EXAMPLE CFG. L = {a 2n : n 1 } L = {a 2n : n 0 } S asa aa. L = {a n b : n 0 } L = {a n b : n 1 } S asb ab S 1S00 S 1S00 100

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "EXAMPLE CFG. L = {a 2n : n 1 } L = {a 2n : n 0 } S asa aa. L = {a n b : n 0 } L = {a n b : n 1 } S asb ab S 1S00 S 1S00 100"

Transcription

1 EXAMPLE CFG L = {a 2n : n 1 } L = {a 2n : n 0 } S asa aa S asa L = {a n b : n 0 } L = {a n b : n 1 } S as b S as ab L { a b : n 0} L { a b : n 1} S asb S asb ab n 2n n 2n L {1 0 : n 0} L {1 0 : n 1} S 1S00 S 1S L = { ww R : w { a, b}*} L = { ww R : w { a, b} } asa bsb S S asa bsb aa bb n m k L { a b c : n 0, m 0, k 0} C A aa B bb C cc L { a b : n 0} { b a : n 0} S S S S S as b 1 bs 2 2 a L { a b b : n 0} S Ab L = { a n b n c k : n, k 0 } S AC C cc L = {a n b n c i : n 1, i 0} A aab ab B cb

2 L = {a j b n c n : n 1, j 0} A aa B bbc bc L = {a n b n+m c m n, m 0} L = {a n b n+m c m n, m 1} A aab ab B bbc B bbc bc L = {a n ba n : n 0} S asa B B b L = {a n b m c n : n, m 0} L = {a n b m c n : n, m 1} S asc A S asc aac A ba A ba b L { ab cd f : n 0} S aaf A bad c L={a i b j c k d l a l b k c j d i i, j, k, l 0} S asd A A bac B B cbb C C dca L = {a n b m c 2n+m : n, m > 0} Here a n b m c 2n+m = a n b m c m c 2n S ascc A A bac bc L = { (ab} i (cd )j (ba) j (dc) i i, j 0 } S absdc A A cdaba L = {a n b m a m b n : n, m 0} S asb A A baa L = {a n b m a m b n : n, m 1} S asb aab A baa ba

3 R L = { wc * w : w { a, b}*} S C asa bsb C Cc L = {a i b j c k i = j+k } a i b j c k = a j+k b j c k = a k a j b j c k S asc A L = {a i b j c k j = i+k } a i b j c k = a i b i+k c k = a i b i b k c k B bac L = {a i b j c k k = i+j } a i b j c k = a i b j c i+j = a i b j c j c i S asc A A bac L = {a i b j c k j=i or j=k} Here the language is union of two language L 1 = {a i b j c k j=i} and L 2 = {a i b j c k j=k} L 1 = {a i b j c k j=i} a i b j c k = a i b i c k A CD D cd L 1 = {a i b j c k j=k} a i b j c k = a i b k c k B EF E ae F bfc The grammar for L is S A B A CD D cd B EF E ae F bfc L = {a i b j c k i=j or i=k} Here the language is union of two language L 1 = {a i b j c k i=j} and L 2 = {a i b j c k i=k}

4 L 1 = {a i b j c k i=j} a i b j c k = a j b j c k A CD D cd L 1 = {a i b j c k i=k} a i b j c k = a k b j c k B abc E E be The grammar for L is S A B A CD D cd B abc E E be L = {a i b j c k k=i or k=j} Here the language is union of two language L 1 = {a i b j c k k=i } and L 2 = {a i b j c k k=j } L 1 = {a i b j c k k=i } a i b j c k = a i b j c i A aac C C bc L 1 = {a i b j c k k=j} a i b j c k = a i b j c j B EF E ae F bfc The grammar for L is S A B A aac C C bc B EF E ae F bfc L = {0 i 1 j 0 k j > i+k, i. k 0} Let j = i+k+m where m > 0 0 i 1 j 0 k = 0 i 1 i+m+k 0 k = 0 i 1 i 1 m 1 k 0 k L = L 1 L 2 L 3 L 1 = {0 i 1 i : i 0 } L 2 = {1 m : m > 0 } L 3 = {1 k 0 k : k 0 } C A 0A1 B 1B 1 C 1C0

5 L = {a i b j c k i < j or i> k} Here the language is union of two language L 1 = {a i b j c k i<j} and L 2 = {a i b j c k i>k} L 1 = {a i b j c k i < j} Let j = i+m where m 1 a i b j c k = a i b i+m c i = a i b i b m c k A CDE D bd b E ce L 1 = {a i b j c k i>k } Let i= k+m where where m 1 a i b j c k = a k+m b j c k = a m a k b j c k B FG F af a G agc H H bh The grammar is S A B A CDE D bd b E ce B FG F af a G agc H H bh L = {a n b m 2n m 3n} S asbb asbbb L = {a n b m : n 2, m 3} S asb as Sb aabbb i j L { a b : i j} S X Y ( L = L(x) L(y)) X axb ax a ( L(x)= { a i b j ; i>j }) Y ayb Yb b ( L(y)= { a i b j ; i<j }) m n L { 0 1 : m n, n, m 1} S 0A1 0B1 A 0A1 0A 0 B 0B1 1B 1 n m L { a b : m n, m, n 1} S asb aa bb a b A aa a B bb b n m p L { a b c : n m p} S Sc asc Ac aac A Ab aab

6 L = { a n b m : n m+3 } S asb A B A a aa aaa B bb L = { a n b m : n m-1 } S asb A B A aa B bb bb L = {0 n 1 m 0 n : n+m 2} case I: case II: case III: n a = n b in L 3 n a - n b 0 in L n a < n b in L Here L is union of 111*, 011*0 and L= {0 n 1*0 n : n 1} S S 1 S 2 S 3 S 1 1 S 1 11 A 1A S 2 01A0 S 3 0 S 3 0 0A0 The set of all string over alphabet {a,b} with exactly twice as many a s as b s S SaSbSaS SaSaSbS SbSaSaS The set of all string over alphabet {a,b} not of the form WW for some string W. S aba bab as bs A ba b B ab a The set of all string over alphabet {0,1} with at least three 1s S A1A1A1A A 0A 1A 0 1 The set of all string over alphabet {0,1} which starts and ends with same symbol S 0A0 1A1 A 0A 1A 0 1 The set of all string over alphabet {0,1} which length is odd RE = ((0+1) (0+1))*(0+1) The grammar is S CA A 0 1 (RE : (0+1) ) B AA (RE : (0+1)(0+1)) C BC (RE: ((0+1)(0+1))*) The set of odd length strings in {a,b}* with middle symbol a. S asa bsb asb bsa a

7 The set of even length strings in {a,b}* with two middle symbols equal S asa bsb asb bsa aa bb The set of odd length strings in {a,b}* whose first, middle and last symbols are all the same. S aaa bbb A aaa bab aab baa a B aba bbb abb bba b Construct grammar which generates all integers S DS D D Construct grammar which generates all even integers up to 998 S AS 1 AAS 1 A S L = { a i b j c k d l i+k=j+l } S asd ABC A aab B bbc C ccd L = { a i b j c k d l i+j=k+l } S asd B C B abc A C bcd A A bac A represent {b j c j j > 0} B represent {a i b j c k i+j = k & i,j,k > 0} a i b j c j c i C represent {b j c k d l k+l=j & i,j,k > 0} b l b k c k d l L = {a i b j c k : i j or i k or j k } Here given language is union of following three languages L = {a i b j c k : i j, k 0 } {a i b j c k : i k, j 0 } {a i b j c k : j k, i 0 } The first language {a i b j c k : i j, k 0 } is the concatenation of {a i b j : i j } with {c k : k 0 } S 1 S 11 S 12 S 11 X Y ( L = L(x) L(y)) X axb ax a ( L(x)= { a i b j ; i>j }) Y ayb Yb b ( L(y)= { a i b j ; i<j }) S 12 cs 12

8 The third language {a i b j c k : j k, k 0 } is the concatenation of {a i : i 0 } with {b j c k : j k } S 3 S 31 S 32 S 31 as 31 S 32 W Z ( L = L(w) L(z)) W bwc bw b ( L(w)= { b j c k ; j>k }) Z bzc Zc c ( L(z)= { b j c k j<k}) The second language {a i b j c k : i k, j 0 }, may be written as: L 1 L 2 L 2 L 3 where L 1 = {a n : n 1}, L 2 = {a n b m c n : n, m 0 }, and L 3 = {c n : n 1}. S 2 S 21 S 22 S 21 AB A aa a B abc B B bb S 22 BC C cc c The CFG of the language {a i b j c k : i j, k 0 } {a i b j c k : i k, j 0 } {a i b j c k : j k, i 0 } is S S 1 S 2 S 3 S 1 S 11 S 12 S 11 X Y ( L = L(x) L(y)) X axb ax a ( L(x)= { a i b j ; i>j }) Y ayb Yb b ( L(y)= { a i b j ; i<j }) S 12 cs 12 S 2 S 21 S 22 S 21 AB A aa a B abc B B bb S 22 BC C cc c S 3 S 31 S 32 S 31 as 31 S 32 W Z ( L = L(w) L(z)) W bwc bw b ( L(w)= { b j c k ; j>k }) Z bzc Zc c ( L(z)= { b j c k j<k})

5.A Examples of Context-Free Grammars 3.1 and 3.2 of Du & Ko s book(pp )

5.A Examples of Context-Free Grammars 3.1 and 3.2 of Du & Ko s book(pp ) 5.A Examples of Context-Free Grammars 3.1 and 3.2 of Du & Ko s book(pp. 91-108) Example 3.1 Consider S ε asb. What is L(S)? Solution S asb aasbb a n Sb n a n b n. L(S) = {a n b n n 0} Example 3.2 Consider

More information

Lecture 12 Simplification of Context-Free Grammars and Normal Forms

Lecture 12 Simplification of Context-Free Grammars and Normal Forms Lecture 12 Simplification of Context-Free Grammars and Normal Forms COT 4420 Theory of Computation Chapter 6 Normal Forms for CFGs 1. Chomsky Normal Form CNF Productions of form A BC A, B, C V A a a T

More information

Theory of Computation - Module 3

Theory of Computation - Module 3 Theory of Computation - Module 3 Syllabus Context Free Grammar Simplification of CFG- Normal forms-chomsky Normal form and Greibach Normal formpumping lemma for Context free languages- Applications of

More information

TAFL 1 (ECS-403) Unit- III. 3.1 Definition of CFG (Context Free Grammar) and problems. 3.2 Derivation. 3.3 Ambiguity in Grammar

TAFL 1 (ECS-403) Unit- III. 3.1 Definition of CFG (Context Free Grammar) and problems. 3.2 Derivation. 3.3 Ambiguity in Grammar TAFL 1 (ECS-403) Unit- III 3.1 Definition of CFG (Context Free Grammar) and problems 3.2 Derivation 3.3 Ambiguity in Grammar 3.3.1 Inherent Ambiguity 3.3.2 Ambiguous to Unambiguous CFG 3.4 Simplification

More information

Automata Theory CS F-08 Context-Free Grammars

Automata Theory CS F-08 Context-Free Grammars Automata Theory CS411-2015F-08 Context-Free Grammars David Galles Department of Computer Science University of San Francisco 08-0: Context-Free Grammars Set of Terminals (Σ) Set of Non-Terminals Set of

More information

Concordia University Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering

Concordia University Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering Concordia University Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering COMP 335/4 Theoretical Computer Science Winter 2015 Assignment 3 1. In each case, what language is generated by CFG s below. Justify

More information

Homework 4 Solutions. 2. Find context-free grammars for the language L = {a n b m c k : k n + m}. (with n 0,

Homework 4 Solutions. 2. Find context-free grammars for the language L = {a n b m c k : k n + m}. (with n 0, Introduction to Formal Language, Fall 2016 Due: 21-Apr-2016 (Thursday) Instructor: Prof. Wen-Guey Tzeng Homework 4 Solutions Scribe: Yi-Ruei Chen 1. Find context-free grammars for the language L = {a n

More information

Problem Session 5 (CFGs) Talk about the building blocks of CFGs: S 0S 1S ε - everything. S 0S0 1S1 A - waw R. S 0S0 0S1 1S0 1S1 A - xay, where x = y.

Problem Session 5 (CFGs) Talk about the building blocks of CFGs: S 0S 1S ε - everything. S 0S0 1S1 A - waw R. S 0S0 0S1 1S0 1S1 A - xay, where x = y. CSE2001, Fall 2006 1 Problem Session 5 (CFGs) Talk about the building blocks of CFGs: S 0S 1S ε - everything. S 0S0 1S1 A - waw R. S 0S0 0S1 1S0 1S1 A - xay, where x = y. S 00S1 A - xay, where x = 2 y.

More information

CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing

CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing Fuhua (Frank) Cheng Department of Computer Science University of Kentucky 1 Table of Contents: Week 1: Preliminaries (set algebra, relations, functions) (read Chapters

More information

Theory of Computer Science

Theory of Computer Science Theory of Computer Science C1. Formal Languages and Grammars Malte Helmert University of Basel March 14, 2016 Introduction Example: Propositional Formulas from the logic part: Definition (Syntax of Propositional

More information

Recitation 4: Converting Grammars to Chomsky Normal Form, Simulation of Context Free Languages with Push-Down Automata, Semirings

Recitation 4: Converting Grammars to Chomsky Normal Form, Simulation of Context Free Languages with Push-Down Automata, Semirings Recitation 4: Converting Grammars to Chomsky Normal Form, Simulation of Context Free Languages with Push-Down Automata, Semirings 11-711: Algorithms for NLP October 10, 2014 Conversion to CNF Example grammar

More information

download instant at Assume that (w R ) R = w for all strings w Σ of length n or less.

download instant at  Assume that (w R ) R = w for all strings w Σ of length n or less. Chapter 2 Languages 3. We prove, by induction on the length of the string, that w = (w R ) R for every string w Σ. Basis: The basis consists of the null string. In this case, (λ R ) R = (λ) R = λ as desired.

More information

Simplification of CFG and Normal Forms. Wen-Guey Tzeng Computer Science Department National Chiao Tung University

Simplification of CFG and Normal Forms. Wen-Guey Tzeng Computer Science Department National Chiao Tung University Simplification of CFG and Normal Forms Wen-Guey Tzeng Computer Science Department National Chiao Tung University Normal Forms We want a cfg with either Chomsky or Greibach normal form Chomsky normal form

More information

Simplification of CFG and Normal Forms. Wen-Guey Tzeng Computer Science Department National Chiao Tung University

Simplification of CFG and Normal Forms. Wen-Guey Tzeng Computer Science Department National Chiao Tung University Simplification of CFG and Normal Forms Wen-Guey Tzeng Computer Science Department National Chiao Tung University Normal Forms We want a cfg with either Chomsky or Greibach normal form Chomsky normal form

More information

CS 133 : Automata Theory and Computability

CS 133 : Automata Theory and Computability CS 133 : Automata Theory and Computability Lecture Slides 1 Regular Languages and Finite Automata Nestine Hope S. Hernandez Algorithms and Complexity Laboratory Department of Computer Science University

More information

ÖVNINGSUPPGIFTER I SAMMANHANGSFRIA SPRÅK. 17 april Classrum Edition

ÖVNINGSUPPGIFTER I SAMMANHANGSFRIA SPRÅK. 17 april Classrum Edition ÖVNINGSUPPGIFTER I SAMMANHANGSFRIA SPRÅK 7 april 23 Classrum Edition CONTEXT FREE LANGUAGES & PUSH-DOWN AUTOMATA CONTEXT-FREE GRAMMARS, CFG Problems Sudkamp Problem. (3.2.) Which language generates the

More information

Theory of Computation

Theory of Computation Fall 2002 (YEN) Theory of Computation Midterm Exam. Name:... I.D.#:... 1. (30 pts) True or false (mark O for true ; X for false ). (Score=Max{0, Right- 1 2 Wrong}.) (1) X... If L 1 is regular and L 2 L

More information

CS A Term 2009: Foundations of Computer Science. Homework 2. By Li Feng, Shweta Srivastava, and Carolina Ruiz.

CS A Term 2009: Foundations of Computer Science. Homework 2. By Li Feng, Shweta Srivastava, and Carolina Ruiz. CS3133 - A Term 2009: Foundations of Computer Science Prof. Carolina Ruiz Homework 2 WPI By Li Feng, Shweta Srivastava, and Carolina Ruiz Chapter 4 Problem 1: (10 Points) Exercise 4.3 Solution 1: S is

More information

CFG Simplification. (simplify) 1. Eliminate useless symbols 2. Eliminate -productions 3. Eliminate unit productions

CFG Simplification. (simplify) 1. Eliminate useless symbols 2. Eliminate -productions 3. Eliminate unit productions CFG Simplification (simplify) 1. Eliminate useless symbols 2. Eliminate -productions 3. Eliminate unit productions 1 Eliminating useless symbols 1. A symbol X is generating if there exists: X * w, for

More information

HW 3 Solutions. Tommy November 27, 2012

HW 3 Solutions. Tommy November 27, 2012 HW 3 Solutions Tommy November 27, 2012 5.1.1 (a) Online solution: S 0S1 ɛ. (b) Similar to online solution: S AY XC A aa ɛ b ɛ C cc ɛ X axb aa b Y by c b cc (c) S X A A A V AV a V V b V a b X V V X V (d)

More information

C1.1 Introduction. Theory of Computer Science. Theory of Computer Science. C1.1 Introduction. C1.2 Alphabets and Formal Languages. C1.

C1.1 Introduction. Theory of Computer Science. Theory of Computer Science. C1.1 Introduction. C1.2 Alphabets and Formal Languages. C1. Theory of Computer Science March 20, 2017 C1. Formal Languages and Grammars Theory of Computer Science C1. Formal Languages and Grammars Malte Helmert University of Basel March 20, 2017 C1.1 Introduction

More information

CSEP 590 Data Compression Autumn Arithmetic Coding

CSEP 590 Data Compression Autumn Arithmetic Coding CSEP 590 Data Compression Autumn 2007 Arithmetic Coding Reals in Binary Any real number x in the interval [0,1) can be represented in binary as.b 1 b 2... where b i is a bit. x 0 0 1 0 1... binary representation

More information

Sheet 1-8 Dr. Mostafa Aref Format By : Mostafa Sayed

Sheet 1-8 Dr. Mostafa Aref Format By : Mostafa Sayed Sheet -8 Dr. Mostafa Aref Format By : Mostafa Sayed 09 Introduction Assignment. For = {a, } a) Write 0 strings of the following languages i) All strings with no more than one a,,, a, a, a, a, a, a, a ii)

More information

Solutions to Problem Set 3

Solutions to Problem Set 3 V22.0453-001 Theory of Computation October 8, 2003 TA: Nelly Fazio Solutions to Problem Set 3 Problem 1 We have seen that a grammar where all productions are of the form: A ab, A c (where A, B non-terminals,

More information

SFWR ENG 2FA3. Solution to the Assignment #4

SFWR ENG 2FA3. Solution to the Assignment #4 SFWR ENG 2FA3. Solution to the Assignment #4 Total = 131, 100%= 115 The solutions below are often very detailed on purpose. Such level of details is not required from students solutions. Some questions

More information

A Universal Turing Machine

A Universal Turing Machine A Universal Turing Machine A limitation of Turing Machines: Turing Machines are hardwired they execute only one program Real Computers are re-programmable Solution: Universal Turing Machine Attributes:

More information

Automata Theory Final Exam Solution 08:10-10:00 am Friday, June 13, 2008

Automata Theory Final Exam Solution 08:10-10:00 am Friday, June 13, 2008 Automata Theory Final Exam Solution 08:10-10:00 am Friday, June 13, 2008 Name: ID #: This is a Close Book examination. Only an A4 cheating sheet belonging to you is acceptable. You can write your answers

More information

Section 1 (closed-book) Total points 30

Section 1 (closed-book) Total points 30 CS 454 Theory of Computation Fall 2011 Section 1 (closed-book) Total points 30 1. Which of the following are true? (a) a PDA can always be converted to an equivalent PDA that at each step pops or pushes

More information

VTU QUESTION BANK. Unit 1. Introduction to Finite Automata. 1. Obtain DFAs to accept strings of a s and b s having exactly one a.

VTU QUESTION BANK. Unit 1. Introduction to Finite Automata. 1. Obtain DFAs to accept strings of a s and b s having exactly one a. VTU QUESTION BANK Unit 1 Introduction to Finite Automata 1. Obtain DFAs to accept strings of a s and b s having exactly one a.(5m )( Dec-2014) 2. Obtain a DFA to accept strings of a s and b s having even

More information

Solution. S ABc Ab c Bc Ac b A ABa Ba Aa a B Bbc bc.

Solution. S ABc Ab c Bc Ac b A ABa Ba Aa a B Bbc bc. Section 12.4 Context-Free Language Topics Algorithm. Remove Λ-productions from grammars for langauges without Λ. 1. Find nonterminals that derive Λ. 2. For each production A w construct all productions

More information

CSCI 340: Computational Models. Regular Expressions. Department of Computer Science

CSCI 340: Computational Models. Regular Expressions. Department of Computer Science CSCI 340: Computational Models Regular Expressions Chapter 4 Department of Computer Science Yet Another New Method for Defining Languages Given the Language: L 1 = {x n for n = 1 2 3...} We could easily

More information

INTRO TO I & CT. (Boolean Algebra and Logic Simplification.) Lecture # By: Department of CS & IT.

INTRO TO I & CT. (Boolean Algebra and Logic Simplification.) Lecture # By: Department of CS & IT. INTRO TO I & CT. (Boolean Algebra and Logic Simplification.) Lecture # 13-14 By: M.Nadeem Akhtar. Department of CS & IT. URL: https://sites.google.com/site/nadeemcsuoliict/home/lectures 1 Boolean Algebra

More information

COSE212: Programming Languages. Lecture 1 Inductive Definitions (1)

COSE212: Programming Languages. Lecture 1 Inductive Definitions (1) COSE212: Programming Languages Lecture 1 Inductive Definitions (1) Hakjoo Oh 2017 Fall Hakjoo Oh COSE212 2017 Fall, Lecture 1 September 4, 2017 1 / 9 Inductive Definitions Inductive definition (induction)

More information

Lecture 11 Context-Free Languages

Lecture 11 Context-Free Languages Lecture 11 Context-Free Languages COT 4420 Theory of Computation Chapter 5 Context-Free Languages n { a b : n n { ww } 0} R Regular Languages a *b* ( a + b) * Example 1 G = ({S}, {a, b}, S, P) Derivations:

More information

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING DUNDIGAL 500 043, HYDERABAD COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BANK Course Name : FORMAL LANGUAGES AND AUTOMATA THEORY Course Code : A40509 Class :

More information

REGular and Context-Free Grammars

REGular and Context-Free Grammars REGular and Context-Free Grammars Nicholas Mainardi 1 Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione Politecnico di Milano nicholas.mainardi@polimi.it March 26, 2018 1 Partly Based on Alessandro Barenghi s

More information

FABER Formal Languages, Automata. Lecture 2. Mälardalen University

FABER Formal Languages, Automata. Lecture 2. Mälardalen University CD5560 FABER Formal Languages, Automata and Models of Computation Lecture 2 Mälardalen University 2010 1 Content Languages, g Alphabets and Strings Strings & String Operations Languages & Language Operations

More information

Semigroup presentations via boundaries in Cayley graphs 1

Semigroup presentations via boundaries in Cayley graphs 1 Semigroup presentations via boundaries in Cayley graphs 1 Robert Gray University of Leeds BMC, Newcastle 2006 1 (Research conducted while I was a research student at the University of St Andrews, under

More information

Definition: A grammar G = (V, T, P,S) is a context free grammar (cfg) if all productions in P have the form A x where

Definition: A grammar G = (V, T, P,S) is a context free grammar (cfg) if all productions in P have the form A x where Recitation 11 Notes Context Free Grammars Definition: A grammar G = (V, T, P,S) is a context free grammar (cfg) if all productions in P have the form A x A V, and x (V T)*. Examples Problem 1. Given the

More information

Properties of Context Free Languages

Properties of Context Free Languages 1 Properties of Context Free Languages Pallab Dasgupta, Professor, Dept. of Computer Sc & Engg 2 Theorem: CFLs are closed under concatenation If L 1 and L 2 are CFLs, then L 1 L 2 is a CFL. Proof: 1. Let

More information

CS375 Midterm Exam Solution Set (Fall 2017)

CS375 Midterm Exam Solution Set (Fall 2017) CS375 Midterm Exam Solution Set (Fall 2017) Closed book & closed notes October 17, 2017 Name sample 1. (10 points) (a) Put in the following blank the number of strings of length 5 over A={a, b, c} that

More information

COSE212: Programming Languages. Lecture 1 Inductive Definitions (1)

COSE212: Programming Languages. Lecture 1 Inductive Definitions (1) COSE212: Programming Languages Lecture 1 Inductive Definitions (1) Hakjoo Oh 2018 Fall Hakjoo Oh COSE212 2018 Fall, Lecture 1 September 5, 2018 1 / 10 Inductive Definitions Inductive definition (induction)

More information

Author: Vivek Kulkarni ( )

Author: Vivek Kulkarni ( ) Author: Vivek Kulkarni ( vivek_kulkarni@yahoo.com ) Chapter-3: Regular Expressions Solutions for Review Questions @ Oxford University Press 2013. All rights reserved. 1 Q.1 Define the following and give

More information

1 Alphabets and Languages

1 Alphabets and Languages 1 Alphabets and Languages Look at handout 1 (inference rules for sets) and use the rules on some examples like {a} {{a}} {a} {a, b}, {a} {{a}}, {a} {{a}}, {a} {a, b}, a {{a}}, a {a, b}, a {{a}}, a {a,

More information

Linear conjunctive languages are closed under complement

Linear conjunctive languages are closed under complement Linear conjunctive languages are closed under complement Alexander Okhotin okhotin@cs.queensu.ca Technical report 2002-455 Department of Computing and Information Science, Queen s University, Kingston,

More information

A B CDE F B FD D A C AF DC A F

A B CDE F B FD D A C AF DC A F International Journal of Arts & Sciences, CD-ROM. ISSN: 1944-6934 :: 4(20):121 131 (2011) Copyright c 2011 by InternationalJournal.org A B CDE F B FD D A C A BC D EF C CE C A D ABC DEF B B C A E E C A

More information

CPSC 313 Introduction to Computability

CPSC 313 Introduction to Computability CPSC 313 Introduction to Computability Grammars in Chomsky Normal Form (Cont d) (Sipser, pages 109-111 (3 rd ed) and 107-109 (2 nd ed)) Renate Scheidler Fall 2018 Chomsky Normal Form A context-free grammar

More information

AC68 FINITE AUTOMATA & FORMULA LANGUAGES JUNE 2014

AC68 FINITE AUTOMATA & FORMULA LANGUAGES JUNE 2014 Q.2 a. Show by using Mathematical Induction that n i= 1 i 2 n = ( n + 1) ( 2 n + 1) 6 b. Define language. Let = {0; 1} denote an alphabet. Enumerate five elements of the following languages: (i) Even binary

More information

Homework 4. Chapter 7. CS A Term 2009: Foundations of Computer Science. By Li Feng, Shweta Srivastava, and Carolina Ruiz

Homework 4. Chapter 7. CS A Term 2009: Foundations of Computer Science. By Li Feng, Shweta Srivastava, and Carolina Ruiz CS3133 - A Term 2009: Foundations of Computer Science Prof. Carolina Ruiz Homework 4 WPI By Li Feng, Shweta Srivastava, and Carolina Ruiz Chapter 7 Problem: Chap 7.1 part a This PDA accepts the language

More information

Please give details of your answer. A direct answer without explanation is not counted.

Please give details of your answer. A direct answer without explanation is not counted. Please give details of your answer. A direct answer without explanation is not counted. Your answers must be in English. Please carefully read problem statements. During the exam you are not allowed to

More information

Theory of Computation

Theory of Computation Theory of Computation Lecture #2 Sarmad Abbasi Virtual University Sarmad Abbasi (Virtual University) Theory of Computation 1 / 1 Lecture 2: Overview Recall some basic definitions from Automata Theory.

More information

Harvard CS 121 and CSCI E-207 Lecture 10: CFLs: PDAs, Closure Properties, and Non-CFLs

Harvard CS 121 and CSCI E-207 Lecture 10: CFLs: PDAs, Closure Properties, and Non-CFLs Harvard CS 121 and CSCI E-207 Lecture 10: CFLs: PDAs, Closure Properties, and Non-CFLs Harry Lewis October 8, 2013 Reading: Sipser, pp. 119-128. Pushdown Automata (review) Pushdown Automata = Finite automaton

More information

cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska

cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska LECTURE 11 CHAPTER 3 CONTEXT-FREE LANGUAGES 1. Context Free Grammars 2. Pushdown Automata 3. Pushdown automata and context -free

More information

Context-Free Grammars: Normal Forms

Context-Free Grammars: Normal Forms Context-Free Grammars: Normal Forms Seungjin Choi Department of Computer Science and Engineering Pohang University of Science and Technology 77 Cheongam-ro, Nam-gu, Pohang 37673, Korea seungjin@postech.ac.kr

More information

Note: In any grammar here, the meaning and usage of P (productions) is equivalent to R (rules).

Note: In any grammar here, the meaning and usage of P (productions) is equivalent to R (rules). Note: In any grammar here, the meaning and usage of P (productions) is equivalent to R (rules). 1a) G = ({R, S, T}, {0,1}, P, S) where P is: S R0R R R0R1R R1R0R T T 0T ε (S generates the first 0. R generates

More information

60-354, Theory of Computation Fall Asish Mukhopadhyay School of Computer Science University of Windsor

60-354, Theory of Computation Fall Asish Mukhopadhyay School of Computer Science University of Windsor 60-354, Theory of Computation Fall 2013 Asish Mukhopadhyay School of Computer Science University of Windsor Pushdown Automata (PDA) PDA = ε-nfa + stack Acceptance ε-nfa enters a final state or Stack is

More information

CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages

CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages Regular Expressions and Finite Automata CMSC 330 Spring 2017 1 How do regular expressions work? What we ve learned What regular expressions are What they

More information

Harvard CS121 and CSCI E-121 Lecture 2: Mathematical Preliminaries

Harvard CS121 and CSCI E-121 Lecture 2: Mathematical Preliminaries Harvard CS121 and CSCI E-121 Lecture 2: Mathematical Preliminaries Harry Lewis September 5, 2013 Reading: Sipser, Chapter 0 Sets Sets are defined by their members A = B means that for every x, x A iff

More information

Talen en Compilers. Johan Jeuring , period 2. October 29, Department of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University

Talen en Compilers. Johan Jeuring , period 2. October 29, Department of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University Talen en Compilers 2015-2016, period 2 Johan Jeuring Department of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University October 29, 2015 12. LL parsing 12-1 This lecture LL parsing Motivation Stack-based

More information

AC68 FINITE AUTOMATA & FORMULA LANGUAGES DEC 2013

AC68 FINITE AUTOMATA & FORMULA LANGUAGES DEC 2013 Q.2 a. Prove by mathematical induction n 4 4n 2 is divisible by 3 for n 0. Basic step: For n = 0, n 3 n = 0 which is divisible by 3. Induction hypothesis: Let p(n) = n 3 n is divisible by 3. Induction

More information

Chapter 1. Introduction

Chapter 1. Introduction Chapter Introduction.0 BASICS.0. Sets A set is a collection of objects. For example, the collection of four letters a, b, c and d is a set, which is written as L ={a, b, c, d } The objects comprising a

More information

(b) If G=({S}, {a}, {S SS}, S) find the language generated by G. [8+8] 2. Convert the following grammar to Greibach Normal Form G = ({A1, A2, A3},

(b) If G=({S}, {a}, {S SS}, S) find the language generated by G. [8+8] 2. Convert the following grammar to Greibach Normal Form G = ({A1, A2, A3}, Code No: 07A50501 R07 Set No. 2 III B.Tech I Semester Examinations,MAY 2011 FORMAL LANGUAGES AND AUTOMATA THEORY Computer Science And Engineering Time: 3 hours Max Marks: 80 Answer any FIVE Questions All

More information

Part 4 out of 5 DFA NFA REX. Automata & languages. A primer on the Theory of Computation. Last week, we showed the equivalence of DFA, NFA and REX

Part 4 out of 5 DFA NFA REX. Automata & languages. A primer on the Theory of Computation. Last week, we showed the equivalence of DFA, NFA and REX Automata & languages A primer on the Theory of Computation Laurent Vanbever www.vanbever.eu Part 4 out of 5 ETH Zürich (D-ITET) October, 12 2017 Last week, we showed the equivalence of DFA, NFA and REX

More information

Context Free Languages. Automata Theory and Formal Grammars: Lecture 6. Languages That Are Not Regular. Non-Regular Languages

Context Free Languages. Automata Theory and Formal Grammars: Lecture 6. Languages That Are Not Regular. Non-Regular Languages Context Free Languages Automata Theory and Formal Grammars: Lecture 6 Context Free Languages Last Time Decision procedures for FAs Minimum-state DFAs Today The Myhill-Nerode Theorem The Pumping Lemma Context-free

More information

Theory of Computation Turing Machine and Pushdown Automata

Theory of Computation Turing Machine and Pushdown Automata Theory of Computation Turing Machine and Pushdown Automata 1. What is a Turing Machine? A Turing Machine is an accepting device which accepts the languages (recursively enumerable set) generated by type

More information

Finite Automata Theory and Formal Languages TMV027/DIT321 LP4 2018

Finite Automata Theory and Formal Languages TMV027/DIT321 LP4 2018 Finite Automata Theory and Formal Languages TMV027/DIT321 LP4 2018 Lecture 14 Ana Bove May 14th 2018 Recap: Context-free Grammars Simplification of grammars: Elimination of ǫ-productions; Elimination of

More information

Chapter 4. Regular Expressions. 4.1 Some Definitions

Chapter 4. Regular Expressions. 4.1 Some Definitions Chapter 4 Regular Expressions 4.1 Some Definitions Definition: If S and T are sets of strings of letters (whether they are finite or infinite sets), we define the product set of strings of letters to be

More information

Section 1.3 Ordered Structures

Section 1.3 Ordered Structures Section 1.3 Ordered Structures Tuples Have order and can have repetitions. (6,7,6) is a 3-tuple () is the empty tuple A 2-tuple is called a pair and a 3-tuple is called a triple. We write (x 1,, x n )

More information

An automaton with a finite number of states is called a Finite Automaton (FA) or Finite State Machine (FSM).

An automaton with a finite number of states is called a Finite Automaton (FA) or Finite State Machine (FSM). Automata The term "Automata" is derived from the Greek word "αὐτόματα" which means "self-acting". An automaton (Automata in plural) is an abstract self-propelled computing device which follows a predetermined

More information

CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Regular Expressions and Finite Automata

CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Regular Expressions and Finite Automata CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages Regular Expressions and Finite Automata CMSC330 Spring 2018 1 How do regular expressions work? What we ve learned What regular expressions are What they

More information

Developing a Distributed Java-based Speech Recognition Engine

Developing a Distributed Java-based Speech Recognition Engine The ITB Journal Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 2 2004 Developing a Distributed Java-based Speech Recognition Engine Tony Ayers Institute of Technology Blanchardstown, tony.ayers@itb.ie Brian Nolan Institute

More information

In English, there are at least three different types of entities: letters, words, sentences.

In English, there are at least three different types of entities: letters, words, sentences. Chapter 2 Languages 2.1 Introduction In English, there are at least three different types of entities: letters, words, sentences. letters are from a finite alphabet { a, b, c,..., z } words are made up

More information

Recursive descent for grammars with contexts

Recursive descent for grammars with contexts 39th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science Špindleruv Mlýn, Czech Republic Recursive descent parsing for grammars with contexts Ph.D. student, Department

More information

Fundamentele Informatica II

Fundamentele Informatica II Fundamentele Informatica II Answer to selected exercises 5 John C Martin: Introduction to Languages and the Theory of Computation M.M. Bonsangue (and J. Kleijn) Fall 2011 5.1.a (q 0, ab, Z 0 ) (q 1, b,

More information

Context-Free Grammar

Context-Free Grammar Context-Free Grammar CFGs are more powerful than regular expressions. They are more powerful in the sense that whatever can be expressed using regular expressions can be expressed using context-free grammars,

More information

5/10/16. Grammar. Automata and Languages. Today s Topics. Grammars Definition A grammar G is defined as G = (V, T, P, S) where:

5/10/16. Grammar. Automata and Languages. Today s Topics. Grammars Definition A grammar G is defined as G = (V, T, P, S) where: Grammar Automata and Languages Grammar Prof. Mohamed Hamada oftware Engineering Lab. The University of Aizu Japan Regular Grammar Context-free Grammar Context-sensitive Grammar Left-linear Grammar right-linear

More information

Properties of Context-free Languages. Reading: Chapter 7

Properties of Context-free Languages. Reading: Chapter 7 Properties of Context-free Languages Reading: Chapter 7 1 Topics 1) Simplifying CFGs, Normal forms 2) Pumping lemma for CFLs 3) Closure and decision properties of CFLs 2 How to simplify CFGs? 3 Three ways

More information

Basic Principles of Lossless Coding. Universal Lossless coding. Lempel-Ziv Coding. 2. Exploit dependences between successive symbols.

Basic Principles of Lossless Coding. Universal Lossless coding. Lempel-Ziv Coding. 2. Exploit dependences between successive symbols. Universal Lossless coding Lempel-Ziv Coding Basic principles of lossless compression Historical review Variable-length-to-block coding Lempel-Ziv coding 1 Basic Principles of Lossless Coding 1. Exploit

More information

CS 373: Theory of Computation. Fall 2010

CS 373: Theory of Computation. Fall 2010 CS 373: Theory of Computation Gul Agha Mahesh Viswanathan Fall 2010 1 1 Normal Forms for CFG Normal Forms for Grammars It is typically easier to work with a context free language if given a CFG in a normal

More information

CS500 Homework #2 Solutions

CS500 Homework #2 Solutions CS500 Homework #2 Solutions 1. Consider the two languages Show that L 1 is context-free but L 2 is not. L 1 = {a i b j c k d l i = j k = l} L 2 = {a i b j c k d l i = k j = l} Answer. L 1 is the concatenation

More information

1. Draw a parse tree for the following derivation: S C A C C A b b b b A b b b b B b b b b a A a a b b b b a b a a b b 2. Show on your parse tree u,

1. Draw a parse tree for the following derivation: S C A C C A b b b b A b b b b B b b b b a A a a b b b b a b a a b b 2. Show on your parse tree u, 1. Draw a parse tree for the following derivation: S C A C C A b b b b A b b b b B b b b b a A a a b b b b a b a a b b 2. Show on your parse tree u, v, x, y, z as per the pumping theorem. 3. Prove that

More information

Lecture 7 Properties of regular languages

Lecture 7 Properties of regular languages Lecture 7 Properties of regular languages COT 4420 Theory of Computation Section 4.1 Closure properties of regular languages If L 1 and L 2 are regular languages, then we prove that: Union: L 1 L 2 Concatenation:

More information

Parsing. Context-Free Grammars (CFG) Laura Kallmeyer. Winter 2017/18. Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf 1 / 26

Parsing. Context-Free Grammars (CFG) Laura Kallmeyer. Winter 2017/18. Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf 1 / 26 Parsing Context-Free Grammars (CFG) Laura Kallmeyer Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Winter 2017/18 1 / 26 Table of contents 1 Context-Free Grammars 2 Simplifying CFGs Removing useless symbols Eliminating

More information

1. (a) Explain the procedure to convert Context Free Grammar to Push Down Automata.

1. (a) Explain the procedure to convert Context Free Grammar to Push Down Automata. Code No: R09220504 R09 Set No. 2 II B.Tech II Semester Examinations,December-January, 2011-2012 FORMAL LANGUAGES AND AUTOMATA THEORY Computer Science And Engineering Time: 3 hours Max Marks: 75 Answer

More information

CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing

CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing Fuhua (Frank) Cheng Department of Computer Science University of Kentucky 1 Table of Contents: Week 1: Preliminaries (set algebra, relations, functions) (read Chapters

More information

Triangles. 3.In the following fig. AB = AC and BD = DC, then ADC = (A) 60 (B) 120 (C) 90 (D) none 4.In the Fig. given below, find Z.

Triangles. 3.In the following fig. AB = AC and BD = DC, then ADC = (A) 60 (B) 120 (C) 90 (D) none 4.In the Fig. given below, find Z. Triangles 1.Two sides of a triangle are 7 cm and 10 cm. Which of the following length can be the length of the third side? (A) 19 cm. (B) 17 cm. (C) 23 cm. of these. 2.Can 80, 75 and 20 form a triangle?

More information

Pentagonal quasigroups. 1. Introduction

Pentagonal quasigroups. 1. Introduction Quasigroups and Related Systems 22 (2014), 147 158 Pentagonal quasigroups Stipe Vidak Abstract. The concept of pentagonal quasigroup is introduced as IM-quasigroup satisfying the additional property of

More information

Regular Expressions [1] Regular Expressions. Regular expressions can be seen as a system of notations for denoting ɛ-nfa

Regular Expressions [1] Regular Expressions. Regular expressions can be seen as a system of notations for denoting ɛ-nfa Regular Expressions [1] Regular Expressions Regular expressions can be seen as a system of notations for denoting ɛ-nfa They form an algebraic representation of ɛ-nfa algebraic : expressions with equations

More information

Properties of Context-Free Languages

Properties of Context-Free Languages Properties of Context-Free Languages Seungjin Choi Department of Computer Science and Engineering Pohang University of Science and Technology 77 Cheongam-ro, Nam-gu, Pohang 37673, Korea seungjin@postech.ac.kr

More information

The Probability of Winning a Series. Gregory Quenell

The Probability of Winning a Series. Gregory Quenell The Probability of Winning a Series Gregory Quenell Exercise: Team A and Team B play a series of n + games. The first team to win n + games wins the series. All games are independent, and Team A wins any

More information

Dynamic Programming. Shuang Zhao. Microsoft Research Asia September 5, Dynamic Programming. Shuang Zhao. Outline. Introduction.

Dynamic Programming. Shuang Zhao. Microsoft Research Asia September 5, Dynamic Programming. Shuang Zhao. Outline. Introduction. Microsoft Research Asia September 5, 2005 1 2 3 4 Section I What is? Definition is a technique for efficiently recurrence computing by storing partial results. In this slides, I will NOT use too many formal

More information

Theory of Computation (Classroom Practice Booklet Solutions)

Theory of Computation (Classroom Practice Booklet Solutions) Theory of Computation (Classroom Practice Booklet Solutions) 1. Finite Automata & Regular Sets 01. Ans: (a) & (c) Sol: (a) The reversal of a regular set is regular as the reversal of a regular expression

More information

The state numbers of a knot

The state numbers of a knot ILDT2014 RIMS, Kyoto University 21 May 2014 The state numbers of a knot Takuji NAKAMURA (Osaka Electro-Communication University) Joint work with Y. NAKANISHI, S. Satoh and Y. Tomiyama (Kobe University)

More information

Isolation and Contentment in Segregation Games with Three Types

Isolation and Contentment in Segregation Games with Three Types Student Projects Isolation and Contentment in Segregation Games with Three Types Mark Burek, Brian McDonough, Spencer Roach Mark Burek is finishing up his undergraduate work in mathematics at Valparaiso

More information

D EFB B E B EAB ABC DEF C A F C D C DEF C AD C AEC D D E C D EF B ABC AB CD A EFD AD D E

D EFB B E B EAB ABC DEF C A F C D C DEF C AD C AEC D D E C D EF B ABC AB CD A EFD AD D E D EFB B E BEAB ABC DEF C A F C D C DEF C AD C AEC D D E A B C D EF B ABC AB CD A EFD AD D E FFF A B FBC AE BC D AD A D F D F D F D D B D A D A ED D D DD F D D D D A A DA ADD D F AD AD C A DD D D F D A

More information

Notes for Comp 497 (454) Week 10

Notes for Comp 497 (454) Week 10 Notes for Comp 497 (454) Week 10 Today we look at the last two chapters in Part II. Cohen presents some results concerning the two categories of language we have seen so far: Regular languages (RL). Context-free

More information

Regularity-preserving letter selections

Regularity-preserving letter selections Regularity-preserving letter selections Armando B. Matos LIACC, Universidade do Porto Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150 Porto, Portugal 1 Introduction and definitions Seiferas and McNaughton gave in [SM76]

More information

Context Free Languages and Grammars

Context Free Languages and Grammars Algorithms & Models of Computation CS/ECE 374, Fall 2017 Context Free Languages and Grammars Lecture 7 Tuesday, September 19, 2017 Sariel Har-Peled (UIUC) CS374 1 Fall 2017 1 / 36 What stack got to do

More information

CSE 105 Homework 1 Due: Monday October 9, Instructions. should be on each page of the submission.

CSE 105 Homework 1 Due: Monday October 9, Instructions. should be on each page of the submission. CSE 5 Homework Due: Monday October 9, 7 Instructions Upload a single file to Gradescope for each group. should be on each page of the submission. All group members names and PIDs Your assignments in this

More information

CS 341 Homework 16 Languages that Are and Are Not Context-Free

CS 341 Homework 16 Languages that Are and Are Not Context-Free CS 341 Homework 16 Languages that Are and Are Not Context-Free 1. Show that the following languages are context-free. You can do this by writing a context free grammar or a PDA, or you can use the closure

More information