arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 20 Aug 2018

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 20 Aug 2018"

Transcription

1 Preared for submission to JHEP arxiv: v1 [he-h] 20 Aug 2018 Correlating the anomalous results in b s decays with inert Higgs doublet dark matter and muon (g 2) Basabendu Barman, Debasish Borah, Loamudra Mukheree, Soumitra Nandi Deartment of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam , India Abstract: In this article, we have considered an extension of the inert Higgs doublet model with SU(2) L singlet vector like fermions. Our model is caable of addressing some interesting anomalous results in b sl + l decays (like R(K ( ) )) and in muon (g 2). Aart from exlaining these anomalies, and being consistent with other flavour data, the model satisfies relevant constraints in the dark matter sector, while remaining within the reach of ongoing direct detection exeriments. The model also roduces signatures at the large hadron collider (LHC) with final states comrised of dileton, diet and missing energy, roviding signals to be robed at higher luminosity.

2 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 IDM with Vector Like Fermions 5 3 Dark Matter Phenomenology Relic abundance of DM Dark matter direct search 8 4 Muon (g 2) and the leton flavour violation (LFV) decays 9 5 NP contributions in b sl + l decay (l = µ, e) 10 6 Results: DM and flavour Low mass DM Case I : M µ=ẽ < M A 0 (H ± ) < M b Case II : M A 0 (H ± ) < M l/m b High Mass DM 23 7 Collider Phenomenology Simulation strategy Dileton with missing energy final state Diet lus E/ T final state with and without b-tagging 33 8 Renormalization Grou Equation (RGE) Running of the Coulings 34 9 Summary Acknowledgement 37 1 Introduction The low energy observables in B decays and B q B q (q = d,s) mixings lay an imortant role in the indirect detection of new hysics (NP). In this regard, the flavour changing neutral current (FCNC) rocesses, such as b s, are unique in a sense that in the standard model (SM) they contribute at the loo level thereby keeing their contributions suressed, in general. For the last coule of years, the semiletonic decays b sl + l (l = µ, e) have got lot of attention. The observed ratios of the exclusive branching fractions such as R(K ( ) ) = B(B K ( ) µ + µ )/B(B K ( ) e + e ) have shown anomalous behaviours with the measured values deviating from their resective SM exectations. The LHCb collaboration has measured [1, 2] 1

3 R(K) = ± 36, in the bin with dileton mass squared q2 [1, 6] GeV 2, (1.1) and R(K ) = { ± 24, q2 [45, 1.1] GeV 2, ± 47, q2 [1.1, 6] GeV 2. The corresonding SM redictions are, resectively, R(K) = 004(8), and R(K ) = { ± 07, q 2 [45, 1.1] GeV 2, ± 02, q 2 [1.1, 6] GeV 2, (1.2) (1.3) the details of which can be found in [3, 4]. Therefore, the observed data indicate a ossible violation of leton universality. There have been lenty of analysis on the NP exlanations of the observed discreancies, which we are not going to elaborate here. In order to exlain the observed discreancies, one needs to develo a new mechanism that will generate leton universality violation (LUV) either at the tree level or via loos. Amongst the other imortant observables, anomalous magnetic moment of muon shows deviation between theory and exeriment. Particle magnetic moments are good robes of hysics beyond the SM, and the similar study could shed light on our understanding of quantum electrodynamics (QED) and the SM. The anomalous magnetic moment of muon has been measured very recisely while it has also been redicted in the SM to a great accuracy. The muon anomalous magnetic moment is defined as a µ g µ 2, (1.4) 2 which includes the quantum loo effects, and arametrizes the small calculable deviation from g µ = 2 (Lande s g factor). The SM contributions to a µ can be exressed as a SM µ = a QED µ + a EW µ + a Had µ, (1.5) where a QED µ, a EW µ and a Had µ are the contributions from QED loos, electroweak loos and hadronic loos resectively. This quantity has been measured very accurately and at resent the difference between the redicted and the measured value is given by a µ = a ex µ a SM µ = 26.8(7.6) 10 10, (1.6) which shows there is still room for NP beyond the SM (for details see [5]). In this study, we will look for a NP model which is caable of addressing simultaneously both the above mentioned excesses. On the other hand, dark matter (DM) has been understood to be resent in significant amount in the resent Universe, roughly five times the abundance of ordinary baryonic 2

4 matter [6]. The resent dark matter abundance, measured by the Planck [6] is often quoted as Ω DM h 2 = ρ DM ρ c h 2 = ± 015 (1.7) where h = H 0 /(100 kms 1 Mc 1 ), ρ DM, and ρ c = 3H2 0 8πG are, resectively, the resent day normalized Hubble exansion rate (H 0 ), DM density, and the critical density of the universe, whereas G is the universal constant of gravity. Such cosmological evidences are also comlemented by astrohysical evidences suggesting the resence of non-luminous and non-baryonic matter comonent in the universe [7 9]. In the SM, we do not have a suitable DM candidate which satisfies the requirements as given in [10]. This has led to several beyond the standard model (BSM) roosals which can successfully exlain DM in the Universe. Amongst different BSM rescritions, the aradigm with a generic weakly interacting massive article (WIMP) is well motivated. In such scenarios, the DM article has mass and interactions tyically around the electroweak ballark and can give rise to the correct dark matter relic abundance, a remarkable coincidence often referred to as the WIMP Miracle (see, for examle, [11]). Since WIMP dark matter scenarios involve additional hysics around the electroweak scale, it is temting to seculate if the same new hysics can have lausible exlanations for the observed flavour anomalies like R(K ( ) ), a µ mentioned earlier. Within such unified framework, one needs to find out the allowed NP arameter sace consistent with flavour data as well as the requirements for a DM candidate. Also, it is necessary to check that the required NP arameter saces are consistent with all the other relevant measurements which are not anomalous. There have been several attemts along this direction, some of which can be found in [12 15] and references therein. Aart from being consistent with all these observations, it is also imortant for such a scenario to be redictive at different exeriments like direct detection of dark matter, collider searches and so on. In a model indeendent analysis [16], by considering an effective theory framework, it has been shown that the deficit in the leton universality ratio R(K ( ) ) can be best exlained by the set of the oerators O9 l = [ bγ µ P L s][ lγ µ l] and O10 l = [ bγ µ P L s][ lγ µ γ 5 l]. Therefore, the NP models under considerations should give rise to these four-fermi interactions either via tree or loo level diagrams for the rocess b sll. Here, we consider the inert Higgs doublet model (IDM), which is a simle extension of the SM by an additional scalar field Φ 2 transforming as doublet under SU(2) L gauge symmetry and has hyercharge Y = 1. The model has been introduced in [17], and later studied extensively by several grous in the context of DM henomenology [18 27]. In this model, an additional discrete Z 2 symmetry is introduced in order to revent the couling of this scalar field to the SM fermions. Under this Z 2 symmetry, the additional scalar field transforms as Φ 2 Φ 2 whereas all SM fields are even. If the lightest comonent of Φ 2 is electromagnetically neutral, it can be stable and hence a good DM candidate. Being inert in nature, IDM will not contribute to the decay b sll. Hence, we have extended this model by considering three generations of vector like SU(2) L singlet down tye quarks and charged letons, odd under the Z 2 symmetry so that they can coule to 3

5 the SM quarks and letons only through the inert scalar doublet. The lightest comonent of Φ 2 remains the lightest Z 2 odd article of the model and hence the DM candidate. We have shown that aart from exlaining the DM abundance of the Universe, the model can also exlain the observed attern in R(K ( ) ). This model has family non-universal Yukawa coulings between Φ 2, vector like fermions and the SM fermions. Hence, it will contribute to b sll at one loo level. Now, if we consider a hierarchical structure between the Yukawa coulings, such as λ e << λ µ, then we can exect to get R(K ( ) ) 1. The additional vector like fermions can also contribute to the relic abundance, as well as direct detection scattering rates of DM in this model, giving us a comlementary robe of the model arameters in both DM and flavour exeriments. In the there exists two mass ranges where DM relic abundance can be satisfied: one in the low mass regime below the W boson mass threshold (M DM < M W ) and the other around 550 GeV or above. In our extended IDM, there will be additional annihilation channels of DM. Therefore, it is imortant to rescan the arameter sace for both the ure and the extended IDM. The direct detection scattering in is rimarily mediated by the SM Higgs and faces the strongest constraints from the direct detection exeriments in the low mass regime. For examle, the latest data from the LUX exeriment rules out DM-nucleon sin indeendent cross section above around cm 2 for DM mass of around 50 GeV [28]. On the other hand, the recently released results from the XENON- 1T exeriment rules out sin indeendent WIMP-nucleon interaction cross section above cm 2 for DM mass of 35 GeV [29]. These strong bounds reduce the allowed DM masses in the low mass regime to a very narrow region near the SM like Higgs resonance M DM m h /2. Although the direct detection limits can be somewhat relaxed in the high mass regime (M DM 550 GeV), the roduction of DM at colliders will be suressed comared to the low mass regime. In the resence of additional vector like quarks, there are additional diagrams which will contribute to the sin indeendent direct detection cross section. We in fact find that, comared to the, the resence of new vector like fermions can kee the dark matter direct detection rates closer to the exerimental uer bound for some choices of arameters. The mediators of our model coules to SM quarks and letons, therefore interesting collider signature are exected with letons and/or ets in the final state with missing energy. We study the final states containing (l + l + E/ T ), ( + E/ T ) and (l + l + + E/ T ) to unravel the model in the large hadron collider (LHC). These final states are already exlored in suersymmetry (SUSY) searches, and imortant constraints have been obtained on the arameter sace [31, 32]. In our model, we reare few benchmark scenarios by choosing oints from the new arameter saces which are allowed by flavour data and overcome bounds from the DM searches. We have redicted the kinematical distributions of our signal events and comared them with the resective SM backgrounds. We find that at the high luminosity LHC the model may be observed for a few benchmark scenarios at more than 5σ significance. We also check the erturbative unitarity of the model and find that for the chosen benchmark oints the model can remain erturbative u to an energy scale GeV. The aer is organised as follows: in Sec. 2 we discuss the article content and ossible 4

6 interactions, followed by the dark matter henomenology of the model in Sec. 3; constraints from muon (g 2) and leton flavour violating decays are discussed in Sec. 4; contributions from b sl + l channels are studied in Sec. 5; results from DM and flavour analysis are discussed Sec. 6 and some benchmark oints are also chosen for further collider study; we then discuss the fate of this model at the LHC in Sec. 7, ointing out the ossibility of robing it in future higher luminosity; the RGE runnings are discussed in Sec. 8 and finally we summarize in Sec IDM with Vector Like Fermions Particles SU(3) c SU(2) L U(1) Y Z 2 q L = u L d L (3, 2, 1 6 ) + u R (3, 1, 2 3 ) + d R (3, 1, 1 3 ) + l L = ν L e L (1, 2, 1 2 ) + e R (1, 1, 1) + Φ 1 (1, 2, 1 2 ) + Φ 2 (1, 2, 1 2 ) - D L,R (3, 1, 1 3 ) - l L,R (3, 1, 1) - Table 1: Particle content of the extension of IDM by vector like fermions. As mentioned earlier, the IDM is an extension of the SM by an additional global discrete Z 2 symmetry under which a newly incororated scalar doublet Φ 2 transforms as Φ 2 Φ 2, while the usual SM fields are even under Z 2. The requirement of keeing the Z 2 symmetry unbroken revents the neutral comonent of the second Higgs doublet from acquiring a non-zero vacuum exectation value (vev). Since the same discrete symmetry revents any couling of Φ 2 with the SM fermions, it automatically makes the lightest comonent of Φ 2 stable and hence a good DM candidate. The scalar otential of the model involving the SM Higgs doublet Φ 1 and the inert doublet Φ 2 can be written as V (Φ 1, Φ 2 ) = µ 2 1 Φ µ 2 2 Φ λ 1 2 Φ λ 2 2 Φ λ 3 Φ 1 2 Φ 2 2 { } + λ 4 Φ 1 Φ 2 2 λ5 + 2 (Φ 1 Φ 2) 2 + h.c.. As the electroweak symmetry has to be broken by the vev of Φ 1, we assume µ 2 1 < 0. Also, µ 2 2 > 0 is assumed so that Φ 2 does not acquire a vev. Writing the scalar fields in terms of 5

7 comonents and exanding the field Φ 1 about the non-zero vev, we have ( ) ( ) 0 H ± Φ 1 = v+h, Φ 2 = 2 H 0 +ia 0 2 (2.1) in unitary gauge. Here v is the vev of the neutral comonent of Φ 1. After electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB), the masses of the hysical scalars, at tree level, can be written as m 2 h = λ 1v 2, M 2 H ± = µ λ 3v 2, M 2 H 0 = µ (λ 3 + λ 4 + λ 5 )v 2 = M 2 H ± (λ 4 + λ 5 ) v 2, M 2 A 0 = µ (λ 3 + λ 4 λ 5 )v 2 = M 2 H ± (λ 4 λ 5 ) v 2. (2.2) Here m h 125 GeV is the mass of the SM Higgs, M H 0, M A 0 are the masses of the CP even and CP odd scalars of the inert doublet while M H ± being the mass of the charged scalar. Without any loss of generality, we consider λ 5 < 0, λ 4 + λ 5 < 0 so that the CP even scalar is the lightest Z 2 odd article and hence a stable dark matter candidate. Aart from the Z 2 odd scalar doublet Φ 2, we consider additional vector like charged fermions too, which are odd under the same Z 2 symmetry. The article content of the model is shown in Table 1. Here D is the down-tye vector like quark and l is the exotic leton. This allows the couling of the inert doublet scalar with the SM fermions through the vector like fermion ortal. The relevant Yukawa Lagrangian can be written as L = (y u ) i Qi Φ1 u R + (y d ) i Qi Φ 1 d R + (y e ) i Li Φ 1 e R + (λ D ) i Qi Φ 2 DR + (λ l ) i Li Φ 2 lr + M D D L DR + M l l L lr + h.c. (2.3) where Φ 1,2 = iτ 2 Φ 1,2. 3 Dark Matter Phenomenology In this section we discuss the DM henomenology of this model in terms of relic density and direct search bounds. We divide the discussion into the following two subsections. 3.1 Relic abundance of DM For a single comonent DM, the relic abundance can be obtained by solving the Boltzmann equation (BEQ): dn DM dt + 3Hn DM = σv (n 2 DM (n eq DM )2 ), (3.1) where n DM is the number density of the DM article, n eq DM is the equilibrium number density and H is the Hubble exansion rate. The thermally averaged annihilation cross 6

8 section σv can be exanded in owers of (non-relativistic) velocity as: σv = a+bv , where the first term corresonds to s-wave, the second terms corresonds to -wave and so on. Under this aroximation, BEQ can be solved numerically to find the resent day relic density of the DM [33, 34]: Ω DM h x F M Pl g (a + 3b/x F ), (3.2) where x F = M DM /T F, T F is the freeze-out temerature, M DM is the mass of dark matter, g is the total number of relativistic degrees of freedom (DOF) at the time of freeze-out ( 106) and and M Pl GeV is the reduced Planck mass. WIMPs generally freeze out at: x F {20 30}. Generically, x F can be obtained from the relation: x F = ln 38gM PlM DM < σv > g 1/2 x 1/2, (3.3) F which is derived from the equality condition of DM interaction rate Γ = n DM σv with the rate of exansion of the Universe H g 1/2 T 2 M P l (i.e, the freeze-out condition). For all ractical uroses, one can obtain the aroximate analytical solution for relic density as [35] : Ω DM h cm 3 s 1. (3.4) σv The thermally averaged annihilation cross section σv is given by [36] 1 σv = 8m 4 T K2 2(M σ(s 4M DM/T ) DM) 2 sk 1 ( s/t )ds, (3.5) 4MDM 2 where K i s are modified Bessel functions of order i. In resence of co-annihilation, the effective cross section can be exressed as [37]: σ eff = = N σ i v r i r i, N i, σ i v g ig g 2 eff ( ) (1 + i ) 3/2 (1 + ) 3/2 x e F ( i + ), (3.6) where x F = M DM T F and i = m i M DM M DM, where the masses of the heavier comonents of the inert Higgs doublet are denoted by m i. Total number of effective DOF is given by: g eff = N g i (1 + i ) 3/2 e x F i. (3.7) i=1 Thermally averaged cross section then reads: 7

9 x F σ i v = 8m 2 i m2 M DMK 2 ((m i /M DM )x F )K 2 ((m /M DM )x F ) dsσ i (s 2(m 2 i + m 2 )) sk 1 ( sx F /M DM ). (m i +m ) 2 (3.8) The relic density can be again comuted by aroximate analytical solution: Ω DM h 2 = σ eff GeV 2. (3.9) In the resent model, discussed in the revious section, we consider one of the neutral comonent of the scalar doublet Φ 2 namely H 0, as the DM candidate for our analysis. This is similar to the inert doublet model of dark matter discussed extensively in the literature [18 25]. In the low mass regime (M H 0 M DM M W ), the annihilation of DM to the SM fermions (through s-channel Higgs mediation) dominates over other channels. As ointed out in [22], the annihilation H 0 H 0 W W W f f also lays a role in the M DM M W region. Deending on the mass differences M H ± M H 0 ( M H ±), M A 0 M H 0 ( M A 0), co-annihilation of H 0, H ± and H 0, A 0 become imortant in determining the relic abundance of the DM. Tyically, when the heavier comonents of the inert scalar doublet have masses close to the DM mass, they can be thermally accessible at the eoch of DM freeze-out. Therefore, the annihilation cross section of DM in such a case gets additional contributions from co-annihilations between the DM and the heavier comonents of the scalar doublet Φ Dark matter direct search H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 q h D D q q q q q H 0 Figure 1: The Feynman diagrams contributing to the direct search of H 0. As mentioned earlier, there are severe constraints on sin indeendent DM-nucleon scattering rates from ongoing exeriments [28, 29]. In the, the tree level DMnucleon elastic scattering can arise through the SM Higgs mediation and the current bounds on direct detection cross section can rule out some ortion of the arameter sace satisfying relic secially in the low mass regime M DM m h /2 where bounds are stronger. The elastic DM nucleon scattering in the resent model gets additional contributions from exotic quark 8

10 D, as deicted in Fig. 1 where the first diagram corresonds to the usual SM Higgs mediated one. The additional contributions will come from the rest of the two diagrams. There is another ossible diagram mediated by Z-boson, even in the, but that has already been excluded by recent direct search data. Therefore, in order to forbid the Z-mediated channel, the mass of A 0 has to be ket higher than that of H 0 by a non-zero value, higher than tyical kinetic energy (O(100 kev)) of a DM article so that H 0 can not scatter inelastically into A 0. The chosen mass slitting in our analysis satisfy this bound as well as the ones from LEP II data [30]. Hence, in this model we have three direct search grahs corresonding to t-channel Higgs and exotic quark mediation and another s-channel diagram mediated by the vector like quark. Due to these additional diagrams, the direct detection rates of the extended IDM can be more romising comare to the, as we will discuss later. In the limit of very large exotic quark masses or very small coulings of exotic quarks to DM, the direct detection rates will converge towards the ones known for. 4 Muon (g 2) and the leton flavour violation (LFV) decays The effective vertex of hoton with any charged article is given by: ū( )eγ µ u() = ū( ) [eγ µ F 1 (q 2 ) + ieσ µνq ν ] F 2 (q 2 ) +... u(). (4.1) 2m f The factor g µ 2(F 1 (0) + F 2 (0)), and the anomalous magnetic moment is given as a µ F 2 (0) 0 (since F 1 (0) = 1 at all order). Similarly, the amlitude for the LFV decays l i l γ can be written as: M γ = ū l ( ) [ A L q 2 γ µ P L + ia R m li σ µν q ν P R ] uli (). (4.2) The associated branching fraction can be exressed as: where τ li B(l i l γ) = ατ l i 4 m5 l i A 2 R, (4.3) is the life time of the leton l i and α = 1/137 is the fine structure constant. µ l i H 0 /A 0 l γ H 0 /A 0 l γ l l µ l Figure 2: Feynman diagrams contributing to muon anomalous magnetic moment a µ (left) and leton flavour violating decays (right). Here, l (= τ/ µ/ẽ) is the vector like leton. In our model, the leading contributions in a µ and the LFV decays like τ µγ, µ eγ and τ eγ are obtained from the diagrams in Fig. 2. In the loo, we have either H 0 or 9

11 A 0 and the vector like leton l (which could be either of τ, µ or ẽ). The diagram on the left hand side will contribute to a µ, which is given by a µ = λ µ lλ µ l m2 µ 16π 2 [ 1 M 2 H 0 ( ξ 1 (r l ) ) + ξ 2 (r ) + 1 ( l MA 2 0 ξ 1 (r A0 l )] ) + ξ 2 (r A0 ) l, (4.4) with r X l = m 2 l/m 2 X (X = or A 0 ). The functions ξ 1 and ξ 2 are given by: ξ 1 (r) = ξ 2 (r) = 3 + 4r r2 2(1 r) 3 ln r (1 r) 3 1 6(1 r) 4 [ r 9r2 + 2r 3 6 ln r]. (4.5) The contributions to the decay l i l γ will be obtained from the RHS diagram of Fig. 2, which is given as: A R = λ li lλ l lm li 16π 2 [ 1 MH 2 (ξ 1 (r ) + ξ l 2 (r ) + 1 l 0 MA 2 (ξ 1 (r A0 l 0 ] ) + ξ 2 (r A0 ) l. (4.6) In this section we have only shown the analytical exressions of various contributions in a µ and B(l i l γ), the numerical results are resented in section 6. 5 NP contributions in b sl + l decay (l = µ, e) As mentioned earlier, the FCNC transitions such as b s are imortant robes of flavour hysics and are highly sensitive to NP contributions. The effective Hamiltonian for the b s transitions at low energy can be written as [40, 41]: H eff = 4G F 2 V tb V ts i=1...6 C i O i + i=7,8,9,10,s,p (C i O i + C io i) + h.c. (5.1) where O i and O i s are the dimension six effective oerators which are given as below, 10

12 O 1 = ( s α c β ) V A ( c β b α ) V A, O 2 = ( sc) V A ( cb) V A, O 3 = ( sb) V A ( qq) V A, O 4 = ( s α b β ) V A ( q β q α ) V A, O 5 = ( sb) V A ( qq) V +A, O 7 = e g 2 m b( sσ µν P R b)f µν, q q O 6 = ( s α b β ) V A ( q β q α ) V +A, O 7 = e g 2 m b( sσ µν P L b)f µν, O 8 = 1 g m b( sσ µν T a P R b)g µν, O 8 = 1 g m b( sσ µν T a P L b)g µν, O 9 = e2 g 2 ( sγ µp L b)( lγ µ l), O 10 = e2 g 2 ( sγ µp L b)( lγ µ γ 5 l), O S = O P = O 9 = e2 g 2 ( sγ µp R b)( lγ µ l), O 10 = e2 g 2 ( sγ µp R b)( lγ µ γ 5 l), e2 16π 2 ( sp Lb)( ll), O S = e2 16π 2 ( sp Rb)( ll), e2 16π 2 ( sp Lb)( lγ 5 l), O P = e2 16π 2 ( sp Rb)( lγ 5 l), (5.2) where α and β denote the color indices and the labels (V ± A) refer to γ µ (1 ± γ 5 ), and P L,R = ( 1 γ 5 ) 2. The oerators O1 to O 10 aear in the SM effective theory, as well as in secific BSM scenarios, while the rest will aear only in NP models. The Wilson coefficients (C i s) corresonding to the SM effective oerators can be found in [42]. The oerators relevant for the decay b sl + l are given by O ( ) 9,10. However, only O 9,10 can exlain the observed attern in R(K ( ) ) [16]. The exression for the decay rate corresonding to the oerator basis given in Eq. 5.2 are taken from [40]. Another b sµ + µ transition that lays a maor role in constraining the NP arameter saces is the rare decay B s µ + µ. In the SM, this decay occurs via the enguin and the box diagrams, and is helicity suressed. In the oerator basis mentioned in Eq. 5.2, only O 10 contributes to this rocess within SM. Corresonding exression for the branching fraction is given by: B(B s l + l ) SM G 2 F = τ α2 Bs 16π 3 V tbvts m Bs m 2 µ 1 4m2 µ m 2 fb 2 s C B s (5.3) The SM rediction [43] and the measured value [44] of the branching fraction for this articular rare decay are resectively given by: q q B(B s µ + µ ) SM = (3.65 ± 3) 10 9, (5.4) B(B s µ + µ ) Ext = (3.0 ± +0.3 ) (5.5) We note that the measured value and the SM rediction are consistent with each other. This, in turn, will constrain new hysics arameters. 11

13 b X l b X/X s b k l b γ/z s X b b s s l l b b b s l X/X γ/z γ/z X/X l l l l Figure 3: Feynman diagrams contributing to b sll rocess. Here X/X can be either H 0 or A 0. The box diagrams with X = X = H 0 /A 0 will also contribute to b sll rocesses. In the BSM framework, there are several dimension six effective oerators which may contribute to the rocess B s µ + µ. In the oerator basis of Eq. 5.2, the exression for the branching fraction will then be modified to: B(B s µ + µ ) BSM = τ Bs fb 2 s m 3 G 2 F α2 B s 64π 3 V tbvts 1 4m2 µ Here, C ( ) S and ) C( P + m 2 B s [ m 2 Bs m 2 b m Bs m b (C P C P ) + 2 m µ ( ) CS 1 4m2 µ m 2 C S B s (C 10 C m 10) Bs 2 2 ]. (5.6) are the Wilson coefficients associated with the scalar and seudoscalar oerators. It has been shown that these oerators are tightly constrained by the data on B(B s µ + µ ). Therefore, the contributions from the scalar and seudoscalar oerators can not exlain the observed anomalous results in R(K ( ) ) [45, 46]. In our model, the diagrams that will contribute to the rocess b sll are shown in Fig. 3, where X/X can be either of H 0 or A 0. As one can see from Eq. 2.3, the new coulings carry the generation indices of the SM fields as well as that of the vector like fermions. Therefore, deending on the tye of vector like fermion in the loo, there will be several contributions to the decay amlitude. This will be function of the new Yukawa coulings and the masses of the new articles. However, for the simlicity of the analysis, we have followed the hierarchy: λ i << λ ii (i, = 1, 2 and 3), i.e, the off diagonal Yukawas are suressed with resect to the diagonal terms. Also, since one of our goals is to exlain the R(K ( ) ) anomaly, which requires leton universality violation, we have further assumed λ 33 >> λ 22 >> λ 11. Here, for simlicity, we assume the three generations of the downtye vector like fermion D to be mass degenerate (M d = M s = M b). In this simlified icture, the box diagram with b and µ (in the loo) will have the dominant contribution 12

14 to the rocess b sµ + µ. In general, the contributions from the enguin diagrams are dominant over that of the box diagrams. However, the enguin diagrams alone can not exlain R(K ( ) ) anomaly, as they contribute equally to the decay rates of B K ( ) µµ and B K ( ) ee. Perhas it is ossible to exlain the observed data by considering contributions from the new box diagrams alone. In such cases, the interference of the SM Wilson coefficients (WC) with that obtained from the box diagrams will lay the leading role in exlaining the observed attern in R(K ( ) ) data. If we add the contributions from the enguin diagrams, then there will be interference of the WC obtained from the box and the enguin diagrams. Hence, deending on the size of the individual contributions, the interference of the new box and enguin diagrams could also lay an imortant role in the exlanation of the observed data. For comleteness, in our analysis we have considered the contributions from all tyes of diagrams which are shown in Fig. 3. The most general exression for the box diagram with two scalars X and X is given by : im Box = iπ2 λ b b λ s b λ µ µ λ µ µ (2π) 4 A O eff, (5.7) where, l = e, µ and the loo factor is [ M 4 ( X A = M 2 ) (MX 2 M 2 )(M 2 b M 2 )(M 2 l M 2 ) ln X M 2 X X X X M 4 b ( ) M 2 b + (M 2 b M 2 l )(M 2 b M 2 )(M 2 b M 2 X X )ln MX 2 M 4 l ( )] M 2 l + (M 2 l M 2 b )(M 2 l M 2 )(M 2 l M 2 X X )ln. M 2 X (5.8) The effective oerator is given by O eff = [ bγ µ (1 γ 5 )s][ lγ µ (1 γ 5 )l] = [ bγ µ (1 γ 5 )s][ lγ µ l] [ bγ µ (1 γ 5 )s][ lγ µ γ 5 l] = O 9 O 10. (5.9) From now on, we will rewrite the coulings λ b b = λ b, λ s b = λ s, and λ µ µ = λ µ. Thus Eq. 5.7 can be written as where, im Box i[c NP 9 O 9 + C NP 10 O 10 ], (5.10) ( C9 NP = C10 NP λ s λ 2 ) µa = 32π 2, (5.11) 13

15 ( 2 ) which has to be normalized with a factor N = 4G F Vtb 4π Vts α so that the oerators are at ar with those given in Eq The amlitude of the hoton exchanged enguin diagrams can be written as M γ = [ b(a L q 2 γ µ P L + ia R m τ σ µν q ν P R )s] e2 q 2 [ lγ µ l], (5.12) where q is the hoton momentum. The form-factors A L and A R are induced by flavour changing λ s λ b coulings. Therefore, the contribution to C 9 will come only from A L, whose aroximate form is given by: A L = λ s λ b 32π 2 M 2 X ( ) ξ(r q ) 3, (5.13) with ξ(r q ) = 1 6(1 r q ) 4 [ r q 9r 2 q + 2r 3 q 6 ln r q ]. (5.14) and r q = M 2 q /M 2 X ( ). The Z-mediated enguin amlitude for the rocess b sll can be written as where a f L = M Z = [ bf L γ µ P L s] From the diagrams of Fig. 3 we obtain F L = 1 M 2 Z [ lγ µ (a l LP L + a l RP R )l], (5.15) g (t f 3 cos θ Q f sin 2 θ W ), a f R = g ( Q f sin 2 θ W ). (5.16) W cos θ W The finite arts of C b, ξ 0 and B are given by g λ s λ [ ( ) ] b 1 a b cos θ W 32π 2 R 2 2C b + a b L r bξ 0 (r b) + a s LB. (5.17) C b = 1 2 ξ 0 (r q ) = B = dx(1 x) ln[xm 2 X ( ) + (1 x)m 2 b ], 1 x dx x + (1 x)r q 0 dxx ln[xm 2 X ( ) + (1 x)m 2 b ]. (5.18) The Z-mediated enguin diagrams will contribute to both C 9 and C 10. Therefore, the total contributions to C 9 and C 10 can be extracted from The numerical analysis are done the next section (6). M = M Box + M Z + M γ. (5.19) 14

16 6 Results: DM and flavour In this section we discuss the results obtained from the analysis of the DM and flavour sector of our model. We scan the NP arameter sace using the constraints from flavour data, relic density and direct detection bounds. In the context of our model, the free arameters are: {λ b, λ s, λ µ, λ τ (= λ τ τ ), M H 0, M A 0, M H ±, M τ, Mẽ = M µ, M b}. Amongst them, we have fixed few of the coulings, such as λ s = 1 and λ τ 1. Also, we choose λ b < 1 and λ µ < 1. With these choices of the coulings, we can easily overcome the resent constraints on flavour changing b s rocesses, like B s B s mixing, B(B X s γ), B(B K ( ) νν), etc. The rest of the free arameters are constrained from the R(K ( ) ) data. 10 ΔM = 60 GeV, ~ Mτ = 250 GeV, Mμ~ = 150 GeV, Mb~ = 200 GeV Pure IDM λμ =, = λμ =, = λμ =, = 0.5 λμ =, = λ μ =, λ b = λ μ =, λ b = λ μ =, λ b = ΔM = 2 GeV, M b ~ = M l ~ = 850 GeV 1 λ μ =, λ b = λ μ =, λ b = 0.5 λ μ =, λ b = 0.5 Ωh Ωh Current bound on Relic Abundance M H 0 (GeV) Current bound on Relic Abundance MH 0(GeV) (a) (b) Figure 4: Variations of relic abundance with the DM mass M H 0 for different values of the coulings in the (a) low mass and (b) high mass regions of the DM. The lots show that as we switch on the letonic and/or quark ortal coulings, new annihilation channels oen u, lowering the relic abundance for a fixed DM mass. First, we will discuss the effects of different arameters of our model on DM relic abundance. As mentioned earlier, in, there exists two distinct regions of DM mass which satisfy the relic abundance criterion. In Fig. 4 we have shown the variations of DM relic abundance with M H 0 for two different DM mass regions (low and high). In Fig. 4a, we have ket M = 60 GeV and varied M H 0 between 50 GeV and 100 GeV, while in Fig. 4b, M = 2 GeV and M H 0 > 500 GeV. Here, we kee the same mass slitting between different comonents of the inert scalar doublet namely, M = M H ± M H 0 = M A 0 M H 0. We note that the allowed values of M H 0 are sensitive to the new coulings and masses of the exotic vector like fermions. In the low mass region, with the variation of our new arameters, the allowed values of M H 0 do not change significantly from that obtained in case. However, in the high DM mass region, the deviation from scenario is significant. As exected, for the fixed values of the masses of the vector like fermions, the new coulings and the associated allowed values of M H 0 are ositively correlated. For the scenario, in the low mass region, the allowed values of M H 0 is not strongly correlated with the choice of M, while in the high mass region the relic abundance is 15

17 M H 0 = 70 GeV, ~ Mτ = 250 GeV, Mμ~ = 150 GeV, = M H 0 = 70 GeV, ~ Mb = 300 GeV, λμ = Ωh Ωh Current bound on Relic Abundance 5 Current bound on Relic Abundance λμ = 5 = = 0.7 λμ = = λμ = = 0.5 λμ = ΔM (GeV) = ΔM (GeV) (a) (b) M H 0 = 70 GeV, ΔM = 110 GeV, ~ Mμ = 150 GeV, λμ = 0.5 M H 0 = 600 GeV, ~ Mμ = 650 GeV, Mτ~ = 2 TeV, = Ωh Ωh Current bound on Relic Abundance M τ ~ = 200 GeV, λ b = M τ ~ = 250 GeV, λ b = M τ ~ = 300 GeV, λ b = M τ ~ = 200 GeV, λ b = 0.5 M τ ~ = 250 GeV, λ b = 0.5 M τ ~ = 300 GeV, λ b = ΔM (GeV) (c) 50 λμ = λμ = λμ = ΔM(GeV) (d) Figure 5: The lots in the to anel (5a,5b) and the bottom left lot (5c) shows the variations of relic abundance with the mass slitting M = M H ± M H 0 = M A 0 M H 0 for the DM mass MH 0 = 70 GeV. Here, different benchmark oints are chosen for the other new arameters. The similar correlations in the high DM mass region is shown in the bottom right lot (5d). only satisfied when M is very small, or in other words when the inert scalars are nearly degenerate. For simlicity, in the low DM mass region, we have fixed M H 0 at 70 GeV for the rest of our analysis. In Fig. 5, we have shown the variations of the relic abundance with the mass slitting M for different benchmark values of the new coulings and masses. From Fig. 5a, 5b and 5c we note that, as the new arameters are switched on, the relic abundance decreases comared to scenario due to the increase in annihilation cross section for fixed values of the masses (M τ and/or M b). However, the nature of variations of relic abundance with M remains unchanged. The sensitivity of the relic abundance to the mass slitting in the high mass region is shown in Fig. 5d. With the increase in λ µ, the mass degeneracies are becoming tighter comared to scenario. Similar trend is also exected with the variation of λ b as well. Here we divide our analysis into two arts: in one art, we choose M H 0 = 70 GeV (low 16

18 80 60 ~ Mμ = 110 GeV ~ Mμ = 130 GeV ~ Mμ = 150 GeV ~ Mμ = 250 GeV M H 0 = 70 GeV, ΔM = 110 GeV 8 6 Mμ ~ = 110 GeV Mμ ~ = 130 GeV Mμ ~ = 150 GeV Mμ ~ = 250 GeV M H 0 = 70 GeV, ΔM = 110 GeV Δaμ Γτ μγ λμ λ μ (a) (b) Figure 6: The left lot shows the variations of a µ (muon (g 2)) with the couling λ µ for different values of M µ. In these lots M H 0 has been taken as 70 GeV. The red dashed and dotted lines reresent the 1σ and 3σ bands of the a µ, resectively. The right lot shows that with the same benchmark values of the NP arameters the decay width for τ µγ is well below the resent exerimental limit [5]. DM mass), and in the other we have considered M H 0 = 600 GeV (high DM mass). These will be discussed in the following sections. 6.1 Low mass DM Here, deending on the values of the vector like fermion masses, we divide our analysis into two cases. This will become imortant for collider search of this articular model, which we will discuss in Sec Case I : M µ=ẽ < M A 0 (H ± ) < M b In this case, we consider only the first and second generation vector-like letons to be lighter than the inert scalars (A 0, H ± ), while the third generation is required to be heavier in order to satisfy the correct relic abundance. This is due to the fact that we have considered λ τ 1. The mass of the third generation vector like leton M τ is fixed at 250 GeV, while M b is varied in between 200 and 500 GeV. In section 4, we have discussed various diagrams and their contributions to muon (g 2) and LFV decays l i l γ. There will be contributions from enguin diagrams with vector like letons τ, µ or ẽ in the loo. Since we are assuming a hierarchical structure for the coulings: λ τ µ λ µ τ << λ µ < λ τ, therefore, the contributions in a µ from all these diagrams will not be imortant. The dominant contribution will come from the enguin diagram with µ in the loo. The variations of a µ with the new couling λ µ for different values of M µ are shown in Fig. 6a. We note that for 100 GeV M µ 300 GeV, the excess in muon (g 2) allows the values of λ µ to vary in between 0.3 and. Esecially, higher masses refer higher values of the couling λ µ. On the other hand, the contribution from all the vector like fermions will be relevant for the LFV decays. However, since in 17

19 0 MH = 70 GeV, ΔM = 110 GeV 0 MH = 70 GeV, ΔM = 110 GeV λμ λμ Mμ ~ = 110 GeV Mμ ~ = 130 GeV Mμ ~ = 150 GeV (a) Mμ ~ = 110 GeV Mμ ~ = 130 GeV Mμ ~ = 150 GeV (b) Figure 7: The left and right lots show the correlations between λ µ and λ b allowed by flavour and constraints from relic abundance and direct search resectively, for M H 0 = 70 GeV, M = 110 GeV, and three different values of M τ while M b has been varied between 200 GeV and 500 GeV. our framework the off-diagonal elements are small comared to the diagonal elements, the contribution to the branching fraction will not be significantly large. As an examle, we have chosen λ τ µ = λ µ τ 1. With this choice, the branching fraction τ µγ will be much below the current exerimental limit, even if we choose λ µ or λ τ roughly O(1) (Fig. 6b). Here, we have not discussed the LFV τ µ µ + µ decay. In our model, the leading diagram for this decay is same as τ µγ, with a virtual hoton converting into a muon air 1. It is exected that for the same set of NP arameters the branching fraction B(τ µ µ + µ ) will be small comared to B(τ µγ); as an examle see [47]. Therefore, our NP arameters will be safe with resect to resent limit B(τ µµµ)( O(10 8 )) [5]. The LFV decays and a µ are insensitive to the couling λ b. However, observables like R(K ( ) ) and DM relic abundance are sensitive to all the relevant coulings and masses of the model. In Fig. 7, we have shown the correlation between the arameters λ µ and λ b, which are allowed by R(K ( ) ) (left lot), relic abundance and direct search (right lot). These lots are generated for three values of M µ, while the mass of M b has been varied between 200 and 500 GeV, keeing the mass slitting M = 110 GeV. As we can see from Fig. 7, a common arameter sace satisfied by flavour data, relic density and direct search together will occur mostly for high λ µ and λ b. Also, lower values of λ b refer the higher values of λ µ. From R(K ( ) ), there are small changes in the maximum allowed values of λ µ (Fig. 7a) due to small variations in M µ. Higher values of the coulings are required for higher values of M µ in order to satisfy bounds from relic density and direct detection. Therefore, if we decrease M µ, the arameter sace satisfying relic data shrinks and moves towards lower values of λ µ. Here, for simlicity, we are assuming Mẽ = M µ. In Fig. 8, we have shown the correlation between λ µ and λ b for different values of 1 There will be one additional box diagram, the contribution of which will be suressed comared to that of the enguin diagram. 18

20 M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = ± MH = 130 GeV, Mμ~ = 110 GeV, Mτ~ = 200 GeV M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = ± MH = 150 GeV, Mμ~ = 110 GeV, Mτ~ = 200 GeV λμ λμ (a) (b) M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = ± MH = 130 GeV, Mμ~ = 110 GeV, Mτ~ = 250 GeV M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = ± MH = 180 GeV, Mμ~ = 110 GeV, Mτ~ = 250 GeV λμ λμ (c) (d) M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = ± MH = 180 GeV, Mμ~ = 130 GeV, Mτ~ = 250 GeV M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = ± MH = 180 GeV, Mμ~ = 150 GeV, Mτ~ = 250 GeV λμ λμ (e) (f) Figure 8: The correlations between λ µ and λ b allowed by the data for different values of mass slitting M, and the mass of vector like leton M τ. For all these lots, the mass of the vector like quark has been varied as (200 M b 500) GeV. The green regions are the values that can exlain the exerimental R(K ( ) ) data and the red regions are the ones satisfying relic and DD constraints. (This color code is followed for all cases). mass slitting M and mass of the vector like leton M µ. Also, in these lots we have overlaid the correlations obtained from flavour data with those obtained from relic density 19

21 M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = M H ± = 180 GeV, ~ Mμ = 110 GeV, Mτ~ = 250 GeV M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = M H ± = 180 GeV, ~ Mμ = 130 GeV, Mτ~ = 250 GeV Mb ~(GeV) Mb ~(GeV) M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = M H ± = 180 GeV, ~ Mμ = 150 GeV, Mτ~ = 250 GeV Mb ~(GeV) Figure 9: The correlations between the λ b and M b (mass of the vector like quark). The inuts are same as in Fig. 8. and direct search. For a fixed value of M µ, the effect of increasing the mass slitting on the arameter saces is reflected in Fig. 8a and Fig. 8b. We see that the allowed regions get more and more disoint as we increase M for fixed values of M l. Next, by fixing M at 60 GeV and increasing the value of M τ from 200 to 250 GeV we get back the common arameter sace λ µ λ b lane, as shown in Fig. 8c. Further, to investigate the effect of the masses of µ/ẽ, we have generated the arameter sace for different values of M µ/ẽ while keeing M and M τ fixed at 110 and 250 GeV resectively, as illustrated in Fig. 8d, 8e, 8f. These correlations are shown for three values of M µ : (i) 110 GeV, (ii) 130 GeV, and (iii) 150 GeV. We note that M µ = 150 GeV and M = 110 GeV rovides the maximum overlaing arameter saces. We also show the correlation between λ b and M b (vector like quark) in Fig. 9 for M = 110 GeV, which reveals the fact that higher values of λ b are required for higher values of M b to kee the annihilation cross-sections in the correct ballark for achieving the desired relic abundance. As mentioned earlier, the branching fraction for the rare decay B s µ + µ is consistent with its SM rediction within 1σ confidence level. Therefore, the data on B(B s µ + µ ) is exected to ut tighter constraints on the arameters of any NP model in the decay b sµµ. Here, for comleteness, we check whether our allowed arameter sace is consistent with the data from B(B s µ + µ ). The variation of the branching fraction with the couling λ b for different values of λ µ, M µ and M b are shown in Fig. 10a. The chosen benchmark oints are taken from the allowed arameter saces given in Fig. 8 and 9. We 20

22 7 λμ = 0.7, Mμ ~= 110 GeV, Mb~ = 300 GeV 7 λμ = 0.7, Mμ ~= 250 GeV, Mb~ = 350 GeV Branching Fraction of Bs -> μ + μ - ( 10 9 ) λμ = 0.7, Mμ ~= 150 GeV, Mb~ = 300 GeV λμ = 0.9, Mμ ~= 110 GeV, Mb~ = 300 GeV Branching Fraction of Bs -> μ + μ - ( 10 9 ) λμ = 0.7, Mμ ~= 350 GeV, Mb~ = 350 GeV λμ = 0.9, Mμ ~= 250 GeV, Mb~ = 350 GeV 0 (a) 0 (b) Figure 10: The variations of B(B s µ + µ ) with λ b for few benchmark values of λ µ, M µ and M b. The chosen benchmark values for the arameters are allowed by the data on R(K ( ) ), relic abundance and direct detection searches of the DM. The green dashed and dot-dashed lines reresent the 1σ and 3σ bands of the exerimentally observed branching fraction of B s µ + µ, resectively. The solid curves reresent the variation of the central value of the SM branching fraction with λ b while the dotted bands are within 3σ C.L. note that the overlaing arameter saces are allowed by the current exerimental bound on the branching fraction. In, the electroweak recision observables (EWPO) like S and T, lay an imortant role in constraining the mass slitting M between the inert scalars [19]. We have already taken care of this constraint while scanning the new arameter saces. Our model contains singlet vector fermions which do not mix. Hence, there will not be any additional significant contributions in S, T and U arameters, although there will be diagrams that contribute to Z µ µ and Z b b decays at one loo level. However, we have checked that within our chosen model arameters those contributions are highly suressed. Therefore, the EWPO will not ut any stringent constraint on our model arameters Case II : M A 0 (H ± ) < M l/m b We reeat a similar analysis as in Case I keeing the DM mass fixed at 70 GeV and M at 110 GeV. But now we scan the arameter sace by maintaining M A 0 (H ± ) < M l/m b. In this case, for simlicity, we assume that all generations of the vector-like letons have the same mass. Unlike the revious case, here we allow the mass to vary in the range 200 M l 500 GeV, instead of keeing them fixed. Various correlations in this case are shown in Fig. 11. We find that relic abundance and direct search bounds are satisfied for almost all values in the λ b λ µ lane. However, flavour data continue to rovide tight constraints even in this case. In Fig. 10b, we have shown that the arameter sace allowed by R(K ( ) ) data, relic density and direct detection of DM are also comatible with B(B s µ + µ ). As mentioned earlier, since we have chosen λ s 1, the allowed NP arameters are safe from other flavour data like the radiative decays B(B X s γ), B s B s mixing etc. From the allowed arameter sace we have chosen four oints in Case-I and two oints in Case-II as our Benchmark Points (BP) for analysis at the LHC. The BPs are resented in Table. 2 21

23 M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = + MH = 180 GeV M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = + MH = 180 GeV λμ Mb ~(GeV) M H 0 = 70 GeV, M A 0 = + MH = 180 GeV Mτ ~(GeV) Mb ~(GeV) Figure 11: Correlation between different NP arameters for Case II of Low Mass DM at M H 0 = 70 GeV. BP M A 0 (GeV) M H ± (GeV) M b (GeV) M τ (GeV) M µ (GeV) λ µ λ b Ωh 2 σ DD (cm) Table 2: Benchmark oints for low mass Case I along with the corresonding relic abundance and DD cross-section is shown. and Table. 3, the associated values of relic abundance and direct detection cross section are also mentioned in the tables. Before moving on to the collider analysis, we show, for illustrative urose, the variation of sin-indeendent direct search cross section (er nucleon) with the DM mass in Fig. 12 for the chosen BPs in Table. 2 and Table. 3. For a comarison, the similar correlation for is resented in the same figure. The solid red line is the exclusion limit from recent XENON-1T data [29]. The black dots on each black line refer to articular oint corresonding to a fixed M H 0, satisfying constraints from relic density, direct search 22

24 BP M A 0 (GeV) M H ± (GeV) M b (GeV) M l (GeV) λ µ λ b Ωh 2 σ DD (cm) Table 3: Similar to Table 2 for low mass Case II Case I xenon1t BP1 BP Case II xenon1t BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 σdd (cm 2 ) σdd (cm 2 ) M H 0(GeV) M H 0(GeV) Figure 12: Left: The lot shows the variation direct detection cross section with DM mass in direct search lane for case-i. The black lines corresond to different BPs, where the DM mass has been varied, while the dots corresond to secific choices of the DM mass (see text for details), the red line is the exclusion limit from recent XENON-1T data and the blue line is the direct search limit from case. Right: same for case-ii. (as they lie below the exerimental exclusion limit) and flavour bounds (which we have discussed in Sec. 4 and Sec. 5). As ointed out earlier, and can now be seen from these lots, the resence of exotic quarks increases the direct detection rates comared to the keeing it more romising for observing at ongoing direct search exeriments. 6.2 High Mass DM We analyze the high DM mass region of the IDM in context of our extended framework. As discussed earlier, we need to consider degenerate masses for the IDM scalars (as we need to resort on co-annihilation channels in order to satisfy relic density) and also tune λ L to an aroriate value. So the masses of vector-like letons ( l) and the vector-like bottom artner ( b) will have to be greater than the masses of A 0 or H ± to maintain the stability of the DM. We consider a mass slitting of 2 GeV between the inert scalars and set λ L to 001. The arameter sace which are allowed by flavour data are shown in Fig. 13a and Fig. 13b. We have ket the value of the DM mass fixed at M H 0 = 600 GeV. It is interesting to note that, in this case, we will be able to exlain the R(K ( ) ) anomaly only for higher values of λ µ ( 3 or 4). However, for the same masses, such high values of λ µ will not allow us to achieve right relic abundance (see Fig. 13c). Hence, it is not ossible to obtain a common arameter sace that satisfies both relic abundance and flavour constraints 23

25 0 ~ Mμ = Me~ = 0.7 TeV ~ Mμ = Me~ = 0.7 TeV ~ Mμ = Me~ = 1 TeV ~ Mμ = Me~ = 1 TeV ~ Mμ = Me~ = 2 TeV 0.9 ~ Mμ = Me~ = 2 TeV RK 5 RK * λ b = 0.5, M b ~= 650 GeV, 5 M H 0 = 600 GeV, M A 0 = M H ± = 602 GeV λμ (a) λ b = 0.5, M b ~= 650 GeV M H 0 = 600 GeV, M A 0 = M H ± = 602 GeV λμ (b) ~ Mμ = Me~ = 0.7 TeV ~ Mμ = Me~ = 1 TeV ~ Mμ = Me~ = 2 TeV Ωh λ b = 0.5, M b ~ = 650 GeV, M τ ~ = 2 TeV M H 0 = 600 GeV, M A 0 = M H ± = 602 GeV λμ (c) Pure IDM ΔM = 2 GeV, λμ = 0.5, = 0.5, ~ Mμ = 850 GeV, Mb~ = 850 GeV 0.30 =, λμ = λτ = 1.5, ~ Mμ = Mτ~ = 2 TeV 0 Mτ ~ = 1 TeV ~ Mτ = 1.5 TeV Mτ ~ = 2 TeV 5 =, λμ = λτ = 1.5, ~ Mμ = Mτ~ = 4 TeV =, λμ = λτ = 2, ~ Mμ = Mτ~ = 2 TeV =, λμ = λτ = 2, ~ Mμ = Mτ~ = 4 TeV =, ~ Mb = 1.5 TeV, λμ = λτ = 1.5, Mμ~ = Mτ~ = 4 TeV =, ~ Mb = 1.5 TeV, λμ = λτ = 2, Mμ~ = Mτ~ = 4 TeV Ωh 2 Ωh Current bound on Relic Abundance M H 0 (GeV) (d) Current bound on Relic Abundance M H 0(GeV) (e) Figure 13: To Left (13a): Variation of R(K) with λ µ for fixed values of DM mass and λ b, for three different values of M µ. The yellow band shows the 1σ exerimental range of R(K). To Right (13b): Same for 1σ exerimental range of R(K ( ) ). Middle (13c): Variation relic abundance with λ µ for the same chosen arameters as in 13a and 13b, the orange band shows the Planck-observed relic density bound. Bottom Left (13d): Variation of relic abundance with DM mass for three different values of M τ, keeing all other arameters fixed. Bottom Right (13e): Same as 13d, for different choices of coulings and masses (see text for details). simultaneously. When we add new interactions, new annihilation channels oen u and they make the DM under-abundant. So in order to make the effects of NP minimal, we 24

HIGGS&AT&LHC. Electroweak&symmetry&breaking&and&Higgs& Shahram&Rahatlou. Fisica&delle&Par,celle&Elementari,&Anno&Accademico&

HIGGS&AT&LHC. Electroweak&symmetry&breaking&and&Higgs& Shahram&Rahatlou. Fisica&delle&Par,celle&Elementari,&Anno&Accademico& IGGS&AT&LC Electroweak&symmetry&breaking&and&iggs& Lecture&9& Shahram&Rahatlou Fisica&delle&Par,celle&Elementari,&Anno&Accademico&2014815 htt://www.roma1.infn.it/eole/rahatlou/articelle/ WO&NEEDS&IGGS?

More information

Feynman Diagrams of the Standard Model Sedigheh Jowzaee

Feynman Diagrams of the Standard Model Sedigheh Jowzaee tglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Feynman Diagrams of the Standard Model Sedigheh Jowzaee PhD Seminar, 5 July 01 Outlook Introduction to the standard model Basic information Feynman diagram Feynman rules

More information

HIGGS AT HADRON COLLIDER

HIGGS AT HADRON COLLIDER IGGS AT ADRON COLLIDER Electroweak symmetry breaking and iggs Lecture 8 24 October 2012 Shahram Rahatlou Fisica Nucleare e Subnucleare III, Anno Accademico 2012-2013 htt://www.roma1.infn.it/eole/rahatlou/fns3/

More information

Introduction. Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics. Diego Bettoni Anno Accademico

Introduction. Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics. Diego Bettoni Anno Accademico Introduction Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics Diego Bettoni Anno Accademico 010-011 Course Outline 1. Introduction.. Discreet symmetries: P, C, T. 3. Isosin, strangeness, G-arity. 4. Quark Model

More information

Probing anomalous quartic couplings at the Large Hadron Collider with proton tagging

Probing anomalous quartic couplings at the Large Hadron Collider with proton tagging Probing anomalous quartic coulings at the Large Hadron Collider with roton tagging Cristian Baldenegro University of Kansas cbaldenegro@ku.edu Setember 4, 07 / Central exclusive reactions rocesses Central

More information

The Quark-Parton Model

The Quark-Parton Model The Quark-Parton Model Before uarks and gluons were generally acceted Feynman roosed that the roton was made u of oint-like constituents artons Both Bjorken Scaling and the Callan-Gross relationshi can

More information

Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM

Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM Shaaban Khalil Center for Theoretical Physics Zewail City of Science and Technology SM Higgs at the LHC In the SM there is a single neutral Higgs boson, a weak isospin

More information

Constraining minimal U(1) B L model from dark matter observations

Constraining minimal U(1) B L model from dark matter observations Constraining minimal U(1) B L model from dark matter observations Tanushree Basak Physical Research Laboratory, India 10th PATRAS Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs CERN Geneva, Switzerland July 3, 2014

More information

Searches for RPV SUSY with ATLAS

Searches for RPV SUSY with ATLAS Max Goblirsch Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München IMPRS Young Scientist Worksho 24, Ringberg Reminder: Suersymmetry (SUSY) Idea: Introduce a new symmetry transformation Q with the following roerty:

More information

Hidden two-higgs doublet model

Hidden two-higgs doublet model Hidden two-higgs doublet model C, Uppsala and Lund University SUSY10, Bonn, 2010-08-26 1 Two Higgs doublet models () 2 3 4 Phenomenological consequences 5 Two Higgs doublet models () Work together with

More information

Effective Theory for Electroweak Doublet Dark Matter

Effective Theory for Electroweak Doublet Dark Matter Effective Theory for Electroweak Doublet Dark Matter University of Ioannina, Greece 3/9/2016 In collaboration with Athanasios Dedes and Vassilis Spanos ArXiv:1607.05040 [submitted to PhysRevD] Why dark

More information

A cancellation mechanism for dark matter-nucleon interaction: non-abelian case

A cancellation mechanism for dark matter-nucleon interaction: non-abelian case A cancellation mechanism for dark matter-nucleon interaction: non-abelian case University of Ioannina 31/3/2018 In collaboration with: Christian Gross, Alexandros Karam, Oleg Lebedev, Kyriakos Tamvakis

More information

MEASUREMENT OF THE INCLUSIVE ELECTRON (POSITRON) +PROTON SCATTERING CROSS SECTION AT HIGH INELASTICITY y USING H1 DATA *

MEASUREMENT OF THE INCLUSIVE ELECTRON (POSITRON) +PROTON SCATTERING CROSS SECTION AT HIGH INELASTICITY y USING H1 DATA * Romanian Reorts in Physics, Vol. 65, No. 2, P. 420 426, 2013 MEASUREMENT OF THE INCLUSIVE ELECTRON (POSITRON) +PROTON SCATTERING CROSS SECTION AT HIGH INELASTICITY y USING H1 DATA * IVANA PICURIC, ON BEHALF

More information

Minimal Flavor Violating Z boson. Xing-Bo Yuan. Yonsei University

Minimal Flavor Violating Z boson. Xing-Bo Yuan. Yonsei University Minimal Flavor Violating Z boson Xing-Bo Yuan Yonsei University Yonsei University, Korea 21 Sep 2015 Outline 1. Standard Model and Beyond 2. Energy Scalar of New Physics Beyond the SM From Naturalness:

More information

A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:

A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients: I. THE STANDARD MODEL A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:. The symmetries of the Lagrangian; 2. The representations of fermions

More information

BSM Higgs Searches at ATLAS

BSM Higgs Searches at ATLAS BSM Higgs Searches at ATLAS Martin zur Nedden Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin for the ATLAS Collaboration SUSY Conference 2014 Manchester July 20 th July 25 th, 2014 Introduction Discovery of a scalar Boson

More information

November 24, Scalar Dark Matter from Grand Unified Theories. T. Daniel Brennan. Standard Model. Dark Matter. GUTs. Babu- Mohapatra Model

November 24, Scalar Dark Matter from Grand Unified Theories. T. Daniel Brennan. Standard Model. Dark Matter. GUTs. Babu- Mohapatra Model Scalar from November 24, 2014 1 2 3 4 5 What is the? Gauge theory that explains strong weak, and electromagnetic forces SU(3) C SU(2) W U(1) Y Each generation (3) has 2 quark flavors (each comes in one

More information

Physics at e + e - Linear Colliders. 4. Supersymmetric particles. M. E. Peskin March, 2002

Physics at e + e - Linear Colliders. 4. Supersymmetric particles. M. E. Peskin March, 2002 Physics at e + e - Linear Colliders 4. Supersymmetric particles M. E. Peskin March, 2002 In this final lecture, I would like to discuss supersymmetry at the LC. Supersymmetry is not a part of the Standard

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Mar 2017

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Mar 2017 Flavon-induced lepton flavour violation arxiv:1703.05579v1 hep-ph] 16 Mar 017 Venus Keus Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki,

More information

Leaving Plato s Cave: Beyond The Simplest Models of Dark Matter

Leaving Plato s Cave: Beyond The Simplest Models of Dark Matter Leaving Plato s Cave: Beyond The Simplest Models of Dark Matter Alexander Natale Korea Institute for Advanced Study Nucl. Phys. B914 201-219 (2017), arxiv:1608.06999. High1 2017 February 9th, 2017 1/30

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 5 Sep 2014

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 5 Sep 2014 Proceedings of the Second Annual LHCP CMS CR-2014/199 September 8, 2014 Future prospects of Higgs Physics at CMS arxiv:1409.1711v1 [hep-ex] 5 Sep 2014 Miguel Vidal On behalf of the CMS Experiment, Centre

More information

U(1) Gauge Extensions of the Standard Model

U(1) Gauge Extensions of the Standard Model U(1) Gauge Extensions of the Standard Model Ernest Ma Physics and Astronomy Department University of California Riverside, CA 92521, USA U(1) Gauge Extensions of the Standard Model (int08) back to start

More information

Exclusive diffractive results from ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, TOTEM at the LHC

Exclusive diffractive results from ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, TOTEM at the LHC Exclusive diffractive results from ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, TOTEM at the LHC 1 Christohe Royon University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA On behalf of the ATLAS, CMS, LHCb and TOTEM collaborations 47th International

More information

Beyond the Standard Model

Beyond the Standard Model Beyond the Standard Model The Standard Model Problems with the Standard Model New Physics Supersymmetry Extended Electroweak Symmetry Grand Unification References: 2008 TASI lectures: arxiv:0901.0241 [hep-ph]

More information

Supersymmetry Basics. J. Hewett SSI J. Hewett

Supersymmetry Basics. J. Hewett SSI J. Hewett Supersymmetry Basics J. Hewett SSI 2012 J. Hewett Basic SUSY References A Supersymmetry Primer, Steve Martin hep-ph/9709356 Theory and Phenomenology of Sparticles, Manual Drees, Rohini Godbole, Probir

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Dec 2018

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Dec 2018 Vector Boson roduction with heavy flavor quarks with the exeriment at LHC arxiv:8.633v [he-ex] 3 Dec 8 Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium E-mail: bugra.bilin@cern.ch In this aer, a brief

More information

perturbativity Pankaj Sharma Based on : arxiv: st September, 2012 Higgs-electroweak precision, vacuum stability and perturbativity

perturbativity Pankaj Sharma Based on : arxiv: st September, 2012 Higgs-electroweak precision, vacuum stability and perturbativity 21st September, 2012 PLAN Type II Seesaw Particle Spectrum Vacuum Stabilty and. RG evolution of couplings Electroweak precision data (EWPD). enhancement. Conclusion. A 125 GeV Higgs has been discovered

More information

The Higgs discovery - a portal to new physics

The Higgs discovery - a portal to new physics The Higgs discovery - a portal to new physics Department of astronomy and theoretical physics, 2012-10-17 1 / 1 The Higgs discovery 2 / 1 July 4th 2012 - a historic day in many ways... 3 / 1 July 4th 2012

More information

Simplified models in collider searches for dark matter. Stefan Vogl

Simplified models in collider searches for dark matter. Stefan Vogl Simplified models in collider searches for dark matter Stefan Vogl Outline Introduction/Motivation Simplified Models for the LHC A word of caution Conclusion How to look for dark matter at the LHC? experimentally

More information

A realistic model for DM interactions in the neutrino portal paradigm

A realistic model for DM interactions in the neutrino portal paradigm A realistic model for DM interactions in the neutrino portal paradigm José I Illana + Vannia González Macías, José Wudka (UC Riverside) 1 Model 2 Constraints 3 Conclusions JHEP 05 (2016) 171 [160105051]

More information

Mirror fermions, electroweak scale right-handed neutrinos and experimental implications

Mirror fermions, electroweak scale right-handed neutrinos and experimental implications Mirror fermions, electroweak scale right-handed neutrinos and experimental implications P. Q. Hung University of Virginia Ljubljana 2008 Plan of Talk The question of parity restoration at high energies:

More information

Calculation of Momentum Distribution Function of a Non-Thermal Fermionic Dark Matter

Calculation of Momentum Distribution Function of a Non-Thermal Fermionic Dark Matter Calculation of Momentum Distribution Function of a Non-Thermal Fermionic Dark Matter, March 8, 2017. arxiv:1612.02793, with Anirban Biswas. Aritra Gupta Why Non-Thermal? 1 / 31 The most widely studied

More information

The Higgs boson. Marina Cobal University of Udine

The Higgs boson. Marina Cobal University of Udine The Higgs boson Marina Cobal University of Udine Suggested books F.Halzen, A.D.Martin, Quarks & Leptons: An Introductory Course in Modern Particle Physics, Wiley 1984 Cap.14,15 W.E.Burcham,M.Jobes, Nuclear

More information

Strongly Coupled Dark Matter at the LHC

Strongly Coupled Dark Matter at the LHC Strongly Coupled Dark Matter at the LHC Graham Kribs University of Oregon Appelquist et al (LSD Collaboration): 1402.6656; 1503.04203; 1503.04205 GK, Adam Martin, Ethan Neil, Bryan Ostdiek, Tom Tong [in

More information

Probing the Majorana nature in radiative seesaw models at collider experiments

Probing the Majorana nature in radiative seesaw models at collider experiments Probing the Majorana nature in radiative seesaw models at collider experiments Shinya KANEMURA (U. of Toyama) M. Aoki, SK and O. Seto, PRL 102, 051805 (2009). M. Aoki, SK and O. Seto, PRD80, 033007 (2009).

More information

Higgs Searches and Properties Measurement with ATLAS. Haijun Yang (on behalf of the ATLAS) Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Higgs Searches and Properties Measurement with ATLAS. Haijun Yang (on behalf of the ATLAS) Shanghai Jiao Tong University Higgs Searches and Properties Measurement with ATLAS Haijun Yang (on behalf of the ATLAS) Shanghai Jiao Tong University LHEP, Hainan, China, January 11-14, 2013 Outline Introduction of SM Higgs Searches

More information

Updated S 3 Model of Quarks

Updated S 3 Model of Quarks UCRHEP-T56 March 013 Updated S 3 Model of Quarks arxiv:1303.698v1 [hep-ph] 7 Mar 013 Ernest Ma 1 and Blaženka Melić 1, 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, California

More information

Pseudo-Dirac Bino as Dark Matter and Signatures of D-Type G

Pseudo-Dirac Bino as Dark Matter and Signatures of D-Type G and Signatures of D-Type Gauge Mediation Ken Hsieh Michigan State Univeristy KH, Ph. D. Thesis (2007) ArXiv:0708.3970 [hep-ph] Other works with M. Luty and Y. Cai (to appear) MSU HEP Seminar November 6,

More information

Golden SUSY, Boiling Plasma, and Big Colliders. M. Perelstein, Cornell University IPMU LHC Workshop talk, 12/18/07

Golden SUSY, Boiling Plasma, and Big Colliders. M. Perelstein, Cornell University IPMU LHC Workshop talk, 12/18/07 Golden SUSY, Boiling Plasma, and Big Colliders M. Perelstein, Cornell University IPMU LHC Workshop talk, 12/18/07 Outline Part I: Supersymmetric Golden Region and its Collider Signature (with Christian

More information

New Physics from Vector-Like Technicolor: Roman Pasechnik Lund University, THEP group

New Physics from Vector-Like Technicolor: Roman Pasechnik Lund University, THEP group New Physics from Vector-Like Technicolor: Roman Pasechnik Lund University, THEP group CP3 Origins, September 16 th, 2013 At this seminar I will touch upon... σ 2 Issues of the Standard Model Dramatically

More information

Basic Formalism (leading order in EW coupling)

Basic Formalism (leading order in EW coupling) Dee Inelastic cattering in Leton-Hadron Collisions Probing the Parton tructure of the Nucleon with Letons Basic Formalism (inde. of strong dynamics and arton icture) Exerimental Develoment Fixed target

More information

S = 2 decay in Warped Extra Dimensions

S = 2 decay in Warped Extra Dimensions S = 2 decay in Warped Extra Dimensions Faisal Munir IHEP, Beijing Supervisor: Cai-Dian Lü HFCPV CCNU, Wuhan October 28, 2017 based on: Chin. Phys. C41 (2017) 053106 [arxiv:1607.07713] F. Munir (IHEP) New

More information

The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos

The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos Ernest Ma Physics and Astronomy Department University of California Riverside, CA 92521, USA The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos (2018) back to start 1 Contents Introduction The

More information

Stable or Unstable Light Dark Matter arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 27 Jul 2015

Stable or Unstable Light Dark Matter arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 27 Jul 2015 UCRHEP-T555 July 015 Stable or Unstable Light Dark Matter arxiv:1507.07609v1 [hep-ph] 7 Jul 015 Ernest Ma 1, M. V. N. Murthy, and G. Rajasekaran,3 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California,

More information

Ricerca di nuova fisica a HERA

Ricerca di nuova fisica a HERA Ricerca di nuova fisica a HERA Incontro sulla Fisica delle Alte Energie, Lecce 23-26 aprile 2003 S.Dusini, INFN Padova 1 Overview Introduction to Hera Results from HERA I Contact Interaction: Compositness,

More information

Scalar leptoquarks from GUT to accommodate the B-physics anomalies

Scalar leptoquarks from GUT to accommodate the B-physics anomalies Scalar leptoquarks from GUT to accommodate the B-physics anomalies Nejc Košnik Nejc Košnik (JSI, Univ. of Ljubljana) Corfu Summer Institute 018.9.018 1 / 18 Lepton universality violation in charged and

More information

Search for tau LFV decays at Belle. K.Hayasaka (KMI, Nagoya University)

Search for tau LFV decays at Belle. K.Hayasaka (KMI, Nagoya University) Search for tau LFV decays at Belle K.Hayasaka (KMI, Nagoya University) 1 Introduction Leton flavor violation (LFV) in charged letons negligibly small robability in the Standard Model (SM) even including

More information

Session 5: Review of Classical Astrodynamics

Session 5: Review of Classical Astrodynamics Session 5: Review of Classical Astrodynamics In revious lectures we described in detail the rocess to find the otimal secific imulse for a articular situation. Among the mission requirements that serve

More information

IX. Electroweak unification

IX. Electroweak unification IX. Electroweak unification The problem of divergence A theory of weak interactions only by means of W ± bosons leads to infinities e + e - γ W - W + e + W + ν e ν µ e - W - µ + µ Divergent integrals Figure

More information

Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model

Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model Why is the Standard Model incomplete? Grand Unification Baryon and Lepton Number Violation More Higgs Bosons? Supersymmetry (SUSY) Experimental signatures for SUSY

More information

Split SUSY and the LHC

Split SUSY and the LHC Split SUSY and the LHC Pietro Slavich LAPTH Annecy IFAE 2006, Pavia, April 19-21 Why Split Supersymmetry SUSY with light (scalar and fermionic) superpartners provides a technical solution to the electroweak

More information

FLAVOR PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL

FLAVOR PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL SFB Colloquium DESY Hamburg, July 3rd, 2008 FLAVOR PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL Gudrun Hiller, Dortmund University of Technology Standard Model of Particle Physics renormalizable quantum field theory

More information

Electroweak baryogenesis from a dark sector

Electroweak baryogenesis from a dark sector Electroweak baryogenesis from a dark sector with K. Kainulainen and D. Tucker-Smith Jim Cline, McGill U. Moriond Electroweak, 24 Mar., 2017 J. Cline, McGill U. p. 1 Outline Has electroweak baryogenesis

More information

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 25 Sep 2002

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 25 Sep 2002 Energy fluctuations at the multicritical oint in two-dimensional sin glasses arxiv:cond-mat/0207694 v2 25 Se 2002 1. Introduction Hidetoshi Nishimori, Cyril Falvo and Yukiyasu Ozeki Deartment of Physics,

More information

Phenomenology of low-energy flavour models: rare processes and dark matter

Phenomenology of low-energy flavour models: rare processes and dark matter IPMU February 2 nd 2016 Phenomenology of low-energy flavour models: rare processes and dark matter Lorenzo Calibbi ITP CAS, Beijing Introduction Why are we interested in Flavour Physics? SM flavour puzzle

More information

Little Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology

Little Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology Little Higgs Models Theory Phenomenology Wolfgang Kilian (Karlsruhe) Karlsruhe January 2003 How to make a light Higgs (without SUSY) Minimal models The Littlest Higgs and the Minimal Moose Phenomenology

More information

The inert doublet model in light of LHC and XENON

The inert doublet model in light of LHC and XENON The inert doublet model in light of LHC and XENON Sara Rydbeck 24 July 212 Identification of Dark Matter, IDM 212, Chicago 1 The CERN Large Hadron Collider Only discovery so far. If no new strongly interacting

More information

Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Jay Wacker. APS April Meeting SLAC. A Theoretical Perspective. May 4, 2009

Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Jay Wacker. APS April Meeting SLAC. A Theoretical Perspective. May 4, 2009 Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model A Theoretical Perspective Jay Wacker SLAC APS April Meeting May 4, 2009 1 The Plan Motivations for Physics Beyond the Standard Model New Hints from Dark Matter

More information

Searches for Beyond SM Physics with ATLAS and CMS

Searches for Beyond SM Physics with ATLAS and CMS Searches for Beyond SM Physics with ATLAS and CMS (University of Liverpool) on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations 1 Why beyond SM? In 2012 the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SM) particle content

More information

Highlights from the ATLAS experiment

Highlights from the ATLAS experiment Nuclear Physics A Nuclear Physics A (28) 7 www.elsevier.com/locate/rocedia XXVIIth International Conference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (Quark Matter 28) Highlights from the ALAS exeriment

More information

Supersymmetry at the LHC

Supersymmetry at the LHC Supersymmetry at the LHC What is supersymmetry? Present data & SUSY SUSY at the LHC C. Balázs, L. Cooper, D. Carter, D. Kahawala C. Balázs, Monash U. Melbourne SUSY@LHC.nb Seattle, 23 Sep 2008 page 1/25

More information

Exploring Inert Scalars at CLIC

Exploring Inert Scalars at CLIC Exploring Inert Scalars at CLIC Jan Kalinowski a, Wojciech Kotlarski b, Tania Robens c, Dorota Sokolowska a Aleksander Filip Żarnecki a a Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw b Institut für Kern- und

More information

Fermionic DM Higgs Portal! An EFT approach

Fermionic DM Higgs Portal! An EFT approach Fermionic DM Higgs Portal An EFT approach Michael A. Fedderke University of Chicago Based on 1404.83 [hep-ph] (MF, Chen, Kolb, Wang) Unlocking the Higgs Portal ACFI, UMass, Amherst May 014 01 discovery

More information

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker 1. PP TH 03/04 Accelerators and Detectors 1 hysics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker 2003-12-03 1. Accelerators and Detectors In the following, we concentrate on the three machines SPS, Tevatron and LHC with

More information

Particle Physics: Problem Sheet 5

Particle Physics: Problem Sheet 5 2010 Subatomic: Particle Physics 1 Particle Physics: Problem Sheet 5 Weak, electroweak and LHC Physics 1. Draw a quark level Feynman diagram for the decay K + π + π 0. This is a weak decay. K + has strange

More information

Problem set 6 for Quantum Field Theory course

Problem set 6 for Quantum Field Theory course Problem set 6 or Quantum Field Theory course 2018.03.13. Toics covered Scattering cross-section and decay rate Yukawa theory and Yukawa otential Scattering in external electromagnetic ield, Rutherord ormula

More information

SUSY and Exotics. UK HEP Forum"From the Tevatron to the LHC, Cosener s House, May /05/2009 Steve King, UK HEP Forum '09, Abingdon 1

SUSY and Exotics. UK HEP ForumFrom the Tevatron to the LHC, Cosener s House, May /05/2009 Steve King, UK HEP Forum '09, Abingdon 1 SUSY and Exotics Standard Model and the Origin of Mass Puzzles of Standard Model and Cosmology Bottom-up and top-down motivation Extra dimensions Supersymmetry - MSSM -NMSSM -E 6 SSM and its exotics UK

More information

Spin light of electron in matter

Spin light of electron in matter Sin light of electron in matter Alexander Grigoriev a,b, Sergey Shinkevich a, Alexander Studenikin a,b, Alexei Ternov c, Ilya Trofimov a a Deartment of Theoretical Physics, arxiv:he-h/0611103v1 8 Nov 006

More information

Based on arxiv:0812:4320 In collaboration with A. Dedes, J Rosiek. Informal CIHEP Pizza Lunch February 6, 2009

Based on arxiv:0812:4320 In collaboration with A. Dedes, J Rosiek. Informal CIHEP Pizza Lunch February 6, 2009 A Case Study of B s µ + µ in the MSSM Based on arxiv:0812:4320 In collaboration with A. Dedes, J Rosiek. Cornell University Informal CIHEP Pizza Lunch February 6, 2009 Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 10 Aug 2011

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 10 Aug 2011 The Physics Potential of SuperB F. F. Wilson 1 on behalf of the SuperB Collaboration STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK arxiv:1108.2178v1 [hep-ex] 10 Aug 2011 SuperB

More information

The Four Basic Ways of Creating Dark Matter Through a Portal

The Four Basic Ways of Creating Dark Matter Through a Portal The Four Basic Ways of Creating Dark Matter Through a Portal DISCRETE 2012: Third Symposium on Prospects in the Physics of Discrete Symmetries December 4th 2012, Lisboa Based on arxiv:1112.0493, with Thomas

More information

Creating Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry from Dark Matter Annihilations in Scotogenic Scenarios

Creating Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry from Dark Matter Annihilations in Scotogenic Scenarios Creating Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry from Dark Matter Annihilations in Scotogenic Scenarios Based on arxiv:1806.04689 with A Dasgupta, S K Kang (SeoulTech) Debasish Borah Indian Institute of Technology

More information

generation Outline Outline Motivation Electroweak constraints Selected flavor constraints in B and D sector Conclusion Nejc Košnik

generation Outline Outline Motivation Electroweak constraints Selected flavor constraints in B and D sector Conclusion Nejc Košnik th Discovery Discovery of of the the 4 4th generation generation Outline Outline Motivation Electroweak constraints Selected flavor constraints in B and D sector Conclusion 1 Introduction Introduction

More information

Matter, antimatter, colour and flavour in particle physics

Matter, antimatter, colour and flavour in particle physics Matter, antimatter, colour and flavour in particle physics Sébastien Descotes-Genon Laboratoire de Physique Théorique CNRS & Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France RBI, Zagreb, 5

More information

Exotic Charges, Multicomponent Dark Matter and Light Sterile Neutrinos

Exotic Charges, Multicomponent Dark Matter and Light Sterile Neutrinos Exotic Charges, Multicomponent and Light Sterile Neutrinos Julian Heeck Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg 2.10.2012 based on J.H., He Zhang, arxiv:1210.xxxx. Sterile Neutrinos Hints for ev

More information

Where is SUSY? Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik

Where is SUSY?   Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik Where is SUSY? Institut ür Experimentelle Kernphysik KIT Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales Forschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschat www.kit.edu I supersymmetric particles exist,

More information

ZEEMAN EFFECT: p...(1). Eigenfunction for this Hamiltonian is specified by

ZEEMAN EFFECT: p...(1). Eigenfunction for this Hamiltonian is specified by ZEEMAN EFFECT: Zeeman Effect is a magneto-otical henomenon discovered by Zeeman in 1896. He observed that when an atom (light soce) is laced in an external magnetic field, the sectral lines it emits are

More information

Possible implications ofb anomalies

Possible implications ofb anomalies Possible implications ofb anomalies Jim Cline, NBI & McGill University NBIA Current Themes Workshop, 21 Aug. 2017 J.Cline, McGill U. p. 1 Anomaly: B K ( ) µ + µ versusee R X = B( B Xµ + µ ) B( B Xe + e

More information

Moriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, Flavour physics in the LHC era. An introduction. Clara Matteuzzi. INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca

Moriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, Flavour physics in the LHC era. An introduction. Clara Matteuzzi. INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca Moriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, 2009 Flavour physics in the LHC era An introduction Clara Matteuzzi INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca 1 Contents 1. The flavor structure of the Standard Model 2. Tests

More information

Aspetti della fisica oltre il Modello Standard all LHC

Aspetti della fisica oltre il Modello Standard all LHC Aspetti della fisica oltre il Modello Standard all LHC (con enfasi sulla verificabilità sperimentale in gruppo I e II) Andrea Romanino SISSA e INFN TS Giornata di Seminari, INFN TS, 07.07.09 The Standard

More information

Constraints on Darkon Scalar Dark Matter From Direct Experimental Searches

Constraints on Darkon Scalar Dark Matter From Direct Experimental Searches Constraints on arkon Scalar ark Matter From irect Experimental Searches Based on PhysRev.79.023521 (arxiv:0811.0658 [hep-ph]) Ho-Chin Tsai National Taiwan University in collaboration with Xiao-Gang He,

More information

Koji TSUMURA (NTU à Nagoya U.)

Koji TSUMURA (NTU à Nagoya U.) Koji TSUMURA (NTU à Nagoya U.) Toyama mini WS 20-21/2/2012 S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and H. Yokoya, arxiv:1111.6089 M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and K. Yagyu, Phys. Rev. D80 015017 (2009) Outline The

More information

Implications of a Heavy Z Gauge Boson

Implications of a Heavy Z Gauge Boson Implications of a Heavy Z Gauge Boson Motivations A (string-motivated) model Non-standard Higgs sector, CDM, g µ 2 Electroweak baryogenesis FCNC and B s B s mixing References T. Han, B. McElrath, PL, hep-ph/0402064

More information

Lecture 4 - Beyond the Standard Model (SUSY)

Lecture 4 - Beyond the Standard Model (SUSY) Lecture 4 - Beyond the Standard Model (SUSY) Christopher S. Hill University of Bristol Warwick Flavour ++ Week April 11-15, 2008 Recall the Hierarchy Problem In order to avoid the significant finetuning

More information

Dark Matter Direct Detection in the NMSSM

Dark Matter Direct Detection in the NMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection in the NMSSM,DSU27. Dark Matter Direct Detection in the NMSSM Daniel E. López-Fogliani Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Departamento de Física Teórica & IFT DSU27 D. Cerdeño,

More information

GALACTIC CENTER GEV GAMMA- RAY EXCESS FROM DARK MATTER WITH GAUGED LEPTON NUMBERS. Jongkuk Kim (SKKU) Based on Physics Letters B.

GALACTIC CENTER GEV GAMMA- RAY EXCESS FROM DARK MATTER WITH GAUGED LEPTON NUMBERS. Jongkuk Kim (SKKU) Based on Physics Letters B. GALACTIC CENTER GEV GAMMA- RAY EXCESS FROM DARK MATTER WITH GAUGED LEPTON NUMBERS Jongkuk Kim (SKKU) Based on Physics Letters B. 752 (2016) 59-65 In collaboration with Jong Chul Park, Seong Chan Park The

More information

ATLAS Run II Exotics Results. V.Maleev (Petersburg Nucleare Physics Institute) on behalf of ATLAS collaboration

ATLAS Run II Exotics Results. V.Maleev (Petersburg Nucleare Physics Institute) on behalf of ATLAS collaboration ATLAS Run II Exotics Results V.Maleev (Petersburg Nucleare Physics Institute) on behalf of ATLAS collaboration What is the dark matter? Is the Higgs boson solely responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking

More information

Phenomenology of a light singlet-like scalar in NMSSM

Phenomenology of a light singlet-like scalar in NMSSM Phenomenology of a light singlet-like scalar in NMSSM Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Warsaw Corfu Summer Institute, 12 September 2014 based on: MB, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, JHEP

More information

Stau Pair Production At The ILC Tohoku University Senior Presentation Tran Vuong Tung

Stau Pair Production At The ILC Tohoku University Senior Presentation Tran Vuong Tung e + Z*/γ τ + e - τ Stau Pair Production At The ILC Tohoku University Senior Presentation Tran Vuong Tung 1 Outline Introduction of the International Linear Collider (ILC) Introduction of (g μ -2) in the

More information

Low Scale Flavor Gauge Symmetries

Low Scale Flavor Gauge Symmetries Low Scale Flavor Gauge Symmetries Michele Redi CERN in collaboration with Benjamin Grinstein and Giovanni Villadoro arxiv:1009.2049[hep-ph] Padova, 20 October Outline Flavor Problem Gauging the Flavor

More information

kev sterile Neutrino Dark Matter in Extensions of the Standard Model

kev sterile Neutrino Dark Matter in Extensions of the Standard Model kev sterile Neutrino Dark Matter in Extensions of the Standard Model Manfred Lindner Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg F. Bezrukov, H. Hettmannsperger, ML, arxiv:0912.4415, PRD81,085032 The

More information

Constraints on new physics from rare (semi-)leptonic B decays

Constraints on new physics from rare (semi-)leptonic B decays Rencontres de Moriond, QCD and High Energy Interactions, 12 March 2013 Constraints on new physics from rare (semi-)leptonic B decays David M. Straub Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Introduction Magnetic

More information

Higgs Searches at CMS

Higgs Searches at CMS Higgs Searches at CMS Ashok Kumar Department of Physics and Astrophysics University of Delhi 110007 Delhi, India 1 Introduction A search for the Higgs boson in the Standard Model (SM) and the Beyond Standard

More information

Phenomenology of the Higgs Triplet Model at the LHC

Phenomenology of the Higgs Triplet Model at the LHC Phenomenology of the Higgs Triplet Model at the LHC Andrew Akeroyd SHEP, University of Southampton, UK Higgs Triplet Model (HTM) and doubly charged scalars (H ±± ) The decay channel H 1 γγ and contribution

More information

Relating the Baryon Asymmetry to WIMP Miracle Dark Matter

Relating the Baryon Asymmetry to WIMP Miracle Dark Matter Brussels 20/4/12 Relating the Baryon Asymmetry to WIMP Miracle Dark Matter PRD 84 (2011) 103514 (arxiv:1108.4653) + PRD 83 (2011) 083509 (arxiv:1009.3227) John McDonald, LMS Consortium for Fundamental

More information

Searching for sneutrinos at the bottom of the MSSM spectrum

Searching for sneutrinos at the bottom of the MSSM spectrum Searching for sneutrinos at the bottom of the MSSM spectrum Arindam Chatterjee Harish-Chandra Research Insitute, Allahabad In collaboration with Narendra Sahu; Nabarun Chakraborty, Biswarup Mukhopadhyay

More information

Electroweak Physics and Searches for New Physics at HERA

Electroweak Physics and Searches for New Physics at HERA Electroweak Physics and Searches for New Physics at HERA Uwe Schneekloth DESY On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations 14th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics 5.08.009 Outline Introduction

More information

Koji TSUMURA (NTU Nagoya U.) KEK 16-18/2/2012

Koji TSUMURA (NTU Nagoya U.) KEK 16-18/2/2012 Koji TSUMURA (NTU Nagoya U.) @ KEK 16-18/2/2012 Outline: -Two-Higgs-doublet model -Leptophilic Higgs boson S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and H. Yokoya, arxiv:1111.6089 M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and K.

More information

How high could SUSY go?

How high could SUSY go? How high could SUSY go? Luc Darmé LPTHE (Paris), UPMC November 24, 2015 Based on works realised in collaboration with K. Benakli, M. Goodsell and P. Slavich (1312.5220, 1508.02534 and 1511.02044) Introduction

More information

Double Higgs production via gluon fusion (gg hh) in composite models

Double Higgs production via gluon fusion (gg hh) in composite models Double Higgs production via gluon fusion (gg hh) in composite models Ennio Salvioni CERN and University of Padova based on work in collaboration with C.Grojean (CERN), M.Gillioz (Zürich), R.Gröber and

More information