Machine Learning. Linear Models. Fabio Vandin October 10, 2017

Transcription

1 Machine Learning Linear Models Fabio Vandin October 10,

2 Linear Predictors and Affine Functions Consider X = R d Affine functions: L d = {h w,b : w R d, b R} where ( d ) h w,b (x) = w, x + b = w i x i + b i=1 Note: each member of L d is a function x w, x + b b: bias 2

3 Linear Models Hypothesis class H: φ L d, where φ : R Y h H is h : R d Y φ depends on the learning problem Example binary classification, Y = { 1, 1} φ(z) = sign(z) regression, Y = R φ(z) = z 3

4 Equivalent Notation Given x X, w R d, b R, define: w = (b, w 1, w 2,..., w d ) R d+1 x = (1, x 1, x 2,..., x d ) R d+1 Then: h w,b (x) = w, x + b = w, x (1) we will consider bias term as part of w and assume x = (1, x 1, x 2,..., x d ) when needed, with h w (x) = w, x 4

5 Linear Classification X = R d, Y = { 1, 1}, 0-1 loss Hypothesis class = halfspaces HS d = sign L d = {x sign(h x,b (x)) : h w,b L d } (2) Example: X = R 2 5

6 Finding a Good Hypothesis Linear classification with hypothesis set H = halfspaces. How do we find a good hypothesis? Good = ERM rule Perceptron Algorithm (Rosenblatt, 1958) Note: if y i w, x i > 0 for all i = 1,..., m all points are classified correctly by model w 6

7 Perceptron Input: training set (x 1, y 1 ),..., (x m, y m ) initialize w (1) = (0,..., 0); for t = 1, 2,... do if i s.t. y i w (t), x i 0 then w (t+1) w (t) + y i x i ; else return w (t) ; Interpretation of update: Note that: y i w (t+1), x i = y i w (t) + y i x i, x i = y i w (t), x i + x i 2 update guides w to be more correct on (x i, y i ). Termination? Depends on the realizability assumption! 7

8 Perceptron with Linearly Separable Data Realizability assumption for halfspace = linearly separable data Proposition Assume that (x 1, y 1 ),..., (x m, y m ) is linearly separable, let: B = min{ w : y i w, x i 1 i, i = 1,..., m, }, and R = max i x i. Then the Perceptron algorithm stops after at most (RB) 2 iterations and when it stops it holds that i, i {1,..., m} : y i w (t), x i > 0. 8

9 Perceptron: Notes simple to implement for separable data convergence is guaranteed converge depends on B, which can be exponential in d... an ILP approach may be better to find ERM solution in such cases potentially multiple solutions, which one is picked depends on starting values non separable data? run for some time and keep best solution found up to that point (pocket algorithm) 9

10 10 X = R d, Y = R Linear Regression Hypothesis class: H reg = L d = {x w, x + b : w R d, b R} Note: h H reg : R d R Commonly used loss function: squared-loss l(h, (x, y)) def = (h(x) y) 2 empirical risk function (training error): Mean Squared Error L S (h) = 1 m (h(x i ) y i ) 2 m i=1

11 Linear Regression - Example 11 d = 1

12 Least Squares 12 How to find a ERM hypothesis? Least Squares algorithm Best hypothesis: arg min L 1 S(h w ) = arg min w w m m ( w, x i y i ) 2 Equivalent formulation: w minimizing Residual Sum of Squares (RSS), i.e. m arg min ( w, x i y i ) 2 w i=1 i=1

13 13 Let RSS: Matrix Form x 1 x 2 X =. x m X: design matrix y 1 y 2 y =. y m we have that RSS is m ( w, x i y i ) 2 = (y Xw) T (y Xw) i=1

14 14 Want to find w that minimizes RSS (=objective function): RSS(w) = arg min (y w Xw)T (y Xw) How? Compute gradient RSS(w) w compare it to 0. of objective function w.r.t w and RSS(w) w = 2X T (y Xw) Then we need to find w such that 2X T (y Xw) = 0

15 15 2X T (y Xw) = 0 is equivalent to X T Xw = X T y If X T X is invertible solution to ERM problem is: w = (X T X) 1 X T y

16 Complexity Considerations 16 We need to compute (X T X) 1 X T y Algorithm: 1 compute X T X: product of (d + 1) m matrix and m (d + 1) matrix 2 compute (X T X) 1 inversion of (d + 1) (d + 1) matrix 3 compute (X T X) 1 X T : product of (d + 1) (d + 1) matrix and (d + 1) m matrix 4 compute (X T X) 1 X T : product of (d + 1) m matrix and m 1 matrix Most expensive operation? Inversion! done for (d + 1) (d + 1) matrix

17 X T X not invertible? How do we get w such that X T Xw = X T y if X T X is not invertible? Let A = X T X Let A + be the generalized inverse of A, i.e.: AA + A = A Proposition If A = X T X is not invertible, then ŵ = A + X T y is a solution to X T Xw = X T y. Proof: [UML]

18 Generalized Inverse of A 18 Note A = X T X is symmetric eigenvalue decomposition of A: A = VDV T with D: diagonal matrix (entries = eigenvalues of A) V: orthonormal matrix (V T V = I d d ) Define D + diagonal matrix such that: { 0 if D + Di,i = 0 i,i = otherwise 1 D i,i

19 19 Let A + = VD + V T Then AA + A = VDV T VD + V T VDV T = VDD + DV T = VDV T = A A + is the generalized inverse of A.

20 Logistic Regression 20 Learn a function h from R d to [0, 1]. What can this be used for? Classification! Example: binary classification (Y = { 1, 1}) - h(x) = probability that label of x is 1. For simplicity of presentation, we consider binary classification with Y = { 1, 1}, but similar considerations apply for multiclass classification.