Since rf (x) is a Pmatrix, there exists an index j 2 R such that z j [rf (x)z] j : Now choose y 2 IR n in such a way that y j = z j and y i = for all i 6= j: Then nx hy; rf (x)zi = y i [rf (x)z] i = y j [rf (x)z] j = z j [rf (x)z] j ; i=1 i.e., x is regular. 2 16
18 Similarly to Lemma 5.2, one can show that if rf (x) is (strictly) semimonotone and N = ;; then x is (strictly) regular, see [15] for the denition of a (strictly) semimonotone matrix. The following theorem shows that the (strict) regularity provides a necessary and sucient condition for a stationary point of g to be a solution of the NCP. Theorem 5.1 Let the NCPfunctions i be dened by (3) with and i (respectively, i ) for all i = 1;... ; n, and let g be dened by (2). Suppose that x is a stationary point of g. Then, x is a solution of the NCP if and only if x is regular (respectively, strictly regular). Proof. By using Lemma 5.1, it can be proved in a way similar to the proof of [19, Theorem 4.2] for the case where i are constituted by and i , and the proof of [2, Theorem 3.3] for the case where i are constituted by and i Theorem 5.1 indicates that a necessary and sucient condition for any stationary point x of g p F B with p > 1 to be a solution of the NCP is that x is a regular point, whereas such a condition for g p II with p > 1 is that x is a strictly regular point. From Lemma 5.2, we obtain the following corollary, which gives sucient conditions under which any stationary point of g solves the NCP. Corollary 5.1 Let the NCPfunctions i be dened by (3) with and i (respectively, i ) for all i = 1;... ; n, and let g be dened by (2). If F is a P function (respectively, rf (x) is a P matrix for any x), then any stationary point of g is a solution of the NCP. 2 Corollary 5.1 indicates that a sucient condition for any stationary point of g p F B with p > 1 to be a solution of the NCP is that F is a P function, whereas such a condition for g p II with p > 1 is that rf (x) is a P matrix. As an application of the previous results, we obtain the following corollary. 17
19 Corollary 5.2 Assume that F is monotone and the NCP is strictly feasible. Then the NCP has a nonempty and bounded solution set. Proof. We consider g 2 F B. Note that, by Theorem 4.1, the level set L(c) of g 2 F B is nonempty and compact whenever c g 2 F B(x) for some x 2 IR n : Hence, by the BolzanoWeierstrass Theorem, the function g 2 F B has a global minimum x 3. In particular, x 3 is a stationary point of g 2 BF. Since F is monotone, rf (x 3 ) is positive semidenite and therefore a P  matrix. Hence g 2 BF (x 3 ) = by Corollary 5.1, i.e., x 3 solves the NCP. The boundedness of the solution set follows from the fact that the level set L() is bounded. 2 We note that the results stated in Corollary 5.2 are known to hold under even weaker conditions [1, Theorem 3.4]. But the above proof is completely dierent from classical proofs and, in particular, quite elementary. 6. Descent methods Similar to, e.g., [5, 21, 14, 17], we present in this section a simple descent method which makes no use of the derivatives of F. This method is therefore applicable in particular to largescale problems. Throughout this section, we will use the following F (x))! T 1(x 1 ; F 1 n (x n ; F n (x)) ;... ; 2 IR n F (x)) As a search direction, we will take the vector! T 1(x 1 ; F 1 n (x n ; F n (x)) ;... ; 2 IR n : d(x) F (x)) : (17) The following lemma shows that this direction is a descent direction of the merit function g with and i ; i = 1;... ; n, if rf (x) is positive semidenite. 18
20 Lemma 6.1 Let the NCPfunctions i be dened by (3) with and i for all i = 1;... ; n, and let g be dened by (2). If rf (x) is positive semidenite, then the direction d(x) given by (17) is a descent direction for 9 at x as long as x is not a solution of the NCP. Proof. Suppose that x is not a solution of the NCP. We recall that the gradient of g can be written as rg(x) = Hence we have hrg(x); d(x)i = F F F (x)) ; + rf (x) + F (x)) F F (x)) ; rf (x) By property (P.2) shown in Lemma 5.1, the rst term is nonpositive. Since rf (x) is positive semidenite, the second term is also nonpositive. Hence we have + : (18) hrg(x); d(x)i : Assume now that hrg(x); d(x)i = : This implies the both terms of the righthand side of (18) vanish. In particular, by the abovementioned property (P.2), we i (x i ; F i i (x i ; F i (x)) = for all i = 1;... ; n: It then follows from properties (P.1) and (P.3) in Lemma 5.1 that i (x i ; F i (x)) = for all i. Hence x solves the NCP, a contradiction to the assumption. Therefore we must have hrg(x); d(x)i < ; i.e., d(x) is a descent direction of g at x: 2 Based on Lemma 6.1, we now present a derivativefree descent algorithm for solving the NCP. Algorithm 6.1 (Descent method) (S.) Choose x 2 IR n ; " ; 2 (; 1=2); 2 (; 1) and set k := : (S.1) If g(x k ) "; stop. 19
21 (S.2) Let d k ; F (x k )) : (S.3) Compute a steplength t k = m k, where m k is the smallest nonnegative integer satisfying the Armijotype condition g(x k + m k d k ) (1 ( m k ) 2 )g(x k ): (S.4) Set x k+1 := x k + t k d k ; k := k + 1 and go to (S.1). We summarize the convergence properties of Algorithm 6.1 in the following theorem. Here we suppose that " = in the algorithm and that the generated sequence is innite. Theorem 6.1 Let the NCPfunctions i be dened by (3) with and i for all i = 1;... ; n, and let g be dened by (2). If F is monotone, then Algorithm 6.1 is welldened, and any accumulation point of the generated sequence fx k g is a solution of the NCP. Moreover, if the NCP is strictly feasible, then there exists at least one accumulation point. Proof. Since F is monotone, rf (x) is positive semidenite for any x. Hence, by Lemma 6.1, d k is a descent direction of g at x k for each k. Then the rst part of the theorem can be proved in exactly the same way as Proposition 11 in [21]. (In [21], Jiang considers a similar algorithm based on the squared FischerBurmeister function.) The last part follows from Theorem 4.1 and the descent property of Algorithm Theorem 6.1 demonstrates in particular that the proposed algorithm is valid for the merit function g constituted by the NCPfunctions p F B. For the merit function g constituted by and i for i = 1;... ; n, it is also possible to show that d k! as k! 1, so ;F (x 3 )) = holds at any accumulation point of the generated sequence. However, unlike the case of i for i = 1;... ; n, this does not necessarily imply that g(x 3 ) =, i.e., x 3 solves the NCP (cf. Lemma 5.1). To cope with this diculty, we may slightly modify the search direction as d k ; F (x k )) ; F (x k )) ;
22 where is a suciently small positive constant. Then, the convergence of the modied algorithm will be proved in a similar way to [17]. We will not go into detail here, however. 7. Final remarks In this paper, we have introduced new merit functions for the nonlinear complementarity problem and proved several desirable properties of these functions, which compare favorably with corresponding properties of other existing merit functions. On the other hand, one of the reasons why the squared FischerBurmeister function has attracted much attention of the researchers is the fact that it is the natural dierentiable merit function for the following equation reformulation of the nonlinear complementarity problem: 8 F B (x) := 1 C F B (x 1 ; F 1 (x)). A = ; F B (x n ; F n (x)) where F B is the function displayed in Example 1.1. Similarly, we can view the merit functions presented in [14] and this paper as natural merit functions of the following two equations, respectively: 8 LT (x) := and 8(x) := (hx; F (x)i) 1(x 1 ; F 1 (x)). n(x n ; F n (x)) (x 1 F 1 (x)). (x n F n (x)) 1(x 1 ; F 1 (x)). n(x n ; F n (x)) 21 1 C A 1 C A = = ;
23 where and i ; i = 1;... ; n. Note that these are generalized nonlinear least squares reformulations of the nonlinear complementarity problem, and that there is no corresponding equation for the implicit Lagrangian by Mangasarian and Solodov [8]. References [1] Harker, P.T., and Pang, J.S., FiniteDimensional Variational Inequality and Nonlinear Complementarity Problems: A Survey of Theory, Algorithms and Applications, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 48, pp. 161{22, 199. [2] Pang, J.S., Complementarity Problems, Handbook of Global Optimization, Edited by R. Horst and P. Pardalos, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 271{338, [3] Fukushima, M., Merit Functions for Variational Inequality and Complementarity Problems, Nonlinear Optimization and Applications, Edited by G. Di Pillo and F. Giannessi, Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, NY, to appear. [4] Fischer, A., An NCPFunction and Its Use for the Solution of Complementarity Problems, Recent Advances in Nonsmooth Optimization, Edited by D.Z. Du, L. Qi and R.S. Womersley, World Scientic Publishers, Singapore, pp. 88{15, [5] Geiger, C., and Kanzow, C., On the Resolution of Monotone Complementarity Problems, Computational Optimization and Applications, Vol. 5, pp. 155{173, [6] Kanzow, C., Nonlinear Complementarity as Unconstrained Optimization, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 88, pp. 139{155, [7] Kanzow, C., and Kleinmichel, H., A Class of NewtonType Methods for Equality and Inequality Constrained Optimization, Optimization Methods and Software, Vol. 5, pp. 173{198,
24 [8] Mangasarian, O.L., and Solodov, M.V., Nonlinear Complementarity as Unconstrained and Constrained Minimization, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 62, pp. 277{ 297, [9] Fischer, A., A Special NewtonType Optimization Method, Optimization, Vol. 24, pp. 269{284, [1] Luo, Z.Q., Mangasarian, O.L., Ren, J., and Solodov, M.V., New Error Bounds for the Linear Complementarity Problem, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 19, pp. 88{892, [11] Tseng, P., Growth Behavior of a Class of Merit Functions for the Nonlinear Complementarity Problem, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 89, pp. 17{37, [12] Kanzow, C., and Fukushima, M., Equivalence of the Generalized Complementarity Problem to Dierentiable Unconstrained Minimization, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, to appear. [13] Pang, J.S., A Posteriori Error Bounds for the LinearlyConstrained Variational Inequality Problem, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 12, pp. 474{484, [14] Luo, Z.Q., and Tseng, P., A New Class of Merit Functions for the Nonlinear Complementarity Problem, Working Paper, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, [15] Cottle, R.W., Pang, J.S., and Stone, R.E., The Linear Complementarity Problem, Academic Press, New York, NY, [16] More, J.J., and Rheinboldt, W.C., On P  and SFunctions and Related Classes of ndimensional Nonlinear Mappings, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Vol. 6, pp. 45{68,
25 [17] Yamashita, N., and Fukushima, M., On Stationary Points of the Implicit Lagrangian for Nonlinear Complementarity Problems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 84, pp. 653{663, [18] Chen, B., and Harker, P.T., Smooth Approximations to Nonlinear Complementarity Problems, SIAM Journal on Optimization, to appear. [19] De Luca, T., Facchinei, F., and Kanzow, C., A Semismooth Equation Approach to the Solution of Nonlinear Complementarity Problems, Mathematical Programming, to appear. [2] Facchinei, F., and Kanzow, C., On Unconstrained and Constrained Stationary Points of the Implicit Lagrangian, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, to appear. [21] Jiang, H., Unconstrained Minimization Approaches to Nonlinear Complementarity Problems, Journal of Global Optimization, to appear. 24
Stationary Points of Bound Constrained Minimization Reformulations of Complementarity Problems1,2
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS: Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 449467, AUGUST 1997 Stationary Points of Bound Constrained Minimization Reformulations of Complementarity Problems1,2 M. V. SOLODOV3
More informationWHEN ARE THE (UN)CONSTRAINED STATIONARY POINTS OF THE IMPLICIT LAGRANGIAN GLOBAL SOLUTIONS?
WHEN ARE THE (UN)CONSTRAINED STATIONARY POINTS OF THE IMPLICIT LAGRANGIAN GLOBAL SOLUTIONS? Francisco Facchinei a,1 and Christian Kanzow b a Università di Roma La Sapienza Dipartimento di Informatica e
More informationsystem of equations. In particular, we give a complete characterization of the Qsuperlinear
INEXACT NEWTON METHODS FOR SEMISMOOTH EQUATIONS WITH APPLICATIONS TO VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY PROBLEMS Francisco Facchinei 1, Andreas Fischer 2 and Christian Kanzow 3 1 Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
More information20 J.S. CHEN, C.H. KO AND X.R. WU. : R 2 R is given by. Recently, the generalized FischerBurmeister function ϕ p : R2 R, which includes
016 0 J.S. CHEN, C.H. KO AND X.R. WU whereas the natural residual function ϕ : R R is given by ϕ (a, b) = a (a b) + = min{a, b}. Recently, the generalized FischerBurmeister function ϕ p : R R, which
More information2 B. CHEN, X. CHEN AND C. KANZOW Abstract: We introduce a new NCPfunction that reformulates a nonlinear complementarity problem as a system of semism
A PENALIZED FISCHERBURMEISTER NCPFUNCTION: THEORETICAL INVESTIGATION AND NUMERICAL RESULTS 1 Bintong Chen 2, Xiaojun Chen 3 and Christian Kanzow 4 2 Department of Management and Systems Washington State
More informationSmoothed FischerBurmeister Equation Methods for the. Houyuan Jiang. CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences
Smoothed FischerBurmeister Equation Methods for the Complementarity Problem 1 Houyuan Jiang CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences GPO Box 664, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia Email: Houyuan.Jiang@cmis.csiro.au
More informationError bounds for symmetric cone complementarity problems
to appear in Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 014 Error bounds for symmetric cone complementarity problems XinHe Miao 1 Department of Mathematics School of Science Tianjin University Tianjin
More informationMerit functions and error bounds for generalized variational inequalities
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 287 2003) 405 414 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Merit functions and error bounds for generalized variational inequalities M.V. Solodov 1 Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada, Estrada
More informationSOLUTION OF NONLINEAR COMPLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS
A SEMISMOOTH EQUATION APPROACH TO THE SOLUTION OF NONLINEAR COMPLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS Tecla De Luca 1, Francisco Facchinei 1 and Christian Kanzow 2 1 Universita di Roma \La Sapienza" Dipartimento di Informatica
More informationA PENALIZED FISCHERBURMEISTER NCPFUNCTION. September 1997 (revised May 1998 and March 1999)
A PENALIZED FISCHERBURMEISTER NCPFUNCTION Bintong Chen 1 Xiaojun Chen 2 Christian Kanzow 3 September 1997 revised May 1998 and March 1999 Abstract: We introduce a new NCPfunction in order to reformulate
More information1 Introduction Let F : < n! < n be a continuously dierentiable mapping and S be a nonempty closed convex set in < n. The variational inequality proble
A New Unconstrained Dierentiable Merit Function for Box Constrained Variational Inequality Problems and a Damped GaussNewton Method Defeng Sun y and Robert S. Womersley z School of Mathematics University
More informationA Continuation Method for the Solution of Monotone Variational Inequality Problems
A Continuation Method for the Solution of Monotone Variational Inequality Problems Christian Kanzow Institute of Applied Mathematics University of Hamburg Bundesstrasse 55 D 20146 Hamburg Germany email:
More informationProjected Gradient Methods for NCP 57. Complementarity Problems via Normal Maps
Projected Gradient Methods for NCP 57 Recent Advances in Nonsmooth Optimization, pp. 5786 Eds..Z. u, L. Qi and R.S. Womersley c1995 World Scientic Publishers Projected Gradient Methods for Nonlinear
More informationA Novel Inexact Smoothing Method for SecondOrder Cone Complementarity Problems
A Novel Inexact Smoothing Method for SecondOrder Cone Complementarity Problems Xiaoni Chi Guilin University of Electronic Technology School of Math & Comput Science Guilin Guangxi 541004 CHINA chixiaoni@126.com
More informationON REGULARITY CONDITIONS FOR COMPLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS
ON REGULARITY CONDITIONS FOR COMPLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS A. F. Izmailov and A. S. Kurennoy December 011 ABSTRACT In the context of mixed complementarity problems various concepts of solution regularity are
More informationSpectral gradient projection method for solving nonlinear monotone equations
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 196 (2006) 478 484 www.elsevier.com/locate/cam Spectral gradient projection method for solving nonlinear monotone equations Li Zhang, Weijun Zhou Department
More informationGENERALIZED secondorder cone complementarity
Stochastic Generalized Complementarity Problems in SecondOrder Cone: BoxConstrained Minimization Reformulation and Solving Methods MeiJu Luo and Yan Zhang Abstract In this paper, we reformulate the
More informationOn the Coerciveness of Merit Functions for the SecondOrder Cone Complementarity Problem
On the Coerciveness of Merit Functions for the SecondOrder Cone Complementarity Problem Guidance Professor Assistant Professor Masao Fukushima Nobuo Yamashita Shunsuke Hayashi 000 Graduate Course in Department
More informationNumerical Optimization
Constrained Optimization Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560 012, India. NPTEL Course on Constrained Optimization Constrained Optimization Problem: min h j (x) 0,
More informationExpected Residual Minimization Method for Stochastic Linear Complementarity Problems 1
Expected Residual Minimization Method for Stochastic Linear Complementarity Problems 1 Xiaojun Chen and Masao Fukushima 3 January 13, 004; Revised November 5, 004 Abstract. This paper presents a new formulation
More informationA polynomial time interior point path following algorithm for LCP based on Chen Harker Kanzow smoothing techniques
Math. Program. 86: 9 03 (999) SpringerVerlag 999 Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 0.007/s007990056a Song Xu James V. Burke A polynomial time interior point path following algorithm for LCP based on Chen
More informationA SIMPLY CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION REFORMULATION OF KKT SYSTEMS ARISING FROM VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES
A SIMPLY CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION REFORMULATION OF KKT SYSTEMS ARISING FROM VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES Francisco Facchinei 1, Andreas Fischer 2, Christian Kanzow 3, and JiMing Peng 4 1 Università di Roma
More informationSOR and Jacobitype Iterative Methods for Solving l 1 l 2 Problems by Way of Fenchel Duality 1
SOR and Jacobitype Iterative Methods for Solving l 1 l 2 Problems by Way of Fenchel Duality 1 Masao Fukushima 2 July 17 2010; revised February 4 2011 Abstract We present an SORtype algorithm and a
More informationSchool of Mathematics, the University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
Computational Optimization and Applications, 13, 201 220 (1999) c 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Manufactured in The Netherlands. On NCPFunctions * DEFENG SUN LIQUN QI School of Mathematics,
More informationFIRST AND SECONDORDER OPTIMALITY CONDITIONS FOR MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMS WITH VANISHING CONSTRAINTS 1. Tim Hoheisel and Christian Kanzow
FIRST AND SECONDORDER OPTIMALITY CONDITIONS FOR MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMS WITH VANISHING CONSTRAINTS 1 Tim Hoheisel and Christian Kanzow Dedicated to Jiří Outrata on the occasion of his 60th birthday Preprint
More informationUNDERGROUND LECTURE NOTES 1: Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization Problems
UNDERGROUND LECTURE NOTES 1: Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization Problems Robert M. Freund February 2016 c 2016 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. 1 1 Introduction
More informationPolynomial complementarity problems
Polynomial complementarity problems M. Seetharama Gowda Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Maryland, Baltimore County Baltimore, Maryland 21250, USA gowda@umbc.edu December 2, 2016
More informationVariational Inequalities. Anna Nagurney Isenberg School of Management University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003
Variational Inequalities Anna Nagurney Isenberg School of Management University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 c 2002 Background Equilibrium is a central concept in numerous disciplines including economics,
More informationA QPFREE CONSTRAINED NEWTONTYPE METHOD FOR VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY PROBLEMS. Christian Kanzow 1 and HouDuo Qi 2
A QPFREE CONSTRAINED NEWTONTYPE METHOD FOR VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY PROBLEMS Christian Kanzow 1 and HouDuo Qi 2 1 University of Hamburg Institute of Applied Mathematics Bundesstrasse 55, D20146 Hamburg,
More informationA continuation method for nonlinear complementarity problems over symmetric cone
A continuation method for nonlinear complementarity problems over symmetric cone CHEK BENG CHUA AND PENG YI Abstract. In this paper, we introduce a new P type condition for nonlinear functions defined
More informationA new ane scaling interior point algorithm for nonlinear optimization subject to linear equality and inequality constraints
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 161 (003) 1 5 www.elsevier.com/locate/cam A new ane scaling interior point algorithm for nonlinear optimization subject to linear equality and inequality
More informationA FRITZ JOHN APPROACH TO FIRST ORDER OPTIMALITY CONDITIONS FOR MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMS WITH EQUILIBRIUM CONSTRAINTS
A FRITZ JOHN APPROACH TO FIRST ORDER OPTIMALITY CONDITIONS FOR MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMS WITH EQUILIBRIUM CONSTRAINTS Michael L. Flegel and Christian Kanzow University of Würzburg Institute of Applied Mathematics
More informationAlternative theorems for nonlinear projection equations and applications to generalized complementarity problems
Nonlinear Analysis 46 (001) 853 868 www.elsevier.com/locate/na Alternative theorems for nonlinear projection equations and applications to generalized complementarity problems Yunbin Zhao a;, Defeng Sun
More informationNondegenerate Solutions and Related Concepts in. Ane Variational Inequalities. M.C. Ferris. Madison, Wisconsin
Nondegenerate Solutions and Related Concepts in Ane Variational Inequalities M.C. Ferris Computer Sciences Department University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Email: ferris@cs.wisc.edu J.S. Pang
More informationQUADRATICALLY AND SUPERLINEARLY CONVERGENT ALGORITHMS FOR THE SOLUTION OF INEQUALITY CONSTRAINED MINIMIZATION PROBLEMS 1
QUADRATICALLY AND SUPERLINEARLY CONVERGENT ALGORITHMS FOR THE SOLUTION OF INEQUALITY CONSTRAINED MINIMIZATION PROBLEMS 1 F. FACCHINEI 2 AND S. LUCIDI 3 Communicated by L.C.W. Dixon 1 This research was
More informationUsing exact penalties to derive a new equation reformulation of KKT systems associated to variational inequalities
Using exact penalties to derive a new equation reformulation of KKT systems associated to variational inequalities Thiago A. de André Paulo J. S. Silva March 24, 2007 Abstract In this paper, we present
More informationON GAP FUNCTIONS OF VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY IN A BANACH SPACE. Sangho Kum and Gue Myung Lee. 1. Introduction
J. Korean Math. Soc. 38 (2001), No. 3, pp. 683 695 ON GAP FUNCTIONS OF VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY IN A BANACH SPACE Sangho Kum and Gue Myung Lee Abstract. In this paper we are concerned with theoretical properties
More informationA Regularized Directional DerivativeBased Newton Method for Inverse Singular Value Problems
A Regularized Directional DerivativeBased Newton Method for Inverse Singular Value Problems Wei Ma ZhengJian Bai September 18, 2012 Abstract In this paper, we give a regularized directional derivativebased
More informationNewtontype Methods for Solving the Nonsmooth Equations with Finitely Many Maximum Functions
260 Journal of Advances in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 1, No. 4, October 2016 https://dx.doi.org/10.22606/jaam.2016.14006 Newtontype Methods for Solving the Nonsmooth Equations with Finitely Many Maximum
More information4TE3/6TE3. Algorithms for. Continuous Optimization
4TE3/6TE3 Algorithms for Continuous Optimization (Algorithms for Constrained Nonlinear Optimization Problems) Tamás TERLAKY Computing and Software McMaster University Hamilton, November 2005 terlaky@mcmaster.ca
More informationAbsolute value equations
Linear Algebra and its Applications 419 (2006) 359 367 www.elsevier.com/locate/laa Absolute value equations O.L. Mangasarian, R.R. Meyer Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, 1210 West
More informationA Regularization Newton Method for Solving Nonlinear Complementarity Problems
Appl Math Optim 40:315 339 (1999) 1999 SpringerVerlag New York Inc. A Regularization Newton Method for Solving Nonlinear Complementarity Problems D. Sun School of Mathematics, University of New South
More information58 Appendix 1 fundamental inconsistent equation (1) can be obtained as a linear combination of the two equations in (2). This clearly implies that the
Appendix PRELIMINARIES 1. THEOREMS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SYSTEMS OF LINEAR CONSTRAINTS Here we consider systems of linear constraints, consisting of equations or inequalities or both. A feasible solution
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF STRICT LOCAL MINIMIZERS OF ORDER ONE FOR STATIC MINMAX PROBLEMS IN THE PARAMETRIC CONSTRAINT CASE
Journal of Applied Analysis Vol. 6, No. 1 (2000), pp. 139 148 A CHARACTERIZATION OF STRICT LOCAL MINIMIZERS OF ORDER ONE FOR STATIC MINMAX PROBLEMS IN THE PARAMETRIC CONSTRAINT CASE A. W. A. TAHA Received
More informationA proximallike algorithm for a class of nonconvex programming
Pacific Journal of Optimization, vol. 4, pp. 319333, 2008 A proximallike algorithm for a class of nonconvex programming JeinShan Chen 1 Department of Mathematics National Taiwan Normal University Taipei,
More informationTechnische Universität Dresden Herausgeber: Der Rektor
Als Manuskript gedruckt Technische Universität Dresden Herausgeber: Der Rektor The Gradient of the Squared Residual as Error Bound an Application to KarushKuhnTucker Systems Andreas Fischer MATHNM132002
More informationKey words. linear complementarity problem, noninteriorpoint algorithm, Tikhonov regularization, P 0 matrix, regularized central path
A GLOBALLY AND LOCALLY SUPERLINEARLY CONVERGENT NONINTERIORPOINT ALGORITHM FOR P 0 LCPS YUNBIN ZHAO AND DUAN LI Abstract Based on the concept of the regularized central path, a new noninteriorpoint
More informationA derivativefree nonmonotone line search and its application to the spectral residual method
IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis (2009) 29, 814 825 doi:10.1093/imanum/drn019 Advance Access publication on November 14, 2008 A derivativefree nonmonotone line search and its application to the spectral
More informationConvergence Analysis of Perturbed Feasible Descent Methods 1
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS Vol. 93. No 2. pp. 337353. MAY 1997 Convergence Analysis of Perturbed Feasible Descent Methods 1 M. V. SOLODOV 2 Communicated by Z. Q. Luo Abstract. We
More informationConvex Optimization Theory. Chapter 5 Exercises and Solutions: Extended Version
Convex Optimization Theory Chapter 5 Exercises and Solutions: Extended Version Dimitri P. Bertsekas Massachusetts Institute of Technology Athena Scientific, Belmont, Massachusetts http://www.athenasc.com
More information2 JOSE HERSKOVITS The rst stage to get an optimal design is to dene the Optimization Model. That is, to select appropriate design variables, an object
A VIEW ON NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION JOSE HERSKOVITS Mechanical Engineering Program COPPE / Federal University of Rio de Janeiro 1 Caixa Postal 68503, 21945970 Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL 1. Introduction Once
More informationAlgorithms for constrained local optimization
Algorithms for constrained local optimization Fabio Schoen 2008 http://gol.dsi.unifi.it/users/schoen Algorithms for constrained local optimization p. Feasible direction methods Algorithms for constrained
More information16 Chapter 3. Separation Properties, Principal Pivot Transforms, Classes... for all j 2 J is said to be a subcomplementary vector of variables for (3.
Chapter 3 SEPARATION PROPERTIES, PRINCIPAL PIVOT TRANSFORMS, CLASSES OF MATRICES In this chapter we present the basic mathematical results on the LCP. Many of these results are used in later chapters to
More informationBulletin of the. Iranian Mathematical Society
ISSN: 1017060X (Print) ISSN: 17358515 (Online) Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 41 (2015), No. 5, pp. 1259 1269. Title: A uniform approximation method to solve absolute value equation
More informationSolution of a General Linear Complementarity Problem using smooth optimization and its application to bilinear programming and LCP
Solution of a General Linear Complementarity Problem using smooth optimization and its application to bilinear programming and LCP L. Fernandes A. Friedlander M. Guedes J. Júdice Abstract This paper addresses
More informationJournal of Convex Analysis Vol. 14, No. 2, March 2007 AN EXPLICIT DESCENT METHOD FOR BILEVEL CONVEX OPTIMIZATION. Mikhail Solodov. September 12, 2005
Journal of Convex Analysis Vol. 14, No. 2, March 2007 AN EXPLICIT DESCENT METHOD FOR BILEVEL CONVEX OPTIMIZATION Mikhail Solodov September 12, 2005 ABSTRACT We consider the problem of minimizing a smooth
More informationSequential Quadratic Programming Method for Nonlinear SecondOrder Cone Programming Problems. Hirokazu KATO
Sequential Quadratic Programming Method for Nonlinear SecondOrder Cone Programming Problems Guidance Professor Masao FUKUSHIMA Hirokazu KATO 2004 Graduate Course in Department of Applied Mathematics and
More information1. Introduction. We consider the classical variational inequality problem [1, 3, 7] VI(F, C), which is to find a point x such that
SIAM J. CONTROL OPTIM. Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 765 776 c 1999 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics A NEW PROJECTION METHOD FOR VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY PROBLEMS M. V. SOLODOV AND B. F. SVAITER Abstract.
More informationLecture 19 Algorithms for VIs KKT Conditionsbased Ideas. November 16, 2008
Lecture 19 Algorithms for VIs KKT Conditionsbased Ideas November 16, 2008 Outline for solution of VIs Algorithms for general VIs Two basic approaches: First approach reformulates (and solves) the KKT
More informationc 1998 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
SIAM J. OPTIM. Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 179 189 c 1998 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics WEAK SHARP SOLUTIONS OF VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES PATRICE MARCOTTE AND DAOLI ZHU Abstract. In this work we
More informationConstrained Optimization Theory
Constrained Optimization Theory Stephen J. Wright 1 2 Computer Sciences Department, University of WisconsinMadison. IMA, August 2016 Stephen Wright (UWMadison) Constrained Optimization Theory IMA, August
More informationNonmonotonic backtracking trust region interior point algorithm for linear constrained optimization
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 155 (2003) 285 305 www.elsevier.com/locate/cam Nonmonotonic bactracing trust region interior point algorithm for linear constrained optimization Detong
More informationMODIFIED PROJECTIONTYPE METHODS. M. V. Solodovy and P. Tsengz. Mathematical Programming Technical Report # 9404
MODIFIED PROJECTIONTYPE METHODS FOR MONOTONE VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES M. V. Solodovy and P. Tsengz Mathematical Programming Technical Report # 9404 May 24, 1994 (revised January 11, 1995) (to appear
More informationA smoothing Newtontype method for secondorder cone programming problems based on a new smoothing FischerBurmeister function
Volume 30, N. 3, pp. 569 588, 2011 Copyright 2011 SBMAC ISSN 01018205 www.scielo.br/cam A smoothing Newtontype method for secondorder cone programming problems based on a new smoothing FischerBurmeister
More informationA globally and Rlinearly convergent hybrid HS and PRP method and its inexact version with applications
A globally and Rlinearly convergent hybrid HS and PRP method and its inexact version with applications Weijun Zhou 28 October 20 Abstract A hybrid HS and PRP type conjugate gradient method for smooth
More informationLecture 8 Plus properties, merit functions and gap functions. September 28, 2008
Lecture 8 Plus properties, merit functions and gap functions September 28, 2008 Outline Plusproperties and Funiqueness Equation reformulations of VI/CPs Merit functions Gap merit functions FPI book:
More informationLinear Algebra (part 1) : Vector Spaces (by Evan Dummit, 2017, v. 1.07) 1.1 The Formal Denition of a Vector Space
Linear Algebra (part 1) : Vector Spaces (by Evan Dummit, 2017, v. 1.07) Contents 1 Vector Spaces 1 1.1 The Formal Denition of a Vector Space.................................. 1 1.2 Subspaces...................................................
More informationOn Penalty and Gap Function Methods for Bilevel Equilibrium Problems
On Penalty and Gap Function Methods for Bilevel Equilibrium Problems Bui Van Dinh 1 and Le Dung Muu 2 1 Faculty of Information Technology, Le Quy Don Technical University, Hanoi, Vietnam 2 Institute of
More informationThe Relation Between Pseudonormality and Quasiregularity in Constrained Optimization 1
October 2003 The Relation Between Pseudonormality and Quasiregularity in Constrained Optimization 1 by Asuman E. Ozdaglar and Dimitri P. Bertsekas 2 Abstract We consider optimization problems with equality,
More informationMaxPlanckInstitut fur Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Uniformly distributed measures in Euclidean spaces by Bernd Kirchheim and David Preiss PreprintNr.: 37 1998 Uniformly Distributed
More informationFinite Convergence for Feasible Solution Sequence of Variational Inequality Problems
Mathematical and Computational Applications Article Finite Convergence for Feasible Solution Sequence of Variational Inequality Problems Wenling Zhao *, Ruyu Wang and Hongxiang Zhang School of Science,
More informationConstrained Optimization
1 / 22 Constrained Optimization ME598/494 Lecture Max Yi Ren Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arizona State University March 30, 2015 2 / 22 1. Equality constraints only 1.1 Reduced gradient 1.2 Lagrange
More informationOptimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization
72 CHAPTER 7 Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization 1. First Order Conditions In this section we consider first order optimality conditions for the constrained problem P : minimize f 0 (x)
More informationResearch Article A PenalizedEquationBased Generalized Newton Method for Solving AbsoluteValue Linear Complementarity Problems
Mathematics, Article ID 560578, 10 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/560578 Research Article A PenalizedEquationBased Generalized Newton Method for Solving AbsoluteValue Linear Complementarity Problems
More informationOptimization Methods. Lecture 18: Optimality Conditions and. Gradient Methods. for Unconstrained Optimization
5.93 Optimization Methods Lecture 8: Optimality Conditions and Gradient Methods for Unconstrained Optimization Outline. Necessary and sucient optimality conditions Slide. Gradient m e t h o d s 3. The
More informationMathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part I: Algebraic Structures, Sets and Permutations
Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part I: Algebraic Structures, Sets and Permutations D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 19967 1 Number Systems and Matrix Algebra Integers The whole numbers 0, ±1, ±2, ±3, ±4,...
More informationA double projection method for solving variational inequalities without monotonicity
A double projection method for solving variational inequalities without monotonicity Minglu Ye Yiran He Accepted by Computational Optimization and Applications, DOI: 10.1007/s1058901496597,Apr 05, 2014
More informationOptimization: InteriorPoint Methods and. January,1995 USA. and Cooperative Research Centre for Robust and Adaptive Systems.
Innite Dimensional Quadratic Optimization: InteriorPoint Methods and Control Applications January,995 Leonid Faybusovich John B. Moore y Department of Mathematics University of Notre Dame Mail Distribution
More informationR. Schaback. numerical method is proposed which rst minimizes each f j separately. and then applies a penalty strategy to gradually force the
A Multi{Parameter Method for Nonlinear Least{Squares Approximation R Schaback Abstract P For discrete nonlinear leastsquares approximation problems f 2 (x)! min for m smooth functions f : IR n! IR a m
More informationDownloaded 12/13/16 to Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see
SIAM J. OPTIM. Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 962 973 c 2001 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics MONOTONICITY OF FIXED POINT AND NORMAL MAPPINGS ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY AND ITS APPLICATION
More informationA class of Smoothing Method for Linear SecondOrder Cone Programming
Columbia International Publishing Journal of Advanced Computing (13) 1: 94 doi:1776/jac1313 Research Article A class of Smoothing Method for Linear SecondOrder Cone Programming Zhuqing Gui *, Zhibin
More informationARE202A, Fall Contents
ARE202A, Fall 2005 LECTURE #2: WED, NOV 6, 2005 PRINT DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 2005 (NPP2) Contents 5. Nonlinear Programming Problems and the Kuhn Tucker conditions (cont) 5.2. Necessary and sucient conditions
More informationMAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9
MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: FALL 204 Contents. Sets 2 2. Functions 5 3. Countability 7 4. Axiom of choice 8 5. Equivalence relations 9 6. Real numbers 9 7. Extended
More informationA NOTE ON A GLOBALLY CONVERGENT NEWTON METHOD FOR SOLVING. Patrice MARCOTTE. JeanPierre DUSSAULT
A NOTE ON A GLOBALLY CONVERGENT NEWTON METHOD FOR SOLVING MONOTONE VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES Patrice MARCOTTE JeanPierre DUSSAULT Resume. Il est bien connu que la methode de Newton, lorsqu'appliquee a
More informationOn the iterate convergence of descent methods for convex optimization
On the iterate convergence of descent methods for convex optimization Clovis C. Gonzaga March 1, 2014 Abstract We study the iterate convergence of strong descent algorithms applied to convex functions.
More informationDepartment of Social Systems and Management. Discussion Paper Series
Department of Social Systems and Management Discussion Paper Series No. 1262 Complementarity Problems over Symmetric Cones: A Survey of Recent Developments in Several Aspects by Akiko YOSHISE July 2010
More informationResearch Article The Solution Set Characterization and Error Bound for the Extended Mixed Linear Complementarity Problem
Journal of Applied Mathematics Volume 2012, Article ID 219478, 15 pages doi:10.1155/2012/219478 Research Article The Solution Set Characterization and Error Bound for the Extended Mixed Linear Complementarity
More information1 Introduction We consider the problem nd x 2 H such that 0 2 T (x); (1.1) where H is a real Hilbert space, and T () is a maximal monotone operator (o
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 6 (1999), No. 1, pp. xxxx. cheldermann Verlag A HYBRID PROJECTION{PROXIMAL POINT ALGORITHM M. V. Solodov y and B. F. Svaiter y January 27, 1997 (Revised August 24, 1998)
More informationReal Analysis Math 131AH Rudin, Chapter #1. Dominique Abdi
Real Analysis Math 3AH Rudin, Chapter # Dominique Abdi.. If r is rational (r 0) and x is irrational, prove that r + x and rx are irrational. Solution. Assume the contrary, that r+x and rx are rational.
More informationALGORITHMS FOR COMPLEMENTARITY EQUATIONS. Stephen C. Billups. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the. requirements for the degree of
ALGORITHMS FOR COMPLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS AND GENERALIZED EQUATIONS By Stephen C. Billups A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Computer
More information290 J.M. Carnicer, J.M. Pe~na basis (u 1 ; : : : ; u n ) consisting of minimally supported elements, yet also has a basis (v 1 ; : : : ; v n ) which f
Numer. Math. 67: 289{301 (1994) Numerische Mathematik c SpringerVerlag 1994 Electronic Edition Least supported bases and local linear independence J.M. Carnicer, J.M. Pe~na? Departamento de Matematica
More informationExistence of Global Minima for Constrained Optimization 1
Existence of Global Minima for Constrained Optimization 1 A. E. Ozdaglar 2 and P. Tseng 3 Communicated by A. Miele 1 We thank Professor Dimitri Bertsekas for his comments and support in the writing of
More informationMATH 5720: Unconstrained Optimization Hung Phan, UMass Lowell September 13, 2018
MATH 57: Unconstrained Optimization Hung Phan, UMass Lowell September 13, 18 1 Global and Local Optima Let a function f : S R be defined on a set S R n Definition 1 (minimizers and maximizers) (i) x S
More informationPriority Programme 1962
Priority Programme 1962 An Example Comparing the Standard and Modified Augmented Lagrangian Methods Christian Kanzow, Daniel Steck Nonsmooth and Complementaritybased Distributed Parameter Systems: Simulation
More informationA convergence result for an Outer Approximation Scheme
A convergence result for an Outer Approximation Scheme R. S. Burachik Engenharia de Sistemas e Computação, COPPEUFRJ, CP 68511, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21941972, Brazil regi@cos.ufrj.br J. O. Lopes Departamento
More informationLocal Indices for Degenerate Variational Inequalities
Local Indices for Degenerate Variational Inequalities Alp Simsek Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Office: 32D740, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139
More informationSome Properties of the Augmented Lagrangian in Cone Constrained Optimization
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH Vol. 29, No. 3, August 2004, pp. 479 491 issn 0364765X eissn 15265471 04 2903 0479 informs doi 10.1287/moor.1040.0103 2004 INFORMS Some Properties of the Augmented
More informationOn Secondorder Properties of the MoreauYosida Regularization for Constrained Nonsmooth Convex Programs
On Secondorder Properties of the MoreauYosida Regularization for Constrained Nonsmooth Convex Programs Fanwen Meng,2 ; Gongyun Zhao Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore 2 Science
More informationMethods for a Class of Convex. Functions. Stephen M. Robinson WP April 1996
Working Paper Linear Convergence of EpsilonSubgradient Descent Methods for a Class of Convex Functions Stephen M. Robinson WP96041 April 1996 IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
More information