APMP.T-K3.4: Key comparison of realizations of the ITS-90 over the range C to C
|
|
- David Woods
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 APMP.T-K3.4: Key comparison of realizations of the ITS-90 over the range C to C Final report Prepared by. Joung (coordinator) and K. S. Gam Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) Republic of Korea A. Achmadi and B. A. Trisna Research Center for Metrology-LIPI (RCM-LIPI) Indonesia April, 016 1
2 Table of content 1. Introduction 3. Participating laboratories 3 3. Artifact 3 4. Measurement procedure 4 5. Summary of raw data submissions 4 6. Link from APMP.T-K3.4 to CCT-K Linkage mechanism Data analysis 9 7. Bilateral differences 1 8. Incomplete submission 16 Appendix 1: Protocol of the APMP.T-K Appendix : Measurement data 3 Appendix 3: Uncertainty of the measurement 5 Appendix 5: Immersion curve 7 Appendix 5: Instrumentation 3
3 1. Introduction The APMP bilateral key comparison APMP.T-K3.4 was initiated by the request of RCM-LIPI (Indonesia) to link their national standards to the average reference values (ARVs) of the CCT-K3. Korea research institute of standards and science (KRISS, Republic of Korea) was requested to provide the linkage to the CCT-K3 for the temperature range from C to C. The protocol of the comparison (Appendix 1) was agreed by both the laboratories in 011, and the comparison was carried out in a participant-pilot-participant sequence from 011 to 013. In the APMP.T-K3.4, two standard platinum resistance thermometers (SPRTs) were chosen as the artifacts, and they were calibrated at the ITS-90 fixed-points in the comparison range. The fixed-points in this comparison included Zn FP ( C), Sn FP (31.98 C), In FP ( C), Ga MP ( C), and Hg TP ( C). The protocol of the APMP.T-K3.4 provided general guidance of the comparison and the measurement sequence to be performed. Actual realization of the fixed-points and measurement with the artifacts were carried out according to the local practice. Participants including the pilot were asked to make all the required corrections such that the resistance ratios were equivalent to the ITS-90 assigned temperature values at 0 ma.. Participating laboratories KRISS (Republic of Korea) ukchul Joung, Kee Sool Gam Korea research institute of standards and science 67 Gajeong-Ro, Yuseong-Gu Daejeon 34113, Korea wukchul.joung@kriss.re.kr RCM-LIPI (Indonesia) Aditya Achmadi, Beni Adi Trisna Research Center for Calibration, Instrumentation and Metrology Indonesian Institute of Sciences Kompleks PUSPIPTEK Gedung 40 Tangerang Selatan, BANTEN- INDONESIA aditya_achmadi@yahoo.com 3. Artifact The artifacts used for this comparison were two SPRTs, and they were provided by RCM-LIPI. The specifications of the artifacts are as follows. 3
4 - Serial number: 136 and 160 (hereafter referred to as artifact 1 and artifact ) - Model: 670SQ - Manufacturer: Isotech - Sheath type: Quartz sheathed - Sensing element length: 35 mm (distance from the tip of the thermometer to the mid-point of the sensing element: around 5 mm) 4. Measurement procedure The SPRTs were first calibrated at RCM-LIPI before being sent to KRISS, the pilot laboratory. After the calibration at KRISS, the artifacts were sent back to RCM-LIPI to repeat the calibration. Transportation of the artifacts was done by hand-carrying. Measurements at fixed-points were performed in order of decreasing temperatures alternating with measurements at the triple point of water. 5. Summary of raw data submissions Raw data from the participating laboratories are given in Appendix. However, for convenience, the reported resistance ratios are duplicated here in Tables 1 and. Table 1. Resistance ratios received from participants in APMP.T-K3.4 (artifact 1). Lab (Zn FP) (Sn FP) (In FP) (Ga MP) (Hg TP) RCM-LIPI pre KRISS RCM-LIPI post Table. Resistance ratios received from participants in APMP.T-K3.4 (artifact ). Lab (Zn FP) (Sn FP) (In FP) (Ga MP) (Hg TP) RCM-LIPI pre KRISS RCM-LIPI post Measurement uncertainties from the participants are also given in Appendix 3, and for convenience, the uncertainties at the fixed-points are presented here in Table 3. Table 3. Uncertainties of the fixed-point resistance ratios in mk at 95 % level of confidence and k =. Lab U(Zn FP) U(Sn FP) U(In FP) U(Ga MP) U(TP) U(Hg TP) RCM-LIPI KRISS
5 6. Link from APMP.T-K3.4 to CCT-K Linkage mechanism KRISS participated in the CCT-K3 and served as the linking laboratory in the APMP.T-K3.4. The linkage was from the fixed-point resistance ratios of RCM-LIPI to the ARVs of the CCT-K3 through the difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of KRISS and the ARVs of the CCT-K3. The linkage mechanism is as follows. T RCM LIPI APMP.TK3.4 T RCM LIPI T KRISS T KRISS APMP.T K3.4 CCTK3 ARV CCTK3 APMP.TK3.4 ARV KRISS KRISS CCTK3 CCTK3 APMP.TK3.4 (1) here K3.4 CCT-K3 T RCM LIPI APMP.T ARV is the temperature difference between the K3.4 APMP.T K3.4 fixed-point resistance ratios of RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T-K3.4 and the ARVs of the CCT- K3, T RCM LIPI APMP.T KRISS is the fixed-point temperature difference APMP.T -K3.4 CCTK3 between KRISS and RCM-LIPI measured in the APMP.T-K3.4, T KRISS KRISS is the temperature difference between the CCTK3 CCTK3 fixed-point cells of KRISS in the APMP.T- K3.4 and those in the CCT-K3, T KRISS ARV is the temperature difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of KRISS in the CCT-K3 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3. The fixed-point temperature difference between KRISS and RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T-K3.4, K3.4 APMP.T K3.4 T RCM LIPI APMP.T KRISS was defined as the average of the measured differences from the two artifacts. T RCM LIPI APMP.T K3.4 T KRISS 1 T RCM LIPI RCM LIPI APMP.T K3.4 APMP.T K3.4 APMP.T K3.4 KRISS KRISS APMP.T K3.4 1 APMP.T K3.4 () 5
6 The temperature difference between KRISS and RCM-LIPI for each artifact was defined by the difference in the resistance ratios at the fixed-point. T RCM LIPI APMP.TK3.4 KRISS RCM LIPI KRISS APMP.TK3.4 i APMP.TK3.4 i APMP.TK3.4 i dr dt (3) Here, the subscript, i refers to the each artifact. The resistance ratio of RCM-LIPI for an artifact was defined as the average of the measurement results before and after the measurement at KRISS. RCM LIPI 1 APMP.TK3.4 i RCM LIPI RCM LIPI APMP.TK3.4 i,pre APMP.TK3.4 i,post (4) Here, the resistance ratios RCM LIPI APMP.T K3.4 i and APMP.T K3.4 i from the 3 repeated measurements. KRISS were the averages The temperature difference between the fixed-point cells of KRISS in the APMP.T-K3.4 and those in the CCT-K3, KRISS KRISS T accounted for any changes in the fixed-point cells APMP.T -K3.4 CCTK3 between these two comparisons. In the APMP.T-K3.4, as the same fixed-point cells were used, this difference vanished but only had uncertainties. As for the temperature difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of KRISS in the CCT-K3 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3, T KRISS ARV Table 4 reproduces these results. CCTK3 CCTK3, the results from the CCT-K3 was used. Table 4. Temperature difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of KRISS in the CCT-K3 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3, and corresponding expanded uncertainties at 95 % level of confidence and k =. Temperature difference / mk Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP Uncertainty in the temperature difference / mk CCTK3 CCTK3 T KRISS ARV CCTK3 CCTK3 U T KRISS ARV The uncertainty in the temperature difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of RCM-LIPI and the ARVs of the CCT-K3 was evaluated based on the following equation under the assumption of no correlation between the temperature differences in Eq. (1). The expanded uncertainties were evaluated at 95 % level of confidence and k =. 6
7 U T RCM LIPI U U U APMP.TK3.4 T RCM LIPI T KRISS T KRISS APMP.T K3.4 CCTK3 ARV CCTK3 APMP.TK3.4 ARV KRISS KRISS CCTK3 CCTK3 APMP.T K3.4 (5) here K3.4 CCT-K3 U T RCM LIPI APMP.T ARV is the expanded uncertainty in the temperature K3.4 APMP.T K3.4 difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T-K3.4 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3, U T RCM LIPI APMP.T KRISS is the expanded uncertainty in the fixed-point APMP.T -K3.4 CCTK3 temperature difference between KRISS and RCM-LIPI measured in the APMP.T-K3.4, U T KRISS KRISS is the expanded uncertainty in the temperature CCTK3 CCTK3 difference between the fixed-point cells of KRISS in the APMP.T-K3.4 and those in the CCT-K3, U T KRISS ARV is the expanded uncertainty in the temperature difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of KRISS in the CCT-K3 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3. The expanded uncertainty in the fixed-point temperature difference between KRISS and RCM-LIPI measured in the APMP.T-K3.4, T RCM LIPI APMP.T KRISS based on the following equations. U was evaluated K3.4 APMP.T K3.4 U U U T RCM LIPI 1 U 4 U APMP.TK3.4 T T T RCM LIPI U RCM LIPI 1 U 4 RCM LIPI KRISS RCM LIPI APMP.TK3.4 APMP.T K3.4 APMP.TK3.4 APMP.TK3.4 KRISS KRISS KRISS APMP.T K3.4 1 APMP.T K3.4 RCM LIPI U KRISS APMP.TK3.4 i APMP.TK3.4 i APMP.TK3.4 i dr dt APMP.TK3.4i RCM LIPI U RCM LIPI APMP.TK3.4 i,pre APMP.T K3.4 i,post (6) (7) (8) 7
8 In this comparison, SPRT cutoff criteria were used to ensure that uncertainty associated with the travel, handling, or stability of either SPRT did not dominate the standard uncertainty of the temperature difference. In this regard, the test for the stability of the travelling artifacts was based on measurements done by RCM-LIPI before and after the travel to KRISS. Eqs. (9) and (10) show the cutoff criteria used in this comparison, and an artifact which met both the two criteria was not included in the calculation. RCM LIPI RCM LIPI 0.95, eff u RCM LIPI d dt u RCM LIPI r R APMP.TK3.4 i,pre APMP.T K3.4 i,pre R APMP.T K3.4 i,post APMP.TK3.4 i,post t (9) u C SPRT, i u T RCM LIPI u C APMP.T K3.4 i 3 SPRT, i (10) here u C SPRT, i RCM LIPIAPMP.TK3.4i,pre RCM LIPIAPMP.TK3.4i d dt 1,post. (11) In the cutoff criteria above, RCM r ur LIPI APMP.T K3.4 i is the combined standard uncertainty from all sources of random uncertainty for each SPRT, and t 0.95, eff is the appropriate quantile of the Student s t distribution with degrees of freedom, eff needed to compute an approximate 95 % level of confidence for the temperature differences observed after travel to and from KRISS for each SPRT. The expanded uncertainty in the temperature difference between the fixed-point cells of KRISS used in the APMP.T-K3.4 and those in the CCT-K3, T KRISS KRISS using the following equation. U was evaluated APMP.T K3.4 CCTK3 U T KRISS U uc K3.4 KRISSCCTK3 TKRISS U TKRISS APMP.T APMP.T K3.4 uc CCTK3 (1) Here, the subscript uc refers to the uncorrelated uncertainty components in the fixed-point resistance ratio measurements. In this comparison, only the uncertainties due to the chemical impurity and to the hydrostatic head correction were assumed to be correlated. This assumption was based on the fact that the reference fixed-point cells at KRISS had been strictly restricted in use except for international comparisons and calibrations of other fixed-point cells. Thus, contamination of the samples since the CCT-K3 was thought to be unlikely. Therefore, as the same fixed-point cells were employed in the APMP.T-K3.4, uncertainty components related with the physical content and the geometry of the fixed- 8
9 point cells were assumed to be correlated, which were the uncertainties due to the chemical impurity and to the hydrostatic head correction. The expanded uncertainty in the temperature difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of KRISS in the CCT-K3 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3 was available in the final report of the CCT-K3, and is reproduced in Table Data analysis Table 5 shows the results of the cutoff criteria analysis. As shown in the table, since no artifacts failed both the criteria, the data from the two artifacts were all used in the following analysis. Hg TP Passed Passed Table 5. Results of the cutoff criteria analysis. Fixedpoint u C SPRT, i / mk Cutoff criterion 1 value Cutoff criterion 1 result Artifact 1 Artifact Artifact 1 Artifact Artifact 1 Artifact Zn FP Passed Passed Sn FP Passed Passed In FP Passed Failed Ga MP Passed Passed Fixedpoint u T RCM LIPI APMP.T K3.4 i Cutoff criterion value / mk / mk Cutoff criterion result Artifact 1 Artifact Artifact 1 Artifact Artifact 1 Artifact Zn FP Passed Failed Sn FP Passed Failed In FP Passed Passed Ga MP Passed Passed Hg TP Passed Passed Table 6 shows the fixed-point temperature differences between RCM-LIPI and KRISS for both the artifacts and corresponding expanded uncertainties. Table 6. Fixed-point temperature differences between RCM-LIPI and KRISS for both the artifacts and corresponding expanded uncertainties (95 % level of confidence and k = ). Temperature difference / mk Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP Uncertainty in the temperature difference / mk RCM LIPI APMP.T K3.4 KRISS APMP.T K3.4 1 RCM LIPI APMP.T KRISS T U T K3.4 APMP.T K
10 RCM LIPI APMP.T K3.4 KRISS APMP.T K3.4 RCM LIPI APMP.T KRISS T U T K3.4 APMP.T K3.4 Table 7 and Fig. 1 show the averaged fixed-point temperature difference between RCM-LIPI and KRISS, and the corresponding uncertainty. Table 7. Averaged fixed-point temperature difference between RCM-LIPI and KRISS, and corresponding expanded uncertainty (95 % level of confidence and k = ). Temperature difference / mk Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP Uncertainty in the temperature difference / mk K3.4 APMP.T K3.4 T RCM LIPI APMP.T KRISS K3.4 APMP.T K3.4 U T RCM LIPI APMP.T KRISS Fig. 1. Averaged fixed-point temperature difference between RCM-LIPI and KRISS, and corresponding expanded uncertainty (95 % level of confidence and k = ). In order to complete the linkage, it was needed to evaluate the uncertainty in the temperature difference between the fixed-point cells of KRISS used in the APMP.T-K3.4 and those in the CCT-K3, T KRISS APMP.T -K3.4 KRISS CCTK3. As noted above, since the fixed-point cells used in the APMP.T- K3.4 were the same as those in the CCT-K3, the temperature difference did not influence the linkage, but its uncertainty affected the linkage. The uncertainty in that temperature difference accounted for any 10
11 uncorrelated uncertainties in the realization of the fixed-point and in the measurement of the resistance ratio. In this comparison, only the uncertainties due to the chemical impurity and the hydrostatic head correction were assumed to be correlated. Table 8 shows the related uncertainty components in the APMP.T-K3.4 and in the CCT-K3. Table 8. Uncertainty component for KRISS in the APMP.T-K3.4 and CCT-K3. Uncertainty components correlated between the APMP.T-K3.4 and the CCT-K3 are in boldface. Expanded uncertainty was evaluated at 95 % level of confidence and k =. All the uncertainties are in mk. Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP Uncertainty APM APM APM APM APM component CCT CCT CCT CCT CCT P P P P P Repeatability Chemical impurity Hydrostatic head Heat flux Gas pressure Slope of plateau Propagated from TP Bridge nonlinearity Bridge repeatability SPRT self-heating R s stability SPRT oxidation Total A Total B Total U correlated U uncorrelated U{ΔT(KRISS)} U{ΔT(KRISS)} designated KRISS KRISS T. APMP.T -K3.4 CCTK3 Based on the above analysis and using the temperature difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of KRISS in the CCT-K3 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3 in Table 4, the temperature difference 11
12 between the fixed-point resistance ratios of RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T-K3.4 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3 and its uncertainty were calculated. Table 9 and Fig show the result. Table 9. Temperature difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T- K3.4 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3, and corresponding expanded uncertainty (95 % level of confidence and k = ). Temperature difference / mk Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP Uncertainty in the temperature difference / mk K3.4 CCT-K3 T RCM LIPI APMP.T ARV K3.4 CCT-K3 U T RCM LIPI APMP.T ARV Fig.. Temperature difference between the fixed-point resistance ratios of RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T- K3.4 and the ARVs of the CCT-K3, and corresponding expanded uncertainty (95 % level of confidence and k = ). 7. Bilateral differences The bilateral differences from RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T-K3.4 to CCT-K3 participants were calculated based on the following equations. In doing so, it was assumed that the differences between the CCT-K3 participants were uncorrelated. 1
13 T RCM LIPI APMP.TK3.4 T RCM LIPI T KRISS T KRISS APMP.T K3.4 CCTK3 Lab CCTK3 APMP.TK3.4 Lab KRISS CCTK3 KRISS CCTK3 APMP.TK3.4 (13) U T RCM LIPI U U U APMP.TK3.4 T RCM LIPI T KRISS T KRISS APMP.T K3.4 CCTK3 Lab CCTK3 APMP.TK3.4 Lab KRISS CCTK3 KRISS CCTK3 APMP.T K3.4 (14) here -K3.4 CCTK3 T RCM- LIPI APMP.T Lab is the fixed-point temperature difference CCTK3 CCTK3 between RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T-K3.4 and a participant of the CCT-K3, T KRISS Lab is the fixed-point temperature difference -K3.4 CCTK3 between KRISS and a participant of the CCT- K3, U T RCM- LIPI APMP.T Lab is the expanded uncertainty in the fixed-point CCTK3 CCTK3 temperature difference between RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T-K3.4 and a participant of the CCT-K3, U T KRISS Lab is the expanded uncertainty in the fixed-point temperature difference between KRISS and a participant of the CCT-K3. The bilateral differences between KRISS and participants of the CCT-K3 and the corresponding uncertainties are reproduced in Table 10. Table 10. Bilateral differences between KRISS and participants of the CCT-K3 and corresponding expanded uncertainties (95 % level of confidence and k = ). T KRISS Lab / mk Fixed-point CCTK3 CCTK3 CCTK3 CCTK3 U T KRISS Lab / mk BIPM BNM IMGC MSL NIM NIST NML Zn FP ΔT U Sn FP ΔT U
14 In FP ΔT U Ga MP ΔT U Hg TP ΔT U Fixed-point T KRISS Lab / mk CCTK3 CCTK3 CCTK3 CCTK3 U T KRISS Lab / mk NPL NRC NRLM PTB SMU VNIIM VSL Zn FP ΔT U Sn FP ΔT U In FP ΔT U Ga MP ΔT U Hg TP ΔT U Based on the above equations and the bilateral differences between KRISS and participants of the CCT- K3, the bilateral differences between RCM-LIPI in the APMP.T-K3.4 and participants of the CCT-K3 were calculated, and the result is shown in Table 11. Table 11. Bilateral differences between RCM-LIPI and participants of the CCT-K3 and corresponding expanded uncertainties (95 % level of confidence and k = ). T RCM- LIPI APMP.T Lab / mk Fixed-point -K3.4 -K3.4 CCTK3 CCTK3 U T RCM- LIPI APMP.T Lab / mk BIPM BNM IMGC MSL NIM NIST NML Zn FP ΔT U Sn FP ΔT U In FP ΔT U Ga MP ΔT U
15 ΔT Hg TP U Fixed-point T RCM- LIPI APMP.T Lab / mk -K3.4 -K3.4 CCTK3 CCTK3 U T RCM- LIPI APMP.T Lab / mk NPL NRC NRLM PTB SMU VNIIM VSL Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP ΔT U ΔT U ΔT U ΔT U ΔT U
16 8. Incomplete submission Laboratories failing to submit data for APMP.T-K3.4 report draft A: (1) RCM-LIPI: Instrumentation list Appendix 1: Protocol of the APMP.T-K3.4 Appendix : Measurement data Appendix 3: Uncertainty of the measurement Appendix 4: Immersion curve Appendix 5: Instrumentation 16
17 Appendix 1: Protocol of the APMP.T-K3.4 Bilateral Comparison from the Hg TP to the Zn FP between KRISS and KIM-LIPI Objective: This comparison is designed to compare the realization of the ITS-90 through the calibration of SPRTs. The range of temperature covered in this comparison is from the triple point of Hg ( K) to the freezing point of Zn ( K). The transfer standards used will be long-stem SPRTs. NMI Participants: Pilot: KRISS, ukchul Joung, Participating lab: KIM-LIPI, Beni Adi Trisna, Projected Timeline: Protocol Agreement June 30, 011 Transfer Standards Sent to KRISS September 30, 011 Transfer Standards Returned to KIM-LIPI December 31, 011 Transfer Standards Re-Measured by KIM-LIPI March 31, 01 Draft A Report Completed April 30, 01 Participants will supply the following information: ITS-90 calibrated SPRTs o o o NMI participant will select their own SPRTs based on their own criteria for suitability and will convey the selection criteria to the Pilot Laboratory SPRTs must be calibrated by NMI participant before measurements are made by the pilot and then again on return from the pilot SPRTs are to be measured at every available fixed-point cell over the range of the comparison including the In FP and Ga MP Calibration results supplied in FP with all corrections applied by the NMI such that the FP values are equivalent to the ITS-90 assigned temperature values for 0 ma. Uncertainties, u FP SPRTi, may be specific to each SPRT or a nominal uncertainty may be given for both SPRTs. The calibration results should be based on 3 repeated measurements at each fixed point. 17
18 o Appendix A gives a reporting worksheet The measurement equation used to compute each calibration result with an indication of which inputs vary randomly for each realized equilibrium and which inputs are systematic across all equilibria for each fixed point within this comparison o Any quantities in the measurement equation that are a mixture of random and systematic effects for each SPRT should be broken into constituent parts that are either purely random or purely systematic within this comparison. An example of an SPRT measurement is given in Appendix B. Uncertainty budget compliant with CCT G3 that includes degrees of freedom associated each component o A suggested fixed-point cell uncertainty budget is given in Appendix C Sources of uncertainty may be added or deleted as needed An NMI may choose to supply their own uncertainty budget (CMC and G3 compliant) that includes degrees of freedom for each source of uncertainty Please identify which components of the uncertainty budget are associated with random effects in FP and which are associated with systematic effects in FP within this comparison. Heat Flux (Immersion) profile for each fixed-point cell used o [R(FP), 0 ma] and corresponding [immersion depth (sensor midpoint), cm] Reporting the calibration results: The participating NMIs should report FP to the independent party within weeks after completing the measurement without informing the results to the other participating laboratory. After receiving all results from the participating laboratories (two results from KIM-LIPI, one from KRISS), the independent party will forward the results to the pilot laboratory. After reporting FP to the independent party, the participating NMI (KIM-LIPI) should send all the results and required information to KRISS (ukchul Joung, wukchul.joung@kriss.re.kr). If you have questions about any aspect of the protocol or are not sure how to report something that is requested, please contact ukchul Joung prior to submitting your report. After reviewing a ll submitted reports, we will contact you if there is anything that is unclear to us or if any addi tional information is needed to complete the analysis of the data. Method of Analysis: 18
19 The fixed-point realization temperature differences between KRISS and KIM-LIPI will be calculated using the following equations: T KIM LIPI 1 T T KIM LIPI,SPRT1 KIM LIPI, SPRT where T KIM FP FP KIM LIPI,SPRT i i LIPI,SPRT i SPRT. i d r dt KRISS,SPRT C C SPRT is a term used to account for uncertainty associated with the travel, handling, or stability of each i SPRT and is taken to have a value of C and a standard uncertainty, u SPRT i C SPRTi, of u C SPRTi FPKIM LIPI,SPRT FP i,postkriss d dt 1 KIM LIPI,SPRT i,pre KRISS. r An SPRT cutoff criterion for use in calculating values of T KIM LIPI will be used to ensure that uncertainty associated with the travel, handling, or stability of either SPRT does not dominate the standard uncertainty of T, u KIM LIPI T KIMLIPI. The cutoff criterion will be based on the statistical agreement between each SPRT s resistance ratios before and after its travel to KRISS and the magnitude of u C SPRTi. The mathematical definition for the cutoff criterion will be: and u C FPKIM LIPI,SPRT FP d d i,postkriss KIM LIPI,SPRT i,pre KRISS r T FP u FP u R SPRTi KIM LIPI,SPRT i,postkriss u T uc KIM LIPI 3 SPRTi In the cutoff criterion above, R R FP KIM LIPI,SPRT i KIM LIPI,SPRT i,pre KRISS t 0.95, eff Resultsfrom SPRTi willnot be used u is the combined standard uncertainty from all sources of random uncertainty for each SPRT and t is the appropriate quantile of the Student s t 0.95, eff distribution with eff degrees of freedom needed to compute an approximate 95 % confidence interval for the temperature difference observed after travel to and from KRISS for each SPRT. 19
20 Appendix A: Measurement Reporting orksheet Participating NMI Before sending SPRTs to pilot laboratory Zn Sn In Ga Hg SPRT 1, mk u FP SPRT1 Number of equilibria realized SPRT u FP SPRT, mk Number of equilibria realized Final R(TP) On return to participating laboratory Zn Sn In Ga Hg SPRT 1, mk u FP SPRT1 Number of equilibria realized SPRT u FP SPRT, mk Number of equilibria realized Final R(TP) Fixed-point cell information s/n Zn Sn In Ga Hg Immersion depth, cm Pressure, kpa Resistance ratio bridge model Reference resistor model Resistor enclosure stability, mk 0
21 Measurement system Appendix B: Example of an SPRT measurement T meas. (FP) = T 90 (FP) + pressure correction + immersion correction (FP) = calc.(fp) + (T meas. T 90 ) / dr/dt Before sending SPRTS to pilot laboratory pressure immersion correction, mk u correction, mk correction, mk u correction, mk Zn Sn In Ga Hg After sending SPRTS to pilot laboratory pressure immersion correction, mk u correction, mk correction, mk u correction, mk Zn Sn In Ga Hg 1
22 Appendix C: Suggested Fixed-Point Cell Uncertainty Budget Participating NMI Type A Phase transition realization repeatability Hg Ga In Sn Zn Systematic mk df mk df mk df mk df mk df or random Total A Type B Chemical impurities Hydrostatic-head Propagated TP SPRT self-heating Heat flux Moisture Gas pressure Slope of plateau Total B Combined standard uncertainty Expanded uncertainty (k = level, using effective df)
23 Appendix : Measurement data Participating NMI Before sending SPRTs to pilot laboratory RCM-LIPI Artifact 1 Artifact Fixed-point Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP R FP / Ω Number of R FP / Ω Number of R TP / Ω equilibria R TP / Ω realized U / mk U / mk equilibria realized Final R(TP) Ω Ω 3
24 On return to participating laboratory Artifact 1 Artifact Fixed-point Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP R FP / Ω Number of R FP / Ω Number of R TP / Ω equilibria R TP / Ω realized U / mk U / mk equilibria realized Final R(TP) Ω Ω 4
25 Participating NMI KRISS Artifact 1 Artifact Fixed-point Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP R FP / Ω Number of R FP / Ω Number of R TP / Ω equilibria R TP / Ω realized U / mk U / mk equilibria realized Final R(TP) Ω Ω 5
26 Appendix 3: Uncertainty of the measurement Participating NMI RCM-LIPI Type A Hg TP TP Ga MP In FP Sn FP Zn FP Systematic or random Phase transition realization repeatability random Total A Type B Chemical impurities systematic Hydrostatic-head systematic Heat flux systematic Gas pressure systematic Slope of plateau systematic Propagated from TP systematic Isotopic variation systematic Bridge nonlinearity systematic Bridge repeatability random SPRT self-heating systematic R s stability systematic SPRT oxidation systematic Total B Combined standard uncertainty / mk Expanded uncertainty / mk (95 % level of confidence, k = )
27 Participating NMI KRISS Type A Hg TP TP Ga MP In FP Sn FP Zn FP Systematic or random Phase transition realization repeatability random Total A Type B Chemical impurities systematic Hydrostatic-head systematic Heat flux systematic Gas pressure systematic Slope of plateau systematic Propagated from TP systematic Isotopic variation systematic Bridge nonlinearity systematic Bridge repeatability random SPRT self-heating systematic R s stability systematic SPRT oxidation systematic Total B Combined standard uncertainty / mk Expanded uncertainty / mk (95 % level of confidence, k = )
28 Appendix 4: Immersion curve Appendix 4.1: Zn FP 8
29 Appendix 4.: Sn FP 9
30 Appendix 4.3: In FP 30
31 Appendix 4.4: Ga MP 31
32 Appendix 4.5: Hg TP 3
33 Appendix 5: Instrumentation Appendix 5.1: Resistance measuring device Laboratory RCM-LIPI KRISS Bridge manufacturer MI ASL AC/DC DC, 6010C AC, F900 If AC, give Frequency 30 Hz Bandwidth 0.1 Hz Gain 10 4 Quad gain 10 Output IEEE-488 Normal measuring current 1 ma Self-heating current ma Unity reading Zero reading Compliment check error If DC, give Gain Period of reversal 4 s Output IEEE-488 Reference resistor Type DC, standard resistor 10 Ω AC/DC Manufacturer Tinsley Tinsley Temperature 3 C 5 C Temperature coefficient / C / C Linearity of bridge
34 Appendix 5.: Triple point of water cell Laboratory RCM-LIPI KRISS Cell manufacturer PTB KRISS ater source and purity Distilled deionized water ell diameter 15 mm 11 mm Immersion depth 60 mm 60 mm Heat transfer liquid: water? Alcohol ater Cell maintained in: ice bath/water bath? ater bath mixed with alcohol Ice bath Ice mantle: Method of preparation Dry ice Dry ice Annealing time before use 1 week weeks 34
35 Appendix 5.3: Other fixed-point cell Laboratory RCM-LIPI Fixed-point Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP Cell Cell manufacturer Hart Hart Hart Hart Scientific Scientific Scientific Scientific Open/closed? Open Open Open Closed Closed Pressure in cell kpa kpa kpa MP TP Crucible Crucible material Austenitic Graphite Graphite Graphite PTFE Stainless Steel Crucible manufacturer Hart Hart Hart Hart Hart Scientific Scientific Scientific Scientific Scientific Crucible length 50 mm 50 mm 50 mm 168 mm 13 mm Metal sample Sample source Hart Hart Hart Hart Hart Scientific Scientific Scientific Scientific Scientific Sample purity % % % % % Sample weight 1 kg 1 kg 1 kg Thermometer well ell material Austenitic Graphite Graphite Graphite PTFE Stainless Steel ell ID (mm) 8 mm 8 mm 8 mm 7 mm 7 mm Immersion depth of SPRT 170 mm 170 mm 170 mm 143 mm 188 mm Furnace/Bath Furnace Furnace Furnace Furnace Bath Manufacturer Hart Hart Hart Hart Hart Scientific Scientific Scientific Scientific Scientific Control type PID PID PID PID PID How many zones? 3 Zone 3 Zone 3 Zone Furnace heater AC/DC? AC AC AC Heat pipe liner? No No No ITS-90 realization Thermoelectric Heater AC Freeze/melt? Freeze Freeze Freeze Melt Melt Technique Induced Induced Induced Induced Heater Freeze Freeze Freeze melt Heat transfer fluid Air Air Air Air Halocarbon Duration of freeze/melt 16 hours 16 hours 6 hours 10 hours 18 hours Cell used as FP/MP/TP? FP FP FP MP TP 35
36 Laboratory KRISS Fixed-point Zn FP Sn FP In FP Ga MP Hg TP Cell Cell manufacturer KRISS KRISS KRISS KRISS Isotech Open/closed? Open Open Closed Open Closed Pressure in cell Pa Pa Pa Pa TP Crucible Crucible material Graphite Graphite Pyrex Teflon Stainless steel Crucible manufacturer Ultra carbon Ultra carbon NA NA Isotech Crucible length 55 mm 55 mm 180 mm 310 mm 30 mm Metal sample Sample source Johnson Johnson Johnson Rhone- Matthey Matthey Matthey Poulenc Unknown Sample purity % % % % % Sample weight 1.0 kg 1.0 kg 0.7 kg 0.8 kg 3.0 kg Thermometer well ell material Graphite Graphite Pyrex Teflon Stainless Steel ell ID 11 mm 11 mm 10 mm 1 mm 9.5 mm Immersion depth of SPRT 140 mm 140 mm 115 mm 180 mm 155 mm Furnace/Bath Furnace Furnace Furnace Bath Refrigerator Manufacturer Isotech Isotech Isotech Hart Isotech Control type PID PID PID PID PID How many zones? NA NA Furnace heater AC/DC? AC AC AC NA NA Heat pipe liner? No No No NA NA ITS-90 realization Freeze/melt? Freeze Freeze Freeze Melt Melt Outside Technique Induced nucleation, Induced Induced Heater freeze induced freeze melt freeze Heat transfer fluid Air Air Air ater Ethanol Duration of freeze/melt 15 hours 8 hours 0 hours 50 hours 15 hours Cell used as FP/MP/TP? FP FP FP MP TP 36
37 37
NIST CERTIFICATION OF ITS-90 FIXED-POINT CELLS FROM K TO K: METHODS AND UNCERTAINTIES
NIST CERTIFICATION OF ITS-90 FIXED-POINT CELLS FROM 83.8058 K TO 1234.93 K: METHODS AND UNCERTAINTIES Gregory F. Strouse National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA ABSTRACT
More informationINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR M. Araya 1, D. Almeida 2 1 National Laboratory of Temperature of Chile, LCPNT, Santiago, Chile 2 Ecuadorian Standardization
More informationFinal Report for the APMP.T-K4 (Draft B on October 27, 2011)
Final Report for the APMP.T-K4 (Draft B on October 27, 2011) Comparison of Realizations of Aluminum Freezing-Point Temperatures Prepared by K. S. Gam (coordinator) and W. Joung Korea Research Institute
More informationAPMP-K3: KEY COMPARISON OF REALIZATIONS OF THE ITS-90 OVER THE RANGE o C TO o C Final Report Prepared by M. K. Nguyen and M. J.
APMP-K3: KEY COMPARISON OF REALIZATIONS OF THE ITS-90 OVER THE RANGE 38.8344 o C TO 419.527 o C Final Report Prepared by M. K. Nguyen and M. J. Ballico National Measurement Institute of Australia Lindfield,
More informationA SPRT Intercomparison at Hg, TPW, Ga, Sn and Zn ITS-90 Fixed Points between PTB and LATU with PTB as Pilot Laboratory
A SPRT Intercomparison at Hg, TPW, Ga, Sn and Zn ITS-90 Points between PTB and LATU with PTB as Pilot Laboratory O. Robatto, Departamento de Metrología Científica, Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay(LATU),
More informationINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF WATER TRIPLE POINT CELLS LEADING TO A MORE PRECISE DEFINITION OF THE KELVIN
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF WATER TRIPLE POINT CELLS LEADING TO A MORE PRECISE DEFINITION OF THE KELVIN Michael Stock and Stéphane Solve Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) Pavillon de Breteuil,
More informationREPORT to the CCT on Comparison COOMET. T-K3 (COOMET theme No. 285/RU-а/03) Final Report
REPORT to the CCT on Comparison COOMET. T-K3 (COOMET theme No. 285/RU-а/03) Final Report REGIONAL COMPARISONS OF THE NATIONAL STANDARDS OF TEMPERATURE IN THE RANGE FROM THE TRIPLE POINT OF WATER TO THE
More informationI. Yang, C. H. Song, Y.-G. Kim & K. S. Gam
Cryostat for Fixed-Point Calibration of Capsule-Type SPRTs I. Yang, C. H. Song, Y.-G. Kim & K. S. Gam International Journal of Thermophysics Journal of Thermophysical Properties and Thermophysics and Its
More informationINTERCOMPARISON OF WATER TRIPLE POINT CELLS FROM INTIBS AND INRIM 1. INTRODUCTION
METROLOGY AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS VOL. XV, NUMBER 4 (2008) A. SZMYRKA-GRZEBYK 1, A. KOWAL 1, L. LIPIŃSKI 1, PETER P. M. STEUR 2, R. DEMATTEIS 2 1 Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research PAN,
More informationCCT/10-21 Extrapolation of the ITS-90 down to the boiling point of nitrogen from the triple point of argon
CCT/10-21 Extrapolation of the ITS-90 down to the boiling point of nitrogen from the triple point of argon Tohru Nakano and Osamu Tamura National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), AIST Tsukuba, Japan
More informationA Sub-millikelvin Calibration Facility in the Range 0 C to 30 C
Int J Thermophys (2017) 38:37 DOI 10.1007/s10765-016-2171-9 TEMPMEKO 2016 A Sub-millikelvin Calibration Facility in the Range 0 C to 30 C R. Bosma 1 A. Peruzzi 1 R. Van Breugel 1 C. Bruin-Barendregt 1
More informationFinal Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR
Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR Jin Wan Chung 1, Shih Mean Lee, Sungjun Lee 1 1 Korea Research Institute of Standards
More informationDemonstrating Competency and Equivalency of Two Commercial SPRT Calibration Facilities
Demonstrating Competency and Equivalency of Two Commercial SPRT Calibration Facilities T. J. Wiandt 1,2 1 Fluke Corporation, Hart Scientific Division, American Fork, Utah United States. 2 E-mail: tom.wiandt@hartscientific.com
More informationThe ITS-90 after definition of neon isotopic reference composition: extent of the isotopic effect tested on previous inter-comparison results
Online Supplementary Information for the paper: The ITS-90 after definition of neon isotopic reference composition: extent of the isotopic effect tested on previous inter-comparison results Franco Pavese
More informationFinal Report. CCEM Comparison of 10 pf Capacitance Standards. Anne-Marie Jeffery Electricity Division NIST May 2000 Revised March 2002
Final Report CCEM Comparison of 10 pf Capacitance Standards Anne-Marie Jeffery Electricity Division NIST May 2000 Revised March 2002 Abstract Comparison of electrical standards must be carried out periodically
More informationEuropean Association of National Metrology Institutes
European Association of National Metrology Institutes EURAMET GUIDELINES ON TEMPERATURE: Extrapolation of SPRT calibrations below the triple point of argon, 83.8058 K, and traceability in baths of liquid
More informationFinal report of APMP.T-S5. APMP Regional Comparison of Au/Pt Thermocouples from 0 C to 960 C
Final report of APMP.T-S5 APMP Regional Comparison of Au/Pt Thermocouples from 0 C to 960 C Dr. F Jahan 1, Dr M J Ballico 1, Yong-Gyoo Kim 2, Hans Liedberg 3, Wang Li 4, Hideki Ogura 5 and C. M. Tsui 6
More informationFinal Report on APMP.T-K7
Final Report on APMP.T-K7 Key Comparison of water triple point cells Shu-Fei Tsai 1, Rod White 2, Jun Tamba 3, Kazuaki Yamazawa 3, Mong-Kim Ho 4, C M Tsui 5, Ghufron Zaid 6, Aditya Achmadi 6, Kee Sool
More informationHow do you really know what the temperature is? Michael de Podesta
How do you really know what the temperature is? Michael de Podesta TECO: Madrid September 2016 GOLDEN RULE OF TALKS One talk: one thing This Talk: TWO THINGS! Thing 1: The definitions of the SI units of
More informationLINKING SIM MASS COMPARISONS TO THE KCRV ON 1 kg. Luis O. Becerra CENAM Querétaro, Qro., Mexico,
LINKING SIM MASS COMPARISONS TO THE KCRV ON 1 kg Luis O. Becerra CENAM Querétaro, Qro., Mexico, lbecerra@cenam.mx Abstract. Within the frame of SIM (Sistema Interamericano de Metrología), inter laboratory
More informationBUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES
BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kω standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the NIMT (Thailand) and the BIPM December 016 Final
More informationEuramet EM-S40. Bilateral Comparison KIM-LIPI / LNE. Final Report
DC resistance 1 mω, 100 Ω and 100 MΩ Bilateral Comparison KIM-LIPI / LNE Final Report Isabelle BLANC Laboratoire national de métrologie et d essais (LNE) 9 avenue Roger Hennequin F-78190 Trappes (France)
More information2.1. Accuracy, n- how close the indication of the thermometer is to the true value.
AASHTO Accreditation Policy and Guidance on Thermometer Selection and Records Revised: January 25, 2018 Revision #: 0 1. Objective 1.1. The purpose of this document is to clearly define acceptance criteria
More informationANNEXE 8. Technical protocols for the interlaboratory comparisons
ANNEXE 8 Technical protocols for the interlaboratory comparisons TECHNICAL PROTOCOL FOR BILATERAL COMPARISON (Magnitude of the complex charge sensitivity of accelerometers) EURAMET.AUV.V-S1 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationDRAFT B, Final Report on CIPM key comparison of 1 kg standards in stainless steel (CCM.M-K1)
1 DRAFT B, Final Report on CIPM key comparison of 1 kg standards in stainless steel (CCM.M-K1) C. Aupetit 1, L.O. Becerra, N. Bignell 3, W. Bich 4, G.D. Chapman 5, J.W. Chung 6, J. Coarasa 7, S. Davidson
More informationBUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES
BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES Bilateral comparison of 1 Ω and 10 kω standards (ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a and 13.b) between the SMD (Belgium) and the BIPM October 2017 Final
More informationIsotech Journal of Thermometry Index Volumes 1 10, 1990 to 2000
Isotech Journal of Thermometry Index Volumes 1 10, 1990 to 2000 Welcome to the Isotech Journal of Thermometry Fundamentals of Thermometry Part 1 Temperature Scales Practical Calibration of Thermometers
More informationAPMP.T-S6 APMP SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETER. Final Report. Prepared by
APMP.T-S6 APMP SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETER FOR RANGE 50 C TO 400 C Final Report Prepared by Nurulaini Md Ali 1, Hafidzah Othman 1, Mong-Kim Ho 2, Inseok Yang
More informationFinal Report on COOMET Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf (COOMET.EM-K4)
State Enterprise All-Ukrainian State Scientific and Production Center of Standardization, Metrology, Certification and Protection of Consumer (SE Ukrmetrteststandard ) Approved by the chairman of TC 1.3
More informationIntroduction to Blackbody Sources
Introduction to s This section contains dedicated blackbody sources for low uncertainty calibration of infrared thermometers. A range of portable primary blackbody sources combine high emissivity with
More informationEVALUATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY IN THE REALIZATION OF THE PLTS-2000 AT NMi
EVALUATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY IN THE REALIZATION OF THE PLTS-000 AT NMi A. Peruzzi and M.J. de Groot Nmi van Swinden Laboratorium, Delft, The Netherlands 1 Abstract The Provisional Low Temperature Scale
More informationBureau International des Poids et Mesures
Bureau International des Poids et Mesures Comparison of the air-kerma standards of the VNIIM and the BIPM in the medium-energy x-ray range D.T. Burns, N.D. Villevalde, A.V. Oborin and E.N. Yurjatin September
More informationFinal Report. APMP.EM-K4.1 APMP Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf
Final Report APMP.EM-K4.1 APMP Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf H. L. Johnson National Measurement Institute, Australia February 09 1 Contents 1 Introduction...5 Participants and organisation of
More informationCertificate of Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025:2005
United States Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology Certificate of Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025:2005 NVLAP LAB CODE: 200508-0 Insco Metrology, Inc. Miami, FL is accredited
More informationFinal Report August 2010
Bilateral Comparison of 100 pf Capacitance Standards (ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K14.b) between the CMI, Czech Republic and the BIPM, January-July 2009 J. Streit** and N. Fletcher* *Bureau International
More informationGood practice guide containing experimental results and recommendations for the selection, preparation and calibration of the temperature sensors
Good practice guide containing experimental results and recommendations for the selection, preparation and calibration of the temperature sensors 1. Scope... 2 2. Introduction... 2 3. Selection of thermocouples
More informationCCT-K5: Comparison of local realizations of the ITS-90 between the silver point and 1700 C using vacuum tungsten strip lamps as transfer standards
CCT-K5: Comparison of local realizations of the ITS-90 between the silver point and 1700 C using vacuum tungsten strip lamps as transfer standards Prepared by M.J. de Groot, E.W.M. van der Ham and R. Monshouwer
More informationCOMPARISON OF HUMIDITY MEASUREMENTS USING A DEW POINT METER AS A TRANSFER STANDARD APMP-IC-1-97 REPORT
COMPARISON OF HUMIDITY MEASUREMENTS USING A DEW POINT METER AS A TRANSFER STANDARD APMP-IC-1-97 REPORT BY NATIONAL METROLOGY CENTRE (A DIVISION OF SPRING SINGAPORE) COORDINATOR OF THE COMPARISON September
More informationApproximation of ITS-90 with High Temperature Thermometers up to 1085 C
Approximation of ITS-9 with High Temperature Thermometers up to 185 C N.P. Moiseeva, A.I. Pokhodun D. I. Mendeleyev Institute of Metrology, St. Petersburg, Russia Abstract. The upper limit of the ITS-9
More informationFinal Report of COOMET.T-K7: Regional key comparison of water triple point cells (COOMET theme No 395/BY/07)
Final Report of COOMET.T-K7: Regional key comparison of water triple point cells (COOMET theme No 395/BY/07) Belarusian State Institute of Metrology (BelGIM) Starovilensky trakt 93, 220053, Minsk, RB Dikun
More informationTechnical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5
Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5 2017-03-06 revised 2018-02-13 (changed schedule) Task and Purpose of the Comparison According to the rules set up by the CIPM MRA the consultative
More informationFinal Report on CIPM key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (CCM.M-K2)
1 Final Report on CIPM key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (CCM.M-K) 1. Introduction L.O. Becerra 1, W. Bich, N. Bignell 3, G.D. Chapman 4, J.W. Chung 5 S. Davidson 6, M. Gläser
More informationCERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION
Page 1 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION 1K Thermistor CERTIFICATE NO.: MANUFACTURER: Measurement Specialties DATE OF CALIBRATION: 26-Apr-17 TC15249 CUSTOMER: AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: (21 ± 3) C JOB NUMBER:
More informationAjchara Charoensook, Chaiwat Jassadajin. National Institute of Metrology Thailand. Henry Chen, Brian Ricketts and Leigh Johnson
1 Revised Report on APMP.EM-S6 APMP Bilateral Supplementary Comparison of Resistance between the National Institute of Metrology Thailand and the National Measurement Institute, Australia December 2003
More informationRadiation Thermometry Review Protocol
9 th Oct. 009 (Revised 17 th May 010) Thermometry Review Protocol Scope: To provide a method of reviewing CMC s in the subfield of for acceptance in Appendix C of the KCDB. Covers service category numbers
More informationTemperature measurement
Temperature measurement and control in length metrology Dr. Youichi Bitou Length standard section National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ) 1 Outline Theoretical treatment of temperature measurement
More informationFinal Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede
Final Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS Jan P.M. de Vreede Department of Electricity, Radiation and Length NMi Van Swinden Laboratorium Thijsseweg 11, 2629 JA Delft, the
More informationThe Journey from Ω Through 19 Orders of Magnitude
The Journey from 12 906.403 5 Ω Through 19 Orders of Magnitude Presented at: 2013 NCSLI Conference and Symposium Nashville, Tennessee Personalize with title, slogan or I/B/P name in master slide Kai Wendler
More informationThe Development of a High-Temperature PRT Calibration Process Based On Dry- Block Calibrators
The Development of a High-Temperature PRT Calibration Process Based On Dry- Block Calibrators Michael Coleman Fluke Corporation, Temperature Calibration Division, American Fork, Utah, USA mike.coleman@fluke.com
More informationPreparation of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) in air standard being traceable to SI by gravimetric method
Preparation of nitrous oxide ( O) in air standard being traceable to SI by gravimetric method 15th WMO Meeting of Experts on Carbon Dioxide, Other Greenhouse Gases, and Related Tracer Measurement Techniques
More informationBILATERAL COMPARISON REPORT LNE KIM-LIPI
File o P109029/1 BILATRAL COMPARISO RPORT L KIM-LIPI CALIBRATIO OF A MASS STADARD AT 50 kg URAMT n 1315 Final report o. P109029/1 Requesting party: IDOSIA ISTITUT OF SCICS (Puslit KIM-LIPI) Kompleks PUSPIPTK,
More informationKey comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K3 of the air-kerma standards of the BEV, Austria and the BIPM in medium-energy x-rays
Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K3 of the air-kerma standards of the BEV, Austria and the BIPM in medium-energy x-rays D.T. Burns, W. Tiefenböck* and J. Witzani* Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Pavillon
More informationThe Water Triple Point - A Reference Cell Close to the ITS-90 Value
The Water Triple Point - A Reference Cell Close to the ITS-90 Value By John P. Tavener & Anne Blundell. Northern Temperature Primary Laboratory., Pine Grove, Southport, Merseyside, PR9 9AG, England. Tel:
More informationCHARACTERIZATION OF LPM'S 1-T DEW POINT GENERATOR
XVIII IMEKO WORLD CONGRESS Metrology for a Sustainable Development September, 17 22, 2006, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil CHARACTERIZATION OF LPM'S 1-T DEW POINT GENERATOR Davor Zvizdic, Tomislav Stasic, Lovorka
More informationTraceability of temperature measurements in Estonia
116 Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, 2013, 62, 2, 116 121 Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, 2013, 62, 2, 116 121 doi: 10.3176/proc.2013.2.05 Available online at www.eap.ee/proceedings
More informationA Case for Periodic Calibration or Verification of RTDs
A Case for Periodic Calibration or Verification of RTDs If you are experiencing audio problems please call the teleconference number below Phone 650-479-3208 Access code 668 676 434 Your Host and Presenter
More informationIMPLEMENTATION OF ETHANOL HEAT PIPE AT CETIAT
IMPLEMENTATION OF ETHANOL HEAT PIPE AT CETIAT JO Favreau 1, E Georgin 1, B Savanier 1, A. Merlone 2 1 CETIAT, 96100 Villeurbanne, France 2 INRIM, Torino, Italy Abstract. CETIAT is a calibration laboratory
More informationTechnical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1
Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1 Updated at 12-December-2012 Task and Purpose of the Comparison According to the rules set up by the CIPM
More informationEUROMET Project 702 EUROMET.M.D-K4
EUROMET TC-M Meeting 2007 Thursday, 01 March 2007 EUROMET Project 702 EUROMET.M.D-K4 Comparison of the calibrations of high resolution hydrometers for liquid density determinations Salvatore Lorefice INRIM,
More informationVSMOW Triple Point of Water Cells: Borosilicate versus Fused- Quartz
VSMOW Triple Point of Water Cells: Borosilicate versus Fused- Quartz M. Zhao 1,3 and G. F. Strouse 2 1 Fluke Corporation, Hart Scientific Division, American Fork, Utah 84003, U.S.A. 2 National Institute
More informationCalibration of temperature sensors within Length Standard Section of NMIJ
Calibration of temperature sensors within Length Standard Section of NMIJ Dr. Akiko Hirai Length Standard Section National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ) 1 Contents Temperature measurement system
More informationCombined method for establishment and dissemination of the international temperature scale
DISSERTATIONES PHYSICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 86 RIHO VENDT Combined method for establishment and dissemination of the international temperature scale DISSERTATIONES PHYSICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS
More informationFinal Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu
Bilateral Comparison of between NMIA (Australia) and SPRING (Singapore) (KCDB reference No. CCPR-K1.a.1) Final Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu Contents 1. Introduction..2 2.
More informationEstablishing traceability and estimating measurement uncertainty in physical, chemical and biological measurements
Establishing traceability and estimating measurement uncertainty in physical, chemical and biological measurements Experimental Design 8.2.2013 Doc. Martti Heinonen etunimi.sukunimi@mikes.fi Outline 1.
More informationFinal report to the CCT on key comparison CCT-K6 Comparison of local realisations of dew-point temperature scales in the range -50 C to +20 C
NPL REPORT ENG 57 Final report to the CCT on key comparison CCT-K6 Comparison of local realisations of dew-point temperature scales in the range -50 to +20 S Bell, M Stevens, H Abe, R Benyon, R Bosma,
More informationCalibration of Temperature Block Calibrators
European Association of National Metrology Institutes Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators EURAMET cg-13 Version 2.0 (03/2011) Previously EA-10/13 Calibration Guide EURAMET cg-13 Version 2.0 (03/2011)
More informationThe BIPM key comparison database, Aug /10
BIPM.EM-K11.b, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.1, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.5, EUROMET.EM.BIPM-K11.6, SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b, COOMET.EM.BIPM-K11, APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.4 and APMP.EM.BIPM-K11.3 Key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.b
More informationDevelopment of the High-Temperature Dew-Point Generator Over the Past 15 Years
Int J Thermophys (2017) 38:161 DOI 10.1007/s10765-017-2291-x TEMPMEKO 2016 Development of the High-Temperature Dew-Point Generator Over the Past 15 Years R. Bosma 1 J. Nielsen 2 A. Peruzzi 1 Received:
More informationMASS DETERMINATION OF SILICON SPHERES USED FOR THE AVOGADRO PROJECT
MASS DETERMINATION OF SILICON SPHERES USED FOR THE AVOGADRO PROJECT Michael Borys, Michael Gläser, Michael Mecke Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Germany ABSTRACT Spheres made of a silicon
More informationEA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Indicators and Simulators by Electrical Simulation and Measurement
Publication Reference EA-10/11 EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Indicators and Simulators by Electrical PURPOSE This document has been produced by EA as a means of giving advice for calibrating
More informationMASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS AT MIKES
MITTATEKNIIKAN KESKUS CENTRE FOR METROLOGY AND ACCREDITATION Julkaisu J4/2000 MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS AT MIKES Additional results to the EA intercomparison of weights 1 mg 100 g (Ma1) and to the EUROMET
More informationAutomated volume measurement for weihts using acoustic volumeter
IMEKO 20th TC3, 3rd TC16 and 1st TC22 International Conference Cultivating metrological knowledge 27th to 30th November, 2007. Merida, Mexico. Automated volume measurement for weihts using acoustic volumeter
More informationHow do you really know what the temperature is? Michael de Podesta
How do you really know what the temperature is? Michael de Podesta Varenna 6 th July 2016 Talk#1 Michael de Podesta Age: 20,645 Earth rotations : More than 56 complete solar orbits Work Lecturer in Physics
More informationCCT Working Group for Humidity
CCT/17-41 CCT Working Group for Humidity Report to the CCT 2017 Stephanie Bell CCT Working Group for Humidity Terms of reference: to advise the CCT on matters relating to humidity; to pursue harmonization
More informationForce Key Comparison APMP.M.F-K2.a and APMP.M.F-K2.b (50 kn and 100 kn) Final Report 6 August Pilot: KRISS, Republic of Korea Yon-Kyu Park
Force Key Comparison APMP.M.F-K2.a and APMP.M.F-K2.b (50 kn and 100 kn) Final Report 6 August 2018 Pilot: KRISS, Republic of Korea Yon-Kyu Park Muktar Sawi (NMIM) Seif M. Osman (NIS) S.S.K.Titus (NPLI)
More informationNew Thermometer Guidance Document from AASHTO Accreditation Program. Maria Knake Asphalt Binder ETG Meeting May 10, 2018
New Thermometer Guidance Document from AASHTO Accreditation Program Maria Knake Asphalt Binder ETG Meeting May 10, 2018 Background Mercury reduction initiatives have hastened the need to find suitable
More informationIntercomparison of Thermal Expansion Measurements. EUROMET Project 275. Final Report
Eidgenössisches Amt für Messwesen Office fédéral de métrologie Ufficio federale di metrologia Swiss Federal Office of Metrology Intercomparison of Thermal Expansion Measurements EUROMET Project 75 Final
More informationEA-10/13. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators. Publication Reference PURPOSE
Publication Reference EA-10/13 EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators PURPOSE This document been produced by EA to improve the harmonisation in the calibration of temperature
More informationCCT-K2.5: NRC/NMIJ/INRIM comparison of capsuletype standard platinum resistance thermometers from 13.8 K to K
CCT-K2.5: NRC/NMIJ/INRIM comparison of capsuletype standard platinum resistance thermometers from 13.8 K to 273.16 K K. D. Hill 1, T. Nakano 2, P. Steur 3 1 Institute for National Measurement Standards,
More informationASIA PACIFIC METROLOGY PROGRAME
APMP.M.M-K6 (SUB) multiples mass key comparison ASIA PACIFIC METROLOGY PROGRAME Final Report of APMP Comparison of Mass standards APMP.M.M-K6 (SUB) multiples mass key comparison Coordinated by: Vietnam
More informationIMPROVING SOIL MEASUREMENTS FOR BOUNDARY LAYER RESEARCH
IMPROVING SOIL MEASUREMENTS FOR BOUNDARY LAYER RESEARCH Hannelore Bloemink, Jan Bijma Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) Instrumentation Division P.O. Box 201, 3730 AE De Bilt, The Netherlands
More informationTemperature. 3
Temperature In 1848, Sir William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) stated the zero principle of dynamics. This principle enabled him to define thermodynamic temperature and to establish an objective method of measuring
More informationFinal report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum
Final report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum 5 October 2010 Ref 1107-03 HDJ Report no. DFM-2008-R07 Summary A follow-up comparison to CCQM-K36 has been carried out November 2007 to February 2008, designated
More informationSIM SIM.M.D-K3. provide. SIM.M.M-K5 for. A set of. Institute LACOMET LATU INTI. Country Costa Rica Uruguay Argentina Chile México Canada Brazil
FINAL REPORT SIM COMPARISON IN VOLUME OF WEIGHTS SIM.M.D-K3 Kornblit, F 1 ; Leiblich, J. 1 ; Becerra, L.O. ; Peña, L.M. ; Luján, L. ; Díaz,J.C. ; Centeno, L.M. ; Ramos, O 3 ; Rodríguez, S. 3 ; Santo, C.
More informationP1-APMP.EM-S9. VNIIM/KRISS Bilateral Comparison of DC Magnetic Flux Density by Means of a Transfer Standard Coil. TECHNICAL PROTOCOL
P1-APMP.EM-S9 VNIIM/KRISS Bilateral Comparison of DC Magnetic Flux Density by Means of a Transfer Standard Coil. TECHNICAL PROTOCOL 1. Introduction Po Gyu Park (KRISS, S.Korea), Vladlen Shifrin (VNIIM,
More informationArgon Triple-Point Device for Calibration of SPRTs
Int J Thermophys (2015) 36:229 239 DOI 10.1007/s10765-014-1768-0 Argon Triple-Point Device for Calibration of SPRTs B. Kołodziej H. Manuszkiewicz A. Szmyrka-Grzebyk L. Lipiński A. Kowal P. P. M. Steur
More informationActivity measurements of the radionuclide 153 Sm for the ANSTO, Australia in the ongoing comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Sm-153
Activity measurements of the radionuclide 153 Sm for the ANSTO, Australia in the ongoing comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Sm-153 G. Ratel*, C. Michotte*, M. Reinhard, D. Alexiev, L. Mo *BIPM, ANSTO, Australia
More informationKey Comparisons, the MRA and CMCs: An International Measurement Infrastructure. Robert Wielgosz. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures
Key Comparisons, the MRA and CMCs: An International Measurement Infrastructure Robert Wielgosz The task of the BIPM is to ensure world-wide uniformity of measurements and their traceability to the International
More informationCALIBRATION REPORT FOR THERMOHYDROMETER
CALIBRATION REPORT FOR THERMOHYDROMETER SAMPLE CUSTOMER S/N: XXXXX Report Number: Y205188 Page 1 of 5 Report No. Y205188 ICL CALIBRATION LABORATORIES, INC. ISO/IEC 17025 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 accredited
More informationTHE ITS-90 AFTER DEFINITION OF NEON ISOTOPIC REFERENCE COMPOSITION: EXTENT OF THE ISOTOPIC EFFECT ON PREVIOUS INTER-COMPARISON RESULTS
THE ITS-90 AFTER DEFINITION OF NEON ISOTOPIC REFERENCE COMPOSITION: EXTENT OF THE ISOTOPIC EFFECT ON PREVIOUS INTER-COMPARISON RESULTS Franco Pavese 1*, Anna Szmyrka-Grzebyk 1, Peter P.M. Steur 2 1 INTiBS,
More informationCCM short note on the dissemination process after the proposed redefinition of the kilogram
CCM short note on the dissemination process after the proposed redefinition of the kilogram Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities 1. Introduction This note proposes how the mise en pratique
More informationCCQM-K45: Sn in tomato paste key comparison
CCQM-K45: Sn in tomato paste key comparison Final report September 2006 CCQM-K45: Sn in tomato paste key comparison Final report September 2006 Contact Point: Gill Holcombe Tel: +44 (0)20 8943 7442 Prepared
More informationVersion 4.0 (09/2017) Version 3.0 (02/2015) Version 2.0 (03/2011) Version 1.0 (07/2007) EURAMET e.v. Bundesallee 100 D Braunschweig Germany
Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators Authorship and Imprint This document was developed by the EURAMET e.v., Technical Committee for Thermometry. Authors: Yves Hermier (LNE-INM,
More informationMeasuring Systems for Thermometer Calibration in Low-Temperature Range
Int J Thermophys (2011) 32:2466 2476 DOI 10.1007/s10765-011-1055-2 Measuring Systems for Thermometer Calibration in Low-Temperature Range A. Szmyrka-Grzebyk L. Lipiński H. Manuszkiewicz A. Kowal A. Grykałowska
More informationCALIBRATION. Calibration. General Principles & Theory, Equipment Considerations. Copyright Caltech 2014
Calibration General Principles & Theory, Equipment Considerations Metrological Principles Accurate but not Precise Calibration A A+ Correction = Precise but not Accurate Correction B Ref Std (Radio Link
More informationChemical Standard Department, 1600, Shimo-Takano, Sugito-machi, Kitakatsushikagun, Saitama , JAPAN
International Key Comparison APMP.QM-K4.1 Final report 24/10/2007 Kenji Kato 1, Masaaki Maruyama 2, Jin Seog Kim 3, Oh, Sang Hyub 3, Jin-Chun Woo 3, Yongdoo Kim 3, Hyunkil Bae 3, Qiao Han 4, Zeyi Zhou
More informationGeneral Accreditation Guidance. Liquid-in-glass thermometers selection, use and calibration
General Accreditation Guidance Liquid-in-glass thermometers selection, use and calibration January 2018 Copyright National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia 2013 This publication is protected
More informationAPMP supplementary comparison of absorbed dose rate in tissue for beta radiation
APMP supplementary comparison of absorbed dose rate in tissue for beta radiation BIPM KCDB: APMP.R(I)-S2 Technical Protocol N. Saito and M. Kato National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), Tsukuba, Ibaraki
More informationSupplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S12. Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L
Supplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S12 Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L Pilot: M. Maldonado (CENAM, Mexico) mmaldona@cenam.mx km 4.5 Carretera a los Cués, El Marqués, Qro 76241, Mexico Participants:
More informationProper Platinum Resistance Thermometer Calibration Uncertainty Analysis
Proper Platinum Resistance Thermometer Calibration Uncertainty Analysis Thomas Wiandt Fluke Corporation, Hart Scientific Division NCSLI 2007 Session 8B 1 Introduction Uncertainty quantification is a primary
More information