Exponential stabilization of a Rayleigh beam - actuator and feedback design
|
|
- Arthur King
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Exponential stabilization of a Rayleigh beam - actuator and feedback design George WEISS Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Imperial College London London SW7 AZ, UK G.Weiss@imperial.ac.uk Abstract: Our plant is a hinged elastic beam described by the Rayleigh beam equation on the interval [0, π. We assume the presence of two sensors: one measures the angular velocity of the beam at a point ξ (0, π) and the other measures the bending (curvature) at the same point. These two measurements are advantageous because they make the open-loop system exactly observable, regardless of the point ξ. We design the actuators and the feedback law in order to exponentially stabilize this system. Using the theory of colocated feedback developed in a recent paper by Ruth Curtain and the author, we choose colocated actuators, meaning that B = C, where B is the control operator and C is the observation operator. It turns out that the actuators cause a discontinuity of the bending exactly at ξ. This obliges us to use an extension of C to define the output signal in terms of the left and right limit of the bending at ξ. It turns out that for all positive feedback gains in a suitable finite range, the closed-loop system is well-posed and exponentially stable, as follows from the general theory in the paper mentioned earlier. Keywords: Rayleigh beam, well-posed linear system, output feedback, exact controllability and observability, colocated sensors and actuators. 1. Problem statement The physical system that we are modelling consists of a hinged elastic beam with two sensors: one measures the angular velocity of the beam at a point ξ and the other measures the bending (curvature) of the beam at the same point. These two measurements are advantageous because they make the open-loop system exactly observable, as we shall see. Our aim is to design actuators and a feedback law such that the closed-loop system is exponentially stable in a suitable state space. This research was supported by EPSRC (from the UK) under the portfolio partnership grant GR/S6156/01.
2 We model the open-loop system as a homogenous Rayleigh beam situated along the interval [0, π, with the two sensors located at ξ (0, π). This is an extension of an example discussed in Ammari, Liu and Tucsnak [1 and Weiss, Staffans and Tucsnak [3, and these papers contain relevant further references to Rayleigh beam models. As far as we know, [1 was the first paper to consider the stabilization of a beam using two sensors and two actuators which are colocated (not the same sensors as considered here). They considered also the stabilization of Euler-Bernoulli beams by a similar technique. The equations describing the open-loop system are q(x, t) α q x (x, t) + 4 q (x, t) = U(x, t), (1.1) x4 q q(0, t) = q(π, t) = 0, x (0, t) = q (π, t) = 0, t 0, (1.) x y 0 (t) = q (ξ, t), x y 1(t) = q (ξ, t). (1.3) x In these equations q(x, t) represents the transverse displacement of the beam at the position x [0, π and the time t 0, δ ξ is the Dirac mass at the point ξ and α > 0 is a constant, proportional to the moment of inertia of the cross section of the beam (α is proportional to the square of the thickness of the beam and it is often neglected). In (1.1), U denotes the control terms which are to be designed. The scalar signals y 0 and y 1 are the two output signals (measurements). According to our design, the actuators for this system should be such that d U = u 0 dx δ ξ u 1 [αδ ξ + b, (1.4) where u 0 and u 1 are the two (scalar) input signals and b(x) = { ax ξ for x ξ, aπ ax π ξ for x > ξ, where 1 a = 1 ξ + 1 π ξ. (1.5) The graph of b consists of two straight lines, with a peak at x = ξ. The actuators will cause a jump discontinuity of q at ξ, so that the second part of (1.3) becomes x ambiguous. The output signal y 1 must be re-defined in the form y 1 (t) = γ q x (ξ, t) + (1 γ) q (ξ+, t), (1.6) x where γ C, but it seems more reasonable to assume that γ [0, 1. Then the system described above is well-posed, with the state space The two components of the state x(t) are X = H (0, π) H 1 0(0, π) H 1 0(0, π). (1.7) q(, t) and q(, t) + b( )u 1 (t). We call this (open-loop) system the beam system. The strongly continuous semigroup of operators on X which describes the evolution of the state x(t) when u 0 = 0 and u 1 = 0 is unitary. Our main result is the following:
3 Theorem 1.1. There exists a number κ 0 > 0 such that for every κ (0, κ 0 ), the closed-loop system corresponding to the beam system with the feedback u j = κy j + v j, j = 1,, where v 1 and v are the new input signals, is well-posed and exponentially stable. Note that the exponential stability is independent of the position ξ of the two sensors, which is not always the case for stabilizing feedback laws in the literature. To treat the above problem, we need a recently developed theory concerning the exponential stabilization of systems with colocated sensors and actuators, which can be found in Curtain and Weiss [6. The main result of this theory will be recalled in Section. In Section 3 we develop an abstract framework which helps to apply the theory from Section to a specific class of systems described by differential equations of order two in Hilbert spaces. We do this because the beam system fits into this specific class of systems. Finally, in Section 5 we solve the stabilization problem for the beam system, obtaining (also) Theorem A stabilization result from a recent paper In this section, we recall the main results of Curtain and Weiss [6 concerning the stabilization of a special class of well-posed linear systems by colocated feedback. To specify our terminology and notation, we recall that for any well-posed linear system Σ with input space U, state space X and output space Y, all Hilbert spaces, the state trajectories z C([0, ), X) are described by the differential equation ż(t) = Az(t) + Bu(t), (.1) where u L loc([0, ), U) is the input function. The operator A : D(A) X is the generator of a strongly continuous semigroup of operators T on X and the (possibly unbounded) operator B is an admissible control operator for T. In general, the output function y is in L loc([0, ), Y ). If u = 0 and z(0) D(A), then y is given by y(t) = Cz(t) t 0, where C : D(A) Y is an admissible observation operator for T. B is called the control operator of Σ and C is called the observation operator of Σ. If z(0) = 0, then the input and output functions u and y are related by the formula ŷ(s) = G(s)û(s), (.) where a hat denotes the Laplace transform and G is the transfer function of Σ. The formula (.) holds for all s C with Re s sufficiently large. Assumption ESAD. The operator A is essentially skew-adjoint and dissipative, which means that D(A) = D(A ) and there exists a Q L(X) with Q 0 such that Ax + A x = Qx x D(A). 3
4 This implies that T is a contraction semigroup. Note that A is a bounded perturbation of the skew-adjoint operator A + 1 Q. Such a model is often used to describe the dynamics of oscillating systems, such as waves or flexible structures. Assumption COL. Y = U and C = B. Our aim is to show that for certain numbers κ > 0, the static output feedback law u = κy + v stabilizes the system, where v is the new input function. The closed-loop system Σ κ is shown as a block diagram in Figure 1. v u y + Σ κ Figure 1: The open-loop system Σ with negative output feedback via κ. If Σ satisfies ESAD and COL and the number κ > 0 is sufficiently small, then this is a new wellposed linear system Σ κ, called the closed-loop system. If Σ is exactly controllable and exactly observable, then Σ κ is exponentially stable. The main result of [6 is the following: Theorem.1. Suppose that Σ is a well-posed linear system which is exactly controllable, exactly observable and satisfies assumptions ESAD and COL. Then there exists a κ 0 > 0 (possibly κ 0 = ) such that for all κ (0, κ 0 ), the feedback law u = κy + v (where u and y are the input and the output of Σ) leads to a closedloop system Σ κ which is well-posed and exponentially stable. The paper [6 also gives various formulas for κ 0. For this paper, the important formulas are the following: First, we introduce a self-adjoint operator E L(U) by E = 1 [G(0) + G(0) + B (A ) 1 QA 1 B. (.3) Recall that a transfer function G, analytic on the open right half-plane C 0, is called positive if G(s) + G(s) 0 s C 0. The crucial property of the operator E introduced earlier is that G + E is a positive transfer function (see [6 for details). Now let E + be the positive part of E. This means that E + = EP + where P + is the spectral projector corresponding to all the positive spectrum of E (hence E + E but E + E ). Then κ 0 = 1 E + (for E + = 0, take κ 0 = + ). (.4) 4
5 Many models of controlled flexible structures satisfy assumptions ESAD and COL. The feedback u = κy + v is very simple to implement and it is often used in the stabilization of these structures. An extensive list of relevant references is given in [6. Here we mention only some of the papers which refer to beams and plates and which obtain exponential stability by static output feedback through colocated control and observation: Chen [3, 4, Rebarber [10, Triggiani [15, Tucsnak and Weiss [16, Luo, Guo and Morgul [9, Guo and Luo [7, Ammari and Tucsnak [. In many of these examples the approach is a classical Lyapunov one, with the key step being the appropriate PDE formulation so that the energy of the system can play the role of a Lyapunov functional. If one examines these examples carefully, one can recognize that they fit into our framework (the assumptions ESAD and COL are satisfied) and they use the feedback u = κy + v for stabilization. However, it must be pointed out that not all the examples of this type in the literature satisfy our assumptions, since sometimes the open-loop system is not well-posed. In all the published examples that we are aware of, the feedback u = κy + v is stabilizing for all κ > 0, at least in the input-output sense, and often strongly or exponentially. However, in [6, Section 5 there is an example of a simple open-loop system Σ which fits into our framework, moreover it is regular with feedthrough operator zero, but for which the feedback u = κy + v is only exponentially stabilizing for sufficiently small κ > 0. For too large a κ, the closed-loop semigroup has a positive growth rate. 3. A class of undamped second order systems In this section we introduce a class of undamped second order systems satisfying ESAD and COL. For these systems we derive an explicit expression for κ 0 from Theorem.1. The beam system introduced in Section 1 fits into the class introduced here, as we shall see in Section 4. Let U 0, U 1 and H be Hilbert spaces and let A 0 : D(A 0 ) H be positive and boundedly invertible on H. Consider the system described by the following second order differential equation and two output equations: { q + A0 q = C0u 0 + A0 1 C1 u 1, (3.1) y 0 = C 0 q, y 1 = C 1 q, for sufficiently smooth signals u 0, u 1 and compatible initial conditions q(0) and q(0). The input signals u 0, u 1 and the output signals y 0, y 1 are such that u 0 (t) U 0, u 1 (t) U 1, y 0 (t) U 0, y 1 (t) U 1. To formulate these equations in the form { ż = Az + Bu, y = Cz + Du, (3.) which describe a well-posed linear system for sufficiently smooth u and compatible z(0), we have to introduce various spaces and operators, and we have to make some assumptions. For every µ > 0, we put H µ = D(A µ 0), with the norm φ µ = A µ 0φ H. 5
6 We define H µ = H µ (duality with respect to the pivot space H). We put H 0 = H and φ 0 = φ H. We assume that C 0 L(H 1, U 0 ) C 1 L(H 1, U 1 ). We identify U 0 and U 1 with their duals, so that C0 L(U 0, H 1 ), C1 L(U 1, H 1 ). We assume that C 0 and C 1 have extensions C 0 and C 1 such that the operators D 0 = C 0 A 1 0 C 1 L(U 1, U 0 ), D 1 = C 1 A 1 0 C 0 L(U 0, U 1 ) exist. Introduce the input (and output) space U and the state space X: U = U 0 U 1, X = H 1 H. (3.3) Now the equations of the system Σ from (3.1) can be rewritten in the form (3.), where q u0 y0 z = X, u = U, y = U, (3.4) w u 1 y 1 0 I A : D(A) X, A =, (3.5) A 0 0 B = X 1 = D(A) = H 1 H 1 [ 0 A 1 0 C 1 C 0 0 C =, X 1 = H H 1, A = A, 0 L(U, X 1 ), C = B C0 = L(X C 1 0 1, U), (3.6) 0 C0 0 D0, D =. (3.7) C We shall now prove that for sufficiently smooth u, (3.1) is equivalent to (3.). We also show how the condition of compatible initial conditions, Az(0) + Bu(0) X, can be expressed in terms of the functions and operators appearing in (3.1). The significance of this condition for well-posed systems is that if u H 1 loc(0, ; U), then this condition is preserved (i.e., Az(t) + Bu(t) X remains valid for all t 0) and the output function is well defined by the second part of (3.). Proposition 3.1. For u H 1 loc(0, ; U), the equations (3.1) (for a specific t 0) are equivalent to (3.) (for the same t) with z, u, y as in (3.4) and with w(t) = q(t) A 1 0 C 1u 1 (t). The first part of (3.1) is regarded as an equation in H 1, and the first part of (3.) is regarded as an equation in X 1. Moreover, for any t 0, the conditions A 0 q(t) C 0u 0 (t) H, q(t) H 1 (3.8) are equivalent to Az(t) + Bu(t) X. 6
7 Proof. We rewrite the first part of (3.): [ d q(t) 0 I q(t) = dt w(t) A 0 0 w(t) or, equivalently, + [ 0 A 1 0 C 1 C 0 0 [ u0 (t) u 1 (t) q(t) = w(t) + A 1 0 C 1u 1 (t), ẇ(t) = A 0 q(t) + C 0u 0 (t). From these we obtain, by differentiating the first formula, the first equation in (3.1). To derive the last two equations in (3.1), we compute, starting from (3.), [ y0 (t) 0 C0 q(t) 0 C0 A 1 0 C = + 1 u0 (t) y 1 (t) C 1 0 w(t) 0 0 u 1 (t) [ C0 ( q(t) = A 1 0 C1u 1 (t)) + C 0 A 1 0 C1u 1 (t) C0 q(t) =. C 1 q(t) C 1 q(t) To obtain (3.) from (3.1), we just reverse the order of the computations. It is easy to verify that the conditions (3.8) are equivalent to Az(t) + Bu(t) X. Clearly, Σ satisfies ESAD and COL, but it need not be well-posed. The optimal control of systems of this type, but with C 1 = 0, has been studied in [ without assuming well-posedness. Here, we do assume that our system Σ is well-posed. The transfer function of Σ is given by G(s) = C(sI A) 1 B + D, and this is easy to compute in terms of A 0, C 0 and C 1 : for s ρ(a 0 ), C0 s G(s) = (s I + A 0 ) [ 1 C0 A 1 0 C1s. (3.9) C 1 Note the curious fact that G does not depend on the extended operator C 0. This extended operator appears in the representation (3.) of Σ, but (3.9) shows that the system Σ is in fact independent of the choice of the extension C 0. In particular, we see from (3.9) that G(0) = [ 0 0 D 1 0., According to (.3) (with Q = 0) we have E = 1 [ 0 D 1 D 1 0. (3.10) Such systems, but with C 1 = 0 (hence E = 0), have been considered in [, [7, [. The main result of this section is the following: Proposition 3.. Suppose that the well-posed system Σ from (3.) is exactly controllable (or equivalently, exactly observable). Let E L(U) be the operator from (3.10), let E + be the positive part of E and put κ 0 = 1. Then for every κ (0, κ E + 0), K = κi is an admissible feedback operator for Σ and the resulting closed-loop system Σ κ is exponentially stable. 7
8 Proof. The equivalence of exact controllability and exact observability follows by duality, since A = A. Thus, we can apply Theorem.1 and formula (.4) to obtain this proposition. For the example treated in the next section, it will be useful to note the following facts. We have for all s ρ(a), using the expression (3.6) for B, (si A) 1 B = (s I + A 0 ) 1 [ C 0 sa 1 0 C 1 sc 0 C 1 Since the growth bound of the semigroup generated by A is zero, according to a result in [19 there exists a δ > 0 such that (si A) 1 B L(U,X) δ Re s holds for all s C with Re s 1. This together with the above expression for (si A) 1 B implies that (s I + A 0 ) 1 C0 L(U0,H 1 ) (s I + A 0 ) 1 C1 L(U1,H) δ Re s for Re s 1, (3.11) δ Re s for Re s 1, (3.1). s(s I + A 0 ) 1 A 1 0 C1 L(U1,H 1 ) δ Re s for Re s 1. (3.13) 4. Stabilization of a Rayleigh beam Our main task in this section is to show that the beam system from Section 1 fits into the framework of Section 4, in particular, it is well-posed. We also show that it is exactly controllable and exactly observable, so that we can apply Proposition 3.. Here, C 0 will be the operator corresponding to the measurement of the angular velocity at ξ, and C 1 will be the operator corresponding to the measurement of the bending at ξ. We shall see that in order to have the control terms as in (3.1) (which means that they are colocated), we must choose them to be as in (1.4). In order to fit the system described by (1.1) (1.7) into the framework of (3.1), (3.3), let us denote H = H0(0, 1 π), V = H (0, π) H0(0, 1 π). On H we define the inner product such that φ, ψ H = (I α d ) φ, ψ φ, ψ V. dx L We introduce the operator R : L (0, π) V by R = (I α d dx ) 1. 8
9 It is easy to see that R > 0 when regarded as an operator from L (0, π) to L (0, π). We also define the linear operator A 0 : D(A 0 ) H by { D(A 0 ) = φ H 3 (0, π) φ(0) = φ(π) = 0, d φ dx (0) = d } φ dx (π) = 0, The set {φ k k N} with φ k (x) = A 0 φ = d 4 is an orthonormal basis in H, and we have A 0 φ k = dx 4 (Rφ) φ D(A 0). 1 sin kx x [0, π (4.1) 1 + αk π k αk φ k, Rφ k = αk φ k, so that, in particular, A 0 is self-adjoint, strictly positive and it commutes with R. Defining H µ and φ µ for µ R by fractional powers of A 0 and duality, as explained after (3.1), we have H 0 = H = H 1 0(0, π) and H 1 = D(A 0 ), H 1 = V, H 1 = L (0, π), H 1 = H 1 (0, π), H 1.5 = V, the norm 1 being equivalent to the L -norm. Here, V denotes the dual of V with respect to the pivot space L (0, π). For every µ R, A 0 and R have extensions (or restrictions) to H µ and we have A 0 L(H µ, H µ 1 ), R L(H µ, H µ+1 ). The spaces U 0 and U 1 from (3.3) are U 0 = U 1 = C, so that U = C. Corresponding to the two measurements in (1.3), we define the operators C 0 L(H 1, C) and C 1 L(H 1, C) by C 0 φ = dφ dx (ξ), C 1φ = d φ dx (ξ). Then C0 H 1 and C1 H 1 (the adjoints of C 0 and C 1 with respect to the pivot space H) are C0 = R d dx δ ξ, C1 = R d dx δ ξ. Assuming that the terms of (1.1) are in H 1.5 = V and applying R to these terms, we obtain q + A 0 q = RU in H 1 = L (0, π). (4.) Now the first equation in (3.1) shows that the control terms, represented above by RU, should be RU = C0u 0 + A 1 0 C1 u 1 = u 0 R d dx δ ξ u 1 b, (4.3) where b = A 1 0 C 1 H is given by (1.5). If we apply R 1 to the terms of (4.), with RU as in (4.3), we obtain that in H 1.5, q α q x + 4 q x = u d 4 0 dx δ ξ u 1 [αδ ξ + b. (4.4) This equation must also hold in the sense of distributions on (0, π). Together with (1.) and (1.3), it defines our open-loop system with the designed actuators. 9
10 Proposition 4.1. For u H 1 loc(0, ; C ), the equations (4.4) (in H 1.5 ) and (1.3) are equivalent to ż = Az + Bu ( in X 1 ), y = Cz + Du, with z, u, y as in (3.4) and with w = q A 1 0 C1u 1 = q + bu 1. Here, A is as in (3.5), B is as in (3.6) and C, D are as in (3.7). These equations determine a well-posed linear system Σ with input and output space U = C and state space X = H 1 H. This system is exactly controllable and exactly observable. Proof. Assume that (4.4) and (1.3) hold. We have seen that (4.4) (in H 1.5 ) is equivalent to (4.) and (4.3) (in H 1 ). According to Proposition 3.1, these equations are equivalent to ż = Az + Bu (in X 1 ), with z, u as in (3.4) and with w = q A 1 0 C1u 1 (recall that b = A 1 0 C1). According to the same proposition, (1.3) is equivalent to y = Cz + Du, with y as in (3.4). The eigenvalues and the corresponding normalized eigenvectors of A are ±iω k and e ±k, for k N, where k ω k =, e 1 + αk ±k = 1 1 ±iω k φ k φ k and the set {e k, e k k N} is an orthonormal basis in X. (Here, φ k are the eigenvectors of A 0 defined in (4.1).) We introduce the vectors c ±k R by c ±k = Ce ±k = 1 [ C 0 φ k 1 ±iω k C 1 φ k = 1 k 1+αk π 1 k ±iω k 1+αk π cos kξ sin kξ Since ω k k/ α, we see from the last formula that there exist constants C min > 0 and C max > 0 such that C min c ±k C max k N. (4.5) Since the eigenvalues of A have a uniform gap, the second estimate above implies, via the Carleson measure criterion (see, for example, Hansen and Weiss [8, Theorem 1.3) that C is an admissible observation operator for the (unitary) semigroup generated by A. Since A = A and B = C, it follows by duality that B is an admissible control operator for the same semigroup. To check the well-posedness of the system Σ, according to the criterion in [5, it remains to show that its transfer function G from (3.9) is bounded on some right half-plane. This would be difficult to show using eigenfunction expansions, as the discussion (in particular, the counterexamples) in [7 show. Instead, we will estimate G(s) by using an approximation of A 0, as in [1, [3. We introduce A 1 : D(A 0 ) H by A 1 φ = 1 α d φ dx. This operator has the same eigenvectors as A 0, so that it commutes with A 0. A 1 has an extension to all the spaces H µ, and we have A 1 L(H µ, H µ 1 ) for all µ R. The. 10
11 eigenvalues of A 1 are k α, so that the eigenvalues of A 1 A 0 are bounded. Hence, A 1 A 0 is a bounded (positive) operator on any of the spaces H µ. Note that (s I + A 1 ) 1 = (s I + A 0 ) 1 (s I + A 0 ) 1 (A 1 A 0 )(s I + A 1 ) 1. (4.6) Applying C 1 to all the terms and using the dual version of (3.1), we get that for some η > 0 C1 (s I + A 1 ) 1 η for Re s 1. (4.7) L(H,C) Re s For each s ρ(a), G(s) is a matrix and its component G 11 (s) has been estimated on a right half-plane in [1 (in the proof of their Proposition 3.). We give the details for how to estimate G 1 (s), in order to prove its boundedness on the half-plane where Re s 1. First we rewrite (4.6) in the form (s I + A 0 ) 1 = (s I + A 1 ) 1 + (s I + A 1 ) 1 (A 1 A 0 )(s I + A 0 ) 1. (4.8) Recall that G 1 (s) = C 1 (s I + A 0 ) 1 C 0. Using the above formula, we obtain G 1 (s) C 1 (s I + A 1 ) 1 C 0 + C 1 (s I + A 1 ) 1 L(H,C) (A 1 A 0 ) L(H) (s I + A 0 ) 1 C 0 H. Using (3.11), the continuous embedding H 1 H and (4.7), we see that the second term on the right-hand side above is uniformly bounded for Re s 1. Thus, we only have to prove the boundedness (for Re s 1) of the function g(s) = C 1 (s I + A 1 ) 1 C 0. Lemma 4.. The function g defined above is bounded for Re s 1. The proof of this lemma involves some tedious computations, and it will be given in the journal version of this paper. As mentioned before the lemma, this lemma implies that G 1 (s) is bounded on the half-plane where Re s 1. The boundedness of G 1 (s) on the same half-plane can be inferred from the boundedness of G 1 (s), by the following argument: G 1 (s) = C 0 s (s I + A 0 ) 1 A 1 0 C 1 = C 0 [ A 1 0 (s I + A 0 ) 1 C 1 = { C 1 [ A 1 0 (s I + A 0 ) 1 C 0 } = {G1 (0) G 1 (s)}. The last component of G to be estimated is G (s) = sc 1 (s I + A 0 ) 1 b, where we have used (3.9) and the definition of b (after (4.3)). We introduce the function h by replacing A 0 with A 1 in the above formula: h(s) = sc 1 (s I +A 1 ) 1 b. We claim that G (s) h(s) is bounded for Re s 1. Indeed, using (4.8) we have G (s) h(s) = sc 1 (s I + A 1 ) 1 (A 1 A 0 )(s I + A 0 ) 1 b, 11
12 G (s) h(s) C 1 (s I + A 1 ) 1 L(H 1,C) A 1 A 0 L(H 1 ) s(s I + A 0 ) 1 b 1. The factor s(s I + A 0 ) 1 b 1 is bounded for Re s 1, according to (3.13). The operator A 1 A 0 is bounded on any of the spaces H µ, as explained before (4.6). The factor C 1 (s I + A 1 ) 1 L(H 1,C) is bounded for Re s 1, according to the dual version of (3.1), with A 1 in place of A 0, and using the continuous embedding H 1 H. This shows that G (s) h(s) is indeed bounded for Re s 1. Thus, to prove the boundedness of G (s) for Re s 1, it is enough to prove the boundedness of h(s) on this half-plane. This can be done by explicit computations, as in Lemma 4., and we omit the gory details. To prove that Σ is exactly observable, we use the first estimate in (4.5) together with [11, Theorem 5.9, which is based on the vector-valued version of Ingham s theorem. By duality, it follows that Σ is also exactly controllable. Proposition 4.3. Let Σ be the well-posed system from Proposition 4.1 (the beam equation with two sensors and two actuators). Denote D 1 = C 1 A 1 0 C0, κ 0 =. D 1 Then for every κ (0, κ 0 ), K = κi is an admissible feedback operator for Σ and the resulting closed-loop system Σ κ is exponentially stable. Proof. We know from Proposition 4.1 that the system Σ is well-posed, exactly controllable and exactly observable. Let E L(C ) be the matrix from (3.10). Its eigenvalues are ± 1 D 1, so that E + (the positive part of E) is a matrix of rank one with the eigenvalues 1 D 1 and 0. Hence, E + = 1 D 1, κ 0 = D 1. According to Proposition 3., for every κ (0, κ 0 ), K = κi is an admissible feedback operator for Σ and Σ κ is exponentially stable. References [1 K. Ammari, Z. Liu and M. Tucsnak, Decay rates for a beam with pointwise force and moment feedback, Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems 15 (00), pp [ K. Ammari and M. Tucsnak, Stabilization of second order evolution equations by a class of unbounded feedbacks, ESAIM COCV 6 (001), pp [3 G. Chen, A note on boundary stabilization of the wave equation, SIAM J. Control and Optim. 19 (1981), pp [4 G. Chen, M.C. Delfour, A.M. Krall and G. Payre, Modelling, stabilization and control of serially connected beams, SIAM J. Control and Optim. 5 (1987), pp [5 R.F. Curtain and G. Weiss, Well-posedness of triples of operators (in the sense of linear systems theory), Control and Estimation of Distributed Parameter Systems (F. Kappel, K. Kunisch, W. Schappacher, eds.), pp , Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel, [6 R.F. Curtain and G. Weiss, Exponential stabilization of essentially skew-adjoint systems by colocated feedback, submitted in
13 [7 B-Z. Guo and Z-H. Luo, Controllability and stability of a second-order hyperbolic system with colocated sensor/actuator, Systems & Control Lett. 46 (00), pp [8 S. Hansen and G. Weiss, The operator Carleson measure criterion for admissibility of control operators for diagonal semigroups on l, Systems & Control Letters 16 (1991), pp [9 Z-H. Luo, B-Z. Guo and O.Morgul, Stability and Stabilization of Infinite Dimensional Systems with Applications, Springer-Verlag, London, [10 R. Rebarber, Exponential stability of coupled beams with dissipative joints: a frequency domain approach, SIAM J. Control and Optim. 33 (1995), pp [11 D.L. Russell and G. Weiss, A general necessary condition for exact observability, SIAM J. Control and Optim. 3 (1994), pp [1 D. Salamon, Infinite dimensional systems with unbounded control and observation: A functional analytic approach, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 300 (1987), pp [13 O.J. Staffans, Well-Posed Linear Systems, Cambridge University Press, to appear. [14 O.J. Staffans and G. Weiss, Transfer functions of regular linear systems, Part II: The system operator and the Lax-Phillips semigroup, Trans. Amer. Math. Society 354 (00), pp [15 R. Triggiani, Wave equation on a bounded domain with boundary dissipation: an operator approach, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 137 (1989), pp [16 M. Tucsnak and G. Weiss, How to get a conservative well-posed linear system out of thin air. Part II: Controllability and stability, SIAM J. Control and Optim. 4 (003), pp [17 G. Weiss, Admissibility of unbounded control operators, SIAM J. Control and Optim. 7 (1989), pp [18 G. Weiss, Admissible observation operators for linear semigroups, Israel J. Math. 65 (1989), pp [19 G. Weiss, Two conjectures on the admissibility of control operators, in Estimation and Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, eds: W. Desch, F. Kappel, and K. Kunisch, pp , Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel, [0 G. Weiss, Transfer functions of regular linear systems, Part I: Characterizations of regularity, Trans. Amer. Math. Society 34 (1994), pp [1 G. Weiss, Regular linear systems with feedback, Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems 7 (1994), pp [ G. Weiss, Optimal control of systems with a unitary semigroup and with colocated control and observation, Systems & Control Letters 48 (003), pp [3 G. Weiss, O.J. Staffans and M. Tucsnak, Well-posed linear systems -a survey with emphasis on conservative systems, Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 11 (001), pp
Conservative Control Systems Described by the Schrödinger Equation
Conservative Control Systems Described by the Schrödinger Equation Salah E. Rebiai Abstract An important subclass of well-posed linear systems is formed by the conservative systems. A conservative system
More informationEQUIVALENT CONDITIONS FOR EXPONENTIAL STABILITY FOR A SPECIAL CLASS OF CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SYSTEMS
EQUIVALENT CONDITIONS FOR EXPONENTIAL STABILITY FOR A SPECIAL CLASS OF CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SYSTEMS G. WEISS Λ, M. Tucsnak y Λ Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Imperial College London Exhibition
More informationEIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS OF SEMIGROUP GENERATORS OBTAINED FROM DIAGONAL GENERATORS BY FEEDBACK
COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS c 211 International Press Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 71-14, 211 5 EIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS OF SEMIGROUP GENERATORS OBTAINED FROM DIAGONAL GENERATORS BY FEEDBACK CHENG-ZHONG
More informationWELL-POSED LINEAR SYSTEMS A SURVEY WITH EMPHASIS ON CONSERVATIVE SYSTEMS
Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 001, Vol.11, No.1, 7 33 WELL-POSED LINEAR SYSTEMS A SURVEY WITH EMPHASIS ON CONSERVATIVE SYSTEMS George WEISS, Olof J. STAFFANS Marius TUCSNAK*** We survey the literature
More informationNonlinear stabilization via a linear observability
via a linear observability Kaïs Ammari Department of Mathematics University of Monastir Joint work with Fathia Alabau-Boussouira Collocated feedback stabilization Outline 1 Introduction and main result
More informationTHIS paper is about coupled systems in which a wellposed
IEEE RANSACIONS ON AUOMAIC CONROL, VOL. 56, NO. 1, JANUARY 211 1 Controllability and observability of a well-posed system coupled with a finite-dimensional system Xiaowei Zhao and George Weiss, Member,
More informationStability of an abstract wave equation with delay and a Kelvin Voigt damping
Stability of an abstract wave equation with delay and a Kelvin Voigt damping University of Monastir/UPSAY/LMV-UVSQ Joint work with Serge Nicaise and Cristina Pignotti Outline 1 Problem The idea Stability
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 58, NO. 5, MAY invertible, that is (1) In this way, on, and on, system (3) becomes
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 58, NO. 5, MAY 2013 1269 Sliding Mode and Active Disturbance Rejection Control to Stabilization of One-Dimensional Anti-Stable Wave Equations Subject to Disturbance
More informationPerturbation theory of boundary value problems and approximate controllability of perturbed boundary control problems
Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec. 9-11, 28 TuC7.6 Perturbation theory of boundary value problems and approximate controllability of perturbed boundary
More informationSuppression of the vibrations of wind turbine towers
IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information 211 28, 377 389 doi:1.193/imamci/dnr14 Advance Access publication on June 27, 211 Suppression of the vibrations of wind turbine towers XIAOWEI ZHAO Department
More informationGeorge Weiss 1 and Marius Tucsnak 2
ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations February 3, Vol. 9, 47 73 DOI: 1.151/cocv:31 HOW TO GET A CONSERVATIVE WELL-POSED LINEAR SYSTEM OUT OF THIN AIR. PART I. WELL-POSEDNESS AND ENERGY
More informationDELAY-DIFFERENTIAL systems arise in the study
438 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL On Feedback Stabilizability of Linear Systems With State Input Delays in Banach Spaces Said Hadd Qing-Chang Zhong, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract The feedback stabilizability
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.oc] 9 Mar 2019
arxiv:1903.03819v1 [math.oc 9 Mar 2019 On exact controllability of infinite-dimensional linear port-hamiltonian systems * Birgit Jacob 1 Julia T. Kaiser 1 Abstract Infinite-dimensional linear port-hamiltonian
More informationOutput tracking control of a exible robot arm
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 25 Seville, Spain, December 12-15, 25 WeB12.4 Output tracking control of a exible robot arm Tu Duc Nguyen
More informationLeft invertible semigroups on Hilbert spaces.
Left invertible semigroups on Hilbert spaces. Hans Zwart Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 75 AE
More informationStabilization of second order evolution equations with unbounded feedback with delay
Stabilization of second order evolution equations with unbounded feedback with delay S. Nicaise and J. Valein snicaise,julie.valein@univ-valenciennes.fr Laboratoire LAMAV, Université de Valenciennes et
More informationOn the Three-Phase-Lag Heat Equation with Spatial Dependent Lags
Nonlinear Analysis and Differential Equations, Vol. 5, 07, no., 53-66 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/0.988/nade.07.694 On the Three-Phase-Lag Heat Equation with Spatial Dependent Lags Yang
More informationThe Role of Exosystems in Output Regulation
1 The Role of Exosystems in Output Regulation Lassi Paunonen In this paper we study the role of the exosystem in the theory of output regulation for linear infinite-dimensional systems. The main result
More informationSTABILIZATION OF EULER-BERNOULLI BEAM EQUATIONS WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS UNDER DELAYED BOUNDARY OUTPUT FEEDBACK
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 25 (25), No. 75, pp. 4. ISSN: 72-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu STABILIZATION OF EULER-BERNOULLI
More informationStrong Stabilization of the System of Linear Elasticity by a Dirichlet Boundary Feedback
To appear in IMA J. Appl. Math. Strong Stabilization of the System of Linear Elasticity by a Dirichlet Boundary Feedback Wei-Jiu Liu and Miroslav Krstić Department of AMES University of California at San
More informationObservation and Control for Operator Semigroups
Birkhäuser Advanced Texts Basler Lehrbücher Observation and Control for Operator Semigroups Bearbeitet von Marius Tucsnak, George Weiss Approx. 496 p. 2009. Buch. xi, 483 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 7643 8993
More informationC.I.BYRNES,D.S.GILLIAM.I.G.LAUK O, V.I. SHUBOV We assume that the input u is given, in feedback form, as the output of a harmonic oscillator with freq
Journal of Mathematical Systems, Estimation, and Control Vol. 8, No. 2, 1998, pp. 1{12 c 1998 Birkhauser-Boston Harmonic Forcing for Linear Distributed Parameter Systems C.I. Byrnes y D.S. Gilliam y I.G.
More informationStabilization of Heat Equation
Stabilization of Heat Equation Mythily Ramaswamy TIFR Centre for Applicable Mathematics, Bangalore, India CIMPA Pre-School, I.I.T Bombay 22 June - July 4, 215 Mythily Ramaswamy Stabilization of Heat Equation
More informationA conjecture on sustained oscillations for a closed-loop heat equation
A conjecture on sustained oscillations for a closed-loop heat equation C.I. Byrnes, D.S. Gilliam Abstract The conjecture in this paper represents an initial step aimed toward understanding and shaping
More informationReduced-order Model Based on H -Balancing for Infinite-Dimensional Systems
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 9, 405-418 Reduced-order Model Based on H -Balancing for Infinite-Dimensional Systems Fatmawati Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science and Technology,
More informationSpectrum and Exact Controllability of a Hybrid System of Elasticity.
Spectrum and Exact Controllability of a Hybrid System of Elasticity. D. Mercier, January 16, 28 Abstract We consider the exact controllability of a hybrid system consisting of an elastic beam, clamped
More informationwe denote by P u its truncation to the interval [; ]. Then the well-posed system consists of the family of bounded operators = ( ) such that x() P y =
Well-posed linear systems - a survey with emphasis on conservative systems George WEISS Dept. of Electr. & Electronic Eng. Imperial College of Sci. & Technol. Exhibition Road, London SW7 BT United Kingdom
More informationBOUNDED WEAK SOLUTION FOR THE HAMILTONIAN SYSTEM. Q-Heung Choi and Tacksun Jung
Korean J. Math. 2 (23), No., pp. 8 9 http://dx.doi.org/.568/kjm.23.2..8 BOUNDED WEAK SOLUTION FOR THE HAMILTONIAN SYSTEM Q-Heung Choi and Tacksun Jung Abstract. We investigate the bounded weak solutions
More informationSimultaneous boundary control of a Rao-Nakra sandwich beam
Simultaneous boundary control of a Rao-Nakra sandwich beam Scott W. Hansen and Rajeev Rajaram Abstract We consider the problem of boundary control of a system of three coupled partial differential equations
More informationBoundary Controllers for Euler-Bernoulli Beam with Arbitrary Decay Rate
Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Meico, Dec. 9-11, TuA7.1 Boundar Controllers for Euler-Bernoulli Beam with Arbitrar Deca Rate Andre Smshlaev, Bao-Zhu Guo, and Miroslav
More informationStability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games
Stability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games Alberto Bressan ) and Khai T. Nguyen ) *) Department of Mathematics, Penn State University **) Department of Mathematics,
More informationCOPRIME FACTORIZATIONS AND WELL-POSED LINEAR SYSTEMS
SIAM J. CONTROL OPTIM. c 1998 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 1268 1292, July 1998 009 COPRIME FACTORIZATIONS AND WELL-POSED LINEAR SYSTEMS OLOF J. STAFFANS Abstract.
More informationLecture Notes on PDEs
Lecture Notes on PDEs Alberto Bressan February 26, 2012 1 Elliptic equations Let IR n be a bounded open set Given measurable functions a ij, b i, c : IR, consider the linear, second order differential
More informationC M. Bergische Universität Wuppertal. Fachbereich Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften
M A C M Bergische Universität Wuppertal Fachbereich Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften Institute of Mathematical Modelling, Analysis and Computational Mathematics (IMACM) Preprint BUW-IMACM 12/24 Birgit
More informationBOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS IN KREĬN SPACES. Branko Ćurgus Western Washington University, USA
GLASNIK MATEMATIČKI Vol. 35(55(2000, 45 58 BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS IN KREĬN SPACES Branko Ćurgus Western Washington University, USA Dedicated to the memory of Branko Najman. Abstract. Three abstract boundary
More informationAn Example of Output Regulation for a Distributed Parameter System with Infinite Dimensional Exosystem
An Example of Output Regulation for a Distributed Parameter System with Infinite Dimensional Exosystem Christopher I. Byrnes Systems Science and Math, One Brookings Dr. Washington University, St. Louis,
More informationAPPROXIMATE CONTROLLABILITY OF DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS BY DISTRIBUTED CONTROLLERS
2004 Conference on Diff. Eqns. and Appl. in Math. Biology, Nanaimo, BC, Canada. Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 12, 2005, pp. 159 169. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu
More informationOBSERVATION OPERATORS FOR EVOLUTIONARY INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
OBSERVATION OPERATORS FOR EVOLUTIONARY INTEGRAL EQUATIONS MICHAEL JUNG Abstract. We analyze admissibility and exactness of observation operators arising in control theory for Volterra integral equations.
More informationAnalysis of undamped second order systems with dynamic feedback
Control and Cybernetics vol. 33 (24) No. 4 Analysis of undamped second order systems with dynamic feedback by Wojciech Mitkowski Chair of Automatics AGH University of Science and Technology Al. Mickiewicza
More informationSome recent results on controllability of coupled parabolic systems: Towards a Kalman condition
Some recent results on controllability of coupled parabolic systems: Towards a Kalman condition F. Ammar Khodja Clermont-Ferrand, June 2011 GOAL: 1 Show the important differences between scalar and non
More informationRoot-Locus Theory for Infinite-Dimensional Systems
Root-Locus Theory for Infinite-Dimensional Systems by Elham Monifi A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Mathematics in Applied
More informationGeometry and the Kato square root problem
Geometry and the Kato square root problem Lashi Bandara Centre for Mathematics and its Applications Australian National University 7 June 2013 Geometric Analysis Seminar University of Wollongong Lashi
More informationStability of Linear Distributed Parameter Systems with Time-Delays
Stability of Linear Distributed Parameter Systems with Time-Delays Emilia FRIDMAN* *Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Israel joint with Yury Orlov (CICESE Research Center, Ensenada, Mexico)
More informationBoundary Stabilization of Coupled Plate Equations
Palestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2(2) (2013), 233 242 Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2013 Boundary Stabilization of Coupled Plate Equations Sabeur Mansouri Communicated by Kais Ammari MSC 2010:
More information1 Introduction We study innite-dimensional systems that can formally be written in the familiar form x 0 (t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t); y(t) = Cx(t) + Du(t); t
Quadratic Optimal Control of Regular Well-Posed Linear Systems, with Applications to Parabolic Equations Olof J. Staans Abo Akademi University Department of Mathematics FIN-20500 Abo, Finland Olof.Staans@abo.
More informationA Distributed Parameter Control Approach to Optimal Filtering and Smoothing with Mobile Sensor Networks
A Distributed Parameter Control Approach to Optimal Filtering and Smoothing with Mobile Sensor Networks J A Burns, Fellow, IEEE, E M Cliff, Member, IEEE, and C Rautenberg Center for Optimal Design and
More informationGeometry and the Kato square root problem
Geometry and the Kato square root problem Lashi Bandara Centre for Mathematics and its Applications Australian National University 7 June 2013 Geometric Analysis Seminar University of Wollongong Lashi
More informationTheory of Vibrations in Stewart Platforms
Theory of Vibrations in Stewart Platforms J.M. Selig and X. Ding School of Computing, Info. Sys. & Maths. South Bank University London SE1 0AA, U.K. (seligjm@sbu.ac.uk) Abstract This article develops a
More informationObserver Design for a Flexible Robot Arm with a Tip Load
5 American Control Conference June 8-, 5. Portland, OR, USA WeC7.6 Observer Design for a Flexible Robot Arm with a Tip Load Tu Duc Nguyen and Olav Egeland Abstract In this paper, we consider the observer
More informationPointwise stabilisation of a string with time delay in the observation
International Journal of Control ISSN: -7179 (Print) 1366-58 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tcon Pointwise stabilisation of a string with time delay in the observation Kun-Yi
More informationDiscrete-Time Modal State Reconstruction for Infinite-Dimensional Systems Using Generalized Sampling
Discrete-Time Modal State Reconstruction for Infinite-Dimensional Systems Using Generalized Sampling Christian Harkort and Joachim Deutscher Chair of Automatic Control, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg,
More informationControl Systems. Laplace domain analysis
Control Systems Laplace domain analysis L. Lanari outline introduce the Laplace unilateral transform define its properties show its advantages in turning ODEs to algebraic equations define an Input/Output
More informationOn feedback stabilizability of time-delay systems in Banach spaces
On feedback stabilizability of time-delay systems in Banach spaces S. Hadd and Q.-C. Zhong q.zhong@liv.ac.uk Dept. of Electrical Eng. & Electronics The University of Liverpool United Kingdom Outline Background
More informationSemigroups of Impedance Conservative Boundary Control Systems
Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, yoto, Japan, July 24-28, 26 TuP13.5 Semigroups of Impedance Conservative Boundary Control Systems Jarmo MALINEN
More informationA Spectral Characterization of Closed Range Operators 1
A Spectral Characterization of Closed Range Operators 1 M.THAMBAN NAIR (IIT Madras) 1 Closed Range Operators Operator equations of the form T x = y, where T : X Y is a linear operator between normed linear
More informationsemigroups are consistent, we shall simply use the notation T (t). Assume further that U and Y are separable Hilbert spaces (the input and output spac
CDC-REG467 Optimal Hankel norm approximation for the Pritchard-Salamon class of non-exponentially stable innite-dimensional systems A.J. Sasane and R.F. Curtain Department of Mathematics, University of
More informationACM/CMS 107 Linear Analysis & Applications Fall 2016 Assignment 4: Linear ODEs and Control Theory Due: 5th December 2016
ACM/CMS 17 Linear Analysis & Applications Fall 216 Assignment 4: Linear ODEs and Control Theory Due: 5th December 216 Introduction Systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) can be used to describe
More information1 Basic Second-Order PDEs
Partial Differential Equations A. Visintin a.a. 2011-12 These pages are in progress. They contain: an abstract of the classes; notes on some (few) specific issues. These notes are far from providing a
More informationENGI 4430 PDEs - d Alembert Solutions Page 11.01
ENGI 4430 PDEs - d Alembert Solutions Page 11.01 11. Partial Differential Equations Partial differential equations (PDEs) are equations involving functions of more than one variable and their partial derivatives
More informationController Design for Robust Output Regulation of Regular Linear Systems
Controller Design for Robust Output Regulation of Regular Linear Systems L. Paunonen We present three dynamic error feedbac controllers for robust output regulation of regular linear systems. These controllers
More informationUniversal shifts and composition operators
Universal shifts and composition operators Jonathan R. Partington and Elodie Pozzi Abstract It is shown that a large class of weighted shift operators T have the property that for every λ in the interior
More informationA quantitative Fattorini-Hautus test: the minimal null control time problem in the parabolic setting
A quantitative Fattorini-Hautus test: the minimal null control time problem in the parabolic setting Morgan MORANCEY I2M, Aix-Marseille Université August 2017 "Controllability of parabolic equations :
More informationStabilization and Passivity-Based Control
DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 2010 1 Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control Lecture 8 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 10, plus handout from R. Sepulchre, Constructive
More informationStrong stabilization of the system of linear elasticity by a Dirichlet boundary feedback
IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics (2000) 65, 109 121 Strong stabilization of the system of linear elasticity by a Dirichlet boundary feedback WEI-JIU LIU AND MIROSLAV KRSTIĆ Department of AMES, University
More information1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1
Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +
More informationREGULARIZATION AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN STABILITY OF WELL POSED SYSTEMS
REGULARIZATION AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN STABILITY OF WELL POSED SYSTEMS YURI LATUSHKIN, TIMOTHY RANDOLPH, AND ROLAND SCHNAUBELT Abstract. We study linear control systems with unbounded control and observation
More informationDefinition and basic properties of heat kernels I, An introduction
Definition and basic properties of heat kernels I, An introduction Zhiqin Lu, Department of Mathematics, UC Irvine, Irvine CA 92697 April 23, 2010 In this lecture, we will answer the following questions:
More informationSTABILIZATION OF ODE-SCHRÖDINGER CASCADED SYSTEMS SUBJECT TO BOUNDARY CONTROL MATCHED DISTURBANCE
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 215 (215), No. 248, pp. 1 22. ISSN: 172-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu STABILIZATION OF
More informationAbstract In this paper, we consider bang-bang property for a kind of timevarying. time optimal control problem of null controllable heat equation.
JOTA manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) The Bang-Bang Property of Time-Varying Optimal Time Control for Null Controllable Heat Equation Dong-Hui Yang Bao-Zhu Guo Weihua Gui Chunhua Yang Received:
More informationThe elliptic sinh-gordon equation in the half plane
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 8 25), 63 73 Research Article The elliptic sinh-gordon equation in the half plane Guenbo Hwang Department of Mathematics, Daegu University, Gyeongsan
More informationON THE WELL-POSEDNESS AND REGULARITY OF THE WAVE EQUATION WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS
ESAIM: COCV Vol. 13, N o 4, 007, pp. 776 79 DOI: 10.1051/cocv:007040 ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations www.esaim-cocv.org ON THE WELL-POSEDNESS AND REGULARITY OF THE WAVE EQUATION
More informationA spectral approach for the exact observability of infinite dimensional systems with skew-adjoint generator.
A spectral approach for the exact observability of infinite dimensional systems with skew-adjoint generator. Karim Ramdani, Takeo Takahashi, Gérald Tenenbaum, Marius Tucsnak To cite this version: Karim
More informationCONTINUITY OF CP-SEMIGROUPS IN THE POINT-STRONG OPERATOR TOPOLOGY
J. OPERATOR THEORY 64:1(21), 149 154 Copyright by THETA, 21 CONTINUITY OF CP-SEMIGROUPS IN THE POINT-STRONG OPERATOR TOPOLOGY DANIEL MARKIEWICZ and ORR MOSHE SHALIT Communicated by William Arveson ABSTRACT.
More informationA CONCISE PROOF OF THE GEOMETRIC CONSTRUCTION OF INERTIAL MANIFOLDS
This paper has appeared in Physics Letters A 200 (1995) 415 417 A CONCISE PROOF OF THE GEOMETRIC CONSTRUCTION OF INERTIAL MANIFOLDS James C. Robinson Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics,
More informationStability of Switched Linear Hyperbolic Systems by Lyapunov Techniques
2196 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 59, NO. 8, AUGUST 2014 Stability of Switched Linear Hyperbolic Systems by Lyapunov Techniques Christophe Prieur, Antoine Girard, Emmanuel Witrant Abstract
More informationScalar Asymptotic Contractivity and Fixed Points for Nonexpansive Mappings on Unbounded Sets
Scalar Asymptotic Contractivity and Fixed Points for Nonexpansive Mappings on Unbounded Sets George Isac Department of Mathematics Royal Military College of Canada, STN Forces Kingston, Ontario, Canada
More informationSecond Order Elliptic PDE
Second Order Elliptic PDE T. Muthukumar tmk@iitk.ac.in December 16, 2014 Contents 1 A Quick Introduction to PDE 1 2 Classification of Second Order PDE 3 3 Linear Second Order Elliptic Operators 4 4 Periodic
More informationEstimates for the resolvent and spectral gaps for non self-adjoint operators. University Bordeaux
for the resolvent and spectral gaps for non self-adjoint operators 1 / 29 Estimates for the resolvent and spectral gaps for non self-adjoint operators Vesselin Petkov University Bordeaux Mathematics Days
More informationCompact perturbations of controlled systems
Compact perturbations of controlled systems Michel Duprez, Guillaume Olive To cite this version: Michel Duprez, Guillaume Olive. Compact perturbations of controlled systems. Mathematical Control and Related
More informationStabilization of persistently excited linear systems
Stabilization of persistently excited linear systems Yacine Chitour Laboratoire des signaux et systèmes & Université Paris-Sud, Orsay Exposé LJLL Paris, 28/9/2012 Stabilization & intermittent control Consider
More informationABOUT SOME TYPES OF BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS WITH INTERFACES
13 Kragujevac J. Math. 3 27) 13 26. ABOUT SOME TYPES OF BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS WITH INTERFACES Boško S. Jovanović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mathematics, Studentski trg 16, 11 Belgrade, Serbia
More informationThe i/s/o resolvent set and the i/s/o resolvent matrix of an i/s/o system in continuous time
21st International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems July 7-11, 2014. The i/s/o resolvent set and the i/s/o resolvent matrix of an i/s/o system in continuous time Damir Z. Arov 1,
More informationThe Kato square root problem on vector bundles with generalised bounded geometry
The Kato square root problem on vector bundles with generalised bounded geometry Lashi Bandara (Joint work with Alan McIntosh, ANU) Centre for Mathematics and its Applications Australian National University
More informationA spectral approach for the exact observability of infinite-dimensional systems with skew-adjoint generator
Journal of Functional Analysis 6 (5 193 9 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa A spectral approach for the exact observability of infinite-dimensional systems with skew-adjoint generator K. Ramdani, T. Takahashi,
More informationTechnische Universität Dresden
Technische Universität Dresden Als Typoskript gedruckt Herausgeber: Der Rektor arxiv:1502.05496v1 [math.fa] 19 Feb 2015 On a class of block operator matrices in system theory. Sascha Trostorff Institut
More information3 2 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) 3. a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1
Math Problem a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1 3 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) = Au( t) with u (0) =. 3 1 u 1 =, u 1 3 = b- True or false and why 1. if A is
More informationThe Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator
Lecture 8 The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator plays an important role in the theory of inverse problems. In fact, from measurements of electrical currents at the surface
More informationNONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS FOR SUPERQUADRATIC NONAUTONOMOUS PERIODIC SYSTEMS. Shouchuan Hu Nikolas S. Papageorgiou. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 34, 29, 327 338 NONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS FOR SUPERQUADRATIC NONAUTONOMOUS PERIODIC SYSTEMS Shouchuan Hu Nikolas S. Papageorgiou
More informationBoundary Control of an Anti-Stable Wave Equation With Anti-Damping on the Uncontrolled Boundary
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 1-1, 9 WeC5. Boundary Control of an Anti-Stable Wave Equation With Anti-Damping on the Uncontrolled Boundary Andrey Smyshlyaev
More informationThe Kato square root problem on vector bundles with generalised bounded geometry
The Kato square root problem on vector bundles with generalised bounded geometry Lashi Bandara (Joint work with Alan McIntosh, ANU) Centre for Mathematics and its Applications Australian National University
More informationSemigroups and Linear Partial Differential Equations with Delay
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 264, 1 2 (21 doi:1.16/jmaa.21.675, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Semigroups and Linear Partial Differential Equations with Delay András
More informationExponential stability of abstract evolution equations with time delay feedback
Exponential stability of abstract evolution equations with time delay feedback Cristina Pignotti University of L Aquila Cortona, June 22, 2016 Cristina Pignotti (L Aquila) Abstract evolutions equations
More informationExplicit formulae for J pectral factor for well-poed linear ytem Ruth F. Curtain Amol J. Saane Department of Mathematic Department of Mathematic Univerity of Groningen Univerity of Twente P.O. Box 800
More informationLucio Demeio Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e delle Scienze Matematiche
Scuola di Dottorato THE WAVE EQUATION Lucio Demeio Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e delle Scienze Matematiche Lucio Demeio - DIISM wave equation 1 / 44 1 The Vibrating String Equation 2 Second
More informationOn the bang-bang property of time optimal controls for infinite dimensional linear systems
On the bang-bang property of time optimal controls for infinite dimensional linear systems Marius Tucsnak Université de Lorraine Paris, 6 janvier 2012 Notation and problem statement (I) Notation: X (the
More informationand finally, any second order divergence form elliptic operator
Supporting Information: Mathematical proofs Preliminaries Let be an arbitrary bounded open set in R n and let L be any elliptic differential operator associated to a symmetric positive bilinear form B
More informationControl, Stabilization and Numerics for Partial Differential Equations
Paris-Sud, Orsay, December 06 Control, Stabilization and Numerics for Partial Differential Equations Enrique Zuazua Universidad Autónoma 28049 Madrid, Spain enrique.zuazua@uam.es http://www.uam.es/enrique.zuazua
More informationFormulas for Finding Coefficients from Nodal Lines
Formulas for Finding Coefficients from Nodal Lines by Joyce R. McLaughlin Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York 12181 Introduction We ask the question: What can be determined about a vibrating
More informationNonlinear error dynamics for cycled data assimilation methods
Nonlinear error dynamics for cycled data assimilation methods A J F Moodey 1, A S Lawless 1,2, P J van Leeuwen 2, R W E Potthast 1,3 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, UK.
More informationSingle input controllability of a simplified fluid-structure interaction model
Single input controllability of a simplified fluid-structure interaction model Yuning Liu Institut Elie Cartan, Nancy Université/CNRS/INRIA BP 739, 5456 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France liuyuning.math@gmail.com
More information