Stochastic dynamics of small gene regulation networks. Lev Tsimring BioCircuits Institute University of California, San Diego

Transcription

1 Stochastic dynamics of small gene regulation networks Lev Tsimring BioCircuits Institute University of California, San Diego Nizhni Novgorod, June, 2011

2 Central dogma Activator Gene mrna Protein Repressor All cells have the same genes So why cell differ from each other? Transcriptional Regulation Activator increases rate of production Repressor decreases rate of production

3 Systems Biology Ribosome & translation Mitochondria Peroxisome Metabolism & amino acid biosynthesis RNA processing Secretion & vesicle transport Chromatin & transcription Nuclearcytoplasmic transport Nuclear migration & protein degradation Mitosis & chr. segregation DNA replication & repair Cell polarity & morphogenesis Protein folding & glycosylation Cell wall biosynthesis GAL80 Gal3* Gal Gal scale GAL4 GAL3 GAL2 GAL1 GLU genes Glu Glu

4 Gene regulation networks Proteins affect rates of production of other proteins (or themselves) This leads to formation of networks of interacting genes/proteins Large stochastic fluctuations Sub-networks are non-markovian, even if the whole system is Different reaction channels operate at vastly different time scales and number densities A B C D E

5 Auto-repressor: A cartoon DNA promoter RNAP gene Binding/unbinding rate: <1 sec Transcription rate: ~10 3 basepairs/min Translation rate: ~10 2 aminoacids/min mrna degradation rate ~3min (Alberts et al, 1994) Transport in/out nucleus ~10 min mrna protein Vastly different time scales: need for reduced descriptions

6 Transients in gene regulation Genetic circuits are never at a fixed point: Intrinsic noise Extrinsic noise External signaling Oscillations: circadian rhythms; ultradian rhythms; cell cycle

7 Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic noise? yfp cfp Identical promoters; different reporter genes Elowitz et al, 2002

8 Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic noise? yfp cfp Bacteria Yeast Elowitz et al, 2002 Raser & O Shea, 2004 Intrinsic noise is smaller in Yeast

9 Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic noise Multiple identical promoters; same reporter gene Gene expression: For identical promoter-gene pairs: For intrinsic noise (c=0), For correlated (extrinsic) noise (c=v), Volfson et al., Nature, 2006

10 Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic noise Saccaromyces cerevisiae (yeast); galactose utilization circuit galactose GAL3 GAL80 GAL1 GAL1 GAL1 GAL7 GAL1 GFP GAL1 GFP GAL1 GFP GAL4 GAL1 GFP Volfson et al., Nature,2006

11 Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic noise galactose GAL3 GAL80 GAL1 GAL1 GAL1 GAL7 GAL1 GFP Volfson et al., Nature,2006 GAL4 GAL1 GFP GAL1 GFP GAL1 GFP Flow cytometry data Intrinsic noise is small in Yeast

12 Bistability: λ-phage Life Cycle M.Ptashne, 2002 Two positive feedback loops

13 Genetic noise Experiments with synthetic bistable autoregulatory circuit in E. coli (derived from λ-phage) fluorescence Isaacs et al., 2003

14 Neurospora crassa Oscillations: circadian clock ε Courtesy of Stu Brody D PROOF

15 Synthetic gene oscillator in in E.coli Design: use AraC as activator and LacI as repressor Two experimental knobs : Arabinose required for activator binding and IPTG prohibits repressor binding Flow cytometry: time series of fluorescence in initially synchronized batch culture of cells 2 mm IPTG Stricker et al., Nature,456(7221):516-9 (2008). Three plasmid with identical promoters: (i) activator, (ii) repressor, (iii) reporter All proteins are tagged with ssra tag for fast enzymatic decay (~15-20min) 0.2% arabinose 0.3% arabinose 0.7% arabinose 2.0% arabinose What is it: oscillations stop or desynchronize?

16 Single cell experiments Stricker et al., Nature,456(7221):516-9 (2008). 2mM IPTG 0.7% arabinose

17 Modeling gene regulation Techniques for modeling gene networks dynamics Boolean dynamics Deterministic Equations (Mass Action kinetics) Monte-Carlo Simulations; Master Equations Stochastic Differential Equations

18 Modeling gene regulation: Single gene circuit k x Fast X + X k 1 X 2 X 2 k 1 X + X D 0 + X k 2 D 1 D 1 k 2 D 0 + X 2 Slow Binding/unbinding rate: 1 sec Transcription rate: ~10 3 basepairs/min Translation rate: ~10 2 aminoacids/min mrna degradation rate ~3min Transport in/out of nucleus 10min..10hrs Protein degradation 10min..hours D 0 + P k t D 0 + P + X D 1 + P αk t D 1 + P + X X k x

19 Fast Mass action kinetics X + X k 1 X 2 X 2 k 1 X + X D 0 + X k 2 D 1 D 1 k 2 D 0 + X 2 Slow D 0 + P k t D 0 + P + X D 1 + P αk t D 1 + P + X X k x Separation of scales: x t = x +2x 2 +2d 1 d = d 0 + d 1 x 2 = K 1 x 2 d 1 = K 2 d 0 x 2 = K 1 = k 1 /k 1 K 2 = k 2 /k 2

20 Including fluctuations: Monte-Carlo Simulations Jump probabilities: k x P 1 (2X X 2) = k 1 x(x 1) Time between reactions: P 2 (X 2 2X) =k 1 x 2 P 3 (D 0 D 0 + X) =k t d 0 x P 4 (D 1 D 1 + X) =αk t d 1 x P 5 (D 0 D 1 )=k 2 d 0 x P 6 (D 1 D 0 )=k 2 d 1 P 7 (X ) =k x x Simulations: D. Gillespie, J. Phys. Chem. 81:2340 (1977) 20

21 Monte Carlo Data Complete and exact Straightforward to simulate Computationally expensive Nonintuitive Since it is exact, it is the gold standard for evaluating the accuracy of other modeling approaches 21

22 Master equation for Master equation description n total # of monomers; u # of unbound dimers; b - # of bound dimers Projection: See Kepler & Elston, Biophys. J., 2001

23 Back to ODE In the continuum limit (large n): Fokker-Planck equation (no prefactor) Corresponding Langevin equation with Fast reaction noise is filtered out Kepler & Elston, Biophys J 81:3116 (2001)

24 Transcriptional delay Fast X + X k 1 X 2 X 2 k 1 X + X D 0 + X k 2 D 1 D 1 k 2 D 0 + X 2 Slow X k x [cf. Santillán & Mackey, 2001] After projection Delayed D 0 + P k t D 0 + P + X D 1 + P αk t D 1 + P + X

25 Genetic oscillations: Hopf bifurcation Fixed point: Complex eigenvalues Instability k t T Instability

26 Stochastic simulations of delayed reactions delayed delayed (modified Gillespie algorithm) N species X, M independent reactions, rates, stoichiometric matrix Markovian statistics of reaction times: exponential next reaction time distribution which reaction to choose? immediate execution Delayed reactions [e.g. transcription, translation]: Delayed execution Execution time τ : fixed or stochastic, e.g. with Gaussian time distribution Bratsun, Volfson, LT, Hasty, PNAS, 2005

27 Stochastic simulations Bratsun, Volfson, LT, Hasty, PNAS, 2005

28 Synthetic bacterial oscillator: A detailed model Stricker et al., Nature,456(7221):516-9 (2008). 23/67 Regulation Transcription/translation Enzymatic decay

29 Explicit delay model replace chains of interactions with a single effective delay in feedback delay lumps many potentially unknown parameters into a few meaningful parameters (identify ignorance) makes mechanism more transparent amendable to analytic treatment delay faster simulations using delay approximation 29

30 Delayed auto-repression: degrade-and-fire model Mather et al, PRL 102, (2009) Fast production Slow degradation Period: Two time scales: relaxation oscillations

31 Zeroth-order degradation: stochastic model [ ] $2 " # 1+x(t$% )/C 0 & x &&& &' x ( &' " For C 0 0 these two reactions do not overlap in time Period variability: Two sources of variability (both Poissonian): fluctuations of x max fluctuations of decay time Mather, Bennett, Hasty, Tsimring, PRL 2009 Period variance:

32 Enzymatic processing substrate product(s) enzyme enzyme E + S k 1 [ES] [ES] k 1 E + S [ES] k 2 E + P enzyme Examples: metabolism, transcription, translation, degradation, signaling...

33 Enzymatic Queueing: ClpXP degradation machine ClpXP senses proteins that are tagged for fast degradation and destroys them normally unstable proteins are stabilized and become active when ClpXP is overloaded

34 Enzymatic queueing substrate Lots of substrate: queues! enzyme product(s) How do fluctuations affect queueing?

35 Two Cases Underloaded service rate > incoming traffic rate little competition between customers queue lengths are short Overloaded service rate < incoming traffic rate competition between customers queue lengths are long

36 Enzymatic queueing: multiple substrates substrate k E + S 1 i [ESi ] enzyme [ES i ] k 1 E + S i product(s) [ES i ] k 2 E + P i Stochastic kinetics: fluctuating substrate fluctuating products...correlations?

37 Queueing Model (a) (b) λ 1 λ 2 λ 1 λ 2 enzymes servers # of molecules of type i

38 Sample trajectories number of enzymes

39 Correlation: Main result

40 Queueing Model underloaded overloaded x 2 x 1 S S S SERVERS S S S S SERVERS S

41 Queueing in experiment: ClpXP degradation TetR Dox. P LtetO ClpXP YFP-LAA AraC Ara. 0 P lac/ara CFP-LAA on a microfluidic device, we drove direct induction (green) by a time-dependent chemical signal time-dependent signal is carried through Time (min) % middle 80% correlation log10 cfp (A.U.) Fluorescence (AU) log yfp (A.U.) time (min.) periodic noise resonance associated with crossing through balance

42 Conclusions Genetic regulation is strongly affected by fluctuations, both intrinsic and extrinsic In many cases, extrinsic factors dominate Theoretical description of extrinsic variability is developed and compared with experimental data from multiple promoter-gene pairs. Deterministic and stochastic description of regulatory delays developed, delays of transcription/translation of auto-repressor may lead to increased fluctuations levels and oscillations even when deterministic model shows no Hopf bifurcation Modified Gillespie algorithm is developed for simulating timedelayed reactions D. Volfson, J. Marciniak, N. Ostroff, L. Tsimring, J. Hasty, origins of extrinsic variability in eukaryotic gene expression, Nature, 439, (16 Feb 2006). D.A. Bratsun, D.N. Volfson, L.S. Tsimring, and J. Hasty, Delay-induced stochastic oscillations in gene regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 102, no.41, (2005) J. Stricker, S. Cookson, M. Bennett, W. Mather, L. S. Tsimring, J. Hasty. A robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator. Nature, 456(7221): (2008). W. Mather, M. R. Bennett, J. Hasty, L. S. Tsimring, Delay-induced degrade-and-fire oscillations in small genetic circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, (2009) W. Mather, N. A. Cookson, J. M. Hasty, L. S. Tsimring, and R. J. Williams. Correlation resonance generated by coupled enzymatic processing. Biophys. J., 2010, 99,