April 29, 2010 CHAPTER 13: EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM
|
|
- Sherilyn Benson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 April 29, 200 CHAPTER : EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM Some concepts from biology have been applied to game theory to define a type of equilibrium of a population that is robust against invasion by another type of strategy or state. In evolutionary game theory, there is assumed to be a large population that plays a mixed strategy as a whole: either each player plays a mixed strategy or the mixed strategy gives the probability that a random person plays a given strategy. An individual or invading sub-population plays against a randomly chosen person from the population as a whole in a given symmetric game. Rather than assume rationality of the players, the population is assumed to maintain a state with the maximum fitness, which is measured by the payoff: therefore, the population is assume to adjust to the maximum payoff. We assume that a symmetric game is fixed with a finite number of possible actions {s,..., s n } and payoffs u(s i, s j ) = a i j. Let { = p = (p,..., p n ) T : p i 0 for all i, } p = i be the simplex of probability vectors giving mixed strategies. In the context of evolutionary game theory, an element p is called a state (or strategy) of the population. A state p can be thought of as either (i) the mixed strategy played by each individual in the population or (ii) the probability distribution of an individuals within a large population playing each action s j with probability p j. We consider the repeated random pairing of an individual against a population in state p, so the individual encounters the states s j with probability p j. The payoff of an individual who takes action s i against a population with state p is assumed to be U(s i, p) = a i j p j = (e i ) T Ap = e i Ap, j where e i is the standard unit vector with a in the i th -coordinate and 0s in the other coordinates. In the same way, the payoff of a state q playing against a state p is assumed to be U(q, p) = i j q ia i j p j = q T Ap = q Ap. The latter quantity U(q, p) can be thought of as either (i) an individual playing mixed strategy q against the whole population playing strategy p or (ii) an invading sub-population which plays the various strategies s j with probability q j. Definition (29.2). A state ˆp is called a Nash equilibrium provided that it is a symmetric Nash equilibrium, i.e., U(ˆp, ˆp) U(q, ˆp) for all q, and the state q = ˆp has the largest payoff in response to a population in the state ˆp, or ˆp B(ˆp). Definition (cf. 97.). A state ˆp is an evolutionary stable state (or evolutionary stable strategy), ESS, provided that for any q in with q ˆp, there exists an ɛ(q) > 0 such that U(ˆp, ɛq + ( ɛ)ˆp) > U(q, ɛq + ( ɛ)ˆp) and for all 0 < ɛ ɛ(q). This means that if a small amount of a new state q invades to form a new state q ɛ = ɛq + ( ɛ)ˆp then the intruder q has a lower payoff playing against than new state q ɛ than the original state ˆp has playing against q ɛ. In the definition of an ESS, we can think of q representing either (i) a mutation my individuals making a random choice of a strategy and ɛ the proportion of the population with this mutation, or (ii) an invading sub-population with state q with size ɛ in relation to the original population.
2 2 CHAPTER : EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM Rational Game Theorem Set of player Payoff measured in payoff Strategy is chosen by a player Equilibrium: no player can do better Comparison Evolutionary Game Theory Population from which the set of players is drawn Fitness of state Strategy is inherited or endowed by a player ESS: no small mutation in the population can survive The following theorem gives conditions for a Nash equilibrium and an ESS. Osborne takes the assumptions of part (b) of this theorem as the definition (00.) of ESS. Theorem. a. A state ˆp is a Nash equilibrium if and only if the following two conditions hold: (i) e i Aˆp ˆp Aˆp for all i, and (ii) e i Aˆp = ˆp Aˆp for all i with ˆp i > 0. b. A state ˆp is an ESS if and only if the following two conditions hold: (i) ˆp Aˆp q Aˆp for all q (i.e., ˆp is a Nash equilibrium), and (ii) ˆp Aq > q Aq whenever q ˆp and ˆp Aˆp = q Aˆp. c. Let ˆp with ˆp i > 0 for all i. The state ˆp is an ESS iff ˆp Aq > q Aq for all q with q ˆp. d. Any state ˆp is an ESS iff ˆp Aq > q Aq for all q ˆp sufficiently close to ˆp in. Proof. a. If ˆp is a Nash equilibrium, then the inequality (i) holds for all q and so certainly for for all e i. Assume that ˆp i > 0. Then by (i), ˆp Aˆp = ˆp i e i Aˆp ˆp i ˆp Aˆp = ˆp Aˆp. i I i I Since the first and last terms are equal, the inequality is an equality and we must have condition (ii) for all i for which ˆp i > 0. If we assume conditions (i) and (ii), then for any q, q Aˆp = i q ie i Aˆp i q i ˆp Aˆp = ˆp Aˆp. This shows that ˆp is a Nash equilibrium. b. Assume that ˆp is an ESS and q ˆp. Expanding the condition defining an ESS and collecting terms, gives (*) ( ɛ) (ˆp Aˆp q Aˆp ) + ɛ (ˆp Aq q Aq ) > 0. Since (*) holds for small ɛ > 0, we get conditions (i) and (ii) of part (b). Conversely, if conditions (i) and (ii) hold, then (*) holds for all ɛ > 0 sufficiently small. (Note that the second term can be negative so the inequality is not necessarily true for all ɛ.) c. Assume that ˆp is an ESS with ˆp i > 0 for all i. Since ˆp is a Nash equilibrium with ˆp i > 0 for all i, ˆp Aˆp = e i Aˆp for all i. Take any q ˆp and sum with weights q i, ˆp Aˆp = i q i ˆp Aˆp = i q ie i Aˆp = q Aˆp. By condition (ii) of ESS, ˆp Aq > q Aq for this arbitrary q ˆp. This is what we wanted to prove. For the converse, for q ˆp, set q ɛ = ( ɛ)ˆp + ɛq. So by assumption, ˆp Aq ɛ > q ɛ Aq ɛ for all ɛ > 0. Subtracting ( ɛ)ˆp Aq ɛ from both sides of the inequality yields ɛ ˆp Aq ɛ > ɛq Aq ɛ. Dividing the last inequality by ɛ gives the condition for an ESS. d. Since part (c) covered the case with all the ˆp i > 0, we assume that ˆp is an ESS with some ˆp i = 0. Let I (ˆp) = { i : ˆp i > 0 }, I (ˆp) = {q : q i > 0 if i I (ˆp), q j = 0 if j / I (ˆp) }, and I (ˆp) = {q : q i = 0 for some i I (ˆp), }. The set I (ˆp) is a vertex, edge, or face of of where certain q j are zero. The set I (ˆp) is the union of all the faces opposite to I (ˆp). In fact, let r be any state not equal to ˆp. Since i r i = i ˆp i =, i (r i ˆp i ) = 0 and some of the r i ˆp i must be negative. Let j be the index
3 CHAPTER : EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM and t > 0 be such that 0 = ˆp j + t(r j ˆp j ) and all the ˆp i + t(r i ˆp i ) 0. Let q = ˆp + t(r ˆp). Note that q I (ˆp). Since the line segment from ˆp to q is in, t. Thus, r = ( t q + ) ˆp, t with 0 < /t. This shows all states in can be written in this form. For q I (ˆp), q ˆp. Let q ɛ = ɛq + ( ɛ)ˆp. By the definition of ESS, q Aq ɛ < ˆp Aq ɛ for ɛ(q) ɛ > 0. Multiplying this inequality by ɛ and adding ( ɛ)ˆp Aq ɛ to both sides gives q ɛ Aq ɛ < ˆp Aq ɛ. The ɛ(q) can all be taken greater than the same ɛ 0 > 0 for all q I (ˆp) (where we have compactness ). The union of the line segments from ˆp to all q I (ˆp) fill up all of, so we get the inequality for all q ɛ ˆp in a neighborhood of ˆp. The proof of the converse is like the converse for part (c), but is only for small ɛ > 0. Remark. From part (c) of the theorem, it follows that if an interior Nash equilibrium is an ESS, then there cannot be any other Nash equilibrium. In other words, if there is an interior Nash equilibrium and another Nash equilibrium, then the interior Nash equilibrium is not an ESS. Examples ( ) 2 Example. Consider the game with matrix A =. For a state p = (p, p) 0 T, the expected payoffs of e and e 2 are E(e, p) = 2 p and E(e 2, p) = p. These are equal for = 2p, or p = /2. For p < /2, e is preferred and e 2 is preferred for p > /2. The best response in terms of the value q of (q, q) is {} if p < /2 B(p, p) = [0, ] if p = /2 {0} if p > /2. Therefore, the only Nash equilibrium is p = /2. Let ˆp = ( /2, /2) T. Because ˆp is an interior Nash equilibrium, ˆp Aˆp = q Aˆp for all q. Letting q = (q, q) T, Is q Aq = (q, q) T (2 q, q) T = 2q q 2 + 2q + q 2 = 2q 2 and ˆp Aq = ( /2, /2) T (2 q, q) T = /2 2q. 2q 2 < /2 2q, or 0 < 2q 2 2q + ( 2 = 2 q 2 q + ) ( = 2 q 2 2) This last inequality is true for all q /2. Therefore, ˆp is an ESS. ( ) c 2 Example (Example 0.2). The Dove-Hawk game can be modeled with the matrix A = for 0 c > 0, where the first choice is an aggressive bird or hawk and the second choice is passive bird or dove. In comparison to the book, we have taken v = 2 and replaced c by 2c (to eliminate fractions). The expected payoffs for a state p = (p, p) T are E(e, p) = ( c)p+2( p) = 2 (+c)p and E(e 2, p) = p. If 0 < c <, then E(e, p) E(e 2, p) = cp > 0 for all p, e is always preferred, and the only Nash equilibrium is p =. Since e is a strict Nash equilibrium, it an ESS. This equilibrium corresponds to only hawks or aggressive birds surviving.
4 CHAPTER : EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM If c, then E(e, p) = E(e 2, p) for 2 ( + c)p = p, = cp, or ˆp c = /c. The best response in terms of the value q of (q, q) is {} if p < /c B(p, p) = [0, ] if p = /c {0} if p > /c. The only Nash equilibrium where p B(p) is ˆp c = ( /c, (c ) /c). B(p) /c p FIGURE. Best responses For c =, it can be checked directly that ˆp = e is an ESS. For c >, the equilibrium ˆp = ˆp c is interior, so to be a ESS, we need ˆp Aq > q Aq for all q ˆp. Letting q = (q, q), ( c ˆp Aq =, + c ) q = 2q + + c and c c c Therefore, we need q Aq = ( c)q 2 + 2q( q) + ( q) 2 = cq q + c + c > cq 2 +, cq 2 2q + > 0, or c c (cq )2 > 0. This last inequality is true for all q /c = ˆp c, so ˆp c is an ESS for c >. This equilibrium corresponds to both aggressive and passive birds surviving. Example. Consider the game with matrix A = 0 0. For a state p, the expected payoffs are 0 E(e, p) = p 2 + p, E(e 2, p) = p + p, and E(e, p) = p + p 2. A straight forward consideration shows that these expected payoffs are equal only for p = p 2 = p = /. Let ˆp = ( /, /, T /). Because ˆp is an interior Nash equilibrium, ˆp Aˆp = q Aˆp for all q. We need to show that q Aq < ˆp Aq for q ˆp. The payoffs are ˆp Aq = ( 2 /, 2 /, 2 /)q = 2 / and q Aq = 2q q 2 + 2q q + 2q 2 q. Substituting q = x + /, q 2 = x 2 [ + /, and ] q = / x x 2, q Aq = 2x 2 2x 2 2 2x x /. The quadratic 2 terms have the matrix, which has determinant > 0 and negative upper left entry. By the test for 2 negative definite, q Aq < 2 / for (x, x 2 ) (0, 0), i.e., for (q, q 2, q ) ˆp. This shows that ˆp is an ESS. Since ˆp is a completely mixed ESS, there cannot be any other Nash equilibrium.
5 CHAPTER : EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM 5 Example. Consider the game given by the matrix A = The expected payoffs against 0 a state of p are E(e, p) = 6p 2 p, E(e 2, p) = p + 5p, and E(e, p) = p + p 2. When p = e, E(e, e ) = 0, which is greater than E(e 2, e ) = and E(e, e ) =, so e = (, 0, 0) is one Nash equilibrium. Since q Ae = q 2 q < 0 = e Ae for all q e, e is a strict Nash equilibrium. Since there are no states q e, with q Ae = e Ae, e is automatically an ESS. For an interior equilibrium, the expected payoffs must all be equal. A direct calculation shows that p = p 2 = p = /, and ˆp = ( /, /, /) is an interior Nash equilibrium. Since there is another Nash equilibrium, ˆp cannot be an ESS. Alternatively, since ˆp Ae = / < 0 = e Ae, ˆp is not an ESS. This example has both an interior Nash equilibrium and one on the boundary; the one on the boundary is an ESS and the one in the interior is not an ESS. Example (Two ESS). Consider the game with There are three Nash equilibria, one completely mixed equilibrium and two mixed between two states. The expected values in playing against p = (p, p 2, p ) are E(e, p) = 5p + 7p 2 + 2p E(e 2, p) = 8p + 6p 2 + 5p E(e, p) = p + 8p 2 + p. If all three are equal, then we have the equations 5p + 7p 2 + 2p = 8p + 6p 2 + 5p = p + 8p 2 + p p + p 2 + p =. This leads to the equations and = p + p 2 + p 0 = p p 2 + p 0 = 7p + 2p 2 p. Solving the augmented system by row reduction is as follows: We get the completely mixed Nash equilibrium of ( 5 2,, 2). If E(e, p) = E(e 2, p) > E(e, p), then p = 0, p = p, and p 2 = p. We get the equation 5p + 7( p) = 8p + 6( p) = p p =. 2
6 6 CHAPTER : EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM Then E(e, p) = E(e 2, p) = = 26 and E(e, p) = + 8 = 25 < 26. Thus, (,, 0) is a Nash equilibrium. Similarly, if E(e 2, p) = E(e, p) > E(e, p), then p = 0, p 2 = p, and p = p. We get the equation 6p + 5( p) = 8p + ( p) = p p =. Then E(e 2, p) = E(e, p) = = 6 and E(e, p) = = < 6. Thus, ( 0,, ) 2 is a Nash equilibrium. It can be checked that there are not any other Nash equilibria, pure or with E(e, p) = E(e, p) > E(e 2, p). Since there are other Nash equilibria, the completely mixed Nash equilibrium cannot be an ESS. Consider the Nash equilibrium ˆp = (,, 0). If U(ˆp, ˆp) = U(q, ˆp), then q = (q, q, 0). We get the following payoffs, U(ˆp, q) = [ ] q (5 + 8, 7 + 6) = q (29 25) q + 25 = q + 25, U(q, q) = 5q 2 + (8 + 7)q( q) + 6( q) 2 = 5q 2 + 5q 5q q + 6q 2 = q 2 + q + 6. To be an ESS, for q, we need q + 25 > q 2 + q + 6 q 2 2q + ( q 2 2 q + ) 6 > 0 > 0 ( q ) 2 > 0. This is indeed true, so this is an ESS. The case for the Nash equilibrium ( 0,, ) 2 is similar. The only p that give the same payoff with U(ˆp, ˆp) = U(q, ˆp) have q = (0, q, q). We get the following payoffs, U(ˆp, q) = (6q + 5( q)) + 2 (8q + ( q)) = ( = q +, ) q U(q, q) = 6q 2 + (8 + 5)q( q) + ( q) 2 = 6q 2 + q q 2 + 8q + q 2 = q 2 + 5q +. To be an ESS, for q, we need q + > q 2 + 5q + q 2 2q + > 0 ( q 2 2 q + ) ( = q 2 > 0. 9 )
7 CHAPTER : EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM 7 This is indeed true, so this is also an ESS. Example (.2.6: No ESS). Some games have no ESS. Consider γ γ. γ with 0 < γ <. The expected payoffs against a state p are E(e, p) = γ p p 2 + p, E(e 2, p) = p + γ p 2 p, E(e, p) = p + p 2 + γ p. and (i) No pure strategy is a NE. (ii) If p = 0 and p, p 2 > 0, then γ p p 2 = p +γ p 2 iff 0 = ( γ )p +(+γ )p 2, so p = p 2 = 0. It is impossible for all the p i = 0. (iii) The case of p = 0 or p 2 = 0 is similar to case (ii). (iv) The expected values are all equal for p = p 2 = p = /. A calculation shows that these are the only values with all three expected values equal. Thus, p = ( /, /, /) is the only Nash equilibrium. For any pure strategies has a payoff U(e i, p ) = γ / = U(p, p ). Since U(e i, e i ) = γ > γ / = U(e i, p ), p I not an ESS. This shows that the only Nash equilibrium is not an ESS and there are no ESS. Example (.2.5 Bach versus Stravinsky). Because we want to set the problem up in a symmetric manner, we do not use the possible actions of Bach or Stravinsky, but rather of (i) choosing favorite concert F and (ii) deferring to the preference of your friend D. The payoffs are then assumed to be given by the following matrix: F D The payoffs in response to a state of p = (p, p) are [ F (0, 0) D ] (2, ). (, 2) (0, 0) E(e, p) = 2( p) E(e 2, p) = p. They are equal for 2 2p = p, 2 = p, or p = 2 /. For p < 2 /, e is preferred so p = is the best response. For p > 2 /, e 2 is preferred so p = 0 is the best response. The best response correspondence is {} if p < 2 B(p, p) = [0, ] if p = 2 {0} if p > 2. The only symmetric equilibrium is ˆp = (2 /, /). There is no pure strategy symmetric equilibrium, even though we earlier found non-symmetric ones. To check for an ESS, we need to compare the payoffs U(q, q) = 2q( q) + ( q)q = q q 2 U(ˆp, q) = 2 2 ( q) + q = q. and
8 8 CHAPTER : EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM Is q q 2 < q, or 0 < q 2 q + ( = q 2 q + ) 9 ( = q 2 2 ) This latter quantity is positive for q 2 = ˆp. Therefore, this is an ESS.
Outline for today. Stat155 Game Theory Lecture 16: Evolutionary game theory. Evolutionarily stable strategies. Nash equilibrium.
Outline for today Stat155 Game Theory Lecture 16: Evolutionary game theory Peter Bartlett October 20, 2016 Nash equilibrium 1 / 21 2 / 21 A strategy profile x = (x1,..., x k ) S 1 Sk is a Nash equilibrium
More informationOther Equilibrium Notions
Other Equilibrium Notions Ichiro Obara UCLA January 21, 2012 Obara (UCLA) Other Equilibrium Notions January 21, 2012 1 / 28 Trembling Hand Perfect Equilibrium Trembling Hand Perfect Equilibrium We may
More informationEvolution & Learning in Games
1 / 27 Evolution & Learning in Games Econ 243B Jean-Paul Carvalho Lecture 2. Foundations of Evolution & Learning in Games II 2 / 27 Outline In this lecture, we shall: Take a first look at local stability.
More informationGame Theory -- Lecture 4. Patrick Loiseau EURECOM Fall 2016
Game Theory -- Lecture 4 Patrick Loiseau EURECOM Fall 2016 1 Lecture 2-3 recap Proved existence of pure strategy Nash equilibrium in games with compact convex action sets and continuous concave utilities
More informationLecture 6: April 25, 2006
Computational Game Theory Spring Semester, 2005/06 Lecture 6: April 25, 2006 Lecturer: Yishay Mansour Scribe: Lior Gavish, Andrey Stolyarenko, Asaph Arnon Partially based on scribe by Nataly Sharkov and
More informationExercise 11. Solution. EVOLUTION AND THE THEORY OF GAMES (Spring 2009) EXERCISES Show that every 2 2 matrix game with payoff matrix
EOLUTION AND THE THEORY OF GAMES (Spring 009) EXERCISES 11-15 Exercise 11 Show that every matrix game with payoff matrix a,a c,b b,c d,d with a c or b d has at least one ESS. One should distinguish the
More informationGame Theory for Linguists
Fritz Hamm, Roland Mühlenbernd 4. Mai 2016 Overview Overview 1. Exercises 2. Contribution to a Public Good 3. Dominated Actions Exercises Exercise I Exercise Find the player s best response functions in
More informationLecture December 2009 Fall 2009 Scribe: R. Ring In this lecture we will talk about
0368.4170: Cryptography and Game Theory Ran Canetti and Alon Rosen Lecture 7 02 December 2009 Fall 2009 Scribe: R. Ring In this lecture we will talk about Two-Player zero-sum games (min-max theorem) Mixed
More informationGame Theory and Evolution
Game Theory and Evolution Toban Wiebe University of Manitoba July 2012 Toban Wiebe (University of Manitoba) Game Theory and Evolution July 2012 1 / 24 Why does evolution need game theory? In what sense
More informationStatic and dynamic stability conditions for structurally stable signaling games
1/32 Static and dynamic stability conditions for structurally stable signaling games Gerhard Jäger Gerhard.Jaeger@uni-bielefeld.de September 8, 2007 Workshop on Communication, Game Theory, and Language,
More informationAlgorithmic Game Theory and Applications. Lecture 4: 2-player zero-sum games, and the Minimax Theorem
Algorithmic Game Theory and Applications Lecture 4: 2-player zero-sum games, and the Minimax Theorem Kousha Etessami 2-person zero-sum games A finite 2-person zero-sum (2p-zs) strategic game Γ, is a strategic
More informationComputational Evolutionary Game Theory and why I m never using PowerPoint for another presentation involving maths ever again
Computational Evolutionary Game Theory and why I m never using PowerPoint for another presentation involving maths ever again Enoch Lau 5 September 2007 Outline What is evolutionary game theory? Why evolutionary
More informationGame Theory DR. ÖZGÜR GÜRERK UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT WINTER TERM 2012/13. Strict and nonstrict equilibria
Game Theory 2. Strategic Games contd. DR. ÖZGÜR GÜRERK UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT WINTER TERM 2012/13 Strict and nonstrict equilibria In the examples we have seen so far: A unilaterally deviation from Nash equilibrium
More information6.891 Games, Decision, and Computation February 5, Lecture 2
6.891 Games, Decision, and Computation February 5, 2015 Lecture 2 Lecturer: Constantinos Daskalakis Scribe: Constantinos Daskalakis We formally define games and the solution concepts overviewed in Lecture
More informationGame Theory. 2.1 Zero Sum Games (Part 2) George Mason University, Spring 2018
Game Theory 2.1 Zero Sum Games (Part 2) George Mason University, Spring 2018 The Nash equilibria of two-player, zero-sum games have various nice properties. Minimax Condition A pair of strategies is in
More informationMohammad Hossein Manshaei 1394
Mohammad Hossein Manshaei manshaei@gmail.com 1394 2 Concept related to a specific branch of Biology Relates to the evolution of the species in nature Powerful modeling tool that has received a lot of attention
More informationOPTIMALITY AND STABILITY OF SYMMETRIC EVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH APPLICATIONS IN GENETIC SELECTION. (Communicated by Yang Kuang)
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES doi:10.3934/mbe.2015.12.503 AND ENGINEERING Volume 12, Number 3, June 2015 pp. 503 523 OPTIMALITY AND STABILITY OF SYMMETRIC EVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH APPLICATIONS IN GENETIC SELECTION
More informationIntroduction to Game Theory Lecture Note 2: Strategic-Form Games and Nash Equilibrium (2)
Introduction to Game Theory Lecture Note 2: Strategic-Form Games and Nash Equilibrium (2) Haifeng Huang University of California, Merced Best response functions: example In simple games we can examine
More informationGame Theory Fall 2003
Game Theory Fall 2003 Problem Set 1 [1] In this problem (see FT Ex. 1.1) you are asked to play with arbitrary 2 2 games just to get used to the idea of equilibrium computation. Specifically, consider the
More informationPrisoner s Dilemma. Veronica Ciocanel. February 25, 2013
n-person February 25, 2013 n-person Table of contents 1 Equations 5.4, 5.6 2 3 Types of dilemmas 4 n-person n-person GRIM, GRIM, ALLD Useful to think of equations 5.4 and 5.6 in terms of cooperation and
More informationFirst Prev Next Last Go Back Full Screen Close Quit. Game Theory. Giorgio Fagiolo
Game Theory Giorgio Fagiolo giorgio.fagiolo@univr.it https://mail.sssup.it/ fagiolo/welcome.html Academic Year 2005-2006 University of Verona Summary 1. Why Game Theory? 2. Cooperative vs. Noncooperative
More informationGame Theory and Algorithms Lecture 2: Nash Equilibria and Examples
Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 2: Nash Equilibria and Examples February 24, 2011 Summary: We introduce the Nash Equilibrium: an outcome (action profile) which is stable in the sense that no player
More informationEVOLUTIONARY STABILITY FOR TWO-STAGE HAWK-DOVE GAMES
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS olume 25, Number 1, Winter 1995 EOLUTIONARY STABILITY FOR TWO-STAGE HAWK-DOE GAMES R. CRESSMAN ABSTRACT. Although two individuals in a biological species often interact
More informationIterated Strict Dominance in Pure Strategies
Iterated Strict Dominance in Pure Strategies We know that no rational player ever plays strictly dominated strategies. As each player knows that each player is rational, each player knows that his opponents
More informationComputing Solution Concepts of Normal-Form Games. Song Chong EE, KAIST
Computing Solution Concepts of Normal-Form Games Song Chong EE, KAIST songchong@kaist.edu Computing Nash Equilibria of Two-Player, Zero-Sum Games Can be expressed as a linear program (LP), which means
More informationBELIEFS & EVOLUTIONARY GAME THEORY
1 / 32 BELIEFS & EVOLUTIONARY GAME THEORY Heinrich H. Nax hnax@ethz.ch & Bary S. R. Pradelski bpradelski@ethz.ch May 15, 217: Lecture 1 2 / 32 Plan Normal form games Equilibrium invariance Equilibrium
More informationa i,1 a i,j a i,m be vectors with positive entries. The linear programming problem associated to A, b and c is to find all vectors sa b
LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS MATH 210 NOTES 1. Statement of linear programming problems Suppose n, m 1 are integers and that A = a 1,1... a 1,m a i,1 a i,j a i,m a n,1... a n,m is an n m matrix of positive
More informationAn Introduction to Evolutionary Game Theory: Lecture 2
An Introduction to Evolutionary Game Theory: Lecture 2 Mauro Mobilia Lectures delivered at the Graduate School on Nonlinear and Stochastic Systems in Biology held in the Department of Applied Mathematics,
More informationUC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016
UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016 More on strategic games and extensive games with perfect information Block 2 Jun 12, 2016 Food for thought LUPI Many players
More information1 Equilibrium Comparisons
CS/SS 241a Assignment 3 Guru: Jason Marden Assigned: 1/31/08 Due: 2/14/08 2:30pm We encourage you to discuss these problems with others, but you need to write up the actual homework alone. At the top of
More informationEvolutionary stability of games with costly signaling
1/25 Evolutionary stability of games with costly signaling Gerhard Jäger Gerhard.Jaeger@uni-bielefeld.de December 17, 2007 Amsterdam Colloquium 2/25 Overview signaling games with costly signaling Evolutionary
More informationProblem Set 6 Solutions
Problem Set 6 Solutions Exercise. Prom Example : (Alex Alice, Bob Betty), College Admission Example: (A (β,γ), B α); (A (α,β), B γ), Prom Example 2: (Alex Alice, Bob Betty); (Alex Betty, Bob Alice). Exercise
More informationLower Semicontinuity of the Solution Set Mapping in Some Optimization Problems
Lower Semicontinuity of the Solution Set Mapping in Some Optimization Problems Roberto Lucchetti coauthors: A. Daniilidis, M.A. Goberna, M.A. López, Y. Viossat Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di
More informationEVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH GROUP SELECTION
EVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH GROUP SELECTION Martin Kaae Jensen Alexandros Rigos Department of Economics University of Leicester Controversies in Game Theory: Homo Oeconomicus vs. Homo Socialis ETH Zurich 12/09/2014
More informationהאוניברסיטה העברית בירושלים
האוניברסיטה העברית בירושלים THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM TOWARDS A CHARACTERIZATION OF RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS by ITAI ARIELI Discussion Paper # 475 February 2008 מרכז לחקר הרציונליות CENTER FOR THE
More informationEC3224 Autumn Lecture #04 Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium
Reading EC3224 Autumn Lecture #04 Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium Osborne Chapter 4.1 to 4.10 By the end of this week you should be able to: find a mixed strategy Nash Equilibrium of a game explain why mixed
More informationEVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGIES AND GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL SELECTION
39 EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGIES AND GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL SELECTION Objectives Understand the concept of game theory. Set up a spreadsheet model of simple game theory interactions. Explore the effects
More informationEvolutionary Game Theory
UTRECHT UNIVERSITY BACHELOR THESIS MATHEMATICS AND APPLICATIONS Evolutionary Game Theory Author Daphne VAN HESTEREN Supervisor Dr. Karma DAJANI November 28, 2017 2 Abstract This thesis provides an introduction
More informationGame Theory and Algorithms Lecture 7: PPAD and Fixed-Point Theorems
Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 7: PPAD and Fixed-Point Theorems March 17, 2011 Summary: The ultimate goal of this lecture is to finally prove Nash s theorem. First, we introduce and prove Sperner s
More informationAn Introduction to Evolutionary Game Theory
An Introduction to Evolutionary Game Theory Lectures delivered at the Graduate School on Nonlinear and Stochastic Systems in Biology held in the Department of Applied Mathematics, School of Mathematics
More informationGame interactions and dynamics on networked populations
Game interactions and dynamics on networked populations Chiara Mocenni & Dario Madeo Department of Information Engineering and Mathematics University of Siena (Italy) ({mocenni, madeo}@dii.unisi.it) Siena,
More informationChapter 7. Evolutionary Game Theory
Chapter 7 Evolutionary Game Theory In Chapter 6, we developed the basic ideas of game theory, in which individual players make decisions, and the payoff to each player depends on the decisions made by
More informationIntroduction to game theory LECTURE 1
Introduction to game theory LECTURE 1 Jörgen Weibull January 27, 2010 1 What is game theory? A mathematically formalized theory of strategic interaction between countries at war and peace, in federations
More information6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 8: Supermodular and Potential Games
6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 8: Supermodular and Asu Ozdaglar MIT March 2, 2010 1 Introduction Outline Review of Supermodular Games Reading: Fudenberg and Tirole, Section 12.3.
More informationArea I: Contract Theory Question (Econ 206)
Theory Field Exam Summer 2011 Instructions You must complete two of the four areas (the areas being (I) contract theory, (II) game theory A, (III) game theory B, and (IV) psychology & economics). Be sure
More informationDETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC SELECTION DYNAMICS
DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC SELECTION DYNAMICS Jörgen Weibull March 23, 2010 1 The multi-population replicator dynamic Domain of analysis: finite games in normal form, G =(N, S, π), with mixed-strategy
More informationMS&E 246: Lecture 4 Mixed strategies. Ramesh Johari January 18, 2007
MS&E 246: Lecture 4 Mixed strategies Ramesh Johari January 18, 2007 Outline Mixed strategies Mixed strategy Nash equilibrium Existence of Nash equilibrium Examples Discussion of Nash equilibrium Mixed
More informationWriting Game Theory in L A TEX
Writing Game Theory in L A TEX Thiago Silva First Version: November 22, 2015 This Version: November 13, 2017 List of Figures and Tables 1 2x2 Matrix: Prisoner s ilemma Normal-Form Game............. 3 2
More informationVariants of Nash Equilibrium. CMPT 882 Computational Game Theory Simon Fraser University Spring 2010 Instructor: Oliver Schulte
Variants of Nash Equilibrium CMPT 882 Computational Game Theory Simon Fraser University Spring 2010 Instructor: Oliver Schulte 1 Equilibrium Refinements A complex game may have many Nash equilibria. Can
More informationDARWIN: WHICH MATHEMATICS?
200 ANNI DI DARWIN Facoltà di Scienze Matemtiche Fisiche e Naturali Università del Salento 12 Febbraio 2009 DARWIN: WHICH MATHEMATICS? Deborah Lacitignola Department of Mathematics University of Salento,,
More informationEvolutionary Game Theory and Frequency Dependent Selection
Evolutionary Game Theory and Frequency Dependent Selection 1 Game Theory A major component of economics Given a set of rules, predict how would rational beings behave in an interaction Who is in the game?
More informationSolutions to Exercises of Section III.1. a (13/4, 3) (22/4, 3/4). b (4, 10/4) (21/4, 2)
Solutions to Exercises of Section III.1. 1. The bimatrix is c d ( ) a (13/4, 3) (22/4, 3/4). b (4, 10/4) (21/4, 2) 2. (a) Player I s maxmin strategy is (1, 0) (i.e. row 1) guaranteeing him the safety level
More informationLecture Notes on Game Theory
Lecture Notes on Game Theory Levent Koçkesen Strategic Form Games In this part we will analyze games in which the players choose their actions simultaneously (or without the knowledge of other players
More informationWeak Dominance and Never Best Responses
Chapter 4 Weak Dominance and Never Best Responses Let us return now to our analysis of an arbitrary strategic game G := (S 1,...,S n, p 1,...,p n ). Let s i, s i be strategies of player i. We say that
More informationSF2972 Game Theory Exam with Solutions March 15, 2013
SF2972 Game Theory Exam with s March 5, 203 Part A Classical Game Theory Jörgen Weibull and Mark Voorneveld. (a) What are N, S and u in the definition of a finite normal-form (or, equivalently, strategic-form)
More informationNear-Potential Games: Geometry and Dynamics
Near-Potential Games: Geometry and Dynamics Ozan Candogan, Asuman Ozdaglar and Pablo A. Parrilo September 6, 2011 Abstract Potential games are a special class of games for which many adaptive user dynamics
More informationComputing Minmax; Dominance
Computing Minmax; Dominance CPSC 532A Lecture 5 Computing Minmax; Dominance CPSC 532A Lecture 5, Slide 1 Lecture Overview 1 Recap 2 Linear Programming 3 Computational Problems Involving Maxmin 4 Domination
More informationFPTAS for Computing a Symmetric Leontief Competitive Economy Equilibrium
FPTAS for Computing a Symmetric Leontief Competitive Economy Equilibrium Department of Management Science and Engineering, and Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering Stanford University
More informationSurvival of Dominated Strategies under Evolutionary Dynamics. Josef Hofbauer University of Vienna. William H. Sandholm University of Wisconsin
Survival of Dominated Strategies under Evolutionary Dynamics Josef Hofbauer University of Vienna William H. Sandholm University of Wisconsin a hypnodisk 1 Survival of Dominated Strategies under Evolutionary
More informationBasic Game Theory. Kate Larson. January 7, University of Waterloo. Kate Larson. What is Game Theory? Normal Form Games. Computing Equilibria
Basic Game Theory University of Waterloo January 7, 2013 Outline 1 2 3 What is game theory? The study of games! Bluffing in poker What move to make in chess How to play Rock-Scissors-Paper Also study of
More informationComputing Minmax; Dominance
Computing Minmax; Dominance CPSC 532A Lecture 5 Computing Minmax; Dominance CPSC 532A Lecture 5, Slide 1 Lecture Overview 1 Recap 2 Linear Programming 3 Computational Problems Involving Maxmin 4 Domination
More informationMS&E 246: Lecture 17 Network routing. Ramesh Johari
MS&E 246: Lecture 17 Network routing Ramesh Johari Network routing Basic definitions Wardrop equilibrium Braess paradox Implications Network routing N users travel across a network Transportation Internet
More informationPart IB Optimisation
Part IB Optimisation Theorems Based on lectures by F. A. Fischer Notes taken by Dexter Chua Easter 2015 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often significantly) after
More information6-3 Solving Systems by Elimination
Another method for solving systems of equations is elimination. Like substitution, the goal of elimination is to get one equation that has only one variable. To do this by elimination, you add the two
More informationChapter 9. Mixed Extensions. 9.1 Mixed strategies
Chapter 9 Mixed Extensions We now study a special case of infinite strategic games that are obtained in a canonic way from the finite games, by allowing mixed strategies. Below [0, 1] stands for the real
More informationIntroduction to Evolutionary Game Theory
Introduction to Evolutionary Game Theory Karl Sigmund Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
More informationA (Brief) Introduction to Game Theory
A (Brief) Introduction to Game Theory Johanne Cohen PRiSM/CNRS, Versailles, France. Goal Goal is a Nash equilibrium. Today The game of Chicken Definitions Nash Equilibrium Rock-paper-scissors Game Mixed
More informationSUMS PROBLEM COMPETITION, 2000
SUMS ROBLEM COMETITION, 2000 SOLUTIONS 1 The result is well known, and called Morley s Theorem Many proofs are known See for example HSM Coxeter, Introduction to Geometry, page 23 2 If the number of vertices,
More informationNormal-form games. Vincent Conitzer
Normal-form games Vincent Conitzer conitzer@cs.duke.edu 2/3 of the average game Everyone writes down a number between 0 and 100 Person closest to 2/3 of the average wins Example: A says 50 B says 10 C
More informationLindsell, E. A. B., & Wiesner, K. (2014). Entanglement gives rise to Pareto optimality in the generalised quantum Hawk-Dove Game. arxiv.
Lindsell, E. A. B., & Wiesner, K. (2014). Entanglement gives rise to Pareto optimality in the generalised quantum Hawk-Dove Game. arxiv. Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in Explore Bristol
More informationIntroduction to Game Theory
COMP323 Introduction to Computational Game Theory Introduction to Game Theory Paul G. Spirakis Department of Computer Science University of Liverpool Paul G. Spirakis (U. Liverpool) Introduction to Game
More informationGains in evolutionary dynamics. Dai ZUSAI
Gains in evolutionary dynamics unifying rational framework for dynamic stability Dai ZUSAI Hitotsubashi University (Econ Dept.) Economic Theory Workshop October 27, 2016 1 Introduction Motivation and literature
More informationToday: Linear Programming (con t.)
Today: Linear Programming (con t.) COSC 581, Algorithms April 10, 2014 Many of these slides are adapted from several online sources Reading Assignments Today s class: Chapter 29.4 Reading assignment for
More informationCS364A: Algorithmic Game Theory Lecture #13: Potential Games; A Hierarchy of Equilibria
CS364A: Algorithmic Game Theory Lecture #13: Potential Games; A Hierarchy of Equilibria Tim Roughgarden November 4, 2013 Last lecture we proved that every pure Nash equilibrium of an atomic selfish routing
More information6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 7: Supermodular Games
6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 7: Asu Ozdaglar MIT February 25, 2010 1 Introduction Outline Uniqueness of a Pure Nash Equilibrium for Continuous Games Reading: Rosen J.B., Existence
More informationNear-Potential Games: Geometry and Dynamics
Near-Potential Games: Geometry and Dynamics Ozan Candogan, Asuman Ozdaglar and Pablo A. Parrilo January 29, 2012 Abstract Potential games are a special class of games for which many adaptive user dynamics
More informationThe Distribution of Optimal Strategies in Symmetric Zero-sum Games
The Distribution of Optimal Strategies in Symmetric Zero-sum Games Florian Brandl Technische Universität München brandlfl@in.tum.de Given a skew-symmetric matrix, the corresponding two-player symmetric
More informationConjectural Variations in Aggregative Games: An Evolutionary Perspective
Conjectural Variations in Aggregative Games: An Evolutionary Perspective Alex Possajennikov University of Nottingham January 2012 Abstract Suppose that in aggregative games, in which a player s payoff
More informationReview of topics since what was covered in the midterm: Topics that we covered before the midterm (also may be included in final):
Review of topics since what was covered in the midterm: Subgame-perfect eqms in extensive games with perfect information where players choose a number (first-order conditions, boundary conditions, favoring
More informationGame Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks
Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Introduction Giovanni Neglia INRIA EPI Maestro 27 January 2014 Part of the slides are based on a previous course with D. Figueiredo (UFRJ)
More informationGame Theory. Greg Plaxton Theory in Programming Practice, Spring 2004 Department of Computer Science University of Texas at Austin
Game Theory Greg Plaxton Theory in Programming Practice, Spring 2004 Department of Computer Science University of Texas at Austin Bimatrix Games We are given two real m n matrices A = (a ij ), B = (b ij
More informationGame Theory Lecture 10+11: Knowledge
Game Theory Lecture 10+11: Knowledge Christoph Schottmüller University of Copenhagen November 13 and 20, 2014 1 / 36 Outline 1 (Common) Knowledge The hat game A model of knowledge Common knowledge Agree
More informationMicroeconomics for Business Practice Session 3 - Solutions
Microeconomics for Business Practice Session - Solutions Instructor: Eloisa Campioni TA: Ugo Zannini University of Rome Tor Vergata April 8, 016 Exercise 1 Show that there are no mixed-strategy Nash equilibria
More informationNotes on Blackwell s Comparison of Experiments Tilman Börgers, June 29, 2009
Notes on Blackwell s Comparison of Experiments Tilman Börgers, June 29, 2009 These notes are based on Chapter 12 of David Blackwell and M. A.Girshick, Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions, John Wiley
More informationEquilibrium Refinements
Equilibrium Refinements Mihai Manea MIT Sequential Equilibrium In many games information is imperfect and the only subgame is the original game... subgame perfect equilibrium = Nash equilibrium Play starting
More informationEvolutionary Game Theory
Evolutionary Game Theory ISI 330 Lecture 18 1 ISI 330 Lecture 18 Outline A bit about historical origins of Evolutionary Game Theory Main (competing) theories about how cooperation evolves P and other social
More informationMixed Nash Equilibria
lgorithmic Game Theory, Summer 2017 Mixed Nash Equilibria Lecture 2 (5 pages) Instructor: Thomas Kesselheim In this lecture, we introduce the general framework of games. Congestion games, as introduced
More informationComputation of Efficient Nash Equilibria for experimental economic games
International Journal of Mathematics and Soft Computing Vol.5, No.2 (2015), 197-212. ISSN Print : 2249-3328 ISSN Online: 2319-5215 Computation of Efficient Nash Equilibria for experimental economic games
More informationGame Theory for Linguists
Fritz Hamm, Roland Mühlenbernd 4. Juli 2016 What is? mathematical theory of games applied in a biological context evolved from the point of view that frequency-dependent fitness gives a strategic aspect
More informationLecture 7 Duality II
L. Vandenberghe EE236A (Fall 2013-14) Lecture 7 Duality II sensitivity analysis two-person zero-sum games circuit interpretation 7 1 Sensitivity analysis purpose: extract from the solution of an LP information
More informationCalibration and Nash Equilibrium
Calibration and Nash Equilibrium Dean Foster University of Pennsylvania and Sham Kakade TTI September 22, 2005 What is a Nash equilibrium? Cartoon definition of NE: Leroy Lockhorn: I m drinking because
More informationGeneral-sum games. I.e., pretend that the opponent is only trying to hurt you. If Column was trying to hurt Row, Column would play Left, so
General-sum games You could still play a minimax strategy in general- sum games I.e., pretend that the opponent is only trying to hurt you But this is not rational: 0, 0 3, 1 1, 0 2, 1 If Column was trying
More informationGames and Their Equilibria
Chapter 1 Games and Their Equilibria The central notion of game theory that captures many aspects of strategic decision making is that of a strategic game Definition 11 (Strategic Game) An n-player strategic
More informationSolution to Tutorial 9
Solution to Tutorial 9 2012/2013 Semester I MA4264 Game Theory Tutor: Xiang Sun November 2, 2012 Exercise 1. We consider a game between two software developers, who sell operating systems (OS) for personal
More informationZero-Sum Games Public Strategies Minimax Theorem and Nash Equilibria Appendix. Zero-Sum Games. Algorithmic Game Theory.
Public Strategies Minimax Theorem and Nash Equilibria Appendix 2013 Public Strategies Minimax Theorem and Nash Equilibria Appendix Definition Definition A zero-sum game is a strategic game, in which for
More informationEC3224 Autumn Lecture #03 Applications of Nash Equilibrium
Reading EC3224 Autumn Lecture #03 Applications of Nash Equilibrium Osborne Chapter 3 By the end of this week you should be able to: apply Nash equilibrium to oligopoly games, voting games and other examples.
More informationA finite population ESS and a long run equilibrium in an n players coordination game
Mathematical Social Sciences 39 (000) 95 06 www.elsevier.nl/ locate/ econbase A finite population ESS and a long run equilibrium in an n players coordination game Yasuhito Tanaka* Faculty of Law, Chuo
More informationOptimality conditions and complementarity, Nash equilibria and games, engineering and economic application
Optimality conditions and complementarity, Nash equilibria and games, engineering and economic application Michael C. Ferris University of Wisconsin, Madison Funded by DOE-MACS Grant with Argonne National
More informationThe coevolution of recognition and social behavior
The coevolution of recognition and social behavior Rory Smead 1 and Patrick Forber 2 May 4, 2016 Affiliations 1 (Corresponding author) Department of Philosophy and Religion, Northeastern University, Holmes
More informationStatic (or Simultaneous- Move) Games of Complete Information
Static (or Simultaneous- Move) Games of Complete Information Introduction to Games Normal (or Strategic) Form Representation Teoria dos Jogos - Filomena Garcia 1 Outline of Static Games of Complete Information
More information