Liquid crystal flows in two dimensions
|
|
- Catherine Dorsey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Liquid crystal flows in two dimensions Fanghua Lin Junyu Lin Changyou Wang Abstract The paper is concerned with a simplified hydrodynamic equation, proposed by Ericksen and Leslie, modeling the flow of nematic liquid crystals. In dimension two, we establish both interior and boundary regularity theorem for such a flow under smallness conditions. As a consequence, we establish the existence of global weak solutions that are smooth away from at most finitely many singular times in any bounded smooth domain of R. 1 Introduction We consider the following hydrodynamic system modeling the flow of liquid crystal materials in dimension two (see [6] [7] [11] [14] and references therein): u t + u u ν u + P = λ ( d d) in (0, + ), (1.1) u = 0 in (0, + ), (1.) d t + u d = γ( d + d d) in (0, + ), (1.3) where R is a bounded smooth domain, u(x, t) : (0, + ) R represents the velocity field of the flow, d(x, t) : (0, + ) S, the unit sphere in R 3, is a unit-vector field that represents the macroscopic molecular orientation of the liquid crystal material, and P (x, t) : (0, + ) R represents the pressure Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY 1001, USA. School of Mathematics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou , China. Department of Mathematics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA. The first and third author are partially supported by NSF. 1
2 function. The constants ν, λ, and γ are positive constants that represent viscosity, the competition between kinetic energy and potential energy, and microscopic elastic relaxation time for the molecular orientation field. denotes the divergence operator, and d d denotes the matrix whose (i, j)-the entry is given by i d j d for 1 i, j. The above system is a simplified version of the Ericksen-Leslie model, which reduces to the Ossen-Frank model in the static case, for the hydrodynamics of nematic liquid crystals developed during the period of 1958 through 1968 ([7] [6] [11]). It is a macroscopic continuum description of the time evolution of the materials under the influence of both the flow field u(x, t), and the macroscopic description of the microscopic orientation configurations d(x, t) of rod-like liquid crystals. Roughly speaking, the system (1.1)-(1.3) is a coupling between the non-homogeneous Navier- Stokes equation and the transported flow of harmonic maps. In a series of papers, Lin [13] and Lin-Liu [14, 15] initiated the mathematical analysis of (1.1)-(1.3) in 1990 s. More precisely, they considered in [14] the Leslie system of variable length, i.e. the Dirichlet energy 1 d dx for d : S n 1 is replaced by the Ginzburg-Landau energy ( 1 d + (1 d ) ) dx for d : R n (ɛ > 0), and proved existence of 4ɛ global classical and weak solutions in dimensions two or three. In [15], they proved the partial regularity theorem for suitable weak solutions, similar to the classical theorem by Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg [5] for the Navier-Stokes equation. However, as pointed out in [14, 15], both their estimates and arguments depend on ɛ, and it is a challenging problem to study the convergence as ɛ tends to zero. In this paper, we are interested in the existence of global weak solutions (u, d) of (1.1)-(1.3) that may enjoy possible regularity under the initial and boundary conditions: (u(x, 0), d(x, 0)) = (u 0 (x), d 0 (x)) x, (1.4) (u(x, t), d(x, t)) = (0, d 0 (x)) (x, t) (0, + ). (1.5) Throughout this paper, we introduce H = closure of C 0 (, R ) {v : v = 0} in L (, R ),
3 J = closure of C 0 (, R ) {v : v = 0} in H 1 0 (, R ), We make the assumptions: H 1 (, S ) = { d H 1 (, R 3 ) : d(x) S a.e. x }, u 0 H, d 0 H 1 (, S ) and d 0 C,β (, S ) for some β (0, 1). (1.6) Definition 1.1 For 0 < T +, u L ([0, T ], H) L ([0, T ], J) and d L ([0, T ], H 1 (, S )) is a weak solution of (1.1)-(1.5), if u, ψ φ + [ u u, ψφ + ν u, ψ φ ] [0,T ] = ψ(0) [0,T ] u 0, φ + λ d, ψ φ + [0,T ] = ψ(0) d 0, φ + γ [0,T ] [0,T ] d d, ψ φ, [ u d, ψφ + γ d, ψ φ ] [0,T ] d d, ψφ, for any ψ C ([0, T ]) with ψ(t ) = 0 and φ H 1 0 (, R3 ). Moreover, (u, d) satisfies (1.5) in the sense of trace. In this paper, we establish both the regularity and existence of global weak solutions in dimension two. More precisely, we prove Theorem 1. For 0 < T < +, assume u L ([0, T ], H) L ([0, T ], J) and d L ([0, T ], H 1 (, S )) is a weak solution of (1.1)-(1.5), with (1.6). If, in addition, d L ([0, T ], H ()), then (u, d) C ( (0, T ]) C,1 β ( (0, T ]). Utilizing Theorem 1., the global and local energy inequality, and the global estimate of the pressure function P in 4 below, we establish the existence of global weak solutions that enjoy the partial smoothness property. Theorem 1.3 Under the assumption (1.6), there exist a global weak solution u L ([0, ), H) L ([0, ), J) and d L ([0, ), H 1 (, S )) of (1.1)-(1.5) such that the following properties hold: (i) There exists L N depending only on (u 0, d 0 ) and 0 < T 1 < < T L, 1 i L, such that (u, d) C ( ((0, + ) \ {T i } L i=1)) C,1 β ( ((0, + ) \ {T i} L i=1)). 3
4 (ii) Each singular times T i, 1 i L, can be characterized by lim inf t T i max ( u + d )(y, t)dy 8π, r > 0. (1.7) x B r(x) Moreover, there exist x i m x i 0, ti m T i, r i m 0 and a non constant smooth harmonic map ω i : R S with finite energy such that as m +, (u i m, d i m) (0, ω i ) in C loc (R [, 0]), where u i m(x, t) = r i mu(x i m + r i mx, t i m + (r i m) t), d i m(x, t) = d(x i m + r i mx, t i m + (r i m) t). (iii) Set T 0 = 0. Then, for 0 i L 1, d t + d L ( [T i, T i+1 ɛ]), u t + u L 4 3 ( [Ti, T i+1 ɛ]) for any ɛ > 0, and for any 0 < T L < T < +, d t + d L ( [T L, T ]), u t + u L 4 3 ( [TL, T ]). (iv) There exist t k + and a harmonic map d C (, S ) C,β (, S ) with d = d 0 on such that u(, t k ) 0 in H 1 (), d(, t k ) d weakly in H 1 (), and there exist l N, points {x i } l i=1, and {m i} l i=1 N such that (v) If (u 0, d 0 ) satisfies d(, t k ) dx d dx + l 8πm i δ xi. (1.8) i=1 ( u 0 + d 0 ) 8π, then (u, d) C ( (0, + )) C,1 β ( (0, + )). Moreover, there exist t k + and d C (, S ) C,β (, S ) with d = d 0 on such that (u(, t k ), d(, t k )) (0, d ) in C (). Remark 1.4 We would like to point out (i) If d is a constant map, then (1.1)-(1.3) reduces to the Navier-Stokes equation. It is well-known (see Temam [4] and Ladyzhenskaya [9]) that in dimension two, any 4
5 weak solution u L t L x L t H 1 to the Navier-Stokes equation is smooth. (ii) If u = 0, then (1.1)-(1.3) reduces to the heat flow of harmonic maps. The classical theorems by Struwe [3] and Chang [1] assert that there exists a unique global weak solution that is smooth away from finitely many singular points. (iii) Theorem 1.3 can be viewed as a mixture of the Navier-Stokes equation and the heat flow of harmonic maps in dimension two. (iv) For smooth initial data (u 0, d 0 ), it is also a very interesting question to ask whether the short time smooth solution to (1.1)-(1.3) can develop finite time singularity (see Chang-Ding-Ye [] for the heat flow of harmonic maps). Remark 1.5 (i) We conjecture that the global weak solution (u, d) in Theorem 1.3 is unique in the class of all weak solutions (ũ, d) of (1.1)-(1.5) that enjoy the following properties: there are K N and 0 < S 1 < < S K < + such that d satisfies d L ([0, + ), H 1 ()) and d K 1 i=0 ɛ>0 L ([S i, S i+1 ɛ], H ()) L loc ([S K, + ), H ()). (ii) We also conjecture that there are at most finitely many singular points for the weak solution constructed by Theorem 1.3. The paper is written as follows. In section, we prove both interior and boundary regularity theorems for (1.1)-(1.3) under smallness conditions and Theorem 1.. In section 3, we employ the contraction map theory to establish the existence of short time smooth solutions to (1.1)-(1.3). In section 4, we show both global and local energy inequalities for smooth solutions to (1.1)-(1.3) and global estimates for the pressure function. In section 5, we prove Theorem 1.3 by estimating the first singular time in terms of energy concentration and performing blow-up analysis near each singularity. Since the exact values of ν, λ, γ don t play a role, we henceforth assume ν = λ = γ = 1. 5
6 Regularity of solutions and proof of Theorem 1. This section is devoted to the proof of Theorem 1.. The proof is based on two Lemmas: (i) the interior regularity under the smallness condition, and (ii) the boundary regularity under the smallness condition. We refer to [3] for interesting results on two dimensional NSE with singular forcing. We begin with some notations. Throughout the paper, we use A B to denote A C 0 B for some universal constant C 0 > 0. For x 0 R, t 0 R, z 0 = (x 0, t 0 ), and r > 0, let B r (x 0 ) = {x R : x x 0 r} and P r (z 0 ) = B r (x 0 ) [t 0 r, t 0 ] denote the ball in R and the parabolic cylinder in R 3 respectively. Let p P r (z 0 ) (B r (x 0 ) {t 0 r }) ( B r (x 0 ) [t 0 r, t 0 ]) denote the parabolic boundary of P r (z 0 ). For x 0 = 0 and t 0 = 0, we simply denote B r = B r (0), P r = P r (0, 0), p P r = p P r (0, 0). For f L 1 (P r (z 0 )), denote by 1 f z0,r = f(x, t) dxdt and f x0,r(t) = P r (z 0 ) P r(z 0 ) as the average of f over P r (z 0 ) and B r (x 0 ) respectively. 1 f(x, t) dx B r (x 0 ) B r(x 0 ) For 1 < p, q < +, denote L p,q (P r (z 0 )) = L q ([t 0 r, t 0 ], L p (B r (x 0 ))) and f L p,q (P r(z 0 )) = ( t0 t 0 r f(, t) q L p (B r(x 0 )) dt W 1,0 p,q (P r (z 0 )) L q ([t 0 r, t 0 ], W 1,p (B r (x 0 ))), with the norm ) 1 q. f W 1,0 p,q (P r(z 0 )) = f L p,q (P r(z 0 )) + f L p,q (P r(z 0 )). W,1 p,q (P r (z 0 )) = {f W 1,0 p,q (P r (z 0 )) : f, f t L p,q (P r (z 0 ))}, with the semi-norm and the norm [f] W,1 p,q (P r(z 0 )) = f + f t L p,q (P r(z 0 )), f W,1 p,q (P r(z 0 )) = f W 1,0 p,q (P r(z 0 )) + [f] W,1 p,q (P r(z 0 )). 6
7 For p = q, we denote L p ( ) = L p,p ( ), W 1,0 p ( ) = W 1,0 p,p ( ), and W,1 p ( ) = W,1 p,p ( ). By scaling, the first part of Theorem 1. follows from the following Lemma. Lemma.1 For any α (0, 1), there exists ɛ 0 > 0 such that for z 0 = (x 0, t 0 ) R 3 and r > 0, if (u, d) W 1,0 (P r (z 0 )), P W 1, 4 3 (P r (z 0 )) is a weak solution to (1.1)-(1.3) and P r(z 0 ) then (u, d) C α (P r (z 0), R S ). Moreover, ( u 4 + d 4 ) ɛ 4 0, (.1) [d] C α (P r (z 0 )) C( u L 4 (P r(z 0 )) + d L 4 (P r(z 0 ))) (.) { } [u] C α (P r (z 0 )) C u L 4 (P r(z 0 )) + d L 4 (P r(z 0 )) + P 4 L 3. (.3) (Pr(z0 )) Proof. By translation and dilation, we may assume that z 0 = (0, 0) and r = 1. It then follows from the interior W,1 -estimate (see [10]) that d W,1 (P 3 ) and d L (P 34 ) u L 4 (P 1 ) + d L 4 (P 1 ). (.4) 4 Pick any point z 1 = (x 1, t 1 ) P 1 Claim 1. d 4 P r(z 1 ) Let d 1 : R 3 solve and 0 < R < 1 4. We need ( r R) 4α P R d 4, 0 < r R. (.5) d 1 t d 1 = 0 in (.6) d 1 = d on p. Then d = d d 1 : R 3 solves d t d = u d + d d in (.7) d = 0 on p. Since ( u d + d d) L (), we have that d t, d L (). Hence, multiplying the equation (.7) by d and integrating over B R (x 1 ), we obtain d d + d = (u d d d) d. dt B R (x 1 ) B R (x 1 ) B R (x 1 ) 7
8 Integrating over [t 1 R, t 1 ] and applying Hölder inequality yields sup d + d t 1 R t t 1 [( B R (x 1 ) u d + u 4 ) 1 + ( d 4 d 4 ) 1 ]( d 4 ) 1. By the Ladyzhenskaya inequality, we have d 4 d ( d + R d ). B R (x 1 ) B R (x 1 ) B R (x 1 ) B R (x 1 ) Hence, by integrating t over [t 1 R, t 1 ], we have d 4 ( sup d ) t 1 R t t 1 ( B R (x 1 ) d + ( u 4 + For d, we have that for any θ (0, 1), d 1 4 θ 4 d 1 4 P θr (z 1 ) θ 4 { θ 4 +( Combining (.8) with (.9) yields d 4 {Cθ 4 + C( P θr (z 1 ) (Cθ 4 + Cɛ 4 0) sup t 1 R t t 1 d 4 ) B R (x 1 ) d 4 + d 4 } d 4 d ) d 4. (.8) u 4 + d 4 ) d 4. (.9) u 4 + d 4 )} d 4 d 4. (.10) For any α (0, 1), first choose θ 0 = θ 0 (α) (0, 1 ) such that Cθ4 0 θ4α 0 and then choose ɛ 0 θ 0, we have P θ0 R(z 1 ) d 4 θ0 4α d 4. (.11) 8
9 Iteration of this inequality yields that for any 0 < r R, Claim. P r(z 0 ) P r(z 1 ) d 4 ( r R )4α d 4. (.1) d t C( r R )α ( d 4 ) 1, 0 < r R. (.13) P R (z 0 ) Let φ C 0 (B r(x 0 )) be such that 0 φ 1, φ 1 on B r (x 0), φ r 1. Multiplying (1.3) by d t φ and integrating over B r (x 0 ) gives B r(x 0 ) = 4 B r(x 0 ) d t φ + d d φ dt B r(x 0 ) φd t d φ (u )dd t φ B r(x 0 ) d t φ + Cr B r(x 0 ) B r(x 0 ) Let s 0 (t 0 r, t 0 r 4 ) be such that d(, s 0 ) r Then we obtain P r (z 0 ) B r(x 0 ) d t C[r P r(z 0 ) d + C P r(z 0 ) P r(z 0 ) d. u d. d + u d ] P r(z 0 ) C(1 + u L 4 (P r(z 0 )) ) d L 4 (P r(z 0 )) C( r R )α d L 4 (P r(z 0 )). Claim 1 and Claim imply that r P r (z) ( d + r d t ) Cr α ( d 4 ) 1, z P 1, 0 < r 1 P 1 4. (.14) Hence the parabolic Morrey s decay Lemma (see [4]) implies that d C α (P 1 ) and (.) holds. Now we proceed to estimate u as follows. Let u 1 : R solve u 1 t u 1 = 0 in (.15) u 1 = u on p. 9
10 Then u = u u 1 : R solves u t u + P = [u (u u z1,r) + d d] in (.16) u = 0 on p where denotes the tensor product. Multiply both sides of (.16) by u and integrate over B R (x 1 ), we obtain d dt 8 B R (x 1 ) B R (x 1 ) B R (x 1 ) u + u B R (x 1 ) [ d + u u u z1,r ] u + P u [ d 4 + u u u z1,r ] + 1 B R (x 1 ) u + u P. B R (x 1 ) Integrating over [t 1 R, t 1 ] and applying Hölder inequality, we have sup t 1 R t t 1 B R (x 1 ) d 4 + ( u + u 4 ) 1 ( u u u z1,r 4 ) 1 + u L 4 () P L 4 (). (.17) Applying Ladyzhenskaya inequality and Hölder inequality, we have Thus u 4 [ sup C[ t [t 1 R,t 1 ] + 1 B R (x 1 ) u ] d 4 ] + C u u u z1,r 4 u 4 + C( P 4 3 ) 3. u 4 [ d 4 ] + u u z1,r 4 u 4 + ( P 4 3 ) 3. (.18) Plugging (.17) into (.18) also gives u [ d 4 ] + u u z1,r 4 u 4 +( P 4 3 ) 3. (.19) u 4 10
11 For u 1 solves the heat equation, we have that for any θ (0, 1 ) P θr (z 1 ) u 1 u 1 z 1,θR 4 θ 8 u 1 u 1 z 1,θR 4 θ 4 u u z1,θr 4 + u 4, and P θr (z 1 ) u 1 θ 4 u 1 θ 4 u + u. Putting these inequalities together yields solves P θr (z 1 ) P θr (z 1 ) u u z1,θr 4 (θ 8 + u θ 4 u 4 ) + [ d 4 ] + ( u + + [ d 4 ] + ( u 4 u u z1,r 4 P 4 3 ) 3. (.0) u u z1,r 4 P 4 3 ) 3. (.1) Now we estimate P L 4 3. On B R (x 1 ), write P as P = P 1 + P, where P 1 P 1 = (u u + ( d d)) in B R (x 1 ) P 1 = 0 on B R (x 1 ) so that P is a harmonic function on B R (x 1 ). For P 1, the Calderon-Zygmund theory implies that P 1 L 4 3 () and P 1 4 L 3 () u L (P 3R4 (z 1 )) u L 4 (P 3R4 (z 1 )) + d L 4 (P 3R4 (z 1 )) d L (P 3R4 (z 1 )) u L 4 () u L () + ( u L 4 () + d L 4 ()) d L 4 (). (.) 11
12 For P, we have that for θ (0, 1 4 ), P θr (z 1 ) P 4 3 θ θ θ P 4 3 ( P P ) P u 4 3 L 4 () u 4 3 L () + ( u 4 3 L 4 () + d 4 3 L 4 () ) d 4 3 L 4 (). (.3) Putting (.) and (.3) together, we obtain P θr (z 1 ) θ P 4 3 P u 4 3 L 4 () u 4 3 L () + ( u 4 3 L 4 () + d 4 3 L 4 () ) d 4 3 L 4 (). (.4) Define Φ(u, z 1, R) = Ψ(u, z 1, R) = u u z1,θr 4 + u 4, D(P, z 1, R) = [ Θ(z 1, R) = Φ(u, z 1, θr) + D(P, z 1, R). u, P 4 3 ], Putting (.0) together with (.1) and applying Claim 1, we have Φ(u, z 1, θ R) (θ 8 + Ψ(u, z 1, θr))φ(u, z 1, θr) + (θr) 8α + D(P, z 1, θr), D(P, z 1, θr) { θ 6 D(P, z 1, R) + Ψ(u, z 1, R)Φ(u, z 1, R) + (R 4α + Ψ(u, z 1, R))R 4α ) }. Adding these two inequalities, we obtain Θ(z 1, θr) C[θ 6 + Ψ(u, z 1, θr)]θ(z 1, R) + CΨ(u, z 1, R)Φ(u, z 1, R) + C(R 4α + Ψ(u, z 1, R))R 4α (.5) provide P θ 1 R(z 1 ) P 1. Since Ψ(u, z 1, θr) Ψ(u, z 1, R), we have Θ(z 1, θr) C[θ 6 + Ψ(u, z 1, R)]Θ(z 1, θ 1 R) + C(R 4α + Ψ(u, z 1, R))R 4α (.6) 1
13 provide P θ 1 R(z 1 ) P 1. Let α 1 = 1+α 4 and choose θ = θ(α 1 ) (0, 1 ) so that Cθ 6 (θ ) +α 1. If ɛ 0 θ 3, then P 1 u 4 + d 4 θ 6. Hence, for any z 1 P 1 we have Ψ(u, z 1, R) θ 4. and 0 < R R 0 = θ 4, Hence, for ρ = R θ and τ = θ, we have Θ(z 1, τρ) τ +α 1 [Θ(z 1, ρ) + Cρ +α 1 ], z 1 P 1, 0 < ρ 1 4. (.7) Iterating (.7) finitely many times, we obtain Θ(z 1, R) R +α 1 M 0, R P 1, 0 < R 1 4 (.8) where M 0 C[ ( u 4 + d 4 ) + ( P 4 3 ) 3 ]. P 1 P 1 Now we want to show the decay estimate for Ψ(u, z 1, R) as follows. By (.8), we have u 1 ρ u ρ Cρ 1 ( u u ρ 4 ) 1 C 4 P ρ(z 0 ) ρ Θ 1 4 (z1, ρ) CM ρ α 1 1 for any z 1 P 1 and 0 < ρ 1 4. Hence, for R 0 = 1 4, we have u k R 0 u R0 CM k 1 i=0 ( R 0 i ) α1 1 CM 1 4 ( ) α 1 1 R0 0 k, k N so that u ρ u R0 CM ρ α 1 1, ρ (0, 1 4 ). This implies, for any 0 < ρ R 0 = 1 4, Ψ(u, z 1, ρ) Φ(u, z 1, ρ) + ρ 4 u z1,ρ 4 Φ(u, z 1, ρ) + ρ 4 u z1,ρ u z1,r ρ 4 u z1,r 0 4 Φ(u, z 1, ρ) + M 0 ρ 4 + M 0 ρ +α 1 M 0 ρ +α 1. (.9) 13
14 Substituting (.9) into (.5), we arrive Θ(z 1, θr) θ 4+4α 1 Θ(z 1, R) + C(1 + M 0 )R 4+4α 1, z 1 P 1, 0 < R 1 4. (.30) Iterating (.30) finitely many times yields Φ(u, z 1, ρ) CM 0 ρ 4+4α 1, z 1 P 1, 0 < ρ 1 4. Using the characterization by Campanato spaces, we conclude that u C α 1 (P 1 ) and (.3) holds with α = α 1. By repeating the above argument, we can show that u C α (P 1 ) and (.3) holds for any α (0, 1). Now we need to establish the boundary regularity Lemma under the smallness condition. To state it, we need some notations. Denote R + = {x = (x 1, x ) R : x > 0}. For x 0 R, t 0 R and r > 0, denote z 0 = (x 0, t 0 ) let B + r (x 0 ) = B r (x 0 ) R be the upper half ball, P + r (z 0 ) = B + r (x 0 ) [t 0 r, t 0 ] denote the half parabolic cylinder. Write B + r (x 0 ) = Γ r (x 0 ) S r (x 0 ), where Γ r (x 0 ) = B + r (x 0 ) R and S r (x 0 ) = B + r (x 0 ) R +, and p P + r (z 0 ) = (B + r (x 0 ) {t 0 r }) ( B + r (x 0 ) (t 0 r, t 0 )) be its parabolic boundary. When x 0 = 0 and t 0 = 0, we simply denote B + r = B + r (0), P + r = P + r (0, 0), B + r = B + r (0), Γ r = Γ r (0), S r = S r (0), and p P + r = p P + r (0, 0). Lemma. For any α (0, 1), there exists ɛ 0 depending on α and d 0 C,β (Γ + r (x 0)) such that if for z 0 = (z 0, t 0 ) R R and r > 0, (u, d) W 1,0 (P r + (z 0)), P W 1, 4 3 (P + r (z 0)) is a weak solution of (1.1)-(1.3), with (u, d) = (0, d 0 ) on Γ + r (x 0) [t 0 r, t 0 ] and P + r (z 0 ) ( u 4 + d 4 ) ɛ 4 0, (.31) then (u, d) C α (P + r (z 0 )). Moreover, [d] C α (P + r (z 0 )) u L 4 (P + r (z 0 )) + d L 4 (P + r (z 0 )) + d 0 C,β (Γ r(x 0 )) (.3) [u] C β (P + r (z 0 )) u L 4 (P + r (z 0 )) + d L 4 (P + r (z 0 )) + d 0 C,β (Γ r(x 0 )) + P L 4 3 (P + r (z 0 )). (.33) 14
15 Proof. By scalings, it suffices to consider z 0 = (0, 0) and r = 1. The argument is similar to Lemma.1, except that we have to estimate P differently. Here we only outline it. For any z 1 = (x 1, t 1 ) Γ 1 [ 1 4, 0] and 0 < R 1 4, let d1 : P + R (z 1) R 3 solve d 1 t d 1 = 0 in P + R (z 1) (.34) d 1 = d 0 on Γ R (x 1 ) [t 1 R, t 1 ] d 1 = d on S R (x 1 ) [t 1 R, t 1 ] (B + R (x 1) {t 1 R }). Then d = d d 1 : P + R (z 1) R 3 solves d t d = u d + d d in (.35) d = 0 on p P + R (z 1). Since ( u d + d d) L ( + ), we have that d t, d L (P + R (z 1)). Multiplying (.35) by d and integrating over B + R (x 1), we obtain d d + d = (u d d d) d. dt B + R (x 1) B + R (x 1) B + R (x 1) Integrating over [t 1 R, t 1 ] and applying Hölder inequality yields sup t 1 R t t 1 [( P + R (z 1) P + R (z 1) d + B + R (x 1) d + u d + d 4 u 4 ) 1 + ( P + R (z 1) P + R (z 1) d 4 ) 1 ]( This, combined with the Ladyzhenskaya inequality, yields P + R (z 1) d 4 ( sup t 1 R t t 1 ( P + R (z 1) B + R (x 1) d + ( u 4 + P + R (z 1) d ) sup t 1 R t t 1 P + R (z 1) P + R (z 1) d 4 ) d 4 ) 1. B + R (x 1) P + R (z 1) d ) d 4. (.36) Since d 1 ΓR (x 1 ) [t 1 R,t 1 ] = d 0 C,β, the boundary regularity for the heat equation 15
16 implies that d 1 C,β (P + R (z 1 )) and for any θ (0, 1 ), d 1 4 (θr) 4 d 1 4 P + θr (z C 1) 0 (P + R (z 1 ) (θr) 4 d 0 4 C,β (Γ 1 [ 1,0]) + θ4 [ + θ 4 [R 4 d 0 4 C,β (Γ 1 [ 1,0]) + P + R (z 1) ( u 4 + d 4 ) P + R (z 1) P + R (z 1) P + R (z 1) d 4 + d 4 ] P + R (z 1) d 4 ] Combining (.36) with (.37) yields that for any θ (0, 1 ), d 4 C 0 (θr) 4 + C[θ 4 + ( u 4 + d 4 )] P + θr (z 1) where C 0 d 0 4 C,β (Γ 1 [ 1,0]). P + R (z 1) C 0 (θr) 4 + C(θ 4 + Cɛ 4 0) d 4. (.37) P + R (z 1) P + R (z 1) d 4 d 4, (.38) For any α (0, 1), choose θ 0 = θ 0 (α) (0, 1 ) such that Cθ4 0 θ4α 0 and ɛ 0 θ 0, we obtain P + θ 0 R (z 1) d 4 C 0 (θ 0 R) 4 + θ0 4α d 4. (.39) P + R (z 1) Iteration of this inequality yields that for any 0 < r R, d 4 C 0 r 4 + ( r R )4α d 4. (.40) P + r (z 1 ) P + R (z 1) The estimate of P + r (z 1 ) d t is similar to Lemma.1. Let φ C 0 (B r(x 1 )) be such that 0 φ 1, φ 1 on B r (x 1), φ r 1. Since d t = 0 on Γ r (x 1 ) [t 1 r, t 1 ], multiplying (1.3) by d t φ and integrating over B r + (x 1 ) gives d t φ + d d φ r d + dt B + r (x 1 ) B + r (x 1 ) B + r (x 1 ) Integrate t from s 0 to t 0, where s 0 (t 0 r, t 0 r 4 ) is such that d(, s 0 ) r d, we obtain P + r (z 1 ) B + r (x 1 ) d t C[r P + r (z 1 ) P + r (z 1 ) B + r (z 1 ) d + u d ] P r + (z 1 ) u d. C[r + ( r R )α d L 4 (P + R (z ]. (.41) 1)) 16
17 Hence we have for any z 1 Γ + 1 r P + r (z 1 ) ( d + r d t ) C[r + r α ( P + 1 d 4 ) 1 ] (.4) [ 1 4, 0] and 0 < r 1 4. Combining this with Lemma.1 and the parabolic Morrey s decay Lemma ([4]), we conclude that d C α (P + 1 holds. ) and (.3) To estimate u and P, let u 1 : R + [ 1, 0] R and P 1 : R + [ 1, 0] R solve the non homogeneous, non-stationary Stokes equation: u 1 t u 1 + P 1 = [u u + ( d d)]λ P + R (z 1), R + ( 1, 0) (.43) u 1 = 0, ( R + [ 1, 0]) (R + { 1}), where λ P + R (z 1) is the characteristic function of P + R (z 1). Set u = u u 1 : P + R (z 1) R and P = P P 1 : P + R (z 1) R. Then (u, P ) solves u t u + P = 0, P + R (z 1) (.44) u = 0, Γ + R (x 1) [t 1 R, t 1 ]. By the boundary W,1 q -estimate of non-stationary Stokes equations (see [17] Lemma 3.1), we conclude that u 1 W,1 (R + [ 1, 0]) and P 1 W 1,0 (R + [ 1, 0]), and u 1 W,1 4 (R + [ 1,0]) + P 1 4 L 3 (R + [ 1,0]) 3 u u + u u L 4 3 (P + R 1(z 1)) u L 4 (P + R (z 1)) u L (P + R (z 1)) + d L (P + R (z 1)) d L 4 (P + R (z 1)) (.45) By Sobolev embedding theorem (see [10]), W,1 4 (R + [ 1, 0]) W 1,0 (R + [ 1, 0]) 3 L 4 (R + [ 1, 0]), (.45) yields u 1 L (R + [ 1,0]) + u1 L 4 (R + [ 1,0]) u L 4 (P + R (z 1)) u L (P + R (z 1)) (.46) + d L (P + R (z 1)) d L 4 (P + R (z 1)) 17
18 For (u, P ), by the boundary W,1 p,q -estimate for homogeneous, non-stationary Stokes equation (see [17] Lemma 3.), we have u W,1 for any 4 < q < + and P + q, 4 R 3 (z 1 )), P L q, 4 3 (P + R (z 1 )) R 3 q [[u ] W,1 q, 4 (P + R (z 1 )) + P L q, 4 ] 3 (P + 3 R (z 1 )) u L (P + R (z 1)) + P 4 L 3 (P + R (z 1)) ( u L (P + R (z 1)) + P L 4 ) + 3 (P + R (z 1)) ( u1 L (P + R (z 1)) + P 1 4 L 3 (P + R (z 1)) ( u L (P + R (z 1)) + P L 3 4 ) + u (P + R (z 1)) L 4 (P + R (z 1)) u L (P + R (z 1)) + d L (P + R (z 1)) d L 4 (P + R (z 1)). By Sobolev inequality and Hölder inequality, we have that for any θ (0, 1 4 ), u u z 1,θR L 4 (P + θr (z 1)) + P L 4 3 (P + θr (z 1)) θ 3 q [R 3 q ([ u ] W,1 q, 4 (P + R (z 1 )) + P L q, 4 )] 3 (P + 3 R (z 1 )) θ 3 q [ u L (P + R (z 1)) + P L 4 3 (P + R (z 1)) ] (.47) + θ 3 q [ u L 4 (P + R (z 1)) u L (P + R (z 1)) + d L (P + R (z 1)) d L 4 (P + R (z 1)) ]. To estimate u L, let φ C 1 0 (B θr(x 1 )) be such that 0 φ 1, φ 1 on B θr (x 1 ), and φ θr. Multiplying the equation of u by (u u z 1,θR )φ and integrating over B + θr (x 1), we obtain d u u dt B + θr (x z 1,θR φ + 1) (θr) u u z 1,θR + B + θr (x 1) B + θr (x 1) B + θr (x 1) u φ P u u z 1,θR. Integrating over [s 0, t 1 ], where s 0 [t 1 (θr), t 1 (θr) ] is such that u u z 1,θR (θr) u u z 1,θR, B + θr (x 1) {s 0 } P + θr (z 1) 18
19 we obtain P + θr (z 1 ) (θr) u P + θr (z 1) u u z 1,θR + P u u P + θr (z z 1,θR 1) u u z 1,θR L 4 (P + θr (z 1)) + P L 4 3 (P + θr (z 1)) u u z 1,θR L 4 (P + θr (z 1)) u u z 1,θR L 4 (P + θr (z 1)) + P L 4 3 (P + θr (z 1)). (.48) Putting together (.45), (.46), (.47), (.48), applying (.39), and setting q = 8, we arrive u u z1,θr L 4 (P + θr (z 1)) + u L (P + θr (z 1)) + P L 4 3 (P + θr (z 1)) [θ u L 4 (P + R (z 1)) ][ u u z 1,R L 4 (P + R (z 1)) + u L (P + R (z 1)) + P L 4 3 (P + R (z 1)) ] + d L (P + R (z 1 )) d L 4 (P + R (z 1)). (.49) For d L (P + R (z 1 )), we have d L (P + R (z 1 )) u L 4 (P + R (z 1)) + d L 4 (P + R (z 1)). Thus, by choosing θ = θ 0 sufficiently small and ɛ 0 θ 0, we obtain where C 0 depends on d 0 C,β (Γ 1 ), and Θ + (z 1, θr) θθ + (z 1, R) + C 0 (θ + R α )R α, (.50) Θ + (z 1, r) u u z1,r L 4 (P + r (z 1 )) + u L (P + r (z 1 )) + P L 4 3 (P + r (z 1 )), 0 < r 1 4. The same argument as in Lemma.1 can imply r 4 u u z1,r 4 C 1 (Θ + (z 1, 1 ))4 r 4α, 0 < r 1 4. P + r (z 1 ) This, combined with Lemma.1, implies that u C α (P + 1 ) and (.33) holds. Proof of Theorem 1.: Since u L ([0, T ], L ()) L ([0, T ], H 1 ()), it follows from the Ladyzhenskaya s inequality that u L 4 ( [0, T ]). L ([0, T ], H 1 ()) and d = 1, we have Since d d d + d = 0. 19
20 Hence d L 4 ( [0, T ]) and u u + ( d d) L 4 3 ( [0, T ]). Hence Lemma 4.4 implies that P L 4 3 ( [0, T ]). It follows from the absolute continuity of ( u 4 + d 4 ) that (i) for any z 0 = (x 0, t 0 ) (0, T ], there exists 0 < r 0 min{dist(x 0, ), t 0 } such that P r0 (z 0 ) ( u 4 + d 4 ) ɛ 4 0, where ɛ 0 > 0 is given by Lemma.1. Hence we conclude (u, d) C α (P r 0 (z 0 )) for any α (0, 1). (ii) for any z 0 = (x 0, t 0 ) (0, T ], since is smooth, it is well known that there exists r 0 > 0 depending only on such that ( B r0 (x 0 )) [t 0 r 0, t 0] is C 3 -close to P + r 0 and ( B r0 (x 0 )) [t 0 r 0,t 0] u 4 + d 4 ) ɛ 4 0, where ɛ 0 > 0 is given by Lemma.. Hence, we can perform the standard boundary flatten technique, which is a small perturbation of the one on P + r 0, so that a slight modification of Lemma. implies that (u, d) C α (( B r 0 (x 0 )) [t 0 r 0 4, t 0 ]. The reader can consult with [17] for such details. The higher order regularity can be obtained as follows. One can follow the standard hole filling argument for (1.3) of d to show that d C α ( (0, T ]) and then apply the Schauder theory to show d Cα,1 ( (0, T ]). Substitute this regularity of d into (1.1)-(1.), we can apply the standard Cα,1 -regularity theory (see [19]) to show u Cα,1 ( (0, T ]). Once we obtain Cα,1 -regularity for (u, d), the smoothness of (u, d) on (0, T ] can be obtained by the standard boot-strap argument. Similarly, the boundary C,1 β -regularity for (u, d) can be obtained. 3 Existence of short time smooth solutions In this section, we prove the existence of short time smooth solutions to (1.1)-(1.3) for smooth initial and boundary data. We would like to point out that the proof also works for R 3. More precisely, we have 0
21 Theorem 3.1 For any α > 0, if u 0 C,α 0 (, R ) with u 0 = 0, and d 0 C,α (, S ), then there exists T > 0 depending on u 0 C,α (), d 0 C,α () such that there is a unique smooth solution (u, d) Cα,1 ( [0, T ), R S ) to the initialboundary value problem (1.1), (1.), (1.3), (1.4), and (1.5). Proof. The proof is based on the contraction mapping principle. For T > 0 and K > 0 to be chosen later, denote T = [0, T ], X = {(v, f) C,1 α ( T, R R 3 ) v = 0, (v, f) t=0 = (u 0, d 0 ), Equip X with the norm v u 0 C,1 α ( T ) + f d 0 C,1 α ( T ) K}. (v, f) X := v C,1 α ( T ) + f Cα,1 ( T, (v, f) X. ) It is easy to see that (X, X ) is a Banach space. Define the operator L : X C,1 α (Q T, R R 3 ) as follows. For any (v, f) X, let (u, d) = L(v, f) be the unique solution to the non homogeneous, non-stationary Stokes system: u t u + P = v v ( d d), (0, T ), (3.1) u = 0, (0, T ) (3.) d t d = f f v f, (0, T ) (3.3) (u, d) = (u 0, d 0 ), {0} (3.4) (u, t) = (0, d 0 ),. (3.5) We will prove that for T > 0 sufficiently small and K > 0 sufficiently large, L : X X is a contraction map. Lemma 3.1 There exist T > 0 and K > 0 such that L : X X. Proof. For any (v, f) X, let (u, d) = L(v, f) be the unique solution to (3.1)-(3.5). Let C 0 > 0 denote constants depending only on u 0 C,α and d 0 C,α. 1
22 Assume K C 0. By the Schauder theory of parabolic systems, we have d d 0 C,1 α ( T ) v f C α ( T ) + f f C α ( T ). (3.6) For the first term in the right hand side, we have v f C α ( T ) v f u 0 d 0 C α ( T ) + u 0 d 0 C α () (v u 0 ) f C α ( T ) + u 0 (f d 0 ) C α ( T ) + C 0 K[ v u 0 C 0 ( T ) + v u 0 C α ( T )] + C 0 [1 + (f d 0 ) C 0 ( T ) + (f d 0 ) C α ( T )]. Since v u 0 = f d 0 = 0 at t = 0, it is easy to see v u 0 C 0 ( T ) KT, (f d 0 ) C 0 ( T ) KT. By the interpolation inequality, we have that for any 0 < δ < 1, and v u 0 C α ( T ) 1 δ v u 0 C 0 ( T ) + δ v u 0 C,1 α ( T ) (δ + T δ )K, (d f) C α ( T ) 1 δ (d f) C 0 ( T ) + δ d f C,1 α ( T ) (δ + T δ )K. Putting these inequalities together, we obtain v f C α ( T ) (C 0 K + CK )(T + δ + T δ ) + C 0 K provided K = 16C 0, δ 1 (C 0 +C K) K, and T = δ. The second term in the right hand side of (3.6) can be estimated by 4 (3.7) f f C α ( T ) f f d 0 d 0 C α ( T ) + d 0 d 0 C α ( T ) f (f d 0 ) C α ( T ) + d 0 ( f d 0 ) C α ( T ) + C 0 = I 1 + I + C 0. I 1 f d 0 C α ( T ) f C 0 ( T ) + f d 0 C 0 ( T ) f C α ( T ) K ( f d 0 C 0 ( T ) + f d 0 C α ( T )) K [(1 + 1 δ ) f d 0 C 0 ( T ) + δ f d 0 C,1 α ( T ) ] K 3 ( T δ + δ).
23 Similarly, I can be estimated by I f d 0 C α ( T ) + f d 0 C 0 ( T ) d 0 C α ( T ) ( f + d 0 ) (f d 0 ) C α ( T ) + C 0 ( f + d 0 ) (f d 0 ) C 0 ( T ) (1 + C 0 )K ( ) (f d 0 ) C 0 ( T ) + (f d 0 ) C α ( T ) (1 + C 0 )K (T + δ + T δ ). Hence f f d 0 d 0 C α ( T ) K3 ( T δ + δ) + (1 + C 0)K (T + δ + T δ ) provided K = 16C0, δ 1, and T = δ. Thus (1+C 0 )K 5 d d 0 C,1 α ( T ) K. (3.8) By the Schauder theory for non homogeneous, non-stationary Stokes equations [19], we have u u 0 C,1 α ( T ) v v C α ( T ) + ( d d) C α ( T ). (3.9) For the first term of the right hand side of (3.9), we have v v C α ( T ) (v u 0 ) v C α ( T ) + u 0 (v 0 u 0 ) C α ( T ) + u 0 u 0 C α () K( v u 0 C 0 ( T ) + v u 0 C α ( T ) ) + C 0 ( (v u 0 ) C 0 ( T ) + (v u 0) C α ( T ) ) + C 0 (C 0 K + K )(T + δ + T δ ) + C 0 K 4 provided K = 8C 0, δ 1 (1+C 0 )K, and T = δ. 3
24 For the second term in the right hand side of (3.9), it follows from (3.8) that ( d d) C α ( T ) (d d 0 ) d C α ( T ) + d 0 (d d 0 ) C α ( T ) + d 0 d 0 C α ( T ) C 0 + d d 0 C,1 α ( T ) d Cα,1 ( T ) + C 0 d d 0 C,1 K K C 0 + (C 0 + ) + C 0 K K. α ( T ) (3.10) Combining (3.8) with (3.10), we have Therefore L maps X to X. u u 0 C,1 α ( T ) + d d 0 C,1 α ( T ) K. Lemma 3. There exist sufficiently large K > 0 and sufficiently small T > 0 such that L : X X is a contraction map. Proof. For any (v i, f i ) X, let (u i, d i ) X be such that (u i, d i ) = L(v i, f i ), i = 1,. Denote u = u 1 u, d = d 1 d, P = P 1 P, v = v 1 v, f = f 1 f. Then (u, d) solves u t u + P = G, (0, T ) (3.11) u = 0, (0, T ) (3.1) d t d = H, (0, T ) (3.13) (u, d) t=0 = (0, 0) (3.14) (u, d) = 0, (0, T ) (3.15) where G = (v 1 v 1 v v ) ( d 1 d 1 d d ) = (v v 1 + v v) ( d d 1 + d d), 4
25 and H = ( f 1 f 1 f f ) (v 1 f 1 v f ) = f 1 f + [ (f 1 + f )] ff (v f 1 v f). By Lemma 3.1, we have that for i = 1,, u i u 0 C,1 α ( T ) + d i d 0 C,1 α ( T ) K. Applying the Schauder theory of parabolic systems, we have d C,1 α ( T ) H C α ( T ) where we have used v f 1 + v f + f 1 f + f ( f 1 + f ) f C α ( T )) K ( v C α ( T ) + f C α ( T ) + f C α ( T )) K [δ( v C,1 α ( T ) + v C,1 α ( T ) ) + 1 δ ( v C α ( T ) + f C α ( T ))] K (δ + T δ )[ v Cα,1 ( T ) + f Cα,1 ( T ], (3.16) ) v C α ( T ) + f C α ( T ) ( v C,1 α ( T ) + f Cα,1 ( T )T. (3.17) ) Applying the Schauder theory for non homogeneous, non-stationary Stokes equations ([19]) to (3.11)-(3.1), we have u C,1 α ( T ) G C α ( T ) v v1 + v v + d d 1 + d d C α ( T ) K d C,1 α ( T ) + K( v C α () + v C α ( T )) K 3 (δ + T δ )[ v C,1 α ( T ) + f C,1 α ( T ) ] + K (δ + T δ ) v C,1 α ( T ) K 3 (δ + T δ )[ v Cα,1 ( T ) + f Cα,1 ( T ]. (3.18) ) It follows from (3.16) and (3.18) that L(v 1, f 1 ) L(v, f ) X K 3 (δ + T δ ) (v 1, f 1 ) (v, f ) X 1 (v 1, f 1 ) (v, f ) X 5
26 provided δ and T are sufficiently small. Therefore, L : X X is a contraction map. It follows from Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3. that if T > 0 is sufficiently small, then there exists a unique solution (u, d) C,1 α ( [0, T ), R S ) to ( ), (1.5). Applying the maximum principle to the equation for d, one can easily see that d = 1 in (0, T ). The proof of Theorem 3.1 is now complete. 4 Energy inequalities, estimates of pressure function This section is devoted to both global and local energy inequalities, and the estimate of the pressure function. First, we have Lemma 4.1 For 0 < T < +, suppose u L, ( [0, T ]) W 1,0 ( T ), d L ([0, T ], H 1 ()) L ([0, T ], H ()), and P L 4 3 ( T ) is a weak solution to (1.1)- (1.4), (1.5). Then, for any 0 < t T, we have ( u + d ) (, t) + ( u + d + d d ) Proof. First, by Ladyzhenskaya s inequality, we have = t ( u0 + d 0 ). (4.1) u L 4 ( T ), d L 4 ( T ). Multiply (1.1) by u and integrate over. Since u H, it is well-known ([4]) that (u u) u = 0, P u = 0. Hence we have d 1 dt u + u = d d : u. (4.) Multiplying (1.3) by d + d d and integrating over, we obtain (d t + u d) d = d + d d, where we have used the fact that d = 1 to get (d t + u d) d d = 1 ( d d t + u d d ) = 0. 6
27 Since d t = 0 on, by integration by parts, we have d t d = d 1 dt d. Now we claim d (u d) = d d : u. (4.3) In fact, (4.3) follows from d (u d) = d ββ u α d α ] = [(d β u α d α ) β d α d β u αβ uα ( d ) α = d α d β u α β = d d : u. Hence we obtain d dt 1 d + d + d d = d d : u. (4.4) It is now easy to see that (4.1) follows by adding (4.) and (4.4) and integrating from 0 to T. In order to prove Theorem 1.3, we also need a local energy inequality of both interior and boundary types for solutions to (1.1)-(1.4), (1.5). Lemma 4. For 0 < T < +, suppose u L, ( [0, T ]) W 1,0 ( T ), d L ([0, T ], H 1 ()) L ([0, T ], H ()), and P L 4 3 ( T ) is a weak solution to (1.1)- (1.4), (1.5). Then, for any nonnegative φ C0 () and 0 < s < t T, t φ( u + d )(t) + φ( u + d + d d ) s φ( u + d )(s) t +C φ [ u 3 + P P u + u u + d u + d t d ], (4.5) s where P is the average of P over. Proof. Multiplying (1.1) by uϕ and integrating over implies d u φ + u φ dt = [ u u uφ u u φ + (P P ) u φ + d d : (uφ)]. 7
28 For the first term in the right hand side, we have, by integration by parts, 1 u u uφ = u u φ. For the last term in the right hand side, we have d d : (uφ) = u d d φ + d d : uφ. Putting all these two terms into the identity above yields d u φ + u φ d d : uφ (4.6) dt + ( u 3 + u u + P P u + d u ) φ. Multiplying (1.3) by ( d + d d)φ and integrating over yields (d t + u d) ( d + d d)φ = d + d d φ. (4.7) As in Lemma 4.1, since d = 1, we have (d t + u d) d dφ = 0. (4.8) On the other hand, by integration by parts, we have d t dφ = d d φ dt d t d φ, (4.9) u d dφ = (u i d i ) j d j φ u i d i d j φ j = u i ( d ) i φ u i jd i d j φ u i d i d j φ j d = u φ d d : uφ (u d)( φ d). (4.10) Combining (4.7), (4.8), (4.9), with (4.10), we obtain d d φ + d + d d φ dt = d t d φ u : ( d d)φ + d u φ (u d)( d )φ. (4.11) 8
29 Adding (4.7) and (4.11), we have d ( u + d )φ + ( u + d + d d )φ dt [ u 3 + u u + P P u + 6 d u + d t d ] φ. Integrating this inequality from s to t implies (4.5). This completes the proof. We also need the boundary version of the local energy inequality. More precisely, Lemma 4.3 For 0 < T < +, suppose u L, ( [0, T ]) W 1,0 ( T ), d L ([0, T ], H 1 ()) L ([0, T ], H ()), and P L 4 3 ( T ) is a weak solution to (1.1)- (1.4), (1.5). There exists r 0 = r 0 ( ) > 0 such that for any x 0 and 0 < r r 0, if φ C0 (B r(x 0 )) is nonnegative and 0 < s < t T, then t φ( u + d )(t) + φ( u + d + d d ) B r(x 0 ) +C B r(x 0 ) t s s ( B r(x 0 )) φ( u + d )(s) (4.1) ( B r(x 0 )) where P is the average of P over. φ [ u 3 + P P u + u u + d u + d t d ], Proof. Multiply (1.1) by uφ and integrate over B r (x 0 ). Since uφ = 0 on ( B r (x 0 )), all the boundary terms vanish in the process of integration by parts. Multiply (1.3) by ( d + d d)φ and integrate over B r (x 0 ). Since both d t φ = 0 and uφ = 0 on ( B r (x 0 )), all the boundary terms vanish in the process of integration by parts. The rest of the argument is exactly same as Lemma 4.. We leave it to the readers. In order to justify the assumptions on pressure functions in Lemma.1 and Lemma., we need Lemma 4.4 For 0 < T < +, suppose u L, ( [0, T ]) W 1,0 ( T ), d L ([0, T ], H 1 ()) L ([0, T ], H ()) is a weak solution to (1.1)-(1.4), (1.5). Then P L 4 3 ( T ). Moreover, P satisfies the following estimate: { } max P 4, P P L 3 (T ) L 4, 4 3 ( T ) u L 4 ( T ) u L ( T ) + d L 4 ( T ) d L ( T ). (4.13) 9
30 Proof. Write u = v + w, where v solves the heat equation: v t v = 0, (0, T ) v = 0, (0, T ) v = u 0, {t = 0}, and w solves the non homogeneous, non-stationary Stokes equation: w t w + P = u u ( d d), (0, T ) (4.14) w = 0, (0, T ) (4.15) w = 0, {t = 0}. (4.16) Since f u u ( d d) L 4 3 ( T ), the L p -theory [0] of non homogeneous, non-stationary Stokes equations to (4.14)-(4.16) implies that P L 4 3 ( T ) and P L 4 3 (T ) f L 4 3 (T ) u u L 4 3 (T ) + d d L 4 3 (T ) u L 4 ( T ) u L ( T ) + d L 4 ( T ) d L ( T ). Since P P L 4, 4 3 ( T )) P L 4 3 ( T ), (4.13) follows. The proof of Lemma 4.4 is complete. 5 Global weak solutions and proof of Theorem 1.3 In this section, we will establish the existence of global weak solutions to (1.1)-(1.5) that enjoy both the regularity and uniqueness properties described as in Theorem 1.3. First, we need to recall the following version of Ladyzhenskaya s inequality. Lemma 5.1 There exist C 0 > 0 and R 0 > 0 depending only on such that for any T > 0, if u L, ( T ) W 1,0 ( T ), then for R (0, R 0 ), { u 4 C 0 sup u (, t) u + 1 } T B R (x) T R u. (5.1) T (x,t) T 30
31 Proof. See Struwe [3] Lemma 3.1. We now derive the life span estimate for smooth solutions in term of Sobolev space norms of initial data. Lemma 5. Let ɛ 0 > 0 be given by Lemma.1 and.. There exist 0 < ɛ 1 << ɛ 0 and θ 0 = θ 0 (ɛ 1, E 0 ) (0, 1 4 ), here E 0 = ( u 0 + d 0 ), such that if (u 0, d 0 ) C,β (, R S ) satisfies sup x B R0 (x) for some 0 < R 0 1. Then there exist T 0 θ 0 R 0 ( u 0 + d 0 ) ɛ 1 (5.) and a unique solution (u, d) C ( (0, T 0 ), R S ) C,1 β ( [0, T 0), R S ) to (1.1)-(1.5) satisfying sup ( u + d )(, t) ɛ 1. (5.3) (x,t) T0 B R0 (x) Proof. By Theorem 3.1, there exists T 0 > 0 such that there exists a unique smooth solution (u, d) C ( (0, T 0 ), R S ) C,1 δ ( [0, T 0 ), R S ) to (1.1)-(1.5). Let 0 < t 0 T 0 be the maximal time such that sup sup ( u + d )(, t) ɛ 1. (5.4) 0 t t 0 x B R0 (x) Since t 0 is the maximal time for (5.4), we have ( u + d )(, t 0 ) = ɛ 1. (5.5) sup x B R0 (x) Now we estimate the lower bound of t 0 as follows. Assume t 0 R0. For, otherwise, we are done. Set E(t) = ( u + d )(, t), E 0 = ( u 0 + d 0 ). Then Lemma 4.1 implies that for any 0 < t t 0, E(t) + ( u + d + d d ) E 0. (5.6) t Lemma 5.1 implies d 4 C 0 ( sup t (x,s) t C 0 ER 0 (t)( B R0 (x) t d + te 0 R 0 d (, s))( d + 1 Q R0 d ) t 31 ) (5.7)
32 where and E 1 R 0 (t) = E R 0 (t) = sup (x,s) t sup (x,s) t B R0 (x) B R0 (x) E R0 (t) = E 1 R 0 (t) + E R 0 (t). u (, s), d (, s), By (5.4), we have E R0 (t) ɛ 1, 0 t t 0. Hence Since d 4 C 0 ɛ 1( d + t 0 t0 t0 R0 E 0 ). (5.8) d ( d + d d + d 4 ), (5.6) and (5.8) imply d ( d + d d + d 4 ) E 0 + d 4 t0 t0 t0 E 0 + C 0 ɛ 1( d + t 0 t0 R0 E 0 ). Therefore we get Choose 0 < ɛ 1 1 C 0, we have (1 C 0 ɛ 1) d C 0 (1 + ɛ 1 t 0 t0 R0 )E 0. t0 d C 0 (1 + ɛ 1 t 0 R 0 )E 0 C 0 (1 + t 0 R0 )E 0 C 0 E 0. (5.9) This, combined with (5.8), also gives d 4 C 0 ɛ 1(1 + t 0 t0 R0 )E 0 C 0 ɛ 1E 0. (5.10) Similarly, we can estimate t0 u 4 as follows. u 4 C 0 ER 1 0 (t 0 )( u + 1 t0 t0 R0 u ) t0 C 0 ER 1 0 (t 0 )( u + t 0E 0 t0 R0 ) C 0 ɛ 1(1 + t 0 R0 )E 0 C 0 ɛ 1E 0. (5.11) 3
33 Now we estimate the quantity E R0 (t) as follows. C 0 (B R 0 (x)) be a cut-off function of B R0 (x) such that For any x, let φ 0 φ 1, φ 1 on B R0 (x), φ 0 outside B R0 (x), φ 4 R 0. Then, by the local energy inequality Lemma 4. and Lemma 4.3, we have sup 0 t t 0 sup 0 t t 0 B R0 (x) B R0 (x) ( u + d ) E R0 (0) ( u + d )φ E R0 (0) [ u 3 + u u + P P u + d u + d t d ] φ t0 ) 1 4 [ ] u 3 L 4 ( t0 ) + u L ( t0 ) u L 4 ( t0 ) + P P L 4, 3 4 u ( t0 ) L 4 ( t0 ) ( t0 + R0 ( t0 R 0 ) 1 4 [ ] d L 4 ( t0 ) u L 4 ( t0 ) + d t L ( t0 ) d L 4 ( t0 ), (5.1) where we have used t 0 R0 1. Notice u L ( t0 ) (t 0 E 0 ) 1 E 1 0. (5.13) For d t, multiplying (1.3) by d t and integrating over t0, we obtain t0 d t d u d t0 E u L 4 ( t0 ) d L 4 ( t0 ) C 0 E 0. (5.14) Putting (4.13), (5.9), (5.10), (5.11), (5.13) and (5.14) into (5.1), we obtain ɛ 1 = sup ( u + d ) 0 t t 0 B R0 (x) ( ) 1 t0 4 1 E R0 (0) + C 0 ɛ 1 E R 0 ( ) 1 ɛ t C 0 ɛ R0 1 E (5.15) This implies t 0 ɛ6 1 C0 4 R E3 0 = θ 0 R0, with θ 0 ɛ6 1 0 C0 4. E3 0 33
34 Set T 0 = t 0, we have T 0 θ 0 R0 and (5.3) holds. This completes the proof. Before we prove Theorem 1.3, we need the following density property of Sobolev maps, whose proof can be found in Schoen-Uhlenbeck []. Lemma 5.3 For n = and any given map f H 1 (, S ) C,δ (, S ) with 0 < δ < 1, there exist {f k } C (, S ) C,δ (, S ) such that f k = f on for all k, and Proof of Theorem 1.3: lim f k f H k 1 () = 0. Since u 0 H, there exists u k 0 C 0 (, R ), with u k 0 = 0, such that lim k uk 0 u 0 L () = 0. Since d 0 H 1 (, S ) C,β (, S ), Lemma 5.3 implies that there exist {d k 0 } C (, S ) C,β (, S ), with d k 0 = d 0 on, such that lim k dk 0 d 0 H 1 () = 0. By the absolute continuity of ( u 0 + d 0 ), we conclude that there exists R 0 > 0 such that sup ( u 0 + d 0 ) ɛ 1 x B R0 (x), (5.16) where ɛ 1 > 0 is given by Lemma 5.. By the strong convergence of (u k 0, dk 0 ) to (u 0, d 0 ) in L (), we have that ( u k 0 + d k 0 ) ɛ 1, k >> 1. (5.17) sup x B R0 (x) For simplicity, we assume (5.17) holds for all k 1. By Lemma 5., there exist θ 0 = θ 0 (ɛ 1, E 0 ) (0, 1) and T k 0 θ 0R 0 such that there exist solutions (uk, d k ) C ( T k, R S ) C,1 0 β ( T0 k, R S ) to (1.1)-(1.3) along with the initial-boundary condition: (u k, d k ) {0} = (u k 0, d k 0), (u k, d k ) (0,T k 0 ] = (uk 0, d k 0). (5.18) Moreover we have sup (x,t) T k 0 B R0 (x) ( u k + d k )(, t) ɛ 1. (5.19) 34
35 By Lemma 4.1, we have sup 0 t T k 0 ( u k + d k )(, t) + ( u k + d k + d k d k ) T k 0 u k 0 + d k 0 )( 1 + E 0 ) (5.0) for sufficiently large k. Combining (5.19) and (5.0) with Lemma 5.1, we conclude that and ( u k 4 + d k 4 ) Cɛ 1E 0, (5.1) T k 0 d k t + d k CE 0. (5.) T k 0 T k 0 By Lemma 4.4, (5.19), (5.1), and (5.), we have P k 4 L 3 (T k ) 0 u k L ( T k 0 ) u k L 4 ( T k 0 ) + d k L ( T k 0 ) d k L 4 ( T k 0 ) Cɛ 1 1 E (5.3) Furthermore, (1.1) implies that for any φ J, u k t, φ = u k φ + (u k u k + d k d k ) φ, where, denotes the inner product between H 1 and H 1 0, we conclude that uk t L ([0, T k 0 ], H 1 ()) and u k t CE 0. (5.4) L ([0,T0 k],h 1 ()) By Theorem.1, we conclude that for any δ > 0, (u k, d k ) C,1 β ( [δ,t k 0 ]) C(δ, E 0, u k L 4 ( T k ), d k L 4 ( 0 T k ), P k 4, d 0 L 3 (T 0 k ) C,β ( )) 0 C(ɛ 1, E 0, δ, d 0 C,β ( )). (5.5) Furthermore, for any compact sub domain K and δ > 0, (u k, d k ) C l (K [δ,t k 0 ]) C(dist(K, ), δ, l, E 0), l 1. (5.6) 35
36 Hence, after passing to possible subsequences, there exist T 0 θ 0 R 0, u W 1,0 ( T0, R ), and d W,1 ( T0, S ) such that u k u weakly in W 1,0 ( T0, R ), d k d weakly in W,1 ( T0, R ), lim k uk u L 4 ( T0 ) = 0, ( ) lim d k d L k 4 ( T0 ) + d k d L ( T0 ) and for any l, δ > 0, γ < β, and compact K, lim k (uk, d k ) (u, d) C l (K [δ,t 0 ]) = 0, lim k (uk, d k ) (u, d) C,1 γ ( [δ,t 0 ]) = 0. = 0, It is clear that (u, d) C ( (0, T 0 ], R S ) C,1 β ( (0, T 0], R S ) solves (1.1)-(1.3) in (0, T 0 ] and satisfies the boundary condition. It follows from (5.4) and (5.) that we can assume (u, d)(, t) (u 0, d 0 ) weakly in L () as t 0. In particular, On the other hand, (5.0) implies E(0) lim inf t 0 E(t). E(0) lim sup E(t). t 0 This implies (u, d)(, t) converges to (u 0, d 0 ) strongly in L (). Hence (u, d) satisfies the initial condition (1.4). Let T 1 (T 0, + ) be the first singular time of (u, d), i.e. (u, d) C ( (0, T 1 ), R S ) C,1 β ( (0, T 1), R S ), but (u, d) / C ( (0, T 1 ], R S ) C,1 β ( (0, T 1], R S ). Then we must have lim sup t T 1 max ( u + d )(, t) ɛ 1, R > 0. (5.7) x B R (x) 36
37 Now we look for an eternal extension of this weak solution in time. In order to do it, we need to define the new initial data at t = T 1. Claim 3. (u, d) C 0 ([0, T 1 ], L ()). In fact, for any φ H0 (, R3 ), (1.3) yields d t, φ = ( d φ + u d φ) d d φ d L () φ L () + ( u L () d L () + d L () ) φ C 0 () [ d L () + ( u L () d L () + d L () )] φ H (), where we have used the fact H0 () C0 () and φ C 0 () φ H (). Hence d t L ([0, T 1 ], H ()). This, combined with d L ([0, T 1 ], H 1 ()), implies d C 0 ([0, T 1 ], L ()). Similarly, for any φ H0 3(, R ) with φ = 0, (1.1) yields u t, φ = ( u φ + u u φ) d d : φ [ u L () φ L () + u L () u L () φ C 0 () + u L () φ C 0 ()] [ u L () + u L () u L () + u L () ] φ H 3 ()] where we have used the fact H 3 () C 1 () and φ C 1 () φ H 3 (). Since u t is divergence free, We have u t L ([0, T 1 ], H 3 ()). This, combined with u L ([0, T 1 ], H 1 ()), implies u C 0 ([0, T 1 ], L ()). By Claim 3, we can define (u(t 1 ), d(t 1 )) = lim t T1 (u(t), d(t)) in L (). By the energy inequality, we have that d L ([0, T 1 ], L ()). Hence d(t) d(t 1 ) weakly in L (). In particular, u(t 1 ) H and d(t 1 ) H 1 (). Moreover, since d(t) = d 0, d(t 1 ) = d 0 on. Now we can use (u(t 1 ), d(t 1 )) and (0, d 0 ) as initial and boundary data in the above procedure to obtain a continuation of (u, d) beyond T 1 as a weak solution of (1.1)-(1.5). At any further singular time, we repeat this procedure. We will prove that there are at most finitely many such singular times, afterwards we will have constructed an eternal weak solution. 37
38 We want to show that at any singular time there is at least a loss of energy amount of ɛ 1. By (5.7), there exist t i T 1 and x 0 such that This implies lim sup ( u + d )(, t i ) ɛ 1 for all R > 0. t i T 1 B R (x 0 ) ( u + d )(, T 1 ) = lim ( u + d )(, T 1 ) R 0 \B R (x 0 ) lim lim inf ( u + d )(, t i ) R 0 t i T 1 \B R (x 0 ) lim [lim inf ( u + d )(, t i ) lim sup R 0 t i T 1 t i T 1 lim inf ( u + d )(, t i ) ɛ 1 E 0 ɛ 1. t i T 1 B R (x 0 ) ( u + d )(, t i )] From this, we see that the number of finite singular times must be bounded by L = [ E 0 ], here [ ] denotes the largest integer part. If 0 < T ɛ L < + is the last 1 singular time, then we must have E(t L ) = ( u + d )(, T L ) < ɛ 1. Hence, if we use (u(t L ), d(t L )) and (0, d 0 ) as the initial and boundary data to construct a weak solution (u, d) to (1.1)-(1.3) as before, then (u, d) will be an eternal weak solution that we look for. It is clear that (i), (iii), and (ii) (1.7) of Theorem 1.3 has been established. Now, we want to perform the blow-up analysis at each singular time. It follows from (1.7) that there exist 0 < t 0 < T 1, t m T 1, r m 0 such that ɛ 1 = sup x,t 0 t t m B rm (x) ( u + d ). (5.8) By Lemma 5., there exist θ 0, depending only on ɛ 1 and E 0 and x m such that B rm (x m) 1 max x ( u + d )(t m θ 0 r m) B rm (x) ( u + d )(t m θ 0 rm) ɛ 1 4. (5.9) 38
39 By Lemma 4.1, (5.8), and the Ladyzhenskaya s inequality, we have Denote m [ t 0 t m, 0] (R, S ) by rm [t 0,t m] ( u 4 + d 4 ) C(ɛ 1, E 0 ). (5.30) = r 1 m ( \ {x m }). Define the blow-up sequence (u m, d m ) : m u m (x, t) = r m u(x m + r m x, t m + r mt), d m (x, t) = d(x m + r m x, t m + r mt). Then (u m, d m ) solves (1.1)-(1.3) on m [ t 0 t m, 0]. Moreover, rm ( u m + d m )( θ 0 ) ɛ 1, m B 1 (x) m B (0) ( u m + d m )(t) ɛ 1, x m, m [ t 0 tm rm,0] t 0 t m r m u m 4 + d m C(ɛ 1, E 0 ). Assume x m x 0, we divide into two cases. t 0, Case1. x 0. We can assume r m < dist(x 0, ) and m R. Also notice that t 0 t m r m. Hence, by Theorem 1., we can assume that there exists a smooth solution (u, d ) : R (, 0] R S to (1.1)-(1.3) such that (u m, d m ) (u, d ) in C loc (R [, 0]). We want to first show u 0. In fact, for any parabolic cylinder P R R [, 0], since u L 4 ( [0, T 1 ]), we have P R u 4 = lim m u m 4 = lim P m R B Rrm (x m) tm t m R r m u 4 = 0. Next we want to show d is a nontrivial, smooth harmonic map with finite energy. In fact, since ( d + d d) L ( [0, T 1 ]), we have, for any compact K R, 0 θ 0 K d + d d lim inf m = lim m tm 0 θ 0 t m θ 0 r m d m + d m d m m d + d d = 0. 39
40 This implies (d ) t + u d 0 on R [ θ 0, 0]. Hence (d ) t = u 0 and d C (R, S ) is a harmonic map. Since B d = lim m B ( u m + d m )( θ 0 ) ɛ 1 4, d is nontrivial. By the lower semicontinuity, we have for any ball B R R, d lim inf B m R d m ( θ 0 ) = lim inf B m R B rmr (x m) d (t m θ 0 r m) E 0 so that d has finite energy. It is well-known ([1], [3]) that d can be lifted to be a non constant harmonic map from S to S. In particular, d has nontrivial degree and R d 8π deg(d ) 8π. It follows from the above argument that for any r > 0, lim sup t T 1 max ( u + d )(t) ( u + d ) 8π. x B r(x) R Case. x 0. Then either (a) lim m x m x 0 r m =, or (b) lim m x m x 0 r m <. If (a) holds, then m R and the same argument as Case 1 yields that (u m, d m ) (0, d ) in C loc (R ), and d C (R, S ) is a nontrivial harmonic map with finite energy. Now we want to show that (b) can t happen. For, otherwise, assume that x m x 0 r m (0, a) for some a R and m R a = {(x 1, x ) R : x a}. Since d m (x) = d(x m + r m x) for x m, we can show, similar to Case 1, that u m 0 in C loc (R a), and d m d in C loc (R a), where d : R a S is a nontrivial harmonic map with finite energy and d (, a) = d(x 0 ) is a constant map. contradicts the nonexistence theorem by Lemaire [1]. Thus (ii) is established. This To show (iv). By Lemma 4.1, there exists t k + such that for (u k, d k ) = (u(, t k ), d(, t k )), u k + d k E 0, lim ( u k + d k + d k d k ) = 0. k 40
41 Since u k = 0, it is easy to see that u k 0 in H 1 (). d k is a H 1 -bounded sequence of approximate harmonic maps from into S, with d k = d 0 C,β ( ) and the L norm of their tension fields τ(d k ) = d k + d k d k converging to zero. By the energy identity result by Qing [18] and Lin-Wang [16], we can conclude that there exist a harmonic map d C,β (, S ) with d = d 0 on and finitely many points {x i } l i=1, {m i} l i=1 N such that This yields (iv). To show (v). First we claim d k dx d dx + (a) There exist no finite time singularities. l 8πm i δ xi. i=1 For, otherwise, (ii) implies that we can blow up near the first singular time T 1 to obtain one nontrivial harmonic map ω C (R, S ) and 8π ω lim R t T1 This, combined with Lemma 4.1, yields T1 0 ( u + d )(t) ( u + d + d d ) = 0 ( u 0 + d 0 ) 8π. so that u = d t 0 in [0, T 1 ] and hence d(, t) = d 0 C,β (, S ), 0 t T 1, is a harmonic map. This contradicts the fact that T 1 is a singular time. (b) φ(t) max x,τ t ( u + d )(x, τ) remains bounded as t +. For, otherwise, there exist t k + and x k such that λ k = φ(t k ) = ( u + d )(x k, t k ) +. Define k = λ k ( \ {x k }) and (u k, d k ) : k [ t k λ k, 0] R S by u k (x, t) = λ 1 k u(x k + λ 1 k x, t k + λ k t), d k(x, t) = d(x k + λ 1 k Then (u k, d k ) solves (1.1)-(1.3) on k [ t k λ k, 0], and x, t k + λ k t). 1 = ( u k + d k )(0, 0) ( u k + d k )(x, t), (x, t) k [ t k λ k, 0]. 41
REGULARITY AND EXISTENCE OF GLOBAL SOLUTIONS TO THE ERICKSEN-LESLIE SYSTEM IN R 2
REGULARITY AND EXISTENCE OF GLOBAL SOLUTIONS TO THE ERICKSEN-LESLIE SYSTEM IN R JINRUI HUANG, FANGHUA LIN, AND CHANGYOU WANG Abstract. In this paper, we first establish the regularity theorem for suitable
More informationOn the uniqueness of heat flow of harmonic maps and hydrodynamic flow of nematic liquid crystals
On the uniqueness of heat flow of harmonic maps and hydrodynamic flow of nematic liquid crystals Fanghua Lin Changyou Wang Dedicated to Professor Roger Temam on the occasion of his 7th birthday Abstract
More informationA SURVEY OF RESULTS AND OPEN PROBLEMS FOR THE HYDRODYNAMIC FLOW OF NEMATIC LIQUID CRYSTALS
Variational and Topological Methods: Theory, Applications, Numerical Simulations, and Open Problems (2012). Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 21 (2014), pp. 149 172. ISSN: 1072-6691.
More informationOn the Boundary Partial Regularity for the incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations
On the for the incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations Jitao Liu Federal University Rio de Janeiro Joint work with Wendong Wang and Zhouping Xin Rio, Brazil, May 30 2014 Outline Introduction 1 Introduction
More informationCompressible hydrodynamic flow of liquid crystals in 1-D
Compressible hydrodynamic flow of liquid crystals in 1-D Shijin Ding Junyu Lin Changyou Wang Huanyao Wen Abstract We consider the equation modeling the compressible hydrodynamic flow of liquid crystals
More informationEnergy identity of approximate biharmonic maps to Riemannian manifolds and its application
Energy identity of approximate biharmonic maps to Riemannian manifolds and its application Changyou Wang Shenzhou Zheng December 9, 011 Abstract We consider in dimension four wealy convergent sequences
More informationAnisotropic partial regularity criteria for the Navier-Stokes equations
Anisotropic partial regularity criteria for the Navier-Stokes equations Walter Rusin Department of Mathematics Mathflows 205 Porquerolles September 7, 205 The question of regularity of the weak solutions
More informationOn Smoothness of Suitable Weak Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations
On Smoothness of Suitable Weak Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations G. Seregin, V. Šverák Dedicated to Vsevolod Alexeevich Solonnikov Abstract We prove two sufficient conditions for local regularity
More informationThe incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in vacuum
The incompressible, Université Paris-Est Créteil Piotr Bogus law Mucha, Warsaw University Journées Jeunes EDPistes 218, Institut Elie Cartan, Université de Lorraine March 23th, 218 Incompressible Navier-Stokes
More informationSobolev Spaces. Chapter 10
Chapter 1 Sobolev Spaces We now define spaces H 1,p (R n ), known as Sobolev spaces. For u to belong to H 1,p (R n ), we require that u L p (R n ) and that u have weak derivatives of first order in L p
More informationBIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES
BIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES SEBASTIAN HERR, TOBIAS LAMM, AND ROLAND SCHNAUBELT Abstract. A global weak solution of the biharmonic wave map equation in the energy space for spherical targets is constructed.
More informationON LIQUID CRYSTAL FLOWS WITH FREE-SLIP BOUNDARY CONDITIONS. Chun Liu and Jie Shen
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: http://aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Volume 7, Number2, April2001 pp. 307 318 ON LIQUID CRYSTAL FLOWS WITH FREE-SLIP BOUNDARY CONDITIONS Chun Liu and Jie Shen Department
More informationCRITERIA FOR THE 3D NAVIER-STOKES SYSTEM
LOCAL ENERGY BOUNDS AND ɛ-regularity CRITERIA FOR THE 3D NAVIER-STOKES SYSTEM CRISTI GUEVARA AND NGUYEN CONG PHUC Abstract. The system of three dimensional Navier-Stokes equations is considered. We obtain
More informationIMA Preprint Series # 2260
LONG-TIME BEHAVIOR OF HYDRODYNAMIC SYSTEMS MODELING THE NEMATIC LIUID CRYSTALS By Hao Wu Xiang Xu and Chun Liu IMA Preprint Series # 2260 ( June 2009 ) INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS UNIVERSITY
More informationMath The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution
Math. 209 The Laplacian Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution Let be a bounded open set in R n, n 2, with smooth boundary. The fact that the boundary is smooth means that at each point x the external
More informationTD M1 EDP 2018 no 2 Elliptic equations: regularity, maximum principle
TD M EDP 08 no Elliptic equations: regularity, maximum principle Estimates in the sup-norm I Let be an open bounded subset of R d of class C. Let A = (a ij ) be a symmetric matrix of functions of class
More information1. Introduction Boundary estimates for the second derivatives of the solution to the Dirichlet problem for the Monge-Ampere equation
POINTWISE C 2,α ESTIMATES AT THE BOUNDARY FOR THE MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN Abstract. We prove a localization property of boundary sections for solutions to the Monge-Ampere equation. As a consequence
More informationSobolev Spaces. Chapter Hölder spaces
Chapter 2 Sobolev Spaces Sobolev spaces turn out often to be the proper setting in which to apply ideas of functional analysis to get information concerning partial differential equations. Here, we collect
More informationSome lecture notes for Math 6050E: PDEs, Fall 2016
Some lecture notes for Math 65E: PDEs, Fall 216 Tianling Jin December 1, 216 1 Variational methods We discuss an example of the use of variational methods in obtaining existence of solutions. Theorem 1.1.
More informationOn the Intrinsic Differentiability Theorem of Gromov-Schoen
On the Intrinsic Differentiability Theorem of Gromov-Schoen Georgios Daskalopoulos Brown University daskal@math.brown.edu Chikako Mese 2 Johns Hopkins University cmese@math.jhu.edu Abstract In this note,
More informationLecture No 1 Introduction to Diffusion equations The heat equat
Lecture No 1 Introduction to Diffusion equations The heat equation Columbia University IAS summer program June, 2009 Outline of the lectures We will discuss some basic models of diffusion equations and
More informationOn Moving Ginzburg-Landau Vortices
communications in analysis and geometry Volume, Number 5, 85-99, 004 On Moving Ginzburg-Landau Vortices Changyou Wang In this note, we establish a quantization property for the heat equation of Ginzburg-Landau
More informationHARMONIC ANALYSIS. Date:
HARMONIC ANALYSIS Contents. Introduction 2. Hardy-Littlewood maximal function 3. Approximation by convolution 4. Muckenhaupt weights 4.. Calderón-Zygmund decomposition 5. Fourier transform 6. BMO (bounded
More informationL p estimates for parabolic equations in Reifenberg domains
Journal of Functional Analysis 223 (2005) 44 85 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa L p estimates for parabolic equations in Reifenberg domains Sun-Sig Byun a,, Lihe Wang b,c a Department of Mathematics, Seoul
More informationL 3, -Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations and Backward Uniqueness
L 3, -Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations and Backward Uniqueness L. Escauriaza, G. Seregin, V. Šverák Dedicated to Olga Alexandrovna Ladyzhenskaya Abstract We show that L 3, -solutions to the Cauchy
More informationOn partial regularity for the Navier-Stokes equations
On partial regularity for the Navier-Stokes equations Igor Kukavica July, 2008 Department of Mathematics University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089 e-mail: kukavica@usc.edu Abstract We consider
More informationHarmonic maps on domains with piecewise Lipschitz continuous metrics
Harmonic maps on domains with piecewise Lipschitz continuous metrics Haigang Li, Changyou Wang Abstract For a bounded domain Ω equipped with a piecewise Lipschitz continuous Riemannian metric g, we consider
More informationASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS. Tian Ma. Shouhong Wang
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: http://aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Volume 11, Number 1, July 004 pp. 189 04 ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS Tian Ma Department of
More informationPartial regularity for suitable weak solutions to Navier-Stokes equations
Partial regularity for suitable weak solutions to Navier-Stokes equations Yanqing Wang Capital Normal University Joint work with: Quansen Jiu, Gang Wu Contents 1 What is the partial regularity? 2 Review
More informationA NOTE ON ZERO SETS OF FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE POWER OF INTEGRABILITY. 1. Introduction
A NOTE ON ZERO SETS OF FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE POWER OF INTEGRABILITY ARMIN SCHIKORRA Abstract. We extend a Poincaré-type inequality for functions with large zero-sets by Jiang and Lin
More informationObservability and measurable sets
Observability and measurable sets Luis Escauriaza UPV/EHU Luis Escauriaza (UPV/EHU) Observability and measurable sets 1 / 41 Overview Interior: Given T > 0 and D Ω (0, T ), to find N = N(Ω, D, T ) > 0
More informationRegularity Theory. Lihe Wang
Regularity Theory Lihe Wang 2 Contents Schauder Estimates 5. The Maximum Principle Approach............... 7.2 Energy Method.......................... 3.3 Compactness Method...................... 7.4 Boundary
More information2 A Model, Harmonic Map, Problem
ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS JOHN E. HUTCHINSON Department of Mathematics School of Mathematical Sciences, A.N.U. 1 Introduction Elliptic equations model the behaviour of scalar quantities u, such as temperature or
More informationSufficient conditions on Liouville type theorems for the 3D steady Navier-Stokes equations
arxiv:1805.07v1 [math.ap] 6 May 018 Sufficient conditions on Liouville type theorems for the D steady Navier-Stokes euations G. Seregin, W. Wang May 8, 018 Abstract Our aim is to prove Liouville type theorems
More informationPartial Regularity of Solutions of the 3-D Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations. Hermano Frid. Mikhail Perepelitsa
i Partial Regularity of Solutions of the 3-D Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations Hermano Frid Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada - IMPA Estrada Dona Castorina, 110 22460-320 Rio de Janeiro RJ,
More informationDEGREE AND SOBOLEV SPACES. Haïm Brezis Yanyan Li Petru Mironescu Louis Nirenberg. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 13, 1999, 181 190 DEGREE AND SOBOLEV SPACES Haïm Brezis Yanyan Li Petru Mironescu Louis Nirenberg Dedicated to Jürgen
More informationOn some nonlinear parabolic equation involving variable exponents
On some nonlinear parabolic equation involving variable exponents Goro Akagi (Kobe University, Japan) Based on a joint work with Giulio Schimperna (Pavia Univ., Italy) Workshop DIMO-2013 Diffuse Interface
More informationA generalised Ladyzhenskaya inequality and a coupled parabolic-elliptic problem
A generalised Ladyzhenskaya inequality and a coupled parabolic-elliptic problem Dave McCormick joint work with James Robinson and José Rodrigo Mathematics and Statistics Centre for Doctoral Training University
More informationOn a Suitable Weak Solution of the Navier Stokes Equation with the Generalized Impermeability Boundary Conditions
Proceedings of the 3rd IASME/WSEAS Int. Conf. on FLUID DYNAMICS & AERODYNAMICS, Corfu, Greece, August -, 5 pp36-41 On a Suitable Weak Solution of the Navier Stokes Equation with the Generalized Impermeability
More informationConservation law equations : problem set
Conservation law equations : problem set Luis Silvestre For Isaac Neal and Elia Portnoy in the 2018 summer bootcamp 1 Method of characteristics For the problems in this section, assume that the solutions
More informationLORENTZ ESTIMATES FOR WEAK SOLUTIONS OF QUASI-LINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS WITH SINGULAR DIVERGENCE-FREE DRIFTS TUOC PHAN
LORENTZ ESTIMATES FOR WEAK SOLUTIONS OF QUASI-LINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS WITH SINGULAR DIVERGENCE-FREE DRIFTS TUOC PHAN Abstract This paper investigates regularity in Lorentz spaces for weak solutions
More informationVISCOSITY SOLUTIONS. We follow Han and Lin, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, 5.
VISCOSITY SOLUTIONS PETER HINTZ We follow Han and Lin, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, 5. 1. Motivation Throughout, we will assume that Ω R n is a bounded and connected domain and that a ij C(Ω)
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationThe Dirichlet s P rinciple. In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation:
Oct. 1 The Dirichlet s P rinciple In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation: 1. Dirichlet s Principle. u = in, u = g on. ( 1 ) If we multiply
More informationSingular Integrals. 1 Calderon-Zygmund decomposition
Singular Integrals Analysis III Calderon-Zygmund decomposition Let f be an integrable function f dx 0, f = g + b with g Cα almost everywhere, with b
More informationΓ-CONVERGENCE OF THE GINZBURG-LANDAU ENERGY
Γ-CONVERGENCE OF THE GINZBURG-LANDAU ENERGY IAN TICE. Introduction Difficulties with harmonic maps Let us begin by recalling Dirichlet s principle. Let n, m be integers, Ω R n be an open, bounded set with
More informationRelation between Distributional and Leray-Hopf Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations
Relation between Distributional and Leray-Hopf Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations Giovanni P. Galdi Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science and Department of Mathematics University
More informationSHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction
SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES GILES AUCHMUTY Abstract. This paper describes sharp inequalities for the trace of Sobolev functions on the boundary of a bounded region R N. The inequalities bound (semi-)norms
More informationMULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR CRITICAL ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS WITH FRACTIONAL LAPLACIAN
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 016 (016), No. 97, pp. 1 11. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu MULTIPLE SOLUTIONS
More informationCourse Description for Real Analysis, Math 156
Course Description for Real Analysis, Math 156 In this class, we will study elliptic PDE, Fourier analysis, and dispersive PDE. Here is a quick summary of the topics will study study. They re described
More informationA Variational Analysis of a Gauged Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation
A Variational Analysis of a Gauged Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation Alessio Pomponio, joint work with David Ruiz Dipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari Variational and Topological
More informationOn the p-laplacian and p-fluids
LMU Munich, Germany Lars Diening On the p-laplacian and p-fluids Lars Diening On the p-laplacian and p-fluids 1/50 p-laplacian Part I p-laplace and basic properties Lars Diening On the p-laplacian and
More informationElliptic stability for stationary Schrödinger equations by Emmanuel Hebey. Part III/VI A priori blow-up theories March 2015
Elliptic stability for stationary Schrödinger equations by Emmanuel Hebey Part III/VI A priori blow-up theories March 2015 Nonlinear analysis arising from geometry and physics Conference in honor of Professor
More informationVariational Theory of Solitons for a Higher Order Generalized Camassa-Holm Equation
International Journal of Mathematical Analysis Vol. 11, 2017, no. 21, 1007-1018 HIKAI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/10.12988/ijma.2017.710141 Variational Theory of Solitons for a Higher Order Generalized
More informationChapter One. The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity
Chapter One The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity Our story begins with a classical situation: convolution with homogeneous, Calderón- Zygmund ( kernels on R n. Let S n 1 R n denote the unit sphere
More informationIncompressible Navier-Stokes Equations in R 3
Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations in R 3 Zhen Lei ( ) School of Mathematical Sciences Fudan University Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations in R 3 p. 1/5 Contents Fundamental Work by Jean Leray
More informationCOMBINED EFFECTS FOR A STATIONARY PROBLEM WITH INDEFINITE NONLINEARITIES AND LACK OF COMPACTNESS
Dynamic Systems and Applications 22 (203) 37-384 COMBINED EFFECTS FOR A STATIONARY PROBLEM WITH INDEFINITE NONLINEARITIES AND LACK OF COMPACTNESS VICENŢIU D. RĂDULESCU Simion Stoilow Mathematics Institute
More informationExistence, stability and instability for Einstein-scalar field Lichnerowicz equations by Emmanuel Hebey
Existence, stability and instability for Einstein-scalar field Lichnerowicz equations by Emmanuel Hebey Joint works with Olivier Druet and with Frank Pacard and Dan Pollack Two hours lectures IAS, October
More informationNew Helmholtz-Weyl decomposition in L r and its applications to the mathematical fluid mechanics
New Helmholtz-Weyl decomposition in L r and its applications to the mathematical fluid mechanics Hideo Kozono Mathematical Institute Tohoku University Sendai 980-8578 Japan Taku Yanagisawa Department of
More informationGrowth Theorems and Harnack Inequality for Second Order Parabolic Equations
This is an updated version of the paper published in: Contemporary Mathematics, Volume 277, 2001, pp. 87-112. Growth Theorems and Harnack Inequality for Second Order Parabolic Equations E. Ferretti and
More informationJUHA KINNUNEN. Harmonic Analysis
JUHA KINNUNEN Harmonic Analysis Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University 27 Contents Calderón-Zygmund decomposition. Dyadic subcubes of a cube.........................2 Dyadic cubes
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 24 Oct 2014
Multiple solutions for Kirchhoff equations under the partially sublinear case Xiaojing Feng School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, People s Republic of China arxiv:1410.7335v1
More informationDETERMINATION OF THE BLOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION
DETERMINATION OF THE LOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION y FRANK MERLE and HATEM ZAAG Abstract. In this paper, we find the optimal blow-up rate for the semilinear wave equation with a power nonlinearity.
More informationThe continuity method
The continuity method The method of continuity is used in conjunction with a priori estimates to prove the existence of suitably regular solutions to elliptic partial differential equations. One crucial
More informationOBSERVABILITY INEQUALITIES AND MEASURABLE SETS J. APRAIZ, L. ESCAURIAZA, G. WANG, AND C. ZHANG
OBSERVABILITY INEQUALITIES AND MEASURABLE SETS J. APRAIZ, L. ESCAURIAZA, G. WANG, AND C. ZHANG Abstract. This paper presents two observability inequalities for the heat equation over 0, T ). In the first
More informationATTRACTORS FOR SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS WITH DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN VARYING DOMAINS. Emerson A. M. de Abreu Alexandre N.
ATTRACTORS FOR SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS WITH DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN VARYING DOMAINS Emerson A. M. de Abreu Alexandre N. Carvalho Abstract Under fairly general conditions one can prove that
More informationA CONVEX-CONCAVE ELLIPTIC PROBLEM WITH A PARAMETER ON THE BOUNDARY CONDITION
A CONVEX-CONCAVE ELLIPTIC PROBLEM WITH A PARAMETER ON THE BOUNDARY CONDITION JORGE GARCÍA-MELIÁN, JULIO D. ROSSI AND JOSÉ C. SABINA DE LIS Abstract. In this paper we study existence and multiplicity of
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS FOR KIRCHHOFF TYPE EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUNDED POTENTIAL. 1. Introduction In this article, we consider the Kirchhoff type problem
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 207 (207), No. 84, pp. 2. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS FOR KIRCHHOFF TYPE EQUATIONS
More informationA Ginzburg-Landau Type Problem for Nematics with Highly Anisotropic Elastic Term
A Ginzburg-Landau Type Problem for Nematics with Highly Anisotropic Elastic Term Peter Sternberg In collaboration with Dmitry Golovaty (Akron) and Raghav Venkatraman (Indiana) Department of Mathematics
More informationTHE HARDY-SCHRÖDINGER OPERATOR WITH INTERIOR SINGULARITY: THE REMAINING CASES
THE HARDY-SCHRÖDINGER OPERATOR WITH INTERIOR SINGULARITY: THE REMAINING CASES NASSIF GHOUSSOUB AND FRÉDÉRIC ROBERT Abstract. We consider the remaining unsettled cases in the problem of existence of energy
More informationA Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequality with variable exponent and applications to PDE s
A Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type ineuality with variable exponent and applications to PDE s Mihai Mihăilescu a,b Vicenţiu Rădulescu a,c Denisa Stancu-Dumitru a a Department of Mathematics, University of
More informationFifth Abel Conference : Celebrating the Mathematical Impact of John F. Nash Jr. and Louis Nirenberg
Fifth Abel Conference : Celebrating the Mathematical Impact of John F. Nash Jr. and Louis Nirenberg Some analytic aspects of second order conformally invariant equations Yanyan Li Rutgers University November
More informationAppendix A Functional Analysis
Appendix A Functional Analysis A.1 Metric Spaces, Banach Spaces, and Hilbert Spaces Definition A.1. Metric space. Let X be a set. A map d : X X R is called metric on X if for all x,y,z X it is i) d(x,y)
More informationLOCAL WELL-POSEDNESS FOR AN ERICKSEN-LESLIE S PARABOLIC-HYPERBOLIC COMPRESSIBLE NON-ISOTHERMAL MODEL FOR LIQUID CRYSTALS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 017 (017), No. 3, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu LOCAL WELL-POSEDNESS FOR AN ERICKSEN-LESLIE S
More informationAn estimate on the parabolic fractal dimension of the singular set for solutions of the
Home Search ollections Journals About ontact us My IOPscience An estimate on the parabolic fractal dimension of the singular set for solutions of the Navier Stokes system This article has been downloaded
More informationHomogenization and error estimates of free boundary velocities in periodic media
Homogenization and error estimates of free boundary velocities in periodic media Inwon C. Kim October 7, 2011 Abstract In this note I describe a recent result ([14]-[15]) on homogenization and error estimates
More informationA RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DIRICHLET AND REGULARITY PROBLEMS FOR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS. Zhongwei Shen
A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DIRICHLET AND REGULARITY PROBLEMS FOR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS Zhongwei Shen Abstract. Let L = diva be a real, symmetric second order elliptic operator with bounded measurable coefficients.
More informationAn introduction to semilinear elliptic equations
An introduction to semilinear elliptic equations Thierry Cazenave Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions UMR CNRS 7598 B.C. 187 Université Pierre et Marie Curie 4, place Jussieu 75252 Paris Cedex 05 France E-mail
More informationat time t, in dimension d. The index i varies in a countable set I. We call configuration the family, denoted generically by Φ: U (x i (t) x j (t))
Notations In this chapter we investigate infinite systems of interacting particles subject to Newtonian dynamics Each particle is characterized by its position an velocity x i t, v i t R d R d at time
More informationEXISTENCE AND REGULARITY RESULTS FOR SOME NONLINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
EXISTECE AD REGULARITY RESULTS FOR SOME OLIEAR PARABOLIC EUATIOS Lucio BOCCARDO 1 Andrea DALL AGLIO 2 Thierry GALLOUËT3 Luigi ORSIA 1 Abstract We prove summability results for the solutions of nonlinear
More informationOn Two Nonlinear Biharmonic Evolution Equations: Existence, Uniqueness and Stability
On Two Nonlinear Biharmonic Evolution Equations: Existence, Uniqueness and Stability Ming-Jun Lai, Chun Liu, and Paul Wenston Abstract We study the following two nonlinear evolution equations with a fourth
More informationMATH Final Project Mean Curvature Flows
MATH 581 - Final Project Mean Curvature Flows Olivier Mercier April 30, 2012 1 Introduction The mean curvature flow is part of the bigger family of geometric flows, which are flows on a manifold associated
More informationTHE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n
THE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n BAISHENG YAN Abstract. We present an elementary L 2 -Hodge theory on whole R n based on the minimization principle of the calculus of variations and some
More informationThe Navier Stokes Equations for Incompressible Flows: Solution Properties at Potential Blow Up Times
The Navier Stokes Equations for Incompressible Flows: Solution Properties at Potential Blow Up Times Jens Lorenz Department of Mathematics and Statistics, UNM, Albuquerque, NM 873 Paulo Zingano Dept. De
More informationPHASE TRANSITIONS: REGULARITY OF FLAT LEVEL SETS
PHASE TRANSITIONS: REGULARITY OF FLAT LEVEL SETS OVIDIU SAVIN Abstract. We consider local minimizers of the Ginzburg-Landau energy functional 2 u 2 + 4 ( u2 ) 2 dx and prove that, if the level set is included
More information4 Riesz Kernels. Since the functions k i (ξ) = ξ i. are bounded functions it is clear that R
4 Riesz Kernels. A natural generalization of the Hilbert transform to higher dimension is mutiplication of the Fourier Transform by homogeneous functions of degree 0, the simplest ones being R i f(ξ) =
More informationThe enigma of the equations of fluid motion: A survey of existence and regularity results
The enigma of the equations of fluid motion: A survey of existence and regularity results RTG summer school: Analysis, PDEs and Mathematical Physics The University of Texas at Austin Lecture 1 1 The review
More informationA LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION
A LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN. Introduction In this paper we study the geometry of the sections for solutions to the Monge- Ampere equation det D 2 u = f, u
More informationRegularity of Weak Solution to Parabolic Fractional p-laplacian
Regularity of Weak Solution to Parabolic Fractional p-laplacian Lan Tang at BCAM Seminar July 18th, 2012 Table of contents 1 1. Introduction 1.1. Background 1.2. Some Classical Results for Local Case 2
More informationAn introduction to Mathematical Theory of Control
An introduction to Mathematical Theory of Control Vasile Staicu University of Aveiro UNICA, May 2018 Vasile Staicu (University of Aveiro) An introduction to Mathematical Theory of Control UNICA, May 2018
More informationBulletin of the. Iranian Mathematical Society
ISSN: 1017-060X (Print) ISSN: 1735-8515 (Online) Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 42 (2016), No. 1, pp. 129 141. Title: On nonlocal elliptic system of p-kirchhoff-type in Author(s): L.
More informationA Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations
A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations Michael Röckner Reference: C. Prevot, M. Röckner: Springer LN in Math. 1905, Berlin (2007) And see the references therein for the original
More informationMinimal Surface equations non-solvability strongly convex functional further regularity Consider minimal surface equation.
Lecture 7 Minimal Surface equations non-solvability strongly convex functional further regularity Consider minimal surface equation div + u = ϕ on ) = 0 in The solution is a critical point or the minimizer
More informationOn the stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equation
On the stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equation Annie Millet collaboration with Z. Brzezniak SAMM, Paris 1 and PMA Workshop Women in Applied Mathematics, Heraklion - May 3 211 Outline 1 The NL Shrödinger
More informationDissipative quasi-geostrophic equations with L p data
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. (), No. 56, pp. 3. ISSN: 7-669. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) Dissipative quasi-geostrophic
More informationRecent developments in the Navier-Stokes problem
P G Lemarie-Rieusset Recent developments in the Navier-Stokes problem CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC A CRC Press Company Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C. Table of contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: What
More informationSYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 21, 2003, 211 226 SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S.
More informationSome results on the nematic liquid crystals theory
Some results on the nematic liquid crystals theory Marius Paicu University of Bordeaux joint work with Arghir Zarnescu Mathflows 2015, Porquerolles September 17, 2015 Complex fluids: Basic laws Incompressibility:
More informationA regularity criterion for the 3D NSE in a local version of the space of functions of bounded mean oscillations
Ann. I. H. Poincaré AN 27 (2010) 773 778 www.elsevier.com/locate/anihpc A regularity criterion for the 3D NSE in a local version of the space of functions of bounded mean oscillations Zoran Grujić a,,
More informationGeometric intuition: from Hölder spaces to the Calderón-Zygmund estimate
Geometric intuition: from Hölder spaces to the Calderón-Zygmund estimate A survey of Lihe Wang s paper Michael Snarski December 5, 22 Contents Hölder spaces. Control on functions......................................2
More information