Time-Varying FIR Decision Feedback Equalization of Doubly-Selective Channels
|
|
- Patience Leonard
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Time-Varying FIR Decision Feedback Equalization of Doubly-Selective Channels Imad Barhumi, Geert Leus and Marc Moonen K.U.Leuven-ESAT, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001 Leuven, Belgium Abstract In this paper we propose a minimum mean-square error (MMSE) decision feedback (DF) time-varying (TV) finite impulse response (FIR) equalizer for doubly-selective (time- and frequency-selective) channels. We use the basis expansion model (BEM) to approximate the doubly-selective channel and to design the TV FIR DFE. This allows us to turn a large design problem into an equivalent small design problem, containing only the BEM coefficients of the doubly-selective channel and the BEM coefficients of the TV FIR feedforward and feedback equalization filters. Through computer simulations we show that the performance of the proposed TV FIR DF equalizer approaches the performance of the block DF equalizer, while the equalization as well as the design complexity are much lower. I. INTRODUCTION THE wireless communication industry has experienced rapid growth in recent years, and digital cellular systems are currently designed to provide high data rates at high speeds. High data rates give rise to intersymbol interference (ISI) due to multipath fading. Such an ISI channel is called frequencyselective. On the other hand, due to mobility and/or frequency offset the received signal is subject to frequency shifts (Doppler shifts). The Doppler effect in conjunction with ISI gives rise to a so-called doubly-selective channel (frequency- and timeselective). Equalization is required to compensate for these channel effects. Equalization can be of different types. Well-known types are i) linear equalization (LE), ii) decision feedback equalization (DFE) iii) maximum likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE). LE is used because of its simplicity and cost effectiveness, but may also sacrifice performance. MLSE is extremely complex, and gives optimum or near optimum performance. DFE on the other hand, provides a good compromise between complexity and performance. The basic idea behind DFE is that once information has been detected, the ISI that it induces on future symbols can be subtracted out before detection of subsequent symbols. DFE has been previously proposed in literature for the case of frequency-selective channels, some based on block processing This research work was carried out at the ESAT laboratory of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, in the frame of the Belgian State, Prime Minister s Office - Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs - Interuniversity Poles of Attraction Programme ( ) - IUAP P5/22 ( Dynamical Systems and Control: Computation, Identification and Modeling ) and P5/11 ( Mobile multimedia communication systems and networks ), the Concerted Research Action GOA-MEFISTO-666 (Mathematical Engineering for Information and Communication Systems Technology) of the Flemish Government, Research Project FWO nr.g ( Design of efficient communication techniques for wireless timedispersive multi-user MIMO systems ) and was partially sponsored by IMEC (Flemish Interuniversity Microelectronics Center). The scientific responsibility is assumed by its authors. Partly supported by the Palestinian European Academic Cooperation in Education (PEACE). Postdoctoral Fellow of the F.W.O. Vlaanderen. [1], [2] and others based on serial processing by means of finite impulse response (FIR) filters [3]. In previous work we proposed time-varying (TV) FIR LEs to compensate for the doubly-selective channel effects [4], [5], [6]. In this paper we extend this idea to design a TV FIR DFE, which shows to give better performance and to be more robust against channel imperfections. The proposed TV FIR DFE consists of a TV FIR feedforward filter, a TV FIR feedback filter, and a decision device. We use the basis expansion model (BEM) to model the TV FIR feedforward and feedback filters. The beauty of using the BEM is that it allows us to turn a large design problem into a small design problem, containing only the BEM coefficients of the channel, and the BEM coefficients of the feedforward and feedback TV FIR filters. We also show that this approach extends the results obtained for the case of purely frequency-selective channels. This paper is organized as follows. The system model is described in section II. The block decision feedback equalizer (BDFE) is introduced in section III. The TV FIR DFE equalizer is introduced in section IV. In section V, we show through computer simulations the performance of the proposed equalizer. Finally, our conclusions are drawn in section VI. Notations: We use upper (lower) bold face letters to denote matrices (column vectors). Superscripts, T, and H represent conjugate, transpose, and Hermitian, respectively. We denote the 1- and 2-dimensional Kronecker delta as δ n and δ n,m, respectively. We denote the N N identity matrix as I N and the M N all-zero matrix as 0 M N. Finally, diag{x} denotes the diagonal matrix with x on the diagonal. II. SYSTEM MODEL The system under consideration is depicted in Figure 1. We assume a single-input multiple-output (SIMO) system, where N r receive antennas are used. Focusing on a baseband-equivalent description, when transmitting a symbol sequence s(n) at rate 1/T and sampling each receive antenna at the same rate 1/T, the received sample sequence at the rth receive antenna can be written as: y (r) (n) = (n;ν)s(n ν) η (r) (n) (1) ν= where η (r) (n) is the additive noise at the rth receive antenna, and (n;ν) is the doubly-selective channel (time- and frequencyselective) from the transmitter to the rth receive antenna. Here, we model the doubly-selective channel (n;ν) using the basis expansion model (BEM) [7], [8], [9], [10], which is shown to accurately approximate the well-known Jakes model. In the BEM, the channel is modeled as an FIR filter where the
2 s(n) s(n) h (1) (n; ν) h (Nr) (n; ν) η (1) (n) η (Nr) (n) y (1) (n) y (Nr) (n) η (1) (n) η (Nr) (n) S/P S/P y (Nr) (n) y (1) N 1 y (Nr) N 1 G (1) G (Nr) (a) Block DFE h (1) y (n; ν) (1) (n) g (1) (n; ν) h (Nr) (n; ν) Fig. 1. g (Nr) (n; ν) (b) TV FIR DFE System Model s(n d) s B b(n; ν) δd ŝ ŝ(n d) taps are expressed as a superposition of complex exponential basis functions. Before we proceed to define the BEM for doublyselective channels, we make the following assumptions: A1) The delay-spread is bounded by τ max ; A2) The Doppler-spread is bounded by f max. Under assumptions A1) and A2), it is always possible to model the channel between the transmitter and the rth receive antenna in discrete time as: (n;ν) = L l=0 δ ν l q= q,l ej2πqn/n, (2) where N is the block size over which this channel model holds, and L and Q satisfy the following conditions: C1) LT τ max ; C2) Q/(NT) 2f max, where T is the symbol period. In this expansion model, L represents the delay-spread (expressed in multiples of T, the delay resolution of the model), and Q represents the Doppler-spread (expressed in multiples of 1/(NT), the Doppler resolution of the model). Note that the coefficients q,l remain invariant over a period of length NT, and may change from block to block. Substiute (2) in (1), the received sample at the rth receive antenna at time index n can be written as: y (r) (n) = L l=0 q= e j2πqn/n q,l s(n l) η(r) (n), (3) Suppose we want to transmit a symbol burst s(n), where s(n) 0 for n / {0,1,...,M 1}, M = N L zp and L zp L (zp refers to zero-padding). The input-output relation in (3) can also be written in block form. Defining the M 1 symbol block as s := [s(0),...,s(m 1)] T, the received sample block at the rth receive antenna y (r) := [y (r) (0),...,y (r) (N 1)] T, can be written as: y (r) = H (r) T zp s η (r), (4) where η (r) is similarly defined as y (r), T zp := [I M,0 M Lzp ] T, and H (r) is an N N lower triangular matrix. Using (2), H (r) can be written as: H (r) = L l=0 q= q,l D qz l (5) where D q := diag{[1,,e j2πq(n 1)/N ] T }, and Z l is an N N lower triangular Toeplitz matrix with first column [0 1 l,1,0 1 (N l 1) ] T. Substituting (5) in (4), the N 1 received sample block at the rth receive antenna can be written as: y (r) = L l=0 q= q,l D qz l T zp s η (r). (6) Stacking the N r received sample blocks: y := [y (1)T,...,y (Nr)T ] T, we obtain y = HT zp s η, where η is similarly defined as y and H := [H (1)T,...,H (Nr)T ] T. III. BLOCK DECISION-FEEDBACK EQUALIZATION In this section we review conventional BDFEs. We focus on the minimum mean-square error (MMSE) BDFE. The BDFE consists of a feedforward equalizer represented by the M N matrix G (r) on the rth receive antenna, the decision making device, and the feedback equalizer represented by the M M matrix B, as shown in Figure 1(a). Hence, a soft estimate of s is computed as: N r s = G (r) y (r) Bŝ, ŝ =Q( s), (7) where Q( ) is the quantizer used by the decision device. The MMSE BDFE is designed to minimize the error at the decision device. Define the error vector e = s s. Assuming past decisions are correct (ŝ = s) we get N r ( e = G (r) H (r) T zp s η (r)) (B I M )s. (8) Defining G := [G (1),...,G (Nr) ], (8) can be written as: e = GHT zp s Gη (B I M )s. (9) Similar to [1], we obtain the MMSE feedforward and the feedback block equalizers under the constraint that (B I M ) is an upper triangular matrix as: G = (B I M) (HT zp) H R 1 η 1 (HT zp) R 1 (HTzp) H R 1 B =L H I M, (10) where L is a lower triangular matrix, obtained by Cholesky factorization of ( ) (HT zp ) H R 1 η (HT zp ) R 1 s = LDL H. The above approach is rather complex in particular for large N. In the next section, we will therefore develop a DFE equalizer, s η,
3 with TV FIR feedforward and TV FIR feedback filters. Doing this we lower the design and the equalization complexity at the cost of a slightly lower performance. IV. TIME-VARYING FIR DECISION-FEEDBACK EQUALIZATION In this section, we will apply a TV FIR feedforward filter (n;ν) on the rth receive antenna and a TV FIR feedback filter b(n;ν), as depicted in Figure 1(b). Hence, a soft estimate of s(n d) is computed as XN r s(n d) = X ν= (n; ν)y (r) (n ν) X ν= b(n; ν)ŝ(n ν), ŝ(n d) =Q( s(n d)), (11) where d is the synchronization delay. Since the doubly-selective channel (n;ν) was modeled by the BEM, it is also convenient to design the TV FIR feedforward and feedback filters, (n;ν) and b(n; ν), using the BEM. This will allow us to turn a large design problem into an equivalent small design problem, containing only the BEM coefficients of the doubly-selective channel and the BEM coefficients of the TV FIR feedforward and feedback filters. Using the BEM, we design the TV FIR feedforward filter (n;ν) to have 1 taps, where the time-variation of each tap is modeled by Q 1 complex exponential basis functions. Similarly we design the TV FIR feedback filter b(n;ν) to have taps, where the time-variation of each tap is captured by Q 1 complex exponential basis functions. Hence, we can write the TV FIR feedforward and feedback filters as: (n;ν) = b(n;ν) = l =0 1 δ ν l δ ν l q = Q /2 q,l e j2πq n/n, b q,l ej2πq n/n, (12a) (12b) where is chosen to be larger than the synchronization delay; i.e. d 1. since we can only feedback the past decisions and not the future ones. Instead of continuing to work on the sample level, it is easier to switch to the block level at this point. On the block level, (11) corresponds to estimating s as in (7) but with G (r) and B constrained to L G (r) =R zp l =0 q = L 1 B =R zp q,l D q Z l, (13) Q /2 b q,l D q Z l T zp, (14) where R zp := [0 M d I M 0 M (Lzp d)]. It is clear that this requires 0 < d L zp. In practice, we will take L zp = max{l,d}. Hence we can write N r s =R zp r N r R zp R zp q = l =0 r q = l =0 Q /2 q,l D q Z l 1 L q= l=0 q,l D q Z l η (r) q,l D qz l T zp s b q,l D q Z l T zpŝ. (15) Defining p = q q and k = l l, and using the property Z l D q = e j2πql /N D q Z l, (15) can be written as: where s =R zp f p,k := (QQ )/2 LL p= (QQ )/2 k=0 N r R zp R zp N r q = l =0 Q /2 q = l =0 1 We can further rewrite (16) as f p,k D p Z k T zp s q,l D q Z l η (r) b q,l D q Z l T zpŝ, (16) e j2π(p q )l /N q,l p q,k l. (17) N r s = (f T I M )Ãs (T I M ) Cη (r) ( b T I M )Ãŝ = (f T I M )Ãs (gt I M )(I Nr C)η ( b T I M )Ãŝ, (18) where we have f := [f,0,...,f,l,..., f Q /2,L]T, := [,0,...,g(r),L,...,,L ] T, g := [g (1)T,...,g (Nr)T ] T, and the augmented vector b := [0 (QQ Q )/2 (L 1) 0 1 b T Q /2 0 u 1,..., 0 1 b T Q /2 0 u 1 0 (QQ Q )/2 (L 1)] T, where u = L 1 and b q := [b q,,,b q, 1] T, i.e. we construct b in a way to match f in dimension. Defining the matrices A and C as D Q /2Z 0 D Q /2Z 0.. A := D Z L. D Q /2Z L, C := D Z. D Q /2Z, the matrices à and C in (18) are à := (I (QQ 1)(L 1) R zp )AT zp and C := (I (Q 1)( 1) R zp )C, respectively. Note that the term in f p,k corresponding to the rth receive antenna is related to a 2-dimensional convolution of the BEM coefficients of the doubly-selective channel for the rth receive antenna and the BEM coefficients of the TV FIR feedforward filter for the
4 rth receive antenna. This allows us to derive a linear relationship between f and g. We first define the ( 1) ( L 1) Toeplitz matrix T l,l 1( q,l ) := q,0... q,l q,0... q,l. We then define H q (r) := Ω q T l, 1( q,l ), where Ω q := diag{[1, e j2πq/n,...,e j2πql /N ] T }, and introduce the (Q 1)( 1) (Q Q 1)(L 1) block Toeplitz matrix T q,q 1(H q (r) ) := H (r)... H (r) H (r)... H (r). Introducing the definitions H (r) := T q,q 1(H (r) q ) and H := [H (1)T,...,H (Nr)T ] T, we can derive from (17) that f T = g T H. (19) Assuming past decisions are correct, the error at the decision device e = s s can be written as: e =(g T H I M )Ãs (gt I M )(I Nr C)η (( b T I M )Ã I M)s. (20) Now we can write the mean-square error MSE = E{e H e} as: MSE = tr{(g T H I M )ÃR sãh (H H g I M )} tr{(g T I M )(I Nr C)R η (I Nr C H )(g I M )} tr{( b T I M )ÃR sãh ( b I M )} 2R{tr{(g T H I M )ÃR sãh ( b I M )}} 2R{tr{(g T H I M )ÃR s}} 2R{tr{( b T I M )ÃR s}} tr{r s }. (21) Introducing the properties tr{(x T I M )X} = x T red(x), tr{(x T I M )X(x I M )} = x T red(x)x, where red( ) splits the matrix up into M M submatrices and replaces each submatrix by its trace, then (21) can be rewritten as: ( ) MSE = g T HRÃH H R C g ( b T e T d )RÃ( b e d ) 2R{g T HRÃ b } 2R{g T HrÃ}, (22) where RÃ := red(ãr sãh ), R C := red((i Nr C)R η (I Nr C H )) and rã := red(ãr s). Note also that we have used the fact that tr{r s } = e T d red(ãr sã)e d, where e d is a (Q Q 1)(L 1) 1 unit vector with the 1 in position d(qq 1) (Q Q )/2 1. By solving MSE/ g = 0, we then obtain: g T = ( b T e T d )RÃH H ( HRÃH H R C) 1, (23) where we used the fact that r H = Ã et d R Ã, substituting (23) in (22) we get: where MSE = ( b T e T d )R ( b e d ), (24) ( 1 R = RÃ RÃH H HRÃH H R C) HRÃ ( ) 1 = R 1 Ã HH R 1 C H. (25) The last line in (25) is obtained by applying the matrix inversion Lemma. By defining the selection matrix P as: I Q (e T /2 I L P = ) 0 0 0k v k v 0 0 I Q /21 (e T I ) (26) where k = Q 1, v = (Q Q Q )(L 1)/2 and e is an L 1 unit vector with the 1 in position ( 1), we can write (24) as: MSE = [b T Q /2,,bT 1, 1, b T 0,,b T Q /2 }{{} ] R b, (27) b T where R = P R P H. The formula in (27) is a quadratic form that is minimized by choosing the TV FIR feedback filter coefficients as: b = R 1 e x e T xr 1 e (28) x where e x is a Q 1 unit vector, with the 1 in the position (Q /2 1). By substituting (28) in (23) we can solve for the TV FIR feedforward equalizer coefficients. In comparing the two approaches, BDFE and TV FIR DFE, we consider two types of complexity: design complexity and implementation complexity. The design complexity is the complexity associated with computing the equalizer (feedforward and feedback) coefficieints. To design the BDFE, we need a matrix inversion of size M M to compute the feedforward matrix G, and a Cholesky factorization of an M M matrix to compute the feedback matrix B. Both require about O(M 3 ) flops. On the other hand, to design the TV FIR DFE equalizer, we need to compute the inverse of a K K matrix to obtain the feedforward filter coefficients, where K = (Q Q 1)(L 1), and we need to compute the inverse of a (Q 1) 1 (Q 1) 1 matrix to obtain the feedback filter coefficients. So, provided that K and (Q 1) 1 are less than M, the design complexity of the TV FIR DFE is less than the design complexity of the BDFE. In practice and also in our simulations, the TV FIR DFE parameters Q,, Q and always satisfy K < M and (Q 1) 1 M. The implementation complexity is the complexity associated with estimating a block of M samples. For the BDFE, to estimate a block of M samples we require M N multiply-add (MA) operations per receive antenna coming from the feedforward part, and (M 1)M/2 MA operations coming from the feedback part. To estimate the same block using the TV FIR DFE we require M( 1) MA operations per receive antenna coming from the feedforward part and M MA operations coming from
5 10 0 BDFE TV FIR DFE TV FIR LE 10 0 BDFE TV FIR DFE TV FIR LE BER BER SNR (db) Fig. 2. BER vs. SNR for Nr = 1 the feedback part. So, provided that is less than the block size N, and is less than M/2, the implementation complexity of the TV FIR DFE is lower than the implementation complexity of the BDFE. In practice and also in our simulations, the TV FIR DFE parameters Q,, Q and always satisfy N and M/2. V. SIMULATIONS In the simulations, we consider a SISO as well as SIMO (N r = 2) system. The channel is assumed to be doubly-selective, simulated according to the BEM with the following parameters: transmitted block size N = 800; symbol period T = 25µsec; maximum delay spread τ max = 75µsec maximum Doppler spread f max = 100Hz; number of basis functions Q = 2 f max NT = 4; channel order L = τ max /T = 3. N r Q Q TABLE I FILTER COEFFICIENTS FOR DIFFERENT RECEIVE ANTENNAS The proposed number of equalizer parameters for different receive antennas is listed in table I. In all simulations, QPSK signaling is used, the delay d = LL 2 1, and = d1. The performance is measured in terms of the BER vs. SNR. In each plot, we draw comparisons between the proposed TV FIR DFE, the TV FIR LE (no feedback case), and the BDFE. As shown in Figure 2 (SISO N r = 1), the SNR loss for the TV FIR DFE compared to BDFE is less than 1dB at BER = On the other hand, the proposed TV FIR DFE outperforms the TV FIR LE, and the latter suffers from an early error floor. Similarly, in Figure 3 (SIMO N r = 2), we see that the performance of the proposed TV FIR DFE almost coincides with that of the BDFE, whilst it significantly outperforms the TV FIR LE equalizer SNR (db) Fig. 3. BER vs. SNR for Nr = 2 VI. CONCLUSION In this paper, we have proposed a TV FIR DFE to compensate for doubly selective channel distortion. The proposed equalizer provides a good compromise between complexity and performance compared to BDFE and the TV FIR LE. We show that by properly choosing the feedforward and feedback filter coefficients, we can reach the performance of the BDFE. We also show that the TV FIR DFE outperforms the TV FIR LE. REFERENCES [1] A. Stamoulis, G. B. Giannakis and A. Scaglione, Block FIR Decision- Feedbak Equalizers for Filterbank Precoded Transmissions with Blind Channel Estimation Capabilities, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 49, pp , January [2] D. Williamson, R. A. Kennedy and G. W. Pulford, Block Decision Feedback Equalization, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 40, pp , February [3] N. Al-Dhahir and J. M. Cioffi, MMSE Decision-Feedback Equalizers: Finite Length Results, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 41, pp , July [4] I. Barhumi, G. Leus and M. Moonen, Time Varynig FIR Equalization of Doubly-Selective Channels, in Int. Conf. on Comm., (Anchorage, Alaska USA), May accepted. [5] G. Leus, I. Barhumi and M. Moonen, MMSE-Time Varying FIR Equalization of Doubly-Selective Channels, in Int. Conf. on ASSP, (Hong Kong), April accepted. [6] I. Barhumi, G. Leus and M. Moonen, Time Varynig FIR Equalization of Doubly-Selective Channels, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., Dec submitted. [7] G. B. Giannakis and C. Tepedelenlioğlu, Basis Expansion Models and Diversity Techniques for Blind Identification and Equalization of Time Varying Channels, Proc. IEEE, vol. 86, no. 10, pp , Oct., [8] A. M. Sayeed and B. Aazhang, Joint Multipath-Doppler Diversity in Mobile Wireless Communications, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 47, pp , January [9] X. Ma, and G. B. Giannakis, Maximum-Diversity Transmissions over Doubly-Selective Wireless Channels, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, revised, February see also Proc. of WCNC., vol. 1, pp , Orlando, FL, March 17-21, [10] G. Leus, S. Zhou and G. B. Giannakis, Orthogonal Multiple Access over Time- and Frequency-Selective Fading, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, revised, June, see also Proc. of the ACSSC, Pacific Grove, California, November 4-7, 2001.
Estimation and Direct Equalization of Doubly Selective Channels
Hindawi Publishing Corporation EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing Volume 2006, Article ID 62831, Pages 1 15 DOI 101155/ASP/2006/62831 Estimation and Direct Equalization of Doubly Selective Channels
More informationBLOCK DATA TRANSMISSION: A COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE MBER PRECODER DESIGNS. Qian Meng, Jian-Kang Zhang and Kon Max Wong
BLOCK DATA TRANSISSION: A COPARISON OF PERFORANCE FOR THE BER PRECODER DESIGNS Qian eng, Jian-Kang Zhang and Kon ax Wong Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, caster University, Hamilton,
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. 49, NO. 10, OCTOBER
TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL 49, NO 10, OCTOBER 2003 1 Algebraic Properties of Space Time Block Codes in Intersymbol Interference Multiple-Access Channels Suhas N Diggavi, Member,, Naofal Al-Dhahir,
More informationEfficient Equalization for Wireless Communications in Hostile Environments
Efficient Equalization for Wireless Communications in Hostile Environments Thomas Strohmer Department of Mathematics University of California, Davis, USA strohmer@math.ucdavis.edu http://math.ucdavis.edu/
More informationAn Adaptive Decision Feedback Equalizer for Time-Varying Frequency Selective MIMO Channels
An Adaptive Decision Feedback Equalizer for Time-Varying Frequency Selective MIMO Channels Athanasios A. Rontogiannis Institute of Space Applications and Remote Sensing National Observatory of Athens 5236,
More informationLattice Reduction Aided Precoding for Multiuser MIMO using Seysen s Algorithm
Lattice Reduction Aided Precoding for Multiuser MIMO using Seysen s Algorithm HongSun An Student Member IEEE he Graduate School of I & Incheon Korea ahs3179@gmail.com Manar Mohaisen Student Member IEEE
More informationA Computationally Efficient Block Transmission Scheme Based on Approximated Cholesky Factors
A Computationally Efficient Block Transmission Scheme Based on Approximated Cholesky Factors C. Vincent Sinn Telecommunications Laboratory University of Sydney, Australia cvsinn@ee.usyd.edu.au Daniel Bielefeld
More informationAdaptive Bit-Interleaved Coded OFDM over Time-Varying Channels
Adaptive Bit-Interleaved Coded OFDM over Time-Varying Channels Jin Soo Choi, Chang Kyung Sung, Sung Hyun Moon, and Inkyu Lee School of Electrical Engineering Korea University Seoul, Korea Email:jinsoo@wireless.korea.ac.kr,
More informationThe Optimality of Beamforming: A Unified View
The Optimality of Beamforming: A Unified View Sudhir Srinivasa and Syed Ali Jafar Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2625 Email: sudhirs@uciedu,
More informationMMSE DECISION FEEDBACK EQUALIZER FROM CHANNEL ESTIMATE
MMSE DECISION FEEDBACK EQUALIZER FROM CHANNEL ESTIMATE M. Magarini, A. Spalvieri, Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, I-20133 Milano (Italy),
More informationTime-Variant Channel Equalization via Discrete Prolate Spheroidal Sequences
Time-Variant Channel Equalization via Discrete Prolate Spheroidal Sequences Thomas Zemen and Christoph F. Mecklenbräuker Telecommunication Research Center Vienna (ftw.) Tech Gate Vienna, Donau-City Str.
More informationAdaptive Space-Time Shift Keying Based Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Systems
ACSTSK Adaptive Space-Time Shift Keying Based Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Systems Professor Sheng Chen Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO7 BJ, UK E-mail: sqc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
More informationMulti-Branch MMSE Decision Feedback Detection Algorithms. with Error Propagation Mitigation for MIMO Systems
Multi-Branch MMSE Decision Feedback Detection Algorithms with Error Propagation Mitigation for MIMO Systems Rodrigo C. de Lamare Communications Research Group, University of York, UK in collaboration with
More informationMaximum Achievable Diversity for MIMO-OFDM Systems with Arbitrary. Spatial Correlation
Maximum Achievable Diversity for MIMO-OFDM Systems with Arbitrary Spatial Correlation Ahmed K Sadek, Weifeng Su, and K J Ray Liu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Institute for Systems
More informationSINGLE antenna differential phase shift keying (DPSK) and
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, VOL 3, NO 5, SEPTEMBER 2004 1481 On the Robustness of Decision-Feedback Detection of DPSK Differential Unitary Space-Time Modulation in Rayleigh-Fading Channels
More informationTurbo per tone equalization for ADSL systems 1
Departement Elektrotechniek ESAT-SISTA/TR 2003-186a Turbo per tone equalization for ADSL systems 1 Hilde Vanhaute and Marc Moonen 2 3 January 2004 Accepted for publication in the Proceedings of the IEEE
More informationThe Sorted-QR Chase Detector for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Channels
The Sorted-QR Chase Detector for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Channels Deric W. Waters and John R. Barry School of ECE Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0250 USA {deric, barry}@ece.gatech.edu
More informationarxiv:cs/ v1 [cs.it] 11 Sep 2006
0 High Date-Rate Single-Symbol ML Decodable Distributed STBCs for Cooperative Networks arxiv:cs/0609054v1 [cs.it] 11 Sep 2006 Zhihang Yi and Il-Min Kim Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
More informationShallow Water Fluctuations and Communications
Shallow Water Fluctuations and Communications H.C. Song Marine Physical Laboratory Scripps Institution of oceanography La Jolla, CA 92093-0238 phone: (858) 534-0954 fax: (858) 534-7641 email: hcsong@mpl.ucsd.edu
More informationZERO-FORCING MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS USING LONG CODES
ZERO-FORCING MUTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS USING ONG CODES Cássio B Ribeiro, Marcello R de Campos, and Paulo S R Diniz Electrical Engineering Program and Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering
More informationApproximate ML Decision Feedback Block. Equalizer for Doubly Selective Fading Channels
Approximate ML Decision Feedback Block 1 Equalizer for Doubly Selective Fading Channels Lingyang Song, Rodrigo C. de Lamare, Are Hjørungnes, and Alister G. Burr arxiv:1112.0725v1 [cs.it] 4 Dec 2011 Abstract
More informationEfficient Semi-Blind Channel Estimation and Equalization Based on a Parametric Channel Representation
Efficient Semi-Blind Channel Estimation and Equalization Based on a Parametric Channel Representation Presenter: Kostas Berberidis University of Patras Computer Engineering & Informatics Department Signal
More informationEstimation of Performance Loss Due to Delay in Channel Feedback in MIMO Systems
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES http://www.merl.com Estimation of Performance Loss Due to Delay in Channel Feedback in MIMO Systems Jianxuan Du Ye Li Daqing Gu Andreas F. Molisch Jinyun Zhang
More informationLow-Complexity Banded Equalizers for OFDM Systems in Doppler Spread Channels
Submitted to EURSIP Journal on pplied Signal Processing, June 005 Revised on Jan. 006 Low-Complexity Banded Equalizers for OFDM Systems in Doppler Spread Channels Luca Rugini, Paolo Banelli, and Geert
More informationFast Time-Varying Dispersive Channel Estimation and Equalization for 8-PSK Cellular System
Ft Time-Varying Dispersive Channel Estimation and Equalization for 8-PSK Cellular System Sang-Yick Leong, Jingxian Wu, Jan Olivier and Chengshan Xiao Dept of Electrical Eng, University of Missouri, Columbia,
More informationDiversity Interference Cancellation for GSM/ EDGE using Reduced-Complexity Joint Detection
Diversity Interference Cancellation for GSM/ EDGE using Reduced-Complexity Joint Detection Patrick Nickel and Wolfgang Gerstacker University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Institute for Mobile Communications,
More informationTitle. Author(s)Tsai, Shang-Ho. Issue Date Doc URL. Type. Note. File Information. Equal Gain Beamforming in Rayleigh Fading Channels
Title Equal Gain Beamforming in Rayleigh Fading Channels Author(s)Tsai, Shang-Ho Proceedings : APSIPA ASC 29 : Asia-Pacific Signal Citationand Conference: 688-691 Issue Date 29-1-4 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/39789
More informationMMSE Decision Feedback Equalization of Pulse Position Modulated Signals
SE Decision Feedback Equalization of Pulse Position odulated Signals AG Klein and CR Johnson, Jr School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 4853 email: agk5@cornelledu
More informationApproximate Best Linear Unbiased Channel Estimation for Frequency Selective Channels with Long Delay Spreads: Robustness to Timing and Carrier Offsets
Approximate Best Linear Unbiased Channel Estimation for Frequency Selective Channels with Long Delay Spreads: Robustness to Timing and Carrier Offsets Serdar Özen,SMNerayanuru, Christopher Pladdy, and
More informationAdaptive MMSE Equalizer with Optimum Tap-length and Decision Delay
Adaptive MMSE Equalizer with Optimum Tap-length and Decision Delay Yu Gong, Xia Hong and Khalid F. Abu-Salim School of Systems Engineering The University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AY, UK E-mail: {y.gong,x.hong,k.f.abusalem}@reading.ac.uk
More informationPerformance Analysis of a Deterministic Channel Estimator for Block Transmission Systems With Null Guard Intervals
684 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL 50, NO 3, MARCH 2002 Performance Analysis of a Deterministic Channel Estimator for Block Transmission Systems With Null Guard Intervals Sergio Barbarossa,
More informationMultiple Carrier Frequency Offset and Channel State Estimation in the Fading Channel
Multiple Carrier Frequency Offset and Channel State Estimation in the Fading Channel Brad W Zarikoff, James K Cavers School of Engineering Science, Faculty of Applied Sciences Simon Fraser University Burnaby,
More informationDoubly-Selective Channel Estimation and Equalization Using Superimposed. Training and Basis Expansion Models
Doubly-Selective Channel Estimation and Equalization Using Superimposed Training and Basis Expansion Models Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this dissertation
More information926 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 53, NO. 3, MARCH Monica Nicoli, Member, IEEE, and Umberto Spagnolini, Senior Member, IEEE (1)
926 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 53, NO. 3, MARCH 2005 Reduced-Rank Channel Estimation for Time-Slotted Mobile Communication Systems Monica Nicoli, Member, IEEE, and Umberto Spagnolini,
More informationACOMMUNICATION situation where a single transmitter
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. 50, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2004 1875 Sum Capacity of Gaussian Vector Broadcast Channels Wei Yu, Member, IEEE, and John M. Cioffi, Fellow, IEEE Abstract This paper
More informationADAPTIVE DETECTION FOR A PERMUTATION-BASED MULTIPLE-ACCESS SYSTEM ON TIME-VARYING MULTIPATH CHANNELS WITH UNKNOWN DELAYS AND COEFFICIENTS
ADAPTIVE DETECTION FOR A PERMUTATION-BASED MULTIPLE-ACCESS SYSTEM ON TIME-VARYING MULTIPATH CHANNELS WITH UNKNOWN DELAYS AND COEFFICIENTS Martial COULON and Daniel ROVIRAS University of Toulouse INP-ENSEEIHT
More informationSoft-Output Decision-Feedback Equalization with a Priori Information
Soft-Output Decision-Feedback Equalization with a Priori Information Renato R. opes and John R. Barry School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 333-5
More informationJoint FEC Encoder and Linear Precoder Design for MIMO Systems with Antenna Correlation
Joint FEC Encoder and Linear Precoder Design for MIMO Systems with Antenna Correlation Chongbin Xu, Peng Wang, Zhonghao Zhang, and Li Ping City University of Hong Kong 1 Outline Background Mutual Information
More informationRevision of Lecture 4
Revision of Lecture 4 We have discussed all basic components of MODEM Pulse shaping Tx/Rx filter pair Modulator/demodulator Bits map symbols Discussions assume ideal channel, and for dispersive channel
More informationDetermining the Optimal Decision Delay Parameter for a Linear Equalizer
International Journal of Automation and Computing 1 (2005) 20-24 Determining the Optimal Decision Delay Parameter for a Linear Equalizer Eng Siong Chng School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological
More informationComputation of Bit-Error Rate of Coherent and Non-Coherent Detection M-Ary PSK With Gray Code in BFWA Systems
Computation of Bit-Error Rate of Coherent and Non-Coherent Detection M-Ary PSK With Gray Code in BFWA Systems Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Basrah University Basrah Iraq,
More informationVandermonde-form Preserving Matrices And The Generalized Signal Richness Preservation Problem
Vandermonde-form Preserving Matrices And The Generalized Signal Richness Preservation Problem Borching Su Department of Electrical Engineering California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125
More informationEstimation of the Capacity of Multipath Infrared Channels
Estimation of the Capacity of Multipath Infrared Channels Jeffrey B. Carruthers Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Boston University jbc@bu.edu Sachin Padma Department of Electrical and
More informationReducing Multiple Access Interference in Broadband Multi-User Wireless Networks
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 7-2015 Reducing Multiple Access Interference in Broadband Multi-User Wireless Networks Ali Nayef Alqatawneh University of
More informationA New SLNR-based Linear Precoding for. Downlink Multi-User Multi-Stream MIMO Systems
A New SLNR-based Linear Precoding for 1 Downlin Multi-User Multi-Stream MIMO Systems arxiv:1008.0730v1 [cs.it] 4 Aug 2010 Peng Cheng, Meixia Tao and Wenjun Zhang Abstract Signal-to-leaage-and-noise ratio
More informationSpace-time Coded Transmissions with Maximum Diversity Gains over Frequency-Selective Multipath Fading Channels Λ
Space-time Coded Transmissions with Maximum Diversity Gains over Frequency-Selective Multipath Fading Channels Λ Shengli Zhou and Georgios B. Giannakis Dept. of ECE, Univ. of Minnesota, 200 Union Street
More informationLecture 5: Antenna Diversity and MIMO Capacity Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1. Overview. CommTh/EES/KTH
: Antenna Diversity and Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications Wednesday, May 4, 206 9:00-2:00, Conference Room SIP Textbook: D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication
More informationCHANNEL FEEDBACK QUANTIZATION METHODS FOR MISO AND MIMO SYSTEMS
CHANNEL FEEDBACK QUANTIZATION METHODS FOR MISO AND MIMO SYSTEMS June Chul Roh and Bhaskar D Rao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 9293 47,
More informationEffect of Spatio-Temporal Channel Correlation on the Performance of Space-Time Codes
Effect of patio-temporal Channel Correlation on the Performance of pace-time Codes C. Fragouli, N. Al-Dhahir, W. Turin AT& T hannon Laboratories 18 Park Ave Florham Park, N 7932 Abstract The determinant
More informationPilot Optimization and Channel Estimation for Multiuser Massive MIMO Systems
1 Pilot Optimization and Channel Estimation for Multiuser Massive MIMO Systems Tadilo Endeshaw Bogale and Long Bao Le Institute National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS) Université de Québec, Montréal,
More informationML Detection with Blind Linear Prediction for Differential Space-Time Block Code Systems
ML Detection with Blind Prediction for Differential SpaceTime Block Code Systems Seree Wanichpakdeedecha, Kazuhiko Fukawa, Hiroshi Suzuki, Satoshi Suyama Tokyo Institute of Technology 11, Ookayama, Meguroku,
More informationExpected Error Based MMSE Detection Ordering for Iterative Detection-Decoding MIMO Systems
Expected Error Based MMSE Detection Ordering for Iterative Detection-Decoding MIMO Systems Lei Zhang, Chunhui Zhou, Shidong Zhou, Xibin Xu National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua
More informationOptimal Receiver for MPSK Signaling with Imperfect Channel Estimation
This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the WCNC 27 proceedings. Optimal Receiver for PSK Signaling with Imperfect
More informationDOPPLER RESILIENT GOLAY COMPLEMENTARY PAIRS FOR RADAR
DOPPLER RESILIENT GOLAY COMPLEMENTARY PAIRS FOR RADAR Ali Pezeshki 1, Robert Calderbank 1, Stephen D. Howard 2, and William Moran 3 1 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 8544, USA 2 DSTO, Edinburgh 51,
More informationRADIO SYSTEMS ETIN15. Lecture no: Equalization. Ove Edfors, Department of Electrical and Information Technology
RADIO SYSTEMS ETIN15 Lecture no: 8 Equalization Ove Edfors, Department of Electrical and Information Technology Ove.Edfors@eit.lth.se Contents Inter-symbol interference Linear equalizers Decision-feedback
More informationAdaptive beamforming for uniform linear arrays with unknown mutual coupling. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.
Title Adaptive beamforming for uniform linear arrays with unknown mutual coupling Author(s) Liao, B; Chan, SC Citation IEEE Antennas And Wireless Propagation Letters, 2012, v. 11, p. 464-467 Issued Date
More informationADAPTIVE FILTER ALGORITHMS. Prepared by Deepa.T, Asst.Prof. /TCE
ADAPTIVE FILTER ALGORITHMS Prepared by Deepa.T, Asst.Prof. /TCE Equalization Techniques Fig.3 Classification of equalizers Equalizer Techniques Linear transversal equalizer (LTE, made up of tapped delay
More information2336 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 57, NO. 6, JUNE Minimum BER Linear MIMO Transceivers With Adaptive Number of Substreams
2336 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 57, NO. 6, JUNE 2009 Minimum BER Linear MIMO Transceivers With Adaptive Number of Substreams Luis G. Ordóñez, Student Member, IEEE, Daniel P. Palomar,
More informationLECTURE 16 AND 17. Digital signaling on frequency selective fading channels. Notes Prepared by: Abhishek Sood
ECE559:WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES LECTURE 16 AND 17 Digital signaling on frequency selective fading channels 1 OUTLINE Notes Prepared by: Abhishek Sood In section 2 we discuss the receiver design
More informationTraining Aided Frequency Offset Estimation for MIMO OFDM Systems via Polynomial Rooting
Training Aided Frequency Offset Estimation for MIMO OFDM Systems via Polynomial Rooting Yanxiang Jiang, Xiaohu You, Xiqi Gao National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University, Nanjing
More informationImproved Channel Estimation Methods based on PN sequence for TDS-OFDM
Improved Channel Estimation Methods based on P sequence for TDS-OFDM Ming Liu, Matthieu Crussière, Jean-François Hélard Université Européenne de Bretagne (UEB) ISA, IETR, UMR 664, F-35708, Rennes, France
More informationHopping Pilots for Estimation of Frequency-Offset and Multi-Antenna Channels in MIMO OFDM
Hopping Pilots for Estimation of Frequency-Offset and Multi-Antenna Channels in MIMO OFDM Mi-Kyung Oh 1,XiaoliMa 2, Georgios B. Giannakis 2 and Dong-Jo Park 1 1 Dept. of EECS, KAIST; 373-1 Guseong-dong,
More informationBLIND DECONVOLUTION ALGORITHMS FOR MIMO-FIR SYSTEMS DRIVEN BY FOURTH-ORDER COLORED SIGNALS
BLIND DECONVOLUTION ALGORITHMS FOR MIMO-FIR SYSTEMS DRIVEN BY FOURTH-ORDER COLORED SIGNALS M. Kawamoto 1,2, Y. Inouye 1, A. Mansour 2, and R.-W. Liu 3 1. Department of Electronic and Control Systems Engineering,
More informationImproved Detected Data Processing for Decision-Directed Tracking of MIMO Channels
Improved Detected Data Processing for Decision-Directed Tracking of MIMO Channels Emna Eitel and Joachim Speidel Institute of Telecommunications, University of Stuttgart, Germany Abstract This paper addresses
More informationEM Channel Estimation and Data Detection for MIMO-CDMA Systems over Slow-Fading Channels
EM Channel Estimation and Data Detection for MIMO-CDMA Systems over Slow-Fading Channels Ayman Assra 1, Walaa Hamouda 1, and Amr Youssef 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Concordia Institute
More informationPOWER ALLOCATION AND OPTIMAL TX/RX STRUCTURES FOR MIMO SYSTEMS
POWER ALLOCATION AND OPTIMAL TX/RX STRUCTURES FOR MIMO SYSTEMS R. Cendrillon, O. Rousseaux and M. Moonen SCD/ESAT, Katholiee Universiteit Leuven, Belgium {raphael.cendrillon, olivier.rousseaux, marc.moonen}@esat.uleuven.ac.be
More informationCO-OPERATION among multiple cognitive radio (CR)
586 IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, VOL 21, NO 5, MAY 2014 Sparse Bayesian Hierarchical Prior Modeling Based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Wideb Cognitive Radio Networks Feng Li Zongben Xu Abstract This
More informationDemixing Radio Waves in MIMO Spatial Multiplexing: Geometry-based Receivers Francisco A. T. B. N. Monteiro
Demixing Radio Waves in MIMO Spatial Multiplexing: Geometry-based Receivers Francisco A. T. B. N. Monteiro 005, it - instituto de telecomunicações. Todos os direitos reservados. Demixing Radio Waves in
More informationBLIND CHIP-RATE EQUALISATION FOR DS-CDMA DOWNLINK RECEIVER
BLIND CHIP-RATE EQUALISATION FOR DS-CDMA DOWNLINK RECEIVER S Weiss, M Hadef, M Konrad School of Electronics & Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton, UK fsweiss,mhadefg@ecssotonacuk M Rupp
More informationEFFECTS OF ILL-CONDITIONED DATA ON LEAST SQUARES ADAPTIVE FILTERS. Gary A. Ybarra and S.T. Alexander
EFFECTS OF ILL-CONDITIONED DATA ON LEAST SQUARES ADAPTIVE FILTERS Gary A. Ybarra and S.T. Alexander Center for Communications and Signal Processing Electrical and Computer Engineering Department North
More informationA CLOSED FORM SOLUTION TO SEMI-BLIND JOINT SYMBOL AND CHANNEL ESTIMATION IN MIMO-OFDM SYSTEMS
A CLOSED FORM SOLUTION TO SEMI-BLIND JOINT SYMBOL AND CHANNEL ESTIMATION IN MIMO-OFDM SYSTEMS Kefei Liu 1, João Paulo C. L. da Costa 2, André L. F. de Almeida 3, and H.C. So 1 1 Department of Electronic
More informationA Systematic Approach for Interference Alignment in CSIT-less Relay-Aided X-Networks
A Systematic Approach for Interference Alignment in CSIT-less Relay-Aided X-Networks Daniel Frank, Karlheinz Ochs, Aydin Sezgin Chair of Communication Systems RUB, Germany Email: {danielfrank, karlheinzochs,
More informationWhen does vectored Multiple Access Channels (MAC) optimal power allocation converge to an FDMA solution?
When does vectored Multiple Access Channels MAC optimal power allocation converge to an FDMA solution? Vincent Le Nir, Marc Moonen, Jan Verlinden, Mamoun Guenach Abstract Vectored Multiple Access Channels
More informationA Precoding Method for Multiple Antenna System on the Riemannian Manifold
Journal of Communications Vol. 9, No. 2, February 2014 A Precoding Method for Multiple Antenna System on the Riemannian Manifold Lin Zhang1 and S. H. Leung2 1 Department of Electronic Engineering, City
More informationSecure Degrees of Freedom of the MIMO Multiple Access Wiretap Channel
Secure Degrees of Freedom of the MIMO Multiple Access Wiretap Channel Pritam Mukherjee Sennur Ulukus Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Maryland, College Park, MD 074 pritamm@umd.edu
More informationShannon meets Wiener II: On MMSE estimation in successive decoding schemes
Shannon meets Wiener II: On MMSE estimation in successive decoding schemes G. David Forney, Jr. MIT Cambridge, MA 0239 USA forneyd@comcast.net Abstract We continue to discuss why MMSE estimation arises
More informationDirect-Sequence Spread-Spectrum
Chapter 3 Direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum In this chapter we consider direct-sequence spread-spectrum systems. Unlike frequency-hopping, a direct-sequence signal occupies the entire bandwidth continuously.
More informationUNBIASED MAXIMUM SINR PREFILTERING FOR REDUCED STATE EQUALIZATION
UNBIASED MAXIMUM SINR PREFILTERING FOR REDUCED STATE EQUALIZATION Uyen Ly Dang 1, Wolfgang H. Gerstacker 1, and Dirk T.M. Slock 1 Chair of Mobile Communications, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstrasse
More informationData Detection for Controlled ISI. h(nt) = 1 for n=0,1 and zero otherwise.
Data Detection for Controlled ISI *Symbol by symbol suboptimum detection For the duobinary signal pulse h(nt) = 1 for n=0,1 and zero otherwise. The samples at the output of the receiving filter(demodulator)
More informationAn Adaptive MLSD Receiver Employing Noise Correlation
An Adaptive MLSD Receiver Employing Noise Correlation Ting Liu and Saeed Gazor 1 Abstract A per-survivor processing (PSP) maximum likelihood sequence detection (MLSD) receiver is developed for a fast time-varying
More informationON DECREASING THE COMPLEXITY OF LATTICE-REDUCTION-AIDED K-BEST MIMO DETECTORS.
17th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 009) Glasgow, Scotland, August 4-8, 009 ON DECREASING THE COMPLEXITY OF LATTICE-REDUCTION-AIDED K-BEST MIMO DETECTORS. Sandra Roger, Alberto Gonzalez,
More informationReduced Complexity Space-Time Optimum Processing
Reduced Complexity Space-Time Optimum Processing Jens Jelitto, Marcus Bronzel, Gerhard Fettweis Dresden University of Technology, Germany Abstract New emerging space-time processing technologies promise
More informationTiming errors in distributed space-time communications
Timing errors in distributed space-time communications Emanuele Viterbo Dipartimento di Elettronica Politecnico di Torino Torino, Italy viterbo@polito.it Yi Hong Institute for Telecom. Research University
More informationWeiyao Lin. Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Chapter 5: Digital Transmission through Baseband slchannels Textbook: Ch
Principles of Communications Weiyao Lin Shanghai Jiao Tong University Chapter 5: Digital Transmission through Baseband slchannels Textbook: Ch 10.1-10.5 2009/2010 Meixia Tao @ SJTU 1 Topics to be Covered
More informationMulti-User Gain Maximum Eigenmode Beamforming, and IDMA. Peng Wang and Li Ping City University of Hong Kong
Multi-User Gain Maximum Eigenmode Beamforming, and IDMA Peng Wang and Li Ping City University of Hong Kong 1 Contents Introduction Multi-user gain (MUG) Maximum eigenmode beamforming (MEB) MEB performance
More informationCS6956: Wireless and Mobile Networks Lecture Notes: 2/4/2015
CS6956: Wireless and Mobile Networks Lecture Notes: 2/4/2015 [Most of the material for this lecture has been taken from the Wireless Communications & Networks book by Stallings (2 nd edition).] Effective
More informationSIGNAL PROCESSING FOR TRANSMIT-REFERENCE UWB. Hieu Q. Dang and Alle-Jan van der Veen. TU Delft, Fac. EEMCS, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
SIGNAL ROCESSING FOR TRANSMIT-REFERENCE UWB Hieu Q Dang and Alle-Jan van der Veen TU Delft, Fac EEMCS, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands Transmit-reference (TR) is known as a realistic but low
More informationAnalog Electronics 2 ICS905
Analog Electronics 2 ICS905 G. Rodriguez-Guisantes Dépt. COMELEC http://perso.telecom-paristech.fr/ rodrigez/ens/cycle_master/ November 2016 2/ 67 Schedule Radio channel characteristics ; Analysis and
More informationShallow Water Fluctuations and Communications
Shallow Water Fluctuations and Communications H.C. Song Marine Physical Laboratory Scripps Institution of oceanography La Jolla, CA 92093-0238 phone: (858) 534-0954 fax: (858) 534-7641 email: hcsong@mpl.ucsd.edu
More informationABSTRACT ON PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF OPTIMAL DIVERSITY COMBINING WITH IMPERFECT CHANNEL ESTIMATION. by Yong Peng
ABSTRACT ON PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF OPTIMAL DIVERSITY COMBINING WITH IMPERFECT CHANNEL ESTIMATION by Yong Peng The optimal diversity combining technique is investigated for multipath Rayleigh and Ricean
More informationCyclic Prefix based Enhanced Data Recovery in OFDM
Cyclic Prefix based Enhanced Data Recovery in OFDM T. Y. Al-Naffouri 1 and A. Quadeer 2 Electrical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia, Email: {naffouri
More informationBit Error Rate Estimation for a Joint Detection Receiver in the Downlink of UMTS/TDD
in Proc. IST obile & Wireless Comm. Summit 003, Aveiro (Portugal), June. 003, pp. 56 60. Bit Error Rate Estimation for a Joint Detection Receiver in the Downlink of UTS/TDD K. Kopsa, G. atz, H. Artés,
More informationLecture 7: Wireless Channels and Diversity Advanced Digital Communications (EQ2410) 1
Wireless : Wireless Advanced Digital Communications (EQ2410) 1 Thursday, Feb. 11, 2016 10:00-12:00, B24 1 Textbook: U. Madhow, Fundamentals of Digital Communications, 2008 1 / 15 Wireless Lecture 1-6 Equalization
More informationAuthor(s)Takano, Yasuhiro; Juntti, Markku; Ma. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters
JAIST Reposi https://dspace.j Title Performance of an l1 Regularized Sub MIMO Channel Estimation with Random Author(s)Takano, Yasuhiro; Juntti, Markku; Ma Citation IEEE Wireless Communications Letters
More informationTwo-Way Training: Optimal Power Allocation for Pilot and Data Transmission
564 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 9, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 200 Two-Way Training: Optimal Power Allocation for Pilot and Data Transmission Xiangyun Zhou, Student Member, IEEE, Tharaka A.
More informationTransmitting. Base-station. Interfering. Base-station Mobile Receiver of Desired User
ReducedRank Linear Equalization for the Forward Link in HighSpeed CDMA PhD Preliminary Examination, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University. Major Professor : Michael D. Zoltowski November
More informationEE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 15. OFDM on AWGN and ISI Channels
EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications Week 15 OFDM on AWGN and ISI Channels 1 { x k } x 0 x 1 x x x N- 2 N- 1 IDFT X X X X 0 1 N- 2 N- 1 { X n } insert guard { g X n } g X I n { } D/A ~ si ( t) X g X
More informationSimultaneous SDR Optimality via a Joint Matrix Decomp.
Simultaneous SDR Optimality via a Joint Matrix Decomposition Joint work with: Yuval Kochman, MIT Uri Erez, Tel Aviv Uni. May 26, 2011 Model: Source Multicasting over MIMO Channels z 1 H 1 y 1 Rx1 ŝ 1 s
More informationBlind Identification of FIR Systems and Deconvolution of White Input Sequences
Blind Identification of FIR Systems and Deconvolution of White Input Sequences U. SOVERINI, P. CASTALDI, R. DIVERSI and R. GUIDORZI Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informatica e Sistemistica Università di
More information