W 1 æw 2 G + 0 e? u K y Figure 5.1: Control of uncertain system. For MIMO systems, the normbounded uncertainty description is generalized by assuming
|
|
- Alfred Allen
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 5 Robust stability and the H1 norm An important application of the H1 control problem arises when studying robustness against model uncertainties. It turns out that the condition that a control system is robustly stable in spite of a certain kind of model uncertainties can be expressed quantitatively in terms of an H1 norm bound which the control system should satisfy. The connection of the H1 norm and robust stability will be described in this chapter. We will consider a plant y = Gu where it is assumed that G can be characterized as G = G 0 +æ A è5.1è è5.2è Here, G 0 is the nominal plant model, which is assumed to be linear and ænite dimensional. The additive uncertainty æ A is unknown, but it is assumed that an upper bound on its magnitude can be estimated as a function of frequency. More precisely, for a SISO system we can specify a ælter W èj!è such that jæ A èj!èjjwèj!èj; all! èsisoè è5.3è The uncertainty bound jw èj!èj characterizes the assumed maximum model uncertainty at various frequencies, and it can often be estimated from experimental data. In particular, if the plant model has been determined by frequency response experiments, the maximum error of the frequency response can often directly be estimated from the available experimental frequency response data. For convenience, the characterization è5.2è, è5.3è of an uncertain plant is usually stated in an equivalent form obtained by deæning æ such that æ A = W æ. Then è5.2è, è5.3è is equivalent to G = G 0 + W æ; jæèj!èj1; all! èsisoè è5.4è Here, the uncertainty block æ is assumed to be uniformly bounded at all frequencies, and the varying amount of plant uncertainty at various frequencies is completely incorporated into the ælter W. The ælter W is therefore commonly called uncertainty weighting ælter or simply the uncertainty weight. 52
2 W 1 æw 2 G + 0 e? u K y Figure 5.1: Control of uncertain system. For MIMO systems, the normbounded uncertainty description is generalized by assuming that the uncertainty blockæ A is bounded in its induced matrix norm kæèj!èk = èæèj!èè according to èæ A èj!èè jwèj!èj; all! èmimoè è5.5è where W is a scalar weighting ælter. The characterization è5.4è is then replaced by G = G 0 + W æ; èæèj!èè 1; all! èmimoè è5.6è or, equivalently èrecalling the deænition of the H1 normè G = G 0 + W æ; kæk1 1 èmimoè è5.7è Although the uncertain plant in è5.4è or è5.7è has been formulated for the additive uncertainty è5.2è, it is straightforward to extend the uncertainty description to other forms of normbounded uncertainties. An important uncertainty type is the output multiplicative uncertainty, G =èi+æ M èg 0 è5.8è Assuming that èæ M èj!èè jwèj!èj; all! the uncertain plant can be written in the equivalent form G =èi +æwèg 0 è5.9è =G 0 +æwg 0 ; kæk1 1 è5.10è which is of the same general form as è5.7è, with uncertainty weight WG 0 and with the uncertainty and weight in reversed order. Input multiplicative uncertainties can be characterized in a similar way. 53
3 æ v i? + + P u y z K Figure 5.2: Standard representation of uncertain control system. A general description of an uncertain system with a normbounded uncertainty is given by G = G 0 + W 1 æw 2 ; kæk1 1 è5.11è See Figure 5.1. For the control system in Figure 5.1, it is important to study whether the closed loop is stable for all possible G, i.e., for all normbounded æ such that kæk1 1. In this case the control system is said to be robustly stable and the controller K is said to be robustly stabilizing. The problem of ænding such a robustly stabilizing controller is stated as follows. Robust stabilization problem. Consider the uncertain plant described by è5.11è. Find a controller such that the control system in Figure 5.1 is stable for all uncertainties æ which satisfy the norm bound kæk1 1. The robust stabilization problem can be stated in terms of an equivalent H1 optimal control problem. The result will be based on the observation that the control system in Figure 5.1 can be written in the equivalent form in Figure 5.2, where P is an augmented plant deæned as P11 P P = 12 0 W2 = è5.12è P 22 G 0 P 21 To see the equivalence of the control systems in Figures 5.1 and 5.2, it is suæcient to show that the block diagrams give the same transfer function from u to y. Notice that by Figure 5.2 and equation è5.12è we have W 1 y =ëp 22 + P 21 æèi, P 11 æè,1 P 12 ëu =ëg 0 +W 1 æèi, 0 æ æè,1 W 2 ëu =ëg 0 +W 1 æw 2 ëu è5.13è 54
4 æ v + i? F z Figure 5.3: Representation of uncertain system. which is the same as in Figure 5.1. In order to obtain a qualitative appreciation of the robust stability problem, notice that the uncertainty block æ appears in a feedback loop around the closedloop plant, and classical stability analysis can be applied to provide stability conditions for this feedback loop. More precisely, the control system in Figure 5.2 can be written in the equivalent form shown in Figure 5.3, z =èi,fæè,1 Fv; F = FèP; Kè è5.14è where F = F èp; Kè denotes the closedloop transfer from v to z for the nominal system èwith æ = 0è in Figure 5.2, i.e., F èp; Kè =P 11 + P 12 èi, KP 22 è,1 KP 21 è5.15è According to classical control theory of SISO systems, the feedback loop in Figure 5.3 is stable if F èp; Kè is stable and the loop transfer function F æ has magnitude less than one; jf èj!èæèj!èj é 1, all! èimplying that jf èj! c èæèj! c èj é 1 at the crossover frequency! c, where F æ has phase,è. This result is known as the small gain theorem. By the assumption that æ is normbounded, such that jæèj!èj1, robust stability is thus guaranteed if the closedloop transfer function F satisæes jf èj!èj é 1, all!, or equivalently, the H1norm bound kf k1 é 1 holds. It turns out that the assumption on the uncertainty block æ, kæk11, leaves suæcient freedom so that a normbounded æ which actually destabilizes the system can always be found if jf èj!èj1, for some!, i.e., if kf k1 1. Hence, kf k1 é 1 is both a suæcient and necessary condition for robust stability. For MIMO systems, we can use the following èsimpliæedè qualitative arguments. Notice that the transfer function in è5.14è can be written èi, F æè,1 F = 1 adjèi, F æè æ F detèi, F æè è5.16è Assuming that F and æ are both stable, the stability of the operator in è5.16è is determined by the zeros of detèi, F æè. Since the system in Figure 5.3 is stable for 55
5 suæciently small æ, it follows by interpolation that if there exists a normbounded æ such that the operator in è5.16è is unstable, i.e., it has a righthalfplane pole, then there also exists a normbounded æ such that the operator in è5.16è has a pole on the stability boundary, i.e., on the imaginary axis, implying detèi, F èj!èæèj!èè = 0 for some!. Hence the robust stability condition is equivalent to the condition that detèi, F èj!èæèj!èè 6= 0; all! and æ such that kæk1 1 è5.17è Some analysis shows that the condition è5.17è holds if and only if èf èj!èè é 1, all!, or equivalently, kf k1 é 1. The above results are summarized in the following robust stability condition. Theorem 5.1 Condition for robust stability. Consider the system in Figure 5.2 or 5.3. The system is stable for all uncertainties which satisfy the norm bound kæk1 1 if and only if the nominal closedloop transfer function F = F èp; Kè is stable and kf k1 é 1 è5.18è Remark 5.1. As mentioned above, the 'if'part, kf k1 é 1 è robust stability follows from the classical small gain theorem, because the H1norm bound guarantees jf èj!èæèj!èj é 1 for SISO systems and èf èj!èæèj!èè é 1 for MIMO systems. By contrast, the 'only if'part, robust stability è kf k1 é 1 is newer, and was proved only in the 1980's. The result follows basically from the fact that the uncertainty can be chosen to have arbitrary phase. Hence, if kf k1 1 it follows that a normbounded uncertainty kæk1 1 can always be found which destabilizes the system. Remark 5.2. The robust stability condition in è5.18è is formulated for normbounded uncertainties with a norm bound which is normalized so that kæk1 1. Any other magnitude of the norm bound is assumed to be incorporated as a corresponding factor in the weight ælters W 1 and W 2. Sometimes it is, however, convenient to formulate the robustness criterion explicitly for normbounded uncertainties which satisfy the general norm bound kæk1 æ. It is easy to see that the corresponding robust stability condition is then kf k1 éæ,1 è5.19è It may for example be of interest to determine the largest normbounded uncertainty that can be allowed such that it is still possible to ænd a controller which gives robust stability. The maximally robustly stabilizing controller can be found by minimizing kf k1 èby æiterationè. The controller is then robustly stabilizing for all æ such that kæk1 é kf k,
6 Remark 5.3. Robust stability against nonlinear andèor timevarying uncertainties. Although the robust stability result has above been formulated for linear, timeinvariant èltiè uncertainties, it can easily be generalized to nonlinear, and possibly timevarying uncertainties. Suppose that the uncertainty is not restricted to be linear, but is only assumed to satisfy the norm bound kæk 1 è5.20è where kæk denotes the L 2 induced norm kæk = sup kævk2 : v 6= 0 kvk 2 è5.21è Notice that this deænition of the L 2 induced norm coincides with the deænition of the H1 norm form for linear timeinvariant systems èequations è2.51è, è2.61èè, but now æ may be nonlinear andèor timevarying. Then it can be shown that the system in Figure 5.2 or 5.3 is stable for all, possibly nonlinear andèor timevarying uncertainties æ which satisfy the L 2 induced norm bound è5.20è if and only if the nominal closedloop transfer function F = F èp; Kè is stable and satisæes the H1norm bound è5.18è, i.e., kf k1 é 1. Hence the condition for robust stability against nonlinear, timevarying uncertainties is the same as the condition for robust stability against linear timeinvariant uncertainties. This result may appear counterintuitive, as one would expect that the ærst, more general, uncertainty class would correspond to a more restrictive condition on the closed loop. The result is, however, a consequence of the fact that the nominal system is linear and timeinvariant, and then the worst, destabilizing uncertainty is also linear and timeinvariant. By Remark 5.3 the robust stability condition provides a quantitativeway of treating plant nonlinearities as uncertainties about a nominal linear plant model. Such an approach is of course only feasible for not too strongly nonlinear plants, where the norm bound of the uncertainty which captures the nonlinearities is not excessive. The signiæcance of the robust stability condition è5.18è is that it gives a quantitative characterization of robust stability in terms of the H1 norm. By the procedure in Chapter 4 we know how to ænd a controller which achieves the norm bound è5.18è, and which is robustly stabilizing. Before the introduction of H1 control theory the solution of the robust stabilization problem was not known. Although theoretically important, the robust stabilization problem alone is perhaps of limited practical interest. Firstly, many processes, for example in chemical process control systems, are known to be openloop stable. The maximally robustly stabilizing control strategy is then to operate the plant in open loop, because any feedback controller gives a reduction in robust stability for an openloop stable plant. Secondly, even for an unstable uncertain plant, a controller which is only designed for robust stability will in general be conservative. In practical controller design, the robust stability condition è5.18è is useful as a robustness bound used in combination with other performance related design criteria. This will be discussed in Chapter 7. Notes and references The formulation of robust stability in terms of the H1 norm is due to a number of 57
7 researchers, see for example Doyle and Stein è1981è, Chen and Desoer è1982è, Kimura è1984è, Vidyasagar è1985è, and Vidyasagar and Kimura è1986è. Highly readable accounts of the robust stability issue are found in the books by Vidyasagar è1985è and McFarlane and Glover è1990è. References Chen, M. J. and C. A. Desoer è1982è. "Necessary and suæcient conditions for robust stability of linear distributed feedback systems," Int. J. Control 35, 255í267. Doyle, J. C. and G. Stein è1981è. "Multivariable feedback design: concepts for a classicalèmodern synthesis," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 26, 4í16. Kimura, H. è1984è. "Robust stabilizability for a class of transfer functions," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 29, 788í793. McFarlane, D. C. and K. Glover è1990è. Robust Controller Design Using Normalized Coprime Factor Plant Descriptions. SpringerVerlag, Berlin. Vidyasagar, M. è1985è. Control Systems Synthesis: A Factorization Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Vidyasagar, M. and H. Kimura è1986è. "Robust controllers for uncertain linear multivariable systems," Automatica 22, 85í94. 58
In the previous chapters we have presented synthesis methods for optimal H 2 and
Chapter 8 Robust performance problems In the previous chapters we have presented synthesis methods for optimal H 2 and H1 control problems, and studied the robust stabilization problem with respect to
More informationPreface The purpose of these lecture notes is to present modern feedback control methods based on H 2 - and H1-optimal control theory in a concise way
ROBUST CONTROL METHODS Hannu T. Toivonen Process Control Laboratory çabo Akademi University Turku èçaboè, Finland htoivone@abo.fi Preface The purpose of these lecture notes is to present modern feedback
More informationClosed-loop system 2/1/2016. Generally MIMO case. Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure. (2 DOF structure) The closed loop equations become
Closed-loop system enerally MIMO case Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure (2 DOF structure) 2 The closed loop equations become solving for z gives where is the closed loop transfer function
More informationA.V. SAVKIN AND I.R. PETERSEN uncertain systems in which the uncertainty satisæes a certain integral quadratic constraint; e.g., see ë5, 6, 7ë. The ad
Journal of Mathematical Systems, Estimation, and Control Vol. 6, No. 3, 1996, pp. 1í14 cæ 1996 Birkhíauser-Boston Robust H 1 Control of Uncertain Systems with Structured Uncertainty æ Andrey V. Savkin
More information322 HENDRA GUNAWAN AND MASHADI èivè kx; y + zk çkx; yk + kx; zk: The pair èx; kæ; ækè is then called a 2-normed space. A standard example of a 2-norme
SOOCHOW JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 27, No. 3, pp. 321-329, July 2001 ON FINITE DIMENSIONAL 2-NORMED SPACES BY HENDRA GUNAWAN AND MASHADI Abstract. In this note, we shall study ænite dimensional 2-normed
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 5: Uncertainty and Robustness in SISO Systems [Ch.7-(8)] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 5:Uncertainty and Robustness () FEL3210 MIMO
More informationRobust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization
Robust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization Alireza Karimi, Gorka Galdos and Roland Longchamp Abstract A new approach for robust fixed-order H controller design by
More informationChapter Stability Robustness Introduction Last chapter showed how the Nyquist stability criterion provides conditions for the stability robustness of
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter Stability
More informationalso has x æ as a local imizer. Of course, æ is typically not known, but an algorithm can approximate æ as it approximates x æ èas the augmented Lagra
Introduction to sequential quadratic programg Mark S. Gockenbach Introduction Sequential quadratic programg èsqpè methods attempt to solve a nonlinear program directly rather than convert it to a sequence
More informationMRAGPC Control of MIMO Processes with Input Constraints and Disturbance
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 9 Vol II WCECS 9, October -, 9, San Francisco, USA MRAGPC Control of MIMO Processes with Input Constraints and Disturbance A. S. Osunleke,
More informationThe parameterization of all. of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers
The parameterization stabilizing controllers 89 The parameterization of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada 2, Yuko Tatsumi 3, Non-members ABSTRACT
More informationRobustness Analysis and Controller Synthesis with Non-Normalized Coprime Factor Uncertainty Characterisation
211 5th IEEE onference on Decision and ontrol and European ontrol onference (D-E) Orlando, FL, USA, December 12-15, 211 Robustness Analysis and ontroller Synthesis with Non-Normalized oprime Factor Uncertainty
More informationUncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems
Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Outline Nature of uncertainty (models and signals). Physical sources of model uncertainty. Mathematical
More informationRobust feedback linearization
Robust eedback linearization Hervé Guillard Henri Bourlès Laboratoire d Automatique des Arts et Métiers CNAM/ENSAM 21 rue Pinel 75013 Paris France {herveguillardhenribourles}@parisensamr Keywords: Nonlinear
More informationOn Computing the Worst-case Performance of Lur'e Systems with Uncertain Time-invariant Delays
Article On Computing the Worst-case Performance of Lur'e Systems with Uncertain Time-invariant Delays Thapana Nampradit and David Banjerdpongchai* Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
More information1 Summary This paper outlines a general approach for the design of H 1 dynamic output feedback controllers and applies this method to designing contro
1 Summary This paper outlines a general approach for the design of H 1 dynamic output feedback controllers and applies this method to designing controllers for the active mass driver èamdè benchmark problem.
More informationThM06-2. Coprime Factor Based Closed-Loop Model Validation Applied to a Flexible Structure
Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Maui, Hawaii USA, December 2003 ThM06-2 Coprime Factor Based Closed-Loop Model Validation Applied to a Flexible Structure Marianne Crowder
More informationTitle unstable additive/multiplicative pe. works must be obtained from the IEE
Title Robust stability of sampled-data sy unstable additive/multiplicative pe Author(s) Hagiwara, T; Araki, M Citation IEEE Transactions on Automatic Cont 346 Issue Date 998-09 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/39968
More information80DB A 40DB 0DB DB
Stability Analysis On the Nichols Chart and Its Application in QFT Wenhua Chen and Donald J. Ballance Centre for Systems & Control Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Glasgow Glasgow G12
More informationMIMO analysis: loop-at-a-time
MIMO robustness MIMO analysis: loop-at-a-time y 1 y 2 P (s) + + K 2 (s) r 1 r 2 K 1 (s) Plant: P (s) = 1 s 2 + α 2 s α 2 α(s + 1) α(s + 1) s α 2. (take α = 10 in the following numerical analysis) Controller:
More informationAn Architecture for Fault Tolerant Controllers
An Architecture for Fault Tolerant Controllers Henrik Niemann Ørsted DTU, Automation Technical University of Denmark Building 326, DK2800 Lyngby, Denmark Email: hhn@oersted.dtu.dk www.oersted.dtu.dk/staff/all/hhn/
More information3 Stabilization of MIMO Feedback Systems
3 Stabilization of MIMO Feedback Systems 3.1 Notation The sets R and S are as before. We will use the notation M (R) to denote the set of matrices with elements in R. The dimensions are not explicitly
More informationModel Uncertainty and Robust Stability for Multivariable Systems
Model Uncertainty and Robust Stability for Multivariable Systems ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Devron Profile Control Solutions Outline Representing model uncertainty.
More informationTHIS paper deals with robust control in the setup associated
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 50, NO 10, OCTOBER 2005 1501 Control-Oriented Model Validation and Errors Quantification in the `1 Setup V F Sokolov Abstract A priori information required for
More informationStability and composition of transfer functions
Problem 1.1 Stability and composition of transfer functions G. Fernández-Anaya Departamento de Ciencias Básicas Universidad Iberoaméricana Lomas de Santa Fe 01210 México D.F. México guillermo.fernandez@uia.mx
More informationChapter 9 Robust Stability in SISO Systems 9. Introduction There are many reasons to use feedback control. As we have seen earlier, with the help of a
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 9 Robust
More informationRobust Control. 2nd class. Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room
Robust Control Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) 2nd class Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room 2. Nominal Performance 2.1 Weighted Sensitivity [SP05, Sec. 2.8,
More informationCDS Final Exam
CDS 22 - Final Exam Instructor: Danielle C. Tarraf December 4, 2007 INSTRUCTIONS : Please read carefully! () Description & duration of the exam: The exam consists of 6 problems. You have a total of 24
More informationDistance Measures for Uncertain Linear Systems: A General Theory Alexander Lanzon, Senior Member, IEEE, and George Papageorgiou, Member, IEEE
1532 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 54, NO. 7, JULY 2009 Distance Measures for Uncertain Linear Systems: A General Theory Alexer Lanzon, Senior Member, IEEE, George Papageorgiou, Member,
More information9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design
9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design In some feedback schemes we have additional degrees-offreedom outside the feedback path. For example, feed forwarding known disturbance signals or reference signals. In
More informationChapter Robust Performance and Introduction to the Structured Singular Value Function Introduction As discussed in Lecture 0, a process is better desc
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter Robust
More informationTWO- PHASE APPROACH TO DESIGN ROBUST CONTROLLER FOR UNCERTAIN INTERVAL SYSTEM USING GENETIC ALGORITHM
International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Research (IJEEER) ISSN:2250-155X Vol.2, Issue 2 June 2012 27-38 TJPRC Pvt. Ltd., TWO- PHASE APPROACH TO DESIGN ROBUST CONTROLLER FOR UNCERTAIN
More informationproblem of detection naturally arises in technical diagnostics, where one is interested in detecting cracks, corrosion, or any other defect in a sampl
In: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, N. Olhoæ and G. I. N. Rozvany eds, Pergamon, 1995, 543í548. BOUNDS FOR DETECTABILITY OF MATERIAL'S DAMAGE BY NOISY ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS Elena CHERKAEVA
More informationA Method to Teach the Parameterization of All Stabilizing Controllers
Preprints of the 8th FAC World Congress Milano (taly) August 8 - September, A Method to Teach the Parameterization of All Stabilizing Controllers Vladimír Kučera* *Czech Technical University in Prague,
More informationFINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES. Danlei Chu, Tongwen Chen, Horacio J. Marquez
FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES Danlei Chu Tongwen Chen Horacio J Marquez Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton
More information(Continued on next page)
(Continued on next page) 18.2 Roots of Stability Nyquist Criterion 87 e(s) 1 S(s) = =, r(s) 1 + P (s)c(s) where P (s) represents the plant transfer function, and C(s) the compensator. The closedloop characteristic
More informationInternal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems
Internal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems Asma Mezzi Tunis El Manar University, Automatic Control Research Laboratory, LA.R.A, National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT),
More informationCHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER
114 CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER 5.1 INTRODUCTION Robust control is a branch of control theory that explicitly deals with uncertainty in its approach to controller design. It also refers
More informationH-INFINITY CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR A DC MOTOR MODEL WITH UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS
Engineering MECHANICS, Vol. 18, 211, No. 5/6, p. 271 279 271 H-INFINITY CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR A DC MOTOR MODEL WITH UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS Lukáš Březina*, Tomáš Březina** The proposed article deals with
More informationTHE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL ROBUST STABILIZING MULTI-PERIOD REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS FOR MIMO TD PLANTS WITH THE SPECIFIED INPUT-OUTPUT CHARACTERISTIC
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information Control ICIC International c 218 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 14, Number 2, April 218 pp. 387 43 THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL ROBUST STABILIZING MULTI-PERIOD
More informationUniversity of California, Berkeley. ABSTRACT
Jagged Bite Problem NP-Complete Construction Kris Hildrum and Megan Thomas Computer Science Division University of California, Berkeley fhildrum,mctg@cs.berkeley.edu ABSTRACT Ahyper-rectangle is commonly
More informationRobust Output Feedback Controller Design via Genetic Algorithms and LMIs: The Mixed H 2 /H Problem
Robust Output Feedback Controller Design via Genetic Algorithms and LMIs: The Mixed H 2 /H Problem Gustavo J. Pereira and Humberto X. de Araújo Abstract This paper deals with the mixed H 2/H control problem
More informationDelay-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Multiple Time Delays
Delay-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Multiple Time Delays Yong He, Min Wu, Jin-Hua She Abstract This paper deals with the problem of the delay-dependent stability of linear systems
More informationDesign Methods for Control Systems
Design Methods for Control Systems Maarten Steinbuch TU/e Gjerrit Meinsma UT Dutch Institute of Systems and Control Winter term 2002-2003 Schedule November 25 MSt December 2 MSt Homework # 1 December 9
More informationSwitching H 2/H Control of Singular Perturbation Systems
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(4): 443-45, 009 ISSN 1991-8178 Switching H /H Control of Singular Perturbation Systems Ahmad Fakharian, Fatemeh Jamshidi, Mohammad aghi Hamidi Beheshti
More informationRobust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming
Robust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming Gorka Galdos, Alireza Karimi and Roland Longchamp Abstract A quadratic programming approach is proposed to tune fixed-order
More informationA Comparative Study on Automatic Flight Control for small UAV
Proceedings of the 5 th International Conference of Control, Dynamic Systems, and Robotics (CDSR'18) Niagara Falls, Canada June 7 9, 18 Paper No. 13 DOI: 1.11159/cdsr18.13 A Comparative Study on Automatic
More informationFall 線性系統 Linear Systems. Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian. NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08
Fall 2007 線性系統 Linear Systems Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08 Materials used in these lecture notes are adopted from Linear System Theory & Design, 3rd.
More informationSynthesis of Controllers for Non-minimum Phase and Unstable Systems Using Non-sequential MIMO Quantitative Feedback Theory
Synthesis of Controllers for Non-minimum Phase and Unstable Systems Using Non-sequential MIMO Quantitative Feedback Theory Chen-yang Lan Murray L Kerr Suhada Jayasuriya * Graduate Student Graduate Student
More informationHence the systems in è3.5è can also be written as where D 11,D 22. Gèsè : 2 4 A C 1 B 1 D 11 B 2 D 12 C 2 D 21 D è3.è In è3.5è, the direct feed
Chapter 3 The H 2 -optimal control problem In this chapter we present the solution of the H 2 -optimal control problem. We consider the control system in Figure 1.2. Introducing the partition of G according
More informationAnalysis of robust performance for uncertain negative-imaginary systems using structured singular value
8th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation Congress Palace Hotel, Marrakech, Morocco June 3-5, 00 Analysis of robust performance for uncertain negative-imaginary systems using structured singular
More informationLinear Control Systems Lecture #3 - Frequency Domain Analysis. Guillaume Drion Academic year
Linear Control Systems Lecture #3 - Frequency Domain Analysis Guillaume Drion Academic year 2018-2019 1 Goal and Outline Goal: To be able to analyze the stability and robustness of a closed-loop system
More informationQuantitative Feedback Theory based Controller Design of an Unstable System
Quantitative Feedback Theory based Controller Design of an Unstable System Chandrima Roy Department of E.C.E, Assistant Professor Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata, WB Kalyankumar Datta Department
More informationState feedback gain scheduling for linear systems with time-varying parameters
State feedback gain scheduling for linear systems with time-varying parameters Vinícius F. Montagner and Pedro L. D. Peres Abstract This paper addresses the problem of parameter dependent state feedback
More informationA New Invariance Property of Lyapunov Characteristic Directions S. Bharadwaj and K.D. Mease Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of Califor
A New Invariance Property of Lyapunov Characteristic Directions S. Bharadwaj and K.D. Mease Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Irvine, California, 92697-3975 Email: sanjay@eng.uci.edu,
More informationThe Tuning of Robust Controllers for Stable Systems in the CD-Algebra: The Case of Sinusoidal and Polynomial Signals
The Tuning of Robust Controllers for Stable Systems in the CD-Algebra: The Case of Sinusoidal and Polynomial Signals Timo Hämäläinen Seppo Pohjolainen Tampere University of Technology Department of Mathematics
More informationImprove Performance of Multivariable Robust Control in Boiler System
Canadian Journal on Automation, Control & Intelligent Systems Vol. No. 4, June Improve Performance of Multivariable Robust Control in Boiler System Mehdi Parsa, Ali Vahidian Kamyad and M. Bagher Naghibi
More informationControl and Robustness for Quantum Linear Systems
CCC 2013 1 Control and Robustness for Quantum Linear Systems Ian R. Petersen School of Engineering and Information Technology, UNSW Canberra CCC 2013 2 Introduction Developments in quantum technology and
More informationRobust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Using Coefficient Diagram Method
International Journal of Electrical Engineering. ISSN 0974-2158 Volume 7, Number 2 (2014), pp. 257-270 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
More informationP.B. Stark. January 29, 1998
Statistics 210B, Spring 1998 Class Notes P.B. Stark stark@stat.berkeley.edu www.stat.berkeley.eduèçstarkèindex.html January 29, 1998 Second Set of Notes 1 More on Testing and Conædence Sets See Lehmann,
More informationactuator 1 actuator 2 = k + r γ ψ Joint Axis
Robust Control of a Robot Joint with Hydraulic Actuator Redundancy Benoit Boulet and Vincent Hayward McGill University Research Centre for Intelligent Machines 3480 University Street, Montréal, Québec,
More informationA new robust delay-dependent stability criterion for a class of uncertain systems with delay
A new robust delay-dependent stability criterion for a class of uncertain systems with delay Fei Hao Long Wang and Tianguang Chu Abstract A new robust delay-dependent stability criterion for a class of
More informationActuator saturation has a signiæcant eæect on the overall stability of aircraft. The recent YF-22 crash èapril 1992è has been blamed on a pilot-induce
Nonlinear Control of Mechanical Systems in the Presence of Magnitude and Rate Saturations Richard M. Murray Mechanical Engineering California Institute of Technology Summary Report, Grant N00014-96-1-0804
More informationIterative Learning Control Analysis and Design I
Iterative Learning Control Analysis and Design I Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK etar@ecs.soton.ac.uk http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ Contents Basics Representations
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #19 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Stengel Chapter 6 Question: how well do the large gain and phase margins discussed for LQR map over to DOFB using LQR and LQE (called LQG)? Fall 2010 16.30/31 19
More informationRobust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering ; (): -7 DOI:.59/j.control.. Robust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems M. M. Share Pasandand *, H. D. Taghirad Department
More informationJ. TSINIAS In the present paper we extend previous results on the same problem for interconnected nonlinear systems èsee ë1-18ë and references therein
Journal of Mathematical Systems, Estimation, and Control Vol. 6, No. 1, 1996, pp. 1í17 cæ 1996 Birkhíauser-Boston Versions of Sontag's Input to State Stability Condition and Output Feedback Global Stabilization
More information7 Robustness Analysis with Real Parametric Uncertainty
7 Robustness Analysis with Real Parametric Uncertainty Roberto Tempo IEIIT CNR Politecnico di Torino Franco Blanchini Università di Udine 7.1 Motivations and Preliminaries...7-1 Motivating Example: DC
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationRobust and Optimal Control, Spring A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization
Robust and Optimal Control, Spring 2015 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization A.2 Sensitivity and Feedback Performance A.3
More informationAchievable performance of multivariable systems with unstable zeros and poles
Achievable performance of multivariable systems with unstable zeros and poles K. Havre Λ and S. Skogestad y Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 17: Robust Stability Readings: DDV, Chapters 19, 20 Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology April 6, 2011 E. Frazzoli
More informationDisturbance Attenuation Properties for Discrete-Time Uncertain Switched Linear Systems
Disturbance Attenuation Properties for Discrete-Time Uncertain Switched Linear Systems Hai Lin Department of Electrical Engineering University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA Panos J. Antsaklis
More informationA Unied Approach on Stability Robustness for Uncertainty. Descriptions based on Fractional Model Representations
A Unied Approach on Stability Robustness for Uncertainty Descriptions based on Fractional Model Representations R.A. de Callafon z P.M.J. Van den Hof P.M.M. Bongers x Mechanical Engineering Systems and
More informationwhere Sènè stands for the set of n æ n real symmetric matrices, and æ is a bounded open set in IR n,typically with a suæciently regular boundary, mean
GOOD AND VISCOSITY SOLUTIONS OF FULLY NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS 1 ROBERT JENSEN 2 Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Loyola University Chicago, IL 60626, U.S.A. E-mail: rrj@math.luc.edu
More informationStructured Stochastic Uncertainty
Structured Stochastic Uncertainty Bassam Bamieh Department of Mechanical Engineering University of California at Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA, 9306 bamieh@engineeringucsbedu Abstract We consider linear
More informationStructured Uncertainty and Robust Performance
Structured Uncertainty and Robust Performance ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Devron Profile Control Solutions Outline Structured uncertainty: motivating example. Structured
More informationDERIVATIVE FREE OUTPUT FEEDBACK ADAPTIVE CONTROL
DERIVATIVE FREE OUTPUT FEEDBACK ADAPTIVE CONTROL Tansel YUCELEN, * Kilsoo KIM, and Anthony J. CALISE Georgia Institute of Technology, Yucelen Atlanta, * GA 30332, USA * tansel@gatech.edu AIAA Guidance,
More informationCONTROL using quantized feedback has been an important
1698 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 50, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2005 The Sector Bound Approach to Quantized Feedback Control Minyue Fu, Fellow, IEEE, Lihua Xie Abstract This paper studies a number
More informationRobust Adaptive MPC for Systems with Exogeneous Disturbances
Robust Adaptive MPC for Systems with Exogeneous Disturbances V. Adetola M. Guay Department of Chemical Engineering, Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (e-mail: martin.guay@chee.queensu.ca) Abstract:
More informationFloor Control (kn) Time (sec) Floor 5. Displacement (mm) Time (sec) Floor 5.
DECENTRALIZED ROBUST H CONTROL OF MECHANICAL STRUCTURES. Introduction L. Bakule and J. Böhm Institute of Information Theory and Automation Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic The results contributed
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 6: Robust stability and performance in MIMO systems [Ch.8] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 6: Robust Stability and Performance () FEL3210
More informationQUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS
Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2003, Vol. 13, No. 2, 179 184 QUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS PINI GURFIL Department of Mechanical and Aerospace
More informationInformation Structures Preserved Under Nonlinear Time-Varying Feedback
Information Structures Preserved Under Nonlinear Time-Varying Feedback Michael Rotkowitz Electrical Engineering Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Email: michael.rotkowitz@ee.kth.se
More informationHere represents the impulse (or delta) function. is an diagonal matrix of intensities, and is an diagonal matrix of intensities.
19 KALMAN FILTER 19.1 Introduction In the previous section, we derived the linear quadratic regulator as an optimal solution for the fullstate feedback control problem. The inherent assumption was that
More informationROBUST STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS* [8 # ]
ROBUST STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS* [8 # ] General control configuration with uncertainty [8.1] For our robustness analysis we use a system representation in which the uncertain perturbations are
More informationInformation-Based Complexity of Uncertainty Sets in Feedback Control
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 46, NO 4, APRIL 2001 519 Information-Based Complexity of Uncertainty Sets in Feedback Control Le Yi Wang and Lin Lin, Member, IEEE Abstract In this paper, a
More informationFrequency-Domain Robust Control Toolbox
Frequency-Domain Robust Control Toolbox Alireza Karimi Abstract A new frequency-domain robust control toolbox is introduced and compared with some features of the robust control toolbox of Matlab. A summary
More informationAPPLICATION OF D-K ITERATION TECHNIQUE BASED ON H ROBUST CONTROL THEORY FOR POWER SYSTEM STABILIZER DESIGN
APPLICATION OF D-K ITERATION TECHNIQUE BASED ON H ROBUST CONTROL THEORY FOR POWER SYSTEM STABILIZER DESIGN Amitava Sil 1 and S Paul 2 1 Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Neotia Institute
More informationEL2520 Control Theory and Practice
EL2520 Control Theory and Practice Lecture 8: Linear quadratic control Mikael Johansson School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Stockholm, Sweden Linear quadratic control Allows to compute the controller
More informationLecture 1. Introduction. The importance, ubiquity, and complexity of embedded systems are growing
Lecture 1 Introduction Karl Henrik Johansson The importance, ubiquity, and complexity of embedded systems are growing tremendously thanks to the revolution in digital technology. This has created a need
More informationThe Generalized Nyquist Criterion and Robustness Margins with Applications
51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 10-13, 2012. Maui, Hawaii, USA The Generalized Nyquist Criterion and Robustness Margins with Applications Abbas Emami-Naeini and Robert L. Kosut Abstract
More informationLMI based output-feedback controllers: γ-optimal versus linear quadratic.
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress he International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul Korea July 6-11 28 LMI based output-feedback controllers: γ-optimal versus linear quadratic. Dmitry V. Balandin
More informationA NEW APPROACH TO MIXED H 2 /H OPTIMAL PI/PID CONTROLLER DESIGN
Copyright 2002 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NEW APPROACH TO MIXED H 2 /H OPTIMAL PI/PID CONTROLLER DESIGN Chyi Hwang,1 Chun-Yen Hsiao Department of Chemical Engineering National
More informationRobust control in presence of parametric uncertainties: observer based feedback controller design
This is an electronic version (author's version) of the paper: Fissore D. (2008). Robust control in presence of parametric uncertainties: observer based feedback controller design. Chemical Engineering
More informationOn the simultaneous stabilization of three or more plants
On the simultaneous stabilization of three or more plants Christophe Fonte, Michel Zasadzinski, Christine Bernier-Kazantsev, Mohamed Darouach To cite this version: Christophe Fonte, Michel Zasadzinski,
More informationDidier HENRION henrion
POLYNOMIAL METHODS FOR ROBUST CONTROL PART I.1 ROBUST STABILITY ANALYSIS: SINGLE PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY Didier HENRION www.laas.fr/ henrion henrion@laas.fr Pont Neuf over river Garonne in Toulouse June
More informationMANY adaptive control methods rely on parameter estimation
610 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 52, NO 4, APRIL 2007 Direct Adaptive Dynamic Compensation for Minimum Phase Systems With Unknown Relative Degree Jesse B Hoagg and Dennis S Bernstein Abstract
More informationH-Infinity Controller Design for a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor
International Journal of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. ISSN 974-2174 Volume 7, Number 8 (214), pp. 767-772 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com H-Infinity Controller
More informationFragility via Robustness of Controllers Dedicated. to the Congestion Control in Internet Protocol
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 88, 4353-4362 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2013.3528 Fragility via Robustness of Controllers Dedicated to the Congestion
More information