A SHORT OVERVIEW OF SPIN REPRESENTATIONS. Contents

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "A SHORT OVERVIEW OF SPIN REPRESENTATIONS. Contents"

Transcription

1 A SHORT OVERVIEW OF SPIN REPRESENTATIONS YUNFENG ZHANG Abstract. In this note, we make a short overview of spin representations. First, we introduce Clifford algebras and spin groups, and classify their finite dimensional representations. Next, we touch on infinite dimensional spin representations, introduce spinor bundles and make an explicit construction of SL(, C)- spinorial tensor fields on Minkowski spacetime. Finally, we briefly talk about the results of Bargmann-Wigner on explicit construction of irreducible unitary spin representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group via spinorial tensor field equations. Contents 1. Clifford algebra, Spin groups, and Representations Clifford algebra 1.. The Pin and Spin groups Representation of Spin groups 4. Spinor Bundles, Spinor fields on Minkowski spacetime 5.1. Spinor Bundle 5.. Spinors on Minkowski spacetime 6 3. Irreducible unitary representation of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group and Bargmann-Wigner equations Lie algebra structure of ISO 1,3, classification of representations via Casimir elements Bargmann-Wigner equations 7 References 8 1. Clifford algebra, Spin groups, and Representations Spin groups Spin r,s are universal covering group of SO r,s, which is the special orthogonal group, namely, the matrix group that preserves the quadratic form on R r+s. We are interested in representations q r,s (x) = x x r x r+1 x r+s ρ : Spin r,s GL(V ) of Spin r,s that does not factor through SO r,s, in other words, the kernel of ρ does not contain -1. Such representations are call spin representations. As it turns out, the spin group could be embedded within the group of units of an algebra called Clifford algebra, and from the representations of the Clifford algebra one gets all the spin representations. We remark that by semisimplicity of the spin group, every finite dimensional representation could be decomposed as direct sum of irreducible ones, thus it suffices to get all the irreducible representations. Date:

2 1.1. Clifford algebra. In this section, we pick up basic concepts about Clifford algebra. Let V be a vector space over a field k(= R, C) and q is a quadratic form. The Clifford algebra Cl(V, q) associated to V and q is an associative algebra defined as follows. Let T (V ) = r V denote the tensor algebra of V and define I q to be the ideal in T (V ) generated by all elements of the form v v + q(v)1 for v V. Then the Clifford algebra is defined to be the quotient r=0 Cl(V, q) T (V )/I q (V ). One easily sees that V embeds in Cl(V, q) naturally and Cl(V, q) is generated by V subject to the relations v v = q(v)1. This leads to the following universal characterization of the Clifford algebra. Proposition 1.1. Let f : V A be a linear map into an associative k-algebra with unit, such that f(v) f(v) = q(v)1 for all v V. Then f extends uniquely to a k-algebra homomorphism f : Cl(V, q) A. Furthermore, Cl(V, q) is the unique associative k-algebra with this property. Here are some example of consequences of this characterization. (1)The orthogonal group O(V, q), the subgroup of GL(V ) that preserves that quadratic form, extends canonically to a group of automorphisms of Cl(V, q). ()We have the automorphism α : Cl(V, q) Cl(V, q) which extends the map α(v) = v. This in turn gives a decomposition Cl(V, q) = Cl 0 (V, q) Cl 1 (V, q), Cl i (V, q) being the eigenspaces of α that corresponds to eigenvalues ( 1) i. Elements in Cl 0 and Cl 1 are said to have pure even or odd degree. An algebra with such a decomposition is called a Z -graded algebra. We may define instead of the ordinary tensor product a Z -graded tensor product of two Z -graded algebras A and B, A ˆ B, via a Z -graded multiplication, (a b) (a b ) = ( 1) deg(b) deg(a ) (aa ) (bb ). The Z -graded tensor product has the following useful consequence. Proposition 1.. Let V = V 1 V be a q-orthogonal decomposition of the vector space V. Then there exists a natural isomorphism of Clifford algebras where q i denotes the restriction of q to V i. Cl(V, q) Cl(V 1, q 1 ) ˆ Cl(V, q ) Proof. The isomorphism is induced via universal property of Clifford algebra from the map f : V Cl(V 1, q 1 ) ˆ Cl(V, q ), f(v) = v v where v = v 1 + v is the decomposition of v with respect to the splitting V = V 1 V. In particular, if we consider Cl r,s Cl(V, q) where V = R r+s and q(x) = x 1 + x r x r+1 x r+s, then we have an isomorphism Cl r,s = Cl 1,0 ˆ ˆ Cl 1,0 ˆ Cl 0,1 ˆ ˆ Cl 0,1 where Cl 1,0 appears r times and Cl 0,1 appears s times. It s easily seen that Cl 1,0 = C and Cl0,1 = R, and it follows that dim R (Cl r,s ) = r+s. Lastly, let s observe that we have a canonical vector space isomorphism V Cl(V, q) given by v 1 v r 1 sign(σ)v σ(1) v σ(r). r! This is not an isomorphism of algebras unless q = 0. σ

3 1.. The Pin and Spin groups. We now consider the multiplicative group of units in the Clifford algebra, which is defined to be the subset Cl (V, q) {φ Cl(V, q) : φ 1 with φ 1 φ = φφ 1 = 1}. This group clearly contains all the elements x V with q(v) 0. This is a Lie group with Lie algebra Cl(V, q), thus we have the adjoint representation give by and give by Ad : Cl (V, q) Aut(Cl(V, q)) Ad φ (x) = φxφ 1 ad : Cl(V, q) End(Cl(V, q)) ad y (x) = [y, x] = yx xy. One computes for v V Cl(V, q) with q(v) 0, that Ad v (w) = w q(v, w) v, ( ) q(v) which has a geometrical interpretation as reflection across the hyperplane v = {w V : q(w, v) = 0}. It follows that Ad v (V ) = V and Ad v preserves the quadratic form. Therefore, if we define P (V, q) to be the subgroup of Cl (V, q) generated by the elements v V with q(v) 0 then we have the representation Ad : P (V, q) O(V, q) where O(V, q) is the orthogonal group of the form q. The group P (V, q) has certain important subgroups. Definition 1.3. The Pin group of (V, q) is the subgroup Pin(V, q) of P (V, q) generated by the elements v V with q(v) = ±1. The associated Spin group is defined by Spin(V, q) = Pin(V, q) Cl 0 (V, q). That is, Pin(V, q) = {v 1 v r P (V, q) : q(v i ) = ±1 for all j}, Spin(V, q) = {v 1 v r Pin(V, q) : r is even}. Now we modify the adjoint representation using the Z -graded structure of Clifford algebra to eliminate the negative sign in front of the equation ( ). Consider the twisted adjoint representation by setting Ãd : Cl (V, q) GL(Cl(V, q)) Ãd φ (y) = α(φ)yφ 1. Ãd φ (y) = ±Ad φ (y) the sign depending on whether φ is an even or odd element. In particular, q(v, w) Ãd v (w) = w q(v) v. Assume from now V is finite dimensional and q is nondegenerate. For any φ Pin(V, q), φ = v 1 v r, q(v i ) 0, we have Ãd φ = Ãd v 1 Ãd v r. Since each Ãd v i is reflection, thus by the classical result that the orthogonal group is generated by reflections, the representation Ãd : P(V, q) O(V, q) is surjective. One could also prove that the kernel is the group k of nonzero multiples of 1. Restricting to SP(V, q) Cl 0 (V, q), we get the surjective representation Ãd : SP(V, q) SO(V, q) where SO(V, q) is the special orthogonal group. 3

4 Finally, restricting to the groups Pin(V, q) and Spin(V, q) which simply normalizes P(V, q) and SP(V, q), we have the following short exact sequences 0 F Spin(V, q) Ãd SO(V, q) 1 0 F Pin(V, q) Ãd O(V, q) 1 where F = {±1} if k = R or F = {±1, ± 1} if k = C Representation of Spin groups. Every nondegenerate quadratic form over R or C could be reduced to the standard q(x) = x x r x r+1 x r+s and q(z) = z z n respectively. Let Cl r,s and Cl n denote the Clifford algebras that corresponds to the these forms. It turns out Cl r,s and Cl n could be explicitly described as matrix algebras K( m ) or K( m ) K( m ) over K = R, C or H, where K( m ) is simply the algebra of n n K-matrices. But the representation theory of such algebras are relatively simple. Theorem 1.4. (1)The natural representation ρ of K(n) on K n is, up to equivalence, the only irreducible real representation of K(n). ()K(n) K(n) has exactly two equivalent classes of irreducible real representations given by ρ 1 (φ 1, φ ) ρ(φ 1 ) and ρ (φ, φ ) ρ(φ ). We have similar results for irreducible complex representations. Now let s define the spinor representations as the restriction of the irreducible real or complex representations of Clifford algebra to the spin group. From these spinor representations one gets all the irreducible real or complex representations of the spin groups which do not factor though the orthogonal group. Let s simply record here one case in these results, namely the case when the Clifford algebra is Cl n,0 over the reals and n = 4m. Proposition 1.5. Consider 4m : Spin 4m GL(S) given by restricting an irreducible real representation ρ : Cl 4m,0 Hom R (S, S) to Spin 4m Cl 4m,0. Then we have a decomposition 4m = + 4m 4m where ± 4m are the inequivalent irreducible representations of Spin 4m. Proof. The key role in the analysis is played by the volume element in Cl n,0 ω = e 1 e n where {e i } is an orthonormal basis of the base space R n. It has the following basic properties Thus ρ(ω) = 1, we may decompose ω = 1, φω = ωα(φ) for all φ Cl n,0. S = S + S where S ± are eigenspaces of ρ(ω) corresponding to eigenvalues ±1 respectively. Since ω commutes with Cl 0 n,0, S ± are invariant under Cl 0 n,0. Consider the map f : R n 1 Cl 0 n,0 by setting f(e i ) = e n e i, i < n where R n 1 = span{e i } i n 1. One easily checks that f(x) = q(x)1, thus by universal property of Clifford algebra, f extends to an algebra homomorphism f : Cl n 1,0 Cl 0 n,0 which is in fact an isomorphism. f maps the volume element ω = e 1 e n 1 in Cl n 1,0 to the volume element ω Cln,0. 0 Via the isomorphism f : Cl n 1,0 = Cl 0 n,0, we may view the representation restricted on Cln,0 0 as representations of Cl n 1,0 on S ± and it follows that ω acts as Id on S + and Id on S, thus these two representations are inequivalent which correspond to the two irreducible representation classes of Cl n 1,0. Finally, we observe that any irreducible representation of Cln,0 0 restricts to an irreducible representation of Spin n,0 because Spin n,0 contains an additive basis for Cln,0. 0 We usually call the vectors in a spin representation space as spinors. 4

5 . Spinor Bundles, Spinor fields on Minkowski spacetime Now we turn to infinite dimensional (irreducible) (unitary) representations of the spin groups. A natural construction goes as follows. Let ρ : G Gl(V ) be a finite dimensional representation of G and consider an infinite dimensional linear space of functions on V, denoted F (V ). Then we may define a representation P : G Aut(F (V )) via (P g f)(x) = f(ρ g 1x), x V, f F (V ). In particular, we may choose V to be G itself, and G acts on G via left multiplication, and the function space chosen to be L (G). When G is a compact Lie group, for example the spin groups Spin n,0, this is the setting for Peter-Weyl theorem. It states that, the above particular unitary representation, as well as every unitary representation on a Hilbert space splits into irreducible finite dimensional unitary representations. But for non-compact groups, one could show that no nontrivial irreducible finite dimensional unitary representation exists. And it is an unsolved problem how to effectively classify irreducible unitary representations. Known approaches include the Langlands classification of admissible Harish-Chandra modules and the cases SL (R) and SL (C) are solved. We will not touch these general approaches but will talk about the SL (C) case, which is Spin 3,1 the universal cover group of the Lorentz group SO 3,1, the construction of which irreducible representations via relativistic wave equations will be seen. The basic idea of this construction is to consider a possibly infinite dimensional representations of the spin group SL (C) on a bundle of finite dimensional spinors, in this case the spinors being C on which SL (C) naturally acts as matrice multiplication, over the base manifold the Minkowski spacetime M. Now SL (C) acts on M via Lorentz transformation. Thus one may define (gφ) A (x) = g A Bφ B [g 1 (x)] where g = gb A SL (C), φ A (x) is a spinor field, i.e. a section of the bundle of spinors, x M, and elements in SL (C) acts on the Minkowski spacetime by Lorentz transformation. The Lie algebra simultaneously acts as differential operators on the spinor fields φ. This Lie algebra action plays a key rule of specifying irreducible representations in the following way. We define the Casimir elements as the elements in the universal enveloping algebra that commutes with all the Lie algebra elements. Thus the representatives of the Casimir elements, called Casimir operators, commutes with all representatives of the Lie algebra, hence by Schur s lemma on irreducible representation, must be a multiple of the identity operator. These numbers provides convenient labels of so as to classify the irreducible representations, and more importantly, they may be interpreted as the conserved quantities when the spinor field is interpreted as a physical system. One may set up differential equations of the form of a eigenvalue equation Cφ = cφ where C stands for the Casimir operator and c is a constant, and expect the solutions to be desired constructions of irreducible representations. This turns out to be the case. In the following sections, we will first introduce a rigorous definition of spinor bundles and then give an explicit construction of spinor fields and spinorial tensor fields on Minkowski spacetime..1. Spinor Bundle. To define a spinor bundle, one needs to define the notion of a principal fiber bundle. A principal fiber bundle (B, G, M, φ) consists of a manifold B (called the bundle manifold), a Lie group G (called the fiber group), a manifold M (called the base manifold), and a free left action φ : G B B satisfying the following local trivialization: for each x M there exists an open neighborhood, U, of x such that there is a diffeomorphism, ψ, taking π 1 (U) B into G U such that the action of G on π 1 (U) corresponds to left multiplication on G U, i.e. if ψ(p) = (g, x), then ψ(φ g (p)) = (g g, x). An important example of a principal fiber bundle is the bundle of bases of tangent space, and the group action is the natural action of GL(n) on the bases. If we require the bases to be orthonormal, assuming the base manifold M with a metric, we may construct the bundle of orthonormal bases via action of the orthogonal group. Definition.1. Let P SO be the principle fiber bundle of orthonormal bases on the base pseudo Riemannian manifold (M, g). Let ξ 0 : Spin SO be the universal covering homomorphism. Then a spin structure on M is a principal Spin-bundle P Spin together with a -sheeted covering ξ : P Spin (E) P SO (E) 5

6 such that ξ(gp) = ξ 0 (g)ξ(p) for all p P Spin and g Spin. In other words, the spin structures on E are in one-to-one correspondence with -sheeted coverings of P SO which are nontrivial on the fibers. We remark that the spin structure might not always exist. Consider the special case when P SO is simply-connected. (Even though the fiber SO is not simply connected, one could still have a simply-connected fiber bundle P SO.) In this case, there is no nontrivial -sheeted covering of P SO. It turns out that a topological invariant of the tangent bundle, namely the second Stiefel-Whitney class is the obstruction to existence of spin structures. To define spinor bundles, let s briefly describe the associated bundle construction. Let (B, G, M, φ) be a principal fiber bundle, and F another manifold, and a left action χ : G F F of G on F, there is a general procedure for constructing from B a new fiber bundle over M with fiber F as follows. Consider the left action ψ of G on B F by ψ g (b, f) = (φ g (b), χ g (f)) for b B, f F. We define B χ F M to be the set of orbits of G on B F. It is called the bundle associated to B by χ. Definition.. Let (M, g) be an oriented pseudo Riemannian manifold with a spin structure ξ : P Spin P SO. A spinor bundle of M is a bundle of the form where µ : Spin GL(S) is a spin representation. S(M) = P Spin (E) µ S.. Spinors on Minkowski spacetime. Let s consider the special case when M is the Minkowski spacetime, with the natural spin representation of SL (C) on C. We would love to explicitly describe the spinor fields and more generally the spinorial tensor fields. Let s start with W = C. Define a tensor T of type (k, l, k, l ) over W as a multilinear map from direct products of k copies of W, l copies of W, k copies of W, l copies of W to C. Here W is the complex conjugate space of W. We shall adopt index notation for T, e.g. TC ABD denotes a tensor of type (, 1; 1, 0). The complex conjugation map of vectors extends to tensors and maps a tensor T of type (k, l; k, l ) into a tensor, denoted T, of type (k, l ; k, l). Note that T = T. Note that the vector space of antisymmetric tensors of type (0, ; 0, 0) is one-dimensional. Let s choose a particular tensor ɛ AB = ɛ BA. Since ɛ AB is nondegenerate we obtain via ξ A ɛ AB ξ A an isomorphism of W and W. Following standard conventions, we define ɛ AB to be minus the inverse of ɛ AB, i.e. ɛ AB is the antisymmetric tensor of type (, 0; 0, 0) which satisfies ɛ AB ɛ BC = δc A, where δa C denotes the identity map on W. Now consider the natural action of the matrix group SL(, C) on tensors on W. Note in particular that L A CL B Dɛ AB = ɛ CD for L A B SL(, C), which is equivalent to the condition that LA B has unit determinant. This equation means that ɛ AB is preserved under the action of L A B. The relation between SL(, C) and the Lorentz group now may be established. The tensors of type (1, 0; 1, 0) comprise a four complex dimensional vector space, Y. Let o A, ι A be a basis of W satisfying o A ι A = 1. Then we have the following basis of Y : t AA = 1 (o A ō A + ι A ῑ A ), x AA = 1 (o A ῑ A + ι A ō A ), y AA = i (o A ῑ A ι A ō A ), z AA = 1 (o A ō A ι A ῑ A ). Now, complex conjugation maps Y into itself, and we call an element that is taken into itself under complex conjugation a real element. We can easily check that the above basis for Y are real and they span all the real elements of Y. Let V denote this four dimensional real vector space. 6

7 The tensor g AA BB = ɛ AB ɛ A B defines a multilinear map V V R and has a nondegenerate signature + by checking it on the basis. Now associate with each map L A B SL(, C) the map λ : V V defined by λ AA BB = LA A B L B. Since L A B preserves ɛ AB, it follows that λ AA BB preserves g AA BB. This means λaa BB is a Lorentz transformation on V. A more careful computation, e.g. in exponent form, yields that λ AA BB in fact belongs to the special orthogonal group on the Minkowski spacetime V. This gives an explicit universal covering map SL(, C) SO 1,3. Finally, we define the spinor field on the Minkowski spacetime to be simply a map of spacetime into spinor space W. Similary, a spinorial tensor field of a specified type is defined as a map of spacetime into the tensor space over W of that type. We define the representation of g ISL(, C), i.e., SL(, C) added with translations, on spinor fields via ψ A (x) L A B ψb [P 1 (x)] where L A B SL(, C) is the homogeneous part of g and P is the inhomogeneous Lorentz group (denoted ISO 1,3 ) element associated with g. This representation does not descends to a true representation of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group, thus a spin representation. One could see this by making the identification of the tangent space of the Minkowski spacetime with the space V defined earlier. Via the identification of the four spinorial tensor fields, t AA, x AA, y AA, z AA, of type (1, 0; 1, 0) constituting the basis of V with the basis of tangent space, we may consistently identify real spinorial tensor fields of type (1, 0; 1, 0) with vector fields, and more generally, spinorial tensor fields of type (k, l; k, l) with ordinary tensor fields of type (k, l). One realizes that the ISL(, C) representations of spinorial tensor fields of the type (k, l; k, l) descends to true representations of ISO 1,3 on ordinary tensor fields of type (k, l), but not for spinorial tensor fields of other types. 3. Irreducible unitary representation of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group and Bargmann-Wigner equations 3.1. Lie algebra structure of ISO 1,3, classification of representations via Casimir elements. Let g kl be the standard Minkowski metric tensor of signature +. The Lie algebra of ISO 1,3 is generated by p k and M kl, where p k is translation in the x k direction and M kl is a rotation in the (x k, x l ) plane with M kl = M lk. We record here the Lie bracket structures. Define [M kl, M mn ] = i(g lm M kn g km M ln + g kn M lm g ln M km ), [p k, p l ] = 0, [M kl, p m ] = i(g lm p k g km p l ). P = p k p k, W = 1 M klm kl p m p m M km M lm p k p l. One could compute to see that these two elements commutes with all M kl and p k, thus they are Casimir elements of the Lorentz group. Thus for every irreducible representation of ISO 1,3, it corresponds to an irreducible representation of iso 1,3, and the representatives of the Casimir elements are constant multiple of identity. Thus we may classify the representations according to the values of P = m as well as W = m S. Representations corresponding to all these cases are obtained by Bargmann and Wiger, and in particular for the cases m > 0 we have the realization of the representations on spinorial tensor fields on spacetime, which are generalizations of the Dirac equation. In the following exposition, we will sketch the construction of these spinorial tensor field equations, which corresponds to cases when m > 0, S = s(s + 1) and s = N, N a nonnegative integer. This corresponds to relativistic quantum particles of positive mass and N -spin. 3.. Bargmann-Wigner equations. As mentioned in the first paragraph of this section, to find a good candidate for the spinorial tensor field equation, one may try to set up an eigenvalue equation of the form P φ = m φ where φ is a spinorial tensor field, P = p k p k is one of the Casimir operators, m is a positive constant. To guess a possible form of P = p k p k, we could borrow some physical intuition, one being that the p k are momentum operators. One knows from basic quantum mechanics that the momentum operators are often 7

8 realized as differentiation, in fact, we define the momentum operator as multiplication by the frequency (which is the momentum) on the frequency space, thus on the physical space, they are differentiations. Thus p k p k may be realized as the Laplacian. We have ( x 1 + x + x 3 t )φ = m φ. Inheriting the notations from the last section, we could also rewrite it as AA AA φ = m φ. Now let φ be a spinor field of type (n = s, 0, 0, 0). The cases s = 0, 1, 1 correspond to the Klein-Gordon, Dirac, and Proca equations, respectively. From previous discussions, we see that s being a half integer corresponds to spinor representations while the integer s cases descend to true representations of the Lorentz group on ordinary tensor fields. For s > 0, the Bargmann-Wigner equation could also be expressed in the following form. Let the spinorial tensor field be φ A1 An A,,An. We define the auxiliary variable σ by A 1 A 1 φ A1 An then the Bargmann-Wigner equation becomes A 1 A1 σ A An A 1 A 1 = m σ A An A, 1 = m φ A1 An. From these coupled equations for the case n = 1, denoting the four components of φ A, σ A as ψ 0, ψ 1, ψ, ψ 3 respectively, one gets the more commonly known form of Dirac equation iγ µ µ ψ = mψ where γ µ are the matrix generators of the Clifford algebra Cl 1,3, which should be of little surprise. In fact, very real spin bundle is also a bundle of modules over the bundle of Clifford algebras, thus the Clifford acts on spinors naturally. Historically, Dirac discovered this equation by trying to take the square root of the Laplacian x 1 + x + x 3 t. One could generalize the notion of Dirac operator to be any first-order differential operator acting on a vector bundle (e.g. spinor bundle) with a Riemannian connection such that D =. For a famous example, for a spin manifold M, i.e. a manifold M with a spin structure, we could define the Atiyah-Singer- Dirac operator locally as follows: for x M and e 1 (x),, e n (x) a local orthonormal basis for the tangent space of M at x, the Atiyah-Singer-Dirac operator is n e j (x) Γ ej(x), j=1 where Γ is a lifting of the Levi-Civita connection on M to the spinor bundle over M, and denotes the Clifford algebra multiplication. We omit the process of equipping spinorial tensor fields a ISL(, C)-invariant inner product thus making the representations unitary. References [1] H. Blaine Lawson and JR. Marie-Louise Michelsohn, Spin Geometry, Princeton University Press, [] Robert M. Wald, General Relativity, The University of Chicago Press, [3] E. Wigner, On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group, Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, Vol.40, No 1, [4] V. Bargmann and E. P. Wigner, Group Theoretical Discussion of Relativistic Wave Equations, Princeton University, 1947 [5] Richard Borcheds, reb/courses/61/37.pdf, Lecture notes, UCB, 01. 8

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups Math G4344, Spring 2012 We ll now turn from the general theory to examine a specific class class of groups: the orthogonal groups. Recall that O(n, R) is the group of

More information

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

BRST and Dirac Cohomology BRST and Dirac Cohomology Peter Woit Columbia University Dartmouth Math Dept., October 23, 2008 Peter Woit (Columbia University) BRST and Dirac Cohomology October 2008 1 / 23 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Representation

More information

Lecture 11: Clifford algebras

Lecture 11: Clifford algebras Lecture 11: Clifford algebras In this lecture we introduce Clifford algebras, which will play an important role in the rest of the class. The link with K-theory is the Atiyah-Bott-Shapiro construction

More information

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop Eric Sommers 17 July 2009 2 Contents 1 Background 5 1.1 Linear algebra......................................... 5 1.1.1

More information

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) IVAN LOSEV In this lecture we will discuss the representation theory of the algebraic group SL 2 (F) and of the Lie algebra sl 2 (F), where F is

More information

A users guide to K-theory

A users guide to K-theory A users guide to K-theory K-theory Alexander Kahle alexander.kahle@rub.de Mathematics Department, Ruhr-Universtät Bochum Bonn-Cologne Intensive Week: Tools of Topology for Quantum Matter, July 2014 Outline

More information

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX USA Febuary, 2016 Recall Einstein s famous equation, E 2 = (Mc 2 ) 2 + (c p) 2, where c is the speed of light, M is the classical

More information

9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence

9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence 9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence 9.1. The functor Lie. The fundamental theorems of Lie concern the correspondence G Lie(G). The work of Lie was essentially local and led to the following fundamental

More information

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition

More information

something on spin structures sven-s. porst

something on spin structures sven-s. porst something on spin structures sven-s. porst spring 2001 abstract This will give a brief introduction to spin structures on vector bundles to pave the way for the definition and introduction of Dirac operators.

More information

Dirac Operator. Göttingen Mathematical Institute. Paul Baum Penn State 6 February, 2017

Dirac Operator. Göttingen Mathematical Institute. Paul Baum Penn State 6 February, 2017 Dirac Operator Göttingen Mathematical Institute Paul Baum Penn State 6 February, 2017 Five lectures: 1. Dirac operator 2. Atiyah-Singer revisited 3. What is K-homology? 4. The Riemann-Roch theorem 5. K-theory

More information

Representations Are Everywhere

Representations Are Everywhere Representations Are Everywhere Nanghua Xi Member of Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 What is Representation theory Representation is reappearance of some properties or structures of one object on another.

More information

The Spinor Representation

The Spinor Representation The Spinor Representation Math G4344, Spring 2012 As we have seen, the groups Spin(n) have a representation on R n given by identifying v R n as an element of the Clifford algebra C(n) and having g Spin(n)

More information

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg = Problem 1 Show that if π is an irreducible representation of a compact lie group G then π is also irreducible. Give an example of a G and π such that π = π, and another for which π π. Is this true for

More information

Fractional Index Theory

Fractional Index Theory Fractional Index Theory Index a ( + ) = Z Â(Z ) Q Workshop on Geometry and Lie Groups The University of Hong Kong Institute of Mathematical Research 26 March 2011 Mathai Varghese School of Mathematical

More information

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles Theorems Based on lectures by N. Dorey Notes taken by Dexter Chua Michaelmas 2016 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often

More information

Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups

Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups D. Testerman (with M. Liebeck and G. Seitz) EPF Lausanne Edinburgh, April 2016 D. Testerman (with M. Liebeck and G. Seitz) (EPF Lausanne) Multiplicity

More information

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory Nikolai Nowaczyk December 4, 2014 Abstract. The aim of this text is to give an overview of the Index Theorems by Atiyah and Singer. Our primary motivation is to understand

More information

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations. Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine Windsor, October 23, 2008 β ν 1 = ν 2 S α S β ν S β ν S α ν S α S β S α S β ν

More information

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that ALGEBRAIC GROUPS 61 5. Root systems and semisimple Lie algebras 5.1. Characteristic 0 theory. Assume in this subsection that chark = 0. Let me recall a couple of definitions made earlier: G is called reductive

More information

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) IVAN LOSEV Introduction We proceed to studying the representation theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras. Algebraic groups are the groups

More information

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 30A, Spring 007, Hitoshi Murayama 1 Poincaré Symmetry In order to understand the number of degrees of freedom we need

More information

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations

More information

Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture

Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture Nigel Higson, John Roe PSU NCGOA07 Nigel Higson, John Roe (PSU) Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture NCGOA07 1 / 15 History of the BC conjecture Lecture

More information

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1 Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1 1. Conformal change of Riemannian metrics [3 points] Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold. A conformal change is a nonnegative function λ : M (0, ). Such a function defines

More information

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2)

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2) MAT65 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU() (Notes for MAT80 taken by Shannon Starr, October 000) There are many references for representation theory in general, and

More information

The Dirac operator on quantum SU(2)

The Dirac operator on quantum SU(2) Rencontres mathématiques de Glanon 27 June - 2 July 2005 The Dirac operator on quantum SU(2) Walter van Suijlekom (SISSA) Ref: L. D abrowski, G. Landi, A. Sitarz, WvS and J. Várilly The Dirac operator

More information

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Math G4344, Spring 2012 We will now turn to the problem of classifying and constructing all finitedimensional representations of a complex semi-simple Lie algebra (or,

More information

Introduction to Group Theory

Introduction to Group Theory Chapter 10 Introduction to Group Theory Since symmetries described by groups play such an important role in modern physics, we will take a little time to introduce the basic structure (as seen by a physicist)

More information

Lecture 22 - F 4. April 19, The Weyl dimension formula gives the following dimensions of the fundamental representations:

Lecture 22 - F 4. April 19, The Weyl dimension formula gives the following dimensions of the fundamental representations: Lecture 22 - F 4 April 19, 2013 1 Review of what we know about F 4 We have two definitions of the Lie algebra f 4 at this point. The old definition is that it is the exceptional Lie algebra with Dynkin

More information

ERRATA FOR INTRODUCTION TO SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

ERRATA FOR INTRODUCTION TO SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY ERRATA FOR INTRODUCTION TO SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY DUSA MCDUFF AND DIETMAR A. SALAMON Abstract. These notes correct a few typos and errors in Introduction to Symplectic Topology (2nd edition, OUP 1998, reprinted

More information

(www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/harder/manuscripts/buch/), files chap2 to chap

(www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/harder/manuscripts/buch/), files chap2 to chap The basic objects in the cohomology theory of arithmetic groups Günter Harder This is an exposition of the basic notions and concepts which are needed to build up the cohomology theory of arithmetic groups

More information

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem 1 Fourier Analysis, a review We ll begin with a short review of simple facts about Fourier analysis, before going on to interpret

More information

CLIFFORD ALGEBRAS AND DIRAC OPERATORS

CLIFFORD ALGEBRAS AND DIRAC OPERATORS CLIFFORD ALGEBRAS AND DIRAC OPERATORS EFTON PARK 1 Algebras Definition 11 Let K be a field A ring R is a K-algebra if there exists a map : K R R that makes R into a K-vector space and has the property

More information

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES ASIAN J. MATH. c 2008 International Press Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 289 298, September 2008 002 ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES RAUL QUIROGA-BARRANCO Abstract.

More information

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS ANA BALIBANU DISCUSSED WITH PROFESSOR VICTOR GINZBURG 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to explore the geometry of a Lie algebra g through the action

More information

Donaldson and Seiberg-Witten theory and their relation to N = 2 SYM

Donaldson and Seiberg-Witten theory and their relation to N = 2 SYM Donaldson and Seiberg-Witten theory and their relation to N = SYM Brian Williams April 3, 013 We ve began to see what it means to twist a supersymmetric field theory. I will review Donaldson theory and

More information

(6) For any finite dimensional real inner product space V there is an involutive automorphism α : C (V) C (V) such that α(v) = v for all v V.

(6) For any finite dimensional real inner product space V there is an involutive automorphism α : C (V) C (V) such that α(v) = v for all v V. 1 Clifford algebras and Lie triple systems Section 1 Preliminaries Good general references for this section are [LM, chapter 1] and [FH, pp. 299-315]. We are especially indebted to D. Shapiro [S2] who

More information

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties Contents 1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties 1 1.1 Almost complex manifolds............................................ 1 1.2 Hermitian manifolds................................................

More information

Math 210C. The representation ring

Math 210C. The representation ring Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let

More information

Quantising noncompact Spin c -manifolds

Quantising noncompact Spin c -manifolds Quantising noncompact Spin c -manifolds Peter Hochs University of Adelaide Workshop on Positive Curvature and Index Theory National University of Singapore, 20 November 2014 Peter Hochs (UoA) Noncompact

More information

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Lecture 0: A (Brief) Introduction to Group heory (See Chapter 3.3 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Having gained some new experience with matrices, which provide us with representations of groups, and because symmetries

More information

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = a M T am, called the tangent bundle, is itself a smooth manifold, dim T M = 2n. Example 1.

More information

Representation Theory

Representation Theory Part II Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2018 Paper 1, Section II 19I 93 (a) Define the derived subgroup, G, of a finite group G. Show that if χ is a linear character

More information

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES NILAY KUMAR In these lectures I want to introduce the Chern-Weil approach to characteristic classes on manifolds, and in particular, the Chern classes.

More information

SYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS

SYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS 1 SYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS HUAJUN HUANG AND HONGYU HE Abstract. Let G be the group preserving a nondegenerate sesquilinear form B on a vector space V, and H a symmetric subgroup

More information

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES ANDREAS ČAP AND KARIN MELNICK Abstract. We use the general theory developed in our article [1] in the setting of parabolic

More information

Geometry of Dirac Operators

Geometry of Dirac Operators Geometry of Dirac Operators By Babak Beheshti Vadeqan A thesis submitted to the Graduate Program in Mathematics & Statistics in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Master Of Science Q ueen

More information

Quantum Physics and the Representation Theory of SU(2)

Quantum Physics and the Representation Theory of SU(2) Quantum Physics and the Representation Theory of SU(2 David Urbanik University of Waterloo Abstract. Over the past several decades, developments in Quantum Physics have provided motivation for research

More information

A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM

A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM MAN SHUN JOHN MA 1. Introduction In this short note, we prove the Borel-Weil-Bott theorem. Let g be a complex semisimple Lie algebra. One basic question in representation

More information

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP JAY TAYLOR 1 Examples of Lie Groups The following is adapted from [2] We begin with the basic definition and some core examples Definition A Lie group is a smooth

More information

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula 20 VASILY PESTUN 3. Lecture: Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer Index theorems 3.. Index for a holomorphic vector bundle. For a holomorphic vector bundle E over a complex variety of dim

More information

is an isomorphism, and V = U W. Proof. Let u 1,..., u m be a basis of U, and add linearly independent

is an isomorphism, and V = U W. Proof. Let u 1,..., u m be a basis of U, and add linearly independent Lecture 4. G-Modules PCMI Summer 2015 Undergraduate Lectures on Flag Varieties Lecture 4. The categories of G-modules, mostly for finite groups, and a recipe for finding every irreducible G-module of a

More information

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem PETER B. GILKEY Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem Second Edition CRC PRESS Boca Raton Ann Arbor London Tokyo Contents

More information

Atiyah-Singer Revisited

Atiyah-Singer Revisited Atiyah-Singer Revisited Paul Baum Penn State Texas A&M Universty College Station, Texas, USA April 1, 2014 From E 1, E 2,..., E n obtain : 1) The Dirac operator of R n D = n j=1 E j x j 2) The Bott generator

More information

OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS, CONFORMAL DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, AND THE BGG COMPLEX

OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS, CONFORMAL DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, AND THE BGG COMPLEX OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS, CONFORMAL DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, AND THE BGG COMPLEX ANDREAS ČAP Dedicated to the memory of Tom Branson Abstract. This is an expanded version of a series of two lectures given at

More information

Category O and its basic properties

Category O and its basic properties Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α

More information

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the

More information

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional

More information

LECTURE 2: SYMPLECTIC VECTOR BUNDLES

LECTURE 2: SYMPLECTIC VECTOR BUNDLES LECTURE 2: SYMPLECTIC VECTOR BUNDLES WEIMIN CHEN, UMASS, SPRING 07 1. Symplectic Vector Spaces Definition 1.1. A symplectic vector space is a pair (V, ω) where V is a finite dimensional vector space (over

More information

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS 1. Lie groups A Lie group is a special smooth manifold on which there is a group structure, and moreover, the two structures are compatible. Lie groups are

More information

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly.

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly. These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly. LIE GROUPS, LIE ALGEBRAS, AND REPRESENTATIONS SPRING SEMESTER 2008 RICHARD A. WENTWORTH Contents 1. Lie groups and Lie algebras 2 1.1. Definition

More information

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms. Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms. Basic Notions: Jerusalem, March 2010 Birgit Speh Cornell University 1 Let G be a group and V a vector space.

More information

Exercises Lie groups

Exercises Lie groups Exercises Lie groups E.P. van den Ban Spring 2009 Exercise 1. Let G be a group, equipped with the structure of a C -manifold. Let µ : G G G, (x, y) xy be the multiplication map. We assume that µ is smooth,

More information

Talk at Workshop Quantum Spacetime 16 Zakopane, Poland,

Talk at Workshop Quantum Spacetime 16 Zakopane, Poland, Talk at Workshop Quantum Spacetime 16 Zakopane, Poland, 7-11.02.2016 Invariant Differential Operators: Overview (Including Noncommutative Quantum Conformal Invariant Equations) V.K. Dobrev Invariant differential

More information

Discrete Series and Characters of the Component Group

Discrete Series and Characters of the Component Group Discrete Series and Characters of the Component Group Jeffrey Adams April 9, 2007 Suppose φ : W R L G is an L-homomorphism. There is a close relationship between the L-packet associated to φ and characters

More information

LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES

LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES DMYTRO MATVIEIEVSKYI Abstract. These are notes for a talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Graduate Student Seminar on category O and Soergel bimodules,

More information

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI 1. Maximal Tori By a torus we mean a compact connected abelian Lie group, so a torus is a Lie group that is isomorphic to T n = R n /Z n. Definition 1.1.

More information

Math 594. Solutions 5

Math 594. Solutions 5 Math 594. Solutions 5 Book problems 6.1: 7. Prove that subgroups and quotient groups of nilpotent groups are nilpotent (your proof should work for infinite groups). Give an example of a group G which possesses

More information

ROTATIONS, ROTATION PATHS, AND QUANTUM SPIN

ROTATIONS, ROTATION PATHS, AND QUANTUM SPIN ROTATIONS, ROTATION PATHS, AND QUANTUM SPIN MICHAEL THVEDT 1. ABSTRACT This paper describes the construction of the universal covering group Spin(n), n > 2, as a group of homotopy classes of paths starting

More information

TRANSLATION-INVARIANT FUNCTION ALGEBRAS ON COMPACT GROUPS

TRANSLATION-INVARIANT FUNCTION ALGEBRAS ON COMPACT GROUPS PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 15, No. 3, 1965 TRANSLATION-INVARIANT FUNCTION ALGEBRAS ON COMPACT GROUPS JOSEPH A. WOLF Let X be a compact group. $(X) denotes the Banach algebra (point multiplication,

More information

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero. Math 210C. The remarkable SU(2) Let G be a non-commutative connected compact Lie group, and assume that its rank (i.e., dimension of maximal tori) is 1; equivalently, G is a compact connected Lie group

More information

Group Theory - QMII 2017

Group Theory - QMII 2017 Group Theory - QMII 017 Reminder Last time we said that a group element of a matrix lie group can be written as an exponent: U = e iαaxa, a = 1,..., N. We called X a the generators, we have N of them,

More information

What is the Langlands program all about?

What is the Langlands program all about? What is the Langlands program all about? Laurent Lafforgue November 13, 2013 Hua Loo-Keng Distinguished Lecture Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences This talk is mainly

More information

Endoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group

Endoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group Endoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group Wen-Wei Li wwli@math.ac.cn Morningside Center of Mathematics January 17, 2012 EANTC The local case: recollections F : local field, char(f ) 2. ψ

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007 arxiv:0711.2128v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007 SUPPORT VARIETIES OF NON-RESTRICTED MODULES OVER LIE ALGEBRAS OF REDUCTIVE GROUPS: CORRIGENDA AND ADDENDA ALEXANDER PREMET J. C. Jantzen informed me that the proof

More information

SOME REMARKS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF QUATERNION DIVISION ALGEBRAS

SOME REMARKS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF QUATERNION DIVISION ALGEBRAS SOME REMARKS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF QUATERNION DIVISION ALGEBRAS DIPENDRA PRASAD Abstract. For the quaternion division algebra D over a non-archimedean local field k, and π an irreducible finite dimensional

More information

Topological K-theory

Topological K-theory Topological K-theory Robert Hines December 15, 2016 The idea of topological K-theory is that spaces can be distinguished by the vector bundles they support. Below we present the basic ideas and definitions

More information

Quasi Riemann surfaces II. Questions, comments, speculations

Quasi Riemann surfaces II. Questions, comments, speculations Quasi Riemann surfaces II. Questions, comments, speculations Daniel Friedan New High Energy Theory Center, Rutgers University and Natural Science Institute, The University of Iceland dfriedan@gmail.com

More information

Irreducible subgroups of algebraic groups

Irreducible subgroups of algebraic groups Irreducible subgroups of algebraic groups Martin W. Liebeck Department of Mathematics Imperial College London SW7 2BZ England Donna M. Testerman Department of Mathematics University of Lausanne Switzerland

More information

Introduction to Representations Theory of Lie Groups

Introduction to Representations Theory of Lie Groups Introduction to Representations Theory of Lie roups Raul omez October 14, 2009 Introduction The purpose of this notes is twofold. The first goal is to give a quick answer to the question What is representation

More information

GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS

GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS Wu-Ki Tung World Scientific Philadelphia Singapore CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 PREFACE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Particle on a One-Dimensional Lattice 1.2 Representations

More information

Vertex algebras generated by primary fields of low conformal weight

Vertex algebras generated by primary fields of low conformal weight Short talk Napoli, Italy June 27, 2003 Vertex algebras generated by primary fields of low conformal weight Alberto De Sole Slides available from http://www-math.mit.edu/ desole/ 1 There are several equivalent

More information

4.1 What is a manifold?

4.1 What is a manifold? Spin 2010 (jmf) 27 Lecture 4: Spin manifolds Thus, the existence of a spinor structure appears, on physical grounds, to be a reasonable condition to impose on any cosmological model in general relativity.

More information

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems (Courses in canonical gravity) Yaser Tavakoli December 15, 2014 1 Introduction In canonical formulation of general relativity, geometry of space-time is given

More information

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 6 Feb 1998

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 6 Feb 1998 Cartan Spinor Bundles on Manifolds. Thomas Friedrich, Berlin November 5, 013 arxiv:math/980033v1 [math.dg] 6 Feb 1998 1 Introduction. Spinor fields and Dirac operators on Riemannian manifolds M n can be

More information

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group

More information

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES 1. Vector Bundles In general, smooth manifolds are very non-linear. However, there exist many smooth manifolds which admit very nice partial linear structures.

More information

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2. 1. K-Theory of Topological Stacks, Ryan Grady, Notre Dame Throughout, G is sufficiently nice: simple, maybe π 1 is free, or perhaps it s even simply connected. Anyway, there are some assumptions lurking.

More information

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups Lecture 4 Super Lie groups In this lecture we want to take a closer look to supermanifolds with a group structure: Lie supergroups or super Lie groups. As in the ordinary setting, a super Lie group is

More information

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER 2017-8: MODERN ALGEBRA JAROD ALPER Week 1, Sept 27, 29: Introduction to Groups Lecture 1: Introduction to groups. Defined a group and discussed basic properties

More information

Physics 557 Lecture 5

Physics 557 Lecture 5 Physics 557 Lecture 5 Group heory: Since symmetries and the use of group theory is so much a part of recent progress in particle physics we will take a small detour to introduce the basic structure (as

More information

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries Comparison techniques for infinitesimal automorphisms of parabolic geometries University of Vienna Faculty of Mathematics Srni, January 2012 This talk reports on joint work in progress with Karin Melnick

More information

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N 74 16. Lecture 16: Springer Representations 16.1. The flag manifold. Let G = SL n (C). It acts transitively on the set F of complete flags 0 F 1 F n 1 C n and the stabilizer of the standard flag is the

More information

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions Symmetries, Fields and Particles 013 Solutions Yichen Shi Easter 014 1. (a) Define the groups SU() and SO(3), and find their Lie algebras. Show that these Lie algebras, including their bracket structure,

More information

Bundles of Irreducible Clifford Modules and the Existence of Spin Structures. A Dissertation presented. Xuan Chen. The Graduate School

Bundles of Irreducible Clifford Modules and the Existence of Spin Structures. A Dissertation presented. Xuan Chen. The Graduate School Bundles of Irreducible Clifford Modules and the Existence of Spin Structures A Dissertation presented by Xuan Chen to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor

More information

Math 396. An application of Gram-Schmidt to prove connectedness

Math 396. An application of Gram-Schmidt to prove connectedness Math 396. An application of Gram-Schmidt to prove connectedness 1. Motivation and background Let V be an n-dimensional vector space over R, and define GL(V ) to be the set of invertible linear maps V V

More information

EQUIVARIANT AND FRACTIONAL INDEX OF PROJECTIVE ELLIPTIC OPERATORS. V. Mathai, R.B. Melrose & I.M. Singer. Abstract

EQUIVARIANT AND FRACTIONAL INDEX OF PROJECTIVE ELLIPTIC OPERATORS. V. Mathai, R.B. Melrose & I.M. Singer. Abstract j. differential geometry x78 (2008) 465-473 EQUIVARIANT AND FRACTIONAL INDEX OF PROJECTIVE ELLIPTIC OPERATORS V. Mathai, R.B. Melrose & I.M. Singer Abstract In this note the fractional analytic index,

More information

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n) Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n) 1 Definition of Clifford Algebra A set of N Hermitian matrices γ 1, γ,..., γ N obeying the anti-commutator γ i, γ j } = δ ij I (1) is the basis for an algebra called

More information

Representation Theory

Representation Theory Representation Theory Representations Let G be a group and V a vector space over a field k. A representation of G on V is a group homomorphism ρ : G Aut(V ). The degree (or dimension) of ρ is just dim

More information