arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 10 May 2014
|
|
- Olivia Stone
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 On the construction and the cardinality of finite σ-fields arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 10 May 2014 P. Vellaisamy, S. Ghosh, and M. Sreehari Abstract. In this note, we first discuss some properties of generated σ-fields and a simple approach to the construction of finite σ-fields. It is shown that the σ-field generated by a finite class of σ-distinct sets which are also atoms, is the same as the one generated by the partition induced by them. The range of the cardinality of such a generated σ-field is explicitly obtained. Some typical examples and their complete forms are discussed. We discuss also a simple algorithm to find the exact cardinality of some particular finite σ-fields. Finally, an application of our results to statistics, with regard to independence of events, is pointed out. Keywords. Finite σ-fields, induced partition of sets, cardinality, independence of events MSC. Primary: 28A05; Secondary: 60A Introduction The role of σ-fields in probability and statistics is well known. A σ-field generated by a class of subsets of a give space Ω, also known as the generated σ-field, is defined to be the intersection of all σ-fields containing that class. However, a constructive approach to obtain the σ-field generated by finite number of subsets has not been well studied in the literature. Indeed, no easy constructive method is available. It is a challenging task to construct a σ-field generated by, say, four arbitrary subsets and to know its exact cardinality. Given a finite class of σ-distinct sets (see Definition 2.2) which are also atoms, we discuss a simple approach to obtain the generated σ-field based on the partition induced by the given class and then look at the σ-field generated by this partition. In this direction, we first obtain the cardinality of the induced partition by a finite class of such sets. Using this result, we obtain the cardinality of the generated σ- field. When all members of the induced partition are non-empty, the cardinality of the generated σ-field is 2 2n, a known result in the literature (see Ash and Doleans-Dade (2000), p 457). Let R denote the set of real numbers. Then the cardinality of R (also called cardinality of the continuum) is given by 2 ℵ 0, where ℵ 0 is the cardinality of N, The research of S. Ghosh was supported by UGC, Govt. of India grant F.2-2/98 (SA-I).
2 2 P. Vellaisamy, Sayan Ghosh, and M. Sreehari the set of natural numbers. One of the fascinating results in measure theory is that there is no σ-field whose cardinality is countably infinite. In other words, the cardinality of a σ-field can be either finite or equal to 2 ℵ 0 (uncountable) (Billingsley (1995), p. 34). Our focus is on the cardinality of a σ-field, generated by a finite class of n sets, and to show that it assumes only particular values within a fixed range. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has been addressed only for some special cases (Ash and Doleans-Dade (2000), p. 11). Several typical examples are discussed to bring out the nature of the finitely generated σ-fields. An algorithm to find the exact cardinality of some specific σ- fields of interest is also presented. Finally, we discuss an application to statistics with regard to the independence of some events and establish some new results in this direction. 2. Range for Cardinality of a finite σ-field Let us begin with a simple example. Let Ω be the given space, and consider two distinct subsets B and C of Ω such that B C Ω and B C φ. We henceforth suppress the intersection symbol, unless the context demands it. For instance, A B will be denoted by AB. It is well known that the σ-field generated by the class {B,C}, denoted by σ(b, C), is obtained by the usual operations of complementations, unions and intersections, as σ(b,c) = {φ,ω,b,c,b c,c c,b C,B C c,b c C,B c C c,bc, BC c,b c C,B c C c,(bc c ) (B c C),(BC) (B c C c )}. Let P B,C = {BC,B c C,BC c,b c C c } denote the partition (see Definition 2.3) of Ω induced by B and C. The elements of the σ-field generated by a partition consist of the empty set φ, the sets in the partition and all possible (finite) unions of them. The resulting class is evidently closed under complementation. Hence, the σ-field generated by P B,C is given by (2.1) σ(p B,C ) = σ(bc,b c C,BC c,b c C c ) = {φ,ω,bc,b c C,BC c,b c C c,(bc) (B c C), (BC) (BC c ),(BC) (B c C c ),(B c C) (BC c ), (B c C) (B c C c ),(BC c ) (B c C c ), (BC) (B c C) (BC c ),(BC) (B c C) (B c C c ), (BC) (BC c ) (B c C c ),(B c C) (BC c ) (B c C c )} = {φ,ω,bc,b c C,BC c,b c C c,c,b,(bc) (B c C c ), (B c C) (BC c ),B c,c c,b C,B c C,C c B,B c C c },
3 On the construction and the cardinality of finite σ-fields 3 as some unions in (2.1) admit simple forms which can be obtained using De Morgan s laws. It is interesting to note that σ(b,c) = σ(p B,C ). Note that σ(b,c) = 16. Consider next the case when BC = φ. In this case, P B,C = {BC c,b c C,B c C c } = {B,C,B c C c }; σ(p B,C ) = {φ,ω,b,c,b c C c,b C,B (B c C c ),C (B c C c )} = {φ,ω,b,c,b c C c,b C,C c,b c }. = σ(b,c) and σ(b,c) = 8 here. Thus, when BC = φ also, we have σ(b,c) = σ(p B,C ). Consider next the cardinality of P B,C, denoted by P B,C, where B and C are arbitrary subsets of Ω. Two cases arise: (i) B C = Ω and (ii) B C Ω. Case(i): IfBC = φ,thenp B,C = {B,C}. IfBC φ,thenp B,C = {BC,B c C,BC c } or {B,B c C} (if B C) or {C,BC c } (if C B). Hence, in this case, P B,C {2,3}. Case (ii): If BC = φ, then P B,C = {B,C,B c C c }. If BC φ, then P B,C = {BC,B c C,BC c,b c C c } or {B,B c C,B c C c } (if B C) or {C,BC c,b c C c } (if C B). Hence, in this case, P B,C {3,4}. Thus, from cases (i) and (ii), we have P B,C {2,3,4} for arbitrary subsets B and C. It is of interest to know the cardinality of the partition based on n arbitrary sets. To answer the question, we first introduce the following formal definitions. Definition 2.2. We call a class A = {A 1,A 2,...,A n } of sets σ-distinct if no set in A can be obtained from other sets by an operation of union or intersection or complementation. Let A 1 AandA 0 A c henceforth. Aformal definitionof thepartitioninduced by n sets is the following. Definition 2.3. Let A = {A 1,A 2,...,A n } be a σ-distinct class of subsets of Ω. Then the finest partition induced by A, denoted by P A1,A 2,...,A n, is the collection of sets of the form { n } n (2.4) P A1,A 2,...,A n = A ǫ i i where the empty sets are excluded. ǫ i {0,1},0 ǫ i n = P A,
4 4 P. Vellaisamy, Sayan Ghosh, and M. Sreehari Remark 2.5. Note that P A1,A 2,A 1 A 2 = P A1,A 2,A 1 A 2 = P A1,A 2,A c 1 = P A 1,A 2. That is, P A1,A 2,B = P A1,A 2 for B σ(a 1,A 2 ). Hence, we consider, without loss of generality, only the σ-distinct sets A 1 and A 2. The following definition is well known. Definition 2.6. Let A be a collection of sets. A set A A is called an atom of A if B A, and B A, imply B = A; that is, no proper subset of A belongs to A. We start with a simple fact. Lemma 2.7. If {A 1,A 2,...,A n } themselvesform a partitionof Ω, then P A1,A 2,...,A n = {A 1,A 2,...,A n } and P A1,A 2,...,A n = n. Proof. Since A = {A 1,A 2,...,A n } forms a partition of Ω, A c 1...A c n = φ and all intersections of A j s order 2 to n are empty. This implies that all the sets in n P A1,A 2,...,A n with 2 ǫ i n are empty. Consider next the sets of the form A ǫ A ǫn n with A 1 φ, since P A1,A 2,...,A n = n. n n ǫ i = 1. Then, for example, A 1 A c 2...A c n = A 1 ( A i ) c = n A i = Ω. Thus, P A1,A 2,...,A n = {A 1,A 2,...,A n } and hence The following example clearly shows the nature of the partition and its cardinality. Example 2.8. Consider the class {A,B,C,D} of 4 subsets of Ω. Then the partition P A,B,C,D induced by them is P A,B,C,D = {ABCD,A c BCD,AB c CD,ABC c D,ABCD c,a c B c CD,A c BC c D,A c BCD c, AB c C c D,AB c CD c,abc c D c,a c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c, A c B c C c D c }. If A,B,C and D themselves form a partition of Ω, then P A,B,C,D = {A,B,C,D} and P A,B,C,D = 4. If A B C D Ω, there may be two cases as follows. (a) If ABCD φ and all other elements of P A,B,C,D are also non-empty, then P A,B,C,D = 2 4 = 16. (b) If ABCD = φ, there can be the following sub cases : i=2
5 On the construction and the cardinality of finite σ-fields 5 (i) If only ABCD = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 15 and P A,B,C,D = {A c BCD,AB c CD,ABC c D,ABCD c,a c B c CD,A c BC c D,A c BCD c, AB c C c D,AB c CD c,abc c D c,a c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c, A c B c C c D c }. (ii) If onlybcd = φ,along withtheimplied case (i) (notmentioned later), then P A,B,C,D = 14 and P A,B,C,D = {AB c CD,ABC c D,ABCD c,a c B c CD,A c BC c D,A c BCD c,ab c C c D, AB c CD c,abc c D c,a c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (iii) If only BCD = ACD = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 13 and P A,B,C,D = {ABC c D,ABCD c,a c B c CD,A c BC c D,A c BCD c,ab c C c D,AB c CD c, ABC c D c,a c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (iv) If only BCD = ACD = ABD = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 12 and P A,B,C,D = {ABCD c,a c B c CD,A c BC c D,A c BCD c,ab c C c D,AB c CD c,abc c D c, A c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (v) If only BCD = ACD = ABD = ABC = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 11 and P A,B,C,D = {A c B c CD,A c BC c D,A c BCD c,ab c C c D,AB c CD c,abc c D c, A c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (vi) If only ABD = ABC = CD = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 10 and P A,B,C,D = {A c BC c D,A c BCD c,ab c C c D,AB c CD c,abc c D c,a c B c C c D, A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (vii) If only ABC = CD = BD = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 9 and P A,B,C,D = {A c BCD c,ab c C c D,AB c CD c,abc c D c,a c B c C c D,A c B c CD c, A c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (viii) If only CD = BD = BC = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 8 and P A,B,C,D = {AB c C c D,AB c CD c,abc c D c,a c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c, AB c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (ix) If only CD = BD = BC = AD = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 7 and P A,B,C,D = {AB c CD c,abc c D c,a c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c, AB c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (x) If only CD = BD = BC = AD = AC = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 6 and P A,B,C,D = {ABC c D c,a c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }.
6 6 P. Vellaisamy, Sayan Ghosh, and M. Sreehari (xi) If only CD = BD = BC = AD = AC = AB = φ, then P A,B,C,D = 5 and P A,B,C,D = {A c B c C c D,A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. Hence, we observe that P A,B,C,D {4,5,6,...,16}. Remark 2.9. Two or more different partitions P A1,A 2,...,A n may have the same cardinality. For example, if A = {A,B,C,D} such that A B C D Ω, then P A,B,C,D = 9 corresponds to the following distinct cases : (i) If only AB = CD = φ, along with the implied empty intersections, then P A,B,C,D = {A c BC c D,A c BCD c,ab c C c D,AB c CD c,a c B c C c D,A c B c CD c, A c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (ii) If only AB = AC = AD = φ, along with the implied empty intersections, then P A,B,C,D = {A c BCD,A c B c CD,A c BC c D,A c BCD c,a c B c C c D, A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. (iii) If only AB = AC = BCD = φ, along with the implied empty intersections, then P A,B,C,D = {A c BC c D,A c BCD c,ab c C c D,A c B c CD,A c B c C c D, A c B c CD c,a c BC c D c,ab c C c D c,a c B c C c D c }. In the above cases, the partitions are different, though their cardinality is same. We next look at the cardinality of P A1,A 2,...,A n induced by {A 1,A 2,...,A n }. It looks difficult to argue for the arbitrary sets. However, we have the following result for a fairly large and reasonable class of sets. Theorem Let A = {A 1,A 2,...,A n },n 3, be a class of σ-distinct sets of Ω, where each A i is an atom of A, and P A1,A 2,...,A n be the partition induced by A 1,A 2,...,A n. Then P A1,A 2,...,A n {n,n+1,...,2 n }. Proof. Let (2.11) Q j = { n A ǫ i i ǫ i {0,1},1 i n, for 0 j n. Then P A1,A 2,...,A n can be represented as n (2.12) P A1,A 2,...,A n = Q j, j=0 } n ǫ i = j,
7 On the construction and the cardinality of finite σ-fields 7 where only non-empty elements of Q j s are considered. This is because some Q j s may contain empty sets. Note that Q j consists of at most ( n j) distinct nonempty sets corresponding to a selection of j of the n ǫ i s as 1 and the rest as 0. So Q j ( n j), and hence n n n ( ) n (2.13) P A1,A 2,...,A n = Q j Q j = 2 n. j j=0 Note that the elements of Q j, for 1 j n 1 are all disjoint. Indeed, if D 1 Q i and D 2 Q j, for some j i, then D 1 D 2 = φ. Therefore, an element E Q j being empty or non-empty does not affect the nature (emptiness or nonemptiness) of another element D coming from Q i or Q j for all i j, in general. Consider next the four exhaustive cases. n n Case (i): A i Ω, A i φ. In this case, our claim is (2.14) P A1,A 2,...,A n {n+2,n+3,...,2 n }. Here, both Q 0 and Q n contain non-empty sets, so that Q 0 = Q n = 1. Suppose now A i s are such that all elements of Q 1 to Q n 2 are empty. We show that none oftheelementsofq n 1 isempty. SupposeanelementofQ n 1,say, A c 1A 2...A n = φ. Note first that A ǫ A ǫn n = Ω, since the LHS is the union of sets in P A3...A n. Hence, 0 n j=3 ǫ j n 2 (2.15) (A 3...A n ) c = Now, j=0 0 n j=3 ǫ j n 3 j=0 A ǫ A ǫn n. A c 1 A 2 = A c 1 A 2A 3...A n +A c 1 A 2(A 3...A n ) c = A c 1A 2 A ǫ A ǫn (using (2.15)) = = φ, 0 n j=3 ǫ j n 3 0 n j=3 ǫ j n 3 A c 1 A 2A ǫ A ǫn n since each element A c 1 A 2A ǫ A ǫn n, with 1 n j=3 ǫ j n 3 belongs to one of Q 1 to Q n 2. So A 2 A 1, a contradiction, since each A i is an atom of A. Also, in this case, P A1,A 2,...,A n = 2+ ( n n 1) = n+2. n
8 8 P. Vellaisamy, Sayan Ghosh, and M. Sreehari Let now 2 k n 1. Consider the case where all elements of Q j for 1 j k 1 arenon-empty, only r elements of Q k areempty, and all elements of k 1 ( ) n Q l for k+1 l n 1 are empty. In this case, P A1,A 2,...,A n = 2+ +r, j j=1 where 1 r ( ) ( n k. If k = n 1 and r = n n 1) = n, then PA1,A 2,...,A n = n 2 ( ) n n = 2 n. That is, when all elements of Q 0 to Q n are non-empty, j j=1 we get P A1,A 2,...,A n = 2 n. Thus, P A1,A 2,...,A n {n+2,n+3,...,2 n }. n n Case (ii): A i = Ω, A i φ. In this case, we claim (2.16) P A1,A 2,...,A n {n+1,n+2,...,2 n 1}. Here Q 0 = {φ} and Q n {φ} and so Q n = 1. The argument for the minimum value of P A1,A 2,...,A n is the same as that in Case (i). Also, P A1,A 2,...,A n is exactly 1 less than that in Case (i), and so P A1,A 2,...,A n {n+1,n+2,...,2 n 1}. n n Case (iii): A i Ω, A i = φ. In this case also, we claim (2.17) P A1,A 2,...,A n {n+1,n+2,...,2 n 1}. 0 n i=2 ǫ i n 1 Here Q 0 {φ} and Q 0 = 1, while Q n = {φ}. Suppose A i s are such that all elements of Q 2 to Q n 1 are empty. Let now an element of Q 1, say, A 1 A c 2...Ac n = φ. Then A 1 = (A 1 A ǫ A ǫn n ) = φ, by assumptions, which is a contradiction. Thus, all elements of Q 1 are non-empty, so that P A1,A 2,...,A n = 1+ ( n 1) = n + 1 in this case. The rest of the arguments are similar to those in Case (i). Hence, P A1,A 2,...,A n {n+1,n+2,...,2 n 1}. Case(iv): n A i = Ω, n A i = φ. Our claim in this case is (2.18) P A1,A 2,...,A n {n,n+1,...,2 n 2}. Here, Q 0 = Q n = {φ}. Observe first that it is not necessary that A 1,A 2,...,A n themselves form a partition of Ω. The argument for the minimum value of P A1,A 2,...,A n is the same as that in Case (i). Also, P A1,A 2,...,A n is exactly 1 less than that in Case (iii), and so P A1,A 2,...,A n {n,n+1,...,2 n 2}. Thus, from all the above cases, P A1,A 2,...,A n {n,n+1,...,2 n }.
9 On the construction and the cardinality of finite σ-fields 9 Remark If R j = B i, where B i Q j, for 0 j n, then Ω = i Note that R = {R 0,...,R n } forms a partition of Ω. n R j. Our main interest is on the construction and the cardinality of finite σ-fields. Our approachisviathepartitioninducedbythegeneratingclassa = {A 1,A 2,...,A n }. Note first that σ(p A1,A 2,...,A n ) is obtained by including the empty set and taking all the sets in P A1,A 2,...,A n, and all possible unions taken two at a time, three at a time, and so on till the union of all the sets in P A1,A 2,...,A n. The following result justifies our approach. Theorem Let A = {A 1,A 2,...,A n } be a class of n subsets of Ω that satisfies the conditions of Theorem Then (2.21) (i) σ(a) = σ(p A ) (ii) σ(a) = 2 P A. Proof. Let ǫ i {0,1} for 1 i n. Since A i A, we have A ǫ i i σ(a), for 1 i n and hence A ǫ A ǫn n σ(a). Thus, P A σ(a) and hence σ(p A ) σ(a). Conversely, for 1 i n, A i = A i A ǫ A ǫ i 1 i 1 Aǫ i+1 i+1...aǫn n = ǫ j :j i σ(p A ), ǫ j :j i ( A ǫ A ǫ i 1 i 1 A ia ǫ ) i+1 i+1...aǫn n since each A ǫ A ǫ i 1 i 1 A ia ǫ i+1 i+1...aǫn n P A. Thus, {A 1,A 2,...,A n } = A σ(p A ) = σ(a) σ(p A ). Thus, σ(a) = σ(p A ). Let now P A1,A 2,...,A n = k. Since σ(p A1,A 2,...,A n ) is the σ-field obtained by taking all possible unions of the sets in P A1,A 2,...,A n, we have ( ) ( ) ( ) k k k σ(p A1,A 2,...,A n ) = k = 2 k, where the unity is added for the empty set. Hence, σ(p A ) = 2 P A. It is known that the cardinality of a finite σ-field is of the form 2 m for some m N (see, for example, Rosenthal (2006), p. 24). The following corollary, which follows from Theorems 2.10 and 2.20, gives the explicit range for m. j=0
10 10 P. Vellaisamy, Sayan Ghosh, and M. Sreehari Corollary Let F be a finitely generated σ-field of subsets of Ω. Then F = 2 m, for some n m 2 n and n 1. Suppose F = σ(b) for some class B of subsets of Ω. Let A be the largest σ-distinct subclass of atoms (of B). Then m = P A. Remark (i) Suppose A 1,A 2,...,A n themselves form a partition of Ω. Then, from Lemma 2.7 and Theorem 2.20, σ(a 1,A 2,...,A n ) = 2 n. n n (ii) Suppose A i Ωand A i φ.also, ifallelementsofq j for1 j n 1 are non-empty, then P A1,A 2,...,A n = 2 n (Case (i) of the proof of Theorem 2.20) and hence, σ(a 1,A 2,...,A n ) = 2 2n, a known result (Ash and Doleans-Dade (2000), p 457.) Example (i) Let A = {A}. Then P A = {A,A c } and P A = 2,σ(A) = σ(p A ) = {φ,ω,a,a c }, σ(a) = σ(p A ) = 4. (ii) Let A = {A,B,C} be a collection of three σ-distinct subsets such that A B C Ω. Then P A,B,C = {ABC,A c BC,AB c C,ABC c,a c B c C,A c BC c,ab c C c,a c B c C c }. The different possible values of P A,B,C are listed in the following cases: (i) If ABC φ, then P A,B,C = {ABC,A c BC,AB c C,ABC c,a c B c C,A c BC c, AB c C c,a c B c C c }. Also, P A,B,C = 8 and σ(a,b,c) = σ(p A,B,C ) = 2 8 = 256. (ii) IfonlyABC = φ,thenp A,B,C = {A c BC,AB c C,ABC c,a c B c C,A c BC c,ab c C c, A c B c C c }. Also, P A,B,C = 7 and σ(a,b,c) = σ(p A,B,C ) = 2 7 = 128. (iii) If AB = φ, then P A,B,C = {A c BC,AB c C,A c B c C,A c BC c, AB c C c,a c B c C c }. Also, P A,B,C = 6 and σ(a,b,c) = σ(p A,B,C ) = 2 6 = 64. (iv) If AB = AC = φ, then P A,B,C = {A c BC,A c B c C,A c BC c, AB c C c,a c B c C c }. Also, P A,B,C = 5 and σ(a,b,c) = σp A,B,C ) = 2 5 = 32. (v) If AB = AC = BC = φ, then P A,B,C = {A c B c C,A c BC c,ab c C c, A c B c C c }. Also, P A,B,C = 4 and σ(a,b,c) = σ(p A,B,C ) = 2 4 = 16. Also, in this case, σ(a,b,c) = σ(p A,B,C ) = {φ,ω,a,b,c,a c,b c,c c,a B,A C,B C, A B C,A c B c C c,a c B c,a c C c,b c C c }.
11 On the construction and the cardinality of finite σ-fields 11 Thus, we see that σ(a,b,c) {16,32,64,128,256}. This result easily follows also from (2.14) and (2.17) and Theorem Exact cardinality of some finite σ-fields Let n = {1,2,...,n}. Given a class A = {A 1,A 2,...,A n } of σ-distinct sets, we call henceforth A i A j,i j, 2-factor intersections, A i A j A k,i j k, 3-factor intersections, and so on. Clearly, there is only one n-factor intersection, namely A 1 A 2...A n. We denote A i1 A i2...a ik = A S, where S = {i 1,i 2,...,i k }. We now discuss a simple algorithm to find the exact cardinality of some special σ-fileds: Let n 1 A i Ω, so that Q 0 = 1. Note that an element A 1 A c 2...A c n Q 1 is empty if A 1 ( n j 1 A j). Also, let s 1 denote the number of A i s such that n A i A j. Then, n s 1 = Q 1, the cardinality of Q 1. j=1;j i Let now 3 l n. Suppose none of the j-factor intersections, for 2 j l 1, is empty and only k of the l-factor intersections, say, A L1,...,A Lk are empty for some L i n with L i = l,1 i k. Define S Li = {B L i B n}. We call S Li the set of indices of implied empty intersections of L i, as A B = φ, B S Li. Then (3.1) P A1,A 2,...,A n = 2 n k S Li s 1, if none of the higher order intersections A M is empty, where l < M n 1 and M k S L i. If there exist M 1,...,M r such that l < M i n 1 and M i k S L i, then k (3.2) P A1,A 2,...,A n = 2 n ( S Li ) r ( S Mj ) s 1. j=1 Indeed, it suffices to consider only those M j s such that for 2 j n 1. M j ( k S Li ) j 1 ( S Mr ), r=1
12 12 P. Vellaisamy, Sayan Ghosh, and M. Sreehari We next consider some particular cases of interest under the case s 1 = 0. (i) When none of the intersections of A j s of order two or more is empty, P A1,A 2,...,A n = 2 n. (ii) When only the (n 1)-factor intersections, say q n 1 in number, are empty, then P A1,A 2,...,A n = 2 n q n 1 1, since A 1...A n is the only implied empty intersection. (iii) When all the 2-factor intersections A i A j = φ, then all the collections Q 2 to Q n are empty and in this case all the elements of Q 1 are non-empty. Thus, since P A1,A 2,...,A n = n+1, n A i Ω which implies Q 0 is nonempty. Two typical examples follow. Example 3.3. LetΩ = {5,6,...,20}andconsiderthesetsA 1 = {8,10,14,16,17}, A 2 = {6,7,18}, A 3 = {7,8,9,14,16,19} and A 4 = {9,10,11,14,20}. Then 4 A i Ω, and only A 1 A 2 = A 2 A 4 = φ. Hence, L 1 = {1,2},L 2 = {2,4} and (i) S L1 = {{1,2},{1,2,3},{1,2,4},{1,2,3,4}}, (ii) S L2 = {{2,4},{1,2,4},{2,3,4},{1,2,3,4}}. Thus, S L1 S L2 = 6. Also, here s 1 = 0. Using (3.1), we get P A1,A 2,A 3,A 4 = = 10 and by Theorem 2.20, σ(a 1,A 2,A 3,A 4 ) = 2 10 = Example 3.4. Consider the case where Ω = {5,6,...,15},A 1 = {8,9,10},A 2 = {7,11,12,15}, 4 A 3 = {7,11,12,13} and A 4 = {8,10,13,15}. Then A i Ω and A 1 A 2 = A 1 A 3 = φ are the only 2-factor intersections so that L 1 = {1,2},L 2 = {1,3} and (i) S L1 = {{1,2},{1,2,3},{1,2,4},{1,2,3,4}}, (ii) S L2 = {{1,3},{1,2,3},{1,3,4},{1,2,3,4}}, Also, A 2 A 3 A 4 = φsothatm = {2,3,4} S L1 S L2 ands M = {{2,3,4},{1,2,3,4}}. 4 4 Therefore, S L1 S L2 S M = 7. Note also that A 2 A j,a 3 A j and j 2 j 3
13 On the construction and the cardinality of finite σ-fields 13 A 4 4 A j, so that s 1 = 3. Using (3.2), P A1,A 2,A 3,A 4 = = 6 and, by j 4 Theorem 2.20, σ(a 1,A 2,A 3,A 4 ) = 2 6 = 64. Finally, we look at the question of cardinality σ(b,d), where D B and B = σ(a) is a σ-field. Here, we need to talk about P{B,D}, where the members are not σ-distinct. Definition 3.5. Let A = {A 1,...,A n } be an arbitrary class of n subsets of Ω. Then the partition P A induced by A is defined as the subclass of P A, defined in (2.1), where each element of P A is an atom. That is, the sets in P A which can be obtained as the union of other sets, are removed from P A to obtain P A. For simplicity and continuity, we denote P A by P A only. Theorem 3.6. Let A = {A 1,A 2,...,A n } be a class of σ-distinct sets, and B = σ(a) be the generated σ-field. Let D Ω and D B. Then (3.7) σ(b,d) = 2 P A,D. Proof. Let P A,D be the finest partition induced by the class {A,D}. Then { } P A,D = A ǫ A ǫn n Dǫ n+1 ǫ n+1 j {0,1},0 ǫ j n+1 j=1 { } n = A ǫ A ǫn n D ǫ j {0,1},0 ǫ j n j=1 { A ǫ A ǫn n D c ǫ j {0,1},0 When none of the elements of P A,D is empty, (3.8) P A,D = 2 P A. } n ǫ j n. Note also that P σ(a) = P A, since σ(a) is the collection of all possible unions of the sets in P A. Hence, (3.9) P σ(a),d = P A,D for D σ(a). Observe also that the sets in {A,D} are σ-distinct. Now Hence, from Theorem 2.20, which proves the result. j=1 σ(b,d) = σ(p B,D ) = σ(p σ(a),d ) = σ(p A,D ). σ(b,d) = 2 P A,D,
14 14 P. Vellaisamy, Sayan Ghosh, and M. Sreehari Remark (i) When none of the elements of P A,D is empty, we have from (3.7) and (3.8), (3.11) σ(b,d) = 2 P A,D = 2 2 P A = (2 P A ) 2 = B 2. (ii) It follows from (3.9) that (3.12) an expected result. σ(σ(a),d) = σ(p σ(a),d ) = σ(p A,D ) = σ(a,d), Example Consider the simplest case, where B = σ(a) = {φ,ω,a,a c }. Let D B be such AD φ and A D Ω. Then {B,D} = {φ,ω,a,a c,d} and P A,D = {AD,A c D,AD c,a c D c } = P A,D. Note here all the elements of P A,D are non-empty. Hence, P B,D = P A,D = 2 P A = 4 and σ(b,d) = B 2 = 16. Example Consider the case when A 1 and A 2 are two σ-distinct subsets of Ω such that A 1 A 2 Ω and A 1 A 2 = φ. Let A = {A 1,A 2 } and B = σ(a). Here P A = {A c 1A 2,A 1 A c 2,A c 1A c 2} and B = {φ,ω,a 1,A 2,A c 1,A c 2,A 1 A 2,A c 1 A c 2}. Let D Bbeanon-emptysubsetofΩ,sothat{B,D} = {φ,ω,a 1,A 2,A c 1,A c 2,A 1 A 2,A c 1 A c 2,D} and{a,d} = {A 1,A 2,D}.ThenP B,D = {A c 1 A 2D,A 1 A c 2 D,Ac 1 Ac 2 D,Ac 1 A 2D c,a 1 A c 2 Dc,A c 1 Ac 2 Dc } = P A,D. Assume all elements of P A,D to be non-empty. Then P B,D = P A,D = 2 P A = 6. Hence, σ(b,d) = 2 P B,D = 2 2 P A = σ(a) 2 = B 2 = An Application to Independence of Events Let us consider three events A,B and C such that A is independent of B (denoted by A B) and A is independent of C (denoted by A C). It is known that these assumptions neither imply A (B C) nor A (BC), unless B and C are disjoint (see Whittaker (1990) p. 27). However, we have the following lemma. Lemma 4.1. Let A B and A C. Then A (B C) iff A (BC). Proof. Consider so that P[A (B C)] = P[(AB) (AC)] = P(AB)+P(AC) P(ABC) = P(A)[P(B)+P(C)] P(ABC) (by assumption) = P(A)[P(B C)+P(BC)] P(ABC), (4.2) P[A (B C)] P(A)[P(B C)] = P(A)[P(BC)] P(ABC). Hence, A (B C) (that is, L.H.S. of (4.2) = 0) iff A (BC) (that is, R.H.S. of (4.2) = 0).
15 On the construction and the cardinality of finite σ-fields 15 Lemma 4.3. If A B, A C and A (B C), then A P B,C. Proof. We need to show that under the assumptions, A E, for every E {BC,B c C,BC c,b c C c } = P B,C. Using Lemma 4.1 and the assumptions, we have A (BC). Since, P[A (B c C)] = P(AC) P(ABC) = P(A)P(C) P(A)P(BC) = P(A)[P(C) P(BC)] = P(A)P(B c C) shows that A (B c C). Similarly, A (BC c ), by symmetry. Further, A is independent of B C implies A is independent of (B C) c = B c C c. Hence, A P B,C. The following stronger form of independence of three events is used especially in graphical models (see Whittaker (1990) p. 27). Definition 4.4. A [B,C] if A is independent of E, for every E P B,C. As another application Theorem 2.20, we have the following result which states that A [B,C] implies the independence of A E, where E σ(b,c) and 4 σ(b,c) 16. Theorem 4.5. The following statements are equivalent. (i) A [B,C]. (ii) A B, A C and A (B C). (iii) A σ(b,c). Proof. Assume (i) holds. Since the elements of P B,C = {BC,B c C,BC c,b c C c } are disjoint, A is independent of all possible unions of elements in P B,C. Note that B = BC BC c,c = BC B c C and B C = BC B c C BC c. So, A B, A C and A (B C). Hence, (i) = (ii). Assume now (ii) holds. Then by Lemma 4.3, A P B,C. Since σ(p B,C ) consists the collection of all possible unions of sets in P B,C, we have A σ(p B,C ) = σ(b,c), by Theorem So, (ii) = (iii). Consider now statements (i) and (iii). Since P B,C σ(b,c), A σ(b,c) implies A P B,C and thus A [B,C], by Definition 4.4. Hence, (iii) = (i). Thus, statements (i),(ii) and (iii) are equivalent.
16 16 P. Vellaisamy, Sayan Ghosh, and M. Sreehari References [1] Billingsley, P. (1995). Probability and Measure. 3rd edition. Wiley Interscience, New york. [2] Ash, R. B. and Doleans-Dade, C. A. (2000). Probability and Measure Theory. 2nd Edition. Academic Press, CA, USA. [3] Rosenthal, J. S. (2006). A First Look at Rigorous Probability Theory. 2nd Edition. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore. [4] Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York. P. Vellaisamy Address: P. Vellaisamy, Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai , INDIA. pv@math.iitb.ac.in S. Ghosh Address: Sayan Ghosh, Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai , INDIA. sayang@math.iitb.ac.in M. Sreehari Address: M. Sreehari, 6-B, Vrundavan Park, New Sama Road, Vadodara , INDIA. msreehari03@yahoo.co.uk
Mathematics 2260H Geometry I: Euclidean geometry Trent University, Winter 2012 Quiz Solutions
Mathematics 2260H Geometry I: Euclidean geometry Trent University, Winter 2012 Quiz Solutions Quiz #1. Tuesday, 17 January, 2012. [10 minutes] 1. Given a line segment AB, use (some of) Postulates I V,
More informationBASIC MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES
CHAPTER 1 ASIC MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES 1.1 Introduction To understand automata theory, one must have a strong foundation about discrete mathematics. Discrete mathematics is a branch of mathematics dealing
More informationLecture Notes 1 Basic Probability. Elements of Probability. Conditional probability. Sequential Calculation of Probability
Lecture Notes 1 Basic Probability Set Theory Elements of Probability Conditional probability Sequential Calculation of Probability Total Probability and Bayes Rule Independence Counting EE 178/278A: Basic
More informationMathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part I: Algebraic Structures, Sets and Permutations
Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part I: Algebraic Structures, Sets and Permutations D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 1 Number Systems and Matrix Algebra Integers The whole numbers 0, ±1, ±2, ±3, ±4,...
More informationStatistical Inference
Statistical Inference Lecture 1: Probability Theory MING GAO DASE @ ECNU (for course related communications) mgao@dase.ecnu.edu.cn Sep. 11, 2018 Outline Introduction Set Theory Basics of Probability Theory
More informationALGORITHMS FOR COMPUTING QUARTIC GALOIS GROUPS OVER FIELDS OF CHARACTERISTIC 0
ALGORITHMS FOR COMPUTING QUARTIC GALOIS GROUPS OVER FIELDS OF CHARACTERISTIC 0 CHAD AWTREY, JAMES BEUERLE, AND MICHAEL KEENAN Abstract. Let f(x) beanirreducibledegreefourpolynomialdefinedover afieldf and
More informationAdvanced Digital Design with the Verilog HDL, Second Edition Michael D. Ciletti Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, 2011
Problem 2-1 Recall that a minterm is a cube in which every variable appears. A Boolean expression in SOP form is canonical if every cube in the expression has a unique representation in which all of the
More informationVectors 1C. 6 k) = =0 = =17
Vectors C For each problem, calculate the vector product in the bracet first and then perform the scalar product on the answer. a b c= 3 0 4 =4i j 3 a.(b c=(5i+j.(4i j 3 =0 +3= b c a = 3 0 4 5 = 8i+3j+6
More informationStat 451: Solutions to Assignment #1
Stat 451: Solutions to Assignment #1 2.1) By definition, 2 Ω is the set of all subsets of Ω. Therefore, to show that 2 Ω is a σ-algebra we must show that the conditions of the definition σ-algebra are
More informationLECTURE 1. 1 Introduction. 1.1 Sample spaces and events
LECTURE 1 1 Introduction The first part of our adventure is a highly selective review of probability theory, focusing especially on things that are most useful in statistics. 1.1 Sample spaces and events
More informationScott Taylor 1. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS. Definition 1.1. Let A be a set. An equivalence relation on A is a relation such that:
Equivalence MA Relations 274 and Partitions Scott Taylor 1. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS Definition 1.1. Let A be a set. An equivalence relation on A is a relation such that: (1) is reflexive. That is, (2) is
More informationPoint sets and certain classes of sets
1 Point sets and certain classes of sets 1.1 Points, sets and classes We shall consider sets consisting of elements or points. The nature of the points will be left unspecified examples are points in a
More informationSet Theory. CSE 215, Foundations of Computer Science Stony Brook University
Set Theory CSE 215, Foundations of Computer Science Stony Brook University http://www.cs.stonybrook.edu/~cse215 Set theory Abstract set theory is one of the foundations of mathematical thought Most mathematical
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 3 9/10/2008 CONDITIONING AND INDEPENDENCE
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 3 9/10/2008 CONDITIONING AND INDEPENDENCE Most of the material in this lecture is covered in [Bertsekas & Tsitsiklis] Sections 1.3-1.5
More informationExercises for Unit VI (Infinite constructions in set theory)
Exercises for Unit VI (Infinite constructions in set theory) VI.1 : Indexed families and set theoretic operations (Halmos, 4, 8 9; Lipschutz, 5.3 5.4) Lipschutz : 5.3 5.6, 5.29 5.32, 9.14 1. Generalize
More informationSpring 2014 Advanced Probability Overview. Lecture Notes Set 1: Course Overview, σ-fields, and Measures
36-752 Spring 2014 Advanced Probability Overview Lecture Notes Set 1: Course Overview, σ-fields, and Measures Instructor: Jing Lei Associated reading: Sec 1.1-1.4 of Ash and Doléans-Dade; Sec 1.1 and A.1
More informationCDA 3200 Digital Systems. Instructor: Dr. Janusz Zalewski Developed by: Dr. Dahai Guo Spring 2012
CDA 3200 Digital Systems Instructor: Dr. Janusz Zalewski Developed by: Dr. Dahai Guo Spring 2012 Outline Combinational Logic Design Using a Truth Table Minterm and Maxterm Expansions General Minterm and
More informationSets are one of the basic building blocks for the types of objects considered in discrete mathematics.
Section 2.1 Introduction Sets are one of the basic building blocks for the types of objects considered in discrete mathematics. Important for counting. Programming languages have set operations. Set theory
More informationMeasure and Integration: Concepts, Examples and Exercises. INDER K. RANA Indian Institute of Technology Bombay India
Measure and Integration: Concepts, Examples and Exercises INDER K. RANA Indian Institute of Technology Bombay India Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076,
More informationSELF-DUAL UNIFORM MATROIDS ON INFINITE SETS
SELF-DUAL UNIFORM MATROIDS ON INFINITE SETS NATHAN BOWLER AND STEFAN GESCHKE Abstract. We extend the notion of a uniform matroid to the infinitary case and construct, using weak fragments of Martin s Axiom,
More informationSection 31. The Separation Axioms
31. The Separation Axioms 1 Section 31. The Separation Axioms Note. Recall that a topological space X is Hausdorff if for any x,y X with x y, there are disjoint open sets U and V with x U and y V. In this
More informationMetric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions. HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y)
Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y) d(z, w) d(x, z) + d(y, w) holds for all w, x, y, z X.
More informationAutomata and Languages
Automata and Languages Prof. Mohamed Hamada Software Engineering Lab. The University of Aizu Japan Mathematical Background Mathematical Background Sets Relations Functions Graphs Proof techniques Sets
More information5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting
5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting Let N denote the positive integers, N 0 := N {0} be the non-negative integers and Z = N 0 ( N) the positive and negative integers including 0, Q the rational numbers,
More information2. Prime and Maximal Ideals
18 Andreas Gathmann 2. Prime and Maximal Ideals There are two special kinds of ideals that are of particular importance, both algebraically and geometrically: the so-called prime and maximal ideals. Let
More informationMeasures. 1 Introduction. These preliminary lecture notes are partly based on textbooks by Athreya and Lahiri, Capinski and Kopp, and Folland.
Measures These preliminary lecture notes are partly based on textbooks by Athreya and Lahiri, Capinski and Kopp, and Folland. 1 Introduction Our motivation for studying measure theory is to lay a foundation
More information2. Sets. 2.1&2.2: Sets and Subsets. Combining Sets. c Dr Oksana Shatalov, Spring
c Dr Oksana Shatalov, Spring 2015 1 2. Sets 2.1&2.2: Sets and Subsets. Combining Sets. Set Terminology and Notation DEFINITIONS: Set is well-defined collection of objects. Elements are objects or members
More informationA MINIMAL VERSION OF HILBERT S AXIOMS FOR PLANE GEOMETRY
A MINIMAL VERSION OF HILBERT S AXIOMS FOR PLANE GEOMETRY WILLIAM RICHTER Abstract. This note is intended to be useful to good high school students wanting a rigorous treatment of Hilbert s axioms for plane
More informationIn N we can do addition, but in order to do subtraction we need to extend N to the integers
Chapter 1 The Real Numbers 1.1. Some Preliminaries Discussion: The Irrationality of 2. We begin with the natural numbers N = {1, 2, 3, }. In N we can do addition, but in order to do subtraction we need
More informationQuestion 1: In quadrilateral ACBD, AC = AD and AB bisects A (See the given figure). Show that ABC ABD. What can you say about BC and BD?
Class IX - NCERT Maths Exercise (7.1) Question 1: In quadrilateral ACBD, AC = AD and AB bisects A (See the given figure). Show that ABC ABD. What can you say about BC and BD? Solution 1: In ABC and ABD,
More information0 Logical Background. 0.1 Sets
0 Logical Background 0.1 Sets In this course we will use the term set to simply mean a collection of things which have a common property such as the totality of positive integers or the collection of points
More informationClass IX Chapter 7 Triangles Maths
Class IX Chapter 7 Triangles Maths 1: Exercise 7.1 Question In quadrilateral ACBD, AC = AD and AB bisects A (See the given figure). Show that ABC ABD. What can you say about BC and BD? In ABC and ABD,
More information20 Ordinals. Definition A set α is an ordinal iff: (i) α is transitive; and. (ii) α is linearly ordered by. Example 20.2.
20 Definition 20.1. A set α is an ordinal iff: (i) α is transitive; and (ii) α is linearly ordered by. Example 20.2. (a) Each natural number n is an ordinal. (b) ω is an ordinal. (a) ω {ω} is an ordinal.
More informationIntroductory Analysis I Fall 2014 Homework #5 Solutions
Introductory Analysis I Fall 2014 Homework #5 Solutions 6. Let M be a metric space, let C D M. Now we can think of C as a subset of the metric space M or as a subspace of the metric space D (D being a
More informationMathematical Reasoning & Proofs
Mathematical Reasoning & Proofs MAT 1362 Fall 2018 Alistair Savage Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Ottawa This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
More informationCHAPTER 1. Preliminaries. 1 Set Theory
CHAPTER 1 Preliminaries 1 et Theory We assume that the reader is familiar with basic set theory. In this paragraph, we want to recall the relevant definitions and fix the notation. Our approach to set
More informationLöwenheim-Skolem Theorems, Countable Approximations, and L ω. David W. Kueker (Lecture Notes, Fall 2007)
Löwenheim-Skolem Theorems, Countable Approximations, and L ω 0. Introduction David W. Kueker (Lecture Notes, Fall 2007) In its simplest form the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem for L ω1 ω states that if σ L ω1
More informationSet Theory. CPT Section D Quantitative Aptitude Chapter 7 Brijeshwar Prasad Gupta
Set Theory CPT Section D Quantitative Aptitude Chapter 7 Brijeshwar Prasad Gupta Learning Objectives Number system Set Theory Set operations Product of Sets MCQ Number system Natural numbers:- N N = {1,2,3..}
More informationECE353: Probability and Random Processes. Lecture 2 - Set Theory
ECE353: Probability and Random Processes Lecture 2 - Set Theory Xiao Fu School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Oregon State University E-mail: xiao.fu@oregonstate.edu January 10, 2018 Set
More informationLecture 2: A crash course in Real Analysis
EE5110: Probability Foundations for Electrical Engineers July-November 2015 Lecture 2: A crash course in Real Analysis Lecturer: Dr. Krishna Jagannathan Scribe: Sudharsan Parthasarathy This lecture is
More informationMath 421, Homework #6 Solutions. (1) Let E R n Show that = (E c ) o, i.e. the complement of the closure is the interior of the complement.
Math 421, Homework #6 Solutions (1) Let E R n Show that (Ē) c = (E c ) o, i.e. the complement of the closure is the interior of the complement. 1 Proof. Before giving the proof we recall characterizations
More informationNAME: Mathematics 133, Fall 2013, Examination 3
NAME: Mathematics 133, Fall 2013, Examination 3 INSTRUCTIONS: Work all questions, and unless indicated otherwise give reasons for your answers. If the problem does not explicitly state that the underlying
More information2 Equivalence Relations
2 Equivalence Relations In mathematics, we often investigate relationships between certain objects (numbers, functions, sets, figures, etc.). If an element a of a set A is related to an element b of a
More informationClass IX Chapter 7 Triangles Maths. Exercise 7.1 Question 1: In quadrilateral ACBD, AC = AD and AB bisects A (See the given figure).
Exercise 7.1 Question 1: In quadrilateral ACBD, AC = AD and AB bisects A (See the given figure). Show that ABC ABD. What can you say about BC and BD? In ABC and ABD, AC = AD (Given) CAB = DAB (AB bisects
More informationChapter 2 - Basics Structures
Chapter 2 - Basics Structures 2.1 - Sets Definitions and Notation Definition 1 (Set). A set is an of. These are called the or of the set. We ll typically use uppercase letters to denote sets: S, A, B,...
More informationAxioms for Set Theory
Axioms for Set Theory The following is a subset of the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms for set theory. In this setting, all objects are sets which are denoted by letters, e.g. x, y, X, Y. Equality is logical identity:
More information1 Chapter 1: SETS. 1.1 Describing a set
1 Chapter 1: SETS set is a collection of objects The objects of the set are called elements or members Use capital letters :, B, C, S, X, Y to denote the sets Use lower case letters to denote the elements:
More informationChapter 3. Betweenness (ordering) A system satisfying the incidence and betweenness axioms is an ordered incidence plane (p. 118).
Chapter 3 Betweenness (ordering) Point B is between point A and point C is a fundamental, undefined concept. It is abbreviated A B C. A system satisfying the incidence and betweenness axioms is an ordered
More informationProblem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016
Problem Set 2: s Math 201A: Fall 2016 Problem 1. (a) Prove that a closed subset of a complete metric space is complete. (b) Prove that a closed subset of a compact metric space is compact. (c) Prove that
More informationPartial cubes: structures, characterizations, and constructions
Partial cubes: structures, characterizations, and constructions Sergei Ovchinnikov San Francisco State University, Mathematics Department, 1600 Holloway Ave., San Francisco, CA 94132 Abstract Partial cubes
More informationThe non-bipartite graphs with all but two eigenvalues in
The non-bipartite graphs with all but two eigenvalues in [ 1, 1] L.S. de Lima 1, A. Mohammadian 1, C.S. Oliveira 2 1 Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso
More informationIn N we can do addition, but in order to do subtraction we need to extend N to the integers
Chapter The Real Numbers.. Some Preliminaries Discussion: The Irrationality of 2. We begin with the natural numbers N = {, 2, 3, }. In N we can do addition, but in order to do subtraction we need to extend
More informationSanjay Mishra. Topology. Dr. Sanjay Mishra. A Profound Subtitle
Topology A Profound Subtitle Dr. Copyright c 2017 Contents I General Topology 1 Topological Spaces............................................ 7 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 Topological Space 7 1.2.1 Topological
More informationSolutions I.N. Herstein- Second Edition
Solutions I.N. Herstein- Second Edition Sadiah Zahoor 25, July 2016 Please email me if any corrections at sadiahzahoor@cantab.net. Problem 0.1. In the following determine whether the systems described
More informationMath 105A HW 1 Solutions
Sect. 1.1.3: # 2, 3 (Page 7-8 Math 105A HW 1 Solutions 2(a ( Statement: Each positive integers has a unique prime factorization. n N: n = 1 or ( R N, p 1,..., p R P such that n = p 1 p R and ( n, R, S
More informationEconomics 204 Fall 2011 Problem Set 1 Suggested Solutions
Economics 204 Fall 2011 Problem Set 1 Suggested Solutions 1. Suppose k is a positive integer. Use induction to prove the following two statements. (a) For all n N 0, the inequality (k 2 + n)! k 2n holds.
More informationCOMPLETE SETS OF CONNECTIVES FOR GENERALIZED ŁUKASIEWICZ LOGICS KAMERYN J WILLIAMS. CUNY Graduate Center 365 Fifth Avenue New York, NY USA
COMPLETE SETS OF CONNECTIVES FOR GENERALIZED ŁUKASIEWICZ LOGICS KAMERYN J WILLIAMS CUNY Graduate Center 365 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10016 USA Abstract. While,, form a complete set of connectives for
More informationA Universal Turing Machine
A Universal Turing Machine A limitation of Turing Machines: Turing Machines are hardwired they execute only one program Real Computers are re-programmable Solution: Universal Turing Machine Attributes:
More informationA general Stone representation theorem
arxiv:math/0608384v1 [math.lo] 15 Aug 2006 A general Stone representation theorem Mirna; after a paper by A. Jung and P. Sünderhauf and notes by G. Plebanek September 10, 2018 This note contains a Stone-style
More informationAnalysis I. Classroom Notes. H.-D. Alber
Analysis I Classroom Notes H-D Alber Contents 1 Fundamental notions 1 11 Sets 1 12 Product sets, relations 5 13 Composition of statements 7 14 Quantifiers, negation of statements 9 2 Real numbers 11 21
More informationInformal Statement Calculus
FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS Branches of Logic 1. Theory of Computations (i.e. Recursion Theory). 2. Proof Theory. 3. Model Theory. 4. Set Theory. Informal Statement Calculus STATEMENTS AND CONNECTIVES Example
More informationDefinition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Example:
Chapter 9 1 Binary Relations Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Example: Let A = {0,1,2} and B = {a,b} {(0, a), (0, b), (1,a), (2, b)} is a relation from A to B.
More informationMAT2377. Ali Karimnezhad. Version September 9, Ali Karimnezhad
MAT2377 Ali Karimnezhad Version September 9, 2015 Ali Karimnezhad Comments These slides cover material from Chapter 1. In class, I may use a blackboard. I recommend reading these slides before you come
More information1 Alphabets and Languages
1 Alphabets and Languages Look at handout 1 (inference rules for sets) and use the rules on some examples like {a} {{a}} {a} {a, b}, {a} {{a}}, {a} {{a}}, {a} {a, b}, a {{a}}, a {a, b}, a {{a}}, a {a,
More informationPacket #2: Set Theory & Predicate Calculus. Applied Discrete Mathematics
CSC 224/226 Notes Packet #2: Set Theory & Predicate Calculus Barnes Packet #2: Set Theory & Predicate Calculus Applied Discrete Mathematics Table of Contents Full Adder Information Page 1 Predicate Calculus
More informationBulletin of the. Iranian Mathematical Society
ISSN: 1017-060X (Print) ISSN: 1735-8515 (Online) Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 43 (2017), No. 3, pp. 951 974. Title: Normal edge-transitive Cayley graphs on the nonabelian groups of
More informationClass Equation & Conjugacy in Groups
Subject: ALEBRA - V Lesson: Class Equation & Conjugacy in roups Lesson Developer: Shweta andhi Department / College: Department of Mathematics, Miranda House, University of Delhi Institute of Lifelong
More informationChapter Summary. Sets The Language of Sets Set Operations Set Identities Functions Types of Functions Operations on Functions Computability
Chapter 2 1 Chapter Summary Sets The Language of Sets Set Operations Set Identities Functions Types of Functions Operations on Functions Computability Sequences and Summations Types of Sequences Summation
More informationAbstract Measure Theory
2 Abstract Measure Theory Lebesgue measure is one of the premier examples of a measure on R d, but it is not the only measure and certainly not the only important measure on R d. Further, R d is not the
More informationLecture 2: Probability, conditional probability, and independence
Lecture 2: Probability, conditional probability, and independence Theorem 1.2.6. Let S = {s 1,s 2,...} and F be all subsets of S. Let p 1,p 2,... be nonnegative numbers that sum to 1. The following defines
More informationExercises for Unit V (Introduction to non Euclidean geometry)
Exercises for Unit V (Introduction to non Euclidean geometry) V.1 : Facts from spherical geometry Ryan : pp. 84 123 [ Note : Hints for the first two exercises are given in math133f07update08.pdf. ] 1.
More informationMULTIPLE PRODUCTS OBJECTIVES. If a i j,b j k,c i k, = + = + = + then a. ( b c) ) 8 ) 6 3) 4 5). If a = 3i j+ k and b 3i j k = = +, then a. ( a b) = ) 0 ) 3) 3 4) not defined { } 3. The scalar a. ( b c)
More informationChapter 0. Introduction: Prerequisites and Preliminaries
Chapter 0. Sections 0.1 to 0.5 1 Chapter 0. Introduction: Prerequisites and Preliminaries Note. The content of Sections 0.1 through 0.6 should be very familiar to you. However, in order to keep these notes
More informationCHAPTER 1 SETS AND EVENTS
CHPTER 1 SETS ND EVENTS 1.1 Universal Set and Subsets DEFINITION: set is a well-defined collection of distinct elements in the universal set. This is denoted by capital latin letters, B, C, If an element
More informationLecture 3: Probability Measures - 2
Lecture 3: Probability Measures - 2 1. Continuation of measures 1.1 Problem of continuation of a probability measure 1.2 Outer measure 1.3 Lebesgue outer measure 1.4 Lebesgue continuation of an elementary
More informationRevealed Reversals of Preferences
Revealed Reversals of Preferences Houy Nicolas October 5, 2009 Abstract We weaken the implicit assumption of rational choice theory that imposes that preferences do not depend on the choice set. We concentrate
More informationTopological properties
CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological
More informationIntroduction to Proofs
Real Analysis Preview May 2014 Properties of R n Recall Oftentimes in multivariable calculus, we looked at properties of vectors in R n. If we were given vectors x =< x 1, x 2,, x n > and y =< y1, y 2,,
More informationNotes for Math 290 using Introduction to Mathematical Proofs by Charles E. Roberts, Jr.
Notes for Math 290 using Introduction to Mathematical Proofs by Charles E. Roberts, Jr. Chapter : Logic Topics:. Statements, Negation, and Compound Statements.2 Truth Tables and Logical Equivalences.3
More informationSection V.3. Splitting Fields, Algebraic Closure, and Normality (Supplement)
V.3. Splitting Fields, Algebraic Closure, and Normality (Supplement) 1 Section V.3. Splitting Fields, Algebraic Closure, and Normality (Supplement) Note. In this supplement, we consider splitting fields
More informationDiscrete Mathematics. (c) Marcin Sydow. Sets. Set operations. Sets. Set identities Number sets. Pair. Power Set. Venn diagrams
Contents : basic definitions and notation A set is an unordered collection of its elements (or members). The set is fully specified by its elements. Usually capital letters are used to name sets and lowercase
More informationChapter 2 - Basics Structures MATH 213. Chapter 2: Basic Structures. Dr. Eric Bancroft. Fall Dr. Eric Bancroft MATH 213 Fall / 60
MATH 213 Chapter 2: Basic Structures Dr. Eric Bancroft Fall 2013 Dr. Eric Bancroft MATH 213 Fall 2013 1 / 60 Chapter 2 - Basics Structures 2.1 - Sets 2.2 - Set Operations 2.3 - Functions 2.4 - Sequences
More informationRelations, Functions, Binary Relations (Chapter 1, Sections 1.2, 1.3)
Relations, Functions, Binary Relations (Chapter 1, Sections 1.2, 1.3) CmSc 365 Theory of Computation 1. Relations Definition: Let A and B be two sets. A relation R from A to B is any set of ordered pairs
More informationChapter 1 : The language of mathematics.
MAT 200, Logic, Language and Proof, Fall 2015 Summary Chapter 1 : The language of mathematics. Definition. A proposition is a sentence which is either true or false. Truth table for the connective or :
More informationSolutions to Tutorial 8 (Week 9)
The University of Sydney School of Mathematics and Statistics Solutions to Tutorial 8 (Week 9) MATH3961: Metric Spaces (Advanced) Semester 1, 2018 Web Page: http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/ug/sm/math3961/
More informationcse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska
cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska LECTURE 1 Course Web Page www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/ cse303 The webpage contains: lectures notes slides; very detailed solutions to
More informationOn Transfinite Cardinal Numbers
IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: 2278-5728, p-issn: 2319-765X. Volume 14, Issue 4 Ver. IV (Jul - Aug 2018), PP 17-21 www.iosrjournals.org On Transfinite Cardinal Numbers J N Salunke* and B
More informationThis section will take the very naive point of view that a set is a collection of objects, the collection being regarded as a single object.
1.10. BASICS CONCEPTS OF SET THEORY 193 1.10 Basics Concepts of Set Theory Having learned some fundamental notions of logic, it is now a good place before proceeding to more interesting things, such as
More informationChapter 1. Sets and Numbers
Chapter 1. Sets and Numbers 1. Sets A set is considered to be a collection of objects (elements). If A is a set and x is an element of the set A, we say x is a member of A or x belongs to A, and we write
More informationWith Question/Answer Animations. Chapter 2
With Question/Answer Animations Chapter 2 Chapter Summary Sets The Language of Sets Set Operations Set Identities Functions Types of Functions Operations on Functions Sequences and Summations Types of
More informationPROBABILITY VITTORIA SILVESTRI
PROBABILITY VITTORIA SILVESTRI Contents Preface. Introduction 2 2. Combinatorial analysis 5 3. Stirling s formula 8 4. Properties of Probability measures Preface These lecture notes are for the course
More informationSETS AND FUNCTIONS JOSHUA BALLEW
SETS AND FUNCTIONS JOSHUA BALLEW 1. Sets As a review, we begin by considering a naive look at set theory. For our purposes, we define a set as a collection of objects. Except for certain sets like N, Z,
More informationThus, X is connected by Problem 4. Case 3: X = (a, b]. This case is analogous to Case 2. Case 4: X = (a, b). Choose ε < b a
Solutions to Homework #6 1. Complete the proof of the backwards direction of Theorem 12.2 from class (which asserts the any interval in R is connected). Solution: Let X R be a closed interval. Case 1:
More informationChapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries
Chapter 1 Measure Spaces 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets 1.1.1 Notation and preliminaries We shall denote by X a nonempty set, by P(X) the set of all parts (i.e., subsets) of X, and by the empty set.
More informationDiscrete Mathematics 2007: Lecture 5 Infinite sets
Discrete Mathematics 2007: Lecture 5 Infinite sets Debrup Chakraborty 1 Countability The natural numbers originally arose from counting elements in sets. There are two very different possible sizes for
More informationIntroduction. Chapter 1. Contents. EECS 600 Function Space Methods in System Theory Lecture Notes J. Fessler 1.1
Chapter 1 Introduction Contents Motivation........................................................ 1.2 Applications (of optimization).............................................. 1.2 Main principles.....................................................
More informationHW 4 SOLUTIONS. , x + x x 1 ) 2
HW 4 SOLUTIONS The Way of Analysis p. 98: 1.) Suppose that A is open. Show that A minus a finite set is still open. This follows by induction as long as A minus one point x is still open. To see that A
More informationMath 117: Topology of the Real Numbers
Math 117: Topology of the Real Numbers John Douglas Moore November 10, 2008 The goal of these notes is to highlight the most important topics presented in Chapter 3 of the text [1] and to provide a few
More informationLecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352
Lecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352 Ivan Avramidi New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM 87801 June 3, 2004 Author: Ivan Avramidi; File: absmath.tex; Date: June 11,
More informationMath 203A, Solution Set 6.
Math 203A, Solution Set 6. Problem 1. (Finite maps.) Let f 0,..., f m be homogeneous polynomials of degree d > 0 without common zeros on X P n. Show that gives a finite morphism onto its image. f : X P
More information