IDENTIFICATION OF MARGINAL EFFECTS IN NONSEPARABLE MODELS WITHOUT MONOTONICITY
|
|
- Virgil Stone
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Econometrica, Vol. 75, No. 5 (September, 2007), IDENTIFICATION OF MARGINAL EFFECTS IN NONSEPARABLE MODELS WITHOUT MONOTONICITY BY STEFAN HODERLEIN AND ENNO MAMMEN 1 Nonseparable models do not impose any type of additivity between the unobserved part and the observable regressors, and are therefore ideal for many economic applications. To identify these models using the entire joint distribution of the data as summarized in regression quantiles, monotonicity in unobservables has frequently been assumed. This paper establishes that in the absence of monotonicity, the quantiles identify local average structural derivatives of nonseparable models. KEYWORDS: Nonparametric, partial identification, nonseparable model, quantile regression, nonparametric instrumental variable, weak axiom. 1. INTRODUCTION IN MANY CLASSICAL ECONOMETRIC MODELS the error terms have been modeled as additively separable because this allows the application of powerful statistical tools. However, additive separability has often no real foundation in economic theory, and hence models with weakly separable error terms have become increasingly popular. In the most basic setup, such a model takes the form (1) Y = φ(x A) where Y and X are observable real valued random p and d vectors, φ is a smooth measurable function, and A is an unobservable random vector. Often, the relationship between Y and some or all of the regressors X is of key economic interest, while A captures omitted factors and all types of unobserved heterogeneity. This model (1)was first analyzed byroehrig (1988).Recent contributions that avoid assuming monotonicity are by Imbens and Newey (2003), Altonji and Matzkin (2005), and Hoderlein (2007). See also Hoderlein and Mammen (2006) for more references. In this paper we will be concerned with the following question: What can we learn from the entire joint distribution of observables (Y X) about marginal effects of φ with respect to economically important variables in the structural model (1)? To be clear, we are not looking for a minimal set of assumptions that make the structural model (1) completely identifiable. Instead we look at functionals of the structural model that are still identified without invoking any major assumption on the structure of φ or the dimensionality of A. 1 Stefan Hoderlein dedicates this paper to the memory of Eduardo Hoderlein. We are indebted to the coeditor Whitney Newey, to three anonymous referees, to Andrew Chesher, Joel Horowitz, Oliver Linton, Rosa Matzkin, and Jim Powell, as well as to seminar participants at the ESWC, EMS Oslo, Bergen, Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg, Frankfurt, Madrid, Mannheim, Northwestern, Strassburg, Tübingen, and UCL/IFS for helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies. 1513
2 1514 S. HODERLEIN AND E. MAMMEN The main result of this paper establishes that for scalar Y the conditional expectations of derivatives of φ with respect to X, given all available data, that is, X and Y, are identified under a weak conditional independence assumption. This result does not imply that every single individual s marginal effect in a heterogeneous population is identified (e.g., x1 φ), but it shows that the average marginal effects over all individuals with the same observable data outcomes (covariates and response) are identified. We call this quantity the local average structural derivative (LASD). For instance, by use of quantile derivatives we can identify the average marginal effect of a marginal increase in schooling on wage for a subpopulation defined by different values of the covariates, say age and number of children, as well as at different quantiles of the wage distribution. Consequently, if policy makers want to target the average wage of young low income families with many children by marginally increasing their schooling, then it would be exactly the LASD they would have to consider. Of course, in this example the obvious question is that of endogeneity of the regressors. In Hoderlein and Mammen (2006) we discussed the economic rationale of our approach in more detail and extended it precisely to include endogenous regressors. Moreover, we discussed semiparametric modeling, nonparametric estimation, and testing (including the associated large sample theory), and we provided an application. 2. IDENTIFICATION: BASIC RESULT In this section we establish formally what can be learned from data about the marginal effect of one regressor, say x 1 on the dependent variable y.summarizing the setup, in model (1), let Y be a random scalar and let X be a random d vector. A is an unobserved random variable that takes values in a Borel space A, that is a set that is homeomorphic to a Borel subset of the unit interval endowed with the Borel σ-field. This includes the case that A is a random element of a Polish space, for example, a random piecewise continuous (utility) function. Moreover, let x1 denote the partial derivative with respect to the first component of x. We can now formulate the central question as follows: What can be learned about x1 φ from the observed data (Y X)? To answer this question, we introduce some notation and assumptions. Let k α (x) denote the conditional α-quantile of Y given X = x, that is, for 0 <α<1 the quantity k α (x) is defined by P[Y k α (x) X = x] =α For fixed values x R d and 0 <α<1 we will make use of the following assumptions: ASSUMPTION A1: The random variables A and X 1 are conditionally independent given X 2 X d. ASSUMPTION A2: The conditional distribution of Y given X is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure for x 1 in a neighborhood of x 1 and for x 1 = x 1. Here we use the notation x 1 = (x 2 x d ). The density
3 MARGINAL EFFECTS IN NONSEPARABLE MODELS 1515 f Y X (y x 1 x 1 ) of Y given X is continuous in (y x 1) at the point (y x 1 ) = (k α (x ) x 1 ). The conditional density f Y X(y x ) of Y given X = x is bounded in y R. ASSUMPTION A3: k α (x) is partially differentiable with respect to the first component at x = x. Moreover, there exists a measurable function that satisfies P [ φ(x 1 + δ x 1 A) φ(x A) δ (A) εδ X = x ] = o(δ) for δ 0andfixedε>0. We write x1 φ(x a)for (a) and x1 φ for (A). ASSUMPTION A4: The conditional distribution of (Y x1 φ) given X is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure for x = x. For the conditional density f Y x1 φ X of (Y ; x1 φ) given X, we require that f Y x1 φ X(y y x ) Cg(y ),wherec is a constant and g is a positive density on R with finite mean (i.e., y g(y )dy < ). REMARK 2.1: The only substantial assumption is Assumption A1, a(conditional) independence assumption that is weaker than full joint independence of A and X usually assumed in this literature. The other assumptions are common regularity conditions. Note that all other regressors may be arbitrarily correlated with the unobservables A and they may be discrete. For a discussion of the economic content of these assumptions, including an example, we refer again to Hoderlein and Mammen (2006). Under these assumptions, we obtain the following theorem on the relation between the derivative of the conditional quantile and the marginal effect of the nonseparable function φ. The proof can be found in the Appendix. THEOREM 2.1: For fixed values x R d and 0 <α<1, assume that Assumptions A1 A4 hold. 2 Then E[ x1 φ(x A) X = x Y = k α (x )]= x1 k α (x ) REMARK 2.2: This theorem states that we can identify an average over the marginal effects x1 φ from the data. The derivative of the quantile is the best approximation (in the sense of minimizing L 2 distance) to the true marginal effects given all the information at our disposal. Obviously, from this quantity, weighted population averages can be obtained where the weights may depend on the dependent variable. In Hoderlein and Mammen (2006), we extended 2 Here the versions of the conditional expectation and of the conditional quantile are calculated with versions of the conditional and unconditional densities that fulfill Assumptions A1 A4.
4 1516 S. HODERLEIN AND E. MAMMEN this result further by treating the case of endogenous regressors in a control function setup. However, we also showed by counterexample that an extension to systems of equations is not possible without further assumptions. REMARK 2.3: Let us compare our model to the case where A is univariate, without loss of generality uniformly distributed on [0 1], andφ is strictly monotone in A. Under this additional monotonicity assumption the function φ(x α) is identified by k α (x), and hence x1 φ(x α) = x1 k α (x). However, this assumption has severe consequences. Take as an example consumer demand: By observing the expenditure Y of an individual for only one value of the covariate X, the expenditure for the same individual is determined for all values of X. Moreover, any two individuals with the same expenditure at one X have identical demands for all X. Finally, together with conditional independence, monotonicity implies that the ordering of individuals remains strictly preserved, that is, they stay at exactly the same percentile of expenditure for any level of the covariates. As is obvious from these examples, invoking the assumption of monotonicity should be carefully considered in general. To see the differences from the monotonicity approach formally, suppose for the moment that we were interested in the closest approximation to the square of the derivative x1 φ(x A). Given all our information, that is, X and Y, the best L 2 approximation to this quantity is E[ x1 φ(x A) 2 X = x Y = y] = E[ x1 φ(x A) X = x Y = y] 2 + Var[ x1 φ(x A) X = x Y = y] = x1 k α (x) 2 + Var[ x1 φ(x A) X = x Y = y] x1 k α (x) 2 with equality holding only if x1 φ is degenerate in the sense that it is a function of (X Y ) only; else, E[ x1 φ(x A) 2 X = x Y = y] > x1 k α (x) 2, that is, we can only bound the quantity of interest. The obvious conclusion is that for general nonlinear functions of the derivative, the monotonicity approach still point identifies the nonlinear function of the derivative, while without monotonicity we will, in general, not even be able to give bounds for the best approximation. Dept. of Economics, University of Mannheim, L 7, 3-5, Mannheim, Germany; stefan_hoderlein@yahoo.com and Dept. of Economics, University of Mannheim, L 7, 3-5, Mannheim, Germany; emammen@rumms.uni-mannheim.de. Manuscript received October, 2005; final revision received April, 2007.
5 MARGINAL EFFECTS IN NONSEPARABLE MODELS 1517 APPENDIX PROOF OF THEOREM 2.1: For simplicity of exposition, we concentrate on the scalar x case and we write X = X 1. By definition of k α (x),forδ>0, (2) where 0 = P[Y k α (x + δ) X = x + δ] P[Y k α (x ) X = x ] = A 1 + A 2 + A 3 A 1 = P [ φ(x + δ A) k α (x + δ) X = x + δ ] P [ φ(x + δ A) k α (x ) X = x + δ ] A 2 = P [ φ(x + δ A) k α (x ) X = x + δ ] P [ φ(x + δ A) k α (x ) X = x ] A 3 = P [ φ(x + δ A) k α (x ) X = x ] P [ φ(x A) k α (x ) X = x ] By Assumption A1 we have A 2 = 0. For A 1 we get (3) A 1 = kα(x +δ) k α(x ) f Y X (y x + δ) dy = δ x k α (x )f Y X (k α (x ) x ) + o(δ) by Assumptions A2 and A3 for δ 0. For A 3 we get, for δ 0, (4) A 3 = P [ k α (x )<Y k α (x ) + Y φ(x + δ A) X = x ] P [ k α (x ) + Y φ(x + δ A) < Y k α (x ) X = x ] = P [ k α (x ) Y k α (x ) δ x φ X = x ] P [ k α (x ) δ x φ Y k α (x ) X = x ] + o(δ) where in the last step we have used Assumptions A3 and A4. By some more simple algebra, [ A 3 = P Y k α (x ) x φ Y k α(x ) ] X = x δ [ P Y k α (x ) x φ Y k α(x ) ] X = x + o(δ) δ [y kα(x )]/δ = f Y xφ X(y y x )dydy k α(x )
6 1518 S. HODERLEIN AND E. MAMMEN 0 = δ δ 0 = δ δ kα(x ) + u 0 [y k α(x )]/δ f Y xφ X(y y x )dydy + o(δ) f Y xφ X(k α (x ) δu y x )dudy u f Y xφ X(k α (x ) δu y x )dudy + o(δ) ( y )f Y xφ X(k α (x ) y x )dy 0 y f Y xφ X(k α (x ) y x )dy + o(δ) = δe[ x φ Y = k(x ) X = x ]f Y X (k α (x ) x ) + o(δ) From (2) (4)andA 2 = 0 we get the statement of the theorem. Q.E.D. REFERENCES ALTONJI,J.,AND R. MATZKIN (2005): Cross Section and Panel Data Estimators for Nonseparable Models with Endogenous Regressors, Econometrica, 73, [1513] HODERLEIN, S. (2007): How Many Consumers Are Rational? Working Paper, Mannheim University. [1513] HODERLEIN,S.,AND E. MAMMEN (2006): Partial Identification and Nonparametric Estimation of Local Average Structural Derivatives, Working Paper, Mannheim University. [ ] IMBENS, G., AND W. NEWEY (2003): Identification and Estimation of Triangular Simultaneous Equations Models Without Additivity, Working Paper, MIT. [1513] ROEHRIG, C. (1988): Conditions for Identification in Nonparametric and Parametric Models, Econometrica, 56, [1513]
Generated Covariates in Nonparametric Estimation: A Short Review.
Generated Covariates in Nonparametric Estimation: A Short Review. Enno Mammen, Christoph Rothe, and Melanie Schienle Abstract In many applications, covariates are not observed but have to be estimated
More informationUnconditional Quantile Regression with Endogenous Regressors
Unconditional Quantile Regression with Endogenous Regressors Pallab Kumar Ghosh Department of Economics Syracuse University. Email: paghosh@syr.edu Abstract This paper proposes an extension of the Fortin,
More informationControl Functions in Nonseparable Simultaneous Equations Models 1
Control Functions in Nonseparable Simultaneous Equations Models 1 Richard Blundell 2 UCL & IFS and Rosa L. Matzkin 3 UCLA June 2013 Abstract The control function approach (Heckman and Robb (1985)) in a
More informationConditions for the Existence of Control Functions in Nonseparable Simultaneous Equations Models 1
Conditions for the Existence of Control Functions in Nonseparable Simultaneous Equations Models 1 Richard Blundell UCL and IFS and Rosa L. Matzkin UCLA First version: March 2008 This version: October 2010
More informationFlexible Estimation of Treatment Effect Parameters
Flexible Estimation of Treatment Effect Parameters Thomas MaCurdy a and Xiaohong Chen b and Han Hong c Introduction Many empirical studies of program evaluations are complicated by the presence of both
More informationIdentification in Nonparametric Limited Dependent Variable Models with Simultaneity and Unobserved Heterogeneity
Identification in Nonparametric Limited Dependent Variable Models with Simultaneity and Unobserved Heterogeneity Rosa L. Matzkin 1 Department of Economics University of California, Los Angeles First version:
More informationESTIMATION OF NONPARAMETRIC MODELS WITH SIMULTANEITY
ESTIMATION OF NONPARAMETRIC MODELS WITH SIMULTANEITY Rosa L. Matzkin Department of Economics University of California, Los Angeles First version: May 200 This version: August 204 Abstract We introduce
More informationRandom Coefficients on Endogenous Variables in Simultaneous Equations Models
Review of Economic Studies (207) 00, 6 0034-6527/7/0000000$02.00 c 207 The Review of Economic Studies Limited Random Coefficients on Endogenous Variables in Simultaneous Equations Models MATTHEW A. MASTEN
More informationNonparametric Instrumental Variables Identification and Estimation of Nonseparable Panel Models
Nonparametric Instrumental Variables Identification and Estimation of Nonseparable Panel Models Bradley Setzler December 8, 2016 Abstract This paper considers identification and estimation of ceteris paribus
More informationNonseparable multinomial choice models in cross-section and panel data
Nonseparable multinomial choice models in cross-section and panel data Victor Chernozhukov Iván Fernández-Val Whitney K. Newey The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working
More informationUnobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Demand Using Generalized Random Coefficients
Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Demand Using Generalized Random Coefficients Arthur Lewbel and Krishna Pendakur Boston College and Simon Fraser University original Sept. 011, revised Oct. 014 Abstract
More informationContinuous Treatments
Continuous Treatments Stefan Hoderlein Boston College Yuya Sasaki Brown University First Draft: July 15, 2009 This Draft: January 19, 2011 Abstract This paper explores the relationship between nonseparable
More informationMissing dependent variables in panel data models
Missing dependent variables in panel data models Jason Abrevaya Abstract This paper considers estimation of a fixed-effects model in which the dependent variable may be missing. For cross-sectional units
More informationIdentification of Instrumental Variable. Correlated Random Coefficients Models
Identification of Instrumental Variable Correlated Random Coefficients Models Matthew A. Masten Alexander Torgovitsky January 18, 2016 Abstract We study identification and estimation of the average partial
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES IDENTIFICATION OF TREATMENT EFFECTS USING CONTROL FUNCTIONS IN MODELS WITH CONTINUOUS, ENDOGENOUS TREATMENT AND HETEROGENEOUS EFFECTS Jean-Pierre Florens James J. Heckman Costas
More informationAdditional Material for Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation (Cuttings from the Web Appendix)
Additional Material for Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation (Cuttings from the Web Appendix Flavio Cunha The University of Pennsylvania James Heckman The University
More information13 Endogeneity and Nonparametric IV
13 Endogeneity and Nonparametric IV 13.1 Nonparametric Endogeneity A nonparametric IV equation is Y i = g (X i ) + e i (1) E (e i j i ) = 0 In this model, some elements of X i are potentially endogenous,
More informationNonlinear Difference-in-Differences in Repeated Cross Sections with Continuous Treatments
Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences in Repeated Cross Sections with Continuous Treatments Xavier D Haultfœuille Stefan Hoderlein Yuya Sasaki CREST Boston College Johns Hopkins March 29, 2015 Abstract This
More informationINFERENCE APPROACHES FOR INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE QUANTILE REGRESSION. 1. Introduction
INFERENCE APPROACHES FOR INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE QUANTILE REGRESSION VICTOR CHERNOZHUKOV CHRISTIAN HANSEN MICHAEL JANSSON Abstract. We consider asymptotic and finite-sample confidence bounds in instrumental
More informationIndividual Heterogeneity and Average Welfare
Individual Heterogeneity and Average Welfare Jerry A. Hausman Whitney K. Newey The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP42/14 Individual Heterogeneity and Average
More informationNONPARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF TRANSFORMATION MODELS. [Preliminary and Incomplete. Please do not circulate.]
NONPARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF TRANSFORMATION MODELS PIERRE-ANDRE CHIAPPORI, IVANA KOMUNJER, AND DENNIS KRISTENSEN Abstract. This paper derives sufficient conditions for nonparametric transformation
More informationPartial Identification of Nonseparable Models using Binary Instruments
Partial Identification of Nonseparable Models using Binary Instruments Takuya Ishihara October 13, 2017 arxiv:1707.04405v2 [stat.me] 12 Oct 2017 Abstract In this study, we eplore the partial identification
More informationIDENTIFICATION, ESTIMATION, AND SPECIFICATION TESTING OF NONPARAMETRIC TRANSFORMATION MODELS
IDENTIFICATION, ESTIMATION, AND SPECIFICATION TESTING OF NONPARAMETRIC TRANSFORMATION MODELS PIERRE-ANDRE CHIAPPORI, IVANA KOMUNJER, AND DENNIS KRISTENSEN Abstract. This paper derives necessary and sufficient
More informationPrinciples Underlying Evaluation Estimators
The Principles Underlying Evaluation Estimators James J. University of Chicago Econ 350, Winter 2019 The Basic Principles Underlying the Identification of the Main Econometric Evaluation Estimators Two
More informationThe Triangular Model with Random Coefficients
The Triangular Model with andom Coefficients Stefan Hoderlein Boston College Hajo Holzmann Marburg June 24, 2015 Alexander Meister ostock The triangular model is a very popular way to capture endogeneity.
More informationThe Triangular Model with Random Coefficients
The Triangular Model with andom Coefficients Stefan Hoderlein Boston College Hajo Holzmann Marburg June 15, 2017 Alexander Meister ostock The triangular model is a very popular way to allow for causal
More informationEcon 2148, fall 2017 Instrumental variables II, continuous treatment
Econ 2148, fall 2017 Instrumental variables II, continuous treatment Maximilian Kasy Department of Economics, Harvard University 1 / 35 Recall instrumental variables part I Origins of instrumental variables:
More informationCorrect Specification and Identification
THE MILTON FRIEDMAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS MFI Working Paper Series No. 2009-003 Correct Specification and Identification of Nonparametric Transformation Models Pierre-Andre Chiappori Columbia
More informationUnobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Demand Using Generalized Random Coefficients
Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Demand Using Generalized Random Coefficients Arthur Lewbel and Krishna Pendakur Boston College and Simon Fraser University original Sept. 2011, revised Nov. 2015
More informationRecall Errors in Surveys
Recall Errors in Surveys Stefan Hoderlein University of Mannheim Joachim Winter University of Munich May 4, 2007 Abstract This paper considers measurement errors from a different perspective. Concentrating
More informationApplied Health Economics (for B.Sc.)
Applied Health Economics (for B.Sc.) Helmut Farbmacher Department of Economics University of Mannheim Autumn Semester 2017 Outlook 1 Linear models (OLS, Omitted variables, 2SLS) 2 Limited and qualitative
More informationSemiparametric Identification in Panel Data Discrete Response Models
Semiparametric Identification in Panel Data Discrete Response Models Eleni Aristodemou UCL March 8, 2016 Please click here for the latest version. Abstract This paper studies partial identification in
More informationNonparametric Identification in Nonseparable Panel Data Models with Generalized Fixed Effects
Nonparametric Identification in Nonseparable Panel Data Models with Generalized Fixed Effects Stefan Hoderlein Brown University Halbert White UC San Diego November 28, 2009 Abstract This paper is concerned
More informationNonlinear Difference-in-Differences in Repeated Cross Sections with Continuous Treatments
Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences in Repeated Cross Sections with Continuous Treatments Xavier D Haultfœuille Stefan Hoderlein Yuya Sasaki CREST Boston College Johns Hopkins August 13, 2013 Abstract
More informationIdentification of Nonparametric Simultaneous Equations Models with a Residual Index Structure
Identification of Nonparametric Simultaneous Equations Models with a Residual Index Structure Steven T. Berry Yale University Department of Economics Cowles Foundation and NBER Philip A. Haile Yale University
More informationNonadditive Models with Endogenous Regressors
Nonadditive Models with Endogenous Regressors Guido W. Imbens First Draft: July 2005 This Draft: February 2006 Abstract In the last fifteen years there has been much work on nonparametric identification
More informationIdentifying Effects of Multivalued Treatments
Identifying Effects of Multivalued Treatments Sokbae Lee Bernard Salanie The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP72/15 Identifying Effects of Multivalued Treatments
More informationNew Developments in Econometrics Lecture 16: Quantile Estimation
New Developments in Econometrics Lecture 16: Quantile Estimation Jeff Wooldridge Cemmap Lectures, UCL, June 2009 1. Review of Means, Medians, and Quantiles 2. Some Useful Asymptotic Results 3. Quantile
More informationA Test for Rank Similarity and Partial Identification of the Distribution of Treatment Effects Preliminary and incomplete
A Test for Rank Similarity and Partial Identification of the Distribution of Treatment Effects Preliminary and incomplete Brigham R. Frandsen Lars J. Lefgren April 30, 2015 Abstract We introduce a test
More informationSensitivity checks for the local average treatment effect
Sensitivity checks for the local average treatment effect Martin Huber March 13, 2014 University of St. Gallen, Dept. of Economics Abstract: The nonparametric identification of the local average treatment
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Spring Economics 241A Econometrics
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS R. Smith, J. Powell UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Spring 2006 Economics 241A Econometrics This course will cover nonlinear statistical models for the analysis of cross-sectional and
More informationHow Many Consumers are Rational?
How Many Consumers are Rational? Stefan Hoderlein Brown University October 20, 2009 Abstract Rationality places strong restrictions on individual consumer behavior. This paper is concerned with assessing
More informationRegressor Dimension Reduction with Economic Constraints: The Example of Demand Systems with Many Goods
Regressor Dimension Reduction with Economic Constraints: The Example of Demand Systems with Many Goods Stefan Hoderlein and Arthur Lewbel Boston College and Boston College original Nov. 2006, revised Feb.
More informationHow Many Consumers are Rational?
How Many Consumers are Rational? Stefan Hoderlein Boston College September 5, 2010 Abstract Rationality places strong restrictions on individual consumer behavior. This paper is concerned with assessing
More informationCOUNTERFACTUAL MAPPING AND INDIVIDUAL TREATMENT EFFECTS IN NONSEPARABLE MODELS WITH DISCRETE ENDOGENEITY*
COUNTERFACTUAL MAPPING AND INDIVIDUAL TREATMENT EFFECTS IN NONSEPARABLE MODELS WITH DISCRETE ENDOGENEITY* QUANG VUONG AND HAIQING XU ABSTRACT. This paper establishes nonparametric identification of individual
More informationQuantile and Average Effects in Nonseparable Panel Models 1
Quantile and Average Effects in Nonseparable Panel Models 1 V. Chernozhukov, I. Fernandez-Val, W. Newey MIT, Boston University, MIT First Version, July 2009 Revised, October 2009 1 We thank seminar participants
More informationON ILL-POSEDNESS OF NONPARAMETRIC INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE REGRESSION WITH CONVEXITY CONSTRAINTS
ON ILL-POSEDNESS OF NONPARAMETRIC INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE REGRESSION WITH CONVEXITY CONSTRAINTS Olivier Scaillet a * This draft: July 2016. Abstract This note shows that adding monotonicity or convexity
More informationIDENTIFICATION OF THE BINARY CHOICE MODEL WITH MISCLASSIFICATION
IDENTIFICATION OF THE BINARY CHOICE MODEL WITH MISCLASSIFICATION Arthur Lewbel Boston College December 19, 2000 Abstract MisclassiÞcation in binary choice (binomial response) models occurs when the dependent
More informationCausal Inference Lecture Notes: Causal Inference with Repeated Measures in Observational Studies
Causal Inference Lecture Notes: Causal Inference with Repeated Measures in Observational Studies Kosuke Imai Department of Politics Princeton University November 13, 2013 So far, we have essentially assumed
More informationCollege Education and Wages in the U.K.: Estimating Conditional Average Structural Functions in Nonadditive Models with Binary Endogenous Variables
College Education and Wages in the U.K.: Estimating Conditional Average Structural Functions in Nonadditive Models with Binary Endogenous Variables Tobias J. Klein University of Mannheim JEPS Working Paper
More informationA Test for Rank Similarity and Partial Identification of the Distribution of Treatment Effects Preliminary and incomplete
A Test for Rank Similarity and Partial Identification of the Distribution of Treatment Effects Preliminary and incomplete Brigham R. Frandsen Lars J. Lefgren August 1, 2015 Abstract We introduce a test
More informationUnobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Demand Using Generalized Random Coefficients
Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Demand Using Generalized Random Coefficients Arthur Lewbel and Krishna Pendakur Boston College and Simon Fraser University original Sept. 2011, revised April 2013
More informationStochastic Demand and Revealed Preference
Stochastic Demand and Revealed Preference Richard Blundell Dennis Kristensen Rosa Matzkin UCL & IFS, Columbia and UCLA November 2010 Blundell, Kristensen and Matzkin ( ) Stochastic Demand November 2010
More informationHow Revealing is Revealed Preference?
How Revealing is Revealed Preference? Richard Blundell UCL and IFS April 2016 Lecture II, Boston University Richard Blundell () How Revealing is Revealed Preference? Lecture II, Boston University 1 / 55
More informationRandom Coefficients on Endogenous Variables in Simultaneous Equations Models
Random Coefficients on Endogenous Variables in Simultaneous Equations Models Matthew A. Masten Department of Economics Duke University matt.masten@duke.edu May 9, 205 Abstract This paper considers a classical
More informationA Bootstrap Test for Conditional Symmetry
ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE 6, 51 61 005) A Bootstrap Test for Conditional Symmetry Liangjun Su Guanghua School of Management, Peking University E-mail: lsu@gsm.pku.edu.cn and Sainan Jin Guanghua School
More informationNonparametric panel data models with interactive fixed effects
Nonparametric panel data models with interactive fixed effects Joachim Freyberger Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin - Madison November 3, 2012 Abstract This paper studies nonparametric panel
More informationIDENTIFICATION IN NONPARAMETRIC SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS
IDENTIFICATION IN NONPARAMETRIC SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS Rosa L. Matzkin Department of Economics Northwestern University This version: January 2006 Abstract This paper considers identification in parametric
More informationIdentification and Estimation Using Heteroscedasticity Without Instruments: The Binary Endogenous Regressor Case
Identification and Estimation Using Heteroscedasticity Without Instruments: The Binary Endogenous Regressor Case Arthur Lewbel Boston College Original December 2016, revised July 2017 Abstract Lewbel (2012)
More informationIdentification in Triangular Systems using Control Functions
Identification in Triangular Systems using Control Functions Maximilian Kasy Department of Economics, UC Berkeley Maximilian Kasy (UC Berkeley) Control Functions 1 / 19 Introduction Introduction There
More information7 Semiparametric Estimation of Additive Models
7 Semiparametric Estimation of Additive Models Additive models are very useful for approximating the high-dimensional regression mean functions. They and their extensions have become one of the most widely
More informationThoughts on Heterogeneity in Econometric Models
Thoughts on Heterogeneity in Econometric Models Presidential Address Midwest Economics Association March 19, 2011 Jeffrey M. Wooldridge Michigan State University 1 1. Introduction Much of current econometric
More informationNonparametric Estimation of a Nonseparable Demand Function under the Slutsky Inequality Restriction
Nonparametric Estimation of a Nonseparable Demand Function under the Slutsky Inequality Restriction Richard Blundell, Joel Horowitz and Matthias Parey October 2013, this version February 2016 Abstract
More informationApril 05 - April Introduction by The Organizers 2
Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods in Econometrics Joel Horowitz Northwestern University Oliver Linton London School of Economics Enno Mammen University of Mannheim April 05 - April 10 Contents 1
More informationHETEROGENEOUS CHOICE
HETEROGENEOUS CHOICE Rosa L. Matzkin Department of Economics Northwestern University June 2006 This paper was presented as an invited lecture at the World Congress of the Econometric Society, London, August
More informationLocal Identification of Nonparametric and Semiparametric Models
Local Identification of Nonparametric and Semiparametric Models Xiaohong Chen Department of Economics Yale Sokbae Lee Department of Economics SeoulNationalUniversity Victor Chernozhukov Department of Economics
More informationWeak Stochastic Increasingness, Rank Exchangeability, and Partial Identification of The Distribution of Treatment Effects
Weak Stochastic Increasingness, Rank Exchangeability, and Partial Identification of The Distribution of Treatment Effects Brigham R. Frandsen Lars J. Lefgren December 16, 2015 Abstract This article develops
More informationParametric Identification of Multiplicative Exponential Heteroskedasticity
Parametric Identification of Multiplicative Exponential Heteroskedasticity Alyssa Carlson Department of Economics, Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824-1038, United States Dated: October 5,
More informationCounterfactual worlds
Counterfactual worlds Andrew Chesher Adam Rosen The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP22/15 Counterfactual Worlds Andrew Chesher and Adam M. Rosen CeMMAP
More informationAn Overview of the Special Regressor Method
An Overview of the Special Regressor Method Arthur Lewbel Boston College September 2012 Abstract This chapter provides background for understanding and applying special regressor methods. This chapter
More informationLectures on Identi cation 2
Lectures on Identi cation 2 Andrew Chesher CeMMAP & UCL April 16th 2008 Andrew Chesher (CeMMAP & UCL) Identi cation 2 4/16/2008 1 / 28 Topics 1 Monday April 14th. Motivation, history, de nitions, types
More informationResearch Statement. Zhongwen Liang
Research Statement Zhongwen Liang My research is concentrated on theoretical and empirical econometrics, with the focus of developing statistical methods and tools to do the quantitative analysis of empirical
More informationDealing with a Technological Bias: The Difference-in-Difference Approach
Dealing with a Technological Bias: The Difference-in-Difference Approach Dmitry Arkhangelsky Current version November 9, 2017 The most recent version is here Abstract I construct a nonlinear model for
More informationEstimation of partial effects in non-linear panel data models
Estimation of partial effects in non-linear panel data models by Jason Abrevaya and Yu-Chin Hsu This version: September 2011 ABSTRACT Nonlinearity and heterogeneity complicate the estimation and interpretation
More informationIdentifying Multiple Marginal Effects with a Single Instrument
Identifying Multiple Marginal Effects with a Single Instrument Carolina Caetano 1 Juan Carlos Escanciano 2 1 Department of Economics, University of Rochester 2 Department of Economics, Indiana University
More informationGeneralized Roy Model and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Programs 1
Generalized Roy Model and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Programs 1 James J. Heckman The University of Chicago University College Dublin Philipp Eisenhauer University of Mannheim Edward Vytlacil Columbia
More informationleebounds: Lee s (2009) treatment effects bounds for non-random sample selection for Stata
leebounds: Lee s (2009) treatment effects bounds for non-random sample selection for Stata Harald Tauchmann (RWI & CINCH) Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI) & CINCH Health
More informationControl Variables, Discrete Instruments, and. Identification of Structural Functions
Control Variables, Discrete Instruments, and arxiv:1809.05706v1 [econ.em] 15 Sep 2018 Identification of Structural Functions Whitney Newey and Sami Stouli September 18, 2018. Abstract Control variables
More informationEndogenous binary choice models with median restrictions: A comment
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Economics Letters 98 (2008) 23 28 www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase Endogenous binary choice models with median restrictions: A comment Azeem M. Shaikh a, Edward
More informationNonparametric identification in nonseparable panel data models with generalized fixed effects
Nonparametric identification in nonseparable panel data models with generalized fixed effects Stefan Hoderlein Halbert White The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working
More informationEconometrics of causal inference. Throughout, we consider the simplest case of a linear outcome equation, and homogeneous
Econometrics of causal inference Throughout, we consider the simplest case of a linear outcome equation, and homogeneous effects: y = βx + ɛ (1) where y is some outcome, x is an explanatory variable, and
More informationQuantile methods. Class Notes Manuel Arellano December 1, Let F (r) =Pr(Y r). Forτ (0, 1), theτth population quantile of Y is defined to be
Quantile methods Class Notes Manuel Arellano December 1, 2009 1 Unconditional quantiles Let F (r) =Pr(Y r). Forτ (0, 1), theτth population quantile of Y is defined to be Q τ (Y ) q τ F 1 (τ) =inf{r : F
More informationRandom coefficients on endogenous variables in simultaneous equations models
Random coefficients on endogenous variables in simultaneous equations models Matthew Masten The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP01/14 Random Coefficients
More informationBayesian Interpretations of Heteroskedastic Consistent Covariance Estimators Using the Informed Bayesian Bootstrap
Bayesian Interpretations of Heteroskedastic Consistent Covariance Estimators Using the Informed Bayesian Bootstrap Dale J. Poirier University of California, Irvine September 1, 2008 Abstract This paper
More informationProgram Evaluation with High-Dimensional Data
Program Evaluation with High-Dimensional Data Alexandre Belloni Duke Victor Chernozhukov MIT Iván Fernández-Val BU Christian Hansen Booth ESWC 215 August 17, 215 Introduction Goal is to perform inference
More informationDummy Endogenous Variables in Weakly Separable Models
Dummy Endogenous Variables in Weakly Separable Models Edward Vytlacil and ese Yildiz April 3, 2004 Abstract This paper considers the nonparametric identification and estimation of the average effect of
More informationEstimation of the Conditional Variance in Paired Experiments
Estimation of the Conditional Variance in Paired Experiments Alberto Abadie & Guido W. Imbens Harvard University and BER June 008 Abstract In paired randomized experiments units are grouped in pairs, often
More informationInformation Structure and Statistical Information in Discrete Response Models
Information Structure and Statistical Information in Discrete Response Models Shakeeb Khan a and Denis Nekipelov b This version: January 2012 Abstract Strategic interaction parameters characterize the
More informationIdentifying Structural E ects in Nonseparable Systems Using Covariates
Identifying Structural E ects in Nonseparable Systems Using Covariates Halbert White UC San Diego Karim Chalak Boston College October 16, 2008 Abstract This paper demonstrates the extensive scope of an
More informationWhat s New in Econometrics? Lecture 14 Quantile Methods
What s New in Econometrics? Lecture 14 Quantile Methods Jeff Wooldridge NBER Summer Institute, 2007 1. Reminders About Means, Medians, and Quantiles 2. Some Useful Asymptotic Results 3. Quantile Regression
More informationA Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 14: Control Functions and Related Methods. Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August 2008
A Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 14: Control Functions and Related Methods Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August 2008 1. Linear-in-Parameters Models: IV versus Control Functions 2. Correlated
More informationNonparametric Estimation of a Nonseparable Demand Function under the Slutsky Inequality Restriction
Nonparametric Estimation of a Nonseparable Demand Function under the Slutsky Inequality Restriction Richard Blundell, Joel Horowitz and Matthias Parey October 2013, this version April 2015 Abstract We
More informationEndogenous Semiparametric Binary Choice Models with Heteroscedasticity
Endogenous Semiparametric Binary Choice Models with Heteroscedasticity Stefan Hoderlein Brown University First Draft: February 15, 2006 This Draft: September 19, 2013 Abstract In this paper we consider
More informationEstimation of Treatment Effects under Essential Heterogeneity
Estimation of Treatment Effects under Essential Heterogeneity James Heckman University of Chicago and American Bar Foundation Sergio Urzua University of Chicago Edward Vytlacil Columbia University March
More informationIdentification of the timing-of-events model with multiple competing exit risks from single-spell data
COHERE - Centre of Health Economics Research Identification of the timing-of-events model with multiple competing exit risks from single-spell data By: Bettina Drepper, Department of Econometrics and OR,
More informationIdentification of Regression Models with Misclassified and Endogenous Binary Regressor
Identification of Regression Models with Misclassified and Endogenous Binary Regressor A Celebration of Peter Phillips Fourty Years at Yale Conference Hiroyuki Kasahara 1 Katsumi Shimotsu 2 1 Department
More informationThe relationship between treatment parameters within a latent variable framework
Economics Letters 66 (2000) 33 39 www.elsevier.com/ locate/ econbase The relationship between treatment parameters within a latent variable framework James J. Heckman *,1, Edward J. Vytlacil 2 Department
More informationExploring Marginal Treatment Effects
Exploring Marginal Treatment Effects Flexible estimation using Stata Martin Eckhoff Andresen Statistics Norway Oslo, September 12th 2018 Martin Andresen (SSB) Exploring MTEs Oslo, 2018 1 / 25 Introduction
More informationComments on: Panel Data Analysis Advantages and Challenges. Manuel Arellano CEMFI, Madrid November 2006
Comments on: Panel Data Analysis Advantages and Challenges Manuel Arellano CEMFI, Madrid November 2006 This paper provides an impressive, yet compact and easily accessible review of the econometric literature
More informationBirkbeck Working Papers in Economics & Finance
ISSN 1745-8587 Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics & Finance Department of Economics, Mathematics and Statistics BWPEF 1809 A Note on Specification Testing in Some Structural Regression Models Walter
More information